Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-01-09 Council Packet CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS TS TUESDAY, DECEMBER 1, 2009 C ITY COtJNCIL MEETING AGENDA 7.00 P.M. 7:00 p.m. I. Call to Order /Pledge of Allc�_Yiance /Awroval of Agenda l"stitnared lilies 7:05 p.r . IL Devartment/Council Liaison Reports A. Planning Commission B. Parks Commission C. Cable; Commission 1). Water Management Organizations L. Other Liaison /Staff Reports 7:10 p.m. Ili. Visitors /Public Comment Recycling Award (1 ) This is an opportunity for the public to address the C UnCll with questions or conceE on issues not part of the regular agenda. (Please limit comments to 3 minutes in length.) 7:10 p.m. IVo Consent )eLj(a (Roll Call Vote) A. Approve bills & Investments B. Approve City Council Minutes ­.- November 10, 2009 (2) C. Approve Fiscal Year 2010 Midgets for Central St. Croix Valley ,loint Cable Commission (3) D. Approve Selected Winter Rink Attendants for 2009 -2010 Season (4) 7:15 p.m. V. Public I-l rin A. "Truth - in- Taxation I-fearing 7:30 p.m. VI. Old Business A. Proposed 2010 Budget and Tax Levies -- Review and Discussion (5) B. City llall l Update (no enclosure) 7:45 p.m. Vila New business A. Schedule Workshop with Planning Commission .-.. Design Guide] ines (6) 7:50 p.m. IX. Adiournmf, nt Pagel of 42 This Page is Left Intentionally Blank. Page 2 of 42 r ,• Oak Park Heights Request for Council Action Meeting Date December I , 2009 Agenda Item Recycling; Award Time Required 0 Agenda Placement Visitors /Public Comment Originating Department / Requestor .. Adzilinistration /Jennifer Pinski r i Requester's Signature Action Requested Receive Information Background /Justification (Please indicate an) previous action has been taken or if other public bodies have been advised). Page 3 of 42 CITY OF ®AID PARK HEIGHTS 111111.1.111111 1 11111111e1111111111111111. 111111. 111111. 11111.1.11. 11111. 11 1111 11 111 1111. 11111111. 111111. 1111111. 111..11. 11..IJ.1.1L 11111111.I.m 111111 �. 111,11111 . 111111111111111 .11.1.1 J11. 1111, 1111J..1111.111.e 111 11111111111111.111u. 11111111 .111.1i.1111.1111JI111.1. 14168 Oak Park Boul ova rd No. ^ 1 Box 2007 ° Oak Park Heigi }es, MN 55082 -2007 ° Phone: 651/439.4439 ° Fax: 651/439 -0574 November 19, 2009 Anthony & Gina Watry 5616 Osgood Avenue North Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Dear Anthony & Gina: Thank you for participating in the City's recycling program. As an incentive to recycle and to increase fire prevention awareness, the City rewards two residents each month with their choice of an award of $25.00 or a fire extinguisher and /or smoke detector(s). Your residence was checked on Thursday, November 19, 2009 to determine if you had your recycling bin out with your regular garbage. Your recycling was out and ready for collection; therefore, you are one of this month's winners. Please contact me at 439 -4439 at your convenience to arrange for delivery of the reward of your choice. On behalf of the Oak Park Heights City Council, thank you for participating in the City's recycling program. Congratula '.o sl `` Je fifer Pinski Administrative Secretary/ Deputy Clerk I I i i I 1 11111111„. 1. 1 IN 11.11111. 11 11111.11111 i11 1111111 .1.11111111111111 IIi 111111,11111111111111 11111111111111111111111 . 11111111111111111111111. 1111. 1111. 1111 . 1111111. 1.11111....11 111 1.11.1LI1.111.IIIJ 1, .1161 1111 111.11 1..111111A 111nuIS15 W A.11111'11i 111.1.1. 11111111. 111. 1 t ,1111.1110111.111.1111111111 Tree City U Page 4 of 42 Oak Park Heights Sj Request for Council Action Meeting; Date December 1, 2009 Agenda Item Approve City Council Minutes -- November 10, 2009 Time Reel. 0 Agenda Placement Consent Originating Department / Requester Administration/Jennifer Pinski Requester's Si gnature . (.._'� _...._._..... Action Requested Approve Background/Justification (Please indicate any previous action has been taken or if Other public bodies have been advised). See Attached Minutes. Page 5 of 42 CITY OF OAK PARK RIGHTS 7:00 P.M. TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 10 2009 CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES I. Call to Order /Pledge of Alleeiance /Approval of Agenda: The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Beaudet. Present: Councilmembers Abrahamson, McCornber, Runk, and Swenson. Staff present: Administrator Johnson, City Attorney Vierling, City Engineer Long, Finance Director Holst, and Public Works Director Kegley. Absent: City Planner Richards. Mayor Beaudet added "Additional Testing for Future Well Land" as Old Business Item C. and "Finance Director Search Process" as New Business Item A. Counediriember McComber, seconded by Councilmember Swenson moved to approve the Agenda as aanended. Carried 5 -0. II. Department /Council Liaison Reports: A. Planning Commission: Councilmember Abrahamson reported that the next meeting of the Planning Commission was scheduled for November 12 at 7:00 p.m. 13. Parks Commission: CouneiImember MCComber reported that the next Parks Commission meeting was set for November 16 at 6:30 p.m. at City Hall. C. Cable Commission: Nothing to report. D. Water Manaaenient Organizations /Middle St, Croix: Mayor Beaudet reported that the next meeting of the Middle St. Croix Water Management Organization was set for November 12, 2009, at 7:00 p.m. at the Washington Conservation District Office. E. Other Liaison/Staff Reports: Councilmember MCComber reported that the League of Minnesota Cities Regional Meeting and Metro Cities Policy Adoption Meetings were set for the upcoming Thursday at the Crowne Plaza Hotel in St. Paul. Mayor Beaudet reported that the County certified the CEC charges to property taxes for those 288 residents who had not yet paid the bill. Beaudet reported that those residents may still be able to pay the bill without penalties and interest and should contact Washington County to determine that. III. Visitors /Public Comment: Page 6 of 42 City Council Meeting Minutes November 10, 2009 Page 2 of 4 Administrative Secretary Pinski reported that Robert and Margaret Hart of 5710 Newgate Circle North were chosen as the recycling award winners. IV. Consent Agenda: A. Approve Bills & Investments B. Approve City Council Minutes — October 27, 2009 C. Jorgenson Construction Inc. 5"' Payment for New City Hall D. City I hall Facility — Approve Change Order 41 E. City Hall Facility — Award Furniture Contract to Innovative Office Solutions F. Adopt Veteran's Day Proclamation G. Award Contract to Telephone Service Provider H. Approve Application to MN Dept. of Agriculture for Emerald Ash Borer Planning; and Preparedness Grant Program Councilrnember Swenson, seconded by Councilmernber Runk moved to approve the Consent agenda. Roll call vote taken. Carried 5 -0. V. Public Hearinlxs: A. Increase in On -Sale Intoxicatim - Liquor License lees. On -Sale Non - In toxicatinf? Lictuor License Fees, Off -Sale Non- lntoxicatin�), Liquor License Fees, and Wine License Dees: Finance Director Holst recommended a seven percent increase in fees. Robert Cartwright, owner of Liquor `Dime, was present at the meeting; and questioned whether the council could freeze the increase for five years instead of possibly raising the fee every year. Mayor I3eaudet reported that the council determined it would review fees every two years to acliust for inflation. Ile reported that the last raise in fees was two years ago. Councilmember Swenson, seconded by Mayor I3eaudet, moved to close the Public Ihearing. Carried 5 -0. Councilrncmber Swenson reported that he received a phone call from the VFW regarding the increase. Swenson stated that the increase may hurt smaller businesses more than the larger ones. Councilmember Swenson, seconded by Councilmember McComber, moved to postpone this item and revisit again next year. Carried 3 -2, Beaudet and Runk opposed. VI. Old Business: Page 7 of 42 City Council Meeting Minutes November 10, 2009 Page 3 of 4 A. City Hall Facility General Update: Randy Engel of Buctow & Associates provided an update on the construction progress. Mayor Beaudet reported that seven lights and their foundations from the existing parking lot would need to be removed and placed in the parks as directed the Parks Commission. Mayor Beaudet, seconded by Councilmember Abrahamson, moved to have staff identify contractors to remove the existing seven lights, relocate them to the city parks, and work with the architect and the supplier for the existing city lights and replace the three from Oak Park Boulevard that are not In the project. Carried 5 -0. Mayor Beaudet stated that the architect should have the electrical engineer review that the lights are sired so that they do not spill light into the adjacent properties. City Administrator Johnson stated that the City received a quote from Lipner Electric to reinstall the lights in the parks. l le stated the Cit should secure another quote. Mayor Beaudet, seconded by Councilmember Swenson, moved that the City Administrator be authorized to do the work to have the lights reinstalled not to exceed $21,000. Carried 5-0. B. Roadway 'Fransfer Agreement .. - Oxboro and 62nd Street to Washington County: Mayor Beaudet moved to approve the Agreement with additional language added to number 2 that the current access points to the roads shall be preserved by the County unless the affected property owners consent otherwise to the closure. Motion failed per lack of a second. Councilmember Swenson, seconded by Councilmember McComber, moved to approve the Agreement as drafted in the packet. Carried 4 -1, Beaudet opposed. C. Additional Testing for Future Well Land: Mayor Beaudet reported that additional testing is needed to snake sure there is no contamination to the existing wells around the property. Mayor Beaudet, seconded by Councilmember Swenson, moved to approve an additional $1,000 in well testing adjacent to the land the City is purchasing frorn Stillwater Motors coming from the general fund reserve. Carried 3 -2, Abrahamson and McColnber opposed. VII. New Business: Page 8 of 42 City Council Meeting Minutes November 10, 2009 Page 4 of 4 A. finance Director Search Process: Councilmember Swenson, seconded by Councilmember McComber, moved to appoint Councilmember Abraharson and CouncilmenIber Swenson to the search committee. Councilmember Runk, seconded by Councilmember McComber, moved to amend that the committee be formed with five members: Councilmember Swenson, Councilmember Abrahamson, City Administrator Johnson, finance Director Holst, and one outside member for which City Administrator Johnson is to find a fit member. Carried 4 -1, Beaudet opposed. Main motion carried 5 -0. VIII. Adiourninent: Councilmember McComber, seconded by Mayor Beaudet, moved to adjourn at 8:02 p.m. Carried 5-0. Respectfully submitted, Approved as to Content and ]`orm, Jennifer Pinski David Beaudet Adn3lnlstrative Secretary/Deputy Clerk Mayor Page 9 of 42 This Page Is Left Intentionally Blank. Page 10 of 42 Oak Park Heights EN O -C SURF Request for Council Action Meeting Date: December z. 2ooq Time Required: 1 Minute Agenda Item Title: ADorove Fiscal Year 2010 Budgets for Central St. Croix Valley Joint Cable Commission and Vallev Access Channels Agenda Placement: Consent Originating Department /Re Eric Johnson, City Administrator Requester's Signature Action Requested ove Budgets As Submitted. Background /Ju ification (Please indicate if any pre vious action has been taken or if other publk bodies have advise See attached budgets. Page 11 of 42 CEN'rRAL SAINT CROIX VALLJ--,Y JOINT CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSfON 1492 Frontage Road West SffllwaLer, MN 5F)W32 Phone (651) 439-8803 Fax (651) 275-1766 October 22, 2009 Mr. Eric Johnson City of Oak Park Heights P.O. Box 2007 Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Dear Last nighi the Cable Commission approved the FY 201 budgets - for the Commission and fioi- Valley Access Channels. As in. the past years, we. would like our Cities' approvals also, so could you put this ode an upcoming meeting agenda? Please send a copy of n to lot w, know whet.) the budgets have been approved. As always, I would be glad to answer auy questions you might have. Kathy Ch mon Administrative Secretary Enclosures: Cable Commission Budget Valley Access Chamels Budget Representing the Chios o f Stillwater, 0A Pm-k T-ioi and Bayport zjjja tj of Stilkvater and Baytown Page 12 of 42 Central St. Crow Valley Joint Cable Communications Commission Operating & Capital Expenditure Budget Fiscal Year 2010 (February 1, 2010 — January 31, 2011) Revenue Franchise Fees 255,100 PEG Fees 123,000 Interest Earnings 1,300 Expense Reimbursements 1,000 Lower Valley Funding 16,800 Capital Revolving Fund 13,370 Total Revenue $ 410,570 Expenses Salary (includes employer's FICA & PERA) Admin. Secretary (30 hr. week) 37,825 Professional Services Legal Fees 1,000 Accounting 800 FY 2008 Audit Expense 7,500 Other Expenses Office Supplies 1,000 Telephone 950 Postage 300 Maintenance /Repairs 100 Conf /Mtgs /Dues 1,200 Print/Publish 65 Insurance /Bond 4,100 Medical Insurance 7,920 Dental Insurance 520 Office Rent 19,500 Gas & Electric 2,200 Security System Monitoring 135 Photocopier Expenses 350 Page 13 of 42 Cable Commission FY 2010 Budget -- Page 2 Access Center Support 314,245 (PEG Fees 123,000; Franchise Fees 161,945; Interest Earnings 500; Loner Valley Funds 16,800; Tape Dub Reimbursements 12,000) Miscellaneous Expenses 2,000 Telephone System Maintenance 185 Valley Ridge Mall Christmas Event 200 Culligan Water Service 108 Reserve Funds Accounts Legal Contingency -0- Leasehold/Facility/Relocation -0- HVAC Maintenance /Repair -0- Security Fund -0- Capitol Revolving Fund 6,36' Payroll Expense Reserves 2,000 Total Expenses $410,570 Salary figures includes a 3% cost of living increase as of February 1 st, 2010. Page 14 of 42 Valley Access Channels Operating & Capital Expenditure Budget Fiscal Year 2010 (February 1, 2010 — January 31, 2011) Revenue Commission Subsidies: PEG Fees 123,000.00 Franchise Fees 161,945.00 Interest Earnings 500.00 Lower Valley Funds 16,800.00 Tape Dub Reimbursements 12,000.00 314,245 834 School Dist. Reimbursement 3,500.00 Miscellaneous Reimbursements 400.00 Total Revenue $318,145.00 Expenses *Salaries (includes employer's FICA & PERA where applicable) Access Manager — 40 hours /wk 59,715 Lead Facilities Coordinator — 40 hours /wk 48,265 Facilities Coordinator— 40 hours /wk 43,000 Facilities Coordinator— 40 hours /wk 41,100 1 Access Associate — up to 20 hrs /wk. 16,690 Govt. Meetings & School Board Meetings 8,625 Freelance/Temp Employees 10,000 Total Salary Expense $227,395 Professional Services Accounting 800 Other Expenses Office Supplies 1,000 Media Supplies 500 Telephone 950 Rent & CAM 39,000 Gas & Electric 4,200 Culligan Water Service 220 Insurance /Bond 4,000 Medical Insurance 21,300 Dental insurance 2,080 Postage /Mtg /Conf /Dues 1,000 Maintenance /Repairs 5,000 Mileage -.55/mile & car repairs 1,200 Publicity 1,000 Page 15 of 42 Valley Access Channels — FY 2010 Budget — Page 2 Grants 2,500 Misc /Facility /Office Furniture 5,000 Telephone System Maintenance 375 Security Monitoring 275 Copy Machine Expense 350 Total Expenses $318,145 Salary figures are budgeted for a 3% COLA increase as of February 1, 2010. The Media Fund is funded almost entirely from tape dub reimbursements. Page 16 of 42 NC Oak Park Heights Request for Council Action Meeting Date Tuesdav December I ", 2009 Agenda Item 'ritle: Anorove selected winter rink Attendants for 2009-2010 season Time: I Minute Agenda Placement Consent Origiiiatingf)epai'ti )r Public Works/ Andv id Requester's Signatui-&,,,,-- Action Requested Anp• ve for Hire Background/Justification (Please indicate if any previous action has been taken or if'other public bodies have advised): See attached memo. Page 17 of 42 City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Blvd Me Box 2007 • Oak Park 1leighls, MN 55082 e Phone (65 €) 439 -4439 0 1�ax 439 -0574 Memorandum To: Eric Johnson From: Andrew Kegley Date: 11/19/09 Re: 2009/2010 Winter Rink Attendants The following individuals were selected as winter rink attendants for the 2009/2010 season: Andy Swenson Adam Swenson Mike Hoffman John Sortedahl ,lay Sortedahl Chief of Police Brian DeRosier confirmed all candidates cleared the necessary background investigation for temporary public works /parks employment with the City. TREE CITY U.S.A. Page 18 of 42 a Oak Park Heights E.NCL0 tJRF, Request for Council Action Meeting Date December 1, 2009 Time Required: Agenda Item Title Proposed 2010 Budget and Tax Levies —Review and Discussion .Agenda Placement Old Business Originating Department /Requestor Finance — Judv Holst, Deputv Clerk /Finance Director Requester's Signature „,, < Action Requested Review and public discussion of 2010 budget and tax levies Background /Justification (Please indicate if any previous action has been taken or if other public bodies have advised): See attached -- City of Oak Park Heights 2010 Annual Budget information 2010 Preliminary General Fund Revenue & Expenditure Summary Budget 2010 `fax Impact Worksheet with work session adjustments 2010 Tax Impact Worksheet with work session adjustments and UVTA recertification Page 19 of 42 This Page Is Left Intentionally Blank. Page 20 of 42 City Of Oak Park Heights 2010 Annual Budget k'a�e 1 Page 21 of 42 2010 Annual budget Table of Contents City Officials 3 Budget Process 4 Anticipated Changes to Preliminary Budget b General fund Revenues 7 General fund Expenditures 9 Tax Levies, 'Tax Capacity anti Tax Capacity Rate 1 I Utility fund Revenues and Expenditures 13 Debt Service Funds 14 Budgeted Projects fund 15 Page 2 Page 22 of 42 Oak :Park Heights City Officials Position Term Expires Mayor David Beaudet 12/31/2012 Councilmember Les Abrahamson 12/31/2010 Councilmember Mary McComber 12/31/2012 Councilmember Mike Runk 12/31/2012 Councilnaember Mark Swenson 12/31/2010 City Staff` 1:sric A. Johnson -- City Administrator Judy Hoist __ 1 "Inance Director Brian DeRosier — Police Chief Andrew Kegley -- Public Works Director David Mol — City Auditor Mark Vierling — City Attorney Bob Schunicht — City Engineer Page 3 Page 23 of 42 Budget Process The annual budget process is a thorough review of all City revenues and expenditures for the current and upcoming, year. There are many uncontrollable factors the City must comply with that affect both the amount of revenues the City receives and the amount the City must expend in order to provide the current level of services. 'There are also numerous unfunded mandates the City must comply with, such as: Revenues • Tax exempt property — City must still maintain police /fire protection, strects, etc. • Limitations of local special assessments. • Local improvement feasibility reports requirements. • I..imitation of maximum penalties and fines for ordinance violations. • Truth in taxation requirements. • Limitation on lees for licenses, i.e. off -sale and Sunday on -sale liquor, fireworks. Ext)enditures • Pay equity, implementation and reporting. • Wor'ker's compensation. • Public pensions. • Continuation of health and life insurance coverage. • Prevailing wages paid on public contracts. • Veterans preference. • Mandatory binding arbitration for employee classes such as police and firefighters. • Various public safety requirements i.e. Peace officer standards and training, Iconfi €led space entry, suspense rile reduction, tobacco compliance checks. • Building code administration and limits to permit fetes for minor improvements. • Numerous environment requirements i.e., wastewater treatment standards Wetland Conservation Act, recycling programs, waste collection practices, drinking water standards, surface water management plans, 1'ederal Clean Water - Act, Wastewater permit requirements, and storing of hazardous substances reporting. • Planning requirements for land use, zoning, building; codes. • Comprehensive plan updates. • Conducting elections including paying judges, absentee ballots and recounts. • Record keeping; requirements for Data Practices Act and retention schedules. • Competitive bidding. • Open Meeting Law notices, agendas and minutes. • Various financial reporting requirements, i.e. budget, audit reports, ,riF reports, Building Inspection fee reporting, business subsidy reports, outstanding debt reports, Continuing, Disclosure reports. !'a-e 4 Page 24 of 42 Budget Process The City Council and staff engage in a thorough budget process each year in order to present a fair and balanced budget for the citizens of Oak Park Heights. 1. The annual budget process commences in July of each year with the finance Director distributing budget worksheets to the department heads for completion. The City Council is requested to inform the finance Director of any special requests they may have for the budget. 2. The department heads determine the anticipated expenditures and budget requests for the upcoming year. These requests are submitted to the Finance; Director and Administrator for review by the end of July. 3. The finance Director compiles a draft of the preliminary budget and submits it to (lie City Council. 4, The City Council schedules workshops for discussion and review of the preliminary budget. ']'here are usually 2 to 3 workshops held during the month of August and the first week in September. All workshops are public meetings and the public is welcome to attend. 5. After all input and requests have been considered, the ]Finance Director makes revisions to the preliminary budget and submits it to Council for approval of the proposed budget and tax levy. Per Minnesota State Statute this must be completed and certified to the County no later than September 15. 6. "I'he City Council sets the date for the Truth in Taxation meeting requirements. In 2010 the City is required to hold a single meeting in which the public is allowed to speak and the budget and levy is discussed. For the year 2010, the hearing may be a part of a regularly scheduled meeting. The dates must be certified to the County no later than September 15. 7. Council conducts additional workshops to discuss any additional changes to the budget due to updated revenue and /or expenditure information, i.e. insurance rates, contract fees, etc. The City Council is proposing a decrease in the Proposed Revenue Budget from $4,178,486 to 53,988,936 and a decrease in the Proposed Expenditure Budget from $4,162,033 to $3,988,933. 8. The 'T'ruth in Taxation meeting is held. 9. The final budget and levy must be certified to the County by December 28, 2009 and to the Minnesota Department of Revenue after the levy is adopted. Page 5 Page 25 of 42 Anticipated Changes to Preliminary Budget The City discussed several changes to the revenue and expenditure budget at their October 13, 2009 and November 6, 2009 work session. The changes suggested were due to updated information received for 2010 revenues and expenditures and the desire to reduce the proposed tax levy to have minimum impact on the amount of tax paid by residential property owners. Revenues decreased $189,550. The following areas were adjusted: I . General Property Taxes decreased $388,185 from $3,778,596 to $3,390,411. 2. Police Aid increased $5,000 from $65,000 to $70,000, reflecting updated information. 3. $193,635 of the 2008 undesignated fund balance will be used to balance the budget. With the changes discussed, the revenue budget would decrease $23,329 or .6% over the 2009 revenue budget. I= xpenditures decreased $173,100 in the following departments: 1. City Administration decreased $10,800 from $26,900 to $16,100 for adjustment to travel, conference, schools. 2. Employee Hospital, Life, Dental Insurance decreased $24,500 from $301,400 to $277,000 for an adjustment to estimated insurance premium . 3. Building Inspections, 1 "ire Inspection Services decreased $1,800 from $3,000 to $1,200 to reflect '/2 estimated revenue for fire inspections paid to Bayport. 4. Building Inspections, increased $1,000 from $2,000 to $3,000 for adjustment to travel, conference, schools. 5. lrec Removal, Other Contractual Services increased $21,000 from $24,750 to $45,750 to reflect estimated costs 'for emerald ash borer management. 6. Transfers Out to Other Funds decreased $158,000 from $762,850 to $604,850 to reduce transfers for capital projects. Decrease needed to reduce tax levy. With the changes discussed, the expenditure budget would decrease $23,257 or .6% over the 2009 expenditure budget. In addition to the above ad,justnients, the City is anticipating a recertification of the 2010 Utility Valuation Transition Aid (tjv from the Minnesota Department of Revenue. If the UVTA is recertified, the City will receive an estimated $102,947 in 2010 UVTA. The tax levy will be reduced to reflect the Aid. Page 6 Page 26 of 42 General Fund Revenues An important change the City Council and the residents of Oak Park Heights should be aware of is the trend towards relying more on the tax levy for the City's source of revenue. In 2005 the tax levy consisted of 71.2% of the City's revenue source. 'rhe proposed tax levy for 2010 is 83.4% of the City's revenue source. There are several factors that contribute to this trend. Licenses and Permits have decreased from 11.7 % in 2005 to 2.1% in 2010. The City also reduced the utility fund administration fee from 10% to 7% in 2007. The State has also limited the ability of Cities to increase fees for certain services, i.e. Sunday on -sale license fees, sale of fireworks fees, and permit fees for minor improvements. The Other Revenue category for 2010 reflects the use of $193,635 of the December 31, 2008 undesignated field balance allocated to offset the amount needed to balance to the 2010 expenditure budget. Revised Actual Actual Actual Actual Budget Budget 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Taxes 71.2% 77.0% 80.8% 81.9 82.7% 83.4% Licenses /Permits 11.7% 9.7% 4.6% 5.0 "N 3.1% 2.1 Dines and forfeits 2.2% 2.6% 1.9% 1,6% 1.8% 1.7 %j Intergovernmental Revenue 3.3% 3.3% 3.1% 2,5% 6.5% 2.1% Charges for Services 6.9% 2.5% 39°/ 19% 1.7% 1.8% Other Revenue 4.7% 4,9% 5.7% 7.1% 4.2% 8.9% General Fund Revenues 100.001/6 - ,i_..._._.._.. 90.001/0 80.00% � 1 t �a 0Taxes 70.00 , .- I J ®Licenses /Permits 60100 ✓. .. ©Fines &Forfeits 50.00% L 1 E ❑lnterg avernmental Revenue 30.00%^ jj ®Charges for Services p 3 DOther Revenue A 10.00"/0 -. 0.00% ' Actual 2005 Actual 2006 Actual 2007 Actual 2008 Budget 2009 Budget2010 'rhe overall 2010 revised proposed revenue budget reflects a decrease of $23,329 or .6% over the 2009 revenue budget. Page 7 Page 27 of 42 General Fund Revenue Summary Revised 2009 2010 Increase Buffet Budget (Decrease) Taxes $3,319,365 $3,327,911 .3% Business Licenses-Permits $30,265 $31,650 4.6% Non - Business Licenses- Permits $92,875 $50,000 (46.2 %) Fines & Forfcits $70,500 $67,700 (4.0 %) Intergovernmental Revenues $259,890 $83,040 (68.0 %) Charges for Services $70,400 $72,420 2.9% Miscellaneous Revenues $168,970 $162,580 (3.8 %) Undesignated Fund Balance 0 $192,635 100.0% Total Revenues $4,012,265 $3,988,936 (.6 %) The chart be]oNv shows the anticipated revenues for budget year 2010. 2010 Revenue Distribution Distribution Charges for Services 1.8 Intergovernmental Miscellaneous Undesignated Fund ❑Taxes Revenues Revenues Balance 2,1% 4,1% 4.9% ®Business Licenses - Fines &Forfeits Permits 1.7% ❑Non - Business Licenses - P e rmits Non - Business ❑Fines & Forfeits Licenses - Permits 1.3 MInfergovernmental Revenues rs :3Char es for Services Business Licenses- f ?- g Permits } 0.8% ' fi IMiscellaneous Revenues - v ' ❑Undesignated Fund ' Balance -j n Taxes 83.4% While the City of Oak Park Heights is in good financial condition, the majority of our long- term difficulties will be from outside sources. With current economic conditions, the City is Breed with the possibility of State laid cuts after the budget and tax levy has been certified to the County and State. Pau 8 Page 28 of 42 General Fund Expenditures The Revised Proposed 2010 budget for expenditures is $3,988,933; which reflects in a.6% decrease over the 2009 expenditure budget. The chart below shows the expenditures for years 2005 through 2010. For the year 2010, General Government accounts for 32.6% of all expenditures. Public Safety accounts for 35% of all expenditures. Other expenditures, which include financing of capital projects, account for 32.4% of all expenditures. Revised Actual Actual Actual Actual Budget Budget 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 General Government 29.5% 31.7% 312% 27.1% 29.4% 32.6% Public Safety 40.6% 39.8% 6.9% 32.5% 34.1% 35.0% Public Works 6.2% 6.1% 6,0 ° / r 7.4% 7.1% 7.8% Parks 3,5% 3.6% 4.3% 3.6% 4.5% 4.4% Sanitation 3.1% 3,0% 2.4% 4.5% 4.9% 4.8% Other Expenditures 17.1% 15.8% 19.2% 24,9% 20.0°/ 15,4% General Fund Expenditures _,. _ ..._..... 100.0% { ElGeneral X0.0% Government ® Public Safety -70.0% 60.0% 0 Public Works -50.0% C7 Parks - 40.0% - -30A% ®Sanitation 20.0% pother Expenditures F ` f 10.0% E 0.0 IM3 M ° /o Actual 2005 Actual 2006 Actual 2007 Actual 2008 Budget 2009 Budget 2010 The City will have increased expenditures for salaries, insurance premiums, salary allocation changes, City Hall maintenance, planning fees, tree removal and utilities. 'There were slight decreases in conferences, schools, contractual services, and transfers to the Budgeted Projects Fund for capital purchases. The overall 2010 revised proposed expenditure budget would decrease by $23,257 or .6% over the 2009 budget. Page 9 Page 29 of 42 General Fund Expenditure Summary 2009 2010 % Increase Budget Budget (Decrease) General Government 1,177,385 1,300,295 10.4% Public Safety 1,369,455 1,394,710 1.8% Public Works 285,420 313,271 9.8% Parks 181,280 174,857 (3.5 %) Sanitation 196,050 191,050 (2.6 %) Other Expenditures 802,600 614,750 (_23.4 %) "Total l:'xpenditures 4,012,190 3,988,933 (.6 %) The chart below shows where the City will make the majority of its expenditures in the 2010 budget year. 2010 Expenditure Distribution Otter Expenditures 15.4% General Govemment 32 6% EjGeneral Government Sar laEiOn - ;;, faPublicSafety 4.8% C ❑ Pub li c Wo rks Parks w ,. {]Parks r i ElSanRatbn E10fier Expenditures Pubic Works 7.9% Pubtic Safety 35,0% Pa«e 10 Page 30 of 42 Tax Levies, Tax Capacity and Tax Capacity Rate Tax Levies The proposed payable 2010 general levy for Oak Park heights that was submitted to Washington County for the TNT parcel specific notices was $3,778,596. The City Council has proposed a reduction in the amount to be certified as the general levy to $3,390,411. The City also has a general obligation debt levy in the amount of $502,000 for the General Obligation Capital Improvement Bonds of 2008 and 2009. The total revised levy now proposed is $3,892,411. As seen in the chart below, the City's total tax levy has increased from $2,293,825 in 2005 to $3,892,411 proposed for 2010. 'fhe City had 14.2% increase for 2006, 12.7% increase for 2007, 20.7% increase for 2008, 8.6% increase for 2009 and a proposed 6.4% increase for 2010. The 2010 increase is due to the additional bonding for City Hall and a reduction from the State in the Utility Valuation Transition Aid. A 500,044 Jf Y 4.000.040 - 077f. - 3,500.000 - - 7387 CBO; 2.500.0W 2293825 2,000 ' s ',`', n 1 .400.400 �,S 1 - � v �� f . r • ...�... T 200 S 200 G 2007 2008 2009 2010 If the UV`fA is recertified, the levy will be reduced by the amount of aid; which will result in an additional levy decrease of $102,947, Tax Capacity The City's estimated 2010 tax capacity value is $8,519,590. This represents a 4.5% decrease in tax capacity value over 2009. Tax capacity value is market value of the property tunes the class rates. Class rates are established by the State of Minnesota and have not changed since 2002. The current class rates for residential property is I% of market value for the first $500,000 of value and then 1,25% on the remaining valve of the property — l xample of a $600,000 home -- 1% of first $500,000 — $5,000 1.25% of Balance ($100,000) — $1,250 Total Tax Capacity $6,250 The current class rates for commercial property is 1.5% of market value for the First $150,000 of value and then 2% on the remaining value of the property — Example of a $600,000 commercial business -- 1.5% of first $150,000 -- $2,250 2% of balance ($450,000) $9,0 Total Tax Capacity = $11,250 1'ale I I age 31 of 42 The chart below shows the change in Tax Capacity Values from 2005 through Proposed 2010. 10,000,000 -- 8,000,000 n 6, 000 , 000- f •` u,G K rc �' g 4,000,000 y S 2,000,000 Y Q..._._..� 6,44 F 8, 19590 ITa p � ..... Value �.. 5.96Q3�"L ,1195 I .. 7,356 ,,891 8,42, 05 Q921�390 ... 6 a ... Tax Capacity Rate The City's "Tax Capacity Rate for the general levy for 2010 is estimated to be 37.602% per $1,000 of tax capacity value. This represents an increase of 7.7% from 2009 rates. ne Tax Capacity Rate for the general obligation debt levy is 5.601 %. This represents an increase of 46.9% from the 2009 debt levy rate. The total Tax Capacity Rate is 43.203 %. Total Tax Capacity Rate is estimated to increase 11.5% over the 2009 I-ate. If the UVTA is recertified, the tax rate will decrease to 41.99 ° /l; which is an 8.4 %l increase over the 2009 tax rate. Tax Capacity Rates _ ..._ _ _ _ .......__.._.. _ _...._.. 50 ✓i 40, �5 f j 30 N� 5 v 20 � , rte , G 10 rt �' V 2005 2006 I 2007 2008 I 2009 2010 JUTax Rate 36.988 36.136 35.731 36.343 38.732 43.203 The median market value frorn 2009 to 2010 for the City is estimated to decrease 7.5 %. Assuming a 7.5% decrease in value, the net effect in total City tax is 1.2% to 3.3% increase depending on the market value of the home. A $200,000 hone will experience a 2.6% or $19.68 increase in tax. An increase or decrease in the amount levied for taxes combined with an increase or decrease in market value or tax capacity value, result in the tax capacity rate changes. If UVTA is recertified, the net effect in total City tax will be an .8% to 2% decrease depending on the market value of the home. A $200,000 hone will experience a 1.5% or $9.89 decrease in t Page 12 Page 32 of 42 Utility Funds Revenues and Expenditures The Water Utility Fund revenues are anticipated to increase 6.1% for the year 2010. The increase in revenue reflects an increase in water rates needed to meet projected operation and capital expenses. Expenditures in the Water Utility fund are anticipated to increase 5.9% for the year 2010. The increase is due to a reduction in estimated interest earned and transfers out for capital equipment. The Sewer Utility Fund revenues are anticipated to increase 8% for the year 2010. The increase in revenue reflects an increase in sewer rates needed to meet projected operation and capital expenses. Expenditures in the Sewer Utility fund are anticipated to increase 8.1 % for the year 2010. The increase is due to a reduction in estimated interest earned, increased charges from Metropolitan Council Environmental Services and transfers out for capital equipment. The Storm Sewer Utility Fund revenues are anticipated to decrease 1.7% for the year 2010. The revenue decrease is due to a Deduction in estimated interest earned. I{:xpenditures in the Storm Sewer Utility Fund are anticipated to decrease 2.6% for the year 2010. The decrease is due to a decrease in operating expenditures. Utility Funds Revenues Summary 2009 2010 % Increase Budget Budget (Decrease) Water Utility fund $556,625 $590,650 6,1% Sewer Utility Fund $724,420 $782,675 8.0% Storm Sewer Utility Fund $80,950 $79,600 1.7% Totals $1,361,995 $ 1,452,925 6.7% Utility Fund Expenditures Summary 2009 2010 % Increase Budd Budget (Decrease) Water Utility Fund $557,510 $590,645 5.9% Sewer Utility Fund $724,330 $782,675 8.1% Storm Sewer Utility Fund $69,185 $67,375 (2.6%) Totals $1,351,025 $1,440,695 6.6% Pare 13 cage 33 of 42 Debt Service Funds As of December 31, 2009 the City will have outstanding debt, including interest, in the amount of $10,675,407.50 for the following bond issues: G.O. Capital Improvement Bonds ol'2008 $9,275,877.50 G.O. Capital Improvement Bonds of 2009 $1,399,530.00 The G.O. Capital Improvement Bonds of 2008 were issued in 2008 to provide financing for the construction of a new City Hall, This bond is scheduled to be repaid by a General Obligation Debt Levy. The bonds are scheduled to retire in 2028. `I^he G.O. Capital Improvement Bonds oi'2009 were issued in 2009 to provide additional financing for the construction of a new City Hall. This bond is scheduled to be repaid by a General Obligation Debt I.,evy. The bonds are scheduled to retire in 2019. Pa =e 14 age 34 of 42 Budgeted Projects Fund The Budgeted Projects fund was established to fund capital purchases for public works, police, administration, etc. `1'llc revenues received in this fund are transfers in from the General Fund and the Utility Fund. Revenue received for tree replacement and occasionally revenue received as donations are also deposited in this fund. For the year 2010 the City has budgeted transfers in from the General fund Revised Preliminary Budget in the amount of $206,850 and transfers in from the Utility liund in the amount of $80,600. The anticipated expenditures for 2010 are for sealcoaticrack seal, park and trail improvements and maintenance, tree planting, police vehicle, public works vehicles, computers, police equipment, and public works equipment. Pa �e 15 age 35 of 42 This Page Is Left Intentionally Blank. fw" Page 36 of 42 2010 PRELIMINARY GENERAL FUND REVENUE BUDGET SUMMARY 1109 -7109 2007 2008 CUR YTD 2009 2010 FUND ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET REQUESTED COMMENTS TAXES $2,768,796 $3,312,432 $1,727 $3,319,355 $3,327,911 0.3% Increase SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS $0 $500 $486 $0 $0 0.0% Increase BUSINESS LICENSES - PERMITS $36,898 531,640 $4,608 $30,265 $31,650 4.6% Increase NONBUSINESS LICENSES- PERMITS $118,923 $171,398 $64 $92,875 $50,000 - 46.2% Decrease FINES & FORFEITS $66,189 $63 $35,121 $70,500 $67,700 -4.0% Decrease INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUES $107,528 $100,516 $92,931 $259,890 $83,040 - 68.0% Decrease CHARGES FOR SERVICES $132,557 $75,997 $35.096 $70,400 $72,420 2.9% Increase MISC, REVENUES $194,942 $288 $92,349 $168,970 $162,580 -3.8% Decrease UNDESIGNATED FUND BALANCE $0 $0 $0 $0 $193,635 100.0% Increase TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUE SUMMARY $3,425,833 $4,044,441 $2,052,894 $4,012,265 $3,988,936 -0.6% Decrease v v m Cl) 0 4 . N 2010 PRELIMINARY GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURE BUDGET SUMMARY 1109 -7109 2007 2008 CUR YTD 2009 2010 FUND ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET REQUESTED COMMENTS GENERAL MANAGEMENT & BUILD €NG $77 $80 $41,681 $93,690 $102,985 9.9% Increase MAYOR & COUNCIL $73 $82,579 $48,614 599,880 $93,130 -6.8% Decrease LEGAL $26,093 $17,070 $7,587 $30.000 $29,700 -1,0% Decrease ELECTIONS $3 x8 $943 $940 $4,790 409.6% Increase CITY ADMINISTRATOR $205 $235 $138,652 $255 $249,135 -2.4% Decrease PLANNING & ZONING $23,499 $23 $19,162 531.650 $35,640 12.6% Increase FINANCE $206 $224,653 $134,975 $241,590 $308,275 27.6% Increase COMPUTER S15,626 $17 $13,461 $23,000 $22,900 -0.4% Decrease AUDIT $22 $16 $14,239 $21,500 $21,250 -1.2% Decrease INSURANCE $309.540 $335,214 $157,448 $331,690 $383,860 15.7% Increase ASSESSING $19 $20,503 $21,169 $21 $21,940 2.8% Increase ENGINEERING $19,192 $11 $19,980 $27.000 $26,730 -1.0% Decrease POLICE $939,975 $1,026,170 $591,392 $1,083,500 $1,105,450 2.0% Increase FIRE PROTECTION 5127,539 $134 $73,736 $146 $150,600 2.9% Increase BUILDING INSPECTIONS $116,821 $121 $71,002 $132,895 5131,975 -0.7% Decrease CIVIL DEFENSE $980 $1 $44 $5.100 $5,050 -1.0% Decrease ANIMAL CONTROL $1,040 $1.195 $147 $1,650 $1,635 -0.9% Decrease PUBLIC WORKS - STREET MAINTENANCE 849,060 $53,388 $23,573 $63,465 $61,570 -3.0% Decrease PUBLIC WORKS -SNOW REMOVAL $106,617 S131,297 $43,832 S117,000 $122,750 4.9% Increase PUBLIC WORKS- STREET LIGHTING $14,749 $59,653 $31 864,600 $68,000 5.3% Increase ARBORIST $11,571 $16 $5.316 $95,355 $15,201 -1.0% Decrease SANITATION & WASTE $76,800 $176,215 $93.132 $196,05D $191,450 -2.6% Decrease TREE REMOVAL $10,793 $29,423 $7.002 $25,000 845,750 83.0% Increase PARKS $137,427 $143,556 568 $181,280 $174,857 -3.5% Decrease COUNCIL CONTINGENCY $0 83,335 $2.102 $10,000 $9,900 -1.0% Decrease TRANSFERS OUT 8617,000 $982.000 $396,300 $792,600 $604,850 -23.7% Decrease v v m w TOTAL GENERAL. FUND EXPENDITURE SUMMARY $3,212,613 $3,952,152 $2,024,535 $4,012,190 $3,988,933 -0.6% Decrease 0 4 . N INCREASE /(DECREASE) REVENUES OVER EXPENDITURES $213,220 $92,289 $28,359 $75 $3 Proposed Pay 2010 Property Tax Impact Worksheet Taxing District: 1700 Oak Park Heights - GENERAL LEVY & DEBT LEVY Step 1 - Calculate the Taxing District' s Tax Rate - General Levy & Debt Levy Reduce $388,185 (10 -13 Adj.) Actual Proposed % Item Pay 2009 k Pay 2010 Change (A) l (B)I (C) 1. Levy before reduction for state aids I $3,836,255 $3,892,411 1.5 9/0 � 2. State Aids $178,390 [ 0.0% 3. Certified Property Tax Levy 11 $3,657,865 $3,892,411 6.4%1 4. Fiscal Disparity Portion of Levy $202,415 $211,70611 4.6 %1 5. Local Portion of Levy $3,455,450 $3,680,70511 6.5% 6 Local Taxable Value "Pay 2010 is a ROUGH ESTIMATE" I $8,921,360 $8,519,59011 -4.5% 7 Local Tax Rate I 38.732% 43,203 %11 11.5% Step 2 - Calculate the Impact of the Taxing District's Rate on Residential Homestead Taxes: 8. Assumes a -7.5% change in market value from 2009 to 2010, which is the city median change (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) Taxing Total Taxing Taxing Taxable District Mkt Value District District Market Tax Gross Hstd share of Net Value Capacity Taxing Credit Credi Tax Actual Pay 2009 500,000 @ 1.0% (137 x E) + 76,000 @ .40% rem @ 1.25% (1312 x D) I rem @ .09% (G) x % (F) - (H) 9. Estimated Tax District rate as % of total rate: 45% 10. 108,200 1,082 $419.08 $275.02 $123.76 $295,321 11. 162,200 1,622 $628.24 $226.42 $101.89 $526.351 12, 1 216,300 2,163 $837.78 $177.73 $79.98 $757.8011 13. 270,400 2,704 $1,047.32 $129.04 $58.07 $989.251 14. 324,400 3,244 $1,256.48 $80.44 $36.20 $1,220.28 15. 432,500 4,325 $1,675.17 $0.00 $0.00 $1,675.17 16, 540,800 5,510 $2,134.15 $0.00 $0.00 $2,134.15 17. 811,100 8,889 $3,442.921 $0.00 $0.00 $3,442.92 Proposed Pay 2010 Pa y 2009 MV 500,000 @ 1.0% 137 x E + 76,000 @ .40% X-1% I rem @ 1.25% (1312 x D) I rem @.09% (G) x % (F) - (H) 18. Estimated Tax District rate as % of total rate: 45% 1 19, 100,000 1,000 $432.031 $282.40 $127.08 $304.951 20. 150,000 1,500 $648.04 $237.40 $106.83 $541.211 21. 200,000 2, $864.06 $192.40 $86.58 $777.48 22. 250,000 2,500 $1,080.071 $147.40 $66.33 $1,013.74 23.1 300,000 3,000 $1,296.091 $102.40 $46.08 $1,250.01 24.1 400,000 4,000 $1,728.11 $12.40 $5.58 $1,722.53 25.1 500,000 5,000 $2,160.14 $0.00 $0.00 $2,160.14 26.1 750,000 8,125 $3,510.23 $0.00 $0.00 $3,510.23 Percentage Change from 2009 to 2010 1 Increase 27.1 -7.6% -7.6% 3.1 % 2.7% 2.7% 3.3 %1 $9.62 28. -7.5% -7.5% 3.2% 4.8% 4.8% 2.8 %1 $14.86 29. -7.5% -7.5% 11% 8.3% 8.3% 2.6 %1 $19.68 30.1 -7.5% -7.5% 3.1% 14.2% 14.2% 2.5 %1 $24.49 31. -7.5% -7.5% 3.2% 27,3% 27.3% 2.4% $29.73 32.1 -7.5 -7.5% 3.2% 0.0 %1 0.0% 2.8% $47.36 33. -7.5% -9.3% 1.2% 0.0 %I 0.0% 1.2% $25.99 34.1 -7.5% -8,6% 2.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.0%1 $67.31 Page 39 of 42 Proposed Pay 2010 Property Tax Impact Worksheet Taxing District: 1700 Oak Park Heights - GENERAL LEVY & DEBT LEVY Step 1- Calculate the Taxing District' s Tax Rate - General Levy & Debt Levy (10 -13 & UVTA Adj.) Actual Proposed % Item Pay 2 09 Pay Change 1 1. Levy before reduction for state aids 11 $3,836,255 $3,892,41111 1.5 %I 1 2. State Aids 11 $178,390 $102,9471 0.0% 1 3. Certified Property Tax Levy 1 $3,657,865 $3,789,46411 3 . 6 %1 4. Fiscal Disparity Portion of Levy 1 $202,415 $211,706 1 4.6 %1 1 5. Local Portion of Levy 1 $3,455,450 $3,577,758 1 3.5 %1 1 6 Local Taxable Value °PaV 20:10 is 0 1�Ot f!;H LsfI U1ATL 1 $8,921,360 $8,519,590 1 - 4.5% 7 Local Tax Rate 1 38.732% 41.994 %11 8.4% Step 2 - Calculate the Impact of the Taxing District's Rate on Residential Homestead Taxes: 8. Assumes a -7.5% change in market value from 2009 to 2010, which is the city median change (D) (E (F) (G) (H) (I) Taxing Total Taxing Taxing Taxable District Mkt Value District District Market Tax Gross Hstd share of Net Value Capacity Taxing Credit Credit Tax 1 Actual Pay 2009 1 500,000 @ 1.0% (137 x E) + 76,000 @ .40% rem @ 1.25% (1312 x D) I rem @ .09% (G) x % (F) - (H) 9. 1 Estimated Tax District rate as / of total rate: 45% 10. 108,200 1,082 $419.08 $275.02 $123.76 $295.321 11. ( 162,200 1,622 $628.24 $226.42 $101.89 $526.35 12.1 216,300 2,163 $837.78 $177.73 $79.98 $757.80 13. 270,400 2,704 $1,047.32 $129.04 $58.07 $989.25 14. 324,400 3,244 $1,256.48 $80.44 $36.20 $1,220.28 15. 432,500 4,325 $1,675.17 $0.00 $0.00 $1,675.17 16. 540,800 5,510 $2,134.15 $0.00 $0.00 $2,134.15 17. 811,100 8,889 $3,442.92 $0.00 $0.00 $3,442.92 1 Proposed Pay 2010 Pa y 2009 MV 500,000 @ 1.0% (137 x E + 76,000 @ .40% X -1% I rem @ 1.25% I (1312 x D) I rem @.09% (G) x % I (F) - (H) 18. Estimated Tax District rate as % of total rate: 45% 19. 100,000 1,000 $419.94 $282.40 $127.08 $292.86 20. 150,000 1,500 $629.92 $237.40 $106.83 $52109 21. 200,000 2,000 $839.89 $192.40 $86.58 $753.31 22. 250,000 2,500 $1,049.86 $147.40 $66.33 $983.53 23.1 300,000 3,000 $1,259.83 $102.40 $46.08 $1,213.75 24.1 400,000 4,000 $1,679.78 $12.40 $5.58 $1,674.20 25.1 500,000 5,000 $2,099.72 $0.00 $0.00 $2,099.72 26.1 750,000 8,125 $3,412.05 $0.00 $0.00 $3,412.05 1 Percentage Change from 2009 to 2010 1 Increase 27.1 -7.6% -7.6% 0.2% 2.7% 2.7% -0.8 %1 -$2.46 28.1 -7.5% -7.5% 0.3% 4.8% 4.8% -0.6 %1 -$3.26 29.1 -7.5% -7.5% 0.3% 8.3% 8.3% -0.6 %1 -$4.49 30, -7.5% -7.5% 0.2% 14.2% 14.2% -0.6 %1 -$5.72 31. -7.5% -7.5% 03% 27.3% 27.3% -0.5 %1 -$6.52 32. -7.5% -7.5% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% -0.1 %1 -$0.97 33. -7.5% -9.3% -1.69/. 0.0% 0.0% -1.6 %1 - $34.43 34. -7.5% -8.6% -0.9% 0.0% 0.0% -0.9 %1 - $30.86 Page 40 of 42 .%t. Oak Park Heights Request for Council Action Meeting Date: December 1, 2oo4 'lime Required: i Minute Agenda Item Title: Schedule WorkshoD on w/ Planning Commission — Design Guidelines Agenda Placement; Neve/Busiines Originating Department /R Eric Johnson. Citv Administrator Requester's Signature Action Requested See Background /justification (Please indicate if anv Drevious action has been taken or if other public bodies have advised): The Planning Commission would like to schedule a workshop with the City Council to review the proposed Revised Design Guidelines. Two possible dates are: 1. Prior to the Dec 8' } ' City Council meeting, (Also on this date i am anticipating that the City Council will need to hold a work session with the Architect on City Hall items and we will need to briefly discuss some flood plain issues and FEMA map amendments) 2. Prior to the Dec 10 Planning Commission Meeting Page 41 of 42 This Page Is Left Intentionally Blank. ..=.fir ;«a: =e, s } .'•" ri it Page 42 of 42