Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutUntitled 4/7/S 4)&; .ze 67AzD, 4<.5&c 7 &/-2ewt, : 64.e.,tz . .401._ � . .bcr` ' ate' z:.)h . ✓Lzz_/L. eiLe, >"?.,e/i/teoerettarezzeoe-e-, ,/t7 ,7/r)t- 4a;260- Gt.4 ezezz ›x74e. .�e... ,. :a .....Leo .moo / (g)‘-1) hailasazdel_ b 2c.e. Z ,..�c r� .�z`o e_ha ecc : .. a za7z _/.dc,�e:C ( ?e/6"- e L.), c. 4,Z6 eetce ‘‘ ce-Oz /23%-z-- p44:2...Zej 9, ear.44x-e itc2z4A-Ze-C.. �..3 1'�4-J /2Q-dem_ - • - �.� r l • Gtr- eto e &-z ate. )04.4>azi •Q,7c. 40 mar./2 Q z ,6 r .6, - 11 - 7` Z2e L/1.4 ?, rediti,iaeteZ G.)L- c.r /22-e_/9712,,t.c) a!/ljee...62.G# v‘OceeLe_ao ..E6 �Oa.b.�� ,.�.. da-z,a 11ZM .. G'r.�� •gyp ..a'LD �'L G �Z�yao .�- 44., 0 &90 c.zj L �D� -- . . "az-- 12-e-,ceopeZ d/Z-44-e �i�e c:o A., �'o�a c cfvc� 1C-;), 1,9/4:Z hoz ah6 � SLG oc�� / 9,6. ,61tea. ,./.---- . • • ! �� , • c to of Minne ,.- 5ta sofa 11.5 f, tiijo la __ -"I �r - rSECRETARY OF STATE 1:) 1�. .... � �� CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION 1} {L I) I, Joan Anderson Grove, Secretary of State of 1 4. Minnescta, do certify that: Articles of incorporation, I duly signed and acknowledged under oath, have been filed on.- this date in the Office of the Secretary of State, for theincorporation of the following corporation, under and in accordance with the provisions of the chapter of Minnesota .� le•Q Statutes listed below. This corporation is now legally organized under-the l r laws of Minnesota. `' ti Corporate Rame: CHERL, Inc. >ILA Corporate Charter Number: 1A-88 b•;C • Chapter Formed under: 317 10 <:-�.-.� �This certificate has been issued on 09/08/1986. • rv-k.'-' • .. . war y 1 -a tib'; tt_ li'j ♦ •,. Ire •r / Secretary of State. . 4.1 / ......t i S • ir 1111 • • • „... ARTICLES eF INCCHFCHATI:.N C} 1[1L 1 4 - p 6 CHL'n:., inc. WE, the undersigned, for the purpose of forming a corporation under and pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 317. Minnesota Non-Profit Corporation Act, do hereby associate ourselves as a body corpoate. and do hereby adopt t:.e following Articles of Incorporation pursuant to the by-Laws of said Corporation and applicable State laws. ARTICLE I THE name of i.nls corporation shall be CHERL, inc. lY_ 15326 11th Street Soat'i,Afton , 2.innesota 55001 ARTICLE II THE general purpose of this corporation shan be to comply with the provisions of Section 501(c)) of the United States Internal Revenue Code, and any other applicable laws that will enable this body corporate to be tax exempt. FURTHER, this corporation is to promote, educate. assist, and expedite the earliest possible priority for planning.land acquisition, engineering, financing, and construction of residential. comter:ial, industrial.recreational, business, historical, interpretive sites and educational facilities,utilities. roads. streets rad other associated real and personal property to conduct Charitable, research, educational and historical activities which will encourage,promote. perpetuate and otherwise develop employment,all citizen self- determination, economic development, housing. solid and hazardous waste management(including but not limited to disposal. storeage, treatment,transportation.recycling.resource recovery),electric and steam generation and distribution.and independence of public types of assistance for all citizens and other activities related thereto, :1 for the purpose of realizing the goals and objectives and broad tr development policy for the general public and business and industry, c: securing fair equitable early priorities for the development, construction. implimentation. operation.nad management of activities and to research, compile, disseminate materials and information related to their immediate and early needs. development and progress. To meet the varied and complexity of problems relating to in the areas of the States affected thereby, and to achieve a reasonable degree of efficiency of operation consistent with the maximum • i e • • • . i 41110 •.e. • •• • • kA•;k: 2 • 11S •� enjoyment and use thereof in the furtherance of the health. safety and g.neral welfare of the general public. private enterprise,and the natural environment and general eco-system. • To sell. contract. manage. improve. develop. assign. transfer. convey. lease. sublease, pledge or otherwise alienate or dispose of. and to mortgage or otherwise encumber the lands. buildings, real property. chattels real and other property.of the corporation. real and personal and wheresoever situate and any and all legal and equitable nights therein. • ARTICLE III THE regiotered office of this corporation shall bet 15326 11th Street South • Afton. Minnesota 55001 ARTICLE IV • THERE shall be no capital stock. • • ARTICLE V THIS corporation does not afford pecuniary gains. incidentally or otherwise for its members other than individual members may enter into contracts with the corporation to provide needed and necessary materials. labor and services and upon dissolusionment of this corporation all assets will be distributed to a local. State or Federal agency and or another non-profit organization. ARTICLE VI • TaE offic*.r:. of this corporation shall be Chairman, Vice-Chairman. Second Vice-Cha;-nan. Secretary and Treasurer or Secretary - Treasurer. The tertu of office of the officers of this corporation shall be for one year upon organisation/incorporation and such terms and elected at such times and under such conditions as shall be more definitely specified in the 9y-Laws. :he first officers of this corpo.•ation shall be. CHAIRMAN =•• • • r • ♦ • • 3 11.=9 VICE-CHAIRY.AN _..a.• :c. .,,:..;,:c., SECOND VICE-CHAIRMtAN .-:.:car; SECRETARY-TREASURER •"::Y :��li:.:,A ARTICLE VII THE names and addresses of each of the incorporators arc' Name Address 1. k:arry n. Shornso'i _2921 .4u: it Ave. No. , :;t111mater, Alen. 55052 2. John K. Sauers 1326 11th Street Jouth, Afton, N.1nn. 55001 3. Kimberly Thompson ;0 2921 .ivant Ave. No., Stillwater, him. 55J82 4. John C. Sauers 1021 stagecoach Trail South, Afton, Kinn. 55001 5. Nancy F. F'.ARIANA X 2921 .1uant Ave. No., St111water,K1nn. 55082 6. 7. 8. 9. - tfo,Lt.e-,. cam,--(i�.(, art. fes,-•�` 17.�5'Cf_cre,2S a•n d lolls.� rJif O iL • s oh 7/ 74 ,its1 AnnpEETi•,c�- ARTICLE VIII �T THIS corporation chall have perpetual existence. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereonto set our hands and seals this 8th day of' September 1586. IN THE PRESENCE OF, IN ¢Jt/TG RS xC 7-z ! , .-411 z • ./ • CORPORATE RESOLUTION 00 (-eei C.H. E.R .L. , INC. -�k� Cot, C/ %4715 Ward Street Cincinnati3Ohio 45227 4 WHEREAS IT is required of the St. Croix County Courts , Circuit Court Judge Scott Needham to varify information and , WNEREAS it is necessary to identify the person to whom service of process or legal papers my accomplished and, WHEREAS it is necessary to identify officers of the corporation and those officers that are empowered to execute agreements and represent the corporate interests in a court of law and , WHEREAS SAID officers or officer acting for the corporation in a court of law is hereby authorized to act on the behalf of the corporation understanding said officer is not an attorney, does not hold himself out as an attorney, does not charge a fee for representing the interests of the corporation and as such does not appear to be in violation of any Wisconsin Attorney certification or licensing laws and , NOW THEREFOREBE IT RESOLVED this 12 th day of March, 1997 at duely called meeting 51, the C.H.E.R.L. , Inc.board of • directors to: 1 . Authorize John R.Sauers to receive all papers and service of process and to execute agreements and corporate interests in a court of law, and represent , speak for ,and otherwise act for the corporation in court hearings and trials as the corporate Secritary and/Treasurer and,. 2 . Authorize Garry B.Thompson, the corporate President to execute corporate agreements with other parties and to recieve service of process in the State. of Minnesota , and to authorize John R. Sauers to act for the President other officers and directors in courts of law and other negotiations and, 3 . Name Garry B. Thompson as President; and John R. Sauers Secritary/Treasurer. GARRY TROMPS' N. K. MARIANA / JOHN R. SAUERS DIRECTORS ANS OFFICERS o4 Jt - .. ( ohSih S�. 'S- �cip,� No�iCLc ft 4;EN1':14:%t. PROVISIONS 757.30 , i. 19,t). --tai.- that all t•.tuiv:tl.vtt pruviki.at Supreme court rules revision. Sep flute : li i•-• rimi:iinrtl ill r • thr supreme remrt mull taint• 111 prrrtlillg§7:I7 M. i . ri' Itulr: tirr til'It 211•11S- i 757.30 Penalty for practicing without license 1 (1) EverY person. who without having first obtained a license to it practice law as an attorney of a court of record in this state, as pro- vided by law, practices law within the meaning of sub. (2), or pur- ports to be_licensee Lto practice law as an attornev_within the meaning of sub. (3), shall be fined not less than S30 nor more than $500 or im- ; ; pri-isorted not more than one year in the county jail or both, and in ad- , i dition may be punished as for a contempt. . by (2) Every person who appears as agent, representative or attor- • mils,Ed. ney, for or on behalf of any other person, or any firm, copartnership, t i '...lid. association or corporation in any action or proceeding in or before any E court of record, court commissioner, or judicial tribunal of the United ;,t . States, or of any state, or who otherwise, in or out of court, for com- n. 1, pensation or pecuniary reward gives professional legal advice not in- cidental to his or her usual or ordinary business, or renders any legal service for any other person, or any firm, copartnership, association or corporation, shall be deemed to be practicing law within the mean- :lents • ing of this section. -aria- legal (3) - __ .- •a '•. - _ 8- words attorney at law, lawyer, •chni- • solicitor, counselor, attorney and counselor, proctor, law, law office, ttlter- -ote_• or other equivalent words in connection with his or her name or any fur- 6 '� sign, advertisement, business card, letterhead, circular,notice, or other i ad- writing, document\or design, the evident pul:lose of which is t9 induce their ry' rep- r rs to believe or understand the person to be authorized to practice tither C1�(Q law or who in any other manner represents himself or herself either •• • and verbally or in writing, directly or indirectly, as authorized to practice "'ti"'' "`--`y�� �''� �'�' law in this state, shall be deemed to be purporting to be licensed to nouns iii ., .4 / ('- ,bjet.. a ' practice law as an attorney within the meaning of this section. r the p-,- 11.CY-- :k (4) No person shall practice law in this state under any other was given name or any other surname than that under which originally ' admitted to the bar of this or any other state, in any instance in 1978. which the board of attorneys professional competence shall, after a Creme hearing, find that practicing under the changed name operates to • 'wing unfairly compete with another practitioner or to mislead the pub- . lic as to identity or to otherwise result in detriment to the profes- sion or the public. Any person violating this subsection shall be sub- De- ject to the penalty provided in subsection (1). This subsection does ry 1. L not apply to a change of name resulting from marriage or divorce. ,1 357 �- ' No-• -/ a i 't 1S .06'e---S /✓o 7- Cr r it y Ci`'c- 5 0-$1D A C,1 i CAI S 0-/- JO4� -5a.c.{EAs /N 77 o2 �-7vs6 � c:PO lS_ 1 J� . , A�l S a c s , 3 0 /S /-0_,....,..., :s No-r- T i C,n8 4 do ?.. n -.`„ rr 'n.G ?-Yvr•,,rl�^'lt� _ �^'�`',. _,-,---,,,,,,,-.7c., ir �. , l•, r v"'.." • 1.1.1:54[Ttey ' ' � •t - MJ.'y . -- l'y r. .1. E•'''''''• 1 . . ^2.a P +t 1 b :,?'. �47.r. +F.F+ ✓' ?' `•i,, ._w3 '}' ---.,_.t � h` ''.,-..$-.44..t..; 1 ':-.r.. - ~• -it.44;4•,W-,. r." .Z "i. :w� 4,is 2. l„tirn ,a �' t . ',1xyt"•.L _.,--*-7,-3;-.7"-:,h.: , � � .v.iis 1 ': -:;.4.4-`" -q4-4:'44:. '. • iTa II CHERL INC. A NON-PROFIT P. 4715 WARD STREET CINCINNATI OHIO 45227 JOHN R. SAUERS, SEC/TREAS. November 1, 1997 Governor Arney Carlson Office of the Governor Minnesota State Capitol Bldg. St. Paul , Minnesota 55101 Re: Junker Landfill Site Litigation The Honorable Governor Carlson I would like to take this opportunity to congratulate you on your gaining the governorship as your friend and long term supporter. I further would like you andaamajority of the citizens of Minnesota and Wisconsin to know that therewill be no legal actions aimed toward you or the Attorney General , or the Pollution Control Agency. We know who the perpetrators of the discharges are and they are the ones that will pay for their wrong doings. You and the Attorney General can come out of this situation that the people receive justice and you can establish a better reputation with the environmentabists and the inocent general public politically a good step. We will work closely with you if you desire. CHERL, INC. , the site owner, If you wish to join our suit you and the people are welcome to participate. It may be desireable for the State of Minnesota to request the U.S. EPA-N.E.I.C. office in the U.S. Government Center, Denver Colorado to begin an investigation into the situation a govern- mental body must make the request. The director of the U.S. EPA-N.E.I.C. is Diane Love. It may also be desireable for a representative of the governor or the governor assist in a negotiated settlement of the matter for the same reasons. We have had the solutions to the Solid Waste Management Problem in the U.S. of A since 1971. This is a CRADLE-TO-THE-GRAVE approach which includes the people and government in the managemer lequation a program that collects, sorts waste, salvages, incinerates and buries ash if a product is not made from it first. This program, yes, even the ash can be used for productive. A reading of the 1980 CERCLA LAWS and RCRA clearly demand the use of "Systems" to handle all solid waste. There are no guidelines no rules and regulations exist to this day in Minnesota or any other state. This means all of the states including the U.S. EPA are opperating in violation of the RCRA and CERCLA-SARA Laws. Lastly you are welcome to intervene in our legal action, if it be your desire - please let me know within 10 days, of your interest and desires, that is 10 days from the post marked date or date you receive this letter. Respectfully, 9411 The landfill site is for the use and bedefit of the majority of people of Minnesosta, Wisconsin and the nation, "We The People" and that is the way we want and propose to run it. Greedy, selfish people want the site for the "BILLIONS of DOLLARS" it will take in through its oper- ation. I was in 1971, designed to be operated and managed by the people and the owners as a team and the proceeds being used to serve the general public interests. Why is that not possiblE now when it has been proven government run operations are inefficient, costly, cumbersomly heourocratic, and violate every law in the books. We are for the people and are not driven by greed for economic and/or political gain. Garry B. Thompson, Pr a. ohn R. Saaers, Sec/ yeas. + AFFIDAVIT W ,xA,6 T G c4-40 r y d State of Colorado ;. r. lc- ; - t� $. Nd Fin County of Jefferson Z-L4 N - Comes now your affiant, Edward L. Bour, sworn ttpon -- • - . oath, deposes, and says the following; : r. c . 1) I was employed by the USEPA-NEIC, a criminal: i westig- atory body in Denver, Colorado until my retirement :in - . Feb. 1996 after 34 years of service. 1 . ; c: . 2) I was an atomic spectroscopist specialized inhel : r • P analysis of elemental constituents in hagardo s; wastes, • and was considered an expert testimonial witness ;i,n this field. t f 3) I was also a duly appointed enforcement officer author- ized to conduct official investigations and inspections . pursuant to all federal laws administered by taw USEPA. 4) That I have known John Sauers since 1971-. 5) That John Sauers is honest, trustworthy,- and a person of integrity. • - - 6) -6) I have confirmatory knowledge; z e a) that John Sauers informed the USEPA-NEIC• o€i unlawful acts taking place at the Junker Landfill in St. Croix County, Wisconsin in or about 1981. b) that an investigative team from the USEPA-NEI£- • interviewed John Sauers and Garry Thompson. at-. the - home of Garry Thompson. r_, , ; C . .. C) that the USEPA-NEIC investigators were escorted to . - the Junker Landfill Site, but were unable, to pe�,for an inspection due to Junker's occupationrthereof. : t d) that John Sauers and Garry Thompson as individuals: . , . and business officials gave notice of the. discharge of hazardous materials into the environments upon , ; . learning of said discharges. : ai. ; i . c . 7) That upon my best information and belief', the,_investe . - , igation of the Junker Landfill Site was doneA,n con-. junction with an investigation of the Lake Jane , Sanitary Landfill in Washington County, Minnesota, by . . . the USEPA-NEIC investigative team. _ _ . . • . page 2 8) That I am giving this affidavit as a free act and deed, being under no threat or coercion to do so, but in the interest of justice. Further, your affiant sayeth not at this time,- but reserves his right to amend said affidavit upon acquisition of new information. Date Ja��/ T i Affiant; dward L. Bour ` Signature; Subscribed and swo before me �y tcGJ � J L. a this /ft day of O�b`✓ 1996, al Notary Public -in Jefferson County, State of Colorado. #1r. My co.. •I ission�a. . res - day of , /9g/- A• /-- a • 411 Summary of Events Klondike Resource Conservation Recovery System Site AKA Junker Landfill Site In early 1971 under a U.S. H.E.W./EPA request for Solid Waste Management Demonstration Grant request. A proposal for the Klonike System was prepared, Municipal (citizen) advisory body was organized for submission of said proposal and siting approval was given by the State of Wisconsin (still in existance today) The purpose of this proposal developed some 6 years prior to the enactment of RCRA (p194-580) was a result of the advanced thinking of John R. Sauers while working with the Engineering consulting firm of Vogt Sage and Pflue of Cincinnati3Ohio. Although the Demonstration Grant proposal was not accepted by U.S. EPA/HEW for funding it appears it was used by congress to develop the objectives of RCRA in 1976-77. John Sauers prepared 2 real property appraisals for the landfill site when owned by landfill land co. for the purposes of obtain a bank mortgage and a second update by Sanitary Landfill Site, Inc. For a potential sale and Bank Mortgage. John R. Sauers is one of the few real property appraisers competent to value solid waste management sites. In 1981 Ecological conservation services, Inc. entered into a contract with sanitary landfill site inc. to investigate and management of the landfill now being operated by a RENTER "JUNKER SANITARY LANDFILL INC. JAMES L. JUNKER. It should be noted by the reader that the renter of the site was perporting to be the site purchaser in 1976 . As it final turned out the above James L. Junker entered into a lease option to purchase for $3, 500/per month and with said lease and option to expire in 1982 . Prior to the lease-option with Junker, landfill land co. was issued a license to operate a dry fill which received demolition waste like wood and masonry waste and clay putty and glass from Andersen Corp. Prior to the rental of the landfill site to Junker and after the dry fill license was issued by the state of Wisconsin sanitary landfill site. inc. purchased the site and contracted with the Engineering company of Owen Ayers of Eau Claire Wisconsin to prepare engineering and operating plans for the site so it could be used to receive residential and non-hazardous commericial/business waste. Prior to the lease-option agreement with Junker sanitary landfill incorporated-James L. Junker the state of Wisconsin dept. of Natural Resources (WDNR) issued a limited sanitary landfill license . One should remember and keep in mind that first Junker was going to purchase the landfill site and the provisions of chapter 144 of Wisconsin statutes which indicate the owner of the site is to be issued and to hold Junker prior to the lease-option agreement told the WDNR according to Jack Tritt the local representative of the solid waste division of the WDNR he was purchasing the landfill site and would be operating the landfill site along with his commercial and residential collection business which also included a contract to collect and transport Andersen Window Manufacturing waste to the landfill site. Jack Tritt never checked with sanitary landfill site, inc. to varify the alleged sale of the landfill site went through or was consumated nor did he request of Junker to produce any sales agreements or deeds proving the site had in deed been sold. Junker without first notifing sanitary landfill site, inc. The site owned and landlord, applied to have the license transfered to Junker Sanitary landfill , inc. The state (WDNR)did unlawfully do this act . The • • landfill owned believed the license was still in the owners name, everything appeared to be progressing o.k. until 1981 when it came to the owners attention that area resident were having problems with the color and taste of the well waters, orders, and middle-of-the-night operations at the landfill site. Garry B.Thompson, pres. of sanitary landfill site , inc. learned from the past owner of the site Mr.Pilquist that John Sauers had prepared plans for the site and might be able to help. John Sauers was contacted to provide consulting services being an expert in solid waste managment and having in depth knowledge of the landfill site. In 1981 areal photographs were taken of the site, topographic maps were made of the site files were purchased from the (WDNR) , site operators were interviewed and a preliminary report was issued indicating the site was not being operated according to the license or the operational plans. It appeared from site observations (owner/landlord was denied access to the site to inspect) tape from 3m company was being dumped, dead animals were being dumped, cheese waste was dumped lead and acid contaminated soils from Polk county had been dumped,semi trailers loads of 55gal barrels of liquids were disposed of being spilled by crushing when buried. Further the plan of operation required daily cells of compacted solid waste be constructed in three 2ft. lifts and the covered daily with 1 of compacted impervious earth. This was not being done with the approval of WDNR rather waste material was being spread over a wide area and sprinkled with cover material to minimize blowing paper. This however permitted water penetration of waste animal (rat) contact with waste 3 ) Oderemission 4) Bird penetration of waste (poor vector control ) 5 ) Blowing papers off and on the site 6) and a general waste of the site and site space. The WDNR issued what appeared to be continuous non-comliance orders to Junker without notifying the owner of the site. The owners discussed the site problems with Jack Tritt, Paul Didder (director of solid waste division of WDNR) and Laveque (ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR WDNR) and were informed be Diddier "that all of the states landfills were being operated the same way and there was nothing wrong. " In 1982 Junker landfill to give notice of intent to renew lease agreement and failed to exersize the option to purchase agreement or to request and extention. There of when no satisfaction could be received from the WDNR and when the WDNR refused to restore the unlawfully transfered to sanitary landfill site , inc. after notification that the lease to the site was not renewed and Junker was notified to vacate the site. The state refused to do so. Sanitary too steps to evict Junker in small claims court (Judge Todryk) only to find Todryk had a case, STATE OF WISCONSIN VS. ROSEN METALS in which it was agreed by the parties and unknown to sanitary at the time this lead contaminated material was to be deposited in the bottom of a third stage expunsion of the landfill again with no knowledge of the site owners. Todryk refused to hear per law and statute the eviction, issued an injuction against owners taking peaceful possession of the site, an unlawfull act of the court. Junker filed an action to restrain the owners from taking the site after orbitration of rent and forced reinstatement of lease had failed . In the Junker action the owners have never received a final order of resolution of the case even after the court per court order, received lab tests on leachates taken by site owners per court orders in middle of January with a hand spade/shovel when temperatures were 411below -10 ' degrees for weeks, and which samples of soils and liquids showed voc ' s existing in violation of federal, state, and plan of operation and license prohibitions . The attorny for the county, Eric Lundell , (now a judge) was supplied with documents proving existance of unlawfull material being in the site and did nothing including failure to report spills and unlawful discharge of hazardous material into the landfill as required and mandated by RCRA & CERCLA-SARA. This makes county judge & attornies as liable as Junker and the state for the unlawful discharges. The owners of the site in 1985 sold the site to Whiteagle, and it again was sold in 1986 to Cherl, inc. a non-profit corp. of and for the people. Sauers nor Thompson may become rich as a result of the present ownership or as officers there of. It should be noted early in the site investigations of the site operations & management the site owners took it upon themselves to notify official at the U.S. EPA region 5 with personal meeting and trips to see Adamke the region administrator in Chicago, meeting & trips to Washington D.G. to report unlawful acts to U.S.-EPA administrator , general accounting office, U.S . Attorny general , U. S. presidential advisors, senators & representives involved in solid waste management legislation staff Florid, Vento, Dingell, Durenburger, office of disease control , U.S. EPA-NIEC, state govnernors of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Solid Waste Management officials in each state along with Federal and State Legislators. RCRA and CERCLA-SARA are clear in their intent to punish and hold liable for clean-up of solid waste disposal sites which have discharged unlawful waste or material into the enviroment. To this end when it was reported to local, state, and federal authorities repsponsible for the enforcement of RCRA and CERCLA-SARA laws, rules, and regulations, and objectives, and noting was done to stop or otherwise remedute the unlawful acts of the site operator, pollutors, and enforcement persons , the citizens suit provisions of the RCRA&CECLA-SARA LAWS enforced and supposedly enable a person to force enforcement of laws through Judicial means when legislative and executive/administrative means fail. To this end then the owners of the site and their officers respectively have attempted to seek relief though the courts local through U.S. court of appeals Washington D.C. to the end the owners prevailed in 2 cases venued in Polk County Wisconsin where the Comopolitum bank under A.R. Kircher a CGO & pres. initiated a foreclosure action and where the court when payments were deposited there in dismissed the foreclosure action and second caused to have issued a restrainer order and injuction infavor of the site owners preventing the State or anyone else from drilling monitorny and test wells on the landfill site without owner of site being notified, involved in planning and granting approval said orders are still in effect but ignored by state, federal and pollutor, futher, both John Sauers and Garry Thompson were forced into chapter 7 bankrupts where all parties having claims or potential claims against Sauers and Thompson in 1987&1988 including the state of Wiscons & Junker as related to the landfill failed to appear and make any claims were summary discharge. To this day U.S. District Courts state courts and affected parties v.s . Junker landfill remediation trust, Junker landfill trust . Judge Needham, Tommy Thompson through and including Wisconsin attoney general , county of St . Croix among others in violation of i U.S . bankruptcy court orders keep attempting to collect and imprison the owners representives and officers Sauers and Thompson. Garry Thompson and John Sauers have not only been attempting to protect themselves from liability by initiating some 25 individual actions in various courts at their own expense but have done so to protect the rights of the innocent citizens/people from having to pay over and over for the criminal acts of Wisconsin, Minnesota , U.S. EPA, Junker, Junker landfill trust 23+ including but not limited to Andersen co. 3-m N.S. P. , West Publishing, Lake Elmo, Landfill remediation trust (James L. Junker when it was their responsibility to see that waste of whatever nature was discharged safely and sanitarily per law directives once. John Sauers and Garry Thompson have proposed legistlation and agreements whereby the site would be operated as a national demonstration site and in compliance with the laws beginning in 1971 , and again in 1982-83, 85, 87, 96, 97. We Sauers and Thompson are and have been working fo the people in this matter. CHERL, INC.- is a non-profit corp. of the people, by the people and for the people Klondike Resource conservation and recovery system is a cradle-to-grave solid waste management system created in 1971 by John Sauers and intended to be on operation of the people by the people, by the people and for the people. 1971 to almost 1998 some 26+years. How have John Sauers and Garry Thompson been treated for trying to comply with the RCRA and CERCLA-SARA laws. They have had their inheritances taken from them, they have lost their homes, their marriages are floundering, they have been forced into bankruptcy, They have lost not employable, they are protrayed as "crack-pots" by courts & media and attornies and their very reputations are at risk. For what reason? Because the would dare to demand the enforcement of state and federal solid waste management laws. The question we ask and the questions the american people should be asking: What are these people and business trying to hide that causes them to violet every environmental law, judicial law, ethical law and rule , enter criminal conspiracies , engage in racketeering, lie, file false papers , enter false orders, commit perjury and the like from the president of these U.S. to the mayors and city council and townships. Why don ' t these officials and organations want the truth and the laws complied with and why don ' t they want the people involved? Why would a person stoop to such a low degree to lide something? Are they on the take/bribery/payoffs? What do you think? We think/ YES ! ! ! Isn ' t it strange that Sauers and Thompson mitiate 25+years law suits, with and without attornies and there is no merit to our actions in court but there is merit to cases brought by the some persons that were defendants when they are plaintiffs on exactly the some issues heard by the same Judges (John C . Shakey) How have we been rewarded by the courts for wanting to comply with the laws $36 , 000 + judgements against Sauers and Thompson and joil time and death due to a lack of notice and the right to appear in courts and face our accusers due to court mindions unlawful injunctions of all for complying with the laws. CHERL INC. NON-PROFIT CORP. OF MINNESOTA Garry B. Thompson, Pres . • 110 110 To: U.S. EPA-NEIC P.O. BOX 25227 DENVER, COLORADO 80225 ATT: DIANA LOVE, DIR. RE: REQUEST FOR CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION OF THE JUNKER LANDFILL SITE OPERATION MANAGEMENT STATE ACTIVITY FEDERAL LAWS SUPER FUND LAWS (RCRA) PL-94-580 (CERCLA) PL-96-510 This law is for the people Cherl inc. are the people, everyone is part of Cherl inc. We the people need to act on this . It is your resonsibility as public officals represinting the citizens/people of your community to protect there interest by requesting of the U.S. EPA/NECI to investigate the unlawful/ criminal activities assioted with the operation and management of the junker landfill site by the operateor, by the pollutors, by the state regulators body, by a dankus the Region 5 administrator of U.S. EPA in Chicago Be aware that the Junker landfill site in 1971 was approved by the state of Wisconsin as the Klondike resource conservation and recovery system for which there are no laws, rules , or regulations, licenses reguard or manated by the_U.S. EPA or any states in the union as such it appears the Junker landfill site run as a system needs no licenses. we are being unlawfully denied are rights to operate. CHERL INC. NON-PROFIT CORP. Garry B. Thompson Pres . 4 • • • • La dfli owners file suit • Two officers of two corporations seek $613 million in damages By MIKE MARSNIK Sanitary Landfill Site, Inc. and News Editor CHERL, Inc., are the entities that •Alleging a conspiracy to hide own the property upon which the wrongdoing and to profit from the landfill was developed. John R. illegal disposal of waste,along with Sauers of Cincinnati, Ohio, and of defamation and slander, officers of Stillwater,is secretary and treasurer two corporations that own the Junker of both,according to documents filed Landfill site filed suit with a U.S. with the court,and Gary B.Thomp- District Court in Ohio on Oct. 1, son of Oak Park Heights is president seeking damages of$613 million of both corporations.The two offic- from a host of defendants. ers say they can now be found in Cin- Defendants in the suit include a cinnati. law firm, several attorney s. :wo The $613 million lawsuit, is be- judges,Wisconsin Governor Tommy fore Judge Arthur Spiegel of the U. Thompson;former landfill operator S. District Court for the Southern James L. Junker; and the Junker District of Ohio Western Division. . Landfill Trust,•which includes cor- Technically a countersuit,it alleges potations and municipalities in Min- that the defendants conspired to pre- nesota and Wisconsin, vent removal of the contaminating An attorney for one of the defen- waste and materials discharged at the dants called the suit frivolous and landfill site by means of restraining filed for a change of venue,to bring orders in Wisconsin for the past 20 it to Minnesota or Wisconsin,where or so years, taking away the plain- the defendants as well as the land in question,are all located. (See Landfill page 16) ';4:0k,, :. ,..ah: r S4.,..m,.:.0:. 5E.-. ,i3`3ax.< ;57 :',. a'...r. :' 3 a6e"..'' •.kM : 411 } Friday,October 31,1997 �ti[[bi�tel• �Ebening� ette 1 Landfill : :: : Continued from 1) 1 e firm and th h t to in u u� firm (Aim= ) pn� ' nal - Q Att O s tui 1 n- Auri to redreiffS C° ss evances. never represented any o th p ,.,:..,:...:.:.. . $n .,Is::a:atatc:. t M&c t t d B y; «;, Attorney_Bob Brown of Rend!gs;. tiffs,despite the plaintiffs alleg :::.....:: ..:;..;;;: :.;;:;:, :., ::,",:....:::::. _. „ fi�:�.xis,: ar.;?!�:�.::::.::::.: .:.:.;;. �:::. .::..::::: ':;;;:.;:.;:::::.::..:::;�: -ry, ttheyare nail of some wild con- ;:.;<.:: .;:.;:.;:.;:.;:.:.::.::.<;;:;:.;: .,.:::.;;:.;::::: .>...::.:>.: .;::.:....;; ;::.:.;;: :;;:.:::.::.:::. ICiele and Dennis 1)Cincinnati ui p Y the s otic he said. Azm an and , n Mark Y nti s re se P Pre $ which Brown stated in his motion,"The >;:::;>:;:: :: t : "'t? i _; SEs::.;::.:::»:;_<:::>:::.><,; -.,,,I:>::::>:::<::::: �umhvan Law Firm for «:>::>::>::;.:: ;:,::;.» ;:;:;:;;:;::<> . .:: .:.:::. . :.:. .:..::;::::::,:::.. .. • nhvan defendants believe lam- uA�+t: ' I It•}s;;:.;.::. :.>: :, �an is employed.Azman and the Qui • P ..::::::::::::::: :::::.:._:..... ::.::;;.:;;;;:;:: ;::::: ,::::: :.::: ; :. . .. ....,_..,: .; ..:. .::;: are raisingthese claims in some t: :. ,ors Eoti; dtpCraL I,;. .; :»::::;::::::::,: >. 2uinlivan firm are among the defers- tiffs - >;�etR': "�:::;:::::»::�`' ..:;;:>::> <:..:.;:.:;. .:::::::.:.;:.;..>:.: .:.... ...;....;:: ..>. ..:.. ..:..;: way related to umhvan s re - ;::>alteg ::�°i�l. :.:......::..::<:: >»:;:�t <+ :; :< ;:><:;:._;:.:>;::: tants. Y Q ::::...:::: ...:::::::i ::: _. ....:. .:. .::...: . ......... Brown said that Sauers an tion of co-defendants Junker and : . 220.1* mmpson have filed pro se,meaning LRT. stOmtl ?t S ids ►:m;;;.. e that, in an <:;; ::.............;.>:: ::;. . :..;.: . . .:. ces on to stat Y :��'ra::1RW�G:�:;:..; .:t�d:<'C #1#lf bat the are representing them- He gi:'�' sj ...:<:;;:<;:;::;:>::; ;: : .;:::.. ,, .,....;::;:. :.:...:. .:::..:::::::::..>::;;;�.. Y P inlivan defendants have . Atm::.:;::'::::::::.;:. : , :;:>. the -<'VV:tiS' • m to Brown,the two case, Qu ;�� &:> ;:.:..::<.:.,.:;;:.:.>; : t' it�!'.,; > ;;:-::;:.;;:.....:;;:>:.::.;;::;;<:.::.:.: :. .:........:: elves.Accord g � :.......:.:.. ... . n ver cited in Ohio. ;:::: • • q- si\a& 40.3,L) L- qy - sso LRLte- (AID- sin 1- wy,& goa_o tcu_.0 (3L3 b(n sem, o 0_0.NTh 0,.1A�� -"`o Chef L earnc OA\b- o , 2-111c b.)0,5\.&) 146-aa-i cis\ye apc& oh&Jui - L139-361° a Qat sem- eIk. 34)\, sin Enclosure 12 JARDINE • • ATTORNEYS AT LAW LOGAN P.L.L.P. O'BRIEN 2100 Piper Jaffray Plaza 444 Cedar Street — l! Saint Paul,Minnesota October 7, 1997 55101-2160 Firm (612)290-6500 ----- Fax (612)223-5070 ATTN MR MICHAEL ROBERTSON E-Mail JARDINELAW@AOL.COM CITY ADMINISTRATOR CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS Donald M.Jardine PO BOX 2007 John R.O'Brien OAK PARK HEIGHTS MN 55082 2007 Gerald M.Linnihan Alan R.Vanasek Re: Our File: 26056 ( 1657) John M.Kennedy,Jr. Eugene J.Flick JUNKER LANDFILL TRUST VS. CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS Charles E.Gillin James J.Galman Pierre N.Regnier Dear Mr. Robertson: Mark A.Fonken George W.Kuehner Mary A.Rice We are closing our file at this time. Patti J.Skoglund SeanE.Hade Our file may contain documents, records, materials, etc. , that Timothy S.Crom LawrenceM.Rocheford you wish to be retained. Unless we receive a request from you James G.Golembeck to return those documents, records or materials within six (6) KerryC.Koep months of the date of this letter, we will assume that you DavidJ.Hoekstra have approved our right to destroy the file containing such JamesK.Helling Richard.).Leighton records or documents . At your request, we will also forward Michael A.Rayer to you all pleadings, including discovery documents and Marlene S.Garvis depositions . Again, if you do not request that we return such Mary P.Rowe Karen R.Cote documents to you, we will assume that within six (6) months of Nathan W.Hart the date of this letter that we are free to destroy the file, ThomasJoseph E.L.Cun including such documents and records . L.Cummings Gregory R.Broos Margaret C.Galvin We thank you for giving us the opportunity to work with you in Shari L.Johnson Elizabeth B.Hayes this matter. Katherine E.Kennedy Cara J.Debes Yvonne M.Flaherty Brenda L.Theis Very truly yours, Jerre F.Logan(1923-1983) JARDINE, LOGAN & OBRIEN, P.L.L.P. Some members also admitted to practice law in Wisconsin, /rh North Dakota,Illinois and Iowa. enc. JARDINE • Enclosure H ATTORNEYS AT LAW LOGAN P.L.L.P. O'BRIEN June 23, 1997 2100 Piper Jaffray Plaza 444 Cedar Street PERSONAL/CONFIDENTIAL Saint Paul,Minnesota CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS 55101-2160 ATTN: ADMINISTRATOR MIKE ROBERTSON Firm (612)290-6500 P 0 BOX 2007 Fax (612)223-50706500 OAK PARK HEIGHTS MN 55082-2007 E-Mail JARDINELAW@AOL.COM Re: Our File No: 26056 (1657) Donald M.Jardine Junker Landfill Trust v. Junker Recycling, Inc. , et al John R.O'Brien Gerald M.Linnihan Dear Mr. Robertson: Alan R.Vanasek John M.Kennedy,Jr. Eugene J.Flick The Consent Decree has been approved by the Court . The matter Charles E.Gillin is now resolved. We are closing our file at this time. If James J.Galman PierreN.Regnier you have any other questions or concerns, please feel free to MarkA.Fonken contact me directly. George W.Kuehner Mary A.Rice Patti J.Skoglund Thank you for this opportunity to represent the City of Oak Sean E.Hade Park Heights . Timothy S.Crom Lawrence M.Rocheford James G.Golembeck Very truly yours, Kerry C.Koep David J.Hoekstra )ARD NE, LOGAN & O'BRIEN, P.L.L.P. James K.Helling Richard J.Leighton Michael A.Rayer Marlene S.Garvis 5 4,4r Mary P.Rowe Karen R.Cote Sean E. Hade Nathan W.Hart Direct Dial : (612) 290-6510 Joseph E.Flynn Thomas L.Cummings Gregory R.Broos SEH:dj Margaret C.Galvin Shari L.Johnson Elizabeth B.Hayes Katherine E.Kennedy Cara J.Debes Yvonne M.Flaherty Brenda L.Theis Jerre F.Logan(1923-1983) Some members also admitted to practice law in Wisconsin, North Dakota,Illinois and Iowa. _cam • ! ATTORNEYS AT LAW LOGAN P.L.L.P. IEEE March 19, 1997 , f HAND DELIVERED 2100 Piper Jaffray Plaza LOWELL ROTHSCHILD 444 Cedar Street POPHAM HAIK SCHNOBRICH & KAUFMAN LTD1\ 1 ��p MAR Saint Paul,Minnesota 2 0 55101-2160 222 S NINTH ST STE 3300 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 _ Firm (612)290-6500 Fax (612)223-5070 E-Mail JARDINELAW@AOL.COM Re: 26, 056 - Junker v. City of Oak Park Heights Donald M.Jardine John R.O'Brien Gerald M.Linnihan Alan R.Vanasek Dear Mr. Rothschild: John M.Kennedy,Jr. Eugene J.Flick CharlesE.Gillin I represent the City of Oak Park Heights . Attached to this JamesJ.Galman correspondence, please find the following: Pierre N.Regnier Mark A.Fonken George W.Kuehner 1 . Signature page of David D. Schaaf, Mayor of Mary A.Rice PattiJ.Skoglund Oak Park Heights to the Consent Decree; Sean E.Hade Timothy S.Crom 2 . Signature page of Michael Robertson, City Lawrence M.Rocheford James G.Golembeck Administrator for Oak Park Heights to the Kerry c.xoep Settlement and Release Agreement; David J.Hoekstra JamesK.Helling 3 . The check of Oak Park Heights No. 033466 Michael A.Rayer Marlene S.Garvis payable to the Junker Settlement Fund in the Mary P.Rowe amount of $100, 000 . 00. Karen R.Cote Josenw.Hat JosephphE.Flynn PLEASE NOTE THAT THE SETTLEMENT CHECK IS MADE PAYABLE ON Thomas L.Cummings MARCH 26, 1997 PURSUANT TO MY TELEPHONE CONVERSATION WITH YOU Margaret C.Galvin Shari L.Johnson ON TUESDAY, MARCH 18, 1997 . THEREFORE, PLEASE DO NOT Elizabeth B.Hayes NEGOTIATE THIS CHECK UNTIL MARCH 26, 1997 . Laurence A.Diamond Katherine E.Kennedy CaraJ.Debes If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to Yvonne M.Flaherty give me a call . Brenda L.Theis Jerre F.Logan(1923-1983) Very truly yours, JARDINE, LOGAN & O'BRIEN, P.L.L.P. Some members also admitted to practice law in Wisconsin, North Dakota,Florida andlllinois Sean E. Hade Direct Dial: (612) 290-6510 SEH:tlm Enclosures cc: MIKE ROBERTSON CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS • • The undersigned hereby agrees to the terms of this Consent Decree, relating to the Junker Sanitary Landfill Inc. Site. FOR City of Oak Park Heights (Name o ettlinPndan By: Date: IK, 72 7/7 G 7 (Your Signature) David D. Scha f Name: David D. Schaaf (Please print) Title: Mayor - City of Oak Park Api ghts (Relationship to Settling Defendant) Mailing Address: David D. Schaaf Mayor - Oak Park Heigh-ts P.O. Box 2007 Oak Park Heights, MN 55002-2007 Agent Authorized to Accept Service on Behalf of the Above-Named Party: Name: Sean E. Hade Title: Attorney - Jardine, Logan & O'Brien Address: 444 Cedar Street, Suite 2100, St. Paul, MN 55101 Phone Number: (612) 290-6510 13 ' 03/14/97 11:13 Cif OAK PARK HEIGHTS -+ 612 223 507041k h3.007 P02 • The undersigned hereby agrees to the terms of this Agreement of Compromise, Settlement and Release, relating to the Junker Sanitary Landfill Inc. Site. FOR City of Oak Park Heights (Name of Settling Defendant) • By: , � Date 3-14-97 - (Your Si-- ature) Name:- Michael Robertson (Please print) Title; Cit .kdnninistrator (Relationship to Settling Defendant) Mailing Address: C fiy ''- �5 HQiahts p,0_ Box 20Q7 (lik Pam Heights. tom 3 55002-2007 Agent Authorized to Accept Service on Behalf of the Abovc-Namcd Party: Name Title: Ai—nrnay - Jardine, _an & O'Brien Address:ede .. dor S#raga+ _ Gu1 to 2100, St. Paul, MN 55101 Phone NumberLf F,1 21 290- 5510 ACRSBMENT OF COMPROMISE, SETTLEMENT' AND RELEASE Page 14 of 14 R=97% 612 439 0574 03-14-97 11 : 15AM P002 #43 Enclosure 6C • i Oak Park Heights Emergency Executive Session, Tuesday, March 18, 1997 Call to Order: The meeting was called to order at 6: 10 p.m. by Acting Mayor Turnquist . Present : Councilmembers Beaudet and Robert . Absent: Mayor Schaaf and Councilmember Swenson. Staff Present: Deputy Clerk/Finance Director Holst . Councilmember Robert, seconded by Councilmember Beaudet, moved to accept settlement of $100, 000 for the Junker Landfill Trust litigation and authorize Mayor and City Administrator to sign Consent Decree relating to the Junker Sanitary Landfill Inc. Site . Carried 3-0 . Adjourned at 6: 30 p.m. _ .r -e Holst Deputy Clerk/Finance Director ;'-titilbitMeartAL,torattit IFISIM Dent TO Councilmembers DEPT FROM Dave Schaaf, Mayor DEPT SUBJECT Junker Landfill Lawsuit DATE March 18, 1997 **************************************************************************************************** NOTICE OF EMERGENCY EXECUTIVE SESSION MEETING 6:00 PM Tonight at City Hall Regarding JUNKER LANDFILL LAWSUIT *** This will be a closed session TOPS 50 FORM 3398 LITHO IN U.S,A. a • illo MESSAGE CONFIRMATION 03/18/97 12:51 SESSION NO.= 022 ID=CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS DATE TIME SIR—TIME DISTANT STATION ID MODE PAGES RESULT 03/18 12:51 00'20" 612 439 7531 ECM—S 01 OK 0000 • 4110 MESSAGE CONFIRMATION 03/18/97 12:48 SESSION NO. = 021 ID=CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS DATE TIME S,R-TIME DISTANT STATION ID MODE PAGES RESULT 03/18 12:47 00'20" 612 351 0857 ECM-S 01 OK 0000 III/ 411/ MESSAGE CONF I RMAT I ON 03/18/97 12:45 SESSION NO. = 020 ID=CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS DATE TIME SIR-TIME DISTANT STATION ID MODE PAGES RESULT 03/18 12:45 00'20" 351 1436 ECM-S 01 OK 0000 R a 4110 1110 MESSAGE CONFIRMATION 03/18/97 12:42 SESSION NO.= 019 ID=CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS DATE TIME S.R-TIME DISTANT STATION ID MODE PAGES RESULT 03/18 12:41 00'28" 612 351 0727 G3 -S 01 OK 0000 CITY PF f OAK PARK HEIGHTS . ' 14168 N. 57th Street• Box 2007 •Oak Park Heights,MN 55082 •Phone: (612) 439-4439 •FAX 439-0574 Notice of Emergency Executive Session March 18, 1997 An Emergency Executive Session regarding pending litigation has been called for March 18, 1997, 6 : 00 p.m. at City Hall, 14168 57th St . N. This session will not be open to the public. Judy Holst Deputy Clerk/Finance Director Tree City U.S.A. M1 • • . JARDINE ATTORNEYS AT LAW LOGIN-& P.L.L.P. O'BRIEN March 17, 1997 11 W7 r_ PERSONAL/CONFIDENTIAL CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS MAR I 8 1991 2100 Piper Jaffray Plaza ATTN: ADMINISTRATOR MIKE ROBERTSON 444 Cedar Street P O BOX 2007 \\I L/0/ Saint Paul,Minnesota OAK PARK HEIGHTS MN 55082-2007 55101-2160 Firm (612)290-6500 Fax (612)223-5070 E-Mail Re: Our File No: 26056 (1657) JARDINELAW@AOL.COM Junker Landfill Trust v. Junker Recycling, Inc. , et al Donald M.Jardine John R.O'Brien Gerald M.Linnihan Dear Mr. Robertson: Alan R.Vanasek John M.Kennedy,Jr. I am writingtoprovide you with additional information Eugene J.Flick Charles E.Gilin pertaining to the settlement of this matter. James J.Galman Pierre N.Regnier Mark A,Fonken First, as previously discussed, a new TLI allocation sheet has GeorgeW.Kuehner been received. A copy is attached for your file. In Paarytti Skoge reviewingit Patti J.skogluna you will note that , it has three new columns SeanE.Hade labeled A, B, and C. It was prepared in this matter to assist TimothyS.Crom an evaluation of settlement. In order for the settlement to Lawrence M.Rocheford JamesG.Golembeck proceed, it was necessary to raise a total settlement of Kerry C.Koep $4, 360, 700 .28 . As you know, we were able to negotiate a set DavidJ.Hoekstra dollar amount for the City of Oak Park Heights to settle its James K.Helling claims with the plaintiffs . However, the plaintiffs were Michael A.Rayer unwilling to negotiate in a similar fashion with almost all of Marlene S.Garvis Mary P.Rowe the other defendants . Therefore, this spread sheet was Karen R.Cote created to show the potential range of the cost of each Nathan W.Hart Joseph E.Flynn party' s settlement. Thomas L.Cummings Margaret C.Galvin Column A shows what each party would pay if all parties joined Shari L.Johnson Elizabeth B.Hayes in the settlement . It represents the minimum contribution any Laurence A.Diamond party could have anticipated. It was determined by dividing Katherine E.Kennedy CaraJ.Debes the volume contributed by each party by the total volume Yvonne M.Flaherty contributed by all of the parties . It was the most Brenda L.Theis unrealistic projection. Jerre F Logan(1923-1983) Column B was the most realistic. It approximated each party' s estimated contribution assuming all members of the JLT Some members also admitted participated plus $1 million was raised from other parties. to practice law in Wisconsin, North Dakota,Florida and Illinois Column C shows what each party would contribute if only that party and the members of the JLT participated in the settlement . I anticipate receiving in the future a final spread sheet indicating what each settling party contributed to the settlement. I have not received that to date. However, it is • • CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS March 17, 1997 Page 2 my understanding that approximately $1. 9 million was raised which. This means that most defendants will be required to pay about 80% of the figure represented in Column B. This means if we had not been able to position ourselves to negotiate a separate agreement on behalf of the City of Oak Park Heights, it would have been required to pay $141, 000 . 00 to sign on to the Consent Decree. Fortunately, we were able to negotiate a separate agreement. The City will be paying $100, 000 . 00 cash up front . The trial remains scheduled to commence on Monday, March 31, 1997 in Madison, Wisconsin. However, the City of Oak Park Heights will not be required to participate. The Court, by Order dated March 13, 1997, has stayed the proceedings against all parties who became signatories to the proposed Consent Decree on or before March 21, 1997 . Further, the Court has scheduled a hearing to consider approval of the Consent Decree on Tuesday, April 29, 1997 . I will continue to keep you advised. Very truly yours, JARDINE, LOGAN & O'BRIEN, P.L.L.P. J Sean E. Ha e Direct Dial: (612) 290-6510 SEH:tlm Enclosures • DOCKET NUMBER U.S DISTRICT COURT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Wes-. - - v.%CoNSiN FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSI0 MAR 1 31997 JOSEPH W.SKUF.4 E'W/TZ.CLERK JUNKER LANDFILL TRUST, NCASE UMBER ~� a Minnesota business trust, Plaintiff, FINAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER v. 96-C-019-S JUNKER RECYCLING, INC. , et al. , Defendants. LANDFILL REMEDIATION TRUST, Plaintiff, 96-C-489-S v. GARRY THOMPSON, et al. , Defendants. Final pre-trial conference was held in the above entitled matter on March 10, 1997, plaintiff Junker Landfill Trust and defendants 3M, Press On, Inc. , Minnesota Correctional Facility, Minnesota Department of Transportation, Stillwater Armory, Chicago & Northwestern, City of Glenwood, City of Lake Elmo, Croix Oil Company, Dahl Tech, Erikson's Diversified Corp. , Geo Siegfried Construction, Glass Service Company, Maple Island, Inc. , Mill 's Fleet Farm, Northern States Power Company, Stillwater Housing Partners, The Toro Company, Northwestern Bell/U.S. West Communications Inc. , United For Excellence, Andersen Corporation, • 410 U.P. Incorporated, Town of Troy, Washington County, Wisconsin Telephone/Ameritech, Stillwater Armory and Johnson's Auto Body by Oppenheimer Wolff & Donnelly by Kathleen M. Mahoney and Lind, Jensen & Sullivan, P.A. by Ted E. Sullivan; plaintiff Landfill Remediation Trust and defendants Junker Recycling, Inc. , Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. and James L. Junker by Quinlivan Law Firm by Mark R. Azman and Kevin A. Spellacy. Defendants Washington County Housing and Raymie Johnson Estates by McGrann Shea Franzen Carnival Straughn & Lamb by Corey J. Ayling; Diess Sanitation and Eisinger Sanitation Services, Inc. by Doar, Drill & Skow, S.C. by Matthew Biegert; City of Hudson, School District of Hudson, Town of Richmond, Town of River Falls and Village or North Hudson by Bell, Metzner, Gierhart & Moore, S.C. by Jeanne M. Armstrong; Duro Bag Manufacturing by Norys, Sater, Seymour and Pease by Martyn T. Brodnik; Stephens Sanitation, Ltd. by Meissner Tierney Fisher & Nichols by Christopher L. Rexroat; Bayport Printing House, Inc. , First State Bank of Bayport and Stillwater Clinic by Karl M. Ranum for Cummins, Gervais & Associates by Dwight P. Cummins; United States Postal Service by United States Department of Justice by Natalie M. Duval; Nor-lake, Inc. by Michael Best & Friedrich by Jon G. Furlow; Maroney's Sanitation, Inc. and Maroney's Service, Inc. by Otjen, Van Ert, Stangle, Lieb & Weir, S.G. by Paul J. Pytlik; City of Bayport and City of Oak Park Heights by Jardine, Logan & O'Brien by Sean E. Hade; Consolidated Lumber Co. By Arthur, Chapman, Kettering, Smetak & Pikala, P.A. by Robert W. Kettering, Jr. ; Jim's Tom Thumb by 2 • 410 Stich Angell Kreidler Brownson & Ballow, P.A. by Michael Kreidler; United Waste Systems, Inc. and •United Waste Transfer, Inc. by Lommen Nelson Law Firm by James M. Lockhart; City of Stillwater by David T. Magnuson; The Shannon Group, Inc. , Pizza Hut, Inc. and Kentucky Fried Chicken, Inc. by Quarles & Brady by Amy M. Hinman; Hudson Township by Winner, Wilson & Pernis by Scott G. Pernitz and Kim I. Moermond; B & L Liquor Store, Best Chiropractic Clinic, County Market, Cud Brothers Construction, Dairy Queen, Inc. , Dave Holt-Ford Mercury Inc. , Erickson Oil Products, Inc. , Family Barbers, Gilbert Motors, Inc. , Fred Harwell, William Harwell, Hotel Dibbo, Hudson Country Club, Inc. , Hudson News Agency, Hudworth, Inc. , Kenall Enterprises, Inc. , Marine Associates, Marketplace Foods, Midwest Vision Center, Mike's Standard Service, Nordstrand Burt & Associates, O'Connell's Valley Funeral Home, Martin O'Connell, Roger Peterson, S-S-G Corporation, St. Croix Manor Ltd. , Starr's Tavern, Strome Sanitation, Inc. , Swager Bros. Paint Store, True Value Hardware, Anthony Zappa, B.P.O. Elks #640, Dr. G. D. Gaynor, Hudson Medical Center and Hudson Memorial Hospital by Mudge, Porter, Lundeen & Sequin, S.C. by Joel D. Porter and R. Michael Waterman; Hudson Housing Authority by William J. Radosevich; American Legion-Stillwater, Big T. Tavern, Bliss Plumbing & Heating, A.A. Connel, St. Croix Animal Hospital, Holiday Foods, Home Decorating Center, Irven R. Kiesow, Meister's Bar & Grill, Meister's Bar & Liquor Store, Meister's Confectionary, J.E. Monheim, Nordic East, Harold Onstad, Ralph B. Otte, Ted Raduenz, Albert Ranum, Arcade Rivertown, Schwantes, Inc. , Thompson Hardware 3 411 410 Co. , V.F.W. Stillwater, Ranun Law Offices and Independent School District #834, Port of Sunnyside Club, Inc. by Rooney & Neilson, Ltd. By Thomas J. Rooney; Birchwood Apartments, Burger King Corporation, Burger King Corporation (Hudson) , Kmart Corporation, Kingwood Management, Oak Park Heights Apartments, Radio Shack, St. Croix Valley Clinic, Tandy Corporation and Williamsburg Apartments by Murnane, Conlin, White & Brandt by Michael S. Ryan; Metropolitan Council Environmental Services by Lockridge Grindal Nauen & Holstein by Christian M. Sande; United Building Centers, Linner Electric and Penguin Insulation by Bakke Norman, S.C. by Gary L. Bakke; Evanson Plumbing & Heating, Hardware Hank, Hudson Liquor Store, Pudge's Bar, Randy Iten Chevrolet and Star Observer Publishing by Law Offices of Davison & Vlack by Sara M. Bakula; Robert C. Bardill, DDS and Lake Mallalieu Apartments by Terwilliger, Wakeen, Piehler & Conway, S.C. by Virginia L. Erdman; Dunlap & Gherty by Dunlap & Gherty, S.C. by Mark J. Gherty. The following defendants having failed to appear although are represented by counsel: Brinkman Photographic, Stillwater Gazette, Rose Floral, Hudson Star Observer, Inc. , Allied Signal, Inc. , Associated Eye Physicians & Surgery, Big Ben of Stillwater, Brine's Inc. , Brookfield Company, Harry Campbell, Erickson Post, Inc. , Fraternal Order of Eagles, Freight House, Hansman Industries, Herold Enterprises Inc. , Hooley's TV, Jerry's Auto Detail, Inc. , Johnny's TV & Video, Joseph's Family Restaurant, Inc. , Gottfried Lamers, Lo, Inc. , Montgomery Ward, Pilquist Auto Parts, R. Hagstrom Builders, Reed Friendly Drug, Reed's Drug Store, Routson Motors, 4 L 410 411 Schaefer Building, Shorty Cleaner Launderer, Snyder Bros. Drug, Inc. StillwaterEY a Clinic Partn. , Stillwater Medical Arts Building, Stillwater Veterinary Clinic, James A. Vinar, Jr. , Canadian Pacific LTD, Piper, Jaffray & Hopwood Inc. , Waste Management of Minnesota, Niro Atomizer, Inc. , Rustic Inn, Inc. , Bethel Lutheran Church, First United Methodist, Our Savior's Lutheran Church, Peoples Congregational Church, Trinity Lutheran Church, Reichhold Chemicals Inc. , Rivertown Commons, Victoria Villa Apartments, Culligan Water Conditioning, Mcgough Construction Co. , Inc. , Burlington Northern Railroad, West Industries, Ascension Episcopal Church, Vance Bushay, G S Electric, Jones Chemical Co. , Inc. , Phillips Plastics, McDonald's Restaurants of Minn. , Edina Realty, Inc. , Heywood, Cari and Murray, John Heywood, St. Croix Valley Rod & Gun Club, R.H.H.K. Building, First Bank, FSB, Metropolitan Federal Bank, Gagnon Construction Company, Consolidated Lumber Co. , Duenow Management Corp. , Jim's Meats, James L. Schmitz, T.O. Plastics, Inc. , Dr. Stephen Schwalbach, Greeley Health Care Center, Linden Health Care Center, Midwest Vision Center, Esteban's Restaurant, Vittorio's, Inc. , Beaudet Apartments, First Presbyterian Church, First National Bank of Hudson, Norwest Bank, Phipps Center for the Arts, Milwaukee Road Depot, Maurices Incorporated, Lake Elmo Hardwood Lumber Inc. , St. Croix Day Care, Kroy Medical Inc. , Cub Foods, Hooley's Super Markets, Supervalue, Inc. , Thorp Finance Corp. , Ward Management of Hudson, LTD. , GTA Feeds, St. Croix County, First National Bank - Stillwater, Delaval Separator Company, Madsen Johnson Corporation, 5 • s Clark Oil & Refining Co. , Champion Auto Store, Mall Theatres 1, 2, & 3 and Mall Theatres I & II. The following defendants having previously made appearances failed to appear: Aamodt's Apple Farm, Inc. , Carbone's Pizza, Harold 'Chambers, Gardy's Sports, Harold Kimmel, Lily Lake Terrace Apartments, Charles McMahon, Nelson Builders, Dwayne Nelson, Clark Nyberg, Sanitary Landfill Site, Inc. , John Sauers, Garry Thompson, The Gaughan Companies and Michael R. Tobiassen. The following defendants having failed to appear either in person or by attorney: 2-Way Inc. , 3 'D' Company, A & W Restaurant, Act II at the Opera House, Action Rental, Inc. , Acton Construction Co. Inc. , Albertson Marine Service, All Construction, Anchor Inn, Freitag Anderson, Paul Anderson, Lloyd Anex, Ann-Ren-Son Foods Inc. , Arrow Building Center, Art's Auto Parts, Associated Printers Inc. , Atlas Copco Inc. , Dr. Austin, Ronald Axdahl, B & D RV Repair Service, B.W. Harris Manufacturing, Paul Bartlett, Bayport Garage, Bayport Laundry & Drycleaners, Bayport-Stillwater Waste Treatment, Bears Harbor A & W, Ed Behrman, O.E. Benson, Berbrida Associates, Bergman's Garden Center Inc. , Bestke's Drug Store, Bethlehem Lutheran Church, Biagi's Inc. , Bills' Bluff Bait, Bluff Oasis, Body & Sole Therapeutic Massage, Bonne's Shoe Store, Brick Alley Restaurant, Robert Briggs, Steven Brink, Brookfield II, Brookman Motors, Brownson Properties, Bruette Roofing, C.A. Gerbitz Company, Calvary Assemblies of God Church, Canelake's Steak & Seafood, Carpenter's Union-Local 957 , Carpet Shop, Casanova Beverage Co. , Century 21 Pendleton Co. , Century 21 Realtors, Charles Cudd Co. , 6 410 Charles Cudd Model Home, Cherry Street Apartments, Christian Community Home, Church of St. Charles, Clark Super 100, Cluth & U-Joint - St. Paul Inc. , Clyde's Restaurant, Cobble Craft, Steven Colombo, Commemorative Imports Collectors, Community Sanitation, Con/Spec Corp, Conrad's Auto Service, Copy Cat Printers, Cornellier Specialties, Inc. , Cosmopolitan State Bank, Country Boy, Country Kitchen, Countryside Wood Products, James Covey, Croix Del Realty, Inc. , Croix Rental Management, Croixdale Apartments, Croixland Cleaning Center, Croixside Press, Croixvale Recreation, Croixville Recreation, Dwight Cummins, William A. Curtis, Curve Crest Partners, D & L Bar, Dabruzzi Village Liquor, Dahlman Construction, Dairy Mark, Dana, Dan, Darius & Associates, Del's Lawn & Log, Del's Sharpening Service, Del's Stillwater Outdoor Power, Della's Day Care Center, Dick's Bar of Hudson, Roy Dick, Diesel Supply Company Inc. , Diversified Fabrication, Michael Doe, Domino's Pizza, Inc. , Dor-El Beauty Salons, Dueber's Big V Dept. Store, Duling Optical Corp. , Dunn, Maurice, Ernest J. Duwell, E.L. Murphy Trucking, Eckberg Law Office, Elk's Lodge #179, Elmo Aero, Inc. , Elmo Inn, Eric Investments, Erickson Garage, Erickson Warehouse, Ethridge Pontiac Cadillac GMC, Ethridge Tire & Service Center, F.T.L. Corp. , Farho's, St. Croix Inc. , Farmers' Group Insurance, Farmers' Insurance Group, Fazendin's, John Fetzner, First Baptist Church, First Federal Savings & Loan, Five Sub & Pizza, Dr. David A. Fleming, Fox Business Machines, Fox River Falls, Kay Frattalone, Fred's Tire Company, Inc. , Fulton's Landing, G & T Enterprises, G.A. Meyer Mercantile, Gannon's Auto Body, Garfield's Valley House, 7 Garley, Cleon, Gherty and Dunlap, Giebler-Jahnke Woodworking, Golden Crown Restaurant, Golden Mirror Beauty Shop, Good Neighbor Care Centers, Grand Garage, Grand Stillwater Assoc. , Greenbriar Terrace Partners, Greenbrier Lawn & Landscaping, Greenbrier Terrace, Greystone Bar, Growth Equity, Guaranty Fuels - Stillwater, Gwin, Gilbert & Mudge, H.M. Pauley Realty, Hagberg Country Market, Paul Halverson, Hanley Apartments, Hans Hagen Homes, John F. Hansen, David Hanson, Harding's at Hudson, Glen Hardman, Jan Harriman, Harvest Tec, Robert c. Haussner, Heritage Building, Heritage Ford, Herman Junker Candy Co. , Hidden Valley Lounge, Jeff B. Hitchcock, D.D.S. , Roy Holsten, Home Marketing Concepts, Housing Management Services, Hudson Auto Parts, Hudson Bowling Center, Hudson Children's House, Hudson Clinics, Hudson Community Day Care Center, Hudson Distributing Company, Hudson Elevator, Hudson House Inn, Hudson on the St. Croix Inc. , Hudson Outboard & Small Engine, Hudson Pet Hospital, Hudson Products, Hudson Refuse Service, Inc. , Inter-state Lumber Co. , J & D Bluff Baits, J.L.H. Inc. , J.R. Ranch, J.R.B. Partnership, Janda's, Jerry's Auto Body, Jesse Miller Trucking Co. Inc. , Jim Gannon Body Shop, Jo Fahro's Dress Shop, Jo Farho' s Bridal, John E. Clements Co. Inc, John's Auto Parts, Johnson Housemovers Inc. , Johnson's Sanitation, Dennis Johnson, Jon' s Designs, Joyce Office Building, Jun's Beauty Shop, K-Sun, Frederick P. Kalinoff, Jr. , Kangaroo Self Storage, Kari Clinic, Tom Keech, Keller Construction Co. , Keller Properties, Ken's Mobil Service, Kenall's Modern Motel, Kendrick Chiropractic Clinic, Kern Collectibles, Kinsel's Liquor Store, Jerry Kleckner, Herbert 8 Kleeme, Koncepts International, Kramer Funeral Home, Kristin Investments Inc. , Krongard Construction, Kroy (Pierce Corp) , Kroy Incorporated, Kroy Industries, LTD Repair, L.D.L. Investments, Labon's Truck Stop, Dick Lacosse, Lake Elmo Motor, Lake Front Deli, Lakeside Drive-In, Lakeview Memorial Hospital, Lamperts Yard, Langness, Robert, Larson Electrical Company, Laurel Hill Association, Mark Leubker, Lind Custom Shoe Company, Lindes Hallmark, Lindsay Water Conditioning, Lowell Inn, Lumberman's of Stillwater, John Lund, Lundgren Bros. Construction, Lynn Rose Fashions, Macpherson Towne Co. , Mad Capper Saloon, Mall Restaurant, Mall Restaurant & Catering, Mallalieu Inn, Mar-len Enterprises, Dave Marshall, Marv's Bar, Orville Mausolf, Mayer Aviation, McCarthy's Irish Pub, Mcgarry-Kearney Agency, Robert C. Meisterling, Metro 500 Inc. , Metropolitan Contract Services, MGM Liquor Warehouse, Mickelsen Drug, Inc. , Mickelson Drug Store, Michael D. Miller, Peter J. Miller, Jr. , Mini-Mall Inc. , Modern Beauty Shop, Montgomery Ward & Co. , Inc. , Russell Morris, Mr. T's Bar, Nicholas Mucciacciaro, Multi-Print Company, Namrog Inc. , Nan-Gar Salvage Inc. , Nancy's Hallmark, Nash-Finch Company, National Restaurants, Needham Distributing Co. , Nelson's Dairy Store Inc. , Dr. Robert C. Nelson, New Richmond Sanitation, New Stillwater Project, No Hudson Service Station, Norm's Sanitary Service, North Star Auto Body, Northern Door, Northwest Cinema, R.J. O'Neil, Oak Glen Development Co. , Oak Park Development Co. , Oak Ridge Apartments, Oasis Petroleum Company, Ole's Northland Lindsay, Olson Sanitation, Orrin Thompson Homes, Orville Madsen & 9 411 111 son, V.A. Ostendorf, P.F.A Properties, Shirley Pagliarini, Benjamin Palmer, Pat Collins Hair Design, Patchworks & Primitives, Ben Patterson, Paulson Auto Supply, Pawnee's Bar, Mark T. Peddecord, Pierce Business Products Inc. , Pilquist Auto Salvage, Bert Plaskett, Post Service Station, Powell Land Company, Prime Cuts, Queen Fashions Inc. , R & D Properties, R E Partners, R.E.V. Inc. , Radio Station WVLE, Bernard Rappa, Ray's Shoe Repair, Red Owl Store, Red Owl Store-Stillwater, Reese Aviation Inc. , Reliance Electric, Reliance Electric Motors, Richards Wall & Harris, Richert Decorating, Russell Richert, River City Investments, River City Wood Products, River Oasis Cafe, River Valley Athletic Club, River Valley Racquetball Club, Riverside Self Storage, Riverside Sound, Robertson Factories Inc. , Ron & Primo's TV Clinic, Roofings Inc. , Rosen Metals, Inc. , Royal Coaches, Ruetten, Roger, James E. Rusch, Rustic Hut, Salem Lutheran Church, Sandeen Insurance, George Schmitt, Dr. R.L. Schneider, Schoenrock East, Seasons Tique, Selas Company, Senior Citizen's Center, Sherburne's Gold & Gems Jewelry, Sherman-Boosalis, Sick Optik Elektronick Inc. , Silver Lake Restaurant, Simonet Furniture Store, Sinclair and Valentine, L.P. , Solnuts Inc. , Somerset Systems Inc. , Sowle Company, Sports Club Lounge, St. Croix Animal Hospital, Inc. , St. Croix Beauty Salon, St. Croix Boat & Packet, St. Croix Boom Company, St. Croix Bowl, St. Croix Car Wash, St. Croix Cleaners & Launderers, St. Croix Condominiums, St. Croix Design Inc. , St. Croix Drug, St. Croix Housing, St. Croix Mall Key shop, St. Croix Mall Restaurant, St. Croix Pools, St. Croix Storage Co. , St. Croix Texaco, St. Croix 10 111 Valley Catholic School, St. Croix Valley Improvement Co. , St. Patrick's Rectory, St. Paul Lutheran Church, Standard Management Corp. , Steeple Towne Inc. , Stillwater Bakery, Stillwater Book & Stationery, Stillwater Country Club, Stillwater Dock Company, Stillwater Ford Lincoln Mercury, Stillwater Honda, Stillwater Large Investment Club, Stillwater Manufacturing Co. , Stillwater Metal Fabricators, Stillwater Paint & Wallpaper Co. , Stillwater Realty Co. , Stillwater Residence, Stillwater Self Service, Stillwater Steak, Inc. , Stone Lake Restaurant, Studio Sinoauv, Sukowatey Realty, Sunshine Auto, Swager Bros. Realty Inc. , Swanson Murphy Funeral Home, Tamarack Galleries, Tan Me, Tech Con Services Inc. , The Baywood Corporation, The Brass Track, The Brokerage Inc. , The Captain's Galley, The Club Tara, The Harbor, The Highlander, The Knolls, The Mallalieu Beach, The Old Log Cabin, The Sandbar, The Trophy shop, The Village Shop, Thomas Development Corporation, T.B. Tibbetts D.D.S. , Timark, Inc. , Tip Top Bar, Tom O'Brien Olds/AMC Jeep, Tom Thumb Food Markets, Inc. , Torglers, Trans World Export, Travels With Jean, Tru Tire Inc. , Tubby Lohmer's Travel Agency, William E. Tucker, Tulgren Properties, Dr. John P. Turner, Dr. P.A. Tweet, Twin States Music Co. , U.S. Metal Fab, Val-Croix Home Owners Assoc. , Valley Auto & R.V. Brokers, Valley Auto Supply Inc. , Valley Cartage, Valley Co-op, Valley Dental Arts, Valley Dri-Kleenette, Valley Realty, Valley Trophy, Valley Ventures, James P. Vanwinkle, Vern's GTC Auto Supply, Viking Electronics Inc. , Village Inn, Village Sanitation Inc. , Vine Street Florist, Voorlas Manufacturing Company, Wallace Chiropractic Clinic, Dr. James L. Wallace, M.L. 11 Wailer, Walt's Boat Dock's, Warehouse Market, Washington Co. Cable TV Co. , Washington Co. Shelter Inc. , Washington Co. Weatherization, Washington County Auditor, Washington Federal Savings, Waste Management Salvage, Water Music, Wayne L. Stephanson Decorating, Weber, Thomas, Paul Westmoreland, Fred Westrum, Wettelson Construction, White Bear Dodge, Inc. , White Drug Store, Wilcox Nurseries, Wilfer Laboratory, Willow Park Care Facility, Willow Park Corporation, Willow River Inn, Greg Wind, Winona Knitting Mills, Paul A. Wolff, Wolff Distributing Co. , Wood Specialists Inc. , Wright Oil Company, Y.M.C.A Camp St. Croix, Zaczkowski's Blue Belle, Zappa Company, Scott Zeuli and Leo Zolldan. The Hon. John C. Shabaz, District Judge, presided. ORDER IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff Junker Landfill Trust's motion for voluntary dismissal without prejudice of its claims alleged at Counts 1 and 6 of its amended complaint is GRANTED except for those previously considered and pending. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that motion of plaintiff JLT, JLT defendants, LRT and Junker defendants to further consolidate the above two entitled cases so as to constitute a single case is GRANTED except that the movants named in paragraph 1 of the introduction to this order shall proceed as plaintiffs. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that joint motion for stay of these proceedings is GRANTED to all parties named herein who on or before March 21, 1997 become signatories to the proposed consent decree referred to in Case No. 97-C-139-S. 12 411 S IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that motion of United States Postal Service to strike jury demand is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motions of third party defendants Garry Thompson, John Sauers and Sanitary Landfill Site, Inc. are DENIED, said defendants having failed to appear either in person or by attorney to pursue said motions, and the Court specifically denies their request to appear by video or written presentation. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that response to the motion of defendant Independent School District #834 may be served and filed not later than March 17, 1997 without reply from said defendant. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all defendants having failed to appear in this action either in person or by attorney as set forth in the introduction to this order beginning at paragraph 2, page 6, are DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel may serve and file not later than noon March 19, 1997 motions to be considered by the Court prior to trial, amendments to the final pre-trial reports, motions for reconsideration and default as to those defendants who have been dismissed herein where service has been perfected, shall serve and file narrative deposition summaries of no more than five pages for witnesses not available for trial, the depositions, and a copy of each contested exhibit with justification for the receipt thereof by the offeror. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel may serve and file not later than noon March 26, 1997 responses to pending matters, 13 4 . . III 411 responsive narrative deposition summaries of no more than five pages and shall serve and file proposed findings of fact, conclusions of law, form of judgment and trial briefs (optional) . IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a hearing is scheduled for March 28, 1997 commencing at 8:30 A.M. to resolve the issues pursued by the filings referred to herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that trial to the Court is scheduled for March 31, 1997 commencing at 8:30 A.M. Entered this 13th day of March, 1997 . 41 BY THE e .--• <AV JOHN C. rBAZ Distrudge r • • N • • N a • 01 • Ri • C. • •• • • 0 • • • • • a W 0 5 Of U t` in N 0 0 U1 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V. 0 0 10 O 54.4 • V y b 01 0 01 0 OP- N 0 0 0 0 0 0 m O O N O 0 m O O a • -.L A Cr 0 m IO O O co t+1 O O O O O O m O O O O O ry p ♦• �z$y E m CO N O 0 0 m O O 0 0 0 0 0+ 0 0 O0 0 0 O0 0 V • J 3 0) r N 0 N 00 O1 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 V 0 0 n 0 • .. A tD in in in rn 1D r in in in in in in in in in a in in In n 4 0 F 0) C. W 0 N 10 N N N U? V) K O. 0 N fA 0 N N CO N N N K Ea. e0 O 'P N 0, d° • .0 •I q N 0 ♦• h O 0 b • a 4 + • U Z" a . • L 0 `4 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 In O co • O. co O N O O N O O O O O O O O O O N O O 0 O 4. • 0 0 '0 0. N O en 0 0 0 01 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 a Si C 0 CO O CO 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 CP O 0 •• O) m 0 0 0 .A o o O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N o • 5 3 01 N d. n 0 in in co to in n in in n in in in n in in n o in • 0 UT N N N N N N N N N N N N 00 N Vf n N N N N n t •• 0 > X a .0 • LO E N o c • • ti Z N 'r ' aJ • 01 a .-• • .a 0 OP • 0 W : 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 O o 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 m 0 o 0 O 0 N 4., • 4 O 0 0 en o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o n o 0 0 0 .. 0) 0 • .0 a. W 0 0 0, C. 01 0 . '�• y 01 F 0 0 N 0 O 0 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 10 E • Ea 3 0. Si 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 U L 0. 4 .a U T in in in in in in n in in in n in in in in in 0 in in in in ) 4 a 0 a)0 0 N f? M N N N N N N H N N O N N N N N N N N 0 0 N 4. A H • CO 0. 4 0 *I L • 4 a 3 41 N .... C Si C. Q 0.4 14, m b O 10 O. O. to 4.I1 in N M. N 0 e` n 01 Ul P 0 01 N 07 01 • O V 0 10 Ln N 10 N 0 0, O 0 N in in m N 0 N 0 N ID in 47 • .1 • a,e > 111 N 1D O ID 0 N co 0 N 0 0 N O N 0 r1 m 0 0 5. N 0 F 4 • C 0 0 U1 Ln 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4. N 0. • U m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 Uo C 0 ••O `" ` N C w • E. h F • F . 0• 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E.. O • '0 O.0 N m O m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e` 0 CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q 01 01 O 01 0 0 0 a0 0 0 0 0 CO \D O ON N 01 a• • 01 0 os : L 01 m 10 01 1n a In N ON n o N en o N N 01 N CI ..1 Ln 0 sI ♦ E UI U1 O N co N to n U1 co p 0, 0 co p O N co N a0 0\ m a C • 0 .0 U1 N U1 ID CO n UI CO N 01 N N N n N 111 O N 0 4V. 4 b .0 N N N N N N n N N O N N • C N • 0 N W • _ N 0 • H • en • N Cu Z • >1 0 a u • 4 C. • 0 • .0 y o 6 0 • 0 4 CO Z > •4 4 a Z4 W >. t. • CO• 1:6 F 0 • 4 N W a „CO ��,, H 4 N 0. `n 4 4 W • sC. Z • d 1s .a i >>• 4 i E U • U) _ ❑ 01 • Z • 2 2 W W Z 4 N UI 4 W C) W 0) E. Z 0 4 N • ^ • • CO N o O 4 w 0. 4z �" 0 0 us.-. s • c7 q ^O0 0 0 • U t1 O O FJ g • U 8 .- N S 4 'I' O K y 4 2 >+ U F • OL 4 pp ` 4 d 4 O N • \ O Z m W C. r r 41 Z .�R W FF Z .0 F m W 0 x O W Z Z 4 N o z m .�+ W • 0 N ex x W yU) .qg W 0 0 0 0 E+ F N W E. x _ 4. .0 in o N W A. EE-. En E• Z 0 A 'C w tai] .0 o N z C. N Llai F C0 U O w • u m s z > ,� 41 tilZ er z ' a a s u 4 0 p > O • v w o 0 n C0 F W x z F U' m O & 41 v U • E 0 CO U O CO 4 CO- U 2 U1 Za y 3 0 0 0 0 F W 16 a 0 Z 0 4.1 E+ N Z F 0 ❑ .0 U U O CO C/) co41 0 oN U Z 0- - • Z 4 a n 4. m S G e.. 0 m U N 4 ~ N Do 141 fra3 IX 03 N COCCO zw too 4 E0 >. Y N i a N n n n 4 4 4 4 2 4 K •t 6 K O• Z t U i N. 0 N N O 5. 0 d • 1{ o : 0 `.. • to . n a 01 v O a. m O m n N O. 1.0 N 0 4 N CO P•• C. W fY 0 C + OC I � 0 N n N 0 n co 0 m to N n n es N In N b 10 W CZ C. L Se' N N IA O N N N V 1D N N IO N 1D •• N N N N N NY .0 0 N 1 • • N • • 0) • • 0.1 4 10 • 0 • • • •• • 0 • • • �+ s • a 0 • 41 L 0 az, 0 o 0 0 0 O 0 0 O O 0 0 0 O O .4 • N 0 0 T4 • 44 41 0 01 r. 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O O 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 .1 • 0 0 fa. • Z $ U .0 .0 0. 00 01 .-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 10 0 0 C.) •• I N r. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N U) o 0 • = 0 0 • m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4i1 .. N O O • a 40 n CD h in in in n In in in in n 01 in in in in in F CD 1D n in •• 00 441 4 0. w N N N N 4" N N N 4Y w N 4T N 4T N N N 4T N .. N N N N O • y 0 11 4C0 H a . 44 M • • $ • u C11 • 44 0 n 4. 0000000000C 0 0 0 0 • N 4D O O 0 a0 • n 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n n t0 0 0 4. • CO 0 '0 0 a 4n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 •n a r 0 0 ZZ •4 . 0 0 O n F O O 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 O O O O O in F 40 0 0 0 • \ 40 +0 0 in O O 0 0 0 0 O 0 O O 0 0 O 0 0 O CO CO CO 0 0 • 3 0) .4 in • W n n in in in in n in in 01 in n in 4n 4n to .4 • Al Al I. • a O I .N 4T N N VT N N 4T 4T 1? 4t 4} 4T 4T N 4T N N 01 N VT N tif N t 4 V 0 E O C • • CA E 441 • u • 0) • st --4 • a • •• �.. ut o 0 0 4n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 0 0 0 41 ... . .4 0 0 (.1 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 0 0 a E) .-4 • 4 .0 01 0) C) • .0 .J 4) 0000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O O O O 0. 0 0 O O. 10 A • 14 10 +4 0 F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO 0 0 0 Z .0 0 • .0 0. ..1 00200000000000000000 in O O O 0 40 .0 4 3 ..4 4. . V u a • a O 10 in in In n in n n in n n Al Al Al n Al Al Al in n u1 in in in ea m O 4 • 0 4) 4) 1.1 0. V• 4" 4T 4T 4T 4f 4T VT 4" N VT N 4T 4T V) 44 N 1? 44 N N N N VT Cu 10 4-4 ♦ 471 O. a g • O 0) • O . ) • .J 04 • 0) Z • M 01 . W 0 d •• O O1 01 O O OD10 .r n N 1/0 O 4D N D1 O r•1 • n 1D • N N 0 n O m 0 10 40 v • N O 0) .. 0 0 • 4D 0 N Ill • -. in W l4 . • U > O 10 10 .1 O O 01 0 0 0 0 N N 0 4-1 0 .+ 1171 411 4A P4 N O F )4 •• 04) 0 .. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z14 :CO( 1 L.y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 OV C m •a EO . 7 M • 7 F • �. • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 f. 4. • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 n 0 0 0 4. 0L • � N O CO N l0 N • N N • V` O r N0 CO co in N 00 CO O 10 •♦ 4) 1A 40 N 0 r4 N 41 n • n .1 a 10 to 01 40 CD 1n in 0) CO 10 co N Co r N N F O O A. N Al 7 • LA lA 4D N CO • .. m 0) • 7 7 01 1.11 01 • n in 1O N N 41 • 0 01 10 h • O n IA 0 0 0 • •n ti '0 ? r n N n 01 N 01 r. a • C w • O O • N 4. • N O • a Q U • 4y • [a • w• • 0 X 4.g C •• H O 0 i 4.3 to O • C a y� > • • 4 Zd' m te+ • rn w w a • 41• 0 i U 0 d 0. H '- 03 co 9 . U) a, >o a '" 0)• U •• y co 4 0) 1.4 m • _ w •• S 7c QC z v o °b 0 U a z 5 Z 40. 4 y • C.) Dp `���j .NC ZM al m aw o m ao m u ; 4� a «1 0 • w to (a�il.. 4 ,.� to •0 < 0 V D. m C 4 a SO• in m QN wW - c4 CO CO F • >1 0: <X r4 O w 4 _co m 14 K a Z .a7 F • to W a d S w C > s a .m7 4m m I-, • O U U F 0 °i Z W F r7 a. 4-. z o .3e W m tJ a 471 ': ` � w • w to m w .. .. m m to u w w w a t.+ 4 - w z 0 * Gr r r 04. 0. 43 0. R a (.4 a Dl C. m IZ-1 t F a z ca. 43 w 0 U 4. • Z O 0 w o Z 4ti Z y 4. 0 0) .. .r 0 wd 4.. w E V) Z • o a a o 010 u 0 4 0 0 C .4 w 0 a u 404. a DC o V) .r Z CO w 0. a a Z b a •] 4 4 C 4. > .. 0 • 4) . D 0 a 0 F F 0 w 4 •. w F. gZ F w e • a W a0 m 4 N < 14. U a 4: W a • Z a a a 0.E' C R G7 .a O w a T • Z OC S to Z O 0 a O 44 r-4 0 0 0 0 N pa 4. Z E. a l4 •a 4. y4' 04 cg F-. tU� co co ..7 y00� w w as W z 14 aO !a+ N ?a. 4 4 Z toil Z 4 0.ff r a • a If. 4 4 4 4C 4 4 4 02 t0 CO CO CO CO m DI al 01 CO CO 03 Co Z V o • a a 0 3.1 • 40 t N h N N in in O N F O N N 04 0 40 .1 0 01 • IA to 0. w a 0. {Y. 1 N 10 n IA • • CO N F CO 0 F O F in CO 10 • 'n N 141 h 4D w 4. 4 O • 40 47 N • V1 121 in 10 10 P • N in F F in in • 1-4 N r./ N N 0 0 tt • 0 r, • • O, a • W • 0. • • • • •• 0' •• • M • • 41 0 • 0 L 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 O r, 0 01 01re 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 •-• • 14 ll 00000000010 p 0 n 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z • u, 4 . a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0l 0 v m m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • -+� 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o u+ o ,o n 01 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 3 E u 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m .r 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 4 45 nnnnnnnnNnaa „ nnnnnnnnnn [r • 0 4) 0. 41. V) V) V) N N V) V) 4/1. V) N N Vs .4 1/Y 40 V) N N N N V) N N 4. •a U '4 0 'O VT a to 0 m • a • h. • U • .4 • U W • k o 0 O 0 O O 0 O tf1 0 p 07 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 to 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4. • m 0 'O o 0 0 0 O o 0 0 .•t 0 u1 01 N O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ZO a 11 C C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 05 a N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 + CC) N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o d' O n N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 • 3 40 .ti en en 4, r•, r, r, r, in U, .., r, r, n n r, fel N n n 01 n n n • rl 44 '4 N N N N N V) V) V) N V) N N N !? N N 40 V) V. V) V) V) N Cu • •• O R 0 0 N C a to Z N N • .7 01 • 4 .+ .4 .4 • r a 0 U + 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 •ti • .d O 0 O O 0 O O 0 0 O O O 0 m 0 0 0 O O 0 O O O O 0 01v • .CAV 000000000000010000000000 4. R A • Z .) 4. .'. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 ZO 0 co a .3 ,0, ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 to 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .) 0 b 01nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn4I ,nn O .4 • 0 4) •U Cl., V) V) V) N N V) N V7 V) 413 V) N V) N N U) N N N 47 N N N • 14 w -. F .+ C • .0 to .r .0 .. • U) 0. 6 C • O •..1 a• 0) • LI 01 a 0 m • 4 4 Z • 4-4 to • w 0 s4 a 0 0 Cl 01 r, n o ..4 N .0 U, n r, r•, m 01 a V' m .. 10 m o m M 4! 0 N .•e U, e0 10 0 N .. .1 N N b m N N 0 10 0 N 0) U1 N U) 14 14 ♦1 • U > 0 0 .4 0 0 ., 0 0 10 .. V' en p 0 0 .r O N 0 0 0 0 0 O F )r • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O r. 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 1.4 0 • 4) .4 Cu 14 40. + U 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OU C 41 a 0 • 0. H 7 N a h F • F w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E. O * n U , O N n N OD 0 O 0 .i O U, 0 0 0 .-1 CO 0 N 0 0 0 p 4 .e * '0 10 N N N N N N t0 10 0 to 01 N ,0 ,0 t0 r, 0 r, u . la Al •14i * CO Q1 V' N N o n o .40 10 10 .e .-, .-I p N 10 .. n 0 V' U, 10 CO W • E 0, 01 p 0, .e N 0 10 n m m 0 p 01 M to O N 0 O N 0\ n C • 7 .7i n r, r, V' .4 m U, O. n Cr .. p r, 0, .•, p N N 4) • O 0 N .. .4 10 F C7 a G > W a O • to 4. • N O • a- 4.3 a u • 4 a 4 4 • w a• O 0 X a5 • - o a O • .4 Z• > • .. • .-- m F4 • X m • - z o m • X 40 • m x a .-' C 4. a• - .4 4 V a .. a >U • F ... _ E O J 0 a) • m GA ma w • CA _ Z _ to to z a • to m 0 to X O .. >. F. • �.1 W mm .4 K N Z y F y 4q' ♦ 0: x V to m .1 u1 m H m E-' to fY 5 [O EW 4C. 0 - 0 m 0 4 W .4 41 0 C 0 441 ..) 0 • iZ 4. .1 CO .-. m 4 DICO m S m 4 CJ F "1 a z 0 U W 4 .. [-• Z m h at O 41 4 a tZ.1 Z Z X w 44 C7 F 41 .. 0 u1 C 41 41 6. .4 F 001 - m E. .4 a .7 0 .a 4 o 4 01 •• m m a 1$ E -- w m 4 0 E. 0 � 01 .4 0 CO m .. CO -1 a .4 • pq( 41 m • ig z [4n 'y- ty Ua. q1 m Z m CO to .iqt'• m .4 Z o 0.O • 41 C7 0. O. Z w CO R' 4. 4 Z 1 0 41 0 0 4 w F y o to a s x a > .1 z c t4 o tail - CO s °C d > *1 4. a C..) a E z z CI a m i Z 14• COK g m h o V)tn w 04.11 3 F a 01 • Z o o 1 a 41 :. a • y Cl) Zy Sx m F 0 U H CO CO CO 4. T. 1 C., of X m > • 4 Z Z 0: K y F 4 m C7 0 a CO 0; 41 .+ N O O C G 00 m Z .4 Cl. n 5 y m 41 41 41 W 41 .-4 w r .. M M �.4 ON m m m m m m m m m m m m m 0' am m m m m CO m m S w u y. • ,)• F Cl) F u 0 r C • ,0 n 0, r.1 O n N 0 10 r, 1'n CO re 01 10 p 01 0 .r .. .r p n 0.. I0 0. e', • 0: . co co 10 0 If in to .4 If 0 n 0 10 01 N If Uf 0, v1 0, 01 m N til4. V 0 •• 10 10 4, h 111 V' 10 n .4 p .4 N n 10 10 p N N 10 V' U, 40 U, 0: .G 0 CO 0 S 0 . • 0) • 0) • • • • as • .4 is . 0 • • • • [�.i • W • • • 0 • CO L N O 0 CO 01 N m n O .. O O 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 1.1 • 1.1 1. U7 0 0 01 0 in 0 O 0 N 0 0 0 tN 01 N 0 0 0 0 in 0 0 U. • U Q. 40 8^ .0 0. 1- 0000,. ... 0 0 n1 0 0 0 N 04 0 0 0 0 O N O 0 • L M O O f• ry {(1 1[1 N O ON O O O .r Y •s a! r) 0 0 0 a to ri CO 0 vi 0 0 0 0) 0 0 0 0 0 ems•' 0 0 O ill 10 in n a n N 0 In rn vi in 01 n 4o 01 0 In In n m In W In y . U .4 0• w .4 N 00 (? N 01 r/ V) V) N t? V) N rn N 04 Vf N 4/) N N N N per. V) V) N N N • da❑ • y U' rC ••• ♦ • 1-i • •.. • w ♦ M 440044004 N O O n O O O 01 O N O 0 O O O O O O • O. ra N O 0 0 O N .4 0 0 m 0 0 0 ra 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 )4 • 7 0. . . G. • 00 0 '4 0400010 N .40040000040040000000 Z • N CC N O O V O 0 U1 O O O O O O O O 01 O O O O O O O O • I CO 410 01 0 0 .-t 0 ra 0, 00000 O 01 00 0 NO 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 3 01 .1 N in in In n 0, 00 In n 04 n In In 00 In 0 In In in In In In In • O 1. -4 H V) V) N V) 4..). N N 0) N V) V) V) N N H (h V) V) V) V) N N q N V) V) 44.. • U 1.4 M E A • 0 • V0) X H • L • a m • a • .. a . 0 • 0 w + rd 0 C a 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O n 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m L • 4 0 0 40 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o u1 0 0 o m0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H U) 0 • .0 L Q1 0] 0 O O O O O O O In O O 0 a 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 4. 443 .0 • L 40 •.. .. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m 0 0 0 m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z .0 )C . .3 0. .) N O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 n 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n U L O. • a 0 rt nnn nnnnn n1n nn n N n n nnnn .n n . 0 a • 0 )) 1.) 0. N N V) V) N V) V) V) N V) V) V) fl) N N V) V) N N N N V) V) 4+ 40 w • 40 0.. a 0 •.O ...J . 3 . F 0) • w C N • 0 m n ..4 V04 n N n 04 m m 1n 10 to n n N in t� m IP 01 ♦ 0 n o in 1n o 0 n n 40 in n .0 n Cl n 0 o 10 N n GI F .1 • L > m O O n N N .. 01 n 0 0 N 0 N NNN 0 .0 .•i 0 in 0 Cl F O • 0 '.404000 .1000 N O o n 0 .. 0 0 O 0 O o N 4. 4.1 Q. U 10 0 0 0 0 0• 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 0 m .G0. F )+ • 7 F • • o 0 0 0 o 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • o m o 0 0 o In o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m o 0 L o 0 0 n N 0 10 0 0 0 .0 N 00 .0 0 O N N N Ut 0- b 00 A • L W 0 1•• In 01 411 N .•. m 0 .w .i In N .. 0 U1 0 Cl U1 ., to 0 N * 0) E .0 N 0. U1 01 .0 N U1 10 N N 01 0 O t` In N 0 0 In U1 • r 4 0 0 N N 10 n N V1 0 0. In .. N N a .0 01 n ,11 n C) • 0 0 t0 .y .•i141 0. 4 0 .. � .( Ln .. • 04 w • O • • co w • .. z >1 o a U • a • t • L 0 • • • 0 Ca • CO o a o T. o > 4-4 • z Z m • g4g Co a • C:1 CC 4 8 m u m a 0. .0 w . 0 - 03 � F z a [•. U • z * Y U U F > a I E _ 4 o 04 • �h Y -• 40 4 . m $ w CO F'• < - z - O a N pp . W > UOm . • - et CO [l ,]0I m Co Al• F Z 01 m wZ CO CC CO i-1 sCO 4 a > U) w 4:4 > • CO CO a- w .e 0nm • muouw D) 0, a 0 r- .• x CO V) ru aoCO CO o r Y m • = u 0 a asw Nm 0) got . , o a o t- 4- zw m w a ,-4 V) m N i co 3 3$cf, z az m ow 40 0 U V) 0 44 V)CO Z • o zo v •.. a > 1 a (0 4w > L d 0 Y w a a CO 1 H 41 .0 y w w .a w o w >• .344z 0 0 w a CT 0 o z •• 0. :. 8 S 8 F F 4 CO m a m 3 a • a a a a a a a a o a Fd zd �'a °a 0 z z c0 4- CuCO0 01 f0 a1 i0 01 03 01 00 0) 04 W 01 0 V U U U V U U U 0, • . w w o •• C C C 0 4 '� • 4.3m 0) u1 o n u) .. .. 0 .( 4o In U1 r N v 01 .. Q C �• o. n • a • a N 01 0 01 N .r ..1 .0 N O 1/1 N 0 0 01 N a N 441 .. .1 r 03 01 Z 40 at0 . N N 1A N N 01 N 0 U1 U1 N N n N m p n 0 U1 N V7 N a 4 0 • on • a v • 0, a • 0. • • • • • • o • • M • • co o • O1 u 0 0 O h 01 0 0 0 0 0 F 0 0 0 0 C1 0 0 p 0 to .4 0 ,. a M 1. 0 0 0 .O 0, O O O O O m O O O O V' O N V• Om 0. O W • Z a u,-.0 .0 0. o 0 o fV a} 0 0 0 0 o U1 0 o 0 ONCOF 00 04 r1 0 V a /. L E 000 10 N O 0 0 0 0 F 00004, 0 Nis O n V• 0 • •. 4) .c o 00 a 1fl 0 0 0 0 0 w 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 m 0 0. F 0 • 1.7 m n N n .-i V' n n el 1.11 n n r., n n n N n CO 10 r1 CO a rf • 0 O1 0. W 4) CO N N N N N N y N N 4) 4) N 41 N N CO 01 Vj N h 41 CKj a ,0• O 'V 0 N Vl o . • Co C C a �+ * o tc .a . CO1.1 • 14 0 0 0 N V 0 0 0 0 0 m 000000 '0 N O N N 0 0) • a ro 0 0 0 V' V. 0 0 0 0 0 F 00000000000 0 H • 7 4 4. • m O 'O o 0 0 1n m 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 m o N N o n N o Z • 1. C C 0 0 0 .•4 ..0 .. .. 000 0 0e10 00 n 0 10 n 0 0 • t 0 N 0 00001000 000004400000 10 O V+ N 0 0 .-1 0 • 3 0) .-1 n en n CO en r, n en n en 0 n e•, r, n CO n CO a' n CO CO in • .7 14 .••. V/ 41 N N N (/) 0. 41 47 N N 0 V) N 0. 41 N 70 .0 4. F to N • C) W W -14 0. N V' N N t • U 1. .0 Z 41 v1 V) • e0 E O .04 • CO f H a7 • ra 04 • •C 0) • 44 • r• • o N • 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 10 0 N ,n O W 0 v • 4 e-. O y 0000000000000000000 u, 'CO 1"' CO 0) • 0 a, 4i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO 0 F N 0 4. a .0 • Z• U o .. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N 0 ZO .0 • .3 0. 4) 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 40 0 en en O U a., o. a .) U e0 n n n n n en r•, r, n en n en n In en en n m v n 0 N en 0 a • U M U G N N 4! /? 4T 4) N N N N 4Y N N 4) VY V) N .-• P (n 1A .0 (h • N N 0 N [Fi. e01-1 •1- N a ,-.4N N e 4 O Ge • O •el u a U O) • ro i •• C 41 • O N 'U1 O1 C. CO n m F O. CONNF n 00 C, N ,O COm eT V. W W• U • U 0 O 01 h C. Q. n CO F N C. O N 0 h F n 171 N 414 0 V' n .> 0 0 .•. CO n O .-I 0 0 N .•. N N 0 O1 .1 10 .. N O F. N 0 E. .. • C O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 F 0 0 N O. O M 0 • O) N 4. 1. O. • U A O 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 O N 0 0 N ° to o U C m ••aa. F 7 1. • ,7 F • * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1. • o 0 ,r, 0 0 0 h 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 0 m 0 u, N o 0 • '0 0 O CO 0 V' 10 m V' N O 0 'D 10 0. .0 h O of m 0 V' ar 5) . 0.1 Q * L C, .O l0 ••4 N CO U1 .0 N O V' m .O N C. N O COU, COF N 01 E N .0 n F V' F h V N CO h N n 1.11 n N o .O N N o. O. .•l C • 'r7". ..7., a' CO 10 CO N CO n N an P O F n U, 'O m N N N N O ..4 W •• 1 .*. N 111 .. V•011 N N CO 0 N n co 0, N • • CD N IA Ca 0) * a (L. • F-1 1n oo • • a • w HO O G1 • CO Z U J 0 i> a C > a 0 aZ •• A: U a W D. NI 0 Z m E ' o 0 w -) • 43 • a .. o a 'C0 a Z COCFO a sVV 4. O U > E U a .• a, x u W cn - y U U' UP. W CO M of 0. F a .3 exp x �.. (. 4. a O W ° 41 U U U Z E M a - ' E E t" 5 CO H f� a N E •* u v a • a w .. u a .. C a u U U Z S E H S F S U •-. U 0 CO W CO F a W w O W U Al W F U ?+ r. F w Z GK 3. • z y wt. o o u CO CO F V M X C M Cl. ..) 0 n a a i• o V43) «7 a a y Z a m gg 3 til o8 u x 4 mz DJ gr X Ed w °: CO •• INCAw w w a F o co Ea w o o. e4 Z V) W a 4. W u m 0 43 43 xx P m W Z u v) W �1�c X ... .a w F. m z a CO y w W N N P ri o v, a F 0. m t v °• > Z N N 47 Z 0 o o N Z 4 4 ¢ E m o .. V a E Z F W ° w D. ?. 0 O V) ,ti 0 w 4-, ° 4. 43 w 4. 4. 0 ° W a 01 aa Z o W o W a a 4.w v a N o 0 0 0 0 z H a c y * 0. tWii 1•+ 1. CO i [. I. F h F 4) Z .• O4. h •• a 88886vuu11Iuu , u , ,, i, uuuuuu sz u° C. a • COE. u o • .0 ... 40 O V' * a N F a 0 C. b to F .0 h C1 4. 0 w Q 0on •• 0: ' in 171 V' 0 C. N h N N .0 .0 d' h .0 N 0 m n V' 10 W QZ 4. W .-- aT n N N .0 h n 0 .0 CO V' N n 1(1 N n N n N n N N CC < 0 IX • • •to • • 0.) • o1 • C •il. • • • • • ' a o • • .+ • • • ❑ • 0) L 000000000000 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 01 0 n a i U0._ L 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cc 0 0 0 n 0 0 0 N 0 0 N tl1 0 f Z • ' .0 .0 O. O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 O 0 0 Os O 0 0 tf) 0 ONO 0 . O • g U E O O 0 O O O O O N O O 0 1f1 O O O N 0 O 10 ID OW U • 3 91 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 LA 0 O O N 0 O N p 0 10 • .. Y ro P1 r1 en P1 m in est en 0 en PI n p en eel en en en en N en en 01 • O 0) a 40 N N N 4} O. if4 N t/4. eef N N N K (A N N N N N . r. N N qt'• • U k 7 co. N N R • a ul (� IE ❑ a ay� a• i • H • t) • M • y 41 • N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 111 0 0 0 0 0 0 .. 10 0 p 0 • a ro 00000000 (4000 0 0 0 0 0 0 n N 0 p . • 7 a 4. • an O 'O O 0 O O O O O 0 10 0 O 0 .0 0 0 O 0 O 0 N .-1 0 4. Z • H C 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 0 n ID 0 .♦ U + ��piL. 0 0 O0 00 0 o 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 1n 0 0 0 0 0 0 1A 0' 0 1n • J 3 0) ) een en en en en n ren en en en fn .. n r 1 en e1 en en 01 0 en N • .7 N .. 41. N t/} N N 4} 41. 4} N 4} N N N VT N N N N tit N .. OV N [r • 0 El ,141 ..4 N N t a U :7E 1 E 01 a .04/ .. a C t to Z 0> O ... • SJ • al • a • • 0 a o W • o • o C o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m o 0 0 0 o O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ❑ N 4) • 4• 0 O O O o O O O O O r0 O O O 0 O O o O O 0 O O O .. to 63 • .0 L 0) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4. 0 .0 * rJ 4 •.I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z IAO / • .3 a 4 0 o 0 0 0 O 0 0 n O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 O ♦/ a • .3 .0 0 n n n n n n n en .D en en n n n n n en n n n en n e1 a) ❑ 4 • U V 0. 10. H N N N. N 4} 4} N 40 N N N to 01. N N N N N t/) 4} N • eV N .. 4. to M • U) 0. 6Q 4 4 0 • °.l' 4.) 0) • IVO 3 + h. 01 • W 0 7. • 0 .. nr N CO 0 .. m n a m r. v u v t� 1n v N C. en Cr, .. 16 0) t 0 N 10 en .1 N O In p N CO 01 0 1f1 tD N n V N CO 0. 0 M c1 • 4) > .y 0 .. . O r1 .0 N - 0 en N 0 0 en 0 0 .. 0 m 0 F 1+ • C O 0 O 0 O 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 .-1 .. 0 0 0 • 6) .. 2 Off) 0. •COi • v. u o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 0 C •0. F 7 )e a h F • F • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t+. Si t o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1n o 0 o m o 0 0 o m o 0 t '0 +} N b n O O O O 1D p p N n N SO N 10 m CV O. L ♦ N RI ♦ 41 N .. Cet N 0 V p N N 0 p SD N .. I/) 10 n .1 N m e0 0 N a CO E m .. .. .. en 0 p .0 !` Cs UI N N O .. t` 0 m .n n a 0 • ,C .7 .1 111 n N . A p ..1D . I1A n aD O1 N en 1/) .. 0 p p 01 4 0 • m> 0 .Ni .: .: .i vi v; en M • G W • • 0 0 • Co wI.• z • CO U • 4 • • 4 •• 0 ca g •• •cao 0 P. 0 4 CO• a . .. a '4E. •• V _ CO ..) 4) • 0 0 wci, 04 . C CI • M • Z0 ••• N U Q (p V) a O 4 I.. Ol U • NCO V) U 4 41 N 0 U 0 > ❑ O) a Am�tyy i - 4 vl a 0 0 0. 0 U 0 0 1.1 •• .] 4 0 4 D' 4 s.z U _ N U O s 3 . O Z >, CF.. • U a 4) U O 2 8 3 F U X U 005.50 I. La tap F th - 4 i • • ••���' • • F V U V Z W 41 W O 0 F Q tE�pr. U U 7 o Oat a O • cp 4) Z a1 Z N U O U fp m Z H 4) U F • I 186 - E2t065626, - .1 :14,aW0 yy ae aa a• F SZ 6• F 40 F. O tp aaE.4 U 01 .Ce - , X0F4 U U F IC Z .2 4 4�.. 4 F m tZ • 0 0 Fc� U 0 4 .a7 y.. Z• co 0 .] .] N 0. u/ 4 Z Z N N .U�] 5 O -- 0 • 4 4 • N 1 wy h F pp ❑ O CO CO yq q U U 4. 4) > D 4N7 U e� A 4 S y U 4 4) F F O. 4 O F 4 IF-1 1F-e 0 D 47 F Ca a 54 a' m >. 0 4 4 �Itt 41 .. O aC X Z C) a O. > .) • p Z • .4 0 U .7 F U m ❑ ❑ F .0a7 t F to .0O • E co y 44 4i-1 47 r. . D. 0 >• 0. >. >. 0 4) 0 05 • 0 0 O • 5 ❑. ymop Z zz yi 0 g g g g 4 4 a 04 u ap U p U U U U U U U U ppU U U U U 00 SZ U_ N • a q1 • 0 4) • CO 0 0 w 0 a C o W a O �` • ro e .. 1D N en 1/1 .. .. N N .D .. N .0 N 0 .. .. .. 0 0. en • Z . 0 r p ON N US n N 0 in 0 01 01 01 @ N .1 t` en m m m N 4) 1 6. L .. O • V P. 1A n q. .D C n .• N O C .. N en IA N N 10 01 m Q .. 0: 4 0 a • • n a • 4) a Cn m a C. • • •a a 0 a a a t a a a al 0 a 01 u 0 0 0 0 N o 0 r o a m 0 o .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.0 La. a CU a 4 nn m •0 0 0 o o 0 o . o o ,n o 0 0 0 0 0 o m a .�+ a --t 4) C. o 0 o 0 en 0• 0 .1 0 a .. 0 0 .-+ 0 0 0 0 0• 0 0 0 m 5UJ • 1� 0 0 0 0 n 0 O N 0 4O V� 0 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a .-1 a •3 U 0 0 0 0 r 0 0 ,n 0 O. M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 el V • a m n rn ,n n en en en en n ..1 a m en M en rI en n 1+1 n in In en a4 0 0 4t CO N N N N N N N N N N N N N n N N N N N N 4/). N N O N N 'O N 0 a CO 0 b a a • 4 N • •-. t yi w • S. 0 0 O O O• O O o O In N 0 0 In 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a0. m O o 0 0 o 0 0 0 o In o 0 o In 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a a O4• • m O 'O O 0 0 0 N 0 O O O en N O 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a >+ 0 0 0 0 0 0 .e 0 0 0 0 m en 0 0 .I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U a ) m O O O O 0 r O O O O O In 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 5 3 0) ti n m en n O en en en n n en n en .n en en n n en n en en en a a) 4 ._. V) N N N e-e N N N N N N N N .. N N N N N N N N N •t-' a m E a N N U 4 1'1 N z 0 a (n E N L • 0) a .+ • MI a t o a o w u a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 O O O O 0 to 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 O O 01 eel • 4 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 O O O 0 O 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 .+ N N t .0 L 4) O co O O O O O O O O O O O O. O O O O 0 O O O O Z CO • i m •ti O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ln O O O O O O O O 0 0 m r • 1 a' .) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U aa p. a ..a u m en en n n n n en n n en en en n 0 n n n n en n n n en O 4 • U 4 y O. N N N N N N 4n N N N N N N 40 N N N N N N N N N N .•+ 0 a -0 10 .-4 .t 0 a O z 4tY 0 a) a O •.i a) t a u m a 4 m 3 • 4.1 F C 4 a O er •,), 0 a• ea r 4. m w N Ln corn m m 4 N o 40 m Q' In 0 r Z it 4) a o o .. o N 0\ r 0 0 b 0. O. m In r 0. O en C. N r a• Ce eT w 4 U a a) > .10 .-40 .-e0 IN n O rl n 0 0 .+ O N 0 0 0 0 .. N N 04-. 4 • C 0 0 0 0 .. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .. a a 0) W 4 z 41 W • 01 a m.1 O O O O O O O O O O O O O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 UU 0 m a a F a I. • h F • F 4 a O O O O O O O O co O O O O O O 0 0 O O O O O O Uf 0 0 0 0 r 0 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 0. m 0 0 0 0 0 E. 0 a 0 In r l0 N en r N 10 p0 O O ti fo 0 0 m N p 0 0 T a• L • O • U 4) or- coy N m n n N C eT e0 e0 OI 0 r UI en .+ O N O. O E m a' m n 0 eel, n T .. a• O r m a' y n Ln O. Ln m In O. C a 0 en .0 4 a• .. on en Oe v N e0 m a' N r a' O. N a• en 10 n en • 0 • N • H H el r - .-e .-1 .1 a C O y a 0 • • 0 z a m o a a• U a .7 a 4d F a 0 w a 0 CO• O ce a) 0 a to O a 5.• z 4 w > • >• • Zd m F • .4 • w 0 a _ U Z 4 N w a O. u a 1.CO 4 u 0 o z z a o a C) .+ > • x ru > 0 4) • C9 u s a z O. 0 G m CO Z m t a V1 w o O: o fY o w S Y o r+ 5. U G 4 v1 ,q ' y 6 ^. cg Oa • a O U 03 .. X w C. U) C.. a te 3 Z 0 10 IX a ' O.a z C 0 CO o CUA C ] E. 0 7 Z �r0 40 u F .4. a o µg7 U 4 w 6 Z U F zO O - z al q Cza _ •7 a a O a, �a a O Q yF r,i gy tY .yq. cu 1 {�Y Z O V 4 R 4 lig F i(4ri FCA .moi Z a S w 4 Y S a 4 U 41 4) V C.) U z to Ir O. w .07 4 la y z w 0 • 3 3. 4 O U .7 O. z 4 a W CC - 1-1 OC Z a) O 0 a O 4a. w . U ,.. a ; 4 .+ U O. a U w 0 1 a F - .. w F 0 -- z ' 0 E. a 4 4 w CO w 3 00 0 H y h 3 W z a4 > w $ > M U a 1 a. CO C9 X 0 a 4 14 4 0 4 w F O O Z o co la 0 w a Oe a .7 4 • as O O (A > > W U N N 0 N F z F • z F X X YC X 1.4 X X X X X X O. 4. Ir r+ rn w r7 O (A a 4 I r. M on .. 1-1 r. r. 1.. e-e -4 G. 0 a7 F F > F 1Y .a v1 4 4 a, a p pOH aO yO O pOH O O O aO c0� yO aO ,D7 {aY 6 �j ren S4 pw 3 4--+. C. e' • C. U U U U 6 U 6 0 0 0 u V U a U U V U U O 0 0 O z Z U o. •• w w • C K O IL. a • �( , G 0 s C • m 4 N n .+ CO 0 .+ m In a, m Ge o N .+ 40 40 en 0. 0 a .. C. wwp C. 0 X m N N N r en • a 1 O N O U1 In N 01 N 10 O O. m m n 0 0 e0 0 ..I m m n w Z O. U 0 • 4 n 0 10 m U) NN U) .. T U) IA a• n 10 a/ 1.0 Uf CO 44 • • ea • • d 4 01 • r 44 4 a 4 4 4 • • • 0 • •• H • •4 CO • 0 • 10 >. 0 0 0 N a 0 0 0 0 .+ 01 n 0 0 0 r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . + U - )4 A 0 0 0 01 .4 0 0 0 0 n n a 0 0 0 n 0 0 0 r 0 0 0 4. • .0 .0 a 0 0 0 .1 v 0 0 o N m en 01 0 0 0 en 0 0 0 m 0 0 0 �.j • L 0 0 O N '0 0 0 0 0 0 .1 m 0 0 O 01 0 0 0 V 0 0 0 ..4• 41 C 0 0 0 10 .0 0 0 0 01 LA .. 4 0 0 0 .. 0 0 0 r 0 0 0 •• a ro en en en en ini en en en .~ 4 r 01 en 14/ r; VI en en en 0 en en r. F 5 0 H 7 0 N N N N N N N N ..4 0 .i CO N N 4/) 4/) N N N N t? V} N Cuas • e6 O '0 N N r411• • CO 0 N 0 • 4 a 4 U • ..4 • L + 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 r .a P 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 r 0 0 0 0 • 0. a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n a a P 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 CO 0 0 0 4. • m O 'O 0 O O O O O 0 O 01 10 O 0 O 0 0 N O O O r 0 0 0 Z * L 0 C 0 O O O 0 O O O .4 P .4 N 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 b 0 0 0 U +Z ` as, O O O O O O O O O n 04 n 0) O 0 0 01 0 0 0 n 0 0 0 . 3 01 .. n n n 01 01 en r1 In 01 a In m r1 n n r1 en n n m In n In • a0 v .4 N N to OP N 0 4A N /A N N 1D N N N N VI. V> it N N N H A b .. 4F. t U 10E 0 C CCI) Z va• • 4.) • 0 • 4 • M 4 • a t * L v 0• 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d u 4 e4 .+ O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r u1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . • . .. m v • .0 .) a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CL. a m • ! .", m .4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m at o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 it D •♦ . .a w 0000000000 1n 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U al O. • a U e0 Men Men n n enn n n m m en n n n n Men n en en en O .0. • 0 N a~ .1 a H Vi N• 0. N N N N N GA 41) .4 IA N N 0 N (el N 4A N N N N • (01.4 .. .n+ C 4 .0 e0 .+ C . 4 y a a o 14 * 0 • a> O1 • U 10 a 4 m Z • M co . W C /4 • 0 r. 0 N tel to co N 40 P 10 n N a s .410 m r n .t b A Oa t O n P ti N P r a P m 01 4/4 n H N P CO n P 01 a CO 14 s/ > 0 0 0 .. 0 0 P a 40 0 0 0 •0 .. 01 N 00 C F 14 t L n n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .. 0 .. r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • . .0 4. M . • 01 .. • . U Z 41 CO 4. (0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 0 • U 0 e0 • 0. F O 14 • h F • • O o 0 O O O O O O O O o O O o o O O o 0 F la 4. I • a 0 0 o en o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O 40 0 an 4. L • '0 01 0 a 1D n a N o 01 .. 0 0 m 0 a CO 00 m n n m + al 4) m o .1 w 04 m LAN 4n N 03 0 0 a N • N10 '0 0 m 0 >•. 4 0) E r o r C' NONCOF 01 /444054/ 004 CO CO n n .. 41 4 7 7 0-1 N 4. 4. N O N eD N 01 r .. .1 0 0 n .. P N C t .. 0.1 M • 0 •"e •4 P N 10• n N a 44 4 a 47 4 0 • CA • N 4. • CO a0 •• .S a S a 0 a 1 0. •• o CO o a o 4 Z _ a 01 zz• > • CO pp�� yZy Z F [[[Z��� •5 K Q • .. 0 4. W .e 0. C .. ♦ 41• 0 .e w • ... a u Z um tis a o a al U • 0 CO - 0 0) g 11 U 0 Z et a m 4) • U o w Q a VI ~ u 61 x o Z • a •• _ c too vi .u,• m o a a�j o a .. Gal 0 0 • 0 Z 0 0 �[4e SS0 > w - V O U Z .a1 W 0 U F • a A O 4 O Q tWir a>e�� U U 4 a tppOA U aa. a O r • O Y 4 U R Z .7 O m eC S o 0 a F 04 a S •• a{Y 0 • 7� O 00 U O epi a .. f• Z �qt Z 4. O 4.4. 0 O a CZ O - 0 + y Z Z Z G > W X 40. .Q.7 F y G p• y Y. , O 4, aO O 43 of V1 Z • y N 8 F m w Z CO F a " 3 qq C.1 vwi G a a Q 0 r a A. > u 0 5 0) 1 R o n - w td 8'.. ' 1 uJ U 4 m C C O 47 41 C U : x oa 4 Of rn co co a 3 a u u u w z 0.'' • a Z % 4 e 4 ad `� t rt m 43 43 m cu 41 CO m w .. .. .. o o r • a C 0 0 0 0 G 0 0 0 o Ca 0 g CI 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 Q 0 O Z u O1 • 47 41 . a 4 0 ' 0 0. 0 0 0 VI '' A N N .. 50N n 0 .. 0 0 P en ti 44 04 rr a rt 0 01 10 a G. O 0. r1 • a e N N r N N O 0f O O ..4 P V n .1 e0 r r N r O to r .0 47 Z N CC � 0 • 10 10 r N N 1D n b N .. r .1 e0 r V r4 r n r .. P 1D COa .S 0 • • • 01 • • • as a 0. • • • • • •0 • • •• -I a • • w a 0 • W U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i!1 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 in d N 0000000000000 4 O 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 Co • 0 i • • ZZ • . .0 A O. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 U) 0 0 0 0 0 O 8 i +� E . . . . . o000000040000, 000000 3 V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 en 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 • a 1a en n n en r1 en en n n en In en en N en n N n en en en en n a U ri 0 W N N N N VT VT N VT N 4t• V) N N H N N 4 e? N K V> N VT q ♦ e0 0 00 in 0.' •• U r C Q a 43 a a • • .1 • O a .e w a 1a O 0 O O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O O 0 O 0 e0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 + Q. a O O O O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 04 O 0 .-1 0 0 O O O 0 M a. o.. • (0 O 'O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 n 0 0 0 O 0 0 Z • H 0 C 0000000000000 .i 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 o • (0 e0 0 0000000 0 0 O 0 0 0 1D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U • 3 0) .4 n n n en en en en en en en en en en a1 in en en in in en en en en Y .a M .•i N N V• VT N VT VT N V) V) an in N VT VT N n N V) VT VT VT VT VT ta 0 F., A £ • m E O •C a //1) Z V L • CO • •a) •1 ..7 • M • 0 U a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 is 0 0 0 0 0 0 w -.. • .i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 ❑ m u 4-.1 COv • .0 +, a) 0 0 0 0 to 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 n o 0 0 0 0 0 4. A 0 • ! e0 .� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 L a .. 0' U4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 v ., a • a u ro n n en en n n en en en en en en en e• n en n m en en e l en e.; en O Q • 0 411 •-i 0.N VT V) N N N V) N VT V) N N V! N VT VT N V) VT VT N h N .1 N a e0 10 .-e tIV C I a 0. a a 0 •� � • u N • O 45 • e0 2 • !+ N • W tZ^ C 11 i 0 40 4 V N 0, 01 U1 .y N c0 0 i0 ,L, e`er 'i 4••IN CO O 0 0 .i 4 .-e O 0 .y 0 4 .0 01 h 10 N N M N h CO 0 0 Cs) 1. L a . > .-1 0 0 0 0 ti 0 0 n 0 00004- 0 .•1 000 0 F L. • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ... 0 o en o 0 0 0 0 0 6. r+ Q. • v m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z a) a) • r. ., °V c .0 . a H a r. . ') F • 4` • O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O 0 1-a. F. • 0 0 0 co 0 0 0 N 0 0 04 0 0 01 N n0 0 en 0 0 4D. 0 • V 04 4 D• 1D Co e0 4 h eD h 4.4 N in 0i N N N eD 0 .-e IS ♦ L eU 04 .i 0 eT iD N N V1 .y h n en en 04 In 1D .1 4 4 CO 0 ❑ 1.4 • 0) E CO on 0 1D CO .r On ea 0 en 4 CO N n 1D N n ea n h v • 0 0 4 N en 1.11 e0 N 4 0 N 4 N N n en 4 0 • . v + O 0 en N 0 • e0 > .1 C4 a • ❑ • H a U) (y • M zCil U • a • 4rL • F-ti. • a 0 CZ £ g aa Ce) ° a ❑ a a > a • 44 • • a41• • o z 0.ci ❑ • E 0 G. d M .. a. • 4U 4/ , • w y Z 0 E. 0) 0 a - > - C 07 ) w a ° z a v0 o o ° o z > • M EF-. a• G H CZ C4 1 Z 4 0 .-. h - �i w - (0 0 La w Cu [Vail .❑j . E. N • O 44 0 44 O. Z �L 0 IO a o a ° Q ❑ a µ� p g y 0 in 0 _ • 0 0 O F �d F - 0 h TZ-. x W ti)41 .- C i. 4 v F 4 a z N.• N 4. ❑ M M w .. + 0 C a 0 • c t g Y u .ai a 4 F 0 • a «`'0 a ❑ w z w mEa w • >' 0 a. m h nai a w w >• F a Cu a �Z o ❑ • a a ❑ 1 a 1 .wa [a- 0 Z .-. 61108N- a 0 >. a. w ., u .i : g b. a a w o. 01 0 0 z F 0 F • h s s s a 3 a a 0 - Z • 0 W m th .i a s w a a F 4 a 0. > U i Li-,1vi ° �a ° a o w a 0 a e I a' pm . -a Z o w ❑ • a • ., 44 r, COa z 1. eY z F •• z a U w ° i a a p w z �z a °y w a r.4 a T h a o c a $ 8 B 8 8 0 M. 0 o A o Q a A w U) La w g z v° D, a w CO V 44 0 0-. w 4 4 Y 0 • C . (QQ0 • e0 . ..i 0 N 01 0 en 4 N 04 d 0. .4 to V1 N of N N V1 n N LL O. Fa • 0 e N 4 N •N .4 0 Al 0. 40 04 10 h h V7 h 0 .1 04 N n O n In w W V O • N 4 „ 40 h WI 4 .O h n V1 h 4 01 4I1 h in 1.0 4 1n in h 4 44 0 44 • • . O • .4 • . V ) • to • a • • • • • O + • • • N • E ••• 0 4 0) 4.1 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 N 0 01 n O O m O O O O O O O O 41 • v W A {fl O 0 O UI O 0 O .( 40 m O O O 10 04 O O O O 0 0 0 w $ . Z i U . C. N O O O N 000040 UI N O O N a 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 U • • g a E 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 t^ 01 W O 0 c0n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 11.I3 U In 0 0 CO 0 0 0 a 40 N to 0 0 n .o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I I ' ' I I 1 1 1 f 1• .] 10 NnnntDNNrU44Urn4' PrrrnNrr • 0 01 0. w 01 K H v) o) Vi DT 4) ti N N N N N to (A N N (A IA N N N 34 0 4 U 40 O Tt N N N • to CJ CO • t • U • ..4 L t WO .4 r . UI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 10 0 01 0 0 05 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. tiro 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 00 n m W 0 0 N C• 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N . . 0. • m 0 10 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N t" W N 0 0 m a 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 ` N C C 01 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 .f n 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 0 t0 -0 04 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 W CO a O 0 a W 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 • 3 01 .1 4-4 n n n u' n n re) N n 0) 4 n n n n n n n n n n n • .4 14 '4 N N N V) to N to N .. N .4 (4 N N N V) N CO. N N N N N 4 U 14 .0 5 N N N t to • 10 E O • C • CC0 f K u • 4 • to • a • of • O 41C 000030000000000000 '� ` 0 O 0 0 O O O co0000O 0 I+ O b 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ••• f0 4) • a .0 V 01 W O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Cc. DI .0 * 2 L t0 •.( n O 0 0 0 0 O O U1 0 04 000000000000 2 T r • •4 Q, 4J N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 U ., O. • 0 U ro 0I r1 1I ri N N r1 r; r1 u1 N N rl N r; r1 N r1 r1 r; r; r1 O R • 0• 0 14) -4 Cl. � (I) N to N to V) N N N tO N V) V) V) N to (0 to Vl V) Vi IA 4. r0 . * Oro .43 COW O. tr. 0 -.1• L • .) CO • U t0 • 01 Z • + 01 • W C 11 i 0 .4 N O1 0 W N .4 n ..) .4 tN N n .l O, .t n CO .1 01 01 P CO W CO )+ U • f.I 0 N to 0 n 01 01 0 N U1 0 .1 0r N .i m 0 N W CO W .r N 01 N 0 0 H NO .1 O O . 0 0 0 0 Cl F a. • C co o 0 0 0 0 0 n a a O n a N -r 0 '-4045000000000000 t: w a . U 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U C i Oro, O O 14 F I. h F • F 4 ` o 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1n t- JJ • 1:1 N 01 0 N N .a a W 01 N 0 0 W 0 a N 0 a N 0 0 W N k 4 4 4) UI N n o N n N a OD .1 tN 40 .1 N a N N W W W 0 .. N 0 E W N n t` 01 0 n N O r0 0 0 01 m m n U1 tD N r DO in .1 4) •0 • 0 .0 4' a W N CO UI n n 0, .a n .4 N 00 .4 N CO n .4 a .40) • '0 0 O) N 50 .1 0, N .4 .4 0 • a > n W * 0 N • - w • a a 0 i C.., 4 • • rL • •a ' 0 0 CO'' ° g .4 ' a ' to • 0 ° • >• 0 > • . z E.. C.J �d 0) F ' tO F w .j 4 • 0 03 S CO a 0.0. .0 0 g .. .4 u r'. • m a, a a a E. 0 • a 0 Q m Z E. m 0 r2. > Cl0 �E Ei COCl. Q •• y a U u 0 4 Ct. E0 0 2 m > qY °Fi co WE• N EV w E O• a4 o l1i- R po 2 y W W W Fr .1 'C H U U cO •-•4 WX Z0 0 > 0 .. N O W aD • r7 CO a U 1. m• OF w +• W Cal y > u343 X a 0 W co u CO z 2 > w z 1 z a a ° r- -,. . f-'• F• W a 0 o 0 W 0 4 0 0 M 0 w w E. 43 41 E.42 + F 41 U ! Y F t..t CO 2 4 ~ /3 CO a H a E°^ it 2 .3 2 0 - • N ^� to Cu �3 W '" 41 F 0 05 o a 0 . a F - 0. u i 0 rn w w 0. U N • 7 8 0 ` s z 0 m w w 0. 0 a 0. > N • zz E (43 W 2 ti 2 Z U 3 m O. z CO r • [s py 'y 2 W V) H a a O W w 0) • 2 Z resit COt• > m `• 0) Ur co tC t'•+ 04 o • h1 >. >t a 0 0 w Z F -4 • X Y X IA a a m .] > .7 .a W Z 0 0 0 a T • )" u u u u w w w z a 4.4 H w a a ca 4 r ••• 0. t41 tr a a• s cFA W F 4 E 'i tC N W w w S 4. O. 0. CO CO w W W w W W w W w W 0.t rt. w w 4. Cu 0. m 0. 8 z 01 CZ U 01 4' • x o . • 43N O N W UI n n O) .4 01 N N 01 01 0 N m m W N O wl 0. 0 0. n • W r s 00 N 01 a Nm n .D tD 0 W N 01 01 O in ,13N n 0 N W W 2 W 0) o • 44 a n n4, n a In N .4 W .+ W W .4 44 W n n u1 r W a .S 0 C • 0 • .( • • • o, •• to • a. • • . • • • ❑ • • • • M • t • • 1V • 0 • 01 a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N O 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 •r p 0 0 0 - • 14 4 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ON 0 0 re CO 0 0 0 1 G. • Z • V._Z •p 0. 0000004) 00000 ul O 0 0 0 0 V 0 0 4 p 0 0 0 SU.! • L• E 00004) 4) 4) 00 N O 0 0 0 0 111 0 0 10 m 100 ,400 0 • -••e 4) .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 C.- 000000100 %00000 • 3 S U a m M M M M M M en M 0 .n en en M M M ea M en M V. M M M • U 4 a 01 U V) V) V) N N 411V) m N N N N N N .l N N N N N N N tN V) • ey O 'O R' • • 4,1 (0 la0 0 • • r • M • U t • ... 11 W • 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .O 0 0 0 0 0 0 en 0 0 0 t0 0 0 0 ❑ • a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .• 0 0 0 + 7 0. • 4. • m0 •O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 .v 0 0 0 01 o 0 0 Z s 4 c c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 Or- 000 .2% 000 O : g 0 N O 04) 04) 04) 04) 0000000 N O O or- 000 • 3 m .r m m en en m m en en en In en en in en on V. en en en en en en in • a H V) N N V) V) (N In V) N N N 411 411 V) N .1 V) to V) iA V) Vl V) F : • • N • N • • d1 • ro • a • ♦ • • * O • • i 1-4 a t i •W 0 • Oi aJ In N O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 .d 0 N 0 0 0 0 14 i 14 14 0 0 0 0 r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .1 O an O N 0 0 0 0 0. a 0 • v• ,.C .0 0. m O. 0 0 .4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 O N 0 r O 0 0 0 E 0, r 0 0 CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ..4 0 01 O N 0 0 0 0 V • .4 4) .0 01 N 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r O IO O N 0 0 0 0 I ♦ • a 2 10 V r en rf Uf n en n en n en en en en en en N n V' en n en en •F • 0 y1 } W N 01 N N N N to 40 N N N N N 0 to 40 .4 N .1 M N K t? • 0 O 0 N N n : /1) 0 ro • ♦ H • -.1 • aJ 440 :4 m en O 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U1 0 .-1 0 0 0 0 • a d ON 0 0 en O O 0 O O 0 O 0 0 0 0 01 0 10 0 0 0 0 04 • CO 0 10 10 01 0 0 .4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 In 0 0 0 0 Z • 4 0 C N n 0 0 p 0 O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 r O 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 4. z€ 0\' ea 0 N V' 0 0 n 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 • a 2 44 ,-1 n n n n ae en n en en en en en en en en n a1 n . n n n en • a 14 .4 tR 14 m N N N to tR N tR to N to N rn t/n t? N .1 40 N N N • G. • 0 d 0) -.1 to N F. U 4 A X 0 C 4 to X 0. L • 0 4. .1 • a • 40 • 0 Cl) -.a U ` 0 C 0 CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Al • 4 0,4TY) IO 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I"• 01 0) • .0 aJ 4) O r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G. R .0 • Al e0 -.4 O N 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z R 44 f ; Q ) 0 IO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N Ct. • a ti e0 n en en n en en en en n en en en en n n en n en n en n n n n 4 • U 4 Ll a. t? N 40 N N N N 41i4? N N N t!f N N to w4/1 to V! N N N • 10 4 .ti II.. N eti • .0 A 4 m a 4 0 w . 0 .A LI • u m • MZ • • F m • w C H •44 • O 0 m 0 Io In N m In In n .w m a n en to Io Ic .y r m N .H W H U • L 0 O IO 0 0 n CO r CO 01 b 1 N 0 . CO r N .4 0 CO V' U1 01 N IR n UI .4 O W 0 N N 0 0 0 0 0 010107 .4 .-1 N N 0 0 0 0 F H * C o .1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .1 0 .I o 0 0 0 11 0 • 41 .i • • ta. 4 a • U 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 o 0 0 0• o 0 0 0 o 0• 0 0• 0 0 U C m . a 7 4 . F h F • F • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 In 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 •.^5i. 0 •• N IA 0 .4 .a ' N N N N 0 0 0 N U1 V 44 0 IO N r 0 GO 0 CO .61 n 4 • 0�1 r IO 0 01 n .4 CO N CD 0 CO UI 0 N a r .4 0 V' .1 V• .I 0. • 44 0 N r IO r a m .1 O O 01 01 .e ..1 .4 r r 0 0 10 0 V' C • 0 .-0 b 0 44 01 N n CO 01 n .4 en 0) M 0 .1 CO 40 N a .-1 N M 4C • ^� CO • 0 • • N G. a .-I Z w 0 • U • • • 4. • • 0 CO X . 44 4 o 0 •• 44 >. •g o • • U• U . m M • 01 qC W • W 0 - V F 4' W a a .00 0 • U 4 Q a ♦ • O 4 yy a O W 0 C7 0 C C C07 aU"' F > F U 6 ♦ IX CC�� • u 0 x W • 0 a. m a O v • p U W + • w 0 z CO E. 4. {cam.; 0 a .. a m !� u 0 ti l a m a Z a < C i ... • V zn C • 0 V 0 till G U 0 44 L7 IVj-1 a 1.1 j • 0 5 0 3 Z .47 4 0 Z U Co 4 z • d Cl. W 0 U F a • cn F o n I. n `-' a V' 4 w 0 ` w " z o 5 a a o r 4 • 2 2 g x 1 F 4 z .4 z 4 F 01• Co Z CZ m 0x o.i + F CJ .- 0 m m -. a w - m m .t •• U > w o a G. Z F U w Z 4 C0 W Z 0 • m Z a X F m O O > w 0 x x 4 Z q� CO FI > F a a O ♦ pp 'yy O O W Z w1 4 O F C7 w G. W H Ca w S O .r w ~7 S a m C7 a 44 m C 1 J m F UI Z • X o v ' 0 x 0 '' 4 °z � x a 7 a Cl. a o O Gt U O U E 1Vi F Z Z t, Z Oat o F a 10 t U • E is) G: F F V Co 44 G7 44 N p 2 F W O W 44 IT • 2 to COW X X to ZZZZX >~ F .4 H x W 2 F +/ • ..7 W GO to ..I w CO w a to a m G, to a I. • a a m m m a � a 0 O ❑ O W >. w G. Z m 4 4 > r a. • 44 GOt W co .w9 ♦.4 ta4 1a -I 7( x a a .7 W W .. .. O 4 W Z .+ d ♦ UYYJ Q • 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 c8i c8i UQ S § o o 6 6 6 6 6 v 8 8 z �C u • W w 0 • 4) O [�Xu a O o i C a • 10 en N n 0 m .1 o n en IR a In 0 o co T Q en • 44 I O n UI en b N N N UI r 10 0. 0, t/1 N r .1 N 14 INR UI r O w 7. G. 4/ 0 • N r V' 10 .-1 IR en n 0 IO N IO 4 01 N N 01 on m N V• 40 IO 44 i.4 0 0 • • r, • .. • • v • • 01 • 03 • 0 • •• • • 0 • • • N • • W • >. 0 * 01 11 0 r1 a 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 h 0 0 0 0 0 r1 O N O N 5 H U O O 0, N 0 0 N 000000010000000 %1, 0 L. • CJ a) 10 U • '.0 A a O r1 o N 0 0 NI 0 0 0 0 0 0 v 0 0 0 0 0 40 0 CO• 0 • L E O 11) N N O O I!1 O O O O O O N O O O O 0 N O h O •• • 3 ') U 0 40 a IP 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 IV 0 0 0 • a 1E r1 N as 10 401 NI O. 01 In IN (41 rt r1 N n 01 441 PI N UI 1441 N 141 • 0 F • ).1 0 N 00 N 01 N N N N N N w v) N N N N N N U) N N N V) N N U) W • 10 0 'O g • s 40 C., 16 O • • i • N • .a • y W • ). 0 O IN 7 0 0 In 0 0 0 0 0 0 IA 0 0 0 0 0 h 0 0 0 0 • 0 CO 0 04000001000000a000000% 000 N • . L. • W 0 10 004) N 0 0 IA 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO 0 0 0 0 0 MI O O 0 Z s N 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 )0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 • ....„..C.4m 0 0 0 .4 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 • 3 0) .r 01 IN 111 V> In NI N 01 N r1 rt N. e41 01 0) rt 101 N N ON 01 M 4441 • a 11 NI K N .+ N N N N N N N N V? N .•I N V) N N N 01 N V) N 0 • C.) 11 A E N N H • 0 E o c : (4 Z H u • .I • .a F ♦ O W .. • U1 ` O C 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .-1 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 W U • K •eN O 0 o N O o 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 o h v o o O o O ' 0 o O • N a) } .0 a) a! 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 0 0 0 L. a1 .0 • 1 a) as ••4 0 0 h 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 0 0 z0 .0 L $ •3 a 4) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .r 0 0 0 0 0 r1 0 0 0 1 n i M t i i ' , 1U a0. • a U 01 001 .0NNImNNrNrInmNrrNur0n • 04v, N V) N V) N VN ) N V) V ) N N V) N N N N N N 04 * 40• 0 0u • IC 11 r•1 t• .. C • .0 b .-1 L! a N • m 0.. 4 aq C a • ) • O .. u • L 0) • U it 10 3 V N I0 • 1.) C 1+ • 0 .-1 w N u h N 0 m a h N 40 N 10 V1 0 h h 0 0 0 0 N I0 at 4) • 0 0 .. 01 IO 01 IN N m 0 I0 N h 0 O r1 r1 IO 0 N d' 0 10 m W 11 U • U > .•1 NI 40 In 0 0 4.41 0 0 0 01 O O N N N .-I 4•1 441 N N N O C F N • C 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 F1 • a) ..• 4. a) N • • C) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z°U 4.1 0 m • 0. I. 0U • h F •• • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 [.F. 14 • 0 0 0 0 0 IA 0 h V' 0 0 0 Ul 0 co 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 O •• ? V' O V' I0 O p h 400 0 r1 N 10 •0 a0 0' .•I 0 0 N 0, 01 fKX N • 4) aI 01 h V' b b NNh V) 0 0 ,10:. tf ONNO UI 00r1 ? 0 U • W E 00 N U1 U1 N h r1 N a a a NON P O N WON N 0 m • 0 0 in a' 01 I0 v 01 IN d' N 111 r1 VI 0 IO h ar In a Sr N v C • .n .-1 V • '0 0 r/ Is N N4. 0 .. O .4 F 0 • C > N CO • 7 0 • CO • N Z o • C-1 • • zy L. K • • • co o •• o co R > • }N m .F.. N • 0 • • • W N 0. .0 N • 0 • . (1) _ >o 4 E 1 10 • i Z V 0. H 1 N x o ot a v>, t 0 • • C+F1 V) �• W h a C1 W a • 1 ,- O C7 4 S U O YG Z h aS til U F • en • •7• F W VJ v W rWr C O S YS a Fit .7 F a • 4 >1 S 4 [Ni1 V) Cn F SS . 4N Cn ...I w H a o o �d ,�, a z w w o i 4 gi 3 0 iii O a o V3 u • y 6 o W O a Q N W o '7 .. O U zy q S 0. > a) E O 0 to m g z z z li 2 tp Z 1 q W . y Z F S �, • 8 {y Z it. iv, U • Z S W F 0 W L1 W W W 0 1. N 3 N N CO U • i. 1. ON • W W •` • F to F u v • Y 0 • C 0 10 CO a a I.1 IA m 1.1 O1 N 0 h CO CO OI h N a .I If) N Q. 0 a 0 0. r1 • CC I N N N Q 10 01 a o) 0% IO 0 N .r U) 10 CO V7 N 0 I0 U1 P a WN N IA WI KT1 L. 0 0 • e N IO .e4 V• r•1 V' T IA h UI N NI 7 C U1 4 N T 0: 0 C i i a • .1 • 0) • • 01 16 • Cu • • • • • 0 • • • • M • • • 47 • 7. 0 • al L 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 r 0 0 0 0 0 0 1!1 0 0 0 0 N 0 01 CO Cs. 0• u 44 A 0 0 0 C. 0 0 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 .'1 0 0 r Z • .0 a 0 O O r O O O N O O O O O 0 U) 0 0 0 0 r O 10 CO 8 •• v 0 0 0 m 0 0 0 I 000000 N 0 0 0 O N O 4 10 • 3 4 0) U 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 ONON .i • .a A rl ri r1 a ri m rt en r1 ri Al r1 1.i i.i ri 01 Al n 01 tb 01 ! ri • 0 F • m7 4)N N N V) N N H N N v> N N N i). N N N N N .4 N m N N .1 • .0 N O N 0 • 41 0 .4 • • . • M • U • M + u Cs) • N 0 0 0 r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 r 0 .1 0 0 • O. 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r o 0 0 0 10 0 w 0 M1 • 7 O. 4. • Q1 0 'O 0 0 o u1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r1 0 0 0 0 10 0 r1 0 Z • N 0 0 o 0 0 co 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U1 0 0 0 0 N o .1 0 o • \ CO 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .1 0 I 0 C.) • 3 01 .1 m m m m m m m m m al m m m m m m ri m m e m v ri • .a N .-1 N V) VJ V) N V} N N N N N N N N N N N N N 01 N 0 N F i V 4 Z V/ •-• 4. • 16 U• o C • m Z 00 U • 01 • H , .a • x u • o G 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 o O co 0 I o 051 .4 . .i 0 O O O O 0 O O O O O 0 O 0 O O O O O O U1 O U) 0 • Q -.1 01 N 01 111 * t .J 41 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r O a 0 R. N II • g y to •N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 1D 0 .0 0 •• 3 -Q 4 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 O U .� 0. t .] ti CO m en m m m m m m en m m m m m m m m m m m m CO m C) 4 • Q 4 .. 0. V) N N N V) V) N V? O. N N CR N N VT 4/0 VY Lr in V> N N K N F r1 0 • L 16 .ti i+. 10 a CO 0, Q O a1 • 0 -.i L • .1 0 • 1U6 Z • 0 N • 0 C. tf1 Cl N CO 411 N N 0 0 0 UI 01 0 .1 CO U1 m 0 .i 0 m N 16 of t 0 O .i m m .1 .--. .-. 0 0) 01 0 0 0 .D 0 I 10 40 m 01 01 N V' r A F * ..l > .1 O N a 0 0 N IN .-I .--I .4 01 0 .--1 m 0 0 0 .-. N 0 0 N O • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .i O N 0 Cu 4. O. . U 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .-1 0 Z 41 m • N u U 0 MI • 0. F 7 N • 7 F • ▪ • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 F N 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 .i 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 r 0 0 4. 0 • '0 N .D O N m 40 m 01 m N N a N O 4 01 01 N N O U) a ra .0 lJ . d . y� 16 t U a1 N a IN 01 N 1-1 m O. 01 04 0 U1 in O m O N 10 .i a a r 01 0 N • 01 E to V) IN N m r 0 .i CO r N 01 N r 01 N .i U1 01 0 01 m CO Ill • 7 7 U1 .1 .) Co Uf m CO a s V ea U1 m N .I CO a m Al 4)C t .1 t• a .--I 0 • 0 0 N N .i N in •. C 4) • 0 • In 1-i • Cn N •• .] u • Q • v d� •• 0 Cl) F. • CO o J • V) 0 O i >' ❑ > a • w >• 4-1 .4O F • .i • Cs) • 4) Z 0. 0 0 • E a 04 • u CO v > o a i 0, • _ N W E d > ❑ L • O .- [. • ca S S O 5 0 Cl)() DMZ Z o • 4. • • F .y _ D 5 0. Y 6. Q Obi I a° a >" Z cu a CO 0 si a •I E • D m .+ 7 m ❑ ❑ W a • °r c$m� S uqa a a a7 F x a �Zp z > > «, oa as o r I 03 F rt Y E. .1 x w Z 00 2 4. x (U U G] F F S S F [--1 14 F m • a.• p � S ° t .. V) ., •• Z qqqG yy E. O • F `" W 1aa X flu 0 1a• O til S > S 7 O N t7 S S I to 0. W )2 0-I u 1'1 • o. Q a .i a a D O 6 O a �yV S ZF O O E0 O F vl Z , F F �• 3 Z m W 0 h N .S' 'L 5.0 O Z N mm h CC D a c°. > u 0 • a) 4. 1 a CO 444i1l p 0 C) V N O .i < Q F til r U • Z >. 6) GI C 4(�) N F F gS O 4 h 5Z5 0 O tw.,. O. tal .7 F O O 2 F ..7 -S. S • 0. > 3 3 t. J qD Ix a S. >Z• 2 F .a ❑g S 0 F 0 V) U)N fat Z Q a r 40 0. 2 s i Z s S S s S S Z X 8 s° °s = 2 Z �i O 01 • 4) m I • s Cl) o it a • Y O • C O CO 0. 0 • 10 N 1D .1 r m N N OJ COO 01 r O m 0 a U1 N m N o 0. 0. In I a . m In 1D 0) 0. O in m w U1 U1 m a 1l1 01 a .1 V' .'1 CO m .'1 a 43 W V O , I U) N .1 40 r a N m a a P Ui a N 111 1D U) m U) U) .i N D:' 0 a • • In ., • • CO • .6 • 0. • • • • 0 • • • 1.4 • ♦ • Q • CO L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Uf 0 N 10 4 Uf 0 en 0 0 4 r 0 0 0 U L Ise ttS O O 0 O O O .-. 0 0 1p 0 n in .. co 0 N 0 0 r 4 U1 0 z • -.0 . /L o 0 0 0 O o m 0 0 4 0 N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 N U1 0 0 8 ♦ u E o 0 0 0 0 o m o o 11) 0 .•f 4 U1 m o r o 0 01 r 4 0 •R Q•E� u 0 0 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 m O en 0 10 0 0 N O 0 m N UI 0 • AIt en n en en en en M en en en R1 en R en CO en O en 4 h N N e 0H7. w y y y y N. 1 411 y y y y N y y 4 y y y y y ~ n • Of yy • 13 y y y .tey. .0 C CO CIt• • i • .. • U • •.1 • y W 00000111000000 U) 0 0 10 m 0 O 0 • O. m 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 .. 0 N O n 0 0 en u1 .4 0 t 7 44. 4• • CO 0 'O 000000 .4 0 0 0 0 U) M 0 10 0 4 0 0 4 N m O Z • 4 C C O 0 O O 0 0 0 O O O 0 M m O R 0 .H 0 O R 4 R O Q •0 !4 0 O 0 o O 0 0 .. o O o 0 .. o O M O N 0 0 u1 U1 .. 0 • 3 in ti en en en M M en en i.e en en in CO r- in r en N en en U7 01 4 en • .] 1. .1 y y to U). y y y CO. y U! y .+ y y M y y y VA y y M y F • U N .O 2 y y .-. y Ls. • m E 0 G •• tO F CO • L • vl • . • .7 • r • 0 U + 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .+ 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 WO 4) ..4 • .••e O 00 o0 O 0 0 O o0 O M o O i O 0 O O O O M O 0 61 L ` CO 44 • a .0 L d O O O O O O O O O O O N O O b O O O O O O h O Ci. e0 Q • L N •.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 Z b t • -; ,0. ..... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 .. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U L 0. • a u A en en en en en en en en en en en a en M o en en en en en en N en 0 a • 0 4 -y 0. y y y y y y y y y U> y y y y .-0 y y y y y V/ M y y y ell le .M 4et a. ed .. • 0 a en .. R 0 O u • L en • 4 (0 3 • on 0) • w • C S. • O .•0 r N 10 M m n n r N Y1 m r r n 10 m N 030 o o m 'f• it 4) • 0 0 m 1p 1p R R 4 0 0 en M m .•1 N m 0 .. o N r N n O F 4 • L > 0 .. 0 0 0 0 M 0 N M0 h en -4 N 1 .1 N . m 0 0 0 10 G. -• a ` C O O O O O O O O O O N O O 4 O O O O O .. U1 O Z 61 q • U+ L O O O O O O O O O O 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 0 O O .•. O 0 0 m • 0. F°• 7 1. • h F • • 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Lle • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 'p 4 N 4 1p N en 10 0) 4' 0 N a R 4 10 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 L • L 0) 1J 4) 4 4 NNN wen 4 N m 'pin Ut 4 4 .. m 01 O N 0 1O 0 1. • 0) E M in . m 1p N N M 4 10 en m m h as m U1 O en O h M C * 7 7 m M N 4 4 10 R 171 0 10 4 N m h celR 0 0 m a ` C ; .. .. R M .. 01 en N 0 M • .. N W • 0 0 • ♦ Ci) 4. • le z • N 0 • 0 • • _ ` 4 • 0 0 w � og • -• >Q • Cl) p O ea• •U S Z m 4-.. ` CO • i H . zoo 0 • H N K d M Q %.i • m a e.w . a ia ° a o a > It • V6 _ G d• 0 0) O A. U Cz., ix w L yZ • • w u ° a Q.= o a 0 o 0 Ila X a X • w a 0 ; 0 14 ° m u a z ra x a of m a ; w v F • O. a p r • @ m • u ` w u P. u a [7�r x a H ss Z F y� F. ZZe —le � F o'1 GO • z° .°Z. U r ›. N M t°. a " 2 a *. a w ri o U w = CJ Z o 0 a a yy w a a CO w - ° in Z 0 s O Ct co Z 4. co .. u "1 a .z. F p?p o3 rn W D W F Q .. w z • O CO zz a a p o a�• H .7 .] o o °e COW CO Z C44 °a 42 o a d. > L 0 • v m CO V U U U 0 0 0 CO 4. s s 4 Z Z O O a a a F 2 F w t Ce. • E Z Z Z Z Z z Z Z z Z z z z Z Z Z z z Z Z Z Z Z 0 F a •° ••• z• 1111E1E111111E1111E112 2zi8 •00000000000000000000000 CO '>. a r •. pa .. • ` a a 0 i • 0 * Q • 44 N 4 N 0 r 4 n m O 4 e-. 10 U) CO 4 Cr, m .4 N 0. 0 O. • in . 4 M U1 h N 1p O M O .. h .. N N R N N .. N 4 n 4 w Z L.L. O 5 n M U) in 4 4 N r M N h 1p en N M .. r 4 .. R R ) a 4 IX • • 0 • • . 4) • ) • • 40 • a • • • • 0 i • • H • a W • .) 0 • 03 4) 0 0 pl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r1 0 O N N o .-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 H • U 3.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O 0 ••1 0 .•1 0 1p o In O 0 0 0 0 0 W s U - Z • - C A 0.. 0 ONO 0 0 0 m 0 0 5 0 T 1!f n 0 .-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 • E 0 O al 0 0 O O N O 0 .-1 0 N ON .p 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 •.• a) L' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 n eD n O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 3 E U - _ _ _ _ - _ •- • a e4 n n ON n r1 en en a e1 n ON en In 4) e1 • b en en Al 1'1 04 m [r a 0 0) 0. 0.1 N NN N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 4• • e0 0 0 y N N Q ♦ V) f7 e0 • • • H • U . -.1 • ..r W • 1.1 0 0 e 0 0 0 0 In 0 0 n 0 In In 0 0 Ol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • a m 0 0 er 0 0 0 0 e4 0 0 In o 0 0 0 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 1'" • 7 0. 4. $ m 0 '0 0 0 e 0 0 0 0 e 0 0 N 0 e N 0 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z • 34 C C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e O 0 .I 0 e e0 0 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 o * Z 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 •4 In 0 0 e 0 0 0 0 00 • n n CO n n n en con n N en a •• n n 0 en en en n en en • 33 0 ). •• .. U al 4) -1 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 1.4 G N N U. • U 54 E N o C 10 u1 E N ✓ . •• + 3 t a • As . 0 U M 0 C 0 0 Ol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 0 W '^4 • ."4 0 00000000300 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a) v • d .0 ✓ 0 0 0 O. 0 0 0 0 e 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 E. ea A • 1 ✓ CO 0 0 e 0 0 0 0 0. 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 ZZ t • .• 3 0. ) 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1n 0 0 0 0 0 0 U ✓ 0. • a U ea en en o en n en n In en n n n in n n en 01 e• n n n n en n O Q • 0 41 .1.1O. N N 0.3. N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N t ea M .-1 .-1 C • .0 e0 .•1 03 gr H �• n a K 0 d • 0 ++ ✓ • ✓ m • )O m • 0 3 + tm • w C'• C 41 + 0 al n 0 N n U1 co d. .-1 In N n n n N as e N 0 n 40 n T. 40 al • 0 N O 0 0 0 N Ch H 0 n co 0 to .y pl O 04 0 r•1 In n 1p LA 0 W -' L • ✓ '> 0 0 H N 0 0 0 .y 0 0 0 0 e In N O N .•1 0 .• 0 0 0 0 F 41 • C o o H 0 0 o O N o 0 0 o O o O O N O O O O O o4) .• • • .Ca. U 0. . Z 4) 0) • U u O ON 00000000000000000000 0 .0 C • U eCO . 0. F 7 U • h F • � • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E'• 41 + 40 In 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ON n 0 0 0 1l1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 R' 0 • IDN n 40 e .-1 0 40 40 co In co N N 0 co ON a 40 N 0 0 0 40 ✓ • 4) A • ✓ 44 Ol N Ol n H 0 r- Ol 0 In a I. 0 .-e 0 U1 0 Ol 0 e 10 0 01 o M • 40 E n H 0 n ON 0 e 0 N O. N e N 0 r r, 4.41 to l0 0 u) N e 4) • 7 7 H n 04 N .-1 a Ol .) l0 n en n I.- e f •-• n N a C • •n .•. _ '� rt C 1 • �b.�..� > 04 Ol n N N .-I 0 H .1 Z • ✓ W • 0 • CO H 4 C.. • � U • P. • F •• • ocd X g •• cn H 0 a • 0 ; > a •W >• 0)..,*C • 4 m 1F.. • • W Wo • a w w Z 0.C m • Z Z s .4 0. 0 0 FC 0 0 a [a. .a Cu .. in Z o y 0 Z 00) U • fX a +.O CO yD u • 1-4 I-0 �� --- W WU) Z 0) t '• F - AA m h O Z h � dO 7 Y 2 0. H d iFN vi C HC •• WcoU a H 0 h m O C) 0. 4-. S 0 COO • O U h • W 0• F OC 0 S Cu U • F° CO a U O H CO z U 0 C •• aaow a 1-4 ,• 0 h m aW E. 0aUF 0- a O N F MHYy S 70 F 7 h CO .4> O W K O W W O H U) O a F H E. Z .r• o a h a s h < F 0 0 En F hW Z Z 4 W 0 Z CO W h 4344-41Z W C 0. a0G • yS43L... W WCO Ze �� 0.0. CA .4 Z r.gW U 0 cpcp hO 0 Z W > ..1 13 O E.h W4 R 2ZU4 O OC d d d6 a5 - OU 0. W0 0 0 FOH H a y 0 a F 4.1 E to 1 ' () co y W E. RW • O W C en• OC Ni W 41) W COF >.•• Z W H 0. Z Z CO 1C CO > D. >. W m h Z CO Z CO CO mQ WW 0 Z 0.• .• a j ea6CCC W CW C S EE E 0W WO ZO Z S Z Ur a SS . H 7 h h h h h h h h h 7 h •7 h h h h h04 • WW a v) F ....1e • Y o • C • la a 0, N 4p n ON 1l1 .-1 N CO O. 0 N .w 0l e 0 n In up 0. 0 d 0. n • ye I In In e0 b N 40 ON In In N N 50 40 n n n Al H N e e ON WCI. Ip 0 • 40 n 4.13N N 0a 1n r. 40 .•i N .• .-1 N In In e r n 40 In 1n 10 4 0 0 • • h • .+ • • d • • 0) • la 0.. a • a n • • 4 Cu • • • 0 • to N .. O rd 0 0 0 0 O 0 O N 0 n m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I0 0 44 H V 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 h 0 Ir en 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 h Cl. ♦ U 4) A Z • .0 .0 a am 0 \0 0 0 0 o O .+ 0 0 0 eo IA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 40 O • �jp•.- .) E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .-4 0 m 0 CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n O. O • 0 -4 E U .I 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 IA 0 n 0 10 V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .1 01 • J • a e0 en en en en n en en en 0 en m en m .e en en en en m en en 0 40 0 N 0 0. N N N N N N N N 4 N N N N n N N N N N N N .. N N N N N 0 : m 0 m •• • F. • �. V • ..I li w • 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O. .( 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V m 0 • Cl. 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o n 0 0 0 .. en 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m .r a o. Cl. • m 0 '0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IA 0 U1 0 1D N0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N .r ZZ • 1. C 0 o 0 0 0 0 o O 0 h 0 CO 0 UI n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .1 0, V • 1 0 0 0 000000 n Or- UI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O1 0 • 3 m .. en en en en n n n en 0 n N en Io en en en en en en n n h in • 2 1r .4 N N N N N N N N N N N N N In N N N N N N N N N N N 1 4- 5 U I. .0 Z 0 • • Cl) Z (ft L • W • •M • It a • y • O La • U+ • 0 0 0 O 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 m 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O < t. 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N 0 • .0 ♦. N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ZRI 0 • 0 v e0 .^1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 In 0 0 CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O R • -3 0. w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U L a • a -U e0 en en n n n en .1 •r. en •en IO en en U1 en en en en en en • en en en I C 4 • 0 N U 0. N N N N N N N N N N N N N .••I N N N N N N N N N N rlE... e0 .0 • .0 IS ~ C Cl) d 4 C • 0 i • L 4) • U Z • 0 S. • W • 0 .. 0 0 N n .r ID n V1 0 10 n O1 in U) ., en m 0 n a 0 CO N O S n .. In P n N 0 - In . ... IA Ifl ID 0 .I0 .. V m 0 h CO F co 4)E. 4 L > N 0 n 0 N .. 0 0 01 N UI 0 n en 0 .rO 0 NN N .d CO U1 0 • 0 O O O O O O O O O O N O O ID O O O O O O O O O OZ. N t)1 •• N L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C • 0. O e)5 C I. • F h F • F • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 0 In 0 0 0 N V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • '0 V m 0 0 CO n .I m IO m 0 40 N CO N n 0 0 n CO V 01 m 1J *19 • 4) O F. ♦ V 0) Q N CO N N N U1 .•1 IA N T CO 0 40 h m m 1.0 N CO In 01 IO 01 E 10 U1 ID V 10 01 N V CO N CO 01 V N 01 0 V n O en 0 V f0 C • .n r7 N .-I V O 1 N N 0 N h n N U1 IA N UI 0 01 40 NI ID W • •O 0 .. .. .. Q ..e n 01 .-I V' N F0 > .ti N Z • 0 • wCO•• N Z Cl) 0 • > Le • a 4 a F • • o c. Z Cl. • .. .-1 m• o a • u 0 • * S b..• 0 > .a. •- ? Z m E V Z a U)a Cl) u 0 s 8 a s .C. ♦ ae� 4. 4 U S W ce en 0 0 a [O; 0 U CO 0 h > a E • O 7. _ h- Z -. W C1 44 a (X • Y Vaj U m w W co . m 4 ; • 0 a .. • V • a) a a 4/ a a • . a , a0 • a • ., • • • a 0 . CO a) 0 0 x 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '0 0 '+ • U d A 0 0 h 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o w 0 0 0) 0 a . O a -C A a 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ui 0 000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N COMO U . -ti ep 0 0 V' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U1 0 0 N 0 a • .7 3 m n n Is n n n n n en en en n n en en en en n .: n en .0 en q •00 0 0 • W N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N .I N N N N C • e0 O .0 N • • co C7 eCa O • a w i • a dove W •a V 0 • w 0 0 h 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 ..1 0 )e 7 00. 0 0 en 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 en 0 0 V 0 Z • m 0 '0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 en 0 0 N 0 Z • C 0 00 ui 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4/ 0 0 e0 0 0 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 COO • 3 01 4-1 n Ni .-i n n n In an n en en n en en en n en n a in en V' n f U y,1 '� N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N I.A. N N N N N N N O •0 • X N L •a 1 -.+ a a 0 W •.V1 a 0 C 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q L u a e:( 0 0 0 h 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e.e 01 0 a .0 L a) 0 0 w 0 0 0 0 CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W A .0 a L e0 •.i 0 0 Is 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ZO R L • -3 .O. (a 0 0 h 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 U 1J a • a 0 I'D eo n •v) en r• ; en n •en en n n n n n • n n • n n n n n • n n 0 Q • O 4 a-. a N N N N V! N N N N N V/ N N 4/1. N N N N N N N N N hlC a CO 4.4 .-1 • (4 w a 4o 0 • 0 ••• u • J.) 0) • 0 u 0 • e0 3 a H N a W 0 )a a O N fV al N 0 N 0, N N .d Q N •-•) Y O V' N N O 0) en en N N W H v • 4/J O n h 0 w co n h N N h N 0) 0 Ul 0 0 V' 0 0 .4 N V• r) > 0 0 Q N .4 0 0 .ti 0 O O 0 N rl 0 .4 0 .1 O N N N 0 0 F 1y 4 C 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .4 0 0 0 0 •+ 0 a v ow Zy 04/1 •• Ui 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V° C e41 a G 0 7 )+ f e) F a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F H f 0 0 0 04 o • U) V' n Cl 0 1' 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w 0 1.I * '0 0 w 0 •• •• ID en w IA m a n v ea v a 0 N 0 0) ea Cl w 0 • U L V' V' w 0, N N r+ N .1 w Q' 0 h n .. n 0 .-I N 01 01 U) V' a W E U1 1/) n .-I U) e9 p 01 0 V 0 n 01 0 N 01 O h N 01 h n 11) v • 7 7 .e n N N CO .1 n U1 H n N V. 01 N V' N v N 01 1!) LO CO) a .1 • EZ • W . 0 • [L • a1/•1 ° a U • a • e¢ F 4. a• O W ga• .-. Oo 0 • to • O • >• 0 > a • a Z • a W > zd m M• ` • U Z W Da 5 ad. W d 0 • N a mx o -0 o a • • • 0 10 s °m a z x 0• •- ! m Y ww .. H Hg ill ., E. .+ al 4 U Z W Y z H Y X H ^L .Wi d Oq CII ~ a .1 E•F h • aCU 0 .] 0 US c`p� F O Orb C U C F LZi.] U X id, w H z .1 0 > W taa aH s 5)) . 4 a CC X m m jv) Z a 00.. �y a Z o 0 '" c 4 UW w > o i h a Z W Z 0 C U 4 u m m H v, EN U a a U z z 0 4/ 0 °: . • • a .- . • O1 • 10 • Ai • •• • • 0 M • • M • • w • 0 a W y .-1 0 0 u1 0 0 0 0, 0 01 0 0 N N 0 0 0 0 10 0 n O O W ; u U A 4 00 04 0 0 0 171 0 O1 0 0 .n 0 0 0 0 w 4 0 e.1 o o Z • ".0 .0 ! 0. 10 0 0 10 0 0 0 10 0 01 0 0 0 ., 0 0 0 o1 1f1 0 4 0 0 8 • • u 10 O 0 .i 0 0 0 N 0 .1 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 r-1 0 .400 •• S U Al 0 0 in 0 0 0 01 0 1!1 0 0 r• .1 0 0 0 N m 0 100 0 . a 111 N en en U1 n en en N en N at en 4 on en en en m 4 en 4 en en ± 0 LUI 7, w N N N N N N N r•. N .1 N N N N N N N 01 N N 01 N N N N N N • a a .0• cCiee •• U a • u w • 14 4.40040000400 N 0 0 .1 0 0 0 0 N 10 0 0 0 0 0 • 0., 4 en 0 0 01 0 0 0 Ul 0 r O 0 w 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 r 0 0 N • 7 0. • m 0 '0 m 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 O r 00 N O 0 0 O en V1 0 10 0 0 O ; 4 . n C C , 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 4 0 10 0 0 O • f0 0 10 0 O N 0 0 0 10 0 r` 0 0 r 0 0 0 0 ., r 0 en O 0 • 3 W .r 01 en en a' n n oen 'rn f en O+ 1 en en en ON en 4 en en .ie• n en • ..7 4 Ni N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N .1 N N ., N N F • U 1. 0l X N N ta. • a 0 C • 4/• ) f 40 4 •• • .1 • .a ♦ 0 + o u • 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 en 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 0 w 0 0 p ..4, • a. + 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 0 n 0 0 m en DI v • .0 i w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 x 000000000 en 0 0 10 0 0 k. re .0 ♦ i L r0 •.1 O 0 0 0 0 0 O en O O O O O O O 0 0 N 0 0 10 0 0 ZZ .0 0 * _ C3, L+ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 O O O 0 O 0 O 0 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 o - 0 • .a U ep en en en en en en en w en en en en en n en en In at en n en en en Q Q i 0 111 a. N N N N N N 411. N N N N N K N N N N N N 41 N N N • f t .1 C N .~i a .. . .0 0A a 4 O v a• O .., a, • u ar • 4 a x • MI 50 4 W C 4 * O -4 ' m n 01 O N n 4 4 N .1 01 n O. O. w P U1 N O1 4 4 n 0' f0 d ♦ 0 r N O m N 4 NO ON 0. as 4 N ., w 01 .1 N m .1 01 r ..• n CO 44 U 4 .J > 0 .1 0 4 .1 0 0 in ., 0 1.-1 0 4 N r* O O U1 4 0 N N 0 0 F 4 • C eH 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 ., 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .1 0 0 .1 O O 1-, . Cr. 4 CY . U 10 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Y C • d 0 O C .e • 0. F 7 4 • '7 F 4 ..... • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � 4 Oa 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 1n 0 0 0 0 m r 0 0 0 0 0 0 L . 0 N w 0 m N O w 4 N O U1 U1 4 N 4 4 ., w 0 4 N 4 01 r0 • 4.) d 4 n w w w N 0. 4 N N O ., m N ., O1 N r O N 4 N U1 0 4 • 10 E 4 .1 4 4 0 0 O1 O1 0 0 0 4 en w N w .-1 n w 4 w 01 m 0 • r1 .7e 0 m N m N N 4 O1 ,M N n 01 N O1 Ni 4 O1 40, 01 .ti II C • 0 0 in N n - lis .M ., r N U1 0 • m > No Ca a j 0 • M ••-• • CI. • en o • a T •• 4 • U o X ♦ .. .4 0 • o a r > p • •• W 4 m F H • • N • Z W Cal i IfI�{L' S, H Q nr 0 _ F M ♦ _ y a• ,u„ w fa w ea .] E. zU 0 •• e.�C .eC� U1 5 eS '8 1-1 V 2 r41 0 4 'J E • Z X Ca Ad • .7 F. • o f E 8 a . a R o Oo. a 0n a w 04 o w a9 a 0. LO ., a a .• 1. 0 ., D. 09• a Z d m w b CO a w a Ca • F> a 3>• >. 0 vz F. n5 a - a m `3 ao x a • a a F1p w Wcn w v - 041 O. 0 ♦ 5O Cl)C/)a < e, a co S H go W Y 2 yyo F µ a F .7 a V .4 rn .+•: ., 1. F 4 . Ol a aa ** a a4 2 O > 3 W Zw X µl24 E. 01 41 > O 2 X a EHa aZ0Va • Ca F O SH to 4 i • 2 X rA w I. U, . ♦ QpypCC . a ¢QQ a a4 a a) H 43 .0 ais O 33 Z42 4 1 • Cl)E • • 4 e4la w w . 2 Z W Z .1 Z .a p Z 54 2Waen F •p R. 61 •` 8FZ 0 r a 0 Ca • F U1 F .. O • C 5 O W G0. 0 • 40 • 01 as 14 n ., ,-1 en 1n in 4 n r 0% r 0 .d n n a. �1 a 1 n • a 1 4 4 N w N N w m .e n r N m 4 0 0 10 01 m r .1 m N Cal X ra. 01 0 • a n r .+ en w 1•11n n 0% n r(1 ., N en N w w ., 4 m N w a a 0 a ! i 0 • N • • 0) • 4 al • Cu • • • • • 0 • 4• • M • • 4 a • t0 L 0 0 0 P 0 CO 0 0 0 0 O 0 1O 01 0 0 r1 t-. r. N 0 r1 O 4-1 • 1..) U I A 0 O 0 N O 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N 0 0 0 P lO N O N O 01. a . Z • .0 1 0. o 0 0 ,-I o s 1-1000 0 0 0 0 0, 0 0 0• 0 0• r1 0 0 N o U • Y O O O 0 o On O O co O O O co O O O ry ref N 0 o 411 O U0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r1 0 0 0 01 .. N O 0 0 • 4 to r1 r1 I'1 01 01 P I.1 In r1 r1 01 N V P r1 rt P N r1 Cl rt I. 01 • U )4 =W V) V) 1.I). U1 N .r V) N N N V) 0 N N V) V) N N .40 N 01 V) N N N N N O • 4 01 0 0 •4 • 4 a U • •.1 Ca • • 1. 000 N 000000000 N O O 0 O N P 0 01 0 0 •• 0 co o o 0 UI 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 10 0 0 U1 t` N P O N 0 Cl.I-I • o 0 'O o 0 0 P 0 N 0• 0 0 0 0 0 0 P 0 0 01 en N ri 0 en 0 Z • 1. c c 0 0 0 N O 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P 0 0 01 N O .. O N 0 U •• 0 10 0 0 0 O UI 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 .1 r1 0 0 U1 N N 10 0 r1 O I. 3 0) r. N 01 1.1 1O r1 04 0) N r1 r. r•1 01 N N n 01 N N 0 t` 01 10 r1 • .7 M .. N N N P V) .. N V) N V) N N N N 4/) V) V) N .. N N N N • 0 44 4) . V) LA N 4n. N . ro SE3 C • U1 / N LI • I • 0 • .] • 0 4 o W .. in 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 1O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 0 0 0) y • ,Q 0 O O O O P r U1 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 1..1 0) 11) 4 .0 U) 0 0 O O 10 O l0 O O O O O O 0 co 0 O O O O O O U1 O Cl. 10 .0 • L ro •.I 0 0 0 01 0 P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 N 0 .0Z 10 • ' •.. 0. ) o o 0 ID 0 .. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .. 0 U a.1 0. 4 .7 U to N rt N• N N N r.t n r1 I.1 N r1 r1 rn n minor'r1 u1 r1 r.1 N• N e•1 a 4 • U i. U 0, V/ N N ..I N IA V) V. N V) N V) N N N N N 40 N V) N N U) N Cl. m .GI • CO1 a a 0 •0+ u * L./ 01 • U 10 . I 01 S , ee 01 4 w C Z05 L •i 0 01 1O .. 01 N rD CO 1O r1 P m b P 1O P N CO V' 01 N 10 .d 0 01 0 0 N 0 0 0 01 r1 r.1 P N V1 N r- UI 0 N P U1 r 10 01 Wa E I.1 • V > .. 0 0 N 0 r1 0 O N 0 0 N r.1 rl .•1 N P P .•1 0 0. 01 O 0 • C O O O N O N O O O O O O O O O O O N N O O N O 4' 4 a • U to 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 Z 0) 01 • 14 L UU C ICO • 00 . F 7 f•. • 7 F • F M 4 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O 0 01 0 O O O 00 0 0 O • O O1 O P 0 0 01 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 10 Cu 'O .. P O N 0 0 1.1 0 V ID N O .I 0 0 0 P P 0 P 0 0 .•. V 0 • i u 41 .I N N U1 P 0 01 0 0. 1D N 0 01 0 P N P 0 P 0 N 01 01 CO E M 01 UI 01 01 N 0 ID 0.1 0 N .I ID 1.0 N 01 01 10 U1 01 N 0. N .7 c . . 0 0 O. 10 .-I N P 10 .. SO N 10 N CO .. a0 01 01 O1 CO CO P 40) • 1..1 O • 0 0 N H. r .+ .. re .. U1 r1 r1 .. W • O O • co a w z • • > o a U • 4 . • 4 • 0 [±7 C •• CO.. 0 UJ' 0 p • Cl) • O • 4 ,. 2 > •• U) .0 Z ZW o •' • W .F. • • W .a • 0 • E. U O - W D", 0. 0 0 , • g Cl)• g 4 2 S [•. C h1 u • _ cil 01 • C h OH 4. r� O 0-. U OW] - X 0 •2• >. • 2 F a 4 4 F 1W+ ag 14.. W R y F U1 0 4.' a 0 2 .54.7 rV7 a .*.1 d U g Ca g i 1 y Z ❑ 111 U) H 0. 4 M �4C1 _• O +.. 2 W U F • • `7 ZZ 4. Z m I- O o 1. p• pyU7 8Z 0 - .$ i UZ U) 41 po DO 0 ��., a F 0' U a r1'�•CC Sp 0 k. p��,1 U• U S .•7 2 [?qr, I. Z ~ O. R 0 U W LUi7 !. Z .-I a : Y S . O 7. N 2 W g. m v01 (Y tWa7 Z • 41 U a >4 G. W ° 0 ragtag N C t6 W a I .7 C ►I H O 41 W 0 W F U1 Z • 4 2 )-I x Oi U) a 0 O Ca 0 E r<c a 2W UU) 4 to C y > u OU 5 E W U Ca "• 0. h t10 0 X 00.. UWa1 Cl] .W.I 1W. Z ft OO., >W�. a 0 W C 01 *• ro CC (a1 qq� ..3 W (� p 01010. • W 4 CO 2 tY F 1U) fa F W Z F -. a 0.2 2 Q2 oC oS Q I Z YI X V1 U4 U N sad a .] CO�q aq H X aqO SSSt/1 6p1 2 •.. O. • GC, a .] .i S a a .7 l a s E S i i S i i S S i i S i a tZ U al Oa \ •• 0 0 0 1L. P • Y I o •• C • ro •• 1t1 ... O 01 N M .. N 0 P 01 1.0 111 0 t` P 0 0. p�W1 O. O r1 • C I 00' N UI P O N 10 01 P 0 Uf 0 0. mat N P t Nal U7 O .. ` tW` Z. Cl. 01 '.' O • N t` t` N t` 0 P P M 10 r•1 N N .-1 to N .-I P 01 N rf N P C 4 0 C 1 • • .. a N • a d1 a It • w • • • a • o • . a • • . a co O • 01 L 0 0 0 0 O N .0 0 0 .. 0 m 01 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 IO 0 « 0 N 41 0 0 0 0 O n N O 0 m 0 V N 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 10 Z • --.0 . 0. 0 0 0 0 0 ...I00 0 0 r 0 .4 01 0 0 0 0 CO 0 0 0 0 N 8 • ' i1 E 0 0 0 O O rl .1 0 0 r O U1 P1 O 0 0000 000 N « .4.3 .0 0 0 0 0 O m U1 0 0 0 0 r 01 0 0 0 0 U1 0 0 0 0 0 . aRI n in in in in UI r n n 01 n T s in in in n V n in in n 0 • 8 4) G. W . N N IA NN .1 0. N N N N N N IA N N N 4A N N N .•1 a )4 7 N N N 0) a a U) 0 it 1 0 • •• • [Qi i • U • .H W • 10 YI 0 0 0 0 ONONOONOLO 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .. O • O. ro 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 uI 0 is r 00004. 00004) h~. a m O 'O w 0 0 0 0 0 r+ w 0 0 0• o in• N 0 0 o o as o 0 0 o • al ZZ « 44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OI N O 0 10 0 01 01 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 01 U • 0 03O 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 00 0 0 0 .4 0 0 0 0e. � n n n Cl f n 1• O .4 r1 nI.1nnOnnnNnnnn n1. PN • a f. ..I IA N N (o V) N .. CA N N in in N aA N 41) N .. N U) N N N w A4 N H Mu .61 Z q 0 C • 2iZ N • 11 • C11 • ..) a a • 0 o C1 ♦ O 0 0 O O O O N in0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 w •^ • •-• O Oen 0 O o O o O n O O O O O O O O O O .1 O O O O O 0 4�) 4) a `t ..I 4) . L u 4) 0 0 0 0 0 n m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 w IC .0 r.0 • ...I •-. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r 0 0 0 0 0 o .0 L •• g •'. 0 0 0 0 o a U) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .. 0 0 0 0 0 C.) u 0. a a U ro n n n n n In n •In n In n In m m � in n U1 in n n in in O a • 0 4 •.4 a N 4) N V) N IA CA N N N N N .1.A VI 0 N 4A N IA 4A t? N N • ro M -. CF+. ro .C. « •C .r ad 0 m 0. C 0 0 0 •.I L • L 01 • •C t Z • .-1 m • w C 4. ♦ 0 •0 .I m co in el 01 01 .n .0 0 LA n 01 m UI .. r 0 n -I O m in ID 41 • O .-) '••4 0 0 .0 0 N .. 0 O. r e. N 0 N 0 .0 In U1 In N 0 r Cal 1+ N • .1 > - N N H O N UI O N r m p p 0 0 0 0 ./ N 0 0 0 m 0 E" 1. • C co O 0 O O N i 0 0 O O O 0 O O O 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 O 2• 1+ 0. • U it 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0•0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z . 0) •• 4) 0 O 0 41 a n. F 7 1. • •7 F • • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 F• • 0« o o m o 0 0 0 .r0 0 0 0 0 r r 10 . 0 0 0 0 0 i 0 IC L a 0 N 40 r CO N N UI U1 m O p m N 0 .0 0 O 0 Vi l0 a ar O q� 47 4 CD N C) N UI Ul .0 .O 01 p in QP 0 .I Q 01 .-1 r1 U1 0. CO .O 01 .0 m .0 0 1. • Ol E N U1 r 0 m U) to r U/ O N n 0 a' N r-I VI m In 01 n m a 4)• • 7 7 LA in 01 01 N IA N 01 r m 0. 0 m in 0 .1 N O Q >C.) * 0 r n. . N 0 N 01 1... • 43 .. • • j O1 • O • y H w « CO 0 • `a C3 . •• °u 0 •CO a •• a a • CO CO• a a ate. a >> • CO w '" • 'Cy CO F H 3 0 ti q .) .7 CC 3 0 w a Z 0 4.1 « • ., w w 0. C 0 .. X au..w CO o • - O z CO w > 4 ES « U) O CO w m .4 w w4a a a a ,.• ,,a yaa • 0 - i ~ w x wa a m« '' a8f 0 ZZLa t zr4 o m u E.• w o a• a >• 431i •• 4 _ S a ~ g2 o FwM a O C. • _ .1 w a za U) `" wwZ :;t ` •H. gaa . F w ao i .e w > w Fa oCre Z cZ E., CO Ow •a . o Dm ca F 7COa O • > - a F N 1.4 Ce y yyI .+ �:1 y a 4 a w w •. U • 4) co co coO > U O Y 0 COCO #4 IC ,.7 0e F _ H O h z CC E. a. C.. • CO Z a 0 : • O CQ 0 w > N • E - CO I. 4 it X Z a a a a U1 3 a a d .7 ° w K O1 a Z 4) a a o w w w al a O a Z Z F H F a I• 0 0 0 02 a w z in R l • HFA > q CO w U j �Qj O 1 CO C0 i0 Wa a Z w wr. x pm 4.. • 7E i S i i i I S Z F Y l S E S t T E Tr. f 'i Y O z w U a a. • a r • d m \ • v 1� 0 40 °a 0♦ C 5 0 h. • A I .. in m N N UJ in UI m .0 1.0 .4 111 T 01 .0 W in a' V 0. 0. in • a . N .. m .. C. O N 0 04 N • m N in .0 40 a' m U1 0 m in .4 W T. w d y O • .I 1 N n UI 1.0N N N .. n e. .1 r '0 r UI U1 N V) b N .� 2 4 0 2 al 0 N • N • • • b1 • ro a w • • a • • 0 • a • • M a a a Da .4 6. 0 • 0 .... CCC 04/5500 t0 F O 0 Oe 0 0 t0 O .. O O M F N • - 4 4 0 0 N 0 In O O N F O O m O O O O 0 0 Owen Otw • A . . . . . . . . . . . . . •• -LV E 0. R u 0 0 F O 0 1(1 p m OOryOpppF E 0 0 a 0 m 0 0 ,-1 V O 0 N O O US O O O O !1 Os N 0 0 V 0 0 V. 0 0 0 0 05 r .-4 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 til 0 0 N 0 } • . It N N a N F #11 N u1 F N M F N N N en F rf N m F H • 0 V C. w N (n (n N N N N N N N N N 44 44 44 44 N V) N N .. w •• C.) C O 'O N N N • Ci) O ro O • • • • • U • *4 • u OW • 4 0 0 Os O .. r-1 0 .•1M 000500 N O a O O r1 .. tW • a ro 0 0 a O N ON O F WOO t0 O O OT O N O O N N 7 • • • • • W • m 0 'C 0 0 N 0 co IN 0 Os 0 0 0 Os 0 o N o N 0 o to N Z • 4 C C 0 0 a O 0\ N O a /500 m o O N 0 rl O O m 0 O • Z o go O O 0 a O O Ol O N ut 0 O .., O O Ot O m 0 0 t0 N • C e0 .-1 en r.l N t1 t0 N ..l t0 N N N ... rl N rl rl ul rl N t0 IN • a 4 .•1 N N K 44 N V} (4 m Vt V' H N N N N V! N 4). N N .1 • 0 0 V •.•tV. N N F-.4. •• U to E X a Q C • a to Z N L a W a .+ • a a 0 .T+ ♦ O w "r •• 0 0 0 0 O 0 O O 0 LnO O O Ol 0 0 0 O 0 0 O O ena a) L • 4 •.1 al o-. C C • .0 ♦.1 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 a COON 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o F Z 03 0 • • Z ..J 4 •. 0 0 0 O O O 0 to O O O rl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O F 0 ro C •• 3 .0' 4) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F COON 00000000 to U J1 a • a u .0 r, r1 r1 rl r1 r1 N e7 r1 rl rl 1!1 rf rl N r, al rl en en rn 1 Cf▪ 4 • 0 4 ♦4 0. A N N (4 K N N .N-1 N (0 e? V/ N N N N N 40 (A N N • it /4 .+ y tt C • • V) 4. ¢ • O C a G .ti 4) • aJ C • CC 3 • '[Zr C 4 • O ."r .1 ul ul NCS F F F Ot O N F NNN ON u1 N CO O CO •F 40 Ill • 0 t0 IA CO N m 1•1m .N++ III Ot N F u1 CO 0t 0 r.. N I4N 0 a m w 4 L • y10, O 0 rl .. #0 a 0 0 N t0 0 0 N .. .. a 0 t0 N .4 F a O F 1. • C 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 a 0 a COON 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O w 4 a • U MI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u1 o u1 0 0 0• 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z C CO • 4 a/ Orp a C . O •• �. U0. F. 7 4 • h F • • 0 0 O 0 o O 0 to 0 u1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 • 0 ul 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O ; rl m t0 N m a m 0 0 0 m ON .. m N COa .1 m t0 .•1 0 0 O VI s4 a J.) m O. N F• a s OI a O a N WOO .. .. a F VIm 05rt m 01 E CO rt O m ON N O m F .•. O rl F IA O m VI .. ul t0 t0 0 ul a C • n• .7.1 N N CO VI 4 0 a N N 0 ON en N .r0, a 0 .. 0 0 a VI O. 4 L • 'O 0 .•1 r1 N a a N .. N N .•r en t0 t•'t 0 • RI > ut ul .. • 'aC N N til • O • .... 40 U) • U) 4 a ]. a o • 4 • 4. •• 0 CO F O. • H 0 0 cti • U o p Q •• ��Q77++ m r • CO • •• ..)) F - > - Z . O 0 ••• 0 a Fw. .a. C wwg a °' '4 Z •• F U) Z a a F. .. . °u V CO w 4 s 8 1-1 ro O > 4 0 E Ei CC Z w F 2� u 17 V .dC • U E w 0 rte+ cW O 34 U)E. C FO, 0 tw/1 F 0.' • l.. OC 44 EQ. O t a. 0. Z . pZ CO SS(X a C . h Q C.)i .Ci i • S [ywr > 1-. oWF �}�. �J S 3 Y OS a C a ?� O F a to CO COCo CO € a I. T. o Z cw 7t 5 -- - .0 °' a ° a • U • o F O F 4 x X to Z 4 m w .. s 4 O, F O a h U to 3 N Ga' O m F a z • CO CO U " CA •+ Z 4 •• A. 4 4 0 co E F to O O fY Cal w F z • • oO Z Cal * a 1. `� ' 0 • r-. O) O E w F F �-1 .. 03Z Y X = q O [U, tX E E 0 4. F C) i FCC D mCS 7 Z CO ar w a i a 4YX O tY Or • 6 > F Z Cl. w a 4 IOW 4 w a X a. a Z w > u wIX ya0 oo •• d CON E. Emgon. O w w f • Z zS 4zF -4• umtoa4U) X ZF 4) .1 1.r = E a W 3y •• UF' wF. F 40• A. UOYas .3ZZ nn CO 4O3 .. 0. a a F O. E E Z Z Z E E Z i ppipY i III O z t y on . 4.3 a ' o •• C cFwwc CO F p • ro m rl to N t0 N O N 0 F 7 F N m Os os co .. II. G. rf • C 5 b O Os O N F CO a N m Os N a F t0 rl t0 VI e1 to w Z w 01 ,.. 0 • N t0 .. a .. .4 a VI .. m N a rl V' rr t0 .. N a .4 F a 44 0 a • • M • N • v • 0) t • 10 • a • • • • • O ♦ a • [^��4 * • • • s y, o • in L N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 N .-1 N 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 H •• U yd N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e-1 0 0 0 M M 0 10 N 0 0 0 W • . Z • .0 0 a h 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 O1 .4 0) 1 0 0 O • -L CO 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 M 0 U! 4) 0 0 0 0 0 0 U • 1. •) E .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N - /0 N O N 0 0 0 0 • 3• a 16 N n M 0.1 n fel e+1 n n en n N P1 0 � 0 N 01 U1 0 n n n • 0 N O. CO 10 N N N 0. N 0 4/ N 4) N .-1 N N .1 .-1 p V! h 111 4) N N E * U 14 7 i*• l6 O 'OmCO N N N N N N N 0 4 • . -.J • W • 10 111 0 O 0 O O 0 O O 0 0 .4 O O 4 p CO 0 01 CO O O 0 0 • O. 06 0000000000 0001001 M N N O N O O O O 1•+ + 0+. • 0 0 'O 0 O 0 O O O O O O O O p 0 M O N N O 01 M O 0 0 Z • 1e C C 0) O O O O 0 O O 0 0 0 CO 0 01 p 01 N O N 4 0 O O 0 • 0 e6 0 N O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 M O h 1a N N O U e-1 0 0 0 t 3 10 0 0] M M M M M M M M M M 01 M U) m CO 40 M e0 0) M M M • .0 d AN .-+ d.4// N N 0 4) 4) V) 0 0 4/3- N t? 4) N N V) M N U) 4' 4) N 4) W * U O Z v) h v) :C N E N 111 E Q a.1 • a .� * a • .. • 0 U . 0 c M 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 o U1 o M M 0 0 0 011 v N • 44-4• 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 o 00o 0 0 0 •1-1 M N • .0 V v 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 O N .-1 0 0 0 3. m .0 • UI L m --1 h o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0) 0 .. o 0 0 0 O .0 L * -3 a N .y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 M 0 0 0 U L 0. . a U 10 n In n e� n n en n en n In n e••1 n en n 01 eel 1c N 1.1 n1 In 0ceen 4 • 0 lei -y Cl. I, N 4) 4/1. 4) N 0. 4) 4) N N N N V) N 4/) 4) 4) e-1 .-1 4) N 4) t 10 I1 ^-f V) N E .e 0 • 4-4 0).. f6 1-1 t 30 0. Yt QCT 0 a) • 0 . a) * L N • 16 6 • 3 • F 6 0) i w C M YRI 0 . W N .•1 01 1A .H .N O F CO N 01 .-1 CO ON of N F . 4' O 1!1 61 . 0 h O M Ul U) ITT O N N M tr,0 41 10 10 N Ire N Uf .-1 0 N M CO F 1-1 * 0 ? p 0 0 .-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 01 ON 4i N 1O .1 0 0 0 M 0 t C 0 O O O O O O O O O 4•1 O O O O p 0 1O Uf O O O IL u 0.. . u 61 e6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U C e6 * dei O 0 H • F h F • F •,* • 00• 0 0 0 o O 0 0 0 0 o O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 E O t ct p 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 01 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 •0). 0 0 01 F 10 p p N N p M p 10 0 0 0 01 4 10 0 10 N 10 L . II G 4 * N 0) CO h p N M CO 4f 0 U) .r 01 0 0 N N o Ul b 0 CO p 4.1 p 01 0 01 ON M Cr N h 10 M n M 4 .pN .1 P 10 J C * )D 7 7 .- 4 h M COea 1O 01 N U1 0 4 O e 01 N ..1 •n .- 4 4) v n p T 01 -1. i n 7.. 0 • T > N .1 M N 4.i C W • 0 • N • 41 k. • r-e Z • en o • a. U • a • 4 Y Ti Y Li i( • E t 0 W 4 *to cK 0•• a 0 • o 60 a *a t 4 • •4 W )'• M • .... CO IE-e • i g - W0.w • w • o o . Nm u. . Z Z F U •• W .F-1 U• O 0 a a f+07 u OG «a 4) 0 2 Z F F 2 F Z Y 0 z >. • w m t • • W LA W 5 co 2 w O 1. Z 30 E rn 4) v1 I-0 CO Q • * -4 - 0 Z a OOC23z .o. 0 0 F F rpUI .-. K {Wp W W Q U F ••• Wi t0» qUq O Z Z Z Z3 .WW7 2 O z eyyF.1 C Z Rte' O Z cr4 .4U 0 D' .a.7 0 04F H * y Z a W U 41 h Z y A 4 O 4. ~ F z a y �j H Z al • Z CO 4lb4 o �. D • R • cau pa a y pN p E F w w u v1 Ui .y F 2 W ° - x 2 U! `. ' y ..1 0 U 4 .. �j Z Z 4 N F 2 0 O E It.63 F v) ♦ W y g Z 0) m Q• RIO N co O 0 4 D UI ..0 T a r- 0 0 0 0 W c0. > L o91 .3Fa pg� z Z yZ tJz� z z tZ� U 1.1 F K U co Z COi 0, 00 F a .moi •• a �j N ��e C 4 IC O pap11�� oa7 W WW7 W WZ 0 WW0 H O O O O O W 0 �. O a. Y 2 5 z Z z 2 z 2 2 2 Z Z Z z Z z 2 Z 2 Z z Z O z 5 U 4 • 'Y 1 Z C F U • 0 1 a • (0 4 0 U1 .r 4 1O 4 (0 .4 CO 0 10 CO N O 4-4 N Ul 10 a W G. M • a 1 4 4 0 0 N N .-4 /0 m 10 01 0 N N O -f O N 0 h N N M W D. el) 0 • N h 10 M N 0) M N 10 10 M .1 1.0 N .) .y M N N N 0 F 0 0 q 0 0 • f • N • • 01 • 10 0. • • •• • O • • • •• E •• >. M ` 4 4.) 00 0 en 0 O n 0 0 0t 0 0) 0 0 h O N 0 O O O O Iy 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 en o O 0 o m co O 0 0 m Z • u .C .0 0. o 0 .-1 0 0 ref 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 r p re 0 0 0 0 r 8 • a� 0 0 .-1 O O IA 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 en r m 0 0 0 0 N + 3 X U O O 0 0 .-e 0 0 ON 0 h O co No so 0 0 o 0 t0 *▪ .. U d W coen 0 en en C en en 4. n co n n ON m h n RI en n In t • U 4) = N N N N N N N N p N N N N n N N N N N ep N N O r in 0 43 C7 ro • •• • !e M Cl {F+ • M • u W . I. O O t0 0 O n 0 O N O U) 0 0 N eO m 0 0 0 0 m O • 0. ro 0 0 N 0 0 e-1 0 0 N O h 0 0 r r 0 0 0 0 0 .4 M ♦ a a. . . • u., • CO 0 b0 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 w 0 0 0 o r m CO 0 0 0 0 r Z5 H0 C 0 0 .4 0 O n 0 0 a ON 0 0 .ti r 0 0 0 0 0 h Ot \ ft; O 0 O 40 O 0 N 00 ,400, 0 0 40 N n 0 0 0 0 en • 3 04 re n en 0 en en n en n NO en r n n r e0 a n rn n en V + a Y1 re N N In N N N N N N N n VT N N N N N N N N (4 F •• 0 0) ,pc 4)) +) N co N Co • U A E Z C • • CO X H u • n7 CO • •.O • a • ree + O u • 0 C 0 0 In 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e.0 0 0 0 0 x 0 0 0 0 0 40 as u • 4• •. 0 o o r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m o 0 0 0 UI 0 0 0 0 0 m w . .0 a) 4) 0 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ri 0 0 0 0 CO 0 0 0 0 0 1+. ro .0 • +.I ro •.+ o o r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e. 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 Z 7 .0 • g Q. .1 o o r+ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 0"0, 0 0 0. 0 0 U .1 a • a U ro nn04 nn nnnno nnnen N ,nenen nn 10 4 • 0 N •e 0. N N N N N N N N N N re N N N N N N co- N N N t N .. 0 • .0 .o .-+ (4 ., , en 0. 4 • O Oe u •. • ♦.) of • 4.4• W 3 • • w ... C i+ .ele 0 .O uW 0 a tD tD e-I (0 w r a0 .+ r r N re en er eV o N IO m W 0) • y 0 !n s0 0 0 re O 0 to n N en 0 co 0 N en 0 0 r D. en De co O F 1•. . 0 > O O r'en roi 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 T 0 0 0 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 M • N N Ce. I. p. • u ro o 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 U C 01 t a E h 4- •• 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O o 0 0 0 o O o o O o 0 E. • 00000000000040000404' 0 0 0 N o O • '0 4.0400 )04' Q O N 10 e 1 O r 04)404.04-4 N T a O n O •/ • ., 0 0 a07 d tO h m 0s e0 •• u) 0e T 0 O cor t0 Nr O O N n N n ry t E t0 O O N N UI CO 0 n N an n n r0 0s 'JON 0e UI YI Os C • 0 0 N en ON Ve C en t0 re NN O r/ CO N ve 0 CO re P N • • r�•1 .�•1 N e. .-e 0-1 n O n en co N N re [r t 0C • CO , 0 • .. Cl) fs. • •-•, z • � U • a• • • m • t •• • co o• ° ca a o • o E •• U) 0, 2 ' F ` ¢ W a + °z_ z • W ` CO .4 a c • d O • w U .. , e. X 0 SD 47 • o a o x Y p q 0 0 E ♦ co• j O O: !Y 7X DC CO V C.7W ..7 0.eC Y re tooy Cl) Z in >. t 5 7°. S X H W W y'� O O W O .4- en:7 P. F N • _ 77 g 41• oH m O • •• A 3 y y Z COC OZ Z ,� O �.1 W K [vr� q .7 U) Q U F • O OC 0 W W O 04 aC C [Zi] eq tFn Z F U a .�'7 O r w + 04 p0 O. F F Z a e-. Z Cel 07 cn y •• U) U) F W .FC [Wal Z O 0. F rFX .~7 O O N N O 5 4 0 E. y W .Z•e m Z a X F OU Z • > > e. 0E. o4e O a 4 w coZo u W • C G CO4yy» F 4- E. 4. Z U ,G 4 J � �• Q cx� yY pY� CWS F V sC F P. C>i� r U • ss401 y:ouzo W YSW 3 M C� C,Z7 W W a .W3 .¢ 6 .0 O m vl Z N K CI •• Z F F H Z Z E. F F E- X LLP IX 0 O C O C tL W K Z W 0 CO b 4 T Y AY a D: o: U) a CC U U Z X X Y X Y W W W X .+ W `+ a ° O O 0 0 0 0 + 4 4 4 4 4 a a a 8 O r • w X X X Z 2 Z Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° z V 0t • LOU) °' 5 a• C 0 4.. 0 • ,. n Ow•,. so In m h N N N In N In T n n N r {n to n a. 0 6. O. • 40 , 01 In N O t0 so n t0 m en en Nen me). .i a W t0 W W d 0 • 01 co en N r N N W e. r N r e0 N .4 n n n VD 40 r1 a 0 C • • • In a N a • O a a 01 • a • • • • a • • a a • a In i , ❑ • W u 0 0 0 0 0 .a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w •U d m 0 0 0 0 0 ,1 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z • .0 . 0. 0 0 0 0 0 CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • ++ b 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • +e 0) .0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • a 170 e1 en n in n h en in en 01 n n en n n n r en in rn en en n F a• 0 4)1. 7 w K y y y N N N N N V) 4/1- N N N IA V/ N N N N N eh N K , m 0 'O 0 • • • • 1-1 y 0 e41 4 • • .1 a .. a y ' In • I.1 0 0 0 0 O .1 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ❑ • 7 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w a000 000001000000000000000000 ZZ •a f-. 0 C o 0 0 0 0 h 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O • ` m 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 3 rn .~i n n n n n in in in rn r; rn .n en en in r; rn in r; en in r; r; • a 11 . N N N N N N to to N N N N VJ N N N N N N N N W N •• 0 U O Z ♦ m ❑ C 44 f H • u • W • • rL M a .+ a a a. • a 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O 0 Cr O . 44❑ 4 a• 4 .0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 o 0 7 7 7 • .0 N tU O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Z .0 •0 • '�y m ..• 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 r. • .�27• 3 0. 4) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C1 as 0. • a 0 m en 01 r; 01 en m en en e^ r; en en Men en rn en 01 en r; 01 en 01 ri 4a0 •• 0 4)u 14 4) O. Vi N N N N to N N N VY 4) N N Vs N N N N N N N N K • 0 a a y a 4 O 4) as 0 -.1 u • I-1 01 • as 3 • Fm • w 2 IC0 F. • O H O O n N ea In N N h D. N o. VN Y .f ' O O 1 h .0 tel N N • 0 n .1 10 h 0 n h h to N n .1 .0 Cl CD In 0 10 03 to N N n 44 iw y a U > 0 0 0 O 0 .0 O O N 0 Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .-e 0 0 0 0 E N • C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4. • M 0 • 6) .-403 . 2 m • 4) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 UU C 0Cp a 0.. F • 7 i. • h E • � ♦ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1. * 0 0 0 n 0 0 h 0 to 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m a I ± '0 o. N of N na n O h M CO h 0. N MtD .4 n .D 0 a a C. ["Lh m u 4) n a 0 1D rl COf .4 O. N 1(f .D o O. {n CO n .D COh 0 0 a 0 44 s+ 1 01 E a of 0, a h a n O .1 4400 O. h a N COo n .0 o to • 7 7 .-e n O. e' N 1 n N M 0 N n N N a h N .-1 .-1 C4) a 71 O i• 4 >0 Cl .-. .1 • 0 GO • ' ❑ • 4. • M z >1 ' 0 r U • • a4 • to 4 a • • 0 w F a g Q a O a 4' • ❑ a >>. ❑ > • a ...3 Z • m Fr. a 14 a U 0 0 Z D4. C CI a .7 _ _ a . .r ' 4. t • U • 00 �] a O a of • ss (� y - - r0 _ Z 1 X O •• >. • Fa, O d a v71 •••• �Z~yj tai) F N W� a w 1-1 CO N ❑ •• 1 q 0 a 0 v1 .>a ww U 4 a. O. Z ..] 7 w ❑ U F a a °a 2 C7 u! Vi r� CO F H �+ 0 4. w O F a T• p 4 • C? O Z r44 V1 .3 a ❑ Z 0 a W O F WWW. a.. a. ,a] F 0 s 4Csi • a 0 0Q 0 O d w 7) w 1-• 4 0 w Y F 0 E. 4 0. a 0 .7 Z . .E' of pg 0. Z In C7 u 4g w z Z w H Z o a W o >e m = a a a w co0 ~ 5 0 ` O 44. w ON U ., [ (�K( _ 4. a 4z7 pq� . a 0 N W Z Cry • J 0 4. M 0 C7 h 4e E. 1n U aa 41 • • Z •F. w7 4 4 a a a 0 us a 0 0 0 U .Z-1 W N N Z EA F a PI • Z toqy vot�l h 000 pp17 .a-1 Id Cd .• 4 w ax U �.. w w ❑ a a a 44 .4 Ia a . a 2 2 F. a C w. 4 4 rEC . 4 4 4 4 42 w nl 444 LI pw 4z 0 h a 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . . . . . O. . . . O. . . . O. 0. 8 : U o. • w w • C E al 2 4 a •• C 4 C O • • m N n n 0 n O n 0 t0 0. . 10 .0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 h N a h 0. 0 0. n • a . W N 10 N 10 a N N U1 1 0 T 0 m 0 1 1 O O. N 10 0) t0 O. h a CO 4Z Cl. 4) , n N h N N . 0 • 10 h 1In N b N 1 10 N 0 II 1n h N a n N .0 .0 a 0 a i • Ulf • N • • 0 01 • fa • a • •r ♦ O a a a M • E ♦ Q e-. a 0 V 000000 V' 0 h 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 O m 0 0 0 0 Zaa U y A O 01 O O O O at O N O O O O 1[7 O O ut O n O b O O 8 --s A. 0 m 0 0 0 0 m 0 V. 0• 0 0 0 of 0 0 .+ 0 N 0 0 0 0 • g- . ONO 0 CONON 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 • 1 0 a 0 0 0 0 Cl 0 a0 0 0 0 V/ 0 0 N 0 N 0 0 0 0 • ..1 10 en n in en en n ui en VI in in en en Cl in n a rn v in en in en 5 0 V O. W N co to t? V) VT W VT N N VT VT (? K N V) t? V) t? 0. V) N N N O a 44 U C a a • aU a M (4 a 4 O 0 O 0 0 O V' 0 en 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 .4 0 .O 0 0 0 0 0 • 7 a 00000000 n o 0 0 o N 0 0 01 0 01 0 0 0 0 • , A. • 0 0 '0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0e 0 .. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O h 0 0 0 0 0 • N C C O O O 0 O co O 0 O. O 0 O O n 0 0 V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 UOa t. 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V 0 Vl 0 0 0 0 d 0 0 N 0 N 0 0 0 0 • 3 Q) .4 n n en in in n a In 0 in n in en h en en en en in n en en n a .7 4 .. t? t? N N t? Vr N NN VI. {? VT N V) VT (? 4T N N V) V> VT N t a U T4+ . E `? Q C a 44 N f u a .4 m • 4 •.. • a • oo a o W .UI a 4 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 *0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.. • 4 0 co 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 in 0) 4) • . *4 V O O O O O O O O O O coo 00 O 00000 O O Cu it .0 a L e0 -.l 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O h o O O O O O O O O O O O O O Z0 5 a -J -.Ai• 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 In 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U ,� a • U ID nne. nnnnnif • nnnnnnennnnnnnn ❑ 4 • 0 VUi -.4 a VT N N N V) N M M t? V) V) M M M VT VT 11) 0. N V) N H VT V. 0 M a .0 eb 4 cn a 4 a cti c 0 .. ,.) a ,J M •1 0 a M C 4 • 0 .-e 141 CO CO CO 0 CO e0 Cr, N U1 H 01 0101fa, n, to - N .1 ZQ 0 0 a 0 In 01 01 U1 m CO .-e .. .4 0 h .4 In en en Uf IO 0 *0 0 .r n n. . .. ,1 O. O N ... 0 .e 0 It1 0 n 0 0 0 0 b 0 0 n .. 0 0 O N O C O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w 4 O. . U R O O O O O O O O O O o O O O O O O O O O O O O O Y C •C . 4 ') U 0 10 • a 0 a 4 • ") F * `.. + 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 )+ • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 C. 0 0 0 0 0 U1 0 0 • N Ho V' N 00 V• O O 0 m 05 f0 .-1 ,0 h p b 0 N h N 0 0 L • 0 73,‘.. :.• V O IA N V' V' V V• .. a .4 N N h O) IO UI 0 0 .i h N O N • 7 7 N n IO N V) V' V. CO V In N O In N U1 0 * 4 Cl r7 C • .a - • a •'e N 0 n .r .-1 M • C • 0 W • ❑ • H . 0 w • 44 0 • V) o • O • • ` • A. • a• o • a a co O a a. 0 > a '.4L m F aw .4- a D w 0 a 4 � W M a .C. .. • CO a U €� 0 A a U 0o • O. U 7 4 Z E U • a • 4 M 4 in o O 0 3 0 Y co 0 to T • .4 V) a O. _ VR), 0. 4 44 ♦ 0a C. F _ .. Iy. �. 0. C *) .�-. C 0 • a F. W 0 0 0' O❑p w�qp .7 2 U Q u) V1 41 ❑ U F r CO F 0 4 0 .7 0 _ 2 a 47 a > 0 a' Y a • a CO O F m 04. F 0 - .7 a ..3 F aA. o o o ups 4 - 44 m o a 0 E. 4 Cl Fy' • 440 F w N vJ S 44 F y 0. t(il a O. CO CO CO 0 0 Z CO 4 z ~ • ',�'j� ? CO a W 0 oo a s w ?ZZ.. 47 W O. av in Fw' CO 0 m FH. "' • 0 0. 0 V) 4 co m Z U H 4 m a m 0 Z O F Y O m U LI a D p U0 a a E O tO U m F A. CO HQ 0 a m D. Z U x r. 4 a >9 .0 • 41• �U)) ►. CO 44 •-•CO 17 SS ' C.I. 0 vii ..7 co- y O. a Iu 0 - D. CO f�/I• 0 CO CO .. • a F -. ... m .3 0. 44 yq E. 'Z'S. ..s GO W 447 0 44 O O 0 3 .7 �. r p o pp .CO g 9 p (M. h a Og. 0.. O0. OO.. O. t 1. ~i. OO.. O. a 4. O. 0. w Om. W a a C' a oL 4 g 'a ryw O z t 8 as ♦ F m u V• • �( O a C \ • e0 I N CO m N N SO CO 0 rev O 01 N h op V' n V' 0 V' .. 0.. �0Q1 a p. .. •• 0L . 01 N N CD n CO UI 01 .4 01 n m N N n 10 0 n CD n 01 m N 47 0 w V O • Un n U1 V' V I N UI V' .. I0 1 ).0 u1 .. U1 h N V• .. b 10 N h 0 4 0 0 I0 • • h • N • • v • 01 • RI • 0. • • • • 4. O ► •• • • • • (0 • 0 • 4 u OHO 0 40 04 h 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r1 .4 0 4 0 0 0 0 ). 14 04' 0 0 h 4n 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 (44 Z i u N re c fa 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 08 • MN ES 0400 p N a O O O O O O O O 1 N O 01 O O O O 3O to p O N N 04 O O O O O O 001 0 h O O O O• v r . . N ; N• a 10 NNN4041 NNrNNNNNNNN > NNN 1 0 0) 0. W 4) 4.4 N N N to N y 44. 4. y N 44 N 4() N N 44. N 44. 43. 44 N . U ro O b N U> 40. 4/> • 4) C7 10 O 1 * i ^ • U • ,I • y W • )4 0 4 0 0 h h N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 h 0 0 '4 0 0 0 0 0 • = W 0 4 0 0 N In N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 It) 0 0 0 0 N . . 4. • (9 0 '0 0 N 0 0 0 40 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 0 0 m 0 0 0 0 Z • >4 C G ONO 0041) 414' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 0 0 0 0 U • 10 61O 0 4 0 0 N 05 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41) 0 0 0 0 • 3 01 .4 r) h 01 r1 m 4A o N N N N N r1 N r4 4D r1 r1 h N N N N • a II ti 40. iA N N N 4 .-1 44 44 40 44> N N N 4. .-4 N N VT N N N N •• C 0 N T VT iz v! 1.4N 4311. 0 G y 2 4n a • as 1.1 . 41Ca.44 • a • 011 • 0 W 0 C 0 0 0 0 N r1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q .4 Q 0 0 0 0 0 t(1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 04 4 .0 .) CU o 0 0 o N a o 0 0 0 o 0 o 0 o N o 0 0 0 0 0 0 (. la . 4) re •.4 0 0 0 0 0. 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z 0 •• . 0, M 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 s3U f NU 4J O, • a ro N NNNNNrNNNNNNNaNNNNNNN O 4 • 0 15. ... a 0 N 43. 4n 4p .1 N 40 4? N 40 4.44 V> O. 4> 40 N 4) 41 4) 4> N N F ,y C 4 40 >4 .-4 N 4. m N • CO 0. a O 0) s 0 . 1) • L 0 • 0) 3 ♦ N 0 ♦ W C >4 • O •0 U1 .1 4 .4 0 .1 10 04 N 4 N N N r1 r1 m 1.1 h ./ O) CO 41 re O • 0 h N m N 0 N N d m 4o 05 40 h r4 N 410 40 4' 4a 0 m O W 1. 4.. • 4.3 > 0 m 0 0 (.4 N Cu 0 0 0 0 0 0 .-1 O N 0 4D N N 0 0 0 F ). • 0 M 0 0 0 0 r4 1(1 4-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U C m • a 4-. 44 • h F • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E" i 0 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ''4.. 0 1 0 .4 40 rt 0 0 N CO rl h O .+ 04 N N 0 0 0 co 4• 0 40 0 [rQ i 0) NO 4 N N 04 m O h N h 0 0 10 .1 N 40 40 O N 111 .1 E 0 04 04 u) h h CO N CO 0 4n CO 4' N 4o 111 04 40 1.11 CO .4 4' 04 . a 7 r. CO r1 04 rl 40 N rl r1 4' N rl til P (') N 01 CO 01 4 47 C .4 ., •.4 0 a 0 N 4 a to411 N 01 O • IC > N N 0 0 • W N � W • 2 • N O U • • Z ♦ (.. S • t •• 0 t:7 g " .O. O • a 0 • Y 0 > • a )4. • 2 m F • N • • • 4 z a 0U w • W a a P. M 0 N 1a2 ••• 3a 0. a a F .1 0 • 4) W - U H w > 4 i E U • F a H C E. a• V1 a W 2 u •• m a w a U N w (0 z 0) CO C- 4 M _ a X m iF ► t F y • Z 2nnQ Q a 4� U a fes» V ppop .+. W N a Pq A • F W F 0 a > CWC F .3u a .u4 Z 0 a 41 F 1>-) 4 > CO 1 CZ U E. 6 - 2 41 ... _ CL w o N Z a a N a >~ • • w a a 0) Dw w a u o a z HZ a 0 F o g a a aa F 04 N " G W ,'L a ` a vai a F w o H �i 9w y V M yu. •• 0 w 0 w 41 0 N t a g N �' $ F w x a" c7 a a ZZ o Cal • w Eyy�i a 0 CC r w w 3 w 4-+ �3 v� �>4 a CO 0 o. w .4 0 z • IO O y B .4. 6 w § 4 C a F F a4,� E `" a G4iG W W a 0 )-' 1, w •. 0 F . z 4. 0 > 0 w 4. CO .4 .4 4 W 0.4 4 4 0 00 0 F r U • E h1 -. CO a 4 a u O F F U U W 2 0 > N N 0 w a 0) • 2 2 7~ - y 0 3 O 0 41 a s V1 (0 t/1 2 F ..4 • o 0304 - 4141414141414141414141 w a w • D to N W S W W W W f11 W W `>"' W 0 4 4 7. o W w • a u u u u > > ` > > W 3 a h • W w w W CO N M N N N N N N N .4 N N 8 Ncr, • a a a a a a a a a 4' a a a a a a a a g z • W W 4 • Y 0 . C 0 .4 • n3m N h N N N .4 04 N N m h N a m 10 10 .n N a W a 0. .- N • a 1 .4 N 04 N N 40 4 O h O to h h N N N 41 40 N n 4p CO r1 W 1 a 01 O 1 /(1 N 4 h 1.) N m 40 N 4410 4 111 1t1 4 40 N IA N r1 N 4 h a0 0 a 0 1110 CO • N • • 4) • • 0 •• Cu • • • •o • • • • N • • >a Q • in q y N 0 V 0 0 0 0 h h N 0 0 0 hi 0 O N V 0 01 0 0 0 W : H H N O 10 0 0 0 0 N h 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0) h 0 f•1 O 0 O • u U 10 • • • • • • • . 1Vz • ,-.0 .0 0. N0 0 0 0 0 O 0 1(1 .•1 0 0 0 h O 0 0 0 0 1n 0 0 0 E N O 0 0 0 0 0 01 N N 0 0 0 0. 0 0 V) h O 10 0 0 0 • ' £ U 01 0 V) 0 0 0 0 N .4 4D 0 0 0 n 0 0 N 01 0 0 0 0 0 • a 0 10 n h n n n n 10 n V n n n 0 n n n h n n n n n • 0 4) 0. W N 40 N 40 0 N (0. 01 10 N 40 IA N 40 N N N N N N N N 40 • U H 7 N N y y q • 0) U 0 • • [[� • • 'L • .V4 i y W q• H O 0 O 0 0 0 0 N O1 N 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 N 0 N 0 0 0 H • a a• Rs VI O 10 O O O 0 .0 V1 O. O O O N O O O O O V O O O C' • 0. O b N O V1 0 0 0 0 0 0 .4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 VI 0 10 0 0 0 ZO H C C 0 O n 0 0 0 O N 0 V 0 0 O N 0 0 0 0/ 0 0 0 0 0 V • 0 4 0 .-1 0 V1 0 0 0 0 44 .4 h 0 0 0 V 0 0 0 h 0 0 0 0 0 • 3 0) .4 n 01 .+ n n n n 0 01 N n • n • n n n n n h• n n n• n rr • a H .ti .1 N N 40 N N (A N 0 N N 40 V) N 40 N 40 N N 4/1. 40 N Vr EA • 0 H O -Ai v!y N Q C : V) f N u • N • H • In A • • 0 N U # 0 0 01 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m0 0 0 0 0 O 4) u • R N 0 0l 40 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 b 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO 0 0 0 0 0 W 4) • .0 y Q1 N O h O O O O O V! O O O O O O O O 10 O O O O O t+. 41 .0 • L A .•i V1 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0) 0 0 0 0 0 z0 0 r •• •3 _0. U 0 0 4D 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO 0 0 0 0 0 O u 0. • a U m n n U) N n N n N N n N N • n n n n n U; n n n n n 44.. • C.) 4) u 0. 40 N N � VY N N V) .•r N N N t? N O) N tb 40 N i? N N N .4 0 • R H N • . V) 0i 4 Q O u • O 0)4 • • '4 • M C) • 4.1 C H • 0 r4 h h N .i 1A 10 CO 0 40 01 IL) 111 N 1!f Nn I`• .n .0 OJ 0 ry CO H u • y 0 h h N h t0 0 r.. h .4 N V .) as n i/1 CO VN Al 1!i 40 O) > V 0 V 0 0 .i 0 V. V 0 0 0 n 0 0 N V .4 n 0 0 0 Q F H • C N 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 hi 0 4 4) .4 2 y 004 •j • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H y 0 -C C • 4 U c i0 • O. F 0-2• F • • O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H • V O O O 0 O O O O O 10 O O V1 O O N O O O O h O • 't} N V O h 0' 0 V 0 0 V 0 10 V 0. to N N 40 10 10 0, O. U • 0 H •• N 4) 0 N V V V1 0 .•i h O. .4 N N O V1 N h O V1 N N O N • E .4 ION N O ON N V1 O. N N O. t0 V N V1 h h h h O O 4) • •n 7 0. NM n n V1 V) 0 O. N h N N r. V V1 10 IN n ../4) • N 10 N .•1 .4 N N [.r 0 • / > "'i in .4 L • C W • 5 Q • Mr • V) 4. • H z • U) 0 • N u • a • a •• �d F o CO 4.1 g • - o q s N .4 • O • >+ O > •• y4y >+ • K CO - • 0. W 0 * a Z 0. a iUC4 N • N _ V) w 0 • a V 0.0 > O Z E • _ j Q d •• ofto. ix tail N Z 0 q P. a :4 ° r�u u a m F y • o o£ �' *Ri m 0 4 z zd CO ' h 0 a • = 8 m .z4 0. x m D u a a to to u w .2 ttn x W u F • U Z N a E. 4 H a, • to a1 o U a C0 tfo oa o • 0 - z z >. m V •• Z N o o a a a s m m o o F u u Ca a E. m a W ., F F w Ca A 04 F Z 0 N U a V Qi a 0 N a >~ a ! F 1 .a a a z o C.) m n4 .4 a R u a� W v a a W to i m o N U M _ t4 • 0. i� y tq� 0 • E 1 p6 y 0 • y CO O CO > Z 0 O 0 • . o y~ CU • F a N ..00 • ���+a77• F F y W 0 V CO U ,�04 V U w a 07 Al tW.. E. Z �fa a4 ,O1 • 00.0 1r > co O O O 0 O O 0 0 0 0 a >, to CO [0 i•� Fd Z 0 U g z Z U h • Q• a a a a a a tY a a a a a a a a to m to 40 co 40 u1 40 W CO 01 • V • -V 1 a CC 0 H o �, • • 0 n N 10 Al a 1C N n .4 V1 1e to h h . 10 n Al 0. 10 a 0 a on • a 1 h .4 10 n 0 h in V1 n 40 O. .4 0 01 in 01 n n 0 N CO 0 0 WD. 41 ... 0 • h V1 V V1 01 h •• .4 N N V) 40 h N 10 111 N a a N V1 U1 V1 a 4 0 4 • • • N • • d • m • • 10 • a t • 4 t * 0 t • a • • • co • • >' H • O1 4. e 0 0 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W • 4. l+ m O O 0 H O O O 0 O 0 O O O O O O O 0 O O O 0 41 • U1. . .0 0. 0r 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • .r t0 0 0 0 .• 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 •• 3 U l0 0 0 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 3 tonna - nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn E •00 II 0. CO N N N N HN N N N N co. N N N N N N N N N N N N N 4 4 1 14 C ❑ 4 V1 Cl et • • H • U • .I • u CO • 14 0 0 0 0 171 000000000000000000 0ft_ 0. . N 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • II. • CO 0 'O n 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z • 11 C C e 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 UO 4 t 0 b 0 N 0 0 0 H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O • 3 0) .r 0 en In en 01 n n n n n in n en n en en en in in in n n n 4 0 01 4) NIN tN N N U). N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N • U roE x Q C 4 •.• r1 E N L • 0) • •M • H 7 4 44 0 U + O C O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 41 •.1 • .. 0 e O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 O O O O O O O O 0H N N • 6 r L 01 .d O O o O O O O O O O O O O o o O O O O O O O W It .0 • ..1 a .1 H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ZO .0 at • •3 L1. M 1D O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O U a1 0. 4• ...7773 U et I[1 n en n en en n n n n n n en n n n n n n n n in n ea❑ - • 0 H a1 a N N NO N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 40 N N f it 1+ .-1 EW" C • ID M • to 0 a( O 0 •• O •.t al 4 L 01 4 It i • • 01 4 44 C fr • 0 0 , en CO e m 0 CO 0 a N n e m n ...I .+ n 0 0 1.0 0 et Q! . 0 en e 01 O n l0 10 O m CO O N m Co in H l0 VI 0 N W S. L • L > n 0 n N 0 .-1 O N ... O .+ ... .-1 0 0 N H H N 0 0 E I. • C N 0 0 0 .. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H . 2 )-I 0 .• U i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 140 4 0. H U > w • h F • 5 • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w O • 0 n0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 U . @ .4 0 N n N in 0 m 40 O 4 N 0 111 e n V e• .r gIt a SP L 01 V• h 0 111 OIC UI m a} rl 10 N 0 10 0 N ..4 in e O 0 1• • a1 E .• N .I r N m CO U1 111 0. CO e 10 N e in 111 0 W N C • V rV 01 N 01 01 m N N CO CO n e m m e r1 111 F h 01 • '47 01 ` T1 O 0 e t) 4 C N > • 0 CO • 0 • H • W Ci. • • CO 4 a. 8 • a.3 • 41• 4. • 0 X V) 0 • 3 0 • ❑t511 > ❑ > • a ,St • H M 4 cn Z Ol .E-. • a • • x CO W * Ca W o • CO a ° H G •t Fe: 0H0xu Oz • CO aCC.3 >. < ZW E 0 t 4 a h z 0 1n v1 a CO u CO 3 CO 3.. a • _ 0 H H a .Q: CO * • U • et s tri X O • CC W U O .. W M a H 0 • Sh •W U z F U 0 X11 CO F coF4 �,a1 rzi N 0 oa as W ❑ U E • U 0 N 41 CO .t .a .a 0 a U O • y. W a N w .�7 O r • N S W CO W [a+C 4 Wp� O 0 0 CO 2 0 t� F m E. 41 • y •- CO H a u uFi a a m Ka H CO t� H ttao ... CO • to •a 1.2 y z C7 .W7 41 N CO W W y X CO a O -. W F • E a' W • ''" 0 4 V/ O ..a W CO i Ca. F Q 'U7. W CO U < W 53 CO CO V C'. • h • X - H 0 O U X X 0 1 H a a 0. a X O f O •t W F W CO �H., 1G CO C W F a a a > 0 Vl G, ..7 02 CO U W H H 1a F w .0 0 • ni ❑ ul U F 0 co X 0 U 0 W 0 tT •• z '" o v a i z 43 V1 41 3 Z w v CO(}p�¢� s nyX t`) ett a + a g 63° F g a Wzs4HHHH 100 g Vo 00 �+. $ z u F • a CO Vi CO CO CO to to V1 CO CO V1 V1 to V1 to COto t7 COto COto to . . 01 . W W 1, ♦ pCp Cl) of su 0 • 0 • 0 S a Ct 0 •a W • ro • 0 ..4 O1 N .4 CO Y H1 n CO e .4 01 H 01 01 T l0 N N e e en • a, 1 0 H H m 0 r YS r 01 n 01 e r n n F F e $4 10 h co N W {7].1 G. 4f y 0 • N t0 n N .H r n UI N n e e h n n e F 10 V n n N h IX ej 0 1Y • 0 0 4 N 9 9 4) 4 en • • A • a • • • • 0 a • • H • t • W • >. O • Co y O 0 0 N O N 0 0 0 .-1 N 0 O1 b N 01 0 0 0 CO 0 w • t.l 14 N. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .r N 0 0% u1 .D ON 0 0 0 a 0 0 Z w .0 .0 0. o 0 o rr o .0 0 0 0 0 N o 0% N .4 a1 0 0 0 CO 0 8 • z +1 E 0 0 0 .n 0 m 0 0 0 .n r- 0 .4 .a N .+ o o a .4 o • 3 u o 0 0 .I o N o 0 o N o o III er Y) 0 0 0 N o • a A n n rn .y n V. en l ri m ri ri rn V e- n N M ri N 4O ((.... 4 0 4• 3 W M N 441. N VT 40 N Vl N 4A V} N 40 N N N N N N N • 40 0 17 411. N V? 4A• N O 1.4 q 0 • • •w • N • U • M • u CO • 14 0 0 0 N0 b 0 0 0 0% U1 0 0 CO N c0) 0 0 0 UI o O •• 7 W 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 O1 O1 )O 0 0 0 0 0 I.t+• a O 0 b 0 0 0 tO O N 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 N •v 0 0 0 .. 0 ZZ • 44 0 0 000 N O N 0 0 0 Ot N 0 0 N h N 0 0 0 CO 0 0 0 • 0 m 0 0 0 0 10 0 N 0 0 0 N U1 0 0 U1 0% VO 0 0 0 UI 0 r f i %t 3 W .4 Nr1 N mN Nnrr00 NN N MN COrrN 0rn •9 O Q1 ,44 if-.4 1? 40 N N N 4A N 40 Vf VY e•1 N 4. Vi ri 4.4 4? N N N N a U 44 s X t? 40 4A 1 0 0 • Un Z Ur L .4 • .4 a N a • X • 0 U t 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 ca d u • N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N a 0 0 0 0 0 N 01 61 • 4 t U v 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N m 0 0 0 0 0 4. e0 L1 •4j JJ 10 M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 h N 0 0 0 0 0 O .0 t •• .3 ,O.• .1 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N to 0 0 0 0 0 10U u O. • a U N N N N N N N N N N N en N N N rn N N N rn N N 0) O. O 4 a 0 ) L V> 44 N N N 4/) 41 4? 4. N VT N VT N 4/) V) V) 4F N N V) * A 44 .•1 F .-I 0 • .G It .-I 10 M • U) 0. 4 0 •.i L) * u CO • • IUD Z 0 M ra 0 YJ _ _ 0 Y• • 0 .4 4 m N N N ID N N N O N l0 N 1A CO 0 N Uf N N a N N 4) 4 O U1 N N N N N N O N 10 CO N 10 0% 10 N N .•i N N N U1 W 14 L a y > 04 0 0 T 0 to 0 .-1 n N .-I O N N VI N N co N ri 0 0 0 F 44 • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .I 0 0 0 e. .i 0 0 0 0 N 0 F4 O t y .4 O. It m • Ui S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 Z 8 C m i 0. F 7 sr • h F a • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 M a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i01 a NON O O m N b N O N N N 10 O m a a ON p. 1p as• 0.1 0 N y .I 41 0 a N COOMa CON m m N Ol .i O a m .D 0% N a cc, E N N b a m a O N N Ul N N N Ul V UI N .4 N N N N U1 . 0 •• .r 7 ,j N .4 U1 O. .4 p U1 U1 4 N CO N .i N m .D m 0 N e2 01 t 'Li 0 ? r-/ N Ill .-. .4 N N N N 141 F 0 • 0 > a COJ 0 • CO N t a. N a a Za 0 CO •• 4 U • • 4d •M• 0 a X F g a. • .` O a • •• a 0 CO O • a t > • • .7 4 al M Z • Y �t a • W CO • r. 41 U S W H G. H O s t UUU . • U to u O U U • V y E• m 4 U W ti vUi y° 4 E yU� pq y+ _ z z o V • F 0- 044 0 U 0• 0 N 41 .X.7 W O Z .) • _ vl to �c ul c` a v X o > * y' • H ft z m `� U `1 F a N a d F. c. 0 • Z 0 0 U 0 m i.e. ��44 W in >. CO D U F .a.� 0 _ F2 fat M • V) =1 U X x N d O a y 2 X z y F W W t+ OL a .-] O N 0 a p p4( (y� F w a W O >• >4 `� r .M = O U U U z 2 4 F 4 F m Z • N F U W W Z a F }. a g U 1�+ y X Ca re 2 .4 0 •• -" Z 2 4 4 0 § 0 W 8 DDD 04 04 S• >i 0 O a O 00. • H W CO 0 O 0 4 MB a O 1-1 N 4 40130 up r+. 1.4 u Cl. • 2 I,, 0. > > al m W cC U U U U U p OH a O O O x to 0 rrl V J ?C fC �4 N. SC >C fG Y. 7C ?C X V U N. r4 X X X 0. > L te z • 44 N N 14 M N M N M N M H 1••1 M M M M N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0) 0 0 • z qq0 ps gi gi gi ti ti t ti 6i t Oi bi b t ctn vii 2i 2i u 2 6i CO 04 a �r O. $ F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F 8 z U N • Oa. CO to N U) U1 0 Co U1 V1 to W rA V) 0 U3 W 0 V) V) 01 V) W W O1 w �. • F v) F u a • -V o • q \ a Ip '1/40N tel U1 0 N 1D CO 0 O1• a N N IO N N N O. 0 0e a I lD U1 N 0 0 m N a N N N m a O1 O N O1 N to up O D1 Z 4. 4) O • N V N N N N ID P a N m SD N N N N N N N O. 40 O: 4 0 13 • 1110 N • M a • N a • of • T. • C. a a • • •0 • a a • c`M • • t w . O a m y 0 C•1 01 0 0 0 0 .r 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n O •1 • 31 N 010000000000000000 O N O 0 N 0 4. • U z • L G C. o 40 .i 0 0 0 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 Sc r 0 0 0 N 0 0 a 0 U a I• y al E 0 a SO 0 000000000005 O O O 0 O. .... 0 000 or- 0 • .r=Ll2 3 ',OE U.0 o O. m o 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 'C n 0 0 0 01 0 0 SO 0 • 10 M U1 a M M M n 10 el el rl el Nl Ci N N 1.l 5, P1 Ni en n en •[.. a 0 0 O Sc N N N N N N N N N 41! 2 N N N N N N N N N N n N (y N • V1 E7 3 • a a • M a a ..• u W a 11 00 N 000000000041) n 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 a G. a 0 a N 0 0 0 0 n m r-40 O O O 0 l 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O M Ca. • 0 0 10 0 0 rs 0 0 0 o r1 0 0 0 0 0 .r N o 0 o U1 0 0 N o 0 Za 4 C C o 0 m o 0 0 o O1 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 n 0 0 N 0 U •• 0 C 0 o m r 0 0 0 0 w 0 0 0 0 0 v1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ► 3 al .^1m N M M M n Nl a Nl N rf .•l Nf r b N N M n Nl Ni 0 N F a a N M N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 1C N N 4. ► a 0 a !n Z N .J • 0> C . •.l • a • k a o CO M • o 0 O co o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO .1 a 6 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 •-• 01 0 a t .. 10 0 O5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 •N 0 z 0 03 0 •• Z ti T .1 0 h 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M 0 O 0 ,C a 3 .0. 1.40 U` 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 o O o 0 Sc 0 U U0, a a E) 1D M n M M n M M N Nl Nl Nf n Nl Nl Nf m M N M M N 10 Nl N N a O N M 0. N N N N N N N N N N N NN N N N t? N N N N 01 N O .0 • U )a u N • 10 M N 0 •O L a u CO • 4 33 a H 0l • W C N a 0 N 01 r4 n m 0 n N N CO Sc CO a N M a 01 n Sc O1 • L a O N U7 N N CO a U1 Sc N 05 a a N 0 N Men • h 0 CaF M • U > 0 N a 0 .1 an 0 0 N N .-1 CO Sc .-1 0 n N m 1-1 0 0 M O 0 0 O 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 0 N 4. 11 G. • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U C IS • 0. F r7 F • • O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O 0 O O O O O t 1. t 0 O O O CO a Sc O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 o t0 n fo t0 o m m a a w 0 1c O o M • O 0 10 0 +• 61 U C O1 N 01 N M .+ 01 t0 0 .1 a N a N M m 0 Sc 0 a 01 E m a r r a Sc NON N 01 U1 a 0 N m C UJ N a G •a ? a N 0= N CO U1 N N O 01 Sc O1 .-. a N Sc 1O N N F 0 ± N O a N N N n n N .-1C > N N M z • a Sc • 0 • N a En. z • F a U • a a Z a 4 .S w a 0 a 0• Na ° 0 a to 5. 0 > a z • • a m 4. 0} p0 N t fa y 6 2 b � ._ y U z 4 U Sc _ w a a N •a -fCU b w • F f5 to •w a to — ... Fr1 §a in a E pt 0 a yip U i y co w a pt/� w U u aK F to F G Y 91 • 2 V G c m0 Ca • pF; O 0 0 F 8 a 1 0 5.. N a C9 F F m o 4 m t • K FV! 0 F CO CO CO s • U 4 z N w F 4 CO F a a as c� a F tr °22 rai O F 0 S 1S 0 N C 0 0 .5 0 •• .q • U D [., puo�; U �F w O w c�Lj yC a 1W-1 d O z CO 5. a '�'+ O F • a •7 .Oa W G U' full U >.. >. i1 Sc 4 5 co co S 1z-1 4 w 0* ri V1 N F • lwY Z t a w a a a a Sc ul ° FZ wE. Z 4. • uawHx `o aa >z • x x x x x x x x x x x x x 1+ F z u• H al H M M M H M N H M M N M 0 x 0 O 0 F W tU a E O O O O O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O O F 0 .-1 m CO 0 w Vl 0 0 0 Q1 a• z 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 u 6 6 6 6 6 u a a °a ° •a w a Z w z 04 pq� ix r a d F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F f+ F F F F $ F O • r. a CO CO CO y CO CO a 0 V) 0 N CO V1 0 V1 t0 0 CO V1 V1 y 2 V1 2 41 W U ..- • U) O • yC b ca a.a. 0 O t C LS t b r O1 N M m N a M a m h 01 m 10 O N N N N 10 M • 0'. . 01 10 N N m n 111 O n N O h N M a n r N h m 01 N Sc D. 0 M1 O • t0 l•'1 N r N N N t0 Sc N M M N N a O h N r M N a 0 4 0 0 • • N • en • u • •« SIP • • Cl. • 0 • •• CI • • • • N •• • 40 +10 u 0 0 0 0 a n 0 0 0 0h 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o N 0 o r H • U d A 0 0 O 0 to 0 0 0 O e. N O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 h 0 O m 0 • ".0 .Q 0. 0 0 0 O m N 0 0 O N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O 0 a O • u E 00001010000 N 0400000000 r 0 0 m U . 3 E .0 0 0 0 O N e. 0 O 0 N a% o o O 0 o 0 0 0 m 0 0 .t • ..1 10 n n n In a N n rn n m 0% n n n n n n en n a en n to • 0 4) a W U) N ill in N .1 N in N '0 .e H N V) t? (R N N N VT ie) N N • V Fa 0 e0 O '0 in v) O w• 0 0 45 • • • U • •N • u • w 0 0 0 0 01 111 000 n N O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N o o m A * ga. wro 0 0 0 o 0 In'5000040000000004000 10 ++ • I'' • 0 0 '0 0 0 0 0 e-t 01 O 0 0 N Cl 0 O 0 0 0 0 O O n 0 40 N OZ • 7. C C 00000000000M n * 40 m 0 0 0 0 0 r v 000 '5100000000 0 0. 0 0 0 • 3 W e.i n n n n n 01 n n n 10 of n n n en en n n n m n en a • .Q.a A en - N L1 N N VS ill (? N i? N ..1 N N V) N Ll N N 41l to N N CO. • U Yr v N • 47 W C * Cap 40 N .0 • 4 • 0 « •+ ..7 • • o W .. • 0 0 0• 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 co 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A L u • 4 0 CO.4 o o O o O O O O O O N O O O O o O O O o O O O M W 111 • .0 u 4) 0000000000 O O O O O O O O O O O O O w rt A « u o -4 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A 40 $ 2: .3 0. H 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 .. 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U u a •• •.7. U A n en n n n en n n en en a n en en en en en n en en n n en O 4 • O 4)) ...4 Cl. N N N to 0 N V} V) H tel 44 N V) N V. (? V. N t? V) V) V) V. • 10 7. ti 10 .C1 ••• m 0. a Q -..40 ° i • u 010 U 3+ !+ m ♦ w tC w * O 'in N a o '54004040CO N o m to r e0 40 v 40 .-t w 44 y « AJC o 0 0 e CO o + .+ en m � 0 0 0 o e N m y > .i N a 0 0 e1 N h h O .1 .4 .1 0 0 0 a 0 a O F H .0 O 0 0 .ti O 0 o 0 ti 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 H . •1.. 7. a • u m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u C m• a• E 0 N • 'D F • • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t" 7. • O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 • 0 a ‘4, eo b a eo a '0 m 10 e0 a CO 0 N 0e N CO a 10 W O •• 01 E04 0) U1 CO h O N 10 n 0 .4 N CO m U1 n .1 N tO Cl .1 E0e 10 en b 01 CO N U1 n m O N 01 n UI .1 CO 01 .e 4.7 C • .0e e0 a 01 01 01 n a 0 n .4 en 10 Cl a a en 0. n .1 4 0) •* 106 0 .1 P .. en m .. N 1:1N 40 • W • 40 • 0) H •4 • to V • 1 • 40 00 X F • ... !4y• W• g •• N O O • ?W+ 40 > a •• ° a 5 4 • U U 3 C W Y N • F •a 4 m • y F F w 4) 40 • 40 a 0 40 G~i4 Ci) a s rUC i ragH 5 Ch •U • y U h F H 0 y co O W 4 F u - UUj •• 0 041°Z - U7 U U > E • 2 F W [� O U 40 W a 40 0 0C 440 1�i 4 W �n Op cCK� 2Z� �i u i t, a O a 40 .. W g F I. w (n 40 0) �F f y M N �y F o4. w Z m < a r CE h w E. 40 a d U) fY • F '• P w F x cC 4 W .�1 H .1 .] 40 v y 4 U) h O 440 .�7 • F F 4 F .7 -- U U) w eC W 40 40 > Q • pt < �q • U to v7 N w u Z t0i7 4) U 4 3 O U g .0 G Z a > u F •• > 0 .+ E. 40 C4. Fw [40 ❑❑❑❑ .. a a o h • •• a w x z g . u w O pn 10 8 K z Z F F H 2 q (j w w Cl W • 40 40 a O co. r 4 20 8 40 1 O F 4 .. 40 40 3 1.1 w 4 4�1 0 _ 64 • W W 4 0. W W w F F J 2 O 8 0] m V V 8 w C7 x s tr 40 40 4 a a a y U7 Ch 4 45 .. U w • OC OC Z 0C 0C 44 a a a a G40 40 a s 40 4' 40 40 X 4' 40 40 40 W O •e 64.'4 • m F F F E F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F Cu H F F F O. w 0 U • E 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 0 45 40 in • 2 .ZZX a S a a 3 Z 3 3 3 3 3 Z 3 Z 3 3 3 E .1 3 Z - • 7 4 .3 a a a a a a a Aa a a a a w a a 4 a $. • a a a a a a a a a a a .s .a a a a a a a a a a a u7 4 4 >. • 0 1.1 N 1.1 M .. H Mi M hl M H N bl 44 H M M N M H .. M M w 3 M Cl. • •W IX F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F O h N • w 40 0) w 40 Cq C4 V7 COw 000C00Cn w Cn Cn C0 40 Cn 40 Z U cn t En W V • x N u 0 • C CL 0 44 4 r N .1 1n 01 a n N N CO e. LA t0 n co .1 h e4 o a4) 0 e'1 • 40 4 en 01 r m m 01 a r n a 0 01 r 0 n a 1O N h r m N 44)7 4 V 0 * a N h e. 01 a a N .1 10 0 n r n a r a N el r 4) .. a 0 40 • n * n a • 6, • • t0 • . (2), • a a a a 0 a • • • ., • E8a . 61 .1 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 M IM 4 4 m • U 10 m 0 CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 7+ • -.0 . at 04.400000000 N O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 4D 0 0 U a I- .. E 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 o 0 O 0 0 F 0 1-1 a v ) '£ .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F 0 CO • a 16 40 0 101 .n en en m m m r In 4P1 M 0,1 r1 rl 4.1 en en N 1n 10 8+ 0 N 7 W t? N t? V) t? t? N 4r. t? N r1 t? 4? N N N N 4? N Vf N t? N t? 40 • . S0. 0 0 i 011 gto 0 16 • a • M44 a .Vi a W a w o F 0 o 0 o 0 0 0 0 .•1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO 0 1n o • 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V5 0 0 M . • ti. • 0 0 0 0 VV 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 Z a SI C 0 0 N 0 0 O O O o O O n 000000000000 0 U a ! 0 )5 •.0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 1•, a 3 6) .•1 n 10 1+1 1.1 n n n r1 n 1+1 0 n n n I0 in in 1•) n n N n LA * .1 N .•4 N N N N V) N N N t? V) N N N V) N N V) 40 V) N N V) N • 0 61 V7 -H N t? G. • U 16 E Q 03 a 0 a to X 40 L a 0 • .1 • A •F a . o C0 a , C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n o 0 0 6, .5 a 4 0 01 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 4D 0 0 1'1 0 61 a .0 U 6) O 0 O O 0 O O 0 0 0 O O 0 O 0 O O 0 0 O 111 0 O W .6 .0 • g 11 .0 •.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 a .0 8 -. O. w o 0 0 o O o 0 o O o 0 0 0 o O o o O o O m o O V a1 C6 • .3 0 V In en n r1 r1 en n r1 en .n m en r1 111 a; 1+1 n &I 1n en N M en a 00. Vt? N N t? N N V) N V) V) N VV) N 40 4. N 40 N N t? V) Q4 I. 04 t N t .1• H ± In 6 4 0 0 EU 4 L • L 61 t 4 co 3 • N • W 0 U a 0 -4 'N CO V F F 0 F N m 01 CD V LO N N LD 0 N LD n 0 01 n m 4) a 0 N a ON 0 n N L/1 h N 10 VI h N N 0L n 0 n N N n 0 01 a F • 11 0. N n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .-. 0 0 0 0 .•1 N Ul la I.1 O « 0 N O O O O O O O O O O N0 O O O O O O O O N O O Z4. N 0. • 0• 54 u 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OU 0 06 • Off. F O b 7 F • • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -' 11 a 0 0 to 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O M 'p 0 0 0 LO N SD N ..1 n 0 0 LA h O a' h N 0 CO N 0 0 0 U a 4) 0 V •t .) W 0 0 n n n h O1 1? F h 01 F .-4 N 0 CO LO F M N O h LD N Cr O n 0 N F 0 b LD O F N C N N n n NON N h .4 r- 11) • 0 0 m b 0 n N N n N 0 n N .•1 0 LO 50 0 N N n 0 F .4 • -O �0+ en • ? N N N 8 C N Ca + 0 • 1n s 4. N cn 0 • U • 4• • a a O p1 g a + r2•1 0 O • CO. 0 > a a z a 4 GI ?" a V 2 03 EZE.. Ea •• y •�4 a a a t• H U 4-4 a o o a CO U i U U > 0 W • N jM h1 y •44 H 4 a a _ 113000 GC •• ¢¢�� _ • U 2 W 0 y 0 8 y p� V O 0 O 0 ti C .. 4 i Y. y 41 iC V) C - F W F .. 4 `• tai. a C. U F + £ • a+ 'S "4L T. 4 O 4 t� 2 2 p� Ip4p]; 'JN co U p ., ` ce a (0 F ?+ .+ y 5 N 2K2N F a U R a y$ !1 ~ 0 U M ^[j' f+ N 1� 2 • W F 0 F4 p 0 W 12 >+ 0 0 r..1 0 > -CO U 4 .44 ,41 0 E. 2 .-1 C O •- tX 4 Z o: U 4 O 0 0 0• F I07 K CV C p0o CCI) Ct H C 0 . 0 2 a m to «+ ayLL CO W C E. W OO pp i o cc 4 U •• E 4 k1 N FF to 2 y2 y2 W .] U x 2 SI V) 1U•1 O •z•1 a pm O W ,0 CO • Cu • 02. ••.4 t� O Y Z'y y 4 •K •14 01 O yZ 6 SW 47 14 G1 W W t0 W m t2i) i 1E4.1 CL _ s N � 0.0. y co co co y co y y co O F• E+ E. F F F F F Ex+ F F t. 8 2 Z U co0 0 •a .1C C 6a 0 a7 O. w 0 a• C o N 0 .0 0 0 .t CO ID N O 5A N 0 LO 0 N 0 L? n N 7 5112 8. n 8 p4 4 Y1 O N N n N 66 N OL F OL N 4.040 F OL LD L0 LD F 0 m 0 W .(Z G. 6) r- o • n N O I11 10 F 111 45451) 0 Lfl Lp v 0 n n N •O \D 0 0 ..1 OG 4 0 a • 410 V+ 4 n • a 0 • • 01 a 0 • 0. • • • • o • • a 1 • t • • 0 • t0 U .. 0 CO 10 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 in 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N V 0 0 W ` M 4 1[1 O o O O O o O O O o O o O O O o O O O N O O 6 4 u .0 A a O 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 v • ++ E 0 Os 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 en 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u) n 0 0 • ••.4 e0 t e. 0 01 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,n 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 10 N 0 0 • • .. U 0 n •• n n en n en n in n en en n en In n n en 0 en en en W 4 0 L. O f0 01 41.- N N N V> N N 40 N N 4> N (? N N N Lt U V> N V) V> N 0• O 'ON Q i to 0 A • •a • M « • ..e • [U4 Ln N O In 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .•10 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 • a o5 lO O h o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m 0 0 0 H • Lt. • N 0 'O Cr) O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 co 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 u1 0 0 0 Oa 4 C 0 0 0 CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 )0 0 0 0 U • m 0 010 m O O O 0 O O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O • 3 eq .1 h en en en en en In en n en en in en en n en en en n 10 n n en • a Le H V> V) N Vt V) V) N V) N V) V> N V) V) 40 V) N V) V> .r N 4. M. qt • O eD E E th Q 0 to X 4) y • •1 • M • A 4 0 4 O U 4 o 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 000000000 O O 10 o O 0 0 71 .) 4 .0 r•1 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O +"eh y •• .0 U Q) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0. 1p A 4 4.) a +e 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 v 0 0 0 Z 0 10 e •3 C, 4., 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 0 0 0 leU a) 0. • .] U N en r• n n • en n n en n • eh n en n en en n en n en en a' en in en eti n O e • 0 1+ .4 W N N N V. V) N 4) U) V) N N N VT N N V> V. V. V) N N M. N • b Le .. t .'1 0 R .0 ro «, } 100 CU .0 O ep • • 0 L 4 44 W 4 e0) 3 • M 0 0 • 0 e. w N O' e. O e. m b .. m N N O 0. O 0' N .r N h 0 m 0 en N .•� CO u1 .e r ' m 0 0 .. en .r co 0 co en W 44 4.I • 44 > CO N O' en 0 0 .e 0 0 N O O 0 N eV 0 .•e CO N N 0 E4 a C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .. 0 0 e. 0 •• Z W m • U• � a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 04 i 0.F1-. 7 Le 4 "] F • •`.. • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 O o 0 O 0 0 0 0 Wq 0 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 C1.1 • N 0 .0 m N 10 .•1 N .0 m 0 t0 0 n m 0' O .1* 10 .0 0' 0 R• 4) 10 r N r N. O en m en 0 VI 0 O N N en r 0' O en . E V' •• n O r m V• r n eo m .e en 0 0 .. in •• in 0 0 • 0 0 .4 0+ 0 U1 in h en 10 n 0 h N m Vo en N C •CD 4 -n - C7 • etl V' N N N .e m eV 4. 4 0 4 O co • 0 • N • 44 W } H Z } > 0 • U } Q • • • 0 • 4 O 43 e4 • .. O 0 • to • O .00 >aa m3 *ti U 4. a • oCa a • Z0 4 0 ♦• F :, _ m a 6 H W •♦ 0. r� 8 O F £ 8 0 co •• 8 8 Y. 00 • 1- z _ 4-. E- z w i • 8j 1 M a eY 0 .. 0. 0 •+ 5.. • v v� aq 4 v1 aO. O F W E 0 F 0 •♦ w3 / S p5 S tau x y �5. U y pF{ a y��je E U F F a ,0� O F ri,4 • 4 a E. S EL4r tn O E R O F a .7. § t W ° a v F 0 Os 4 E x a - c w tv >.e 0 oC - 03 ai Q 0 3 u S U O to O w •F. w Z o v O .-) a 0X1 , £0)0Ig Ci tnu0. a0. > 4) 1. f _ Z • U Oa eti a 2 Z •O. a 0 O W • to W CO so) 0 0 CO CL R1 • q {pp W K .0 0 S. • 2 tl S S e7 2i ZZ txo F > x> 61. C. q Q O E. Z OZ �t E• • N ••4 a F F F E. F E. E. F F F F E.• 15., 111 103 Cil Ce3 43 CA CO 41 43 43 ca E. E. F E. E. E. E. EO•• 8 z Z U a •«• �{ m W o a C i qap a O N ti • W 0 0. G. n • e e 1n O. n N en r r a .. 0 en m 0 .. r H n m N ON e. r O • C + .. ON h N o o r W r o n •r 0 10 •r m r N n en en N r W y W 0 r 04 N e. N N Y1 r In r r U1 ., in r r N en 40 In 10 N N h 03 4 0 C • • 4n • m • • 4) . 0l • 40 • a • • •• • a • • • • • • • w 4 0 * 0 U 0 r N 0 0 0 0 0 .4 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O n 0 40 w 41 U 14 14 ON N 0 0 0 0 0 r 0 0 0 0 0 0 4r 0 .4 0 N Z • l 4. O b 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 0 m4 0 40 0 CO o • z L E ON O 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 m 0 ON U • g ..4 4) .c 0 40 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 01 0 40 • t * ..7 U n w .i n n .n to .h 0 M r; r; e.1 .n M N M r r LA • O 4) 0.w 40 0 01 44. (A N 0. 40 n N N H N N 0 40 N N 40 V) • L 14 C 40 N 40 40 O : 0 0 40 03 0 13 • • .4 • U • .N • .. Q ••4 O w N 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 0 Qe O N 0 n 3 0 U1 ..4 0 0 0 0 0 CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 U1 M • . • Z • CO 0 1:30 .. 40 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 00 00 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 r • C C C. n r 0 0 0 0 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 .4 0 0 0 CO Com) 40 0 O 01 N O O O O O n O O O O O 0 .4 O .. O 15) • X 01 "4 01 N .4 n n n n rn m in n n n 01 (41 0 n n n 04 • ..7 i. -4 N CO r 40. N N (A N N N U) 4n (0 N 40 n 4A N N N • 0 0) 41 4 N N N 54 a0. • U e0 N E Q C • co Z 4A 0 • W • . • t OP r E •. 0 U • 0O C O N .4 0 00000000000010000 la 0 4) . •• 4 .. 0 O N U1 O O O O O CO O O O O O O r O O O O . 0) 0.1 • .0 U 01 O r n O O O O O O O O O O O O ti O O O O 4. 40 .0 + 1 U 40 .ti 0 O1 1O 0 0 0 0 ONO 0 0 0 0 0 40 0 0 0 0 Z O .0 .0 •• S 0. 4 0 N .1 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 O U 0. • ..a U 10 n N n to 0) r. n 4a n n n n n n v n m on in 0 4-41 10 .Z • 0 4) C. N N -4 to N N 40 0 N 45 y 4A N 40 N n N H en N N F .-. C • L m -44 4. 10 1-+ • to 04 .4 0.4' C I • 0 N • O .4 U + L 0) • 44 Z .1 01 • 44.. _ _ A 44 • 0 ..e .4 0 r r a r r U1 m a' 4r r m N r .T 0 1D n n - n m 0 Cr. r 4D V n 01 O1 0 N 0 01 f0 n in V• V• N 40 0 .4 N Is CO W 34 U • U > N N 0) 0 0 0 .r 0 10 .4 0 0 0 N 0 U1 0 n .-1 U1 O N . a E s+ • C 0 01 N 00000 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H 0 • 04 .-1 Z 44 0 •U .4.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 7 40 ••. a E ... ._ . hF • _ _ _ '� • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 • 3 •? 0 m 7 0) n 0r 0 4} 40 01 n 0 CO 4O 0 f0 CO 0 n .4 40 40 Q1.1 •5 ...40) U1 01 n O co 4O n CO O N U1 d' 0 0 .i .i UI N 0 N .4 r n 44 . 0 0 m n N N ...1 4r ON N N 4 N n .4 t0 N 0 40 N V' N N CO .�• C • •n .'4 - - - 01 • 'd 0 n r • 0 `"• C > V• n .4.4. CO tr.t N N I a w • 0 • - _ co M • . • 4cn 0 • •• a • 0 • • a • to o • a 0 : 3.. 0 > • a aco• • F • F 5 0 u 0 • a 0. C (0. • y (ada,7 (sy7 U 51 CO) • U a y S ? 0. v u CJ > a E 4) • 1H t a .4 4.. a w .-4 ` o - v a7 w a U U o o 'd °a a cn 4• w U as t 3� U .- F K 13.c4 t��e uaFi O - a w t... E F 1N4 Fa 54 Cl •• c^� F F w p>G h U v F wF4] S�l X F O Cc. O co $ w a U F • a F aa' U E. F ch p O w F F F na• a O r • w a 7d. E K w U O 3 r.) •C to 0) CO CO ..8 E 01 Z • • 0 w $ ti • 03 co o (n a' a a maw m o0 z a a a 4 ch 03 • f• Z Q : gf'd 8 a o . x . oc `n oai a o 0. o ax 4, a. a a H X co coFa ca ° u O • _ a 44 •a w 4.4 4 03 0 0 a Eo 4.. U E ayc ` z° a. a S s z H a 0 Z 40 m a awe o w a 171 0 Z5 w 4 0 a E a > z w w Z Z +y CI a G 4� 'y Z F -4 • z a w .. F >• w a .4 z w w w .] 0 a ••• 0. a As > o ° m {^yam 4-, v; rCX 43 c°s Cms 4.4 Cmf m4 i eey.44.�..40 a • Ort •5 Ga. F C. g l^ Ea'. !^ Ea+ [^ i^ .7a J a J wJ J ✓ L! �Z m �O) .,. • • Y Cl)ma0 • C 4. 44 &• 44 4 40 n 0 I. 40 01 n a 40 r V. N 1.11 0) m O1 ((]] n .4 n U . • a 4 I .1 a 40 0 40 .4 4p 01 V' N 01 54 0 CO 0 40 U1 w Z. 4. 0 .- O • n .i .4 10 40 n r a O UU1 4 n 04 1 0 10 .4 .11, N n .. a 44 0 0 0 0 en • . W • IT • a •• •• O . .4 .4 • cLMi L 4 G • N 4 44 L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .-e 0 0 N 0 4!1 O N O .1 0 0 Co 4 U' �+ 0 04 m O O O O O O O O O O N O O 1 O 1 O m O m 00 Z * .0 0. .O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IA n N CO0 0 0 0 N O 0 0 `8 • t J.! • Om. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 en O N O 0 '^� 01 .0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ON 0 0 .•1 0 10 0 N 0 N 0 0 . • a 000 n n n In en .n en en en en 0 .n en m en vi en en en .-1 en en • 0. �H 4 0 0 1 W � 0N V) N e4 N V) VF N 0 44 K N N 044 V) V) 44 N N N iiii 0 4 re •.4 '.4 • -e. W • y O 4 44 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 e0 0 0 M 4• 7 Q4 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ge • W 0 '0 1 O4 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O O O 0 O O 0 * 14 C C 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 0 0 . ` •ro O.4 .. 0000000000 m 0 0 0 0 n 0 0 0 N 0 0 • 3 0) .1 m en eee en n en en en en en en 1 en en en en 1 n en en 1 eel en • a ti e-1 e4 N v> 44 44 N 0 v> 34 e4 44 N N (4 N 44 N N e4 N 1O N 0 • U i4 .0 Z .-/ V> A .0 * t4 £ N 1..I in . -e4 4 .-1 a • •• • 0 W 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 0 0 04 . d • 0 W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 0 ~ m Q1 • .0 a.1 0) 000 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0+ O O ZA ` Li ro -.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O .-e 0 0 O As 4 3 O. o 0 O O o 0 o 0 O 0 0 O O 0 0 0 o O 0 0 1 O o C.1 L O. . a 0 sof n n en n en en en en en en en en en en en en en In e n en 40 en m Wd 4 0 0.2 1e 4 O. y 0 (4 en e4 V> N N N e4 V! N N V) (A N N V) V! f4 1 N 41) Vf CO 10 H • V) 0. d O `'i N • .) m • V0 3 • •I to • e,. C >1 • 0 1 N 0A N 01 CO 1 1 N 01 N .4 n CO 0 0 . 0 1 LII 0 01 al 07 4 L .4 y� 0 .-1 m .-e 0 m 01 N en . 0 .-4 N .e OI N .r T 0 N 1 0 ti .- > 01 eq .i O O O O O ri O til .-1 O N N 1 .i n O n ti N A F >w . C O 0 0 0 o O O 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o eT 0 o M . Co s. a `• 1) e0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o ti 00 8z m w * 14 u C m : 0. E. 7 E. • .7 F . • o 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 I. • N 4.00 40 O O O 0 0 1 0 O O 4 'C m N 1 n 1 N 00 .e 4 N 0 N en .e . 1 N N 4.0 0 n 1 m QO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 1. .4 L 4) 0l CO 0 10 IA 0 n en 0 N m N 0 .-e n N ON 0, 01 N m O m 0) E N N 1 n m 10 N t0 W n 4 n n 40400040 .4 .i 0 00 .� C • n r-7. N m N m 1 N .i N 4 40 1 N 01 N 1 Yl N N til 0 d 41 . N .4 N -4 O .4 I. 40 4 ro > 1 ow • C O 47 . O • N to .4 e. z • cn >• O • U a• .• w ♦• O to 0 a .4 >�. a 0 a 4am >. .d-. .4 U Z CO F a 4 M O ♦ > •-• O. C 0I. COC d N w _ u 2 • H > 2 y 0 d 0) U 4• H •• 14i - [0 I. > z a 40 u C •• • a p W m• > 0. U of F E. w 0 40 H Cr et d W 2 x Z C a O N rdi • U d. > > ti te] m 0. ca U .+ 0 '. EE.. H e:1 O C a tri 4 40 > > > m O d 81. r H F V .• CO .moi . y W aUS 07 0 GI y y. .7 O5...2 d 6 W O OW •• > F S O O F W O E» g cWil F a *, d ra-e i E. Z 0 W F an O e 4 a O X W O LL6 0~G J O O t i E.u > a 0 y 4 x O > u • V a p..• d 4 U a` U Cl 0 w s a a 0 e 4 W .7 w a of •• 2 z x U >.. m 400 >,, m W [4i0 W w m W IZ-1 to O O 1 1 CO11n z H a w • . N • • W W ON 4 . .E( COE0'COw444 0 • C I \ • ro e N N 111 e0 n 0 MI N VI In m N m 01 N In N 1 N t0 .i OI 0 0 0 �^ 0 • N en le0 I e-1 N N n N IO Ot en .4 N .i II) .•1 VI 1 m t0 in ed .4 N N CO 2 O R' n 1 N n 1 40 t 0 N 1 N .i 1 1 N N en 1 N t0 m 1 N 2 • • F a n t • a • . tT • ro • w a • r • • ❑ a a • N i • a >4 0 • U y A 0 m 0 0 0 0 obi h 0 el.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w « • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O • -'.0 .G n. 0 n 0 m 0 0 w • � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 ` E- . fE 0 0 0s o 0 0 m o 0 a o 0 0 0 0 0 o a t 3 V o o m n O O m a\ o Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ro en .4 0 n r+1 n n v en \o n n eni n n n n n «• 0 4s.) d CO V / H CO N N N N N N N N V) N IA N V) N V) t • ets 0 '0 IAC « ,C L� y 0 • CO 0 43 r • yH a •• +! CO • 41 0 • N O p N 0 0 0 H O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H • • 7 4 0 1!1 Co 0 0 0 N 01 0 el 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O w • m 0 b 0 m N 0 0 0 v. 1n 0 o. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 « M C C ONN COON 0 0 W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0s CD alO 0 w O+ 0 0 0 o m o co 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 • 3 m .i n m N n n n n en n 0 n n n en n n en n • ..a t. .-r N N w N V) to N N N N N V) t? N CO to V) V) 4 •U M4' Z vl Q C « Cl) E N a m i ti a • 0 Mt o W ..4 « .. 1 0 C O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 O O O O O 0 O O O N O O O O O O O O 0 m a • t L a 0 0 w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0• I.. go .0 • 1 U re . O 0 In 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 .0 e0 i .3 0, H 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ell ,C r U a) 0 • .7 U ea en en F en n en en rn m ws m m en m en m n m p Q. • O Ya+ .4 0.. V) V) .. N N V) tQ V) V) V) N VT VP N N VY N N H a to 4 00 qe� i0 H s CO 6e 4 a O as t O .. lJ t 410) •• • 4rO0 2 a 4) t w CN « 0 .•r .Co h w -1.• 0 0 m 0 0 01 01 01 00 T 0 0 w w .+ 0 .d F 0 F w w 0e 0 F n en h 01 F 01 N w en 0 N F 0 N 0 F .. wH 1J a 1..) > 0 01 1.1 N •.1 0 en .0. O N N n 0 N n 0 e^. .. 0 ..1 N 0 N O E fa • C 0 0 F 0 • 0 0 0 0 0 N H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ha a a .-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . G, 4. Z a m • C ra 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OU .CO m« •• a F a s,. s h F • E yam`. « 0 0 0 O o O O O o 0 o O O O o 0 0 o 0 O 0 O o w 0 • 0 O O 0 0 O O O 0 00000000044440000004000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 w 0 0 0 0 0 44 0 0 0 N 0 21 w m N w 01 O N N n o N F N F N 01 N .4 L i0) 4a • a .ti en a• n N CO n n 0 w w 0 1A CO w en N n N CO U1 N 0. 03• E h N N w 0 p CO .e en 0 m F .. e-1 w F Sc N n w N n N .3C• .3 .0 n N U1 n F n U1 0 n F 01 co .. N V1 N /s 0 N 4 n 0 04a •• 0 0 V en N .4 NN 0 01 ti .1 e.4 .1 t•4E (7 « .. COC •• 0 a • s CO W •• H O • U • .7 • z • t a -- o CO «• CO O 5)3 • a U ❑ _ _va Op COS az >_ u zw E«a u 4 U e4 R y Q w r H a U 3 3 3 3 U • m m M 3 K- • W a _ W 3 E U V! 0 W 3 a 3 W Z a C * Cl) 0 •a U a a 4 Y .q E a H t H _ w w Z a o t a • z v y •« t U tjo ❑ o O a s z o yy" o .Ec ZZp ro ..�4 O >• >+ W a VI H E. 4. > Y E U « Ca a > Cu .❑Ea 4 H N m Z a tai) Y u E a w o pp• o 00 Z CO p_ i p ap w > CO H v1 W En Z m 4. • > Z U S O b L OO S a DO, 3 W EW.7 F W r2+ w yyY a a to r V «7 • • O C7 Q a H 1 3 3 >+ !+ W CO= W _ E p U F a F F w to �'�y" i HHy "3p Baa .q ❑ >+ >. >e .? CO 0 a. ."a7 F m i aso F Ep�� O w Eyr '� 4 CEC 4 Cl) 05 a .7 N 4 h C 4�..ee Y N Z Z Z Z Z D 0 w 2 w a Z w 0) CO W EZ� S O O O O O O O O O W — 3 7 0 • EE.... a COwi •a F S EE� FE� E U U U U W EE�� G. rail OH Cl a t+! 10 a 0 4 ❑ Z Z Z Z Z Z Z 2 a 1U+ Z a 0 µ w i Ito Ca 0 105) N H N N M 0 a m a S Z S S 7 E F H E F O W Z M1 t• z ai as g 3 u 0 pR q❑O ox tz� a2 `2 a2 `2 2a CCE vE CCR yz EE Eta •• a rZi 1•. o $ e4 .t 4 3 z 3 a a K r4 4 4 4 2 Q w w 3 `4 0. .. Oh+ « O. > > > > z : : 2 T a : z 3: Z z Z Z X 8 g (yyap u 0 •« C 1 te a a Li. 4 C w LL o 5. • so s 0 m n 0 N N 0 w a O h 50 CO 0 V h n • a 1 .1 0 m n F N .. h MN 0 H 0 0 0 w n W h w aa1 0 a N N H N en in N .1 U1 Uf N p n h O N U1 N a 0 a ! • co • to • 4 d • • to • to • 0 • • • a • 0 • • • r • • 0 • 0 ♦) NO 000040004) 00000 N O 0 0 h . 14 1. NO 0 0 0 0 N 10 0 0 h 0 0 0 0 0 r1 0 0 0 H. tL • 4) Z • ..0 t] a N 0 0 0 0 0 10 h 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 2 U • 4., E a 0 0 0 0 0 o n 0 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N R 3 .0 h 0 0 0 0 O N V• 0 0 r1 0 0 0 0 0 V• 0 0 0 • .a U 0 N M r rl r1 r1 N LAMM M %O N N N N N b N 01 r 10 • O 0) G. w Vl 4/1 N N U) U) N U) Vi f? N V) V) N U) V) U) to U) N ./ L 3� 0 la N 0 i N 0 .6 N • N • • -+ M • U N • ..1 W • 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 w 0 0 0 @ 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 • 0. d 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO 0 0 r•) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H t . �• 5 O1 0 '0 O 0 0 0 0 0 e- a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 0 . ill Z ). V C C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 111 0 0 0 0 0 ' 0 0 0 0 : 0 • 0 RI0 000000 N N O 0 O1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4f1 44• 3 W .. N r1 r1 r) r1 N .. v r) M tr .r1 to r1 r. r. N r) r1 N N • .a H .•. U) N V) V) N V) N {A V) U) V) N V) N N V) V) N Y) N • 0 U N •.r N rn w • U 0 E n co A C +• COto X V) • L • N .a to a 4 •.1 44 M .a s ay • 0 U 4, 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 h 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 w .a • .•. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 co 0 cu U • 4 .44 o1 t0 a) • .0 i) a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 h 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 h 0. It .0 • I V ro 4.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 r1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 20 0 6 40 4 X a y 0 0 0 0 0 o h 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 h U .. 0. • .a U rt ri r1 N N r1 ri w rt )) ri r1 r1 r1 N M r1 r1 r ri rN 0 0 .4 • 0 0 .. a V) V) V) U) N V) N V) N N V> N N V) N N V) N V) v b RI 14 hir, t h C ' ill .. $ 4/2 0 4 'r d co (K C . 0 a u . • 44 0) . 4 ro Z • .. W • 4. CU • O 4.1 • O M N O 40 h Il) t11 Y1 rl V' N 1D V1 h N N h Q 0 0 N r) 40 M VO CO h O1 N .•a N 0 N 0 t0 0 O1 0 0 w 14 11 • a.) > hl O M 0 .•. 441 V• ..) to 0 0 .a .. 0 Lel .J 0 0 0 0 44 F. . C 0 0 0 0 O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .• 0 • V .4 Z v m •• 1., 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U0 C C C . • tY 0 4.4 ••, O 1+ • F 7 44 • h • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O t0 N O N O O O O N 111 U. O t 't] .p O O O O 0. 0 f0 . m ra N 1!1 N h m rn r) r1 g 4.) • 0to • u 0) .+ O d• 0 .•+ O N N m Vf0 0 O1 ' V' 01N .0 O1 h N E .4 u) CO h CO 10 N .•. o 10 0 ON m N V' 4) N) .•. 01 0) • o 7 441 .+ CO .a h .4 N U. Ul .. V. 0 10 v p C • -n O) • 13 0N N N h E..::: C0 •• C > '" " f0 z • a a w • 0 • N W • •/2 0 ' a U •• .. z4 C 4 • w 0 w 4. 0 o a • •• w v)54 to O O •• 0 N Z >.y • L Z to F [Lr ♦ 1 • CO w , C a • _ U W a a .. w « U a a F 4.U O. al cO U • `" yp • 3 tory Va) 1A.7 O a 0 £ 0 t oq4.5 wq 4• to to z 01 z ^ A 3 a 3 8 N " 0 a ai a' -3- to a 3 V1 A F .� • y �y (. t79�� 7 ro ? a I. • d c .7 'L M C t!/ U Q 2 O .7 4 0 ❑ w .] a ± w ~ s s CO w 4 s raj w h Z .. h w a u F CO > 0 F 3c G 00 O ( a Z 0 'F•• 0 5. 3 m N 0 °' a F m CO C. 48 - . (4X 4CO U0 .3 N CO o � w • F 4. w4 CO 0 2 rC D p .c m .t w d .�.4,R a CO x F CO E. > o w a Z Z a y a s Z Z to > r Cn U ~ Fz 0 * m ❑ S CO Z 0 4 a O Y .d COi FD a 2u t to • Z .. 06 K EX �)i2444 2 at 2 w CO F �- 3 2 F a5. • m oo m • a N F N S w a A O U CO u: 3 ❑ 0 4 ox a '" y sC 4 >. y ra .1 A a a a Z a) F a .a )a u U o. to 2 .. 0. ...mil, h •• 20. w x 2 r M M M w 1•. .. M a y 44 U. * 3 Z Z Z Z Z 2 3 Z 2 Z Z a Z T >. N N N O Z to Z U .1. • x CI) E u 0 5 C 0 \ • .6 . .a ra O N .a o h U. ti .a 01 U) VI .4 .4 0 U V' 40 a 0 a 0. f co • a ) N V, N r1 h 111 m 10 0 h 4/) 0 h N 0 v 11 w 111 Vr 40 1 2 Et. 0 • N 10 T41 40 h r) .T .a r1 h N h 10 V. V. h N v. V. h OC 4 O a JARDINE • • ATTORNEYS AT LAW LOGAN & P.1...L.P. O'BRIEN March 13 , 1997 ,,2:,:': \� L FEDERAL EXPRESS 2100 Piper]affray Plaza THE HONORABLE JOHN S SHABAZ MAR 1 4 1997 444 Cedar Street UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Saint Paul,Minnesota .) 55101-2160 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN t______ `_ , 4 120 N HENRY ST , Firm (612)290-6500 PO BOX 432 `---' __________ Fax (612)223-5070 MADISON WI 53701 E-Mail JARD1 NELAW@AOL.COM Re: Court File No. 96-C-0019-S and 96-C-489-S Donald I\ Junker Landfill Trust, v Junker Recycling, Inc. , John Geralddnl_LiLiM. icnmtihan Landfill Remediation Trust vs . Garry Thompson; et al . Alan R.Vanasek John M.Kennedy,Jr. Eugene J.Flick Charles E.Gillin Dear Judge Shaba z : James).Galman Pierre N.Regnicr MarkA.Fonken I represent the City Oak Park Heights in the above captioned GeorgeWKuehner consolidated case. I am writing in follow-up to my telephone Mary A.Rice Patti J.Skoglund conversation with your office of March 12, 1997 . I called to SeanE.Hade inform the Court that the City of Oak Park Heights has reached Timothy S.Crom a settlement with thelaintiffs . Therefore, the Court need Lawrence M.Rochehord P James G.Golembeck not rule on the pending motion filed for summary judgement by Kern C.Koep the City against the plaintiffs. David J.Hoekstra JamesK.Helling However, this does not terminate Oak Park Heights Michael A.Rayer participation in this law suit . Recently, defendants K-Mart, Marlene S.Garvin Mary P.Rowe Kingwood and Hardware Hank Enterprises asserted Cross Claims Karen R.Cote against the City seeking indemnity and defense costs . Nathan W.Hart Joseph E.Flynn Thomas L.Cummings At the present time K-Mart and Kingwood Corporation have Margaret C.Galvin motions for summary judgement Pending pertaining to their L.Johnson Elizabeth B.Hayes claims against the City for full indemnity and attorney fees . Laurence A.Diamond The City has opposed their motions and awaits the Court ' s Katherine E.Kennedy caraJ.Debes ruling_ Therefore, please do not remove me from the roll at Yvonne M.Flaherty this point . Brenda L.Theis JerreF.Logan(1913-1983) Thank you for your consideration. Very truly yours, Some members also admitted to North Dakota, Flori aonsin, JARDINE, LOGAN & O'BRIEN, P.L.L.P. North Dakota,Florida and Illinois Sean E. Hade Direct Dial : (612) 290-6510 cc: All Counsel of Record b.cc: Mike Robertson City of Oak Park Heights 1 • 111 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN JUNKER LANDFILL TRUST, a Minnesota business trust, Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER v. 96-C-019-S JUNKER RECYCLING, INC. , et al. , Defendants. LANDFILL REMEDIATION TRUST, Plaintiff, 96-C-489-S v. GARRY THOMPSON, et al. , Defendants. This action consolidates cases brought by plaintiffs Junker Landfill Trust ("JLT") and Landfill Remediation Trust ("LRT") , each of whom have contributed to the remediation of the contaminated Junker Landfill site near Hudson, Wisconsin. Plaintiffs seek contribution from numerous defendants including defendants Kingwood Corporation, Kmart Corporation and City of Oak Park Heights alleging that the defendants are potentially responsible parties who generated hazardous waste or arranged for the disposal of hazardous waste which was deposited at the Junker Landfill. 1-' f .mow •ti.: �.,,.v(E.�s[�7.L_._ • Defendants Kingwood and Kmart assert cross claims against the City of Oak Park Heights on the basis of Minnesota common law indemnity. Defendants Kingwood and Kmart now move for summary judgment on their cross claims. The relevant facts are not disputed. FACTS The Junker Landfill was operated during the period from 1972 to 1987 . Effective January 1, 1975 the City of Oak Park Heights enacted an ordinance creating a "garbage collection system" . The relevant ordinance provided in part: All garbage and refuse accumulations shall be accumulated, conveyed and disposed of by the City of Oak Park Heights through its legally authorized agent, the city collection contractor. No persons shall collect or convey garbage or refuse over any of the streets or alleys of the city, or dispose of any garbage accumulated in the city, except the city's duly authorized agent. The city duly authorized as its agent Junker Sanitation. In compliance with the ordinance defendants Kingwood and Kmart contracted with Junker Sanitation for the collection and disposal of their waste which was deposited at the Junker Landfill. MEMORANDUM The sole issue on summary judgment is whether Minnesota indemnity law and the city ordinance combine to require the city to indemnify defendants Kingwood and Kmart for their potential CERCLA liability. There being no material factual disputes relevant to this purely legal issue, the matter may appropriately be resolved on summary judgment. 2 411 !II The circumstances under which indemnity is available were established by the Minnesota Supreme Court in Hendrickson v, Minnesota Power & Light Co. , 104 N.W.2d 843 (1960) . Only two of those circumstances are arguably relevant here: 1. Where the one seeking indemnity has only a derivative or vicarious liability for damage caused by one sought to be charged. 2. Where the one seeking indemnity has incurred liability by action at the direction, in the interest of, and in reliance upon the one sought to be charged. Defendants Kingwood and Kmart assert that both of these circumstances are present in this case and entitle them to indemnification for any potential CERCLA liability from the City of Oax Park Heights. To the contrary, consideration of the elements and purposes of CERCLA liability reveal that neither circumstance is applicable. The potential liability of all defendants involved in the pending motion is based upon 42 U.S.C. § 9607 (a) (3) wnicn imposes liability upon: any person who by contract, agreement or otherwise arranged for disposal or treatment, or arranged with a transporter for transport for disposal or treatment, of hazardous substances owned or possessed by such person, by any other party or entity, at any facility or incineration vesselowned or operated by another party or entity and containing such hazardous substances. . . " This provision, together with the other provisions of § 9607 (a) have been broadly construed to extend liability to all parties who contribute to the problems caused by hazardous substances from generation through disposal. B.T. Goodrich V._. 3 • i Betkaoski, 99 F.3d 505, 514 (2nd Cir. 1996) . The law is intended to make sure that those who benefit financially from a commercial activity internalize the environmental costs of the activity as a cost of doing business. Id. Defendants Kingwood and Kmart as generators of hazardous waste benefitted financially from the use of the products which resulted in the generation of hazardous waste and therefore are the type of parties who are liable under the broad reach of CERCLA. CERCLA extends liability to those who make decisions concerning waste disposal including what to dispose, where and when to dispose of it. Kingwood and Kmart were solely responsible for the activities which generated the waste and for determining what waste to accumulate for disposal. Under the circumstances defendants Kingwood and Kmart exercised far greater discretion than did defendant City of Oak Park Heights whose sole decision was the determination of the contract hauler. Clearly, the two circumstances relied upon by defendants are inapplicable. The first circumstance, derivative liability, does not apply since Kingwood and Kmart are not vicariously liable but are directly liable for their role in the generation and disposal of hazardous waste. The City of Oak Park Heights exercised absolutely no control over the nature of the waste of which the defendants disposed and therefore the concept of vicarious liability is inapplicable. Similarly, defendantg Kingwood and Kmart were not directed by the City of Oak Park Heights to generate or accumulate hazardous substances. Accordingly, any liability attributable to Kingwood and Kmart was not the result of reliance 4 4 410 upon or direction by the City of Oak Park Heights. The arguments of defendants Kingwood and Kmart are based on the false premise that CERCLA liability is based exc]usively on the decision of where to dispose hazardous waste. There are no doubt many instances where generators of hazardous waste do not know or care about the ultimate destination of their waste, having left that decision to others either by ordinance or contract. A party making that decision does not assume the obligation to indemnify the generator for CERCLA liability unless it does so by express agreement. In conclusion, the Court finds that by generating hazardous waste, contracting with Junker Sanitation Services for its removal and delivering such waste to Junker Sanitation Services defendants Kingwood and Kmart became potentially liable under CERCLA for the costs of remediating the Junker landfill site. The fact that the selection of the hauler was dictated by the City does not eliminate defendants liability nor does it entitle defendants Kingwood and Kmart to indemnification from the City of Oak Park Heights. ORDER IT IS ORDERED that the motions for summary judgment on cross claims for indemnification by defendants Kingwood Corporation and Kmart Corporation against the defendant City of Oak Park Heights is DENIED. Entered this 12th day of March, 1997 . BY - - • s' (:' ?It/JOHN C. S--'i.BAZ Distr. t 'fudge 1• • i JARDINE ATTORNEYS AT LAW LOGAN ELLE 0 BRIEN March 12, 1997 2100Piper Jaffray Plaza PERSONAL/CONFIDENTIAL 1 J \ 1' 444 Cedar Street CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS Saint Paul,Minnesota Z 55101-2160 ATTN: ADMINISTRATOR MIKE ROBERTSON ; 7 P 0 BOX 2007 ; 1 ?! Firm (612)290-6500 OAK PARK HEIGHTS MN 55082-2007 Fax (612)223-5070 E-Mail JARDINELAW@AOL.COM Re: Our File No: 26056 (1657) Junker Landfill Trust v. Junker Recycling, Inc. , et al Donald M.Jardine John R.O'Brien Gerald M.Linnihan Alan R.Vanasek Dear Mr. Robertson: John M.Kennedy,Jr. Eugene J.Flick CharlesE.Gillin The State of Wisconsin has finally agreed to the Consent James J.Galman Decree! I have attached a copy for your file along with a copy Pierre N.Regnier Mark A.Fonken of the Release. George W.Kuehner Mary A.Rgagreed e Patti J.SkogNow that Wisconsin has to the settlement, the JLT and SeanE.Hade LRT have made a counter offer to the City's settlement offer TimothyS.Crom of $90, 000 . 00 . Their new settlement demand is $100, 000 . 00 . Lawrence M.Rocheford James G.Golembeck Under the terms of the settlement the City would have to make Kerry C.Koep David J.Hoekstra the full payment by 9:00 a.m. on March 21, 1997 . The JamesK.Helling settlement check should be made payable to "JUNKER SETTLEMENT Michael A.Rayer FUND" and forwarded to me for delivery. If the amount is Marlene S.Garvis Mary PRowe acceptable to the City. Karen R.Cote Nathan W.Hart Joseph E.Flynn I attended a mandatory pretrial conference on Monday, March Thomas L.Cummings 10, 1997 . The Court considered a number of motions that have MargarShari Let Johnson an an impact on the settlement and the trial. Shari L.Johnson Elizabeth B.Hayes Laurence A.Diamond First, the Court considered a motion to stay the trial because Katherine E.Kennedy CaraJ.Debes of the impending Consent Decree. As you know, the consent YvonneM.Flaherty decree can not be finalized until after the a 30 day comment Brenda L.Theis period expires. This conflicts with the scheduled trial date JerreFLogan(1923-1983 of March 31, 1997 . The Court refused to move the trial date, but rather stayed all claims against anyone who has signed the Consent Decree by March 21, 1997. The Court then set the Some members also admitted hearing on the Consent Decree for April 29, 1997 at 1 : 00 p.m. to practice law in Wisconsin, North Dakota,Florida and Illinois Next, the Court considered a motion by the U.S . Postal Service to strike the jury trial . The Court granted the motion and then indicated that the case will now be tried in Madison; that it would be tried in one week; and that if necessary the Court would be in session 16 hours a day, six days, but the trial will not carry over into the following week. ti CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS March 12, 1997 Page 2 The Court also denied a motion by the JLT to be re-aligned in the case as a defendant rather than as a plaintiff . The Court indicated that it would not rule until next week on the summary judgement motions we filed on behalf of the City. However, if we enter into the Consent Decree, I will so advise the Court and therefore it will not have to issue those rulings. The court also read off an eleven page list of parties to the litigation who have not made appearances todate. The Court then dismissed those parties for lack of service, but ruled that if the plaintiffs could show that a party had been served and failed to appear the Court would then enter a default judgement against that party. Please let me know if you have any questions. Very truly yours, JARDINE, LOGAN & O'BRIEN, P.L.L.P. 5 (J Sean E. Hade Direct Dial: (612) 290-6510 • • IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN THE STATE OF WISCONSIN, Plaintiff, v. Case No. JUNKER LANDFILL TRUST, et al., Defendants. CONSENT DECREE • ! • TABLE OF CONTENTS ` I. BACKGROUND 1 II. JURISDICTION 2 III. PARTIES BOUND 2 IV. STATEMENT OF PURPOSE 2 V. SITE DESCRIPTION 3 VI. DEFINITIONS 4 VII. GENERAL PROVISIONS 6 VIII. RESERVATION OF RIGHTS 9 IX. EFFECTIVE DATE 10 X. TERMINATION AND SATISFACTION 10 XI. COVENANTS NOT TO SUE 11 XII. SIGNATORIES AND SERVICE 11 • 411 I. BACKQROUND • A. The State of Wisconsin ("the State"), by its attorneys, James E. Doyle, Attorney General, and Shari Eggleson and Frank Remington, Assistant Attorneys General, at the request of the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources ("the WDNR"), filed a complaint seeking damages in this matter pursuant to Section 107 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, as amended, ("CERCLA"), 42 U.S.C. s.9607, and Sections 292.11(3) and 292.95 (formerly ss. 144.76(3) and 144.98), Wisconsin Statutes. B. The State seeks in its complaint, inter alia: (1) reimbursement of costs it has incurred for response actions at the site of the former Junker Sanitary Landfill in the Town of Hudson in St. Croix County, Wisconsin ("the Landfill" or "the Site"), and (2) contribution towards the costs of implementing additional response actions at the Landfill consistent with the National Contingency Plan, 40 C.F.R. Part 300 (as amended) ("the NCP"). C. The defendants, who are listed in Appendix B ("the Settling Defendants"), do not, by entering into this Consent Decree, admit any liability to the Plaintiff arising out of the transactions or occurrences alleged in the complaint. The Settling Federal Defendants do not admit any liability to the Plaintiff arising out of the transactions or occurrences alleged in the complaint. D. In response to releases of hazardous substances at and from the Site of the former Junker Sanitary Landfill, the WDNR installed a cap, an active gas extraction system and a leachate extraction system at the landfill and operated and maintained the landfill systems from September 1992 until March, 1995. In March of 1995, the Junker Landfill Trust, a group comprised of the Settling Defendants, took over operation and maintenance work at the Site under a contract with WDNR. E. A Remedial Investigation ("RI") Report, prepared by Wenck Associates, Inc. on behalf of the Settling Defendants, was approved by the WDNR on August 10, 1995, and a Feasibility Study ("FS") Report, prepared by Wenck Associates, Inc. on behalf of the Settling Defendants, was approved by the WDNR on March 27, 1996. F. Pursuant to Section 117 of CERCLA, the WDNR published notice of the completion of the FS and of the proposed plan for final remedial action at the Junker Sanitary Landfill, and provided an opportunity for the public to comment on the proposed plan. G. The decision of the WDNR on the final remedial action to be implemented at the Site is contained in a Record of Decision ("ROD"), which was issued by the WDNR on August 20, 1996. 1 • H. The Settling Parties believe, and the Court by entering this Consent Decree finds, that this Consent Decree has been negotiated by the Settling Parties in good faith and implementation of this Consent Decree will expedite the cleanup of the Landfill and will avoid prolonged and complicated litigation between the Settling Defendants, the Settling Federal Defendants and the State, and that this Consent Decree is fair, reasonable, and in the public interest. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby ordered, adjudged and decreed: II. JURISDICTION This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. s. 1331, and 42 U.S.C. ss. 9607 and 9613(b). This Court also has personal jurisdiction over the Settling Defendants and the Settling Federal Defendants. Solely for the purposes of this Consent Decree, the Settling Defendants and the Settling Federal Defendants waive all objections and defenses that they may have to the jurisdiction of this Court or to venue in this District. The Settling Defendants and the Settling Federal Defendants agree not to challenge the terms of this Consent Decree nor to contest this Court's jurisdiction to enter and enforce this Consent Decree. III. PARTIES BOUND This Consent Decree is binding upon the State, and upon the Settling Defendants and the Settling Federal Defendants and their agents, successors and assigns (the "Settling Parties"). The undersigned representative of each Settling Party certifies that he or she is fully authorized by the party whom he or she represents to enter into and execute this Consent Decree and legally bind such party to the terms of this Consent Decree. IV. STATEMENT OF PURPOSE In consideration of each of the promises, covenants and undertakings of the WDNR, the Settling Defendants and the Settling Federal Defendants under this Consent Decree, the WDNR, the Settling Defendants and the Settling Federal Defendants hereby agree that, to avoid the inherent costs and delays of protracted litigation and to minimize other transactional costs at the Site: 1. The Settling Defendants and the United States, on behalf of the Settling Federal Defendants, shall reimburse the WDNR for a portion of the response costs incurred by the WDNR for this Site, to the extent provided herein; and 2 411) S 2. The Settling Defendants and the United States, on behalf of the Settling Federal Defendants, shall provide additional funds for the implementation of the response actions at the Site, to the extent provided herein. V. SITE DESCRIPTION Site Names: Junker Sanitary Landfill, Inc., a/k/a: Pilquist Bros. Sanitary Landfill Landfill Land Company Landfill Sanitary Landfill Site, Inc. Klondike Resource Conservation and Recovery System/Program Landfill Site Location and Size: SE1/4, SE1/4, and SW1/4, SE1/4, Section 13, T29N, R19W Town of Hudson, St. Croix County, Wisconsin Fill area of 15 acres which contains approximately 1.25 million cubic yards of waste Total property area is 41.1 acres. Site Geology/Hydrogeology: The Site lies in a former gravel pit. The geology at the Site consists of 40 to 100 feet of unconsolidated material of glacial origin - medium to coarse-grained sand with gravel. The underlying bedrock is the Prairie du Chien formation which is up to 300 feet thick. This • formation is a fractured dolomite with eroded channels and there are several bedrock faults in the region with vertical offsets of up to 400 feet. Underlying the Prairie du Chien is the Jordan sandstone formation. The Prairie du Chien and the underlying Jordan sandstone together comprise the regional aquifer which flows generally westward toward the St. Croix River, a major discharge boundary. The depth of the water table ranges from 100 feet near the Junker Sanitary Landfill Site to 60 feet at CTH A (two and one half miles downgradient/west). The water table is generally within the Prairie du Chien. However near CTH A and in the vicinity of LaBarge Road, the water table is located within the overlying unconsolidated sand and gravel as indicated on well logs for private drinking water wells located in these areas. This is probably a result cf bedrock faulting and erosional features in the surface of the Prairie du Chien which were later filled in with glacial material. There is also a documented bedrock fault west of CTH A. At this point the water table shows up in the unconsolidated deposits above the Prairie du Chien bedrock. Site History: Landfill operations began at the Site in November 1972 under the ownership of Waifred Pilquist. In April, 1973, Garry Thompson purchased the landfill and continued operation as the new owner. The landfill was expanded by Mr. Thompson and licensed by the WDNR in October 1975, under the name of Landfill Land Company, which was owned by Garry Thompson and 3 operated by him until 1977. In 1977, Garry Thompson established a corporatibn, Sanitary Landfill Site, Inc., which leased the landfill to James Junker of Junker Sanitary Landfill Inc. who operated it until January 5, 1987. In June and July of 1987, Garry Thompson reopened the Site illegally under the name Klondike Resource Conservation and Recovery System/Program Landfill. The Site received municipal solid waste, demolition waste and commercial/industrial waste. Site Characteristics: Currently the Site has an NR 504 cap, an active gas extraction system and a leachate extraction system. There are also a series of gas monitoring probes, groundwater monitoring wells and various monitoring points associated with the gas and leachate extraction systems. The cap consists of two feet of clay, one and one-half feet of grading material and six inches of topsoil. The permeability of the clay barrier layer was documented during construction to be less than 1x104 cm/sec. The landfill Site is well vegetated and surface water runoff from the cover system is directed to one of two detention ponds adjacent to the landfill. The active gas extraction system consists of seventeen gas extraction wells which are operated to control methane gas migration away from the landfill site while minimizing oxygen intrusion into the landfill. The gas extracted from the landfill flows through a header system and is thermally destructed by a ground flare. The leachate extraction system consists of four submersible pumps which were installed in four gas extraction wells in December 1993. These four leachate extraction pumps have historically pumped at a rate of 3 to 5 gallons per minute (gpm) for approximately 1.25 hours a week. The leachate flows through the gas header system to an on-site 4,000 gallon holding tank. Condensate from the active gas extraction system is also stored in this tank. Known Substances of Concern in Groundwater: Trichloroethylene (TCE) Tetrachloroethylene (PCE) 1,1,1 Trichloroethane (111TCA) - 1,1 Dichloroethane (11DCA) 1,1 Dichloroethlyene (11DCE) VI. DEFINITIONS Unless otherwise expressly provided herein, terms used in this Consent Decree which are defined in CERCLA or in regulations promulgated under CERCLA, including but not limited to the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan, 40 C.F.R. Part 300 ("the NCP"), shall have the meaning assigned to them in CERCLA or the NCP. Whenever the terms listed below are used in this Consent Decree, including its attachments, the following definitions, including for purposes of 42 U.S.C. § 9613 (0(1) and (2), shall apply: 4 • A. "Consent Decree" shall mean this Consent Decree and all of its attachments and exhibits. In the event of conflict between the text of this Consent Decree and any of its attachments, the text of this Consent Decree shall govern. B. "Feasibility Study" or "FS" shall mean the Feasibility Study submitted by the Junker Landfill Trust, a group comprised of the Settling Defendants, which was approved by the WDNR on March 27, 1996. C. "Junker Defendants" means James L. Junker, Junker Recycling, Inc., Junker Sanitary Landfill, Inc., Junker Sanitation Services, Inc., United Waste Systems, Inc. and United Waste Transfer, Inc. D. "Junker Sanitary Landfill Site," "the Landfill" or "the Site" shall mean the contiguous property as shown on Attachment A, located in the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter, and the southwest quarter of the southeast quarter, of Section 13, T29N, R19W in the Town of Hudson, St. Croix County, Wisconsin, estimated to be 41.1 acres, including an area of approximately 15 acres where waste was landfilled, known as the former Junker Sanitary Landfill, Inc., including all areas where waste was deposited or pollution came to be located. E. "Potentially Responsible Parties" or "PRPs" shall mean all parties who sent wastes to the Site, who operated the Site, who owned the Site, who transported or arranged for the transport of wastes to the Site, or who are otherwise liable under 42 U.S.C. s. 9607(a) or s. 292.11 (formerly s.144.76), Wisconsin Statutes. F. "Record of Decision" or "ROD" shall mean the WDNR's decision for the remedial action to be implemented at the Site, signed on August 20, 1996 by the Secretary of the WDNR, George Meyer, including any changes or amendments thereto. G. "Settling Defendants" shall mean the defendants listed in Attachment B, who are members of the Junker Landfill Trust, a Minnesota business trust operating pursuant to Chapter 318, Minnesota Statutes (1994), and may include other Potentially Responsible Parties, other than the Junker Defendants, who agree to sign this Consent Decree, under the terms and conditions established by the current members of the Junker Landfill Trust. H. "Settling Federal Defendants" shall mean the United States Postal Service, including the United States Post Offices for Hudson, Wisconsin; Lake Elmo, Minnesota; Stillwater, Minnesota; and Bayport, Minnesota. "Settling Parties" shall mean the Settling Defendants, the Settling Federal Defendants and the State of Wisconsin. J. "State" shall mean the State of Wisconsin, including all departments and agencies and all officers and employees thereof. 5 K. "Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources" or "WDNR" shall mean the agency of the State of Wisconsin created pursuant to s. 15.34, Wisconsin Statutes, and charged with implementing the provisions of s. 292.11 (formerly s. 144.76), Wisconsin Statutes, and authorized in conjunction with the Wisconsin Department of Justice to enter into settlements in the name of the State of Wisconsin pursuant to 42 U.S.C. s. 9613 (0(2) and any successor department or agency thereof. L. "United States" shall mean the United States of America, including the United States Postal Service, the United States Post Offices for Bayport, Minnesota; Stillwater, Minnesota; Lake Elmo, Minnesota; and Hudson, Wisconsin, and all other departments, agencies, and instrumentalities of the United States of America. WI. GENERAL PROVISIONS A. The objective of the Settling Parties in entering into this Consent Decree is to protect public health, safety and welfare and the environment at the Site by providing for contribution by the Settling Defendants and the United States to the costs previously incurred and to be incurred to implement the remedy selected for the Site in the ROD. B. In consideration of each of the promises, covenants and undertakings of the State set forth herein, the Settling Defendants and the United States hereby agree to take the following actions on or before April 1, 1997 or within sixty (60) days after the entry of this Consent Decree, whichever date is later, unless otherwise specifically provided: 1. The Settling Defendants shall pay to the WDNR $1.5 million to be deposited into the state environmental fund, to contribute towards the costs incurred by the State at this Site, less the following "set-off': The difference between (a) the low cost quote to purchase a payment funding mechanism from a financial institution or insurance company rated A+ or better which will provide sufficient income to fund in monthly payments the operation and maintenance of the landfill remediation systems, landfill monitoring and filter installation and maintenance costs that have been projected by Dames & Moore for the Site, plus a contingency of 35%, from the point in time that the$3 million in promissory notes being held by United Waste Systems, Inc. under an escrow agreement that was entered into pursuant to a consent decree signed by the Junker Defendants (in Case No. 96-C-0432-S, U.S. District Court, Western District of Wisconsin) is projected to be spent (assuming that the actual costs incurred by the Junker Defendants will be incurred at a rate equal to Dames &Moore's projected costs plus a 25% contingency)("25!35% payment funding mechanism") until the end of the Landfill's 25-year long-term care period in December of 2022, and (b) the actual cost of the payment funding mechanism described in Paragraph B, 3 of this Section. Should the State approve the purchase of the payment funding mechanism described in Paragraph B, 3 of this Section from the A+ or better 6 1110 rated financial institution or insurance company which provides the ldwest quote, and if the amount of the lowest quote is $ 1.5 million or less, there will be no set-off. 2. Payments made pursuant to this Section shall be made by cashier's check or certified check made payable to the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, and shall be mailed or delivered to: Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Bureau Director, Bureau for Remediation and Redevelopment, 101 S. Webster Street, P.O. Box 7921, Madison, Wisconsin 53707-7921. The portion of this payment to be made by the Minnesota Department of Corrections will be paid separately, as provided in Paragraph B, 4 of this Section, and the portion of this payment to be made by the United States will be paid separately, as provided in Paragraph B, 5 of this Section. A copy of the transmittal letter that accompanies each check shall be sent to the following WDNR project managers: Wendy Didier Anderson (1 copy) Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources West Central Region Headquarters 1300 W. Clairemont Avenue P.O. Box 4001 Eau Claire, Wisconsin 54702 Patrick Collins (1 copy) Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources 990 Hillcrest Street, Suite 104 Baldwin, WI 54002 3. The Settling Defendants shall purchase a payment funding mechanism, from a financial institution or insurance company that is rated A+ or higher after the proposed purchase has been approved by the State, which will provide sufficient income to fund in monthly payments the operation and maintenance of the landfill remediation systems, landfill monitoring and filter installation and maintenance costs that have been projected by Dames &Moore for the Site plus a contingency of 35%, from the point in time that the $ 3 million in promissory notes being held by United Waste Systems, Inc. under an escrow agreement that was entered into pursuant to a consent decree signed by the Junker Defendants (in Case No. 96-C-0432-S, U.S. District Court, Western District of Wisconsin) is projected to be spent (assuming that the actual costs incurred by the Junker Defendants will be incurred at a rate equal to Dames & Moore's projected costs plus a 30% contingency) ("30/35% payment funding mechanism") until the end of the Landfill's 25-year long-term care period (December, 2022). The monthly payments from this payment funding mechanism shall be deposited into the escrow account which has been established pursuant to the attached Escrow Agreement, Attachment C, which is incorporated herein by reference. If the low 7 • 110 quote for the cost of the 30/35% payment funding mechanism irorn an A+ or better financial institution or insurance company is less than $1.5 million, and if the State approves of the purchase of the payment funding mechanism from the financial institution or insurance company which has given the low quote, the Settling Defendants shall fully fund the purchase of the 30/35% payment funding mechanism. However, if the State only approves the purchase of a payment funding mechanism from a financial institution or insurance company which did not provide the low quote, the State shall fund the difference between the cost of the low quote 25/35% payment funding mechanism and the cost of the 30/35% payment funding mechanism approved by the State by means of the set-off provided for in Paragraph B, 1 of this Section. The payment funding mechanism purchased pursuant to this paragraph shall be issued and delivered to Junker Recycling, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, or to its assignee for delivery to an escrow agent to be selected by the State under the attached Escrow Agreement (Attachment C). Junker Recycling, Inc. or its assignee shall own and have full right, and inin m . 4. This Consenttitle Decreeterest as to and the MinnesotatosuchpayDepartmentent offunding Correctionsmechanismis contingent upon the Minnesota Legislature appropriating the necessary funds. The Minnesota Department of Corrections shall make a payment of $ on or before August 1, 1997, if an appropriation is approved by that date. In the event that the Minnesota Legislature does not appropriate funds as contemplated by this Paragraph, or the Minnesota Department of Corrections fails to make the required payment on or before August 1, 1997, from funds appropriated by the Legislature, the Settling Defendants shall be considered no longer in compliance with the terms of this Consent Decree. Should the State seek to recover this overdue payment from the Settling Defendants other than the Minnesota Department of Corrections, the Court shall retain continuing jurisdiction to enter judgment against the Settling Defendants for their pro rata share of the amount of the overdue payment. Each Settling Defendant shall be considered to be back into compliance with the terms of this Consent Order once that Settling Defendant's pro rata share of the overdue amount is paid to WDNR. 5. The United States, on behalf of the Settling Federal Defendants, shall pay to the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources the sum of$ within a reasonable time after the effective date of this Consent Decree for its share of all past and future response costs at the Junker Sanitary Landfill Site. Interest will accrue from the 121st day after the entry of the Consent Decree by the Court, if payment is not made within 120 days. Interest shall be determined in the same manner as that provided for determining the rate for pre judgment interest by section 107 of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. s.9607. All obligations of the United States hereunder are subject to the availability of funds applicable for that purpose. No provision of this Consent Decree shall be interpreted as, or constitute, a commitment or requirement that the United States obligate or pay funds in 8 110 contravention of the Anti-Deficiency Act, 31 U.S.C. s. 1341, or any other applicable provision of law. In the event that the United States does not pay the funds as contemplated by this Paragraph, the Settling Defendants, and the Settling Federal Defendants shall be considered no longer in compliance with the terms of this Consent Decree. Should the State seek to recover this overdue payment from the Settling Defendants, the Court shall retain continuing jurisdiction to enter judgment against the Settling Defendants for their pro rata share of the amount of the overdue payment. Each Settling Defendant shall be considered to be back into compliance with the terms of this Consent Order once that Settling Defendant's pro rata share of the overdue amount is paid to WDNR. VIII. RESERVATION OF RIGHTS A. Nothing herein shall waive the right of the State, the Settling Defendants or the Settling Federal Defendants to enforce this Consent Decree. B. Nothing herein is intended to release, discharge or in any way affect any claims, causes of action or demands in law or equity which the Settling Defendants, the Settling Federal Defendants or the State may have against any other person, firm, partnership or corporation (collectively "Other Person") for any liability such Other Person may have arising out of, or relating in any way to, the generation, storage, treatment, handling, transportation, release or disposal of any materials, hazardous substances, solid or hazardous waste, contaminants or pollutants at, to or from the Site. The Settling Parties expressly reserve all rights, claims, demands and causes of action they may have against any and all Other Persons. C. The State recognizes that the Settling Defendants and the Settling Federal Defendants may have the right to seek contribution, indemnity and/or any other available remedy against any Other Person found to be responsible or liable for contribution, indemnity or otherwise for any amount which has been or will be expended by the Settling Defendants or the Settling Federal Defendants in connection with the Site. D. The Settling Parties agree and the Court finds that the Settling Defendants, including those PRPs who have signed this Consent Decree and have contributed funds to help finance the implementation of the remedy selected in the ROD, and the United States are entitled to such protection from contribution actions or claims under 42 U.S.C. s.9613(f)(1) and any other applicable law, as is provided by CERCLA Section 113(0(2), 42 U.S.C. s. 9613 (0(2), from the effective date of this Consent Decree, for as long as the terms herein are complied with, and after termination of this Consent Decree pursuant to the provisions of Section X (Termination and Satisfaction). The aforesaid protection from contribution actions or claims is intended to be the maximum available and to apply to any and all past, present and future claims of any entity against the Settling Defendants or the Settling Federal Defendants pursuant to CERCLA, Wisconsin 9 • statutory or common law, arising from the facts alleged in the complaint filed in this matter, whether such claims exist at the time of entry of this Consent Decree or arise or are asserted subsequent thereto, and irrespective of the person asserting said claim or claims. E. Nothing herein shall be construed to release the Settling Defendants or the Settling Federal Defendants from any liability for failure of the Settling Defendants or the Settling Federal Defendants to make the payments required under Section VII of this Consent Decree. Upon receipt by the WDNR of the payments required under Section VII, B, 1 and 4, and the purchase of the payment funding mechanism required under Section VII, B, 3, the Settling Defendants shall have no further obligations under this Consent Decree. Upon the receipt by the WDNR of the payment from the United States required under Section VII, B, 5, the United States shall have no further obligations under the Consent Decree. The Settling Parties expressly recognize that this Consent Decree does not waive or estop the U.S. EPA from undertaking or requiring additional response actions under the NCP or seeking recovery of past costs related to response actions at the Site. F. Nothing herein is intended to be a release or settlement of any claim for personal injury or property damage to any person not a party to this Consent Decree. IX. EFFECTIVE DATE The effective date of this Consent Decree shall be the date upon which this Consent Decree is entered by the Court: If for any reason the Court should decline to approve of this Consent Decree, or any portion thereof, this Consent Decree is voidable by any party. X. TERMINATION AND SATISFACTION The provisions of this Consent Decree shall be deemed satisfied as relates to the Settling Defendants upon receipt by the WDNR of: (1) the payments required under Section VII, B, 1 and 4, of this Consent Decree; and (2) documentation that proves that the payment funding mechanism required under Section VII, B, 3 of this Consent Decree has been purchased. As relates to the United States, the provisions of this Consent Decree shall be deemed satisfied upon receipt by the WDNR of the payment required under Section VII, B, 5. 10 i XI. COVENANTS NOT TO SUE ` A. Except as otherwise provided in Section VII, B, 4 and 5 (General Provisions) and Section VIII (Reservation of Rights), from the effective date of this Consent Decree, for as long as the terms herein are complied with, and after termination of this Consent Decree pursuant to the provisions of Section X (Termination and Satisfaction), the State covenants not to sue or take administrative action against the Settling Defendants or the United States pursuant to Section 107 of CERCLA, or s. 292.31 or 292.11 (formerly s. 144.442 or 144.76), Wisconsin Statutes, relating to the Site, including, but not limited to, present or future environmental pollution caused by the Landfill. The covenant as to the Minnesota Department of Corrections shall be effective upon WDNR's receipt of the payment required under Section VII, B, 4 of this Consent Decree, and the covenant as to the United States shall be effective upon WDNR's receipt of the payment required under Section VII, B, 5. B. The Settling Defendants and the Settling Federal Defendants hereby waive all claims against the WDNR and the State, and covenant not to sue the WDNR or the State, for damages, reimbursement of costs or any other claim that the Settling Defendants may have against WDNR or the State relating to the Site, including, but not limited to, present or future environmental pollution caused by the Landfill. XII. SIGNATORIE$ AND SERVICE Each undersigned representative of the Settling Defendants, the Settling Federal Defendants or of the Wisconsin Department of Justice, hereby certifies that he or she is fully authorized to execute and legally bind the party which he or she represents to this Consent Decree. Each Settling Defendant shall identify, on an attached signature page, the name, address, of an agent who is authorized to accept service of process by mail on behalf of the Settling Defendant with respect to all matters arising under or relating to this Consent Decree. The Settling Federal Defendants shall identify, on an attached signature page, the persons who are to receive notice respecting all matters arising under or relating to this Consent Decree. The Settling Defendants and the Settling Federal Defendants hereby agree to accept service by mail, including, but not limited to service or waiver of service of a summons, in accordance with Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and any applicable local rule of this Court. SO ORDERED THIS DAY OF , 19 United States District Judge 11 • The parties whose signatures appear on separate signature pages, hereby agree to the terms of this Consent Decree. FOR THE STATE OF WISCONSIN WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE JAMES E. DOYLE, ATTORNEY GENERAL c By: / �:,t ! Date 2l0� 7 Shari Eggleson S Assistant Attorney eneral Wisconsin Department of Justice 123 W. Washington Street P.O. Box 7857 Madison, Wisconsin 53707-7857 • 12 411 411 The undersigned hereby agrees to the terms of this Consent Decree, relating to the Junker Sanitary Landfill Inc. Site. ` FOR: JUNKER LANDFILL TRUST By: QP- -‘r-1 {' -JAZ Date : February 26, 1997 Name: Joseph Grabowski (Please print) Title : Trustee (Relationship to Settling Defendant) Mailing Address : WENCK ASSOCIATES INC 1800 PIONEER CREEK CTR MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 Agent Authorized to Accept Service on Behalf of the Above-Named Party: Name : Kathleen M. Mahoney Title: Attorney Address: Oppenheimer Wolff & Donnelly 1700 First Bank Building St . Paul , Minnesota 55101 Phone Number: 612-223-2819 • The undersigned hereby agrees to the terms of this Consent Decree, relating to the Junker Sanitary Landfill Inc. Site. FOR (Name of Settling Defendant) By: Date: (Your Signature) Name: (Please print) Title: (Relationship to Settling Defendant) Mailing Address: Agent Authorized to Accept Service on Behalf of the Above-Named Party: Name: Title: Address: Phone Number: • 13 • • The undersigned hereby agrees to the terms of this Consent Decree, relating to the Junker Sanitary Landfill Inc. Site. FOR THE SETTLING FEDERAL DEFENDANTS: Chief, Environmental Defense Section Environment and Natural Resources Division United States Department of Justice P.O. Box 23986 Washington, D.C. 20026-3986 DJ Case No. 90-7-4-29A By: Date: Natalie M. Duval, Trial Attorney Environmental Defense Section Environment and Natural Resources Division P.O. Box 23986 Washington, D.C. 20026-3986 DJ Case No. 90-7-4-29A • Attachment A 7unker Sanitary Landfill Inc. Site Map Attachment B List of Settling Defendants Attachment C Escrow Agreement • • __ ____ _ _ ___ s o � r 9 1 - s I H i 1 It. /• Q ` T e W W • N / / ,I Q 41 N z Q) / . i u w / Vl 0 i ? j ' \ J' o C= N o `' / /�• . L 3 ;,. // :. ill S 0 I l) / -•' U I— - hI :: / / Q _ .+. U, /I f • '1 o Q Q /2 o ,..1'v •i I W / l i• ` N ' ' s . \ rt v. (I) L._- ....�_—._. �..- ' --.-..../...--,-- .. i • • • ` 3 1 H •1 :: 2 , \ \ i -—\ -- - . .- ---.- - • 4110 ATTACHMENT B LIST OF SETTLING DEFENDANTS Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company Anderson Corporation Chicago & Northwestern Transportation Co. Croix Oil Company Dahl Tech Plastics Erickson's Diversified Corp. George Siegfried Construction Glass Service Company • Johnson's Body Shop Maple Island, Inc. Mills Fleet Farm Toro Company U.S. West UFE Incorporated Town of Troy Northern States Power Washington County Ameritech Minnesota Department of Transportation City of Glenwood Minnesota Department of Corrections City of Lake Elmo Stillwater Housing Partners 411 A# ►m C ESCROW AGREEMENT This Agreement, made this 26th day of February, 1997, by and among James L. Junker and Junker Recycling, Inc. , a Minnesota corporation, f/k/a Junker Sanitary Landfill, Inc. (the "Junkers") and the State of Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources ("WDNR") and Herrick, Hart, Duchemin, Spaeth, Sullivan & Schumacher ("Escrow Agent") . RECITALS WHEREAS, WDNR, James L. Junker and others have entered into a Consent Decree with respect to remediation of the former Junker Landfill ("Landfill") , a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit 1 (the "Landfill Remediation Trust Consent Decree") ; WHEREAS, WDNR, The Junker Landfill Trust and others have entered into. a Consent Decree with respect to remediation of the former Junker Landfill ("Landfill") , to which this Escrow Agreement is attached (the "Junker Landfill Trust Consent Decree") ; WHEREAS, the parties have agreed that the annuity contracts payable pursuant to the Junker Landfill Trust Consent Decree be held by Junker Recycling, Inc. with the funds paid thereunder to , the Escrow Agent pursuant to this Escrow Agreement, to be held and used for the remediation of the Landfill pursuant to the terms of both Consent Decrees. WHEREAS, the purposes of this Escrow Agreement are: (1) To provide funds for the implementation of additional response actions at the site of the former Junker Sanitary Landfill in the Town of Hudson, St. Croix County, Wisconsin that are required under the consent decree that was signed by James L. Junker, Junker Recycling, Inc. , Landfill Remediation Trust, Junker Sanitation Service, Inc. , United Waste Transfer, Inc. , United 410 Waste Systems, Inc, and the State of .Wisconsin in United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin case number 96-C-0432-S; (2) To provide for escrowed funds to finance a portion of the work that is required to be conducted under the Landfill Remediation Trust Consent Decree; and (3) To provide for methods of managing the escrowed funds described herein. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and understandings contained herein and for good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 1. Escrow Agent and Compensation. A. The parties agree that the Escrow Agent shall initially be Herrick, Hart, Duchemin, Spaeth, Sullivan & Schumacher with the State having the sole discretion to change the Escrow Agent. B. The Escrow Agent's fees shall be as agreed to between the Escrow Agent and the State. C. In any case, the entire escrow fee shall be chargeable to the escrow account. D. (1) The Escrow Agent shall not be held liable fog any actions taken or omitted by it under this Escrow Agreement so long as the Escrow Agent has acted in good faith and without gross negligence. (2) Escrow Agent shall have no responsibility to inquire into or determine the genuineness, authenticity of sufficiency of any securities, checks or other documents or instruments submitted to it in connection with its duties 110 hereunder. (3) Nothing herein to the contrary withstanding, the Junkers agree to indemnify the Escrow Agent from and against any and all liabilities, obligations, losses, damages, penalties, actions, judgments, suits, costs, expenses or disbursements of any kind whatsoever which may at any time (including without limitation at any time following the exchanges and payments contemplated by the Consent Decree or the termination of this Escrow Agreement) be imposed on, incurred by or asserted against the Escrow Agent in any way relating to or arising out of this Escrow Agreement, or Exhibits 1 and 2 hereto, or the transactions contemplated hereby or any action taken or omitted by the Escrow Agent under or in connection with any of the foregoing; provided that the Junkers shall not be liable for the payment of any portion of such liabilities, obligations, losses, damages, penalties, actions, judgments, suits, costs, expenses or disbursements resulting solely from the Escrow Agent's gross negligence or willful misconduct. The agreement in this subsection shall survive the exchanges and payments contemplated by the Consent Decree or the termination of this Escrow Agreement. (4) The Escrow Agent shall only have such responsibility with respect to the funds held in escrow as is expressly provided for in this Escrow Agreement. E. All authorizations and agencies herein contained with respect to the escrowed funds are irrevocable and Escrow Agent's power shall be deemed a power coupled with an interest. 2. Disbursement of Principal: the escrow agent shall apply and distribute the escrowed funds in the following manner: A. Payment of expenses. Bills for work product pursuant to the Landfill Remediation Trust Consent Decree, the scope of work (SOW) and the WDNR Record of Decision (ROD) for the remedy to be implemented at the Landfill Site, and the income tax forms for any income tax that may be due with respect to the escrowed funds, shall be submitted to Escrow Agent for processing and payment along with a draw request in the form attached hereto as Exhibit 3, signed by James L. Junker or his designee and the engineering consultant retained by the Landfill Remediation Trust to supervise the work. Such draw requests shall be paid within 30 days after they are received by Escrow Agent. Escrow Agent shall have no responsibility to obtain any mechanic's lien waivers in connection with any payments made by it. B. Payment of Landfill Remediation and Monitoring Costs and Filter Installation and Maintenance Costs. The Escrow Agent shall use the escrowed funds for the payment of the reasonable and necessary expenses incurred to conduct the work as required by the Landfill Remediation Consent Decree including operation and maintenance of the landfill . remediation systems, landfill monitoring, implementation of contingent remedial actions that might be required, and the installation and maintenance of point-of-entry granulated activated carbon filter systems to provide alternate water supplies. C. The Escrow Agent shall accumulate escrowed funds in excess of the payments required in subsection B above to the amount of two hundred thousand dollars ($ 200,000.00) . D. Once the Escrow Agent has accumulated the amount indicated in subsection C above and all income tax that may be due for income deposited in to the escrowed funds in all previous years has been paid, the Escrow Agent shall annually distribute from the escrowed funds those funds that ar in excess of two hundred thousand dollars ($ 200,000.00) to James L. Junker, or his heirs, assigns or successors. E. Upon termination of this Escrow Agreement pursuant to section 4, the Escrow Agent shall liquidate the escrowed funds and thereupon distribute everything including all accrued, accumulated and undistributed escrowed funds to the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources or its successor 411 411 agency for deposit in to the environmental fund or its successor fund. 3 . Dispute. If there is a dispute under this Escrow Agreement among Escrow Agent, the Junkers and the WDNR only, such dispute shall be resolved pursuant to Article X of the Consent Decree. 4. Termination. This Escrow Agreement shall terminate and the Escrow Agent discharged from any obligation herein upon the Escrow Agent distributing all of the escrowed funds pursuant to this Escrow Agreement or upon written notice or agreement signed -by the WDNR. 5. Cancellation or Amendment of the Agreement. A. Nothing herein to the contrary withstanding, in no event shall the Junkers and/or the Escrow Agent have the authority to terminate or amend this Escrow Agreement without the express prior written consent of the WDNR. 6. Novation. Nothing herein to the contrary withstanding, no contractor or other third party shall have any right to sue the _ Escrow Agent for collection of any portion of the amounts owed under the Escrow Agreement or for any other reason. 7. Miscellaneous. A. Notices. All notices, elections, requests, demands and other communications hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been given at the time received by certified or registered mail, postage prepaid and addressed to the parties hereto as follows (or to such other person or place which the respective party has otherwise designated by notice under this • provision) : TO THE JUNKERS: James L. Junker P. O. Box 1340 Long Key, Florida 33001-1340 TO THE WDNR: Bureau Director Bureau of Remediation and Redevelopment Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources P. O. Box 7921 Madison, Wisconsin 53707 TO ESCROW AGENT: Dennis Sullivan Herrick Hart, et al 118 West Grande Avenue Suite 187 Eau Claire, Wisconsin 54702 B. Binding Agreement. This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto, their respective personal representatives, heirs, successors and assigns. C. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement of the parties hereto pertaining to its subject matter and supersedes all prior and contemporaneous agreements, undertakings and understandings of the parties hereto in connection with the subject matter hereof. D. Governing Laws. This Agreement has been made, delivered and is intended to be performed in the State of Wisconsin and shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws thereof. E. Headings. The headings in this Agreement are inserted for convenience only and are not to be considered in the construction of the provisions hereof and shall not in any way limit or modify the substance or context of any section or paragraph hereof. F. Waivers. Any forbearance, failure or delay by any • provision) : . TO THE JUNKERS: James L. Junker P. O. Box 1340 Long Key, Florida 33001-1340 TO THE WDNR: Bureau Director Bureau of Remediation and Redevelopment Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources P. O. Box 7921 Madison, Wisconsin 53707 TO ESCROW AGENT: Dennis Sullivan Herrick Hart, et al 118 West Grande Avenue Suite 187 Eau Claire, Wisconsin 54702 B. Binding Agreement. This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto, their respective personal representatives, heirs, successors and assigns. C. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement of the parties hereto pertaining to its subject matter and supersedes all prior and contemporaneous agreements, undertakings and understandings of the parties hereto in connection with the subject matter hereof. D. Governing Laws. This Agreement has been made, delivered and is intended to be performed in the State of Wisconsin and shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws thereof. E. Headings. The headings in this Agreement are inserted for convenience only and are not to be considered in the construction of the provisions hereof and shall not in any way limit or modify the substance or context of any section or paragraph hereof. F. Waivers. Any forbearance, failure or delay by any • • party in exercising any right, power, or remedy hereunder shall not be deemed to be a waiver of such right, power, or remedy and any single or partial exercise of any right, power or remedy hereunder shall not preclude the further exercise thereof; and any right, power of remedy shall continue in force and effect until such right, power of remedy is specifically waived by an instrument in writing. No waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed or shall constitute a waiver of any other provision of this Agreement, nor shall such waiver constitute a continuing waiver unless otherwise expressly provided. G. Amendment. No amendment or modification of this Agreement or waiver of its terms shall affect the rights and duties of the Escrow Agent unless its written consent hereto has been obtained. H. Counterparts. This Agreement will be executed simultaneously in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original but all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument and agreement. • I. Severability. Each separately numbered paragraph of this Agreement shall be treated as severable, to the end that if any one or more such paragraphs shall be adjudged or declared illegal, invalid or unenforceable, this Agreement shall be interpreted, and shall remain in full force and effect, as through such paragraph or paragraphs had never been contained in this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on this date first written above. • • i James L. Junker WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Its: AGREED AND ACCEPTED: HERRICK, HART, DUCHEMIN, SPAETH, SULLIVAN & SCHUMACHER By: .� Escrow Agent T • S UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN Civil Action No. 96C 19 S Junker Landfill Trust, a Minnesota. business trust, Plaintiff, and United Waste Systems, Inc. , et al . , Defendants, and Junker Recycling, Inc. , et al. , Defendants and Third Party Plaintiffs, vs. Garry Thompson,' et al . , Third Party Defendants. Civil Action No. 96-C-00489-S Landfill Remediation Trust, a Wisconsin business trust, Plaintiff, vs. Garry Thompson, et al . Defendants. AGREEMENT OF COMPROMISE, SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE Page 1 of 14 • IIS r - UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN Landfill Remediation Trust, a Civil Action No. : Wisconsin Business Trust, Plaintiff, vs. Garry Thompson, John Sauers, individually and d/b/a Sanitary Landfill Site, Inc. , Andersen Corporation, Murtha Brothers, O'Connell, Community Sanitation, New Richmond Sanitation, Fox Riverfalls *and List A, Defendants. AGREEMENT OF COMPROMISE, SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE This AGREEMENT OF COMPROMISE, SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE ("Agreement") is entered into by and among James Junker, Junker Recycling, Inc. , Junker Sanitary Landfill, Inc. , Junker Sanitary Services, Inc. , Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Junker Defendants") ; United Waste Systems, Inc. ; United Waste Transfer, Inc. ; the Junker Landfill Trust and its current members, Andersen Corporation, Minnesota Department of Corrections, UFE, Inc. , The Toro Company, Town of Troy, City of Glenwood, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, Northern States Power, Mills Fleet Farm, Maple Island, Washington County, Erickson' s Diversified, Stillwater Housing Partners, Croix Oil, Minnesota Department of Transportation, Ameritech, U.S. West Communications, Inc. , f/k/a Northwestern Bell, Siegfried Construction, Dahl Tech, City of Lake Elmo, Johnson's Body Shop, AGREEMENT OF COMPROMISE, SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE Page 2 of 24 Glass Service, C&NW (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Junker Landfill Trust or JLT") and those additional parties who sign on to this agreement subject to the terms and conditions of the settlement offer. For purposes of this Agreement, all parties to this Agreement shall be collectively referred to as "Settling Parties" . I. RECITALS WHEREAS, on January 9, 1996, the Junker Landfill Trust filed a lawsuit involving the Settling Parties in the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin, Civil Action No. 96C 19 S. A number of answers, cross-complaints and counterclaims have been filed in each of these lawsuits. These lawsuits, including the cross-complaints and counterclaims, are collectively referred to as "the JLT Action" . WHEREAS, on February 2, 1996, the Junker defendants filed a lawsuit against certain of the Settling Parties, and later amended that complaint to include certain other Settling Parties, but did not serve the "complaint on all the Settling Parties. On June 10, 1996 the Landfill Remediation Trust, filed a lawsuit against the Settling Parties. A number of answers, cross-complaints and counterclaims have been filed in each of these lawsuits. These lawsuits, including the cross-complaints and counterclaims, are collectively referred to as "the LRT Actions" . WHEREAS, both the JLT Actions and the LRT Actions involve claims relating to the Junker Landfill in the Town of Hudson in St. Croix County, Wisconsin (hereinafter "the Junker Landfill or Site" ) and have been consolidated. AGREEMENT OF COMPROMISE, SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE Page 3 of 14 i • WHEREAS, various studies and investigations conducted on the Junker Landfill disclosed the presence of Trichloroethylene (TCE) and other substances, including by-products of TCE, at the Landfill. WHEREAS, the Settling Parties, and each of them, dispute and deny that they have any liability or responsibility with respect to the various claims and/or causes of action that are asserted against one another in the JLT Actions and/or the LRT Actions. WHEREAS, it is the intent and desire of the Settling Parties, and each of them, and it is the purpose of this Agreement to compromise and settle all disputes, claims, debts, liabilities, demands, causes of action and/or claims for relief, whether now known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected, asserted or unasserted, contingent or fixed, that the Settling Parties have or may assert against one another in the JLT Actions and/or the LRT Actions and (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Settled Claims") and for the Settling Parties, and each of them, to release, as provided in Paragraph II . E below, all Claims against one another, without concession or admission of liability by any of the Settling Parties. II. CONSIDERATION NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above recitals and the respective covenants, promises, agreement and releases contained herein, the Settling Parties agree as follows: AGREEMENT OF COMPROMISE, SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE Page 4 of 14 !II A. Incorporation of Recitals Each and every paragraph of the Recitals set forth above is incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in their entirety. This Agreement is supported by the mutual promises and covenants contained herein which all Settling Parties agree constitute good and valuable consideration. B. Payment In consideration of the terms and provisions of this Agreement, the members of the Junker Landfill Trust and additional settling defendants will purchase a payment funding mechanism as described in the Consent Decree in the matter State of Wisconsin v. Junker Landfill Trust, et. al . , a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A. C. Voluntary Settlement Effort 1. The JLT and the Junker Defendants agree to cooperate in a voluntary settlement effort, the purpose of which is to settle the claims made by them against other parties. All parties to the JLT and LRT Actions will be given the opportunity to participate in the voluntary settlement effort. 2 . The members of the JLT and James Junker shall establish the settlement demand based upon the TLI Waste-In-Volume percentages for each party invited to participate in the voluntary settlement effort. Neither the members of the JLT nor the Junker Defendants will enter into a settlement with any party for a lesser amount than agreed to under the terms of this Paragraph, either before or after the close of the voluntary settlement effort, without the written consent of the JLT and James Junker, such AGREEMENT OF COMPROMISE, SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE Page 5 of 14 411 consent not to be unreasonably withheld. The parties expect and understand the need to adjust the settlement demand established pursuant to the terms of this Paragraph for certain parties based on documented financial hardship. 3 . The members of the JLT and James Junker will distribute the proceeds of the voluntary settlement effort pursuant to the following formula: 100% of the first $1 million received through the voluntary settlement effort will be used by the JLT to effectuate its settlement obligations. All proceeds received through the voluntary settlement efforts over and above $1 million will be distributed between the JLT and James Junker, with the JLT receiving 67% of such additional proceeds and James Junker receiving 33% of such additional proceeds. 4 . No Settling Party shall interfere with the voluntary settlement effort. James Junker's support of the voluntary settlement effort will be demonstrated either through the mailing of a joint settlement demand letter with the JLT, or through the mailing of a separate settlement demand letter to be mailed with the JLT settlement offer, at the JLT's sole option. 5 . Within fourteen (14) days of the execution of this Agreement, the Junker Defendants will transfer to the JLT all monies they have received from any other party in settlement of the Junker Defendants ' claims against that party. 6. The voluntary settlement effort will remain open until March 21 , 1997 . 7. Following the close of the voluntary settlement effort and entry of the Consent Decree attached hereto as Exhibit AGREEMENT OF COMPROMISE, SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE Page 6 of 14 410 A, the JLT will dismiss with prejudice all litigation claims it has made relating to the issues raised in the JLT and/or LRT Actions. The LRT shall continue its action against all defendants that do not participate in the voluntary settlement, and may not dismiss parties that do not settle for the voluntary settlement amount, without the written consent of the JLT, which consent may not be unreasonably withheld. 8 . Following the close of the voluntary settlement effort, all proceeds received either through settlement or litigation, will inure to the benefit of James Junker; the members of the JLT will not share in the distribution of any such proceeds referenced in this Paragraph. 9 . Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. will not participate in litigation efforts directed against non-settling PRP' s . 10. As to Settling Parties other than the Junker Defendants, the effectiveness of any party' s executed signature page to this Agreement and the Consent Decree attached as Exhibit A, shall be dependent upon receipt by the JLT of a valid check in - an amount which will be set forth 5 business days prior to the close of the voluntary settlement period, and distributed to the Settling Parties by telephone or facsimile transmission. The check must be received by the JLT by the close of the settlement period. In the event the calculation of the amount to be paid is greater than the amount shown in the last column of Exhibit B attached hereto, a Settling Party may, at its sole option, send written notice of its withdrawal as a Settling Party. Such written AGREEMENT OF COMPROMISE, SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE Page 7 or 14 • • Notice of Withdrawal must be received within three (3) 'business days following the mailing referenced above in order to be effective. Any written Notices of Withdrawal and all checks tendered pursuant to this Paragraph shall be delivered to the following address: Mr. Gary Gengel POPHAM, HAIK, SCHNOBRICH & KAUFMAN, LTD. 3300 Piper Jaffray Tower Minneapolis, MN 55402 Fax No. : (612) 334-8888 D. Dismissal Upon the full execution (i.e. signing) of this Agreement : 1 . The Settling Parties shall cause all legal proceedings each may have pending against any other party to this Agreement and which relate to the JLT or LRT actions to be dismissed with prejudice. 2 . The Settling Parties agree within fourteen (14) days of the execution of this Agreement to execute and deliver 9 such additional documents as are necessary to effectuate the dismissals with prejudice of the claims pending against the " Settling Parties in the JLT Actions and/or the LRT Actions . 3 . The Junker Defendants agree to dismiss with prejudice all claims lodged against churches and true non-profits, and any other parties who participate in the voluntary settlement effort. 4 . Each of the Settling Parties agrees to bear its or their own costs and attorneys' fees with respect to the Settled Claims, and each of the Settling Parties hereby waives any statute, AGREEMENT OF COMPROMISE, SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE Page 8 of 14 • rule of court, or other law or provision awarding costs, .fees, or expenses as against any other Settling Party to this Agreement. E. Releases In consideration of the terms and conditions of this Agreement, and except for the obligations provided herein, the Settling Parties shall and do hereby mutually and generally relieve, release, and discharge each other, their heirs, predecessors, successors, and assigns, and their present and former representatives, agents, licensees, sublicensees, employees, administrators, assigns, subsidiaries, divisions, affiliates, operating companies, parents, partners, officers, directors, stockholders, and attorneys and each of them, of and from any and all claims, debts, liabilities, demands, obligations, promises, acts, agreements, costs, expenses (including g but not limited to attorneys ' fees) , damages, actions, causes of action, and claims for relief, of whatever kind or nature, whether now known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected, based on, arising out of, or in connection with anything whatsoever done, omitted, or suffered to be done with respect to the Settled Claims. Notwithstanding any provisions to the contrary, this release does not apply to future rY PP Y claims made by third parties against the Settling Parties for Personal injury and/or or Pro ert damage. Nothing in this release is s intended to, nor does it, affect the indemnity obligations of James L. Junker and Debra G. Junker to Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. and United Waste Systems, Inc. AGREEMENT OF COMPROMISE, SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE Page 9 of 14 i • F. Representations, Warranties and Agreements - Each of the Settling Parties represents and warrants to each other and agree with each other, as follows: 1. Each of the Settling Parties has received independent legal advice from attorneys of its own choice with respect to the advisability of executing this Agreement, and prior to the execution of this Agreement by each Settling Party, that party' s attorneys reviewed this Agreement at length, and made all desired changes. 2 . Except as expressly stated in this Agreement, no Settling Party has made any statement or representation to any other party to this Agreement regarding any fact relied upon by such other party in entering into this Agreement, and each Settling Party specifically does not rely upon any statement, representation, or promise of the other party in executing this Agreement, except as expressly stated in this Agreement . 3 . There are no other agreements or understandings between the Settling Parties relating in any way to the Settled Claims or this Agreement except as stated in this Agreement . 4 . Each of the Settling Parties, together with its attorneys, has made such investigation of the facts pertaining to this Agreement, and of all the matters pertaining thereto, as it deems necessary. 5. The terms of this Agreement are contractual, not a mere recital, and this Agreement is the result of negotiations between the Settling Parties, each of which has participated in the drafting of this Agreement through its respective attorneys. AGREEMENT OF COMPROMISE, SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE Page 10 of 14 110 6. This Agreement has been carefully rdad ` by, the contents hereof are known and understood by, and it is signed freely by each person executing this Agreement. 7. Each signatory to this Agreement has the power and authority to enter into and perform this Agreement, and the execution and performance of this Agreement has been duly authorized by all requisite corporate action. 8. Each party to this Agreement agrees that such party will not take any action which would interfere with the performance of this Agreement by any other party to this Agreement or that would adversely affect any of the rights provided for in this Agreement. G. Integration This Agreement constitutes a single, integrated, written contract expressing the entire agreement of the Settling Parties to this Agreement relative to the subject matter hereof. No covenants, agreements, representations, or warranties of any kind whatsoever have been made by any of the Settling Parties, except as specifically set forth in this Agreement . All prior discussions and negotiations have been and are merged and integrated into, and are superseded by, this Agreement . H. Successors This Agreement shall be binding and enforceable upon the successors and assigns of the Settling Parties. AGREEMENT OF COMPROMISE, SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE Page 11 of 14 � r I. Severability In the event that any provision of this Agreement should be held to be void, voidable, or unenforceable, the remaining portions hereof shall remain in full force and effect. J. Governing Law This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with, and be governed by, the laws of the State of Minnesota. R. Execution in Counterparts This Agreement may be executed and delivered in two or more counterparts, each of which, when so executed and delivered, shall be an original, but such counterparts shall together constitute but one and the same instrument and agreement. This Agreement shall be deemed to be executed on the last date any such counterpart is executed. L. Section Headings The section headings, titles, and subtitles herein are used solely for convenience, shall not be used in interpreting this Agreement, and shall not be construed in any way to limit, modify, or affect the terms of this Agreement . M. Language of the Stipulation The use of the singular in this Agreement includes the plural, and vice versa. N. Attorneys' Fees In the event of a dispute between the Settling Parties arising out of this Agreement, or any litigation that is brought to enforce or interpret this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled AGREEMENT OF COMPROMISE, SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE Page 12 of 14 IIM to reasonable attorneys ' fees, expenses, and costs incurred after execution of this Agreement. O. Admissions Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be deemed an admission of guilt or liability by or against any party to this Agreement. P. Modification This Agreement may only be modified with the written consent of all parties to this Agreement and the State of Wisconsin, such consent not to be unreasonably withheld. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Settling Parties hereto have each approved and executed this Agreement on the dates set forth opposite their respective signatures. AGREEMENT OF COMPROMISE, SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE Page 13 of 14 4 • The undersigned hereby agrees to the terms of this Agreement of Compromise, Settlement and Release, relating to the Junker Sanitary Landfill Inc. Site. FOR (Name of Settling Defendant) By: Date: (Your Signature) Name: (Please print) Title: (Relationship to Settling Defendant) Mailing Address: Agent Authorized to Accept Service on Behalf of the Above-Named Party: Name: Title: Address: Phone Number: AGREEMENT OF COMPROMISE, SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE Page 14 of 14 612 223 5070 S A1TORNEY$A7 I.AW P.I..I..P. February 24, 1997 2100 Piper Jaffray Plaza PERSONAL/CONFIDENTIAL 444 Cedar Street CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS Saint Paul,Minnesota ATTN: ADMINISTRATOR MIKE ROBERTSON 55301-2160 P 0 BOX 2007 Firm (612)290-6500 OAK PARK HEIGHTS MN 55082-2007 Fax (612)223-5070 E-Mail JARDINELAW@AOL.COM VIA/FACSIMILE 439.0574 Re: Our File No: 26056 (1657) Donald M.Jardine Junker Landfill Trust v. Junker Recycling, Inc. , et al Jahn R.O'$ricn Gerald M.Linnihan Alan R.Vanatek • John M. y,Jr. Dear Mr. Robertson: Eugene J..Flick liek Chatice L•'.Gillis JamcsJ.Galman I attended the pre-trial conference that was held in Hudson Pierre N.Regnier Mark A.Fonkcn today and I am sending this as an update. George W.Kushner MaryA.R" plaintiffs J.Skoglund p 1 . It was reported that the have, again, reached Sean E.Flade a tentative settlement agreement with the State of Timothy S.Crom Wisconsin. However, it has not been confirmed in writting Lawrence M.Rocheford Janice G.Golcsnbcck by Wisconsin' s attorneys and therefore, given the impending cut-off dates all parties are proceeding as if K‘.7 C-Keep • David 3.Hockitra there is not a settlement because this deal has collapsed Janice K.Hding twice before. - Michacl A.Rayer Marlene 3.Gasvts Mary P.Rowe 2 . The cut-off date for all discovery is Monday, March 3, Karen R.Cote 1997. Therefore, a number of depositions have been noted. Nathan E.Fl Hart Joseph E.Flynn Atthe present time the following depositions are Thomas L.Cumming. scheduled: Margaret C.Galvin Shaei L.Johnson Elizabeth B.Player DATE DEPONENT LOCATION Laurence A.Diamond KcaraJ DebraE.Kennedy 2/26/97 WI . DNR Employees Madison, WI . carat-Debt. Yvonne M.Flaherty Brenda L.Theis 2/27/97 WI . DNR Employees Eau Claire, WI . tent F Logan(1923-1983) 2/27/97 Matt Lowe TLI Hudson, WI . Some memherasato sdmitted 2/28/97 Dr. Kirk Brown Hudson, WI . to practice law in Wutonrin, North na4ota,Flo•ida »nd nli,rair 3/1/97 Jim Junker Miami, m. Debra Junker 3/3/97 John Milne Greenwich, CT. United Waste • • CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS February 24, 1997 Page 2 3 . As noted above the depositions of Matt Lowe of TLI and Dr. Brown have scheduled to take place in Hudson Wisconsin. However, to do so it will be necessary to the expense of bring Mr Lowe from Bethesda, Maryland and Dr. Brown from Texas. All defendants that participate in these depositions will share this expense on an equal basis in addition to there hourly rates . 4 . The Court did not grant the motions to exclude the plaintiffs ' expert testimony at this time. However, the Court indicated in would review the issue of prejudice from the late notice at trial. Further, the Court gave defendants 30 days to disclose their own expert witnesses. I have been in contact with some potential experts, but have not retained any at this time. I have also been in contact with the other municipalities involved in this case and we are exploring the possibility of sharing this expense if it is necessary. 5 . If the plaintiffs ' settlement with the State of Wisconsin is formalized, all of the above may not be necessary if we can settle the claims against the City of Oak Park Heights. However, that would not totally resolve the matter because of the claims for indemnity by Kingwood, Kmart and Hardware Hank_ I will continue to keep you advised. Please call if you have any questions. Very truly yours, JARDINE, LOGAN & O'BRIEN, P.L.L.P. 11 Sean E. Haile Direct Dial: (612) 290-6510 • SEH:sl 612 223 5070 • ATl'ORNEY9 Ar LAW migiEL.L I February 21, 1997 i! , 2100 Piper Jaffray Plaza pERSONAL/CONFIDFNTI I I' 444 Cedar Street CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTSFEB 2 1 S 0 - ,Minnesota ATN: ADMINISTRATOR MIKE ROBERTSON 11991 55101-2160, 3lo1212l6o P 0 BOX 2007 Firm (612)290-6500 OAK PARK HEIGHTS MN 55082-2007 Fax (612)223-5070 F•Mail 3ARDINELAweA0E.c0M VIA/FACSIMILE 439 .0574 : Re: Our File No: 26056 (1657) Donald M.Jardine Junker Landfill Trust v. Junker Recycling, Inc. , et al John R.O'Brien Gerald M.l.innihan Alan R.Vanarek John M.Kennedy,Jr. Dear Mr. Robertson: . Eugcec j.Flick Charles E.Galin James J.Galrnan Attached please find a memorandum and a letter from one of the Pierre N.Replier attorneys representing the Junker Landfill Trust that I Mark A.Fanken t:,•„+pnW.Kuchncr received in this morning's mail. Apparently, the settlement Mary A.Riee negotiations have completely fallen apart. Pari J.Skoglund Sean E.Hade -r „orhyS.Crom I have also heard a rumor that the r7LT has just retained a I,awrcaceM.Rochcford James G.Golcrnbcck very large law firm here in St . Paul to act as its' litigation counsel and will attempt Co undertake as much discovery as the Kerry` Keep David J.Hoekstrap resent Scheduling Order will permit. D James K.Helling advised a s I am Michael A.Raver I should know more by Monday and will keep you MarI.Rowes.car`(` Mary made aware of further developments. Karen R.Core Na very truly yours, Joseph ph E..Flynnlynn Thomas L.Cummings • Margaret C.Galvin JARDINE, LOGAN & O'BRIEN, P.L.L.P. Shan L.Johnnon Elizabeth urence A.Hayes � Laurence A.Diamond A� Katherine E.Kennedy CIA �'UA Cara J.Debe Yvonne M.Flaherty Sean E. Heade Brenda L.Theis Direct Dial: (612) 290-6510 Jrrrc F Logan(192.3-1983) SEH:sl Some members alta adfnittrd to practice law in Wivon.rin, North]lakoka,Florida and lllinou • • POPHAM HAIK SCHNOBRICH & KAUFMAN, LTD. O. QCNViR,COLORADO PIPER,JAFFRAM TOWER, SUITE 9900 WARRINGTON.D.C. TCL 303-003.1200 TCL 207.1524-1/000 222 SOUTH NINTH STREET M I NNEAPOLIG, MINNGGOTA 35402.9336 INTERNATIONAL ArriL IATION: 15iIlING,CHIN• MIAMI, A TEL 305-530-0050 TEL 8 t 2-339-4800 • FAX 612.334-8689 T!�01160+•311526• -Ob0. MEMORANDUM TO: ALL PARTIES INTERESTED IN SETTLEMENT OF RTIES TETE JUNKER SITE LITIGATION FROM: Gary P. Gengel DATE: February 20, 1997 RE: Lack of Settlement Attached is a copy of my letter to Frank Remington of the Wisconsin Department of Justice concerning the status of settlement efforts at the Junker Site. In short, we have been unable to package the settlement in any fashion that is acceptable to the State: the State wants "guarantee"all the settling parties to guarantee the Junker Parties' performance under the terms of the consent decree the State chose to enter into with these Parties. The cost and other terms of such a settlement are unreasonable and completely out of line with the exposure to all of us. Unfortunately, the JLT and most of you have held off on discovery in anticipation of this settlement and thus everyone now must scramble to prepare for trial. The State, the Junker Parties, and United Waste may still be able to fashion a settlement acceptable to all of us, but it certainly will not occur before the March 3 close of discovery, if at all. The JLT will start discovery and motion practice shortly in an effort to minimize the generator share. This effort will be directed toward the State, the Junker Parties, and United Waste Systems and its wholly owned subsidiary, Junker Sanitation, Inc. Each party now needs to take whatever actions it deems necessary to protect its interests. We believe the State is being unreasonable. If you or your client agree, please feel free to contact representatives of the State of Wisconsin or others. My July 26, 1996 settlement proposal contains a list of the addresses and phone numbers of some such people with a say in the State's position. Because settlement appeared to be progressing satisfactorily, although slowly, we have never really developed ed the ('-joint defense counsel" concept. Now that we are all faced with the prospect of paying lawyers for a minimum three-week trial, it is time to further discuss this 35022132354 220197 1 • • February 20, 1997 Page -2- i the JLT in some typeof joint defense concept. If you or your client is interested in joining with arrangement so thatyou or your client does not have to appear at the trial except for a couple of hours to introduce evidence concerning you or your client, please send me a fax indicating your interest. If there is sufficient interest, I will convene a meeting or conference call to sec whether we can put such a cost-sharing and cost-saving concept together. If an acceptahle settlement proposal is offered by the State, I will send out another mailing promptly. I am truly sorry that the settlement effort has apparently not worked. GPG II 350!22132354 2/20/97 2 • • POPHAM HAIK SCMNOBRIeH & KAUFMAN. LTD• I ' U.S.Or►iCcs: S U I T E 3300 INTERNATIONAL OFFICES: OCNV�R. COLORADO 222 SOUTH NINTH STREET LEI►21G.GER.IANV MINNEAPOLIS, MINNCSOTA 0640& TEL 303.693-1200 TEL 01137.4 I-491(1471 TEL 612-333.4800 MANI. FLORIDA FAX 6I2-334-eee SYt1TTCARY, GERMAN• TEL 305-550-0050 • TEL 01145.71 1-2 9 6 303 WASN,NGT0H.D.C. GARY P.GENcEL TEL 202.562-9700 QIRECT[TIAL (612)334-2706 February 20, 1997 VIA FACSIMILE AND U.S MAIL Mr. Frank D. Remington Assistant Attorney General 123 West Washington Avenue P.O. Box 7857 • Madison, WI 53707-7857 Re: Junker Landfill Site Our File No. 4966-037 Dear Frank: I am writing to advise you that the Junker Landfill Trust ("JLT"), the potentially responsible party ("PRP)" Group at the Junker Landfill Site ("Site"), will no longer he actively pursuing a global settlement of this Site, effective immediately. I also am writing to convey the JLT's dismay over the inability to achieve a resolution of the issues concerning the Junker Landfill Site, despite two years of negotiations. In order for you to fully understand our position and the extent of the JLT's frustration, it is necessary to review some history. The JLT began negotiating a resolution of the Site issues with the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (11WDNR") in spring 1995. By fall 1995, the JLT had reached an agreement in principle with WDNR concerning the appropriate remedy for the Site and the key terms of a consent decree to he executed by the members of the JLT and any other PRPS that chose to participate in the settlement. At this point, the Wisconsin Department of Justice ("DOT) was involved in the matter in order to negotiate the details and precise wording of a consent decree and for the purposes of lodging and entering the consent decree. Unfortunately, the addition of DOJ to the negotiations resulted in the agreement in principle with WDNR being completely renegotiated. Nevertheless, the JILT, WDNR, and DOJ achieved a second agreement in principle in January 1996. This agreement guided negotiations on the specific language of a consent decree which was finalized on April 15. 1996. However, 350/22132331 2120/97 • i Mr. Frank D. Remington February 20, 1997 Page -2- on that same day WDNR and DOJ started and concluded consent decree negotiations with James L. Dunker, Junker Recycling,Inc.,Junker Sanitary Landfill,Inc.,Junker Sanitation Services, Inc., United Waste Systems, Inc., and United Waste Transfer, Inc. ("Junker Parties") and decided to enter into a consent decree with the Junker Parties rather than the JLT. This consent decree has. been entered by the Court and requires the Junker Parties to implement the remedy at the Site. Settlement discussions among the Junker Parties, the State, and the JLT resumed in early summer 1996. In early July 1996, I sent out a settlement proposal to the State, the Junker Parties, and the members of the JLT. I also communicated this offer to all PRPs at the Dunker Site in a mailing dated July 26, 1996. This proposal ultimately led to a mediation which was conducted October 30 31, 1996, which resulted in a Memorandum of Understanding on yet another agreement in principle between the State, the Dunker Parties, and all other PRPs which wished to participate in the settlement. After further consideration, however, the State rejected this agreement on the basis that all settling PRPs would be receiving a complete covenant not to sue and contribution protection and yet there may not be enough funds available to meet the funding requirement for later years of the 30-year remedy--notwithstanding the fact that the Junker Parties have agreed to fund the entire remedy under the terms of the consent decree the State chose to enter into with the Junket Parties. Further mediations with the Junker Parties, the State, and the JLT were conducted November 27 and December 5, 1996. This mediation was again successful, as confirmed by WDNR's letter dated December 6, 1996, The State's concern that the settling PRPs provide adequate funding to the Junker Parties, which are already obligated under the consent decree to completely fund the remedy regardless of cost, was addressed by requiring the settling PRPs to buy a funding agreement to cover the anticipated expenses at the Site plus a 35 percent contingency. This agreement in principle is now falling apart as well, because the State now wants the settling PRFs to guarantee, and provide funding for, any tax consequences that may arise as a result of the funding agreement or the payments. We have provided the State with options to own or assign the funding agreement, which would guarantee that there be no tax consequences. These proposals have been rejected. Jim Junker offered to take responsibility for any tax consequences that may arise. Although the State chose to enter into a consent decree with-the Junker Parties wherein they agreed to implement the remedy regardless of cost, and oven though the funding agreement would provide the Junker Parties with approximately$4 million, the State rejected Junker's offer. We have devised other settlement structures which result in no tax consequences, but a potential timing difference. The State has rejected these approaches as well and is insisting on a guarantee or a tax reopener to the settling PRPs in the event there are tax consequences. We have indicated that we may be amenable to a reopener if United Waste Systems, Inc. agrees to be primarily responsible for any costs associated with such reopener 350122132331 220/97 0 • % Mr. Frank D. Remington February 20, 1997 Page -3- event, i.e., only if United Waste Systems, Inc. is financially unable to pay would the other settling PRPs become liable on the =opener. However, this offer has not been accepted either. early .lul 1996 has been that in order The fundamental settlement concept going back to ea y y to raise the funds necessary to satisfy both the Junker Parties' litigation desires and the State'i financial security desires, has been that the settling PRPs will pay a significant premium which ' they can only justify if they receive in return a complete covenant not to sue and contribution protection, i.e., a "walk-away" or "buy-out" deal. Consequently, our recent discussions have not been productive for two reasons. First, the State wants the settling PRPs to agree to pay additional sums in order to cover any tax consequaces. We cannot agree to do this, because by our calculation the settling PRPs are already pa ing a premium of four times their share of liability at the Site. Further sums are simply not ustifiable to the PRPs, as even with the cost of litigation the expected result from litigation is heaper than the cost of settlement. Second, despite its purported agreement to a complete co Want not to sue and contribution protection, the State continues to want the settling PRPs to " uarantee" the consent decree the State chose to enter into with the Junker Parties through the re ever provision, which effectively eviscerates the buy-out concept. We simply cannot justify th premium being offered without receiving a complete buy-out. The State declined to enter into the consent decree with the JLT and the other PRPs that chose to join in and instead chose to enter into a consult decree with the Dunker Parties_ It is unreasonable for the State to now expect the PRPs to pay a significant premium and guarantee the Junker Parties' performance of the consent decree. We seem to have reached a conceptual hurdle that will be difficult to overcome: we have offered as much funding as we are willing to put on the table, and the existing offer is not on the table if the terms being offered do not amount to a complete buy-out. Because the litigation discovery cut-off date of March 3 and the trial date of March 31 are looming, we are now going to turn our attention to preparation for trial. If the State, or the Junker Parties, or United Waste Systems. or all three, are able to devise a settlement plan which meets the needs of the PRPs, please let me know. As the State evaluates its position in this matter, we urge it to consider the following points: 1. The JLT voluntarily formed in an effort to responsibly address any environmental risks at the Site. The JLT immediately provided bottled water to the potentially affected residences, conducted the RDFS developing the remedy for the Site, and assisted the State in development of the record of decision. The JLT expended well in excess of$1.5 million in this effort. . 2. The JLT filed suit against the Junker Parties in order to secure their financial participation in the remedy to be employed at the Site. Perhaps the JLT was too successful in this effort, as the Junker Parties finally stepped up to the plate and the State chose to enter into 350/22132331 2/20/97 • 4 Mr. Frank D. Remington February 20, 1997 Page -4- a consent decree with the previously recalcitrant Junker Parties rather than the JLT. The State decided which parties to deal with and must recognize this fact and the consequences which flow from its decision. 3. The JLT has lead the effort to reach a principled settlement at the Site, so that all PRPs can pay their fair share of the Site remediation costs and be done with the matter. A final settlement is particularly important to the small PRPs at the Site who will be forced to bear the high costs and risks of a trial despite minimal dollar liability at the Site. 1 4. While the State may not be a party to the existing litigation, there is likely to be a finding of fact in the existing litigation that the State (in fact the Wi7NR) is a liable party at the Site as both a generator and as an arranger. This finding will result in significant risk to the t State in its plannrd future cost recovery Butt in that every federal appellate court to address the issue, including the Seventh Circuit, has held that only "innocent," i.e., non-liable parties, have a cause of action for joint and several liability under Section 107 of CERCLA; as a liable party itself, the State would be entitled only to contribution under Section 113 of CERCLA. If a court in the subsequent cost-recovery case rules consistent with this case law, the State will be unable to recover any of its past costs, because the JLT already has paid more than its fair share of Site costs to date. 5. The State's principal goal in the settlement negotiations to date appears to be to force settling PRPs to guarantee the Junker Parties' financial performance under the terms of the consent decree the State entered into with the Junker Parties. While the JLT believes the current settlement proposal provides sufficient funding to guarantee the Junker Parties' performance, if there is no settlement the likely result of the litigation will be that the JLT members owe nothinj to the Junker Parties, since they have already paid more than their fair share of costs toward the Site costs. Thus, the State is likely to end up with less "guarantee" of performance by the Junker Parties rather than more. 6. If there is no settlement and the Junker Parties later default in performance under the terms of the consent decree, the State will have to file yet another suit against the PRPs' seeking their financial participation to complete the Junker Parties' obligation to complete the Site remedy. This potential suit by the State will be impacted by rulings in the prior cases, and in any event, is a complete waste of State resources. 7. The consent decree between the State and the Junker Parties is currently on appeal. By not entering into a reasonable settlement the State is risking the result that it has no agreement with any_ party to remediate the Site. The JLT remains willing to participate in a global settlement that provides the PRPs with true finality at no greater cost than the amount repeatedly agreed to by the State "in principle." 350/12132331 2/20/97 • • i V Mr. Frank D. Remington February 20, 1997 Page -5- At this point the JLT sees but three settlement structures that satisfy these unnegotiable points: (1) United Waste Systems, Inc. or some other viable entity being primarily liable on the tax reopener; (2) the funding agreement in the name of the State or the State's assignee; (3) the Junker Parties being responsible for any tax consequences. However, if the State can suggest price structures that provide the JLT members with finality and no increased p ice of participation, the State's proposal(s) will be given immediate and full consideration. Please keep in mind, though, that time is of the essence. Money that is being spent on trial preparation is now unavailable for settlement. We believe the parameters of a settlement as we have outlined are fair and reasonable to all parties, including the State. We have attempted to package these parameters in a number of ways to suit the State's needs, but have been totally stymied by the State's intransigence. Given the lack of progress, the hurdle of the complete buy-out principle which we seem to be unable to overcome, and the press of the Court's trial schedule, we are now turning our attention to the litigation. Thus, we appreciate your willingness to be the point of contact for scheduling the depositions of employees of the State of Wisconsin. Our litigators will be in contact with you shortly. Please feel free to call me if you have any questions regarding this letter. 1 wish you luck in developing a settlement with the Junker Parties and United Waste; and T hope to hear from you regarding success in such an effort. Sincerely, POPHAM, HAIK, SCHNOBRICH & KAUFMAN, LTD. 401,, Gary P. Gengel GPG/rmr cc: All Parties Involved in the Junker Site 350/22132331 2/20197 ! ! 145 University Avenue West, St. Paul, MN 55103-2044 League of Minnesota Cities Phone: (612) 281-1200 • (800) 925-1122 Cities promoting excellence Fax: (612) 281-1299 • TDD (612) 281-1290 February 20, 1997 D FEB 2 1 1991 Mr. Mike Robertson City of Oak Park Heights P.O. Box 2007 Oak Park Heights, MN 55082-2007 Re: BRS File No.: 11013474 Trust Member: City of Oak Park Heights Plainfiff: Dunker Landfill Trust v. Junker Recycling, Inc., et al Dear Mr. Robertson: This letter follows up our phone conversation; and most importantly the correspondence dated January 10, 1997, from your Attorney Sean Hade putting the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust(LMCIT) on notice of a Crossclaim and a Notice and Tender of Defense which has been filed against your city by Kingwood Corporation d/b/a Kingwood Management and Kmart Corporation. Please find attached my disclaimer of coverage letter dated August 27, 1996, pertaining to this same case. Please be advised that the same reasons outlined in that correspondence explaining LMCIT'S postion of no coverage also applies to this Crossclaim filed by Kingwood Corporation. If you have information that you believe LMCIT should consider in reviewing its coverage determination, or if you become aware of such information in the fixture,please bring it to our attention immediately. If you should have any questions,please do not hesitate to contact me at 215-4078. Sincerely, ulie Lassonde Claims Adjuster c: Sean Hade Jardine Logan and O'Brien AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER • 145 University Avenue West, St. Paul, MN 55103-2044 League of Minnesota Cities Phone: (612) 281-1200 • (800) 925-1122 Cities promoting excellence Fax: (612) 281-1299 • TDD (612) 281-1290 August 27, 1996 Mr. Mike Robertson City of Oak Park Heights P.O. Box 2007 Oak Park Heights, MN 55082-2007 Re: BRS File No.: 11013474 Trust Member: City of Oak Park Heights Plaintiff: Landfill Remediation Trust,A Wisconsin Business Trust Dear Mr. Robertson: This letter will formally acknowledge receipt of the lawsuit filed in United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin, entitled: "Landfill Remediation Trust, a Wisconsin business trust, Plaintiff vs. City of Oak Park Heights." Please be advised that the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT) for the reasons stated below, concludes that no coverage is afforded to Oak Park Heights for this matter under the policy/covenants issued by LMCIT. COVERAGE OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS LMCIT issued the following policy/covenants to Oak Park Heights: COVENANT TERM DATES MP 824012 R 07/07/86-87 MCM 85418 07/07/87-88 CMC 0942609 07/07/88-89 CMC 1023590 07/07/89-90 CMC 1105591 07/07/90-91 CMC 1193 892 07/07/91-92 CMC 1280293 07/07/92-93 CMC 1374694 07/07/93-94 CMC 1471595 07/07/94-95 CMC 1565096 07/07/95-96 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER • • Mr. Mike Robertson BRS File No.: 11013474 August 27, 1996 U 000273 07/07/86-87 UEL 6278 07/07/87-88 MEL 0082209 07/07/88-89 MEL 0101190 07/07/89-90 MEL 0120991 07/07/90-91 MEL 0142792 07/07/91-92 MEL 0164393 07/07/92-93 MEL 0187094 07/07/93-94 MEL 0211695 07/07/94-95 MEL 0235196 07/07/95-96 BACKGROUND FACTS The plaintiff seeks contribution from the City of Oak Park Heights for their equitable share of the cost of remediation, operation, maintenance and all other necessary costs and expenses incurred by or assessed against the plaintiff for clean up of a release of hazardous substances into the environment at the Junker Landfill located near Hudson, Wisconsin. COVERAGE ISSUES We set forth the following provision as the basis for our determination of non-coverage. This discussion is without prejudice to LMCIT"s right to raise other defenses to coverage and the listing of potentially applicable covenant provision is nonexclusive. I. THE ABSOLUTE POLLUTION EXCLUSION PRECLUDES COVERAGE The absolute pollution exclusion contained in the policy/covenants issued to Oak Park Heights precludes coverage for the Junker Landfill matter. That provision excludes the following from liability coverage. d. Any loss, cost or expense arising out of any direction, demand, or request by the government or any other entity that the"city" or any other entity test for, monitor, clean up, remove, contain, treat, detoxify or neutralize pollutants; or Damages arising out of the actual, alleged or threatened discharge, dispersal, seepage, migration, release or escape of pollutants: 2 • • Mr. Mike Robertson BRS File No.: 11013474 August 27, 1996 (1) At or from premises the"city" owns, rents, leases, uses or occupies, and premises the "city" no longer owns, rents, leases, uses or occupies. (2) At or from any landfill, dump, or other site or location presently or formerly used by or for the"city" or other for the handling, storage, disposal, processing of treatment of pollutants; (3) Which are or were at any time transported, handled, stored, treated, disposed of, or processed as waste by or for the "city" or any person or organization for whom the "city" may be legally responsible; or (4) At or from any site or location on which the"city" or any contractors or subcontractors working directly or indirectly on the "city's" behalf are or have been performing operations; (a) If the pollutants are brought on or to the site or location in connection with such operations; or (b) If the operations are to test for, monitor, clean up, remove, contain, treat, detoxify or neutralize the pollutants. The exclusion does not apply to any of the following: (1) Any Limited Pollution Liability Claim. (2) Any claim arising out of the discharge or dispersal of mace, tear gas or similar agent, if such discharge was for the purpose of protecting persons or property or incident to an arrest. (3) Any lead or asbestos claim, unless the actual, alleged, or threatened discharge, dispersal, release, escape, use, distribution, or handling of lead or asbestos took place at or from any landfill, dump, or other site or location presently or formerly used by or for the"city" or others for the handling, storage, disposal, processing or treatment of pollutants. (4) Any damages arising,out of heat, smoke, or fumes from a hostile fire. A hostile fire is a fire which becomes uncontrollable or breaks out from where it was intended to be. 3 110 • Mr. Mike Robertson BRS File No.: 11013474 August 27, 1996 The covenant defines Limited Pollution Liability Claim as follows: 10. Limited Pollution Liability Claim means any claim for damages which resulted from a sudden occurrence which took place on or after the retroactive date shown in the Declarations and prior to the expiration date of this covenant, and which: a. Was caused by an actual, alleged, or threatened discharge, dispersal, release, or escape of pollutants which took place entirely above ground and not within or on the surface of any lake, stream, surface water or other body of water, and in which any resulting damages occurred entirely above ground and not within or on the surface of any lake, stream, surface water, or other body of water; or b. Arises from the accident rupture, backup or overflow of the "city's" sanitary sewer, storm sewer, or water supply systems. The covenant defines"pollutants," "damages," "occurrence," and "sudden occurrence" all of which definitions are called to your attention and are incorporated herein fully. The pollution exclusion provides that no coverage will be afforded for contamination caused by depositing wastes in a landfill. The limited exception to the exclusion for"limited pollution liability claims" does not apply because of its terms and because Oak Park Heights' retroactive date for Limited Pollution Liability Claims is 01/01/89, which is after any"occurrence" may have taken place. SECTION I- COVERAGES COVERAGE A. MUNICIPAL LIABILITY COVERAGE (CLAIMS MADE BASIS) 1. COVERAGE AGREEMENT a. Except as otherwise provided in this agreement, LMCIT will pay on behalf of the "covered party" all sums which the"covered party" shall become legally obligated to pay as damages as a result of an occurrence, if the following conditions are met: (1) The claim for such damages must be first made against the "covered party" during the coverage period; and 4 • • Mr. Mike Robertson BRS File No.: 11013474 August 27, 1996 (2) The date of the occurrence giving rise to the claim for damages must be on or after the retroactive date, if any, shown the Declarations... B. Coverage is Precluded Because Damages are Not Sought. The LMCIT covenants require not only that a claim be made, but that the claim be for"damages." The covenant contains the following definition of"damages." 5. Damages means money damages... Damages does not include any of the following: d. Injunctive or equitable relief, or quasi judicial or administrative orders. Landfill Remediation Trust's claims that Oak Park Heights should participate in remediation at the Junket-Landfill is specifically excluded under the definition of"damages." As no covered "damages" are sought, the LMCIT covenant does not provide coverage. C. Coverage is Precluded Because of the Absence of an "Occurrence" After the Retroactive Date. As indicated above, the claims-made covenants require that the"occurrence" take place after the Retroactive Date for Oak Park Heights, which is 07/07/87. The covenant defines "occurrence" as follows: 13. Occurrence means: a. With respect to Coverage A [Municipal Liability], a wrongful act or a series of related wrongful acts. "Wrongful act" is in turn defined as follows: 10. Wrongful act means any actual or alleged error, statement, act, omission, offense, neglect, accident, or violation. The covenant states the following as to the date of"occurrence": 5 • • Mr. Mike Robertson BRS File No.: 11013474 August 27, 1996 2. CLAIM AND OCCURRENCE DATES A. For any claim for damages, the date of the occurrence shall be deemed to be as follows: (1) For claims for bodily injury or property damage, the date of the occurrence is the date on which the bodily injury or property damage first took place or is alleged to have taken place. It is alleged that Oak Park Heights may have deposited wastes at the landfill in the 1970's to the present. Contamination was detected as early as 1984. LMCIT's covenants do not apply to any occurrence taking place before the Retroactive Date of 07/07/87. CONCLUSION The foregoing is not intended to be an exhaustive list of all the terms, exclusions and conditions of the LMCIT covenants issued to Oak Park Heights that may limit or preclude coverage. Other provisions of the LMCIT covenants may apply to limit or preclude coverage. LMCIT reserves its rights to raise such further provisions if applicable. If you have information that you believe LMCIT should consider in reviewing its coverage determination, or if you become aware of such information in the future, please bring it to our attention immediately. Likewise, if you obtain information that is inconsistent with this letter, please advise us immediately. If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Respectfully, Julie Lassonde Claims Adjuster JL:dlm\13474.L 6 • Mr. Mike Robertson BRS File No.: 11013474 August 27, 1996 c: David Snyder, City Attorney Eckberg Lammers Briggs Wolff& Vierling 1835 Northwestern Avenue Stillwater, MN 55082 c: Forest Lake Insurance Agency 2323 South Lake Forest Lake, MN 55025 c Bob Weisbrod Berkley Risk Services 7 D ATTORNEYS AT LAW FEB 1 8 1991 I� P.L.L.P. r O'BRIEN February 13, 1997 2100 Piper Jaffray Plaza PERSONAL/CONFIDENTIAL 444 Cedar Street CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS Saint Paul,Minnesota ATTN: ADMINISTRATOR MIKE ROBERTSON 55101-2160 P 0 BOX 2007 Firm (612)290-6500 OAK PARK HEIGHTS MN 55082-2007 Fax (612)223-5070 E-Mail JARDINELAW@AOL.COM Re: Our File No: 26056 (1657) Donald M.Jardine Junker Landfill Trust v. Junker Recycling, Inc. , et al John R.O'Brien Gerald M.Linnihan Alan R.Vanasek John M.Kennedy,Jr. Dear Mr. Robertson: Eugene J.Flick Charles E.Gillin JamesJ.Galman Please accept this as a status report in the above-captioned Pierre N.Regnier Mark A.Fonken litigation. George W.Kuehner MaryA.Rice Patti J.Skoglund 1. As discussed with you, I did make an offer to SeanE.Hade the Landfill Remediation Trust ' s attorney on Timothy S.Crom behalf of the City in the amount of Lawrence M.Rocheford JamesG.Golembeck $90, 000 . 00, cash, no terms. To date, they have neither accepted nor rejected the offer. Kerry C.Koep DavidJ.Hoekstra I have followed up with them on several James K.Helling occasions and they have advised me that the Michael A.Rayer Marlene S.Gary s offer remains under consideration. Mary P.Rowe Karen R.Cote 2 . Kmart and Kingwood have moved the Court for Nathan W.Hart Joseph E.Flynn summary judgment arguing that the City should Thomas L.Cummings indemnify and defend them against all claims Margaret C.Galvin Shari L.Johnson in this litigation. Their theory is based Elizabeth B.Hayes upon the fact that the City' s ordinance Laurence A.Diamond designated the garbage hauler. Katherine E.Kennedy Cara J.Debes Yvonne M.Flaherty 3 . For your complete file, I am enclosing copies BrendaL.Theis of their motions, our response memorandums and Jerre FLogan(1923-1983) their reply memorandum. All documents have now been submitted to the Some membersalso admitted Court. It is simply a matter of awaiting a to practice law in Wisconsin, North Dakota,Florida ruling from the Court on this issue. I will and Illinois keep you advised. 4 . There is a pending motion with the Court by another defendant to exclude all of the plaintiff 's experts from testifying in the case based upon their late and inadequate CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS February 13 , 1997 Page 2 disclosures . We have advised defendants ' attorney and the Court that we wish to join in the motion. 5 . On behalf of the City of Oak Park Heights we have also filed a motion for summary judgment against the claims of both sets of plaintiffs . Attached and enclosed for your complete please find a copy of our motions and memorandum regarding the same. At the present time, we are awaiting response briefs from both sets of plaintiffs. We will then have seven days to file a reply brief on behalf of the City. 6 . I have received notice that the final Pre-Trial in this matter is scheduled for Monday, February 24, 1997 at the Municipal Building in Hudson, Wisconsin. It is scheduled as an all-day affair. We will attend and keep you advised. 7 . We have also received notice that the plaintiffs are making their expert witnesses available for depositions the week of February 24 through February 28, 1997 . Depending upon the Court ' s ruling regarding their late disclosures discussed above, we may have to attend these depositions as well if the settlement is not accepted by that time. Again, we will continue to keep you advised. In the interim if you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to give me a call at your earliest convenience. Very truly yours, JARDINE, LOGAN & O'BRIEN, P.L.L.P. 57 Sean E. Hade Direct Dial: (612) 290-6510 SEH:tlm Enclosures 1111111111 • • .. ATTORNEYS AT LAW J + j 1 i P.L.L.P. � FEB 1 81997 i O'BRIEN t �1— February 13, 1997 MR MICHAEL S RYAN 2100 Piper Jaffray Plaza ATTORNEY AT LAW 444 Cedar Street 1800 PIPER JAFFRAY PLAZA Saint Paul,Minnesota 55101-2160 444 CEDAR ST ST PAUL MN 55101 Firm (612)290-6500 Fax (612)223-5070 E-Mail JARDINELAW@AOL.CQM� tcC 26056 (16 5 7) Junker Landfill Trust v. Junker Recycling, Inc. , et al Donald M.Jardine John R.O'Brien Gerald M.Linnihan Dear Mr. Ryan: Alan R.Vanasek John Eugene J.Flick Kennedy,Jr. Enclosed herein and served uponyou byUnited States Mail Eugene Flick P Charles E.Gillin please find Affidavit of Sean E. Hade submitted on behalf of James J.Galman the City of Oak Park Heights in Response and Opposition to Pierre N.Regnier MarkA.Fonken Kingwood Corporation d/b/a Kingwood Management and Kmart GeorgeW.Kuehner Corporation' s Motion for Summary Judgment . Mary A.Rice i Patti J.Skoglund Sean E.Hade Very truly yours, Timothy S.Crom ' Lawrence M.Rocheford James G.Golembeck JARDINE, LOGAN & O'BRIEN, P.L.L.P. Kerry C.Koep David J.Hoekstra James K.Helling Michael A.Rayer Marlene S.Garvis Sean E. Hade Mary P.Rowe Direct Dial: (612) 290-6510 Karen R.Cote SEH:tlm Nathan W.Hart Joseph E.Flynn Enclosures Thomas L.Cummings M Shargareti Johnson Galvin cc: All Counsel Of Record Shari L.Johnson Elizabeth B.Hayes b.C C: Laurence A.Diamond PERSONAL/CONFIDENTIAL Katherine E.Kennedy CaraJ.Debes / 4. CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS Yvonne M.Flaherty ATTN: ADMINISTRATOR MIKE ROBERTSON Brenda L.Theis P 0 BOX 2007 Jerre F Logan(1923-1983) OAK PARK HEIGHTS MN 55082-2007 Some members also admitted to practice law in Wisconsin, North Dakota,Florida and Illinois • • C © OWE Tei UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURjY ;i WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSI1' FEB181991 Junker Landfill Trust, a Minnesota business trust, Civil Action No. 96-C-0019-S CONSOLIDATED CASE Plaintiff, v. Junker Recycling, Inc. , a Minnesota corporation, f/k/a Junker Sanitary Landfill, Inc. ; et al. , First Defendants, AFFIDAVIT OF SEAN E. RADE and Eisinger Sanitation Services, Inc. ; et al. , Second Defendants, and City of Stillwater, et al. , Third Defendants, and John Does and Mary Does, Fourth Defendants. Landfill Remediation Trust, a Wisconsin business trust, Civil Action No. 96-C-489-S CONSOLIDATED CASE Plaintiff, vs. Garry Thompson; et al. , Defendants . • • STATE OF MINNESOTA ) SS. COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) Sean E. Hade, being duly sworn on oath says that: 1. He is one of the attorneys representing the City of Oak Park Heights in the above captioned matter. 2 . He submits this Affidavit and exhibits in response to Reply Memorandum of Kingwood Corporation d/b/a Kingwood Management and Kmart Corporation, dated February 10, 1997 . 3 . In response to discovery demands from numerous parties, the plaintiffs held a document inspection at the Lommen, Nelson Law Firm in Minneapolis, Minnesota on February 6, 1997. 4 . Attached hereto and incorporated by reference are true and accurate copies obtained at the document inspection and labeled as : Exhibit "A" - invoices of Junker Sanitation Service, Inc. , to Kmart for the collection of refuse at the store in question from October 1, 1979 through July 1, 1986 . Exhibit "B" - invoices of Junker Sanitation Service, Inc. , to Kmart for the collection of refuse at the store' s auto department from November 14, 1979 through November 1, 1986 . Exhibit "C" - correspondence and billing information directly between Kmart and Junker. 5 . Your Affiant asks this Court to consider Exhibits "A" , "B" and "C" as newly discovered evidence that was unavailable until February 6, 1997 . 6 . The exhibits are relevant and material for a proper evaluation of the following assertions made in defendants ' February 10, 1997 Reply Memorandum: 2 • • a. "In the context of an indemnity claim under state law, there can be no real doubt that neither Kmart nor Kingwood 'arranged' for the disposal of refuse of any kind at the Junker Landfill. " (p.6, Reply Memorandum) . b. "The City claims that because the first sentence of the section refers to refuse 'accumulated at residential properties' all other references to refuse in the remaining provisions of the section should be similarly restricted. This reading is unreasonably. narrow . . . In other words, Junker was required to collect residential garbage at least once a week, while commercial waste could be collected more or less frequently as the needs of the business dictated. " (p. 8, Reply Memorandum) (Emphasis supplied) . 7 . Exhibit "A" evidences that: 1) Between October 1, 1979 and December 31, 1980 Kmart had two containers, one which held 40 yards and the other 8 yards, and that the containers were emptied on an as needed basis without any involvement by the City. (Ex. A. , pgs. 1-3) . 2) Between January 1, 1981 and October 31, 1981 Kmart had one 40 yard container and two 8 yard containers which were emptied on an as needed basis without any involvement by the City. (Ex. A. , pgs. 4-5) . 3) Between November 1, 1981 and October 31, 1982 Kmart had a 40 yard container and an 8 yard container which were emptied on an as needed basis without any involvement by the City. (Ex. A. , pgs. 6-9) . 4) Between November 1, 1982 and June 30, 1986 Kmart had a 40 yard container that Junker would empty when called by Kmart and an 8 yard container emptied on Monday, Wednesday, Friday, and Saturday without any involvement by the City. (Ex. A. , pgs. 10-19) . 8 . Exhibit "B" evidences that between November 14, 1979 and October 31, 1986 Kmart's auto department initially had a two yard container and then switched to a four yard container which were to 3 "PI • • be emptied on Wednesday, but that occasionally Kmart arranged for "extra dumps" or "extra pickups" on an as needed basis without any involvement by the City. (Ex. B. ) . 9. Exhibit "C" evidences that Kmart communicated and made payment directly with its vendor, Junker Sanitation Services, without any involvement by the City. (Ex. C. ) . FURTHER YOUR AFFIANT SAYETH NOT. 4 111 DATED: February 13, 1997 JARDINE, LOGAN & O'BRIEN, P.L.L.P. By: FA ) f-{ SEAN E. HADE (A.R.#1013788) Attorney for City of Oak Park Heights 2100 Piper Jaffray Plaza 444 Cedar Street St. Paul, Minnesota 55101-2160 (612) 290-6510 Subscribed and sworn to before me this 13th da o February, 1997. Notary Public rye ab. THERESA 1.!vMcC1ELIAN la:Fri NOTARY PI 3LIC MINNESOTA WASHINGTON COUNTY ` ,.. My ComMssion Exons Jan.3t.2000 5 L ARDIN 411 ORNEYS AT LAW LOGAN & A P.L.L.P. RS I 8 Ear j O'BRIEN February 13, 1997 1 _f MR MARK R AZMAN ATTORNEY AT LAW 2100 Piper Jaffray Plaza 600 NORWEST CENTER 444 Cedar Street 400 FIRST ST S Saint Paul,Minnesota 55101-2160 P 0 BOX 1008 ST CLOUD MN 56302 Firm (612)290-6500 Fax (612)223-5070 E-Mail JARDINELAW@AOL.COM Re: Our File Nos : 26018(1177) /26056( 1657) Court File Nos . 96-C-0019-S and 96-C-489-S DonaldM.Jardine Junker Landfill Trust vs. Junker Recycling, Inc. , City of iohn R O'Brien Gerald M.Linnihan • Bayport, City of Oak Park Heights, et al Alan R.Vanasek John M.Kennedy,Jr. Eugene J.Flick Charles E.Gillin Dear Mr. Azman: James J.Galman Pierre N. .Funken Replier Mark A.FonI am in receipt of Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. 's, George W.Kuehner Responses to the City of Oak Park Heights and City of • PmA.Rice Skoglund Bayport's Interrogatories and Request for Production of SeanE.Hade Documents. I write this letter to you -to point out what I Timothy S.Crom perceive to be some inadequaciesin the discovery responses. Lawrence M.Rocheford James G.Golembeck Interrogatory No. 3 calls for the identification of all Kerry C.Koep David J.Hoekstra persons who were involved with the actual transport of refuse James K.Helling from the City of Oak Park Heights to the Junker landfill from MichaelA.Rayer 1977 to 1987 . The response simply refers me to a Rule 26 Marlene S.Garvis Mary P.Rowe Disclosure. The Rule 26 Disclosure that you send with your Karen R.Cote discovery responses does not identify with any particularity osephE.Fln whatsoever the actual individuals who were involved with the Joseph E.Flynn Thomas L.Cummings actual transport of refuse from the City of Oak Park Heights Margaret C. Galvin Shari L.Johto the landfill from 1977 to 1987 (i.e. , the drivers of the Elizabeth B.Hayes vehicles that transported the refuse, etc. ) . Laurence A.Diamond Katherine E.Kennedy CaraJ.Debes Interrogatory No. 4 asks for information regarding the Yvonne M.Flaherty specific dates upon which refuse from the City of Oak Park Brenda L.Theis Heights was disposed of at the Junker landfill. Your response JerreFLogan(1923-1983) does not identify any particular day of the week, the frequency of the pickups from the City of Oak Park Heights or any other information that is directly responsive to Somemembersalsoadmitted Interrogatory No. 4 . to practice law in Wisconsin, North Dakota,Florida and Illinois Your response to Interrogatory No. 5 merely states that Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. , is unable to recall the identification of all parties at the landfill responsible for the acceptance of refuse. This is an incomplete answer and you are obligated to inform me of those people whom you are aware of that had any involvement with the acceptance of refuse when it arrived at the landfill. 111 MR MARK R AZMAN February 13, 1997 Page 2 Interrogatory No. 6 requires identity and description of agreements existing between Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. , and the landfill relating to charges for the disposal. The answer to Interrogatory No. 6 only states that they were charged a tipping fee but fails to inform as to the amount of the tipping charge. Your answer to Interrogatory No. 7 is non-responsive. The Interrogatory asks for all documents generated by the landfill relative to the acceptance of Oak Park Heights' waste. The answer that informs me of the contract existing between the City and invoices of Junker to the City is not directly responsive to the question. I want any and all documents, and a description thereof, that relate to the acceptance of the refuse at the landfill (i.e. , tipping documents) . Your answer to Interrogatory No. 8 merely refers me to attached contracts and invoices. While I have received the attached invoices, I would like Interrogatory No. 8 answered with clarity as to whether the billing was done on a monthly basis or on what basis it was billed throughout the period from April of 1977 through January of 1987 . Your response to Interrogatory No. 10, which requires the identity of all records relative to the actual amount of refuse generated in the City of Oak Park Heights that refers me back to Interrogatory No. 7 that only attaches the contract and invoices is incomplete. It is my understanding, based on the invoices, that you billed a flat rate for services for each residence existing in the City of Oak Park Heights. Interrogatory No. 10 contemplates any documentation that you may have relative to the actual amount of refuse, not the actual charge made to the City. Please provide me with any and all records you have that would establish the amount of refuse taken to the Junker landfill from the City of Oak Park Heights. The above analysis of your Interrogatory Responses applies with equal force to your Responses to the City of Bayport's Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents. However, it is my understanding, based on your discovery responses, that there are no copies of any billings for the collection of refuse from the City of Bayport. Your Answer to Interrogatory No. 8 refers me to a TLI volumetric allocation list in response to an interrogatory that asks for identity of all records relative to the actual amount of refuse generated in the City of Bayport. I have received no documents relative MR MARK R AZMAN February 13, 1997 Page 3 to the actual refuse generated and am confused as to your reference to the TLI volumetric allocation if there are no documents to establish any amount of refuse that was taken to the landfill . Please supplement your Interrogatory Answers to provide the specific information requested so that I might avoid having to schedule a hearing relative to these discovery requests. Very truly yours, JARDINE, LOGAN & O'BRIEN, P.L.L.P. Sean E. Hade Direct Dial: (612) 290-6510 SEH:slf b.cc: Mike Robertson City of Oak Park Heights P.O. Box 2007 Oak Park Heights , MN 55082-2007 411 • UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN Junker Landfill Trust, a Minnesota business trust, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 96-C-0019-S CONSOLIDATED CASE v. Junker Recycling, Inc. , a Minnesota corporation, f/k/a Junker Sanitary Landfill, Inc. ; et al. , First Defendants, and Eisinger Sanitation Services, Inc. ; • et al. , 1� Second Defendants, 11t tr174- and City of Stillwater, et al. , Third Defendants, and John Does and Mary Does, Fourth Defendants. Landfill Remediation Trust, a Civil Action No. 96-C-489-S Wisconsin business trust, CONSOLIDATED CASE Plaintiff, vs. Garry Thompson, et al, Defendants. NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BY KINGWOOD CORPORATION d/b/a KINGWOOD MANAGEMENT AND MART CORPORATION AGAINST CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS ,a • 411 TO: DEFENDANT CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS AND ITS ATTORNEY, SEAN E. RADE, JARDINE, LOGAN & O'BRIEN, P.L.L.P. , 2100 PIPER JAFFRAY PLAZA, 44 CEDAR STREET, ST. PAUL, MN 55101. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the following motion will be brought before the Honorable John C. Shabaz at the Federal Courthouse for the Western District of Wisconsin, 120 North Henry Street, Madison Wisconsin, on a date to be scheduled by the Court. MDTIQM Defendants Kingwood Corporation d/b/a Kingwood Management and Kmart Corporation hereby move the Court pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for summary judgment on the moving defendants' cross-claims against the City of Oak Park Heights, granting full indemnity to the moving defendants for all claims, costs, liabilities, and attorney fees assessed against or incurred by the moving defendants arising from the above-captioned litigation. This motion is based upon the Memorandum of Law, Statement of Proposed Facts and Conclusions of Law, and various exhibits attached thereto. Dated this 2- b1-4 day of -4-4Pui,4Arcy , 1997. ' ,_ CONLIN, WRITE & BRANDT P:OFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION Michael S. Ryan, WI #864989 Thomas J. Norby, #184780 Attorneys for Defendant Kingwood Management and Defendant Kmart 1800 Piper Jaffray Plaza 444 Cedar Street St. Paul, MN 55101 (612) 227-9411 2 411 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN Junker Landfill Trust, a Minnesota business trust, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 96-C-0019-S CONSOLIDATED CASE v. Junker Recycling, Inc. , a Minnesota corporation, f/k/a Junker Sanitary Landfill, Inc. ; et al. , First Defendants, and Eisinger Sanitation Services, Inc. ; et al. , Second Defendants, and City of Stillwater, et al. , Third Defendants, and John Does and Mary Does, Fourth Defendants. Landfill Remediation Trust, a Civil Action No. 96-C-489-S Wisconsin business trust, CONSOLIDATED CASE Plaintiff, vs. Garry Thompson, et al, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF KINGWOOD CORPORATION d/b/a KINGWOOD MANAGEMENT AND 'MART CORPORATION'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AGAINST CITY OF OA' PAR' HEIGHTS INTRODUCTION This is a motion for summary judgment on Cross-Claims for indemnity by Kingwood Corporation d/b/a Kingwood Management (Kingwood) and Kmart Corporation (Kmart) against the City of Oak Park Heights (City) . Kingwood, Kmart and the City are all defendants in the above-entitled actions by which the Junker Landfill Trust (JLT) and the Landfill Remediation Trust (LRT) seek contribution for clean-up costs. Kingwood and Kmart brought Cross- Claims against the City for indemnity based on a city Ordinance that required them, and all other residents of the City, to use Junker Sanitation Service, Inc. (Junker Sanitation) for garbage collection. As the fundamental facts concerning the Ordinance are not in dispute, Kingwood and Kmart now move for summary judgment on their Cross-Claims. FACTS Effective January 1, 1975, the City of Oak Park Heights enacted an Ordinance creating a "Garbage Collection System." Pursuant to the Ordinance establishing the Garbage Collection System, "all garbage and refuse accumulations shall be accumulated, conveyed and disposed of by the City of Oak Park Heights through its legally authorized agent, the City Collection Contractor. NQ persons shall collect or convey garbage or refuse over any of the streets or alleys of the City, or dispose of any garbage accumulated in the City, except the City's duly authorized agent." Ordinance S 502.01, 502.02. (Emphasis supplied. ) The City's duly authorized agent ("City Collection Contractor") was Junker 2 410 Sanitation. City's Answer to Crossclaim, para. VIII. The Ordinance further provided that The ownership of garbage and refuse material set out for collection and collected by the City Garbage Collection • Contractor shall be vested in the City. Ordinance S 502.06. (Emphasis supplied. ) Finally, residents who failed to comply with the Ordinance were subject to criminal misdemeanor charges. Ordinance S 502.10. While there is no record of criminal prosecution under this Ordinance by the City, it is clear that Junker Sanitation took the lead in enforcing the Ordinance against those who preferred to contract with other haulers. For example, the accompanying Affidavit of Roy Warren sets forth circumstances where Junker Sanitation successfully sued his business after he told Junker to remove its dumpster from his property in the late 1970's. In that case, the judge ruled that Junker was the exclusive hauler pursuant to the Ordinance, and that no Oak Park Heights resident or business had any choice in the matter. In this case, there is no dispute that Kingwood and Kmart complied with the Ordinance. They had no choice. Junker Sanitation, the City's Collection Contractor and agent, collected refuse generated by Kingwood and Kmart, and delivered it to the Junker Landfill near Hudson, Wisconsin. In 1989, the Junker Landfill site was designated as a clean-up site by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, and litigation was commenced to apportion clean-up costs. While Kmart and Kingwood deny any responsibility to pay any part of the clean-up costs, the question 3 • • now presented to this court is whether Kingwood and Kmart may successfully tender their defense and demand indemnity from the City. ARGUMENTS Summary judgment is appropriate where there this no genuine to anymaterial fact, and where the moving party is issue as entitled to judgment as a matter of law. F.R.C.P. 56. In this case, there is no dispute that Kingwood and Kmart acted at the direction of the City of Oak Park Heights in arranging for the disposal of their solid waste, and that the waste generated by Kingwood and Kmart actually became the property of the City at the moment it was collected by Junker Sanitation, Inc. Given these facts, Kingwood and Kmart are entitled to indemnity from the City under Minnesota law, as set forth below. I. INDEMNITY IS PROPERLY OBTAINED WHERE THE PARTY SEEKING INDEMNITY HAS ACTED AT THE DIRECTION AND UNDER CONTROL OF THE PARTY AGAINST WHOM INDEMNITY IS SOUGHT. Under Minnesota law,1 indemnity is permitted where the party seeking indemnity has or may incur liability based on conduct taken at the direction, in the interest of, and in reliance upon the party sought to be charged. Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light ' Minnesota law applies under Wisconsin choice of law principles as set forth in Heath v. Zellmer, 35 Wis.2d 578, 596, 151 N.W.2d 664, 672 (1967) because this dispute involves a Minnesota ordinance governing Minnesota residents, and the ultimate apportionment of clean-up costs would not derogate the State of Wisconsin's interest in having the clean-up proceed: 4 Co. , 258 Minn. 368, 104 N.W.2d 843 (1960) (overruled in other part by Tolbert v. Gerber Industries. Inc. , 255 N.W.2d 362 (Minn. 1977) ) . In Hendrickson, plaintiff's decedent was electrocuted due to the combined negligence of the decedent's employer and a utility company hired by the employer. The decedent's estate sued the utility company, and the utility company sued the decedent's employer for contribution and indemnity. The Minnesota Supreme Court affirmed the dismissal of the utility company's indemnity claim because the liability of the employer was exclusively governed by the workers compensation system, and because the employer owed no duty to the utility company. ) : In reaching this result, the Minnesota Supreme Court set forth those circumstances where indemnity would be permitted: ,1;\ 4 ;a31 ' L— (1) Where the, one seeking indemnity has only a / r . . derivative or vcarious liability for damage caused by the one sought to be charged. ) - A (2) Where the one seeking indemnity has incurred liability by action at the direction, in the interest of, \ and in reliance upon the one sought to be charged. �� i (3) Where the one seeking indemnity has incurred 3' t liability because of a breach of duty owed to him by the ,?1 JF one sought to be charged. (4) Where the one seeking indemnity has incurred liability merely because of failure, even though negligent, to discover or prevent the misconduct of the one sought to be charged.2 2 The Minnesota Supreme Court later repudiated this circumstance in light of the codification of comparative negligence by the Minnesota Legislature. See Tolbert v. Gerber Industries, Inc. , 255 N.W.2d 362 (Minn. 1977) . 5 411 . (5) Where there is an express contract between the parties containing an explicit undertaking to reimburse for liability of the character involved. Hendrickson, 258 Minn. at 372-73, 104 N.W.2d at 848 (original footnotes omitted) . In the present case, Kingwood and Kmart are entitled to indemnity under the second circumstance set forth in Hendrickson - that is, Kingwood "incurred d and Kmart have liability by action at the direction, upon" in the interest of, and in reliance the City of Oak Park Heights. Specifically, the moving defendants had no choice or control concerning the disposal of their refuse. Pursuant to the express direction of the City, by way of the above- quoted Ordinance, Kingwood and Kmart made their refuse available to Junker Sanitation which delivered the refuse to the Junker Landfill. This arrangement was "at the direction, in the interest of, and in reliance upon" the City. At all times, the moving defendants acted in conformity with the express mandate of the City. Furthermore, there can be no dispute that the express ownership and control of waste produced by the moving defendants passed to the City prior to being transported to or disposed of at the Junker Landfill. Pursuant to S 502.06 of the Ordinance, "ownership" of the refuse material "vested in the City" once the material was "set out for collection and collected" by Junker Sanitation. In other words, once the refuse was placed at the curb, or put in a dumpster, and then collected by Junker Sanitation, the City, through its agent Junker Sanitation, assumed 6 nn- i1 ,2) A toy\ 11111 • ownership and control of its destiny. Accordingly, as between the moving defendants and the City, the City should discharge any liability arising from the disposal of solid waste generated by the moving defendants. Bee Hendrickson, 258 Minn. at 370, 104 N.W.2d at 846. See also Jacobs v. Farmland Mut. Ins. Co. , 352 N.W.2d 803, 807 (Minn. App. 1984) , aff'd. in relevant part 377 N.W.2d 441 (Minn. 1985) (independent adjuster entitled to indemnity from liability insurer against fraud claim by insured where adjuster consummated settlement at the direction and in the interest of the insurer) . II. INDEMNITY IS PROPERLY OBTAINED WHERE THE PARTY SEEKING INDEMNITY HAS ONLY A DERIVATIVE OR VICARIOUS LIABILITY FOR DAMAGE CAUSED BY THE ONE SOUGHT TO BE CHARGED. In addition, the moving defendants may fairly claim indemnity based on the first Hendrickson circumstance, which allows indemnity ), 421 . where the one seeking indemnity "has only a derivative or vicarious R 2<^m= liability for damage caused by the one sought to be charged. " 1 ' r .' , f ty Hendrickson, 104 N.W.2d at 848. As previously stated, plaintiffs ~ r. in these consolidated actions seek contribution from the moving defendants based on the allegation that Kmart and Kingwood 61-(,9 generated hazardous substances which were ultimately disposed of at the Junker Landfill. The fact of the matter is, however, that the refuse of these moving defendants ended up at th Junk re Landfill 4 ` only because the City mandated that it go there. The fact that they City made this arrangement mandatory for all residents brings the 1 -f moving defendants Cross-Claims squarely within Hendrickson. 7 There can be no dispute that the City assumed complete ownership and control of the solid waste once the material was set out and collected by its legally authorized agent, Junker anyliabilityextending to Kmart and Sanitation. Therefore, Kingwood from the disposal of the waste by the Citys agent can only be viewed as vicarious. See Hoffman v. Wiltscheck, 411 N.W.2d 923, 925, pet. for rev. denied (Minn. Nov. 13, 1987) (Minn. App. ) (vehicle owner entitled to indemnity from driver where owner's liability to injured party was only vicariously related to driver's conduct) . CONCLUSION By Ordinance S 502, the City of Oak Park Heights required these moving defendants, and others similarly situated, to give their refuse to Junker Sanitation for disposal. By the terms of the Ordinance, Junker Sanitation was the City's agent for this purpose, and ownership of the refuse became vested in the City once the material was set out and collected. Pursuant to the City's Garbage Collection System, these moving defendants had no choice regarding who picked up their garbage, or where it was taken. The refuse of these moving defendants was deposited in the Junker Landfill "at the direction, in the interest of, and in reliance upon" the City. Under these circumstances, the moving defendants are entitled to indemnity under either the first or second prongs of Hendrickson. 8 411 • Dated: January 28, 1997. MURNANE, CONLIN, WHITE & BRANDT Profes ional Association By: Michael S. Ryan, WI #864989( Thomas J. Norby, MN #`184780 Attorneys for Defendant Kingwood Management and Defendant Kmart 1800 Piper Jaffray Plaza Saint Paul MN 55101 (612) 227-9411 9 410 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN Junker Landfill Trust, a Minnesota business trust, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 96-C-0019-S CONSOLIDATED CASE v. Junker Recycling, Inc. , a Minnesota corporation, f/k/a Junker Sanitary Landfill, Inc. ; et al. , First Defendants, and Eisinger Sanitation Services, Inc. ; et al. , Second Defendants, and City of Stillwater, et al. , Third Defendants, and John Does and Mary Does, Fourth Defendants. Landfill Remediation Trust, a Civil Action No. 96-C-489-S Wisconsin business trust, CONSOLIDATED CASE Plaintiff, vs. Garry Thompson, et al, Defendants. STATEMENT OF FACTS AND PROPOSED CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SUBMITTED BY KINGWOOD CORPORATION d/b/a KINGWOOD MANAGEMENT AND KMART CORPORATION IN SUPPORT OF SUMMARY JUDGMENT 111 Pursuant to Local Rule I. B. (2) , defendants Kingwood Corporation d/b/a Kingwood Management (Kingwood) and Kmart Corporation (Kmart) hereby submit the following statement of the findings of fact and conclusions of law proposed by these moving defendants in connection with their motion for summary judgment on their cross-claims for indemnity against the City of Oak Park Heights (City) : 1. Kingwood is a Minnesota corporation, with its principal place of business in the State of Minnesota. Kingwood is a property management firm located within the limits of the City of Oak Park Heights, State of Minnesota. Affidavit of Ryan at 1 2. 2. Kmart is a Michigan corporation, with headquarters in Michigan. Kmart operated a retail department store within the limits of the City of Oak Park Heights, State of Minnesota. Affidavit of Ryan at .1 3. 3 . The Junker Landfill was a sanitary landfill located east of Hudson, Wisconsin, from 1972 to 1987. From 1977 to 1987, Junker Sanitation Service, Inc. (Junker Sanitation) collected refuse from residents and businesses in the Stillwater/Hudson area, including the City of Oark Park Heights, and delivered the refuse to the Junker Landfill. JLT Amended Complaint at 11 11, 12; LRT Complaint at 1 8. 4. Pursuant to "An Ordinance Regulating the Disposal of Garbage and Refuse and Providing the Creation and Establishment of a Uniform System for Collection and Disposal of Garbage and Refuse," the City of Oak Park Heights mandated that Kingwood and 2 • • Kmart, and all other residents and businesses located in the City of Oak Park Heights use Junker Sanitation Service, Inc. as their garbage and refuse hauler. The Ordinance was made effective January 1, 1975 and was in full force and effect during the time period relevant herein.in Affidavit of Ryan, Exhibit A, Ordinance Preamble; Exhibit B, 1975 Junker Sanitation Contract Preamble; Exhibit C, 1981 Junker Sanitation Contract Preamble; Exhibit D, Cross-Claims of Kmart and Kingwood against the City of Oak Park Heights; Exhibit E, City of Oak Park Heights Answer to Cross-Claims of Kmart and Kingwood at S VIII. 5. Pursuant to Section 502.02 of the City Ordinance, "Commencing January 1, 1975 all garbage and refuse accumulations shall be accumulated, conveyed and disposed of by the City of Oak Park Heights through its legally authorized agent, the City Collection Contractor.. No persons shall collect or convey garbage or refuse over any of the streets or alleys of the City, or dispose of any garbage accumulated in the City, except the City's duly authorized agent." Affidavit of Ryan, Exhibit A, Ordinance S 502.02; Exhibit E, City of Oak Park Heights Answer to Cross-Claims of Kmart and Kingwood at x IV. 6. Pursuant to Section 502.06 of the City Ordinance, "The ownership of garbage and refuse material set out for collection and collected by the City Garbage Collection Contractor shall be vested in the City. Affidavit of Ryan, Exhibit A, Ordinance S 502.06; Exhibit E, City of Oak Park Heights Answer to Cross-Claims of Kmart and Kingwood at 1 V. 3 • 7. Pursuant to Section 502. 10 of the City Ordinance, any person violating the Ordinance was guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of up to $700, or in the event of default, imprisonment for a period not exceeding 90 days. Affidavit of Ryan, Exhibit A, Ordinance S 502.06; Exhibit E, City of Oak Park Heights Answer to Cross-Claims of Kmart and Kingwood at ¶ VI. 8. The City of Oak Park Heights entered into a contract pursuant to this Ordinance with Junker Sanitation effective January 1, 1975, which contract was renewed for a six year period effective January 1, 1981. Affidavit of Ryan, Exhibit B, 1975 Junker Sanitation Contract; Exhibit C, 1981 Junker Sanitation Contract. 9. In this agreement, the City granted Junker Sanitation "the exclusive privilege to negotiate with commercial and industrial establishments. * * * for the collection of their garbage and refuse. " Affidavit of Ryan, Exhibit B, 1975 Junker Sanitation Contract § I; Affidavit of Ryan, Exhibit C, 1981 Junker Sanitation Contract S I. 10. While there is no evidence in the record that the City ever actually got involved in any dispute between Junker Sanitation and any Oak Park Heights resident or business, the record does show that Junker Sanitation successfully sued at least one Oak Park Heights business that attempted to contract with a different refuse collection company. Affidavit of Warren. 11. By operation of the City Ordinance, neither Kingwood nor Kmart, nor other residents and businesses located in the City of Oak Park Heights, had any choice or control concerning the disposal 4 • 410 of their garbage and refuse. In addition to usurping all control over the manner in which garbage and refuse was collected and disposed of, the City expressly assumed "ownership of garbage and refuse materials set out for collection. " Affidavit of Warren at 1 10; Affidavit of Ryan, Exhibit A, Ordinance S 502.06. 12 . Both Kingwood and Kmart, as well as other residents and businesses located in the City of Oak Park Heights, had their garbage and refuse collected by Junker Sanitation Service, Inc. Affidavit of Ryan, Exhibit E, City of Oak Park Heights Answer to Cross-Claims of Kmart and Kingwood at S VIII. 13 . Junker Sanitation Service, in turn, disposed of garbage and refuse generated by Kingwood and Kmart at the Junker Landfill site during the relevant time period herein. Affidavit of Ryan, Exhibit E, City of Oak Park Heights Answer to Cross-Claims of Kmart and Kingwood at i VIII. 14. Kingwood and Kmart have been served with a Summons and Amended Complaint by Plaintiff Junker Landfill Trust (JLT) , in Civil Action No. 96-C-0019-S, alleging that Defendants Kingwood and Kmart are liable to the JLT for damages incurred by the JLT in connection with investigation and remediation of the Junker Landfill, all as more fully set forth in Plaintiff JLT's Amended Complaint. 15. Kingwood and Kmart have also been served with a Summons and Complaint by Plaintiff Landfill Remediation Trust (LRT) , in Civil Action No. 96-C-489-S, alleging that Defendants Kingwood and Kmart are liable to the LRT for damages incurred by the LRT in 5 • 410 connection with investigation and remediation of the Junker Landfill, all as more fully set forth in Plaintiff LRT's Complaint. 16. In each of the above-entitled actions, Defendants Kingwood and Kmart have interposed separate Answers denying any fault or liability to either the JLT or the LRT. 17. There is no evidence before the court that Kingwood or Kmart actually generated any hazardous substance that was disposed of at the Junker Landfill. 18. Kingwood and Kmart subsequently asserted Cross-Claims for indemnity against the City of Oak Park Heights based on the Ordinance and circumstances described in the preceding paragraphs. Affidavit of Ryan, Exhibit D, Cross-Claims of Kmart and Kingwood against City of Oak Park Heights. 19. Kmart and Kingwood duly tendered their respective defenses to the City and demanded indemnity by a Notice and Tender of Defense served upon counsel for the City on December 31, 1996. Affidavit of Ryan, Exhibit F, Tender of Defense and Demand for Indemnity. 20. By correspondence dated January 9, 1997, counsel for the City declined to accept the tender of Kingwood and Kmart. Affidavit of Ryan, Exhibit G, Correspondence from Sean E. Hade dated January 9, 1997. 21. In its Answer to the Cross-Claims by Kingwood and Kmart, the City denied any liability or right of indemnity to Kmart and Kingwood. Affidavit of Ryan, Exhibit E, City of Oak Park Heights Answer to Cross-Claims of Kmart and Kingwood at ! IX. 6 22. Since January 9, 1997, Kingwood and Kmart have incurred legal fees and costs in defending against claims by LRT and JLT in the main action. Affidavit of Ryan at 1 4. 23 . There being no material dispute concerning the facts set forth in the preceding paragraphs, Kingwood and Kmart now move for summary judgment on their Cross-Claims for indemnity against the City of Oak Park Heights. PROPOSED CONCLUSIONS OP LAW 1. This court has supplemental jurisdiction to adjudicate these Cross-Claims pursuant to 28 USC 1367 (a) . 2. The facts set forth above are not disputed, and this court is prepared to rule as a matter of law. 3 . Minnesota law is applicable to this dispute. Under Minnesota law, the remedy of indemnity is available where the party seeking indemnity has. or may incur liability based on conduct taken at the direction, in the interest of, and in reliance upon the party sought to be charged. Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co.,, 258 Minn. 368, 372-73, 104 N.W.2d 843, 848 (1960) (overruled in other part by Tolbert v. Gerber Industries, Inc. , 255 N.W.2d 362 (Minn. 1977) ) . Indemnity is also available where the one seeking indemnity has only a derivative or vicarious liability for damage caused by the one sought to be charged. Hendrickson, 258 Minn. at 372-73, 104 N.W.2d at 848. 4. In this case, there is no dispute that Kingwood and Kmart, as well as other residents and businesses located in the City of Oak Park Heights, had their garbage and refuse collected by 7 110 Junker Sanitation Service, Inc. at the direction, in the interest of, or in reliance upon the City. Further, there is no dispute that ownership of the refuse material collected by Junker Sanitation as agent for the City of Oak Park Heights passed to the City when the refuse was "set out for collection and collected" by Junker Sanitation. 5. Accordingly, any liability arising from the disposal of the waste generated by Kmart and Kingwood, as between the moving defendants and the City, is most properly and equitably borne by the City. 6. In addition, a party that successfully seeks indemnity from another is entitled to recover reasonable costs and attorney fees expended in litigating the main action starting from the time that the indemnitor denied the tender by the indemnitee. 7. Therefore, the motions by Kingwood and Kmart for summary judgment on their Cross-Claims for indemnity against the City are granted in all respects. The City shall indemnify and hold the moving defendants harmless from and against any and all liability, loss, costs, disbursements, expenses, attorney's fees and any other expenses that may be imposed upon them, or to which they may become subjected, by reason of these actions, the defense of these actions, or the defense of any Cross-Claims in these actions. 8. Further, counsel for Kingwood and Kmart shall submit a detailed affidavit setting forth all costs and fees incurred in defending the main action from January 9 to the present within 14 days of the date of this Order. The City may object to any costs 8 411 and fees claimed by Kmart and Kingwood within 7 days of receipt of the affidavit of counsel. Kingwood and Kmart may respond to the City's objections within 3 days of receipt thereof. This Court shall then determine the amount, if any, of costs and fees to be awarded to Kmart and Kingwood. Dated this L$_ day of January, 1997. MURNANE, CONLIN, WHITE AND BRANDT Professional Association B 9 ichael S. Ryan, WI #864989 Attorneys for Defendant Kingwood Corporation d/b/a Kingwood Management and Defendant Kmart Corporation 1800 Piper Jaffray Plaza 444 Cedar Street St. Paul, MN 55101 (612) 227-9411 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN Junker Landfill Trust, a Minnesota business trust, Civil Action No. 96-C-0019-S CONSOLIDATED CASE Plaintiff, v. Junker Recycling, Inc. , a Minnesota corporation, f/k/a Junker Sanitary Landfill, Inc. ; et al. , First Defendants, and Eisinger Sanitation Services, Inc. ; et al. , Second Defendants, and City of Stillwater, et al. , Third Defendants, and John Does and Mary Does, Fourth Defendants. Landfill Remediation Trust, a Wisconsin business trust, Civil Action No. 96-C-489-S CONSOLIDATED CASE Plaintiff, vs . Garry Thompson; et al. , Defendants. STATEMENT OF FACTS AND PROPOSED CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SUBMITTED BY THE CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS IN RESPONSE AND OPPOSITION TO KINGWOOD CORPORATION D/B/A KINGWOOD MANAGEMENT AND KMART CORPORATION'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT • 410 Defendant City of Oak Park Heights submits this Statement of Facts and Proposed Conclusions of Law in Response and Opposition to Kingwood Corporation d/b/a Kingwood Management (hereinafter referred to as "Kingwood") and Kmart Corporation's (hereinafter referred to as "Kmart") Motion for Summary Judgment. STATEMENT OF FACTS 1. Kingwood is a Minnesota corporation, with its principle place of business in the State of Minnesota. Kingwood is a property management firm located within the limits of the City of Oak Park Heights, State of Minnesota. RESPONSE: No objection. 2 . Kmart is a Michigan corporation, with headquarters in Michigan. Kmart operated a retail department store within the limits of the City of Oak Park Heights, State of Minnesota. RESPONSE: No objection. 3 . The Junker Landfill was a sanitary landfill located east of Hudson, Wisconsin, from 1972 to 1987. From 1977 to 1987, Junker Sanitation Service, Inc. , (Junker Sanitation) collected refuse from residents and businesses in the Stillwater/Hudson area, including the City of Oak Park Heights, and delivered the refuse to the Junker Landfill. RESPONSE: No objection. 4 . Pursuant to "An Ordinance Regulating the Disposal of Garbage and Refuse and Providing the Creation and Establishment of a Uniform System for Collection and Disposal of Garbage and Refuse, " the City of Oak Park Heights mandated that Kingwood and 2 111 111 Kmart, and all other residents and businesses located in the City of Oak Park Heights use Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. , as their garbage and refuse hauler. The Ordinance was made effective January 1, 1975 and was in full force and effect during the time period relevant herein. RESPONSE: Object to that portion wherein it states that the Ordinance required the use of Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. , as hauler. The Ordinance required and called for the use of one exclusive hauler but it does not name Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. 5 . Pursuant to Section 502 . 02 of the City Ordinance, "Commencing January 1, 1975 all garbage and refuse accumulations shall be accumulated, conveyed and disposed of by the City of Oak Park Heights through its legally authorized agent, the City Collection Contractor. No persons shall collect or convey garbage or refuse over any of the streets or alleys of the City, or dispose of any garbage accumulated in the City, except the City's duly authorized agent. " RESPONSE: No objection. 6. Pursuant to Section 502 .06 of the City Ordinance, "The ownership of garbage and refuse material set out for collection and collected by the City Garbage Collection Contractor shall be vested in the City. RESPONSE: No objection. 7 . Pursuant to Section 502 .10 of the City Ordinance, any person violating the Ordinance was guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of up to $700, or in the event of default, imprisonment for a period not exceeding 90 days. 3 • • RESPONSE: No objection. 8 . The City of Oak Park Heights entered into a contract pursuant to this Ordinance with Junker Sanitation effective January 1, 1975, which contract was renewed for a six year period effective January 1, 1981. RESPONSE: No objection. 9. In this agreement, the City granted Junker Sanitation "the exclusive privilege to negotiate with commercial and industrial establishments * * * for the collection of their garbage and refuse. " RESPONSE: No objection. 10. While there is no evidence in the record that the City ever actually got involved in any dispute between Junker Sanitation and any Oak Park Heights resident or business, the record does show that Junker Sanitation successfully sued at least one Oak Park Heights business that attempted to contract with a different refuse collection company. RESPONSE: Defendant Oak Park Heights contests that the record actually establishes a successful suit by Junker against an Oak Park Heights business. Rather, the record establishes that there is an Affidavit of an individual named Roy Warren where these facts are alleged. Defendant does not feel that these facts are relevant or necessary for a determination of the motion of Kingwood and Kmart for summary judgment on indemnification. 11. By operation of the City Ordinance, neither Kingwood nor Kmart, nor other residents and businesses located in the City of Oak Park Heights, had any choice or control concerning the disposal of their garbage and refuse. In addition to usurping all control over the manner in which garbage and refuse was collected and 4 • • disposed of, the City expressly assumed "ownership of garbage and refuse materials set out for collection. " RESPONSE: Defendant Oak Park Heights acknowledges that the subject Ordinance and contract required residents and businesses located in the City of Oak Park Heights to have their garbage and refuse hauled by Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. for a period of time, but disputes that the residents and businesses had no control or choice regarding disposal of their garbage and refuse. The g g P 9 9 residents and businesses had the right to voice concerns or ask for repeal of the Ordinance. 12 . Both Kingwood and Kmart, as well as other residents and businesses located in the City of Oak Park Heights, had their garbage and refuse collected by Junker Sanitation Service, Inc. RESPONSE: No objection. 13 . Junker Sanitation Service, in turn, disposed of garbage and refuse generated by Kingwood and Kmart at the Junker Landfill site during the relevant time period herein. RESPONSE: Defendant City of Oak Park Heights has no knowledge of this assertion of fact, and believes that this is a proof element that the Plaintiffs need to provide in this litigation. 14 . Kingwood and Kmart have been served with a Summons and Amended Complaint by Plaintiff Junker Landfill Trust (JLT) , in Civil Action No. 96-C-0019-S, alleging that Defendants Kingwood and Kmart are liable to the JLT for damages incurred by the JLT in connection with investigation and remediation of the Junker Landfill, all as more fully set forth in Plaintiff JLT's Amended Complaint. RESPONSE: No objection. 15. Kingwood and Kmart have also been served with a Summons and Complaint by Plaintiff Landfill Remediation Trust (LRT) , in 5 411 Civil Action No. 96-C-489-S, alleging that Defendants Kingwood and Kmart are liable to the LRT for damages incurred by the LRT in connection with investigation and remediation of the Junker Landfill, all as more fully set forth in Plaintiff LRT's Complaint. RESPONSE: No objection. 16. In each of the above-entitled actions, Defendants Kingwood and Kmart have interposed separate Answers denying any fault or liability to either the JLT or the LRT. RESPONSE: No objection. 17 . There is no evidence before the court that Kingwood or Kmart actually generated any hazardous substance that was disposed of at the Junker Landfill. RESPONSE: Defendant City of Oak Park Heights objects to this assertion of fact as not within its personal knowledge and is a proof element that needs to be provided by Plaintiffs. 18. Kingwood and Kmart subsequently asserted Cross-Claims for indemnity against the City of Oak Park Heights based on the Ordinance and circumstances described in the preceding paragraphs. RESPONSE: No objection. 19. Kmart and Kingwood duly tendered their respective defenses to the City and demanded indemnity by a Notice and Tender of Defense served upon counsel for the City on December 31, 1996 . RESPONSE: No objection. 20. By correspondence dated January 9, 1997, counsel for the City declined to accept the tender of Kingwood and Kmart. RESPONSE: No objection. 6 411 21. In its Answer to the Cross-Claims by Kingwood and Kmart, the City denied any liability or right of indemnity to Kmart and Kingwood. RESPONSE: No objection. 22 . Since January 9, 1997, Kingwood and Kmart have incurred legal fees and costs in defending against claims by LRT and JLT in the main action. RESPONSE: No objection. i 23 . There being no material dispute concerning the facts set forth in the preceding paragraphs, Kingwood and Kmart now move for summary judgment on their Cross-Claims for indemnity against the City of Oak Park Heights. RESPONSE: Defendant City of Oak Park Heights objects and asserts that there are disputes regarding the facts. The disputes are set forth in the above objections. ADDITIONAL PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Neither the City of Oak Park Heights Ordinance 502 or the contracts existing between Defendant City of Oak Park Heights and Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. , specify the location to which garbage and refuse taken out of the City of Oak Park Heights will be disposed of. (See Exhibit A attached to Affidavit of Michael Ryan and Exhibit B attached to Affidavit of Michael Ryan. ) PROPOSED CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. This court has supplemental jurisdiction to adjudicate these Cross-Claims pursuant to 28 USC 1367 (a) . RESPONSE: Agreed. 7 S • 2. The facts set forth above are not disputed, and this court is prepared to rule as a matter of law. RESPONSE: Subject to the above objections, and notwithstanding said objections, Defendant City of Oak Park Heights asserts that there are no facts that give rise to a genuine issue of material facts for purposes of resolving the issue of indemnity presented to the court by Kingwood and Kmart. Based upon the factual record at this time, the court can properly deny the motion for summary judgment. 3 . Minnesota law is applicable to this dispute. Under Minnesota law, the remedy of indemnity is available where the party seeking indemnity has or may incur liability based on conduct taken at the direction, in the interest of, and in reliance upon the party sought to be charged. Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co. , 258 Minn. 368, 372-73, 104 N.W.2d 843 , 848 (1960) (overruled in part by Tolbert v. Gerber Industries, Inc. , 255 N.W.2d 362 (Minn. 1977) ) . Indemnity is also available where the one seeking indemnity has only a derivative or vicarious liability for damage caused by the one sought to be charged. Hendrickson, 258 Minn. at 372-73, 104 N.W.2d at 848. RESPONSE: Agreed. 4. In this case, there is no dispute that Kingwood and Kmart, as well as other residents and businesses located in the City of Oak Park Heights, had their garbage and refuse collected by Junker Sanitation Service, Inc. , at the direction, in the interest of, or in reliance upon the City. Further, there is no dispute that ownership of the refuse material collected by Junker Sanitation as agent for the City of Oak Park Heights passed to the City when the 8 refuse was "set out for collection and collected" by Junker Sanitation. RESPONSE: Disputed. The City of Oak Park Heights disputes that the garbage and refuse generated by Kingwood and Kmart was collected in a manner at the direction, in the interest of, or in reliance upon the City. The City of Oak Park Heights further disputes that it is a "owner" of the refuse of Kingwood and Kmart for purposes of CERCLA. 5. Accordingly, any liability arising from the disposal of the waste generated by Kmart and Kingwood, as between the moving defendants and the City, is most properly and equitably borne by the City. RESPONSE: Disputed in whole. Kingwood and Kmart have provided no supporting authority in their brief for this proposition. 6. In addition, a party that successfully seeks indemnity from another is entitled to recover reasonable costs and attorney fees expended in litigating the main action starting from the time that the indemnitor denied the tender by the indemnitee. RESPONSE: Disputed in whole. 7. Therefore, the motions by Kingwood and Kmart for summary judgment on their Cross-Claims for indemnity against the City are granted in all respects. The City shall indemnify and hold the moving defendants harmless from and against any and all liability, loss, costs, disbursements, expenses, attorney's fees and any other expenses that may be imposed upon them, or to which they may become subjected, by reason of these actions, the defense of these actions, or the defense of any Cross-Claims in these action. RESPONSE: Disputed in whole. 9 411 110 8. Further, counsel for Kingwood and Kmart shall submit a detailed affidavit setting forth all costs and fees incurred in defending the main action from January 9 to the present within 14 days of the date of this Order. The City may object to any costs and fees claimed by Kmart and Kingwood within 7 days of receipt of the affidavit of counsel. Kingwood and Kmart may respond to the City's objections within 3 days of receipt thereof. This Court shall then determine the amount, if any, of costs and fees to be awarded to Kmart and Kingwood. RESPONSE: Disputed in whole. DATED: JARDINE, LOGAN & O'BRIEN, P.L.L.P. By: SEAN E. RADE (A.R.#1013788) Attorney for City of Oak Park Heights 2100 Piper Jaffray Plaza 444 Cedar Street St. Paul, Minnesota 55101-2160 Phone: (612) 290-6500 10 110 111 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN Junker Landfill Trust, a Minnesota business trust, Civil Action No. 96-C-0019-S CONSOLIDATED CASE Plaintiff, v. Junker Recycling, Inc. , a Minnesota corporation, f/k/a Junker Sanitary Landfill, Inc. ; et al. , First Defendants, and Eisinger Sanitation Services, Inc. ; et al. , Second Defendants, and City of Stillwater, et al. , Third Defendants, and John Does and Mary Does, Fourth Defendants. Landfill Remediation Trust, a Wisconsin business trust, Civil Action No. 96-C-489-S CONSOLIDATED CASE Plaintiff, vs. Garry Thompson; et al. , Defendants. STATEMENT OF FACTS AND PROPOSED CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SUBMITTED BY THE CITY OF OAR PARK HEIGHTS IN SUPPORT OF SUMMARY JUDGMENT r • Pursuant to Local Rule I. B. (2) , Defendant City of Oak Park Heights hereby submits the following Statement of Facts and Conclusions of Law proposed by this moving Defendant in connection with its Motion for Summary Judgment: 1. Defendants Kingwood and Kmart are named Defendants in the JLT action and the LRT action. (See Complaints in each action) 2 . Defendant City of Oak Park Heights is a named Defendant in both actions. (See Complaints in each action) 3 . Junker Landfill Trust, in its Amended Complaint, asserts that Kingwood and Kmart, as well as the City of Oak Park Heights, are "public and private generators of waste, and others who arranged for disposal of hazardous substances at the landfill." (See Amended Complaint, 17) 4 . Landfill Remediation Trust, in its Complaint, asserts that Kingwood and Kmart, as well as the City of Oak Park Heights, are "generators. " (See Complaint, 18) 5. The City of Oak Park Heights, pursuant to Ordinance 502 .02, required that businesses and residents in the City of Oak Park Heights have their garbage and refuse hauled by a single hauler. (See Ordinance attached to Affidavit of Michael Ryan and marked as Exhibit A) 6 . The City of Oak Park Heights entered into a contract with Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. , for the exclusive hauling of residential garbage and refuse within the City of Oak Park Heights. Said contract continued from January 1, 1975, and continued until 2 110 411 1987. (See hauling contracts attached to Affidavit of Michael Ryan and marked as Exhibits B and C) CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. A claimant seeking to recover on indemnity must establish that their liability is derivative or vicarious to that of the party against whom they seek indemnity. See Blomgren v. Marshall Management Services, 483 N.W.2d 504, 506 (Minn.App. 1992) , quoting Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co. , 258 Minn. 368, 372-73, 104 N.W.2d 843, 848 (1960) overruled in part by Tolbert v. Gerber Indus. , Inc. , 255 N.W.2d 362, 366-368 (1977) . 2 . A claimant seeking to recover on indemnity must establish that it has incurred liability by action at the direction, in the interest of, and in reliance upon the one sought to be charged. See Blomgren v. Marshall Management Services, 483 N.W.2d 504, 506 (Minn.App. 1992) , quoting Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co. , 258 Minn. 368, 372-73, 104 N.W.2d 843, 848 (1960) overruled in part by Tolbert v. Gerber Indus. , Inc. , 255 N.W.2d 362, 366-368 (1977) 3 . The claims brought against Kingwood and Kmart (CERCLA contribution claims) assert liability on the basis that Kingwood and Kmart were "generators" of hazardous waste as well as arrangers for the transport of hazardous waste. (See JLT Amended Complaint, 17; LRT Complaint, 18) 4. The alleged liability of Kingwood and Kmart as generators and arrangers for disposal is not derivative or vicarious to the alleged liability of the City of Oak Park Heights. 3 • 411 5. The City of Oak Park Heights, in enacting Ordinance 502, was exercising its function as a sovereign. 6 . Ordinance 502 does not transfer ownership of commercial refuse to the City. 7. The sovereign immunity exception exempts the City from any claim based on the passage of Ordinance 502. 8. Kingwood and Kmart's acts of generating and arranging with Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. , for the transport of its refuse and garbage provide the nexus for the CERCLA contribution claims and the City's selection of an exclusive hauler did not lead to or cause the damage at the Junker landfill. 9. Kingwood and Kmart's motion for summary judgment on its Cross-Claims for indemnity against the City of Oak Park Heights is denied. DATED: JARDINE, LOGAN & O'BRIEN, P.L.L.P. By: SEAN E. RADE (A.R.#1013788) Attorney for City of Oak Park Heights 2100 Piper Jaffray Plaza 444 Cedar Street St. Paul, Minnesota 55101-2160 Phone: (612) 290-6500 4 • 111 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN Junker Landfill Trust, a Minnesota business trust, Civil Action No. 96-C-0019-S CONSOLIDATED CASE Plaintiff, v. Junker Recycling, Inc. , a Minnesota corporation, f/k/a Junker Sanitary Landfill, Inc. ; et al. , First Defendants, and Eisinger Sanitation Services, Inc. ; et al. , Second Defendants, and A City of Stillwater, et al. , Third Defendants, and John Does and Mary Does, Fourth Defendants. Landfill Remediation Trust, a Wisconsin business trust, Civil Action No. 96-C-489-S CONSOLIDATED CASE Plaintiff, vs. Garry Thompson; et al. , Defendants. DEFENDANT, CITY OF OAR PARK HEIGHTS' MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO RINGWOOD CORPORATION D/B/A RINGWOOD MANAGEMENT AND KMART CORPORATION'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT I. INTRODUCTION Defendant City of Oak Park Heights submits this Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Kingwood Corporation d/b/a Kingwood Management (hereinafter referred to as "Kingwood") and Kmart Corporation's (hereinafter referred to as "Kmart") Motion for Summary Judgment. Kingwood/Kmart request that the Court enter an Order granting summary judgment and full indemnity to them from the City of Oak Park Heights based on the City's selection of Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. as the exclusive garbage hauler for waste within the confines of the City of Oak Park Heights. Kingwood/Kmart's motion should be denied on the basis that the City's passage of an Ordinance requiring use of one garbage hauler does not give rise to a duty to indemnity. II FACTS Oak Park Heights does not disagree with the facts as set forth in Kingwood/Kmart's Fact portion of its Memorandum. In sum, Oak Park Heights agrees that it enacted an Ordinance requiring all businesses and residences within Oak Park Heights to use a single city collection contractor chosen by the City. Oak Park Heights also agrees that Ordinance 502 .06 states: "The ownership of garbage and refuse materials set out for collection and collected by the city garbage collection contractor shall be vested in the city. " Oak Park Heights does not dispute that Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. , collected the refuse of Kingwood/Kmart from 1977 2 through 1987 but does not have sufficient information to agree that such refuse was then taken to the Junker landfill. III. ARGUMENT The facts in this case are largely uncontested with respect to Kingwood/Kmart's motion for summary judgment on indemnity, and the sole issue presented for the Court is a matter of law. This Court need only resolve the issue of law as to whether Oak Park Heights, by simply passing an Ordinance requiring a single hauler for the entire City, has a duty to indemnify Kingwood/Kmart for CERCLA contribution claims asserted against them in the Complaints. A. Indemnity Oak Park Heights does not dispute the law cited in Kingwood/Kmart's Memorandum regarding indemnity and the fundamental elements of Minnesota law that give rise to a duty to indemnify. Oak Park Heights disagrees with Kingwood's argument that the passage of an Ordinance requiring a single hauler gives rise to an indemnity claim against the City. The Amended Complaint of Junker Landfill Trust ("JLT") makes claim that Kingwood and Kmart are generators and/or arranger for disposal of hazardous substance that found its way to the Junker landfill. (See JLT Amended Complaint, 17) The Landfill Remediation Trust ("LRT") Complaint makes claim that Kingwood and Kmart are transporters and/or generators. (See LRT Complaint, 13) The JLT Amended Complaint alleges that Oak Park Heights is both a generator and arranger for disposal of hazardous substance at the landfill. (See JLT Amended Complaint, 17) 3 • s The LRT Complaint asserts that Oak Park Heights is a generator. (See LRT Complaint, 13) The JLT Amended Complaint and the LRT Complaint assert CERCLA contribution claims against Kingwood/Kmart and the City of Oak Park Heights. A CERCLA contribution claim allows a party, such as the Plaintiffs, who have paid amounts in investigation and remediation of environmental contamination to recover back some of those sums from those entities they feel are also potentially liable parties. See 42 U.S.C. §9613 (f) . Both Plaintiffs, in their respective Complaints, have specified their belief that Kingwood and Kmart are "generators" of hazardous substance that was taken to the Junker landfill. There is no dispute in this case that Kingwood and Kmart generated their own refuse; that their refuse was then set out for collection; and that their refuse was then collected by Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. There is also no dispute that Kingwood and Kmart directly contracted with Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. , for the transportation of their waste. Kingwood/Kmart may recover indemnity from Defendant City of Oak Park Heights only if it can prove the existence of one of the following elements: Oak Park Heights concedes that Ringwood/Kmart were required to contract with Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. , for garbage removal. However, the City had nothing to do with the specifics as to what waste would and would not be collected by Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. and had no control over the terms of the contract between Kingwood/Kmart . 4 • "1. Where the one seeking indemnity has only a derivative or vicarious liability for damage caused by the one sought to be charged. 2. Where the one seeking indemnity has incurred liability by action at the direction, in the interest of, and in reliance upon the one sought to be charged. 3 . Where the one seeking indemnity has incurred liability because of a breach of duty owed to him by the one sought to be charged. * * * 5. Where there is an express contract between the parties containing an explicit undertaking to reimburse for liability of the character involved. " Blomgren v. Marshall Management Services, 483 N.W.2d 504, 506 (Minn.App. 1992) , citing Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co. , 258 Minn. 368, 372-73, 104 N.W.2d 843, 848 (1960) , overruled in part by Tolbert v. Gerber Indus. , Inc. , 255 N.W.2d 362, 366-368 (1977) . 1. Derivative Liability Application of the facts in this case to the doctrine of indemnity in Minnesota leads to the conclusion that the City of Oak Park Heights owes no duty to indemnify Kingwood/Kmart for the CERCLA contribution claims brought against them by the Plaintiffs. Kingwood/Kmart's argument that their liability is derivative or vicarious to the liability of Oak Park Heights is not persuasive. Kingwood/Kmart's liability under CERCLA, if found, will be on the basis of their role as generators of hazardous substance or arrangers for transport of hazardous substance. Kingwood and Kmart's liability for the content of the refuse that it generated 5 • and hired Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. , to transport is independent of the City's role in appointing Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. , as the sole garbage hauler in the City of Oak Park Heights. Kingwood and Kmart 's liability, if they were involved in generating hazardous materials, is very direct and is not derivative or vicarious to the City's simple act of passing an Ordinance requiring Kingwood/Kmart to use the City's exclusive hauler. There is nothing about the City's act, in passing an Ordinance requiring only one garbage contractor within the city limits, that lead to; caused; or resulted in contamination of the Junker landfill.2 Kingwood/Kmart will be liable under its CERCLA contribution claims if Kingwood and Kmart generated hazardous waste and arranged for the transport of such hazardous waste. The City's act of selecting a single garbage hauler is not the act upon which CERCLA liability will attach to Kingwood/Kmart. Liability will attach to Kingwood/Kmart only if the Plaintiffs, in each of their respective actions, can establish that some waste generated by Kingwood/Kmart or some waste for which Kingwood and Kmart arranged for the transport, through Junker, caused contamination of the landfill. The City had absolutely nothing to do with either of these acts of Kingwood/Kmart that may ultimately cause them to incur liability under a CERCLA contribution claim. 2 Contrary to Kingwood/Kmart's assertions, neither Ordinance 502 nor the contract existing between Oak Park Heights and Junker named the Junker landfill as a designated disposal site. 6 • • Based on the fact that any liability that will attach to Kingwood/Kmart is direct to them and is not in any way based on any damage caused by the City of Oak Park Heights, their claim for indemnity must fail. 2 . Principal/Agent Liability Kingwood/Kmart 's argument that the second prong set forth in Hendrickson, supra at 372-73, applies to the facts of this case is also equally without merit. The second prong of the Hendrickson criteria provides: "*2 . Where the one seeking indemnity has incurred liability by action at the direction, in the interest of, and in reliance upon the one sought to be charged. " Supra at 372-373 Oak Park Heights concedes that Kingwood/Kmart contracted with Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. because of, and as a result of, Ordinance 502 . The City of Oak Park Heights disputes that this act of selecting an exclusive hauler has resulted, or will result, in Kingwood/Kmart's liability pursuant to the Plaintiffs' CERCLA claims. Again, as discussed above, liability will attach to Kingwood/Kmart if, and only if, it is shown that the refuse generated by Kingwood/Kmart resulted in contamination of the Junker landfill. The pivotal issue for the contribution claim against Kingwood/Kmart is whether their waste was hazardous and the identity of the hauler is irrelevant. If the waste of Kingwood/Kmart was, in fact, hazardous, it would likely have 7 411 resulted in contamination regardless of the hauler of that hazardous substance.3 Clearly, if, in fact, Kingwood/Kmart generated, and arranged ed for the transport, through Junker Sanitation Services, of hazardous substances, this was not done at the direction, in the interest of, and in reliance upon the City of Oak Park Heights. Therefore, there can be no claim for indemnity against the City for the City's passage of an Ordinance that required the commercial businesses within the confines of the City of Oak Park Heights to contract with a single hauler. 3 . Ownership Kingwood and Kmart argue that, by virtue of Ordinance 502.06 which provides that the ownership of garbage and refuse material set out for collection vested in the City, gives rise to a duty to indemnify. This argument is untenable. First, the full reference to Ordinance 502.06 is as follows: "Garbage and refuse accumulated at residential properties shall be collected at least once each week. No collections of garbage or refuse shall be made except between the hours of 7 a.m. and 6 p.m. The ownership of garbage and refuse material set out for collection and collected by the City Garbage Collection Contractor shall be vested in the city." (Emphasis Added) (Attached to Affidavit of Michael Ryan) It is clear from the full reference to that portion of the Ordinance that the garbage and refuse referred to is only that 3 There is no evidence in this case, at this time, and it is the claim of Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. , that it did not knowingly accept hazardous substance from any person or entity. (See Landfill Remediation Trust Complaint, 110) 8 • accumulated at residential properties. The commercial refuse of Kingwood and Kmart is not addressed nor referred in Ordinance 502 .06. Kingwood/Kmart's reliance on this portion of the Ordinance as giving rise to a duty to indemnify is ill placed and not applicable as the Ordinance does not even apply to their commercial waste. To the extent that Kingwood and Kmart argue that Ordinance 502 .06, even if applicable, obviates Kingwood/Kmart's responsibility as generators under CERCLA, this argument is not valid or supported by law. It is clear that the indicia of ownership, as set forth in Ordinance 502 .06, is solely in the City's role as sovereign and true ownership did not pass for purposes of CERCLA liability. 42 U.S.C. §9601 (2) (D) provides that a municipality does not become an owner or operator, for purposes of CERCLA, merely by acquiring title by virtue of their function as a sovereign. It is clear from a cursory reading of Ordinance 502 that the City's sole purpose in becoming owner of the refuse and garbage once it left the confines of each individual residence was for the purpose of having the authority to restrict the collection of that refuse to only one hauler. This was done to protect the general health and welfare of the residents of the City of Oak Park Heights. (See Ordinance 502 .01) The City was acting as sovereign in passing the Ordinance. In B.F. Goodrich Co. v. Murtha, 958 F.2d 1192, 1199 (2nd Cir. 1992) , the court found that sovereign immunity extended to those 9 111 situations where liability was premised on the municipality being an "owner or operator. " Id. at 1199. "An unmistakable purpose behind CERCLA's strict liability standard was to force the parties who profit from the use and generation of hazardous waste, or directly cause or contribute to their release, to account, in the pricing of their products, for the environmental externalities associated with improper disposal. " "This rationale simply does not apply to the City's abatement of public nuisances." Lincoln v. Republic Ecology Corp. , 765 F.Supp. 633, 635-36 (C.D. Cal. 1991) . The above analysis granting sovereign immunity to a municipality would apply to the claim of Kingwood/Kmart to the extent that they are attempting to assert indemnity against the City on the basis that the City became the "owner" of the refuse generated by Kingwood/Kmart. Under the sovereign function exception, the City of Oak Park Heights would not be viewed as an owner or operator under CERCLA. E. Immunity The City of Oak Park Heights is immune from any liability asserted against it by Kingwood/Kmart on the basis that, the passage of the single hauler Ordinance 502, was a discretionary act subject to immunity from liability. See, Minn. Stat. § 466. 03, Subd. 6 (1990) . The conduct of the municipality, ordinarily at a planning level, that involves a balancing of policy considerations is considered exercise of discretionary function of government and those acts are not subject to liability. See Johnson v. State, 10 II 411 111 536 N.W.2d 328, 332 (Minn.App. 1995) ; Gutbrod v. County of Hennepin, 529 N.W.2d 720, 723 (Minn.App. 1995) ; Nusbaum v. Blue Earth County, 422 N.W.2d 713, 722 (Minn. 1988) . Clearly, the conduct of the City of Oak Park Heights, in endeavoring to protect the general health and welfare of its residents, made a discretionary decision to enact Ordinance 502 which called for an exclusive garbage hauler within the confines of the City. There can be no question that that act of passing an Ordinance was a discretionary act for which the municipality of Oak Park Heights enjoys immunity from suit. See Minn. Stat. § 466.03, Subd. 6 (1990) . Kingwood/Kmart's claim that somehow the City was negligent in enacting an Ordinance that required them to hire Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. , to haul their garbage is an act for which the county is not liable as it was an exercise of their discretionary function. Ringwood/Kmart's motion for summary judgment on indemnity should be dismissed on the basis of the City's immunity from suit under Minn. Stat. § 466 .03, Subd. 6. Further, the City of Oak Park Heights enjoys immunity from liability under Minn. Stat. § 466. 03, Subd. 8 which provides: "Any claim for a loss other than injury to or loss of property or personal injury or death." Kingwood/Kmart's claim for indemnity based on sums they may have to pay to further clean up or remediate the Junker landfill is not a claim for loss of property, personal injury or death. Accordingly, no such claim can be brought against a municipality 11 410 110 and they enjoy immunity from any such action under Minn. Stat. § 466. 03 , Subd. 8 . IV. CONCLUSION Kingwood and Kmart's Motion for Summary Judgment on its claims for indemnity against the City of Oak Park Heights should be denied. Kingwood and Kmart's possible liability under a CERCLA contribution claim is not derivative or vicarious to any alleged liability of Oak Park Heights and Kingwood and Kmart's possible liability was not incurred at the direction of, nor was it controlled by, Oak Park Heights. DATED: JARDINE, LOGAN & O'BRIEN, P.L.L.P. By: SEAN E. BADE (A.R.#1013788) Attorney for City of Oak Park Heights 2100 Piper Jaf fray Plaza 444 Cedar Street St. Paul, Minnesota 55101-2160 Phone: (612) 290-6500 12 A . UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN Junker Landfill Trust, a Minnesota business trust, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 96-C-0019-S CONSOLIDATED CASE v. Junker Recycling, Inc. , a Minnesota corporation, f/k/a Junker Sanitary Landfill, Inc. ; et al. , First Defendants, and Eisinger Sanitation Services, Inc. ; et al. , Second Defendants, and City of Stillwater, et al. , Third Defendants, and John Does and Mary Does, Fourth Defendants. • Landfill Remediation Trust, a Civil Action No. 96-C-489-S Wisconsin business trust, CONSOLIDATED CASE Plaintiff, vs. Garry Thompson, et al, Defendants. REPLY MEMORANDUM OF KINGWOOD CORPORATION d/b/a KINGWOOD MANAGEMENT AND MART CORPORATION • • INTRODUCTION This is a motion for summary judgment on Cross-Claims for indemnity by Kingwood Corporation d/b/a Kingwood Management (Kingwood) and Kmart Corporation (Kmart) against the City of Oak Park Heights (City) . The essential facts and the applicable law are not in dispute. In its response to this motion, the City raised issues concerning sovereign immunity, agency, and the extent of liability of an alleged "generator" under CERCLA. Kingwood and Kmart submit the following reply to the new issues raised by the City. ARGUMENTS The City's reliance on sovereign immunity is misplaced because immunity does not extend to claims for indemnity under Minnesota law. Further, while the moving parties agree that the City K ordinance did not compel them to generate hazardous substances, the mere allegation of generation under CERCLA is not sufficient to trigger independent liability. Instead, liability is imposed under CERCLA only after the waste is transported and disposed of ata site which later exhibits a release. In this case, responsibility for the critical transportation and disposal factors lays directly with the City. Finally, the City cannot credibly deny that it owned the waste from the moment the waste was set out and then collected by the City's legally authorized agent. Points and authorities supporting these arguments are set forth below. 2 • I. SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY DOES NOT APPLY TO ACTIONS FOR INDEMNITY. As a threshold matter, the City bears the burden of establishing its defense of sovereign immunity. Waste Recovery Co- Op v. County of Hennepin, 517 N.W.2d 329, 332 (Minn. 1994) . Despite a decade of CERCLA litigation, the City fails to cite a single case where a municipality successfully established an immunity defense in the contribution phase of a CERCLA proceeding. In addition to its failure to cite any precedent under CERCLA, the City erroneously assumes that sovereign immunity applies to actions not sounding in tort. The general rule in Minnesota is that "every municipality is subject to liability for its torts and those of its officers, employees and agents * * *." Minn. Stat. S 466.02 (emphasis added) .1 The City seeks to rely on one of the many exceptions to the general rule of statutory liability found in Minn. Stat. S 466.03 . However, the applicability of any exception is not an issue in this case because the statute is Confined to tort claims. Indeed, all of the cases cited by the City in support of its immunity defense involve negligence claims against various sovereigns arising in personal injury suits. Contrary to the City's claim, there is no common law sovereign immunity, nor any statutory exception preserving immunity against claims sounding in equity or contract. ee Nadeau v. County of 1 It is noted that Minn. Stat. Chapter 466 is officially entitled "TORT LIABILITY, POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS. " 3 • • Ramsey, 310 Minn. 549, 245 N.W.2d 254 (1976) ; Anderson v. Anderson, 300 Minn. 112, 217 N.W.2d 854 (1974)°. In fact, Minnesota law specifically permits sovereigns to be sued for equitable relief in the absence of a written contract, and without regard to sovereign immunity. Dehn v. Brand Coal & Oil Co. , 241 Minn. 237, 63 N.W.2d 6 (1954) . In Dghn, three people were burned when they were walking across a dump formerly leased by the City of St. Paul and owned by a coal company. Plaintiffs sued the coal company, and the coal company sued the City for indemnity. Recognizing that the City was immune from direct suit by the injured parties, the court nevertheless ruled in favor of the coal company's indemnity claim because the City failed to maintain the dump in violation of an implied covenant between the City and the coal company. In the present case, there is no dispute that the City forced the moving parties to contract with City agent Junker Sanitation. In turn, the moving parties have been vexed with litigation arising from the acts of the City and its agent in arranging for the disposal of waste generated by City residents and businesses. The moving parties now seek indemnity based on their relationship with the City, and based on the acts of the City agent under Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co. , 258 Minn. 368, 104 N.W.2d 843 (1960) (overruled in part by Tolbert v. Gerber Industries, Inc. , 255 N.W.2d 362 (Minn. 1977) ) . Because this is not a negligence claim arising from a personal injury suit, the City's immunity defense simply does not apply. 4 i i II. NEITHER KINGWOOD NOR /MART TOOK "ANY ACTION THAT WOULD SUBJECT THEM TO AN INDEPENDENT CLAIM UNDER CERCLA SO AS TO DEFEAT THEIR CLAIM FOR INDEMNITY AGAINST THE CITY. In attempting to put some distance between itself and Junker Sanitation, the City argues that indemnity does not lie where the conduct of the party seeking indemnity gives rise to an independent cause of action against the party seeking indemnity. Specifically, the City argues that its selection of a designated agent for garbage removal did not compel either of the moving parties to generate hazardous substances. First, there is no proof in the record that Kingwood or Kmart generated hazardous substances. For purposes of this motion, however, that allegation will be assumed. Even assuming that Kingwood and Kmart generated hazardous substances, this fact, without more, is not sufficient to trigger CERCLA liability. The mere allegation that the moving parties generated . While hazardous substances does not give rise to CERCLA liability. two of the classes of persons potentially liable under CERCLA are popularly called "arrangers" and "generators," the language of the statute requires more than mere generation: any person who by contract, agreement, or otherwise arranged for disposal or treatment, or arranged with a transporter for transport for disposal or treatment, of hazardous substances owned or possessed by such person * * *; (or] any person who accepts or accepted any hazardous substance for transport to disposal or treatment facilities, incineration vessels, or sites selected by such person * * * shall be liable for (clean-up costs and damages] . 5 • • 42 U.S.C. S 9607 (a) (3) and (4) . Under this description of generator and arranger status, liability does not arise unless and until any hazardous substance that may be generated is transported to and disposed of at a site by arrangement of, or on behalf of the owner, and from which site there is a release.2 Thus, without proof that the moving parties both generated hazardous substances, and independently arranged for the transportation and disposal of the hazardous substances, the City's attempt to identify an independent basis of liability falls short. In the context of an indemnity claim under state law, there can be no real doubt that neither Kmart nor Kingwood "arranged" for the disposal of refuse of any kind at the Junker Landfill. The "arrangement" was made by the City in its designation of a single hauler for all residents as its agent, and in its responsibility for the acts of its agent, whether or not the City actually knew that Junker Sanitation was using the Junker Landfill. While Kmart and Kingwood may or may not have generated hazardous substances, the critical fact and corresponding legal conclusion in the context. of the present dispute is that the City arranged for the disposal of that waste by Junker and Junker Sanitation took it to the Junker Landfill. Further, the City errs in its claim that the actual identity of the hauler (and presumably the entity that hired the hauler) is 2 See e.g. United States v. A & F Materials Co. , 582 F.Supp. 842, 845 (S.D.I11. 1984) (simple transfer of hazardous substance not covered under CERCLA, unless the transfer also includes an arrangement to dispose of the substance) . 6 • • "irrelevant" because, assuming that the moving parties in fact generated hazardous substances, such substances would "likely have resulted in contamination" at some other hypothetical site. Bee City Response at pp. 7-8. To the contrary, the conduct of Junker Sanitation and all of the related Junker enterprises is perhaps the most critical factual issue in the entire litigation for several reasons. First, assuming that hazardous substances were generated by any person in Oak Park Heights, transportation of the material by Junker Sanitation was the cause in fact of the contamination of the Junker Landfill. Conversely, had the City elected to use some other hauler, or had the residents been free to choose their own hauler, there would be no link between the generation of hazardous substances and the contamination at the Junker Landfill. Without Junker Sanitation acting in this role, the moving parties would not have been parties to this litigation. Accordingly, as between the City and the moving parties, the City should bear the expense of the CERCLA action. • III. THE CITY OWNED THE REFUSE THAT ITS LEGALLY AUTHORIZED AGENT TRANSPORTED TO THE JUNKER LANDFILL. In an abundance of caution, the City disclaims any knowledge that Junker Sanitation transported refuse from Oak Park Heights to the Junker Landfill. This is a feeble argument because the entire litigation, consisting of two consolidated federal court cases involving nearly 800 parties, is premised upon the contention that Junker hauled the waste picked up in the Hudson/Stillwater area to 7 410 • the Junker Landfill. Does the City have evidence to the contrary? If so, they have not produced any to the Court. The City also disclaims ownership of the refuse despite its own ordinance providing that Garbage and refuse accumulated at residential properties shall be collected at least once each week. No collections of garbage or refuse shall be made except between the hours of 7:00 A.M. and 6:00 P.M. The ownership of garbage and refuse material set out for collection and collected by the City Garbage Collection Contractor shall be vested in the City. Ordinance S 502.06. (Emphasis supplied) . The City claims that because the first sentence of this section refers to refuse "accumulated at residential properties, " all other references to refuse in the remaining provisions of the section should be similarly restricted. This reading is unreasonably narrow. Under Minnesota law, the words and phrases contained in legislative enactments must be given their plain and ordinary meanings, and should be construed in a manner avoiding absurd results. Minn. Stat. SS 645.08 subd. 1 and 545.17 subd. 1. Contrary to the City's reading, the phrase "residential properties" • ,, need only modify the first sentence of the provision. In other words, Junker was required to collect residential garbage at least once a week, while commercial waste could be collected more or less frequently as the needs of the business dictated. However, to restrict the remaining provisions of the section to "residential properties" would lead to unintended and absurd results. For example, if the section relating to times of collection applied only the residential properties, then Junker 8 • i Sanitation would have been free to haul garbage through city streets at 3:00 A.M. , provided that the,. garbage was collected from a commercial property. This would be inconsistent with the time restrictions for hauling set forth in the contracts between Junker Sanitation and the City. These contracts restrict the pickup of garbage and refuse from a "household or business" except between the hours of 7:00 A.M. and 6:00 P.M. See S II of Exhibits B and C attached to the Affidavit of Michael S. Ryan. Further, there is no rational basis for distinguishing between ownership of commercial garbage and residential garbage. The fact remains that the City took ownership and control of the material at the moment it was set out for collection and collected by its duly authorized agent. The City also argues that while the ordinance does not transfer "true ownership" of the material to it, the ordinance does provide sovereign immunity from unrelated claims under CERCLA. It is true that a municipality may not be independently liable as an owner/operator of a site under CERCLA upon involuntary assumption of ownership or emergency response to a release. B.F. Goodrich v. Murtha, 958 F.2d 1192, 1199, (2nd Cir. 1992) . However, the court in Murtha specifically rejected the claim that sovereign immunity could be extended beyond that limited exception to shield the City from allegations that it arranged for the disposal of hazardous substances. Id. In the context of an indemnity action under state law, ownership and control of the refuse plays a critical role in 9 1111 establishing that the sovereign should be responsible for the acts of its agent. In the present case, the City exercised strict control of virtually all of the services rendered by Junker Sanitation. As such, the City is responsible to those harmed by and to those vexed bylaw suits brought the conduct of its agent, 9 by others harmed by the acts of the agent. Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co. , 258 Minn. 368, 104 N.W. 2d 843 (1960) (overruled in part by Tolbert v. Gerber Industries, Inc. , 255 N.W.2d 362 (Minn. 1977) ) . CONCLUSION The City is not immune from suit for indemnity. But for the City's designation of Junker Sanitation as the official hauler for all residents, the moving parties would not be subject to liability under CERCLA. Accordingly, the moving parties are entitled to complete indemnity. The moving parties respectfully request that this Court grant their motions for summary judgment in all respects. Dated: February 10, 1997. MURN , CONLIN, WHITE & BRANDT Prof sional Association By: /6,( Ct9 Mi el S. Ryan, WI #8 989 Thomas J. Norby, MN #184780 Attorneys for Defendant Kingwood Management and Defendant Kmart 1800 Piper Jaffray Plaza Saint Paul MN 55101 (612) 227-9411 10 . . . . !II UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN Junker Landfill Trust, a Minnesota business trust, Civil Action No. 96-C-0019-S CONSOLIDATED CASE Plaintiff, v. Junker Recycling, Inc. , a Minnesota corporation, f/k/a Junker Sanitary Landfill, Inc. ; et al. , First Defendants, DEFENDANT, CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS' and MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF SUMMARY JUDGMENT Eisinger Sanitation Services, Inc. ; et al . , Second Defendants, and City of Stillwater, et al . , Third Defendants, and John Does and Mary Does, Fourth Defendants, and Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. , and United Waste Transfer, Inc. , Third Party Defendants . Landfill Remediation Trust, a Wisconsin business trust, Civil Action No. 96-C-489-S CONSOLIDATED CASE Plaintiff, vs . Garry Thompson; et al . , Defendants. 411 I . INTRODUCTION Defendant City of Oak Park Heights (hereinafter referred to as "Oak Park Heights") brings a Motion for Summary Judgment in both the Landfill Remediation Trust (hereinafter referred to as "LRT") case and the Junker Landfill Trust (hereafter referred to as "JLT") case. Oak Park Heights seeks summary judgment on all claims asserted by the Plaintiffs in both actions. Additionally, Oak Park Heights seeks an Order from this Court finding that the contract between Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. , and the City of Oak Park Heights requires Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. , to indemnify Oak Park Heights for all damages sought by Plaintiffs in both cases. Dismissal of the claims against Oak Park Heights in the Junker Landfill Trust case is appropriate on the following bases: 1. Count I of Junker Landfill Trust's Amended Complaint asserts a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 6972. This claim is subject to dismissal being that Junker Landfill Trust failed to comply with the ninety (90) day notification requirement under 42 U.S.C. S 6972(b) (2) (A) . Further, it is subject to dismissal as a citizen suit barred on the basis that the State of Wisconsin is participating in the remediation of the Junker Landfill. See 42 U.S.C. S 6972(b) (2) (C) . 2 . Count II of Junker Landfill Trust's Amended Complaint setting forth a 42 U.S.C. S 9607 CERCLA claim is subject to dismissal under the doctrine of the "law of the case" as this Court has found in Orders dated January 13, 1997, July 17, 1996, and April 29, 1996, that Plaintiff Junker Landfill Trust does not have a right to bring a direct cost recovery under 42 U.S.C. § 9607 . 2 411 410 3. Count III of Junker Landfill Trust's Amended Complaint against Oak Park Heights is subject to summary judgment dismissal on the basis that Oak Park Heights is not a covered person or potentially liable person under 42 U.S.C. § 9607(a) . 4 . Counts IV, V and VI of Junker Landfill Trust's Amended Complaint and Count III of the Landfill Remediation Trust's Complaint are subject to summary judgment dismissal on the basis that Plaintiffs did not comply with the notice requirements of Wis . Stat. S 893.90. 5. The Plaintiffs ' claims for unjust enrichment should be dismissed under the "law of the case" as established in this Court's Order dated January 13, 1997 . 6 . Oak Park Heights is entitled to full indemnification from Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. , for any and all sums that may be apportioned to Oak Park Heights . This right to full and complete indemnity arises out of the garbage hauling contract between Oak Park Heights and Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. II. FACTS Plaintiff JLT is comprised of a number of persons or entities whose waste may have been transported to the Junker landfill at various times. (See JLT Amended Complaint, ¶1) JLT has cooperated with the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources in the investigation and remediation of the landfill . (See JLT Amended Complaint, ¶1) Plaintiff JLT, by its Amended Complaint, names Defendant Oak Park Heights as a Third Defendant and in the body of its Complaint asserts that: 3 "Third Defendant City of Stillwater, et al, are public and private generators of waste, and others who arrange for disposal of hazardous substances at the landfill at all times relevant to this matter." (See JLT Amended Complaint, 17) Plaintiff LRT is a Wisconsin Business Trust that voluntarily entered into an agreement with the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources to remediate environmental contamination at the Junker landfill. (See LRT Complaint, 12) The LRT Complaint asserts that: "other transporters and generators include those parties identified in List A. " (See LRT Complaint, ¶3) Further, the Complaint asserts: "generators included Anderson Corporation, and all of the persons or entities listed in List A, except for those which were involved in transporting materials to the site." (See LRT Complaint, 18)1 Oak Park Heights entered into an agreement with Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. , dated January 1, 1975, wherein it was agreed that Junker Sanitation Service, Inc. , commencing January 1, 1975, and continuing until January 1, 1987, had the contractual right to collect: "all residential garbage and refuse for collection within the corporate boundary in the City . . . . " (See Exhibit A, paragraph I, attached to. Affidavit of Sean E. Hade) The Complaint in the Landfill Remediation Trust case does not allege any claim against the City of Bayport for being an "arranger" for materials to the Junker landfill site. 4 • • The garbage hauling contract in effect from January 1, 1975, through January 1, 1987, does not specify the location at which the City of Oak Park Heights ' garbage and rubbish was disposed of. (See Exhibit A attached to Affidavit of Sean E. Hade) Defendant Oak Park Heights will discuss the claims asserted in the Amended Complaint of JLT and the Complaint of LRT and the reasons for dismissal, in seriatim, in the Law and Argument section of this Memorandum. III. STANDARD OF REVIEW Defendant Oak Park Heights moves for summary judgment on all claims asserted in the Amended Complaint of JLT and the Complaint of LRT pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In 1986, the United States Supreme Court decided three cases which interpret Rule 56 to require entry of summary judgment in actions where there are no genuine issues of material fact. Matshushita Elec . Ind. Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp. , 475 U.S. 574 ( 1986) ; Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317 (1986) ; Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. , 477 U.S. 242 ( 1986) . Defendant Oak Park Heights asserts for purposes of this motion that there are no controverted facts which give rise to a genuine issue of material fact. Defendant's motion for summary judgment raises pure questions of law for which disposition by summary judgment is appropriate. Cf. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. , supra; Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, supra. 5 • • Iv. LAW AND DISCUSSION A. Count I Of Plaintiff Junker Landfill Trust's Amended Complaint Is Subject To Summary Judgment Dismissal Count I of JLT's Amended Complaint asserts a claim against Oak Park Heights asserting claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 6972(a) (1) (B) and 42 U.S.C. § 6972(e) . Plaintiff 's failure to comply with the foundational notice requirements found at 42 U.S.C. § 6972(b) precludes this action. 42 U.S.C. § 6972(b) (2) (A) provides: "( 1) No action may be commenced under subsection (a) (1) (B) of this section prior to ninety days after the plaintiff has given notice of the endangerment to/any person alleged to have contributed or to be contributing to the past or present handling, storage , treatment, transportation, or disposal of any solid or hazardous waste referred to in subsection (a) (1) (B) of this section. " The United States Supreme Court, interpreting a similar notice provision under RCRA for notice to a public agency found that the pre-suit notice provisions of RCRA were mandatory conditions precedent to commencing suit under RCRA. See Hallstrom v. Tillamook County, 110 S.Ct. 304, 311 ( 1989) . The Supreme Court held that District Courts must dismiss RCRA actions wherein the plaintiff has failed to comply with the notice provisions of 42 U.S.C. § 6972 . See Hallstrom v. Tillamook County, supra,. JLT failed to comply with the jurisdictional notice requirements of 42 U.S.C. § 6972 by not notifying the Defendant Oak Park Heights of an alleged endangerment ninety (90) days before 6 411 • this Complaint was filed. Accordingly, Count I of JLT's Amended Complaint is subject to dismissal as a matter of law. This Court, by Order dated January 13, 1997, dismissed the identical RCRA claim against Nor-Lake based on Plaintiff 's failure to comply with the notice requirements. This same ruling should apply with equal force to Oak Park Heights. Additionally, JLT's RCRA claim is inappropriate given the State of Wisconsin's involvement in investigation and remediation ct the Junker Landfill. 42 U.S.C. § 6972(b) (2) (C) (iii) provides that: "No action may be commenced under subsection (a) (1) (B) of this section if the State, in order to restrain or abate acts or conditions which may have contributed or are contributing to the activities which may present the alleged endangerment/ (iii) has incurred costs to initiate a Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study under section 104 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C.A. S 9604) and is diligently proceeding with a remedial action under that Act (42 U.S.C. S 9601 et seq. ) ." Count I of JLT's Amended Complaint asserting a RCRA claim is precluded as a result of the State of Wisconsin's role in investigating and remediating the contamination at the Junker landfill. B. Count II Of Plaintiff Junker Landfill Trust's Amended Complaint Pursuant To 42 U.S.C. S 9607 (a) Is Subject To Dismissal Under The Doctrine Of The "Law Of The Case" On January 13, 1997, July 17, 1996, and on April 29, 1996, this Court has held, as a matter of law, that Count II of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint asserting a direct cost recovery 7 S i action pursuant to S 107(a) of CERCLA was unavailable as a matter of law. Defendant Oak Park Heights now brings its summary judgment motion requesting that the Court dismiss Count II of JLT's Amended Complaint against it asserting a cause of action under 42 U.S.C. § 9607(a) . C. Counts IV, V And VI Of Plaintiff Junker Landfill Trust's Amended Complaint Should Be Dismissed For Failure To Comply With Wisconsin's Notice Of Claim Statute This Court entered an Order on July 17, 1996, granting ueiendants Town of Hudson and the Village of North Hudson's Motions for Summary Judgment on Counts IV, V and VI of JLT's Amended Complaint due to JLT's failure to comply with the notice requirements of Wis. Stat. S 893.80( 1) (a) and § 893.80( 1) (b) . In its Memorandum accompanying the July 17, 1996, Order, the Court found that a plaintiff, prior to bringing suit against a municipality, must give Notice of Injury under S 893.80( 1) (a) and Notice of Claim under § 893.80( 1) (b) , citing Vanstone v. Town of Delafield, 191 Wis.2d 586, 593, 530 N.W.2d 16, 19 (Ct.App. 1995) . The Court found that the notice provisions of Wis. Stat. S 893.80 precluded Plaintiff's common law contribution claims. (See Order, p. 6) Defendant Oak Park Heights did not receive proper Notice of Claim or itemization of injury from JLT in conformance with Wis . Stat. S 893.80( 1) prior to LRT's initiation of this litigation. JLT also failed to wait for disallowance of its claim or for the expiration of the required 120 days prior to bringing this action. Accordingly, Oak Park Heights is entitled to a grant of summary 8 judgment on the common law contribution and unjust enrichment claims contained at Counts IV, V and VI of JLT's Amended Complaint. D. Duplicative Claims 1. Federal Contribution Claims Plaintiff JLT and the LAT have asserted claims under 42 U.S.C. S 9613(f) which provides: "Any person may seek contribution from any other person who is liable or potentially liable under Section 9707(a) of this Title . . . In resolving contribution claims, the court may allocate response costs among liable parties using such equitable factors as the court determines are appropriate. " 42 U.S.C. S 9614 (b) provides that: "Any person compensation who receives for removal costs or damages or claims pursuant to this chapter shall be precluded from recovering compensation for the same removal costs or damages or claims pursuant to any other State or Federal Law. . . ." In its Amended Complaint, Plaintiff asserts in Count IV a claim for federal common law contribution wherein it is alleged that the Defendants share a common liability for the investigation and remediation of the landfill. Defendant Oak Park Heights is unaware of any case law which establishes a "federal common law of contribution. " It would appear that the only right of contribution, given the facts in this case involving alleged investigation and remediation of environmental contamination at the landfill, would arise specifically under 42 U.S.C. S 9613( f) . 9 S • "Any person who receives compensation for removal costs or damages or claims pursuant to this chapter shall be precluded from recovering compensation for the same removal costs or damages or claims pursuant to any other State Federal Law. " 42 U.S.C. S 9614(b) JLT's "federal common law contribution claim" is nothing more than a duplicative claim of its CERCLA contribution claim. 42 U.S.C. S 9614(b) intends that a CERCLA contribution claim be an all inclusive remedy. 2. State Law Contribution Plaintiff JLT asserts a "Wisconsin common law contribution" claim based upon the parties alleged common liability for the investigation and remediation of the landfill . Typically, under Wisconsin law, a co-defendant has a right to contribution from a joint tortfeasor when one tortfeasor is compelled to pay a disproportionate share of the damages. This is usually done by a method of distribution requiring each joint tortfeasor to pay its proportionate share on a comparative fault basis. See Swanigan v. State Farm Ins. Co. , 299 N.W.2d 234, 242 (Wis . 1980) . Ordinarily, a right to contribution is asserted by co- defendants in tort actions . This current action brought by JLT is not a tort action and arguing comparative fault principles is not applicable. 42 U.S.C. S 9613(f) ( 1) provides: "In resolving contribution claims, the Court may allocate response costs among liable parties using such equitable factors as the Court determines are appropriate. " Clearly, under CERCLA, the Court will have to make some assessments as to liability among the parties and apportion 10 410 response costs accordingly. The Plaintiff's attempt to also impose a "common law contribution claim" is merely duplicative of its CERCLA contribution claim under 42 U.S.C. S 9613( f) . Such claim is also barred, as discussed above, under 42 U.S.C. S 9614(b) which allows recovery by only one method. E. The Unjust Enrichment Claims Of Junker Landfill Trust And Landfill Remediation Trust Should Be Dismissed In Accordance With This Court's January 13, 1997, Order In an Order dated January 13, 1997, this Court found that the unjust enrichment claim asserted in Junker Landfill Trust's Amended Complaint, as it applied to Defendant Nor-Lake, should be dismissed. In reaching this finding, the Court discussed the requirements of proof, under Wisconsin law, for an unjust enrichment claim. (See Order, p. 6) The Court found that a claim for unjust enrichment under Wisconsin law requires proof of the following three elements: ( 1) A benefit conferred upon the defendant by the plaintiff; (2) An appreciation or knowledge by the defendant of the benefit; and (3) Acceptance or retention by the defendant of the benefit under circumstances making it inequitable for the defendant to retain the benefit without payment of its value. Puttkammer v. Ninth, 83 Wis.2d 686, 689, 266 N.W.2d 361 ( 1978) The Court found that the Plaintiff JLT entered into a voluntary agreement to clean up the landfill on the basis that they had been involved in the contamination and that these efforts were not done in the interests of Defendant Nor-Lake. These same facts and analysis can be applied to Defendant Oak Park Heights. Neither 11 111 JLT or the LRT entered into their voluntary settlements with the State of Wisconsin for the benefit of the City of Oak Park Heights, nor were they done with Oak Park Heights ' knowledge that the Plaintiffs were acting for the benefit of Oak Park Heights. Defendant Oak Park Heights seeks a ruling, identical to that made by the Court in its January 13, 1997, Order dismissing Count VI of JLT's Amended Complaint against the City of Oak Park Heights and also an Order dismissing the unjust enrichment claim against v. :: Park Heights in the LRT case.2 F. Defendant City of Oak Park Heights Is Not A Person Potentially Liable Under 42 U.S.C. § 9607(a) And Is Not A Party Against Whom A 42 U.S.C. 5 9613(f) Claim Can Be Brought 42 U.S.C. § 9613(f) ( 1) provides: "Any person may seek contribution from any other person who is liable or potentially liable under Section 9607(a) of this Title. . . ." In its Amended Complaint, JLT asserts that: "Third Defendant City of Stillwater, et al, are public and private generators of waste, and others who arranged for disposal of hazardous substances at the landfill at all times relevant to this matter." (See JLT Amended Complaint, ¶7) The Complaint is woefully inadequate in establishing the basis for a CERCLA contribution claim against Defendant Oak Park Heights, and thus far in the litigation, Plaintiffs have not provided any facts or basis to argue that Defendant Oak Park Heights is a 2 The Court's January 13, 1997, Order only dismisses the unjust enrichment claim in the Junker Landfill Trust case but there is no reason that the same analysis and rule of law cannot be applied to the unjust enrichment claim brought by the Landfill Remediation Trust. 12 • generator.3 Assumably, the argument is that Oak Park Heights, through its garbage hauling contract with Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. , arranged for disposal of hazardous substances at the landfill. In order to bring a successful 42 U.S.C. S 9613(f) CERCLA contribution claim, Plaintiffs must establish that Oak Park Heights is a covered person under 42 U.S.C. S 9607(a) (3) which provides: "any person who by contract, agreement, or otherwise arranged for disposal or treatment, or arranged with a transporter for transport for disposal or treatment of hazardous substances owned or possessed by such person, by any other party or entity, at any facility or incineration vessel owned or operated by another party or entity and containing such hazardous substances, and " (Emphasis Added) The statute requires that the person who arranges with a transporter for disposal or treatment must arrange for disposal or treatment of "hazardous substances. " Oak Park Heights at no time arranged with Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. , for the transport or disposal of any hazardous substances . The garbage hauling contract provides solely for the collection by Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. , of : "all residential garbage and refuse for collection within the corporate boundary in the City . . . . " (See Exhibit A, paragraph I, attached to Affidavit of Sean E. Hade) The agreement does not contemplate or arrange for the transportation of any hazardous substances whatsoever. 3Again, as mentioned in the Fact Section of this Memorandum, the Landfill Remediation Trust case makes no that the Cit of Oak Park Heights arranged for allegationy 9 the transport of material and merely states that it is a generator. (See LRT Complaint, para. 3 and 8) 13 411 110 Absent some proof by the Plaintiffs that Oak Park Heights arranged for the transport or disposal of hazardous substances, the claim against Oak Park Heights must be dismissed. There is absolutely no evidence in this case that any item of garbage or rubbish generated within Oak Park Heights and hauled by Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. , to the Junker landfill constituted a hazardous substance. Accordingly, the CERCLA contribution claims in the JLT and LRT cases against the City of Oak Park Heights must be dismissed. CERCLA liability is imposed only if Plaintiff can prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Defendant Oak Park Heights' waste was disposed of at the Junker landfill and that hazardous substances similar to those found in the Oak Park Heights ' waste were present at the landfill at the time of release. See Dana Corp. v. American Standard, Inc. , 866 F.Supp. 1481, 1493 (N.D. Ind. 1994) . Cf. cases cited, Id. at 1493. Implicit in that proof is a showing that Oak Park Heights' waste contained hazardous substance. See Dana Corp. , supra, at 1493 n. 22 . It is Plaintiff's burden, in response to a summary judgment motion, to establish that there is evidence that Defendant Oak Park Heights disposed of hazardous substances at the site in question and that such substance was present or lead to the contamination of the Junker landfill. See Dana Corp. , supra, at 1494; B.F. Goodrich Co. v. Murtha, 840 F.Supp. 187-190 (D. Conn. 1993) . It is simply not sufficient, in the face of a defendant's summary judgment motion, for the plaintiff to hypothesize, surmise, 14 111 or merely allege that because a defendant generated waste that such waste was, in fact, hazardous waste. See B.F. Goodrich Co. v. Murtha, supra, at 187 (the Court granted summary judgment to municipalities whose waste went to a particular landfill on the basis that there was no direct evidence that any municipality's waste contained a specific hazardous substance) .` Defendant Oak Park Heights arranged for the transport, by Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. , of garbage and refuse from residential premises within the City of Oak Park Heights. Plaintiffs have failed to establish that any such waste or rubbish contained any hazardous substance, much less that any alleged hazardous substance originating from the City of Oak Park Heights was on site at the time of the contamination. Defendant Oak Park Heights is entitled to summary judgment dismissal of the 42 U.S.C. § 9613( f) claims asserted by Plaintiffs JLT and LRT. V. SUMMARY JUDGMENT FOR INDEMNITY ON CROSS-CLAIMS AGAINST JUNKER SANITATION SERVICES, INC. Oak Park Heights has brought a Cross-Claim against Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. , in the JLT case and a Third Party Complaint in the LRT case seeking indemnity from Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. , for liability that may be found against Oak Park 4 Similarly, in this case, Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. , has interposed an Interrogatory Answer to a municipality admitting that Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. , has no knowledge of the hazardous substance contained in the refuse of a municipality but simply asserts that municipal waste in general may contain hazardous substance. (See Exhibit B attached to Affidavit of Sean E. Hade, Answer to Interrogatory No. 2) . 15 . . 111 Heights on Plaintiffs ' CERCLA contribution claims. This duty to indemnify arises out of the contract existing between Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. , and the City of Oak Park Heights. The garbage hauling agreement in effect between the City of Oak Park Heights and Junker Sanitation Service, Inc. , provides that: "The Contractor shall maintain, during the whole period of this agreement, public liability insurance in the sum of One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000.00) covering claims for personal injury to one person, and Three Hundred Thousand Dollars ($300,000.00) covering claims to more than one person in the same accident, and Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000.00) for claims of injury to property which shall insure the City as a named insured, as well as the Contractor, against liability imposed by law on the City or the Contractor by reason of any act, or omission of the Contractor or the Contractor's employees in connection with the performance of this contract." (See Exhibit A, paragraph IX, attached to Affidavit of Sean E. Hade. ) CERCLA permits one party to indemnify and hold harmless another from liability under CERCLA. See 42 U.S.C. S 9607(e) ; see also Harley-Davidson, Inc. v. Minstar, Inc. , 41 F.3d 341, 343-344 (7th Cir. 1994) . Parties have been found to have contracted to assume an indemnity obligation for environmental liability even without referring to environmental claims in particular. See Joslyn Mfg. Co. v. Koppers Co. , Inc. , 40 F.3d 750, 754 (5th Cir. 1994) ; see also Kerr-McGee Chem. Corp. v. Lefton Iron & Metal Co. , 14 F.3d 321, 327 (7th Cir. 1994) (the Court found that party had agreed to indemnify another for CERCLA liability even though contract was drafted prior to the enactment of CERCLA) . 16 The Federal Courts have been expansive in their application of indemnity agreements to CERCLA claims. See Purolator Products Corp. v. Allied-Signal, Inc. , 772 F.Supp. 124, 131 (W.D.N.Y. 1991) (the Court held the provision providing indemnity for "all liabilities and obligations . . . relating to or arising out of the Assets" as broad enough to include CERCLA liability if such liability was related to or arose out of assets transferred) ; Smithklein Beecham Corp. v. Rohm and Haas Co. , 89 F.3d 154, 159 (3rd Cir. 1996) (the Court found language of indemnity for "all losses, liabilities, damages . . . resulting from the operation of the business . . . to be sufficient to require indemnity for environmental liabilities") . The Federal Court, in construing indemnity contract provisions, applies applicable state law in addressing the scope of the indemnification agreement. See Harley-Davidson, Inc. v. MinStar, Inc. , 41 F.3d 341, 344 (7th Cir. 1994) . Under Wisconsin law, indemnification agreements are valid.5 See Heritage Mut. v. Truck Ins . Exchange, 516 N.W.2d 8, 10 (Wis.App. 1994) . 5 The Minnesota Courts apply a very similar standard to that of the Wisconsin Courts in strictly construing indemnity provisions that provide for indemnity for a party's own negligence and also look to the intention of the parties . Cf. Nat. Hydrosystems v. M.A. Mortonson, 529 N.W.2d 690, 694 (Minn. 1995) ; Braegelmann v. Horizon Dev. Co. , 371 N.W.2d 644, 646 (Minn.App. ) pet. for rev. den. (Minn. October 11, 1985) . Indemnity contracts and obligations will be enforced . . . "where there is an express contract between the parties containing an explicit undertaking to reimburse for liability of the character involved." See Bloomgren v. Marshall Management Services, 483 N.W.2d 504, 506 (Minn.App. 1992) . 17 "Such agreements are liberally construed when they deal with the negligence of the indemnitor, but are strictly construed when the indemnitee seeks to be indemnified for his own negligence." See Busbialas v. Portage County, 236 N.W.2d 18, 19 ( 1975) . However, a strict construction of indemnification agreements will not be used if it defeats the clear intention of the parties. See Spivey v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. , 255 N.W.2d 469, 472 (Wis. 1977) . In interpreting indemnification agreements, the Court must consider the intent of the parties. See Heritage Mut. v. Truck Ins. Exchange, supra, at 10. The contractual obligation in the contract between Oak Park Heights and Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. , clearly requires Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. , to name the City of Oak Park Heights as an additional insured on its public liability insurance. The City of Oak Park Heights, pursuant to the terms of that insurance indemnity agreement, is entitled to summary judgment finding that Junker Sanitation Service, Inc. , must indemnify the City of Oak Park Heights in the amount of Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000.00) for the claims being asserted by the Plaintiff LRT and Plaintiff JLT. The specific and clear language of the contract provides that the insurance will cover the City of •Oak Park Heights for any liability imposed by any act of Junker Sanitation Service, Inc. , in connection with the performance of this contract. Obviously, Junker Sanitation Service, Inc. 's, act of disposing of the City of Oak Park Heights ' garbage and refuse at the Junker landfill provides the basis for the lawsuits by Plaintiff JLT and Plaintiff 18 111 LRT. As such, they are claims within the provision of the garbage hauling contract for which Junker Sanitation Service, Inc. , must procure Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000.00) of insurance in favor of the City of Oak Park Heights. Defendant City of Oak Park Heights is entitled to a summary judgment ruling that it is entitled to the value of Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000.00) of insurance coverage in favor of the City of Oak Park Heights for the claims being asserted against it by the Plaintiffs in the JLT and LRT litigation. VI. CONCLUSION Defendant City of Oak Park Heights respectfully requests that this Court issue an Order granting summary judgment to Defendant City of Oak Park Heights on its Cross-Claim for indemnity against Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. , and its successor in interest United Waste Transfer, Inc. Additionally, Defendant City of Oak Park Heights requests that this Court enter an Order granting summary judgment to Defendant City of Oak Park Heights on its Third Party Complaint against Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. , on its claim for indemnity in the event that Plaintiffs recover on their contribution (�c;'l•.aims (against Defendant City of Oak Park Heights. DATED: b GI 2 . ` JARDINE, LOGAN & O'BRIEN, P.L.L.P. By:: r SEAN E. RADE (A.R.#1013788) Attorney for City of Oak Park Heights 2100 Piper Jaffray Plaza 444 Cedar Street St. Paul, Minnesota 55101-2160 Phone: (612) 290-6500 19 - •. 110 • STATE OF MINNESOTA) ss. COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) Shari L. Faizone, of the City of St. Paul, County of Ramsey, in the State of Minnesota, being duly sworn, says that on the g)`77 day of February, 1997, she served the annexed Defendant City of Oak Park Heights ' Memorandum of Law in Support of Summary Judgment on Ted E. Sullivan/Dennis M. Sullivan/Kevin A. Spellacy, the attorneys for the parties in this action, by mailing to them a copy thereof, enclosed in an envelope, postage prepaid, and by depositing the same in the Post Office at St. Paul, Minnesota, directed to said attorneys at: MR TED E SULLIVAN ATTORNEY AT LAW 150 S FIFTH ST - STE 1700 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 MR DENNIS M SULLIVAN ATTORNEY AT LAW 116 W GRAND AVE P 0 BOX 167 EAU CLAIRE WI 54702-0167 MR KEVIN A SPELLACY ATTORNEY AT LAW 600 NORWEST CENTER 400 FIRST ST S P 0 BOX 1008 ST CLOUD MN 56302 the last known address of said attorneys. Subscribed day of - . 1997 . • Notary Publi } ON ,tscr% nom. .J COU(JTv czpuusJan 37 2�JJ .►'MI 110 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN Junker Landfill Trust, a Minnesota business trust, Civil Action No. 96-C-0019-S CONSOLIDATED CASE Plaintiff, v. Junker Recycling, Inc. , a Minnesota corporation, f/k/a Junker Sanitary Landfill, Inc. ; et al. , First Defendants, STATEMENT OF FACTS AND PROPOSED CONCLUSIONS and OF LAW SUBMITTED BY THE CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS IN Eisinger Sanitation Services, Inc. ; SUPPORT OF SUMMARY JUDGMENT et al. , Second Defendants, and City of Stillwater, et al. , Third Defendants, and John Does and Mary Does, Fourth Defendants . Landfill Remediation Trust, a Wisconsin business trust, Civil Action No. 96-C-489-S CONSOLIDATED CASE Plaintiff, vs . Garry Thompson; et al. , Defendants . Pursuant to Local Rule I . B. (2) , Defendant City of Oak Park Heights hereby submits the following Statement of Facts and • Conclusions of Law proposed by Defendant Oak Park Heights in connection with its Motion for Summary Judgment ment on all claims asserted in the respective Plaintiffs ' Complaints and on their Crossclaims against Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. : 1. Defendant Cityof Oak Park Heights has been named a g Defendant in the Junker Landfill Trust (JLT) case. (See JLT Amended Complaint) 2 . In its Complaint, JLT alleges that Defendant Oak Park Heights is a public and private generator of waste, and other who arrange for disposal of hazardous substance. (See JLT Amended Complaint, ¶7) 3. Defendant City of Oak Park Heights is a Defendant in the action brought by the Landfill Remediation Trust (LRT) . 4 . In the Complaint of LRT, it is asserted that Defendant City of Oak Park Heights is "other transporter and generators include those parties identified in List A." (See LRT Complaint, ¶3) 5. Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. , pursuant to a contract between it and the City of Oak Park Heights, was the exclusive garbage hauler in the City of Oak Park Heights from January 1, 1977, through January 1, 1987 . (See Exhibit A, attached to Affidavit of Sean E. Hade) 6 . The garbage hauling contract in existence between Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. , contains a provision requiring Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. , to maintain insurance in the amount of Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000.00) for claims of injury to 2 111 property insuring the City, as a named insured, against any "liability imposed by law on the City or the Contractor . . . ." (See Exhibit A, attached to Affidavit of Sean E. Hade) 7. JLT did not give notice to Defendant Oak Park Heights of its alleged contribution to the environmental contamination at the Junker landfill prior to commencement of this action. 8. JLT did not give notice of injury to Defendant Oak Park Heights prior to bringing its action. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. The facts relative to Defendant City of Oak Park Heights' Motion for Summary Judgment on all of Plaintiffs' claims and on Oak Park Heights' Crossclaim for indemnity against Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. , are not disputed and this Court is prepared to rule as a matter of law. 2 . JLT's claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. S 6972(a) (1) (B) and 42 U.S.C. S 6972(e) must fail due to JLT's failure to comply with the notice requirements of 42 U.S.C. S 6972(b) . 3. The pre-suit notice provisions of RCRA are mandatory conditions precedent to commencing suit under RCRA. (See Halistrom v. Tillamook County, 110 S.Ct. 304, 311 ( 1989) . ) 4 . This Court, by Order dated January 13, 1997, dismissed an identical RCRA claim against Defendant Nor-Lake based on Plaintiff's failure to comply with the notice requirements of 42 U.S.C. S 6972(b) . 5. In continue follow up of the "law of the case," Defendant City of Oak Park Heights' Motion for Summary Judgment on the basis 3 • • 411 • , of JLTt s failure to comply with the pre-suit notice requirements of RCRA, shall be granted. 6 . The State of Wisconsin's involvement in investigation and remediation of the Junker landfill precludes a RCRA claim against Defendant City of Oak Park Heights. (See 42 U.S.C. S 6972(b) 2 C iii . 7 . Under the doctrine of the "law of the case," JLT's direct cost recovery action against Defendant City of Oak Park Heights, summaryjudgment pursuant to 42 U.S.C. S 9607(a) , is subject to j g dismissal. (See Orders of this Court dated January 13, 1997, July 17, 1996, and April 29, 1996. ) 8. JLT's failure to comply with the notice requirements of Wis. Stat. S 893.80( 1) (a) and S 893.80( 1) (b) precludes the bringing of this action against the Defendant City of Oak Park Heights. 9. JLT's failure to wait for disallowance of its claim or expiration of 120 days prior to bringing this action also results in dismissal of JLT's common law contribution claims. (pee Wis. Stat. S 893.80( 1) . ) 10. JLT's common law contribution and unjust enrichment claims contained in Counts IV, V and VI of its Amended Complaint are subject to summary judgment dismissal for failure to provide proper notice of claim to Defendant Oak Park Heights and itemization of injury under Wis. Stat. S 893.80. 11. JLT and LRT's claims for federal common law contribution are subject to summary judgment dismissal on the basis that this is merely claim to federal law contribution duplicative of their 4 • 42 U.S.C. S 9613(f) CERCLA contribution claim. (See 42 U.S.C. S 9614(b) . ) 12. JLT's claim for unjust enrichment against Defendant City of Oak Park Heights fails for lack of proof of the requisite elements of unjust enrichment under Wisconsin law. (See Puttkammer v. Minth, 83 Wis.2d 686, 689, 266 N.W.2d 36 ( 1978) . ) 13. JLT entered into a voluntary agreement to clean up the Junker landfill on the basis of their involvement in the and that, at the time of enteringinto that voluntary contamination agreement, they were not doing so for the benefit of Oak Park Heights nor was that benefit appreciated, known or acknowledged by Defendant Oak Park Heights. (See Puttkammer v. Minth, 83 Wis.2d 686, 689, 266 N.W.2d 36 (1978) . ) 14 . This Court's ruling dismissing the unjust enrichment claim against Defendant Nor-Lake dated January 13, 1997, provides the "law of the case" and this dismissal of the unjust enrichment claim against Defendant Oak Park Heights is consistent with the established law of the case. 15. Defendant City of Oak Park Heights is not a person potentially liable under 42 U.S.C. S 9601(a) and, therefore, is not a party against whom a CERCLA contribution claim can be made. 16 . The evidence in this case fails to establish that the City of Oak Park Heights arranged for the disposal or treatment of "hazardous substance" which is a requisite element for being a covered person under CERCLA. (See 42 U.S.C. S 9607(a) (3) . ) 5 17. JLT and LRT's CERCLA contribution claims, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. S 9613( f) must fail on the basis that the record fails to establish that the waste taken from the City of Oak Park Heights and brought to the Junker landfill contained hazardous substance or that that alleged hazardous substance resulted in the environmental contamination at the landfill. (See Dana Corp. v. American Standard, Inc. , 866 F.Supp. 1481, 1493 (N.D. Ind. 1994) ; B.F. Goodrich v. Murtha, 840 F.Supp. 187-190 (D.Conn. 1993) . ) 18. The garbage hauling contract entered into between the City of Oak Park Heights and Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. , provides that Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. , will maintain public liability insurance in the sum of Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000.00) "for claims of injury to property which shall insure the City as a named insured, as well as the Contractor, against liability imposed by law on the City or the Contractor by reason of any act, or omission of the Contractor or the Contractor's employees in connection with the performance of this contract." (See Exhibit A, ¶IX, attached to Affidavit of Sean E. Hade. ) 19 . The agreement to procure insurance clause in the contract between the City of Oak Park Heights and Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. , encompasses the CERCLA contribution claims brought by JLT and LRT in this litigation. (See Joslyn Mfg. Co. v. Koppers Co. , Inc. , 40 F.3d 750, 754 (5th Cir. 1994) ; Kerr-McGee Chem. Corp. v. Lefton Iron & Metal Co. , 14 F.3d 321, 327 (7th Cir. 1994) . ) 20. Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. , is under an obligation to provide Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000.00) of public liability 6 • • insurance for the claims brought in this action against Defendant City of Oak Park Heights by JLT and LRT. 21. In that event that Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. , failed to name the City of Oak Park Heights as a named insured or failed to procure such insurance, Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. , must indemnify the City of Oak Park Heights in the sum of Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000.00) which is the agreed upon sum of insurance that, by contract, Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. , obligated itself tto_ procure. V DATED: CI` •t �) S' JARDINE, LOGAN & O'BRIEN, P.L.L.P. By: S l\SJ- . SEAN E. RADE (A.R.#1013788) Attorney for City of Oak Park Heights 2100 Piper. Jaf fray Plaza 444 Cedar Street St. Paul, Minnesota 55101-2160 Phone: (612) 290-6500 7 • STATE OF MINNESOTA) ss. COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) Shari L. Falzone, of the City of St. Paul, County of Ramsey, in the State of Minnesota, being duly sworn, says that on the rbYl) day of February, 1997, she served the annexed Statement of Facts and Proposed Conclusions of Law Submitted by The City of Oak Park Heights in Support of Summary Judgment on Ted E. Sullivan/Dennis M. Sullivan/Kevin A. Spellacy, the attorneys for the parties in this action, by mailing to them a copy thereof, enclosed in an envelope, postage prepaid, and by depositing the same in the Post Office at St. Paul, Minnesota, directed to said attorneys at: MR TED E SULLIVAN ATTORNEY AT LAW 150 S FIFTH ST - STE 1700 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 MR DENNIS M SULLIVAN ATTORNEY AT LAW 116 W GRAND AVE P 0 BOX 167 EAU CLAIRE WI 54702-0167 MR KEVIN A SPELLACY ATTORNEY AT LAW 600 NORWEST CENTER 400 FIRST ST S P 0 BOX 1008 ST CLOUD MN 56302 the last known address of said attorneys. tolafirGIL- Subsc ibed and s orn to before me this oda of�-�•v-t , 9• . `1Y- r Notary Publicoi COON' iia r.Oc.w+! b►a r) ry __p • • • JARD1N1. ATTORNEYS AT LAW LOGAN P.L.L.P. O'BRIEN January 24, 1997 2100 Piper Jaffray Plaza PERSONAL/CONFIDENTIAL 444 Cedar Street CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS Saint Paul,Minnesota ATTN: ADMINISTRATOR MIKE ROBERTSON 55101-2160 P 0 BOX 2007 Firm (612)290-6500 OAK PARK HEIGHTS MN 55082-2007 Fax (612)223-5070 E-Mail JARDINELAW@AOL.COM Re: Our File No: 26056 (1657) Donald M.Jardine Junker Landfill Trust v. Junker Recycling, Inc. , et al John R.O'Brien Gerald M.Linnihan Alan R.Vanasek John M.Kennedy,Jr. Dear Mr. Robertson: Eugene J.Flick Charles E.Gillin James J.Galman As discussed, I am writing to provide you with a brief Pierre N.Regnier Mark A.Fonken synopsis of the history and status of the above-captioned George W.Kuehner litigation. Mary A.Rice Patti J.Skoglund Sean E.Hade BACKGROUND REGARDING THE SITE Timothy S.Crom Lawrence M.Rocheford James G.Golembeck Landfilling commenced at the Site in November of 1972 . Wilford Pilquist was the owner and operator. In February of Kerry C.Koep J. David J.Hoekstra 1973, Gary B. Thompson became the owner and operator. On James K.Helling, April 1, 1977, Junker Sanitary Landfill, Inc. acquired the MichaelA.Rayer lease for the Site and became the operator. Mr. Thompson Marlene S.Garvis Mary P.Rowe remained the owner. Junker' s operator status terminated on or Karen R.Cote about January 5, 1987 . Mr. Thompson re-opened the Site in NatJoseph E. approximately June of 1987 for a few weeks before he was shut Joseph E.Flynn Thomas L.Cummings down by the State of Wisconsin. Margaret C.Galvin Shari L.Johnson Elizabeth B.Hayes The State of Wisconsin then requested that Thompson and/or Laurence A.Diamond Junker mediate the Site. Both Thompson and Junker' declined to Katherine E.Kennedy Cara J.Debes close or remediate the Site. Therefore, the State of YvonneM.Flaherty Wisconsin commenced remedial activities at the Site in the Brenda L.Theis late 1980 ' s, and continued activities at the Site until the JerreFLogan(1923-1983) spring of 1994 . The State of Wisconsin. capped all but a couple of acres of the Site, and installed an active gas collection system and a leachate collection system. The State Some members also admitted also conducted some work identifying the magnitude of the ' to practice law in Wisconsin, environmental issues at, and emanating from, .the Site. North Dakota,Florida and Illinois In the fall of 1993, the State of Wisconsin requested that Junker, Nor-Lake, Andersen, and 3M get involved at the Site by, at a minimum, providing bottled water to the residence in • CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS January 24, 1997 Page 2 the Special Well Construction Are ("SWCA") . 1 Junker declined to participate, but the other parties -creed to provide bottled water on a voluntary basis . The other partes also engaged an environmental consulting and engineering firm, to ' ommence a remedial investigation at the Site. Initially, this worked focused on identifying the extent and magnitude of the Site groundwat:r plume. When the investigation determined that the Site groundwater plume only extended west short of County Road A, Nor-Lake objectee to the conclusion and withdrew from the voluntary association wi h Andersen and 3M in providing bottled water. Thereafter, Nor- ake provided bottled water to residents in the SWCA west of Co ty Road A, and 3M and Andersen provided bottled water to residents ",n the SWCA east of County Road A. At about the same time, the State of ' isconsin, through its Department of Natural Resources was sending; out information request to potentially responsible parties ("PrPs") . Two of the larger PRPs, 3M and Andersen Window worked to form PRP Group. That PRP Group was formed and is known today as the J er Landfill Trust ("JLT") . Members of JLT are: 3M, Andersen Co •oration, C&NW Transport Company, Croix Oil Company, Dahl Technical elastics, Erickson Diversified, George Siegfried Construction, Glas . Service Company, Johnson Body Shop, Maple Island Incorporated, Mil s Fleet Farm, Total Corporation, U.S. West, UFE Incorporated, the Town Troy, Northern States Power Company, Washington County, Ameri ech, Minnesota Department of Transportation, City of Glenwood, Mi i'esota Department of Corrections, City of Lake Elmo, and Stillwater Hou.ing. This group worked with the State of Wisconsin to find an enviro mental solution to the problems at the Site. Junker also became a member of the JLT pursuant to an arrangement whereby Junker was charged a nominal fee in return for providing JLT with access to its original 1977 through 1987 trip tickets and invoicing records.2 JLT hired TLI Sys ems, Inc. of Bethesda, Maryland 1 The State of Wisconsin, Depar ment of Health established a SWCA for the upper ground water aquif: r which is approximately four miles east to west, and one mile ninth to south. The Site is located at the far eastern end of the SWCA. The purpose of the SWCA is to put parties on notice concernin: the condition of the ground water, and to prevent new wells from ,being placed in the aquifer. 2 The trip tickets were issud at the landfill gate and identified all trucks into the Site a d the volume of waste in each truck. The invoicing records docum=it all of the customers of Junker Sanitation, Inc. , and the cubi• yards of waste each customer was charged for during the period of ime Junker was operator. S • CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS January 24, 1997 Page 3 to secure and tabulate the Junker records and to issue an allocation report. The TLI report on the Junker records identifies approximately 800 generators whose waste was hauled to the Site, and the records also indicate that a total of 19 transporters (including Junker) hauled to the Site during the period that Junker was the operator. The TLI report, which you should have a copy of, lists all the generator customers of Junker was the operator. The TLI report, which you should have a copy of, lists all of the generator customers of Junker, all the transport customers (other than Junker) , and shows the volume for which the customers were charged. Later, disagreements between Junker and the JLT apparently caused Junker to separate from the JLT. The JLT proposed to the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources and voluntarily agreed to conduct the Site Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study. In January of 1995, the JLT also agreed to assume responsibility for operation and maintenance of the Site, and perform this work through April 15, 1996 . The Feasibility Study for the Site was improved in March 1996 . The remedy to be employed consists of completion of and repair to the cap, capping of the ditch alongside the Site, additional gas extraction wells, a barrier gas well, carbon filters on the private water supplies to the residents located in the Site' s plume, as well as routine operation and maintenance. The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources embodied the recommended remedy and Feasibility Study in to a Proposed Plan for the Site. In April of 1995, Jim Junker sold Junker Sanitation, Inc. to United Waste for a reported $7 million. The JLT became concerned that Junker was taking steps to protect its assets against claims for what they considered to be his fair share of the remedy cost at the site and so the JLT filed suit against Junker in the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin in January of 1996 . • At the same time, JLT was negotiating a consent agreement with the State of Wisconsin whereby the JLT would implement the remedy and make fair settlement offers to all of the potentially responsible parties. The JLT litigation against Junker was assigned to Judge Shabaz. On March 1, 1996, Judge Shabaz rejected the proposed Scheduling Order, in order that all parties that were to be brought into the litigation be brought in by April 15, 1996 . At that point in time, the JLT amended its Complaint to name approximately 300 generators and transporters as additional defendants and Junker made third party claims against over 600 third party defendants . In May of 1996, Junker formed the Landfill Remediation Trust ("LRT") , and filed suit against 600 defendants . Junker apparently sued all parties which it could identify, including churches and non-profit community institutions. Thereafter, the JLT and the LRT filed motions for consolidation of the two actions . The JLT moved to consolidate • CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS January 24, 1997 Page 4 the LRT action into its action in order to maintain the tight schedule which provided for December 16, 1996 trial date. The LRT moved to consolidate the JLT action into its second suit in an attempt to gain a new scheduling order with a longer discovery schedule. Judge Shabaz granted the JLT' s Motion to Consolidate but revised the schedule to provide for a March 1997 trial date. The State of Wisconsin filed a separate suit against Junker in order to enter the consent agreement. The JLT and the Nor-Lake filed public comments on the consent agreement, and each filed motions to intervene in the suit . The JLT' s motion to intervene was denied, and that ruling has been appealed to the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals . Nor- Lake' s Motion to Intervene was granted. THE AMENDED COMPLAINT In the Amended Complaint, seven separate counts set out individual complaints and purported claims under various laws. Counts I through Count VI are plead against all defendants, including the City. Count VII is plead only against the Junket. A brief description of the each separate allegation is set out below. Count I. Count One sets out a claim for damages under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act ("RCRA") which is the federal statute governing solid waste disposal. At the present time, we are preparing a motion to dismiss this claim against the City of Oak Park Heights because the Junker Landfill Trust failed to comply with the 90 day notification requirement set in this statute. In addition, we are moving for dismissal because a citizen's suit such as this is barred under the statute because of the State of Wisconsin' s participation with the remediation. Count II. Count Two of the Amended Complaint sets out a claim for damages under the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act Section 107. The Summary Judgment Motion that we are preparing also seeks dismissal of this Count. Previously, as to some other parties, Judge Shabaz has ordered that the Plaintiff does not have a right to bring a direct cost recovery under this section of the statute. Therefore, we are taking the position by virtue of the Court ' s Orders dated April 29, 1995 and July 17, 1996, this Count is subject to dismissal under the doctrine of the "Law of the Case. " 411 • CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS January 24, 1997 Page 5 Count III . Count Three of the Amended Complaint sets out a claim for damages under the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act Section 113 . A detailed discussion of Superfund Liability is set out separately, below. The Superfund Liability Scheme In a nutshell, under Superfund, the following persons are responsible for clean up costs as a result from the release or a threat of a release of a hazardous substance from a facility: (1) The current owner or operator; (2) Certain past owners or operators; (3) Generator of the hazardous substance; and (4) Transporters of the hazardous substance. The liability imposed by Superfund is strict and joint and several. In its practical application, liability is also retroactive and perpetual. More specifically, 42 USC § 9607 (a) states: "Notwithstanding any other provision or rule of law, and subject only to the defenses set forth in Subsection (b) of this section -- (1) The owner and operator of a vessel or a facility; (2) Any person who at the time of the disposal of any hazardous substance owned or operated any facility at which such hazardous substances were disposed of; (3) Any person who by contract, agreement, or otherwise arrange for disposal or treatment, or arrange a with a transporter for transport for disposal or treatment, of hazardous substances owned or possessed by such person, by any other party or entity, at any facility or incineration vessel owned or operated by another party or entity and containing such hazardous substances; and (4) Any person accepts who accepted hazardous P or P any substance for transport to disposal or treatment 111 CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS January 24, 1997 Page 6 facilities, incineration essels or sites selected by such persons, from whic , there is a release or a threatened release whic causes the occurrence of response costs, of a ha.ardous substance, shall be liable for -- (A) All costs, removal od remedial action incurred by the United States g.vernment or a State or an Indian Tribe not inconsistent with the National Contingency Plan ; (B) Any other necessary costs of response incurred by any other person c.i sistent with the National Contingency Plan ; (C) Damages for injury t., destruction of, or loss of natural resources, i cluding the reasonable costs of assessing such i jury, destruction or loss resulting from such release; and (D) The cost of any h=alth assessment or health effect study carried 'cut under Section 9604 (i) of this title. As you can see from examining the la guage of the Act, fault plays no part in determining liability. Gen-rally, the elements required to establish a prima facie case of lia 'ilitY Superfund Su erfund are: (1) The subject site is a "fa4ility; " (2) A "release or threate ed release" of a "hazardous substance" occurred at the facility; • (3) The defendant fits into o e of the four categories of "covered persons; " (4) The plaintiff incurred c.sts in responding to the release; and (5) The costs are consistent w th the National Contingency Plan in the case of a pri ate party plaintiff, or not inconsistent with the National Contingency Plan in the case of a government •laintiff. The defenses available toof he t d end.n t under Superfund are extremely limited. 42 US Code §9607 (b) state: 411 110 CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS January 24, 1997 Page 7 There shall be no liability under subsection (a) of this section for a person otherwise liable who can establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the release or threat of release of a hazardous substance and the damages resulting therefrom were caused solely by -- (1) An act of God; (2) An act of war; (3) An act or omission of a third party other than an employee or agent of the defendant, or than one whose act or omission occurs in connection with a contractual relationship, existing directly or indirectly, with the defendant (except where the sole contractual arrangement arises from a published tariff and acceptance for carriage by a common carrier by rail) , if the defendant establishes by a preponderance of the evidence that -- (a) He exercised due care with respect to the hazardous substance concerned, taking into consideration the characteristics of such hazardous substance, in light of all relevant facts and circumstances; and (b) He took precautions against foreseeable acts or omissions of any such third party and the consequences that could foreseeably result from such acts or omissions; or (4) Any combination of the foregoing paragraphs . • Count IV. Count Four of the Amended Complaint pleads a claim for Federal Common Law Contribution. We are arguing that this Count is subject to dismissal on the basis that the Plaintiff failed to comply with either the Wisconsin or the Minnesota Notice of Claim requirements prior to commencing this lawsuit against a municipality and, therefore, is subject to dismissal. Count V. Count Five of the Amended Complaint sets out a claim for damages under the Wisconsin Common Law for Contribution. Again, the Plaintiff failed to comply with either the Wisconsin or Minnesota Notice of 411 411 CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS January 24, 1997 Page 8 Claim requirements prior to commencing the lawsuit and, therefore, should be dismissed. Count VI . Count Six of the Amended Complaint sets out a claim for Unjust Enrichment. This Count should also be subject to dismissal on the basis that the Plaintiff failed to comply with either Wisconsin or Minnesota' s Notice of Claim requirements prior to commencing the lawsuit . CROSSCLAIMS AGAINST CITY Recently, two entities which were located within the City have filed crossclaims against it for indemnification. The entities, Kingwood Corporation, d/b/a Kingwood Management and K-Mart Corporation have taken the position that because the City' s Ordinance required that to use Junker Sanitation Services, that they should be indemnified by the City for any damages caused by the City' s hauler. We will be moving for summary judgment of those claims based upon the statutory immunity set out in Minn. Stat. § 466 . 03 . COUNTERCLAIM AGAINST JUNKER SANITATION SERVICES, INC. AND UNITED WASTE TRANSFER On behalf of the City, we have counterclaimed against Junker, and on the basis of successor liability, against United Waste. The counterclaim is based upon applicable contracts, Junker was required to provide the City with $50, 000 . 00 worth of coverage for claims to injury to property against liability imposed by law on the City or the Contractor by reason of any act, or omission of the Contractor or the Contractor' s employees in connection with performance of the contract. SETTLEMENT PROPOSAL There is a the present time a settlement balloon which is floating around for consideration. However, it has not been put into a written proposal and therefore should be considered to be the last word on settlement. A written proposal has been promised once the cost of obtaining an annuity to fund future clean up has been determined. The proposal is based upon applying the TLI allocations to the cost of the Remedy which is now estimated to be approximately $4, 500, 000 . 00 . Reportedly, all of the members of the JLT have signaled their intention to participate in the settlement. The JLT represent approximately 30% of allocation attributed to the Site. Due to the impending trial date, it has been suggested that the last day to participate in the settlement will be February 17, 1997. • • CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS January 24, 1997 Page 9 Assuming full participation by the JLT, the City' s worst case settlement scenario at this time would be that only 32 .1028% (the JLT' s 30%, plus the City' s 2 .1028%) of the volume attributed to the site would agree to pay their pro-rata share of $4, 500, 000 . 00 . The best case scenario would be 100% participation. Then the City would pay 2 . 1028% of $4, 500, 000 . 00, or $94, 626 . 00 . However, I think that a more reasonable estimate would be for a participation in the settlement of 50% . Once this settlement is put into place, the JLT will dismiss its ' Complaint and the LRT will prosecute the action against the non- setteling parties . TRIAL SCHEDULES The first stage of the trial is scheduled to commence on March 3, 1997 . It will determine liability. It is presently scheduled to last four weeks . If necessary, there would then a second stage to determine damages . Very truly yours, JARDINE, LOGAN & O'BRIEN, P.L.L.P. Sean E. Hade Direct Dial: (612) 290-6510 SEH:tlm • JAR! NE • • ATTORNEYS AT LAW LOGAN & P.L.L.P. O'BRIEN January 24, 1997 2100 Piper Jaffray Plaza PERSONAL/CONFIDENTIAL 444 Cedar Street CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS Saint Paul,Minnesota ATTN: ADMINISTRATOR MIKE ROBERTSON 55101-2160 P 0 BOX 2007 Firm (612)290-6500 OAK PARK HEIGHTS MN 55082-2007 Fax (612)223-5070 E-Mail JARDINELAW@AOL.COM Re: Our File No: 26056 (1657) Donald M.Jardine Junker Landfill Trust v. Junker Recycling, Inc. , et al John R.O'Brien Gerald M.Linnihan Alan R.Vanasek John M.Kennedy,Jr. Dear Mr. Robertson: Eugene J.Flick Charles E.Giffin James J.Galman As discussed, I am writing to provide you with a brief Pierre N.Regnier Mark A.Fonken synopsis of the history and status of the above-captioned GeorgeW.Kuehner litigation. Mary A.Rice Patti J.Skoglund Sean E.Hade BACKGROUND REGARDING THE SITE Timothy S.Crom Lawrence M.Rocheford James G.Golembeck Landfilling commenced at the Site in November of 1972 . Wilford Pilquist was the owner and operator. In February of Derry C.Koep J. David J.Hoekstra 1973 , Gary B. Thompson became the owner and operator. On James K.Helling April 1, 1977, Junker Sanitary Landfill, Inc. acquired the Michael A.Rayer lease for the Site and became the operator. Mr. Thompson Marlene S.Garvis Mary P.Rowe remained the owner. Junker' s operator status terminated on or Karen R.Cote about January 5, 1987 . Mr. Thompson re-opened the Site in W.Hart JoseJosephph E.Flynn approximately June of 1987 for a few weeks before he was shut Thomas L.Cummings down by the State of Wisconsin. Margaret C.Galvin Shari L.Johnson Elizabeth B.Hayes The State of Wisconsin then requested that Thompson and/or Laurence A.Diamond Junker mediate the Site. Both Thompson and Junker declined to Katherine E.Kennedy Cara J.Debes close or remediate the Site. Therefore, the State of Yvonne M.Flaherty Wisconsin commenced remedial activities at the Site in the BrendaL.Theis late 1980 ' s, and continued activities at the Site until the JerreFLogan(1923-1983) spring of 1994 . The State of Wisconsin capped all but a couple of acres of the Site, and installed an active gas collection system and a leachate collection system. The State Some members also admitted also conducted some work identifying the magnitude of the to practice law in Wisconsin, environmental issues at, and emanating from, the Site. North Dakota,Florida and Illinois In the fall of 1993 , the State of Wisconsin requested that Junker, Nor-Lake, Andersen, and 3M get involved at the Site by, at a minimum, providing bottled water to the residence in II! 411 CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS January 24, 1997 Page 2 the Special Well Construction Area ("SWCA") . 1 Junker declined to participate, but the other parties agreed to provide bottled water on a voluntary basis . The other parties also engaged an environmental consulting and engineering firm, to commence a remedial investigation at the Site. Initially, this worked focused on identifying the extent and magnitude of the Site groundwater plume. When the investigation determined that the Site groundwater plume only extended west short of County Road A, Nor-Lake objected to the conclusion and withdrew from the voluntary association with Andersen and 3M in providing bottled water. Thereafter, Nor-Lake provided bottled water to residents in the SWCA west of County Road A, and 3M and Andersen provided bottled water to residents in the SWCA east of County Road A. At about the same time, the State of Wisconsin, through its Department of Natural Resources was sending out information request to potentially responsible parties ("PRPs") . Two of the larger PRPs, 3M and Andersen Window worked to form a PRP Group. That PRP Group was formed and is known today as the Junker Landfill Trust ("JLT") . Members of JLT are: 3M, Andersen Corporation, C&NW Transport Company, Croix Oil Company, Dahl Technical Plastics, Erickson Diversified, George Siegfried Construction, Glass Service Company, Johnson Body Shop, Maple Island Incorporated, Mills Fleet Farm, Total Corporation, U.S. West, UFE Incorporated, the Town Troy, Northern States Power Company, Washington County, Ameritech, Minnesota Department of Transportation, City of Glenwood, Minnesota Department of Corrections, City of Lake Elmo, and Stillwater Housing. This group worked with the State of Wisconsin to find an environmental solution to the problems at the Site. Junker also became a member of the JLT pursuant to an arrangement whereby Junker was charged a nominal fee in return for providing JLT with access to its original 1977 through 1987 trip tickets and invoicing records.2 JLT hired TLI Systems, Inc. of Bethesda, Maryland 1 The State of Wisconsin, Department of Health established a SWCA for the upper ground water aquifer which is approximately four miles east to west, and one mile north to south. The Site is located at the far eastern end of the SWCA. The purpose of the SWCA is to put parties on notice concerning the condition of the ground water, and to prevent new wells from being placed in the aquifer. 2 The trip tickets were issued at the landfill gate and identified all trucks into the Site and the volume of waste in each truck. The invoicing records document all of the customers of Junker Sanitation, Inc. , and the cubic yards of waste each customer was charged for during the period of time Junker was operator. 111 411 CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS January 24, 1997 Page 3 to secure and tabulate the Junker records and to issue an allocation report. The TLI report on the Junker records identifies approximately 800 generators whose waste was hauled to the Site, and the records also indicate that a total of 19 transporters (including Junker) hauled to the Site during the period that Junker was the operator. The TLI report, which you should have a copy of, lists all the generator customers of Junker was the operator. The TLI report, which you should have a copy of, lists all of the generator customers of Junker, all the transport customers (other than Junker) , and shows the volume for which the customers were charged. Later, disagreements between Junker and the JLT apparently caused Junker to separate from the JLT. The JLT proposed to the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources and voluntarily agreed to conduct the Site Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study. In January of 1995, the JLT also agreed to assume responsibility for operation and maintenance of the Site, and perform this work through April 15, 1996 . The Feasibility Study for the Site was improved in March 1996 . The remedy to be employed consists of completion of and repair to the cap, capping of the ditch alongside the Site, additional gas extraction wells, a barrier gas well, carbon filters on the private water supplies to the residents located in the Site' s plume, as well as routine operation and maintenance. The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources embodied the recommended remedy and Feasibility Study in to a Proposed Plan for the Site. In April of 1995, Jim Junker sold Junker Sanitation, Inc . to United Waste for a reported $7 million. The JLT became concerned that Junker was taking steps to protect its assets against claims for what they considered to be his fair share of the remedy cost at the site and so the JLT filed suit against Junker in the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin in January of 1996 . At the same time, JLT was negotiating a consent agreement with the State of Wisconsin whereby the JLT would implement the remedy and make fair settlement offers to all of the potentially responsible parties. The JLT litigation against Junker was assigned to Judge Shabaz. On March 1, 1996, Judge Shabaz rejected the proposed Scheduling Order, in order that all parties that were to be brought into the litigation be brought in by April 15, 1996 . At that point in time, the JLT amended its Complaint to name approximately 300 generators and transporters as additional defendants and Junker made third party claims against over 600 third party defendants. In May of 1996, Junker formed the Landfill Remediation Trust ("LRT") , and filed suit against 600 defendants. Junker apparently sued all parties which it could identify, including churches and non-profit community institutions. Thereafter, the JLT and the LRT filed motions for consolidation of the two actions . The JLT moved to consolidate 410 410 CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS January 24, 1997 Page 4 the LRT action into its action in order to maintain the tight schedule whichP rovided for December 16, 1996 trial date. The LRT moved to consolidate the JLT action into its second suit in an attempt to gain a new scheduling order with a longer discovery schedule. Judge Shabaz granted the JLT' s Motion to Consolidate but revised the schedule to provide for a March 1997 trial date. The State of Wisconsin filed a separate suit against Junker in order to enter the consent agreement . The JLT and the Nor-Lake filed public comments on the consent agreement, and each filed motions to intervene in the suit . The JLT' s motion to intervene was denied, and that ruling has been appealed to the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals. Nor- Lake' s Motion to Intervene was granted. THE AMENDED COMPLAINT In the Amended Complaint, seven separate counts set out individual complaints and purported claims under various laws . Counts I through Count VI are plead against all defendants, including the City. Count VII is plead only against the Junker. A brief description of the each separate allegation is set out below. Count I. Count One sets out a claim for damages under the Resource Conservation and RecoveryAct ("RCRA") which is the federal statute governingsolid waste disposal . At the present time, we are preparing a motion to dismiss this claim against the City of Oak Park Heights because the Junker Landfill Trust failed to comply with the 90 day notification requirement set in this statute. In addition, we are moving for dismissal because a citizen' s suit such as this is barred under the statute because of the State of Wisconsin' s participation with the remediation. Count II. Count Two of the Amended Complaint sets out a claim for damages under the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act Section 107 . The Summary Judgment Motion that we are preparing also seeks dismissal of this Count. Previously, as to some other parties, Judge Shabaz has ordered that the Plaintiff does not have a right to bring a direct cost recovery under this section of the statute. Therefore, we are taking the position by virtue of the Court ' s Orders dated April 29, 1996 and July 17, 1996, this Count is subject to dismissal under the doctrine of the "Law of the Case. " 111 CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS January 24, 1997 Page 5 Count III. Count Three of the Amended Complaint sets out a claim for damages under the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act Section 113 . A detailed discussion of Superfund Liability is set out separately, below. The Superfund Liability Scheme In a nutshell, under Superfund, the following persons are responsible for clean up costs as a result from the release or a threat of a release of a hazardous substance from a facility: (1) The current owner or operator; (2) Certain past owners or operators; (3) Generator of the hazardous substance; and Transporters (4) of the hazardous substance. The liability imposed by Superfund is strict and joint and several. In its practical application, liability is also retroactive and perpetual . More specifically, 42 USC § 9607 (a) states: "Notwithstanding any other provision or rule of law, and subject only to the defenses set forth in Subsection (b) of this section -- (1) The owner and operator of a vessel or a facility; (2) Any person who at the time of the disposal of any hazardous substance owned or operated any facility at which such hazardous substances were disposed of; (3) Any person who by contract, agreement, or otherwise arrange for disposal or treatment, or arrange with a transporter for transport for disposal or treatment, of hazardous substances owned or possessed by such person, by any other party or entity, at any facility or incineration vessel owned or operated by another party or entity and containing such hazardous substances; and (4) Any person who accepts or accepted any hazardous substance for transport to disposal or treatment • 411 CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS January 24, 1997 Page 6 • facilities, incineration vessels or sites selected by such persons, from which there is a release or a threatened release which causes the occurrence of response costs, of a hazardous substance, shall be liable for -- (A) All costs, removal or remedial action incurred by the United States government or a State or an Indian Tribe not inconsistent with the National Contingency Plan ; (B) Any other necessary costs of response incurred by any other person consistent with the National Contingency Plan ; (C) Damages for injury to, destruction of, or loss of natural resources, including the reasonable costs of assessing such injury, destruction or loss resulting from such a release; and (D) The cost of any health assessment or health effect study carried out under Section 9604 (i) of this title. As you can see from examining the language of the Act, fault plays no part in determining liability. Generally, the elements required to establish a prima facie case of liability under Superfund are: (1) The subject site is a "facility; " (2) A "release or threatened release" of a "hazardous substance" occurred at the facility; (3) The defendant fits into one of the four categories of "covered persons; " (4) The plaintiff incurred costs in responding to the release; and (5) The costs are consistent with the National Contingency Plan in the case of a private party plaintiff, or not inconsistent with the National Contingency Plan in the case of a government plaintiff . The defenses available to the defendant under Superfund are extremely limited. 42 US Code §9607 (b) state: 411 • CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS January 24, 1997 Page 7 There shall be no liability under subsection (a) of this section for a person otherwise liable who can establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the release or threat of release of a hazardous substance and the damages resulting therefrom were caused solely by -- (1) An act of God; (2) An act of war; (3) An act or omission of a third party other than an employee or agent of the defendant, or than one whose act or omission occurs in connection with a contractual relationship, existing directly or indirectly, with the defendant (except where the sole contractual arrangement arises from a published tariff and acceptance for carriage by a common carrier by rail) , if the defendant establishes by a preponderance of the evidence that -- (a) He exercised due care with respect to the hazardous substance concerned, taking into consideration the characteristics of such hazardous substance, in light of all relevant facts and circumstances; and (b) He took precautions against foreseeable acts or omissions of any such third party and the consequences that could foreseeably result from such acts or omissions; or (4) Any combination of the foregoing paragraphs . Count IV. Count Four of the Amended Complaint pleads a claim for Federal Common Law Contribution. We are arguing that this Count is subject to dismissal on the basis that the Plaintiff failed to comply with either the Wisconsin or the Minnesota Notice of Claim requirements prior to commencing this lawsuit against a municipality and, therefore, is subject to dismissal . Count V. Count Five of the Amended Complaint sets out a claim for damages under the Wisconsin Common Law for Contribution. Again, the Plaintiff failed to comply with either the Wisconsin or Minnesota Notice of • • • CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS January 24, 1997 Page 8 Claim requirements prior to commencing the lawsuit and, therefore, should be dismissed. Count VI. Count Six of the Amended Complaint sets out a claim for Unjust Enrichment. This Count should also be subject to dismissal on the basis that the Plaintiff failed to comply with either Wisconsin or Minnesota' s Notice of Claim requirements prior to commencing the lawsuit . CROSSCLAIMS AGAINST CITY Recently, two entities which were located within the City have filed crossclaims against it for indemnification. The entities, Kingwood Corporation, d/b/a Kingwood Management and K-Mart Corporation have taken the position that because the City' s Ordinance required that to use Junker Sanitation Services, that they should be indemnified by the City for any damages caused by the City's hauler. We will be moving for summary judgment of those claims based upon the statutory immunity set out in Minn. Stat . § 466 . 03 . COUNTERCLAIM AGAINST JUNKER SANITATION SERVICES, INC. AND UNITED WASTE TRANSFER On behalf of the City, we have counterclaimed against Junker, and on the basis of successor liability, against United Waste. The counterclaim is based upon applicable contracts, Junker was required to provide the City with $50, 000 . 00 worth of coverage for claims to injury to property against liability imposed by law on the City or the Contractor by reason of any act, or omission of the Contractor or the Contractor' s employees in connection with performance of the contract . SETTLEMENT PROPOSAL There is a the present time a settlement balloon which is floating around for consideration. However, it has not been put into a written proposal and therefore should be considered to be the last word on settlement . A written proposal has been promised once the cost of obtaining an annuity to fund future clean up has been determined. The proposal is based upon applying the TLI allocations to the cost of the Remedy which is now estimated to be approximately $4, 500, 000 . 00 . Reportedly, all of the members of the JLT have signaled their intention to participate in the settlement . The JLT represent approximately 30% of allocation attributed to the Site. Due to the impending trial date, it has been suggested that the last day to participate in the settlement will be February 17, 1997. 411 • CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS January 24, 1997 Page 9 Assuming full participation by the JLT, the City' s worst case settlement scenario at this time would be that only 32 .1028% (the JLT' s 30%, plus the City' s 2 .1028%) of thevolume attributed to the site would agree to pay their pro-rata share of $4 , 500, 000 . 00 . The best case scenario would be 100% participation. Then the City would pay 2 .1028% of $4, 500, 000 . 00, or $94, 626 . 00 . However, I think that a more reasonable estimate would be for a participation in the settlement of 50% . Once this settlement is put into place, the JLT will dismiss its ' Complaint and the LRT will prosecute the action against the non- setteling parties . TRIAL SCHEDULES The first stage of the trial is scheduled to commence on March 3, 1997. It will determine liability. It is presently scheduled to last four weeks. If necessary, there would then a second stage to determine damages. Very truly yours, JARDINE, LOGAN & O'BRIEN, P.L.L.P. 6L..- Sean E. Hade Direct Dial: (612) 290-6510 SEH:tlm 11111111i II) ATTORNEYS AT LAW LOG; N EL,L.E January 10, 1997 2100 Piper Jaffray Plaza PERSONAL/CONFIDENTIAL 444 Cedar Street CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS Saint Paul,Minnesota 55101-2160 ATTN: ADMINISTRATOR MIKE ROBERTSON P 0 BOX 2007 Firm (612)290-6500 OAK PARK HEIGHTS MN 55082-2007 Fax (612)223-5070 Re: Our File No: 26056 (1657) Donald M.Jardine Junker Landfill Trust v. Junker Recycling, Inc. , et al John R.O'Brien Gerald M.Linnihan Alan R.Vanasek John M.Kennedy,Jr. Eugene J.Flick Dear Mr. Robertson: Charles E.Gillin James J.Galman Enclosed herein for your information please find a copy of a Pierre N.Regnier MarkA.Fonken letter dated January 9, 1997 addressed to Attorney Michael George W.Kuehner Ryan who represents Kingwood Corporation and Kmart Mary A.Rice PattiJ.Skoglund Corporation. The Answer serves as our reply to the tender of Sean E.Hade defense. Timothy S.Crom Lawrence M.Rocheford James G.Golembeck I also enclose a copy of my letter to the League of Minnesota Kerry C.Koep Cities putting them on notice of the Crossclaim filed by DavidJ.Hoekstra Kingwood and Kmart Corporations . James K.Helling Michael A.Rayer Marlene S.Garvis Finally, the actual Answer to the Crossclaim is in dictation Mary P.Rowe at the present date. Once the final draft is prepared, I will Karen R.Cote forward a copy to you for your complete file. Nathan W.Hart Joseph E.Flynn Thomas L.Cummings Very truly yours, Margaret C.Galvin Shari L.Johnson Elizabeth B.Hayes JA DINE, LOGAN,& O'BRIEN, P.L.L.P. Laurence A.Diamond J f Katherine E.Kennedy \ (J ( Cara J.Debes Yvonne M.Flaherty Sean E. Hade JerreFLogan0923-1983) Direct Dial: (612) 290-6510 SEH:tlm Enclosures Some members also admitted to practice law in Wisconsin, North Dakota,Florida and Illinois • • ATTORNEYS AT LAW LOGAN & ELLE O'BRI EN January 9, 1997 MR MICHAEL S RYAN 2100 Piper Jaffray Plaza ATTORNEY AT LAW 444 Cedar Street 1800 PIPER JAFFRAY PLAZA Saint Paul,Minnesota 55101-2160 444 CEDAR ST ST PAUL MN 55101 Firm (612)290-6500 Fax (612)223-5070 Re: 26056 (1657) Junker Landfill Litigation Donald NI.Jardine Dear Mr. Ryan: John R.O'Brien Gerald M.Linnihan AlanR.Vanasek I am in receipt of your Notice and Tender of Defense to Oak John Eugene .FlickKennedy,Jr. Park Heights in both the Junker Landfill Trust and Landfill Eugene J.Flick g Charles E.Giffin Remediation Trust cases . It is my understanding that it is James J.Galman your position that the City of Oak Park Heights requires, and Pierre N.Regnier MarkA.Fonken has a duty, to indemnify and defend Kingwood Corporation and George W.Kuehner Kmart Corporation based upon an Oak Park Heights ' Ordinance, Mary A.Rice PattiJ.Skoglund effective January 1, 1975, wherein Oak Park Heights designated SeanE.Hade the duly authorized garbage collector for its City. Timothy S.Crom Lawrence M.Rocheford James G.Golembeck I read nothing in that Ordinance that requires the City of Oak Kerry C.Koep Park Heights to indemnify or defend Kingwood Corporation and David J.Hoekstra Kmart Corporation from any actions that may be brought against James K.Helling them as a result of the refuse that was generated by their MarleneSchael .Gayvi companies. Further, I am not aware of any contract that er Marlene S.Garvis Mary P.Rowe requires the City to provide such indemnification or defense. Karen R.Cote Nathan W.Hart Joseph E.Flynn Absent such information, I see nothing in the Ordinance Thomas L.Cummings referred to in your Notice and Tender of Defense that would Margaret C.Galvin Shari L.Johhnsonnsonrequire the City of Oak Park Heights to defend and indemnify ElizabethB.Hayes your clients. Further, there is no language in the Ordinance Laurence A.Diamond that would obviateour clients responsibilities, obligations Katherine E.Kennedy Y P g CaraJ.Debes and duties under CERCLA and other claims in the underlying Yvonne M.Flaherty Complaints. Jerre F Logan 1923-1983) If you have any further information or argument that would cause me to change my view, please advise immediately. Some members also admitted to practice law in Wisconsin, Very truly yours, North Dakota,Florida and Illinois JARDINE, LOGAN & O'BRIEN, P.L.L.P. Sean E. Hade Direct Dial: (612) 290-6510 SEH:slf 111 J���iuI tii� 0 ATTORNEYS AT LAW , 11111111M P.L.L.P. , 1111111M January 10, 1997 2100 Piper Jaffray Plaza LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 444CedartPaul,Street 145 UNIVERSITY AVE W Saint Paul,Minnesota 55101-2160 ST PAUL MN 55103-2044 Firm (612)290-6500 Fax (612)223-5070 Re: 26, 056 (1657) Junker Landfill Trust v. Junker Recycling, Inc. , et al Donald M.Jardine John R.O'Brien Gerald M.Linnihan Dear Sir/Madam: ` Alan R.Vanasek John M.Kennedy,Jr. Eugene J.Flick I am writing to you on behalf of my client, City of Oak Park CharlesE.Gillin Heights, which is involved in the above superfund site James J.Galman litigation. Quite specifically, I am writing to you to put Pierre N.Regnier MarkA.Fonken you on notice of a Crossclaim which has been filed against the GeorgeW.Kuehner City by Kingwood Corporation, d/b/a Kingwood Management and Mary A.Rice PattiJ.Skoglund Kmart Corporation. For your review, I am enclosing a copy of SeanE.Hade the Crossclaim and a copy of the Notice and Tender of Defense Timothy S. which was served upon the Lawrerencece M.M.Rocheford P City. James G.Golembeck Kerry C.Koep Kingwood Corporation and Kmart Corporation have taken the DavidJ.Hoekstra position that a duty to indemnify and defend them was created JamesK.Helling by a City ordinance which designated the duly authorized Michael A.Rayer MarleneS.Garvis garbage collector for the City. Mary P Rowe Karen R.Cote If you need further information regarding the above, please Nathan W.Hart Joseph E.Flynn feel free to contact me directly. Thomas L.Cummings Margaret C.Galvin Shari L.Johnson Very truly yours, Elizabeth B.Hayes Laurence A.Diamond JARD INE, LOGAN & O'BRI EN P.L.L.P. Katherine E.Kennedy / Cara J.Debes Yvonne M.Flaherty Jerre F.Logan(1923-1983 Sean E. Hade Direct Dial: (612) 290-6510 Some members also admitted to practice law in Wisconsin, S EH:t lm North Dakota,Florida and Illinois Enclosures CC: PERSONAL AND CONFIDENITAL TY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS TTN: MIKE ROBERTSON P 0 BOX 2007 OAK PARK HEIGHTS MN 55082-2007 2 411 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN Junker Landfill Trust, a Minnesota business trust, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 96-C-0019-S CONSOLIDATED CASE v. Junker Recycling, Inc. , a Minnesota corporation, f/k/a Junker Sanitary Landfill, Inc. ; et al . , First Defendants, and Eisinger Sanitation Services, Inc. ; et al . , Second Defendants, and City of Stillwater, et al . , Third Defendants, and John Does and Mary Does, Fourth Defendants . Landfill Remediation Trust, a Civil Action No. 96-C-489-S Wisconsin business trust, CONSOLIDATED CASE Plaintiff, vs. Garry Thompson, et al, Defendants. S • CROSS-CLAIM OF KINGWOOD CORPORATION d/b/a KINGWOOD MANAGEMENT AND KMART CORPORATION AGAINST CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS TO: DEFENDANT CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS AND ITS ATTORNEY, SEAN E. HADE, JARDINE, LOGAN & O'BRIEN, P.L.L.P. , 2100 PIPER JAFFRAY PLAZA, 44 CEDAR STREET, ST. PAUL, MN 55101 . Defendant Kingwood Corporation d/b/a/ Kingwood Management (Kingwood) and Defendant Kmart Corporation (Kmart) , for their Cross-Claim againstDefendant City of Oak Park Heights (City) , state and allege as follows : 1 . Kingwood and Kmart have been served with a Summons and Amended Complaint by Plaintiff Junker Landfill Trust (JLT) , in Civil Action No. 96-C-0019-S, alleging that Defendants Kingwood and Kmart are liable to the JLT for damages incurred by the JLT in connection with investigation and remediation of the Junker Landfill, all as more fully set forth in Plaintiff JLT' s Amended Complaint. 2 . Kingwood and Kmart have also been served with a Summons and Complaint by Plaintiff Landfill Remediation Trust (LRT) , in Civil Action No. 96-C-489-S, alleging that Defendants Kingwood and Kmart are liable to the LRT for damages incurred by the LRT in connection with investigation and remediation of the Junker Landfill, all as more fully set forth in Plaintiff LRT' s Complaint. 3. In each of the above-entitled actions, Defendants Kingwood and Kmart have interposed separate Answers denying any fault or liability to either the JLT or the LRT. 2 • • 4 . These cross-claiming Defendants specifically deny herein any fault or liability to Plaintiff JLT or Plaintiff LRT. 5. That if Plaintiff JLT or Plaintiff LRT were injured or damaged as alleged in their respective Complaints, the same was caused entirely by the actions of the Defendant City. 6. Pursuant to "An Ordinance Regulating The Disposal Of Garbage And Refuse And Providing The Creation And Establishment Of A Uniform System For Collection And Disposal Of Garbage And Refuse, " the City mandated that Kingwood and Kmart, and other residents and businesses located in the City of Oak Park Heights, use Junker Sanitation Service, Inc. as their garbage and refuse hauler. The subject Ordinance was made effective January 1, 1975 and was in full force and effect during the time period relevant herein. 7 . Pursuant to Section 502.02 of the City Ordinance, "Commencing January 1, 1975 all garbage and refuse accumulations shall be accumulated, conveyed and disposed of by the City of Oak Park Heights through its legally authorized agent, the City Collection Contractor. No persons shall collect or convey garbage or refuse over any of the streets or alleys of the City, or dispose of any garbage accumulated in the City, except the City' s duly authorized agent. " 8. Pursuant to Section 502 . 06 of the City Ordinance, "The ownership of garbage and refuse material set out for collection and 3 • collected by the City Garbage Collection Contractor shall be vested in the City. " 9. Pursuant to Section 502 . 10 of the City Ordinance, any person violating the Ordinance was guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of up to $700, or in the event of default, imprisonment for a period not exceeding 90 days. 10. By operation of the City Ordinance, neither Kingwood nor Kmart, nor other residents and businesses located in the City of Oak Park Heights, had any choice or control concerning the disposal of their garbage and refuse. In addition to usurping all control over the manner in which garbage and refuse was collected and disposed of, the City also assumed "ownership of garbage and refuse materials set out for collection. " 11 . Both Kingwood and Kmart, as well as other residents and businesses located in the City of Oak Park Heights, had their garbage and refuse collected by Junker Sanitation Service, Inc. at the direction, in the interest of, or in reliance upon the City. 12 . Kingwood and Kmart hereby make a claim for indemnity under Minnesota law against the City. Pursuant to their claim of indemnity, Kingwood and Kmart request that the City indemnify and hold them harmless for any and all liability, loss, costs, disbursements, expenses, attorney' s fees and any other expenses that may be imposed upon them, or to which they may become subjected, by reason of these actions, the defense of these 4 i • actions, or the defense of any Cross-Claims in these actions. 13. The above-entitled Court has jurisdiction over this Cross- Claim pursuant to 28 USC § 1367 (a) . WHEREFORE, Defendants Kingwood and Kmart pray that the Court enter judgment in their favor on their Cross-Claim against the City and require the City to indemnify, save and hold harmless both Kingwood and Kmart as requested herein. These Cross-Claiming Defendants ask for such other further and additional relief as to the Court seems just and equitable. Dated this 31st day of December, 1996. MURNANE, CONLIN, WHITE AND BRANDT Professional Association By J � Michael S. Ryan, WI #84989 Attorneys for Defendant Kingwood Corporation d/b/a Kingwood Management and Defendant Kmart Corporation 1800 Piper Jaffray Plaza 444 Cedar Street St. Paul, MN 55101 (612) 227-9411 5 jr1RUIV1? • • ATTORNEYS AT LAW - 1111111111 P.L.L.E. MEM January 8, 1997 2100 Piper Jaffray Plaza PERSONAL/CONFIDENTIAL 444 Cedar Street CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS Saint Paul,Minnesota 55101-2160 ATTN: ADMINISTRATOR MIKE ROBERTSON P 0 BOX 2007 Firm (612)290-6500 OAK PARK HEIGHTS MN 55082-2007 Fax (612)223-5070 Re: Our File No: 26056 (1657) Donald M.Jardine Junker Landfill Trust v. Junker Recycling, Inc. , et al John R.O'Brien Gerald M.Linnihan Alan R.Vanasek John M.Kennedy,Jr. Eugene J.Flick Dear Mr. Robertson: Charles E.Gillin James J.Galman The emphasis of this letter is to provide you with a brief Pierre N.Regnier MarkA.Fonken update with regard to the status of the above-captioned George w.Kuehner matter. We have been informed that the Junker Landfill Trust, Mary A.Rice Patti J.Skoglund the Junker defendants and the State of Wisconsin have come to Sean E.Hade an agreement which allows the Junker defendants and the Junker Timothyom LawrerenceceM.Rocheford to make settlement demands Landfill Trust ttlt upon the other M. James G.Golembeck potentially responsible parties which includes the City. I Kerry c.xoep have been advised that these settlement demands will include DavidJ.Hoeksrra contribution protection from non-settling entities. This James K.Helling information was communicated to Judge Shabaz on December 12, Michael A.Rayer Marlene S.Garvis 1996 along with a request for an extension of the Scheduling Mary P.Rowe Order. Judge Shabaz granted the request modifying the KarenR.W.Hart to Nathan W. Scheduling Order, moving the cutoff date for dispositive N Joseph E.Flynn motions from January 3 , 1997 to coincide with the March 3 , Thomas L.Cummings 1997 cutoff for discovery. Margaret C.Galvin Shari L.Johnson Elizabeth B.Hayes The written settlement demand letters were to have been Laurence A.Diamond received byus before the holidays. However, we haveyet to Katherine E.Kennedy Y CaraJ.Debes receive it and we will send a letter in follow-up. Yvonne M.Flaherty Jerre F.Logan(1923-1983) In the interim, we are preparing to move forward on motions for summary judgment in regard to our claim against Junker regarding defense and indemnification. Some members also admitted to practice law in Wisconsin, North Dakota,Florida and Illinois Very truly yours, 7:7 LO O'BRIEN, P.L.L.P. F(L.\ Sean E. Hade Direct Dial : (612) 290-6510 SEH:tlm 11:1)INI; • • ATTORNEYS AT LAW LOG P.L.L.P. January 8, 1997 2100 Piper Jaffray Plaza PERSONAL/CONFIDENTIAL 444 Cedar Street CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS Saint Paul,Minnesota 55101-2160 ATTN: ADMINISTRATOR MIKE ROBERTSON P 0 BOX 2007 Firm (612)290-6500 OAK PARK HEIGHTS MN 55082-2007 Fax (612)223-5070 Re: Our File No: 26056 (1657) Donald M.Jardine Junker Landfill Trust v. Junker Recycling, Inc. , et al John R.O'Brien Gerald M.Linnihan Alan R.Vanasek John M.Kennedy,Jr. Eugene J.Flick Dear Mr. Robertson: Charles E.Gillin James J.Galman Pierre N.RegnierAs anticipated, we have received a Crossclaim from several MarkA.Fonken entities who formerly did business in the City. A copy of GeorgeW.Kuehner that Crossclaim is enclosed for your information. We are Mary A.Rice Patti J.Skoglund serving an Answer to the Crossclaim and will be filing a SeanE.Hade Motion for Summary Judgment on that issue. Please note that Timothy M.R m LawrerenceceM.Rocheford theyhave also tendered the defense. We now have no basis to James G.Golembeck support that tender. Kerry C.Koep David J.Hoekstra Very truly yours, James K.Helling Michael A.Rayer Marlene S.Garvis JA DINE, LOG & O'BRIEN, P.L.L.P. Mary P.Rowe (4-k Karen R.Cote Nathan W.Hart Joseph E.Flynn Sean E. Hade Thomas L.Cummings Direct Dial : (612) 290-6510 Margaret C.Galvin Shari L.Johnson SEH:t lm Elizabeth B.Hayes Laurence A.Diamond Enclosure Katherine E.Kennedy Cara J.Debes Yvonne M.Flaherty Jerre F.Logan(1923-1983) Some members also admitted to practice law in Wisconsin, North Dakota,Florida and Illinois UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN Junker Landfill Trust, a Minnesota business trust, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 96-C-0019-S CONSOLIDATED CASE v. Junker Recycling, Inc. , a Minnesota corporation, f/k/a Junker Sanitary Landfill, Inc. ; et al . , First Defendants, and Eisinger Sanitation Services, Inc. ; et al . , Second Defendants, and City of Stillwater, et al. , Third Defendants, and John Does and Mary Does, Fourth Defendants. Landfill Remediation Trust, a Civil Action No. 96-C-489-S Wisconsin business trust, CONSOLIDATED CASE Plaintiff, vs. Garry Thompson, et al, Defendants. L • i CROSS-CLAIM OF KINGWOOD CORPORATION d/b/a KINGWOOD MANAGEMENT AND KMART CORPORATION AGAINST CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS TO: DEFENDANT CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS AND ITS ATTORNEY, SEAN E. HADE, JARDINE, LOGAN & O'BRIEN, P.L.L.P. , 2100 PIPER JAFFRAY PLAZA, 44 CEDAR STREET, ST. PAUL, MN 55101 . Defendant Kingwood Corporation d/b/a/ Kingwood Management (Kingwood) and Defendant Kmart Corporation (Kmart) , for their Cross-Claim against Defendant City of Oak Park Heights (City) , state and allege as follows: 1 . Kingwood and Kmart have been served with a Summons and Amended Complaint by Plaintiff Junker Landfill Trust (JLT) , in Civil Action No. 96-C-0019-S, alleging that Defendants Kingwood and Kmart are liable to the JLT for damages incurred by the JLT in connection with investigation and remediation of the Junker Landfill, all as more fully set forth in Plaintiff JLT' s Amended Complaint. 2 . Kingwood and Kmart have also been served with a Summons and Complaint by Plaintiff Landfill Remediation Trust (LRT) , in Civil Action No. 96-C-489-S, alleging that Defendants Kingwood and Kmart are liable to the LRT for damages incurred by the LRT in connection with investigation and remediation of the Junker Landfill, all as more fully set forth in Plaintiff LRT' s Complaint. 3 . In each of the above-entitled actions, Defendants Kingwood and Kmart have interposed separate Answers denying any fault or liability to either the JLT or the LRT. 2 • • 4 . These cross-claiming Defendants specifically deny herein any fault or liability to Plaintiff JLT or Plaintiff LRT . 5. That if Plaintiff JLT or Plaintiff LRT were injured or damaged as alleged in their respective Complaints, the same was caused entirely by the actions of the Defendant City. 6. Pursuant to "An Ordinance Regulating The Disposal Of Garbage And Refuse And Providing The Creation And Establishment Of A Uniform System For Collection And Disposal Of Garbage And Refuse, " the City mandated that Kingwood and Kmart, and other residents and businesses located in the City of Oak Park Heights, use Junker Sanitation Service, Inc. as their garbage and refuse hauler. The subject Ordinance was made effective January 1, 1975 and was in full force and effect during the time period relevant herein. 7 . Pursuant to Section 502.02 of the City Ordinance, "Commencing January 1, 1975 all garbage and refuse accumulations shall be accumulated, conveyed and disposed of by the City of Oak Park Heights through its legally authorized agent, the City Collection Contractor. No persons shall collect or convey garbage or refuse over any of the streets or alleys of the City, or dispose of any garbage accumulated in the City, except the City' s duly authorized agent. " 8 . Pursuant to Section 502 . 06 of the City Ordinance, "The ownership of garbage and refuse material set out for collection and 3 411 collected by the City Garbage Collection Contractor shall be vested in the City. " 9. Pursuant to Section 502 . 10 of the City Ordinance, any person violating the Ordinance was guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of up to $700, or in the event of default, imprisonment for a period not exceeding 90 days . 10. By operation of the City Ordinance, neither Kingwood nor Kmart, nor other residents and businesses located in the City of Oak Park Heights, had any choice or control concerning the disposal of their garbage and refuse. In addition to usurping all control over the manner in which garbage and refuse was collected and disposed of, the City also assumed "ownership of garbage and refuse materials set out for collection. " 11 . Both Kingwood and Kmart, as well as other residents and businesses located in the City of Oak Park Heights, had their garbage and refuse collected by Junker Sanitation Service, Inc. at the direction, in the interest of, or in reliance upon the City. 12. Kingwood and Kmart hereby make a claim for indemnity under Minnesota law against the City. Pursuant to their claim of indemnity, Kingwood and Kmart request that the City indemnify and hold them harmless for any and all liability, loss, costs, disbursements, expenses, attorney' s fees and any other expenses that may be imposed upon them, or to which they may become subjected, by reason of these actions, the defense of these 4 IIM 111 . . • actions, or the defense of any Cross-Claims in these actions. 13. The above-entitled Court has jurisdiction over this Cross- Claim pursuant to 28 USC § 1367 (a) . WHEREFORE, Defendants Kingwood and Kmart pray that the Court enter judgment in their favor on their Cross-Claim against the City and require the City to indemnify, save and hold harmless both Kingwood and Kmart as requested herein. These Cross-Claiming Defendants ask for such other further and additional relief as to the Court seems just and equitable. Dated this 31st day of December, 1996. MURNANE, CONLIN, WHITE AND BRANDT Professional Association By �! --------- Michael S. Ryan, WI #8154989 Attorneys for Defendant Kingwood Corporation d/b/a Kingwood Management and Defendant Kmart Corporation 1800 Piper Jaffray Plaza 444 Cedar Street St. Paul, MN 55101 (612) 227-9411 5 • I• , F at heet , , Information for the Community about the Junker Landfill November 20, 1996 A Message from the Landfill Remedia "on Trust Many people in the Hudson community have followed the ! WILLOW - �"� activities at the Junker Landfill located in the Town of Hudson , .' j on Alexander Road about six miles east of the City of Hudson 4� i � �,-.ff' 0 (see map)over the past few years. In July 1996 the IV-411W fI Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources(WDNR) :.;:; ____ __ , entered into a settlement or Consent Decree with the Landfill / :'��•• p . 1011111.1I Remediation Trust.The Trust is responsible for carrying out � JUNKER LANDF iL the terms of the Consent Decree,which includes :::iri ,� o _ NSI implementing the remedy at the site and installing activated ) t--.,';•_-:,...—..1'• � � '~gym, .�� carbon water filters in homes affected by potential ;J_ ` ` .•••••••, •••••U :::: ill groundwater contamination from the landfill. , ' v.-.-.-.-:-:•;•:•;•-•-•'• , .,:,•:•:; IR SPECIAL WELL The Trust will conduct these technical activities and icATCTION CONSTRUCT q community relations activities with oversight from the - -: WDNR. We have retained the environmental engineering :•- i- .�.�_ firm of Dames&Moore to assist with implementing these \, :•: ' activities. - t �-<` a r The Landfill Remediation Trust is committed to cooperate with state and local agencies in addressing and resolving the environmental issues at this site. We welcome your comments and encourage you to attend the upcoming Availability Session(see page 3). For your convenience,we have established a toll-free number. If you have questions or comments,please contact Dave Trainor or Julie Hoffman from Dames&Moore{at 1-800-290-9012. Site History The Junker Landfill operated from about 1972 to 1987 receiving wastes from busineses,industries,schools,government,and thousands of homes. In 1987 waste was no longer deposited at the Landfill. In 1990 the WDNR took on the task of permanently closing the landfill by placing an engineered clay cap over the waste. Part of their responsibility included!evaluating groundwater using monitoring wells installed in the landfill vicinity as well as nearby private wells. Earlier monitoring identified an area of potential groundwater contamination downgradient from the landfill. An unrelated industrial spill site in combination with the landfill caused the WDNR to designate a Special Well Casing Area(SWCA)in 1991. This designation wellsthe SWCA. In the othe drilling of new in is intended to controldo m m d 1992, � g This: slett is by he`Lit Remediation T�..to.. :.;:�.; ;:_;:;.;:.; WDNR continued to control'contaminant migration at the landfill 8r' by ` forth tltc pu he about the flus� activities the installing a system to*tract'and burn subsurface landfill gas. JuLaridl aite< :: " :: ::>::`:. In 1994 the'tinker Landfill rust a groupof past landfill customers, rs , volunteered to conduc a R edial Investigation to better define the �:::::�: "�'�::isii:�::i::i::iiiii:�i:.:::::ii'i::v:�::i::::iiia':.i::��:;: risti::: :k':i' ::::i:::i::::::::�:::i'::iiiii::i:�ii::::::ii:: g �:::::::::::::::: :::: .:::::i.iii: environmental. issues�t the andfill. The RI was followed bya Feasibility < <>Resident > f::S Resulta::;:::<:;:: :::::::;::_::::»:<:::::::>:><:»<;:::>::::>::::: �::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::: :::: ::::: : :. Study(FS)to assess erna ves for remediatingthe site. € . er ;.ir': a".;`',<s>:: > »::>> ` >`<';'`R:`` `_ : <:<:.: a�t 1 MOODO . .:.. .::::>:::::::::::::..::::: ;:;:;; On May22, 1996,the"WDNR held a public meeting in Hudson to discuss �3'.:::::::::::;:.;:.;:.;;:.;:.;:.:.;:.,:;,:.:.;:.;:;,;.;:.;:.;:.::.:..::.:::.:::;;:.;:.;;:.: the findin sof the FS and receive comments on proposed clean up >< iie >'o'trrt<Ito nfonativrt::: :»»::>:::<::;::»::> : I • • Record of Decision and Respons veness Summary On August 18, 1996 the WDNR issued a Record of Decision(ROD)iden ' g a final remedy which is protective of human health and the environment,complies with Federal and State requirements,and is cost i t- tive. The selected remedy addresses groundwater contamination,landfill gas movement away from the landfill,and water su i ply replacement for impacted and potentially impacted private drinking water wells. The selected remedy includes: • continued maintenance of the existing landfill cover installation and maintenance of individual point-of- system and perimeter control including repair to entry granular activated carbon water supply treatment existing subsidence areas; units to all households and businesses in the area impacted by the Junker Landfill; • continued operation and maintenance of the existing landfill gas and leachate extraction systems; upgrading of the existing gas extraction system; • creation of deed restrictions on the landfill property; long-term monitoring of groundwater,leachate, condensate,unsaturated soils,and landfill gas; • extension of the existing landfill cover system over an area of uncovered wastes or excavation and relocation supplemental studies of groundwater quality,landfill of this waste on-site in a previously capped area; seeps and internal landfill leachate quantities and flow properties; • reconstruction of the south perimeter ditch and extension of the existing landfill cover system to the • implementation of additional remedial actions that are south over an area of presumed surface water found to be necessary by the additional studies on infiltration; groundwater quality,landfill seeps,and internal leachate quantities and flow properties. Attached to the Record of Decision is a Responsiveness Summary. In this •ocument the WDNR addresses concerns raised by the public. A copy of the ROD and the Responsiveness Summary are available to the p blic at the Hudson Public Library. Residential Well Sampling Result In early September more than 80 residential drinking water wells were sam I led in the Hudson area. The sampling was a necessary step prior to the installation of the granular activated carbon filters(see below fo more details). We needed to confirm the levels of volatile organic compounds(VOCs),the primary landfill-related contaminants,and ardness and iron levels to ensure the proper carbon systems were selected for each home. Results were mailed to each resident in November. In general,the findings dicated low levels of VOC contamination that confirms the need for and the applicability of the activated carbon filters. We will continue to sample residential wells after the installation of the felt- .to document their effectiveness,and continue to sample the monitoring well network located in the immediate area of the landfill. Water Filter Installation The Landfill Remediation Trust will be installing dual tank activated carbon •lter systems in the affected homes that meet the necessary requirements and request such a filter. Each homeowner will be notified by elephone to schedule a time for installation. Representatives from the Culligan office in Stillwater,MN will conduct the actual installatio I. The system consists of a flow meter and two tanks that contain the activated arbon(see figure 2). The entire system fills an area approximately 5 feet high by 4 feet wide by 3 feet deep. It will be installed d twnstream from the pressure tank. We will collect samples from each system within two weeks of installation to confirm effectiveness. S The Landfill Remediation Trust will contract with a Figure 2 company to manage the maintenance of the filter 3/Y Water systems. Flow meters will be checked when water y.•R samples are collected. The carbon in both filters will flexible (As'Renner be replaced at least once a year,in accordance with Discharge p er' Semple' 'reseure an ms I WDNR and Wisconsin Department of Commerce Cold Water guidelines. sejM '""''' Walhelee� YA •. AG�lnd n 1 Activated Tank Tank Pre-Design Investigation and Stage 2 Stage 1 Design Activities Starting in early September with the signing of the ROD,the Landfill Remediation Trust has been busy implementing pre-design investigations and planning remediation design activities. The pre-design activities include collection of landfill gas samples for VOC analysis,installation of additional off-site monitoring probes to better define landfill gas migration,and evaluation of leachate flow characteristics in the landfill. The field work for these activities was completed in November. The data generated from these activities are being used to design an upgrade to the existing 1 11 gas extraction system as well as improvements to the existing landfill cover. These improvements are scheduled for construction in 1997. Once completed,continued contaminant releases should diminish over time. Long-term monitoring at the landfill will continue to evaluate the effectiveness of these improvements. Public Availability Session A Public Availability Session is scheduled for Wednesday,December 11 from 3:00 p.m until 8:00 p.m. The event will be held at the Hudson Town Hall. Representatives from Dames&Moore,WDNR and Culligan will be on hand to talk one-on-one with well owners and community members about the filter installation program and general site activities. All community members are encouraged to stop by at their convenience during the above noted hours to view display boards and talk with project team members. Where to Get More Information An information repository has been established at the Hudson Public Library. Copies of past site reports as well as the recently issued Record of Decision,Responsiveness Summary,Commmity Relations Plan,and Remedial Design/Remedial Action Project Plans are available for public review. Library hours are as follo s: City of Hudson Library 911 Fourth Street Monday-Thursday 10:00 a.m.to 8:00 p.m. Friday 10:00 a.m.to 5:00 p.m. f Saturday 9:00 a.m.to 1:00 p.m. The following project team members are available to answer your questions: Mr.Patrick Collins Mr.Chuck lza Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Wisconsin Division;of Health (715)684-2914 (608)267-3732 Mr.Tim Hanson Mr.David Trainor Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Dames&Moore (715)839-3773 (608)244-1788 ori-800-290-9012 • 4111 PUBLIC AVAILABILITY SESSION HUDSON TOWN HALL 980 COUNTY ROAD A WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 11, 1996 3:00 p.m. - 8:00 p.m. Junker Landfill eProject Dames&Moore 1s04, /A uS.POSTAbE 2701 International Lane Suite 210 't 111 ' NOV 19T.6 Vh y0.3 Madison, WI 53704 N1 MTER F280E7941 k , • /21;,;;;, ,r? ?#00,4,7116,411 ,� 4,711 ,4 ��; rid S le . titreA3Alt"t It 341{lil�lli3t;lt£liufiftl3!!} 1111111`1119111-1i17t1111 11111)1lt ittlIfilII •r'' 7 LMC 145 University Avenue West, St. Paul, MN 55103-2044 League of Minnesota Cities Phone: (612) 281-1200 • (800) 925-1122 Cities promoting excellence Fax: (612) 281-1299 • TDD (612) 281-1290 J • August 26, 1996 r Mr. Mike Robertson AUG 2 81996 City of Oak Park Heights ; t1L2 P.O. Box 2007 Oak Park Heights, MN 55082-2007 Re: BRS File No.: 11013474 Trust Member: City of Oak Park Heights Plaintiff: Landfill Remediation Trust,A Wisconsin Business Trust Dear Mr. Robertson: This letter will formally-acknowledge receipt of the lawsuit filed in United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin, entitled: "Landfill Remediation Trust, a Wisconsin business trust, Plaintiff vs. City of Oak Park Heights." Please be advised that the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT) for the reasons stated below, concludes that no coverage is afforded to Oak Park Heights for this matter under the policy/covenants issued by LMCIT. COVERAGE OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS LMCIT issued the following policy/covenants to Oak Park Heights: COVENANT TERM DATES MP 824012 R 07/07/86-87 MCM 85418 07/07/87-88 CMC 0942609 07/07/88-89 CMC 1023 590 07/07/89-90 CMC 1105591 07/07/90-91 CMC 1193892 07/07/91-92 CMC 1280293 07/07/92-93 CMC 1374694 07/07/93-94 CMC 1471595 07/07/94-95 CMC 1565096 07/07/95-96 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER • ! Mr. Mike Robertson BRS File No.: 11013474 August 26, 1996 U 000273 07/07/86-87 UEL 6278 07/07/87-88 MEL 0082209 07/07/88-89 MEL 0101190 07/07/89-90 MEL 0120991 07/07/90-91 MEL 0142792 07/07/91-92 MEL 0164393 07/07/92-93 1\' L 0187094 07/07/93-94 MEL 0211695 07/07/94-95 MEL 0235196 07/07/95-96 BACKGROUND FACTS The plaintiff seeks contribution from the City of Oak Park Heights for their equitable share of the cost of remediation, operation, maintenance and all other necessary costs and expenses incurred by or assessed against the plaintiff for clean up of a release of hazardous substances into the environment at the Junker Landfill located near Hudson, Wisconsin. COVERAGE ISSUES We set forth the following provision as the basis for our determination of non-coverage. This discussion is without prejudice to LMCIT"s right to raise other defenses to coverage and the listing of potentially applicable covenant provision is nonexclusive. I. THE ABSOLUTE POLLUTION EXCLUSION PRECLUDES COVERAGE The absolute pollution exclusion contained in the policy/covenants issued to Oak Park Heights precludes coverage for the Junker Landfill matter. That provision excludes the following from liability coverage. d. Any loss, cost or expense arising out of any direction, demand, or request by the government or any other entity that the"city" or any other entity test for, monitor, clean up, remove, contain, treat, detoxify or neutralize pollutants; or Damages arising out of the actual, alleged or threatened discharge, dispersal, seepage, migration, release or escape of pollutants: 2 ! i Mr. Mike Robertson BRS File No.: 11013474 August 26, 1996 (1) At or from premises the"city" owns, rents, leases, uses or occupies, and premises the"city" no longer owns, rents, leases, uses or occupies. (2) At or from any landfill, dump, or other site or location presently or formerly used by or for the "city" or other for the handling, storage, disposal, processing of treatment of pollutants; (3) Which are or were at any time transported, handled, stored, treated, disposed of, or processed as waste by or for the"city" or any person or organization for whom the"city" may be legally responsible; or (4) At or from any site or location on which the "city" or any contractors or subcontractors working directly or indirectly on the"city's" behalf are or have been performing operations; (a) If the pollutants are brought on or to the site or location in connection with such operations; or (b) If the operations are to test for, monitor, clean up, remove, contain, treat, detoxify or neutralize the pollutants. The exclusion does not apply to any of the following: (1) Any Limited Pollution Liability Claim. (2) Any claim arising out of the discharge or dispersal of mace, tear gas or similar agent, if such discharge was for the purpose of protecting persons or property or incident to an arrest. (3) Any lead or asbestos claim, unless the actual, alleged, or threatened discharge, dispersal, release, escape, use, distribution, or handling of lead or asbestos took place at or from any landfill, dump, or other site or location presently or formerly used by or for the"city" or others for the handling, storage, disposal, processing or treatment of pollutants. (4) Any damages arising out of heat, smoke, or fumes from a hostile fire. A hostile fire is a fire which becomes uncontrollable or breaks out from where it was intended to be. 3 . • • Mr. Mike Robertson BRS File No.: 11013474 August 26, 1996 The covenant defines Limited Pollution Liability Claim as follows: 10. Limited Pollution Liability Claim means any claim for damages which resulted from a sudden occurrence which took place on or after the retroactive date shown in the Declarations and prior to the expiration date of this covenant, and which: a. Was caused by an actual, alleged, or threatened discharge, dispersal, release, or escape of pollutants which took place entirely above ground and not within or on the surface of any lake, stream, surface water or other body of water, and in which any resulting damages occurred entirely above ground and not within or on the surface of any lake, stream, surface water, or other body of water; or b. Arises from the accident rupture, backup or overflow of the"city's" sanitary sewer, storm sewer, or water supply systems. The covenant defines"pollutants," "damages," "occurrence," and"sudden occurrence" all of which definitions are called to your attention and are incorporated herein fully. The pollution exclusion provides that no coverage will be afforded for contamination caused by depositing wastes in a landfill. The limited exception to the exclusion for"limited pollution liability claims" does not apply because of its terms and because Oak Park Heights' retroactive date for Limited Pollution Liability Claims is 01/01/89, which is after any"occurrence" may have taken place. SECTION I- COVERAGES COVERAGE A. MUNICIPAL LIABILITY COVERAGE (CLAMS MADE BASIS) 1. COVERAGE AGREEMENT a. Except as otherwise provided in this agreement, LMCIT will pay on behalf of the"covered party" all sums which the "covered party" shall become legally obligated to pay as damages as a result of an occurrence, if the following conditions are met: (1) The claim for such damages must be first made against the"covered party" during the coverage period; and 4 • • • Mr. Mike Robertson BRS File No.: 11013474 August 26, 1996 (2) The date of the occurrence giving rise to the claim for damages must be on or after the retroactive date, if any, shown the Declarations... B. Coverage is Precluded Because Damages are Not Sought. The LMCIT covenants require not only that a claim be made, but that the claim be for"damages." The covenant contains the following definition of"damages." 5. money Damages means damages... g Y Damages does not include any of the following: d. Injunctive or equitable relief, or quasi judicial or administrative orders. Landfill Remediation Trust's claims that Oak Park Heights should participate in remediation at the Junker Landfill is specifically excluded under the definition of"damages." As no covered "damages" are sought, the LMCIT covenant does not provide coverage. C. Coverage is Precluded Because of the Absence of an"Occurrence" After the Retroactive oastv Date. ate. As indicated above, the claims-made covenants require that the"occurrence" take place after the Retroactive Date for Oak Park Heights, which is 07/07/87. The covenant defines"occurrence" as follows: 13. Occurrence means: a. With respect to Coverage A [Municipal Liability], a wrongful act or a series of related wrongful acts. "Wrongful act" is in turn defined as follows: 10. Wrongful act means any actual or alleged error, statement, act, omission, offense, neglect, accident, or violation. The covenant states the following as to the date of"occurrence": 5 • • Mr. Mike Robertson BRS File No.: 11013474 August 26, 1996 2. CLAIM AND OCCURRENCE DATES A. For any claim for damages, the date of the occurrence shall be deemed to be as follows: (1) For claims for bodily injury or property damage, the date of the occurrence is the date on which the bodily injury or property damage first took place or is alleged to have taken place. It is alleged that Oak Park Heights may have deposited wastes at the landfill in the 1970's to the present. Contamination was detected as early as 1984. LMCIT's covenants do not apply to any occurrence taking place before the Retroactive Date of 07/07/87. CONCLUSION The foregoing is not intended to be an exhaustive list of all the terms, exclusions and conditions of the LMCIT covenants issued to Oak Park Heights that may limit or preclude coverage. Other provisions of the LMCIT covenants may apply to limit or preclude coverage. LMCIT reserves its rights to raise such further provisions if applicable. If you have information that you believe LMCIT should consider in reviewing its coverage determination, or if you become aware of such information in the future, please bring it to our attention immediately. Likewise, if you obtain information that is inconsistent with this letter, please advise us immediately. If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Respectfully, og,azeond{ Julie Lassonde Claims Adjuster JL:dlm\13474.L 6 • • Mr. Mike Robertson BRS File No.: 11013474 August 26, 1996 c: David Snyder, City Attorney Eckberg Lammers Briggs Wolff& Vierling 1835 Northwestern Avenue Stillwater, MN 55082 c: Forest Lake Insurance Agency 2323 South Lake Forest Lake, MN 55025 c: Bob Weisbrod Berkley Risk Services 7 ID LAW OFFICES OF ECKBERG, LAMMERS, BRIGGS, WOLFF & VIERLING, P.L.L.P. 1835 NORTHWESTERN AVENUE STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 (612)439-2878 FAX (612)439-2923 LYLE J. ECKBERG GREGORY G.GALLER JAMES F. LAMMERS Direct Dial: 351-2118 KEVIN K.SHOEBERG ROBERT G. BRIGGS THOMAS J.WEIDNER PAULA. WOLFF July 31, 1996 SUSAN D. OLSON MARK J. VIERLING DAVID K.SNYDER C 0 py Mr. Sean E. Hade Jardine, Logan & O'Brien, P .L.L. P. 2100 Piper Jaffray Plaza 444 Cedar Street St . Paul, Minnesota 55101 Re : Junker Landfill Trust v. Junker Recycling, Inc. , City of Oak Park Heights, et al . Court File No. 96-C-0019-S and Landfill Remediation Trust v. Garry Thompson, • et al . , City of Oak Park Heights Court File No. 96-C-489-S Dear Mr. Hade : The City has tendered the Summons and Complaints in the above-referenced actions to its insurers. Defense and indemnity under the Landfill Trust action has been declined under reservation of rights in the Junker Landfill Trust matter. With respect to the Landfill Remediation Trust matter, responses from the insurers have not yet been received. The relevant policies contain either the absolute or qualified pollution exclusion. We do not anticipate that coverage would be afforded under the policies which contain the absolute pollution exclusion. However, we have attempted to secure coverage under those policies containing the qualified pollution exclusion. However, the insurers have observed that there appear to be no facts which would bring these matters within the sudden and accidental exception to the general qualified pollution exclusion contained in those policies during the 1970' s and up to the mid- 1980' s . ;. AUG i 199E . R . • • Mr. Sean E. Hade July 31, 1996 Page 2 If in the course of your representation of the City you discover facts which would assist the City in establishing coverage under the qualified pollution exclusion or even the absolute pollution exclusion, please pass that information along to me so that I can forward it to the insurers and again request defense and indemnification. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, David K. Snyder DKS : sdb cc : Mike Robertson, City Administrator 410 LAW OFFICES OF ECKBERG, LAMMERS, BRIGGS, WOLFF & VIERLING, P.L.L.P. 1835 NORTHWESTERN AVENUE STILLWATER. MINNESOTA 55082 (612)439-2878 FAX(612)439-2923 LYLE J. ECKBERG GREGORY G.GALLER JAMES F. LAMMERS Direct Dial: 351-2131 KEVIN K.SHOE®ERG ROBERT G. BRIGGS THOMAS J.WEIDNER PAUL A.WOLFF July 30, 19 96 SUSAN 0. OLSON MARK J.VIERLING DAVID K. SNYDER Interstate Insurance Group 55 East Monroe Street py Suite 3300 CO Chicago, Illinois 60603 ATTN: Environmental Claims Re : City of Oak Park Heights Retained Limit Policy No. : 155-C05780 Policy No. : 155-C09087 Policy No. : 155-C14518 Policy No. : 155-C0020263 Policy No. : 15S-C0024930 Policy No. : 155-C0024900 Policy No. : 55C-2045296 Policy No. : 55C-2065528 And any other policies issued by Interstate Insurance Group Dear Sir or Madame: Enclosed herewith please find a Summons and Complaint regarding Landfill Remediation Trust v. City of Oak Park Heights, et al . , Court File No. 96C-489-S. The City of Oak Park Heights hereby tenders the defense of this action to Interstate Fire and Casualty Companies under any policies issued by Interstate and requests that Interstate indemnify the City with respect to any claims made herein. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, David K. Snyder DKS : sdb Enclosure cc: Mike Robertson, City Administrator (w/o enc) • i LAW OFFICES OF ECKBERG, LAMMERS, BRIGGS, WOLFF $c VIERLING, P.L.L.P. 1835 NORTHWESTERN AVENUE STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 (612)439.2878 FAX(612)439-2923 LYLE J. ECKBERG GREGORY G.GALLER JAMES F. LAMMERS Direct Dial: 351-2131 KEVIN K. SHOEBERG ROBERT G. BRIGGS THOMAS J.WEIDNER PAUL A.WOLFF July 30, 1996 SUSAN O.OLSON MARK J.VIERLING DAVID K.SNYDER The Home Insurance Company COpy 7600 France Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55435 Re : City of Oak Park Heights Insurance Policy No. : IST-8462807 (Policies 1977-1980) Insurance Policy No. : IST-8776170 (Policies 1980-1986) Dear Sir or Madame : Enclosed herewith please find a Summons and Complaint regarding Landfill Remediation Trust v. City of Oak Park Heights, et al . , Court File No. 96C-489-S. The City of Oak Park Heights hereby tenders the defense of this action to The Home Insurance Company under any policies issued by Home Insurance and requests that Home Insurance indemnify the City with respect to any claims made herein. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me . Sincerely, David K. Snyder DKS: sdb Enclosure cc: Mike Robertson, City Administrator (w/o enc) 110 LAW OFFICES OF ECKBERG, LAMMERS, BRIGGS, WOLFF & VIERLING, P.L.L.P. 1835 NORTHWESTERN AVENUE STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 35082 (612)439-2878 FAX(612)439-2923 LYLE J. ECKBERG GREGORY G. CALLER JAMES F. LAMMERS Direct Dial: 351-2131 KEVIN K.SHOEBERG ROBERT G. BRIGGS THOMAS J.WEIDNER PAUL A.WOLFF July 30, 1996 SUSAN O. OLSON MARK J.VIERLING DAVID K. SNYDER Auto-Owners Insurance P.O. Box 64358 St . Paul, Minnesota 55164-0358 PY Re : City of Oak Park Heights UVJ Policy No. : 852106-71978089 Dear Sir or Madame: Enclosed herewith please find a Summons and Complaint regarding Landfill Remediation Trust v. City of Oak Park Heights, et al . , Court File No. 96C-489-S . The City of Oak Park Heights hereby tenders the defense of this action to Auto-Owners Insurance under any policies issued by Auto-Owners Insurance and requests that Auto-Owners Insurance indemnify the City with respect to any claims made herein. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, David K. Snyder DKS :sdb Enclosure cc: Mike Robertson, City Administrator (w/o enc) ID S LAW OFFICES OF ECKBERG, LAMMERS, BRIGGS, WOLFF & VIERLING, P.L.L.P. 1835 NORTHWESTERN AVENUE STILLWATER,MINNESOTA 55062 (612)439-2878 FAX(612)439-2923 LYLE J. ECKBERG GREGORY G.GALLER JAMES F. LAMMERS Direct Dial: 351-2131 KEVIN K. SHOEBERG ROBERT G. BRIGGS THOMAS J.WEIONER PAUL A.WOLFF July 30, 1996 SUSAN O.OLSON MARK J.VIERLING DAVID K.SNYOER Copy The League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust c/o North Star Risk Services, Inc. 1401 West 76th Street, Suite 550 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55423 Re: City of Oak Park Heights Policy No. : MP821012R Policy No. : 0000273 Policy No. : MCM8541-8 Policy No. : UEL627-8 Policy No. : CMC-9426-B Policy No. : MEL822-9 Dear Sir or Madame : Enclosed herewith please find a Summons and Complaint regarding Landfill Remediation Trust v. City of Oak Park Heights, et al . , Court File No. 96C-489-S. The City of Oak Park Heights hereby tenders the defense of this action to The League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust under any policies issued by the League of Minnesota Cities and requests that the League indemnify the City with respect to any claims made herein. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, David K. Snyder DKS :sdb Enclosure cc : Mike Robertson, City Administrator (w/o enc) • 0 • • Y • tri • a • a •0 C.. • U • • E. • r• V."' . B • o C sdt • .n 0 0 .0 n o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o n o 0 0 0 0 .+ o • -.+ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .. 0 0 0 .0 o r o 0 • .0 L • LI 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 .. 0 • 3 ...10 0 .4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 b 0 0 0 0 0 s0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O 0 0 0 0 N O M F • Y M N N .-,IN N N N N N N N N N N N �0 N N N N N .1 N T. • L L N i? P N i? Yf N N N N N N N N U) 0 N N (? 4/1 N r-1 V) (a • a 14 th 01 V) 0. .i Z • 0 • U • r . • 0 F •• 0 0 0 0 0. 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 4. •-• ... . 4 • .0• I O O N 0 0 M O O O O O O O O O O O O N O O O O O .i b C • a10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 O ' d P U1 0 0 .5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O Q1 3 ... C • U N N 0N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P N Y .... <R N •"'. U) N N U) N N N Vf N N N NV N N N N N N V) [N Y • N L U) n 41 .. m o. O .. .. 4. a . V - • Y 01 U • a Y • W .0 .0 • 0 .. n m N P n 0% N n 10 M .r O. .11 P n N 01 01 P P 01 .i 01 0 .-1 a it • 0 P .0 Is 441 ti 10 .. 0 01 0 1!1 ... n M m N 0 Ifl 0 .I 10 M n .4 CO 0 .0 d • C• in N t0 0 10 0 .4 10 10 N O O- N O N 0 .4 0 0 0 P N O b b ...' 0 0 V> N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .. 0 0 0 0 0 .. 0 4 • V a0 0• •000000000 0 00000 %00000000 MI C • Y 0 �'--. N .O 0. h .+ --. Y • t L aJ • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N A '. 0 .-4 m 0 b 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F O m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 034 r✓✓/��� 0 .IC 3 • 0 ! T O% `C Os Os 0 O O 10 O 0• 0 U1 co 0 b P P n N 01 N 0 m .-. C • a. 0 m t0 O. in P U1 .1 01 M O N M '0 ti N 01 N 01!x;i-I in In N W co N r/'' 4. a 1+ • 03 E to V1 0 !''N IO N U7 N N to P 01 ,O t0. P O N m{.'N 3.0 co to CO N CO .i 0 F u 7 .7i N N co 110 co M co t0 N O. N -.'.I N M .-. U1 O!.i .. O N U1 .1 U L 0 • a 0 N N N1ry N N M s.. 01 'N .. I-- /.1 , td O. • C CCCL N }' '•� 7 a .' b L • 4 as a • � J F • I.•2 Y CO C O Y • c t1 J Iv •U J Z 1� u /~ l • 0 V' • t -� t i: --- _ _ O ... • r % {� Fd m m Z n 4 I J • j O Z - tew4 11 rn Z 47 y 1• Z GG m'. to 4 UIX mCO4NC '"' it m F4U . i Oi U. Z to Q -- v KI co M ZZ-. C w i. Q CO to T Oca 2 .ZO+ Z Z 4 4 O K O 1LU' .a.+ qt .• 1 v �� o o QQm E. a g m 4. iZ C . t U O y F F • C7 W lU+1 .7 E d C Z i� U CI a_ iOon t y Z h CO Z F •7 ..] a0 G. • N t.• f• .,� V • E "Z" V `�' V •C. O O• v1 3 Z Z 2 Z rr r... L u CO z z •• z 1- >. • N 0. CO M 4 F 0 .7 U c°n uOf ton ai >m CO CO E. O 4 O coV1 O ZZ 4m1 co �K X C 0 (4��1 4Qm1 4Q�1 t�a1 jC .0 0 V 1+ b ... d N M n 1 K1 R 4 R1 i' t 1 Z .i R G 1 4 1! 4 p O. U 41 T • • y i ...) ✓ e c � 0 a iN a 0 M I.1 m .. o M .4 in P U1 10 P n n n 4 C... 0. . O • C • P •. P P M 01 O T�t0 P M NN N .. b 10 N M Y �, N N/ N N N SO 10 .IN 10 N t0 P n n .. N t0 10 .. a• N' • • .1\ v' °Q. N • a • O) m GI •••GI • a • w M • tY • J4e 0 • yill U • t' • � • i • C. •• 4!f 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O 0 O 0 O 0 0 O 0+: O 00000 .Ci • •••.• t u O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O 0. O O O O O O Q • .+ m 0000000000000000 %000000000 • .. 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 e', 0 0 0 0 0 0 • s -.• U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .-I O 0: 0 0 0 0 0 0 1'• • d T• N N N N N N N N N Al N N N N N N N N N;N N N N N N• • M Y N f? N N H N N N N N N N N N N N N N 44)N. N N N N N • a s. O •• Cod vs f M • tL • Cj • U • ..• •• 0 g • O C O O 0 O O O O O O O 0 O O O 0 0 N O '040 O O O O O • ••. 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O f1 o O O O O O O O 4. • = U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O 0' O O O O O O L IS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 111 0 :0.' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • Z M' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0a O 0 0 0 0 0 C • U N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O N N} N N N N N N a L • L Y. N N N N N N 4/). N N N I& N N N N N PI N H N V) N N N H 01 •• N • a •• to co f 0 ., .. a • m - oZ Or • U 45 L. • V .1 1 .0 • 0 .4 O 0 0 P N N 0 O 0% N 01 N r. V 1'1 40 U1 NS§ N 0 0. 0% N P a 01 • 0 0 .0 .0 V V N CO 0% .. 0 O P .0 O in 4.0 P ..t m N .. to 0 .0 L . • N > .4 0 0 .4 0 0 0 0 N N 0 .. N N .0 1.11 N N(N 0 0 N 0 0 G • O. • C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 •• M y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c •^C• • a (O. f •'•. .1 1•1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 0 • 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 b O 0 0 O f1 O 0 0 N 11. 0 N 0 �7 '44 3 u N .D N v N N P P 0 0 N N0 0 m e'1 N 0 CO '0 Is N is N 0 C 0) 0 .. .. .0 en V 1'1 *I P 0 N 0. .0 0 44% f•. Cl CO .0 V N Is 0 N A L • 0 E N N N N 0 0 ..4N N V P N CO CO N CO V ':.. 0 O. O. P O. N tL L. 0/ • 0 .'. V in en V N .•• P P 0 01 10 1s. V 0 !'f N '0 0 1'. PI f9 U 1. O • f0 > "'1 N •. N .. .. 0. C. • C V . 01 • 0 . C C F 0 to • ••�. h r 1 • D \ •• a w • O • a • a m • .. • Il • C 0 0 . a• .. co _ U • 3 C4 CO Y F • U to •b. a u hi a. aq .. • `0 4 U ( U •CO m cn u O ae c07 • .3 2 0a. • 7 w .U.7 CO .M W .. 0) m N p • m CIC0 0q 0. V 4 w • E. •• I..• '-' • •U-• . 4 C W CO 6 4 a d 4 Ca F O. ' CO CA O U d 4. z • >' tY 5 > _ �y 4a. co m a a • CO CO m 14 tai. W O ( O 10 U •• E • 0. U W 1n • a ' F m U 4. 3 2 tta co (4 . C .... m (.. •• OG • 4I H M tq S U co C •41i .•. O 4 m m m - JI U ~ • o f • `� y o ~ o .�d z'�a ao H' LA• tL d • O a Y .+ til p� a • U ' F F O T W 4 • W 17 a. U 4 in tail O C u • E 4 4 4 U C vl ..7 F F F F 4 a T pl • • m r '. " .7 CC • 2 y KJ t.1 a V o X c a a a tpo; �� rY o o y u ). F • a F u0! Gs a� O W Jf 0 z 4 C >. >. 4. 4 14 2 Z Z • CCA 0. • S 0. Z ; • a ` m m •• CO m CO m m m m m m m m •• m m • 4. N • Y C u O . • A N P V N N 0 .. N n N P .. 0 fn i1n .0 0. .-I V .. 0 O a • 11. P 0 N r 0 0 • 0 N N 0 V P. N '4 � i 10 0 0. 10 O V y ' ,� O • V Y. n .O V P V N 1" !� N P .•. .. .. �(•I 14 V .O In tel 3 • • 1^ o • el 0. • • • 4] • 0 • M • a. • z • O • U • •• • .v E. • o C 4. • .n O O o o o• 0 0 0 10 O o 0 0 0 0 0 o O o a 0 0 0 cm a • -I.• t L O O O O O O O .1 O O O O O O O O O O N O O •O O O N O • 4.1 10 00000001150000000000 .400000 In • .4 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 0 0 ow 01 .•7 • 3 .... • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 O 4n - • 01 +. CINNNNNNONN N NNNNNNNCANNN N0 10 [-. a U .y N N VT N N VY .1 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N V/ Z • N 0 M • y CO .0 10 0 • U) 0 M z Q • U • r 0 •• 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 o o o 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 Oa. 10 • .. 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 000. 00 r9 01 M 14 • .0 L O 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .-1 m /0=C L• 10 O O O O O O O N N O O O O O O O 0 O O 0 O O O O 0 V t0 O. 000000ON 0000000000410000 N Vl C • U N N N N N N N a N N N N N N N N N N to N N N N 11 N r • Of -.1 . 441. N N N N N N N V) N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N L • Y L M 07 • 01 Y a a MCI. C4 o •.. N •0 Cu U • Z N ma O Ol L • U 1O u • w .0 • 0 .-. 0 .. N Uf U1 m M m Of CO a a m .. 0 O1 0 T 01 41 N a m a rl r0 r0 • 0 0 N .. .. N N 10 m MN 010 0 N m N N UI N 0 N 1n a 0 0 L .0 • L > N 0 0 40 m .41 1.1 a 0 0 .. 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 el 0 0 PI N .4 T F 10 • C r O O O O O O O .y O O O O O O O O O O .•1 O O O O .-1 O .-1 4 • U u 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 10 C * C1 0 CC .. a 8- -••1 6/ a M L L • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F U Ol •RI O 0 m 0 V1 0 0 0 .4 m 0 N 0 0 0 a CO r1 0 m 0 0 0 0 w1 3 • N NN N 10 10 0 V1 01 N 10 10 10 V1 N m 0 r•l a m N 0 10 O V. CO 10O C • L d - 0 .404040 .4 .4 .4 a N 10 .1 11 0 a 1.11 10 m 0 is 1.1 01 V1 N d N •0 S. • 01 E N 0 %0 r m CO 0 a m n m 0 N 00 N 01 F 10 N a 1n a V N Z f L 7 0 a .. MN 01 N 01 .4 a r•1 01 ..1 a N NN N 10 n .-1 N 01.1C.) Y O • A > N .1 .1 40 40 .. .. N a O1 0. C Y 05 • 0 C C • F 7 .0 • C+. •7 Y O l. • O • ..] L • 4 A • Y • C C 030 • O v m z • . 8 • • u F C Cy. r+ Q •• U a 00.. - 0 .. 2 • O _ _ • COO. .F .l m N aui • COw ca m O IC d1 • H 0] K p Z • .. O O •• W m 07 U 07 m K o 0 Ca N - Y o C to • t� co .+ 4 41 ..] ra Z • 14 � COau) co om • 4 mLD yamm � m(.. F ��... Z CL' M 4 O W x • .. 07 - 'Z 10 U • • U• m C-s i 0: m 4 O 0Fq; O 4 m 0 O F 0 CO c4 2 .4 C - a to a CO• t~u 6 m Com N !. O m 1 E O V • • y O m W ^ U K Gw •• m U x F z� 4 F5 z C : z > J Y O S O a=7 02 0 C7 w z • F y 4i O • y ?4 u 4 . E US 0 W F y F 4U • i7 to en .7 Ara pi O O1 .1 • 07 F S E C X V) Ca F i2L Y p2 pp Y Z N 2 . C CO4 W V V .a-1 C C ~ fyi7 rNi 0 Z C C Ca w 1Z-1 8 0 t O O. CV '0 • y .a .4 0 0 0 0 0 • z 0 0: 0: O c 08004008040404 . m m m m m m Ca m m m CI M 4.. N • X L z N •• C M ON A N N m N .... NO ./ m 01 r1 N N 1O m 0 0 a N 0. U N • 0: . V1 m .. .a. O N 0 N O V1 - U1 CO 01 m m N •• 10 0 0 .. O a 10 N r a .. N 1` N 40 N .o a U1 10 VI N 10 N .. CL' • • inj p . 0 \ n. mall ..1 \\....._,II- - .. o C t in 00 0 u1 0 0 0 0% 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 to O 0 0 0 0 4 ••••• 0 0 .-1 O O O N O n 0 000000000 N O• O O O O 0 ate.' 10 00 0 0 0 0 N 0 W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 M 0. 0 0 t0 0 0 0 til 0 .1 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 3 0 o N 0 0 0 .O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 .. a1 .U. N N 10 N N N N N 01 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 4. U N 4A• .+ VS N N N N N N 414. N VT N N N 0N N N N N N VI. VS Z 7 1.. N N 43 MI 0 4.0/10. .. G. Zz . ur 0 00 0 0 N 0 0 0 01t00 t0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 •" 0 0 0 N . 0 oto o p o 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O O 00 o F Cu L u O O N 0 0 0 p O .-1 0 O O O O O O O O 0 p O O O O O .CG . a O 0 N O O O .-1 O .. O O O O O O O O O O p O O O O O 0 'j O. O O n 0 0 O N O W1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C U N NI N N N O1 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N r7 �+ 14 -4 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N .1 1+ L [w CO a M Z 3 M O. CO 0 •-. H a C•• U z a1 -. um ai 1.. .0 .0 ON N 0 0 m 0 a Ul p N N O1 U1 N b N 0% 0% 0 p m N p +I t L > n O N O N N t0 N 01 N 0 V N N 00. 0. 00% e% m N N N N O N .. 0 N O 0 0 N 0 N O NO t 5O. C O O N O O N 0 .1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 00000 00 g 4 u a 1. .1 00 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 O m c 0) o 0 a F u L 0 0 0 0 0' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 U NIII MI .0 0 0 0 0 O 0000000% 00 000000 NO 0 W 2 co t0 N m t0 O p N N N ut N b m 0003 %0 ..4. 0 m p • ' V a m O .. .4 N N N 011100% 0 N Y1 b U1 N p N m U110 N 43 E 0 t0 N N Ot p p N N N O ONO N 'O N N p N N V. Z F aCs. le 7 7 U1 p p N .. .1 N N p t0 Ut N UI N p m V m .. m N /! i. 0 N .. UI N p N U 1. 0 .a > .-. .. .. .1 Y P. C C .) F CI Id :.. c N ca co O V Co., U V) `_ a _ V Q 0 4 u z5 a u F A O `. 0 -- c m F 20 y CV F. 0 1. - U F N Ua a 1 Cl) 4 '^ 4 d .4.1 ' E" 0 Cl) a Y m Z ..7�� U W O f.. U .. pJp W to 0 ra O m �' •` CV 00 F o s (4 0. > 4 ..7 _ f•-• .�7 N .7 4 0 .. Z qq t< — 0 0 lig Ollc' .s ��, 0 WW• Q U O U .s m z W (4 m aU m m d O 4 N Mq 0 ... D O 0 U 0 a Cp( N. m O O W H 0 � '� k, .,100 a0. U 0 0 H Y K y d F 0 W 00.. G,. ) 0 V 0 -�.;1 .`a Z 0 O 0 CV SS 0 .. : m K Sx 04 H - O 0: OW. 4 W v a E W Z z >q: W 0 0z F O cau - ZZ1 0 0N ZZ o 0 ' m °' • '" 13. 2 -,n, J. F F Y [ 4 4 LJ H f O 5 .. d a {qJY GW. yq4 yqN 0 ?1 Z a O. m m 11► m m CO y U CJ U U U U U � U s W - �► N 111 Y 0 A • p ,► O. 0 N 0 1 .. Vb. p N W N tO m m N t0 N N N .. N N m 1t1 N N p N N O1 N 0 N .. N U1 U1 N O O1 N V 0 N p� • N N N N m p p N N In N N p N .. .. N IZ 4 1 • i U7 O • 01 • 01 .. a • • • • Ca �' o • 1,,,C), C.. * z • o u • • • • r F • 0 C Cu • Uf 0 0 V 0 0 0 0 P 0 111 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (.4 O 0 faY • -+ 0 .I 0 0 0 0 to 0 r v 0 .1 .-I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 n O O • t u • C • Al 0 0 01000 0 NO 01 04 o ' of 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0. 0 0 • -1 0. 0 .-1 0 0 0 0 Cl 0 n IA 0 U1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 0 • 3• 0 0 r o 0 0 0 0 0 0. P 0 1h NO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P 0 0 • d -.. N O N N N N r N N 01 N n r N N N N N N N N N T N N • 4 u U) U) 4/t N N 1? 41) N UI n N UI 01 N 0 N N N N N N U) .-1 N N. • b 4 N P .4 Is N 0 • N 0. N V) N r1 • a. • o • U • ••• • o • 0 C 0 N 0 0 0 0 m 0 .0 N 0 .-1 P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • .4 0 O r 0 0 0 0 N 0 .1 1[1 O n .. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 F • -+ • C.. • .0 u o to O o o O N o 10 10 0 N U1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .1 0 0 .0.Z' • U b • 0 01 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r 0 0 O O1 • ; 0. 0 n 0 0 0 0 r 0 r .. 0 m r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1n 0 0 C • U N In N NN N N N .. .-I N Cl 0 Nr N N N N N N NN Net +1 • U -I N N N N N N h N N r N Uf .. N N N N U) N N U) N N U) U! L • 4 u N .1 V) In I-. U) • 10 4 N N • t a C• Li1 C. w O .. • a. a u • Z U -. • O al ♦1 C.) m 0 • U ... .0 .0 • 0 .4 0) n N N N N .-1 01 0 N 0 01 .. P P m .-1 .. CO N N CO N 10 10 • 0 N 01 0 01 N r Is n 10 Q1 10 N IA in N 10 n .. N O 1D P N N .0 • a1 > 0 .4 .4 N .-. 0 01 N 40 N N 0 N N 04 0 .4 .. 0 .4 10 N .. F 10 0. • c 0 r•1 0 0 0 0 0 o r o o .^I O1 0 0 0 0 0 0 o N o 0 K O • U .. . 4 • C) v 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O Ia C • 10 0 •4 C a. F -O. U • .. L L • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U U) • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U1 0 01 0 U1 U1 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 V0 0 0 T.. 10 10 • Q No O 10 1p Ot 10 N 0 P m P P 0. ON n 0 0 0 0 03 W W 3 • 01 • . O C • L U .-1 0 N 01 b In O. .-1 0 01 UI 01 r r .. 01 N O. 10 P N N 0 .. 10 4 • 01 E n 01 r .. n U1 n UI 0 10 .1 r O1 0. 01 .1 .1 .. In O N. 40 N 4. 4 U • Z 7 .. U1 P 0 r In 01 10 0 N N N U) 0 O In .0 01 .. U1 P .. Ill Z FI. 9 0 of .1 _ _ _ U 1. 0 • C > '• n .4 '" a 0 '' ,N. .4 .Z 111 • 7 N ^ C C • 7 .0 • • s4s[[ 7 4 C O I.. • 0 • • a 4 61 • 4 F. L • . z Z C • 41 U • • O 0 Cu • • .> Z • 7 C./ • .0 • • U • .0 .. u C F • = J Z 0 .. 0 • 01 • U F U 7 U •E C..1 8 .3 y • m Cl) U Ca 0 Ca 0 0 a a1 .i p7 u • • Z F .7 I u Z U d O CO u 0 Z O U to u u .. Z • C • • 0 • g - °s u �' z t- u u i a Cal a Z • •• y 01 U Up�� 1W CC cel0 Z U F O • C0 4 • U w • • CC4 Z 4 �y. F O .. Z ZO F. U = szo 01 U • Z .O] W 4 u E. O• of Z m V a W U F y as •• M 03 U 0 4 4 n. • .4 a.Z Q I.F. •• 7 0 � ' 5 •.. 4 • O 7 G Cl) .+ fa w • (1) O 6F. w O. a H O • y F > 7 t.7 U 7 4 Z U 4 tri .1 00 Ca 60 133 34 41 1.4.1 G. O 0 H F U 4 a 4 ••••• Cal u N 1 4 • z a • m q 0 cc M 0 x x u m F `�' ° Z o > H ay �1 m z • a v - - u` 1 u u s F 3 4 a o .-.J 0 0 0 0 0 0 c o U U U U U U u U u u u u u u 4 an • • y . 4 • N • C11 0 0 \ • 10 I N 0 10 • CO 0 .� P N n r 01 P r N n r m 0. C.1 r • 0: 1 10 0 U1 r - •.•I 0 • 1, 10 0 r P Cl N U1 n Is Cl UI 0 U 0 • 10 01 P N U) •• N N P r U1 n P U/ 0• r n N P 0: • • 1 . .• • 0 • y • p1 • b a • `LN C. ••W • O • H • W • Z • U • ••• OP • F • o C 4. • '0 0 o 0 o 0 o O o 0 N .+ 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'Ci • .0 u 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 s •.. 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 • ye e0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 •• . 0 N 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 b o • +. W O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N 0 1n O O o o N 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 • ) -. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 fa v) o .4 o 0 0 o F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • w • 4) N N N N N N N N F ep N V N N N N tD N N N N N N N N [Z. •• b 11. N N V) i? N N N 4) N N N N N eA N N N N N eh N N N K N W • C e0 O Cl) O. H Z • O U • •• • 0 • 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N H 0 N 0 0 0 0 C. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N .O O h 0 0 0 0 N O O 0 0 0 O 0 O F e-e a.) 0 0 0 N C. 0 .O 0 0 0 0 C. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 V' el O C. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G • 3 d 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 N 0 0 0 0 s 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C • C) N N N N N N N N n N N N N N N N e•1 N N N N N N N N 4) M N N N N L) N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N i? N N N N a.! L •• • 0) • e0 M Z J • N as W •_ • N e0 • m u • Z 41 O 0) u . , U q QV • ... .0 .0 • 0 .4e V• N p co N V• F 0 ? C. N O 0 WWWWW 0 N 0 0 h C\ 10 0 • 0 0 C. 0 0 V N e•1 F F co V• 0 N 0 N 0% r 0 0 .O a C\ O N IJ .0 • IJ > co e.1 N 0 O N O 0 N 0 C N 0 N 0 .1 0 N M O e l N 0 0 F Or.1 .- 0. • C C 0 0 0 0 O O 1 0 0 0 0 O O .4 O 0 O 0 O O 0 O . 6; .' 4• • U 16 4.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • a 0 O ea CC • • • 0. -. .. u u • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4) 0 • v. 0 0 0 o. 0 0 0 0 m Ill. 0 0 0 0 r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ZW 3 4.1P v N N h 0 N .D 0 V• V• en h .O N n h N .O V• 0 0 0 .. 0 C • u U V .O N .-1 0 .p N .4 N m WWWWW N 00 N N N V• C. e0 .O e0 1. • 0) E C. in v1 N O .4 F 0 CO .. P1 CO •• CD e•1 0 V• h en 0. .ti V• 0 F W 4 N • 7 7 N eD C. N N 0 .+ 0 T V• C. •• V• .i .O N C. V• N .O 0 V• N Z ' v .-1 U 4 O • 0 > N "1 1n N N N N .+ .r v a •• C x 10 • 0 C c • F 7 •3 • 4. •) 1.. • F • D b • w V • Z C • `� 0 0 •• •Z • U • • C \\•• U C • • p a0 U O U l m L• — W O q K G.N U Oz M U --O UN Z• V ° tg• i : fflih • _ GX W U 43 F. ° A _ a z • ZC7 U .o u �U • F - . 4 C • 7A eh U yZ o .i• C) UW . C WWXo4Y q • 401 a W ZaF • • N C H N !• C O 'CG. C CU 0 f7W Za 'C H v o. aoo a o a4CDai 43 4 CO 7W W 3 u• jy W .] N H W A . 0 W F 0 E O ) > XC0 Y O CC S W 4 H 01 C. 0 D o > > .4 • • Z O !. W Z Cx x x x x x x x X x x C11rN M M N M HHHNHM (.F Z 0 ° z ° ° ° zzy OU0 0 u u U u U U U 0VU UVU U U :J4 u U U U a uD 8 0)at. 1n • Y • ZZN • C14 N Q F • . a O. tN h N N O 0 • V• N 0 N h V 110 5' .4 1. N 5 0 0 411 N N 111 N N P 101 0 • 0 •N o W N 1 g' • a • z • O C 42 • • \ rI • W • 2 •• • e O •• • i • U • ' slqy' •• Uf 0 01000 O 0 0 0 0 0• O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O N 0 0 0 0 OS • .0 L O O O O O O O O O 010 O O O O O O O p O .-..mi co O O 0 • a1 A n O O O O O O O O O.. d 0 d O O O 00010011. 000 Q, 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 O O O O O 0 0 r1 0 N 01 0 0 0 • 3 -I • U 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 01 e4 0 0 0 1"1 • 41 -I UI N NNNNNN N N I N N N N N N N N P N O N N N N F • 14 I N N IA N IA IA 4) N of N§N N N N i? N N N IA N ..1 U1 N N N • CO M N I y N W • ..e A IA ,+ O • to d ., .r • W • 2 U •• •• • 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0- 0 o o 0 o O o 0 01 O N b O 0 0 F •• .+ 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cl 0 b .1 0 0 0 . 4• • .0 u 01 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0-O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O N U1 0 0 0 .0 • L 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0•}O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 tN O U1 N o 0 0 4' +� O. 01o O O O 0 0 0 0 0%0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cl 0 N 14 0 0 0 0 O1 • 3 -.1 C • U N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N p NNNN ^4 • 5) -.+ 01 N N N y} N N I? N V?�N N 0. N IA N N N IA N N N N N N - N ... CO • A fa N F .+ • t A Z .. • N c. W 0 .• : M A • 4. u • 2 W M • O A a1 • C.) A W • w .0 .0 • 0 .. O P N 0 10 matelots CO N UI Cl 01 N Cr. h b N 0 p p .I U Z • U 0 0 01 0 U1 01 .1 N. V 01 01$N p •• .I •• N 1p p W 01 10 N .I N > Cl 0 N 0 0 0 0 .-1 N N I 0 0 N 1.1 0 .4 0 0 P p 01 0 0 0 � • 0 a • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -. 0 0 0 0 0 .I 0 .r N 0 0 0 u• M 4 • 14 y N1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CIO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CI c : a O r - : N0.. 4 • • F IN U L • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U CO • 0 0 0 P 41 0 0 0 0 0;.P 0 40 • m O O m N p O O O p m 0 0 0 M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LA ; • yp 10 N p N 0 Cl .4I 0 0 01 O 0 0 • L W U1 O N UI n .I 0 N Cl 0 k 0i 0 p N t• 01 O. N UI 01 U1 N 01 O )I A la • W E t/1 v. p 14 U1 Cl UI m N 01 ,IN 1N o t• 01 N 0 N CO N 0) f4 ID b 0 2 .. u •4 O 3 P •• Cl N P N 1O N N „1 N P P N 0) N 0/ N O1 f.- ,4 .I oU Ir O • A > P .4 i1 .. N .4 p N b b en Y W • O 0 C • p� fFi •. 7 F g • y 6 \ • 0 L. • O • a ., . 4 A V • 5-. W • 2 C w W • O U • M • Z O U • LI • • 0• C N • a . wa inx • (j w c V) 43 W E a 4 • O w D: O C U y W z - ^ 8g C [. C 0 4 w m W : . V > "" 7 0 O co W w w a. • • .. Z C4 0 ce 8 a to 10-1 W tD O 4 C 0 m _ F U _ w 4 o y > b • U v i .c u a o o a z cn • qq zq aq q p • V) - 0. t11 .3 J _ F 0 U O a C I-, F yO 2 1F+• •• tail O Z .J.1 F 0 0 .2 K y r 0 - u0(�� .qc O O 4 14 w U • q • S N O .•I •v1 W > O 2 F K .0 S W H w o�G O 0 •• W 0 h ce 0 r, H U . w F F O 7a. 4 U a1 •• 01 N yl 0 CO y O N .7 xt� r] 01 .ar • 2 • m o to w U •c • pQ0 a FF F �> F a tZ ..3 04 1 a Z4 ca .- 3 W .C. N . to 0 >. • G a ••• a ) u O U U U 0 04 - 0 0 0. • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G CI O. U O UI • Y u 2 N • C 0 0 \ • A N .I 01 N UI O n N - p O. p N .1 N O 0 N W U N p: . N O 0 b Cl N N n N .I UI .4 0 b .1 b p .. 0) 0 • P n b p b UI N.1 N b b tN- b f4 UI . .I P .-• b r b O'. . ) • 0 u t" ., `\,. CD • L- C1 0 w• d C/ N 0. • t ♦ • 43 • ❑ • 4. Z a 2 O • V\ • • • Y 3 F • O C G. • • i[f O 0 o O `.O .4 o O O O O O O O O O 0 o o O co o to O O e.- g.0 • +•4• 0 0 O :O On 0 0 O 0 0 0 O o b O 0 O 0 O O O. F O 0 .O O .L. ro 0000 .40000000000000 •• 0. o 0 0 .o UI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '0 O COr O 0 CO 3 -+0 o 0 00 m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 o N N • V •4 N N N N V N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N CO F N N F [-. • 1. Y N N N 'N N N VT N N N N N N V) N N N Cl) N N N N N N N a a as w 8 N 0 • y G. N • W U 0 Y • 0 • O C 0 0 0 ?0 05 O 0 0 0 0 O O O O 0 0 O O O 0 0 F 0 0 IF • .. 0 O 0 0 0 UI 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 as E. • ..I c.. • t u o 0 0 0 01 00000000000000000% 0 0 01 •L• iti o 0 0 0 v1 b o O 0 o o O O o O 0 0 0 0 O 0 V 0 0 0 O p� •• 3 0. 0 0 0 ;0 v0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO C • Cl N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N PI N N 0 +. • y M N N N LQ N N N N V) V) N N N N N N N N N N N V) N N N aJ ♦ S. V ( N EN W • to M 2 3 • y CW. • CO • O .r • N q a Do 0 • Z N -. • O W ar • , U •o ar • w .0 .0 • 0 .•. N 0 0 PI N \0 s 0 a co N CO 0% P. UI N N 0 0 V) 0 Y0 • • Y• V .m. T d' 0\ V . V•0 . p1 m 0 .. 0 V• t0 O% F of .. PI 4-. 4 41 C 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 .4 0• 0 .Oi 0 0 n uu4•. 4 • U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 iY Y L O 10 CN 0 . • a. F u • N N L • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F U W •RI 0 0 o 0 co. 0 1f1 0 0 O m 0 0 0 N 0 0 CO 0 0 O. N tV 't4 ♦• 0V` m m m PI PI m Q .0 b CO SO V' F m F N Q' N N 0\ O C • . U 0 N CO 10 0 CO CO N CO CO V) N N UI PI F P1 f'. et m PI N 10 N • W E 05 m m PI PI .4 m UI 0 CO CO .-1 01 CO 0 Il 411. CD en U. 1. O1 • 7 O 0 m PI .-1 V' N V' N PI UI Ur N V• 0 N F p 2 F. L .•. O 0.) 1. O • .7 > N V• .-1 N F Or O. • C "' .x W • D C C • F 3 ra • (q.. ') w • C 0 .. O • 3 .J • ...:3- 1. U f2.1 6Ci • 0 0 0 N • O • @1 J. - U • 9 • ® Z t0 -p I • y• LIC K Z.. N • [w a in faa ' w E. E • .] O O I ! I1❑ U' uhf _ 4 Z O 8 • p Z .1 N 0 6 W Y )u.1 - 1-1 i .•+ 8 ❑ E ,§ E u• • U a 2 •♦ y Io U . U U _. g F O O O Ul p�p�� Cr ",u1 E ❑ a• el U U 0 4 a +J t8l1a g E. i•• Ztq4� , s❑O O J O 0 w .W] 41 4 .7 Z CI W C� ❑ is 1 O 33• i • • •• • O. •41A 4 • °a" • 2 <>Q .qs X X y Ca O far] EEOF..', Cl) .Zy K K 0 41 Z la 0 .• d .3 ; ? it U U f.7 y > G Ww 2 22 U ct 43 CO of m ci n m 0 as • 1 u • 0 \ • ICO 0 Pt • F ID PI N V• 'r N UI PI 0 N 0 PI .0 40 O 0. U F • a . F r • F .•1 F s N N .. N 01 F m F F N Pis 0 V 0 • "' F N . .0 F p F .O F V• V F PI 0 F V' OS UI F a • • ,.« ,......_) ,...., 4 .% c`d . ‘‘...-.1"\-.I 0. '? a d0 CrlJ .. n. • Z • �_ m • 0 Z • o U a I.a • y i • OO o o O O0 UI o O 00000 %00, 000000000 ga -+ • .0 L o 0 0 0 0 o m o 0 0 0 0 cos 01r- o 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 (.c .,,, G • 4.1 0.00 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 00 0 m o.} Os 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • a g o 0 0 0 05 0 0 0 0 0 0 g r o m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G •• 3 -.4 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m o" P o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -. • Si -•1 N N N N N N O N N N N N N N O. N;U1 N N N N N N N N F • L, 61 40 N N N 4/1. N ‘13 N N N N N IA N N N=44 40 40 N N N N V} N `Z • ,7 9.. Of. 1 0. 41 • .0 A 0 • N 0. 4. •• z I u • • •• • 0 • 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .. 0 I N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • .. 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 m Dar 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 '' • t u 0 0 0 0 0 O m 0 00 0 0 0 0 r 0 1 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • U A 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0. 0; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O ▪ 3 0. o 0 0 0 0 O P 0 0 0 0 0 0 o CO 010 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 C • U NNN N N N n N N N N N N N n N-.O N N N N N N N N .•a .0 • S. L 40 N N 40 UT N N N N N N N N N 40 N 1 N 40 40 t? N N N N N N f(.+. 01 4 10 2 .7 y 0.. O O .. • •• •0 • 4. u • Z w --I • 8 H ., • 10 71 • W • 0 .4 r .. .. N m 0 0 T 0 10 N .. IN .. N r p n .. O. .4 e'1 m .4 0. A A • 0 0/ N r m O O f'! m O n 01 O. 0 r 111 0 i.I O. N .4 m 0 N .0 m .I .0 • 1.JO. 0 N 0 0 0 N N 0 0 H UI .. .4 0 n p .. V O 0 n p 0 .4 .. F Q 0. • C 000000450000000 .4 O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' C C • U A • f+ u 0 O 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O m C • 71 0 O• • 0' F •C •• u • .0JJ • 0 0 0 0 0;- 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0'00 U 0/ • n 0 O 1n0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'I. •0 •0 • '0 r N r W 0.,. .-. N 01 O N N m p m O• N O O 10 O p N O p N 47 4) 3 u O C • N 7) b .. P p m':j 0 U1 r n m m UI N n N p N m .. N p r N .0 .O H 71 1.1 • N E .O N n CO n o r .O .. INN 0% 0 4'! N 0 m 0 0 0. m OM in m I+. 1. 71 • 0 .-0-. NUS n n Z F u p P p .o r m UI n n ON m n .4 r m .. NW Y m N V .. O. N .-1 .. U 0 0 C • > en Y 01 • M C C • F v •7 • Q. 7 9. 4. F- •• C1 V • O • •0 • 4 • a • C O U • m • Zo • u • •• W • N G _�� U 'Sy 0. C 0. . C CO W W U 0 a _ a �o H o o u C rn cn 0 • - Y 47 CO 3 47 - G1 .. 0 M M 4 E• Gp N . • K .Y7 y CCD C y N > m Ce. z •• ai yy - 'n m Z 7 4- m Z w 4 y 4 Z $ a .o u 0 U 4 43 W < 47 N • .TZO Np [oLf O IA a (4. .4 Z 4- 4. U K F ~ 3 i 47 F > 1" 5 C ~ S 0: N - ZN (A a + F Cu • '0 + 'a• Oa F 4 ra F O ►a. 0 0 a a F c0. 41 �! • 47 G. LL m •D = Z 2 O 0. N N 41 47 Oa. C vq' L 0 • 5) 0 0 0 O O Z �i m a s o m • ma .. • ?y m • • Z ..3 OF Z et cl) vU 0 "3a .3 o a u u m 4i Z • - �' 0. G • 0. O 47 41 41 47 41 47 47 . 47 41 4J Ca441 la 4CJ caE. 447 43 4. 4. 4. u w \ • Z N 1.1 • C • 1 c • or • C • 0 N n 0 \'N n N S•. P P N O P .0 m .. N 0. 0 • US N N 0 P m N n P1 r O. m O. 0. m .0 .0 N N LP N P r n P UI r • ill .0 .O .I .-• • n n C • t. V • S 0 O N v en .0 0. al UU O (...ZCI%) .r F 00 Cu '0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .+ 0 0 0 O 0 0 0a 0 0 00 0 g •.+ t .J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 o m 0 0 0 !0 0 O a+ 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .. 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 ,0 0 3 4 0000000000000000 .400 0 `0 .0 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m o 0 0 o p O r 0 0 o io 0 N ti --1 N N N N N N N N N N N N O1 N N N N N N N N N N 'N N F r0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N .-1 N N N (? N N 14 N N N :N 40 Z 0 1+ N N Ca . .0 0 N 0. Z . U r o OC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 M O 0 0 `0 0 - O O O O O O O O O O O O O O1 O O O O O O a O O O O O 4. L as 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '0000000 N 0 0 O ?0 -0 6 �+ 00 00 0000000000000000 %000 04 0 .0 0 C - 4 000000000000 U1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1n 0 0 0 3 0 0 O Q1 3 • C U N N N N N N N N N N N N r N N N N N N a N N N 'N N a .4 U a.! N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N U/ 4/5. p 3.4 . .0 N i :� CO` 0. 1 w i o m S ,N. 4a uN. j(( z8 u v 0! L O y W 4A 0 ... ON a m b a0 0 a. N N 04 .0 N 0 a .4 N n N r a a a O1 •1n m .5 .0 0 ao N (•1 as 50 O 0 .4 r r r .•1 r N 0 0 N N m O m m .+ i N r •a .0 L > 0000 .4000 .4 .40 .440 M O O N 0 N a0 0 .4 m `a 0 C _4 0 .-. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 .. 0 0 0 0 0 d U .0 L. f. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 R Z O i0 C 0 0 0 4 F • u c.+., 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U Ol 0 0 N r 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '0 m 0 0 {s'00 .0 A O O a0 N m 0 0 0 r 0 a 0 O a 0 0 a a O N a N V 1 0 (0 Cal .0) 3 U iS n O1 or a0 5o m N ao r a O1 5,r m r a a N OS 5r5 O .o.0 a. 0) E N r m 0 r .•. .o O .w N N m .i N Oa r r .O1 O1 .o Oa 4m a0 'Z F v 7 01 .-. a r m m ..1 U1 a N Oa m a ..1 m a im n o 60 .p > N .. r o N $.-1. MO. C "' V C C 114 C .) V p! F I p o ✓ L F v t / • 43 43 Z . O U a U C V m o m w of D. = 03 Z w ^ 4. Cu .a .Z-. U 44. 1 U O 0. to w U _ 4 4 F S 40 g''' N a m J 0 Z d C7 O - 0) UUil 0 0) u4 d M Z H faU7 H yY yY 0 . w O Z > z 4 O .Z.. O 4C�. 3.w7 vai N O (o U L. W y CO CO • CaCO w U qu O. ° 3U v �i tz ea .. 0. ,� ,,� Y w A Z X y : q N U O F Q a F CO 4 Z z Q ..a t+. N to ..] �C Y' U m F O U f+ <� �q '� o o w a 2 o : w N w z v� w g t 0 N M O v a w a Z `U tom+) '4 o f 4C1 U. U .0 a E z m m 0 4. Z Z • 4 m > Z w >• Cn fel !� .5 a - C < '.CO ..7 n. w Z >+ ••• H Z w J . CO y y CO CO S 4511 0 m a .FC .[to '. w a S y- - ..1 54 > Z C w w S o: a C • C 0 w X X d a w 0) v) d C�. • I c>; 0. G ..a 04 4. 4. 4. 4. G. 4. 4. : : : : : : : ° : 0N CON N N 4 . U r C . ' N a0 .o r .n .4 N m N N CO 0 O N (0 O1 1.1 N .. .0 0 .n NO a .1 r r r H1 a n N N r N NNMW 45 4.4 N N C 0 • ' C't;:' i 3 � al F a •• Cil • O 0 •• Z • V •• • r 4 • ..= O O N 000 O 0000000000 UO 0050000 0.' Q O O O O O 0 O O O O O O o p O 1'- O O O O 0 • u 4 0 b' o p o 0 0' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a\ o O b O o 0 • ••i 0. 0 0k o N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0) 0 r- 0 0 0 0 •• 3 U 0 1O 00000. 00 O, 00000000000 coo w�+ • di ..i N I•� - - i - - - Z N e N .1 N N N N N N N N N N N Na co N co N C1 N N N N . 4 L N M 4 H .-1 V) N N N N N N N N H N N N N N N N Vf N V) V> CO • C i64.41 0 • co c. 'Cr. z U • r • o • 0 C 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V. 0 N 0 0 0 0 • •i 0 0 0 0 a O 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 0 E-• • .0 u 0 0 0 r+ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o en 0 0 0 0 a� u• .10'. � .4 30 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ri 0 0 0 0 0 • 3 d 0 s 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .•1 0 UI 0 0 0 0 C • -4 N' NSCN INNN N N N N N N N N N N N rl N N N N NN ••4 • CO N V N N H N K N N N N N N VY N N N N N V) N N N VT N L ` M V .i 6) • co 4 Z a- • (11.0 ti1 CC. j W • O .r • 1. U • Cu U • Z 4 -1 • O 41 • .0 f .0 .0 • 0 .i V:r- .i 01 0 V 10 N 0 IA 1.11 eq N 01 p el el 10 r- 10 N r- 0 N .r e6 ro • 0 rl ! V 0 o rl O N 01 01 10 N O .r CO N N .41 0 0] p UI 01 N UI 41 .0L N p NAl> N,qq et .i 0 0 .i 0 0 0 0 0 .4 el .4 .i N N 0 0 0 E. O 0. . C .i0 OA 0 .i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .i O .i 0 0 00 Cu 4 < • U ro 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O A c u 0 i w �+ J al • 04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O Z eV ro • •O 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 00 Z 3 .j Vi* p N N N N 0 0 0 N N p p O 1O N N 0 0) 0 0a 0 C • .0 4) 01 r1 N U1 0 01 el .4 0f N 03 03 01 .4 V1 0 N p r- .1 N V. .i p .i .i as 4 5 01 E N Nm IA N 10 N p 0f .4 0 0 o1 T .i .4 .• N N 0 0 V 0 p Cu 14 61 • 7 7 10 .0 0 p N N rl 0) 01 el .1 mod UI 0 .4 0) CO N p .• N Z F .1 .r ++ - - U M Q • I. 0 t N •-• .• U1 UI .-1 61 0. C Y Y 61 • 0 C C 4- 7 rt; • d ' 1- • 4 ❑ 4 0 • a u • 4 ro • 4 • ), Z C 0 0 •Ea C - ❑ 0 Z • y - C •.) u u F • 1 E - _ U • 72 u C ED.. U 3 0 0 - U y g C • ota011 = z 0 G1 - U t9 S o 0 a C 00.' O U 0 F E U .. LI, C7 CU y CE Z.. vl W .¢ u .. • ❑ - E M a. .. t7 i Ca 0. DI F a .�. ) • UI" U O �(W.... 4 GO to OO • 0 • 0 O U a U _ y Cd 0 C7 ZW .+ Z • 0 a1 N F 0 O •Z• •-• Ca " M >• U th cg 4 C a • M Z g V ..4 y Cd R w 11 Z 'O b C..0 10 z `' • • z • u o 3 IX F t. •. 0 C a x v F Ca m a o z b - z m m 0: Z m .. F • ❑ ..a 0 Z C z C•-• CS O m O0 0 0 E. Z m >• F 4' • ❑ C N 343 Z O� to .1 C J H C .F. �. C 0 :s4 a 1. ' rn a •-• a v1 ., 0 • (1 a A ' m r m z C � m x Ca Z Z `A >. HE. m m 4 • Z 0 M' • 1A 0 F a m to € .i E. rn 1 •• • o: o; co m m a a o 0 o m m D. 3 D. • >. F • a a a 0 w .e .i 0 4 . 0. z • 0: .c �_ Ca 111 m m a M • o • 0 T Y Gt W 10 0 as • 0. 0 - U 0 0 C7 C7 0 '� t7 0A 00 t7 0 0 0 0 0 U O. IJ r .4 I t L. Z N C C . i 00 p at UI N • 10 .i 05 N OI T O. . U r- * C. t 01 0 N UI n 10 N 4I r- 1O 01 Uf NO .- U1 U7 r• 6/ 0 • N N N p .0 .i UI 4. 10 r- V1p 41 NOS m N p b 0: • M • N • Caa 01 • • a • O ` • G. • Z • • •• + • x F • o C G. • U1 0 O O wp O O O O O O O 0 O O 5 O O 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 O O 4Ci • -•I• t L 0 0 t0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 .4 0 .0 0 0 0 O • as as 0 0 l0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O' N 0 0 0 0 0. Y1 0 0 0 0 0 O. 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .1 0 0 0 0 0 P a 0 0 0 0 0 • 3 M 0 0 en 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P O O O O O CO O O O O O 1. • 01 .. N N N N N N N N N N N N N W N N N N N 1D:N N N N N • 1. .J N N .-I N N N N N N N N 4f N .. 40 N N N K N E N H N N i? • •0 1• N N 4/ 0 • y a. .. • G. • z • • d#( U • w • 0 • 0 c o 0 0l 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 ..?0 0 0 0 0 • .. 0 00 P O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 O O O O ..' O • O O O 0t . .0 L gg . • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 C1] 0 0 0 0 0 • •! a N 0 O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a1 0 0 0 0 0 I4 0 0 0 0 0 G. O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O .1 O O O O O 0 O O O O O 0 • U N N a. N N N N N N N N N N .0 N N N N N .0? N N Al N Al 4- • 07 +. N N N N N N N N N 4/1. N N N N N N N 410N N{ t? N N N N .. Y 4.4 w 0 . a 1. • E-• .. • L a i Z ...1...1 • Cl) G W • 0 • .. a • G. U • Z 8 d ..s •• 0 L • RI 41 • w .0 .0 • 0 .. CO CO r- co N N 0. at P N ID Al %0 N O N r 0 0 N0 0 t 0 COCf 1 ID 415 s • 0 0 .1 01 l0 V N N m 0 .D N P O P n n '.00 .4 PC O 400 .4 .4 Y S • .J > .. et 10 N 00 .40004- 00 N N N .. .1 .. N 3 .. N 0 .. 0 t F a C 0 .-. • C .r O. • 0 0 .. 0 0 o O 0 O O O O O N 0 0 0 0 0 N4 0 0 0 0 0 .. 4 •• U L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 O 0 0 0 0 O c -. • 0. F 0 O € w L • .. as as . 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0€ 0 0 0 0 0 F U 0 • 0 0 o O O Y1 o P P O O O O o 0 o 0 0 0 o o 04000 Z 0 3 • a 5 P P P .0 O P P O O O N N lD P C) P N O 04N P .. N V 0 0 • Y 0 O. N P 10 V N N N P 0 0 .. eD P CO N N O N Of O e•1 P r P H a Y • 0 E 0 CO el 1(1 y1 Ol N .4 el al a% P N O h P CO es 4.0 WI[ es N 0 N l0 2 F L 7 7 N P O. 10 P eel IN P N IA el N 0 40 N 5 t0 PP P N P N N U Y 0 • a > r Nye .4 N rO.d .-1 m 0 • 0 . X 0 • 7 0 C • 0 u. '77 F •• a • O Y • O • 4 a • Y • F • 2 0 C W 01 • O U • I • Z • - Z M U n • GF. • 0 W t 0 C7 Y FO-. E O• _ co N - V t•H M CO JJ y U 3 aeC ' F Z 5 vii CO•a 0 = QFi 5 ? a 1• 0 .. W g =5 q .E7 F FWF. y F �y 0' > Z .. .t m so U . E F to of 4 .. 5 x [ail Ca >6 ...S CO qF' 4-i •• E s •-• a W .-. 0 t41 O E >. ZZ" W F N ca y O .. Z G C O. q• V U O Z Ca 0 W O Z 0 R F G •• * h 0 Z > G. a 4 n F1. a U O • O U W 20 a O .,7 Cal V 0 h M 4p O 0 f7 Sy S. F.... F. L •` 104; 4 U CO y • a w O U >. >. CO 5 Z Z 2 4 2 F N 0. 2 O N N 0 -moi • 2 3 W F O W W W W W Z O >. .. .] .. .. >. Cd ... F.: •.a • O. ( _ 1111111 = 11tilli1311 � 11111O. o a v Iv L 0 N • c O 0 a at .. C) P .D 1. 5 .. CO m 0 CO 0 es. N O N N N N co Q. ' U 0 • 0 • N N 5 P .D N 0• 0 P V 0 N N W N al N IA 5 •N N T .. tel 0 P N .O H P C1 .-. 5 � .A 5 Ill r N N n .l P '•' P N P P lD 0 • Si • (,.... 0 !'� P1 . T 7 0 ~ • <' '-.) • • 0 a • • ((\ SIS ... C.)Z \• • • 41 r F • o C 4. • 0 0000000000000 0 000040/ N000000 4 •• L 0 .0 O • L0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 ;0 0 .. 0 .y 0 0 0 0 •.I O. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O. 0 .0 O P1 O N O 0 0 0 .] • 3 0000000000004100 0 0 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 - • 01 •.4 N N N N N N N N N N N N (M N N N N ',jN .( N co N N N N 3-. • a 1 VD N N N N 44) N N N N N N Os (n. N N N N .. VY m N t? (4 (0 CO • .0 q N N co0 • 0. H • Z •• 2 0 •• 1. • 0 • O C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0i0 T 0 V• 0 0 0 0 [� • .• O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0g� O 0,0 0 0 0 L1. • L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0#0 0 0 v. 0 0 0 0 L 10 000 O O O O O O O O O 0 O O Oi O O PI O m O O O O 0Cl .•• .44 d 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i 0'°0 UI O N o 0 0 0 C • U N N N NN VNY N N N NN NN NN N a• NN N NN N N eN N 7 1 NN VNF NN NN+. • Cl •4 110 M L NN Ol M 01 b N E - • (ten O. $ i O .+ • O q • Cu 0 • Z v • .0 .0 • 0 .. O N m UI n N 0 0 0 .0 01 0 m N N;.V' O N 0 p Ut N N b 10 0 * 0 e .. 01 A 0 0 04 0 0 0 W 0 % 0. 1.1.N"01 01 N N N 0 m 4 L t • L > N 0 0 0 .-1 N .•. .. .-1 .1 O 4 O O O=W .) ut O O N O .1 O �•• •9- • C O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O •-1 O N O O O O Cl. _ 'C • U .0• M L O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O iO O O O N O O O O 0 n0 • 0. E.O. . H L L • 000000000000 0 O 0•4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3-. U 01 • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .N 11 O 000A,00 n 0 0 0 0 0 N 3 • 0 N 0 COm 01 m N N 0• N 0 01 01 N 0-N 10 O' m f N 7 a. O C • L U N 0. is .4 n 01 0. .( 0 U1 N 0 O N 4--N .1 00- 01 0 0 N I 1-• 101. • 01 E N N m n O .. m n N 0. N n N .. UI 01 0. 0. N O P1 N .( (Y L L • 'J' 7 4401 U1 P1 m 0' 0 0 PI V' 01 N ...P CO P1 N m 10 8 . 0 • o > ~ P N, n v s. 0 O. • C - n Y 01 • 0 1 C C F 7 p Cl. h ). • \ • • 7 O w a I • • - .R. • Z C • . 61 Cl) • 0 r I 2 tu • 8 C I ' N p : $$ 4 V U = of • _ 1 2 sh. - 2 a ta O • Z O C N O .7 = F COOA ... Z ± O F F • Cr] t�+7 Glt O 41 F U • r E. . 0 CO 47 UI O U O 41 !=: G O TA [>o q"" JI 0. •• ,qi/ SE. .. 41 C 2 S al S Z �. U 2 - p F .S �- o. U G1 C U .. 4. 2 U O O O 3V .1 O .] 2 07 e7 0 •. yy .. S m w S -. `. y U ', 3-. •• Cl) .3 X 47 0 C Y > - h F .tl - it.) U Cl. • C 2 OG C O O U O 2 .t F > O O :7 2 !t7 a' •• G. 2 3 CO G. V •) X c' m N �m F m h al O O 9N tt++ 0 • d - Cl. - U) Y O X N - m O O iS L • E .7 .3 m 0 0 0 O >. 7 U G1 w :• m 0 Z #m# m V in • Z 4 4 .0 U - O d �' O Z jZ +. 4 Z G7 C. 'q^ G7 o F F O o 3 • S • O.CLI CO G7 .] F �Op �O D 1+ F •• O. S S w m m C7 Z t'. i F 8, F p '� y 0.1 .o • 0. S S S S • S Z O;S S S 2 " U O o. : "' > Il\ • 1 0 a. O Z : A .+ to 0 01 et n .4 w N m .. .r - M n a a m 0. 1.1 !.1 N O: . .0 m O O n n N .n M 0 p 0t - a .. O •� N n m 1 J .•1 U. V O • N e n n v N n ? P O 0 Q N W. .0 n .0 b n n 0 C Niit ' • )s r „i .--. . c .; a P • J p S.. D • v^ lk ' '....' ...,.... alcri • M •3 • CO • ‘.1,c 0 • ZZ • • O • U • • • r F • 0 C CI. • IA 0 0 0 o 0 o O O O to (0 0 PI 0 .-1 0 0 0 .4 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 •CCG' • 44 • L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F n O P O aro O 0 T N 0 0 0 r 0 0 0 • y.t RI 00000000 F 0 -0 N 0 F 0 0 0 N P 0 0 0 n 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ot N 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 N 10 0 0 0 N 0 0 4 3 +. U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 F 0 0J 0 0. 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 N O 0 • w. 4 U +. N CO N N N N N N P In N 0 N UI N N N r P N N N P N N (-. 4 M U 44 N N 44 N 44 44 N r. N 44 n 44 N N N N N .1 N 44 N UI N N • t0 M N N 44 .-1 w • .0 ro 44 N 0 • Cl) 0. M • G. z • • O • U • 0 • 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 h 0 Y1 0 n 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 to 0 0 t • .+ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 r O T 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 O 0 44 • L 00000000 N N O n 0 0 0 0 0 F 10 0 0 0 O 0 0 .� • L fa 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 P b 0 0 0 r 0 0 0 4 s O. O O O O O O O O CO N O O O n O O O O P O O O O O O C • U N N N N N Al N N IA NNISINNNNN n P NNNO N N L • L L N .A 4A N H Yl .A• N N N t? N N N N N N N P N 41) N .0 N N I. CO • ro w N N .A zz a II) o. co C1 r. • ro • C.. U Z CI +. 4 O 01 .I 4 U ro 0 a u. .0 .0 • 0 r. .-0 Ot I'. F N N IA 0 CO r .4 h Of N m F r. P CO Of 4.41 0 0. N ro roP OJ r1 n OJ 0 1-1 0 N h n F N O N O t0 10 0. CO P O O n .../ .0 • aJ > 0 0 O n O N n 0 F n CO N W 0 .-1 10 0 V .4 0 0 .-1 N 0 ( G 0. • C .r 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 P 0 0 0 O 0 r. 10 0 0 0 .4 0 0 ...I •4 • >Ui u 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .. 0 0 0 N 0 0 O 43 C H. • 0.0 F a o • - •C • 41 I. ..1 .J • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F U CO • 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O 1p UI 0 O O W "0 3 • L 10 NP. n .10 0. P 0 01 .00% P 10 0 0 P P 0 0 0 N P . M ID y 0 C • 4J 41 C• N 10 1•I P N CA N N IA P P .4 03 At 0 h 010 T F 0t N .4 ea L • 0 E m V IA N n P t0 n 0J w h r m N O PI 0 Fm n n .♦ 0 h O. Z F V • 0 nn ,.0 N P P10 0, 1A N NO P F 00 F UI o. 0 0 CO .•1 F O. N U L 0 ro 0 en en . n.4 o• i 0. N N .1 0J •+ r 3 at C C • F 0 ro • Cs. .* w • O >. O • a L It ro • .. Y • a V • •cS+J- W • th 4 • .4 Z a . • U - - H F. • to y H C ca. • CD_ CI h 4 y w U4. O W r+2 7: 4i o: ." a •• �s m o a1 �' a o '4 • v t 3 - y r .. W z = 0 • • N • u u u °w '� e a a o - oa: ° 'o a N o t. w 211 - p_ w o u P a I h 1 a ce o 10 U • ~ ((....' "' C lyy O 5 U 3 dl �j ,�j mW a. • m O U! 14 N CU' h A v7 2 0. S 0 - € .�-1 ,meq F • (ai .4 3W co YN Q pti 4tir CO 0 b Cl) (-. N U=A .UZ' O CO aJ CO ` 3�7 �3p1 • ",O Fi W W Z C :w O h WC 4 4 u d E �+• S a z Z,O O a 0: E F N Z F. Co .7 • o o o pD O o Z Z Z Z Z 'Z Z a CU U w . r 4 • Z • UT O oz O O ';O CC O W 2 0. U >..1.-. • tI► u7 f!1 N Cl) Cl) Y �W �W.. o ... • °• � ! I' q'AiliwIEUEillki .z. z-. .... v Cr Z N . Y a U • b .. 0J N d 0 0 n n IA P o. n .4 of 0 n t0 .. N N 0 d 0 • OG N N V 0 P O F 0 N N CO N N N N P P U1 1O m 10 0 P P N F n N N F t0 an N N n .. F P el ON 01 01 n 10 h 10 N UI C • • 0 • 0 on a CI to o. W 0 .. 4.Z O U r F o C i+. ,n OO O .•t o O a, 0 0 o O o N 0 0 0 0 o O O O O o 0 o O g4.1 0 0 r 0 0 V 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 t u 0 w a 0 0 m 0 b V 000000% 0000000000 0 0 0 0 ..7 3 U 00 V 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 "0 0 00 O .. V +. N N US N N N N N N N N 10 N N N N N N N N_'N N N N N F /a L N N .4 N 4l N N N N N 4) N N N N N N. N N 4Y N N N N Yl Z el 14 W .0 .0 N N 0 00. i 0. 4. z O U r O 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 !0 0 0 0 0 0 o o w o o '.400000 .400000000 ,00000 F -+ 0. i. u O O O O ow O O O O O N O O O 0 0 0 0 0 '0 O 0 O O Iai .. m O. 0 0 n 0 0 .40 0 0 0 0 v 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000 (900000 N 0000000000000 0 OS 3 -. C V N N .O N N N N N N N N .O N N N N N N N N 'N N N N N •4 d w N N N N N N N K N N N N N N N N N 4? N N`N N H N N L L 1... W a • .2 .0 a ca a. W 0 w a 11 Z m u • U a V .0 .0 .0 0 .. n N CI V -. .O n V n n .4 0 V N 0 n CO n O N V el N 0 N a m 0 N O. N 0 n CO N 10 .. 01 N0 0 .4 Nm .O N N n .. 41 N V 0 u .0 u > 0 0 .•. 0 0 N O V V1 N 0 Al ... 0 r. 0 0 0 '.40 .4 O N .1 0 0 UC ... O 0 N 00000000 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 g el 4 U u O O 0 O o O o O o o O O O o O o O O o O' O O O 0 0 -• C .C.. O.. EO- • $ t rt •M • x V 1 • %uU VO) 0 00 000 0OO' 000 NO.0 O0 D NnO NOo 0 00 000 10 00 V bOO 0.0 000 0 00 0 00 b00 0 V0 ;0O. 0 00 0 00 00 D nr1o :V W m V O C u V . O. N 01• O US 0 .. 0 .-I 0 N 0 T 0 V .O 0 O. V 4 t CO N 4 N '0 1 w AS w M E O V Of N V N V N 0 N n U1 0 10 0 145 N V .O 'N".47 V .O 01 N 0.. F 4. +•� ..0.. ^• V MI .-1 .O n .4 V n n N V N .. n N N i.. V NO V U II > 04 n N N .. .. .. .+ 43 i G O J N iL 1 Z I 1 V 7 co U V I 41F 'iia 1 4 • a U of 0 Wh' ► O O •• COWh CW E a �. 4 4. '_ 1• U N Z g m Z h hX Z O O S w0-. OhhUO4 :2D 17 m 7 O a O '"' W 0• F s O T h --- T O F Ca. CO -. 4 U O . W 5 U `. N > G O 0 WKh e V11ps •., 4 > T h r. ou, C 2WO U > O T 7 $ F C h '7 VtF > .-. VI to F a W W O .. to O [r qa� p F Cel W •• C h C C h r 4 F G'N h W Z 4 2 4 .a >. Z ... � UI j W 10 m. O O 4 F >. v -O a 7 ~ 43 0 C • .L O L Z .Z+ U' 44 ucc Q x h- C 4 4 O z 0 co O V 7 S V)i F to O +• E y try y F .0 ce [Or] •• 4 •OZ Z Z Z Z Z 01 4C 2 i T ' 1L iXG ^4 61.. >.- a, (7 CO C '7 4 h W - US COevi CoccO vyi S+ F G O 3 C7 '' 7 z1 5 OT. 01 e h '] I• h �a W ►+ nn .�. .-. O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O G u, r7 h "• ' n h '9 h h 47 h '7 '- - h h h h h .. V .. is. US .4 w Z N C 0 - a N 0 N n If I71 .. N O .0 .. N .O N 0 1O .1 0 0 V O. • U N C . N N an US N • n n N V .. N V V 01 ' V N 0 N co US d 0 40 V N Vi US ' N 12 U1 V N n 10 IA US .O N Ui N n N C 0 411 to0 a o ! w Z u O. E. 0 C n tU, In 0 0 0 0 '.0 0 0'. rI O 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 ;o -.. - U O m O N O .1 U1 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 t` 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 :.0'`i 4 U a 0 1n O . 0 .4 I'4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 0 0 1n 0 0 0 0 0 0� s .. 0. 0 0. 0 0 I.1 r1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3' m 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 .0 i v 0 m . , 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a 0 0 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 . ;01 . U o .D o �+ 3 M N V N CO N 111 b N N N N N N N .0 N N N N N N N N N Ni p L U N N N .4 N N V' H N N N N N H N N N N ..1 N N N N IA,SA a L IA SA= y 3 .0 w N w O tJ a. O 0 C O .4 0 N 0 0. o.f 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 Cl 0 O 0 0 0 0 F "• 0 O O O .4 O n 1n O o 0 0 0 0 0 V o 0 0 10 0 O O 0 O 0 Cu x U0 030 .403' 80000010000 tr 0 0 0 0 0 .co: U a 030 N O N .0 00 0 0 0 0 0 N O 0 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 :04 0 01 3 .• 0 .0 0 .. 0 .. 0'. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 fa 0 O 0 m 0 0 0 0 O O 1 C U N N N I' N N N. N N N N N N N N N N N 40 N N N N N N r.� --. 4) -^1 N 1? N l? N N .i`'N VT IA th N N N M N N N41).SA 1h N V! 1A .N U L U y1 co .] to 0. . 1V a yp1 Z d •••• R 8 W U a L w Si .0 0 .-1 O W In .4 111 N Is i r1 CO 0 N 1n 0 m N o N IA V o N 0% rf n •4 a a 0 'S .4 U1 N 1n U1 .i .0 O .. 0 .4 O V m N rf m N N N N 0 .0 N ' U .0 +.1 > 0 Cl .4 1n 0 t` r1'0 .i 0 0 N N N m N O 0 V N .4 0 0 .4 0 t G _O. C .H O 0 0 N 0 0 ,010 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 010 C _ 4 U a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 3 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O C 0 L U i 0 a .0 d 0 a 1.3 0 o. E. -. u • 1ti U •.. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;0 00000000000000030 ' t01MI O O O O 0 O O'm O O O O O O O O O O O in V r1 3 O'�V _ ` m .0 m 0 0 . N m. N tN 0 0 N m V 0% m 0 .0 0 V V .o r1 V i in co 0O a L A 61 .4 N t" V m O .o• N m 03 V N m U1 a. .D V V40 a. Nin .1 IA N E a. ..a1 m .• m 1n V .0;0% 0 V r1 0 r1 V .D in UI rt UI m V a1•0 w L U 7 U N r. Is N 1n U1 j N 1n 0 Cl 4.0 .1 .0 .4 r1 N N CO .4 I'1 UI .. Z F U T 0 la U L 0 0 0 V - r1 a1 ; .-1 V N .-1 .i O C3. C Al p .1 S Y a1 = ➢ S C C 4w - L . 5 la \ if CI L ...1 J I 4 a L Zu W v 0V U < 9 4 w E o m e u h r 1 43.3 .• _ U • U F a p� U .Ci w % , co 4 Y r C U U O O V .� 01 V W w u ' W to ' ..a z m Z . Z Y ?. W Z Oq 6..e' W O. Z W U X _ Z U -.. 0 ..I CO O 4. w3 - (57(a7Z ' W F 0 r- 4. Y Y w E.7 Y. tE�� Y C F. i ..7 U. co - 10 ' U Z ..7 [.. Z 1 U Y �- 43 w X [[.+ F Z Z 0• U _5 re 3yCf) U O H O 4W7 F U 1ti ► Y W -' ,Z .0 U z os ^a a S a .U• 4 I • j F Y i.C Z O' 0 0 N CI 4 Y F �'V '' F Z U 'g W z0z qq 0. C C - G. Z 6' L7 W -C E. 43 re [4. •-. Z U� ^i4 U Cl. N '4 QW O 4 4 Z w M co a.. r7 co 6WI = W 1 cc wq C.1 rl > O �7"� ga '• d • S£2 Z 0 .• E• 0 0i O:w W .-. x x 0 E G �J m to 4w. • .] O o. WZ E X X >+ 4 .3 3 .a 'O t 4.3 Z y u, N 0.= w � E. 0 • U a z 4 a ;U U s . -0 cn 1... - W W 0. C4 Z .+ W W N .7 .7 C OC W 0 CO i 3 SI F aa 4 qq 2J J Z Z Z Z Z' 3 til 1 'Z 0.ff G m 0. Z Z O O O � qq W W W W W W 1++55141 W 47 W .. 1-1 U 7 •7 7 .J 7 9 Y X Y X Y X 2 X X 9 Y Y X Y 'Y U. 3 y U O N CL 0 ., U N ix . U1 0 0 V O. .1 .. a. o 0 N m .D .o rµ m .0 .0 m 0 '44 04 N .• r -4 a N 0 n N Cl O I'S .1 V V .. .o N „1 N N 0 7 m L O q .1 m V W ... n V t` N r1 r1 .1 .4 U! IA =V N M .0 1n V V co 1 o 0 • IN- 1 \ • ^ N • y> d • . • y .. • J a . � a W p • 4 Z L O • U F. 4. • al Q 000000000 M 0000 M 00000000% O U1 , ,S Mc.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'O O 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 .0 U1 0 e4 ". C • L .. CI • u .0 000000000 N o 0 0 0 .. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'n o 0' a • -. o. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a • 3 V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 m .• • 14 w N N NNN• N N N N n NN N N n N N N N N N N .. N n • .,� Z • L. N UY N N N N N N N N H N N N N N N N N N .? N N h 4A i. / N a • U1 a • pZ • , U . +r • o F • 0 c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m o 0 0 o N 0 0 0 0 0 0 o .. O n .. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1n 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M 4. • L u 000000 0 0 0 en0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N Or. , ad • u m • O O O O O O O O O n 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 , CI, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o N o .4 C • U N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M N N N N N N N 0% N M Z .3 •u • 0) 1.1 H N U) N N U) N N N N N U) N N N N N 40 N N N N N N V) • eY.. 6f • R14 • U) 0`. { Cu • ..+ . ) �. 1 C.. U . z N - m u .0 .0 • W ' `}` u O 0 n N 0, 0 Ut 0 0 a 0 .. .4 N e•r .. n N 0 0 n er Ut 00 N O, a C L a u > 0 0 0 N .4 0 .4 0 .. O N .400 .40 VI O .-1 0 0 0 0 .4 0 , 0 �• . v .. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .. 0 0 0 0 .. 0 0 0 O o 0 O N o .. • g en 4 • U• CI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m ev Q t c 1-. • a F 21 0 `•. u 4.) • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O U 61 • 0 0, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U1 0 0 0 0 0 , 16 a • ..00) ' M er 0] ' 0 0 N 0 0) 0) 0, ,0 N ,0 0 aJ N 0 .. ,O. 0 N 0 j Cu 'O1 Z • v SS en 16 L. • 07 E er 0 M Ui 0 N 01 0 n N O1 n M N er .n er a' 0 0 e 0, O, 0 0 , Q Z (•. L M .4 44O, n ! N V r 01 01 N 0 CO N 01 N N N W O, ...- U '. C. • 0 > v N IA N .M. N 3 Y 01 • Z E C C • F O •1 • i G. •7 1. • 1 F • k O F. • u k • T y • r Z • C Y O 1 x F Z v • Y Z W U A ta 1-Ci N M W r 01 w •.• • Y a ,.., U Y a0Oq d 1Z-. O E+ iy X F r. E•. i. to W • [s7 az .7 w Y 0a' O 0 OC'`. F W .W7 ?. Z 43 10 Y 0 4. • C C'3 DI 43 Z Z Y ,.7 2 Ga h .7 d.4a �W C 4 y ,~,7 H Y X O 0 to F O N O M a 41 0 Z �.i `,Cu a .7 '.K�7S. u. ..r77 5} F U y f a c� pp pp 'Ty BOG �.. g O a G': C7 1 a x # 0% U • D � -a Z S C C 0 Y c) w .] �F 1 } Oc, W aLC ' N < a.-. I.} or •• _ • O W 61 F W Z O W J W to .W7 U F! F a4G' La OF Cl) 0 .W. 'N O.. a. : J �] Z W > O C U 4 U W O O po S" 2 'S P. F .G7 ?0; WS' V _ U aCa M O F F S O s O Z J G EF u 0 • .0 03 CC [CO C.. q0 CI .. n X .4 a: a ..j Y ' Z O W Z! .0 •.� • m .7 Cu Cui t e: 2 Z Z 0. E S • Z - 4 4 W# cu W to C. Z '. .p' 'a • Z W Z U W F U O O ..3 Z i 11 ,of T 4 .. • d Z W W Z q� .yr Z Z Y• 3• F O W AWE ,W¢ rW� 56447 .Cu Cu aW Cu •WC! >. • ]a�+ Ca Oqa� Oqa O O of O '� Y/ .3 .7 ..7 .�7 .7 .i .] .7 ..7 U • W ,o • • a. "' a .7 O X Y Y X Y a .7 J X Y Y fa. U1 • Y 1 ' U Z N • C 1 1. O N ,0 P N ,0 O, V' .. en N V er N .. N ve .S M r• M Q0. V N : 1Y . n n n U1 M N U1 0 0) 0 U1 N M M,,0 1n`. N 0:. .O n .4 N v 0 111 ,0 @ M n P ,0 v .. N er .. n 0, N ..,M': ,O ,0 U1 M {•1 O, p'. • i • 4 1 1 , ..... { J ,• 1 ..., r_..... ., C 01i 1 3 m , C 1 r� O .4 • ti It 01 •• --,- it c----_......,.. • w Q ••o •• u • f+. +• '01 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O NO 01. n 0 0 01 0 0 , 0 U1 0 0 0 0 0 0 OaGi • ..•1 0 0' 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 O .. 0 0 0 0 0 N o m 0 0 .0 0 0 0 • t 4J Q * .4 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. m 0 0 0, 0 0 m 0 .4 o 0 O 0 O 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O O. .-1 0 0. 0: 0 0 01 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 U• 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 O+ n 0 0 0• 0 0 101 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 I. + U •ti N N N N N N N r1 N N'. 01 N N N N N m N 01 N Al N N N Al [S.. • 11 .1.1 0 0. N CO V 4 CO N r1 N 4,p N N N 40. N N P1 N N N N N N VT N E •• .0 A H N Q • N 0. H • 1 I z u •• .. ) O • 0 C 00000004.00 O' N 0 0 0 0 0 .•• O I.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 F • .. -0 0 O O O O O 0 .4 O O^ 111 0 0 O; 0 0 11 0 N0 0 0 0 0 0 4. • .0 .0 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 10 O 001 0 0 0. 0 0 00 0 IF 0 0 0 0 0 0 aJ A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0:, N 0 0 0- 0 0 N 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 .4 O. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 YN 1 0 0) .0 0 0 0`. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q 01 • 3 „4 C • U N N N N N N N 0. N CO P1 N N N' N N IA N r1 N N N N N N a • 10 N N N N N N N N N N. N K N /0. N N •4 H N K N 4n N 1? N .Q u • L. u 1 N H 0 • F , ..0a Z a • U) O. 1 COI Q .. w 111 • 4. U Z N p 45 al • U A d • W 10 A • O .-4 a P. V' O 0• V• 1n .1 a V. A. ..4 a 0.4 0 .4 r•1 0 CO 40 P1 0. n 0 •• N. .-. N a v. 0 Co N a h N O.'. 0 N 0 0 0 0% 4 0 V• U. L L • C '> .•. 0 0 N .•. 0 0 .4 el.0 O t N N 0 .•.^ 0 0 N O 4.4 .•. O .-1 O N N F q _O. • y O O O O O O O .1 O O .•1 O O OE. O O 141 O .. O O O O O O 4�G• .0 • U N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C w •• d O 3 F • -04 •u • d •+ u u • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Oc 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F U A • IA 0 0 0 0 m N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 r 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 Z 01 3 • 0 41 to V• N T m b CO V N V• 01 N; p 0 N CO 0 .•. 0 a .0 N 0 I 43 140 C • N 0/ 0 .4 0) N .4 0. N h 0 N •• a h N N N N V 0 O. 0 r• 40 r` 0 15 L • 01 E O V• P1 .0 N b .4 0.1 b 7 10 01 O I•e e•. 111 IT 1.1 N 0 .O 1.1 U1 r` .4 0 Z F L • -. .0 N m a N 0. .1 V° a f. a a .4 ON 40 .. Y1 V .0 .-1 10 N U %.4 C • A 0 .1 •+ 1. .i • 1n v 10 .i m a •• C ? `") x 0 . p C C • I . (4. •-3 4.. •• ' Q L • G) O •• It . 1. 1. i Z C • 1 n w v • 1•, c • z • m Vn E• U = C• 7 wt • . • s.:,., 07 4 4. r O l' .. .] , 01 - � wQF • o !`✓ Za • 0 . Z O u qce t. aZ ;w CO . pp a1� .< H o f O St.' `C ..3 aDa D. 14 - J w• tZA 0 U 4 3 S 2 a Q '- w' CO+ 3 F - F o • Q J u tn ? u Z Z a m a u S a. z Z o Z CO _ U • w w - Z 4. Z w F 0 O x s U a qNq Cd U CO Q a Ct COO w E. U .7 3pp O N C U O S f0 .a•+ • 4r.. Y m 44 K G y Z 4 3 0: .4 a ..7 O 7Q� N S 'u Qx tF. • p p z i. .ai O N Q 4 U " 5 , v N 4 0 ; Q F • o w 6 w m a - a c o m • c� a a oc x x F Z F w a I .Z .4 CO (q 2 0 .+ 0 • N w to w T 1n n to CA w U w ... •C O Z V1 !•4 CO t 4 • Z z Z y z a Z .3 J LI Z o a a - ..3 (44 '' cc cc ,a cC • 03 .' O CO 0 w >. • a w0v (4 >. ..3 a w yz 0 x•, a ' m• U 1+0 .• WU1gyOwa spa5 Z 5 aZ a w Fa aa aaS Ow, a C.) O \ • u W .n Z N C 0 O \ 0:• A t0 .O n C .4 a a .•1 1A r M N 0 n s n O 01 , V r` • . r- N %0) 0 .1 .0 03 1.-. N a w .0 a 0 0) 0 .r N paha .r . 0) 0 • n U1 .-1 N N N V . N 0 .4 0 N N .0 ir` N r V'N •• 11 n N d N M • • as q .+ • d • to • q a D -\ a D +• ti M tL • .Z. • U • • z F • o C I:. C.. • Ai 0 o 0 0 0. 0 n '-0000000000 N N 0 0 U) 0 0 0 0 K • L � 0 0 0 0 O Q 0 UN 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 0 N .4 •0 0 0• 0 0 0 0 OC C • L 10 0 0 0 -0,0 O, 10 e 0 e 0 0 -0 0 0 0 .n m 0 0 0 0 O O 0 • M t], 0 0 0 01 O N 10 nN O 0 0 0 0 0 O O .1 UrN4 '.a O O N O O O O OOO OUO O O O• ; M • U M. • W •.i N N N N s N N m U1 N .4 N N N N N N '0 .1 -N N UI N N N N [r • W 4. - N N 1? 'N'N .4 N N N N //f N N N N N r1 .ti N N N n N N N W • . b t K N N p • td 0. k N • o C o 0 0 0 0 O, CO 10 O a 0 o 0 0 0 0 o m o o e 0 0 0 0 F •• .+ O 0 0 0 �:o ::o n .. n O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0, m 0 0 ,O 0 0 0 0 Ce. • t u 0 0 0 ;O f 0 n CO m 0 et. 0 0 0 0 0 0 .1 n -•O 0 .• 0 0 0 0 • CR + 4.1 ,Q 0 0 0 `O i O 0 y cps e Ui N 0 a• O 0 O O O O n its O 0 N 0 O O 0 •.4 O.. O O O 0 , N e O 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' n L 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 U1 •• ) •., C • U N N N N N U! n N N m N N N N N N 10 el. 'N N N N N N N r • y - N N N ,N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 1Q 140 N N N V} N N 44 • 1+ u m 0, 11 1, .1 . RI a • td• 0. .. CA 0 0 • q • Z 0! .1.1 cs • '71 O m a' a 71 U 3 10 d • w .0 .0 • 0 .-1 N e 10 ye* n 0 N n m A .1 .1 m m e .1 .1 0',N 10 .1 ut n O, m 01 '5 • JJ > n n N •,moi 0 m e U1 1• U/ 0, .1 .4 0so U1 n 0 , 4.1 0 0• n .i N 0 ;N e e .1 m .1 01 0 .1 .1 N N O N N'0 N n .y e e O G .0. • C• 41 ^ O 0 0 t 07l O N .y 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 N .+'?.O O 0c0 0 00 D. • U a o 0 0 °o4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o1iy' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,Cr . off.F0 � h • 0 . • +1 U .�•, u .A • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 0P 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 CO 0 0 0 0:. ../ 0 0 0 0 0 N 10 A • 'O .• CO O 10' e e 0 e O O .+ N U1 N • N N m f4 N m O e m No 1.7 .co 3 • L 00 • N 4/ 0, 0 e 5.-' e 0 e O N O, 0, N U1 IA10 U1 0, 01' n e 0 .+ a O, .+ F. 10 U1 N-0U CO 10 1.11 on n N N N N t• 0 m 10 U1., N 10 O N n 0 e G. L L • 7 7 o r m .1R m n n O, m m e UI U1 0, 01 N U1 .11 01 N CO 0, 0 C./ 44 L O • C15 > ^ ^ •w .+ .1 U1 n n 0 P 1.n 4 N .0 Ol • p C C • 0. 7 V • i ' 2 F • CZ). e al • 14•. 1a. ' 7 6 f Z C • ` F G CP • ' • 4 i t.`4-\ 1 1 . U CA • C + r .. m • 4 • Z 1F W 4 �. U V ., p m • g. i - u, X - f•-• 1 .F. F3' . i 4. • - d :1' w Vl - W 14• •O' i E •• 7' O E •� © I-* F • [. .e1 a v Z z V� - ,d i N.1 2 2 m m m '! z ' V 0 t m a •• •-• -- a F u a .+ F m O o .+ • 4 ZO I i 111 o. 4 0 •• m F .3 td > I• CC .3 o: • td C 0. > cq� 1. .. /zz > S L7 I. F W • to• EI til z •a W U C 0 > + C F • N U g . C 4 F ~ H U y d C _ E" N Z C7 C1 • A 0O.. h CO 0 ti 41 VI r[ 0. > ts CA. U u Z-1 al c • •� Z .0 Ja ltd. .J] . @ w0C CJ• 34 O `� 0 .0 • Z U ca z F .�] H tFal Z H to .7 I R C7 O G�7 • 4. 1n • yZ N • CO m n m 0. Ut a• NN e ! 1! ! ! l.1 a . O O, a U1 m 0, aN .•1 m .. n .0e n K `',l 1 • • . 3 ) r\c . 3 Nr- C • I N • a// d O1 0 • Q V H Z • i. • • • r► F • O C '. W • U) 0 0 0 0 h 0 10+, 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0) ' 0 0 U1 0 0 • a .r 0 0 0 tn o :;o o o m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 .'.. o •o o. p o, p •• a.1 of o 0 0 a 0 ..0 j 0 o n o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o;i N 0 0 .1 0 0 • •. 0. 0 0 0 .. 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 01 - 0 0 N O 0 r� • 3 ... 0 0 0 fN 0 :0 0 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0,`4N . 0 0 0. 0 0 H • 01 M N N N U) Al N N N 10 N N N N N N N Al':;Is N N h N N • 14 Y U) N Or . In;N N N f? N U) an N N N N N r•0% N N .+ U) N S • 0 n N N 0 • ' )CO. eN •z U • +' • 0 • O C 000 .40000 @ 1y10 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 • .1 0 0 0 0 03 0 0.0 0 Uf 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 CO 0 0 ..y •• L 1.1 0 0 0 O O -O f O O b 0 0 0 O O O O O)N 0 0 111 0 0 • J .0 • +. G 0 0 0 N 0 '0 0 0 0) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 O O CO O O O O O .. 0 .0,0 0 p O O O O O O O O S h 0 0 h 0 0 0 0) . 2 .44 C • U N N N 10 N N N N N N N N N N N N NIP N N V N N .1. • 01 •.1 L • 1~ L N YN In (0-11) 0) ) U) V) N K 01N N N U) U) 41) U) w 01 • 40 1. y . a • 03 0 Cl) • ; . O .. • M A 4. U • Z 01 .141 1 U II 01 • W _ .0 • 0 •• U) .r h Al n ;N 0 m p .r .I 0 U) n 01 h II 103 h 0-N h 10 N n0) .0 • 0 N 0 V) UI 0 ;UI N 0 h 10 III aD N 0 n 0) N 0 N UI h Ifl 0) 0\ 0 L .0 • .I > 0 0 0 .. N ,0'0 0 m 0 0 n .. U/ 0 0 \0 V• 0 n 0 0 n .1 .1FQ O. .• 0000NO1000000000000000-'.0 0 N 0 0 4• ^ 1� • C) L00000.03000000o00001n 0 111 0 0 0 0 0 p C ... O 0 .. E.. u • 1.1 a) •1 : 0 0 0 0 0 '0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U) 0 1n 0 0 0 0 0 F U 0 • 0 0 0 0 O ;h 310 .r 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 -0 01 0 0 0 47 0 3 : e O co O V _102 p p o n 0) 10 N ea O 0) aa O O O 01 N CO N m 0.1 O C • L 01 .. U) a CO 10 1011 10 00 b co 01 N h O 0 01 N.-V• 0 0 0 0 .4 .4 1.4 to 1. • Q E N .-. U) 0) ;at,: 01 n 0D 0) n 0 W 01 N 0 0• 0) h .1 h UI 0 0) `44 14 4' 0 2 F L . .. n 0 .4 N 4 0 N N CO UI .4 0 0 0%.x.N Al 0 N .I 0% V• 0 4 0 • 10 0 0 .-1 a 0 .4 n N N" 0 .f .. CO C. • C ' .. N U1 N Y 0) ., ' N N C C • 1 1 �D.. n a. }( 0 1\. • $ .4 • 15 Z 1i[ 0 C7 ` I I u Z •• 133 M 4. • 1 U Z • s t u $ m •• o z > U F • i.. 2_ g x4(.44 a H : .. .0.. im y t" U U H .! of 0 • -X E U .y.. Cl) C E s U E ..3 _ C D. 0 ar a •• a cg > E _ ® C. 0 z • `� m 04 0 g 8 F- u 00I. oa �d -CO -. '� .. 0 ,na. Ca ' • • F # ICO a CU7 4 w E > ... p m �.. O F U • z _ E i♦ 47 a y4q •U-I F to 4Z) Iwi) O 2 _ p F C F : Z O 10 • .. O p i S S CA 1.. U C 4 O G7 as • U - 'w F z O a h rase i rz U h F • .+ • Z 1 a o tea' m 0'0. 4 .e • t.3 o a s .. m E ., m F F O z U • 0 o It/ c y $ u F = 0 0 0 •- a o • 0 • ZZZ 0-. o z z > F 2 40. a . '4 m m zd y. u G • 0 6m o '3: C O 0 y F*.F Z y E 4 L a •• Ea a. 1^ �;f a v1 N F 0{ O z Z ►1 > m .4. • .0 >. O a .7 N H C x H N .. .. 0 �1 0- Z 4) 47 Cd 4T Cu 41 41 Z E F• W F • • C 41 Y Y 3 41 a a .+ ,L z CD Z Z i Z : 3 ca w W U U V p x a,a z Z Z .7 G *0 ch • 0. E 2 E X X E E E E E E E E E - X 2 2 U .. \ • 4. VI • .X +. Z N • C w O \ ai 1 40 O Is in 10 N 01 N P n U1 Of .1 .1 m 0/1 CJ h • C U/ U) O m n .. 10 0 Cr. 0 n CO s n U) ..4 4010 L 0 • U) UI UI U1 h .. U1 10 .1 Q .4 0 ... 0 111 N n V 2 i S • O N • •0 0 • Q1 • RI • ........7:j• •• Z •• S • •• .. F •O C 4. • 1A 0 0 O O O O P at P 0 O 0 O O O O O O 0 N ON P n N O • M • .0 L 0 0 0 0 0 0 NV 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .1 0 N ,b N N 0 O • as 0 0 0 0 O O rn .. U1 00000000000'. O N N .. .. O • ••+ 0. COCOON N N O 000000000440 b N O1 b 0 • 3• 0 0 0 0 0 0 P 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 b 0 U1 0 0. 4410 w • 0 •.1 N N N N N UI 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N 411 N 10 0 N • M L N 40. '0 N N N .1 P1? y N U) N N N N N40 N 4) U) N N n Y) • 0 '. y y y WL 10 o • CO O. M • 4. • z • o • U .. • 0 • O 0 0 0 0 0 0 U1 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 N N N 0 • •+ 0 COCOON n m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T 0 .4 N n m 0 E • +1 . 4. • .0 Y 0 0 0 0 0 r1 P 0T 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P 0 b b UI N O • L 10 0 0 0 0 0 n n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 O b 0 N 0 :0 O. 000 O O N N N O O O O O O O O O O 0 O N 0 N 10 0 O C • U N N N N N N P U, N N NNNNNNNNNNNNN .. N 4+ • 0 •.4 N N 40 N U) N 4) .. U) N N N U) N K K N N N t? N N 40 .1 4) aJ • 1+ L N N M 0 • .0 1. • .. • CO O. W • O .. • H o • Cu U • 2 0 - • O 0 u • C.) 10 4) • w .0 .0 • 0 .. 01 Uf el 0 0 01 0 .. N N 0 141 .. .. 0 N CO of 01 .. 01 0 N N 0 AI IA C•4 L L • L N 0 10 N 0 r CO CO 0 n N b 01 0 N N n 10 U1 10 10 n U1 N 41 eF. 0 44O. . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ..1 41 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .1 0 0 0 0 p 0 g Pi 4 • 1Ui u 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0• 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 0 0 .0 C • 0 0 c c. E .7 0 . • -+ u w a.1 4. • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F''ca U 0 • X • O O O O p O O O V 10 0 0 P .. CO b .. 0 0 0 01 N b• N O O O O 0 O 0 O O O O O O P N N P n P U0 0 0 CO P • .OC • as 4) e- 4ma 0 CO CO Nr s r 1n m 4o v . a •0 o r N 0 • 0. 0 L • 0 E N nen 0 44 0 05 N n P 0 O COT n P N N b n N ."1 0 0. W 0 • e l 0 .. 0 . P U1 01 b .. N n 0 .� b a N WI UI n P 0 Z F 1. • •C 0 N N .r n b U1 U 1. O • 10 > N P n P P .4 .. 0 O. • C 0 • 0 C C C D. h 1. • 0 0 1• • O • Y a • MY [� Z C • 41 0 • I 0 C7 • CO C• • CO 2 (1 • • o it: U a • , _ w a - Z co co • M •• ft , 6 0 E 0. a. 2 4 Z m rZ+ F S �. • 4) • � y a O W m D m W .+ Z z I. N 41 • Ce m .7. 4f z '• O F z m .. • ® 3 a .>• Z 5 o .. o Y. o. U u� a Z • a. U X p D co 1 a 0 m o z Z • z .097 COaCO Z a C 0 '0i • 9-. E a F .�7 Z y N y y U X p W Z °02`-' ~ 3 aa. w CO as 0'.. • aHa 18 u z m eau m - ? m a Z pF '. o z E 41 CL .. :• Y )S Oa� E, S SF. z .q > F O p X i• C F W G • >• Z OF O D o: U P. 1a. os N r. Og O 3 rN. NE • tt X C w w ce 0: 0: eC [aa Z N O O U O O O 0: U E a E .4 u aO • E F 4 1 U y ca' CO at m 4 ,-�+ .. m 4, a 0 GG71 L • re Z �; N ►+ .. x "Sy U a . Z 2 2 Z Z '+ '. F .S O cn S • U E Cu F F E '. co O OI ) 0 N N N O 0n C Z y 0 0 >. .. • • • as 1 Q^� U y z� z� m a g a a 3 3 3 o z 0. ea 1O 0 en • a. i• Z Z Z 1:33 Z 2 Z Z Z Z Z 2 Z Z Z U M L M 1I • 'O0 .. • 0: ' N N n V UI 0 t0 N V .1 U1 10 10 CO n 0\ N N b 0+ .4 0. o • 10 .. N o ..1 P P UI in N U1 N 0 b CO 0 N N O O 01 0 N N N N b n N Ul N n N b b n 01 U1 .-I .. .. N N N CO .9 • 0 • N O N u 01 ns G Cal 0 w G 2 u N' r .---- F o C Cl. N 0 d' N 0 0 O O 0 O co O O O O 0 0 '0 O O 0 N 0 0 0 . g2 O. 0 o 1.0O O O O O O O O O O O 01 O O O1• T O O O 0 CJ 14 .. ..I 0 .C• 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 b 0 0 N O IA 0 '0 ... 0. 'O CO 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.1 0 0 N p N 0 0 Z U1 • O Co O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O n O O O ..I .. 0 O L -.4 CO N N O N N N N N N N N N N N .. N N 0 IA T N N 1+ U .} 1.10N U• 0N y N 0 N N N all. N N O. N N N N Of V? 2 0% is V} N N N f? 41 ro 0 y D.. r C,. Z 0 U 0 O C N .. O p 0000 O 00000 O N O O O 11% ,0 00 N 0 • r• e4 0 CO 0000 O O O O O O O I` O O CO .. n O O F .0 u NO 00 0000 O O O O O O O N O O 0 N CD O O 0. N 0b 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 O 0 0 Ca OOO O O OOOO O ONOONO C O 00 C .0m .pN O. NNNN N NNNNNNNNNNNONNN a i . Cn N N N} C? 0 N N N N N N N .4 N N N N 4/1. N N A., 4 ..I N N N H 0% N 4 , CO • w • O 03 u U 03.0 .0 0 . . a1 U1 N N 10 0 U1 N IA N N N 'O N 0 .4 .. 1" CO' .. M N .0 .I 'O .0 0 CO .. s 0 CO .. .. el 0 'O . 0 50 r N m 0 0' 0 N M 0 O N 01 N .0 Y > .0 .4 0 v 0 n1 0 0 0 0 NONNOW ON O O CO N ele4 .1 F1 E. 0 • O. C IA n N .o 0 1.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 4 U q o o 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 .-. G E-. r • q u ►. aI a+ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F U 0141 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO 0 0 0 0 0 v 0 0 w 3 .0 0 10 0 10 .0 N O '0 ' p .0 . N O N . O 0 01 0 t0 N N P V 0 C u 4) IA .0 0 CO 01 CO CO e '0 N O b T p 0 0 CO N '0 N N 0 O IA P1 I.. .O 1.. 02 E Q N N 0 N I+ p. '0 .0 0 IA COO 1'. N IA N N CO a' 'O N O1 Cl. I. J 0 0 .. CO N O' V a. .1 N N y .0. .. .. N O .. m N T CO CO • • • • U L 0 A > n N .. .-1 ~ •• ti .+ n O n r1 IA• 410. C N ^4 [� x m 2 4 •] I. ... r .0 F CO y O a q a r. u . 2 41 Y O V M 4. 4 z o N C 4 2 ... 0 til \ pp .3 C V �U O a 4 2 Cl. • ? q i u 3 �] w • _ > ; a w ... , . M uri i w w >. o a 2 4 a o `A y H 0 32 tn h U u 0 g z a z U Z a z of w1 w ... x o a o o a w r 4' .4 Vi V G4f C C CO Z q Z .a1 F W 2oG 1.1 CA ot m g tFA 1Fi1 N o o bid m z a o Ca o .1 a =•• S ffM .+ V -y y E. zz 2 E. K O 1Z. 1K �y Z 0 qqM 4 U w w 67 0 a ►2• CL j N W y Z Qaa; U Ca w w G rl X E. O D. 13 G S• x q U 0 u Z a Z? F,F $ E. zz IFA N N 1Fn O U a s 2 Y Y Y 0 .0 • E w - i of a w w w w .. Z w w w G p1 •e qY4 v1 w o o _ w ti w 'y Z a a 4 C ¢ .. .. 2 ..7 E a F=i, =1= '^ S n. CC M .2 Z N (J G G •G R' 1+ ' F F F F F DC F F a w C OO O w >. a a s C' a t a a a a a a a a CO 02 U U Z Y Y Y Y Y 0. e a °z z z z ° o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a g q q q o 0 a Z Z Z z z z z Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U Z N• in C - 0 8 m ' O N m .1 '0 CO O. .. N . a e N .. N N C0 P 0. n a O' U1 .. .. N n a. UI 0 '0 0 b 50 n .0 N N .0 N N N ? .. d O N N V r .O U1 U1 N N N N .0 .. 1� N N V .4 .4 .1 N(N a 1 0 ! . ... . n `� p N •• G� Q1 r 41 • CI10• .. • 4 Z e • o • ` U • • • 'i C.. • In 0 0000000 ,000001 .0000000000 0 O O K • . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000 `N 0 • L L 0 • u 10 O 0 o 0 O O O 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000 0 f.0 0 • ••.. C1 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000000{0 .0 ' • )• 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �0 0 0 L M N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Z 4 N N N N N N N JR H N N N CO N N N N CO, N !? N N N i1N N 41 • L .0 A Cl • y O. M • i 4. Z • Q • U • Y O •• 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 [. • .• O 00 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O t •• •w L JJ 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0¢0 0 • L 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • •3 O. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 C • U N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 4 u • 4 .J N N N N .? N N N N N N N N N N N N N 4? N N 4? 411N N 01 • JO 4 F • L b Z a • W O. 41 • 0 •. .1 a • 4. U Z a1 • OU of u • 44 OJ • W .0 .0 • 0 .4 N N 0 O 0 n n .-1 10 n N n V N 01 44 0 0 N I11 .. 1` 10 V1 N .0 41 • 0 n T 01 n .. 10 N 0 n r• n In N n .4 10 N m 111 0 .0 CO in 1n N J.J L • 4) 7. 0 0 44• O 0 0 0 0 100 O N O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 C O. • L .... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 .0 .0 ` 0 uKt O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Q O O O C w• • 0. f. r u • 1: . f 1 .. L V • 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 4 .0 • 1O 0 n 0 0cr) 0 ONO O N o 10 o o m o o O o 0 0 0 '0 o 01 CO COM • (1 N 1fl Nin p n O N ... CO r O. N •-1 .0 .. n .0 �o e• p O C4 • .1 O1 N n N n 0 10 .-I W n .. O1 N UA COn 1•10 0 o1 1 .0 CO N 0 0 0. 4. 1. 1. • 01 E .. p N N I11 01 0. N T n . N C O . CO O1 O1 O1 N CO 0 n .0 0 . Z F aJ N n _ 01 n n N .. O N n N N p 'N N .. U 4 0 •• .0 > N N .. .4 0 C. • C .JC w • 0 C C • a .7 4 (> \ Cl 4 • O • u •a • :1 • 4 • Z C p4. • • N U •• pIll• a . O u 4 } r N 4 • _ S U . 0. -a. 0 ''Z . .. M • Z 4CC 0 _ ul La •• .Ny7 C O P. 4 4 O 41 4. ,41 u w O u 4. C0 J-. > m C 0 Z C. < J a w • ,.�� _ O N .. 0 U 4 0.;: Z o F 4 O O al 4 O ZZ - >. 41 F F >. O o. 41 0. F • fA cn J Z O .N] O Z CO N a C m a a 0. p Z a4. aa. a r a 0 .. 0. 10 • [.. a = a •• 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 F JH H a H C r 0 .. Y 1w • F J S 2 O g F S �pG 41 0. z N O U ::F W Z ~ • q •• 47 0OC F Z W O >q~. h _ a m h D C w m O e� 4 7 .�7 U g Cl y j 0. • F O to E• OC al C7 y 8 § 0 a O C Z 40 ..... Y •Z a4 U w p rZ. .4 0 •0 • A Cl) U Cl) 0 C S 5 .. 0. .-. J C O C Z L F 47 KCC > z J 0 to Z Z Z 0. Z 0 01 .4. • Z• z [Z+1 O O Z 5 '�' J 4 • a C a 0 x a 0 0 0 U .. N •.+ Z J 0 4 .. 41 W U 41 N N 41 ' C 4 3. �.. N CFA S C > a �Y�;; U F L-7 p Z F O. F a • OC. 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 00 0 0 0 n. a a. a4. a 0.. 1. .3 a a a 0a. a. • CO u Z N • C , M • 5J q 44 10 N v N p N On . O. . 0 . .0 O .. CO O. N 01 `.CO 10 y V !'- C '0 .0 .0 ..0N .0 N 10 n N N n A f-I10 01 10 m 0 O T 1fl 10 05 10 • N d O • .O T •r V N 1J1 C N .. 1A U1 N .0 N .0 1.1 .0 tel to r• N •• r V C J • 11 . x �,. ,c, ....,,,A czQ ..... 1„ 3 3 �. -.. 0 N • • L Z a. • • *+- G• • • \ `!`• Z a. • • i • 1• .• M `4 0000000 ,t0d; 0 (, -' ,./ 0000 )r \1 a. : .0 0 O 0 0 0 0 O 0 10 O 5; 0 `O O 0 v 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 O 0 Ka • t •L 0 0 0 0 0 o00 '0% 0000 , 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 •0 0 0 0 l CI • ..u 1a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0, 0 ,0 0 '0'0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0'.0 0 t`"' • 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 :.0 0 0 a, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 3• V o O o 0 0 0 0 0 o T"O 'o 0 0 0 o O O O o 0 0 0 0 O •'• • 4 +•. N N N N N N N N N bN N N N b N N N N N N N N N N • 14 U N N4/1 N N N N N N ..'N -N N N N N N t? i? N N N-0) 'N N 'Z •• .0 M ' IA 0 • 0 O. _ {� _ d . O •• I i a •• C C., • 0 3 • 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 IA`0 t 0• O 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 O O O O O 0 0 t • .0 aJ O O O O O O O O to raO, O O O N O O O O O O O O p O u• 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 30' 04 O, 0 O O o O O O O O O O P O •.1 O. O O O O O O o 0 O ul. 0+ 0 0 0 f.1 M O 0 0 0 O_ 0 0 0 10 0 0 • V N N N N N N N N .N .0'._ N' N N N N N N N N N N N NN N ..t1. e.1 N N N N (I) .A• N N.U); N V} N'.N 40 N 0N N N N N .A N M. N 0 • 0 M D.33 ° m •. CO 1 1 U A u • • 1uI i j a .0 .0 • O .•. N an en CO m 0 CO ;b t 0. l•a. UI ..� 04 04 a• 0% en b b N N .4 ...,.l IA rd e0 • 0 0 ‘3/ C. Q N 0. m ,..1 i.. ...1 CO t r .4 ul 0 b 0 .0 o .•1 en en ..{.ti N a.. .0 • L > 0 0 N .-1 0 .. 0 'N 0 en. O 0. 0 0 0) 0 0 N .e a• 0 O N 5 0 0 [F1. O O. : L 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O :0 N 0 10, 000000000 0 0;0 0 .. 4 . LA al ami 00000000 .00. 000000000000000 0 C w • a F 22 i{{ O . • C f -+ O i a•• .I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 .0 0 f 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,0 0 0 F U 03 a V' O 0 O 0 O 0 0 I O „0 4,O l O i ul 0 0 O Ol O O O O 0- an 0 0 Cl) . L T P- m V N 0 0. ;coO O O 5* Cl{ b .ea. 0 a. b 0 N (' I O O .-. O C • U U 0 0 10 N V O 4 .a, -.. T jN N N P CO b ul 0 0 .. N Is 04 Cl N H A 1, • Ol E co b 0. CO 0- a. .1 :.e 04 :.1 ..0 n a, n 0, N .. .. 0 5 b 5 CO ill N 6. I. N • 7 7 4-1 Cl 0 .0 N m O y a03 1o Nom 0 N to 0, .. .. 03 nZF a .-1 . 1.8 L O C 14 C.. Y 0 • 0 C 0 • 1 i F11) 54 10 . U. I � . 0 t, , . • F • Z C • , C • am W a • O 0 • U • • } ' • • a. k • v F ..e m O e m . l .. a • . 0 :-C m i .0yy W H a � y O O C q +, ca 0 • 0 F a !1 0 f d a �' O. !. C Y 0 • C P • CI a Z •• Q. U ... a g _ "u 0. z w •pvp� •-• '^ W E. 8 • • a O. !W O F � a F P f.1 CA >a Wi a ' co x' O F rui of w C Ca C •C7 e 3 O i °; •• O F 1 Z > H N .O. N a 4 Z t.. ... Q.0 Z ' . f a d W W W r a H Q~� O W -.e) •7 O: i e.. W m W U 3 y W a w U S .Y w [l 0 •• E O O a ial 0 • • W ,'o :o y a . y O. CG .e X71 (A Z m a w Ca a . z w N CI) a E w z o d x >100P / - \-�.i i. F. . O. m Cal + '-W °. '..N+ ,j z .411 pNo 3pp § 4.1 .il W S W qq ►109 ar2f. .2 /�J a W b • O. O. O. O. +O. O. O. 0. 00. OO.. 0. O. Oa. cL 0 a a C a a .�,a C a / u 0 a, . M o N • C , j O 0 l� • a 1 v 0, N -, •m O M.u1 0,1�, a, ui N 0 0 N 0, 0 0 N ,N N at O. co T •'A O, co N 0 b .$ 0 0 ul .eC N ... N 0 • b 0 N `,0 0 .. b N' a' IA' b u1 ti to is .4 a' b b `N N N a Y 4) , "`..f i 0 m ' 7(vi ' 0 N `S- 'a v � en m w 3 w i` 1. Z 2 w In oN O o 0 0 N o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0, 0 0 .-1 0 0 0 0 IO 0 CO ,C -1 v r 0 0 .r CM- , 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .4 0 0 r 0 0 0 .0 n 0 .+ • 0 u ILO m o o N 0.:m 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 N 0 o r o 0 0 0 .0 o m +. O. r O 0 002000000000 0• 00000000% 00 r� j --o o 0 o rt o m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r o o .n 0 0 0 0 r o r •"'. 0 •.4 *0 N N n -0) m N N N N N N N N p N N .0 N N N N O N r la LRI 14 N U) N N PI N 4) 0 0 0 N 0 N 0 r1 (0f VI !? N 0 0 V} .. N ..1 Ca .0 .0 N V) N N N 0 u) w w Cl. O U ON 0 O C n 0 0 NO N 'n o O O 0 O O O 0 V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r 0 N .4 O .0 0 O N O O. O O O O O O O O N O O O O O O O N O n F -+ C.. .0 L N 0 0 * '0 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .1 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 N O N 4K' L 0 0. I0 0 0 .-1 n 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 .1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0, n 0 0 m p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (R• 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 N 0 at 0 Cf 3 ..C.. 0 N N N 0% '5 n N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O, N W L +. V) N N N ':N N N V) 0 V) N N V) N V) V) N V) N 0 V) N N N V) L 1 Y +(A 0 10 ). . Z .. t ° 0 w Ca .r N 0 Ch U Z 0) w O 07 u U •e 0 .). .0 0 .9 N a .+ n -.0 r 0. N se N ri n n N 0s n m .1 0 CO CO CO r N of L ,0 Y 0 m O O ry,N 11.4 .4 p 0 O0, .D r .4 N CO 40 <• 0) .1 m 0 r r N N O 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 N 0 all .1 N 0 0 p 0 p Fw 5 • O. C 0 0 0 n+ _N ..4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .1 0 N 4 4 M L 0 0 0 0: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C C H 0. F aq ..1 b ►o u u - 0 o 0 . '0•10 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 [[--.. O 0 - 0 o .0 0 0' �O !co O 0 0 0 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 O W ,W S .0 by O O r O N O. N N 0 0 0 CO a 0 b O N p 0 0 C L Y O a N NtN m n.01: co 0 N 0 0 .0 N N N .1 ID .0 0 N IA N 0 N a ►. to 1. 0 E O. O. N N N CO n 00 0 n m a m b N 0. 10 IA m N a .4 60 n Ca Le 0 u Z F 6/ T. 0 C) n O. n .0 N n n p N n N p n N 0% m 01 a 0. n n 4 0 0 0 > n a p le) i 0. N n b I N O) 0. C Al .4 x m D C C 1 Cl.Fn I. } 0 1r i O b ! z C • I .• En o 0 w Z • Q. C. UC IC Cl w a N ~i,y. wx a w 0iw coIL. w - 0 t � _V) 3 H4 CC Cu d U aw .7., 4 Z t. a.1)C`� H CO )+ _ p :a x a U W RJ x O� s 0 a 4 C CO U y % W O > U a .•0 i > 4 F 3 U 1 a CO > O I. a ta E NO 0 FFC > ct z FiF a d Cyy4W w V y Z p C sF 7 O a W .0 0 - • •••••• C 3.0 IdaM 0 w !•/3 O d F 0 ,11 w o.U .4 9 a w a .. W W 3 0 .• 3 a F N a W O .4 K 0 a - w 3 FO• F x a 3 O kA x H W 4 N N U C. w 0 v < 0 h • M u w .3 w a a• a. ...]]]] c� .yy+ a ZZ yy E vl > pp W Cu u) • .F. .Fi it m .t C'ID O 3 3 toil Ol b _ - .0 .] Uyy 0 F U Co w x 0 > )•• .-. Z y r• pl Z K t•o W C C a C a 0 CCCCC a a C w 1.4 W H a U ? 6 C W W W W W w W w W W W >, tzu o a • a w > > > > > > > > > > m a C:1 'a a • owe a a z a re a s a a a a a a a a CC 0 u Z CC • N a •n N o m a m p N r r .o O a s O p r 0 r 0 .0 r N N .4 n .0 N n m m n .0 N N L .'\,! • .0 r N N p V. p .0 N, 0 N n N p r r N p a • • ,0 • O N • .7 V • 01 • H 4 • • W • 0 • H • 4. • V • • t \ \ • • • .M V F • O C 4. • IA 0 0 0 0 0 0r100000000 %400000 ..40000 § -.4 .0 u O 0 00 O n O O O O O O O O 1 O O O O O lG •O O O n a •• 0 • U 4 00000 .4000000000% 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 .1 • .. 0. 0 0 0 0 0 .1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IA .0 0 o n • 3 ...4 0 0 0 0 0 r o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IA •• V w N N N NNONN N N N N N N F N N N N N I+ N N N I` • C. L N N N 1? N 0 y y} N N Vf N N N .4 N N Vl VY N .+ N N 4/ N W • .COS N Co N ❑ • CO O. 4. • O U • X • 0 j • 0 C 0 0 0000000000001110000 0 0 0 0 0 .0 • •• 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0, 0 0 0 s t ... • t o 0 0 0 0 o r o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n y 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,O 0 0 0 0 0 V' 0 0 0 -M ° • 3 a 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0, 0 0 0 0 0 ,O 0 0 O 'O, al C • V N N N N N ,n N N N N N N N N IO N NNNN ,O N N N N ra +. * V +. N N N 1? N .1 N h N N Co N N N N N 4f44. 4f N f? (Cl. Co (A'• 4A .L y • 3 y N M 0 • 4 I. Z .. • W Cr Ca C .. • S I. 4 • 4A. .0 • i 4J • V oZ I u • 4 V • (.1 L .0 • 0 N .1 U1 CO O, ,A 0, 0, 0 IA n In N 0 0, n co Co 0 .I N CO 0 m N y L • y > 0 O 0 n N .. ~ 0 .1 m n CA m 0 N n N O m n 0 0% 0` n In IA a• 0 0 0 n 0 O N 0 .+ n 0 0 0 n O .. N 0 G • C O O O O IA 0 O O O 0 O 0 0 N O O O O O N 0 0 o••••• .+ L •• W 0 00 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O}O C 1C. :• O. F MI y j • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0� 0 . '[yr !0 4 • 'O 0 ill CO 0 O O O O V O 0 %.300N0000n 0 n O O i V 47 co 3 • d V• O O 00 ,O 0 a m n N m )0 VO 0 O, 0 .. O N! n . O C L • Dy) V 0 a1 0 .. P 0, .. ,. n 0 N N N 0 N n n 0 N 0 f• 0 N# 0 C.. 5 V • E n 0 0 N V1 IA 0, N , 0, %0 7 N O N N 1• Is m .. N .. I•' N Z F u • r •.Oi n n to N O at N I• N N n 0 Y1 VI N n n O, N at N m Q t. • •O Q N b .. .+ • CVJ 4 0 • 4 > ./ .. .4 O 0 V C. • C • N ". ./ j [1.. C C • O ! 4. 7 4 • • •7 L F • ❑ s. • O • a y • IQ 4 • H Y • F a) Z C • W V C • oz • U • • r+ C• •• CA H • V S E • a • O 7 a N u .. • a _ a _ _ az vl E.:: K .4 O cn O N a In 14 • _ V 1q yq ° • _ Z 4. CC VI COVI VUi y4yq U tW,7 IC 14a ° a .. . a ' y W S CO y U S of z i F 4 q p ....)‘: SS Z • �1 a O CO CC to U • 17 O 'V C Ul O a C '1 a .Z. O O O aV,qF Z y CO ° v W I oma, H • - 0 ' y 2 a Co to to W .. m .. .• a a ❑ 0 N .7 H F 1 ~ • O COC (�� O. ZCR, �1{ F COS O 4y7 Za a O 'CO.C 41 CO 7 COOa y '! .�.• U �i ca S O 1'4 M o o o G CO C7 17 a U "` y ❑ • E h Oa. (C) li A •• E Of .z. Z•Z U Z(. z CO U u .. a CO 41 c• F 0 cc 4 W .. • p p W1 E-• O F (7 C7 a H L. gg�C W O 3 g L • • a al O O O O 0' O O D 0 ' y N 0] .7 d. U Y 2 u, p W❑ a 0 0. a a a a a a a a a a a N N I/) KCl) U) 41 N N Co CO CO CO U • 0 Com.. I`)1 • . 1 \ 1. Z N • C I 0 0 4 . mr- n In 0 CA n A N 0, CO I• N 0 N N .. 0, . e U a . n N n 0• IA N O, .1 0 n On .. ..I N 0 -. 0 0 .. N m C. 0 • N M I• P .1 N ./ CO V N N H V N N TV N CA N 0 ,O n N t i • :. lb ,..cat.:_„-% , 0 N ts sl Q1 • • <J 4 •• lcCil • 0 • H • C! • •• i• Fo C 4. . M O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 .a¢ • +1 • L u 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 • u q 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • -.. 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 ..7 • 3 44• 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O. o O O O O O o O s. O O o • N +V. N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N • L CO N N N N (1). y N 4? N f/! 40. N N 4,0). N. N N Yl V) N VY (0 N U) •Z • 00 10 4 W • .0 10 0 • CO O. . H Z • O • U • r • o • • 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0\ 0 0 0 •• p o 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O O o 0 0 10 0 0 0 tri. • .0 rI O 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 o O 0 0 O O 0 O O 0 0 0 n O 0 O . K5 • L 43• - 0 0 0 0 O O O O 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O ‘O O O O 0 3 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 C • U N N N N N N N N N N:01 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N a r • e) .4N N an N V) u) N V) N 10 V) N N N V) N N N N N V) N N U) N u • s. u w • 01 w E. .+ • .0 A .] • y c. W • 0 • .+ • N 45 (1. v • - Z O -. • U W L • q e) • W . . .0 .0 • 0 .-. m N V' N n T 0. a- N N n O O . 0 CC) CO n n N .O N 10 .e • 0 V a0 O e0 of 0 N 0) 0 n N •O N 0 .-1 Uf N .1 0. .+ .. N L .0 • L > .4 O N .-1 0 .. N .4, O O .i N .-1 N 0 .. 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 •a + C .. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 g rt • u .e 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0•0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • M L 0 C w• •• 0. (�. - .O• a r • ►. u u 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 o O 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 o O 'ZF U W O O O O 0 p O O O O O O O N0 O O O O O O O W ID 3 • V N n O m V7 W •'• N O N P n v V .1 N O N 0 0 0 .+ 00 O L • W E 40 m N U1 01 O 400 CO W N .4 n V0 0 0. N CO 0 m 0. Ca. L W • 7 7 f•. N 0% m n 0 CO CO 0 .. 1.0 0 1• 01 •N 1• .r Ut m COp .1 Z F L • r I S y U Y d • C > a • ~ i C C • ' .. F 7 m F • 0 14 C ' • .. u 4 m • I 4.. 1. a) • 0 0 • a • V • y W ,t.,)! P. C j _As 1 _ F 1 • w £ v !LkEN pmt I• • W CmC v0i F (rZW� aa F►. r• G •• 47 [mi] • �G Cv7 _ U• O --1 W D . U > IF-1 Z r. 0. • • F U V y ZO • 1 U f ~ Vl y a 00. COl w O. 0 F O • 4 441 ., yy u U • y y J H " H G VOl VO) h S .7 N y 6 8 U .S+ !+ a O .) W W C• w 0. w .3 Cfl !• !• _ F .+ •• p7 u� _ i7 .D U y • 4a1 C S O U .] 7y U E W E J aa - la U • O 444 y 8 q • pa CC 43 [ p� K • cC CC J I ! % 1-my U 41 ►. T O 1. t• r1O S y n y yO O K•+ Z O S S C C U U tCZ x > J Y U >•+ O. w WW � a M `1-4 EU] W E 3OQO oN0No0. Nh G . • U0 • 0. y 0 o f? vs Vl y V) f/ 0 l 0 NV) y N Q • u w • .1 b. N • C . O . O \ •• 10 r n 1'• en 1(1 01 .0 N 0 n .. 1• n n V SO 1^ 01 7 N .. co (J f• • O: t• N P 001 Q n 'm f• U1 .4 10 r. 01 N 10 UI 0 0 as f• O O • f` n (0 N Q T O N U) T n n N N 0 U) .1 N .4 I.C. 0C • • 1 t- 3 -'' O N .7 Y 01 t 01 o. W w L3 oz Q UI 0 0 0 0 to o O O'co o o n .. 0 b, 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '•1 0 0 0 Cl 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 P 0 '0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 O L AS O O T N O O O: N O o coop .. O O O 0 O O O O O O 0. 0 0 N U1 0 0' O .0 0 0 0 U1 0 0 c 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 •.n 0 O 1!1 ure O 0. 0 P 0 O 0 co co :0( 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 Y •.4 N N LA ClN CO .[ . . . . . '[Tr. N-;r•1 N N N N N N 10 N N N N N N N N N N 4 L N UT N {? N ./T, 4.1. .1 N N N N N N N N 0 N t? to N t? N t? N q H N N ca .0 rtS 0 N O.. i t 2 n ;1 R 0 u y t t r o 4q O C O O N o 0 0`-0 !,.,N 0 0 0 F' O '.O+ .•I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 F ..0 O O N N O O';Orr, 0 O 0 N O 1O. N 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .:31V 0 0 N O 0 O'O F b O O O N O`O'' d O O 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 ...,4a* 0 0 0 .0 NO O 'O .0 0 0 0 U1 0 Oz N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CL O O .1 n 0 0 y0 AP 0 0 0 0 00, O. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O Co I. 0 C u N N N (1 N N N ler N N N P1 N'N"y m N N N N N N N N N N 1. ..1 N N N N U> N H N N N N N N#0, N N N N N N t/) t? K K N M 0 q 10 ti L moo. k . A Cal O .., H .4 Cs. Z --• �i ✓ q Y W 1. .0 0 .ti NN N s 40 N:i 100 N co N .1,01 P Fl CO 0 Cl .1 N 0 N 14 0 0 u 0 .•1 N .,•1 NO 10`t as N N N N IA;.r-1$ U1 N U1 CO P 1/1 l0 .I 01 .. O 0 0 .4 0 N I N .y •••10 0 t 01 .-1 P O .1 IA 0 0 N .4 Y .•1 0 0-.0 0 0 rl O CO N 0 O 0 O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 4 U q 0 0 0 0 0 p'70 0 0 0 0 OO` O 0 .4y� J .y $ § C CI 0. F0 1 0 . Y 000000, 0000. �• O O 0. 0, 0 0 O O O O O O 00 m 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O N VI O T 0 0 O¢ O{ 0 0 V b 01 014 P b 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O .0 N sO 10 o[aa3 Y CO 0 Y Y O1 N co Cl N 00 N 0 O. N 0. as 04 OI N Pf .1 Cl10 0 H q Y Of E N N Uf rf N N' UI .. N .4 C.. 1. Y 0r P ClN N 1 m:{ P N N a 10 N Cl 0 N 2 - F u 7 P N IA N N. Cl .D m 0 N t N O. N Cl LA N N 0 01 V 0 C 21 0 "l 0 .-i: .a N 0 d P M N H ti Y N O � Q C C 3- CF.. .-3 ga 1 k O is y f • Q U +r 2 U t b ' 1 .7 - 4. :. to r IS x 84 u. )\ 8 S... O tui! F to .t. C aea CO .t:. 7 13. N F 1U. G U 2 a W X y W CO r7 U CC y pNptt UF 47 U W N COC U 4 F Co a a 0 F Z V U U m U CA 1 U Z, N U O a # pp Upp y F to CO O a O x F- F W y Cn N N CO W W t C6Tn CO 8 F a u =' c. a. a' z m a a .. CO X 1 14-4.8E !1-1 =1-31t; x 4 • U 8 g m to O PEI E 2 4. 3C a ^ E U kk 2 N Z aW ryW .. Y N F tF/1 O X Z 6q� u U 2 4. 10 �j •a 3 U - !.. .Q .�yZ E q s( z Z 7.:a t 2 a t/� .a] W OJ4 pR C7 vl U f. >. as 01 F >• Z J [ {4 U U IOi try Y f...7 .. 4 4a1 Caa Z. V W a s 't a m4 c g Q1 ic, o 4 w 0 U >C > > 4 o a mo m o t u .0 01 0 x 2 O. a a a cnn co h E. o x x x, x 1 x -`x x x x x x x"x x x x x x x x x x x u Y K , H H N H H .1 1. H 1.1 .1 M 1. 1.1 .. .1 .1 H M IEa 0 0 0 0 f O •. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 Z u u a • CO a a a a a'a a a a a a a a a a .. 4 ut u u u3 u u u u u'u , u u u u u v u u u Za F F EJ E F F F F F F F F, F F F F F F F F F F t[.. F 0 O T h CA N cn .N to to y to to to co ca N to to N N to to y 0 U 4 0 �G • L Z N C Y Q \ 0 . • V N a • P N N Q .ClCl0% N P 0 •,O1 Cl N V T UI P P Cl Cie p P P - P UI O i 01 F N m n U1 0 N N 0 Y N .1 r^ N n 01 .0 10 01 .4 N 0 in .. V N Cl n CO ~ 1 \J V • 0 0, \ • O N • d • C7 • .•. .p • a • • {--+ Ca • CI • _- m Z • O • N. C.) • a • e • r• BI • O C ((.a,{. •• .4 0 0 p O O O O O O N O .. O O O O O O N O O O N m a' ▪ .0 L O 0 O O O O O O .0 O O O O O O O O p 000050 0 • L• • 10 O N O O O O O O 03 O b O O O O O 0Q O O O O p N • $ a O O O O O O O .. 014100000000 O O n O • V N O O O O O O N O O O N N ►: • 14 M• 14 14 N V N N NNNN .•. N 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N Z • 16 N N 44 V) N V. N CO .1 N VI N 4/1. N V/ N N N N N N 4. N CO • .0 res N N O • N a 4 S • ° •U •• 0 • O C 0 CO 0 0 O O O O b O m O O O O O O 0 O O O .. N p.. • ^. 0 O p O O O O O O O O tN 0 O O O O O O O O O O 40 . ..1 [L • .0 L O V1 O 0 O O 0 0 p O p O O O O O O m O O O T m .g • L 10 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 u10 h 0 0 0 0 0 0 .� 0 0 0 n p Q : 3 d O p O O O O O O n O N O O O O O O O O O O O 0. C • U N N N N N N N N .0 N 0. N N N N N N n N N N N p L • $.4 y) N V. 4T N N N N N 43. N H N 4i N N N V! N V) N H H N 111. `j. .] • CO a W • p .. • .. a • 4. U • Z 4) +. a o C./ SI 4) • w .. R 16 a 0 0 v p N 0 N n n .4 �y n N 0 t0 0 . .. n m .0 0. p O) O O N .. 0 .. N n a1 L' • C 0.4 0 t0 I.0 0 n O la• 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 0 0 N N P` 0 G aeg • o .a 0 0 0 0 0 0 .4 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 • .•• 0• • • • .( • ti /( •• s. 4 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 • o Iti C C C . V F 1 a 0 • 4 ... V. • ... .• u a4 • - O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 o 0 O O 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 EZ+ U W •RI M11 a • O O O O O o O O O O O n O O O O O o o O O CO 'N 3 • L 0) m Q v t0 t0 t0 p p 0 0 .0 p b t0 '0 p b p CO CO 0 4 • W L p N P N n 0) p 0) .0 0 '0 0 N 0) N O .4 .0 n 0 .4 E Cr. N v m .. m N n .. I. .0 .1 0. 40 n t0 0 0 N N n G. f. 01 • Z ..=i b 0. v .. III .4 n m t0 .4 N p 0. 0' 0. n p O n .. Z F u - . 0 U I. 0 • 10 n n '•.1 N n n N *4 p N n co Y Oaf • Z n A C C • F C ,a • _ `. D. '7 v • c � •• c 0 • • 5 • ~ 0 1i.: C •• Z 3:. $ - o ci • 4 u •• 0 Q .0 •W • _ F • N v g��j 0 U F • F x F ~ H m • COA 01 E F COm b a • - U co d El 4) 4 CO 0. s. ,xt .4 H O Z� y aU) •• 0 C F a: CO o vii .�. 2 G aC .L (44. Z • U Co 3 y U K 2 Cl) E. W E. y. O `+ Q. Z N F y m 4 F F a O a Fa • y F W H U y 1U. F a Ea+ 4-4 0 • �' C tZ/1 F Z 4. • OZ • = O_ F ,TTT,,, W ..7 F h U •• a CCWJ CO z _ H F 41 U .Y K U U .Z. a )4W .4 < 1 U � 20 .4 • J .7 - a C C a -. 8 • p p • �•. Q 2 2 61 V O W 0 S 5 U • 3 K • •• ? N ; C 4 Y s. F W Z fait .4 • 6) re W C 5 W u C) • 4) .X. .x•1 C W F • W ia a 1' • U ..4 .4aO . .14133 .4 Z U `� H yma > aaaa s "' • u � • WWWM H M M M Qs 2 CO0F F F F ! E. F F F F F MF F F F F 0W so • a H y .4 4 4 .4 •• O. 1 CI • N y co y N y 4) CO y CO U as♦ 4 w Z. of N C 0 0 m 40 0) N N N n 0 n0. .O r 0) N n O N .4 U C N 0 . .. en p N N .. N 02 CO N n Of -• O) 0 p n n N O s n .. .0 .0 n N r • n .4 p p N N F 0 IA p .. V G • 0 IP O O N C C) a '0 0 C.7. Z tili0 U r H o C 0. IA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .+ 0 0 q .0 Y 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O aa 00 0 0 0 O O 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 v 0 0 0. 0000000 O 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q Y1 0 0 3 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Gl ++ NN N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N m N N FZ+ 1.41.4 a La N N N Vf N N N N N Vf N N N N N N N N N N VY N N Vf t? wL a O en 0. N L. . z O 0. op0 O O C O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 O O O O O O 0 O O .. 0 o o 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o o N o 0 (y M . •. . (y L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 L a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 O 3 „0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C U N AIN NNNNNN N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N ra ++ Cl +4 N0 0 N N N N N N417.N N N N N *1) N N to 0 N N N N N L M u (.., m a ti. y .7 0 N 0.. 01 0 . w a 0. 0 Z 0 8 m u a4) w .G .0 O .. N 0 CO .0 N .O .O 0. 0 .. .d 0 C e- N 0 N CO o0 0. 0 .0 .0 a a 0 m N Cl 0 0 Cl .O N CO N N 0 10 .0 N .. IA N .. Ill 0 N N N L u > 0 .. .. .. 0 0 0 0 O V• .1 N 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 .. 0 0 F Q O. N O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .1 0 0 4it• 6 1. 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 41 0 . 0. F 0 0 • .. N aJ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '(L. U W O O 0 0 0 0 0 O O o O O 0 p 0 o .. N o O O O O O 0 O O O 40 OS m 3 0 V b 0. CO O N 0. N 0) O .a N .O N p 0 IA N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O CA U r•• CO CO N N .. N .0 Cl .. 0 0 N N N N 0. IA N N 01 N .. CU i.1 Z F ) 7 .'i N .O O. p N 0. N 0. N .. CO t0 p N H p N N N p N .. U 1. 0 a 9 .' N .. IA 0 4 C .0 m ' C C ta h *• C F 6 \ O L. O .7 a.. 4 a . L Z C �' O 0 A a \` �+f' • Z U 4 U .7 00.. ep 4 Wq 4. UF) U • C) S S `' co ca Q CO U y pF�p• V U Cl) CO Cl) co E • .,4+ Z 03 U 0 F Cl.. d F 03 D H F w 4 'J OC 4 al ?. F '0 (Z O O. w 06-. g UU .. to .a U) y [o+ 8cn Z 1 41 0 1-• Z CCCaO s.4� .7 eF co U4 C.) Cd L]01 ANO N 3 ►. 0 Cd CC.. U Z K 4 3 O U Z ae O Z .0 -- N '0 5 '4 M O V 3 - F Lg� O Z 4 •L. w Z 0 a r. Z Z " 4Zj 04. 7C 3 O pp� •to obi 0 L1 t4a. U .7 F Z K 4 W F ., .'. Uf N F ►. a. Z Z m CL 0.• amt z 40 40 o = >• t� u u o. r. 02 4 e> 0da 1:C a a a MCG a M 'd Z a U 4 o J 0 0 F CaL1 CO m w w 41 CO w Ca Ca W U) .. >. C4. '0 f1� Fat • O a F F C- L1 m .0 F F F F F F F F F F F N Cu 3 K L E 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Cu F 0 CA Z Z Z tre 4 Z .31 .3] 4 .3] .3i ..3 4 4 .31 .3.1 .3.1 .Zl .Z.1 x .0. 3 > s w toi ton at °" w �p▪.» .] .1 a 0 .7 ..1 ..1 .1 0 ..� .] .7 .a O O N C7 7d Tz 0 • >. C F F F F F F F F F H F F F F 3 3 3 3 0 O Q *0 0. Cl) U1 CA to N N U) H U1 CO CO Cl) Cl) CO CO U7 N U1 CO CO CA N F F U u n IA .44 w Z N C O \ IS N Cl N N e'er N Cl Al .O N IA Cl to IA .. .. N 0 O. N 0 O. .0 a w. U N 0 . 0 0, N 0 N p 40 IA N e• 0. .0 N 0 N N N N 00 .. 0 N co .0 0) 0 IA N N N p N 0 0 .. N 0 .. N N 0. N 10 N Nt v. N m 0 U1 .0 C • • .. • O P1 • Q) • M IQ • W ❑ • .. • O • Z C1 • • 11 IR • 40 F • o C Cl.. • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C • -+ • t L 0 0 0 0 0 0 o p o o .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 •0 0 0 0 0 • L it 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 x 0 0 r- 0 0 0 Q1 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • +. 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 I-- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' 0 o. 0 0 0 0 0 • 3 +1 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 o N 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 •• 0 +. N N N N N N N N N N .0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N A 14 L N V! N N 41). N V} 4. N N N N N N N 40 40 N N N N N 414 K N N 41 0 •• h 0. .4 • z • 8 • U • ..• • o • 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PI o 0 Vt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 : .•. 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 F D. • L U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O. 0 0 r1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 KC • L IQ 0 0 0 0 O O O r1 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 • •.� O. 000 00000100 VI 00000 000 0000 0 0 C • U N N N N N N N .O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N "I • N +. N 4,4 N VT N N N N N 40 40 N N 0 N VI N N N N 1h N 414N N • 4 L [w m • 0 4 a • y 0. W ❑ -. • M 41 • 0. U • z • O o L • U : w 0 • 0 .4 VI N '0 p N .0 p N 0. P1 l'. N p 1.1 .0 -1 0. .O N 01 N N V! .0 00 MI • Y 0 CI 0 O .. .p.1 N N N P1 m 0. m 0 P/ N N m N .4 I+ .O CO 0 0 pOOOO 000. 00 4.4 : v. 0 O 0 0 o N 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 N• 15 4./ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . • C •-1 Y • M L L • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F U CO • O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O to O O O O O O O W ,� 3 : 0 p [�NO m N0 0 O O 1D m N up 4. N %0 CO 0 VP O P1 O C • L 0 .1 p a0 .O N V) N O N .0 0 N N p V) 0 PI CO in 0 VI 0 0 .+ 10 4 • 01 E N Pf N t` m N .1 N .1 l"- p p N o N m p N PI .O m .4 PI 4 'I.o L 7 Z ti .0 .O .O O .-1 . N p l"- .1 0. O U1 en r. P1 CO N CJ 4 U • 45 > '1 .r N p N .1 N 0 0. • C .4 Y 01 • O C G • • qq • 7 lei C O 4 • O • a L • 4 .e • 4 • a. • ( c [it 0) • ❑ U • .. • w • Z o • C../ W • ❑ u m x e O (i , • • i, •• p 2 m • O Cu�7 agJ `yam O r y 0 •• F F 01 w 4 u 0 w ^a" r12 F U F 0. • _ a '.7 C E. X W .o O0 • U 03 0 s H u a a F z 4 r • o 0f u z W •• CO 0 Y • X .+ 0 X E. Wm z O o f F N•• 0�1 H O E . O W 4 !. u C ca W ~ W ~Z ' Ny .7 X Clin o • E z m X E.8 v) o M 8 0 - ',i a al 2w i or• P Y� al 01.3 •• •Z 8 m m m •. m V .30G s. M M +1 • O x X - o > > ? ? 4F • 0. 8 0 14 0 01 WWx W SW W W ra C0 W rW WWO O Off. G • m F F F E F F F [ (_ E F F F •I F F FU4m • x Lz N • C40 \ 45 m N N VI V) VI N V1 p N .. V1 m % N N p P• N 0. . U N 0 . .0 N T m .O V) 1^ N m .. •N N 0 0 .0 0 PI ' 0 0 0 • 10 p N P1 N .O .O T p .•. N .r N N N 5 PI N VI N Il) 0 3 1 • • 1 . • N • O n • • 0 • Q1 • A • • W • 0 • 4 •• Z • ^ U 44 •• • F • o C Co. • In 0 0 0 0 0 .4 0 0 0 o N . 0 0 0 0 0 .. 0 0 0 0 0 0 U1 0 .KKi • 4•4 • l 0 0 0 0 ri 0 0 0 0 1A A 0 0 0 0 0 N 0000• 000, 0 .0 0 • 14 A O 0 0 O O. 0 O o O. 0. co 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 • •.4 O. O O o o m O o 0 o M m o O o o 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 3 ... 0 0 0 0 rot 0 O 0 0 N N O O O O O N 0 0 0 0 0 O m 0 • .17 •.•1 N N N N MNNN N I.. m NNNNN O1 N N N N NNW N [-• • la L N t? N N .1 N N N N f0 111 N NA N N .4 M N N N N N 0 l/) 'Z • f0 Y� t? N N N 1 4] • .0 A In 0 • y 0. .. • 4. • Z • • O •• U • 0. • 0 • 0 0 0 0. 0 0 IA 0 0000% 4440000003000 0 O O O. 0 • .4 0 0 000 .40000 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 P 0 0 O O 0 0 AO • .0 V 0 o. 0 O m 0 0 0 0 N n 0 0 0 0 0 .. 0 0 0 0 0 0 .D 0 +1 A 0 0 0 o n 0 0 0 0 01 m o 0 0 0 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 •• •••1 d O o: O O N O O O O n .0 O O O O o C 0 0 0 O O P O C • 4) N N. N NUINNNNIONN NNN N I` N N N NNN .4 N •.. • 67 ..1 th 1? N N N N N N N N Cl N N N N N N VY f? N N N N P N 1••14 0 • C Ir K N N �z .. : CO0. •4> O ., I. A • 4. U Z 07 -1 S O 0 ♦1 * • U A 07 • w .0 • 0 .1 P 0' P r1 .0 .1 I. ..1 O. If1 N P N P fA O P P P O N N 0 O • A A • 0 .1 10. P m o 0 10 O. I. I• P n O.: 0 o n OM 4.0 n P1 P 10 N L .0 • u > N N? O .•1 m N N N N O. 0 0 O' N O .0 .4 O 0 0 .1 0 10 O D. 01 ..04 •• 0 .y 0 0: 0 0 .-1 0 0 O O1 I• 0 0 0' 0 0 N O 0 0 0 0 0 P 0 .. 4 • 14 yIS o o i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .1 0 q 0 C • 0. 4-0 . ,� +C. O • i .i 1.+ u • 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E-• .0 m • o o I 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o N o 0 0 0 0 0 - • A A • 'C m P i O P 10 1D P0 0 m P coN, P O P V O1 N7 O m V O 10 W '0 3 •• 07 I Q 0 . 14 O N N 0 .4 I.4 A L • 01 E O 0 4 .-1 10 N N P .4 0 01 .O r N .0 N' el N O. 0 N .P. m N N P Cl 7o t Z F a+ • •rte .. • N m a= N N m n N N .1 P CO N P CO 1.1 .4 60 N 0 oU 4 0 • A 0 rt m .1 .•1 n 1• N CO 41 0. • C P n .4 .o Y 0 C C • F 7 A • 4. •l L • •. . O M • 0 • y • A • C • v • 0 O O • w • 4 • Z C.) •• • F • • . C o •• g p u to .7 F 8 4 pa E-. 3 u F F .. 4 0 4 • - y 4-. • CO• O» La O .. F d D fn I DJ q • f.., 7 ZZ 4, 41 14 cC C 3 ❑aU .F+ F 4 '+ 3N W O rn .1 8 • 14 w t-• y v x C 4Cl 3 C Z ZU F Z4 • `-• 41 U 0 3 01 •• F O j 47 F 6 d 7[a DI F 00. 4[u st C7 a 5 1-4 t�E~i7 s S 1 O4. G .moi •• • U O ccF77 O 4 �• p s Ca x0.2" 2 .0 GI 1-4 ' J m O`�l w O «aqq 03 U • Z Z [Cca il C4" d F U C ..l nh•1 ~ h 12 _ w C 41 . ao Oj 4�] • "' 4 y 3 0. F «7 u 0 • E H a. m • • vl y C a 4 0 3 3 i+ N Z 4E. 4F t, a C1 • • 2 5 4 U O • U a .4 zO .7 L.>. I..= .7 > C 4t ul F03 Z .1 441 w ♦ 4�.i ". 6F i E a z 3 H O O u C 4 vi i .O, D. Ca .0 • 6C. F F F I. 3 oC • 3 4l yy 0 a • F F F F F F F F F F F E D D D U L 4 u7 • • 14 QZO N • C . •t' 0 \ A 1 .9 T O n .1 n .O 111 N Y1 '0 .+ 10 A O1 N P t• Cl. f• C m I'• Cl n y1 N .•. n N .1 P b O 1A. 0 T P N O. .i m Cl O • N n 50 n N N P n .+ .. .0 .0 P n f• S .n f0 .O n .0 .O 10 • 0 I_ • O r1 • • of •. ., 0 • 0. • • C1 • 0 •• M 4. • z • 4 .I6 o • U • ••• x ui • N O O O O O p 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O 0 O 0 0% g ..4• .0 u 0 0 0 0 r 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 •0 0 0 0 • 0 • u 10 00 0 0 .0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 u • O. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 s 4 0 0 0 0 b 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '. • Cl +. N N N N 10 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N • 4 L N N 40 N N N N N N h 411. N 40 N Vf N 0 N U• N N N 40 N O CI • .• 0 10 '1 N 0 • H 0. .. 4. : Z • 0 • U • .v • 0 • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o In 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .4 L.! • .c u 0 0 0 0 •• o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 in LRK • u '0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 v • Q. 0 0 0 0 40 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 O C1 • 3 . C • U N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N e ••• •./ 01 ++ a� N N N 40 M N N 40 0 N 0 0 0 40 N IA V} 40 (4 N LY 40 0 40 In • L u N r. O1 : b 4 .4 •• (J 0 a 14 O •.. 1•, 40 • 4. U z dU 8 01 -... . al 41w .0 .0 • O .•• • r n 0% V IA 0 Or. T 0 0' .0N 01 N '. N 0 0 0 .-10 U1 Ul 0 O V 0 0 0 .4 0 .1 0 0 01 Ul 01 .1 O N N .. 0. r N 0% 0 N T .4 v .0 • aJ > .•1 N •. .. 01 .0 N 0 N 0 0 0 0 .4 0 IA N 0 N N O N 01 0 01 O fl • Cl .4 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T '•• 4 •• U u co o O o coo o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O N O 0 «• • a. F r7 O • -. u • r. L aJ • • O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 f^4+ U of • 0 O O O O O O 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 O N 10 O 0 0 O O 0 0 v R A •• •Q m 10 10 0 0 N 0' 01 01 r 0)• .-1• •V'• N• .0• r• 1.1• .-.• ..• V• N N .0 O 11 (4 b1 ; • 01 O 0 • L Cl N 0 01 0 0 0 0 40 N 0 01 01 0 N 0 0 O '1 01 N 0 01 0 N 0 M 117. 0 44 0 E N 0 0 N r 1. .. 01 0 10 IA b 10 N IA n .•1 10 10 0 0% •0 .. .. 122 " 't. E•'14 11 • T .,. '0 N 0 0 N 0 U1 0 0 N .. 0 ? in V' N 01 N Val N N 8 U. O • 10 > ti .-1 T N N N .0 0 L 0. • C O. Y oa • 0 CO • 0 44 • 4 m w • O L • 0 • u • .o • w 4 • 0 • . C O 0 •. • 4 8 • x • O d > R > fi • "' a ` C _ i _ 4 4 0 • t•. U r>. w 0 E o F > G .• 4•. ti 0> > Z d • 1 ci y _ 53 I•4 • 0 Ct .1y. S h47 4a .0 > N ▪ > to• i Iw M 0 • s >cZ • F2zqU •• Lr FCL10 4 0. Nw `. a• a > > foil 0 0.1 41r4F. • % a •x vi G • > Z0 uO : E N UOO4• = C 4 .t m .0 a • m 3. z f0Y >. >. >. >. >. a. >. >. a. 00tr..0 • Z 47 I V 41 41 41 mm41mfatW0 0 Z>a •• aCa 0E > >• > > u°.. • u4N • C a 0..0 r O e 0. .0 b 0 n .. 10 r 10 O r 01 .. 0 10 0r C O v N 10 .. N '. '1 N .0 01 '1 N N N '. .0 U1 .. '. yO • N N 01 01N P r 0. ..• 0 10 r •1 r .. 0. .. < N 10 0 OG T 0 • a' O n m .. a t a CO 'o M4.A V r F o C V. .0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 g -+ 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 L L 0 u a 0 0 0 N '0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 3 CI. 0 0 0 ID 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U O O 00 0 o O 0 O 0 0 co o O O O O O O O o M Y ..4 N N N N N N N N N N ID N N N N N N N N N F I. L N N t? N N N N 10 N y ...I N (A N IA N N {R N N I 0 w y In L a 0 U) a 4. Z O U r I O O C O O O tD O O O O O O CO 000000000 .•. 0 0000% 00000001 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F • • • • 4. L v O O O N 0 O O O O O u1 000000000 .Z .+ a 0 O 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 v0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 •2 _a o 0 o r o 0 0 0 0 o in 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C U N N N N N N N N N N 10 NNNNNNNNN r7 -� Y •ti N N N N N N V1 N Uf 411 N N IA N N N IA N 4) N S v L ..1 (Hr CO a M 3 CO O. In Cu ClI Z Y ... Qp m u a Y to 0 - 01 N A N ... 0 a' CO 0 0 .. .. 0 N 0 u9 CO 0 113 .0 .-1 0 .1 r n RI A u > .•1 N O O. N N 0 n O O n N V• O N N O .. .1 0 .. N O N N1 a O. C O O O O O O O O O O N .r0 O O O O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O Cl Y . . 4 U Cl L. Y 0 0 O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O a C Y O C •• 0. F ... � Y .. a, u 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o U Cl o O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u1 u1 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 •O 0 0 a• CO .•1 CO 0 N 0 t0 IA N VCA 0 N N n a• N N N N N 01 N ID In •01 3 Y O C L Y O o .1 N1 N N CO n N1 0 V to 0 U1 CO 1On N N N CO U1 N N .4 M Cl M W E so O N N ID 0 0 CO .. NI U1 CO n .-. .I to r to N n ID N N1 .4 .. Z F u 7 7 VI O n U1 N N .•1 u1 0 N1 N 0% CO .n N In N I.1 CO N .+ n 0 U1 0L O a > .. v ..4IA . � .. N 0 . .-. .a .+ .I .-. a C. C s 01 0 C C F 7 a 4 •'7 E O L O a .. 4 a L F. 6 co V 4. 4 U V W V U 3 O V U 3 3 3 3 U • CO j 3i 1 tX 3 • 0 o 2 2 ce a O Q• - x• W h G 3 O 0 U .. •V O M 0 o o V O >• 3 w 3 h .Z-1 E _ F g a4 U 0 101.13 �, 4 ►4i F > C O .7 4. , 0 O 3 .. E COl Sz 2 w 01 N Z C/) 0 ►. Z & I. ►. • 0 > > > V U ; y T x a a x w Z . _ o IC ff M Ca x G 8 8 F -g -' Cr. .MFC 4 .4O] 4 ry O O R ••4i Z w0 4 PI 2 �_ FF G. t.. �a' X S y O F O O O w x 04 g N 4 Ca y 0 0q 4 a 2 Z 2 Z 2 Zd Z j u 0 Y I r = tl7►1 GMgy = (p(Frr 01 © O • F qZD .0 Z C7 % ti)43 0 .7 4 y x 3 3^ 3 3 2 23.•' y : Z1 FZ a - ? w1 a a a > > > > x x x x 3 x i 1 x x u° u G In Y N 2 N C • 0 .• a • N r M N n N .4 NI, U7 .4 CO C) In N 0 O. O a• N 411 N n N .•. N n CD .. a' a' O n n N 44 N N .. 03 to a' n Is a• N U1 N N D: • • >n • 0 N - a) r .. a 0 • m • z • u • F • x 4. . o C H1 0 O O O 0 O m 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 O 0 0 O O Of g +.4 • .0 u 0 0 O O O N O O 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O O O O .T G • ... A 0 0 0 0 0 .O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a, 01 00000100000000000000 O. • 3 U 0 0 0 0 0 s 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O. d +. NNN NN N N N N N N N N N N N N N O. Z N N V! N N N N N. N N N V! V! N N N N V! N T Ca • .0 0 0 • GO a N 0. • N Z • U + • 0 • o C 0 0 0 0 0 a• 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a • •-+ 0 O 0 0 0 O V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O. F • ++ .0 L 0 0 0 0 0 .. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O. u m 0 0 0 0 0 a. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 • a •s 0 0 0 0 0 C.. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0, C • U N N N N N .0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0. -I • y. L V1, 0 0 VS 0 N 0 VY L/ N 0 N N V! V! N N N N 0. a. -3 • in a N w • N M 4 • C., 0 •• O 0) J • U 03 0 • w .0 0 • 0 .. N 0 0 P. r .n in N s N v UI r N N N 0 0, aS 0 • 0 N O. N .0 0 r as .S .. N O N O V O O. 0 0. v .0 • L 0 0 N 0 .. N V .. N 0 0 N .. 0 N .. 0 0 O. F 0 - • C - O O O O N . • O O O O O O O O O O • C .+ IC • U Q • ImoU RI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O. 0 as e0 0 C ..C . a . I. • n w Y L • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N (•� U 0 • 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 co N 0 0 0 0 0 O N N 'Ca S CO• 0 - O O 0 O. O co ca m m N 10 N N 0 N N aP. O 40 • 0 U 0 a. 0 .. 0 N N 0 0. V 0 0 V N N to m .N-. E 0 a0 N co V) N .. CO .0 0 O. as N s m N .. .O Z F u • r .7.. •'I en .. h N N 0. In .. s 0 .0 s V . N • '0 N n C.) 3000 Ccri • C 0. N N N V v C C 7 >~ 1 • • j D 0 • 3 Y C N 4 a.. w 4 `' Cl) 0• 0 wa. 0. • ( '0 O • • • I U • p • a • • q • u I-8 a • • a s W E m • 3 T e.- • 3 F S 3 8 N .. N 4. .. 1-• 35 3 z r4 aaZ C. tai. 3 .3 D7 •w7 0 3 F F W 4a V F b a. U • • aa N 47 H OC 4 WW y ZS 3 rl to 0 3 W0 N D fa 0• • I. 0 O0 ...ca F O. 4 .Z•. Z N 3 E t00 • 1033 !. N .. • 2 F El g U [!• .3 ?• .t 1. 0 m 8 H 0 O O iG to H 01 F C O U u N W • o a z > vm°v�� u a c� •.. �y u • yy Z G K w O �C K h t • A .N3 m Q X o: 4 3 3 < i w ai y Q1 ,q7 • 01 p o . ••. • Z F F u w a .3 .3 o u° ca u: Cuw o 0 qq • ca. •• a ►. -3 .3 -3 ,3 ,3 z N F .3 a O !. o f a d • CC W O 0 • a 3 3 3 3 2 S 3 3 3 3 S 3 3 3 3 N N V w �• • 0. VI • Y . u 1 Z N • C F. O \ • of 0 O e P1 O. .0 T N 0 .. N t0 N N O. .O I N m D. .. IP V N • G: . 0 N NE-- 0 N .0 0 N .A .. P N 0 s s s .2 MI L O •• .O N .0 P• N s .. N N .. N 0 s s t` .. .• s N 0: "\ r } ! 1 /�' 11 7 �7 i III • , i___ . , , . ,L 2 L\ #1 " 1�J' ATTORNE SAT LAW 1 LOGAN RL.L.E O'BRIEN July 16, 1996 MR MIKE ROBERTSON CITY ADMINISTRATOR 2100 Piper Jaffray Plaza CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS 444 Cedar Street P 0 BOX 2007 Saint Paul,Minnesota 55101-2160 OAK PARK HEIGHTS MN 55082-2007 Firm (612)290-6500 Fax (612)223-5070 Re: Junker Landfill Trust v. Junker Recycling, Inc. , et al Our File No. 26056 ( 1657) Donald M.Jardine Dear Mr. Robertson: John R.O'Brien Gerald M.Linnihan Alan R.Vanasek Attorney Mark J. Vierling of Eckberg, Lammers, Briggs, Wolff John M.EugenJ.Flicedy,Jr. & Vierlinghas asked us to represent the City of Oak Park Eugene J.Flick CharlesE.Gillin Heights, due to a conflict of interest that developed for his James J.Galman firm. I have forwarded a Substitution of Attorneys form to Pierre N.Regnier MarkA.Fonken Attorney Vierling, asking him to sign it and return it to me. George w.Kuehner Upon receipt of the same, I will see that it is filed with the Mary A.Rice Patti J.Skoglund Court and served upon the other parties to this lawsuit. Sean E.Hade Timothy S.Crom Would you please forward to me a copy of the Resolution passed Lawrence M.Rocheford James G.Golembeck by the City or the Minutes of the City Council Meeting regarding the issue of the retention of our firm for Kerry C.Ho David J.Hoekk stra representation purposes. Whichever you have in your James K.Haling possession relating to that issue would be appreciated. I Michael A.Rayer Marlene S.Garvis Mary PRowe Our firm will represent you in this matter. The billing rate Karen R.Cote will be $115 . 00 an hour for attorneys ' fees . You will also be Jane Lanoue Binzak Nathan W.Hart required to reimburse our firm for all costs and disbursements Joseph E.Flynn incurred in this matter. We will be billing you every three Thomas e LGalinCummings (3) months. If you wish to have a different billing schedule, Margaret C.Galvin Shari L.Johnson please advise. Elizabeth B.Hayes Laurence A.Diamond Katherine E.Kennedy I do wish to advise you that our firm has been retained by the JerreFLogan(1923-1989) City of Bayport in this matter. I do not see a conflict in representing the City of Oak Park Heights and the City of Bayport. The joint representation can be beneficial to both Some members also admitted cities . If we undertake legal work that benefits both the to practice law in Wisconsin, City of Oak Park Heights and the City of Bayport, we would, North Dakota,Florida therefore, split our time between the two. The only time we and Illinois would charge a particular City for the work we are performing is if the work we are doing pertains only to that particular City. For instance, if we were answering interrogatories addressed to the City of Oak Park Heights, we would only bill the City of Oak Park Heights for that matter. However, if a deposition is attended that affects the entire claim, the time would be allocated between the two cities . Please advise me if you have any problems with this arrangement. As I • • t CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS July 16, 1996 Page 2 mentioned above, we are in the process of filing a Substitution of Attorneys . We are also gathering the documents and the files from Attorney Vierling's office. After reviewing those documents, I will be in a better position to advise you as to what our preliminary evaluation is relative to this matter. However, in the interim, I would ask that you please provide me with a copy of the contracts between the City and Junker. Additionally, if you receive some sort of letter suggesting a settlement or contribution amount, please forward that along at the same time. Finally, I would like to set up a brief meeting to discuss the handling of this matter and answering any questions you may have. Please give me a call at your earliest convenience. Thank you. Very truly yours, JA INE, LOGAN & 'BRIEN, P.L.L.P. Sean E. Hade Direct Dial: (612) 290-6510 SEH:gs 4 S UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN Junker Landfill Trust, Civil Action No. 96-C-0019-S a Minnesota business Honorable John C. Shabaz trust, Plaintiff, SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEYS vs . Junker Recycling, Inc. , a Minnesota corporation, f/k/a/ Junker Sanitary Landfill, Inc. ; Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. , a Minnesota corporation; James L. Junker; United Waste Systems, Inc. , a Delaware corporation; United Waste Transfer, Inc. , a Minnesota corporation, First Defendants, and Eisinger Sanitation Services, Inc. ; Diess Sanitation, Stephens Sanitation, Ltd. ; Rosen Metals, Inc. ; Murtha Brothers; Norm's Sanitary Service; O'Connell ' s Valley Funeral Home; Maroney' s Sanitation, Inc. ; Community Sanitation; Hudson Refuse Service, Inc. ; New Richmond Sanitation; Olson Sanitation; Johnson' s Sanitation; Stromme Sanitation, Inc. ; River Falls Township; Fox River Falls, Second Defendants, and City of Stillwater; City of Hudson; City of Oak Park Heights; Village of North Hudson; Hudson Township; City of Bayport; New Richmond Township; St. Croix County; River Falls Township; Independent School District 834; Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (n/k/a Metropolitan Council Environmental Services) ; Hudson Housing Authority; The School District of Hudson; United States Postal Service (Stillwater, Hudson, Bayport, and Lake Elmo) ; SuperValu Inc. , individually and on behalf of Cub Foods and Hooley' s Super Markets; Nash-Finch Company (on behalf of a Red Owl Store) ; Jim's Tom Thumb d/b/a RJ' s Fresh Meats; Tom Thumb Food Markets, Inc. (Hastings) ; Hagberg Country Market; Brine 's, Inc. ; Lowell Inn; Benjamin Palmer; Gottfried S. Lamers; LO, Inc. (Joseph' s Family Restaurant) ; The Club Tara; Kentucky Fried Chicken Corporation; Port of Sunnyside Club, Inc. ; Burger King Corporation (Hudson) ; J.R. Ranch; Hudson House Inn; McDonald' s Restaurants of Minnesota, Inc. , Nelson's Dairy Store, Inc. ; Vittorio's Inc. ; Pudge' s Bar; 2-Way, Inc. d/b/a Carbone' s Pizza; Carbone' s Pizza (Stillwater) ; Garfield' s Valley House; Pizza Hut, Inc. (Stillwater and Hudson) ; Estaban's Restaurant (Stillwater) ; Meister' s Confectionery; Meister's Bar & Liquor Store; Mad Capper Saloon; Starr's Tavern; Dairy Queen, Inc. (Hudson and Stillwater) ; Dick' s Bar of Hudson; Willow River Inn; Greystone Bar; Mall Restaurant �► ! & Catering; Sports Club Lounge; Clyde 's Restaurant; Domino' s li Pizza, Inc. (Stillwater) ; The Millroad Inn; St. Croix Bowl; Stillwater Country Club; Casanova Beverage Co. ; River er Oasis Cafe, Bluff Oasis; Aamodt ' s Apple Farm, Inc. ; Croixvale Recreation (n/k/a River Valley Athletic Club) ; River Valley Racquetball Club; Hudson Country Club; Dabruzzi Village Liquor; B & L Liquor Store; Marketplace Foods (n/k/a Country Market) ; K Mart Corporation (Stillwater) ; True Value Hardware (Hudson) ; Montgomery Ward & Co. , Inc. Hardware Hank, Inc. (Stillwater) ; Tandy Corporation, d/b/a Radio Shack (Stillwater) ; Snyder Brothers Drug, Inc. ; Champion Auto Parts, Inc. (Stillwater) ; Duling Optical Corporation (Hudson) ; Canadian Pacific, Ltd. , Successor to the Milwaukee Road Depot; Burlington Northern Railroad; Niro Atomizer, Inc. , individually and successor-in-interest to DeLaval Separator Co. ; Duro Bag Manufacturing Co. , Inc. ; McCormack Furniture Co, ; Herold Enterprises Inc. f/k/a Hansman Industries; River City Wood Products; T.O. Plastics, Inc. ; Kroy Incorporated; United for Excellence Incorporated; Pierce Business Products Inc. ; Jones Chemical Co. , Inc. ; Lind Custom Shoe Company; West Industries; Phillips Plastic Corp. ; Timark, Inc. ; Cornellier Specialties, Inc. ; Reichold Chemicals, Inc. ; C.A. Gerbitz Co. ; Oak Park Heights Apts . ; Raymie Estates, Ltd. ; Lake Mallalieu Apartments; Kingwood Management, successor-in-interest to SBRI-Property Management; Williamsburg Apartments; Hotel Dibbo; Lilly Lake Apartments; Birchwood Apartments; Rivertown Commons; Mar-Len Enterprises; Kenall Enterprises, Inc. ; Hudworth, Inc. ; Victoria Villa Apartments; Mallalieu Inn; Beaudet , A artments; P Croixdale Apartments; Davian Building; Vance Bushay; Jams L. Schmitz; Clark Nyberg; Peter J. Miller; William Harwell; • 110 Fred Harwell; Jan Harriman; James P. VanWinkle; Thomas Weber; James A. Vinar, Jr. ; Harold Chambers; Charles McMahon; Michael Tobiassen; G S Electric; Reliance Electric; Schwantes, Inc. ; Evanson Plumbing & Heating; Viking Electronics; Larson Electrical Company; Linner Electric Co. ; George Olsen Construction; Charles Cudd Co. ; Cudd Brothers Construction; The Gaughan Companies; Oak Glen Development Co. ; McGough Co. , Inc. ; Arrow Building Center; Robert S. Hagstrom, Jr. ; R. Hagstrom Builders; Lake Elmo Harwood Lumber, Inc. ; Madsen Johnson Corporation; United Building Centers, Inc. ; Bruette Roofing; Gagnon Construction Company; H&I Wood Specialties; Consolidated Lumber, Keller Construction Co. , a/k/a Keller Properties; Penguin Insulation Inc. ; Universal Applicators Inc. ; Hans Hagen Homes; Erickson Oil Products, Inc. ; Labon's Truck Stop (d/b/a Fulton's Landing) ; Randy Iten Chevrolet, Inc. ; Jerry' s Auto Detail, Inc. ; Dave Holt Ford, Inc. ; Gilbert ' s Motors, Inc. ; Rouston Motors, Inc. ; Tom O'Brien Olds AMC-Jeep; Erickson Post, Inc. ; Mike 's Standard Service; Food & Fuel, Inc. ; Grand Garage; Brookman Motors; Clark Oil & Refining Company; Hudson Auto Parts (NAPA) ; St. Croix Car Wash; Vern's GTC Auto Supply; Valley Auto Supply; Heritage Ford (n/k/a Stillwater Ford, Lincoln- Mercury, Inc. ) ; White Bear Dodge, Inc. ; Fred' s Tire Company, Inc. ; Pilquist Auto Salvage; Bayport Garage; Dann' s Service Center (n/k/a Herman's) ; St. Croix Valley Clinic P.A. ; St. Croix Animal Hospital, Inc. ; Dr. Stephen Schwalbach; Stillwater Veterinary Clinic, Ltd. ; Wallace Chiropractic Clinic; A.A. Connel, DVM; Robert C. Bardill DDS; Marine Associates; Judd Orff and Associates; Reed's Drug Store; St. Croix Storage Co. ; Bayport Printing House, Inc. ; Multi-Print Co. (n/k/a Copy Cat) ; Stillwater Gazette; Hudson News Agency; Star Observer Publishing; Rose Floral & Greenhouse, Inc. ; Bergman' s Garden Center, Inc. ; S ! Bills ' Bluff Bait (n/k/a Stiles) ; St. Croix Cleaners & Launderers; Shorty' s Cleaners; Brookfield Company; Holiday Foods; Canelake 's Steak & Seafood; S-S-G Corporation; Burt Nordstrand & Associates; Con/Spec Corp. ; Johnny's TV & Video f/k/a Hooley' s TV; Mall Theatres I & II; Waste Management Savage; Norwest Bank Minnesota NA (Stillwater) , Maurice' s Incorporated (Hudson and Stillwater) ; Jo Fahro' s Dress Shop; G.A. Meyer Mercantile Co. ; McGarry-Kearney Agency; Kolliners, Inc. ; Action Rental, Inc. ; Del ' s Lawn & Log (Del 's Stillwater Outdoor Power Equipment) ; Orville•Mausolf; Needham Dist. Co. ; Simonet's Funeral Home; Jones-Bradshaw-Hauge Funeral Chapel; First State Bank of Bayport; Family Barbers; St. Croix Valley Rod & Gun Club; Phipps Center for the Arts; Dwayne Nelson; Happy B. Thomsen; Dr. G.D. Gaynor; Elmo Aero, Inc. (n/k/a Mayer Aviation) ; Bayport Marina; Edina Realty, Inc. (Hudson) ; Anthony T. Zappa; Piper, Jaffray & Hopwood Incorporated; Gardy's Sports; Stillwater Realty Co. ) ; First National Bank of Hudson; Stillwater Steak, Inc. (n/k/a Stone Lake Restaurant) ; Dependable Ford-Mercury, Inc. (n/k/a Stillwater Ford) ; Mickelson Drug Store; Act II at the Opera House (n/k/a McCarthy's Irish Pub) ; Orville Madsen & Son; Big Ben Restaurant (Joseph's) ; Lake Elmo Inn; Sam's Brass Track (n/k/a The Old Log Cabin) ; Hudson Liquor Store (n/k/a Hudson Warehouse Liquor) ; Deluxe Cleaners (n/k/a Rivertown Cleaners) ; Hudson Bus co. (n/k/a House of Hair) ; St. Croix Design, Inc. ; Dave Lindquist; The Sandbar; Farmers Group Insurance (Meyer Agency) ; Metropolitan Federal Bank (Hudson and Stillwater) ; Century 21 Pendelton Co. ; First National Bank (Hudson) ; State Bank of Hudson (n/k/a Mid America Bank) ; The Shannon Group (n/k/a Vollrath Refrigeration) ; Allied Signal, Inc. , successor- in-interest to Sinclair and Valentine, L.P. ; Linden Health Care Center; Greeley Health Care Center; Greenbriar Terrace Partners; Ward Management • of Hudson, Ltd. ; Rustic Inn, Inc. ; Hudson on the St. Croix, Inc. ; and Nor-Lake, Inc. , Third Defendants, and John Does and n Mary Does, Fourth Defendants . TO: The United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin, 120 North Henry Street, P.O. Box 432, Madison WI 53703 PLEASE TARE NOTICE that the law firm of Jardine, Logan & O'Brien, P.L.L.P. , -2100 Piper Jaffray Plaza, 444 Cedar Street, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101, is hereby substituted as attorneys for the City of Oak Park Heights in place of the Law Firm of Eckberg, Lammers, Briggs, Wolff & Vierling. Dated: July 10, 1996 JARDINE, LOGAN & O'BRIEN, P.L.L.P. By: d U"' Sean E. Hade #1013788 Attorneys for Defendant City of Oak Park Heights 2100 Piper Jaffray Plaza 444 Cedar Street St. Paul, MN 55101 (612) 290-6510 4111 • CONSENT TO SUBSTITUTION Eckberg, Lammers, Briggs, Wolff & Vierling do hereby consent to the above substitution of attorneys on behalf of Defendant, City of Oak Park Heights . Dated: 7 - t Z--9' Eckberg, L- - s, Br - -e, Wolf f & Vie ing P .L.P. y. Alow-`. ark Vierling #11 Atto eys for City of Oak ' ark 'eights 1835 Northwestern Avenue Stillwater, MN 55082 (612) 439-2878 Enclosure D • LAW OFFICES OF ECKBERG, LAMMERS, BRIGGS, WOLFF & VIERLING, P.L.L.P. 1835 NORTHWESTERN AVENUE STILLWATER. MINNESOTA 55082 (612)439-2878 FAX(612)439-2923 LYLE J. ECKBERG GREGORY G. GALLER JAMES F. LAMMERS Direct Dial: 351-2116 KEVIN K. SHOEBERG ROBERT G. BRIGGS THOMAS J.WEIONER PAUL A.WOLFF July 10 , 1996 SUSAN 0.OLSON MARK J. VIERLING - DAVIO K.SNYDER Mr. Sean E . Hade Jardine, Logan & O'Brien, P.L.L. P. 2100 Piper Jaffray Plaza 444 Cedar Street , St . Paul, Minnesota 55101 Re : Junker Landfill Trust v. City of Oak Park Heights, et al. Dear Mr. Hade: This will confirm our agreement that your office will assume the representation of the Cityof Oak Park Heights in p respect to this matter and that you will be filing a Notice of Substitution of Attorneys. I believe you have otherwise received all pleadings relevant to the Junker litigation generally which were received by this office. If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me or David Snyder of this office . Yours very truly, Mark J. Vierling MJV:sdb cc : Mike Robertson Page 8 - Minutes""06/24/96 S Closed Session - City Attorney Vierling updated the Council on pending litigation. Councilmember Kern, seconded by Swenson, moved to work together with Bayport to hire a co-counsel for joint defense of pending litigation. Carried 5-0 . Adjournment: Councilmember Kern, seconded by Swenson, moved to adjourn at 10 :55 p.m. Carried 5-0 . Respectfully submitted, Michael Robertson City Administrator Enclosure 11 • 4111 LAW OFFICES OF ECKBERG, LAMMERS, BRIGGS, WOLFF & VIERLING, P.L.L.P. 183 NORTHWESTERN AVENUE STILLWATER. MINNESOTA 55082 (612)439-2878 FAX (612)439.2923 LYLE J. ECKBERG GREGORY G.GALLER JAMES F. LAMMERS KEVIN K. SHOEBERG ROBERT G. BRIGGS THOMAS J.WEIDNER PAUL A.WOLFF Direct Dial (612) 351-2118 SUSAN 0.OLSON MARK J.VIERLING DAVID K.SNYDER June 11, 1996 p 11-17- [ MR MARTIN D [ 11-1 • CLAIM MANAGER Hi ENVIRONMENTAL & MASS TORT DIVISION REM LTD SUITE 530 4940 VIKING DRIVE MINNEAPOLIS MN 55435 • RE: Claim No. 351-L-888924-655 Insured: City of Oak Park Heights Site: Junker Landfill, Wisconsin Dear Mr. Berger: I am in receipt of your letter of April 24, 1996 declining the City of Oak Park Heights' tender of the defense of the City in the Junker Landfill matter. It is the City' s position, as set forth herein, that The Home Insurance Company is obligated to defend, if not to indemnify, the City in connection with the Junker Landfill litigation. Accordingly, for the reasons set forth below I request that you accept the City' s tender of the defense at this time unless and until further facts are developed which would support your denial of coverage. As you are aware, under Minnesota law, if a cause of action even "arguably falls within the scope of coverage, the insurer must defend. " Jostens, Inc. v. CNA Ins. Co. , 336 N.W.2d 544, 545 (Minn. 1983) . As you know, Home "bears the burden of demonstrating that no duty to defend exists by showing that all part of the cause of action fall clearly outside the coverage afforded by the policy. " In your letter, and in support of your denial of coverage, you allege that "remediation costs and the costs of preventative measures are economic losses rather than damages on account of property damages and that the costs of complying with an injunction or administrative order are (not) damages as used in the 4 1 MR MARTIN D BERGER Page Two June 11, 1996 insuring agreement . I respectfully submit that this position is without support in the law. I call your attention to the case of Minnesota Mining v. Travelers Indemnity, 457 N.W.2d 175, 184 (Minn. 1990) where the Minnesota Supreme Court specifically held that environmental clean- up expenditures mandated by environmental enforcement authorities are damages because of property damage within the meaning of CGL policies such as that here . In addition the Court held that pollution of ground water is damage to public property and constitutes covered damages within the meaning of the CGL policies. You may also wish to review in this regard SCSC Corn. v. Allied Mutual Ins . Co. 536 N.W.2d 305 (Minn. 1995) and City of Edgerton v. General Cas . Co. , 493 N.W.2d 768 (Wis. App. 1992) . It is therefore the City' s position that the allegations in the Complaint do reflect an allegation of covered property damages not "uncovered economic loss" as you have argued. In addition, it is the City' s position that the pollution at the Junker Landfill is, or arguably may be, within the sudden and accidental exception to the general pollution exclusion which you have invoked in support of your denial. At a minimum, it is the City' s position that the complaint is not required to contain an assertion that the discharges were such and accidental in order for coverage to be found. It is sufficient that the releases were possibly sudden and accidental so that the duty to defend is triggered. As you may know, in Sylvester' s Bros . Dev. v. Great Century Insurance, 489 N.W.2d 368 (Minn. App. 1992) the Court held the triggering event for determining the applicability of the qualified pollution exclusion is escape of the contaminants from the landfill into the aquifer rather than the initial deposit of the pollutant into the landfill itself. Under Sylvester, "Sudden" means the incident at issue occurs relatively quickly rather than gradually over a long period of time. It is the City' s belief that the Junker Landfill accepted wastes from the late 1970s until the mid 1980s, a period which is much shorter than typically found in most landfill contamination cases. It is the City' s position, therefore, that the contamination could therefore be considered "sudden" within the meaning of the exception to the exclusion. Moreover, as you are aware, the Junker litigation has been brought in the Federal District Court in Madison, Wisconsin and is MR MARTIN D BERGER Page Three June 11, 1996 therefore controlled, at least in part, by the common law of the State of Wisconsin. In that regard, the Wisconsin Supreme Court has interpreted the sudden and accidental exception to the qualified pollution exclusion to mean "unexpected and unintended damages" from the standpoint of the insured. See, Just v. Land Reclamation, Ltd. , 456 N.W.2d 570, 578 (Wis . 1990) . It is the City' s position that if any pollution occurred as a result of the activities of the City, the pollution would be unexpected and unintended from the standpoint of the City and a duty to defend, if not to indemnify, does arise. In addition, it is the City' s position that the so called "known loss doctrine" upon which Home relies in support of its denial of coverage, is not sufficient to remove the duty to defend at the present time. The Minnesota Courts have held that the question of whether a loss is "neither expected nor intended by the insured" is a factually specific inquiry which turns on the "objective standard of what a reasonable insurer should have known" .See, Sylvester Bros . , 480 N.W.2d 368 (Minn. App. 1992) . It is the City' s position that Home has not established that, as a matter of law, the pollution, if any, was expected or intended by the City and, in fact, could not do so at this early stage of the proceeding. Accordingly, it is the City' s position that this doctrine does not, on these facts, support a denial of coverage. For the foregoing reasons, it is the position of the City of Oak Park Heights that The Home Insurance Company is obligated to defend, if not to indemnify the City in respect laims arising out of the Junker Landfill litigation. If you should have any questions, • - •o not hesitate to contact me . Yours - » truly, Ma k J. Vieth—. MJV/smp cc : Mr. Michael Robertson • • UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN Junker Landfill Trust, a Minnesota business trust, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 96-C-0019-S CONSOLIDATED CASE v. Junker Recycling, Inc. , a Minnesota corporation, f/k/a Junker Sanitary Landfill, Inc. ; et al. , First Defendants, and Eisinger Sanitation Services, Inc. ; et al . , Second Defendants, and City of Stillwater, et al. , Third Defendants, and John Does and Mary Does, Fourth Defendants. Landfill Remediation Trust, a Civil Action No. 96-C-489-S Wisconsin business trust, CONSOLIDATED CASE Plaintiff, vs. Garry Thompson, et al, Defendants . • ! NOTICE AND TENDER OF DEFENSE TO: DEFENDANT CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS AND ITS ATTORNEY, SEAN E. HADE, JARDINE, LOGAN & O'BRIEN, P.L.L.P. , 2100 PIPER JAFFRAY PLAZA, 44 CEDAR STREET, ST. PAUL, MN 55101 . YOU WILL PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Defendant Kingwood Corporation d/b/a Kingwood Management (Kingwood) and Kmart Corporation (Kmart) have been served with a Summons and Amended Complaint by Plaintiff Junker Landfill Trust (JLT) , in Civil Action No. 96-C-0019-S, and with a Complaint by Plaintiff Landfill Remediation Trust (LRT) , in Civil Action No. 96-C-489-S, copies of which are attached hereto as Exhibits "A" and "B, " respectively. In each of the above-entitled actions, Kingwood and Kmart have been served as, and are alleged to be generators of hazardous substances deposited at the Junker Landfill near Hudson, Wisconsin. Kingwood and Kmart have interposed separate Answers to the Amended Complaint in which the Plaintiff is the JLT (Civil Action No. 96-C-0019-S) , and have also interposed separate Answers to the Complaint in which the Plaintiff is the LRT (Civil Action No. 96-C- 489-S) . In their respective Answers in both of the above-entitled actions, Kingwood and Kmart have denied any liability to the Plaintiffs. In addition to interposing separate Answers in each of the above-entitled actions, Kingwood and Kmart have jointly served and filed a Cross-Claim against the City of Oak Park Heights alleging a claim and right of indemnity against the City in these actions. 2 110 • NOW, THEREFORE, Kingwood and Kmart hereby demand: 1. That the City of Oak Park Heights undertake the defense of these actions on behalf of Kingwood and Kmart, including the defense of any Cross-Claims which have been, or may in the future be asserted in these actions by any party. 2. That the City of Oak Park Heights pay any verdict, judgment, or settlement amount that may be entered, awarded, or assessed against Kingwood or Kmart in the above-entitled actions. 3 . That the City of Oak Park Heights indemnify and hold harmless Kingwood and Kmart from and against any and all liability, loss, costs, disbursements, expenses, attorney's fees and any other expenses that may be imposed upon Kingwood and Kmart, or to which they may become subjected, by reason of these actions, the defense of these actions, or the defense of any cross-claims in these actions. 4. That this Notice and Tender of Defense is based upon that certain "Ordinance Regulating The Disposal Of Garbage And Refuse And Providing The Creation and Establishment Of A Uniform System For Collection And Disposal Of Garbage and Refuse, " enacted by the City of Oak Park Heights and made effective January 1, 1975. Under said Ordinance, the City established a system of collection and disposal of garbage and refuse. The uniform system included the designation of a City Garbage Collection Contractor as the City's duly authorized agent to collect garbage and refuse. Junker Sanitation Service, Inc. , was the City Garbage Collection Contractor appointed by the City. 3 S 5. By operation of the Ordinance, neither Kingwood nor Kmart had any choice or control concerning the disposal of their garbage and refuse. In addition to usurping all control over the manner in which garbage and refuse was collected and disposed of, the City also assumed "ownership of garbage and refuse materials set out for collection" by its appointed Garbage Collection Contractor (Junker Sanitation Service, Inc. ) . 6. By operation of the subject City Ordinance, Kingwood's and Kmart's garbage and refuse were collected by Junker Sanitation Service, Inc. and delivered to the Junker Landfill at the direction, in the interest of, or in reliance upon the City. As such, Kingwood and Kmart are entitled to indemnity from the City under Minnesota law. 7. That you or your insurer are specifically requested to notify the undersigned in writing with respect to your response to this Tender of Defense within twenty (20) days of the date of service of this Notice and Tender of Defense upon you. 8. Please take notice that if you fail to comply promptly with this demand, Kingwood and Kmart will take such steps as may be necessary to defend themselves in these actions, or otherwise dispose of these actions, and will hold the City of Oak Park Heights liable and answerable to them for any and all liability, loss, costs, disbursements, expenses, and attorney's fees, and any other expenses paid or incurred by them as a result of their defense of these actions. 4 411 411 Dated this 31st day of December, 1996. MURNANE, CONLIN, WHITE AND BRANDT Professional Association � B Y Michael S. Ryan, WI #86t/4989 Attorneys for Defendant Kingwood Corporation d/b/a Kingwood Management and Defendant Kmart Corporation 1800 Piper Jaffray Plaza 444 Cedar Street St. Paul, MN 55101 (612) 227-9411 5 • EXHIBIT A • • wesr. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT APR { ? I996 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN Fit. ' r I Junker Landfill Trust, a Minnesota ) Civil Action to_--96-C-0019-S business trust. ) -- Plaintiff, ) v. ) AMENDED COMPLAINT Hon. John C. Shabaz Junker Recycling, Inc., a Minnesota ) corporation, f/k/a Junker Sanitary Landfill, ) Inc.; Junker Sanitation Services, Inc., a ) Minnesota corporation; James L. Junker; ) United Waste Systems, Inc., a Delaware ) corporation; United Waste Transfer, Inc., ) a Minnesota corporation, ) First Defendants, ) and ) Eisinger Sanitation Services, Inc.; ) Diess Sanitation, Stephens Sanitation, Ltd.; ) Rosen Metals, Inc.; Murtha Brothers; ) Norm's Sanitary Service; O'Connell's ) Valley Funeral Home; Maroney's Sanitation; ) Inc.; Community Sanitation; Hudson Refuse ) Service, Inc.; New Richmond Sanitation; ) Olson Sanitation; Johnson's Sanitation; ) Stromme Sanitation, Inc.; River Falls ) Township; Fox River Falls, ) Second Defendants, ) and ) City of Stillwater; City of Hudson; ) City of Oak Park Heights; Village of North ) Hudson; Hudson Township; City of Bayport; ) New Richmond Township; St Croix County; ) River Falls Township; Independent School ) District 834; Metropolitan Waste Control ) Commission (n/k/a Metropolitan Council ) • Environmental Services); Hudson Housing ) Authority; The School District of Hudson: ) United States Postal Service (Stillwater, ) Hudson, Bayport, and Lake Elmo); ) SuperValu Inc., individually and on behalf ) of Cub Foods and Hooley's Super Markets: ) Nash-Finch Company (on behalf of a Red ) Owl Store); Jim's Tom Thumb d/b/a RJ's ) Fresh Meats; Tom Thumb Food Markets, Inc. ) (Hastings); Hagberg Country Market; Brine's, ) Inc.; Lowell Inn; Benjamin Palmer; Gottfried S. ) Lamers; LO, Inc. (Joseph's Family Restaurant); ) The Club Tara; Kentucky Fried Chicken ) Corporation; Port of Sunnyside Club, Inc.; ) Burger King Corporation (Hudson); J.R. Ranch: ) Hudson House Inn; McDonald's Restaurants of ) Minnesota, Inc., Nelson's Dairy Store Inc.; ) Vittorio's, Inc.; Pudge's Bar; 2-Way Inc., ) d/b/a Carbone's Pizza; Carbone's Pizza ) (Stillwater); Garfield's Valley House; Pizza ) Hut, Inc. (Stillwater and Hudson); Esteban's ) Restaurant (Stillwater); Meister's ) Confectionary; Meister's Bar & Liquor Store; ) Mad Capper Saloon; Starr's Tavern; Dairy ) Queen, Inc. (Hudson and Stillwater); Dick's Bar ) of Hudson; Willow River Inn; Greystone Bar; ) Mall Restaurant & Catering; Sports Club ) Lounge; Clyde's Restaurant; Domino's Pizza, ) Inc. (Stillwater); The Millroad Inn; St. ) Croix Bowl; Stillwater Country Club; Cassanova ) Beverage Co.; River Oasis Cafe; Bluff Oasis; ) Aamodt's Apple Farm, Inc.; Croixvale ) Recreation (n/k/a River Valley Atheletic Club); ) River Valley Raquetball Club; Hudson Country ) Club; Dabruzzi Village Liquor; B & L Liquor ) Store; Marketplace Foods (n/k/a County ) Market); K Mart Corporation (Stillwater); ) True Value Hardware (Hudson); Montgomery ) Ward & Co., Inc., Hardware Hank, Inc. ) (Stillwater); Tandy Corporation, d/b/a Radio ) Shack jStillwater); Snyder Brothers Drug, Inc.; ) Champion Auto Parts, Inc. (Stillwater); Duling ) Optical Corporation (Hudson); Canadian Pacific, ) Ltd., successor to the Milwaukee Road Depot; ) 2 • • Burlington Northern Railroad; Niro Atomizer, ) Inc., individually and successor-in-interest to ) DeLaval Separator Co.; Duro Bag ) Manufacturing Co., Inc.; McCormack Furniture ) Co.; Herold Enterprises Inc. f/k/a/ Hansman ) Industries; River City Wood Products; T.O. ) Plastics, Inc.; Kroy Incorporated; ) United for Excellence Incorporated; Pierce ) Business Products Inc.; Jones Chemical Co., ) Inc.; Lind Custom Shoe Company; West ) Industries; Phillips Plastics Corp.; ) Timark, Inc.; Cornellier Specialties, ) Inc.; Reichold Chemicals, Inc.; C. A. Gerbitz ) Gerbitz Co.; Oak Park Heights Apts; ) Raymie Estates Ltd.; Lake Mallalieu ) Apartments; Kingwood Management, ) successor-in-interest to SBRI-Property ) Management; Williamsburg Apartments; Hotel ) Dibbo; Lilly Lake Apartments; Birchwood ) Apartments; Rivertown Commons; Mar-Len ) Enterprises; Kenall Enterprises, Inc.; ) Hudworth, Inc.; Victoria Villa Apartments; ) Mallalieu Inn; Beaudet Apartments; Croixdale ) Apartments; Davian Building; Vance Bushay ) James L. Schmitz: Clark Nyberg; Peter J. Miller; ) William Harwell; Fred Harwell; Jan Harriman; ) James P. VanWinkle; Thomas Weber; James ) A. Vinar, Jr.; Harold Chambers; Charles ) McMahon; Michael Tobiassen; G S Electric; ) Reliance Electric; Schwantes, Inc.; Evenson ) Plumbing & Heating; Viking Electronics; ) Larson Electrical Company; Linner Electric ) Co.; George Olsen Construction; Charles ) Cudd Co.; Cudd Brothers Construction; The ) - Gaughan Companies; Oak Glen ) Development Co.; McGough Co., Inc.; Arrow ) Building Center; Robert S. Hagstrom, Jr.; R. ) Hagstrom Builders; Lake Elmo Harwood ) Lumber, Inc.; Madsen Johnson Corporation; ) United Building Centers, Inc.; Bruette ) Roofing; Gagnon Construction Company; H&I ) Wood-Specialties; Consolidated Lumber, ) Keller Construction Co., a/k/a Keller ) Properties; Penguin Insulation Inc.; Universal ) Applicators Inc.; Hans Hagen Homes; ) Erickson Oil Products, Inc.; Labon's Truck ) 3 • • Stop (d/b/a Fulton's Landing); Randy Iten ) Chevrolet, Inc.; Jerry's Auto Detail. Inc.: ) Dave Holt Ford Inc.; Gilbert's Motors, Inc.: ) Routson Motors. Inc.; Tom O'Brien Olds ) AMC-Jeep: Erickson Post. Inc.; Mike's ) Standard Service; Food & Fuel, Inc.; Grand ) Garage; Brookman Motors; Clark Oil & ) Refining Company; Hudson Auto Parts ) (NAPA); St. Croix Car Wash; Vern's GTC ) Auto Supply; Valley Auto Supply; Heritage Ford ) (n/k/a Stillwater Ford, Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.); ) White Bear Dodge, Inc.; Fred's Tire ) Company, Inc.; Pilquist Auto Salvage; ) Bayport Garage; Dann's Service Center (n/k/a ) Herman's); St. Croix Valley Clinic P.A.; St. ) Croix Animal Hospital, Inc.; ) Dr. Stephen Schwalbach; Stillwater ) Veterinary Clinic, Ltd.; Wallace Chiropractic ) Clinic; A.A. Connel, DVM; Robert C. Bardill, ) DDS; Marine Associates; Judd Orff and ) Associates; Reed's Drug Store; St. Croix ) Storage Co.; Bayport Printing House, Inc.; ) Multi-Print Co. (n/k/a Copy Cat); Stillwater ) Gazette; Hudson News Agency; Star Observer ) Publishing; Rose Floral & Greenhouse, Inc.; ) Bergman's Garden Center Inc.; Bills' Bluff ) Bait (n/k/a Stiles); St. Croix Cleaners & ) Launderers; Shorty's Cleaners; Brookfield ) Company; Holiday Foods; Canelake's Steak ) & Seafood; S-S-G Corporation; Burt ) Nordstrand & Associates; Con/Spec Corp.; ) Johnny's TV & Video f/k/a Hooley's TV; Mall ) Theatres I & II; Waste Management Savage; ) Norwest Bank Minnesota NA (Stillwater); ) Maurice's Incorporated (Hudson and Stillwater); ) Jo Fahro's Dress Shop; G.A. Meyer ) Mercantile Co.; McGarry-Kearney Agency; ) Kolliners, Inc.; Action Rental, Inc.; Del's Lawn ) & Log (Del's Stillwater Outdoor Power ) Equipment); Orville Mausolf; Needham Dist. ) Co.; Simonet's Funeral Home; Jones- ) Bradshaw-Hauge Funeral Chapel; First State ) Bank of Bayport; Family Barbers; St. Croix ) 4 Valle Rod & Gun Club!hi s Center for ) • Valley PP the Arts; Dwayne Nelson: Happy B. ) Thomsen; Dr. G.D. Gaynor; Elmo Aero. Inc. ) (n/k/a Mayer Aviation); Bayport Marina: ) Edina Realty, Inc. (Hudson); ) Anthony T. Zappa; Piper, Jaffray & Hopwood ) Incorporated; Gardy's Sports; Stillwater ) Realty Co.); First National Bank of Hudson; ) Stillwater Steak, Inc. (n/k/a Stone Lake ) Restaurant); Dependable Ford-Mercury, Inc. ) (n/k/a Stillwater Ford); Mickelson Drug Store; ) Act II at the Opera House (n/k/a McCarthy's ) Irish Pub); Orville Madsen & Son; Big Ben ) Restaurant (Joseph's); Lake Elmo Inn; ) Sam's Brass Track (n/k/a The Old Log Cabin); ) Hudson Liquor Store (n/k/a Hudson Warehouse ) Liquor); Deluxe Cleaners (n/k/a Rivertown ) Cleaners); Hudson Bus Co. (n/k/a Safeway ) Bus Company); Casa De Pelo (n/k/a House of ) Hair); St. Croix Design Inc.; Dave Lindquist; ) The Sandbar; Farmers' Group Insurance ) (Meyer Agency); Metropolitan Federal Bank ) (Hudson and Stillwater); Century 21 Pendleton ) Co.; First National Bank (Hudson); State ) Bank of Hudson (n/k/a Mid America Bank); ) The Shannon Group (n/k/a Vollrath ) Refrigeration); ) AlliedSignal, Inc., successor-in-interest to ) Sinclair and Valentine, L.P.; Linden Health ) Care Center; Greeley Health Care Center; ) Greenbriar Terrace Partners; Ward ) Management of Hudson, Ltd.; Rustic Inn, ) Inc.; Hudson on the St. Croix, Inc.; ) and Nor-Lake, Inc., ) Third Defendants, ) ) and ) John Does and Mary Does, ) Fourth Defendants. ) Plaintiff Junker Landfill Trust, for its Amended Complaint herein against the defendants and each of them, states and alleges as follows: 5 INTRODUCTION This is a civil action under section 7002 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act. as amended (42 U.S.C. § 6901 et seq.), commonly referred to as the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 ("RCRA"), 42 U.S.C. § 6972: sections 107(a) and 113(f) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended, ("CERCLA"), 42 U.S.C. §§ 9607(a) and 9613(f), and the common law of the United States and the State of Wisconsin, to compel corrective remediation actions, for injunctive relief, for reimbursement of costs advanced by plaintiff, and for attorneys fees, expert witnesses fees and costs. in response to the release and threatened release of hazardous substances into the environment at the Junker Landfill ("Landfill"). This is also a civil action for declaratory judgment as to liability for future response costs to be incurred at the site, under 28 U.S.C. § 2201 and 42 U.S.C. § 9613 (g)(2). ll. PARTIES 1. Plaintiff Junker Landfill Trust is a Minnesota business trust operating pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 318 (1994). Plaintiffs settlors are a limited number of persons or entities whose waste may have been transported, on information and belief, to the Landfill at various times. Plaintiff has cooperated voluntarily with the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources ("WDNR") to investigate and remediate environmental contamination at the Landfill, without admitting liability for such 6 • • investigation and remediation. 2. First Defendant Junker Recycling. Inc. is a Minnesota corporation which by itself or through its predecessor Junker Sanitary Landfill. Inc., a Minnesota corporation. operated the Landfill and did business in Hudson Township, Wisconsin. at all times relevant to this matter, and thus is an "operator" within the meaning of CERCLA § 101(20), 42 U.S.C. § 9601(20). 3. First Defendant Junker Sanitation Services, Inc., is a Minnesota corporation, which by itself or through its affiliate First Defendant Junker Recycling, Inc., also operated the Landfill, and further, was involved in the business of transporting waste to the Landfill at all times relevant to this matter, and thus was engaged in "transport" within the meaning of CERCLA § 101(26), 42 U.S.C. § 9601(26). 4. First Defendant James L. Junker is an individual resident of Minnesota or Florida who owned, controlled, and was the alter ego and responsible corporate officer of First Defendants Junker Sanitary Landfill, Inc., Junker Sanitation Services, Inc., and Junker Recycling, Inc. (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Defendant Junker Corporations"), at all times relevant to this matter. First Defendant James L. Junker personally participated in the operation of the Landfill and is an operator of the Landfill within the meaning of CERCLA § 101(20), 42 U.S.C. § 9601(20). 5. First Defendant United Waste Systems, Inc., is a Delaware corporation which in 1995 acquired the business of First Defendant Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. from First Defendant James L. Junker when said parties were aware of the environmental contamination at the Landfill, and the associated liabilities. First Defendant United Waste Transfer, Inc., is a Minnesota corporation which in 1995, on ! .• information and belief. acquired the business of waste hauler Poor Richards. Inc . and perhaps other transporters whose waste may have been deposited at the Landfill. First Defendant United Waste Systems, Inc. is a mere continuation of Defendant Junker Sanitation Services. Inc. and. on information and belief, is undercapitalized in view of First Defendant Junker Sanitation Services, Inc.'s environmental contamination liabilities arising out of the Landfill. First Defendant United Waste Systems, Inc., is the alter ego. parent or other affiliated corporation which exercises substantial management. ownership, and financial control over First Defendant Junker Sanitation Services. Inc. and First Defendant United Waste Transfer. Inc. First Defendants United Waste are the successors-in-interest to First Defendant Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. and Poor Richards, Inc., and thus each is a "person" within the meaning of CERCLA § 101(21), 42 U.S.C. § 9601(21), and RCRA § 1004(15), 42 U.S.C. § 6903(15), as are all other defendants herein. 6. Second Defendants Eisinger Sanitation Services, Inc., et al., were engaged in the business of transporting waste to the Landfill at all times relevant to this matter, and thus were engaged in "transport" within the meaning of CERCLA § 101(26), 42 U.S.C. 9601(26). 7. Third Defendants City of Stillwater, et al., are public and private generators of waste, and others who arranged for disposal of hazardous substances at the Landfill at all times relevant to this matter. 8. Fourth Defendants John Does and Mary Does are other transporters, public and private generators, and others who or which arranged for disposal of hazardous substances at the Landfill. Defendants Does include those who have received CERCLA 8 • • § 104(e), 42 U.S.C. § 9604(e). information requests from the United States Environmental Protection Agency ("USEPA") related to the Landfill. and others whose waste containing hazardous substances was disposed of at the Landfill. Defendants Does also include successors-in-interest. and responsible corporate officers of presently- existing or previously-dissolved corporations, as well as shareholders, directors. partners. employees, agents and others who personally participated in the conduct alleged, and are liable, herein. III. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 9. This court has jurisdiction to hear this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (controversy arising under a federal statute); 28 U.S.C. § 2201 (declaratory judgment action); 42 U.S.C. 6972(a) (exclusive original jurisdiction over all controversies arising under RCRA); and 42 U.S.C. § 9613(b) (exclusive original jurisdiction over all controversies arising under CERCLA). This court also has supplemental jurisdiction to consider and adjudicate plaintiff's claims made under Wisconsin Statutes, Chapter 242 and the common law, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367 (supplemental jurisdiction) and considerations of judicial economy, convenience and fairness to litigants, and comity. 10. Venue lies in this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b), 42 U.S.C. § 6972(a), and 42 U.S.C. § 9613(b). 9 • IV. GENERAL ALLEGATIONS 7Landfill was o erated in Hudson Township.11. From 1972 to 198 , the St.p Croix County, Wisconsin. pursuant to a permit issued by the WDNR. From 1977 to 1987, the Defendant Junker Corporations and First Defendant James L. Junker leased and operated the Landfill. The Landfill property consists of approximately 20 acres and is located off Alexander Road, north of U.S. Highway 12, and about six miles east of the City of Hudson, Wisconsin, in Section 13, Township 29 North, Range 19 West. 12. The Landfill received municipal waste and industrial/commercial waste from commercial waste haulers serving residential and commercial accounts. Solid waste and other hazardous substances were disposed of at the Landfill. 13. In 1985, the WDNR published a report showing that the Landfill was the source of releases of chlorinated solvents into the underlying Prairie du Chein aquifer, based upon water quality sampling commenced in 1984. In 1987, the Landfill ceased accepting waste and the Landfill was closed. The WDNR commenced post-closure care of the Landfill beginning in 1989, which included capping the Landfill and installing a gas collection and destruction system. Further, the WDNR and the USEPA continued with water quality sampling of residential wells in the area, and established a Special Well Construction Area in 1991. The WDNR placed the Landfill on the Wisconsin Hazard Ranking List. 14. Hazardous substances detected in the groundwater underlying the Landfill, and detected off-site via gas migration, include, but are not limited to, Trichloroethene (TCE), Tetrachloroethene (PCE), Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon-11 ), and 10 • • • Dichlorodifluoromethane (Freon-12). 15. In 1993. the WDNR installed a leachate pumping system at the Landfill. USEPA Region V evaluated potential ecological risks at the Landfill in December. 1993. and published a site assessment report concerning the Landfill in April. 1994. On information and belief, the WDNR and USEPA have spent more than $2.8 million in investigation and remediation activities at the site to date. 16. Beginning in early 1994, plaintiff initiated in cooperation with the WDNR a bottled water delivery program to residences located near the Landfill which obtained water from the contaminated aquifer. Plaintiff further undertook preparation of a Remedial Investigation (RI) consistent with USEPA's National Contingency Plan (NCP), 40 C.F.R., Part 300. Plaintiffs RI report was approved by the WDNR in August, 1995. In addition, and in cooperation with the WDNR, plaintiff undertook preparation of a Feasibility Study (FS) to evaluate possible remedies to the environmental contamination issues identified in the RI, consistent with USEPA's evaluation criteria and guidance documents under CERCLA, and consistent with the NCP. Plaintiffs FS was approved by the WDNR in March, 1996. 17. The amount advanced by plaintiff to date without admitting liability on necessary costs of response in connection with inspections, monitoring, evaluations, assessments, sampling, analysis and other removal and remedial response actions not inconsistent with the NCP caused by the release of hazardous substances at the Landfill, is in excess of $1.3 million (excluding pre judgment interest) or as may be proven at the time of trial. 11 • COUNT ONE RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY ACT SECTION 7002(a)(1)(B) fALL DEFENDANTS) 18. Plaintiff restates the allegations contained in Paragraphs 1 through 17 as though fully set forth herein. 19. Plaintiff has complied with the notice requirements set forth at 42 U.S.C. § 6972(b) and 40 C.F.R. Part 254. 20. Each of the defendants is a person within the meaning RCRA § 1004(15), 42 U.S.C. § 6903(15). The defendants include generators of hazardous waste within the meaning of RCRA § 3002, 42 U.S.C. § 6922; transporters of hazardous waste within the meaning of RCRA § 3003, 42 U.S.C. § 6923; and operators of hazardous waste facilities within the meaning of RCRA § 3004, 42 U.S.C. § 6924, and companion state law, with respect to the Landfill. 21 . The Landfill is a treatment, storage or disposal facility within the meaning of RCRA § 7002(a)(1)(B), 42 U.S.C. § 6972(a)(1)(B). The hazardous substances that have been and are being released from the Landfill are solid or hazardous wastes within the meaning of RCRA § 7002(a)(1)(B), 42 U.S.C. § 6972(a)(1)(8). 22. Defendants, each and every one of them, should be compelled to take corrective remediation actions to abate the contamination of the soil and groundwater underlying the Landfill under RCRA § 7002(a)(1)(B), 42 U.S.C. § 6972(a)(1)(B). Defendants, each and every one of them, should further be ordered to pay plaintiffs cost of litigation (including attorney and expert witness fees) pursuant to RCRA § 7002(e), 42 U.S.C. § 6972(e). 12 - - - ---------------- • • COUNT TWO COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE, COMPENSATION AND LIABILITY ACT SECTION 107 (ALL DEFENDANTS) 23. Plaintiff restates the allegations contained in Paragraphs 1 through 22 as though fully set forth herein. 24. The Landfill is a "facility" as defined by CERCLA § 101(9). 42 U.S.C. § 9601(9). 25. "Hazardous substances," as defined by CERCLA § 101(14), 42 U.S.C. § 9601(14), have been and are present at the Landfill. 26. Hazardous substances have been and are being "release[d]," as defined by CERCLA § 101(22), 42 U.S.C. § 9601(22), into the soil and groundwater underlying the Landfill. 27. The defendants caused the "disposal," as defined by CERCLA § 101(29), 42 U.S.C. § 9601(29), of hazardous substances at the Landfill. 28. First Defendant James L. Junker and the Defendant Junker Corporations operated the Landfill at the times of disposal of hazardous substances there. First Defendant James L. Junker and First Defendant Junker Sanitation Services. Inc., accepted hazardous substances for transport to the Landfill for disposal which was a facility selected by them for hazardous substance disposal. First Defendants United Waste Systems, Inc. and United Waste Transfer, Inc., are the alter egos, mere continuations and successors-in-interest to First Defendant Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. and Poor Richards, Inc., respectively, with respect to the transport of hazardous substances for disposal at the Landfill. 13 • 29. Second Defendants Eisinger Sanitation, et al.. accepted hazardous substances for transport to the Landfill for disposal which was a facility selected by them for hazardous substances disposal. 30. Third Defendants City of Stillwater. et al.. generated hazardous substances and/or arranged for disposal of hazardous substances at the Landfill. 31. Fourth Defendants John Does and Mary Does include other persons not presently determined who, by contract, agreement or otherwise arranged for the disposal, or arranged with a transporter for transport for disposal at the Landfill of hazardous substances owned or possessed by each such defendant. Said defendants also include persons who accepted hazardous substances for transport to the Landfill for disposal, which was a facility selected by them for hazardous substance disposal. 32. The release of hazardous substances disposed of by the defendants at the Landfill caused necessary costs of response to be advanced by plaintiff and others consistent with the NCP, and for which the defendants are liable, jointly and severally, pursuant to CERCLA § 107(a), 42 U.S.C. § 9607(a). COUNT THREE COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE, COMPENSATION AND LIABILITY ACT SECTION 113 (ALL DEFENDANTS) 33. Plaintiff restates the allegations contained in Paragraphs 1 through 32 as though fully set forth herein. 14. Section 113(f) of CERCLA, as amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA) of 1986, 42 U.S.C. § 9613(f), authorizes a person to seek contribution for response costs "from any other person who is liable or potentially 14 • • liable under section 9607(a)" of CERCLA. Section 113(g)(2) of CERCLA. 42 U S C § 9613(g)(2), authorizes a court to "enter a declaratory judgment on liability for response costs or damages that will be binding on any subsequent action or actions to recover further response costs or damages." Each of the defendants is liable or potentiallyliable under CERCLA § 35. 107(a), 42 U.S.C. § 9607(a), for necessary costs of response at the Landfill consistent with the NCP. 36. In the event plaintiff were found liable or potentially liable under CERCLA § 107(a) for Landfill-caused response costs, then pursuant to CERCLA § 113(f), 42 U.S.C. § 9613(f), plaintiff would be entitled to contribution from defendants for the response costs incurred and for future response costs to be incurred in connection with the Landfill, and to an allocation by the court of such past and future response costs among the defendants using such equitable factors as the court determines are appropriate. COUNT FOUR FEDERAL COMMON LAW CONTRIBUTION (ALL DEFENDANTS) 37. Plaintiff restates the allegations contained in Paragraphs 1 through 36 as though fully set forth herein. 38. Defendants share a common liability for the investigation and remediation of the Landfill. Plaintiff has advanced more than its equitable share of such costs. If plaintiff were found liable for its equitable share of such costs, then under those circumstances, defendants would be liable to plaintiff for their contribution or comparative 15 • • share of the costs of investigation and remediation of the Landfill. as a matter of federal common law. COUNT FIVE WISCONSIN COMMON LAW CONTRIBUTION (ALL DEFENDANTS) 39. Plaintiff restates the allegations contained in Paragraphs 1 through 38 as though fully set forth herein. 40. Defendants share a common liability for the investigation and remediation of the Landfill. Plaintiff has advanced more than its equitable share of such costs. If plaintiff were found liable for its equitable share of such costs, then under those circumstances, defendants would be liable to plaintiff for their contribution or comparative share of the costs of investigation and remediation of the Landfill, as a matter of Wisconsin common law. COUNT SIX UNJUST ENRICHMENT TALL DEFENDANTS) 41. Plaintiff restates the allegations contained in Paragraphs 1 through 40 as though fully set forth herein. 42. In view of the defendants' operation of the Landfill, and/or the defendants' disposal, transport, or arranging for disposal of hazardous substances at the Landfill, if plaintiff were solely obligated to investigate and rem ediate the Landfill, then defendants would receive an unfair benefit insofar as they would not have contributed to payment for the costs of response and other costs with respect to the Landfill caused by them. 16 i 43. The court should impose a constructive trust in favor of plaintiff for ail sums adjudicated to be the Landfill response cost obligations of the defendants. to prevent their unjust enrichment, pursuant to equitable principles. COUNT SEVEN FRAUDULENT TRANSFER RECOVERY (DEFENDANTS JUNKER) 44. Plaintiff restates the allegations contained in Paragraphs 1 through 43 as though fully set forth herein. 45. For many years, First Defendant James L. Junker and the Defendant Junker Corporations have known of the soil and groundwater contamination at the Landfill, and the magnitude of the associated liabilities for Landfill contamination investigation and remediation. On information and belief, First Defendant James L. Junker, his spouse Deborah G. Junker, and the Defendant Junker Corporations may have transferred their assets to relatives, insiders, and alter egos, to shield their assets from Landfill remediation creditors. Plaintiff has heard, for example, that First Defendant James L. Junker has established sizeable trust funds for his children. True information concerning whether First Defendant James L. Junker and/or the Defendant Junker Corporations have unlawfully transferred assets to avoid Landfill liabilities is within the exclusive control of said defendants and their agents or others. 46. Upon the sale of First Defendant Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. or its assets to First Defendant United Waste Systems, Inc., First Defendant Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. and First Defendant James L. Junker received, on information and belief, substantial value including a sum certain in money. The sale occurred at the time said 17 • • defendants were aware of the environmental contamination investigation of the Landfill by the WDNR and the USEPA. Said defendants further were aware at the time of the sale of the enormity of investigative and response costs necessary to rem ediate the site. 47. If First Defendant James L. Junker's, or the Defendant Junker Corporations', assets, or the consideration received by First Defendant James L. Junker or the Defendant Junker Corporations from First Defendant United Waste Systems. Inc.. have or has been transferred to insiders, third persons or entities, or others in an effort to hinder, delay or defraud Landfill remediation creditors (including plaintiff) seeking reimbursement or contribution from said defendants herein, and/or if the transfer(s) was made without the transferor(s) receiving reasonably equivalent-value, rendering any of them insolvent, then such transfers would be fraudulent and would violate the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act, Wisconsin Statutes, Chapter 242, and other applicable law and equitable doctrines. 48. Accordingly, if it is determined that First Defendant James L. Junker and/or the Defendant Junker Corporations fraudulently transferred assets, money or value to avoid their liabilities for Landfill investigation and remediation, then plaintiff requests the court to declare such transfers unlawful and to avoid, nullify and set them aside, to order the return or recovery of any and all asset, money or value transfers, and to enjoin said defendants from selling, disposing, transferring or otherwise further conveying or encumbering any of their assets, or the consideration received in the sale of First Defendant Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. to First Defendant United Waste Systems, Inc., pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 242.07. 18 • • WHEREFORE. Plaintiff Junker Landfill Trust seeks money damages. injunctive relief, and a declaratory judgment against the defendants. as follows: (a) Compelling the defendants to take corrective remediation action with respect to the Landfill in compliance with applicable law, rules. regulations. and orders; (b) Declaring that defendants by themselves or by their predecessors as appropriate, operated the Landfill, accepted hazardous substances for transport to the Landfill facility which was selected by them, and/or disposed of, transported and/or arranged for the disposal of hazardous substances they owned or possessed at the Landfill, which hazardous substances were, in fact, disposed of at the Landfill; (c) Declaring that hazardous substances have been released into the environment at the Landfill; (d) Declaring that defendants, each and every one of them, are persons responsible for the release of hazardous substances at the Landfill within the meaning of CERCLA §§ 107(a) and 113(f), 42 U.S.C.§§ 9607(a) and 9613(f); (e) Declaring that defendants are jointly and severally liable to plaintiff for all sums advanced by plaintiff for necessary costs of response for investigative, removal or remedial actions at the Landfill consistent with the NCP and applicable law; (f) Awarding plaintiff pre-judgment interest pursuant to CERCLA § 107(a)(4), 19 • • 42 U.S.C. § 9607(a)(4), for all damages and for all sums it has advanced for which it is entitled to contribution and reimbursement from the defendants; (g) Declaring fraudulent transfers void. ordering the return of all asset. money or value transfers, and enjoining First Defendant James L. Junker and the Defendant Junker Corporations from transferring assets to avoid Landfill liabilities; and (h) Awarding plaintiff costs of litigation including reasonable attorneyss and expert witnesses fees pursuant to RCRA § 7002(e), 42 U.S.C. § 6972(e), and reasonable attorneys fees incurred in identifying responsible parties consistent with Key Tronic Corp. v. United States, _ U.S. _, 114 S. Ct. 1960, 128 L. Ed. 2d 797 (1994), together with other costs and disbursements incurred herein: and (i) Awarding plaintiff such other and further relief as the court deems just and equitable under the circumstances. Dated: April 12, 1996 Lind, Jensen & Sullivan Professional Association T-d E. Sulliv-n, Wis. I.D. No. 1009901 Tho • -nsen, Minn. I.D. No. 50179 Attorneys for Plaintiff 150 South Fifth Street, Suite 1700 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 (612) 333-3637 20 • JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Plaintiff alleges that all or some of the issues asserted herein may be triable to a jury and therefore demands a jury trial as to all issues herein or as ordered by the court pursuant to applicable law. 21 EXHIBIT B A".440(rtev.5/851 Summons in e Civil Actio, 1 , • niter tzttes Pi5tricttotteOPY DISTRICT OF Landfill Remediation Trust, a Wisconsin business trust, SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff, V. - CASENUM C 489 S Garry Thompson, John Sauers, individually and d/b/a Sanitary Landfill Site, Inc., Andersen Corporation, Murtha Brothers, O'Connell, Colmunity Sanitation, New Richmond Sanitation, Fox Riverfalls *and List A, Defendants. TO:Mama and Address or aNndaml Garry Thompson John Sauers Andersen Corporation 14447 55th Street 4715 Ward Street Jerold Wulf, C.E.O. Stillwater, MN 55083 Cincinnati, OH 45227 100 4th Ave. North Bayport, MN 55003 *SEE ATTACHED LIST A FOR REMAINING DEFENDANTS TO BE SERVED YOU ARE HEREBY SUMMONED and required to file with the Clerk of this Court and serve upon PLAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY(name and address) Dennis Sullivan Kevin Spellacy Herrick and Hart Quinlivan 116 West Grand Ave. 600 Norwest Center P.O. Box 167 Box 1008 Eau Claire, WI 54702 St. Cloud, MN 56302 an answer to the complaint which is herewith served upon you, within days after service of - this summons upon you, exclusive of the day of service. If you fail to do so, judgment by default will be taken against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. AWN W.SKUPNIE '"" j 1 I CLERK (.ADATE EN .NELSON BY DEPUTY CLERK Cow j. JS 44C (Rev. 11/8.2) CIVIL COVER SHEET The JS-44 civil cover sheet and formation contained herein neither replace nor s ent the filing and service of pleadings or other papers as re d by law, except as provided by local rules of c . This form, approved by the Judicial Conference of the-Unittd States in.September 1974, is required for the use of the Clerk-of Court for the purpose - of initiating the civil docket sheet. (For more detailed instructions,see separate instruction sheet.) PLAINTIFFS DEFENDANTS I I Landfill Remediation Trust, a Garry Thompson, John Sauers, Wisconsin business turst, individually and d/b/a Sanitary Landfill Site,: Inc., Andersen Corporation, Murtha Brothers, O'Connell, Community Sanitation, New Richmond Sanitation, Fox Riverfalls *and List A, COUNTY OF RESIDENCE OF FIRST LISTED PLAINTIFF COUNTY OF RESIDENCE OF FIRST LISTED DEFENDANT (EXCEPT IN U.S.PLAINTIFF CASES) (IN U.S.PLAINTIFF CASES ONLY) NOTE:IN LAND CONDEMNATION CASES,USE THE LOCATION OF THE TRACT OF LAND INVOLVED(' SATTORNEYS(FIRMNAME,ADDRESS,ANDTELEPHONENUMBER) ATTORNE4.96 WN) ,1 89 Dennis Sullivan Kevin Spellacy VV v Herrick & Hart Quinlivan 116 West Grand Ave. 600 Norwest Center P.O. Box 167 Box 1008 Eau Claire, WI 54702 St. Cloud, MN 56302 (PLACE AN(RIM ONE BOX ONLY) BASIS OF JURISDICTION IF DIVERSITY, INDICATE V 1 US.PLAINTIFF 02 U.S.DEFENDANT 03 FEDERAL QUESTION 04 DIVERSITY OarCITIZENSHIP ON REVERSE. (U.S.NOT A PARTY) (28 USC 1332, 1441) CAUSE OF ACTION (CITE THE U.S.CIVIL STATUTE UNDER WHICH YOU ARE FILING ANO WRITE A BRIEF STATEMENT OF CAUSE) (PLACE AN El IN ONE BOX ONLY) NATURE OF SUIT CONTRACT TORTS ACTIONS UNDER STATUTES CIVIL RIGHTS FORFEITURE/PENALTY BANKRUPTCY OTHER STATUTES Cont. 110 INSURANCE PERSONAL INJURY "'420 TRUSTEE ❑450 COMMERCE ICC 120 MARINE 8 310 AIRPLANE ❑441 VOTING ❑610 AGRICULTURE "'421 TRANSFER(91 so) RATES.ETC. ❑460 DEPORTATION 315 AIRPLANE 130 MILLER ACT PRODUCT ❑442 JOBS ❑620 FooD a DRUG "� 422 APPEAL(801) 140 NEGOTIABLE LIABILITY ❑630 LIOUOR LAWS _ INSTRUMENT ❑320 ASSAULT,LIBEL ❑443 ACCOMMODA- PROPERTY RIGHTS ' ❑ala SELECTIVE 0 150 RECOVERY OF &SLANDER notsis ❑640 R.R.a TRUCK —820 COPYRIGHT SERVICE OVERPAYMENT& ❑330 FEDERAL ❑650 AIRLINE BEGS. _� 830 PATENT 0 850 SECURMES ENFORCEMENT EMPLOYERS' ❑444 WELFARE OF JUDGMENT LIABILITY ❑660 OCCUPATIONAL 840 TRADEMARK COMMOOITIES 340 MARINE 0 440 OTHER CIVIL SAFETY/HEALTH - 8 151 MEDICARE ACT 345 MARINE RIGHTS SOCIAL SECURITY ❑891 AGRICULTURAL 152 RECOVERY OF PRODUCT ❑690 OTHER 8 861 HW(1395ff) ACTS DEFAULTED LIABILITY STUDENT LOANS 350 MOTOR VEHICLE 862 BLACK LUNG ❑ MIC EC 892 ECONONOZATION ❑153 RECOVERY OF 8 355 MOTOR VEHICLE (923) OVERPAYMENT PRODUCT 863 DIWC(405(g)) OF VETERANS ❑ LIABILITY 863 oIWW(405(g)) ®893 ENVIRON- 8BENEFITS 63 OTHER PERSONAL PRISONER PETITIONS LABOR 864 ssio nue XVI MATTERS ❑160 STOCKHOLDERS 362 IINJURYY 865 RSI(406(g)) ❑894 ENERGY SUITS 0 190 OTHER ❑ INJURY-MED. ❑510 VACATE ❑710 STANDARDS TAX SUITS ALLOCATIONA CONTRACT __ SENTENCE Ti 870 TAXES ❑195 CONTRACT ❑365 PERSONAL (225.5) ❑720 LA80R/MGM&. ❑ ❑895 FREEDOM OF PRODUCT INJURY -RELATIONS 871 IRS-THIRD INFORMATION LIABILITYPRODUCT 530 HABEAS PARTY 26 USC ACT LIABILITY ❑ CORPUS ❑730 REPORTING&' 7609 900 APPEAL OF FEE REPORTING& REAL PROPERTY PERSONAL PROPERTY DISCLOSURE ❑875 CUSTOMER 0 DETERMINATION 540 MANDAMUS 8 CHALLENGE 12 210 CONDEMNATION 8 370 OTHER FRAUD ACT `"220 FORECLOSURE 371 TRUTH IN OTHER 74O RAILWAY LABOR USC 3410 ACCESS O EQUAL ",230 RENT LEASE& LENDING 0 550 CIVIL RIGHTS ❑ ACT OTHER STATUTES JUSTICE EJECTMENT 0 380 OTl LER 400 STATE950 CONSTfTU- PERSONAL 0 790 OTHER LABOR ❑ 0 240 TORTS TO LAND PROPERTY LITIGATION REAPPORTION- TIONAL.ITY OF 245 BUA ITaRODUCT ❑385 PROPERTY 0 791 EIPL RET.INC. MEQ STATE STATUES 8 41 O ANTI-TRUST 890 OTHER 290 ALL OTHER REAL DAMAGEC SECURITY ACT ❑ ❑ PROPERTY PRODUCT 430 BANKS AND STATUTORY LIABILITY BANKING ACTIONS (PLACE ANO IN ONE BOX ONL Y) ORIGIN „..„ Appeal to Dosnct Transferred from 7 Juage!torn ❑1 Ongntal ❑2 Removed from ❑3 Remanded from ❑4 Reinstated or ❑5 another dtstncf ❑6 Multldismct Magistrate Proceeding State Court Appellate Court Reopened (speafy) Litigation Juogment UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT (Continued on Reverse Side) cOPY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN Landfill Remediation Trust, a Wisconsin business trust, Plaintiff Civil Action No. vs. COMPLAINT AND JURY TRIAL DEMAND Garry Thompson, John Sauers, 196 C if 89 S individually and d/b/a Sanitary C�+V Landfill Site, Inc. , Andersen Corporation, Murtha Brothers, O'Connell, Community Sanitation, New Richmond Sanitation, Fox Riverfalls *and List A, Defendants. Plaintiff Landfill Remediation Trust, for its Complaint herein against the defendants and each of them, states and alleges as follows: I. INTRODUCTION 1. This is a civil action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C.§ 9613 (f) , of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended, (CERCLA) , and the common law of the State of Wisconsin. It seeks reimbursement of costs which the plaintiff is incurring and which it will incur in the future to remedy and clean up a release of hazardous substances into the environment at the Junker Landfill, which is located near the City of Hudson, Wisconsin (Landfill) . This action also seeks a declaratory judgment concerning liability for future response costs 411 to be incurred at the site, pursuant to 42 U. S.C. § 9613 (g) (2) , and 28 U.S.C. §2201. II. PARTIES 2. Plaintiff Landfill Remediation Trust (Trust) is a wisconsin business trust, whose settlers include James Junker personally, Junker Recycling, Inc. , a Minnesota corporation, f/k/a Junker Sanitary Landfill, Inc. , and those persons or entities who may reach settlement with the Trust in the future. The Trust has reached a voluntary agreement with the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) to remediate environmental contamination at the Landfill . 3. Defendants include Garry Thompson and John Sauers, individually and d/b/a Sanitary Landfill Site, Inc. , the owners of the Landfill property, Andersen Corporation, a major generator of materials which were placed at the Landfill, and Murtha Brothers, O'Connell, Community Sanitation, New Richmond Sanitation and Fox Riverfalls, transporters of refuse to the Landfill. Other transporters and generators include those parties identified in List A. III. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 4. This Court has jurisdiction to hear this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1331 (federal question jurisdiction) , 28 U.S.C. § 2201 (declaratory judgment action) , and 42 U.S.C. § 9613 (b) (exclusive jurisdiction over all controversies arising under CERCLA) . In addition, this Court has pendant jurisdiction to consider and 4 adjudicate plaintiff's claims made under Wisconsin statutes and common law, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. S 1367 (supplemental jurisdiction) . 5. Venue lies in this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. S 1391(b) and 42 U.S.C. § 9613 (b) . IV. GENERAL ALLEGATIONS 6. The Landfill is located in Hudson Township, St. Croix County, Wisconsin and was operated during the period of 1972 to 1987 pursuant to a permit issued by the WDNR. The permit restricted allowable materials to municipal waste, brush, and industrial/commercial waste. Hazardous substances were not to be disposed at the Landfill under any circumstances. 7. During the period of 1972 through 1977, the Landfill was initially operated by Wally Pilquist and subsequently purchased and operated by Garry Thompson and John Sauers, individually and d/b/a Sanitary Landfill Site, Inc. Andersen Corporation was either the sole or otherwise the primary generator of materials which were placed in the Landfill during this period of time. 8. During the period of 1977 to 1986, the Landfill was operated by Junker Recycling, Inc. , or its predecessor, Junker Sanitary Landfill, Inc. Generators included Andersen Corporation, and all of the persons or entities listed in List A, except for those which were involved in transporting materials to the site. —9. Hazardous substances were placed in the Landfill, and some of these have since escaped into the environment. Such materials were placed in the refuse without the knowledge or • 4 permission of James Junker, Junker Recycling, Inc. , or Junker Sanitation Services. Junker Recycling, Inc. , at all times material herein, used its best efforts to comply with the permit and accept only those materials specifically permitted. 10. Junker Sanitation services, Inc. hauled refuse to the site during the time period of 1977 through 1987. It, at all times material herein, used its best efforts to comply with the requirements of the permit and it did not knowingly accept hazardous substances from any person or entity. 11. The WDNR has placed the Landfill on the Wisconsin hazard ranking list. A remedial investigation/feasibility study has been completed and a remedy has been selected by the WDNR. 12. On or about April 15, 1996, the WDNR reached an agreement in principle with James Junker, owner of Junker Recycling, Inc. , United Wasted Systems, Inc. , owner of Junker Sanitation Services and Junker Recycling, Inc. , pursuant to which Junker Recycling, Inc. and James Junker, with specified assistance form Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. , will undertake the future remediation of the site, and its operation and maintenance, including services for affected residences. 13 . On or about May 15, 1996, Landfill Remediation Trust was formed by James Junker and Junker Recycling, inc. to carry out the remediation work described in the immediately preceding paragraph. 14. On or about May 15, 1996, the WDNR, Landfill Remediation Trust, Junker Recycling, Inc. , James Junker, and Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. entered into a Consent Decree which addresses the remediation, operation and maintenance activities described herein. 411 41IL 15: Juhker Sanitation Services, Inc. will participate in remediation work prescribed by the Consent Decree, to the extent set forth therein. It does not join in the claims set forth hereafter. 16. Defendants are potentially liable parties under 42 U.S.C. S 9607 (a) . 17. The WDNR has lodged the Consent Decree with the Federal Court pursuant to 42 U.S.C. S 9622. V. CERCLA 42 U.S.C.§ 9613 (F) CONTRIBUTION 18 . Plaintiff is entitled to contribution pursuant to 41 U.S.C. § 9613 (f) from defendants for their equitable shares of any sum which plaintiff is required to pay as response costs pursuant to the consent Decree. VI. DECLARATORY JUDGMENT 19. Plaintiff is entitled to a declaratory judgment pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §9613 (g) (2) against defendants which determines the liability of each for future response costs or damages. VII. UNJUST ENRICHMENTS 20. Plaintiff has contributed monies to defray the cost of remedial investigation and feasibility studies. 21. Plaintiff has and will continue to expend monies for the remedial, operation, maintenance, and other services required by the Consent Decree. ... . . 4 22. Defendants have been unjustly enriched by plaintiff's contributions set forth herein. 23 . Defendants are individually and jointly liable to plaintiff for the value of the benefits conferred upon them by plaintiff, pursuant to state and federal common law. WHEREFORE, plaintiff prays for the entry of judgment against defendants as follows: 1. For contribution against defendants for their equitable share of the cost of remediation, operation, maintenance, and other services prescribed by the Consent Decree. 2. A judgment against all defendants for all other necessary costs and expenses incurred by or assessed against plaintiff, including attorneys fees, and other costs and disbursements. 3 . For declaratory judgment against each defendant for its equitable share of site costs incurred to date and in the future. 4 . Judgment against all defendants in restitution for benefits conferred by plaintiff to date. 5. For such other relief as the Court deems just and proper. III III _ . DATED this 10th day of June, 1996. HERRICK, HART, DUCHEMIN, SPAETH, SULL. v . & SCHUMACHER, S.C. By. $ iss M. an - 101606'1- At 016053 At orneys for Plaintiff 116 West Grand Avenue Post Office Box 167 Eau Claire, Wisconsin 54702 (715) 832-3491 QUINLIVAN, SHERWOOD, SPELLACY & TARVESTAD, P.A. Kevin A. Spellacy - 103962 Attorneys for Plaintiff 600 Norwest Center Box 1008 St. Cloud, MN 56302 (612) 251-1414 • • CO /'/L p —771 Manchester Place Attorneys Ax L E Y BRYNELSON e a u N c 1 2 East Mifflin Street Bradley D. Armstrong Post Office Box 1767 John H. Schmid, Jr. Attorneys Since 1885 Nfr Madison,WI 53701.1767 Timothy D. Fenner John C. Mitby May6, 1996 //lar/ Facsimile(608) 257-5444 Daniel T. Hardy Telephone(608) 257.5661 John Walsh Email: law@axley.com Bruce L. Harms HAND DELIVERED David Easton Curtis C. Swanson Michael S. Anderson United States District Court Clerk [ © [ D V7 E f Patricia M. Gibeault 320 United States Courthouse Michael J. Westcoll Larry K. Libman 120 North Henry Street MAY8 Richard E. Petershacr Madison, WI 53703 Steven A. Brezinski Steven M. Streck _ Joy L. O'Grosky Re: Junker Landfill Trust v. Junker Recycling, Inc., et al. Arthur E.Kurtz Case Number: 96 C 0019-S Edith F.Merila Michael J. Modl Our File: 8643.44201 Sabin S. Peterson Guy DuBeau Dear Clerk: Ritchie J. Sturgeon Beverly A. Seagraves Mark Hazelbaker Enclosedou will find the following: Gregory C. Collins YPaul Voelker Marcia MacKenzie 1. Defendant Town of Hudson's Motion for Summary Judgment; Amelia L.McCarthy Amy B.F.Tutwiler Grant B.Spellmeyer 2. Defendant Town of Hudson's Brief in Support of Its Motion for Summary Darold J.Londo Judgment; Christopher P.Koback g Shannon B.Farrell John T.Payette 3. Affidavit of JoAnn Wert; of Counsel Floyd A. Brynelson 4. Defendant Hudson Township's Proposed Findings of Fact, Conclusions of James C. Herrick Law and Order; and Frank J.Bucaida Griffin G. Dorschel 5. Certificate of Service. in Memoriam Ralph E.Axley 1902-1995 By copy of this letter, a copy of each of the above-documents is being served upon all Peter Weisenberger parties listed on the service list enclosed. 1946.1992 Very truly yours, AXL Y BRYNELSON Amy Nutwiler ABT:mb Enclosures cc: See attached service list • UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN JUNKER LANDFILL TRUST, a Minnesota business trust, Plaintiff, Civil Action Case No. 96 C 0019-S v. Honorable John C. Shabaz JUNKER RECYCLING, INC., a Minnesota corporation, et al., Defendants, and JUNKER RECYCLING, INC., a Minnesota corporation, et al., Defendants and Third Party Plaintiffs, v. GARRY THOMPSON, et al., Third Party Defendants. AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF WISCONSIN ) )ss. COUNTY OF DANE ) Michelle Boehnen, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes and says that she is a legal assistant in the offices of Axley Brynelson, attorneys for defendant Town of Hudson in the 0 • above-entitled action; that on the 6th day of May, 1996, she mailed a true and correct copy of the following: 1. Defendant Town of Hudson's Motion for Summary Judgment; 2. Defendant Town of Hudson's Brief in Support of Its Motion for Summary Judgment; 3. Affidavit of JoAnn Wert; and 4. Defendant Hudson Township's Proposed Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order, the originals of which are attached hereto, in the above-entitled action by first class, United States mail securely enclosed in a postage-paid envelope, addressed to the persons at the addresses shown on the service list attached hereto. ..c-r...Me dcae----Lt...0-,---) M.helle Boehnen Subscribed and sworn to before me this 6th da • Ma , 19,. ;N r, Aide •Lary Public, to e •f Wsconsin My commission: A. Al' 2 • • DEFENDANTS - ALPHABETICALLY BrAamodt's Apple Farm,Inc. 'x,Inc. 1790 428 Manning Avenue Washington Avenue North Stillwater, Stillwater,MN 55082 Stillwater,MN 55082 Brookfield Company Act II at the Opera House 1132(n/k/a McCarthy's Irish Pub) St(W er,StiMNNter Boulevard N 516 2nd Street S811water, 55082 Hudson,WI 54016 Brookman Motors 11144 N Stillwater Boulevard Action Rental,Inc. Lake Elmo,MN 55042 14575 N 61 St Ct Stillwater,MN 55082 Bruette Roofing AlliedSignal,Inc.,successor-in-interest 9270 eN to Sinclair and Valentine,L.P. Stillwateerr,,MMN N 55500822ue Law Department Burger King Corporation(Hudson) P 0 Box 2245 2411 Center Drive Morristown,NJ 07962 Hudson,WI 54016 Arrow Building Center Burlington Northern Railroad 876 County Trunk U Hudson,WI 54016 4105 North Lexington Avenue Arden Hills,MN 55112 B&L Liquor Store Vance Bushay 1369 Highway 35 Houlton,WI 54082 701 -4th Avenue South Minneapolis,MN 55415 Bardiif,Robert C.,DDS Canadian Pacific,Ltd.(successor to the Milwaukee Road Depot) 900 6th Street N,Suite 200 Hudson WI,54016 c/o CP Rail System 105 S 5th Street Bayport Marina Edina Realty,Inc.(Hudson) Minneapolis,MN 55403 200 5th Avenue S Bayport,MN 55003 Canelake's Steak&Seafood 1240 W Frontage Road Bayport Printing House,Inc. Stillwater,MN 55082 102 Central Avenue Carba Bayport,MN 55003 5988 Osgoodne's PAvenue Avenue N ATTORNEYS FOR BAYPORT PRINTING HOUSE,INC. Stillwater,MN 55082 Dwight P.Cummins Cummins,Gervais&Associates Casa De Per (n/k/a House of Hair) Professional Building 797 Sommer Street N 363 5th Ave.N. Hudson,WI 54016 Bayport,MN 55003-1221 Tel: 430-2630 Fax: 430-2813 CassanovaBeverage Co. Coulee Road Beaudet Apartments Hudson,WI 54016 6400 N Lookout Trail Stillwater,MN 55082 Century 21 Pendleton Co. 706 19th Street Bergman's Garden Center Inc. Hudson,WI 54016 12054 N 60th St Stillwater,MN 55082 Chambers,Harold 2712 Fifth Avenue East Big Ben Restaurant(Joseph's) North Saint Paul,MN 55109 Highway 36 Stillwater,MN 55082 Champion Auto Parts,Inc. 14621 N 60th Street Bills' Bluff Bait(n/k/a Stiles) Stillwater,MN 55082 806 S Main St Stillwater,MN 55082 City of Bayport 294 N 3rd St Birchwood Apartments Bayport,MN 55003 14850 North 62nd Street Stillwater,MN 55082 • • City of Hudson Davian Building 505 Third Street 1835 Northwestern Avenue Hudson,WI 54016 Stillwater,MN 55082 City of Oak Park Heights Del's Lawn&Log(Del's Stillwater Outdoor Power Equipment) 14168-57th Street North 150 South Third Street Stillwater,MN 55082 Stillwater,MN 55082 City of Stillwater Deluxe Cleaners(n/k/a Rivertown Cleaners) 216 North Fourth Street 403 2nd Street Stillwater,MN 55083 Hudson,WI 54016 Clark Oil&Refining Company Dependable Ford-Mercury,Inc.(n/k/a Stillwater Ford) 8182 Maryland Avenue 12969 N 60th Street Clayton,MO 63105 Stillwater,MN 55082 The Club Tara Dick's Bar of Hudson 15021 North 60th Street 111 Walnut Street Oak Park Heights,MN 55082 Hudson,WI 54016 Clyde's Restaurant Diess Sanitation 101 5th Avenue S 250 Summit Street Bayport,MN 55003 River Falls,WI 54022 Con/Spec Corp. Domino's Pizza,Inc. 1809 Northwestern Avenue 501 N Main Stillwater,MN 55082 Stillwater,MN 55082 Connel,AA.,DVM Duling Optical Corporation(Hudson) 14303 N 60th St C.T.Corporate Systems Stillwater MN,55082 405 Second Avenue South Minneapolis,MN 55402 Consolidated Lumber Keller Construction Co. Duro Bag Manufacturing Co.,Inc. 808 N 4th St P.O.Box 247 Stillwater,MN 55082 Hudson,WI 54018 Comellier Specialties,Inc. Eisinger Sanitation Services,Inc. Highway 12&1-94 15843 45th Avenue South Hudson,WI 54016 Afton,MN 55001 Croixdale Apartments Elmo Aero,Inc.(n/k/a Mayer Aviation) 750 N Highway 95 12402 N 30th Street Bayport,MN 55003 Lake Elmo,MN 55042 Croixvale Recreation Erickson Oil Products,Inc. (n/k/a River Valley Atheletic Club) 1231 Industrial Road 11828 Northwestern Avenue Hudson,WI 54016 Stillwater,MN 55082 Erickson Post,Inc. Charles Cudd Co. 1465 Stillwater Boulevard N 1802 Wooddale Drive Stillwater,MN 55082 Woodbury,WI 55125 Esteban's Restaurant Dabruzzi Village Liquor 324 S Main Street 711 6th Street N Stillwater,MN 55082 Hudson,WI 54016 Evenson Plumbing&Heating Dairy Queen,Inc. 419 Second Street 14529 N 60th St Hudson,WI 54016 Stillwater,MN 55082 Family Barbers Dairy Queen,Inc. 706 19th 9 South 2nd Street Hudson,WI 54016 Hudson,WI 54016 Farmers'Group Insurance(Meyer Agency) Dann's Service Center(n/k/a Herman's) 5995 Oren Avenue North Highway 95&1st Avenue South Stillwater,MN 55082 Bayport,MN 55003 First National Bank of Hudson Dave Holt Ford Inc. 307 Second Street 2020 Crestview Dr Hudson,WI 54016 Hudson,WI 54016 2 • • First State Bank of Bayport R.Hagstrom Builders 950 N Highway 95 3394 Lake Elmo Avenue N Bayport,MN 55003 Lake Elmo,MN 55042 Food&Fuel,Inc. Hagberg Country Market 4366 W Round Lake Rd 11325 N Stillwater Boulevard New Brighton,MN 55112 Stillwater,MN 55082 Fred's Tire Company,Inc. Hagstrom,Robert S.,Jr. 3955 Highway 61 8441 Kimbro Avenue North White Bear Lake,MN 55110 Cottage Grove,MN 55016 GA.Meyer Mercantile Co. Hans Hagen Homes 3537 Lake Elmo Avenue North 941 NE Hillwind Rd Lake Elmo,MN 55042 Fridley,MN 55432 G S Electric Hardware Hank,Inc. 1301 Industrial Road St.Croix Mall Hudson,WI 54016 14817 North 59th Street Stillwater,MN 55082 Gagnon Construction Company ATTORNEYS FOR HARDWARE HANK,INC. 2286 Capp Road Paul B.Zrsla St.Paul,MN 55114-1210 Moss&Barnet 4800 Norwest Center Gardy's Sports 90 S.7th St. Highway 36&5 Minneapolis,MN 55402-4129 Stillwater,MN 55082 Tel: 347-0300 Fax: 339-6686 Garfield's Valley House Jan Harriman P.O.Box 441 615 S 5th Street Hudson,WI 54016 Stillwater,MN 55082 The Gaughan Companies Harwell,Fred 299 NW Coon Rapids Boulevard 793 Hill Farm Road Coon Rapids,MN 55433 Hudson,WI 54016 Gaynor,Dr.G.D. Harwell,William RR 4&13th Street 767 Aldro Road Hudson,WI 54016 Hudson,WI 54016 George Olsen Construction Heritage Ford(n/k/a Stillwater Ford,Lincoln-Mercury,Inc.) 1902 Greeley Street 12969 N 60th Street Stillwater,MN 55082 Stillwater,MN 55082 Gerbitz,CA. Herold Enterprises Inc.(f/k/a/Hansman Industries) Gerbitz Company 4726 Bouleau Road 11299 N.Stillwater Boulevard White Bear Lake,MN 55110 Lake Elmo,MN 55042 Holiday Foods Gilbert's Motors,Inc. 101 N Owens Street 1621 Coulee Road Stillwater,MN 55082 Hudson,WI 54016 Hotel Dibbo Grand Garage 517 2nd Street 4611 Browndale Avenue Hudson,WI 54016 Minneapolis,MN 55424 Hudson Auto Parts(NAPA) Greeley Health Care Center 215 2nd Street 313 South Greely Street Hudson,WI 54016 Stillwater,MN 55082 Hudson Bus Co.(n/k/a Safeway Bus Company) Greenbriar Terrace Partners 598 Schommer Drive 6625 Lyndale Avenue So. Hudson,WI 54016 Richfield,MN 55423 Hudson Country Club Greystone Bar 378 Frontage Road 143 N 3rd Street Hudson,WI 54016 Bayport,MN 55003 Hudson House Inn H&I Wood Specialties Highway 94 318 N Main Street Hudson,WI 54016 Stillwater,MN 55082 3 • • Hudson Housing Authority K Mart Corporation(Stillwater) 1015 2nd Street C.T.Corporate Systems Hudson,WI 54016 405 Second Avenue South Minneapolis,MN 55402 Hudson Liquor Store (n/k/a Hudson Warehouse Liquor) ATTORNEYS FOR K MART CORPORATION 1810 Webster Street Louis Zednik,Environmental Law Attorney Hudson,WI 54016 Kmart Corporation International Headquarters Hudson News Agency 3100 West Big Beaver Road 651 Laurel Avenue Troy,MI 48084-3163 Hudson,WI 54016 Tel: (810)637.6544 Fax: Hudson Refuse Service,Inc. Keller Construction Co.(a/k/a Keller Properties) Route 1,Box 312 1301 Coulee Road Hudson,WI 54016 Hudson,WI 54016 Hudson Township Kenail Enterprises,Inc. 512 3rd Street 1511 Coulee Road Hudson,WI 54016 Hudson,WI 54016 Hudworth,Inc. Kentucky Fried Chicken Corporation 1511 Coulee Road Corporate Office Hudson,WI 54016 1900 Colonel Sanders Lane Louisville,KY 40213 Independent School District 834 1875 South Greeley Street Kingwood Management(successor-in-interest to SBRI-Property Stillwater,MN 55082 Management) P.O.Box 2010 J.R.Ranch Stillwater,MN 55082 736 Highway 12 Hudson,WI 54016 Kolliners,Inc. 119 S Main Street Jerry's Auto Detail,Inc. Stillwater,MN 55082 13601 N 60th Stillwater,MN 55082 Kroy Incorporated 5201 Industrial Parkway Jim's Tom Thumb d/b/a RJ's Fresh Meats St.Croix Falls,WI 54024 1101 Coulee Road Hudson,MN 54016 Labon's Truck Stop(d/b/a Fulton's Landing) 713 Highway 12 Jo Fahro's Dress Shop Hudson,WI 54016 7141 N 10th Street Oakdale,WI 54649 Lake Elmo Harwood Lumber,Inc. 11320 N Upper 33 St Johnny's N&Video(f/k/a Hooley's TV) Lake Elmo,MN 55042 242 N Main Street Stillwater,MN 55082 Lake Elmo Inn 3442 Lake Elmo Avenue Johnson's Sanitation Lake Elmo,MN 55042 1638-5th Avenue Downing,WI 54734 Lake Mallalieu Apartments 815 2nd Street Jones-Bradshaw-Hauge Funeral Chapel Hudson,WI 54016 6061 Osgood Avenue N Stillwater,MN 55082 Lamers,Gottfried S. 1766 Highway 64 Jones Chemical Co.,Inc. New Richmond,WI 54017 80 Munson Street LeRoy,NY 14482 Larson Electrical Company 901 O'Keefe Road Judd Orff and Associates Hudson,WI 54016 305 South Greeley Street Stillwater MN,55082 Lilly Lake Apartments 1410 South Greeley Street Junker Recycling,Inc. Stiltwater,MN 55082 (f/k/a Junker Sanitary Landfill,Inc.), Junker Sanitation Services,Inc., Lind Custom Shoe Company and James L.Junker 501 Laser Dr Michael J.Ford Somerset,WI 54025 Ouinlivan,Sherwood,Spellacy&Travestad,P.A. 600 Norwest Center Linden Health Care Center 400 First Street South 105 West Linden Street Box 1008 Stillwater,MN 55082 St.Cloud,MN 56302 4 • • Unner Electric Co. Mausolf,Orville 14580 N 61st St 491 Stageline Rd Stillwater,MN 55082 Hudson,WI 54016 Lindquist,Dave Meister's Bar&Liquor Store 780 Newton Meister's Confectionary Baldwin,WI 54002 901 S 4th St Stillwater,MN 55082 LO,Inc.(Joseph's Family Restaurant) 14608 N 60th St Stillwater,MN 55082 Metropolitan Federal Bank 400 S 2nd Madsen Johnson Corporation Hudson,WI 54016 901 Industrial Street Hudson,WI 54018 Metropolitan Federal Bank 200 East Chestnut Street McCormack Furniture Co. Stillwater,MN 55082 133435 North 60th Street Baytown Township,MN 55042 Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (n/k/a Metropolitan Council Environmental Services) McDonald's Restaurants of Minnesota,Inc. Mears Park Centre Prentice-Hall Corporate Systems 230 East Fifth Street 33 South 6th Street St.Paul,MN 55101 Multifoods Tower Minneapolis,MN 55402 Mickelson Drug Store 528 2nd Street McGarry-Kearney Agency Hudson,WI 54016 243 S Main Street Stillwater,MN 55082 Mike's Standard Service 1313 Coulee Road McGough Co.,Inc. Hudson,WI 54016 2737 Fairview Avenue N St.Paul,MN 55113 Charles McMahon Miller,Peter J. 2920 Merrill St 3636 N Stagecoach Trail St.Paul,MN 55113 Stiltwater,MN 55082 The Millroad Inn Mad Capper Saloon 15506 N 59th Street 224 S Main Street Stillwater,MN 55082 Stillwater,MN 55082 Montgomery Ward&Co.,Inc. Mall Restaurant&Catering 1 Montgomery Ward Plaza 14617 N 59th Street Chicago,IL 60671 Stillwater,MN 55082 Montgomery Ward&Co.,Inc. Mall Theatres I&II Prentice-Hall Corporate Systems St.Croix Mall 33 South 6th Street Stillwater,MN 55082 Multifoods Tower Minneapolis,MN 55402 Mallalieu Inn 414 Wisconsin N Multi-Print Co.(n/k/a Copy Cat) Hudson,WI 54016 1305 Frontage Rd Stillwater,MN 55082 Mar-Len Enterprises 908 Coulee Road Murtha Brothers Hudson,WI 54016 Box 243 Baldwin,WI 54002 Marine Associates 1651 Hanley Road Nash-Finch Company(on behalf of a Red Owl Store) Hudson WI,54016 1600 France Avenue South Minneapolis,MN 55418 Marketplace Foods (n/k/a County Market) 2310 Crest View Dr Needham Dist.Co. Hudson,WI 54016 6080 Lake Elmo Avenue Stillwater,MN 55082 Maurice's Incorporated Plaza 94 Nelson's Dairy Store Inc. Hudson,WI 54016 920 W Olive Street Stillwater,MN 55082 Maurice's Incorporated St Croix Mall Nelson,Dwayne Stillwater,MN 55082 822 S 2nd St Stiltwater,MN 55082 5 . • • New Richmond Township Pizza Hut,Inc. Rt 2,Box 260 14563 N 60th St New Richmond,WI 54017 Stillwater,MN 55082 Niro Atomizer,Inc. (individually and successor-in-interest to Pizza Hut,Inc. DeLaval Separator Co.Nor-Lake,Inc.) 1550 Crest View Drive P.O.Box 248 Hudson,WI 54018 Hudson,WI 54016 Port of Sunnyside Club,Inc. Norm's Sanitary Service 6413 North St.Croix Trail 102 Cemetery Road Oak Park Heights,MN 55082 River Falls,WI 54002 Pudge's Bar Norwest Bank Minnesota NA 302 2nd Street 2000 Northwestern Avenue Hudson,WI 54016 Stillwater,MN 55082 Randy!ten Chevrolet,Inc. Clark Nyberg Interstate 94 172 Boutwell Road N Hudson,WI 54018 Stiltwater,MN 55082 Raymie Estates Ltd. Oak Glen Development Co. 14830 N.58th Street 1599 McKusick Rd P.O.Box 2060 Stillwater,MN 55082 Stillwater,MN 55082 Oak Park Heights Apts Reed's Drug Store 5120 Oxboro Avenue N 4425 Lake Avenue South Stillwater,MN 55082 White Bear Lake,MN 55110 O'Connell's Valley Funeral Home 520 South 11th Street Reichold Chemicals,Inc. Hudson,WI 54016 P.O.Box 13582 Research Triangle Park,NC 27709-3582 Olson Sanitation Post Office Box 327 Reliance Electric Somerset,WI 54025 1621 Livingston Road Hudson,WI 54016 Orville Madsen&Son 901 Industrial River City Wood Products Hudson,WI 54016 Highway 94 Hudson,WI 54016 Palmer,Benjamin 102 North 2nd Street River Falls Township,N8088 Stillwater,MN 55082 Louis Campbell,Township Chairman Highway 65 Penguin Insulation Inc. River Falls,WI 54022 14520 N 61st Street Stillwater,MN 55082 River Oasis Cafe/Bluff Oasis 806 S Main Street Phillips Plastics Corp. Stillwater,MN 55082 1201 Hanley Road Hudson,WI 54016 Rivertown Commons 212 N 2nd Street Phipps Center for the Arts Stillwater,MN 55082 109 Locust Street Hudson,WI 54016 Rose Floral&Greenhouse,Inc. 1321 S 5th Street Pierce Business Products Inc. Stillwater,MN 55082 1931 Curve Crest Boulevard Stillwater,MN 55082 Rosen Metals,Inc. Baldwin,WI 54002 Pilquist Auto Salvage Bayport Garage 2910 Quant Avenue N Routson Motors,Inc. Stillwater,MN 55082 14447 N 60th Street Stillwater,MN 55082 Piper,Jaffray&Hopwood Incorporated 106 E Chestnut St Rustic Inn,Inc. Stillwater,MN 55082 N4476 Dam Road Winter,WI 54896 6 • • S-S-G Corporation Schwantes,Inc. Burt Nordstrand&Associates 6080 Oren Avenue 1207 Coulee Road Stillwater,MN 55082 Stillwater,MN 55082 The Shannon Group(n/k/a Vollrath Refrigeration) St.Croix Animal Hospital,Inc. 715 St Croix 14303 N 60th St River Falls,WI 54022 • Stillwater,MN 55082 Shorty's Cleaners St.Croix Bowl 121 East Chestnut Street 5862 Omaha Avenue North Stillwater,MN 55082 Oak Park Heights,MN 55082 Simonet's Funeral Home St.Croix Car Wash 6429 Osgood Avenue N 5900 Osgood Avenue N Stillwater,MN 55082 Stillwater,MN 55082 Snyder Brothers Drug,Inc. St.Croix Cleaners&Launderers 200 S Main 5850 Omaha Avenue North Stillwater,MN 55082 Oak Park Heights,MN 55082 Sports Club Lounge St.Croix County 601 2nd Street 1101 Carmichael Hudson,WI 54016 Hudson,WI 54016 Star Observer Publishing ATTORNEYS FOR ST.CROIX COUNTY 226 Locust Street Gregory A.Timmerman Hudson,WI 54018 Corporation Counsel Starr's Tavern St.Croix County,Wisconsin St.Croix County Government Center State Bank of Hudson(n/k/a Mid America Bank) 1101 Carmichael Road 600 2nd St Hudson,WI 54016-7710 Hudson,WI 54016 Tel: (715)381-4315 Fax: (715)381-4301 Stephens Sanitation,Ltd. St.Croix Design Inc. 1397 Meadowlark Lane 125 S Main Street New Richmond,WI 54017 Stillwater,MN 55082 Stillwater Country Club St.Croix Storage Co. 1421 N 4th Street 239 Monroe N Stillwater,MN 55082 Hudson,WI 54016 Stillwater Gazette 102 South Second Street St.Croix Valley Rod&Gun Club P.O.Box 58 285 Krattley Lane Stilly/der,MN 55082 Hudson,WI 54016 Stillwater Realty Co. Sam's Brass Track(n/k/a The Old Log Cabin) 222 S 3rd St 501 6th Street N Stillwater,MN 55082 Hudson,WI 54016 Stillwater Steak,Inc.(n/k/a Stone Lake Restaurant) The Sandbar 14587 60th Street N 609 2nd Street Stillwater,MN 55082 Hudson,WI 54016 Stillwater Veterinary Clinic,Ltd. James L Schmitz 2020 Curve Crest Boulevard W7493 710 Stillwater,MN 55082 Beldenviile,WI 5403 Stromme Sanitation,inc. The School District of Hudson 1810 Webster Squire Dr.Ron Bemth,Superintendent Post Office Box 85 1401 Vine Street Hudson,WI 54016 Hudson,WI 54016 SuperValu Inc.(individually and on behalf of Cub Foods Schwalbach,Dr.Stephen and Hooley's Super Markets) 650 S Main P.O.Box 990 River Falls,WI 54022 Minneapolis,MN 55440 7 • T.O.Plastics,Inc. VanWinkle,James P. 2901 E.78th Street 10129 Eden Prairie Road Bloomington,MN 55425 Eden Prairie,MN Tandy Corporation(d/b/a Radio Shack(Stillwater)) Vem's GTC Auto Supply 101B St Croix Mall 13951 N 60th St Stillwater,MN 55082 Stillwater,MN 55082 Thomsen,Happy B. Victoria Villa Apartments 9234 N St Croix Trail 1451 S Greeley St Stillwater,MN 55082 Stillwater,MN 55082 Timark,Inc. Viking Electronics 15506 N 59th St 1531 Industrial Boulevard Stillwater,MN 55082 P.O.Box 448 Hudson,WI 54016 Michael Tobiassen 2349 Driftwood Lane Village of North Hudson Stillwater,MN 55082 400 7th Street Hudson,WI 54016 Tom Thumb Food Markets,Inc. 110 17th Street East ATTORNEYS FOR VILLAGE OF NORTH HUDSON Hastings,MN 55003 Steven B.Goff Bye,Golf&Rohde,Ltd. True Value Hardware 258 Riverside Drive St.Croix Mall River Falls,WI 54022-0167 Stillwater,WI 54016 Tel: (715)425-8161 Fax:(715)425-7413 United Building Centers,Inc. Vinar,James A.,Jr. 301 S 2nd Street 1009 Pine Tree Trail Stillwater,MN 55082 Stillwater,MN 55082 United for Excellence Incorporated Vittorio's,Inc. 1850 South Greeley Street 402 S Main Street Stillwater,MN 55082 Stillwater,MN 55082 United States Postal Service Wallace Chiropractic Clinic 102 N.3rd Street 6143 Osgood Avenue N Stillwater,MN 55082 Stillwater,MN 55082 United States Postal Service Ward Management of Hudson,Ltd. 225 Locust Street 1017 Woodward Avenue Hudson,WI 54016 Chippewa Falls,WI 54729 United States Postal Service Waste Management Savage 209 N.3rd Street 12448 Pennsylvania Ave S Bayport,MN 55003 Savage,MN 55378 United States Postal Service 2-Way Inc.(d/b/a Carbone's Pizza) 3469 Lake Elmo Ave N 212 Locust Lake Elmo,MN 55042 Hudson,WI 54016 United Waste Systems,Inc. Weber,Thomas United Waste Transfer,Inc. 205 W Chestnut St James M.Lockhart Stillwater,MN 55082 Lommen,Nelson Law Firm 1800 IDS Center 80 South Eight Street West Industries Minneapolis,Minnesota 55402 1700 Livingstone Road P.Q.Box 546 Universal Applicators Inc. Hudson,WI 54016 18995 N Forest Boulevard Forest Lake,MN 55025 White Bear Dodge,Inc. 3430 Highway 61 Valley Auto Supply Vadnais Heights,MN 5511 218 N Main Street Stillwater,MN 55082 Williamsburg Apartments 13th Street Hudson,WI 54016 8 • • Wilbw River Inn 1106 County Trunk A Hudson,WI 54016 Zappe,Anthony T. 700 Sommers Pt N Hudson,WI 54016 Ili 9 r e • • { UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN JUNKER LANDFILL TRUST, a Minnesota business trust, Plaintiff, Civil Action Case No. 96 C 0019-S v. Honorable John C. Shabaz JUNKER RECYCLING, INC., a Minnesota corporation, et al., Defendants, and JUNKER RECYCLING, INC., a Minnesota corporation, et al., Defendants and Third Party Plaintiffs, v. GARRY THOMPSON, et al., Third Party Defendants. DEFENDANT TOWN OF HUDSON'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT NOW COMES the defendant, Town of Hudson, by its attorneys Axley Brynelson, by Steven M. Streck and Amy B. Tutwiler, and pursuant to Rule 56, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, moves the Court for summary judgment on the following grounds. 1. The Court should dismiss the pending action against defendant Town of Hudson because plaintiff has not provided the Town with notice of its claims pursuant to Wis. Stat. f;\eafdata\8643\44201\mmb0642 • • § 893.80(1)(a), nor notice of its injuries its injuries in accordance with § 893.80(1)(b), Wis. Stats. 2. The Court should also dismiss Count II of the amended complaint against the Town of Hudson because, pursuant to the doctrine of the law of the case, this Court's April 29, 1996 order also governs the plaintiff's claims against the Town. 3. The defendant's motion for summary judgment is supported by the affidavit of JoAnn Wert, Defendant's Brief in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment, Defendant's Proposed Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order and the pleadings of record in this matter. WHEREFORE, defendant respectfully requests that the Court grant the defendant's motion for summary judgment and dismiss with prejudice and on the merits plaintiff's amended complaint in its entirety, together with costs and the defendant's reasonable attorney's fees incurred in defending this matter. Dated this 6( day of May, 1996. Respectfully submitted, AXLEY BRYNELSON C/ L„ Steven N�treck State Bar No. 1013070 Amy B. Tutwiler State Bar No. 1024048 Attorneys for Defendant Town of Hudson 2 East Mifflin Street Madison, WI 53703 Telephone: (608) 257-5661 f:\eafdata\8643\44201\mmb0642 2 S UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN JUNKER LANDFILL TRUST, a Minnesota business trust, Plaintiff, Civil Action Case No. 96 C 0019-S v. Honorable John C. Shabaz JUNKER RECYCLING, INC., a Minnesota corporation, et al., Defendants, and JUNKER RECYCLING, INC., a Minnesota corporation, et al., Defendants and Third Party Plaintiffs, v. GARRY THOMPSON, et al., Third Party Defendants. DEFENDANT HUDSON TOWNSHIP'S BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, Junker Landfill Trust, recently added Hudson Township as a party defendant in this action by amended complaint filed April 12, 1996. Plaintiff alleges claims pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act("CERCLA"), and the Resource, Conservation and Recovery Act ("RCRA") against the Town of Hudson for f:\eafdata\8643\44201\mmb0636 ! S remediation of the Junker Landfill in Hudson Township, Wisconsin. Plaintiff further asserts contribution claims against the Town under federal and Wisconsin common law, as well as a state claim for unjust enrichment. The Town of Hudson is entitled to summary judgment on all of plaintiff's asserted claims against it because plaintiff has not complied with Wisconsin's notice-of-claim requirements set forth at § 893.80(1), Wis. Stats. In addition, Count II of the amended complaint, a CERCLA § 107 (42 U.S.C.S. § 9607) claim against the Town must also be dismissed pursuant to this Court's order on April 29, 1996 in response to Defendant Junker Recycling, Inc. and other's Motion to Dismiss Counts I and IV of the original complaint. As held by this Court, plaintiff, as a potentially responsible party, may not pursue a direct cost-recovery action under that CERCLA provision. In accordance with the law of the case doctrine, that decision applies to plaintiff's § 107 claims for cost recovery against the Town of Hudson as well. ISSUES A. WHETHER THIS COURT SHOULD DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT AGAINST THE TOWN OF HUDSON BECAUSE IT FAILED TO PROVIDE THE TOWN WITH NOTICE OF ITS CLAIMS AND INJURIES PURSUANT TO WISCONSIN STATUTES § 890.80(1). B. WHETHER THIS COURT SHOULD ALSO DISMISS COUNT II OF THE AMENDED COMPLAINT BECAUSE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DOCTRINE OF THE LAW OF THE CASE, THIS COURT'S RULING THAT PLAINTIFF, AS A POTENTIALLY RESPONSIBLE PARTY, MAY NOT PURSUE A DIRECT COST RECOVERY ACTION UNDER CERCLA § 107 ALSO APPLIES TO THE TOWN OF HUDSON. STATEMENT OF FACTS Plaintiff, Junker Landfill Trust ("Trust") originally filed this lawsuit against Junker Recycling, Inc. and others on January 12, 1996, alleging claims under CERCLA, RCRA and f:\eafdata\8643\44201\mmb0636 2 • • state and federal common law. Plaintiff is a group of parties that have joined to respond to claims by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources or the United States Environmental Protection Agency in connection with the Junker Landfill, located in Hudson Township, g Y Wisconsin, which landfill is the subject of this litigation. According to the amended complaint, it's trust members, or settlors, are a limited number of persons or entities whose waste may have been transported, on information and belief, to the Landfill at various times. The amended complaint provides that the Trust members have been identified by the United States Environmental Protection Agency and the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) as parties who allegedly may be liable for part of the cost of cleaning up a landfill site located near Hudson, Wisconsin. According to plaintiff, it cooperated voluntarily with the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources ("WDNR") to investigate and remediate environmental contamination at the Landfill. Plaintiff alleges to also have initiated a bottled water program, in cooperation with the WDNR, to the residences affected by the Landfill's contamination and to have prepared a Remedial Investigation (RI), which was approved by the WDNR in August 1995. Plaintiff further alleges to have prepared a Feasibility Study (FS) in cooperation with the WDNR to evaluate possible remedies to the environmental contamination identified in the RI, which was approved in March 1996. In its amended complaint filed with the court on April 12, 1996, plaintiff added the Town of Hudson as well as several other defendants, against which it alleges liability under RCRA for the continued remediation of the Hudson Landfill and for its litigation costs associated with this suit. Plaintiff claims a right under § 107(a) CERCLA, as amended, 42 U.S.C.S. § 9607(a), to recover a portion of cleanup costs it alleges to have incurred prior to filing this suit. Plaintiff f:\eafdata\8643\44201\mmb0636 3 • a right to contribution under 113 of CERCLA, as amended 42 U.S.C.S. § further claims § (� for unjust enrichment. 613 and under federal and state common law, and makes a claim 9 (fl, J One claim particularly at issue in this motion is Count II of the amended complaint, a claim for cost recovery under § 107 of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C.S. § 9607. That claim, which is identical to plaintiff's CERCLA § 107 claim against the original defendants, was dismissed by this court in its decision on April 29, 1996. With respect to all of plaintiff's claims against the Town of Hudson, plaintiff has not provided the Town with notice of its claims pursuant to Wis. Stats. § 893.80(1)(a). Nor has the plaintiff provided Hudson Township with proper notice of its injuries in accordance with § 893.80(1)(b), Wis. Stats. Accordingly, the Town of Hudson moves this court for an order dismissing all of plaintiff's claims against it pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. ARGUMENT AND AUTHORITY I. STANDARD OF REVIEW The Town of Hudson moves for summary judgment against plaintiff pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Summary judgment is no longer disfavored under the Federal Rules. See Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 327 (1986) ("summary judgment procedure is properly regarded as an integral part of the Federal Rules as a whole which are designed 'to secure the just, speedy and inexpensive determination of every action.") Indeed, federal district courts are required to grant summary judgment if the pleadings, depositions, answer to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if f:\eafdata\8643\44201\mmb0636 4 110 any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c). The presence of some factual dispute does not defeat summary judgment. Rather, "the requirement is that there is a genuine issue of material fact." Anderson v. Liberty Lobby. Inc., 477 U.S.242, 248 (1986). A dispute is genuine, only when the evidence is such that a "reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party." For the fact to be material, it must relate to a disputed matter that "might affect the outcome of the suit." The moving party has the initial burden of demonstrating that it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Celotex, 447 U.S. at 323; Local 1545. United Mine Workers of Am. v. Inland Steel Coal Co., 876 F.2d 1288, 1292 (7th Cir. 1989). Once this burden is met, the non- moving party must "go beyond the pleadings" and designate specific facts to support each element of its cause of action, showing that there is a genuine issue for trial. Celotex, 477 U.S. at 323; Local 1545, 876 F.2d at 1 293. Neither party may rest on mere allegations or denials in the pleadings. Anderson, 477 U.S. at 248; Koclanakis v, Merrimack Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 899 F.2d 673, 675 (7th Cir. 1990), or upon conclusory statements in affidavits, Palucki v. Sears. Roebuck & Co., 879 F.2d 1568, 1572 (7th Cir. 1989); First Commodity Traders. Inc. v. Heinold Commodities. Inc., 766 F.2d 1007, 1011 (7th Cir. 1985), and both parties must produce property documentary evidence to support their contentions. Whetstine v. Gates Rubber Co., 895 F.2d 388, 392 (7th Cir. 1990); Local 1545, 876 F.2d at 1293. In evaluating a motion for summary judgment, a court must draw all inferences in a light most favorable to the non-moving party. Matsuhita Elec. Indus. Co. v Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 587 (1986); Johnson v. Pelker, 891 F.2d 136, 138 (7th Cir. 1989). Nonetheless, f:\eafdata18643\44201\mmb0636 5 • i courts "are not required to draw every conceivable inference from the record--only those inferences that are reasonable." Bank Leumi Le-Israel. BM. v. Lee, 928 F.2d 232, 236 (7th Cir. 1991) (citation omitted). II. PLAINTIFF'S ACTION AGAINST THE TOWN OF HUDSON SHOULD BE DISMISSED BECAUSE IT FAILED TO PROVIDE THE TOWN WITH NOTICE OF ITS CLAIMS AND INJURIES AS REQUIRED BY WISCONSIN STATUTES. 893.80(1). Wisconsin law requires a plaintiff, prior to commencing suit against a municipality, to provide the municipality with notice of its claim and of its injuries. Wis. Stats. § 893.80(1). The Seventh Circuit succinctly summarized the requirements of that statute as follows: A suit may not be brought against a public agency unless two conditions are satisfied: 'written notice of the circumstances of the claim' must be served on the agency 'within 120 days after the happening of the event giving rise to the claim,' unless the agency had actual notice of the claim and the claimant shows to the satisfaction of the court that the delay or failure to give the requisite notice has not been prejudicial to the defendant' agency, Wis. Stat. § 893.80(1)(a); and 'a claim containing the address of the claimant and an itemized statement of the relief' sought 'must be presented to the appropriate clerk [for the defendant agency,] . . . and the claim . . . disallowed.' id., § 893.80(1)(b). Orthmann v. Apple River Campground, Inc., 757 F.2d 909, 911 (7th Cir. 1985). (Citations omitted.) The plaintiff in Orthmann filed suit against the Village of Somerset for personal injuries resulting from a diving accident. As noted by the court however, "[n]o claim was ever presented to the village. Section 893.80(1)(b), unlike (1)(a), contains no excuses, and the Wisconsin courts interpret its requirement strictly (as must we in this diversity case. . .) " Orthmann, 757 F.2d at 911. See e.g.,, Rabe v. Outagamie County, 72 Wis.2d 492, 499-501, 241 N.W.2d 428, 432-33 (1976). f:\eafdata\8643\44201\mmb0636 6 • • The law is plain that "federal courts entertaining state law claims against Wisconsin municipalities are obligated to apply the notice of claim provision." Felder v. Casey, 487 U.S. 131, 151 (1988). Se& also Warzon v. Drew, 855 F.Supp. 1017, 1026 (E.D. Wis. 1994). The Wisconsin Supreme Court has further clarified that§ 893.80(1),Wis. Stats., notice requirements • apply to all causes of action against a municipality, including those asserting environmental claims. State Dep't. of Natural Resources v. City of Waukesha, 184 Wis. 2d 178, 515 N.W.2d 888 (1994) (mandating the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources to provide the City of Waukesha with notice of its claim against the city for environmental violations). Accordingly, because plaintiff has not provided the Town with notice either of its claim or injuries with respect to Counts V and VI of the amended complaint, the state contribution and unjust enrichment claims, the Town of Hudson is entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law. Moreover, the Town of Hudson is also entitled to summary judgment against plaintiff on Counts I, II, III and IV for failure to comply with Wisconsin's notice-of-claim provisions. Admittedly, the Supreme Court in Felder held that the notice-of-claim provisions were not applicable to civil rights actions under 42 U.S.C.S. § 1983. Nonetheless, that decision does not preclude the application of those notice requirements to plaintiff's CERCLA and RCRA claims against the Town. Rather, the court in Felder addressed a very limited issue - whether "the application of the State's notice-of-claim provision to § 1983 actions brought in state courts [is] consistent with the goals of the federal civil rights laws. . . ." As illustrated by the reasoning of the Felder court, that decision was based on the f:\eafdata\8643144201\mmb0636 7 • unique history and characteristics of the civil rights law and particularly on the history of § 1983. The court reasoned for instance that, As we noted above, the central purpose of the Reconstruction-Era laws is to provide compensatory relief to those deprived of their federal rights by state actors. Section 1983 accomplishes this goal by creating a forum of liability that, by its very nature, runs against a specific class of defendants: governmental bodies and their officials. Wisconsin's notice-of-claim statute undermines this 'uniquely federal remedy.' Felder, 487 U.S. at 141. (Citations omitted.) Thus, the Supreme Court did not intend Felder to be extended to preclude the application of Wisconsin's notice-of-claim requirements to all federal claims, but only to the "uniquely federal remedy" afforded by civil rights laws, particularly 42 U.S.C.S. § 1983. Moreover, a review of Seventh Circuit decisions citing Felder demonstrates that court has consistently applied the limitations imposed by Felder exclusively to civil rights actions. Seg e.g., Nelson v. Murphy, 44 F.3d 497, 502 (7th Cir. 1995) cert. denied, 116 S. Ct. 67 (§ 1983 action challenging state restrictions imposed on passes given to mental health inmates); Mid-American Waste Systems, Inc. v. City of Gary. Ind., 49 F.3d 286, 291 (7th Cir. 1995) (§ 1983 action to enjoin the city from interfering with plaintiff's air rights over a landfill wherein the court cited Felder for the point that "[e]xhaustion is unnecessary under § 1983"); and Supreme Video. Inc. v. Schauz, 15 F.3d 1435, 1443 (7th Cir., 1994) (§ 1983 action against officers for alleged unconstitutional seizure of obscene videotapes). Accordingly, plaintiff's claims under CERCLA and RCRA, as well as the federal common law contribution claim against the Town of Hudson are also subject to Wisconsin's notice-of-claim requirements. Given that plaintiff has made no attempt to fulfill those requisite notice requirements, it cannot maintain its action against the Town of Hudson. Therefore, the f:leafdata18643144201 1mmb0636 8 • 40 Town of Hudson respectfully requests this court grant summary judgment in its favor and against plaintiff on all claims against it. II. PLAINTIFF'S COUNT II, A CERCLA 4 107 CLA AGAINST THE TOWN OF HUDSON. MUST BE DISMISSED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAW OF THE CASE DOCTRINE BECAUSE THE COURT HAS RECENTLY DETERMINED THAT PLAINTIFF. AS A POTENTIALLY RESPONSIBLE PARTY. DOES NOT HAVE AN ACTIONABLE CLAIM UNDER THAT PROVISION. The law of the case doctrine mandates that, "when a court decides upon a rule of law, that decision should continue to govern the same issues in subsequent stages in the same case." Arizona v. California, 460 U.S. 605, 618 (1983). See also Donohoe v. Consolidated Operating & Production Corp., 30 F.3d 907, 910 (7th Cir. 1994); and Avitia v. Metropolitan Club of Chicago, Inc., 49 F.3d 1219, 1227 (7th Cir. 1995). On April 29, 1996, prior to the deadline by which the Town of Hudson was obliged to file its responsive pleading, this court ordered that Count I of the original complaint and its counterpart, Count II of the amended complaint, were to be dismissed. The court generally reasoned that, pursuant to the Seventh Circuit Court's decision in Akzo Coatings. Inc. v. Aigner Corp., 30 F.3d 761, 764-65 (7th Cir. 1994), plaintiff's position as a potentially responsible party limited its rights against other potentially responsible parties to an action for contribution under § 113(f) of CERCLA, as amended, 42 U.S.C.S. § 9613(f), Stats. In accordance with Akzo, this court further ordered that plaintiff is precluded from maintaining its CERCLA § 107(a) claim. The court's order also applies to the claim against the Town of Hudson because plaintiff's status as a potentially responsible party remains the same vis-a-vis the Town of Hudson. Therefore, to the extent that there is any question about the applicability of that ruling to f:lcafdata186431442011mmb0636 9 • • plaintiffs § 107 claim against the Town of Hudson, the Town respectfully requests that this court dismiss with prejudice Count II of the amended complaint against it. CONCLUSION On the basis of the argument and authority set forth above, the affidavit in support of the Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment and the pleadings of record, defendant respectfully requests that the Court grant the defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment and dismiss with prejudice the plaintiffs amended complaint in its entirety, together with defendant's costs and reasonable attorney's fees. Dated this (I day of May, 1996. AXLEY BRYNELSON cr'4 Steven M. Strryec State Bar No. 1013070 Amy B. Tutwiler State Bar No. 1024048 Attorneys for Defendants Town of Hudson 2 East Mifflin Street Madison, WI 53701-1767 Telephone: (608) 257-5661 f:\eafdata\8643\442011mmb0636 10 P. 0 1 „t ov iv.vi tv-<< l40041)0r tHUM-AntY BKYNLLSUN T•778 P,02/43 F-568 41,11• t, I ' UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN - JUNKER LANDFILL TRUST, a Minnesota business trust, Plaintiff, Civil Action V. Case No. 96 C 0019-S .TUN7KER RECYCLING, INC., a Honorable John C. Shabaz Minnesota corporation, et al., Defendants, • and �UNRFR RECYCLING, INC., a Post-it•Fax Note 7671 Date 5j`(�/Cal pa°gee' A Minnesota corporation, et al., ToAmt TtAfwi ltr' From CkPo'1 (Aka- CoJDept Co. -rthvil Of AA OSW) O s Defendants and Third F*x# Phone Pavy Plaintiffs, �`* Fax v. GARRY THOMPSON, et al,, Third Party Defendants. AFFIDAVIT OF JOANN WERT STATE OF WISCONSIN ) COUNTY OF ST. CROIX �ss. JoAnn Wert, being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says as follows: 1. I am the Town Clerk of Hudson, St. Croix County,Wisconsin, with offices at 480 County Road A, Hudson, Wisconsin 54016, P. 02 .... i0 r.VJ'VO r Ana sill • • 2. 1 make this affidavit on the basis of my personal knowledge of the facts set forth herein and am competent to testify to the matters stated herein. 3. i make this affidavit in support of Defendant Town of Hudson's Motion for Summary Judgment. 4. At no time las the Town of Hudson received from plaintiff notice of its claims against the Town pursuant to § 893.80(1)(a), Wis. Stats. Nor has the plaintiff provided Hudson Township with proper notice of its injuries in ac.ordance with # $93.80(1)(b), Wis, Stats. Jo f4r , ert STATI? OF WISCONSIN ) COUNTY OF DANE )ss, Came before me this ( of May, I996, the above-named JoAnn Wert. to me known to be the person who executed the above and foregoing instrument and acknowledges the same to me. Amy L " twilcr My Commission is permanent tticacttasa\96431442011rambaii i 2 ti • UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN JUNKER LANDFILL TRUST, a Minnesota business trust, Plaintiff, Civil Action Case No. 96 C 0019-S v. Honorable John C. Shabaz JUNKER RECYCLING, INC., a Minnesota corporation, et al., Defendants, and • JUNKER RECYCLING, INC., a Minnesota corporation, et al., Defendants and Third Party Plaintiffs, v. GARRY THOMPSON, et al., Third Party Defendants. DEFENDANT HUDSON TOWNSHIP'S PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER STATEMENT OF PROPOSED FINDINGS F FACT 1. Plaintiff Junker Landfill Trust ("Trust") originally filed this lawsuit against Junker Recycling, Inc. and others on January 12, 1996, alleging claims under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act ("CERCLA") and state and federal common law. See Complaint dated January 8, 1995. • 4110 2. Plaintiff's trust members, or settlors, "are a limited number of persons or en'ties whose waste may have been transported, on information and belief, to the Landfil at various times." Amended Complaint, ¶ 1. 3. Plaintiff is a group of parties that have joined to respond to claims by the Wisconsin Department of Natural.,Resources ("WDNR") or the United States Env onmental Protection Agency ("EPA") in connection with the Junker Landfill, located Hudson Township, Wisconsin, the landfill that is the subject of this litigation. Plain Ifs Pre- Trial Report, p. 2, 1 1, Amended Complaint, 11 1 and 11. 4. Plaintiff's members "have been identified by the United States Environmental ' otection Agency and the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) as p. 'es who allegedly may be liable for part of the cost of cleaning up a landfill site loca ed near Hudson, Wisconsin." Plaintiff's Pre-Trial Report, p. 2, ¶ 1. 5. Plaintiff "cooperated voluntarily with the Wisconsin Department of Natural Re.ources ("WDNR")to investigate and remediate environmental contamination at the Land . . ." Amended Complaint, ¶ 1. 6. Plaintiff has also initiated a bottled water program, in cooperation with the WD ' ' , to the residences affected by the Landfill's contamination. Amended Complaint, ¶ 6. 7. Plaintiff prepared a Remedial Investigation (RI), which was approved by the WD ' in August 1995. In cooperation with the WDNR, plaintiff also prepared a Feasibility 'tudy (FS) to evaluate possible remedies to the environmental contamination identified ' the RI which was approved by the WDNR in March 1996. Amended Complaint, 1:. 8. In the amended complaint filed with the court on April 12, 1996, plaintiff added the Town of Hudson as well as several other defendants, against which it alleges liabi ity under the Resource, Conservation and Recovery Act ("RCRA"), for the contin ed 2 • remediation of the Hudson Landfill and for its litigation costs associated w th this suit. Amended Complaint, 122. 9. Plaintiff further asserts a right to recover a portion of cleanup costs it alle:es to have incurred prior to filing this suit under § 107(a) of the Comprehensive En 'ronmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act ("CERCLA"), as amended, 42 '.S.C.S. § 9607(a). Amended Complaint, 1 32. 10. Plaintiff also asserts a right to contribution under § 113(f) of CERCLA, as am nded, 42 U.S.C.S. §9613(f), and under federal and state common law, and further, maks a claim for unjust enrichment. Amended Complaint, 1136, 38, 40 and 43. 11. One claim particularly at issue in this motion is Count II of the amended com.laint, a claim for cost recovery under § 107 of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C.S. § 9607. A ended Complaint, 1 32. 12. Count II of the amended complaint, which is identical to Count I in the original complaint, was dismissed by this court in its decision on April 29, 1996. Complaint, Count I, 123, Order. 13. With respect to plaintiff's claims against the Town of Hudson, plaintiff has not pr• ided the Town with notice of its claims against it pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 893.80(1)(a). Nor has the plaintiff provided Hudson Township with proper notice of its injuri s in accordance with § 893.80(1)(b), Wis. Stats. 14. The Town of Hudson moves this court for an Order dismissing all of plaintiff's cl.'ms against it pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. STATEMENT OF PROPOSED CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. Plaintiff is a Potentially Responsible Party. 3 • • 114 2. This court's Order dated April 29, 1996, holding that a Potentially Res,•nsible Party such as plaintiff may not pursue a direct cost-recovery action under CERC A § 107(a), as amended, 42 U.S.C.S. § 9607(a), also applies to plaintiff's similar clai against the Town of Hudson as set forth in Count II of the amended complaint. 3. Wisconsin's notice-of-claim provisions, set forth at Wis. Stats. § 893.80(1), are applicable to all of plaintiffs claims against defendant Town of Hudson. 4. Plaintiff failed to provide the Town of Hudson with either notice of its claim, or notice of its injuries as required by Wis. Stats. § 893.80(1), Stats. BASED UPON THE FOREGOING, the Court hereby makes the following: ORDER Defendant Town of Hudson is granted summary judgment against plainti , Junker Landfill Trust. Dated this — day of , 1996. BY THE COURT: Honorable John C. Shabaz Judge of United States District Court 4 612 281 1297 APR-26-1996 08 02 • LMCIT-BERKLEY RISK SVCS • 612 281 1297 P.01/01 facsimile LMCIT TRANSMITTAL League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust 145 University Avenue West St. Paul, MN 55103-2044 to: In a-%-A- .T (.// //r-7 E$ / fax #: .3 9- ..- 7.'"2-3 company: Ec.4.44,7 . . . . . date: fAVfc,, # pages: (including this covcr sheet) re: t�-,,-k.� .Sd k(-- t/s 04 /fes - j4`f/ /3ks /i o i_3`i 7 y fit, LJ,.ad.4: • .4 �a K 7 e d -71-T, A<£ ,.,,w7--91 -c v? , ' ....cc. � 1 1,/x23/9c,,. No tte 7`'f-2_ el)rv-e(-{,t4d.A-11.y, ' ,44-4(• /e"-Se Qt--, e c t C.1v,u K t c Q--� , A' - a A-9- d-,.,_e 6/Ls p . 4,649/ Awe. "I (aiteh;___*,_____ie., 60 /0,--_e_A;,...,,,... ,•/ 12,4:„ L .c ( 7--- , <( 4 1.r`,,e.,,h 1e ` T 4 enc / 7- /67O//c i 'yee(/t-e 4- is 7 f l c,:64 R; (1 PaG 14-14 Zee ii 4.50 Ack i o/14-4-:A vvl J2/K.CIAA4-e;re1 � -' `t a f_R,K C.6-441-con / ---- --- _ ve)4.,te.,eeGL U✓mak ( / /9le 2 X `.c /J 4�'t G I�� ` Gi oak /'a^`L /1,4,1,4e, Q,R_PCZ -, ff 2CI • d `"/<7 .-"F-(--e-- `S(.c j''f t‘'.74.- / (, 6 [.c- -1- / /Jvu(Q 5- 77,3- 1,3 YvtoL: /'-e cc f,,,3, /b. i C.PP"‹. / T,fS From the desk of... o4. ✓1, n /o d 1 Culp-, fktj h R. A. Weisbrod Vice President/Branch Manager 4,41arue-ree4X e" `l ',46 BERKLEY RISK SERVICES, INC. (612)281-1285 (Direct) or (800)925-1122 CC: m, (Lk -4,4).J2-4S-evt.- TDD(612)281-1290 Fax: (612) 281-1297 „" � i�� � Oa L.Pa-,.k ff Internet: bweisbro@lrr nc_org -re.,,c 4{39 Cy S 7`/ TOTAL P.01 • LAW OFFICES OF C op?, ECKBERG, LAMMERS, BRIGGS, WOLFF & VIERLING, P.L.L.P. 1835 NORTHWESTERN AVENUE STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 (612)439-2878 FAX(612)439-2923 LYLE J. ECKBERG GREGORY G. GALLER JAMES F. LAMMERS KEVIN K.SHOEBERG ROBERT G. BRIGGS Direct Dial No. 351-2118 THOMAS J.WEIDNER PAUL A.WOLFF SUSAN D. OLSON MARK J. VIERLING DAVID K. SNYDER April 18, 1996 Auto-Owners Insurance - P.O. Box 64358 ? C -Erl" 7 l St. Paul, MN 55164-0358 "1 °1APR I 11996 I In Re: City of Oak Park Heights I� Policy No. : 852106-71978089 Gentlemen: Enclosed herewith you will find a copy of the Amended Complaint that has now been served on our client, the City of Oak Park Heights together with a copy of our previous correspondence to you stating the policy number in which you insured the City of Oak Park Heights . We obtained your name as the City' s insurer from city records and also from the former McGowan Insurance Agency in Forest Lake, Minnesota, which was the Broker through which Oak Park Heights purchased all its policies. If you are unable to locate our insurance policies, we suggest that you contact that agency to determine whether or not they could be of assistance. In any event, proof of purchase and identifying the policy was verified through the office of the insurance agent . Yours very truly, Mark J. Vierling MJV:smp Enclosures c: Mike Robertson • COrny LAW OFFICES OF ECKBERG, LAMMERS, BRIGGS, WOLFF & VIERLING, P.L.L.P. 1835 NORTHWESTERN AVENUE STILLWATER. MINNESOTA 55082 (612)439-2878 FAX(612)439-2923 LYLE J. ECKBERG GREGORY G. GALLER JAMES F. LAMMERS KEVIN K.SHOESERG ROBERT G. BRIGGS THOMAS J.WEIDNER PAULA.WOLFF Direct Dial (612) 351-2118 SUSAN D. OLSON MARK J.VIERLING DAVID K. SNYDER April 18, 1996 The Home Insurance Company P Y 7600 France Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55435 In Re: City of Oak Park Heights Insurance Policy No. : IST-8462807 (Policies 1977-1980) Insurance Policy No. : IST-8776170 (Policies 1980-1986) Gentlemen: Enclosed herewith you will find a copy of the Amended Complaint that has now been served on our client, the City of Oak Park Heights together with a copy of our previous correspondence to you stating the policy number in which you insured the City of Oak Park Heights. We obtained your name as the City' s insurer from city records and also from the former McGowan Insurance Agency in Forest Lake, Minnesota, which was the Broker through which Oak Park Heights purchased all its policies. If you are unable to locate our insurance policies, we suggest that you contact that agency to determine whether or not they could be of assistance. In any event, proof of purchase and identifying the policy was verified through the office of the insurance agent . Yours very truly, Mark J. Vierling MJV/smp Enclosures c: Mike Robertson -✓� • • Oro LAW OFFICES OF ECKBERG, LAMMERS, BRIGGS, WOLFF & VIERLING, P.L.L.P. 1835 NORTHWESTERN AVENUE STILLWATER. MINNESOTA 55082 t612)439-2878 FAX(612)439-2923 LYLE J. ECKBERG GREGORY G.GALLER JAMES F. LAMMERS KEVIN K.SHOEBERG ROBERT G. BRIGGS Direct Dial (612) 351-2118 THOMAS J.WEIDNER PAUL A.WOLFF SUSAN O.OLSON MARK J.VIERLING DAVIO K.SNYDER April 18, 1996 The League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust Attn: Barbara Meyer P. O. Box 59143 Minneapolis, MN 55459 In Re: City of Oak Park Heights Policy No. : MP821012R Policy No. : 0000273 Policy No. : MCM8541-8 Policy No. : UEL627-8 Policy No. : CMC-9426-B Policy No. : MEL822-9 Dear Ms . Meyer: Enclosed herewith you will find a copy of the Amended Complaint that has now been served on our client, the City of Oak Park Heights together with a copy of our previous correspondence to you stating the policy number in which you insured the City of Oak Park Heights . We obtained your name as the City' s insurer from city records and also from the former McGowan Insurance Agency in Forest Lake, Minnesota, which was the Broker through which Oak Park Heights purchased all its policies. If you are unable to locate our insurance policies, we suggest that you contact that agency to determine whether or not they could be of assistance. In any event, proof of purchase and identifying the policy was verified through the office of the insurance agent. Yours very truly, 5 / Mark J. Vierling MJV/smp Enclosures ,-//cc: Mr. Michael Robertson • • Co y LAW OFFICES OF ECKSERG, LAMMERS, BRIGGS, WOLFF 8c VIERLING, P.L.L.P. 1835 NORTHWESTERN AVENUE STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 (612)439-2878 FAX (612)439-2923 LYLE J. ECKBERG GREGORY G.GALLER JAMES F. LAMMERS Direct Dial (612) 351-2118 KEVIN K.SHOEBERG ROBERT G. BRIGGS THOMAS J. WEIDNER PAUL A.WOLFF SUSAN D.OLSON MARK J.VIERLING April 18, 1996 DAVID K.SNYDER Interstate Fire & Casualty Company Suite 3300 55 East Monroe Street Chicago, IL 60603 In Re : City of Oak Park Heights Umbrella Liability: $5, 000, 000 . 00 Retained Limit Policy No. : 155-C05780 Policy No. : 155-C09087 Policy No. : 155-C14518 Policy No. : 155-C0020263 Policy No. : 155-C0024930 Policy No. : 155-C0024900 Policy No. : 55C-2045296 Policy No. : 55C-2065528 Gentlemen: Enclosed herewith you will find a copy of the Amended Complaint that has now been served on our client, the City of Oak Park Heights together with a copy of our previous correspondence to you stating the policy number in which you insured the City of Oak Park Heights . We obtained your name as the City' s insurer from city records and also from the former McGowan Insurance Agency in Forest Lake, Minnesota, which was the Broker through which Oak Park Heights purchased all its policies. If you are unable to locate our insurance policies, we suggest that you contact that agency to determine whether or not they could be of assistance. In any event, proof of purchase and identifying the policy was verified through the office of the insurance agent. Yours very truly, Mark J. Vierling MJV/smp Enclosures cc: Mr. Michael Robertson ,/ 7 Enclosure M J 'E S,.wF N SULUVAN } ATTORNEYS April 16, 1996 isft ''` ,1, 141: 1396 AT LAW iy V Mr. Mike Robertson RICHARD A.LIND* City of Oak Park Heights THOMAS D.JENSEN* 14168 57th Street North TED E.SULLIVAN' P. O. Box 2007 PAUL C.PETERSON' Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 ERIC A.NERNESS WILLIAM L.DAVIDSON TAMARA J.BYRAM RE: Junker Landfill CONSTANCE L.HALL Our rile No: 5256 TIMOTHY I.O'C0NN0R SANDRA E.BRISLEY PATRICK M.JUAREZ ALAN W.PORTER Dear Mr. Robertson: Pursuant to request for information at the Junker Landfill meeting on April 1, 1996, I am providing you with the following information: The City of Oak Park Heights' percentage of total waste at the Landfill based upon TLI's (consultant) report is 2.3%. Your current individual loc has percent, determined her by the joins the group as oftoday, Junker Landfill Trust to be 6.5%. In order for the City of Oak Park Heights to join the Junker Landfill Trust as of today, it will cost you a $5,000 entry fee, plus $92,300.00. In addition to the above-stated amount, it will be necessary for your entity to sign on to the Trust Agreement. The above numbers are todayand should not in any your allocation to join the group only way be construed as a limit of your entity's potential liability. At this time we are unable to predict with any reliability your maximum potential liability. We appreciate that because of this short time line imposed by the Federal District Court in the Western District of Wisconsin, that you will not have an opportunity to join the Trust prior to the suit being filed and served. The Trustis very a need to incuasignif esirous of hving �antu oin as legal soon as possible so as to avoid the fees and expenses and become embroiled in this lawsuit. A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION 150 SOUTH FIFTH STREET SUITE 1700 MINNEAPOLIS MINNESOTA 55402 (612)333-3637 FAX:(612)3330030 `CERTIFIED AS A CIVIL TRIAL SPECIALIST 6Y THE MINNESOTA STATE FARASSOCIAFION • • Junker Landfill Trust April 16, 1996 Page No. 4 dated August 18, 1995 for activities July 17 through August 18, 1995; dated September 22, 1995 for activities August 21 through September 22, 1995; dated December 29, 1995 for activities September 22 through December 29, 1995. 6. Fact Sheets prepared for Community by Junker Landfill Group: Fact Sheet #1 dated December 14, 1995; Fact Sheet #2 dated January 3, 1995; Fact Sheet #3 dated March 6, 1995; Fact Sheet #4 dated September 27, 1995; and Fact Sheet #5 dated March 27, 1996. 7. Feasibility Study Report, Junker Landfill, prepared for Junker Landfill Trust (February 1996). Very truly yours, LIND, JENSEN & SULLIVAN Professional Association Uff/ Ted E. Sullivan TES:prc Enclosures • • LAW OFFICES OF ECKBERG, LAMMERS, BRIGGS, WOLFF & VIERLING, P.L.L.P. 1835 NORTHWESTERN AVENUE STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 (612)439-2878 FAX(612)439-2923 LYLE J. ECKBERG GREGORY G.GALLER JAMES F. LAMMERS KEVIN K. SHOEBERG ROBERT G. BRIGGS THOMAS J.WEIDNER PAUL A.WOLFF SUSAN D. OLSON MARK J, VIERLING DAVID K.SNYDER Direct Dial (612) 351-2118 April 15, 1996 n - lig .__, n,____1 Z. • ' 161995 APa161996 '' i MR MICHAEL J ROBERTSON ' 'i.) CITY ADMINISTRATOR CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS P 0 BOX 2007 14168 57TH STREET NORTH OAK PARK HEIGHTS MN 55082 RE: City of Oak Park Heights Junker Landfill The Home Insurance Companies Dear Mr. Robertson: Enclosed herewith for your information and files_ lease find a copy of a letter I received from Risk Ente Z ise anagement Limited (REM) who will be managing the busine - of Hom Insurance Companies . In their correspondence, they .ve asked s to supply to them certain information so they may m e a determination as to their coverage on the claim. Pleaseeview these questions and contact me so that we may go over the YourA very truly, >i r Mark J. Vierling MJV/smp I Enclosure r • w • • Vikin Drive , Suite 530, RE4940g Minneapolis, Minnesota 55435 P.O. Box 39827, Minneapolis, MN 55439-0954 Risk Ente rise p rp Tel: (612) 921-1000/ (800) 347-8987 Management Limited Fax: 612 921-1170 Fax: (612) Mr. Mark J. Vierling April 11, 1996 Eckberg, Lammers, Briggs, Wolff & Vierling 1835 Northwestern Ave. Stillwater, MN 55082 RE: REM's Principle: The Home Insurance Company Claim #: 351-L-888924-655 Insured: City of Oak Park Heights Site: Junker Junker Landfill, WI Dear Mr. Vierling: Please be advised that Risk Enterprise Management Limited (REM) has been appointed to manage the business of The Home Insurance Companies. Consequently, correspondence on this matter will be from REM. On behalf of The Home Insurance Company we hereby acknowledge receipt of your notice of claim made on the part of the City and arising out of alleged environmental contamination at this site. It is our understanding that, according to the notice of claim, the City contracted with Junker Sanitation for the disposal of the municipal wastes of city residents at this site. Suit has not as yet been filed against the City, but has been threatened. Please be advised that we will be reviewing your notice to determine whether Home has a duty to defend against any suit arising out of the claim or to indemnify for any loss that may result from it. We have not as yet verified that Home issued the policies referenced in your letter, nor have we ascertained the terms, conditions, and exclusions contained in those policies. We are presently searching Home's files to develop this information. In order to expedite our review, it will be appreciated if you would be kind enough to provide us with photocopies of those policies issued by The Home that you wish us to consider in making our coverage _ determination. This will assist us in identifying and resolving any differences over the existence or terms of policies implicated by your notice of claim. We also need additional factual information to determine whether there is coverage for the claim. Once we have had the opportunity to complete the policy review process, we then shall be in a position to advise you as specifically as possible what that information is. In the interim, we request that you respond to the following are general inquiries that we make in determining coverage for site contamination claims. It shall be most appreciated if you would address these points and furnish us with as much information as you can develop on each one. This will enable us to respond as quickly as possible, and to obviate the necessity for extensive follow-up inquiries: • • April 11, 1996 Page 2 -- Did the City ever owned, leased, or controlled all or any portion of the allegedly contaminated site? If so, please provide us with the particulars, including when and what its interest was. Also, please provide copies of any studies, reports, evaluations and recommendations made with respect to disposal of waste streams treated, stored, or disposed of at the site. -- Did the City ever participated in the management or operation of the site, or provide any technical assistance or information regarding storage, disposal, or treatment of hazardous substances at the site? If so, please describe each such action and indicate when it happened. -- If the site was used for waste disposal, storage, or treatment prior to the City' s involvement, when and how did the City learn about the site and its waste-related activities? Prior to selecting the site, did the City have any communication with any governmental agencies about the site, the waste ultimately sent to the site or the suitability of the site for the waste it sent? If so, please state what those communications were and when they took place. What other inquiries by preceded its decision to send hazardous substances there and what was learned from each? -- The City was apparently a generator for the site. Please list the type of substances, whether or not hazardous, that the City or its residents caused to be sent to the site, the quantities of each substance sent, the time periods during which each substance was sent, and the identity of those who transported each of the substances to the site. -- Has the contamination affected the site's ground, groundwater, or both? If know, are any of the substances that entered the site--ones that the City caused to be sent to the site? If so, what are they? Are you aware of any other substances which have contaminated the site? -- When and how did the City first learn of the contamination? To your knowledge, are contaminants continuing to enter the site ground or groundwater? Have the contaminants migrated off-site or are they likely to do so? -- Please identify all governmental agencies you know are investigating, or have investigated, waste disposal practices at the site. When and how did the City first learn that- waste practices at the site were under investigation by any governmental agency? -- Kindly make available for review any invoices, manifests, and contracts relating to the site and any brochures or other documents that provide information about the site or its operation. Please be aware that this letter of acknowledgement isnot an admission by Home that it has a duty to defend against the claim you described or to indemnify for any loss that may result from it. As of this time, we are not in a position to make either determination and must respectfully reserve all of Home's rights to contest both. When we complete our policy review and investigation, we will notify you promptly of our coverage position. f ` • • April 11, 1996 Page 3 In the interim, if you have not done so already, it is suggested that you give notice of this claim to any other primary or excess carriers that have not been contacted. Also, kindly advise me if suit is filed against the City, or if there are any other developments. Please feel free to contact me at the above address or at telephone number 612-921-1040. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Very truly yours, 1 Martin D. Berger,CPCU Claim Manager Environmental & Mass Tort Division • • UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN Junker Landfill Trust, a Minnesota ) Civil Action No: 96-C-0019-S business trust, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) AMENDED SUMMONS ) Hon. John C. Shabaz Junker Recycling, Inc., a Minnesota ) corporation, f/k/a Junker Sanitary Landfill, ) Inc.; Junker Sanitation Services, Inc., a ) Minnesota corporation; James L. Junker; ) United Waste Systems, Inc., a Delaware ) corporation; United Waste Transfer, Inc., ) a Minnesota corporation, ) ) First Defendants, ) and ) ) Eisinger Sanitation Services, Inc.; ) Diess Sanitation, Stephens Sanitation, Ltd.; ) Rosen Metals, Inc.; Murtha Brothers; ) Norm's Sanitary Service; O'Connell's ) Valley Funeral Home; Maroney's Sanitation; ) Inc.; Community Sanitation; Hudson Refuse ) Service, Inc.; New Richmond Sanitation; ) Olson Sanitation; Johnson's Sanitation; ) Stromme Sanitation, Inc.; River Falls ) Township; Fox River Falls, ) ) Second Defendants, ) and ) ) City of Stillwater; City of Hudson; ) City of Oak Park Heights; Village of North ) Hudson; Hudson Township; City of Bayport; ) New Richmond Township; St Croix County; ) River Falls Township; Independent School ) District 834; Metropolitan Waste Control ) Commission (n/k/a Metropolitan Council ) • • Environmental Services); Hudson Housing ) Authority; The School District of Hudson; ) United States Postal Service (Stillwater, ) Hudson, Bayport, and Lake Elmo); ) SuperValu Inc., individually and on behalf ) of Cub Foods and Hooley's Super Markets; ) Nash-Finch Company (on behalf of a Red ) Owl Store); Jim's Tom Thumb d/b/a RJ's ) Fresh Meats; Tom Thumb Food Markets, Inc. ) (Hastings); Hagberg Country Market; Brine's, ) Inc.; Lowell Inn; Benjamin Palmer; Gottfried S. ) Lamers; LO, Inc. (Joseph's Family Restaurant); ) The Club Tara; Kentucky Fried Chicken ) Corporation; Port of Sunnyside Club, Inc.; ) Burger King Corporation (Hudson); J.R. Ranch; ) Hudson House Inn; McDonald's Restaurants of ) Minnesota, Inc., Nelson's Dairy Store Inc.; ) Vittorio's, Inc.; Pudge's Bar; 2-Way Inc., ) d/b/a Carbone's Pizza; Carbone's Pizza ) (Stillwater); Garfield's Valley House; Pizza ) Hut, Inc. (Stillwater and Hudson); Esteban's ) Restaurant (Stillwater); Meister's ) Confectionary; Meister's Bar & Liquor Store; ) Mad Capper Saloon; Starr's Tavern; Dairy ) Queen, Inc. (Hudson and Stillwater); Dick's Bar ) of Hudson; Willow River Inn; Greystone Bar; ) Mall Restaurant & Catering; Sports Club ) Lounge; Clyde's Restaurant; Domino's Pizza, ) Inc. (Stillwater); The Millroad Inn; St. ) Croix Bowl; Stillwater Country Club; Cassanova ) Beverage Co.; River Oasis Cafe; Bluff Oasis; ) Aamodt's Apple Farm, Inc.; Croixvale ) Recreation (n/k/a River Valley Atheletic Club); ) River Valley Raquetball Club; Hudson Country ) Club; Dabruzzi Village Liquor; B & L Liquor ) Store; Marketplace Foods (n/k/a County ) Market); K Mart Corporation (Stillwater); ) True Value Hardware (Hudson); Montgomery ) Ward & Co., Inc., Hardware Hank, Inc. ) (Stillwater); Tandy Corporation, d/b/a Radio ) Shack (Stillwater); Snyder Brothers Drug, Inc.; ) Champion Auto Parts, Inc. (Stillwater); Duling ) Optical Corporation (Hudson); Canadian Pacific, ) Ltd., successor to the Milwaukee Road Depot; ) 2 • Burlington Northern Railroad; Niro Atomizer, ) Inc., individually and successor-in-interest to ) DeLaval Separator Co.; Duro Bag ) Manufacturing Co., Inc.; McCormack Furniture ) Co.; Herold Enterprises Inc. f/k/a/ Hansman ) Industries; River City Wood Products; T.O. ) Plastics, Inc.; Kroy Incorporated; ) United for Excellence Incorporated; Pierce ) Business Products Inc.; Jones Chemical Co., ) Inc.; Lind Custom Shoe Company; West ) Industries; Phillips Plastics Corp.; ) Timark, Inc.; Cornellier Specialties, ) Inc.; Reichold Chemicals, Inc.; C. A. Gerbitz ) Gerbitz Co.; Oak Park Heights Apts; ) Raymie Estates Ltd.; Lake Mallalieu ) Apartments; Kingwood Management, ) successor-in-interest to SBRI-Property ) Management; Williamsburg Apartments; Hotel ) Dibbo; Lilly Lake Apartments; Birchwood ) Apartments; Rivertown Commons; Mar-Len ) Enterprises; Kenall Enterprises, Inc.; ) Hudworth, Inc.; Victoria Villa Apartments; ) Mallalieu Inn; Beaudet Apartments; Croixdale ) Apartments; Davian Building; Vance Bushay ) James L. Schmitz; Clark Nyberg; Peter J. Miller; ) William Harwell; Fred Harwell; Jan Harriman; ) James P. VanWinkle; Thomas Weber; James ) A. Vinar, Jr.; Harold Chambers; Charles ) McMahon; Michael Tobiassen; G S Electric; ) Reliance Electric; Schwantes, Inc.; Evenson ) Plumbing & Heating; Viking Electronics; ) Larson Electrical Company; Linner Electric ) Co.; George Olsen Construction; Charles ) Cudd Co.; Cudd Brothers Construction; The ) Gaughan Companies; Oak Glen ) Development Co.; McGough Co., Inc.; Arrow ) Building Center; Robert S. Hagstrom, Jr.; R. ) Hagstrom Builders; Lake Elmo Harwood ) Lumber, Inc.; Madsen Johnson Corporation; ) United Building Centers, Inc.; Bruette ) Roofing; Gagnon Construction Company; H&I ) Wood Specialties; Consolidated Lumber, ) Keller Construction Co., a/k/a Keller ) Properties; Penguin Insulation Inc.; Universal ) Applicators Inc.; Hans Hagen Homes; ) Erickson Oil Products, Inc.; Labon's Truck ) 3 i Stop (d/b/a Fulton's Landing); Randy 'ten ) Chevrolet, Inc.; Jerry's Auto Detail, Inc.; ) Dave Holt Ford Inc.; Gilbert's Motors, Inc.; ) Routson Motors, Inc.; Tom O'Brien Olds ) AMC-Jeep; Erickson Post, Inc.; Mike's ) Standard Service; Food & Fuel, Inc.; Grand ) Garage; Brookman Motors; Clark Oil & ) Refining Company; Hudson Auto Parts ) (NAPA); St. Croix Car Wash; Vern's GTC ) Auto Supply; Valley Auto Supply; Heritage Ford ) (n/k/a Stillwater Ford, Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.); ) White Bear Dodge, Inc.; Fred's Tire ) Company, Inc.; Pilquist Auto Salvage; ) Bayport Garage; Dann's Service Center (n/k/a ) Herman's); St. Croix Valley Clinic P.A.; St. ) Croix Animal Hospital, Inc.; ) Dr. Stephen Schwalbach; Stillwater ) Veterinary Clinic, Ltd.; Wallace Chiropractic ) Clinic; A.A. Connel, DVM; Robert C. Bardill, ) DDS; Marine Associates; Judd Orff and ) Associates; Reed's Drug Store; St. Croix ) Storage Co.; Bayport Printing House, Inc.; ) Multi-Print Co. (n/k/a Copy Cat); Stillwater ) Gazette; Hudson News Agency; Star Observer ) Publishing; Rose Floral & Greenhouse, Inc.; ) Bergman's Garden Center Inc.; Bills' Bluff ) Bait (n/k/a Stiles); St. Croix Cleaners & ) Launderers; Shorty's Cleaners; Brookfield ) Company; Holiday Foods; Canelake's Steak ) & Seafood; S-S-G Corporation; Burt ) Nordstrand & Associates; Con/Spec Corp.; ) Johnny's TV & Video f/k/a Hooley's TV; Mall ) Theatres I & II; Waste Management Savage; ) Norwest Bank Minnesota NA (Stillwater); ) Maurice's Incorporated (Hudson and Stillwater); ) Jo Fahro's Dress Shop; G.A. Meyer ) Mercantile Co.; McGarry-Kearney Agency; ) Kolliners, Inc.; Action Rental, Inc.; Del's Lawn ) & Log (Del's Stillwater Outdoor Power ) Equipment); Orville Mausolf; Needham Dist. ) Co.; Simonet's Funeral Home; Jones- ) Bradshaw-Hauge Funeral Chapel; First State ) Bank of Bayport; Family Barbers; St. Croix ) 4 i i Valley Rod & Gun Club; Phipps Center for ) the Arts; Dwayne Nelson; Happy B. ) Thomsen; Dr. G.D. Gaynor; Elmo Aero, Inc. ) (n/k/a Mayer Aviation); Bayport Marina; ) Edina Realty, Inc. (Hudson); ) Anthony T. Zappa; Piper, Jaffray & Hopwood ) Incorporated; Gardy's Sports; Stillwater ) Realty Co.); First National Bank of Hudson; ) Stillwater Steak, Inc. (n/k/a Stone Lake ) Restaurant); Dependable Ford-Mercury, Inc. ) (n/k/a Stillwater Ford); Mickelson Drug Store; ) Act II at the Opera House (n/k/a McCarthy's ) Irish Pub); Orville Madsen & Son; Big Ben ) Restaurant (Joseph's); Lake Elmo Inn; ) Sam's Brass Track (n/k/a The Old Log Cabin); ) Hudson Liquor Store (n/k/a Hudson Warehouse ) Liquor); Deluxe Cleaners (n/k/a Rivertown ) Cleaners); Hudson Bus Co. (n/k/a Safeway ) Bus Company); Casa De Pelo (n/k/a House of ) Hair); St. Croix Design Inc.; Dave Lindquist; ) The Sandbar; Farmers' Group Insurance ) (Meyer Agency); Metropolitan Federal Bank ) (Hudson and Stillwater); Century 21 Pendleton ) Co.; First National Bank (Hudson); State ) Bank of Hudson (n/k/a Mid America Bank); ) The Shannon Group (n/k/a Vollrath ) Refrigeration); ) AlliedSignal, Inc., successor-in-interest to ) Sinclair and Valentine, L.P.; Linden Health ) Care Center; Greeley Health Care Center; ) Greenbriar Terrace Partners; Ward ) Management of Hudson, Ltd.; Rustic Inn, ) Inc.; Hudson on the St. Croix, Inc.; ) and Nor-Lake, Inc., ) ) Third Defendants, ) ) and ) ) John Does and Mary Does, ) ) Fourth Defendants. ) 5 • • TO: CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OR CLERK; CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS, 14168-57TH STREET NORTH, STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082: You are hereby summoned and required to file with the Clerk of this Court and to serve upon Ted E. Sullivan and Thomas D. Jensen, Plaintiff's attorneys, whose address is Lind, Jensen & Sullivan, Professional Association, 150 South Fifth Street, Suite 1700, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402, an Answer to the Complaint which is herewith served upon you, within 20 days after service of this Summons upon you, exclusive of the day of service. If you fail to do so, judgment by default will be taken against you for the relief demanded in the Complaint. Dated: APR 1 2 199 14s ,no 3.. ,4 k i _ AAAJAk. Clerk ofCost 6 ,,„ • occ,,,sr t4„.„c„_,F.4 411U.3. DISTRICT WEST. DtSf. OF bsISJJiSSfN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT '` WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN APR 1 2 1996 File. Junker LarTdfill Trust, a Minnesota ) Civil ActionVtT:96=C-0019-S business trust, ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) AMENDED COMPLAINT Hon. John C. Shabaz Junker Recycling, Inc., a Minnesota ) corporation, f/k/a Junker Sanitary Landfill, ) Inc.; Junker Sanitation Services, Inc., a ) Minnesota corporation; James L. Junker; ) United Waste Systems, Inc., a Delaware ) corporation; United Waste Transfer, Inc., ) a Minnesota corporation, ) First Defendants, ) and ) Eisinger Sanitation Services, Inc.; ) Diess Sanitation, Stephens Sanitation, Ltd.; ) Rosen Metals, Inc.; Murtha Brothers; ) Norm's Sanitary Service; O'Connell's ) Valley Funeral Home; Maroney's Sanitation; ) Inc.; Community Sanitation; Hudson Refuse ) Service, Inc.; New Richmond Sanitation; ) Olson Sanitation; Johnson's Sanitation; ) Stromme Sanitation, Inc.; River Falls ) Township; Fox River Falls, ) Second Defendants, ) and ) City of Stillwater; City of Hudson; ) City of Oak Park Heights; Village of North ) Hudson; Hudson Township; City of Bayport; ) New Richmond Township; St Croix County; ) River Falls Township; Independent School ) District 834; Metropolitan Waste Control ) Commission (n/k/a Metropolitan Council ) • 410 Environmental Services); Hudson Housing ) Authority; The School District of Hudson; ) United States Postal Service (Stillwater, ) Hudson, Bayport, and Lake Elmo); ) SuperValu Inc., individually and on behalf ) ' of Cub Foods and Hooley's Super Markets; ) Nash-Finch Company (on behalf of a Red ) Owl Store); Jim's Tom Thumb d/b/a RJ's ) Fresh Meats; Tom Thumb Food Markets, Inc. ) (Hastings); Hagberg Country Market; Brine's, ) Inc.; Lowell Inn; Benjamin Palmer; Gottfried S. ) Lamers; LO, Inc. (Joseph's Family Restaurant); ) The Club Tara; Kentucky Fried Chicken ) Corporation; Port of Sunnyside Club, Inc.; ) Burger King Corporation (Hudson); J.R. Ranch; ) Hudson House Inn; McDonald's Restaurants of ) Minnesota, Inc., Nelson's Dairy Store Inc.; ) Vittorio's, Inc.; Pudge's Bar; 2-Way Inc., ) d/b/a Carbone's Pizza; Carbone's Pizza ) (Stillwater); Garfield's Valley House; Pizza ) Hut, Inc. (Stillwater and Hudson); Esteban's ) Restaurant (Stillwater); Meister's ) Confectionary; Meister's Bar & Liquor Store; ) Mad Capper Saloon; Starr's Tavern; Dairy ) Queen, Inc. (Hudson and Stillwater); Dick's Bar ) of Hudson; Willow River Inn; Greystone Bar; ) Mall Restaurant & Catering; Sports Club ) Lounge; Clyde's Restaurant; Domino's Pizza, ) Inc. (Stillwater); The Miliroad Inn; St. ) Croix Bowl; Stillwater Country Club; Cassanova ) Beverage Co.; River Oasis Cafe; Bluff Oasis; ) Aamodt's Apple Farm, Inc.; Croixvale ) Recreation (n/k/a River Valley Atheletic Club); ) River Valley Raquetball Club; Hudson Country ) Club; Dabruzzi Village Liquor; B & L Liquor ) Store; Marketplace Foods (n/k/a .County ) Market); K Mart Corporation (Stillwater); ) True Value Hardware (Hudson); Montgomery ) Ward & Co., Inc., Hardware Hank, Inc. ) (Stillwater); Tandy Corporation, d/b/a Radio ) Shack (Stillwater); Snyder Brothers Drug, Inc.; ) Champion Auto Parts, Inc. (Stillwater); Duling ) Optical Corporation (Hudson); Canadian Pacific, ) Ltd., successor to the Milwaukee Road Depot; ) 2 • • Burlington Northern Railroad; Niro Atomizer, ) Inc., individually and successor-in-interest to ) DeLaval Separator Co.; Duro Bag ) Manufacturing Co., Inc.; McCormack Furniture ) Co.; Herold Enterprises Inc. f/k/a/ Hansman ) Industries; River City Wood Products; T.O. ) Plastics, Inc.; Kroy Incorporated; ) United for Excellence Incorporated; Pierce ) Business Products Inc.; Jones Chemical Co., ) Inc.; Lind Custom Shoe Company; West ) Industries; Phillips Plastics Corp.; ) Timark, Inc.; Cornellier Specialties, ) Inc.; Reichold Chemicals, Inc.; C. A. Gerbitz ) Gerbitz Co.; Oak Park Heights Apts; ) Raymie Estates Ltd.; Lake Mallalieu ) Apartments; Kingwood Management, ) successor-in-interest to SBRI-Property ) Management; Williamsburg Apartments; Hotel ) Dibbo; Lilly Lake Apartments; Birchwood ) Apartments; Rivertown Commons; Mar-Len ) Enterprises; Kenai' Enterprises, Inc.; ) Hudworth, Inc.; Victoria Villa Apartments; ) Mallalieu Inn; Beaudet Apartments; Croixdale ) Apartments; Davian Building; Vance Bushay ) James L. Schmitz; Clark Nyberg; Peter J. Miller; ) • William Harwell; Fred Harwell; Jan Harriman; ) James P. VanWinkle; Thomas Weber; James ) A. Vinar, Jr.; Harold Chambers; Charles ) McMahon; Michael Tobiassen; G S Electric; ) Reliance Electric; Schwantes, Inc.; Evenson ) Plumbing & Heating; Viking Electronics; ) Larson Electrical Company; Linner Electric ) Co.; George Olsen Construction; Charles ) Cudd Co.; Cudd Brothers Construction; The ) Gaughan Companies; Oak Glen ) Development Co.; McGough Co., Inc.; Arrow ) Building Center; Robert S. Hagstrom, Jr.; R. ) Hagstrom Builders; Lake Elmo Harwood ) Lumber, Inc.; Madsen Johnson Corporation; ) United Building Centers, Inc.; Bruette ) Roofing; Gagnon Construction Company; H&I ) Wood Specialties; Consolidated Lumber, ) Keller Construction Co., a/k/a Keller ) Properties; Penguin Insulation Inc.; Universal ) Applicators Inc.; Hans Hagen Homes; ) Erickson Oil Products, Inc.; Labon's Truck ) 3 Stop (d/b/a Fulton's Landing); Randy !ten ) Chevrolet, Inc.; Jerry's Auto Detail, Inc.; ) Dave Holt Ford Inc.; Gilbert's Motors, Inc.; ) Routson Motors, Inc.; Tom O'Brien Olds ) AMC-Jeep; Erickson Post, Inc.; Mike's ) Standard Service; Food & Fuel, Inc.; Grand ) Garage; Brookman Motors; Clark Oil & ) Refining Company; Hudson Auto Parts ) (NAPA); St. Croix Car Wash; Vern's GTC ) Auto Supply; Valley Auto Supply; Heritage Ford ) (n/k/a Stillwater Ford, Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.); ) White Bear Dodge, Inc.; Fred's Tire ) Company, Inc.; Pilquist Auto Salvage; ) Bayport Garage; Dann's Service Center (n/k/a ) Herman's); St. Croix Valley Clinic P.A.; St. ) Croix Animal Hospital, Inc.; ) Dr. Stephen Schwalbach; Stillwater ) Veterinary Clinic, Ltd.; Wallace Chiropractic ) Clinic; A.A. Connel, DVM; Robert C. Bardill, ) DDS; Marine Associates; Judd Orff and ) Associates; Reed's Drug Store; St. Croix ) Storage Co.; Bayport Printing House, Inc.; ) Multi-Print Co. (n/k/a Copy Cat); Stillwater ) Gazette; Hudson News Agency; Star Observer ) Publishing; Rose Floral & Greenhouse, Inc.; ) Bergman's Garden Center Inc.; Bills' Bluff ) Bait (n/k/a Stiles); St. Croix Cleaners & ) Launderers; Shorty's Cleaners; Brookfield ) Company; Holiday Foods; Canelake's Steak ) & Seafood; S-S-G Corporation; Burt ) Nordstrand & Associates; Con/Spec Corp.; ) Johnny's TV & Video f/k/a Hooley's TV; Mall ) Theatres I & II; Waste Management Savage; ) Norwest Bank Minnesota NA (Stillwater); ) Maurice's Incorporated (Hudson and Stillwater); ) Jo Fahro's Dress Shop; G.A. Meyer ) Mercantile Co.; McGarry-Kearney Agency; ) Kolliners, Inc.; Action Rental, Inc.; Del's Lawn ) & Log (Del's Stillwater Outdoor Power ) Equipment); Orville Mausolf; Needham Dist. ) Co.; Simonet's Funeral Home; Jones- ) Bradshaw-Hauge Funeral Chapel; First State ) Bank of Bayport; Family Barbers; St. Croix ) 4 • • s Valley Rod & Gun Club; Phipps Center for ) the Arts; Dwayne Nelson; Happy B. ) Thomsen; Dr. G.D. Gaynor; Elmo Aero, Inc. ) (n/k/a Mayer Aviation); Bayport Marina; ) Edina Realty, Inc. (Hudson); ) Anthony T. Zappa; Piper, Jaffray & Hopwood ) Incorporated; Gardy's Sports; Stillwater ) Realty Co.); First National Bank of Hudson; ) Stillwater Steak, Inc. (n/k/a Stone Lake ) Restaurant); Dependable Ford-Mercury, Inc. ) (n/k/a Stillwater Ford); Mickelson Drug Store; ) Act II at the Opera House (n/k/a McCarthy's ) ' Irish Pub); Orville Madsen & Son; Big Ben ) Restaurant (Joseph's); Lake Elmo Inn; ) Sam's Brass Track (n/k/a The Old Log Cabin); ) Hudson Liquor Store (n/k/a Hudson Warehouse ) Liquor); Deluxe Cleaners (n/k/a Rivertown ) Cleaners); Hudson Bus Co. (n/k/a Safeway ) Bus Company); Casa De Pelo (n/k/a House of ) Hair); St. Croix Design Inc.; Dave Lindquist; ) The Sandbar; Farmers' Group Insurance ) (Meyer Agency); Metropolitan Federal Bank ) (Hudson and Stillwater); Century 21 Pendleton ) Co.; First National Bank (Hudson); State ) Bank of Hudson (n/k/a Mid America Bank); ) The Shannon Group (n/k/a Vollrath ) Refrigeration); ) AlliedSignal, Inc., successor-in-interest to ) Sinclair and Valentine, L.P.; Linden Health ) Care Center; Greeley Health Care Center; ) Greenbriar Terrace Partners; Ward ) Management of Hudson, Ltd.; Rustic Inn, ) Inc.; Hudson on the St. Croix, Inc.; ) and Nor-Lake, Inc., ) Third Defendants, ) ) and ) John Does and Mary Does, ) ) Fourth Defendants. ) Plaintiff Junker Landfill Trust, for its Amended Com P iff laint herein against the tp defendants and each of them, states and alleges as follows: 5 I� — • I •r INTRODUCTION This is a civil action under section 7002 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. § 6901 et seq.), commonly referred to as the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 ("RCRA"), 42 U.S.C. § 6972; sections 107(a) and 113(f) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended, ("CERCLA"), 42 U.S.C. §§ 9607(a) and 9613(f), and the common law of the United States and the State of Wisconsin, to compel corrective remediation actions, for injunctive relief, for reimbursement of costs advanced by plaintiff, and for attorneys fees, expert witnesses fees and costs, in response to the release and threatened release of hazardous substances into the environment at the Junker Landfill ("Landfill"). This is also a civil action for declaratory judgment as to liability for future response costs to be incurred at the site, under 28 U.S.C. § 2201 and 42 U.S.C. § 9613 (g)(2). II. PARTIES 1. Plaintiff Junker Landfill Trust is a Minnesota business trust operating pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 318 (1994). Plaintiff's settlors are a limited number of persons or entities whose waste may have been transported, on information and belief, to the Landfill at various times. Plaintiff has cooperated voluntarily with the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources ("WDNR") to investigate and remediate environmental contamination at the Landfill, without admitting liability for such 6 • investigation and remediation. 2. First Defendant Junker Recycling, Inc. is a Minnesota corporation which by itself or through its predecessor Junker Sanitary Landfill, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, operated the Landfill and did business in Hudson Township, Wisconsin, at all times relevant to this matter, and thus is an "operator"within the meaning of CERCLA § 101(20), 42 U.S.C. § 9601(20). 3. First Defendant Junker Sanitation Services, Inc., is a Minnesota corporation, which by itself or through its affiliate First Defendant Junker Recycling, Inc., also operated the Landfill, and further, was involved in the business of transporting waste to the Landfill at all times relevant to this matter, and thus was engaged in "transport" within the meaning of CERCLA § 101(26), 42 U.S.C. § 9601(26). 4. First Defendant James L. Junker is an individual resident of Minnesota or Florida who owned, controlled, and was the alter ego and responsible corporate officer of First Defendants Junker Sanitary Landfill, Inc., Junker Sanitation Services, Inc., and Junker Recycling, Inc. (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Defendant Junker Corporations"), at all times relevant to this matter. First Defendant James L. Junker personally participated in the operation of the Landfill and is an operator of the Landfill within the meaning of CERCLA § 101(20), 42 U.S.C. § 9601(20). 5. First Defendant United Waste Systems, Inc., is a Delaware corporation which in 1995 acquired the business of First Defendant Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. from First Defendant James L. Junker when said parties were aware of the environmental contamination at the Landfill, and the associated liabilities. First Defendant United Waste Transfer, Inc., is a Minnesota corporation which in 1995, on . information and belief, acquired the business of waste hauler Poor Richards, Inc., and perhaps other transporters whose waste may have been deposited at the Landfill. First Defendant United Waste Systems, Inc. is a mere 'continuation of Defendant Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. and, on information and belief, is undercapitalized in view of First Defendant Junker Sanitation Services, Inc.'s environmental contamination liabilities arising out of the Landfill. First Defendant United Waste Systems, Inc., is the alter ego, parent or other affiliated corporation which exercises substantial management, ownership, and financial control over First Defendant Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. and First Defendant United Waste Transfer, Inc. First Defendants United Waste are the successors-in-interest to First Defendant Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. and Poor Richards, Inc., and thus each is a "person" within the meaning of CERCLA § 101(21), 42 U.S.C. § 9601(21), and RCRA § 1004(15), 42 U.S.C. § 6903(15), as are all other defendants herein. 6. Second Defendants Eisinger Sanitation Services, Inc., et al., were engaged in the business of transporting waste to the Landfill at all times relevant to this matter, and thus were engaged in "transport" within the meaning of CERCLA § 101(26), 42 U.S.C. 9601(26). 7. Third Defendants City of Stillwater, et al., are public and private generators of waste, and others who arranged for disposal of hazardous substances at the Landfill at all times relevant to this matter. 8. Fourth Defendants John Does and Mary Does are other transporters, public and private generators, and others who or which arranged for disposal of hazardous substances at the Landfill. Defendants Does include those who have received CERCLA 8 104(e), 42 U.S.C. § 9604(e), information requests from the United States Environmental Protection Y ( USEPA ) A enc " " related to the Landfill, and others whose 9 waste containing hazardous substances was disposed of at the Landfill. Defendants Does also include successors-in-interest, and responsible corporate officers of presently- existing or previously-dissolved corporations, as well as shareholders, directors, partners, employees, agents and others who personally participated in the conduct alleged, and are liable, herein. III. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 9. This court has jurisdiction to hear this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (controversy arising under a federal statute); 28 U.S.C. § 2201 (declaratory judgment action); 42 U.S.C. 6972(a) (exclusive original jurisdiction over all controversies arising under RCRA); and 42 U.S.C. § 9613(b) (exclusive original jurisdiction over all controversies arising under CERCLA). This court also has supplemental jurisdiction to consider and adjudicate plaintiffs claims made under Wisconsin Statutes, Chapter 242 and the common law, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367 (supplemental jurisdiction) and considerations of judicial economy, convenience and fairness to litigants, and comity. 10. Venue lies in this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b), 42 U.S.C. § 6972(a), and 42 U.S.C. § 9613(b). • 9 it • IV. GENERAL ALLEGATIONS 11. From 1972 to 1987, the Landfill was operated in Hudson Township, St. Croix County, Wisconsin, pursuant to a permit issued by the WDNR. From 1977 to 1987, the Defendant Junker Corporations and First Defendant James L. Junker leased and operated the Landfill. The Landfill property consists of approximately 20 acres and is located off Alexander Road, north of U.S. Highway 12, and about six miles east of the City of Hudson, Wisconsin, in Section 13, Township 29 North, Range 19 West. 12. The Landfill received municipal waste and industrial/commercial waste from commercial waste haulers serving residential and commercial accounts. Solid waste and other hazardous substances were disposed of at the Landfill. 13. In 1985, the WDNR published a report showing that the Landfill was the source of releases of chlorinated solvents into the underlying Prairie du Chein aquifer, based upon water quality sampling commenced in 1984. In 1987, the Landfill ceased accepting waste and the Landfill was closed. The WDNR commenced post-closure care of the Landfill beginning in 1989, which included capping the Landfill and installing a gas collection and destruction system. Further, the WDNR and the USEPA continued with water quality sampling of residential wells in the area, and established a Special Well Construction Area in 1991. The WDNR placed the Landfill on the Wisconsin Hazard Ranking List. 14. Hazardous substances detected in the groundwater underlying the Landfill, and detected off-site viaas migration, include, but are not limited to, Trichloroethene g 9 Tetrachloroethene P Trichlorofluoromethane Freon-11 and (TOE), ( CE), ( ), 10 • Dichlorodifluoromethane (Freon-12). 15. In 1993, the WDNR installed a leachate pumping system at the Landfill. USEPA Region V evaluated potential ecological risks at the Landfill in December, 1993, and published a site assessment report concerning the Landfill in April, 1994. On information and belief, the WDNR and USEPA have spent more than $2.8 million in investigation and remediation activities at the site to date. 16. Beginning in early 1994, plaintiff initiated in cooperation with the WDNR a bottled water delivery program to residences located near the Landfill which obtained water from the contaminated aquifer. Plaintiff further undertook preparation of a Remedial Investigation (RI) consistent with USEPA's National Contingency Plan (NCP), 40 C.F.R., Part 300. Plaintiff's RI report was approved by the WDNR in August, 1995. In addition, and in cooperation with the WDNR, plaintiff undertook preparation of a Feasibility Study (FS) to evaluate possible remedies to the environmental contamination issues identified in the RI, consistent with USEPA's evaluation criteria and guidance documents under CERCLA, and consistent with the NCP. Plaintiff's FS was approved by the WDNR in March, 1996. 17. The amount advanced by plaintiff to date without admitting liability on necessary costs of response in connection with inspections, monitoring, evaluations, assessments, sampling, analysis and other removal and remedial response actions not inconsistent with the NCP caused by the release of hazardous substances at the Landfill, is in excess of $1.3 million (excluding pre judgment interest) or as may be proven at the time of trial. 11 • • COUNT ONE RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY ACT SECTION- 7002(a)(1)(B) (ALL DEFENDANTS) 18. Plaintiff restates the allegations contained in Paragraphs 1 through 17 as though fully set forth herein. 19. Plaintiff has complied with the notice requirements set forth at 42 U.S.C. § 6972(b) and 40 C.F.R. Part 254. 20. Each of the defendants is a person within the meaning RCRA § 1004(15), 42 U.S.C. § 6903(15). The defendants include generators of hazardous waste within the meaning of RCRA § 3002, 42 U.S.C. § 6922; transporters of hazardous waste within the meaning of RCRA § 3003, 42 U.S.C. § 6923; and operators of hazardous waste facilities within the meaning of RCRA § 3004, 42 U.S.C. § 6924, and companion state law, with respect to the Landfill. 21. The Landfill is a treatment, storage or disposal facility within the meaning of RCRA § 7002(a)(1)(B), 42 U.S.C. § 6972(a)(1)(B). The hazardous substances that have been and are being released from the Landfill are solid or hazardous wastes within the meaning of RCRA § 7002(a)(1)(B), 42 U.S.C. § 6972(a)(1)(B). 22. Defendants, each and every one of them, should be compelled to take corrective remediation actions to abate the contamination of the soil and groundwater underlying the Landfill under RCRA § 7002(a)(1)(B), 42 U.S.C. § 6972(a)(1)(B). Defendants, each and every one of them, should further be ordered to pay plaintiffs cost of litigation (including attorney and expert witness fees) pursuant to RCRA § 7002(e), 42 U.S.C. § 6972(e). 12 • . COUNT TWO COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE, COMPENSATION AND LIABILITY ACT SECTION 107 (ALL DEFENDANTS1 23. Plaintiff restates the allegations contained in Paragraphs 1 through 22 as though fully set forth herein. 24. The Landfill is a "facility" as defined by CERCLA § 101(9), 42 U.S.C. § 9601(9). 25. "Hazardous substances," as defined by CERCLA § 101(14), 42 U.S.C. § 9601(14), have been and are present at the Landfill. 26. Hazardous substances have been and are being "release[d]," as defined by CERCLA § 101(22), 42 U.S.C. § 9601(22), into the soil and groundwater underlying the Landfill. 27. The defendants caused the "disposal," as defined by CERCLA § 101(29), 42 U.S.C. § 9601(29), of hazardous substances at the Landfill. 28. First Defendant James L. Junker and the Defendant Junker Corporations operated the Landfill at the times of disposal of hazardous substances there. First Defendant James L. Junker and First Defendant Junker Sanitation Services, Inc., accepted hazardous substances for transport to the Landfill for disposal which was a facility selected by them for hazardous substance disposal. First Defendants United Waste Systems, Inc. and United Waste Transfer, Inc., are the alter egos, mere continuations and successors-in-interest to First Defendant Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. and Poor Richards, Inc., respectively, with respect to the transport of hazardous substances for disposal at the Landfill. 13 • 29. Second Defendants Eisinger Sanitation, et al. accepted hazardous substances for transport to the Landfill for disposal which was a facility selected by them for hazardous substances disposal. 30. Third Defendants City of Stillwater, et al., generated hazardous substances and/or arranged for disposal of hazardous substances at the Landfill. 31. Fourth Defendants John Does and Mary Does include other persons not presently determined who, by contract, agreement or otherwise arranged for the disposal, or arranged with a transporter for transport for disposal at the Landfill of hazardous substances owned or possessed by each such defendant. Said defendants also include persons who accepted hazardous substances for transport to the Landfill for disposal, which was a facility selected by them for hazardous substance disposal. 32. The release of hazardous substances disposed of by the defendants at the Landfill caused necessary costs of response to be advanced by plaintiff and others consistent with the NCP, and for which the defendants are liable, jointly and severally, pursuant to CERCLA § 107(a), 42 U.S.C. § 9607(a). COUNT THREE COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE, COMPENSATION AND LIABILITY ACT SECTION 113 (ALL DEFENDANTS) 33. Plaintiff restates the allegations contained in Paragraphs 1 through 32 as though fully set forth herein. 34. Section 113(f) of CERCLA, as amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA) of 1986, 42 U.S.C. § 9613(f), authorizes a person to seek contribution for response costs "from any other person who is liable or potentially 14 • liable under section 9607(a)" of CERCLA. Section 113(g)(2) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9613(g)(2), authorizes a court to "enter a declaratory judgment on liability for response costs or damages that will be binding on any subsequent action or actions to recover further response costs or damages. 35. Each of the defendants is liable or potentially liable under CERCLA § 107(a), 42 U.S.C. § 9607(a), for necessary costs of response at the Landfill consistent with the NCP. 36. In the eventp laintiff were found liable potentially or otentiall liable under CERCLA § 107(a) for Landfill-caused response costs, then pursuant to CERCLA § 113(f), 42 fromdefendants for the u U.S.C. § 9613(f), plaintiff would be entitled to contribution response costs incurred and for future response costs to be incurred in connection with the Landfill, and to an allocation by the court of such past and future response costs among the defendants using such equitable factors as the court determines are appropriate. COUNT FOUR FEDERAL COMMON LAW CONTRIBUTION (ALL DEFENDANTS) 37. Plaintiff restates the allegations contained in Paragraphs 1 through 36 as though fully set forth herein. 38. Defendants share a common liability for the investigation and remediation of the Landfill. Plaintiff has advanced more than its equitable share of such costs. If plaintiff were found liable for its equitable share of such costs, then under those circumstances, defendants would be liable to plaintiff for their contribution or comparative 15 + t • • • share of the costs of investigation and remediation of the Landfill, as a matter of federal common law. COUNT FIVE WISCONSIN COMMON LAW CONTRIBUTION (ALL DEFENDANTS) 39. Plaintiff restates the allegations contained in Paragraphs 1 through 38 as though fully set forth herein. 40. Defendants share a common liability for the investigation and remediation of the Landfill. Plaintiff has advanced more than its equitable share of such costs. If plaintiff were found liable for its equitable share of such costs, then under those circumstances, defendants would be liable to plaintiff for their contribution or comparative share of the costs of investigation and remediation of the Landfill, as a matter of Wisconsin common law. COUNT SIX UNJUST ENRICHMENT (ALL DEFENDANTS) 41. Plaintiff restates the allegations contained in Paragraphs 1 through 40 as though fully set forth herein. 42. In view of the defendants' operation of the Landfill, and/or the defendants' disposal, transport, or arranging for disposal of hazardous substances at the Landfill, if plaintiff were solely obligated to investigate and remediate the Landfill, then defendants would receive an unfair benefit insofar as they would not have contributed to payment for the costs of response and other costs with respect to the Landfill caused by them. 16 + y • • 43. The court should impose a constructive trust in favor of plaintiff for all sums adjudicated to be the Landfill response cost obligations of the defendants, to prevent their unjust enrichment, pursuant to equitable principles. COUNT SEVEN FRAUDULENT TRANSFER RECOVERY (DEFENDANTS JUNKER) 44. Plaintiff restates the allegations contained in Paragraphs 1 through 43 as though fully set forth herein. 45. For many years, First Defendant James L. Junker and the Defendant Junker Corporations have known of the soil and groundwater contamination at the Landfill, and the magnitude of the associated liabilities for Landfill contamination investigation and remediation. On information and belief, First Defendant James L. Junker, his spouse Deborah G. Junker, and the Defendant Junker Corporations may have transferred their assets to relatives, insiders, and alter egos, to shield their assets from Landfill remediation creditors. Plaintiff has heard, for example, that First Defendant James L. Junker has established sizeable trust funds for his children. True information concerning whether First Defendant James L. Junker and/or the Defendant Junker Corporations have unlawfully transferred assets to avoid Landfill liabilities is within the exclusive control of said defendants and their agents or others. 46. Upon the sale of First Defendant Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. or its assets to First Defendant United Waste Systems, Inc., First Defendant Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. and First Defendant James L. Junker received, on information and belief, substantial value including a sum certain in money. The sale occurred at the time said 17 • • defendants were aware of the environmental contamination investigation of the Landfill by the WDNR and the USEPA. Said defendants further were aware at the time of the sale of the enormity of investigative and response costs necessary to remediate the site. 47. If First Defendant James L. Junker's, or the Defendant Junker Corporations', assets, or the consideration received by First Defendant James L. Junker or the Defendant Junker Corporations from First Defendant United Waste Systems, Inc., have or has been transferred to insiders, third persons or entities, or others in an effort • to hinder, delay or defraud Landfill remediation creditors (including plaintiff) seeking reimbursement or contribution from said defendants herein, and/or if the transfer(s) was made without the transferor(s) receiving reasonably equivalent value, rendering any of them insolvent, then such transfers would be fraudulent and would violate the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act, Wisconsin Statutes, Chapter 242, and other applicable law and equitable doctrines. 48. Accordingly, if it is determined that First Defendant James L. Junker and/or the Defendant Junker Corporations fraudulently transferred assets, money or value to avoid their liabilities for Landfill investigation and remediation, then plaintiff requests the court to declare such transfers unlawful and to avoid, nullify and set them aside, to order the return or recovery of any and all asset, money or value transfers, and to enjoin said defendants from selling, disposing, transferring or otherwise further conveying or encumbering any of their assets, or the consideration received in the sale of First Defendant Junker Sanitation Services, Inc. to First Defendant United Waste Systems, Inc., pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 242.07. 18 • • WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Junker Landfill Trust seeks money damages, injunctive relief, and a declaratory judgment against the defendants, as follows: (a) Compelling the defendants to take corrective remediation action with respect to the Landfill in compliance with applicable law, rules, regulations, and orders; (b) Declaring that defendants by themselves or by their predecessors as appropriate, operated the Landfill, accepted hazardous substances for transport to the Landfill facility which was selected by them, and/or disposed of, transported and/or arranged for the disposal of hazardous substances they owned or possessed at the Landfill, which hazardous substances were, in fact, disposed of at the Landfill; (c) Declaring that hazardous substances have been released into the environment at the Landfill; (d) Declaring that defendants, each and every one of them, are persons responsible for the release of hazardous substances at the Landfill within the meaning of CERCLA §§ 107(a) and 113(f), 42 U.S.C.§§ 9607(a) and 9613(f); (e) Declaring that defendants are jointly and severally liable to plaintiff for all sums advanced by plaintiff for necessary costs of response for investigative, removal or remedial actions at the Landfill consistent with the NCP and applicable law; (f) Awarding plaintiff pre-judgment interest pursuant to CERCLA § 107(a)(4), 19 • • , • 42 U.S.C. § 9607(a)(4), for all damages and for all sums it has advanced for which it is entitled to contribution and reimbursement from the • defendants; (g) Declaring fraudulent transfers void, ordering the return of all asset, money or value transfers, and enjoining First Defendant James L. Junker and the Defendant Junker Corporations from transferring assets to avoid Landfill liabilities; and (h) Awarding plaintiff costs of litigation including reasonable attorneys and expert witnesses fees pursuant to RCRA § 7002(e), 42 U.S.C. § 6972(e), and reasonable attorneys fees incurred in identifying responsible parties consistent with Key Tronic Corp. v. United States, U.S. 114 S. Ct. 1960, 128 L. Ed. 2d 797 (1994), together with other costs and disbursements incurred herein; and (i) Awarding plaintiff such other and further relief as the court deems just and equitable under the circumstances. Dated: April 12, 1996 • Lind, Jensen & Sullivan Professional Association T-d E. Sulliv-n, Wis. I.D. No. 1009901 Tho :_ I _ -nsen, Minn. I.D. No. 50179 Attorneys for Plaintiff 150 South Fifth Street, Suite 1700 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 (612) 333-3637 20 • • JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Plaintiff alleges that all or some of the issues asserted herein may be triable to a jury and therefore demands a jury trial as to all issues herein or as ordered by the court pursuant to applicable law. 21 ,„ • ORDER Any dispositive motion filed by any of the parties prior to the preliminary pretrial conference to be scheduled in this matter shall be accompanied by appropriate memorandum of law; opposing party has 20 days to respond; and the moving party 10 days to reply. This will be the only briefing schedule issued prior to the preliminary pretrial conference, and only those motions filed with appropriate memoranda will be recognized. BY THE COURT: JOHN C. SHABAZ District Judge / r II! • • .4 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: To enable judges and magistrate judges of the court to evaluate possible disqualification or recusal, counsel for a private (non-governmental) business, company, or corporation shall submit at the time of initial pleading this statement of corporate affiliations and financial interest. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ) ) v. ) Case No. ) ) ) DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS AND FINANCIAL INTEREST makes the following disclosure: (name of party) 1. Is said party a subsidiary or affiliate of a publicly owned corporation? YES NO If the answer is YES, list below and identify the parent corporation or affiliate and the relationship between it and the named party: 2. Is there a publicly owned corporation, not a party to this case, that has a financial interest in the outcome? YES NO If the answer is YES, list the identity of such corporation and the nature of the financial interest: Date: (signature of counsel) c.? 410 110 . t IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO DISPOSITION OF A CIVIL CASE BY A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE United States Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker has been specially designated by this court to conduct any and all proceedings, including jury and nonjury trials, in those civil cases in which all parties consent. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636 (c) (2) , you are hereby notified of your right to consent to have all further proceedings in your case handled by United States Magistrate Judge Crocker. Consent forms for this purpose are available from the clerk of court. Your decision to give or withhold such consent is entirely voluntary. Consent of the parties permits the Magistrate Judge to preside over all aspects of your case, but it does not guarantee that the Magistrate Judge will preside. The court retains residual authority, on its own motion or for good cause shown, to remove a reference of a case to a Magistrate Judge. Your attention is also directed to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §636(c) (3) -(5) concerning appeals from judgments of the Magistrate Judge. • '/X/4/ /� Joseph W. Skdpniewitz Clerk, U.S. District Court Western District of Wisconsin 410 c(§) ;;--Th� LAW OFFICES OF ECKBERG, LAMMERS, BRIGGS, WOLFF & VIERLING, P.L.L.P. 1835 NORTHWESTERN AVENUE STILLWATER. MINNESOTA 55082 (612)439-2878 FAX(612)439-2923 LYLE J. ECKBERG Direct Dial No. 351-2118 GREGORY G.GALLER JAMES F. LAMMERS KEVIN K.SHOEBERG ROBERT G. BRIGGS THOMAS J.WEIONER ' PAUL A.WOLFF SUSAN 0.OLSON MARK J.VIERLING April 11, 1996 DAVID K.SNYDER The League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust Attn: Barbara Meyer • P. O. Box 59143 Minneapolis, MN 55459 • :-.Ecm \,\_,.//7 In Re : City of Oak Park Heights D Policy No. : MP821012R Policy No. : 0000273 APR I 6 1996 Policy No. : MCM8541-8 Policy No. : UEL627-8 Policy No. : CMC-9426-B Policy No. : MEL822-9 Dear Ms . Meyer: We are herewith putting you on notice that the City of Oak Park Heights has received a Notice of Claim generated .out of an alleged cause of action dealing with environmental contamination ostensibly occurring in the years 1977 through 1987 . The City of Oak Park Heights has not yet received the formal Summons and Complaint, but has been notified that the same will beforwarded shortly, and as soon as it is, we will forward same to you. The action involves Junker Sanitation, Inc. , who was the City' s contract garbage collector for that period of time, who ostensibly disposed of the municipal collections from the residents of the City of Oak Park Heights at a landfill that it had leased in Wisconsin from 1977 through 1987 . It is alleged that the landfill is now contaminated, and an action has been commenced on behalf of the State of Wisconsin and others against Junker Sanitation, Inc. for the clean-up of that site. The City has been put on notice that it will be brought into the action• as an additional party defendant from the Plaintiffs on or before April 15, 1996 . The City hereby tenders the defense of that action to Auto-Owners Insurance, who issued umbrella excess liabilities coverage to the City of Oak Park Heights for the years 1987 through 1994, and we will provide you with direct copies of the Summons and Complaint as soon as we have received them. Yours very truly, c� Mark J. Vierling MJV:smp c : Mike Robertson • LAW OFFICES OF ECKBERG, LAMMERS, BRIGGS, WOLFF a VIERLING, P.L.L.P. 1835 NORTHWESTERN AVENUE STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55062 (612)439-2878 FAX(612)439.2923 LYLE J. ECKBERG GREGORY G.GALLER Il JAMES F. LAMMERS Direct Dial No. 351-2118 KEVIN K.SMOEBERG ROBERT G. BRIGGS THOMAS J.WEIDNER PAUL A.WOLFF SUSAN D.OLSON MARK J.VIERLING DAVID K. SNYDER April 9, 1996 CERTIFIED MAIL - R.R.R. Interstate Fire & Casualty Company 1 g L5 U\J E Suite 3300 � J 55 East Monroe Street i APR 1 1 1996 Chicago, IL 60603 In Re : City of Oak Park Heights Umbrella Liability: $5, 000, 000 . 0 Retained Limit Policy No. : 155-C05780 Policy No. : 155-C09087 Policy No. : 155-C14518 Policy No. : 155-C0020263 Policy No. : 155-C0024930 Policy No. : 155-C0024900 Policy No. : 55C-2045296 Policy No. : 55C-2065528 Gentlemen: We are herewith putting you on notice that the City of Oak Park Heights has received a Notice of Claim generated out of an alleged cause of action dealing with environmental contamination ostensibly occurring in the years 1977 through 1987. The City of Oak Park Heights has not yet received the formal Summons and Complaint, but has been notified that the same will be forwarded shortly, and as soon as it is, we will forward same to you. The action involves Junker Sanitation, Inc. , who was the City' s contract garbage collector for that period of time, who ostensibly disposed of the municipal collections from the residents of the City of Oak Park Heights at a landfill that it had leased in Wisconsin from 1977 through 1987 . It is alleged that the landfill is now contaminated, and an action has been commenced on behalf of the State of Wisconsin and others against Junker Sanitation, Inc. for the clean-up of that site. The City has been put on notice that it will be brought into the action as an additional party defendant from the Plaintiffs on or before April 15, 1996 . The City hereby tenders the defense of that action to Interstate Fire & Casualty Company, who issued umbrella excess liabilities coverage to the City of Oak Park Heights for the period of time of 1977 • April 9, 1996 Page 2 through and inclusive of 1985, and we will provide you with direct copies of the Summons and Complaint as soon as we have received them. Yours very truly, Mark J. Vierling MJV:smp c : Mike Robertson " T D • • ffloglifiVIE J S N D W all 211111 1 5'0:x: ATTORNEYS April 11, 1996 AT LAW City of Oak Park Heights RICHARD A.LIND* 14168-57th Street North THOMAS Stillwater, MN 55082 * TED E.SULLIVAN" PAUL C.PETERSON* ERIC A.NERNESS WILLIAM L.DAVIDSON RE: Junker Landfill Trust v. Junker Recycling, Inc., et al. TTNCourt File No: 96-C-0019-S CONSTANCE LL..HALL TIMOTHY J.O'CONNOR Our File No: 5256 SANDRA E.BRISLEY PATRICK M.JUAREZ ALAN W.PORTER Greetings: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Junker Landfill Trust, a Minnesota business trust, made up of small and large businesses and others by their attorneys Lind, Jensen & Sullivan, Professional Association, 150 South Fifth Street, Suite 1700, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402, will commence a civil action against you in the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 6972(a), (citizen suit provisions of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act ("RCRA")) as well as other Federal statutes, the Wisconsin Hazardous Waste Management Act, Wisconsin Statutes, Ch. 144, the Solid Waste and Hazardous Management Rules, Wis. Admin. Code Ch. NR 500-590 and possibly other statutes, and the common law of the State of Wisconsin. This action will be filed because information available indicates that you or your company have contributed to the past generation or transportation of waste to, or are a past or present operator of, the Junker Landfill located in St. Croix County, State of Wisconsin, and that you or your company have contributed to the past handling, storage, treatment, transportation or disposal of solid and/or hazardous waste which may present imminent and substantial endangerment to health or to the environment. Specifically, Junker Landfill Trust intends to bring suit under RCRA §§ 7002(a)(1)(A) (42 U.S.C. § 6972(a)(1)(A)) and 7002(a)(1)(B) (42 U.S.C. § 6972(a)(1)(B)), on the basis that the unabated wastes at the Junker Landfill and failure to close properly the Junker Landfill may present an imminent and substantial endangerment to health or A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION 150 SOUTH FIFTH STREET SUITE 1700 MINNEAPOLIS MINNESOTA 55402 (612)333-3637 FAX:(612)3331030 "CERTIFIED AS A CIVIL TRIAL SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION • • the environment, and that this has occurred from approximately 1972 to the present and may be continuing. This notice is being provided to you pursuant to the provisions of 42 U.S.C. § 6972(b) and 40 CFR Part 254. Notice is also being served upon the Administrator and Regional Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, the Secretary of the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, and the Attorney General of the United States pursuant to 40 CFR § 254.2. If you have any questions regarding this Notice of Intent, you may contact the undersigned attorney for the Junker Landfill Trust. Very truly yours, LIND, JENSEN & SULLIVAN Professional Association .AJN'' - Ted E. Sullivan TES:prc A cy D 6 • • .. ,. TR© 1ME Nti\Ta' Ilia .r ATTORNEYS April 11, 1996 , 1 AT LAW 9 City of Oak Park Heights RICHARD A.LIND* 14168-57th Street North THOMAS D.JENSEN* TED E.SULLIVAN* Stillwater, MN 55082 PAUL C.PETERSON* ERIC A.NERNESS WILLIAM L.DAVIDSON RE: Junker Landfill Trust v. Junker Recycling, Inc., et al. TTNCourt File No: 96-0-0019-S L. CONSNSTANCE L.HALL TIMOTHYJ.O'CONNOR Our File No: 5256 SANDRA E.BRISLEY PATRICK M.JUAREZ ALAN W.PORTER Greetings: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Junker Landfill Trust, a Minnesota business trust, made up of small and large businesses and others by their attorneys Lind, Jensen & Sullivan, Professional Association, 150 South Fifth Street, Suite 1700, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402, will commence a civil action against you in the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 6972(a), (citizen suit provisions of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act ("RCRA")) as well as other Federal statutes, the Wisconsin Hazardous Waste Management Act, Wisconsin Statutes, Ch. 144, the Solid Waste and Hazardous Management Rules, Wis. Admin. Code Ch. NR 500-590 and possibly other statutes, and the common law of the State of Wisconsin. This action will be filed because information available indicates that you or your company have contributed to the past generation or transportation of waste to, or are a past or present operator of, the Junker Landfill located in St. Croix County, State of Wisconsin, and that you or your company have contributed to the past handling, storage, treatment, transportation or disposal of solid and/or hazardous waste which may present imminent and substantial endangerment to health or to the environment. Specifically, Junker Landfill Trust intends to bring suit under RCRA §§ 7002(a)(1)(A) (42 U.S.C. § 6972(a)(1)(A)) and 7002(a)(1)(B) (42 U.S.C. § 6972(a)(1)(B)), on the basis that the unabated wastes at the Junker Landfill and failure to close properly the Junker Landfill may present an imminent and substantial endangerment to health or A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION 150 SOUTH FIFTH STREET SUITE 1700 MINNEAPOLIS MINNESOTA 55402 (612)333-3637 FAX:(612)333-1030 'CERTIFIED AS A CIVIL TRIAL SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION • the environment,nment and that this has oe urred from approximately 1972 to the present and may be cont nuing. This notice is being provided to you •'ursuant to the provisions of 42 U.S.C. § 6972(b) and 40 CFR Part 2`.4. Notice is also being served upon the Administrator and Regional dministrator of the United States Environmental Protection Age l cy, the Secretary of the Wisconsin Department of Natural Re-ources, and the Attorney General of the United States pursuan to 40 CFR § 254.2. If you have any questions regarding t is Notice of Intent, you may contact the undersigned attorney for t e Junker Landfill Trust. Very truly yours, LIND, JENSEN & SULLIVAN Professional Association Ted E. Sullivan TES:prc it • • LAW OFFICES OF copy ECKBERG, LAMMERS, BRIGGS, WOLFF & VIERLING, P.L.L.P. 1835 NORTHWESTERN AVENUE STILLWATER. MINNESOTA 55082 (612)439-2878 FAX(642)439-2923 LYLE J. ECKBERG GREGORY G.GALLER JAMES F. LAMMERS Direct Dial No. 351-2118 KEVIN K.SMOEBERG ROBERT G. BRIGGS THOMAS J.WEIDNER PAUL A.WOLFF SUSAN O.OLSON MARK J.VIERLING DAVID K.SNYDER April 4, 1996 Auto Owners Insurance • P.O. Box 64358 A p R© 7. 05 5 St. Paul, MN 55164-0358 In Re: City of Oak Park Heights Policy No. : 852106-71978089 Gentlemen: We are herewith putting you on notice that the City of Oak Park Heights has received a Notice of Claim generated out of an alleged cause of action dealing with environmental contamination ostensibly occurring in the years 1977 through 1987. The City of Oak Park Heights has not yet received the formal Summons and Complaint, but has been notified that the same will be forwarded shortly, and as soon as it is, we will forward same to you. The action involves Junker Sanitation, Inc. , who was the City' s contract garbage collector for that period of time, who ostensibly disposed of the municipal collections from the residents of the City of Oak Park Heights at a landfill that it had leased in Wisconsin from 1977 through 1987 . It is alleged that the landfill is now contaminated, and an action has been commenced on behalf of the State of Wisconsin and others against Junker Sanitation, Inc. for the clean-up of that site. The City has been put on notice that it will be brought into the action as an additional party defendant from the Plaintiffs on or before April 15, 1996 . The City hereby tenders the defense of that acti. • • Auto-Owners Insurance, who issued umbrella excess liabi ies coverage to the City of Oak Park Heights for the calenda ear 19: through 1986, and we will provide you with direct - opies o the Summons and Complaint as soon as we have receive. them. You ver truly, ark J. Vierling MJV:dmr c : Mike Robertson • • py LAW OFFICES OF l ECKBERG, LAMMERS, BRIGGS, WOLFF & VIERLING, P.L. . . ���„//J 1835 NORTHWESTERN AVENUE STILLWATER,MINNESOTA 55082 (612)439-2878 FAX(612)439-2923 LYLE J. ECKBERG Direct Dial No. 351-2118 GREGORY G.GALLER JAMES F. LAMMERS KEVIN K.SHOEBERG ROBERT G. BRIGGS THOMAS J.WEIDNER PAUL A.WOLFF SUSAN D.OLSON MARK J. VIERLING April 4, 1996 DAVID K.SNYDER The League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust c/o North Star Risk Services, Inc. 1401 West 76th Street, Suite 550 Minneapolis, MN 55423 In Re : City of Oak Park Heights Policy No. : MP821012R Policy No. : 0000273 Policy No. : MCM8541-8 Policy No. : UEL627-8 Policy No. : CMC-9426-B Policy No. : MEL822-9 Gentlemen: We are herewith putting you on notice that the City of Oak Park Heights has received a Notice of Claim generated out of an alleged cause of action dealing with environmental contamination ostensibly occurring in the years 1977 through 1987 . The City of Oak Park Heights has not yet received the formal Summons and Complaint, but has been notified that the same will beforwarded shortly, and as soon as it is, we will forward same to you. The action involves Junker Sanitation, Inc. , who was the City' s contract garbage collector for that period of time, who • ostensibly disposed of the municipal collections from the residents of the City of Oak Park Heights at a landfill that it had leased in Wisconsin from 1977 through 1987 . It is alleged that the landfill is now contaminated, and an action has been commenced on behalf of the State of Wisconsin and others against Junker Sanitation, Inc. for the clean-up of that site. The City has been put on notice that it will be brought into the action as an additional party defendant from the Plaintiffs on or before April 15, 1996 . The City hereby tenders the defense of that action to Auto-Owners Insurance, who issued umbrella excess liabilities coverage to the City of Oak Park Heights for the years 1987 through 1994, and we will provide you with direct copies of the Summons and Complaint as soon as we have received them. Yours very truly, Mark J. Vierling • MJV:dmr c: Mike Robertson • • COPY LAW OFFICES OF ECKBERG, LAMMERS, BRIGGS, WOLFF & VIERLING, P.L.L.P. 1835 NORTHWESTERN AVENUE STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 (612)439-2878 FAX(612)439-2923 LYLE J. ECKBERG GREGORY G.GALLER JAMES F. LAMMERS KEVIN K. SHOEBERG ROBERT G. BRIGGS Direct Dial No. 351-2118 THOMAS J.WEIDNER PAUL A.WOLFF SUSAN D.OLSON MARK J.VIERLING DAVID K.SNYDER April 4, 1996 Interstate Fire & Casualty Company 5001 West 80th Street Minneapolis, MN 55437 In Re: City of Oak Park Heights • Umbrella Liability: $5, 000, 000 . 00 Retained Limit Policy No. : 155-C05780 Policy No. : 155-C09087 Policy No. : 155-C14518 Policy No. : 155-C0020263 Policy No. : 155-C0024930 Policy No. : 155-C0024900 Policy No. : 55C-2045296 Policy No. : 55C-2065528 Gentlemen: We are herewith putting you on notice that the City of Oak Park Heights has received a Notice of Claim generated out of an alleged cause of action dealing with environmental contamination ostensibly occurring in the years 1977 through 1987 . The City of Oak Park Heights has not yet received the formal Summons and Complaint, but has been notified that the same will be forwarded shortly, and as soon as it is, we will forward same to you. The action involves Junker Sanitation, Inc. , who was the City' s contract garbage collector for that period of time, who ostensibly disposed of the municipal collections from the residents of the City of Oak Park Heights at a landfill that it had leased in Wisconsin from 1977 through 1987. It is alleged that the landfill is now contaminated, and an action has been commenced on behalf of the State of Wisconsin and others against Junker Sanitation, Inc. TheCityhas been put on notice for the clean-up of that site . that it will be brought into the action as an additional party defendant from the Plaintiffs on or before April 15, 1996 . The City hereby tenders the defense of that action to Interstate Fire & Casualty Company, who issued umbrella excess liabilities coverage to the City of Oak Park Heights for the period of time of 1977 Ir ' . April 4, 1996 Page 2 through and inclusive of 1985, and we will provide you with direct copies of the Summons and Complaint as soon as we have received them. Yours very truly, Mark J. Vierling MJV:dmr c: Mike Robertson • PY LAW OFFICES OF O ECKBERG, LAMMERS, BRIGGS, WOLFF & VIERLING, P.L.L.P. 1835 NORTHWESTERN AVENUE STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 (612)439-2878 FAX(612)439-2923 LYLE J. ECKBERG Direct Dial No. 351-2118 GREGORY G.GALLER JAMES F. LAMMERS KEVIN K. SHOEBERG ROBERT G. BRIGGS THOMAS J.WEIDNER PAUL A.WOLFF SUSAN D.OLSON MARK J.VIERLING April 4, 1996 DAVID K. SNYDER The Home Insurance Company 7600 France Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55435 In Re : City of Oak Park Heights Insurance Policy No. : IST-8462807 (Policies 1977-1980) Insurance Policy No. : IST-8776170 (Policies 1980-1986) Gentlemen: We are herewith putting you on notice that the City of Oak Park Heights has received a Notice of Claim generated out of an alleged cause of action dealing with environmental contamination ostensibly occurring in the years 1977 through 1987 . The City of Oak Park Heights has not yet received the formal Summons and Complaint, but has been notified that the same will be forwarded shortly, and as soon as it is, we will forward same to you. The action involves Junker Sanitation, Inc. , who was the City' s contract garbage collector for that period of time, who ostensibly disposed of the municipal collections from the residents of the City of Oak Park Heights at a landfill that it had leased in Wisconsin from 1977 through 1987 . It is alleged that the landfill- is now contaminated, and an action has been commenced on behalf of the State of Wisconsin and others against Junker Sanitation, Inc. for the clean-up of that site. The City has been put on notice that it will be brought into the action as an additional party defendant from the Plaintiffs on or before April 15, 1996 . The City hereby tenders the defense of that action to The Home Insurance Company, who insured the City during that period of time, and we will provide you with direct copies of the Summons . and Complaint as soon as we have received them. _. Yours very truly, Mark J. Vierling MJV:dmr c: Mike Robertson Environmental • Wenck Associates, Inc. Engineers 1800 Pioneer Creek Ctr. P.O. Box 428 Maple Plain, MN 55359-0428 \A,'e n (612) 479-4200 Fax (612) 479-4242 E-mail wenckmp@wenck.com April 2, 1996 Mr. Mike Robertson City of Oak Park Heights TVE@IE QIE14168-57th Street North P.O. Box 2007 APR - 3 M6 Stillwater, MN 55082 Re: Junker Landfill Dear Mr. Robertson: Thank you for your attendance, or your representative's attendance at yesterday's Junket- Landfill ug kerLandfill meeting. We hope the information we provided to you was helpful. We look forward to working cooperatively with you to resolve the issues at the landfill in a sound and cost- effective manner. If you have not already done so, I encourage you to get in touch With the Trust's legal counsel, Mr. Ted Sullivan at 612-333-3637. For your information the non-member's known to be represented at the meeting yesterday were: St. Croix County, Wisconsin Town of Hudson, Wisconsin City of Hudson, Wisconsin Village of North Hudson, Wisconsin Hudson School District City of Bayport, Minnesota City of Stillwater, Minnesota City of Oak Park Heights, Minnesota Independent School District#834, Stillwater Metro Council Environmental Services If you have any questions of a technical nature please call me at 612-479-4204. Sincerely, WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC. _Pr 1- •-.`eph J. Grabowski `xecutive Vice President JJG:rib cc: Mark Vierling Ted Sullivan Steering Committee N:\0404\02\thnkmun.ltr 411 LAW OFFICES OF ECKBERG, LAMMERS, BRIGGS, WOLFF & `VIERLING,�P.L. 1835 NORTHWESTERN AVENUE I('^ I t- r \\,� , r17) STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 11~ 3 .. �J .� 1 (612)439-2878 J FAX(612)439-2923 APR - 3 1196 LYLE J. ECKBERG GREG' -.GALLER JAMES F. LAMMERS KEVI . OEBERG ROBERT G. BRIGGS THOMAS J.WEIDNER PAULA.WOLFF Direct Dial (612) 351-211 •LSON MARK J.VIERLING DAVID K.SNYDER April 2, 1996 CONFIDENTIAL THE HONORABLE BARBARA H O'NEAL MR MARK SWENSON MAYOR OF CITY OF OAK PARK HTS 14846 UPPER 55TH ST 5495 OAK GREEN PLACE NORTH OAK PARK HTS MN 55082 OAK PARK HTS MN 55082 MR DAVID SCHAAF MS JANET ROBERT 6201 ST CROIX TRAIL N #121 6216 N LOOKOUT TRAIL OAK PARK HTS MN 55082 OAK PARK HTS MN 55082 MR MICHAEL J ROBERTSON MR DEAN KERN SR /` CITY ADMINISTRATOR 5885 OLDFIELD AVENUE NORTH CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS OAK PARK HTS MN 55082 P O BOX 2007 14168 57TH STREET NORTH OAK PARK HEIGHTS MN 55082 RE: Junker Landfill/Wisconsin Federal District Court Litigation Dear Mayor, Administrator and Council : On Monday April 1, 1996, I attended a meeting that was held at the Washington County Government Center with the meeting being sponsored or authored by Wenck Engineering, who is the lead agency for a number of businesses in Wisconsin communities that have organized a trust to represent their respective interest as it affects the Junker Landfill which is located in Wisconsin. As you may recall, the City first heard about the Wisconsin Landfill litigation in the summer of 1994 when we were contacted by Wenck and the Federal EPA. At that time, the EPA requested the City to complete a questionnaire pursuant to Section 104 (e) of CERCLA and related Federal legislation. The EPA decided not to pursue any action on the Federal level thereafter, but the State of Wisconsin, through its Department of Natural Resources as well as the affected commercial contributors to the landfill, have pursued litigation against Junker Sanitation, Inc . as a result of the contamination that is now associated with the landfill . • • MAYOR, ADMINISTRATOR & COUNCIL Page Two April 2 , 1996 Historically, you may recall that Junker Sanitation, Inc. leased this Wisconsin landfill site from 1977 through 1987 and it would appear that records obtained from the Wisconsin DNR and the group designated as "the Trust" indicates that Junker disposed of li all municipal and commercial waste within this landfill throughout this period of time . At the present time, contamination has been identified on the site, principally in the form of Trichloroethane (TCE) which is a solvent and is compounded by the fact that site is building up methanegasleaching and both the methane gas and TCE into neighboring are showing hborin residential properties, who well contamination and who have currently been supplied with bottled water. There appears to be approximately 45 homes that are now affected by the actual or estimated contamination where bottled water is currently being provided. Liability is going to be alleged against the cities of Oak Park Heights, Stillwater and Bayport amongst other communities inasmuch as all 3 cities had contracts with Junker Sanitation to collect residential waste which was transported to the site. Federal litigation is now venued in the Federal District Court in the Eastern Division of Wisconsin with an April 15th date being imposed by the Court for joinder of parties and a December trial date has tentatively been established. There were several purposes of the meeting: 1 . First, the group that now consists of the Trust, which has expended over 1 . 6 million dollars began the process of evaluating the contamination, forming a solution and spent bottled water, has advised that they have 1 . 6 million to date. They estimated that the total cost of the remedy could run to 10 million dollars but that the remedy that was being proposed consisted of providing carbon filters to the affected homes as well as a permanent methane burning and recovery installation being implemented on the site. The solution is an ongoing one that would probably require operation and maintenance for well over 25 years or more and would be an ongoing expense. 2 . Due to the scheduling order that they have received from the Federal Court, this group as well as the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources feels compelled to join as an additional parties defendant, each and every business, entity, waste generator and municipality that was served by Junker Sanitation from 1977 to 1987 and the Cities of Oak Park, Stillwater and Bayport, who are in this group will be sued before this month is out . 411 MAYOR, ADMINISTRATOR & COUNCIL Page Three April 2, 1996 3 . Despite the suit that will be forthcoming, it is the hope of the Trust group that the individual defendants and cities will agree to join the Trust . By agreeing to join the Trust, the Cities, as members of the Trust, agree to commit to provide funding on an annual basis to help fund the solution for the contamination that is on site. The Trust feels that they have provided benefit in that they feel that they can far more economically provide a solution better than the Wisconsin DNR or the EPA can, and additionally, feel that they can best manage the interests of the various contributors of waste to the landfill in terms of representation of their interest. against Junker Sanitation, Inc . There are many pros and cons and details with regard to the litigation that is upcoming and I will need to review that with the Council at the next meeting. I have attached to this correspondence copies of the 5 Fact Sheet publications that have been issued by the Trust group over the past year and a 1/2 so that you can review those and be familiar with their content . liberty of contactingthe City' s I have also taken the lib y insurance agent, who presumably should have records as it affects the City' s coverage over the past years in question and we will, of course, pursue and tender the defense of the matter to the insurance carrier. I fullyexpect the insurance carriers involved will take the position that there is no coverage for environmental contamination, however, there is a rider that is specifically d lic which was implemented, I provided under your current league policy P believe, in the mid 80s. Such a Rider does not exist, to my knowledge, in the past City insurance policies and we will have to research those in order to determine the extent of coverage . (I note that the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance coverage probably was not the only coverage that the City had during the entire period of time from 1977 to 1987 and I am asking the insurance agent, who has consistently served the City throughout theyears to do a research on their records to determine whether or not coverage was provided either by the Home Insurance Co. or by St . Paul Fire and Marine who, generally, were the 2 main providers of government liability coverage prior to the League of Minnesota Cities forming the insurance trust in the early 80s . ) The entire issue of the Junker Landfill site also raises issues with our current waste provider. United Systems who did not purchase just the equipment of Junker Sanitation, Inc. , they purchased the stock and own Junker Sanitation, Inc. as a 111 411 MAYOR, ADMINISTRATOR & COUNCIL Page Four April 2, 1996 corporation. We are reviewing the opportunities that may be before the City as it affects offsetting some of our costs against Junker Sanitation, Inc . and/or isolating funds from the current payments that are due to them to the extent that the City either decides to participate in the Trust or incurs any liability with regard to this action that will be forthcoming. I hope to have the Council advised as to the opportunities for that as well, at the time of the next Council Meeting when we meet in closed session on this issue. Naturally, if any of you have any questions on this matter, I would be happy to talk to individually about those before the next Council Meeting or at the Council Meeting it ose• -ssion. Yours v-- y tru , ark J. Vierling MJV/smp r: ' a act , a ..-,- heet Information for the Communityaboiat the-Junker Landfill March 27;1986 Landfill Cleanup Plan he uunnker s Being Finalized landfill group ...-ip - About 25 years ago,an old gravel pit in group of landfill customers who have been Hudson Township started receiving waste voluntarily working on these concerns since When owners and from places like industries,businesses, - 1994. operators don't fix schools,and thousands of homes.This was a This Group carefully evaluated many polluting landfills, common practice years ago that unfortunately cleanup options in a Feasibility Study that States usually have no led to groundwater contamination,as in the was recently approved by the Wisconsin choice but to require case of the Junker Department of help from the landfill Landfill. the next step... Natural Resources customers and haulers— The good news :,--1-':,:: - SNR). This even when they used The WDNR and JunkerLandfill Group the site legally. is that a complete, have reached a consensus of how to _ study includes technical plan for ;remedy the contamination. The --- detailed recommen- The Junker Landfill site cleanuphas .recommended components of the dations for a remedy has about 800 past remedy are-contained in a Feasibility been developedbyycustomers and haulers. Study that was recently approved by consisting of five Since 1994,about two the Junker Landfill the WDNR. The next step is for the specific components Group—a small WDNR to prepare a Proposed Plan dozen have come P - � (see inside). which formally lays out the compo- forward to work with - nents of the remedy,and to invite the the State and public to review and comment on it. voluntarily study and Timeline correct the problem. 1973-1987 Junker Landfill accepts a million cubic yards of waste 1987 State orders landfill to stop operation Called the Junker 1990 State closes landfill by placing clay cap over waste Landfill Group, these 1991 State establishes regulation of new wells drilled in area 1992 State installs system to extract and bum landfill gas are municipalities, 1994 Junker Landfill Group forms;starts giving free bottled water and launches environmental studies townships,counties, 1995 Group takes over post-closure landfill care,continues studies, and evaluates cleanup alternatives government agencies, 1996 - . Group recommends final cleanup program,with small businesses,and .. WDNR to prepare the Proposed Plan large industries. t s The Recommerided.)Remedy Solvent vapors have been carried by landfill gas out of the waste and into First...What's the problem? the groundwater. With this in mind, \) ) ., _., .j.,: ' C, the recommended remedy consists of MOVE TcE these combined components: warsropicarANT . _ -„ M/pSCY s . ( 1 ��.�c ria.e...3 1 Treat the groundwater with in-home y `` —� t_z_�, ) t filters before it's used by anyone. `::'.:: — t`tO1 mica ICE Control the source of contamination - 444 -04.---..-..,-,-.,•-:..,. ,» cm JT —�yCONCENIIICION *yM at the landfill. <iii `' , ,-.o 3 Expand and repair the permanent landfill -- cap to keep water out of the waste. -w —=�..`--� 4 at hi h componentsOperateand ofmthe intremedyinea .of te The problem is ground in the gas,the Highway 12 and groundwater solvent vapors • McCutcheon Road 5 Monitor the remedy's effectiveness contamination. It transfer from the gas (see map). and report the results to the State. consists of solvents- into water seeping The main solvent -. that came fromdown through the soil. in the groundwater is trash from homes, Once reaching the - .' TCE(trichloroethene). schools,cities, . groundwater,the Fifteen private wells - counties,business- contaminants slowly have exceeded the es,industries,etc. disperse through the State's enforcement Component #1: Solvents easily water- - standard of 5 parts evaporate and are - The area of ICE in a billion parts Protect People carried away. contaminated ground- groundwater. The through the soil in water linked to the highest TCE concen- t Drinking the Water ordinary landfill ' Junker Landfill covers trations are 1/4-mile gas,which is an area about 2.5 south of the landfill, Several of the recommended steps would methane generated miles long(from the with concentrations protect and improve groundwater. The largest part by decomposing landfill west to County decreasing as the of the Group's recommended remedy is drinking waste. While Road A),and 1/2-mile groundwater flows water protection. travelling under- wide(between US west/northwest. The Group recommends water treatment filters for each of the 70 homes and any new homes in the area of impacted groundwater(from the landfill to County Road A,and between Highway 12 and __ ` Carbon filters are McCutcheon Road). This would replace they , 1 7 ' about the size of Group's program of offering free bottled water to \ r;,',k' Yt + water softeners and these homes(started in 1994). # .4._ treat all water before All the water in each home would be filtered. . _ 1 .1 ::� use. This is a The filters would be approved by two State ���. � ;- -': - = <, common and well- agencies and use granular activated carbon(GAC) i proven solution for for effective removal of any contaminants,includ- rural homes without ing the primary contaminant(TCE). --'-; . ;. city water--like Lake The Group recommends that the carbon filters — ,- Elmo homes near the be replaced yearly and that water quality be ;, • 1� k , closed Lake Jane checked with regular reports to the WDNR untilM.+ _ Landfill in groundwater meets State standards. y,'a, ' • - _ Washington County. MN, where this photo - c '-,. was taken. • . Component #2: Control the Source of Contamination Gas naturally Group recommends that "source control vent" "barn's? extraction went" generated by the waste this system continue to extracts gas from, waste from is gas migrating Venin total waste ( vents to has been spreading be operated,and (20be dete�rmsned) from the landfill and expanded by adding two carrying vaporized more vents to capture - solvents into the more gas. groundwater. To In addition,it is A,111111M111111.111 *4' -?v _ protect groundwater, recommended that a WASE /.<( it's crucial to control barrier extraction _- Y,' ' GAS . and remove this gas. system be installed and GAS • Gas extraction is operated at the landfill's now done at virtually southwest edge to , /)), all recently closed capture gas where it's `i, ` `` landfills.At the'tinker migrating out of the /• . _CsJ�$ site,the WDNR waste through a deep `SP, installed a large gas zone of sandy soil. 4-i- -- '-•:•""4-4"4•4,_ - -`� y •o • extraction system in Besides protecting j♦�I`j♦�I��♦I♦♦c♦ ��-��� `�� ♦♦OI�.�♦s'♦•�♦��♦��•♦♦�.i 1992 Slotted pipes _ j♦�'♦�.j♦o41.•♦r0♦s' t`" 4* b"0.�.�♦i'a 4.4♦`�e, P P groundwater,these ♦ ♦I�.♦O♦ OI N P♦ O♦.re♦`♦ ♦'Ire",re♦O♦ ("vents")were drilled measures would help �' �'♦ vertically into the keep gas from spread- The Group recommends that landfill gas continue to be removed from landfill to draw gas out ing toward residential underground and the extraction system expanded so that gas cannot carry of the waste to a flare areas.Four homes near more contaminants into•the soil and groundwater. where it's burned off. the landfill have already The Group took over received indoor operation of the system methane monitors as a in 1995. precaution and would , Based on the continue to be moni- 7--.r.- Feasibility Study, the Cored. .- ti^ fi: S.i e. 4.,! sem` SEE® y �..•;t-.♦ .�.. �\`• ` . :vim ``~ • • Component #3: ' I T �. \''' ,\F.:'', - Expand and Repair the �� r'„',�+,; �.\`, .... \ '''S, Landfill Cap . .\\.-_...•.-- -._-„•.:-:--.-s:.--.,.,,- , •. f- The WDNR placed ing ditches are not addition,the Group (Photo)To keep water from entering the waste, a an engineered clay cap draining adequately and recommends capping a clay cap was placed over the landfill and seeded over the waste in 1990, appear to be sending remaining 1/10th of an It is recommended that this cap be expanded to which keeps rainfall water back into the acre of waste and cover the ditches and that surface water drainage and snowmelt out so it landfill. repairing settled areas be improved. doesn't pool in the Therefore,the in the cap. P bottom of the landfill as Group recommends that These cap improve- "leachate.”Although these ditches be lined ments would allow the the current cap is with clay and that leachate now pooled in keeping 99%of the surface water drainage the landfill to subside water out, the surround- be improved. In naturally. III Component #4: .‹;,- _.:_ : ; . Long-term O&M for Lasting Protection . r�-A . After installing the remedy,the Junker Landfill Group recommends that .µ i --e, r > its components be operated and maintained for years to come.This includes4. +:"::• `A. ;•r maintaining: _.,A.:. .-.-. ' .. = 4--",::-.-. • the landfill's permanent cap - ,A-, • r: • the site's security systems • the gas extraction systems ' • the in-home water filters ` '; •: ^� In 1995,the Junker Landfill Group took over operation and maintenance . -. r of the existing cap,security,and gas extraction systems. The photographs $ .; ,r. ' : / below show an example of recent O&M work. t> Before: s. -'~ . - = yme"' draining This methane monitoringprobe is one ofmanythat Stormwater _ .it .�`� " --<.4,--* -, would be used to monitor subsu ace landfill gas. r .e. »; zap . •, f. off the landfill cap was h ` ,;r -,--1 ,r,,s - washing away the soil Groundwater and drinking water would also be 4-'; ` ' ' ,r ; _ in one area, creating a monitored '0'3 ... 1 - , gully 8 feet deep. If „-`' x • left unrepaired, the _ erosion could Component #5: . ' eventually expose the . -Y - trash beneath the Monitor the Results ��mak. - .� Sty -r. �`j`. . -, landfill cap. To ensure lasting protection to the public and the environment,the Junker Landfill Group recommends that the drinking water,groundwater, and landfill gas be monitored. au; The monitoring program would be designed to The Junker Landfill meet State and Federal requirements,and reports Group repaired the with the test results would be sent to the State on a =• - - eroded area of the cap prescribed schedule for review. : = �_,T _ _ and built a stormwater - rr ''''.7-....".'''' drainage channel „..-ir •• . ., M lined by rock :- "�. «-``'�°" -- ' ,,,,,,,..� ..,i - ("riprap")to reduce _' , ;. .' . . s:-. .; - _ - future erosion. • Questions ? . Call or Write Your Point of Contact for the - - • ` Junker Landfill Group: WHO: Joe Grabowski,Project Manager PHONE: (612) 479-4204 ADDRESS: Wenck Associates,Inc. Consulting Environmental Engineers This Fact Sheet P.O.Box 428,1800 Pioneer Creek Center is a publication of the Maple Plain,Minnesota 55359-0428 Junker Landfill Group and is prepared Also visit the Information Repository at the as needed for the Hudson Public library to review reports and community and others. other landfill documents. • , ' ,,. , . . , ...., .,.... ,.. act . . Information for the Community about the Junker Landfill March 6, 1995 Junker Landfill Group 1 To Care For Site , _ Closed landfills typically require years of care-mainly to ensure that the cover remains intact, W11c) 'is and to operate systems that control landfill gas and leachate. This responsibility usually falls on the landfill owner or operator,but when they refuse or are unable to pay all the costs,the State the JU11kel' calls on the landfill customers. Such is the case at the Junker Landfill,where a small group of Landfill Group ? past customers and a former operator signed an agreement on January 31 with the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources(WDNR)to care for the landfill. The Junker Landfill Group `-.,.This group is 4 will spend about 5150,000 a year to perform the activities described below and report on these `comprised of past -- activities to the WDNR. It is important to note that these activities are typical of closed landfills, -.Iandfill customers regardless of whether the waste is municipal or industrial and whether there is contamination. :;,who have.volun- Leachate •f�lY come-for- _ • • Gas =Ward to perform Collection 'environmental' Landfill Extraction studies, provide:- Despite the :for the long-term landfill cap,, The natural .-'care of the land-�' some precipita- decomposition of Ground- : fill, and take an A crucial task is tion can still organic waste Y maintaining thewater final remedies. • landfill's perma- enter the landfill like old foodhe are over • and pick up produces Monitoring 800past custom-. nent cap so that contaminants as methane, a gas ,ers, ut less than rain and snow- it trickles down that can spread Wells at the melt do not wash . 5% have come toward the underground landfill and off- forward, so the contaminants groundwater. away from the site in the Groupis inviting into the ground- The This mixture of landfill and community will water and accumulate. be monitored all the other cus- water.Junker Landfill contaminants The State regularly for tourers to join. Group will Besides industries, inspect and (called installed a contaminants - past customers "leachate°) system to extract linked to the repair the cap as include 17 public already exists and burn this Junker landfill. needed for within the waste. gas,which the The laboratory sector groupssettlement, (such as cities and Therefore,the Junker Landfill results will be counties) who erosion,and Junker landfill Group will now sent to the contributed over impaired Group will operate and WDNR.Monitor- a third of the drainage. Theoperate and maintain,such ing the ground- landfill's known Group will alsomaintain the as adjusting water will help - waste volume. be responsiblesystem that extraction rates, guide decisions for site mainte- removes this checking flare on possible nance such asleachate for emissions, and future activities mowing and treatment at the monitoring for concerning the fence repair. municipal the spread of Junker Landfill. sewage treat- gas off-site. meet plant. 0 The • Investigation % -:. • -i-,--,44:,, -. .-: ‘ ,. ` _ Activities ,.•� - - Landfill customers have - = �` _ joined together to form the ':" - 1 g v .. Junker Landfill Group,and _ _ - - a central goal is resolving • ' - „. the remaining questions '{ about the landfill. Here's what's being done. ' — Soil samples were collected from the landfill cap to evaluate its ability to Use of test pits to learn more keep rain and snowmelt out of the landfill. In addition,test trenches were about the extent of dug at the landfill's northwest corner to determine the extent of uncapped fill. uncapped waste Collection and analysis of • shallow soil samples to Investigation r-- study how well the landfill cap keeps out precipitation continues i got Sampling and testing at the - • 'f'> landfill's leachate collection _ _ '�' . :• points to evaluate leachate On Schedule _ =_- -�- removal options ,--t -r r Geoprobes to see if landfill People living in the area may have noticed workers ��� '"R . igF1 gas is spreading operating drill rigs,performing geophysical surveys, ,,� .� underground despite the sampling well water,or doing other work at the Junker i. -;-- :Pt--" gas extraction system,plus Landfill or east of County Road A. That's because the - - _� •-s,-- 4i of in-home Junker Landfill Group is spearheading an investigation to +s r0 ''�".....,t'"'"'• methane monitors answer the remaining environmental questions about the - — landfill. (This investigation was described in our , _ -.ec - Deep soil borings to learn previous Fact Sheet and andressed at a January 10 The Junker Landfill Group is more about the geology and Public meeting at the St. Croix County Government evaluating the effectiveness of the how it could impact the Center in Hudson.) To update,much of these field system that extracts and burns landfill spread of contaminated activities have been completed on schedule during „ groundwater December,January,and February,and should wrap up g� They are using gees up t s like — early this month. The environmental engineers retained this to collect gas samples up to 60 Installation of additional by the Junker Landfill Group will prepare a full report to feet underground. monitoring wells,and the WDNR by early April. The results will be explained groundwater sampling at to the public in a future Fact Sheet. these and existing wells to learn more about the groundwater contamination - • � � � - Point of Contact for Questions . ° WHO: -Joe Grabowski,Project Manager - . . Junker Landfill Group This Fact Sheet PHONE: (612) 479-4204 is a publication of the Junker Landfill Group -ADDRESS: Wenck Associates,Inc.,Consulting Environmental-Engineers and is prepared __ : P.O.Box 428,1800 Pioneer Creek Center V - as needed for the Maple Plain,Minnesota 55359-0428 community and others. V ' , • -3 eet ,.. • . Information:for the Community:about the.Junker Landfill } January3 199 • Landfill Investigation Underway The Junker Landfill Group The Junker Landfill Group has begun a multi-faceted investigation to gather the remaining information necessary to plan effective remedies for the landfill. Typically called a"remedial is proceeding investigation,"data are collected to learn the extent and magnitude of environmental impacts and with the find pathways that contamination can spread from the site. State and federal agencies have already completed some studies,but the Junker Landfill Group identified several remaining questions after remaining reviewing 10 years of data last February. The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR)agreed with the Group's recommendations for further investigation,and the Group environmental completed its first task of studying residential wells in August-September 1994. The remedial studies needed investigation is now underway,with the majority of activities scheduled for January and February (weather-dependent work was done in mid- to plan any December to avoid severe cold weather later). By t moving quickly,the Junker Landfill Group will final remedies. plan,implement,and complete the entire investi11- gation in six months--considerably faster than - I Underway is the typical 2-year process. _ ^3 _ ' the"remedial In most cases,private parties perform the environ- ' , _` �. tt mental investigations with close review by 1 -�` �; investigation, government agencies. The Junker Landfill • 1 _0.r / led by the investigation is no exception. The remedial =�'' � investigation is led by the Junker Landfill Group, �` i Group under the_ which consists of past landfill customers like state agencies,counties,municipalities,and businesses approval of of all sizes. In November,the Group met with the , . + the WDNR. WDNR for detailed planning discussions on the -, , investigation's scope, Here is a g and constant communica- �— .-�-. tions among these parties will ensure consistency _.... 3 ? t with guidelines and regulations. Moreover,the summary of this The Junket Landfill Groupis spearheading investigative activities are founded on extensive"work plans"prepared by the Group for an investigation to answer remaining Investigation scrutiny by the WDNR for completeness,techni- questions about landfill concerns. One and the important task is collecting samples from cal accuracy,and quality control,as well as wells for laboratory analysis,both from general consistency with state and federal existing wells and from new wells that will issues it guidelines. These work plans detail the precise be drilled deep into the water table. will address. procedures for field sampling and analysis;data management;community relations;health and safety procedures;and quality assurance. The actual investigative activities will be done by licensed engineers and scientists who specialize in studying contaminated sites;they're from the environmental engineering consulting firm of Wenck Associates. Wenck will subcontract state- licensed drillers and a certified laboratory,and oversee their activities for quality control. Espe- cially critical is the laboratory analysis of groundwater and leachate samples,so the laboratory will follow a Quality Assurance Project Plan that includes numerous check and audit samples.NQnce the investigation is complete,Wenck will write the report for review by the Junker Landfill Group and the WDNR. a�rrtd eves i utta e� ixitie: :_.. l t s . Landfill Cap The trash is currently covered with a"cap"of about 5 feet of clay and soil. This cap is crucial to keep rainwater and snowmelt from draining through the waste,picking up contaminants,and eventually flowing out of landfill into the groundwater(this mix of water and diluted chemicals is called"leachate"). Naturally occurring settlement of the cap,or damage from the freezing and thawing process can sometimes contribute to an increased amount of water flowing through the cap. The investigation will pinpoint how difficult it is for water to flow through this cap. Samples from different soil layers in the cap will be sent to a laboratory to test for physical characteristics like permeability and density. Uncapped During construction of the landfill gas extraction system in 1992,the WDNR found 2 acres of trash Trash to but outside of the landfill cap. Engineers will verify the extent of uncapped trash by • 1 rash - digging trenches and pits outside the capped area. Since 1993,four pumps have been removing leachate from the landfill,but more needs to be Landfill learned. First,what are the leachate's exact chemical characteristics? Second,how much leachate Leachate is generated by the landfill? To answer these questions,engineers will collect leachate samples for laboratory analysis,and perform other tests and measurements at the leachate recovery wells. The test results about the cap soils will also help. A sophisticated computer model will then be used to • estimate how much leachate is generated. La f I Waste decomposition naturally generates gas that can spread underground. The WDNR installed a nd l Gas . system to collect and bum this gas in 1992 to prevent the spread of landfill gas. The Junker Landfill Group will test the gas system for its effectiveness,and learn the current extent of any underground gas outside of the landfill using a technique called"geoprobes"that collect gas samples up to 60 feet underground. In addition,the Group has offered to install free indoor methane alarms for the six homes nearest the landfill while the landfill gas investigation is con- ducted. Although the presence of landfill gas is unlikely in these homes,these alarms offer added protection. .,r�.+._ r .,,.. _ ..z _�-_may,__ �`�..,�per. r. 1�j• . ..�-+ .._-'v wi�^!"'�. — Soil from the landfill cap will - •. be tested for physical ` -'"' ;ate `' characteristics like density,as N. • --' _ - shown here. These tests will help the Junker Landfill Group - i identify how much water - - enters the landfill to generate - leachate,which consists of -.. water containing diluted ~�.. ._ amounts of chemicals from the trash. • •�-- - L �/..-.y. /��" . r/yf.�t�w. yam.. - ./� _. _ /_�. _/�.: r .('_. j '�-•. �./�.. a,:',",:-.•"'"%!..-:•,70 ',. t Mtct,4k4* rt A central issue is the extent of groundwater contamination, which is often called a"plume." The residential well study that the Junker Landfill Group conducted in August-September 1994 identified which private wells have impacts from the landfill,but also pinpointed several questions that still remain to be answered,such as: • How clean is the groundwater before it flows beneath the landfill? • Why is the greatest contamination to the side of the landfill instead of in the apparent direct path of groundwaterflow? • What are the exact chemical characteristics of the contamination? • How deep does the contamination go? • Do subsurface features block or redirect the flow of contamination? Groundwater To answer these questions,the current investigation will study groundwater quality and groundwa- ter flow. This information is supplemental to a large body of data already available. Activities are Quality and described below: Flow D i recti o n • To learn more about groundwater quality and flow direction to the side and upstream of the landfill,four monitoring wells will be installed about 90-170 feet deep. ... • To again check groundwater quality throughout the area,29 monitoring wells and residential wells will be sampled at least once more for laboratory analysis. • To learn more about the depth of contamination,a nest of three wells screened at different depths will be installed about 2 miles downgradient of the landfill. If further data is needed, an eighth well may be installed near the southwestern edge of the plume. • To learn whether groundwater could flow through natural bedrock channels,a"geophysical survey"will be done using ultrasonic soundwaves that penetrate soil to detect surface features in the Prairie du(lien bedrock. • To complete data on groundwater flow,water levels will be measured in each new well. • To collect more soil and bedrock data beneath the landfill,three soil borings will be drilled. Where Will the Investigation < Happen? o GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS All of the investigative z activities will be conductedcl Mccurc►+Eow RD -� ; east of County Road A, — Q primarily at the landfill or on z mII surrounding properties. About m m 0 • LANDFILL five private properties and areas along the railroad will be — '� • accessed to drill wells,and �- several more have been accessed to perform geophysi- t2 GEOPROBES _ SOIL BORINGS cal surveys or to sample existing wells. All land owners have already been contacted by the Junker = COUNTY ROAD UU Landfill Group's engineer to < cs obtain access. cc - I.- 1• - NEW MONITORING WELL(S)1 v • • 0 How Can I Learn More? . Public I •nforr ation Meeting A > \x in Anyone ' terested in .. .,.,.:: >�,' �w w�. � learning more about `�f y.' x »` the Dunker Landfill and "." ,, 4 im X_."'Z, ` xrz,? } `tr`, c.:*„ \z.? ..t n Lx : r If you have remaining questions not,answered.bg this'Fact Sheet,.attend this caeeting what's being done has to:learn more about the remedy investigation underway at the Dunker Landtitl �a This meeting.will be�hostecf byFthe JunkerLand5li roug ;A " 'X= A � :r A several sources of x :44 i yx \'r \ 1,r_ tpt.�4mn ,� .:,4:a 4tz wa 4, c ^r..c, i0 z f a � �x information available. WHEN 'h�esaayjanaary 18,1995,..'!3o pm ,L� A Feel ee to ure '�✓°:,v ,SK a 7 .,i.. Y : N,_.\, F'-µ - 'F , s ,. fr li,' 's�. z 1. s d. ".r,"s.: zM,,k ai,.,e xx Y%. ;x .A a y s J rv- Y S k., r FRE' `St.Crony Cbun ;r s; x t (► r' GoYe},,thictsortienterC'ommur�stg Room -..-A �� these sources for any • fyyA�P k •,f7 11QTx Carmichae€RoacIHuds e-,. . aSR C y "@ .�f,94 r4,xt �r" -� x"`t°\r .y s` i' snr^ y�, c a -+r3n 3*A:. `°S¢ <, v \ °'�ei v a' e:.k questions you may have. 3 f • • • • Y s A . .!ye` » �& a R'� k N,k«.'M.s'�hP..................................... xr < • x r e �?r` r♦ s1 s > sw •�'.;5''�`3 a b ws r ......*'v s `: .^.shYt [•nformati©n4 e s o to _� ?k; � • ..:o x�� :1A4.a � �o as t^' -s'..:-%!......:.:4= _ L x „,„:; ,..,.::,, .��� `zQ '.a�...... x .b r......'°.?....gsx' r�.' ..,,,,,,,-,•-•,,,-,k:..,.„,;.... -.•-•,• -,• ,� "'"""" a wa s,�,z r<r�'3c A . � •,1 :> •.tx „t k_` N�,� a'4e.p.... • > ,aZ s -.5 . l tt$'a�d othe�'� Q♦ ,z. concernmg�the Jnnke f it Asx ,�..1 3, "ti max:" ' c t E z�r`fir : ,""..:-.;. - � � ry r ro 3<- N. Y��y. c . .: \'t } �. L jun^YE.,`.w"y,3AB �`�,}' - 'r p< 2 wi w , ::to ^Y 'E Dunn. hed1 racy €our > f» K F ,, . .�w ti fi �'`4.x's'*gar y:, > ?r ''*y Yru ,�. 2v„� �, :-cu F,y:u $,rk - ? h • >4 z.t ..ay'ks^ xif^. o7` +k swi < s 4R Y y 1f� r5' N x .. YYHERE ..* H/�u�d�son~Pubir Liibrarg» :` N. a \ r Y . x } '.304Io t tree,��dsorr,. "" .-..aa:r >ak"' ',rY' l ; --••••••.4w,":,,,',*: .s,;. .�'"aa� y„ "d"x �` a:, y ry' ,Y ,*Ad t!'K+ E; j x Poinf�ofota foQuestIoc f N� , 3 ,, r-�_ A s•z`w `fi,: ..,. . .. . ` ✓ o» 'y 7f >x ? .� -.-.,,k,.:.:,.. .,,-.;,i- ....... r �.: r` > >>.9 s�'„„ 3,rR.ar' k .'3, r a�t , wb ,r:fi MN„ » y,� a ���.�'-- >r � w rak�'r�"Y€K *''S'.y a ax yrs; wuo froe;G"rabawskrgProiect s 3� !p �r�ke Lan SII Group "4m L � ;� �. f r PHONE (612);479-4204 <-< This Fact Sheet is a publication of the ADDRESS Wenck Associates,:Inc.,Consulting Environmental Engineers = Dunker Landfill Group P O.Bor 428,1800 Pioneer Creek Center and is prepared . Maple Pian,Minnesota 5 59-11428 $ as needed for the u community and others. . . ., . , .‘ . . .... . • act .‘ heet Information for the Community about the Junker Landfill September 27,1995 • The Junker Investigation Answers = .. e4 • Landfill Group - &Li has completed a Landfill Questions multi-faceted r , ,. tiJ investigation Findings Will Guide Corrective Actions dWhen• X polio_ to answer ing landfills, questions about States usually Work Done done over the winter, the landfill;the -'have no choice • the landfill In Record Time the report was sent to potential spread of but to require so corrective The Remedial Investi- - the State in spring,and landfill gas;the help from gation("RI")was done it was finalized this effectiveness of the the landfill actions can in 8 months—by summer. existing gas extraction customers be selected. contrast,most RIs take and flare system;and and haulers— This fact Sheet 2-3 years. The Junker Questions Answered more information about even when they Landfill Group chose a The investigation the groundwater used the site describes the much shorter schedule provided additional contamination. legally. investigation so that corrective information to answer Some of the actions can be done remaining questions Review by State customers have and the results. about the landfill, joined sooner,and the State of including: exact The RI scope,specific together to Wisconsin Department g work plans, field g extent of uncapped voluntarily study of Natural Resources activities,and report (WDNR)cooperated in (uncovered)waste;how were carefully reviewed and correct the meeting this schedule. well the landfill cap and approved by the problem and care Work plans were keeps water out;the WDNR to ensure the RI for the landfill. content and volume of Called the completed last Decem- leachate pooled inside was complete and met Junker Landfill \1 bei, field work was all requirements. Group; they 1 1 ) RI VER formed in 1994 / and have been 1\\\"- COUNTY ROAD A working with the / WNDR. ¢ McCUTCHEON ROAD There are over o HUDSON `..d' t 'j-� t 800 past tr I . . `' I t JUNRER landfill ,. t t. LANDFILL customers, j including t..� t t businesses, _ �� —t t cities, and SPECIAL WELL t------i CONSTRUCT I ON t z counties-- AREA BOUNDARY however, fewer 5than 5% have COUNTY ROAD UU0,111 come forward. so the Group is _..---,—_`` inviting other \-,---\ Ra customers to join. P • III ........ Area of Juier-Re1ated The total Groundwater Impacts amount of The recent groundwater investigation further What Are the Contaminant Levels? TCE in refined what was already known. Here is a Contaminant concentrations are typically measured groundwater- synopsis of the groundwater impacts. in"parts per billion"(ppb)--one way to visualize this throughout is 1 square foot in 36 square miles. The maximum g What Is the Contamination? TCE concentration in 1994-95 was 28 ppb south of the study The contaminants in the groundwater are primarily the landfill. Concentrations declined west of the solvents. The technical name for them is "volatile landfill to typically 3 ppb along Bakken Road. area is organic compounds"or"VOCs"—called"volatile" Further west were only sporadic detections of TCE because they easily evaporate. PCBs and pesticides that did not exceed 0.6 ppb along County Road A. estimated were tested for in monitoring wells and were not (See drawing below.) L, found to be present in the groundwater,and metals to be (believed to be naturally MOST DISTANT occurring)are present only at TCE DETECTION MOST DISTANT 10 gallons. relatively low levels. TCENFORCEMENT STANDARD . What Is the Main ' all ANDFLCotrtaminant? LIL "p, ROUThe main contaminant of to N, 4, concern is the solvent TCE of cTPR • - (trichloroethene). The total amount of TCE in groundwater `Z CONCENTRATION throughout the study area is 1 • estimated to be 10 gallons. Where Is the Contamination? As shown in the drawing, the area of groundwater What About Private Wells? affected by contaminants from the Junker Landfill Out of some 70 private wells in the Junker study extends about 2.5 miles from the landfill to the area, 15 wells exceeded the State's Enforcement vicinity of County Road A. The affected area spans Standard of 5 ppb of TCE. An additional 29 private about a 1/2-mile width between McCutcheon and wells exceeded the State's Preventive Action Limit of US Highway 12. Maximum concentrations of the 0.5 ppb of TCE. Other chemicals were all below the primary contaminants in the affected area were Enforcement Standard. All the well owners have slightly lower in 1994-95 than in the mid-1980s. been notified of the test results,and the Junker Landfill Group has been offering free bottled water to all homes in the area affected by Junker Landfill since last year. What Are the The Enforcement Standard(ES) Groundwater Standards? if a chemical in the groundwater meets or exceeds its Enforcement Standard,the State The Junker Landfill These standards apply can enforce the prevention of new releases from Group is studying the to substances that the source and restoration of the environment • groundwater contami- present concerns for The ES for TCE,the main contaminant attribut- nation by comparing it public health and ed to the Junker Landfill,is 5 parts per billion. to the State's ground- welfare.At the Junker water standards. Landfill,these sub- , The Preventive Action Limit(PAL) There are basically two stances are solvents . groundwater protection (TCF, PCE,freon-11, If a chemical in groundwater reaches its Preven- standards: the and freon-12).The tive Action Limit(which is much lower than the Enforcement Standard State first set ground- ES),it can trigger corrective action so the (ES)and the stricter water standards in contamination does not get much worse. In the i Preventive Action 1985 in Chapter NA case of the Junker Landfill,for example,the • Limit(PAL). 140, Wis.Adm. Code. PAL for TCE is 0.5 parts per billion. • •! The bigSurprising Cause of • discovery is Contamination where the The Usual Suspect The Real Culprit groundwater What was initially suspected is what happens at The investigation discovered a very different most landfills: rainwater and snowmelt enter the culprit: the primary cause of groundwater contain- , eontamina- landfill,pick up contaminants while draining ination at this site is landfill gas. Although this is tion came through the waste,and eventually leak out of the not a commonly reported phenomenon,it has landfill and into groundwater(this mixture of precedence in recent scientific literature. This is a from--this water and chemicals is called"leachate"). crucial discovery because we might have otherwise focused on an ineffective remedy. is crucial to control What Is Landfill Gas and Where Is It? As organic waste decomposes,most landfills naturally generate landfill gas.mainly consisting of the source of methane. This gas generation is also enhanced by leachate—water inside the landfill. There are two concerns with landfill gas at the site. One is that it can escape from unlined landfills(like this one)and the eontami- spread underground beyond the site. The other is that landfill gas carries contaminants that eventually impact groundwater. Most of the landfill gas here is collected from the waste and burned by the flare on- L nation. site. However,as shown below,the RI found that some is movingout of a gas portion of the landfill to an area about 55 feet underground and 1200 feet south of the landfill. • LEALM, 6RO NOwATER Finding#1: Finding#2: Chemicals in Landfill Gas Location of Landfill Gas Match Chemicals in Matches Location of Most Groundwater Impacted Groundwater Similar to comparing fingerprints,the Usually the most contaminated area of investigation compared the chemicals in groundwater lies directly beneath the landfill groundwater to the chemicals in landfill because that's where leachate flows. Howev- leachate and in landfill gas. The surprising er,at the Junker Landfill,the most contami- finding was that while the groundwater has nated area of groundwater lies away from TCE(trichloroethene)and PCE the site(1/4-mile south). Interestingly, (tetrachloroethene),by contrast,the leachate landfill gas was found to migrate from the has hardly any of these chemicals. For landfill to this very same area. It probably example,the leachate in the landfill has only reached this area through a zone of more 2 tablespoons or less of TCE,which is the porous soil such as sand. The gas lies about main groundwater contaminant. Further- 55 feet underground;it doesn't naturally rise more,the primary chemicals that are in the and less porous soil like clay also helps keep leachate are not detected in the groundwa- it from rising. Chemicals in the gas proba- ter. At the same time,the landfill gas does bly dissolve directly into the groundwater or contain substantial amounts of the primary are washed into the groundwater by precipi- groundwater contaminants,TCE and PCE. Cation draining down through the soil. • 9 The In t e meantime... Next OngoingProtective Measures 1 Step Landfill Cap The WDNR closed the landfill in 1990 by placing a clay cap 2 feet thick over the waste,and then planting grass. The recent investigation confirmed that the cap is in good condition,keeping over 99%of rainfall and snowmelt out of The Junker the waste. However,approximately 1/10th of an acre of waste remains to be Landfill Group capped,and drainage ditches around the landfill are allowing surface water to pool,most likely directing more water underground and into the waste. is currently completing a Gas The WDNR installed an active gas extraction and flare system in 1992,and full-scale the Junker Landfill Group continues to operate it. The investigation found • Feasibility Extraction that most of the gas in the waste is successfully captured by the 18 extraction Study ("FS„� vents and burned by the gas flare(see photo). However,some gas is still spreading south awayfrom the landfill and about 55 feet underground g (well to identify the below basements). Five nearby homes received indoor methane monitors from best corrective the Junker Landfill Group and the WDNR, _ and the Group is now exploring options to actions to prevent off-site gas migration. _ supplement -, -.-f.:.; &. 4 -the protective , ,5,-.-f",...._-;,` f - Since 1994,the Junker Landfill Grouphas ' --� . •'V'`. � - Drinkm .k --.s , , L� measures 9 been providing free bottled water to all F =';'. already in Supply homes with private wells in the Special "5 t Y �;�a Well Construction Area east of County 4 place. The .; : Road A(see map on front page). The study has been main• groundwater contaminant,TCE,has submitted to - not been detected in most of these private wells. The Group is now exploring options _ the WDNR for to provide more permanent protection of ?1; review and drinking water. Also,the State estab- lished the Special Well Construction Area comment. The to control the drilling of new residential public will wells there. This flare burns landfill gas, successfully reducing methane have the op- and other chemicals to levels portunity to 100-1,000,000 times below the State's required levels. review and comment ' = � ,-- ,,- — Later this fall. x •�. Call or Write Your Another Fact :` ., Point of Contact for the Sheet summa- _ – ..-4,,.c3 ,"'.'" - -_ , Junker Landfill Group: rizing this study will be WHO: Joe Grabowski,Project Manager PHONE: (612) 479-4204 sent Out. ADDRESS: Wenck Associates,Inc., Consulting Environmental Engineers This Fact Sheet P.O. Box 428, 1800 Pioneer Creek Center is a publication of the Maple Plain,Minnesota 55359-0428 Junker Landfill Group and is prepared Also visit the Information Repository at the Hudson Public Library • as needed for the to review reports and other landfill documents. community and others. j f �y Fxc ,.iii... a • 5. . act • . , Information._for-the Community-about the Junker. Landfill. .. DecemberA:1994-. What Is the Junker Landfill? The Junker Landfill is located six miles east of the St.Croix River in Hudson Township,St.Croix County,Wisconsin,and is approximately 20 acres in size. It is also known as the Klondike Nearly all Landfill and the Landfill Land Co.Landfill. The landfill used to be the Pilquist gravel pit and,like .... .legal landfills most other landfills licensed before the mid-1980s,does not have a clay or plastic liner. Sanitary Landfill Inc.purchased the site in 1973, built before soon expanded it,and operated the landfill with a license until 1976. the mid-80s From 1976 to 1987,Junker Sanitary Landfill Inc.leased and operated • the site. The owner then operated the site for a short time without a don't have liners license until the State closed the landfill in mid-1987. During its 14 years of operation,the landfill accepted a reported total of 1.25 million --so a common cubic yards of residential,commercial/industrial,and demolition problem is waste. The wash came from hundreds of companies as well as from municipalities serving hundreds of thousands of homes in the western that rain and Wisconsin and eastern Twin Cities region. snowmelt Who's Taking Charge? entering the Answer: The Landfill Customers and WDNR landfill pick up Because the landfill owner avoided taking responsibility,the Wisconsin Department of Natural contaminants Resources(WDNR)took the initiative in the 1980s to close the site and will continue monitoring from the trash activities concerning the Junker Landfill When owners step out of the picture,States usually have no choice but to require help from landfill customers and haulers—even though they used the land- .. and seep into fill legally. However,in a voluntary effort,a few of the Junker Landfill's hundreds of customers • have joined together to form the JunkerLand ill Group. This the groundwater g f p group has invited all other custom- ers to join,including municipalities. Beginning in early 1994,the Junker Landfill Group has been below. Like cooperating with the WDNR to voluntarily study the problem,take any final remedies,and take over responsibility for maintaining the landfill. thousands of sites around • What's Being Done? the country, After the WDNR found groundwater contamination in 1984,it closed the site,capped and regraded this is what the landfill to minimize rain and snowmelt from infiltrating through the trash,and added a system to collect and burn landfill gas. The WDNR has also monitored water quality and delineated a happened at the special well construction advisory area. Beginning in 1994,however,the Junker Landfill Group took the lead in cooperating with the WDNR. The group is committed to a timely and effective Junker Landfill. resolution while wisely using public and private resources. The group's chief activities are summa- Here's a rized below. summary of January 1994 Junker Landfill Group forms this problem February 1994 Group begins program giving bottled water to homeowners , February-May 1994 Grouplaunches technical evaluation of landfill data and what s August-September 1994 Group conducts residential well sampling;report to WDNR being done November-December 1994 Group plans full-scale investigation of landfill to resolve it. Winter 1995 Group to assume post-closure care of landfill March 1995 Group to report on investigation findings What Is the ContamStion? • Landfills contaminate groundwater when rainwater and snowmelt trickle down through the trash. pick up contaminants on the way,and then enter the water table below the landfill. This mixture of water and chemical compounds is called leachate. As with most landfills,the Junker leachate contains solvents from ordinary municipal and commercial/industrial trash like old paint,paint strippers,degreasers,motor oil,and household cleansers. The technical name for these solvents is volatile organic compounds,or VOCs(they're called'`volatile"because they easily evaporate). The two main VOCs associated with this site are trichloroethene(TCE)and tetrachloroethene(PCE). •,P,recipita'tiort' s. \\\ �\ ��•� \\\` WATER TABLE 41, \ \ �' Percolation Veachate.p.--im\ r\,\\ \\\�� ...We all Gro , Wat 17; Ovemej\\\\\\\��\\\‘\ \\ ‘ � \\,��N\''\"" tossed our \ • \;\`,\•� .\ ,, \�� \ \,\`,•\r \\�•\ \ �--�\ \ p� j .��� �\\.\ �\ ��`\\� \\�`��\����\���\�x,k44x : empty paint cans, batteries, This illustration shows how landfills typically can impact groundwater. Rainwater and snowmelt draining down through the trash pick up contami- cleaning fluids nants and eventually enter the groundwater below. This diluted mixture of and motor water and chemical compounds is called "leachate." • oil in the garbage can. What Are the Contamination Levels? There was Leachate consists of rainwater and snowmelt mixed with relatively small amounts of chemicals nothing illegal from landfill trash. These chemicals are further diluted when the leachate flows through soil down into the groundwater. The levels of contamination in groundwater are measured by sampling water about that, from wells and analyzing them in the laboratory using highly sensitive methods. These chemicals are typically measured in"parts per billion"(ppb),or micrograms per liter. This is literally one and there were part chemical in a billion parts of water,which would be roughly equivalent to 2 gallons of chemi- - cal mixed evenly throughout a 1-mile stretch of the St.Croix River.Another way to visualize this no alternative proportion of one ppb is 1 square foot in 36 square miles. ways to dispose The Junker Landfill Group conducted a large study last summer of 71 private wells between the of potentially landfill and County Road A. Of these 71 wells, 14 wells exceeded the State standard(5 ppb for TCE and 1 ppb for PCE). The contaminant levels were typically in the 5-9 ppb range(TCE), hazardous which is often seen at municipal landfills with some groundwater contamination. Contaminants were detected in another 30 wells,but the levels were within the State standards. The remaining materials.II . wells had no detections. The WDNR has reviewed the report and recently sent the well results to --Editorial all the homeowners involved in the study. fluslson Star Observer August 25, 1994 • Where Is the Conta ination? The leachate first seeps down from the landfill into the water table,which lies more than 100 feet underground. The water table in this area is called the Prairie du Chien Aquifer. From there,the leachate mixes with the groundwater and flows westerly in the natural direction of groundwater flow. The area of groundwater contamination is called a"plume"and lies roughly in the area between the landfill and County Road A,and between McCutcheon and U.S.Highway 12. The Jordan Aquifer,about 300 feet below ground and beneath the Prairie du Chien Aquifer,has not been impacted. Most private wells east of County Road A extend into the Prairie du Chien,but a few extend further to the underlying Jordan Aquifer. The map below shows the general area of groundwater contamination which appears attributed to the Junker Landfill,based on residential well sampling results. ''�1,' RIVER ilk°1P. 1 _ 7) � ,4ss\‘' jeogiCOUNTY ROAD A ' HUDSON McCUTCHEON ROAD t ............ a•••• _ sssssssssssss 1i V k * ---i �m �� • LANDFRLL N ss•ssssss. 4 I I - SPEC 1 AL WELL i ■s=s o 12 GROUNDWATER a e ` �_� �. „ *CONSTRUCTION CONTAMINATION 1 L._ AREA BOUNDARY PLUhE COUNTY ROAD U \ \ t �: , \ What Can Homeors Near the Landfill Do?. 1 . Do No Use Tap Water for Drinking or Cooking The WDNR recently mailed letters to homeowners in the area of groundwater contamination which appears to be attributed to the Junker Landfill(see map inside). These letters explain the results of a large well investigation conducted by the Junker Landfill Group in August-September 1994. Only 14 of the 71 wells had contamination above State standards,but to be protective,all of the homeowners in this area are advised by the WDNR not to use tap water for drinking or cook- ing. Other uses,such as bathing,are considered safe. 2. Use Bottled Water Instead of using tap water for drinking or cooking,use the bottled water offered free of charge by the Junker Landfill Group. Since February 1994,all homes with wells in the area of the Junker Landfill contamination have been offered bottled water,even though nearly all wells are within State guidelines and/or have no signs of contamination. (Beginning in November 1994,a different party provides water to homes west of County Road A since Junker Landfill contamination does - not extend there.) 3. Don't Drill New Wells New wells in the Prairie du Chien Aquifer cannot be drilled in areas of contaminated water without a variance from the WDNR. The WDNR has set a"special well construction advisory area"shown in the map on the inside of this fact sheet. Call the WDNR with questions about new wells. x-71 "This cooperation between the landfill customers and WDNR Fi to makes federal intervention unnecessary, while saving costs and allowing any final remedies to be done a lot quicker." —Joe Grabowski,Wenck Associates,Inc. Call the Junker Landfill Group How (612) 479-4204 Joe Grabowski, Project Manager Can I 9 Wenck Associates, Inc., Consulting Environmental Engineers Lea rn 1800 Pioneer Creek Center Maple Plain, Minnesota 55359 M o re? This Fact Sheet is a publication of the Junker Landfill Group and is prepared as needed for the community and others.