Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
04-18-2016 Parks Packet
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS 4k PARKS COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA Monday, April 18, 2016 at City Hall Worksession 6:00 p.m. • Mountain Bike Trail Proposal (1) • Capital Improvements/Walkthrough Discussion • Parks Commission Vacancy Interviews (2) Regular Meeting will Commence Following Conclusion of Worksession I. Call to Order II. Approval of Agenda III. Approve Parks Commission Minutes—March 21, 2016 (3) IV. Department/Commission Liaison Reports A. Arborist B. Public Works Director C. Other/ Commission Liaison Report V. Visitors/Public Comment This is an opportunity for the public to address the Commission with questions or concerns not on the agenda. Please limit comments to three minutes. VI. Public Hearings: None VII. New Business A. Parks Commission Vacancy B. Park Fencing (4) C. 2016 Arbor Day Ceremonial Tree Planting (5) VIII. Old Business A. Oak Park Crossing Park Trail Bid Results (6) B. Capital Improvements Discussion IX. Informational A. Next Meeting: Monday, May 16, 2016 at 7:00 p.m. at City Hall B. Ceremonial Tree Planting Date: C. Council Representative: Tuesday, April 26— Commissioner Norton X. Adjourn Page 1 of 50 THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Page 2 of 50 PC 1 City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Blvd, N•Box 2007•Oak Park Heights. MN 55082•Phone(651)439-4439•Fax(651)439-0574 4-15-16 MEMO TO: Park Commiss(de FROM: Eric Johnson, Adm is r RE. MTN Bike Trail The Park Commission diire to discuss in a work session format the concept of the MT Biking Trails. Mr. Hank Grey did provide a revised plan for your continued input and might be something you would wish to carry forward to a future public hearing if you believe it is ready to do so—see attached. Mr. Hank Grey will be able to be present at the meeting to share more information and answer any questions. Naturally, more input and discussion would be needed. • A communication was sent to those parties who supplied a letter commenting on the impacts of such trail development— and which indicated that the Al and A2 areas will not part of the plan review. That copy 1 sample also is enclosed, Hopefully it addressed at least some of the concerns. • l have received two emails from City residents that do support this general concept. Those are enclosed. Page 3 of 50 we�IV c: b �. 4k 17 y w a w. r� " k NX„ ..r � V , z u ' as r a o _. w " p � , r, Y � v 1 , City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Bled. N e Box 2007•Oak Paris Heights, MN 55052• Phone(651)439-4439•Fax(651)439-0574 April 6th, 2016 X X X RE: Mountain Biking Proposal—SASCA: Dear The City has received your communication regarding the proposed mountain biking pathways and concepts by the Stillwater Area Scholastic Cycling Advocates—or SASCA. At this time, the Park Commission has walked these areas in question so as to better understand the layouts and impacts you have commented upon. That said, until the SASCA group provides more information to the Commission and secures all required approvals from the City--no plan will move forward. The SASCA group has heard your comments and concerns and the City does anticipate receiving an updated plan in the near future that will show reduced tracks and avoiding certain areas(Al and A2)as initially conceptualized by SASCA. When more information is available,we will gladly share that with any of you. The Commission will hold another public meeting if there is any further information that comes forward for their consideration regarding additional actions. Please let me know if you have any questions. I can be reached at 651-351-7879, or you can contact City Administrator Eric Johnson at 651-439-4439 or 651-253-7837. Regards, Mary McComber Mayor Cc: City Park Commissioners Weekly Notes Page 5 of 50 Eric Johnson From: Christopher Hayden <christopher.hayden@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 12,2016 4:58 AM To: Eric Johnson Subject: Mountain Biking Trails I wanted to write a quick email to say that I am in favor of the proposed biking trails at Valley View. I am 48yrs old and I don't really get outdoors much, but I do take the time to load up all of the bikes and visit the trails around the metro area. So fun. Thanks, Chris Hayden 14625 57th st N Oak Park Heights, MN Father of Mason, Madi, Wyatt, Cody and Averi - (4 of 5 love to ride trails) :) i Page 6 of 50 Eric Johnson From: Joel Nichols <jbn1020@yahoo.com> Sent: Friday, April 8, 2016 12:21 PM To: Eric Johnson Subject: Valley View MTB trails Eric My name is Joel Nichols. I've resided in Oak Park Heights since 1994. 1 live at 15115 64th St. N. I'm also the co-head coach of the Stillwater Mountain Bike Team. I want to thank you for considering letting us build some mountain bike trails in Valley View Park. It has the the space and the terrain to be one of the best mountain trails in the metro area. I was not able to attend the last park board meeting as I and my family were on a spring break vacation. I understand that there were some concerned citizens opposing the possibility of the trails. Below is a summation of an article written about the impacts of mtbing on a piece of land: While land managers have long been concerned about the environmental impacts of mountain biking, there are still very few good studies published in peer-reviewed journals. White and others (2006) and Hendricks (1997) note that the majority of mountain biking research has focused on social issues, such as conflicts between trail users. As a consequence, the ecological effects of mountain biking on trails and natural resources remain poorly understood. Still, an emerging body of knowledge on the environmental impact of mountain biking can help guide current management decisions. All of the existing scientific studies indicate that while mountain biking, like all forms of recreational activity, can result in measurable impacts to vegetation, soil, water resources, and wildlife, the environmental effects of well-managed mountain biking are minimal. Furthermore, while the impact mechanics and forces may be different from foot traffic, mountain biking impacts are little different from hiking, the most common and traditional form of trail-based recreational activity. Key observations about the environmental impacts of mountain biking: 1. Environmental degradation can be substantially avoided or minimized when trail users are restricted to designated formal trails. Many studies have shown that the most damage to plants and soils occur with initial traffic and that the per capita increase in further impact diminishes rapidly with increasing subsequent traffic. Many environmental impacts can be avoided and the rest are substantially minimized when traffic is restricted to a well-designed and managed trail. The best trail alignments avoid the habitats of rare flora and fauna and greatly minimize soil erosion, muddiness, and tread widening by focusing traffic on side-hill trail alignments with limited grades and frequent grade reversals. Even wildlife impacts are greatly minimized when visitors stay on trails; wildlife have a well-documented capacity to habituate to non-threatening recreational uses that occur in consistent places. 2. Trail design and management are much larger factors in environmental degradation than the type or amount of use. Many studies have demonstrated that poorly designed or located trails are the biggest cause of trail impacts. As evidence, consider that use factors (type, amount, and behavior of trail visitors) are generally the same along the length of any given trail, yet there is often substantial variation in tread erosion, width, and muddiness. These impacts are primarily attributable to differences in grade and slope alignment angle, soil type and soil Page 7 of 50 moisture, and type of tread construction, surfacing, and drainage. This suggests that a sustainable trail that is properly designed, constructed, and maintained can support lower- impact uses such as hiking and mountain biking with minimal maintenance or degradation. 3. The environmental degradation caused by mountain biking is generally equivalent or less than that caused by hiking, and both are substantially less impacting than horse or motorized activities. In the small number of studies that included direct comparisons of the environmental effects of different recreational activities, mountain biking was found to have an impact that is less than or comparable to hiking. For example, Marion and ©live (2000) reported less soil loss on mountain bike trails than on hiking trails, which in turn exhibited substantially less soil loss than did horse and ATV trails. Similarly, two wildlife studies reported no difference in wildlife disturbance between hikers and mountain bikers (Taylor & Knight 2003, Gander & Ingold 1997), while two other studies found that mountain bikers caused less disturbance (Papouchis and others. 2001, Spahr 1990). Wilson and Seney (1994) found that horses made significantly more sediment available for erosion than hikers or mountain bikers, which were statistically similar to the undisturbed control. One final point to consider, however, is that mountain bikers, like horse and vehicle users, travel further than hikers due to their higher speed of travel. This means that their use on a per-unit time basis can affect more miles of trail or wildlife than hikers. However, an evaluation of aggregate impact would need to consider the total number of trail users, and hikers are far more numerous than mountain bikers. Here's a link to the entire article Environmental Impacts of Mountain Biking: Science Review and Best Practices International Mountain Bicycling Association Environmental Impacts of Mountain Biking: Science Review and Best Practices... Mountain biking at Valley View would be a great thing for Oak Park Heights and the valley in general. Mountain bikers are good people who care about the environment and their fellow man. Just go to an existing mountain trail and take a look around and talk to a few people there. Virtually none of the problems opponents bring up exist in the real world. In my 35 years of mtbing I can't remember a single issue with another trail user. We take the entire team to LEPR and ride with horses and walkers all the time without a single problem. z Page 8 of 50 Anyway, sorry for the long email, I know you're a busy man. I'll be at the next meeting for sure. Feel free to give me a call to discuss the issue further. Joel Nichols 651-470-0733 3 Page 9 of 50 THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Page 10 of 50 2 City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Blvd. N•Box.2007.Oak Park Heights. NIti 55062 s Phone(651)4394439•Fax(651)439-0574 4-14-16 MEMO TO: (Park Co tssia e FROM: o / RE: Co on V a cy As you recall,the Commi ion must hold interviews for its next park commissioner.Applications for consideration were due on 4/13/16 and the City did receive two submissions. • Judith Cbirhart • Donald Hovland. Their respective submissions are enclosed. Interviews will first be attempted to be set up in alphabetical order and will he scheduled with your work session that is currently planned. I will plan to have the following.schedule: Judith Chirhart at 6:45 pm Donald Hovland at 7:00 pm. RECALL THERE IS A WORKSESSION ALREADY SCHEDULE FOR 6 PM AND ONCE THE INTERVIEWS ARE COMPLETE THE COMMISSION CAN MOVE TO ITS FORMAL MEETING Thank you Eric Page 11 of 50 CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS PARKS COMMISSIONER APPLICATION NAME DA To provide the City Council with an understanding of you, your background and your interests, please answer the following questions. (You may attach an extra sheet if necessary.) /`q33 574�' Sr n�'. 0A4k PI) kt< 14 sSc� ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL HOW LONG HAVE YOU LIVED IN OAK PARK HEIGHTS? ' 4-1 r,5 OCCUPATION: dah, s f�-Y -� /�� t,�az �;�5�_��'� .� 1 lk'_E� EMPLOYER: d i-ayo-41 S lye 5L��_a-Ad '�_J PHONE: PRIOR EXPERIENCE ON CITY COMMISSIONS, CITY BOARDS, ETC. ST PAUL-A-RTS & SCIENCE COUNCIL: Education Liaison Presented programs about live theatre at every school district in the Metro Area STILLWATER SCHOOL DISTRICT: Handicap Awareness Program Presented over 100 programs in 2 years to classes throughout the district Page 12 of 50 PLEASE PROVIDE A SUMMARY OF WHY YOU WOULD LIKE TO BE APPOINTED TO THE OAK PARK HEIGHTS PARKS COMMISSION. I have lived in Oak Park Heights for 20 years, and what drew me here in the first place was this city's commitment to caring and nurturing its green space. I want to contribute to that important endeavor, and filling the long-standing vacancy on the Parks Commission seems to be the perfect opportunity. I firmly believe the Commission would benefit by the inclusion of a person of a different age group and gender- Because ender_Because I am retired and my children are grown, I have the time to commit to this service. I also have both professional skills and personal experiences which would offer a new and more diverse perspective on the challenges and decisions facing our city in the management of our beautiful and varied city parks. IS THERE ANY OTHER INFORMATION YOU WOULD LIKE US TC CONSIDER REGARDING THIS APPOINTMENT? Bachelor's Degree --University. of Wisconsin River Falls Double major: ENGLISH /BUSINESS COMMUNICATION GFA 4.0 Over 15 years as Officer/ Board Member of Homeowners Association: Vice-President, Seeretary/'l'reasurer Years of experience writing and negotiating settlement proposals, analyzing liability, working with legal and regulatory materials. Specialized in the management of multi-million dollar work injury claims for several state jurisdictions. Please return to: Eric Johnson, City Administrator City of Oak Park Heights PO Box 2007 Stillwater, MN 55082 Date Received: (For office use only) Page 13 of 50 f iAR 1 � 2016 T7 CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS PARKS COMMISSIONER APPLICATION NAME DATE To provide the City Council with an understanding of you, your background and your interests, please answer the following questions. (You may attach an extra sheet if necessary.) Mr. Donald Hovland 5255 Nolan Pkwy ADDRESS 0 Stillwater MN 55082 PHONE E-MAIL HOW LONG HAVE YOU LIVED IN OAK PARK HEIGHTS? OCC UPATIO N:ffg- ��_o r_ ,,��,�r .T�� ,. tG EMPLOYER: PHONE: PRIOR EXPERIENCE ON CITY COMMISSIONS, CITY BOARDS, ETC. Page 14 of 50 PLEASE PROVIDE A SUMMARY OF WHY YOU WOULD LIKE TO BE APPOINTED TO THE OAK PARK HEIGHTS PARKS COMMISSION. .7 1(Q V°� K7 <r<&-,-p --'G �F.51 c�c p �� •y rc s ipc IS THERE ANY OTHER INFORMATION YOU WOULD LIKE US TO CONSIDER REGARDING THIS APPOINTMENT? Please return to: Eric Johnson, City Administrator City of Oak Park Heights PO Box 2007 Stillwater, MN 55082 Page 15 of 50 RESUME' of Donald G. Hovland MN 55082 O ,C-- lea ee ��.��s, V7-iV. Phone: (65,]) 439-8469 Email:.donaldhov(&,comeast.net SUMMARY k4ore than fort\ seven years teaching and administrative experience in secondary education and colle�.,e teaching. Emphasis on administrative processes and leadership in a wide range of ed2rcational councils at the national, state, and local lei els. Active participation on academic and adviso7y comllittees. Strong background in program development and implementation. Expertise as a consultant in restructuring strategies and personnel management. Responsible for improving- perlormance of others b-y- developino -ood communication, positive relationships, and by being responsive to the diverse needs of individeals and groups. Experienced at leading a school through total restructuring. Administrative experience at both the junior high and senior high level. Began teaching graduate and undergraduate level courses in education at the University of St_ Thomas in St. Paul and Minneapolis, Minnesota in the fall of 1988. EXPERIENCE Adjunct Professor, University of St. Thomas, St. Paul, MN 1998 ,0 Principal, Stillwater Junior High School, Stillwater, MN. 1972 - 1998 Acting Assistant Supt Secondary, School District 838, Stillwater, MN. 1983 - 1984 Principal, North Junior High School, Great Falls, MT. 1970 - 1972 Assistant Principal, C. M. Russell High School, Great Falls, MT 1964 - 1970 Dept Chair, Social Studies, Great Falls, High School, Great Falls MT. 1958 - 1962 Teacher, Economics, Charles M. Russell High School, Great Falls, MT. 1965 - 1966 Teacher, History/Sociology, Fargo Central High School, Fargo, ND 1962 - 1963 Page 16 of 50 EDUCATION f.dUcation Specialist Degree 1975 [�mvcrsity of St. Thomas, St. Paul, AIN. N—laster of Arts, Hlstory/Economics North Dakota State [tniversity, Fargo,ND. 1963 B.S. History and Psychology 1956 North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND.. Fell w ship in Economics 1961 Claremont Graduate School Claremont, California Graduate Studies Various University of Montana Missoula, MT. Graduate Studies 1964 Montana State University Bozeman, MT. Graduate Studies 1963 Moorhead State University Moorhead, MN AWARDS Inducted into the University of St. Thomas Alumni Hall of Fame 2005 Letter of commendation for contributions to education, President William Clinton 1998 Certificate of Commendation for contributions to education from two Governors of Minnesota 1997 Certificate of Commendation for leadership in education awarded in the Rotunda of the State Capitol of Minnesota by Lt. Governor Benson 1997. WCCO Good Neighbor Award 1998 Auditorium at Stillwater Junior High School name the "Donald G. Hovland Page 17 of 50 Auditorium" by the Board of Education, School District 834 1998 School District Principal of the Year Award, Stillwater Schools 1993 National Endo«niemt &0r I Iunlanitics Grant, Brandeis C;nivcrsit% 1985 NASSP Recognition of Excellence Award (First Minnesota recipient) 1984 Named Minnesota's first Principal of the Year 1984 Principal of the Year, Capitol Division of MASSP 1983 Boss of the Year, St. Croix. Valley 1978 Two commendations for contributions to education from Governor Rudy Perpich, Goy error of Minnesota 1976, 1978 Desiunated and "Honorar} Iron Ranger' Goyernor Perpich I979 Distin'�uishcd Military Graduate, ROTC, North Dakota State University 1956 Research Scholar Winner, North Dakota State University 1955 CONSULTING POSITIONS Conducted workshops on implementation of Student Council Programs in North Dakota, Montana, and Minnesota 1973 - 1992 In-service to Student Education Programs, University of St. Thomas 1984 - present Consultant on Teacher Induction Criteria, University of Wisconsin River Falls 1992 - 1996 COMMITTEES Developed and founded.Junior High School Student Council Leadership Camp model in Minnesota 1975 MASSP Executive Committee 1979 - 1988 Page 18 of 50 PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS National Association of Secondary School Principals (NASSP) Minnesota Association of Secondary School Principals (MASSP) National Board of Director of the National Association of Secondary School Principals representing, the States of MN, ND, SD, WY, WI and MI. 1988 - 1992 PUBLICATIONS Author: "Middle School Program",NASSP Bulletin 1990 Author: "Histone and Contell Ipoi-ary Status of a Muslim Ethnic Group in Northw,estcrn Forth Dakota." 1956 Co - Author: "11lgli School 1:xperinients in Psychology 1956 PROFESSIONAL LEADERSHIP ACTIVITIES NASSP National Board of Directors 1988 - 1992 MASSP State Coordinator 1979 - 1988 Campaign Manager,NASSP Presidency 1986 - 1987 MASSP Capitol Division President 1974 - 1975 MASSP Capitol Division Vice President 1973 - 1974 MASSP Capitol Division Secretary 1972 - 1973 Executive Director, Montana Association of Student Councils 1966 - 1971 Page 19 of 50 THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Page 20 of 50 CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS 3 PARKS COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Monday, March 21, 2016 at City Hall 1. Call to Order: Chair Bye called the meeting to order. Present: Commissioners Johnson and Norton, City Administrator Johnson, Public Works Director Kegley, and Commission- Liaison McComber. Absent: Vice-Chair Weyer and Arborist Danielson. II. Approval of Ate. Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Chair Bye, moved to approve the Agenda. Carried 3-0. III. Approve Parks Commission Minutes— February 22, 2016: Commissioner Norton, seconded by Commissioner Johnson, moved to approve the Minutes. Carried 3-0. IV. Department/Commission Liaison Reports: A. Arborist: No report. B. Public Works Director: Public Works Director Kegley reported that the summer park attendant position was posted, and the City was accepting applications. He also reported that George and Lorena of 5450 Nolan Parkway generously donated three bat houses that the City would place in Autumn Hills Park at their request. C. Other 1 Commission Liaison Reports: Commission-Liaison McComber reported the City Clean-up event was set for Saturday, May 7 behind Andersen Corporation. She also reported that there was a vacancy on the Parks Commission and interested residents should contact City Hall. V. Visitors/Public Comment: None VI. Public Hearings: A. Mountain Biking Trails Proposal: City Administrator Johnson reported that the Parks Commission set an open house and invited the public to receive more information from Hank Gray, a board member of the Stillwater Area Scholastic Cycling Advocates (SASCA) organization. Mr. Gray provided a presentation of the trail proposal. There were several members of the public present at the meeting. City Administrator Johnson and Commission-Liaison McComber outlined the public process for the project. Resident Madeline Andera came forward and expressed concern about the proximity of the trails to residential areas. Judith Chirhart of 14933 57" Street North came forward and stated that she believed her property taxes were a higher rate because her property was adjacent to the park property. She questioned whether a hydrologist would come because there was a wetland area. She was also concerned about the distance of the trails to private property. Commissioner Norton thanked the public for their comments and for attending the open house. He stated the Parks Commission would take their comments into Page 21 of 50 Parks Commission Minutes March 21, 2016 Page 2 of 2 consideration, and he suggested the Parks Commission walk through the proposed trail area possibly with Mr. Gray. Chair Bye stated he would like to view the area and meet with area residents individually. No action was taken. VII. New Business: A. Set Spring Parks WalkthroU,wh: Chair Bye, seconded by Commissioner Norton, moved to set the walkthrough for Saturday, April 2, 2016 at 8:30 a.m. beginning at Cover Park. Carried 3-0. B. Vending Machine Renewal: Commissioner Norton, seconded by Commissioner Johnson, moved to approve the renewal. Carried 3-0. VIII. Old Business: A. Capital ImnroNements Discussion: Chair Bye, seconded by Commissioner Norton, moved to place the discussion item on the next meeting's agenda. Carried 3-0. Commissioner Norton, seconded by Commissioner Johnson, moved to set a worksession for 6 p.m. on April 18 to discuss the walkthrough and to go over comments from the public on the proposed mountain bike trails. Carried 3-0. IX. Informational: A. Next Meeting: Monday, April 18, 2016 with a worksession at 6 p.m. and the regular meeting at 7:00 p.m. at City Hall B. Council Representative: Tuesday, March 22 —Vice-Chair Weyer C. Playground Idea Image from Commission-Liaison McComber X. Adjournment: Commissioner Norton, seconded by Commissioner Johnson, moved to adjourn. Carried 3-0. Respectfully submitted, Jennifer Pinski City Clerk Page 22 of 50 4 City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Blvd. N•Box 2007.Oak Park Sleights,MN 55082•Phone(651)439-4439•Fax(651)439-0574 4-14-16 MEMO TO: Park Commissioners FROM: Eric Johnson,City ni RE: Park Fencing As discussed at the recent Parks walk-thru, ommission was interested in securing costs for the replacement of the various fencing at 5wager and Valley Vi Parks. Enclosed is an RFB for such cost determination. Also enclosed is the City code relating fencing,please be sure to see 401.15 E.8 b. Please review this and we can discuss more on 4118116. 1 will bring the survey data from 2013 to the meeting as well. Thank you. Eric Page 23 of 50 Request for Bids FENCING REPLACEMENTS—SWAGER AND VALLEY VIEW PARKS Summary& Project Scope: The City of Oak Park Heights (the 'City') is the owner of CERTAIN PARK PROPERTIES —Swager and Valley View parks as well as the connecting trail segments and which contains slatted privacy fencing that is in need of replacement. This RFB outlines the project for which the City is seeking bids from qualified firms, Section#1: Remove all current fencing, restore all ground surfaces to a clean, level grade. Do not impact other vegetation adjacent to such fence. Section #2: Replace all current fencing with new fencing including supporting posts. It is estimated that approximately 1,910 linear feet of fencing is in need of removal and construction. See Exhibit A & B for locations. Fencing - Length Estimates Ali Amounts shall be prorated Trail Property Line Total Swager 270 600 870 Valley View 260 780 1044 Total 1910 4'fencing(trail) 224 6' Fencing(trail and Property Line) 1686 Total 191 Ensure all materials including fasteners are hi-quality pressure treated materials specifically manufactured for such application. Fencing materials shall be of the following general classifications—See Exhibit C for detailed specifications. PANELS: Use pressure treated pine to create shadowbox-style fencing. Installed utilizing 1" X 6" boards — measuring 72" long -dog-eared style and in sections not more than 8' in length between vertical supporting posts. All boards and panels shall be installed not less than 1" from the finished ground surface, but not more than 2" and not more than a 3" gap between each 1" X 6" board. All boards and panels shall be installed so as to ensure a uniform horizontal elevation when viewed Page 24 of 50 along the top of line / plane — with reasonable adjustments to account for current topography. Each board of panel shall be installed an three horizontal support structures which shall be not less than 2" x 4" materials and pressure treated for this exterior application. At the locations for the connecting trails, do not use 6' panels, 4' panels shall be utilized so as to allow trail users visibility of approaching traffic. These locations shall only be as currently installed—See Exhibit D. POSTS: All vertical support posts shall be installed utilizing materials including a minimum of 4" X 4" in design and of the same materials as the fencing panels. All posts shall be installed into the earth utilizing concrete with a minimum diameter base footing of 10" and depth of 36" and 4" compacted crushed gravel for drainage at the bottom of each hole. If viable, retain and reuse all vertical supporting posts that are installed in asphalt or other solid surfaces-field verify. Section #3: Restore and stabilize the impacted locations to a clean, level final grade condition consistent with the surrounding grade and materials. This includes the placement of quality top soils (not less 2") and then apply hydro-seeding so turf is established promptly. No asphaltic repair is to be included except for circumstances where excessive damages are made by the Contractor as determined by the City. GENERAL PROVISIONS: (the following General Provisions accompany, supplement and/or clarify the requirements above to be also performed by the Contractor) 1. The Contractor shall include and provide and/or secure the furnishing of all materials, equipment, labor, permits, insurances, etc., to provide a complete and finished project accomplish all elements of the Project Scope. 2. Full Payment will be made once the City provides written final acceptance and full Lien Waivers are provided. No partial or progress payments will be made. Written final acceptance shall be supplied upon City inspection of site and utilities and when written confirmation (including "tipping" or disposal tickets and well closure) that all materials have been properly disposed of has been supplied to the City by the Contractor. 3. Contractor must be a licensed and insured Minnesota Contractor. Verification will be required should your firm be awarded the project. Well closure(s) must be performed by a firm duly licensed by the State of Minnesota to perform such work. 4. The Contractor shall make a site visits prior to submitting a bid to the City. Internal and external access can be scheduled by contacting Eric Johnson, City Administrator at 651- 439-4439. Page 25 of 50 5. The Contractor warrants to the City that they are competent and capable to perform this this work and that they know the correct disposal facilities for any materials removed. The Contractor will be responsible to ensure of proper disposal of all items. 6. Contractor must complete the Project in not less than twenty-eight (28) calendar days from project acceptance by the City. The project acceptance date will be defined by the City providing the contractor a signed and notarized copy of this document and a Final Agreement. Your bid, if accepted, is a binding legal document that you will complete the Project in the specified timeframe and with stated conditions. 7. The City may deduct 5 percent from amounts due for each day project is not complete beyond the 28 -day requirement. 8. The City reserves the right to reject any and all submissions received for this project and for any reason. The City is not responsible for any costs associated with preparing a bid submission to the City or for non-award. 9. Contractor's bids shall be valid for 120 calendar days from date of submission to the City. 10. A final agreement (also incorporating these Conditions) between the City and Contractor shall be required prior to any work commencing. This agreement will include a full indemnification of the City should there be any loss incurred by the Contractor as it relates to this project. The City shall not execute or sign any agreements drafted or provided by the Contractor. The terms and conditions of the RFB shall prevail. 11. The City is not responsible for the health, safety and welfare for Contractors staff and/or sub-contractors. Follow all best site management practices. The Contractor shall secure, pay for and attain all required permits and inspections if necessary. 12. Any changes to the Scope, Bid or elements of this Project must first be made and agreed upon in writing between the City and the Contractor. 13. Contractor is fully responsible for collateral damages to the worksite including damages cause by Contractor's staff or his sub-contractors. 14, Traffic Control and GOPHER-1 calls are the responsibility of the Contractor. 15. The Contractor shall provide a Bid Security (bank issued cashier's check) of not less than 20 Percent of their submitted bid made payable to the City; but shall not be less than $5,000- supply whichever amount is greater. Non prevailing bidders will be returned these funds; the prevailing bidder (Contractor) shall see these funds withheld by the City until such time as the Project is fully complete and accepted by the City. 16. Failure to complete the Project in a timely and in the required fashion will result in the City withholding costs from the Contractor including but not limited to the $5,000 bid security Page 26 of 50 and shall be $5001 per day. Do not bid unless you know you can perform the work in a timely fashion. 17. All work—including materials and workmanship shall have a two-year warranty period from the Contractor to the City; such timelines shall start upon the date of final acceptance by the City. 18. It is the Contractor's responsibility to ensure that all debris and items removed from the property are disposed of properly according to State and Federal law. 19. See Additional Notice to Bidders - Below Page 27 of 50 ADDITIONAL NOTICE TO BIDDERS • The City is not responsible for costs incurred by anyone responding to this Request for Bids. • Upon submission,all bids become the property of the City. • The City expressly reserves the right to amend or withdraw this Request for Bids at any time and to reject any or all bids for any reason. • The City is not bound to accept the lowest cost bid, and will only work with qualified contractors, subject to objective verification. • Bidders are held legally responsible for their bids and related budgets and fees. • Bidders are not to collude with other Bidders and competitors or take any other action which will restrict competition. Evidence of such activity will result in rejection of the bid. • The City reserves the right to request any additional information at any stage of the Request for Bids process. Compliance shall be at Bidder's expense. • The City will make payment for any contracted work at the completion and final acceptance of the project. • No building permits are needed. But all bidders must be a licensed Minnesota Contractor. Verification will be required should your firm be awarded the project. • Your bid is a binding legal document that you will complete the project in the specified timeframe and with stated conditions. • The City reserves the right to reject any and all submissions received for this project and for any reason. The City is not responsible for any costs or liabilities associated with preparing a bid submission to the City or for non-award. Page 28 of 50 Y CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS BID FORM—DUE 14123/15 SUMMARY: YOUR AMOUNT-BID: $ .00 Name of Proposer: Name of Firm/Company(if applicable) Signature.- Date: ignature:Date: State location(s)where structure debris (Including concrete, wood, etc.) will be disposed of.Attach additional pages if necessary: Notary Signature for Name of Proposer Signature Above: Notary Affix Stamp Here 4 Directions 1. Return this completed Bid Form in orfginai format and notarized to the City-A TTN,Eric Johnson-not tater than _ City Nall Physical address: 14168 Oak Park Blvd N. Oak Park N eights. MN 55082/or PO BOX 2007 Stillwater,MN 55082 2. Supply a Cashier's Check-payable to the City-for the Required Bid Security;must be equal to 20%of your bid amount above,but not fess than$5,000. 3. Direct all questions to the CitV Administrator-Eric Johnson-651-439.4439 Page 29 of 50 Exhibit A FENCING REPLACMENT—APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS a 10 Swager Park& Valley View Park Pence Repair T ;Project Location 2016 Project Location Valley View Park Swager Park L- Page 30 of 50 EXHIBIT B IMAGES OF CURRENT FENCING—MISC.Locations DRAWINGS ARE NOT TO SCALE- but generally representative-site verify all elements. >1� - t w Valley View Park Fence Repair ..�.,. �,....; Ctnwntlot Hne rence toffilaFa 7®0'+;-Grisar teat can ten to Park iencirig 130'feet each side , W E S 11 Swager Park east wssl-sagnr�rrt Fence Repair ApprPy 600'*•- •�,,.. TrPil CPnneclwn - 135'each side ` 270'total k-77 Page C:n at U:rS P rl:H chts Page 31 of 50 Exhibit C GENERAL CONSTRUCTION DETAIL _s RLQ?:.�iV:1 Sll Lf.lYl 2 4• r 3'6" 4"RtfY Sf?ac 2 to 4" space 2xd F'rvc. Plh-A-` ��.iL%V 1 Stu t- -rt-Tc� ;r,11C Page 32 of 50 Exhibit D Entmaces to Valley View 1 1 ma - yT o. ._ ..,. rte✓ . » "'`"._ F ' y Page 0 k. The provisions of Section 401.03.A.8 of this Ordinance shall be considered and a determination made that the proposed activity is in compliance with such criteria. 401.15.E. Fencing, Screening and Landscaping. 1 . Building Permit. No person shall hereafter construct or cause to be constructed or erected within the City of Oak Park Heights, any fence without first making an application for and securing a building permit. 23.352 Application Requirements. Each application for a permit under this section shall be submitted to the Zoning Administrator on forms provided by the City. Each such application shall include a site plan drawn to scale showing the location of house(s), garage(s), and other improvements on the lot and the location of the fencing to be erected; altered or relocated. A certificate of survey shall be required for all fences (including hedges and plantings) to be constructed up to or on the property line, unless: a. Property stakes on the affected property lines are first located and marked by a licensed and registered Minnesota surveyor. b. Or, an agreement is reached between the property owners as to the accepted or property line. 3. General Provisions. All fences within the City shall be subject to the following general provisions: a. No fences shall be placed on or extend into the public rights-of-way. b. All fences shall be located entirely upon the property of the person constructing or causing the construction of such fence. C. That side of any fence considered to be its "face" (i.e., the finished side having no structural supports) shall face abutting property. d. Both sides of any fence shall be maintained in a condition of reasonable repair and appearance by its owner and shall not be allowed to become and remain in a condition of disrepair or danger, or constitute a nuisance, public or private. e. Barbed wire fences are only allowed in the City by conditional use permit. f. No person shall construct or maintain or allow to be constructed or maintained anywhere within the City any fence or metal construction which is charged by or connected with an electrical system. g. No physical damage of any kind shall occur to abutting property. 15-27 Page 34 of 50 h. All man-made fences located in front of the rear building line shall consist of materials comparable in grade and quality to the following: decorative masonry, wrought iron or wood, provided the surfaces are finished for exterior use, or wood of proven durability is used, such as cedar or redwood. i. For the purpose of fence regulations, in the case of a corner lot, both yards abutting a street shall be considered a front yard. 354. Specific Fence Standards. The height of fence shall be the distance from the adjacent finished grade to the highest projection of a fence structure or support post and shall be restricted according to the location as follows: 35 a. Fences or walls located on or adjacent to any property line bordering a public road or street shall not exceed seven (7) feet in height. However, in no case shall any shrub, hedge or fence bordering upon any street or sidewalk be constructed or allowed to grow to a height which could obstruct safe driving visibility at intersections. 35 b Fences or walls on or adjacent to the shore line of any navigable lake, channel or stream shall not exceed four (4) feet in height. Fences or walls on or along that portion of a lot line from a navigable lake, channel or stream to the rear side of the average building construction line shall not exceed four (4) feet in height. 23. 35 C. Fences or walls on or within ten (10) feet or less from a common property line between two adjoining lots or parcels not owned by the same person, firm or corporation shall not exceed seven (7) feet in height. The property owner shall provide written notification to adjoining property owners concurrent with the application for a building permit for a fence installation which is less than five (5) feet from a property line. Fences or walls shall be permitted except as prohibited in sub-paragraphs b. and d. hereof. 35 d. Fences or patio walls not exceeding nine (9) feet in height may be constructed without restriction on the interior of any lot or parcel, providing no such fence or wall shall be closer than ten (10) feet to any common property line between adjoining lots not owned by the same person, firm or corporation (except as permitted under sub-paragraph c. hereof), and provided further in the case of lakeshore lots, no such fence or wall shall be located so as to block or otherwise adversely interfere with an adjoining property owner's lake view. 35 e. Open wire fences not exceeding eleven (11) feet in height enclosing tennis courts; pools, and similar uses, shall be permitted without restriction. 5, Swimming Pool Fences. Outdoor swimming pool fences shall be required as outlined in Section 1303 of the City Code. 15-28 Page 35 of 50 6. Non-Conforming Fences. It is the intent of this Ordinance to allow the continuation of such non-conforming fences until they are discontinued as provided herein. However, it is not the intent of this Ordinance to encourage the survival of non-conforming fences and such fences are declared to be incompatible with permitted fences within the City. Such fences shall be regulated by the following provisions: a. No existing fence not permitted by this Ordinance in the district within which it is located, except when required to do so by law or ordinance, shall be enlarged, extended, reconstructed or structurally altered unless such fence is changed to one permitted in that district. Maintenance of a non-conforming fence will be allowed, however, when this includes necessary repairs and incidental alterations which do not expand or intensify the non-conforming fence. 7. General Landscaping and Maintenance. All exposed ground areas surrounding or within a principal or accessory use, including street boulevards; and not devoted to parking areas, drives, sidewalks, patios or other such uses shall be completely landscaped with grass, shrubs, trees or other ornamental landscape materials before the Building Official issues the certificate of occupancy or if construction is completed during the Winter, no later than May 31 of the year or following year of construction completion. All landscaped areas shall be kept neat, clean and uncluttered, and where a landscape plan is required by City approval any plant material which is diseased or dies shall be replaced with like kind of the original size. No landscaped area shall be used for the parking of vehicles or for the storage or display of materials; supplies or merchandise. Fences and/or plantings placed upon utility easements are subject to removal by the City or utility company if required for maintenance or improvement of the utility. Trees on utility easements containing overhead wires shall not exceed twenty (20) feet in height, which it shall be the property owner's responsibility to maintain. 118. Required Fencing and Screening. Where any public, institutional, business or industrial use (i.e., structure, parking or storage) abuts property zoned for residential use, that public, institutional, business or industrial use shall provide screening along the boundary of the residential property. Screening shall also be provided where a public, institutional, business or industrial use is across the street from a residential zone, but not on that side of a public, institutional, business or industrial use considered to be the front (as determined by the Building Official). All the fencing and screening specifically required by this Ordinance shall be subject to Section 401.15.E.3. and shall consist of either a fence or a green belt planting strip as provided for below. a. A green belt planting strip shall consist of evergreen trees and/or deciduous trees and large shrubs and shall be of sufficient width and density to provide an effective visual screen. This planting strip shall contain no structures other than supplementary fencing. Such planting strip shall be designed to 15-29 Page 36 of 50 provide complete visual screening to a minimum height of eight (8) feet. Earth mounding or berms may be used but shall not be used to achieve more than three (3) feet of the required screen. The planting plan and type of plantings shall require the approval of the City Council based upon a recommendation of the City staff. b. A required screening fence shall be constructed of masonry, brick, wood or metal. Such fence shall provide a solid screening effect and not exceed eight (8) feet in height or be less than six (6) feet in height. The design and materials used in constructing a required screening fence shall be subject to the approval of the City Council based upon a recommendation by the City staff. 9. Required Landscaping - General Residential. The lot area remaining after providing for off-street parking, off-street loading, sidewalks, driveways; building site and/or other requirements shall be landscaped using sod in the front and side yards, and ornamental grass, or other acceptable vegetation or treatment generally used in landscaping in the rear yards. Fences or trees placed upon utility easements are subject to removal if required for the maintenance or improvement of the utility. 1110. Required Landscaping - Public, Institutional, Semi-Public and All Income Producing Property Uses. Prior to approval of a building permit, all above referenced uses shall be subject to a mandatory landscape plan requirement. Said landscape plan should be developed with an emphasis upon the following areas: The boundary or perimeter of the proposed site at points adjoining another existing or proposed site or sites; the immediate perimeter of the structure or building at points of its placement on the site; and the public boulevard areas at points of interface with streets or sidewalk areas of the City. All landscaping incorporated in said plan shall conform to the following standards and criteria: a. All plants must at least equal the following minimum sizes: Balled and Potted/Bare Root Burlapped Shade Trees* 1-3/4 in. diameter 2-1/2 in. dia. Half Trees (Flowering Crab, Russian Olive, Hawthorn, etc.) 6-7 feet 1.5 in. dia. Evergreen Trees ----- 6-8 feet Tall Shrubs and Hedge Material (evergreen or deciduous) 3-4 feet 3-4 feet Low Shrubs: Deciduous 18-24 in. 24-30 in. Evergreen 18-24 in. potted 24-30 in. Spreading Evergreens 18-24 in. potted 18-24 in. 15-30 Page 37 of 50 THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Page 38 of 50 5 City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Blvd N.•Box 2007•Oak Park I leights..MN 55082•Phone(651)439-4439•Fax 439-0574 Memorandum To: Andy Kegley, Public Works Director Cc: Parks Commission From: Lisa Danielson, Arborist Date: 04/14/2016 Re: 2016 Arbor Day Ceremonial Tree Planting Arbor Day is recognized in all 50 states as well as in many other countries. During Arbor Month the benefits of tree care and the importance of tree plantings are expressed. Arbor Day and Arbor Month are a great way to get the community active outdoors and make a difference in the appearance of their property and city parks. This year, the City of Oak Park Heights has proclaimed April 29th 2016 Arbor Day and the month of May 2016 as Arbor Month. The City of Oak Park Heights has been named a Tree City USA for the 34th year and also earned a Tree City USA Growth Award. These awards are valued greatly by the community. To continue to be eligible for the awards, each year an Arbor Day/Arbor Month Ceremonial Tree Planting must take place during this time. Please see the attached map for the planting site location and details. The tree recommended for the planting site this year is a swamp white oak (Quercus bicolor) to be planted at Valley View Park at the northern most part of the parking lot. This is a species that has proven to do well on sites that have suffered from oak wilt in the past, such as this particular area of Valley View Park. The Arbor Day/Arbor Month planting is funded from the tree replacement fund. Because the Tree City U.S.A. designation requires the City to plant a tree during Arbor month (MAY 2016), 1 am requesting the park commission choose a date and Time for the ceremonial tree planting during May 2016. (Please see attached map) TREE CITY U.S.A. Page 39 of 50 l CD 7,1 y V O y jR r� N • "1 a p wr r Cn 17 j fit _ .r "� �� .tF �a� �.��� -�` �.°�'„ try• � s � .� "'� a + a .. -'''i \"L+�r. 9 • 'x, ' "-!!2' F ""+ n /ham rj" e: r w� �y� .' ��•^777...8::: yam,i d i�. �, '� �( r� �..414," x //1. .���_�v'Y F !. �"N:•e .P� y. i t,•"1`P"y 4" <tl a� �,'R �'M','�"�^'�q. Ys� � # ol � 'ig, ay e' �" �,�,` t� �°'f�"f` i '.r,�"� 1 _' 1. � �� ` ?.`• .. .'1� .• r,,f d¢y e„yl°T �: y�_ 4i� � We: �-. ,�, k�Y *t`:/+f 4 1 c r T,,• � tl� ` d rar� fC"" a♦ 'd Paae 40 a �� yr�� vr �.R.ary T• �p� F ,.`• ,�''s.... .'tw,� �-t Y�... S'o• 'E"t+' R �` 1,� id�,��""�C +'•�., 1!*► fj K ¢' r�]•''.. rte'..•^�' ���,,«. j.�'�+ w' .f'.,�-'a' y� ..s'� � �M,. +T'Y .� l"'�.� s_.rad. ~� ry �. �P`: z of 5 w# 6 City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Blvd. N•Box 2007.Oak Park Heights,MN 55082•Phone(651)439-4439•Fax(651)439-0574 4-15-16 MEMO TO: Park Commissioners FROM: Eric Johnson, City A i ' o RE: Trail bid results Attached you will find the complete bid analysis for the trails(base bid)and the altemate option of the shelter pads. Generally,the base bids came in just below the$87,227 estimate. At this time the apparent low bidder is T.A. Schifsky for both the Base Bid and Alternate#1 when combined—to a total of$73,432.00. The additional costs to extend the pads from a 25'diameter to a 50'diameter is$30,221. Alt 1- 25' Alt 2- 50' Bidder Base Bid Slab slab Base+Alt 1 Base +Alt 2 LOW TA Schif sky $61,207.50 $12,224.50 $42,445.50 $ 73,432.00 $103,653.00 =31 Paving $68,745,00 5 5,3813.00 $39,915.00 $ 78,125.00 5108,660.00 Sunram $81,735.00 513,615.00 547,340.00 $ 95,350.00 5129,075.00 G Urban $85,807.50 512,550.00 $49,100.00 $ 98,357.50 S 134,907-50 park Cons. $88,298.50 S12,948-50 545,345.50 $101,247.00 5133 C-1 = 00 The Park Commission should make a final recommendation on the project and its final scope. Kind regards. Enc Page 41 of 50 Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 2335 Highway 36 West,St. Paul MN 55113 April 5, 2016 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Boulevard Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Re: Oak Park Crossing Trail Project Stantec Project No. 193803362 Bid Results Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: Bids were opened for the Oak Park Crossing Trail Project on April 5, 2016. Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Bid Tabulation for your information and file. Copies will also be distributed to each Bidder once the Project has been awarded. There were a total of 5 Bids. The bid request included two alternate bids for different sized concrete pads. Alternate I includes a 25-foot wide slab. Alternate 2 includes a 50-foot wide slab. The following summarizes the results of the Bids received: Contractor Total Base Bid Alternate 1 Alternate 2 Low T. A.Schifsky & Sons, Inc. $61,207.50 $12,224.50 $42,445.50 #2 FPI Paving Contractors, Inc. $68,745.00 $9,380.00 $39,915.00 #3 Sunram Construction, Inc. $81,735.00 $13,615.00 $47,340.00 #4 G. Urban Companies, Inc. $85,807.50 $12,550.00 $49,100.00 #5 Park Construction Co. $88,298.50 $12,948.50 $45,345.50 The low Bidder on the Project was T.A. Schifsky &Sons, Inc.with a Total Base Bid Amount of $61,207.50. This compares to the Engineer's Opinion of Probable Costs of $87,227.50. These Bids have been reviewed and found to be in order. If the City Council wishes to award the Prgject to the low Bidder, then T. A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc. should be awarded the Project. For the smaller sized concrete slab, the award should be based on the Total Base Bid Amount of$61,207.50 plus the Alternate 1 amount of$12,224.50 for a total contract amount of$73,432.00. For the larger sized concrete slab, the award should be based on the Total Base Bid Amount of$61,207.50 plus the Alternate 2 amount of$42,445.50 for a total contract amount of$103,653.00. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact Lucas Miller or me. Sincerely, STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC. Lee M. Mann, P.E. Lucas J. Miller Enclosure Page 42 of 50 Project Name:Oak Park Crossing Trail Project Thereby a W Graf YAK Kan ewet rept ci tfau oflwh fro8ked Client Prgert No. Projwt NO.:. 193843362 Bld Opening:Tuesday,April 5,2016 at 10 A.M.,CDT Owner:ferry of Oak Park NIeFgMr MN PAO 6 7aPW P.E. -' Ixenm Na.19464 Bidd.r No.1 O,idds No.2 Bidder Na 3 Bidder Na 4 BID TABULATION T.A.Schif ky&Sora,Inc FPI PavhV CoabarhoM Inc Sunram C nstrrKLlnn,Inc G.Urban Companies,Inc. Item Muni Item Units Qty Unit Price Total Unit Price Toni Unit Price Total UnLt Price Tata! OASE DID: PART i-GENERAL, L MOBILIZATION LS 1 $7,SO0.00 $7,500.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $6,700.00 $4700.00 2 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $3,00UMD $3,000.00 $4000.00 $toffl.x $1,200.00 $1,200.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 3 1NLFT PROTECTION EA 2 $100.00 $200.00 $250.00 $500.00 $150.00 $300.00 $900.00 $800.0c 4 SRT FENCE,TYPE MACHINE SLICED LF 1900 $1.05 $1,995,00 $2.15 $4,Oa5.00 $2.40 $4,560.00 $3.75 $7,125.00 S STREET SWEEPER WITH PICKUP BROOM. HR 10 $100.Go $1,000.0(1 $165.00 $4,550.00 $125.00 $1,250.00 $100.00 $1,00000 6 PERMANENT HYDROSIED WITH MUt-CH(MEK 25-141) SY 2000 52.10 $4,200.110 $2.00 $4;000.00 $1,70 $3,400.00 $2.70 $5,400.00 7 TOPSOIL BORROW(LV) CY 250 $15.00 $3,750.00 $25.00 6150.00 $25.00 s6.250.00 $25.00 250.00 TOTALGENERAL $21,645.00 $20,485.00 $21,960.00 $29,275.00 BITUMINOUS TRAILS: 8 4-PVC,SDR 26-CULVERT CROSSING LF 4C $20.00 $800.00 $25.00 $1,00000 $25,.00 V.nw.00 $55.00 $2,20D00 9 COMMON EXCAVATION-TRAIL(P) CY 465 $15.00 $6,975.00 $14.00 $6,510.00 $32.50 $15,112.50 $28.00 $13,omoo 10 GEOTEXTILE FAIIRIC TYPE V SY 2006 $1.25 $2,500.00 $1.50 $3,000,00 $2.35 $4,I00.DO $2.25 $4,500.00 11 6-AGGREGATE BASE,CLASS 5,10095 CRUSHED SY 2000 $4.95 $9,900.00 $6.50 $13,000.00 $6.90 $131800.00 $SAO $10AW.o0 12 3-TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING ODURSE MIXTURE(2,.B)(P) SY 1650 $11.75 $19,387.50 $15.00 24 750.00 $L5.25 $25,162. $15.25 $26,812.50 TOTAL BITUMINOUS TRAILS $39,562.50 $43,260.00 $59,775.00 $56,5$2.50 BASE BID SUMMARY: TOTAL GENERAL $21,64S.00 $20,485.00 $21,960.00 $29,275.00 TOTAL BITUMINOUS TRAILS $39,562.50 260. 9 ns. M532.50 TOTAL BASE BID $61,207.50 ;68,745.00 $81,735.00 $85,60750 ALTERNATE 1-25'CONCRETE PADS 13 COMMON EXCAVATION--PADS(P) CY 45 $16.00 $720.00 $14.00 $630,00 $35.00 $1,575.00 $30.00 $1,350.00 I4 AGGREGATE BASE,CLASS 5,1DO%CRUSHED SY 140 $5.W $700.00 $8.50 $1,190.00 $7.25 $1,015.00 $5.110 $700.00 IS REINFORCED CONCRETE PADS SF 1050 $10.29 $10,804.50 $7.20 57560.00 $10.50 %1.1,025-00 $10.00 $10.500.00 TOTAL ALTERNATE I-25'CONCRETE PADS $12,224.50 $9,380.00 $13,615.00 $12,550.00 ALTERNATE 2-SO'CONCRETE PADS 16 COMMON EXCAVATION-PADS(P) CY 176 $16.00 $2,720.00 $1450 $2,465.00 $35.00 $5,950-00 $30.09 $5,100.00. 17 AGGREGATE BASE,C1ASS 5,100%CRUSHED SY 500 $S.00 $2,500.00 $8.50 $4,250.00 $7.25 $3,625.00 $5.00 $2,500.00. 18 REINFORCED CONCRETE PADS SF 4150 $8.97 517.22550 $8.00 $31200-00 $9.10 $37,765.00 $10.00 $41,W0,110 TOTAL ALTERNATE 2-SO'CONCRETE PALS #42,44550 $39,915.00 $47,340.00 $49,100.00 SUMMARY TOTAL BASE BSD $61,207.50 $68,745.00 $81,735.110 $65,807-50 TOTAL ALTERNATE I-25'CONCRETE PADS $12,224.50 $9,380.00 $I3,615.00 $12,550.00 TOTAL ALTERNATE 2-50 CONCRETE PADS $42,445,50 $39,915.00 $47,340.00 $49,1W,W Contractor Name and Address:TA.Schil4ky&Sens,Inc. FPI Paving Contactors,Inc. Sunram Const-im,Inc. G.Urban Companies,Inc. 2370 Highway 36 E 3230 Rice St. 20010 75th Ave.N. 3781 Labore Rd. N.St.Paul,MN 55109 St.Paul,MN 55126,3041 Canaan,MN 55340 St.Paul,MN 55110 Phone:651-777-1313 651.484-MS 763420.2140 651-248-%30 Email: d nlhonyk(Dipianvinp.cam ryam,iNunramcwrsnuaw 2rhan ur6ar mpAniesmc carr Signed By:Rob Stangler Anthony R Kopp Ryan M,Sunram Greg Urban TR1e:COO Vice President Viae President Owner Signed Responsible Ceram=Cert9kate Yes Yes Yrs Yes Bid Security:@1.d DDnd Bid Bond Bid Band Bid Bond 193803362-WTabjdsm QT-1 Page 43 of 50 St a me C Pr*ect Name:Oak Park Cmmdng Tr Client Prolert No. Bid Opernog:Tuesday,April 5,2016: Bidder Na 5 BID TABULATION Park Comtruction Ca. It— N.. lb— Unit Unit Price Total BASE BID: PART I-GENERAL: 1 MOBILIZATION LS 1 $11.5m.00 511,500.00 2 TRAFFIC CONTROL. LS 1 $721.00 $721.00 3 w-ET PROTECTION EA 2 $252.00 $504.00 4 SILT FENCE,TYPE MACHINE SLICED LF 1900 $1.55 $2,945.00 5 STREET SWEEPER WITH PICKUP BROOM HR 10 $129.00 $1,29100 6 PERMANENT HYDROSEED WITH MULCH(MIX 25-141) SY 2000 $3.05 $6,100.00 7 TOPSOIL BORROW(LV) CY 250 $3640 9100.00 TOTAL.GENERAL $32,160.00 BITUMINOUS TRAILS: 8 4"PVC,SDR 26-CULVERT CROSSING LF 40 $64.40 $2,576.00 9 COMMON EXCAVATICIN-TRAIL(P) CY 465 $25.50 $11,857.50 10 GEOTE)MLE FABRIC TYPE VSY 2000 $1.55 $3,100.00 it 6-AGGREGATE BASE,CLASS 5,IW%CRUSHED SY 2000 $6.35 $12,700.00 12 3"TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MDCTLIRE(2,B)(P) SY 1650 $15.70 $25,905.00 TOTAL BITUMINOUS TRAILS $56,138.50 BASE BID SUMMARY: TOTAL GENERAL $32,160-00 TOTAL BITUMINOUS TRAILS $56,138.50 TOTAL BASE BID $88,248.50 ALTERNATE 1-2S'cONCRETE PADS 13 COMMON E(CAVATION-PADS(P) CY 4S $27.50 $1,237.50 14 AGGREGATE BASE,CLASS 5,IOU%CRUSHED SY 140 $8.65 $1,21.1.00 15 REINFORCED CONCRETE PADS SF 1050 MAO 10 500.00 TOTAL ALTERNATE 1-25'CONCRETE PADS $12,44850 ALTERNATE 2-50'CONCRETE PADS 16 COMMON EXCAVATION-PADS(P) CY 170 $27.40 $4,658.00 17 AGGREGATE BASE,CLASS 5,100%CRUSHED SY 50D $8.75 $4,375.00 18 REINFORCED CONCRETE PADS SF 4150 $8.75 $36,312.50 TOTAL ALTERNATE 2-50'CONCRETE PADS $45,34550 SUMMARY TOTAL BASE BID $88,298.50 TOTAL ALTERNATE 1-25"CONCRETE PADS $12,948.50 TOTAL ALTERNATE 2-50'CONCRETE PALS $45,345.50 Oxntramr Mame and Address:Park Construction Co. 1481 81st.Awe.ME Mpls.,FIN 55432 Phone:763-786-9 0M Email:cbc—)e,d7parkcnmtructiortco.com Signed By:Owles Borate Title:Paving DNtsion Manager Signed Responsible Contractor Certlkate Yes Did Security:Bre Bond 193843362-81dTabidsm QT-2 Page 44 of 50 i u Fi— U � i I� I I I I , L4 JR, z > n In D o 70 0 �7 Z Q D p 77 Y E n O -4 � _ co I i A \ W cn N ph 0 m o ay p O ➢ n b Z A x _ ➢ '� n� n` o A N M �- Z7 T n -� o➢ o - C O cZn m z 0 0 n o 7 x Z m O Z O G1 z 0 A T mN vy pZ o �;...; j n 4 Q n D n n In n N n o 0 0 0 0 0 y n n n n z — m A m m m m n ? 3 a° CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS.MINNESOTA StallteC OAK PARK CROSSING TRAIL PROJECT-CONSTRUCTION SE u�au`eu�n. �/ QSHr.,M» Page 45 of 50 TITLE 5HEET 3 g g € o � m g m � Q o a G-) m g a La pc Q g 3 S 6 0 o i�a Cf AAAA g� g �3 3 2<J1 7 x o z h D I I A G m ifili � � m z rn n 71 I � � illl G m s z'����a��8�S����.•9�R��i S"���2 0���x�5�5 0�����`g � 1\4 6 Vri �2 CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS,MINNESOTA Stantec OAK PARK CROSSING TRAIL PROJECT-CONSTRUCTION SE r o may. Page 46 of 50 h] LEGEND&GENERA L NOTES i � Z r � mF�F I l � M 1 � I y ,k o } O t 1 g F �j 1 P ya a 1 OMMY 1 l CITY QE OAK PARK HEIGHTS,MINNESOTA 5tantec N OAK PARK CROSSING TRAIL PRWEC T-C(NSWRUCTK)N SEF a# o � aaw Page 47 of 50 PERMIA NENE EROSION A N❑c EDMEN:C:':::VCL"La:: nw� ssoia i q — I v4 v, 74 t I I i al `� r.i. e . k' 6 f' e R- wMION 01VOr b_HN913 I .I s F _ m rlTl'C OAK PARK HEIGHTS,MINNESOTA Star�t�:e d`. OAK PARK CROSSING TRAIL PROJECT-CONSTRUCTION SET "'�""` `� c� a �Mrwb,�w Page 48 of 50 TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS k 3 0 _ xwNJore. '6 g n O ti �� 1Q 0 n \ O II z T-i• 1a-0' T4' 2.5' m ^ 12" so w o n m p' `> S m � v Z A 34 7 CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS,MINNESOTA StanteC � OAK PARK CROSSING TRAIL PROJECT-CONSTRUCTION SET "- 0 3as ><w Page 49 of 50 $ $TANDARp pETA RS AND TYPICAL SE:'iYJNS alaiiNlfll3 � 3 � n.� rnnWvwemn THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Page 50 of 50