The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2017-05-09 CC Packet Enclosure TPC3601 Thurston Avenue N,Suite 100 Anoka, MN 55303 Phone: 763.231.5840 Facsimile: 763.42 7.0520 TPC@PlanningCo.com MEMORANDUM TO: Eric Johnson FROM: Scott Richards DATE: May 3, 2017 RE: Oak Park Heights — Comprehensive Plan 2040 — City Council Worksession TPC FILE: 226.10 As you are aware, the City Council, at their February 15, 2017 meeting, authorized the work programs from TPC, Inc and Stantec to commence the Comprehensive Plan 2040 process. The Comprehensive Plan 2018 process will update and reinforce the goals, policies and plans from the 2008 plan. Additionally, it will focus on the new issues and challenges this community will need to focus in the next ten years. At their April 13, 2017 meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed the issues summaries from the 2008 plan and provided direction to staff on creating a new issues summary. It has also been suggested that we conduct a community survey so that residents and business owners have a say in the planning process. Issues Please find attached the list of issues that were identified as part of the Comprehensive Plan 2008. The City Council should review these, discuss what has been resolved in the last ten years from the list, and consider what new issues should be identified. Also included are the issues maps from the plan. We will focus much of the discussion at the May 9, 2017 Worksession on issues. Community Survey Staff has worked with Jim Kremer on drafting a format and questions for a community survey. Before it is distributed and placed on the City website, the City Council should comment and make suggestions. Please review for discussion at the Worksession. Pc: Julie Hultman DRAFT City of Oak Park Heights Community Survey The Oak Park Heights City Council would like your input, ideas and thoughts to help it plan for the future. 1. Are you a: Resident 0 Business Owner 0 Both 0 Visitor 0 2. If you are a resident or business owner, how long have you lived or worked here? Less than 5 years 0 6-10 years 0 11 years+ 3. Are you: under 18 0 18-24 0 25-34 0 35-45 0 45-54 0 55+ 0 4. Do you have children in your home who are under 18? Yes 0 No 0 If so, how many? 5. From your point of view is Oak Park Heights a better place to live and work today than it was when you first moved or worked here? ��d : �p � *o'".._ ,S _ax at Ag ''' :;g..4'. .k `, §. '� ',�, g?s- 6. Please list in order the top three things you like about Oak Park Heights(with#1 being the most important). The St. Croix River _ Engaged residents _Other (please list): City parks and trails _Schools _The people _Community events _Small town feel Retail businesses Restaurants Location 7. In your opinion what is the general condition of our streets? Excellent Good Average Below Average Poor 8. Understanding that most of the funds for our streets come from our property taxes, are there any specific roads that you think need to be improved? If so, please list them below. 9. In your opinion what is the general condition of our parks and trails? Excellent Good Average Below Average Poor DRAFT 10. Are there any specific park or trail improvements that you would recommend? If so, please list them below. 11. Rank the top FIVE most important challenges that you see facing the City(#1 being the most important)? _ Traffic congestion _ Tax rates _ Utility rates Improving pedestrian and _ Reducing crime/ _ Protecting the St Croix River bicycle access enhancing public safety and other water resources Providing more retail and _ Quality development _ Improving pedestrian and other types of businesses design &construction bicycle safety Maintaining and _ Improving pedestrian _ Loss of affordable enhancing municipal safety housing Services (police,fire, _ Capital investments in _ Other (please list) permitting, refuse community facilities, collection, etc. parks, storm water, other capital investments 12. Do you have any other input, ideas or thoughts you would like the Oak Park Heights' City Council to consider as it plans for the future? Thank you for taking your time to complete the survey. The City will provide results on its website(www.cityofoakparkheights.com). If you would like to discuss any part of this survey with the City, please provide your name and mailing address or email address. Name: Mailing Address: Email: Please Contact Me: Yes 0 No 0 Oak Park Heights Comprehensive Plan 2008 - Issues INTRODUCTION As an initial means of shaping the Comprehensive Plan, a Comprehensive Plan Committee, representing a broad base of the community, was established by the City Council. The list of the members is found on a previous page of this document. This team provided the guidance and directives to formulate the Comprehensive Plan before it was reviewed by the Planning Commission and approved by the City Council. The Committee which includes the Planning Commission and City Council represents a wide cross section of area residents. They met twice at the beginning stages of the Comprehensive Plan update to discuss potential issues and opportunities in the community. The representation of these people has provided the insight and initial direction for the process. The community involvement will continue throughout the comprehensive planning process with public meetings at the end of each stage. This report provides a summary of the issues and directions which community officials and residents have identified. As such, it will be utilized in conjunction with the technical data compiled in the data collection process to formulate the policies as well as physical layout of the community. Throughout the issues identification process, it was realized that there is agreement on most of the issues but also differences in the philosophy and details of the approaches to be taken. An additional purpose of this report is therefore to highlight these matters so that they can be addressed as part of the planning process. The presentation of information in this report is provided in two sections. The first summarizes the comments and direction raised by the participants. This was accomplished by the use of text and issues and opportunities maps. The second section includes a diagram of the comprehensive planning process in which this document is based. GROUP ISSUES DISCUSSION A wide cross-section of people representing many facets of the community were chosen for their insight and perspective as part of the group meetings. The focus of the discussions was on the existing, developing portions of the community and in the potential areas for infill and redevelopment. A portion of the discussion was focused on potential growth outside of the current City limits. Those participating were asked to identify which community concerns were most important as well as what direction the City should be taking, especially as it relates to land use. To a significant degree, the group discussion and open house revealed that there is an overall consensus among City officials and community representatives on both issues as well as objectives. Simultaneously, there are, however, some uncertainties on • the part of some individuals and some differences of opinion on approach and philosophy. This is not an unusual occurrence and in fact is seen as a positive in that it may help insure a more detailed consideration and discussion of the plan and its components. In this regard, it must be recognized that differences need to be resolved and that a consensus be reached on the course for the plan which is to be implemented. Before proceeding further with a discussion of issues and objectives, additional background explanation and qualification is required. In the paragraphs which follow, the comments which were made by community leaders and residents have been generalized so as not to credit any one person with a particular statement or position. Whenever differences of opinion were encountered on a specific subject, it has been expressed as a majority or minority opinion. Note should also be made that the focus of the issues identification process and hence the discussion in this section is positive although negative comments were received. This negative theme and characterization of the community should not be interpreted as the prevailing opinion of the City. To the contrary, the community leadership, residents and staff view Oak Park Heights as offering a unique and quality living environment. The objective in identifying Oak Park Heights' issues is to ensure that these matters are properly addressed and resolved so that the benefits offered are maintained and increased. The identification of each and every issue raised as part of the issue identification process is not attempted by this report. Such would be beyond the scope and purpose of this effort. The issues which are raised are a broad categorization of topics receiving attention. Identifying and dealing with this more basic framework of concerns will facilitate the organization of responses which, in the long run, will comprehensively address all concerns, including the sub-issues which have not been specifically cited. Also to be noted is that the following discussion is not a priority listing of objectives or issues. In this section, only a comprehensive statement of topics raised by community leaders, residents and staff is attempted. Finally, it needs to be stated that the summary avoids opinions and positions of the planner. Within the policy and planning sections, planning recommendations and alternatives will be offered for consideration. In order to provide a meaningful presentation of the issues identification discussions, the topics which were raised have been organized into a listing of broad issues and subsequently divided into sub-topics. The outline of the issues summary is follows: • Community Attitude • Regional Planning/Cooperation • Environment • Land Use • Developable Land • Planning Study Area/Annexation f • Residential Development • Single Family ♦ Multiple Family • Affordable/Life Cycle Housing ■ Commercial Development • Highway Commercial • Industrial/Business Warehouse Development • Transportation ■ St. Croix River Crossing/Highway 36 • System Improvements/Issues • Community Facilities • City Facilities • Utilities • Police/Fire • Parks and Trails • Park Facilities and Land • Preservation Programs • Administration • Financial • Staff • Codes/Regulations COMMUNITY ATTITUDE The overriding attitude that was expressed by the residents of Oak Park Heights during the issue gathering process was the positive attitude about the community and the long term prospects for continued growth and improvement. Residents cited the quality of life in the area, the existing and expanding potential for commercial and industrial opportunities, established and comfortable neighborhoods, the amenities of the nearby rivers, lakes, and wetlands, and the school systems in the community that contribute to making Oak Park Heights an attractive place to live. Those persons involved in the opportunities and issues discussions as part of the Comprehensive Plan process listed the following as the positive aspects of the community: 1. Excellent access to the freeway system which provides connections to the entire Minneapolis St. Paul area. 2. The community provides an adequate land use density with residential, commercial, and industrial/business warehouse uses. 3. Positive small town/City atmosphere. 4. The community has a number of shopping, recreational and entertainment options for its residents. 5. There is an excellent City park system with good proximity to four State parks. 6. The City is situated in such a way that it is close to the St. Croix River Valley, rural areas and open space. 7. There is excellent housing options with a premier senior living complex in the City. 8. The school system is excellent and the high school is located within the City. 9. The City has a good government structure with a high level of long term participation on City boards and commissions. 10. The taxes are relatively low in comparison to other area cities. There were few negative comments made by residents and most dealt with issues related to the St. Croix River Crossing and the Highway 36 transportation corridor. The uncertainty related to timing of the project, potential utility costs that could be incurred by the City as a result of the bridge/roadway, and the impact to the Oak Park Heights business community were all issues related to that project. The major frustration was that most of the decisions made related to the bridge and the construction schedule were not under the control of the City. REGIONAL PLANNING/COOPERATION Oak Park Heights functions as one of the primary communities along with Stillwater and Bayport in this urban planning area on the east edge of the Minneapolis St. Paul Metropolitan Area. The City has a good level of cooperation with its neighbors Stillwater, Bayport and Lake Elmo. In the past, cooperative studies have been conducted to determine if additional governmental facilities and service provision should be shared by communities. Currently, the Cities are cooperating in development of a St. Croix area YMCA. Residents felt that discussions should continue among jurisdictions to explore means in which to share facilities and services to improve quality at a lower cost to the taxpayer. Due to disagreements over annexation, the working relationship in the past between Oak Park Heights and Baytown Township has not been favorable. Residents and City officials felt that efforts should be made to improve the relationship and continue to work on issues related to cooperation on uses that affect the two communities. ENVIRONMENT The City of Oak Park Heights is situated in an area of varying topography and environmental factors influenced by its proximity to the St. Croix River. While the older areas of the community developed on the bluffs adjacent to the river, recent development is focused on the broad, flat plains moving westerly from the main channel. Areas within these plains are highlighted by steep topography and wetlands. Staff and residents agree that topography, stormwater facility design, and well head locations are all issues that will impact future development and redevelopment. Residents indicated that the City should also look at making better public access ties to the St. Croix River. Trail connections from the City into the rural areas and into a regional trail system was also thought as a way to link residents to the river and open space. LAND USE The map on the following page highlights many of the land use issues discussed in the following text. Developable Land The 1998 Comprehensive Plan planned for a significant increase in land area for the City of Oak Park Heights through annexation from adjacent jurisdictions. The land was to be developed primarily with single and multiple family neighborhoods with other areas designed for commercial and industrial uses. Residents and City officials are not supportive of the large area of annexation proposed in the prior plan. The City Council currently has a policy that annexation will not occur unless agreed to by the other jurisdictions. The plan will discuss areas outside of the City limits that have been discussed for future annexation by the property owners and the City, but those areas are extremely limited. Within the City limits, there is relatively no residential land and a limited amount of commercial and industrial/business warehouse property to develop. The focus of this plan will not emphasize new development, but rather begin to look at potential redevelopment areas within the community. Residents and City officials have supported the growth of the community and welcome the new businesses, services and jobs that accompany this development. Residents expressed some concern about the sameness or repetition of the type of commercial development, especially the number of strip retail/commercial centers. Residents were s1: P also concerned about the transitions between neighborhoods and commercial areas to assure that through development, adverse impacts are mitigated through the design review process. The City has been challenged to look at zoning transitions, the current Design Guidelines, traffic, and providing screening through landscaping and fences, as well as providing protection against light pollution, odor and noise. Residential Development Single Family. Residents of Oak Park Heights take pride in their neighborhoods and City officials make the point that there is a great deal of diversity in housing styles, ages and price ranges. A majority of the housing was built in the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s, most of which is of a medium range value and affordable to a larger number of homebuyers. At the end of the 2006 building season, there were less than 10 fully sewered, subdivided lots available for single family development. Additionally, there are no large parcels of land available for future development of single family neighborhoods. Within the next ten years, there may be some replats of parcels that will provide a handful of additional single family lots. City officials and residents have conceded that this plan will not include large tracts of land currently in Baytown Township for residential development. Instead, the focus of this Comprehensive Plan will be to improve existing neighborhoods and look at the transition areas between commercial and residential to provide better living environments. Continued maintenance, investment by the City on roads and utilities, and provision of trails and parks is now seen as the priority. Multiple Family/Townhouse. Oak Park Heights residents recognize the need for a diversity of housing types of which multiple family plays an important part. There are areas of the community that, as of Spring 2007, are being developed with townhome units. The Oakgreen Village development at 58th Street and Oakgreen Avenue would add a total of 113 townhome units. The Pine Grove Gardens east of Oakgreen Avenue is currently under construction with a total of 26 townhome units. Upon completion of these developments, the readily available land for multiple family and townhome development will be depleted. The Comprehensive Plan will identify other areas that could accommodate infill development of multiple family and townhome development. In 2007, an expansion of the Boutwells Landing senior development is expected that would add a 106 unit skilled nursing facility. This is in addition to the existing development that consists of 56 village homes (side-by-side townhomes), 94 assisted living apartments, 101 independent living apartments, 137 village homes (single family and attached units), and 78 brownstone units. Boutwells has also proposed the final phase of the complex which would consist of a 28 unit memory care facility. Boutwells Landing has examined the possibility for expansion into property south of the main campus which is in Baytown Township. City officials have indicated that if access and City services are required for expansion of the campus, the City would require annexation. Affordable/Life Cycle Housing. For years, the community has prided itself on providing affordable housing for people of all age groups and socio-economic levels. City officials are interested in preserving the levels of affordable housing while expanding the numbers of housing units in the higher price values and as part of infill development. By providing housing of all types and price ranges, the City can remain an attractive place for people as they proceed through their life cycle. The City will continue to work with the Metropolitan Council on providing life cycle and affordable housing. Due to the limited amount of developable land, it is unlikely that significant numbers of additional affordable units will be developed in the community. City officials indicated a preference for more mid to higher level homes and living units as part of the continuing infill and redevelopment that is expected, in that there exists a significant number of affordable units. Commercial Development Highway Commercial. City officials and residents recognize that the development of the Highways 36 and 5 corridor commercial areas are nearing completion. The land available for new development is now concentrated on the west side of the City with potential for infill around the newer commercial developments. In the past ten years, the City has defined more specific commercial zoning districts to direct the types of development to the appropriate areas. The City has also adopted design guidelines to assure quality development in the highly visible Highway 36 corridor. City officials and residents recognize a shift from development on bare ground to redevelopment of numerous areas along the highway corridors. The Comprehensive Plan will identify areas along the Highway 36 corridor for potential redevelopment. City officials indicated that much of the new development was very consistent in architecture and building materials. Too much of the development all looked the same. The Design Guidelines may need to be reviewed and updated to direct the change to redevelopment activity. Industrial / Business Warehouse Development Other than the Allen S. King Plant and a small surrounding area, the City of Oak Park Heights does not have a large industrial land use base. Annexation of the Kern Center, a partially developed office and business park west of Highway 5 enabled the City to add to its business and warehousing base. Portions of the Kern Center remain available for development including a large area with frontage on Highway 5. City officials and residents recognize the limitations the City has in regard to land area and further building its industrial and business base. Land owners to the west of Kern Center, within the City of Lake Elmo, have inquired with both Cities regarding the possibility of detachment from Lake Elmo and attachment to Oak Park Heights. They request this in order to be provided utility service for commercial development. The City of Oak Park Heights has taken the position that it will not pursue an annexation/ detachment unless the City of Lake Elmo would agree to such an action. At this time, the City of Lake Elmo is not interested in a detachment of land and annexation to Oak Park Heights. City officials indicated that the plan should acknowledge this is a potential area for annexation to the City if the City of Lake Elmo and Oak Park Heights can come to an agreement. TRANSPORTATION The map on the following page highlights many of the transportation issues discussed in the following text. St. Croix River Crossing / Highway 36 The most significant community issue discussed by City officials and residents is the St. Croix River Crossing at Highway 36. Ten years ago, the previous Comprehensive Plan indicated that the bridge location had been selected and improvement plans for Highway 36 were being developed. There was optimism that the bridge and Highway 36 improvements would be well underway by the year 2000. As of the date of this plan, there are revised plans for the bridge and Highway 36 improvements but no schedule for construction. The City of Oak Park Heights has not given municipal consent for the project. City officials are resolved to work with Mn/DOT on plans and timing for the bridge and Highway 36. City officials and residents expressed their frustration over this project and how it has affected the City in terms of plans for development/redevelopment along the corridor and the ability to effectively plan for transportation improvements. System Improvements / Issues The City of Oak Park Heights is well served with transportation routes providing access to the region including Highway 36, Highway 5, and Highway 95. Discussions with City staff/consultants stress the need to closely work with representatives of Washington County and Mn/DOT on issues related to new roadway construction, reconstruction, roadway turn backs and maintenance responsibility issues. Of particular importance to the City is the increasing levels of traffic on Highway 36 and the related impacts of highways on Oak Park Heights such as noise, air quality, and intersection congestion. City officials and residents emphasized the need for rebuilding Oakgreen Avenue to an urban section to better accommodate vehicular and pedestrian traffic within the corridor. Although a portion of the improvements would be made by Mn/DOT as part of the Highway 36 improvements, City officials thought it may be necessary to upgrade the road soon, recognizing the continuing residential development in the area. Extension of 58th Street to Manning Avenue was also raised as a planning issue. This would likely be done only if the area to the west of the City limits was annexed to Oak Park Heights and commercial development was to occur. 1 (( F Mass Transit Residents and City officials commented about the lack of mass transit options for people in Oak Park Heights and the St. Croix Valley area. Currently, direct bus service only travels into St. Paul from the park and ride facilities in the region. With the increased awareness and growing need for mass transit options, City officials indicated it would be necessary to work with Metropolitan Council and State representatives on transit options. There are ongoing feasibility studies for mass transit and rail options for Highway 36 and Interstate 94. City officials have indicated the importance of being involved in the studies and their final outcome. COMMUNITY FACILITIES The map on the following page highlights many of the community facilities issues discussed in the following text. City Facilities The City Council has recognized limitations with the current City Hall, Public Works and Police facility at 14168 57th Street North. In 2006, the City retained a consultant to conduct a needs assessment for the City Hall complex. The results of that need assessment and the City Council direction on possible improvements will be made a part of the Comprehensive Plan. City officials and residents discussed the City's participation in the development of a regional YMCA facility. This would be a joint effort between the Cities of Oak Park Heights, Stillwater, Bayport and Lake Elmo. City officials will continue to participate in the planning for and possible construction of this facility to be located in the City of Lake Elmo. An ongoing need for the City is additional public works building space and outdoor storage areas. The City Hall needs assessment study will address the public works facility needs. The City has considered in the past the addition of a fire substation and emergency vehicle placement, and the City officials again raised the issue as a result of the Comprehensive Plan update. City officials had mixed feelings regarding the need and timing of such a facility and considered it a long term issue. Utilities The City Engineer is preparing water, sanitary sewer and storm sewer plan updates as part of the Comprehensive Plan process. These plans are expected to show few issues with the City's utility systems. One issue that has not been resolved since the previous plan is the addition of a third City well. The City Engineer has indicated that the well is required to provide additional pumping capacity for the City as well as providing a back up to the existing system. The City has sized its utility systems to adequately service all areas of the City and those areas that could potentially be annexed at a later date. City E officials have indicated that continuing maintenance and upgrades, as necessary, is the ongoing issue for the utility systems. As indicated previously, one of the primary issues related to the St. Croix River Crossing and Highway 36 improvements is the relocation of the City's utility lines. Presently, Mn/DOT has not offered the City adequate funds as part of the project to reasonably move the affected utilities. This issue will need to be resolved before the City will grant municipal consent to the project. PARKS AND TRAILS The map on the following page highlights many of the transportation issues discussed in the following text. As part of the Comprehensive Plan process, the City will also create a new Comprehensive Park and Trail System Plan to update the 1999 document. The plan will examine park improvements to be made and trail/sidewalk connections that should be completed. Residents and City officials are proud of the extensive park and trail system and look forward to the completion of the system. Potential projects identified as part of the issues and opportunities discussions included the following: 1. Completion of the park shelter at Autumn Hills Park. 2. Possible extension of Brekke Park into adjacent undeveloped area. 3. Park/trail development on the Xcel Ash Facility. 4. Development of a dog park. 5. Possible construction of a community swimming pool. 6. Identify and close gaps in the trail system. 7. Provide a trail connection to Manning Avenue and to regional trail connections. 8. Provide trail connections into the DNR property along Osgood Avenue. 9. Develop trails along each side of Oakgreen Avenue. 10. Plan for sidewalk and trail construction and connections as part of the Highway 36 improvements and the St. Croix River Crossing. 11. Plan for interconnections with regional trail systems and with adjoining communities. 12. Develop recreational programs within the City park system. Also provide programs for older children. ADMINISTRATION Financial City officials were positive of the financial condition of the City of Oak Park Heights and do not foresee any major issues ahead. Continued upgrades and maintenance of existing community facilities, utility systems, and the street network will be an ongoing capital improvement exercise. The City will need to set aside funds for a third well, and possibly for a public works expansion or fire hall within the City if the City Council determines they are necessary public facilities. Staff After retirements and staff replacements in 2007, the employee roster for the City of Oak Park Heights and the level of administrative staffing will be adequate. The City has emphasized utilizing consultants for legal, engineering, planning, forestry, and financial assistance. City officials have indicated that this type of staffing is cost efficient and appropriate for a City the size of Oak Park Heights. Officials indicated that staffing will likely stay at the current levels in the foreseeable future. Regulations / Design Guidelines As a follow up to the Comprehensive Plan, the City will likely need to review its Zoning Ordinance and Design Guidelines. With the emphasis in the coming decade on infill and redevelopment, the City should look at its regulations and make adjustments as necessary. Residents commented on the "sameness" of building architecture and materials with recent developments. The City should review those guidelines to determine how they can better direct development appearance in the City. . -0.1;rippro,,,,, __,, , .c r ___I i..- N 401 ��o t+�IIIIIItll1111 Y (n H 111111111P .--1�4■ " L. fn ol°y m WWI N �O� -.loo MO.Aao its s iuiiiiT� W g a, `,.nnM 1111u11u to I-, ° nr�%�� me% am gat d o �..a -0 a�`cmc -�.`III Warm Y t x CJ o _� lt/111, ". ►►a g%•.is ►�.•iEM•111111 11. d /�• 1rpr.%.aQnl®®®f.•11111111n11m. O 0 Z ego. ili �,�o 1111 IUI 7:'I I®®®III■nminnnun `° [' II1111= III■Il1 l®®®1111 ln■I't � 4- E 5 2O¢:1 - int ni In IIII Is:n ml 111111m nn■1111■nu■ Q p S o-„ �-11n■nla••■..:11111•ma.4=mi. r s !I ullluun ✓/��Ir IIII numm� m ■� EV x32, „e''''' �I� ..11..11 no__Imo1■■1. .. —■�■t11111111ii �C�q'�.:m�+01 fa,. t ,- alum / mu INI�1i11111111 i pegilll� Z r + 011( /11111111 1 r� .11\r� all w.. En ti mu. 11,...„„)+ 11L1.0 �, 1r it 1►111 NIE3 LEI "4=M iar ` un11up■ .ml• II■ �s� ; 11 ln.l,• un IL. i, 11-_- MIT,I_. 91111111. , `.tortigir .lI{II III1■.I..X11■11 El'IVa )1 1 II n. ll .411,,,tic I � unm �'k / laigkiwit. � li NI ik\liril.m... Lo 4 ii o mm rar wMn1111•_mil •m � 1/1 \•nuamuaNb YY;whit E..n1 1111 1 I '•-.a ' ' W mn• - Al 11.1 i 11 l4qol 01 21 —JOINV, —. Ii3n.`„ ,�I�h.p 1 "1 / `t/AL 1111 E 1. -7, il/L711: 111, y raillip. . .. 4iiIIi. ma 1 � l .,..q-® .cE �_ Q Q a�� _�� 1: SE r IIPrn .aorra . % , if...u�m .: v m �'II�.\Pri._ ., „,„........1..... 1 imi.villIII I�1. 1 �,1, '�; ,�,!I •� .�. �� E . . . .IE ill' :_41.,, r �� war tit.I M%iminujimaj, 41 \21111 it E E II''��IIsLic�� i1 211 III I 11i �� Q Q mI_=■2MI74 t' It i \ � MITI. AO 1 cp N N CD 11�,,1♦.�;;�. 1.11 1+ h-,l j1 �� a) v 'O Q �•,� fir,: ��[�� a l` Q a CL ".sal , rim,.. �tt�- 0 to 6N I. � Tu �� 1III 1► Ifllk� al U \ 111M#NI ISI - 2,,o, r_ -11 , ii14a1150 TW 3 w al 101.,....„). INN."--" 11:10. fial 0 0 II toulthiNW, ah Ow it "a 12 ISS ��• rat +rte, No c Q 11 i.►1n. �I+.q r-. aJ 4- , %'0'/ S W N II �� , art . ,�t• Zd 0j a e3 1- } e l r �1=um im i > _O I o,. • �� O 1 `■ , �� 11n to a' d ♦ •>G. ` /tt111,10.u� .fit\m11n11mnu O d s. ♦ �"i f ' 0o i �•/■ tO `t1 a„,„.,\S,.. 0. ....1� �C s Cl.O `=c°° • a1 t I o i ifs tltt�'ASS on�:'AO►�1111111 nnpu n■ IQ Z C 5 6 f ��.w\ td• -a0nl®®tall ME111■III11111111 e a 1 ; -MIun •1®®®1111111111111111,110■ o NIL a eo 2Y 11 t �I:� ,�a11Nl= m.11 1®®®dud rn.11 • - 11- E ix N °'o"Q8 1 dt 1 / I '-1.1ni ri 11.1 n11111111nmIutm II 1: Q o 1- W $°- nam m111 auninn�11num.n I ;' ,'�' �-- uli II1111111N 11111111111LY®® ■711t■Itlll U �U!2 �'/�� 1111 11111 i.7® ■■ i) ^c'Y'v • V r 111 NI Li C11 ir0 (I� NF 2LL t t 1 /I/� ❑.1111 1,11 r..�__1 .. �■ V — (0 l • I r�i 11 miry, •,•b0111*- o:i�� I �// 1■s�t-- 111111111'v„ ' z .i l •• 11 1111 �/�' t�11��!'.!�" �116 � w1u 1 "r 1,4,1,17.6-14:11111.61" � lir '1 ��l{ a■■gnuIl. ` h I„„,- � _u■Iri1N 11■I■ ' : = idI _ .4/ ,uu, • n .. im tO Ei 110 H iriiii � /e II I- 7l711s , Jip I � 11 Id: '�_. _ 11.111_;Is LamL-5 .a= 1. - •- I` Iminim . 11A rjIr• � ■1 I II E 1■'� mama mu i I/Ili"...i1I III L 1- 'di �s L. ! ■1�n ■1�-1� a nlal� h_21„,-;r17„1._ 1 � ■Tu r ■ Itd,• 111I1I1\' I 11111_ 1��n� r�� ^•: 'irm SEWw �Ise I„.1.111 �T■ Ial. BE 3 Iltra ' aci �r�,(III ri MN 1.. E Ilaj ��l�E' Y �11 :':4�; N M rn : •tom m �ta1 ,g ;�__I I it.i.f 0> W N E wows n;�s►� �� ■4111,•.1/iii- c E L. J �I amm11 i ■1■i. •� d d = z, c0 nnla r,.�♦ DAN �� . i � � 2 U IIIIIIIFAII Illtl� � I A ■ 1�t■ n1i wnnl■1 Y L .= . 1 II Prifilirf,Mits1"1111 r EE pi 0 1 I i �•n ,r Ali ii,r•ii�11rrio a .11111111 ( :MI migin ili klIE�VIII 1� I ,,,.,._~'�� r4., L! �pt i g ►F� Fr=II ii MOT8 _ ; �psm 11,x• =ptirr r� N ”lion IN gIrt 441-1.--,....( ' mr—ilior . ibiutziggii, i IL: _ _A y nulik ..._, co III r IP rl'r 11 •� ",. W C stlis t 1'',�11 . IF' atliii *'Zing: ■: Z o •.� it �t.N___ . 'Zin1Nerag:: ini6r _ L • 7 . „„4,,, o a.„t �-„fit, o En �� x ' 41 lisa.„ fits.,,friii (DN. *r, \4r4.4 \ i 2 p„ . im re ijib,:,,:...,. t. old x . r- j I LI WIr 4 ..,..7- 0 a •5-0 S! kik ow l&VII fir �wIIr �A411VA1\t/�1�' a. ® Hi 2COh AI�1 1 * .IsIIA♦� • a •y O II� �nWOt I liii r-. r->, H . i tri-nue 1.:aLINOMM I OAS I I �Q' ,.' �l I l I I�I�I °i`` Z J E- d` 11 �1- l .l L N Q o 6 6'% ars t �■MI 1.";atI`�' I �1 lL p, c a i 1+inn d I�g � G ��'Vii:+u mo 51,.",..".4.,avnq.11uuu Mr— . t H° g,=o 1 111 +oary1111111■11III _.,....-11%.'t fi0,+p= ►1 -,� �N��mmu unml w (6 Z a 8 ■r�.�l 11 o�=u®®®1111111111111111 1111 0 Q. 7 C g2 a$ CO ` Ipi ._VIII 11i. '::I INn 11111111■1111.Nall 11111.■LL w.� �11�4�� 1111111' 111.I:,P1 11:III11■111■IG Nall Hr IF. 0 8 /;� �L.1■0 11.11111 1 1.11 11.11111 Ina 111/1111 11■■■ C p 1 W R P P"11.11111111111.111 111 IO 1 1■1 11111 7.■■11..■1■111111. p uri m / .%�illi s1�� i uuu um c ■ ion. 1..■■ C) 7�` / ❑�.u1nm 1111„tntt1� _ UW a r �� 4 /0M $ °LL � /ice' mi.,. 11 r.,__Irl■.1.Wr =r V % co— , _!!11111111 r '�' ��` � �� .SII!•. z .44( ■111. ' I .2 1�, li it r►111111111111■1 11� - . nn�. ,n 11n.Illpnu� � ♦ opf_ _y1�'k:..1111■■ o 11111_,111 I r( /; ....1' 1111.01. dr. Ili �.•'Liiiiim iliA0_■■II Ill ■ 1 ■1111 \ _ u 111.E_.III ...... "�1 ,1 ►Tr1;r 4 ii i.iO_ 11■Ir�1 ` 111!■1.mow,:- , : v 17 1 ,\ `,\ 111!..1_.1!. ■i■51 y._ I „ I, .� ci .1�.1! L. n!JAE AE El � Ili I` .. 111 1N F !i lin; 1 11 11111/r■�^/ ,': L.... i. 1 .,....i.,....0.1, ,, „„,,„ a=:.~ 111 .111111ICE. ■ u11um— i. i II IIL■I■■ E_I■' frW74L.._ mums 11111►. 'Mt V.:silt 11111111'. SRL] •1l itt U .1111111 _ lX „_,3 IP i co o) L'.■�ry.4 _•, x `11 r�,�•� 03 E !a�111■11, !1 .. ..1 nii�°i�� a d ili I 4 >. t ��I aiuupl -.■-it1�a■ A d Zs III %arei.��,1 ., .11--ii-■ ■ = .ae 5 x U .. 1111 a�ycy— eaLjr"'' r qI '111111 = n!usai 911`.■ uu■ll■■Ei .1 Z c6 !• \,-,NAmplalE1 Ifi1 gillg ,, ., , milit, ,11I...ii'1111' 11 I �. 1MI:4 111 ■ t'i `%Elle p ?II 'M Ayllp F,A.,.., iii 1SCU II 1101.-7411111111111 LE1j sit llrn E- GO co 1idJ $"iiii1 co ♦1��--Elie-: r ram_ _ `� ll` - • iw...,At it VAo !P '�, p. Iwo ', wirrtizivi o mii tt��\,�', i___i_ih avim nts. _I,�.1 nVii wP4...4' � n. 0:4101;41 Ili o � �� ot it I*\ P .I 0 :.., ,�`' al co CA VI Ally \T ' • •I 11- w IIS _ 0 11 I �\ .4 0'01'0/ '= c m llp / - 1 n _ •� is Ww a 1— nn... .. >nn. .. . > N Z / `i tit„1:1■1•n:AZ Ism C D -H g 00 unn■■■■nn a. d g O d m= Q- i..tt., t03*. o- m.mEanr Y t 1- a mo=o o /.�iiii, • t■ so I;L Biu�3 on Lo EEO OE��II IIII��■■� 03 ` ■a a W & \ I i■Nll ,■11■111. :1®®®1111■1111 I 11111 1 11 I Ill O Q. �� 1 VPH nii lu Iii nn 11■®�,®1®nn iii= Iniii 1 O O Q c m,8 O\ -1/1111111 11■..■ Li 11■.11111:.■■■..1■■r1.■ a lti D m o V� ilii_ uNnn.l C) pt o.. ®� nun nm •�..■m ■■IA �+ � t ❑�..11■1111 „�... 111.., — ►�/ mnu en in nz1 111:: �y..u.n z .444( 1_ OV NIMI .a1� i46)1e,. ....�.... . 10110111e- r„jam__.---,.....,....1-.._ � I e amt so Ili um 1 : .9 i.0►- 11. ■■nu■ 1�nn MAIM ou nn■n■ . I■■ I 1, 1�_ m . on. 1111.1.. --.- _ ��.anu�lllllu�• If N.�Ill IIII i MI11 .11.1111.;:P�21=_=f i 4 j' Uk •Alii:=170F•71 r + I,ii, : O ■It11111-■1I.111.1=11013,w+ I[IM IIII_ 1.=1.P- 1111111111111111111111111111.° III - mlm:jai ::1=1-G 3,11 ■' .. ,.., ..111111,.... ,i1,1,E.,,-,,, 1 ■G..,sir-5274 - IV 1 E�1iiu■�E■ nn■1a1 � � _ - ; 11111111/ - �I X1111 . 311�11I. Irt a��r1 r:..•'► , -t '� ` t C. a IIII III 7_®.1 ` J 'bad!'', 3 Eco C7 1n O MEMO hI 1j2 ri 74 / ♦1 I w w E BI?,MVO i� V I ra= I I I• ' i.. 1t ii%t 4- c \ I 0 I 111 ►'Q��iAy 1149� ,. 1 �1 !Ldr':'TE f -B:I1IIlili1 M. ® I Ii1I Ii=tI ■■.jai liihrmvoni....! pl.,..gligii. . N"\\N HA,,F 1 0 EmE 7 < *Alb i>.--ra. 1.16,P 4-kgivIl . , . , ii_ilx=vored mni-ggisiiErzi - ,„,....„. _ , ...._ ir \ 8 E D TAW Ell wiP-1 jal .-. 4tom-liqpia Ct. a SLIC mai.„; _ f . "'gin IhA4411161 \ 0 0 CC LL •_ EJE . ✓.,--if Li 110100111 - co u) kin P#% if. iii..,,,,,,_ -.0 ,11.. u) as ,_ 1 ■ QIt:7 W �lik- � �i H:AVa 11111.`c 17- 0 NI `. 16111.111-21 : o E I n •�, rw I i imi ID 1\ 1 .- Z co m E 12 of gi • so■ II1 �, ` o I_MP O m N to 1-` ` I MA Noire• two N D - U . a. a vy H 1 • II 11111, titre it► 111 Q vimo t11��a s� to alai I F. -. 'enu_r eW 7 . �� 11 n 11P1pm irk t O. �, o. I /' 'd 2 a a ' Y L pj t �. 1p 11/11��. 111 _ C c r \�\P1%a►os \�0��0\\11111 1`11 _Ne . J El,§ i q\1% 111 %a Gt v. lit �ilf�p\A%i:� go11�.:Inn: CU Ie c. w`i3, _��.NN\Op e��in...■r.11 n Q C. C 8 a 3 �MI'1111 Illi 1111 11111 111111,1111 1111 II 1'' t,„'33,5 y p ��1111111,■:II1.II 11111111111111111 N O o j'11.1111 I..Ill11 tow 1111 111 11111 1 O G •X ��H" 4 -1.1111111:11.1.11111111111111-.1 ° w �3�^ -��_/.' 111101!111111111111 1111n 11111 1 I III 111..11 1 Z. 1 U c a` `'JIIIL_. Inu.m yw1 ■w1 ♦� m€ALL iirim .■.a: n 11,1°e fi iu •j.IIIIIII• 11n111111ra1 i II! N 1 z -44 .Ilii 41 IP1 -- i.101 1/111 111!1? IMRE!111 IIIA" � �an�111.�1i'lLI .1 r11111l111.11111111.- L �- u l..1.111.1. 1.1111. 1111 ,..��i_ _tom"' . atI11 n1111J.�j ; L.moi I W.L.-- • 'u1111111 Iglu.111■ '- .I VAN 11.1.1t'l •. /�II.` I ..■1 I,_„mi 111 mei► .., �r /IIIA MI 1Id11 ■ II.1�III„-A , 0� . r II 11111■MII111 EL.----i•11■ .0 `'S I Lo umi 111..1.111.1 Nom m■ ■ ■I 55■.I re Ilk , •` 0 111111 11111.11111.:11I■UI■ 21 1, ��1�1 rl 111ln In111_■ ■■ +�1 1111,111 011111 /11111/1 Ilap •111111.1 rr ■ - i ►�11i-:I�1�) • II t/1 _11111111 IIIII_II 111111119: } "Ai 1 t tam '. I 1111111.1111/111/0 .1 I Yt�{{ ■i -'-a ►� 111.1111 11.1:111:111111■e*,I 1� 1_,:1�A+ gal ®� J N I lllill.UM talYl51.�. � fl'' ••i , O I!u1111111r.1.1.11 11.1111. / 1 mono"-'unn.MI i 1 -6 1';. ILI: ■_ U 1 1u.u1■ on.0 i. J - 1111111111' 111111 111 111.!11,,11■1111 i,.o _..:�ima r��1••/ I:11:.11■■111111 111111PI. "t ■ ► a ,, 11.1111111 111 - ' , i O `nuul.Innen la :■ IIIIIIIIIGI " • • iiI1111.._I . I _ N 1=11111= .•ma I.I 0 N _111111 n01111111.� �1 11e ��ilI N o Ing_ �O1.IO1� !•♦♦ ♦ a �I�C�Og1~• '' sr: .� ruI♦i� ySC`U c li Li I i�111,1.1■■11 qa:i►h rl M.. M_ love.„1 C N C. \I la .uumu 11 a1 O h■■►-'I""� \'`Iiii�6.Ark it i k ,11111:is;I. 7 t w 1�/■111 I � 1uii11.1 1'L ,1E c 2 a �° 5 C 1111■ !r',I'��II 1, a 1 i 1 ( *�.wDL II PSIP.,1110.1 , 11n u11 IMA 1) ' �,� I: -1411 „., * ■IIS., .,.�... " 1 or, �i�� w co 1 WI p C N co ,..: 1-1 E. 1, 34‘r: jetiPkoada-.. .' 4111li &am , oc PS.s..C,...% 1 I m� VetO roil.11 C £ C 7 1y E �_ o m a ` 7=4 '-ikkswg'01111111119 !, O y o s :1%. irC ), pall: 1 tiNon:= riooli Ai -wg4li\\ 40 40.11 \1111(fii4:4\.:1 4 \ i 1101. tn 13 !ii ■ • 7 iII ip i= _; rgi 1 ill 32 �1g4�p� �IIr u o -I i.10 .II'_ 11•'