HomeMy WebLinkAbout1988-05-09 City Planner Ltr to OPH Bldg. Inspector Re Allowable Signge 111111111
northwest associated consultants, inc.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Frank Leier
FROM: Curt Gutoske ,•
DATE: May 9, 1988
RE: Oak Park Heights - Holiday Station
FILE NO: 798.02 - 88.02
Following our phone conversation, I have further reviewed the allowable
signage for the Holiday Station Store. Below is an outline of the signage
permitted and the signage being proposed.
Type of Sign Area Allowed Area Proposed Comments
1 Freestanding Sign 150 s.f. 72 s.f. Height and area
conforms
1 Wall Sign 150 s.f. 75 s.f. /170 s.f. Discrepency exists
between site plan &
sign detail *
1 Canopy Sign 150 s.f. 59 s.f. Conforms
1 4' X 8' Sign Mount -0- 32 s.f. Second free standing
sign is not allowed
*The site plan indicates a wall sign that is 3' X 25' in size while Box 1 of Page
A3 indicates a wall sign that is 33' - 0" X 5' - 2". The latter sign exceeds
the allowable area by being 170 s.f. in size. The sign identified on the site
plan (Page Al) conforms to the ordinance maximum and is the sign that should be
approved.
The 4' X 8' mount is not allowed as it represents a second freestanding sign. The
sign should be eliminated from the signage plan. In addition, the setback for the
freestanding sign should be measured perpendicular from the property line. The site
plan shows this setback in a straight north/south direction which puts it at an
angle to the property line. The sign will have to be moved slightly closer
to the building to achieve the proper setback.
If you have any questions regarding the above information, please call .
cc: LaVonne Wilson
4601 excelsior blvd., ste. 410, minneapolis, mn 55416 (61 2) 925-9420
".'"4
r-11.0.---
MEMORANDUM
TO: File
FROM: Curt Gutoske
DATE: 10 February 1988
RE: Holiday Station - Minor Subdivision
FILE NO: 798.02 - 88.02
In a conversation with Lyle Eckberg this afternoon, it was agreed upon that
the Holiday Station minor subdivision request should have contained a
registered survey. However, at the 8 February Council meeting, the City
Council approved the subdivision without a registered survey. Bruce Foltz,
land surveyor who prepared the property' s site survey, indicated that there
are no statutes which can require a registered survey after City approval
is received. The concern arises then of what means will the property's three
parcels be combined into one.
Fortunately, the metes and bounds legal description describes the three parcels
in a single description and does not reference any of the parcels individually.
Also, once the title of the property is deeded over from Breckenridge Develop-
ment to the Holiday Properties , the property will be of a single parcel via
the title ownership. In addition, concerning the extensive legal description,
Mr. Foltz indicated to Mr. Eckberg that the Title Insurance Company involved
in the transaction would not proceed to insure the title without the legal
description presented. This is due to the overlaps in property description
existing between the old Amoco site and the Greenbrier Office Building to the
east. The City Council thus approved the subdivision with this understanding.
cc: David Licht
LaVonne Wilson
Lyle Eckberg
. _.
10._0. 1 •
f :\....\___0_
, .
1 vom.,„„,„,\. . .
�(bco Scr•�TAIIIIIIIimpppop ',p
1
o•
fttoDo € 7
.5. %....1(..,14-1- i1scTt..�L .---- � � , - ,�F
I a
. , zubo 0.4( VI-YOty
CYA.A v-a'TC-1=,,
ApPt-.X. 1...‘e"%...41-- �-
44-Q 07-1 O
�N..1E� 1=71. ".....-a° • re
-1--°1-11 ..Pit
i r
l4*0 .514,04 - j.-rr :9
A6 --10 ub•4. — I-
1
1 q%•1
G' x4.1
i'SLc," L-GA
•4
tir
1 ' =L a i�I Ntili4 sei L
—i�
rl i- • • -.III-: lI: I ,9
u i' 0 ':
'ITq ;� - I '9
I(4 1 Ybx 4 A �oe_Tp'I 4 d 0+ I I
1 84
i ‘5...I (10)•stoct �►c� I,5 �, \
L-- — — ..-- — —4 __I,
. 9'-8" X 10'-0" TRADEMARK PYLON ELEVATION
Y
WO•IC la00 .4.11.411....r. W,.... 3N NO uuMr10 ,15 wdop M P•Wwry uba a
IO".
"."."7:::".j0411
...O•M WIM M+q S IJ[n� r•••+.r"0"wj r...� w
.r.y r`l ",,,01 ,�„...«
. .. 4 n NO"Ol l MM.MP.W Gum.Awry
1141-1177 -.
CII�°S OI ( v' .y............*r.+.n.•„M r -- -- M .PIMTI9-414 S ..... ..•..e.... Sq-sl jj� ...
Paa!un J "y.r•.+�•.r...41.wr; iry www -1rn!.. �.1 ,.t�h......
......*wow...........«aA... MM SS33..i7c3 ,Ibdnot+
wiranw ..0i.0
t • ' 1 14.9 ITOT
CO a. i i)....,
1 a
Ca
45 •Ji Y iyy O 1
+
r 7
I CO Sek ! 1
Brit
CD O. _ , � "�
Y (f) -GU A cr r
(i) ...air=
oW
I 13 I
O
Lin
a
X o
f v
(IIId 1
CIllisigo a
An itiginN
D:) 1 .
Lk...CD) *....
0
.V 1
\ /
•
ERICKSON PETROLEUM CORPORATION 1
4567 WEST 80TH STREET
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55437
NEW STATIONS W/ BLACK FASCIA PANELS
EXIST. STATIONS W/ BROWN FASCIA PANELS
RED BLUE
A rHolidayexpressliSE=1111
3X25 Illuminated Sign
Centered on Building
t, g
ERICKSON PETROLEUM CORPORATION 4
4567 WEST BOTH STREET
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55437
CANOPIES W/NEW BLACK PANELS
W/ EXIST. BROWN PANELS
. liday
A 1= !• Ho Way
Standard Holiday 2000
Alternates:
Holiday: 30" raised white letters , illuminated (white during day
and red neon at night) , illuminated (fluorescent)
Logo: Flat Lexan, raised Lexan,
illuminated, non-illuminated in can .
S1C9N SJ6►�
,cv
0
Hand. 1
_ 7,1M.
•
liL
Ti r
111
Holiday Reverse 2000
Alternates:
Holiday: 30" raised white letters , illuminated (white during day
and red neon at night) , illuminated (fluorescent)
Logo: Flat Lexan, raised Lexan,
illuminated, non-illuminated in can.