Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2016-09-15 Planning Comission Meeting PacketCITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA Thursday, September 15, 2016 7:00 P.M. I. Call to Order II. Approval of Agenda III. Approve September 1, 2016 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes (1) IV. Department / Commission Liaison 1 Other Reports V. Visitors/PubIic Comment This is an opportunityfor the public to address the Commission with questions or concerns not on the agenda. Please limit comments to three minutes. V1. Public Hearings A. Continued. Oak Ridize Place Memory Care Expansion — 6060 Oxboro Ave. N.: Consider requests of HAF Architects on behalf of TIC Properties 1 LLC for Conditional Use Permits to allow memory care and assisted living and for parking, and a Variance to building height. (2) VII. New Business VIII. Old Business IX. Informational A. Upcoming Meetings: • Tuesday, September 27, 2016 City Council • Thursday, October 6, 2016 PIanning Commission • Tuesday, October 11, 2016 City Council • Tuesday, October 25, 2016 City Council • Wednesday, November 9, 2016 City Council • Thursday, November 10, 2016 Planning Commission • Tuesday, November 22, 2016 City Council B. Council Representative • Tuesday, September 27, 2016 — Commissioner Quale • Tuesday, October 25, 2016 — Commissioner Kremer • Tuesday, November 22, 2016 — Commissioner Nelson X. Adjourn. 7:00 p.m./City Hall 7:00 p.m./City Hall 7:00 p.m./City Hall 7:00 p.m./City Hall 7:00 p.m./City Hall 7:00 p.m./City Hall 7:00 p.m./City Hall ENCLOOM1 CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Thursday, September 1, 2016 — Oak Park Heights City Hall I. Call to Order: Chair Kremer called the meeting to order. Present: Commissioners Kremer, Anthony, & QuaIe; City Administrator Johnson, City Planner Richards, and Commission Liaison Runk. Absent: Commissioner Nelson & Thurmes. II. Approval of Agenda: Commissioner Anthony, seconded by Commissioner Quale, moved to approve the Agenda as presented. Carried 3 — 0. III. Agproval of July 14 2016 Meeting Minutes: Commissioner Quale, seconded by Commissioner Anthony, moved to approved the Minutes as presented. Carried 3 - 0. IV. D artment/Commission Liaison / Other Reports: None. V. Visitors/Public Comment: None. V1. Public Hearings: A. Scott & Christina Mitchell — 5527 Oakgreen Place N. — Consider a request for a Conditional Use Permit related to the placement of an accessory building, located at 5527 Oakgreen Place, N. City Planner Richards reviewed and discussed the August 24, 2016 Planning Memorandum to the request for placement of a storage shed one foot from the side yard property line. Richards stated that placement is proposed upon an existing raised driveway that was constructed with a retaining wall upon the side yard lot line and within the 5 -foot drainage easement, noting that the City Engineer has visited the site and did not find that the placement of the shed upon the existing driveway would impact existing drainage patterns of the driveway. Chair Kremer noted the drainage pipe previously required for the development approved to the east of the property. Richards noted that the request would not create an impact upon the property. Chair Kremer opened the hearing and invited public comment. There being no public comment to the public hearing, Chair Kremer invited Commission discussion. There being none, Chair Kremer closed the public hearing. Planning Commission Minutes September 1, 2016 Page 2 of 4 Commissioner Quale, seconded by Commissioner Anthony, moved to recommend that the City Council approve the request, subject to the conditions of the August 24, 2016 Planning Memorandum; specifically, as follows: 1. The applicant shall be responsible to remove the shed and driveway if required by the City for drainage purpose. 2. The applicant shall apply for and receive a building permit for the structure. Carried 3 - 0. B. Menard's Warehouse Ex ansion — Consider a request for Site Plan & Design Guidelines Review related to proposed warehouse expansion at Menard's, located at 5800 Krueger Lane. N. City Planner Richards reviewed and discussed the August 24, 2016 Planning Report related to the request of Menard, Inc. to expand the warehouse at southwest corner of the existing business location and related site alterations relative to vehicle access to the warehouse. Chair Kremer opened the hearing and invited public comment. Tyler Edwards of Menards. Inc. introduced himself and noted that they are working toward doing such expansions at all of their stores to improve the warehouse area operations and working conditions. Mr. Tyler stated that they continue to work on the curb cut matter. Brief discussion ensued as to building appearance and how the garden doors would function. There being no other visitors to the public hearing, Chair Kremer closed the public hearing. Commissioner Anthony, seconded by Commissioner Quale, moved to recommend that the City Council approve the request, subject to the amended conditions of the August 24, 2016 Planning Report; specifically, as follows: 1. The Applicants are working with the developers of the property to the north, Oak Park Heights Retail Development, related to a curb cut so that there is a cross access with Menards. Approval of the design shall be subject to City Engineer review. 2. All light fixtures shall be full cut off and shall be consistent with Section 401.15.B.7 of the Zoning Ordinance as it relates to lighting requirements. Planning Commission Minutes September 1, 2016 Page 3 of 4 3. The Planning Commission was favorable to the building design and building materials. 4. All mechanical equipment on the roof or on the site shall be fully screened in accordance with the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. 5. The grading, drainage and utility plans shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer and the Middle St. Croix Watershed Management Organization. 6. The landscape plans shall be subject to review and approval of the City Arborist. Carried 3 — 0. B. Oak Ridge Place Memory Care Expansion — 6060 Oxboro Ave. N.: Consider requests of HAF Architects on behalf of TIC Properties 1 LLC for Conditional Use Permits to allow memory care and assisted living and for parking, and a Variance to building height and setback requirements. Chair Kremer noted that this request has been before the Commission and was returning due to lapse of the original approvals, adding that as the applicant was not ready at the time of the September meeting deadline, continuance of the public hearing has been requested. Chair Kremer stated that the public hearing would be continued and suggested that the Planning Commission schedule a meeting for September 15, 2016 for the public hearing, if a quorum of Commission would be available. City staff will consult the Commission and if a quorum is available the September 15, 2016 meeting will be scheduled. VII. New Business: None. VIII. Old Business: None. IX. Informational: A. Upcoming Meetings: • Tuesday, September 13, 2016 • Tuesday, September 27, 2016 • Tuesday, October 11, 2016 • Thursday, October 13, 2016 • Tuesday, October 25, 2016 City Council City Council City Council Planning Commission City Council B. Council Representative • Tuesday, September 13, 2016 — Commissioner Quale • Tuesday, October 25, 2016 — Commissioner Kremer 7:00 p.m./City Hall 7:00 p.m./City Hall 7:00 p.m./City Hall 7:00 p.m./City Hall 7:00 p.m./City Hall Planning Commission Minutes September 1, 2016 Page 4 of 4 X. Adjourn. Commissioner Quale, seconded by Commissioner Anthony, moved to adjourn at 7:18 p.m. Carried 3 — 0. Respectfully submitted, Julie Hultman Planning & Code Enforcement Approved by the Planning Commission: 3601 Thurston Avenue N, Suite 100 Anoka, MN 55303 Phone; 763.231.5840 Facsimile: 763.427.0520 TPCTPC@P1anningCo.00m PLANNING REPORT TO: Eric Johnson FROM: Scott Richards DATE: September 7, 2016 ENCLOSURE 2 RE: Oak Park Heights - Oak Ridge Memory Care and Assisted Living - Conditional Use Permit for Memory Care and Assisted Living, Conditional Use Permit for Building Setback, and Variances for Building Height and Driveway Setback - 6060 Oxboro Avenue North TPC FILE: BACKGROUND 236.02 - 16.10 Michael Hoefier of HAF Architects LLC, representing TIC Properties 1, LLC, has submitted an application for a Conditional Use Permit for memory care and assisted living facility building expansion, and Variances for setbacks and building height to allow for the construction of a 16 room memory care facility and 26 additional assisted living units at Oak Ridge Memory Care and Assisted Living. The plans include a three story addition to the west of the existing facility and changes to the site plan to accommodate access. The plans also include an exterior facelift on the entire existing building including siding, windows and roofing. This update will allow for the new and old portions of the building to appear as one new structure. The City Council approved the same applications on April 281, 2015. The Planning Commission had recommended the project at their November 13, 2014 meeting. The Applicants did not ask the City Council for an extension of approval in time, requiring the Applicant to come back through the entire process. The plans have not changed from what was approved by the City Council in 2015. Prior to the approval in 2015, the Applicants and City realized issues with an existing City drainage easement and ponding area in the southeast corner of the site. The Applicants plans have shown a new driveway in this location and an underground storm water system. The Applicants worked with MnDOT to determine if the pond area could be moved south onto MnDOT right of way. Karen Scheffing from MnDOT indicated on January 15, 2015 that moving the ponding area and retaining walls onto the right of way was unacceptable. The Applicants have proposed constructing the improvements as planned with the City retaining the full easement. They have agreed that they are doing this at their own risk if the City, at some time in the future, requires access to the drainage improvements or if a ponding area is required in this area. The City will reserve the right to require the Applicant, at their expense to remove any and all of the improvements from the easement area, if ordered by the City Council. The City shall not be responsible for any costs related to the Applicant's improvements in the drainage area. The resolution that was prepared for the City Council in 2015 and now in 2016, approves the application with conditions added related to the drainage easement. The project is identical to what was approved in 2015. The report has been updated to reflect the drainage issues. EXHIBITS The review is based upon the following submittals: Exhibit 1: Project Narrative — Michael Hoefier — August 9, 2016 Exhibit 2: Title Sheet (T1) Exhibit 3: Site Information Sheet — USGS and Soils Exhibit 4: Drainage Maps Exhibit 5: Existing Conditions Exhibit 6: Final Erosion and Sediment Control Plan Exhibit 7: Final Grading and Drainage Plan Exhibit 8: Final Utility Plan Exhibit 9: Tree Protection and Replacement Plan Exhibit 10: Details Exhibit 11: Architectural Site Plan (AS1.0) Exhibit 12: Landscaping Plan (1-1) Exhibit 13: Landscape Plan Details (1-2) Exhibit 14: Lower Level Plan (Exhibit B) Exhibit 15: First Level Plan (A1.1) Exhibit 16: Second Level Plan (A1.2) Exhibit 17: Third Level Plan (A1.3) Exhibit 18: Roof Plan (A1.4) Exhibit 19: Elevations (A2.0) Exhibit 20: Elevations (A2.0) Exhibit 21: Elevations (A2.1) Exhibit 22: Elevations (A2.2) Exhibit 23: Phasing Plan (PI -11) Exhibit 24: Photometric Plan Exhibit 25: Light Fixture Specifications Exhibit 26: Building Light Locations and Specifications (Exhibit C) Exhibit 27: Report from City Engineer Exhibit 28: Report from City Arborist 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Mr. Hoefler has provided the following narrative related to the request for the Conditional Use Permits and Variances: "Our proposed approval we are seeking is for the construction of a 96 room memory care facility and 26 additional assisted living units. This proposal is for a three story addition located just west of the existing facility. in addition,. we are also seeking approval for both the remodeling (internal) and for the exterior facelift on the entire existing building. This will consist of new siding, windows and roofing. This movement will allow for an architectural tie-in to the proposed addition. The existing and proposed units are as follows: Existing Assisted Living Minus one existing unit due to the remodel New Memory Care Units New Assisted Living Units Total ISSUES ANALYSIS 84 dwelling units E[ 26 125 dwelling units Adjacent Uses. Uses adjacent to the subject site are listed below: North of Site: Present Zoning — R-3, Residential/Business District Present Use — Oak Park Heights Apartments South of Site: Present Zoning — O, Open Space Present Use — Highway 36 West of Site: Present Zoning — B-2, General Business District Present Use — Walgreens East of Site: Present Zoning — City of Stillwater Present Use — Washington County Courthouse and parking lots Comprehensive Plan. The 2008 Comprehensive Plan designates this area as high density residential. The existing and proposed use is consistent with this land use classification. 3 Zoning. This property has been designated as R -B Residential/Business Transitional in which nursing homes and similar group housing is a listed conditional use. A Conditional Use Permit for a building setback is also required. Variances for driveway setbacks and building height are also required to allow for the construction of a 16 room memory care facility and 26 additional assisted living units. A review of the criteria for nursing homes and group housing as found in Section 401.28.E of the Zoning Ordinance is found later in this report. Subdivision. No subdivision or lot combinations are required. Project Density/Open Space. Section 401.15.C.3 of the Zoning Ordinance establishes the density thresholds for residential properties. Memory care and assisted living housing requires 1,000 square feet of land area per unit excluding right-of-way and wetlands. The multiple family requirements are 2,500 square feet per unit. The total property currently under control of the owner is 144,574 square feet. With a total of 125 units proposed, the resulting density is 1,156 square feet per unit. As long as the project stays as a memory care and assisted living facility it would meet density requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. The approvals will need to include a provision to assure that the project remains as senior housing and is not converted to non restricted rental housing. Proposed Street Access. The project currently accesses from Oxboro Avenue North which is a Washington County roadway. One access point is currently provided for the property. A second access at the south end of the property will be added with a driveway and turnaround that will provide direct access to the building addition. An access permit will be required from Washington County. Discussions with the County have indicated there will no issue with obtaining the access. The new driveway and turnaround area have been reviewed by the Bayport Fire Department. The driveway will be 27 feet in width and the radius of the turnaround is 49 feet 6 inches. This will satisfy the Department requirements for emergency vehicle access. The circle in the middle of the turnaround will have surmountable curb and a paved surface. The applicants have asked if the center circle could be landscaped. Sidewalks. The proposed plan provides adequate access from the parking lots via sidewalks to the building entrance. There is a proposed walking path and patio that is internal to the site that will provide outdoor areas for residents. Setbacks. The R -B District specifies setback requirements as follows: 30 feet front yard, 30 feet rear yard, and 20 feet side yard. Additionally, driveways and turnaround areas must be set back 10 feet from the property line. The conditions for approval of nursing homes and similar group house state that building side yards are to be double the minimum requirements for the district. 4 The plans indicate that the existing and proposed building will have a front yard setback of 84 feet, a rear yard setback of 46 feet and side yard setbacks of 56 feet on the south and 25 feet on the north. The building setbacks are all compliant with- the Zoning Ordinance except for the northerly side yard setback that should be 40 feet. A Conditional Use Permit for this building setback is required. Staff does not see an issue with this request. The new southerly access road to the rear of the building will be at least 10 feet except for a portion of the turnaround is five feet from the property line. A Variance from the required 10 -foot setback is required. The radius of the turnaround is required by the Bayport Fire Department for access of equipment. For this reason, City Staff does not have an issue with recommending the Variance in that the practical difficulty in achieving the setback is necessitated for emergency vehicle access. Tree P rose rvati on/Landscapi ng. The applicant has provided a general landscaping plan and plans for tree removal. The plan shall be subject to the final approval of the City Arborist. Grading and Drainage. Detailed grading and drainage plans have been provided as part of the development submittals. As indicated in this report, the Applicant has proposed placing the southerly driveway and storm water in a City drainage easement. The City will reserve the right to require the Applicant, at their expense, to remove any and all of the improvements from the easement area, if ordered by the City Council. The City Engineer and the Middle St. Croix Watershed Management Organization shall review and approve all of the grading and drainage plans. Utilities. A detailed utility plan has been submitted. The final utility plan is subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. Lighting. A lighting plan has been provided that includes details for lighting the new driveway, locations of fixtures on the building and a photometric plan. The photometric plan is compliant and all of the proposed fixtures are full cut off utilizing LED fixtures. The heights of the freestanding light fixtures are also compliant with the 25 -foot height limit. Signage. The plans indicate a monument sign at the new south driveway. The sign is compliant in height and size. No details are provided as so how the sign will be lit. The sign will need to comply with the sign lighting standards of the Zoning Ordinance when the sign permit is issued. The monument sign will be required to be five feet from the property line. There are no wall signs proposed for the structure. Wall signs would require a sign permit and would need to comply with the standards of the Zoning Ordinance. Parking. The Zoning Ordinance requires the following for elderly or assisted living housing: 5 M. Elderly (Senior Citizen) Housing. Reservation of area equal to one (1) parking space per unit. Initial development is, however, required for only one- half (112) space per unit and said number of spaces can continue until such time as the City considers a need for additional parking spaces has been demonstrated. The following required for nursing home or memory care: ee. Sanitariums, Convalescent Home, Rest Home, Nursing Home or Day Nurseries. Four (4) spaces plus one (1) for each three (3) beds for which accommodations are offered and one space designated for emergency vehicles. The plans indicate that there are 86 existing parking stalls, 65 that are underground and 21 that are exterior. Five additional parking spaces are to be added in the turnaround 11 more at the front of the building making the overall total at 102 spaces. The parking standards of the Zoning Ordinance require one formula for elderly or assisted living and another for nursing or assisted living. The parking calculations are as follows: 109 Assisted Living Units / Requires one space per unit or % space per unit if agreed to by the City = 55 spaces required. 16 Memory Care Units / Requires four spaces plus one space for each three beds = 9 spaces required. Total Parking Required - 64 spaces Snow Storage. The plans should be updated to indicate areas for snow storage. The City Engineer should comment on the adequacy of these areas. Mechanical Equipment. The applicant's architect has indicated that the mechanical equipment is located within the buildings. Any mechanical equipment that is ground mounted or visible from adjacent streets shall be screened as required by the Zoning Ordinance. Trash/Recycling. All of the trash storage and recycling will be internal to the buildings. Unit Types. The memory care and assisted living facility will have the following unit types: Existing: 1. A — 1 bedroom = 637 (square feet) 2. B — 1 bedroom = 770 3. C — 2 bedroom = 866 4. D — 1 bedroom + Den 702 5. E — 2 bedroom = 889 6. F — 2 bedroom = 877 7. HC — 1 bedroom = 637 2 Proposed: (All are Assisted Living unless noted otherwise) 1. New Studio = 411 (square feet) 2. Unit A —1 bedroom = 696 3. Unit B —1 bedroom = 808 4. Unit C —1 bedroom = 758 (2 Memory Care) 5. Unit D — Studio = 544 6. Unit D — Custom = 720 7. Unit E — Studio = 340 (Memory Care) 8. Unit F — Studio = 280 (Memory Care) 9. Unit G — Studio = 401 (Memory Care) The Zoning Ordinance indicates that Elderly Housing must have a minimum floor area of 440 square feet for efficiency units and 520 square feet for one bedroom units. The building as proposed will be compliant with these requirements. Architectural Appearance. The application materials include detail elevations and color elevations. The existing building exterior will be updated to match the new construction. The building will feature a stone veneer base with shake siding. The gable roof ends will feature a vertical siding. The plans indicate the material types and specify colors. The project architect will provide a building materials board for review at the Planning Commission meeting. The residential units are not required to be reviewed under Design Guideline requirements. Building Height. The building height of the new structure will be 42 feet to the mid- point of the gabled roof. The R -B District specifies a maximum building height of 35 feet. A Variance is required to vary from the maximum building height. Variance criteria are provided in Section 401.04 of the Oak Park Heights Zoning Ordinance. The Planning Commission and the City Council should review the following criteria and conditions to determine if the height variance is justified. Review Criteria. The Planning Commission and City Council should make a finding of fact that the proposed action will not: a. Impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property. b. Unreasonably increase the congestion in the public street. c. Have the effect of allowing any district uses prohibited therein, permit a lesser degree of flood protection than the flood protection elevation for the particular area or permit standards which are lower than those required by State law. d. Increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety. e. Unreasonably diminish or impair established property values within the neighborhood, or in any way be contrary to the intent of this Ordinance. f. Violate the intent and purpose of the Comprehensive Plan. g. Violate any of the terms or conditions of Item 5, below. h. Conditions for Approval. A variance from the terms of this Ordinance shall not be granted unless it can be demonstrated that: a. Undue hardship will result if the variance is denied due to the existence of special conditions and circumstances which are peculiar to the land, structure, or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures or buildings in the same district. 7 1) Special cases may include exceptional topographic or water conditions or, in the case of an existing lot or parcel of record, narrowness, shallowness, insufficient area or shape of the property. 2) Undue hardship caused by the special conditions and circumstances may not be solely economic in nature, if a reasonable use of the property exists under the terms of this Title. 3) Special conditions and circumstances causing undue hardship shall not be a result of lot size or building location when the lot qualifies as a buildable parcel. b. Literal interpretation of the provisions of this Ordinance would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of this ordinance or deny the applicant the ability to put the property in question to a reasonable use. c. The special conditions and circumstances causing the undue hardship do not result from the actions of the applicant. d. Granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this Ordinance to other lands, structure or buildings in the same district under the same conditions. e. The request is not a result of non -conforming lands, structures or buildings in the same district. f. The request is not a use variance. g. The variance requested is the minimum variance necessary to accomplish the intended purpose of the applicant. The request does not create an inconvenience to neighboring properties and uses. City Staff does not see any negative impact created by the request for this Variance. The existing .building was constructed over the 35 -foot maximum of the R -B District. The structure is not adjacent or visible to low density residential properties and exists in an area that is primarily commercial, high density residential or government uses. The other senior facilities in the community such as Boutwells and Oakgreen Village have been granted building height variances to accommodate structures that are typical of this type of residential facility. R -B, Residential/Business District Standards Section 401.28.E.3 of the Zoning Ordinance provides the CUP standards for allowing this residential use in the R -B District. The standards are as follows: 3. Nursing homes and similar group housing; a. Side yards are double the minimum requirements established for this district and are screened in compliance with Section 401.15.E. of this Ordinance. Comment: The building setbacks are compliant with this requirement except for the north side -yard setback. The turnaround area requires a setback variance. b. Only the rear yard shall be used for play or recreational areas. Said area shall be fenced and controlled and screened in compliance with Section 401.15.E. of this Ordinance. Comment: There is a center courtyard area is mostly surrounded by buildings and features a patio and walking path. C. All signing and informational or visual communication devices shall be in compliance with Section 409.03. G. of this Ordinance. 0 Comment: The signage will be compliant. d. The site shall be served by an arterial or collector street of sufficient capacity to accommodate traffic which will be generated. Comment: Oxboro Avenue North will accommodate the anticipated traffic. e. All State laws and statutes governing such use are strictly adhered to and all required operating permits are secured. Comment: All State licensing and permits shall be required for opening. f. Adequate off-street parking is provided in compliance with Section 401.15.F of this Ordinance. Comment: The parking standards are met. g. One (1) off-street loading space in compliance with Section 401.15.F. of this Ordinance is provided. Comment: There is adequate space on site for off street loading and an emergency vehicle space is provided in the turnaround. h. The provisions of Section 401.03.A.8 of this Ordinance are considered and satisfactorily met. Comment: The Planning Commission and City Council should review Section 401.03.A.7 related to Conditional Use Permit criteria and determine if there are any issues with issuing the permit. City Staff has reviewed the criteria and has determined the request is complaint. Development Agreement. The applicant will be required to enter into a development agreement with the City if required by the City Attorney. The development agreement shall be subject to review and approval of the City Attorney and City Council. Conditions have been added related to payment in lieu of taxes and emergency services costs via the Bayport Fire Department. These are standard conditions that have also been placed on Boutwell's Landing and Oakgreen Commons senior housing facilities. CONCLUSION I RECOMMENDATION Subject to the preceding review, City staff recommends approval of the following listed requests subject to the conditions that follow. The conditions below are the same conditions approved by the City Council in April 2015. Conditional Use Permit — Memory Care'and Assisted Living 0 • Conditional Use Permit — Building Setback 0 Variances — Roadway Setback and Building Height 1. The Oak Ridge Memory and Assisted Living shall remain as senior rental and shall not be converted to non -restricted rental housing. 2. The Applicant shall obtain and access permit from Washington County for the new driveway. 3. All tree removal and landscape plans shall be subject to review and approval of the City Arborist. 4. The grading and drainage plans shall be subject to City Engineer and the Middle St. Croix Watershed Management Organization for review and approval. 5. All utility plans shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 6. All lighting shall be full cut off and be compliant with the lighting standards of the Zoning Ordinance. 7. The signage shall be compliant with the Zoning Ordinance and shall be set back at least five feet from the property line. 8. The Fire Marshal and Police Chief should review the plans and determine the accessibility of emergency vehicles throughout the development. 9. A snow storage plan shall be provided and shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 10. Any mechanical equipment that is ground mounted or visible from adjacent streets shall be screened as required by the Zoning Ordinance. 11. The Planning Commission should comment on the final building appearance, colors and materials. 12. To the extent that Developer's project contains tax exempt facilities, lands or buildings, Developer will execute an agreement with the City to make a payment in lieu of taxes to the City for the life of the project. A payment in lieu of taxes agreement shall be in a form prepared and approved by the City Attorney. 10 13. The Applicant knowingly is installing its infrastructure upon lands that are encumbered by a City drainage easement, located at the southeast corner of the property. At this time the City and Applicant concur that the modifications as proposed will not materially disrupt the City ability to use such easement and water that drains and will continue to drain to such easement area from areas not under the control of the Applicant. Should the Applicants activities or actions materially impair the City's ability to utilize its drainage easement, the Applicant shall make any corrections as directed by the City at its sole expense. 14. The City reserves the right to require the Applicant, at their expense, to remove any and all of the improvements located within the existing drainage easement if ordered by the City Council. Should the Applicant fail to make such changes as directed by the City, the City may make all necessary changes as required and assess all such costs back to the applicant. The City shall not be responsible for any costs related to the Applicant's improvements in the City's drainage area. 15. The Applicant shall provide a revised description for the drainage easement at the southeast comer of the property that removes the existing building from said easement. The revised easement shall be subject to review and approval of the City Attorney and City Engineer. 16. The terms and conditions listed above for the drainage easement shall be set forth in a Permissive Use Agreement between the City and the Applicant as drafted by the City Attorney to be executed prior to the issuance of any building permits. 17. The applicant shall be required to enter into a development agreement if required by the City Attorney. The development agreement shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Attorney and City Council. 11 7--l' J L A R 1-1 T E C T S August 9, 2016 Julie Hultman, CBO City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Blvd. Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 RE: Oak Ridge Place Memory Care Addition and facelift 01 Our proposed and approvals we are seeking is for the construction of a 16 room memory care facility and 26 additional assistant living units. This proposal is for a 3 story addition located just west of the existing facility. In addition we are also seeking approval for both the remodeling (internal) and for the exterior facelift on the entire existing building. This will consist of new siding, windows and roofing. This movement will allow for an architectural tie-in to the proposed addition. Sincerely, Michael G. Hoefler, NCARB HAF Architects, LLC 233 MAIN STREET SOUTH, STILLWATER, MN 55082 PH: 631-351-1760 FAX. 651-430-0180 WW W.HAFARCHITECTS.COM LL LL �. HIM N ui _ o ui p� J_• a � g f6LggLeed�eLL E a E y@�y@ pE�eE ¢gE6 LL S Uri, � x � E a E y@�y@ pE�eE ¢gE6 YSg 0 7W� %ZL WE 4t 4 WW1 10048 HM / s>Il3►RW / 92MId 3m VLRK BMD = mouvmam mus N=ct(rf zm AHWM-.23rm so= ]WO]ff tJ tt! f.D Q Q LU LU U W w D mo -0I 0 Mr! "O"E e6 aam M 1--m i81 -K if m A9'M 006 ewrwv�M +mOMlwM 7xM\Y unfeT3�nr, a/ �7 su'%i ri� Fmoma"aavxa�� aussa I m s8 �= 7 g[ Q ■ @ G i d Ti }� ��521D1��V115/SUNWId aPam-Zona aom xvo b- Now $ ir 11 C. + ai--- -- CL71 ;• - 's�. t----- �-------- l4 R C o f CD co 1a {. Zn5ED + 1= wo-ow" 3m 1li'SS M h+..e 4il >•5 tr m'w x � / SMNNVM u� `f�lH )(I•a saweP BOt+r:Vo MI VOGfAiaY�Il1v1''VGY tlYl9 �n.1�1'®s •, • + S�:N�16�IOAII .µy Hoag neo 1'545 ey 1 11 � zSHD,�31yf15SH33NOM M —41 3 d J. R A B s g yKti�O* on ' C � matt..■ a. is V.. 10 o.$a�� "Zz mw a "M-ow"mm mkc rw mO4a,�or�nam �wLna�. MU P 7-11 1111 L5 Hf M %V Y OW .7TH NMUo M OIL SUMNIONS/,aSw� ..„ Knd 7auKoo umpt az :v mom 7vxu U1 1I.i H I r waxowaav zuo moym-gid smm xvo� ri�h F tltl Q dA g N Y e W # 15 p s g goo till ' 1 _ c. • F �• 1, I F � y / f I JJ °. 121 47 nacsm sl — w kns-0®(IS61 m M®�{rseN am am mu SbDA3'Nfl6 SMIdNO B / SM NRM WIN Ma'm� 7nMr Y MN°!mC J7I 'Si1 Allo 3LL MmLaa 'IO2L AOD ai ri �uj Im a Bawer w wb, .6NlismazS v NOISOEM �21M g� ..; NDLLIaOV �1L21011S0 I[JFI0tl7d QJDIu 31tl0 a � . Mill lit li lilt'HE } f� ,! 1 i {• �• =1 J 1 � ! t � � 1, 9, r }, i'i; J'9 �� i �. {t# !i i,} E,} ,i li � 1 , � J � � � ��•J}�l �$ � I � !t it � eY �� 1 � �'9•�J 1 1 + 1� "c 9`i ���;'�j�� � �� ��; �l l���� � li. � � #�� r,il•' 1 � �i.'�� i �r F y {� E�l�i � i'i'i i ��j + ��� � �i II=' i' J i E � i+ 17 yi [ Ii�f i !• 1� ��' �� ��•t� i•E �!° r IjF { �N1 �' � i � l�l. #i �il� � I� lilt a ai i=i 1� a�l r !_I •� `!i {�li E'i `1= �e�='� 1 r� i �i�• ��= i E} J � 1 � �� ���. � i� �°i��i7l�li �� i#il{ 1!, 1 1 E JI JI it it r a• ,: = J as { r i'i j + FI ! 1 1 • r!1 , ! 1 1 1 1l lE';li 6 [ JJ !. { ilii , J• ', 1 J it i }IFa , + 1101 is�i IfE�, ! �i.�¢=$ ,i E #'� ;� s J,�`, #� EEit � i i i � � ��• i:� ' } � � � �1 I; � 1 s � i i {! � � i, J i E ii � �iI i i;° 1= " �' � �, Eli �� �ii��{#i �{#f , � ; t, $ � • #� • i 9gi i?iil#�f 1�� ��� 1� �'��� � �:1 � a� ��� �1 � � � �� ��� 1 Iri•1.f :•JI, E �i , I J j, sY , , j e a 1 j# � 1• it3 1 '11��# { � Y f f�i { =t $ �� i 6 ��1. J• �" e• �� 9 , t l a i.. {, � ,� ! +i �� iip jI IF 'I � ;! E t t r r ' °: !1'4 i• ' gait i�l' € illi 1111111(J!Jll,#1 ,y l t:Y¢iiilij !Io E!1 i r� �' ,��i ��" �� JE!1Y, %@, il�ll ii{I,•' , i t± ��al �� i171= � � # � +•� As LLL6We ri x= a � . Mill lit li lilt'HE } f� ,! 1 i {• �• =1 J 1 � ! t � � 1, 9, r }, i'i; J'9 �� i �. {t# !i i,} E,} ,i li � 1 , � J � � � ��•J}�l �$ � I � !t it � eY �� 1 � �'9•�J 1 1 + 1� "c 9`i ���;'�j�� � �� ��; �l l���� � li. � � #�� r,il•' 1 � �i.'�� i �r F y {� E�l�i � i'i'i i ��j + ��� � �i II=' i' J i E � i+ 17 yi [ Ii�f i !• 1� ��' �� ��•t� i•E �!° r IjF { �N1 �' � i � l�l. #i �il� � I� lilt a ai i=i 1� a�l r !_I •� `!i {�li E'i `1= �e�='� 1 r� i �i�• ��= i E} J � 1 � �� ���. � i� �°i��i7l�li �� i#il{ 1!, 1 1 E JI JI it it r a• ,: = J as { r i'i j + FI ! 1 1 • r!1 , ! 1 1 1 1l lE';li 6 [ JJ !. { ilii , J• ', 1 J it i }IFa , + 1101 is�i IfE�, ! �i.�¢=$ ,i E #'� ;� s J,�`, #� EEit � i i i � � ��• i:� ' } � � � �1 I; � 1 s � i i {! � � i, J i E ii � �iI i i;° 1= " �' � �, Eli �� �ii��{#i �{#f , � ; t, $ � • #� • i 9gi i?iil#�f 1�� ��� 1� �'��� � �:1 � a� ��� �1 � � � �� ��� 1 Iri•1.f :•JI, E �i , I J j, sY , , j e a 1 j# � 1• it3 1 '11��# { � Y f f�i { =t $ �� i 6 ��1. J• �" e• �� 9 , t l a i.. {, � ,� ! +i �� iip jI IF 'I � ;! E t t r r ' °: !1'4 i• ' gait i�l' € illi 1111111(J!Jll,#1 ,y l t:Y¢iiilij !Io E!1 i r� �' ,��i ��" �� JE!1Y, %@, il�ll ii{I,•' , i t± ��al �� i171= � � # � +•� "m -a WS »de-dfa$eEEJ .3am dales xn '00a1v1arn 71x[iiv W3B a11xR rasa g aces 111151x..a cel u Ti Fv w aM2 O77 '6,L1�6LS' AIG 31L S SFL�71pN3 / SN3NNY1d wo A M 11V"Id Sj)V111VZIa AjHIay'de 7VNLd S o n s g e f e e S s wI q glelio�l ulaax xwa xra G@ 0 i p E •��! f f!H •a sewer �, �„ Noma" XVa MOtet-30nd ZOM JIva r All low I I II I I � � •�� ayy ii 8 E9■ fyl3 py '6 is ar f//� �/!,I{F,rr r - '. 1 1 I ... p ,� -- u•� --�� HL670N'3fIpCaN '::-:::. , ! r' arE FEE I r S I ti 5 _ I rt y - ri iti E€ r i _ _ EF - l eriE^ i ; -eri n° .'ll � ' c •� } '1 1: LL I DM a 1 I -� ♦__ . � (F T�--r'-_^'�•�-^ArEEEi_-"_C�i-----'�� ,n 1 nrual - ,e "TP-0m4w a *M-oshsa) mom [SITE M7-4 TQI u6.0%W xm2 Si10.137i1i5 / Si133NMN3 / StONWW 'cul IIIH '� sawed i ,��i I I /]A h ifLL y A i1 r01EE MN 'mpEildlll 311e0nr J! lSIIYA LNR ��Q � �,Nm.Ll m b 6 p 'J Ey r � B 3 m WNf3 a�oi'ca xoaav axvO xgax�t-Urrta aWX xro ¢ $i i� I ` # p�a�a�� � � a ■�� !i RM I II y I If I f I I I {y3F�l� f j f r I ..�..' All, �OI i5 I rri rtsi t ... • n _ _ - __ - -- —_ - I (o W co) HLN6N 3fYCihY�0�1(0 I ' ip=y I! rJflLL ell II - i i4 � REI !E. a i I aN a p acE 'I o_... -.. .___._�.a ■ 111 ■■ I i� 1! R ..f....� I ...................... .i i �.' ;::: {Iv; - lall 'yR .il 1 I I Al r I I I ii � W4 I xEii I f. ■� ..1 6g r!1 1 � � 111- � r .Af a _________q# ___________ ei------------ I o¢ N Y I ii _,•�:\\ .��'— _�7 � ��,'� ����_ iiii-__tiC�'�.+."_tiU •acQS�Sa"�4� ail a ...�� _ � � Mm-OMCCW 3Y! M08-09iLSBV aONI blot uu '�OA3WYII ]N6hY Wig Lulu [uu[ _ _ I m 70-M ffiF u6 7k ql c 7 Ou4 LEMu d / srmN IOn � Knd MM I I f G i Sawa I r NNO toad ZOIU1i.H xor�aav zwo a= LA- MOO- -OCEZN-Sxd xvo cr- 4 I I I f G LA- F- I I .I i Mi7-'ilY 7qy ��yy�{�S�9-C��i��e�lyylYarryry9 ��byyTi�yy����YI L���y��i�0i�4 �YKiWIYI / �Y:•IM+IY, RAMI to I[—'��� `piy •a sower p� lel 'OeOYiIMn ie W1 era YN tAfE �1 gLN MUSUM svom�e a wva ■ro No moat/ aMra ASa M11-93V7d ROM 7N4 ��� ���a � �� 6� e' �4 d � a L^,a gym,; 113 !kR iQ llil; il�' e' WLV LL UL ©\\" I rVA Ice,\_� � \: d � } ` � .: )/ k \; � a.:.:] Q CMI _ .o� _:. _ ..: cz C4 -Aiiih -17 L HI � I k h n HN d Ph F y - goo kn HI � I k h n HN d Ph F y LL LJL H rd 4 n Vl � � �:;; y LL / § �]� mm||■il ■ ^ LL < 00 UP r- LOL LL =01 00 -i LL MEMIll OilCD ... IE "# ij+� � ��� �F��� �� a i ILI UL. LL C14 Eel C14 11U. < gee LL Q _:_ Ice,V - tn a �-:G al ___ 367ncr .�' oldOSXO a 2 AMH ]Ub AHOIN w 3001H Nd � -m § | § z ( §} 0 §7;d w�&; 22,2 |2 2 §�� §( � &§ zr ■@o �§2 §! k PH | \!§§ }]k \k oldOSXO a 2 AMH ]Ub AHOIN w 3001H Nd DESCRIPTION The Galleon" LED luminaire delivers exceptional performance in a highly scalable, low -profile design. Patented, high-efficiencyAccul-ED Optics' system provides uniform and energy conscious illumination to walkways, parking lots, roadways, building areas and security lighting applications. IP66 rated. SPECIFICATION FEATURES Construction Extruded aluminum driver enclosure thermally isolated from Light Squares for optimal thermal performance. Heavy wail, die- cast aluminum end ceps enclose housing and die-cast aluminum heat sinks. A unique, patent pending interlocking housing and heat sink provides scalability with superior structural rigidity. 3G vibration tested. Optional too] - less hardware available for ease of entry into electrical chamber. Housing is IP66 rated. Optica Choice of 16 patented, high - efficiency Accul-ED Optics. The optics are precisely designed to shape the distribution maximizing efficiency and application spacing. Aceul-ED Optics create consistent distributions with the scalability to meet customized application requirements. Offered standard in 4000K (+/- 275K) CCT and minimum 70 CRI. Optional 6000K CCT and 3000K CCT. For the ultimate level of spill light control, an optional house side shield accessory can DIMENSIONS POLE MOUNT be field or factory installed. The house side shield is designed to seamlessly integrate with the SL2, SI -3, SI -4 or AFL optics. Electrical LED drivers are mounted to removable tray assembly for ease of maintenance. 120-277V 50/60Hz, 347V 60Hz or 480V 60Hz operation. Standard with D -10V dimming. Shipped standard with Cooper Lighting proprietary circuit module designed to withstand 10kV of transient line surge. The Galleon LED luminaire is suitable for operation in -400C to 401C ambient environments. For applications with ambient temperatures exceeding 40eC, specify the HA (High Ambient) option. Light Squares are IP66 rated. Greater than 90% lumen maintenance expected at 60,000 hours. Available in standard 1A drive current and optional 530MA and 700mA drive currents. Mounting Extruded aluminum arm includes internal bolt guides allowing for #25 MCGRAW-ED[SON®'energy easy positioning of fixture during assembly. Designed for pole or wall mounting. When mounting two or more luminaires at 90e or 120° apart, the EA extended arm may be required. Refer to the arm mounting requirement table on page 3. Round pole top adapter Included. For wall mounting, specify wall mount bracket option. 3G vibration rated. Finish Housing finished in super durable TG1C polyester powder coat paint, 2.5 mil nomineI thickness for superior protection against fade and wear. Heat sink is powder coated black. Standard colors include black, bronze, grey, white, dark platinum end graphite metallic. RAL and custom color matches available. Consult the McGraw -Edison Architectural Colors brochure for the complete selection. Warranty Five-year warranty. 3-15116LU " [100mm1 I - •A' i 21-/4" 1553mm1 i "B' J WALL MOUNT 1157m57mm] DIMENSION DATA Warnberof Light Squares .A, Width "B" Standard Arm Length 'Be Optional Amt Langth' Weight Walt Arm f bs.) EPA with Atm 2 {Sq- Ft.) 1-4 15-1/2" 094mm) 7' (178mm) 10' (254mm) 33 (16.0 k9s.) 0.96 5-6 21-5/8" (549mm) 7' (178mm) 1(" 1254mm) 44 (20.0 kga] 1.00 7.8 27-518' (702mm) 7' (178mm) 13" 030mm) 54 (24.5 ".) 1.07 9.10 33,V4" (857mm] 1 7' (178mm) I 113' (408mm) 1 63 (28.6 kgs.l 1.12 NOTES. t Extended arm option may be required when mounting two Of more fixtures per cola at 90" or 1200. Rater to a+m mounting requirement tilde 2 EPA cekulated what optional amt 1engM. Cooper Lighting by F.T•N "www. d es i gnlig hts.org GLEON GALLEON LED 1-10 Light Squares Solid State LED r.re�rt� AREWSITE LUMINAIRE CERTIFICATION DATA UIJcUL Wet Location Listed ISO 9001 LM79) LM80 Compliant 313 Vibration Rated iPBB Rated Designi-ights ConsordurnR Qualified• ENERGY DATA Electronic LED Driver AS Power Factor <20% Total Harmonic Distortion 12OV-277V 911UH1 347V & 46W 60Hz 40'C Min. Temperature 40'C Max. Temperature 50'C Max. Temperature (HA Option) sy i til 11 ADH140426 `T 2014-08-271604:21 OPTIC ORIENTATION Street Side House Side Standard OPTICAL DISTRIBUTIONS I Street Side House Side Optics Rotated Left @ 9W [1.901 side House Side Optics Rotated Right @ 90e IR901 GLEON GALLEON LED DRILLING PATTERN TYPE "N" 314" [18mm] Diameter 62- Hole mm) 778" [22mm] 14" ml2) 9116" 114mml Diameter Holes AsymmetricArea Dlstribtdiorrs T2 SL2 T3 SL3 T41FT T4W SLA (Type II) (Type II with Spill Control) (Type 111) (Type III with Spill Control) IType IV ForwardThrow) (Type IV Wide) (Type IV with Spill Control) e Asymmetric: Roadway Distributions Symmertric Disbif u Orta RW T2R T3R SNQ 516Q 5WQ (Rectangular WideType 1) {Type 11 Roadway) (Type III Roadway) (Type V Square Narrow) (TypeV Square Medium) (Type V SquareWide) <z:� C=; C _- X-- -) - F-� -E L -J Specialised Distribetiane AFL SLL SLR (Automotive Frontline) (90' Spill Light Eliminator Left) (90" Spill Light Eliminator Right) ARM MOUNTING REQUIREMENTS Configuration 90' Apart 120` Apart GLEON-AE-01 7" Ami 7" Arm (Standard) (Standard) GLPON-AE-02 7" Arm 7' Arm (Standard) (Standard) GLEON-AE-03 7' Arm 7" Arm Otendard) (Standard) GLEON-AE-04 7' Arm 7" Arm (Standard) (StandarM GLEON-AE-05 10" Extended Arm 7" Arm (Required) (Standard) GLEON-AE-05 10" Extended Ann 7" Ann [Required) (Standard) GLEON-AE-07 13" Extended Arm 13" Extended Ann (Required) (Required) GLEON-AE-08 13' Extended Arm 13' Extended Arm (Required) (Required) GLEON-AE-09 16" Extended Arm 16' Extended Ann (Required) (Required) [GLEON-AE-10 IS- Extended Arm 18" Extended Ann (Required) (Required) 2 0 18D° Triple' 4@90" Triples 2@120° Eetae Eater's Cooper L%bdng Redness tOW Eatan Soulmrd 1121 Highway 74 South Cooper Lighting Cleveland. OH 44122 PeachtreeCaty. GA 369 SSpetaiearlons and ADH140426 United State a P; 770466-0800 dimensions subject w by 1F.T•N Eaton,cum www.canper6ghting,corn change without notice. 2014 -DS -2715:04:21 GLEON GALLEON LEO NOMINAL POWER AND LUMENS (1A Number a1 Light Squares 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Drive Current 1A 1A 1A 1A 1A 1A 1A 1A 1A 1A Nominal Power (Watts) 56 107 157 213 264 315 370 421 475 528 Input Current 0120V (A) 0.47 0.90 1.31 1.79 2.21 2.64 3.09 3.51 3.96 4.41 Input Current 0 209V W 0.28 0.51 0.74 1.02 1.25 1.48 1.76 1.99 2.22 2,50 Input Currant 0 240V W 0.25 OAS 0.65 0.90 1.10 1.30 1.55 1.75 1.95 2,20 Input Current 0 277V (A) 0.23 0.41 0.59 0.82 1.00 1.18 1.41 1.59 1.77 2.00 OpOcs Lumens 5,272 10,303 15,373 20,313 25,168 30,118 35,618 40,357 45,018 49,642 7'2 BUG Rating 61-110-G1 82 -UO -G2 82 -UO -G2 H3 -UO -G3 B3 -110-G4 83 -UO -04 63 -U0 -G4 88 -U0 -G5 84 -UO -G5 B4 -U0 -GS Lumens 5,597 10,938 18,321 21,565 26,719 31,974 37,813 42,844 47,792 52,914 T2R BUG Rating 61-U0-01 B2 -U0 -G2 B2 -UO -G2 B3 -U0 -G3 B3 -UO -G3 63 -UO -G4 B3 -U0-04 B3•1,1044 B4 -U0 -G4 B4 -U0 -G5 Lumens 5,374 10,501 15.669 20.704 25,652 30,697 36,303 41,134 45,884 50,802 T3 BUG Rating B1 -U"2 B2 -U0 -G2 B2 -U0 -G3 B3 -UO -G3 93 -UO -G4 ES -UO -G4 83-1.10�5 &9 -U0 -G5 B4 -U0 -G5 B4 -UO -G5 Lumens 5,493 10,735 16.017 21,184 28,222 31,379 37,110 42,048 48,904 51,930 T3R BUG Rating 91-U042 61 -UO -G2 B2 -UO -G3 82 -UO -G4 93-U0-04 H3 -UO -G4 83 -UO -G5 63 -UO -GS B3 -UO -05 B3 -UO -G5 Lumens 5,405 10.562 15,760 20,824 25,801 30.675 36,514 41,372 46,150 51,096 74F7 BUG Rating B1 -U0 -G2 B2 -UD -G2 B2 -UO -G3 B3 -UO -G4 H3 -UO -G4 B3 -U0 -G5 B3-U0.G5 B3 -U0 -G5 B3 -U0 -G5 63 -UO -G5 Lumens 5,335 10,426 15,556 20,555 25,466 317,478 36,042 40,836 45,554 50,436 T4W BUG Rating B1 -U0 -G2 B2 -UO -G2 62 -UO -03 B3 -U0 -G4 B3 -UO -G4 133-110.05 133-UO•G5 84d1045 B4 -U0 -G5 114-1,10435 Lumens 5,263 10,285 15,347 20,278 25,124 30,066 35,556 40,288 44,940 49,756 SL2 BUG Rating 81 -U0 -G2 82 -UO -G2 82 -UO -G3 63 -UO -G3 63 -U0 -G4 B3 -UO -G4 B3 -UO -G5 83 -UQ -G5 B4 -UD -G5 84 -UO -G5 Lumens 5,373 10,500 15.667 20,701 25,649 30,693 36.298 41,128 45,878 50,794 SO BUG Rating B1 -UO -G2 B2 -UO -G3 82 -UO -G3 83-U"4 133 -UO -G4 B3 -U0 -G4 B3 -U0 -G5 83 -UO -G5 B3 -U0 -G5 H3 -UO -G5 Lumens 5.105 9,976 14,886 19,689 24,370 29,163 84,488 39,078 43,591 48,262 SLA BUG Rating B1 -UO -G2 B1 -UO -G3 61 -U0 -G3 S2 -U0 -G4 82 -UO -G4 82 -UO -65 B3 -UO -G5 83-U"S B3 -UO -G5 83 -UO -G5 Lumens 5,542 10,830 16,180 21,352 26,455 31,658 37,439 42,421 47,320 52,392 5NO BUG Rating B2 -UO -G1 B3 -U0 -G1 63 -UO -G2 B4 -UO -G2 B4 -UO -G2 B5 -U0 -G2 BS -UO -G3 85 -U0 -G3 65 -UO -G3 B5 -U0 -G4 Lumens 5,644 11.029 18,457 21,745 25,942 32,241 38.128 43,202 48,191 53,356 5MG BUG Rating 63-U0431 B4 -U0 -G2 B4 -UO -G2 BS -UO -G3 B5 -UO -G3 B5 -U0 -G4 B5 -U0 -G4 S5 -U0 -G4 135-1,1044 B5 -UO -G5 Lumens 5,659 11,059 16,501 21,843 27,014 32,327 38,230 43,317 48,320 53.498 5W0 BUG Rating B3 -UO -G1 B4 -U0 -C,2 64 -UO -G2 B5 -U0 -G3 B55, -UO -G4 85 -UO -G4 135 -U0 -G4 B5 -UO -05 B5 -U0 -G5 B5 -U0 -G5 Lumens 4,722 9.227 13,767 18,191 22,539 26,971 31,897 36,141 40,315 44,635 SLLISLR BUG Rating B1 -UD-G2 81 -UO -G3 82 -UO -G3 132 -UO -G3 83 -UO -84 03 -UO -G4 83 -U0 -G5 63 -UO -G5 83 -UO -G5 83 -UO -G5 Lumens 5,492 10,732 16,014 21,159 26,216 31,372 37,101 42,038 48,893 51,918 RW BUG Rating B2 -L10 -G1 B8 -U0 -G1 134-1,10-02 84 -UO -G2 64 -UO -G2 85 -U0 -G3 85 -UO -G9 B5 -UO -03 B5 -UO -G4 B5 -UO -G4 Lumens 5,512 10,771 16,072 21,236 26,311 31,486 37,236 42,191 47,063 52,107 AFL BUG Rating 61 -UO -G1 B1 -UO -G1 B2 -UO -G2 B2 -UG -G2 63 -U0 -G3 63-Utl-G3 63 -U0 -G3 B3 -UO -03 63 -U0 -G3 I 83 -UO -64 • Nominrl date ter 4000K CCT. Eaton Eateh'a Leepm Ughting Sustnen 1000 Eaton Boulewid 1121 HighmW 74 South Cooper Lighting ClevelsndOH44122 Peacveechy,GAW269 Spscficatiomand AD14140426 Unhed States P: 770A864800 dimensions sUbject to 2014-06-27 15:04:21 by IF.,Ta N Eatm-mm w .cooperligwrxg.com change whhout notice. GLEON GALLEON LED NOMINAL POWER ANO LUMENS (700MA) Number of Light Squares 1 2 3 4 5 a 7 8 9 10 Drive Cement 7GOmA 700mA 70DmA 700mA 700rthA 700mA 700mA T00mA 700mA 700MA Nominal Power (Watts) 38 72 105 138 176 210 243 276 314 348 Input Current f 120V (A) 0.32 0.59 0.86 1.14 1.45 1.72 2 2.28 2.58 2.86 Input Cu+ront 0 208V (A) 0.21 0.36 0.51 0.67 0.87 1.02 1.18 1.34 1.53 1AI? Input Current 0 240V (A) 0.19 0.32 0.45 0.59 0.77 0.90 1-04 1.18 1.35 1 1.49 Input Current 0 277V (A} 0.20 0.29 0.40 0.51 0.69 0.80 0.91 1.02 1.20 1.31 Opties Lumens 3,854 7,531 11,237 14,847 18,395 22,013 28,033 29,497 1 32,904 35,430 T2 BUG Rating B1 -U0 -G1 61 -UO -G2 82-1.10-G2 B2 -UO -G2 B3 -UO -G3 B3 -UO -G3 83 -UO -G4 B3 -U0 -G4 B3 -UO -G4 B3 -UO -G4 Lumens 4,091 7,995 11,929 15,762 19,529 23,370 2708 31,316 34,932 36.676 T2R BUG Rating B1 -U0 -G1 B1 -UO -G2 B2 -U0 -G2 82 -UO -G2 B3 -UO -G3 B3 -U0 -G3 B3 -U0 -G3 133 -UO -64 B3 -UO -G4 B3 -UO -64 Lumens 3,928 7,676 11,453 15,133 18,750 22,437 26.534 30,085 33,537 37,132 T3 BUG Rating 61 -UD -G1 131 -UO -G2 B2 -U0 -G2 B2 -UD -G3 B3 -U0 -G3 B3 -UO -G4 B3 -UO -G4 B3 -UO -G4 63 -UO -G4 63 -UO -GS Lumens 4,015 7,846 11,707 15,469. 19,166 22,938 27,124 30,733 34,283 37,957 TSA BUG Rating 61 -U0 -G1 B1 -UO -82 B2 -UO -G2 B2 -UO -GS B2 -U0 -G3 63 -UO -G4 B3 -UO -G4 B3 -U0 -G4 63 -UO -GS B3 -UO -GS Lumens 3,951 7,720 11,519 15,221 18,858 22,567 26,688 30,240 33,732 37,347 T4F-r BUG Racing B1 -UG -G1 01 -UO -G2 B2 -UG -G2 B2 -UO -03 B2 -tell -G4 S3 -UO -G4 B3 -UD -G4 B3.UO-G5 B3 -UO -G5 B3 -U0, -G5 Lumens 3,900 7,620 11,370 15,024 18,815 22,276 26,343 29,849 33296 36,884 T4 W BUG Rating B1 -UO -G1 B1 -U0 -G2 82-1.10-02 S2 -U0 -G3 83-UO.G4 B3 -UO -G4 B3 -U0 -G4 B3 -UO -G5 B3 -UO -G5 B3 -U0 -G5 Lumens 3,547 7,518 11,217 14,821 18,364 21,975 25,988 29,447 32,647 36,368 SL2 BUG Rating 81 -UO -G1 B1 -UO -G2 82 -UO -G3 82 -UO -G3 B3 -UO -G3 B3 -UO -G4 BS -UO -34 83 -UO -04 63 -UG -G4 W -U045 Lumens 31927 7,675 11,451 15,131 18.747 22,434 26,531 30,051 33,533 37,126 SL3 HUG Rating B1 -UO -G1 B1 -UO -02 B2 -UO -G3 B2 -U0 -G3 B2 -UO -G3 B3 -UO -G4 63 -UO -G4 B3 -UO -G4 83 -UO -GS B3 -UO -G5 Wrnens 3,731 7,292 10,8BO 14,376 17,812 21,315 25,208 28,562 31.861 35,275 SI -4 BUG Rating B1 -UO -G2 81-UO-GZ 61 -U0 -G3 61 -UO -G3 82 -UO -G4 B2 -UO -G4 132 -UO -04 B2 -UG -G5 B2-UO.G5 B3-Uo-G5 Lumens 4,051 7,916 11,811 15,606 19,336 23,139 27,385 $1,006 34,587 38,294 5NO BUG Rating B2 -U0 -G1 83 -UO -G1 93 -UO -G1 83 -UO -G2 B4 -UO -G2 B4 -UO -G2 B4 -UO -G2 65 -UO -G2 B5 -U0 -G3 B5 -UO -G3 Lumens 4.125 8,082 12,029 15.894 19,692 23,565 27,869 31,577 35,224 38,999 SMQ BUG Rating B2 -UG -G1 83 -UO -G2 S4 -UO -G2 64 -UO -02 B4 -U(? -G2 85 -UO -G3 B5-LING3 HS -UO -G3 B5 -U0 -G4 S5 -UO -G4 Lumens 4,138 8,083 12,061 15,936 19,745 23,628 27,943 31,661 35,318 39,103 5WO BUG Rating B3 -UO -G1 83 -UO -G2 B4 -UO -G2 84 -UO -G2 B5 -UO -G3 B5 -UO -G3 B5 -UO -G4 B5 -UO -G4 B5 -U0 -G4 B5JU0-G4 Lumens 3,451 6,744 10,063 13,295 16,474 19.714 23,514 28,416 29,487 32,625 SLL/SLA BUG Rating B1 -UO -G7 B1 -UO -02 B1 -UD -G3 B2 -UO -G3 B2 -UO -G3 62 -UO -G4 83 -UO -G4 B3 -UO -G4 B3 -1.10-G5 83-1.10-G5 Lumens 4,014 7,844 11,704 15,465 19,162 22,930 27,118 30,726 34,274 37,948 RW BUG Rating B2 -U0 -G1 B3 -UO -G1 83 -UO -G2 B4 -UO -G2 B4 -UO -G2 B4 -UD -G2 B4-1.10-112 B5 -UO -03 B5 -UO -G3 B5 -UO -G3 Lumens 4,029 7,873 11,747 15,522 19,231 23,014 27,216 30,838 34,398 38,066 AFL BUG Rating 61 -VO -G1 B1 -U0 -G1 92 -UO -G2 B2 -U0 -G2 B2 -U0 -G2 B3 -U0 -G2 B3 -UO -G3 B3 -UO -G3 B3 -U0 -G3 B3 -UO -G3 ' Nominal dela for 40M CCT. Eetam Eawn4 Cuoper Ltghting Businam 7000 Eaton eouleuard 1121 Highway 74 Sabah Doper Lighting Cleeland. OH 44122 PeachhasCity, GA30269 Spadlicoftnaand ADH140426 United States R 770486-0800 dihrensions subject to by E:T•N Eaton,com w Xnoperlighting-cnm change widmut mace. 2014-08-27 15:04:21 GLEON GALLEON LED NOMINAL POWER AND LUMENS j530MAj Number of Light Squares 1 2 3 4 5 8 7 6 9 10 Drive Cement 530mA SWrnA 5311mA 530mA 530mA 530mA 5WrrLA 530mA 530mA 530MA Nominal PuwerlYNatts) 30 54 80 105 ISO 159 164 209 234 259 Input Current 6 120V (AI 0.25 0.45 0.66 0.86 1.07 1.32 1.52 1.72 1.93 2.14 Input Current ! 209V jA) 0.17 0.26 0.39 0.51 i 0.63 0.76 D.9 1.02 1.14 1,26 input Current @ 240V (Al 0.17 j Q25 1 0.35 0.45 0.55 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00 1.10 Input Current ® 2774 {AJ 0.19 0.24 1 0.32 0.40 0.49 0.64 0.72 0.60 0.69 0.98 Optics Lumens 3,079 6,017 8,978 11,862 14,697 17,588 20,800 23,567 26,289 29,106 T2 BUG Rating 81-00.61 B1 -UO -G2 62 -UO -G2 62 -UO -G2 82.00-62 63 -UO -G3 B3-U0-G3B3•VO-G3 63-00.64 B3•UO-G4 Lumens 3.289 6,388 9,531 12,593 15,603 18,672 22,082 25,02D 27,909 30,900 T2R BUG Rating B1 -U0 -G1 B1 -UG -G1 B1 -UO -G2 B2 -UO -G2 B2 -UO -G2 B2 -UO -G2 83 -UO -G3 03 -UO -G3 83 -UG -03 B3 -UO -G4 Lumens 3,136 6,133 9,150 12,091 14,980 17,928 21,200 24,021 26,795 29,667 T3 BUG Rating B1-U0-Gi B1 -U0 -G2 B2-00-62 82-00-62 H2 -U0 -G3 B3-00-63 93 -U0 -G3 93-110.64 83 -UO -G4 B3-00-64 Lumens 3.208 6,289 9,354 12,359 15,313 18,325 21,871 24,555 27,390 30,326 T3R BUG Rating 61-110-61 B1 -U0 -G2 B1 -UO -Q2 B2 -U0 -G2 62-UO433 B2 -UO -G3 B2 -110•G4 B3-00-64 B3 -UO -04 B3 -110-G4 Lumens 3,156 8,168 9,203 12,181 15,067 18,030 21,323 24,150 26,950 29,839 T4 Fr BUG Rating B1 -U0 -G1 81 -UO -02 131 -U0 -G2 B2-00-62 62-00-63 92 -UO -G3 H3 -U0 -G4 B3-00-64 83 -U0 -G4 B3-00-65 Lumens 3,116 6,088 9,084 12.004 14,872 17,797 21,047 23,848 26,6112 29,453 T4W BUG Rating 81 -UO -G1 H1 -U0 -G2 62-00-62 B2-00-62 62-00.63 63 -U0 -G3 83 -U0 -G4 63-00-64 B9-lJ0-G4 63 -U0 -G5 Lumens 3,074 6,006 8,962 111842 14,672 17,558 20,764 23,527 26,244 MOM 61-2 BUG Rating B1 -UO -G1 81 -U0 -G2 B2-00-62 B2•UO-G3 62-UQ•G3 B3-00-63 83-00-63 83 -UO -G4 B3-00.64 63-00-64 Lumens 31138 13,132 9,149 12,089 14,978 17,924 21,197 24,018 28,191 29,682 SL3 BUG Rating Bi -U0-G1 e1l-00-62 61 -U0 -G2 B2 -UO -G9 132-00-63 B2-00.69 133 -UO -G4 B3 -011-G4 B3-00-64 B3 -UO -G4 Lumene 2,981 5,826 8,693 11,466 14,231 17,030 20,140 22,820 25,456 26,184 SL4 BUG Rating BO -UO -G1 87 -UO -62 81-00-63 Bi -06.63 B1 -U0 -G3 62 -UQ -G3 82-00-64 B2 -UO -04 62 -UO -04 62 -U0 -G8 Lumens 3,236 6,324 9,437 12,489 15,449 18,467 21,663 24,773 27,634 30,595 SNI] BUG Ra0ng B1 -UO -GO B2-00467 B3-00-61 B3-00-62 83 -UG -G2 B4 -U0 -G2 64 -U0 -G2 B4-00-62 B4 -U0 -G2 B5 -UO -G2 Lumens 3.296 6,441 9,610 12,686 15,733 1BA28 22266 25,229 28,142 31,158 SMO BUG Rating B2-00-61 B3 -VO -G1 83-00-62 B4400-62 B4 -U0 -G2 84.00-62 B5 -UD -G3 B5-00-63 65 -LO -G3 65 -U0 -G3 Lumens 3,305 6,458 9,635 12,732 15,775 18,878 22,325 25,286 28,217 31,241 SV1O BUG Ra0ng B2 -U0 -G1 63-00-62 B4 -UO -G2 B4-0462 64 -UO -02 85-00-69 135-00.63 65-00-03 85•UO.O4 65.00-64 Luman5 2,757 5,388 6,040 10,629 13,162 15,751 18,627 21,105 23,543 26,066 S1-L/SLR BUG Rating 61 -UO -C1 B1-00-62 B1-00-62 81-00.63 H2-00-63 82 -UO -G3 82 -U0 -G3 B2-00.64 83 -UO -G4 63-00-64 Cumene 3,207 8,267 9,351 12,356 15,309 18,320 21,666 24,549 27,384 30,319 RW BUG Rating B2-06-61 63 -10O -G1 H3 -UO -G1 63 -U0 -G2 64 -UO -02 134.00.62 H4-00-62 B4-00-62 84-00-62 85-00-63 Lurnens 3219 6,290 9,385 12,401 15,365 18,387 21,745 24,638 27,484 30,429 AFL BUG Rating B1-06-61 B1-UO{,1 B1-00-61 r 62-00-62 62.00-62 62 -U0 -G2 B2-00-62 63-LI0-G2 B3d1D-G3 83-00-63 - Nominal data for 4000K CCT. F.stenEaton's Csapsr Lighting Sualmas 1000 Eaton Boulevard tr21 ftbway 34 South Cooper Lighti ng Cleveland OH 44122 PsacMree Cdy, GA 30259 Spea icamns and ADHI40426 United States P: 770-485-NDD dmiensions mbject to by E:TsN Fatan.cam www.coope light ng, nm than®e wAth= name, 2014-08-27 15:04:21 GLEON GALLEON LED LUMEN MULTIPLIER Ambient Temperature Lumen Multiplier O'C 1.02 10'C 1.01 25"C 1.00 40-C 0.99 50'C 0.97 ORDERING INFORMATION LUMEN MAINTENANCE Sample Number. GLEON-AE-04-LED-E1 T3 -GM -700 ' Product FamilyLI Light Engine En Ambient TM 21 Lumen Theoretical L70 Temperature Maintenance IHoural GLEON--Galleon (60.000Hours) 01=1 25"C > 94% > 350,000 40'C -93% > 250,000 50"C > 90% > 170,000 Sample Number. GLEON-AE-04-LED-E1 T3 -GM -700 ' Product FamilyLI Light Engine En Number of Light Squares I Lamp Type Voltage Distribution Color Mounting GLEON--Galleon AE -1A Drive 01=1 LED=Solid State EI -120-277V TZ --Type II AP --Grey IBlankl=Arm for Round or Current 02=2 Light Emitting 347=347V a T2R=Type 8 Roadway BZ -Bronze Square Pole 03=3 Diodes 480=49OV'•' T3=Typelll 9K -Black FA=FxtendedArmr 04-4 T3R=Type III Roadway DP=Dark Platinum MA.MastArm Adapter' 05=5 T4FT=Type IV Forward Throw GM --Graphite Metallic VM -Well Mount 06=6 T4W=Type IV Wide WH=White 07-7 5N0=Type V Narrow 08=8 5Mt>=Type V Square Medium 09=9 SWO=Type V Square Wide 10=10 8112=Type 11 w/Splll Control SL3=Type III w/Spill Control SL4=Type IV w/Spill Control SLL=90' Spell Light Eliminator Left SLR --90e Spill Light Eliminator Right RW=Rectangular Wide Type I AFL Automotive Frontline Options (Add as Suffix) Accessories (Order Separately) 2L --Two Circuits" 0A/RA1016=NEMA Photocantrai Multi -Tap - 105-285V 7030=70 CRI 30001<e OA/1A1027*NEMA Photoeontrol -480V 7080x:70 CRI 6000Ka OA/RA1201=NEMA Photocontrol -347V 530 -Drive Current Factory Set to 530mA" 0A/RA1013mPhotocontrol Shorting Cap 700=Drive Current Factory Set to 700mA11 OA/RA1014=120V Photocontrol F -Single Fuse (120, 277 or 347V. Must Specify Voltage) MA1252=10k1V Surge Module Replacement FF-Dcubla Fuse (208, 240 Or 480V. Must Spacify Voltage) MAIMS.XX=Single Tenon Adapter for 2-318" O.D. Tenon Po-Buttort Type Photocontrol (120, 208, 240 or 277V) MA1037-XX=249180" Tenon Adapter for 2-38' O.D. Tenon PER7=NEMA 7 -Pin Twistlock Photocontral Receptacle MA1197.XX=3@120e Tenon Adapter for 2-31W.O.D. Tenon R --NEMA Twistlock Photocontral Receptacle MA11B8-XX=4@901 Tenon Adapter for 2.3/8" O.D. Tenon HA -50"C High Ambient' MA11lMXX =2@90a Tenon Adapter for 2-316" O.D. Tenon MS/DIM-LOO.Motion Sensor for Dimming Operation, Maximum B' Mounting Height n -1i 1' 1i MA1190-XX=3090' Tenon Adapter far 2-38" O.D. Tenon MS/DIM-1.20=Motion Sensor for Dimming Operation, 9'- 20' Mounting Height n•=•"'• MA1191•XX=2f8120° Tenon Adapter for 2-318' O.D. Tenon MS/DIM-L40=Motion Sensor for Dimming Operation, 21' -4D' Mounting Height "• 131•" MA1038-XX=Single Tenon Adapter for 3-112" O.D. Tenon MM-LD8=8i-Level Motion Sensor, Maximum 8' Mounting Height 11.1.1•"•1' MA1039-XX=2@180" Tenon Adapter for 3-112' O.D. Tenon MS/X-120=91-Level Motion Sensor, 9'- 20' Maunting Height 1•"•r• "•n MA119Z)O( 3411201 Tenon Adapter for 3-1121 O.D. Tenon MS/X-11.40�8i-Level Motion Sensor, 21'- 40'Mounting Height "•0.'316" MA1193-XX-1@90" Tenon Adapter for 3-1/2" O.D. Tenon MS-1.08=Motion Sensor for ONIOFF Operation, Maximum 8' Mounting Height 11•tl "•" MA1194-XX=2@901 Tenon Adapter for 3-1/2" O.D. Tenon MS-11.20=Motlon Sensor for ONIOFF Operation, g'- 20' Mounting Height "•'•131' MA11B5-XX=3@90° Tenon Adepterfor 3-112" O.D. Tenon MS-1.40=Motion Sensor for ON/OFF Operation, 21'. 40' Mounting Height''. Mixt. FSIR-100=Wireless Configuration Tool for Occupancy Sensor " DIMRF-LW=LumaWstt Wiraloss Sensor, Wide Lens for 8' -16' Mounting Height 11 GLEON-MTI=Field Installed Mash Top for 1.4 Light Squares DIMRF.LN=LumeWatt Wireless Sensor, Narrow Lena for 16'- 40' Mounting Height" GLEON-MT2-Field Installed Mesh Top for 5-6 Light Squares 1.90 -Optics Rotated 90° Left GLEON-MT3=Field installed Mash Top for 7-0 Light Squares R90=Optics Rotated 901 Right GLEON-MT4=Field Installed Mesh Top for 8-10 Light Squares MT=Factory Installed Mash Top LS/HSS=Field Installed House Side Shield%'0 TH=Tool-less Door Hardware LCF=Light Square Trim Plate Painted to Match Housing" HSS=Factory Installed House Side Shield" N~ 1. DesignLlghts Consoniumt Qualiflad. Reform wwmdesignilghts.org QualiRed Froducte List under Family Models fordstags. 2. Standard 4000K CCT and minimum 70CRI. 9. Requires the use of a step down tmnsforn er when combined with MSIDIM, MSA[ or DIMRF. 4. Net to be used with un -gra i dad systems. 8. May be required when two or more luminaires are oriented an a 90' or 12Dr drilling pattern. Rafor to arm mounting requimmenttable. 6. Factory installed. 7.21- is not available with MS, MSAL or MS/DIM at 347V or 490V. 2L in AE-02thmugh AE•04 raquiresa larger housing, normally used ferAE-OS or AE -08. Extended arm option may be required when mounting two ormare fixtures per pole at 90 -or 120'. Reterm edm mounting requirement table. a Not available with LumaWett wireless sensors. 9. Extended lead times apply. Use dedicated IES files for 311100K and 6=K when performing layouts. These 5Iw are published "the Galleon fuminaire product page on the website. 10, 1 Amp standard. Use dedicated IES tiles for 5301MA and 700mA when performing Iayotns.Thase files aria published on the Gallean luminaire product page on the website. 11. Censuh factory for more intormaaon. 12 Utilizer internal step down transformer when 347V or 40001 is selected. 19.The FSIR-100 accessary is required to adjust parameters. t4. Not available with HA option. 15. Replace X with number of Light Squares operating in low output made. fa. WmaWac wireless sensom are factory installed only requiring ntmwrk components RF-EMt. RF-GWi and RF-ROUTI in appropriate quantities. Sea yeww.wopsrlighting.rom for LumaWan applicadun information. 17 Not available with house side shield 1H551• 1.1 Only for use with Sit SL3. SL4 and AFL distributions. The Light Square trim plate Is painted black when the HSS option Is mleated. 19. This tool enables adjustment M e parameters including high and low modes, sensitivity, de delay, cutaff and mora. Consult your Eaton's Cooper Lighting business representative for additional detsils. 90. One equlred for each Light Square, Eaton Eaton's Cooper Lighting Bustnom 1000 Eaton Saulavad 1121 Highway 74 South Cooper Lighting Geveland. OH 44122 Peachaee City. GA 30269 Specifications and ADHI40428 United Suriss R 770-086-4800 dimensions subject to by ]F:'[ N Eaton.com www.conarlighting_corn change without nonce. 2014-08-27 15:04:21 LL, r 0 Q OG ?: Eeli. uj LU I Ei i'l I I pi .111, WIN # 27 5 Stantec September 1, 2o16 Stantec Gonsuiting Services Inc. 2335 Highway 36 West St. Paul MN 55113 Tel: (651) 636-4600 Fax: (651) 636-1311 Mr. Eric Johnson, Administrator City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Blvd. N P.O. BOX 2007 Oak Park Heights, MN 56082 Reference: Oak Ridge — Memory Care Addition — Plan Review Dear Eric, We have reviewed the drainage calculations for the Oak Ridge Memory Care Addition submitted on August 11, 2oi6 and the site development plans submitted on August 16, 2016. Following are our comments and/or recommendations that need to be addressed: Sheet 2.10 — Existing Conditions 1. Clearly identify existing sewer service locations from the mains to the building. 2. Existing 4" water services have been replaced within the ROW. See attached As -Built sheet. Sheet 4.10 — Final Grading and Drainage Plan 1. Coordinate with Washington County the proposed driveway entrance connection to the Oxboro Avenue N. alignment. Construct per City standard detail. 2. Construction of the westerly retaining wall must not to encroach on the adjacent storm water easement. Sheet 4.20 —Final Utility Plan 1. The City's inspector shall be present onsite for the connection to the City's storm water manhole in the Hwy 36 right-of-way. 2. The proposed Storm Sewer facilities will be considered private and shall be owned and maintained by the owner, including those facilities within the drainage easements. Any future changes required because of a status change with the permitted use of the storm sewer in the MnDOT right-of-way will be the responsibility of the owner. Sheet 6.io — Details 1. Add the following City Standard Detail: STR — 30 / CONCRETE CURB REPLACEMENT DRIVE LOCATION (CONCRETE D/W APRON) 2. Revise Storm sewer catch basin manhole detail to be consistent with City Standard Detail Plate STO-5. 3. Revise RIPRAP AT OUTLETS detail to require Type IV Geotextile fabric. 4. Revise HYDRANT DETAIL to be consistent with City Standard Detail P1ateWAT-8. (31, Mr. Eric Johnson Page a of z Reference: Oak Ridge — Memory Care — Plan Review StormWater i. See attached Memo. General Comments 1. The City reserves the right to inspect the construction of the project. The City or its designee shall be present for connections to City utilities. The City reserves the right to require additional erosion control measures as determined/necessary during the construction of the project. 2. The Owner shall be responsible for obtaining all required permits. The approval letter from the MSCWMO will need to be provided prior to construction. 3. Review of issues related to parking, lighting, landscaping, retaining walls or the buildings is by others. 4. Utility construction and improvements in the right-of-way need to conform to the City's Standard Detail Plates. 5. Record plans or as -built drawings shall be provided at project completion. If you have any questions or require further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Regards, STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC. Lee M. Mann, PE City Engineer Phone: 651-604-4860 lee.mann@stantec.com Attachments: Oak Ridge Memory Care Stormwater Review Memo Oxboro Avenue North As -built CC. Andy Kegley, Public Works Director Julie Hultman, Building Official Scott Richards, City Planner Mark Vierling, City Attorney Lisa Danielson, City Arborist Design with community in mind (3 Stantec To: Lee Mann From: Dan Edgerton St. Paul MN Office St. Paul MN Office File: 193800151 Date: August 25, 2016 Reference: Stormwater Review, Oak Ridge Memory Care, Oak Park Heights, MN Memo This memo summarizes the review of materials initially submitted on 10/16/14 and revised on 3/20/15 and 8/11/16 by James R. Hill, Inc., for the Oak Ridge Memory Care Addition. The submittal was reviewed for compliance with the stormwater policies of the City of Oak Park Heights Local Surface Water Management Plan (LSWMP). The site will need to comply with the runoff rate, runoff volume, and water quality policies of the Middle St. Croix Watershed Management Organization. The site proposes 0.72 acres of new impervious area; therefore, permanent stormwater management is not required by the NPDES Construction Stormwater General Permit. The following materials were reviewed as part of the submittal: • Site Plans • Existing and Proposed Drainage Maps • HydroCAD Drainage Summary Runoff Rate 1. The peak runott rate for proposed development must not exceed the existing rate for the 2, 10, and 100 -year rainfall events. The proposed development meets this requirement based on the previous submittal. Runoff Volume 1. The site is not located within the City's Drinking Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA); therefore, infiltration is allowed for the site. 2. Infiltration standards for proposed projects are based on the Middle St. Croix Watershed Management Organization's Watershed Management Plan. The applicant needs to work through the review process with the MSCWMO to ensure standards are being met. Water Quality 1. Per MSCWMO standards, stormwater must be treated prior to discharging into a waterbody. A grassed swale and underground storage trench are used to provide water quality treatment on the site. The applicant needs to work through the review process with the MSCWMO to ensure standards are being met. Design with comrmuft in mind r.\client\municipal\oak-pakheights cLmn\55 private\oak ridge addition\2016\(mann_dedgertonMakddgememorycore�tormwatenmemo_160825.docx ® Sta ntec August 25, 2016 Lee Mann Page 2 of 2 Reference: Stormwater Review, Oak Ridge Memory Care, Oak Park Heights, MN Erosion and Sediment Control 1. The proposed erosion and sediment control plans are acceptable; however, Lee Mann rather than Chris Long should be listed as the LGU Contact. STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC. Dan Edgerton Senior Associate Phone: (651) 604-4820 Dan.Edgerton@stantec.com Design with community in mind r.\client\municlpal\oak_parl.-hetghts ci mn\55 p&aie\oak ridge addltlon\2016\lmann dedgedonroakddgememorycare�tormwalermemc_160825.docx � � � � � �� C I WW3/�O4pdFQ L31A3S AiN11M•' V N1YYf 1siLYM HLtlON�10 snd3(113�Y ONO®(O :auawanatluq r41wn wnoo uo96N144'NM £T4Z NW `5446raH Ved JeO CA .� Zo R P6 W U � 5 l- I u I i i Lu `I 3 „ RN a Jim Mat - pp 8676 - #�[ g 81'fi06 '•'•�m3�3f �u . iBi6 mea j �b of _ v9E6 - W 916 F m u p gg - sire w 7 N x N S y LU- Ybi6vz 16 - y�w 6M6 j Z Wa .. iiy" 9YGfi C.g6_ 6 S6 ==I31 Hai � 'M � � i OUB t;B ~� S ?a xuLU d N N q C3" win La 0 t a Z Be 88 LU vffio LU 1'E6p Tq a } � P2 3�= Jdill cl '1 16 lit seta I - _j ;q _ — 61'M rm Brim o 1x.CS o Gtlm ji ®_—ANN-.�- i��o pia io t IR 616 b - :tT� {6I.F � cpm o e X28 �City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Blvd Me Box 2007 . Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 • Phone (651) 439-4439 • Fax 439-0574 Memorandum To: Eric Johnson, City Administrator Cc: Scott Richards, City Planner, Julie Hultman, Building Official From: Lisa Danielson, Arborist Date: 08/11/2016 Re: Oak Ridge Addition- Senior Memory Care & Senior Housing, Landscape Plan Review I have reviewed the landscape plans submitted by HAF Architects for the Oak Ridge Addition. The following includes my comments and/or recommendations: Landscape Plan (L1) The overall design of the plan is attractive and will complement the site well. The plan includes an acceptable species selection of deciduous trees, coniferous trees, ornamental trees, shrubs and perennial plants to be installed ((151) total). All plants included in the plan are hardy under local growing conditions, tolerant or resistant to major insects and disease problems and fairly low maintenance. All plant sizes, root and container classes included in the plans conform to the City of Oak Park Heights zoning ordinance requirements. The final plans must include tree sizes in caliper inches to apply toward credit for tree replacement. Planting Specifications (L2) The landscape notes and planting detail submitted is acceptable, however, the City of Oak Park Heights does not recommend staking of trees. Any twine or rope which is tied around of the base of the trunk should also be removed, this should be included in the plans. The landscape contractor is required to plant trees and shrubs according to the approved planting detail diagrams and landscape notes submitted with the final approved landscape plan. This will be checked after planting and any deviations from the plans must be corrected before the landscaping will be approved by the City, this needs to be noted in the final plans. Tree Protection & Replacement Plan The tree inventory submitted is acceptable. Tree tag #2039 must be added to the removed caliper inches column which then changes the total number of caliper inches removed to 637. TREE CITY U.S.A. The Tree Replacement Calculation Requirement for the project (Ordinance 1307) is 579 caliper inches without any tree replacement credits or $28,950 ($501cal.in) if all trees cannot be planted on site. A tree protection plan and diagram must also be included with the final plans. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this landscape plan review. Please feel free to forward my comments to the development team for this project. 2 TREE CITY U.S.A.