HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001-08-16 OPH Emails re 55th St.-Post OfficePage 1 of 1
Kris Danielson
From: Kris Danielson [kdanielson a7cityofoakparkheights.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 1:05 PM
Toy Judy Holst
Cc: Mark Vierling
Subject: RE: 55th St. /Post Office
Judy:
Regarding the 55th Street extension, as I mentioned earlier this week, the letter sent to the Post office on 311101
was returned to us this week as non - deliverable by the Post Office as the "forwarding mail notice" had expired.
Also copied on the letter were the Post Office's subcontractor - ECI Building Contractors who has been paying
their bills to the City and personally notified were their architects, Rafferty Rafferty Tollefson.
The letter was re -sent to the Post Office via priority mail on Monday this week, since that time I have also called
the Post Office, their architects, and the building contractor regarding the timely nature of this road extension
request.
I will continue to keep you posted on this project and will let you know as soon as I receive a response. Thanks.
Kris
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Judy Holst [ mailto: jliolst @cityofoakparkh.eights.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 8:39 AM
Too Kris Danielson
Subject: 55th St./Post Office
Kris,
I asked Mark about the Tower contract and escrow money in staff meeting yesterday. We can not sign off on
this contract until we have the escrow monies. Since we didn't get the letter to the Post office until this week,
we have a problem. It was the 7 -24 Council meeting that the project was approved contingent on receiving the
funds within 6 weeks which means we need the money in here by 9- 5 -01. If the Post office waits their 30 or 35
days (whichever it is), they will not have the escrow here in time and we will have to rebid. Dennis says the
asphalt Co. will not lay asplalt after September, so we really have a problem.
Mark wants you to call the Post Office and explain the situation to them and see if we can get the escrow
money in here ASAP.
Keep me posted as to what is going on here.
Thanks,
Judy
8/20/01