Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2017-05-11 Planning Commission Meeting PacketCITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA Thursday, May 11, 2017 7:00 P.M. L Call to Order/Pledge of Allegiance II. Approval of Agenda III. Approve April 13, 2017 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes (1) IV. Department / Commission Liaison / Other Reports V. Visitors/Public Comment This is an opportunity for the public to address the Commission with questions or concerns not on the agenda. Please limit comments to three minutes. VI. Public Hearings A. Oak Park Heights Retail Develo eat PUD Amendment: Review request for Planned Unit Development Amendment (PUD) related to Comprehensive Sign Plan, located at the SW intersection of 60th St. N. and Krueger Ln. N. (2) B. Oak Park Sr. Living PUD General Plan & PUD Amendment: Review requests for Planned Unit Development (PUD) General Plan to allow construction of a 3 -story, 72 -unit Sr. Apartment Building to be located E. of Nova Scotia Ave. N. and Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment to allow a covered walkway connection between buildings located at 13936 Lower 59th St. N. and 13945 Upper 58th St. N., within the Oak Park Senior Living development. (3) VII. New Business VIII. Old Business A. Oak Park Heights — Comprehensive Plan 2040 (4) IX. Informational A. Upcoming Meetings: • Tuesday, May 23, 2017 City Council 6:00 p.m./City Hall • Thursday, June 8, 2017 Planning Commission 7:00 p.m./City Hall • Tuesday, June 27, 2017 City Council 6:00 p.m./City Hall B. Council Representative • Tuesday, May 23, 2017 — Commissioner Freeman • Tuesday, June 27, 2017 — Commissioner Anthony X. Adjourn. I. / II CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS PLANNING COMIVIISSION MEETING MINUTES Thursday, April 13, 2017 — Oak Park Heights City Hall Call to Order/Pled2e of Allegiance: Welcome New Planning Commissioner Tim Freeman. Chair Kremer called the meeting to order and welcomed new Planning Commissioner Tim Freeman. Present: Commissioners Kremer, Freeman & Quale; City Administrator Johnson, City Planner Richards, and City Councilmember Dougherty. Absent: Commissioners Anthony & Nelson. Approval of Agenda: Commissioner Quale, seconded by Commissioner Freeman, moved to approve the Agenda as presented. Carried 3 — 0. Approval of Mich 16.2017 Meeting Minutes: Commissioner Quale, seconded by Commissioner Freeman, moved to approved the Minutes as presented. Carried 3 - 0. 1 Visitors/Public Comment: None. Public Hegjpg: A. Timothy Bockman Garage Addition CUP: Review request for conditional use permits to allow an increase in area size, location and height related to a proposed garage addition to be located at 14151 60t` St. N City Planner Richards reviewed and discussed the April 5, 2017 Planning Report as to the request, noting issues related to the odd shape of Mr. Bockman's lot and the placement of the garage to the side yard as a result of the same, adding that the location was likely the best selection for placement. Chair Kremer opened the public hearing and invited comment. Tim Bockman —14151 60a` St. N. introduced himself as the applicant and discussed the scope of the proposed project and the existing conditions of the property. Chair Kremer inquired if any of his property was lost to the roadway project. Mr. Bockman responded that some of his property was taken as part of the project. Discussion ensued as to the information submitted and that which was required by the City for the request, the open space conservation district zoning classification of the parcel and what could occur if the property were rezoned to something otherwise, the proposed garage size area and height, driveway access and the sites current grade. There being no further public comment, Chair Kremer closed the public hearing. Planning Commission Minutes April 13, 2017 Page 2 of 4 Commissioner Freeman, seconded by Commissioner Quale, moved to recommend that the City Council approve the request, subject to the conditions of the April 5, 2017 Planning Report as amended; specifically, that: 1. The City Engineer shall review the drainage for the site. The final grading for the proposed structure shall be subject to approval the City Engineer. 2. Any exterior mechanical equipment associated with the garage shall be screened. 3. The exterior of the proposed garage shall be finished with siding to match the current home exterior. 4. The applicant shall apply for and receive a building permit for the structure. 5. Any other conditions of the Planning Commission, City Council and City Staff. Carried 3 - 0. B. Midstate Landscaping & Excavating CUP: Review request for a conditional use permit to allow a landscaping business and outside storage of landscaping materials and equipment at 5750 Memorial Ave. N City Planner Richards reviewed the April 5, 2017 Planning Report and provided an issue analysis of the proposed request and discuss the same. Chair Kremer opened the public hearing and invited continent. Jason Anderson — 5750 Memorial Ave. N. introduced himself as the applicant and made himself available for questions. There being no further public comment or discussion from the Commission, Chair Kremer closed the public hearing. Commissioner Quale, seconded by Commissioner Freeman, moved to recommend that the City Council approve the request, subject to the conditions of the April 5, 2017 Planning Report as amended; specifically, that: 1. The City Engineer shall approve any grading and berm work to contain the storage of materials on site. Any grading and drainage plans shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer and the Brown's Creek Watershed District. 2. Landscape material bins shall be placed on the north side of the site by September 30, 2017. Planning Commission Minutes April 13, 2017 Page 3 of 4 3. Any freestanding or wall lighting placed on the site shall be in compliance with the Zoning Ordinance and be subject to review and approval of City Staff. 4. The storage and fueling of vehicles shall be compliant with all Washington County and State of Minnesota rules and requirements. 5. All signage proposed for the site shall be compliant with Section 401.15.G of the Zoning Ordinance and shall be subject to receiving a sign permit. 6. Trash and recycling containers shall be stored inside the building. Carried 3 — 0 VII. New Business: None. A. Oak Park Hei is — Comprehensive Plan 2040: City Planner Richards reviewed his April 6, 2017 Memorandum noting that the April meeting will focus on review of the issued and existing land uses identified during the 2008 Comprehensive Plan process and then discussing potential changes to these areas. Discussion ensued related to traffic/transportation, park related items, the Comprehensive Planning process, the relationship between Metropolitan Council and communities in the planning process, and the desire to see the preparation of the Comprehensive Plan be more meaningful as a planning function and to that end it was suggested that rather than a lump sum review and update of the plan, the process be more continuous and consistent conversation. Existing Land Use was discussed. It was noted that land use zoning is important in creating a healthy mix of development, which will provide community stability and economy. Chair Kremer expressed that he didn't see the Comprehensive Plan as an effective planning tool because so much change occurs in the short term. City Planner Richards stated that he will be meeting with the City Council to review these same issues and also hopes to address them with the Parks Commission. He asked the Commission to give some thought to issues they may want to include in the plan for the next meeting and to also review the existing land use map and to suggest any changes they feel should be made. May discussion will be a wrap up of the issues and land use discussion. Richards indicated that he hopes to assemble inventory information with the updated census numbers and begin the inventory discussion with the Commission as well. Planning Commission Minutes April 13, 2017 Page 4 of 4 1X. Informational: A. 2017 Commission Liaison Calendar Review/Update: Chair Kremer noted that he would not be able to attend the July 13' meeting and asked if anyone had an issue for rescheduling that meeting to July 20d. No issue was expressed. No other changes were recommended for the calendar or the Commission Liaison Schedule. • Tuesday, April 25, 2017 City Council 6:00 p.m./City Hall • Tuesday, May 9, 2017 City Council 6:00 p.m./City Hall • Thursday, May 11, 2017 Planning Commission 7:00 p.m./City Hall • Tuesday, May 23, 2017 City Council 6:00 p.m./City Hall C. Council Rqpresentative • Tuesday, April 25, 2017 — Commissioner Nelson • Tuesday, May 23, 2017 — Commissioner Freeman X. A°o Commissioner Freeman, seconded by Commissioner Quale, moved to adjourn at 7:51 p.m. Carried 3 — 0. Respectfully submitted, Julie Hultman Planning & Code Enforcement Approved by the Planning Commission: 3601 ThursWn Avenue N, Suite •r Anoka, MN r Phone: 763.231.5840 763.427.0520 TO: Eric Johnson FROM: Scott Richards DATE: May 4, 2017 RE: Oak Park Heights — Oak Park Heights Retail • Planned Unit Development Amendment for Sign Plan — Southwest Intersection of 60th Street and Krueger Lane TPC FILE: BACKGROUND 236.02 —17.04 Chris Whitehouse of DJR Architecture Inc. has made application a for Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment for a Sign Plan at the Southwest Intersection of 601h Street and Krueger Lane. Although a general signage plan was reviewed as part of the original PUD approvals, the Applicant has provided more detail and is now asking for building wall signage on three sides of endcap tenant wall spaces and signage on the rear of the two multi -tenant buildings. The PUD Amendment will allow for additional signage not permitted in the sign regulations and set the allowable signage for the development. The development consists of three building of approximately 20,600 square feet, 6,000 square feet, and 6,600 square feet. The buildings are now under construction and the Applicant is in the process of securing tenants. EXHIBITS The review is based upon the following submittals: Exhibit 1: Project Narrative, April 14, 2017 Exhibit 2: Comprehensive Sign Plan Detail, May 1, 2017 Exhibit 3: Signage Site Plan (AS100) Exhibit 4: Signage Elevations, Lots 1-2 (AS200) Exhibit 5: Signage Elevations, Lot 3 (AS210) Exhibit 6: Monument Sign, North Exhibit 7: Monument Sign, East Exhibit 8: Pylon Sign f I:A1[91L, The Project Narrative for the project is found as Exhibit 1. PROJECT: Brackey 4th Addition is a proposed retail development at the Southwest Corner of 60th Street North and Krueger Lane in Oak Park Heights, MN. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed project is composed of three buildings of approximately 20,600 SF, 6,000 SF, and 6,600 SF. The site is located on in the southwest corner of the intersection of 60th Street North and Krueger Lane immediately north of the Menards store. The buildings will be privately developed, owned and leased to a mixture of retail, service and Quick Service Restaurant tenants. The applicant is requesting a PUD Amendment allowing for building wall signage on 3 sides of endcap tenant spaces and wall signage on the rear of the retail buildings See Signage Plans dated 4-14-17 attached with this Amendment application. SITE SIGNAGE: There are two site sign types proposed for the project, a pylon sign at the corner of Krueger Lane and 60th Street North and a monument signs at the entry drives of both Krueger Lane and 60th Street North. Pylon Sign: In compliance with Oak Park Heights sign requirements the proposed pylon sign is 20' high and has a signage area of 100 square feet with space for project name and individual tenants. The base and sign box will be a metal with similar colors for the proposed buildings, and the top of the box will have an EiFS cornice detail to match the cornice detail on the Lots 1 and 2 retail buildings. Signage boxes will be illuminated during normal business hours in compliance with City requirements. Monument Sign: In compliance with Oak Park Heights sign requirements the proposed monument sign located at the entrance drives are 20' high and have sign faces of 100 square feet each with space for project name and individual tenants. The signs are designed to match the brick columns and E1FS cornice details on the Lots 1 and 2 retail buildings. Signage boxes will be illuminated during normal business hours in compliance with City requirements. BUILDING SIGNAGE: See signage plans AS100, AS200, and AS210 for signage criteria for multi -occupant and single tenant buildings. This amendment is asking for endcap tenants to be allowed one sign on each of their three sides, and is also asking for each tenant to be allowed a sign on the rear elevation. Signage to be mounted on a raceway. Other criteria is in compliance with Oak Park Heights sign requirements. 2 DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE: Direction signs are shown on site and master sign plan for identification of drive-thru access, one-way routing, etc. Additional directional signs may be added as required to direct motorists. Design and color of directional signs will be similar to sign faces at monument signs. ISSUES ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan. The property is designated as Commercial on the Proposed Land Use Map. The use of the site as retail and restaurant buildings is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Zoning. The property is zoned B-4, Limited Business District. The retail and restaurant buildings are permitted uses within the B-4 Limited Business District. The development was approved as a PUD but the Applicant has now requested approval of an overall sign plan. The sign regulations are addressed as follows. Pylon Signs. The sign regulations allow one freestanding sign and two additional monument signs for developments in the B-4 Limited Business District. The proposed sign plan indicates a pylon sign at the intersection of 601h Street North and Krueger Lane. The regulations allow one pylon sign no more than 100 square feet and 20 feet in height. The proposed sign will comply with these requirements. The plans indicate two monument signs to be used at each entrance to the site. The regulations allow these signs as monuments that can be a maximum of 100 square feet in size and be no more than 20 feet in height. The signs, as proposed will each be 100 square feet in size and just under 20 feet in height. The approved landscape plan indicates plantings at the base of the pylon and monuments signs. 3 Height Sign Size Height Copy & -Graphic Feet) (Square Multiple Occupancy Business �M=� L -Buildings The proposed sign plan indicates a pylon sign at the intersection of 601h Street North and Krueger Lane. The regulations allow one pylon sign no more than 100 square feet and 20 feet in height. The proposed sign will comply with these requirements. The plans indicate two monument signs to be used at each entrance to the site. The regulations allow these signs as monuments that can be a maximum of 100 square feet in size and be no more than 20 feet in height. The signs, as proposed will each be 100 square feet in size and just under 20 feet in height. The approved landscape plan indicates plantings at the base of the pylon and monuments signs. 3 Wali Signage — Multiple Occupancy Buildings. The sign regulations limit the number of individual wall signs to one (1) per entrance, and each sign shall comply with the maximum wall sign allowances permitted in the district. Tenants on building ends may have a maximum of two (2) signs each to be located at the front and side elevations of the tenant space. The individual signs shall be located only on exterior walls which they are directly related to the use being identified. Rear signage is only allowed if there is an entrance to the space, but not for tenants on building ends. The size allowances for multiple occupancy building wall signage in the B-4 Limited Business District is as follows: Principal Structure Individual Wail Sign Total Wall (Gross Square Feet) Calculation Signage For Proert Multiple Occupancy Business 200 square feet or 10 percent of 500 square feet Buildings the wall face, whichever is less For the two multiple occupancy buildings, (Lot 1 and Lot 2 buildings), the table found as Exhibit 2 indicates the allowable signage for each of the building facades. The table corresponds to the building elevations found in Exhibit 4. The proposed signage would exceed the allowances for multiple occupancy buildings in that the Applicant is requesting three signs for end tenants, one on the front, side and rear. The tenants in the center of the buildings would also be allowed a rear sign under this plan. Staff has reviewed other sign plans and allowances for multiple occupancy buildings. Rear signage has been allowed for the CSM development that includes Buffalo Wild Wings, and the multiple occupancy building near Kowalski's that includes St. Croix Cleaners. The request that the Applicant has made is reasonable, but Staff would suggest the following limitations on size, in that the number of allowable signs will increase from what is permitted: There shall be no allowed signage on the walls facing each other of Lot 1 and 2. The distance between the buildings is approximately 16 feet. Signage on these lots would not be highly visible. Signage on three facades would be allowed for the east fagade of Lot 1 and west fagade of Lot 2. 2. One sign only shall be allowed per fagade per tenant. 3. The allowable signage for the east fagade of Lot 1 and the west fagade of lot 2 would be limited to no more than 75 square feet. 4 Wall Si nae — Single Occupant Building, The sign regulations allow three wall signs on any principal building and each sign shall be placed on a separate building fagade. A total of 300 square feet of signage and a maximum sign size of 120 square feet or 10 percent of the wall face, whichever is less is allowed. In this case, the limit would be 120 square feet per sign face up to 300 square feet total. Principal Structure ! . • R, (Gross• • •; .!' -------------------- 10,000 — 100,000 300 square feet W�—w ra a For the Lot 3 building, the sign plan proposes signs on the north, east and west facades of the building totaling 300 square feet. The second sign on the east facade, above the entrance door, will be allowed if only directional signage with no advertising. The signs will comply with the sign allowances. Directional Signage. The sign plan indicates directional signage through the development for the drive thru restaurant. The directional signage is allowable but cannot contain advertising for the associated business. The detail plans for the directional signage will be reviewed as part of the sign permit process. Sin Illumination. The signs will be required to comply with the Zoning Ordinance lighting requirements. Staff will approve the lighting specifications for the signs at the time of permitting. The pylon and monument signage will be illuminated during normal business hours, but will be required to be shut off one hour after closing. The building signage will be individual lit channel letters, mounted on a raceway attached to the face of each elevation. The sign lighting should be designed such that only the text and logo portions of the signs are to be lit at night. The sign background will need to be dark. CONCLUSION I RECOMMENDATION Subject to the preceding review, City staff recommends approval of the Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment for a Sign Plan at the Southwest Intersection of 60th Street and Krueger Lane subject to the conditions that follow: 1. There shall be no allowed signage on the building walls facing each other of Lot 1 and 2. Signage on three facades would be allowed for the east facade of Lot 1 and west facade of Lot 2. 2. One sign only shall be allowed per fagade per tenant. 3. The allowable signage for the east fagade of Lot 1 and the west fagade of lot 2 shall be limited to no more than 75 square feet. 5 4. For the Lot 3 building, the second sign on the east fagade, above the entrance door, will be allowed if only directional signage with no advertising. 5. The proposed directional signage is allowable but cannot contain advertising for the associated business. The detail plans for the directional signage will be reviewed as part of the sign permit process. 6. The outdoor lighting shall be turned off one hour after closing, except for approved security lighting. 7. All signs shall be designed to comply with the Zoning Ordinance requirements for internal illumination. 8. The bases of the three freestanding signs shall be landscaped and subject to review and approval of the City Arborist. pc: Julie Hultman 2 333 Washington Avenue North, Suite 210, Union Plaza, Minneapolis, MN 55401 1 612.676.2700 F: 612.676.2786 www.djr-inc.com April 14, 2017 PROJECT: Brackey 411 Addition is a proposed retail development at the Southwest Corner of 60th Street North and Krueger Lane in Oak Park Heights, MN. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed project is composed of three buildings of approximately 20,600 SF, 6,000 SF, and 6,600 SF. The site is located on in the southwest corner of the intersection of 60th Street North and Krueger Lane immediately north of the Menards store. The buildings will be privately developed, owned and leased to a mixture of retail, service and Quick Service Restaurant tenants. The applicant is requesting a PUD Amendment allowing for building wall signage on 3 sides of endcap tenant spaces and wall signage on the rear of the retail buildings See Signage Plans dated 4-14-17 attached with this Amendment application. SITE SIGNAGE: There are two site sign types' proposed for the project; a pylon sign at the corner of Krueger Lane and 601h Street North and a monument signs at the entry drives of both Krueger Lane and 601h Street North. Pylon Sign: In compliance with Oak Park Heights sign requirements the proposed pylon sign is 20' high and has a signage area of 100 square feet with space for project name and individual tenants. The base and sign box will be a metal with similar colors for the proposed buildings, and the top of the box will have an EIFS cornice detail to match the cornice detail on the Lots 1 and 2 retail buildings. Signage boxes will be illuminated during normal business hours in compliance with City requirements. Monument Sign: In compliance with Oak Park Heights sign requirements the proposed monument sign located at the entrance drives are 20' high and have sign faces of 100 square feet each with space for project name and individual tenants. The signs are designed to match the brick columns and EIFS cornice details on the Lots 1 and 2 retail buildings. Signage boxes will be illuminated during normal business hours in compliance with City requirements. BUILDING SIGNAGE: See signage plans AS100, AS200, and AS210 for signage criteria for multi -occupant and single tenant buildings. This amendment is asking for endcap tenants to be allowed one sign on each of their three sides, and is also asking for each tenant to be allowed a sign on the rear elevation. Signage to be mounted on a raceway. Other criteria is in compliance with Oak Park Heights sign requirements. DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE: Direction signs are shown on site and master sign plan for identification of drive-thru access, one-way routing, etc. Additional directional signs may be added as required to direct motorists. Design and color of directional signs will be similar to sign faces at monument signs. o o "Prt o o a u m u m m c L m� �c c- ■ S -I? A m m m S S c H e -i T r! S S 40 ti ti S S N N Nc� H S N N N N YY a ni ni W ice rn m m m m m �Qmems N 'i 'i 'i 'i �■ � w m m m m N � N � � enmmamm � o Q mu1w-SS S QNNnI.m 5 S S 99mNG!8 SS8$ ee opNN.eoppN N M NS S Epr�ry�nS M S S 4 4 O ~ N~~ a C rl N N o N o N m N m a ° N �y yy yy 1+ NI T Q Q N N N �P m m c a m m tq O N b 4�pp w w N ci ry R ����� IYi lYi n 0 N m N N n n n pp m m m '& en O1 N m 1n b 0 0 0 0 N N N N N ri ry ri ppp V ry 3I-oili�I �,�J O � H N O O � e� m� a N `ey O °.a IR ri 'i m m m m m m q 6 m n O O m O N `� v m m r m m m rn Y O M m li a eo emmeee v� 000 a o a�n eea u3 Nn000 R c app moo o caae 00000 a o�ppnoo CC b N d.6 M rWi r�'1 N N N M N aml N N ti w o N N N N N w N N N N N lO N 4�p �I 9 m Gt N oo rnoo 00 W -I N N H N N � m N �mnnn b b w W W W W OC N N N -I N g ri N ooe oro, ei ei W w CO N N N N m i -I N eeeoe OC W W w W N N N N eeee o q o o N o V1 o N N N N p S rl a si ri ° oee2 LL LL LL LL LL■ t fl t ti 2 � C C m m �_ N L L L L L Y Z at.. f 4` yoopp ■ w L as.. ti i■ ^8ti Y g 5 5po 5 pp 5po H h >w pp aa N m tp' pp m Z: 2 2 2 N z 2 2 2 I+ N N N N f lig 2 y o S SSSS S S G N N N o v�eo eo mm� o 8 88888 $ a � m pmi�,g o w ewi H .ppi 8 N N N N N S e6orm m S S �-1 S o o g S ry g S E € E ET E 1 n ygga gga; ,�pg eeqq °1 moo y■ m m a o w w o o °a ami oar G G a n ��,®gQF�{ $ gamam m S amain g ggam� � rr��� Sgamu � � '^ o. m m n f o D 4 N ■ 31 , b o m m � In n ■ h e � ■ a mss MI 5 s 0 o zI 1!810N SIAGH VBd �eO IR MAMMMM ............ Igg ..................... xi "R W, .. ............ am & II, GI Drill plIp Ift 1A. L III, I6w r'�,, ,I,, i � MI' � � �' I ��Iq�� �uu lipp NIN r.' ��N. 11 AP if 1E IP zs Im P& IF Al sill; IF 22 4 jig 9 9 1-1m ---- 9IJI 1--u -------- ;A ----------- ;-77 ----------- --------- j ------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ----------------- -------------------------------------- UY q - ....Axa ....... .......... 11- .................................................................1 ............... I110 ............................... .................. I ....................................I ;i IIrI 3114:11min 11,09 111 Hoklv &I. SLO 1,911411DILINYUR 111!�� movilifflas i:i rcll I,I�IIIjI Nvx ............ Igg ..................... xi "R W, .. ............ am & II, GI Drill plIp Ift 1A. L III, I6w r'�,, ,I,, i � MI' � � �' I ��Iq�� �uu lipp NIN r.' ��N. 11 AP if 1E IP zs Im P& IF Al sill; IF 22 4 jig 9 9 1-1m ---- 9IJI 1--u -------- ;A ----------- ;-77 ----------- --------- j ------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ----------------- -------------------------------------- waw x�mn^nrcw.ma.�wll a ...................................................................................uur,............................. ................................... ........ nM�n'mmwm VAA u a 4�u'11gM�', .. . ............ pigi )I In ll Fla ji all u 51 141 till I LU "Mi°© � Z � � § / \} / / � � � \\ \\ :, ^k \ \\}{ `z}/ƒ ^ T -t RIM RW m I I I m d !I:' OT, & lit c C X to w IL L? M UJ Z 0 Lj z <a 177 ------------- — ---- *�— F TO: Eric Johnson FROM: Scott Richards DATE: May 4, 2017 ® Oak Park Heights Oak Park Senior Living Phase 5 Senior Apartment Building and Enclosed Pedestrian Walkway — Planned Unit Development — General Plan and Amendment - Final Plat TPC FILE: 236.02 17.03 Tim Nolde, representing Oakgreen Villa, LLC, has applied for a Planned Unit Development General Plan and Amendment and Final Plat for the Oak Park Senior Living, Phase 5 senior apartment building located near Nova Scotia Avenue and Lower 59th Street North. The application consists of a request for Building 5 as well as an enclosed pedestrian walkway between Buildings 1 and 2. The General Plan is generally in conformance with the Master Plan created for the Oak Park Senior Living Development as approved by the City Council. This phase of the development will consist of a three story, 72 -unit senior apartment building with an underground parking garage. The building will require the removal of the two existing townhouse structures and the reconfiguration of the previously designated road alignment. There will be 41 one bedroom and 31 two bedroom units. The underground parking garage will provide 71 parking spaces. The PUD for the Oak Park Senior Living Development, which included the Master Plan and General Plan approval for portions of the project, was approved by the City Council on May 29, 2013. This also included the Concept Plan approval for Building 5. General Plan approval for Building 5 is now required under this application. A Planned Unit Development Amendment is required to allow the enclosed pedestrian walkway between Buildings 1 and 2. The review is based upon the following submittals: Exhibit 1: Project Narrative, April 28, 2017 Exhibit 2: Oak Park Senior Living Phase 5, Unit Count, Parking Stall Count Exhibit 3: Title Sheet (TO) Exhibit 4: Master Plan (C2.1) Exhibit 5: Site Plan (AS1) Exhibit 6: Site Plan with Basement (AS2) Exhibit 7: Landscaping Plan (1-1) Exhibit 8: Title Sheet Civil (T) Exhibit 9: Existing Conditions and Demolition Plan (Cl) Exhibit 10: Paving and Dimension Plan (C2) Exhibit 11: Fire Truck Turning Display (C2.1) Exhibit 12: Fire Truck Turning Display (C2.2) Exhibit 13: Grading and Erosion Control Plan (C3) Exhibit 14: Utility Plan (C4) Exhibit 15: Details (C5) Exhibit 16: Detail (C6) Exhibit 17: Basement Plan (A1.0) Exhibit 18: 1111 Floor Plan (A1.1) Exhibit 19: 2"d Floor Plan (A1.2) Exhibit 20: 3rd Floor Plan (A1.3) Exhibit 21: Unit Pians (A1.0) Exhibit 22: Unit Plans (A2.0) Exhibit 23: Preliminary Site Design Exhibit 24: Preliminary Building Design (Page 1) Exhibit 25: Preliminary Building Design (Page 2) Exhibit 26: Floor Plan (A1.0) Exhibit 27: Enlargement Plans (A2.0) Exhibit 28: Elevations (A3.0) Exhibit 29: Pedestrian Walkway Design Exhibit 30: Pedestrian Walkway Design Exhibit 31: Sign Plans (5 pages) Exhibit 32: Final Plat — Oak Park Senior Living Second Addition (2 pages) Exhibit 33: Memo from City Arborist - Lisa Danielson Exhibit 34: Memo from City Engineer — Lee Mann Exhibit 35: Memo from Bayport Fire Chief — Allen Eisinger — April 16, 2017 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Beth Diem of Archnet has provided the following narrative related to the PUD General Plan and Amendment request. The attached project represents the fifth and final phase of the Oak Dark Senior Living project and an enclosed pedestrian walkway between buildings one and two. It is our understanding that the walkway and phase five building require a Plat Amendment. Please find enclosed, the application for the Plat Amendment, with the following serving as the project narrative. Phase five will consist of a three story, 72 -unit apartment building with underground parking. This facility will require the removal of the two existing townhouse structures and the reconfiguration of the previously designated road alignment. The layout of the building is being used to create a large park that will serve as the central green space 2 for the entire complex. The revised road alignment will ring the entire central park and accommodate the turning requirements of the city's emergency vehicles. The dwelling unit count for the overall project under the previous plat was 351 (911312091), and would now total 346 units. This number includes the four townhouses remaining on the corner of Nova Scotia and 58th St N. The parking count for the overall project under the previous plat (911312091), was 308 underground stalls and 969 exterior stalls, for a total of 477. With the plat amendment, we are proposing 289 underground stalls and 176 exterior stalls for a total of 457 spaces. The exterior materials will remain the same as previous buildingslphases, with variations provided in color and configuration. The lighting for the building and site will also remain similar to the previous phases. Currently, Building One provides a kitchen with meal services available for Buildings One, Two and Three. The popularity of the meal service, and the need to transport the meals on wheeled carts has created the need for the enclosed walkway between buildings One and Two. The location of the walkway was chosen to minimize the impact on interior units, maintaining a convenient connection for the residents and providing the ability for the existing parking facilities to remain operational during construction. It should also be noted that the walkway cannot be located on the first floor (on grade) due to the security measures required for a memory care facility. Exterior materials will be consistent with the existing buildings. ISSUES ANALYSIS Adjacent Uses. Uses adjacent to the subject site are listed below: North of Site: Present Zoning — B-4, Limited Business District Present Use — Highway 36 orientated commercial development, and the Xcel Energy power line easement South of Site: Present Zoning — O, Open Space and R-1 Single Family Residential District Present Use — City park land and a single-family neighborhood West of Site: Present Zoning — B-4, Limited Business District Present Use — Lowe's/CSM Commercial development East of Site: Present Zoning — B-4/PUD, Residential Planned Unit Development Present Use — Existing Memory/Senior Care and Senior Living, and Oakgreen Avenue Comprehensive Plan. The 2008 Comprehensive Plan originally designated this area as medium density residential. The increase in number of approved units placed the area into a high density residential classification for land use purposes. The land use classification of the Comprehensive Plan was changed to high density residential in 2011. 3 Zoning. This property has been designated as B-4, Limited Business District which accommodates residential development as a conditional use. As such, the underlying base zoning district is B-4, Limited Business District with a PUD overlay. The B-4, Limited Business District lists two-family, townhomes and multiple family dwellings as a conditional use. The performance standards of the R-3 Multiple Family District must be complied with for residential development in the B-4 Limited Business District. Final Plat. The Applicant has provided a Final Plat for Oak Park Senior Living Second Addition. The Final Plat, as well as the dedication and vacation of any easements shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer and City Attorney. Park Dedication. Park dedication has been satisfied for this area. The applicant paid the maximum percentage (14%) of equivalent cash value as part of the original approvals in 2006. Project Density/Open Space. Section 401.15.C.3 of the Zoning Ordinance establishes the density thresholds for residential properties. Elderly housing requires 1,000 square feet of land area per unit excluding right-of-way and wetlands. The multiple family requirement is 2,500 square feet per unit. The property is 770,186 square feet. With a total of 350 units proposed, the resulting density is 2,200 square feet per unit. As long as the project stays as a senior rental complex, it would meet density requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. The development agreement has included a provision to assure that the project remains as senior rental and is not converted to non -restricted rental housing. Proposed Street Access. The existing roadway system that was developed for the Oakgreen Village and Oakgreen Commons projects will remain in place except for the closure of the access from Nova Scotia Avenue to Lower 59th Street North. The new building will block that entrance, so that all access to the development will be from Upper 58th Street North. The access at Nova Scotia Avenue will be 48 feet, 7 inches and narrow to the existing street network that is 28 feet wide. No parking will be allowed on the street network and there will be no street medians on Upper 58th Street North at the entrance to the development. Allen Eisinger, the Fire Chief of the Bayport Fire Department has reviewed the plans and made comments as found in the attached memo (Exhibit 35). The Applicant has altered the plans and provided turning movements diagrams to show how access will be provided for the ladder truck. Staff has indicated that the access is somewhat tight in front of the new building adjacent to the parking lot medians. The Applicant will provide a revised plan, indicating a reduction in the median size or elimination of a parking stall. Additionally, the access between the new building and the dog park would be signed so that there is no left tum allowed. That would allow easier access and traffic flow through this portion of the development. Trails/Sidewalks. The Site Plan as attached includes the locations of the existing public trails and the proposed/existing concrete sidewalks for Building 5. The sidewalk 4 system is well integrated with the City trail system and access is provided to the building entrance as well as around the dog park and park area. Overall the plan shows a well- connected trail and sidewalk system. Setbacks. Within a PUD, the base district setback requirements (R-3) are applied only to the perimeter of the project. The R-3 District specifies setback requirements as follows: 30 feet front yard, 30 feet rear yard, and 20 feet side yard. If the lot is on a corner, not less than 30 feet from a lot line is required for side yards. The PUD section of the Zoning Ordinance specifies that buildings should be located at least 20 feet from the back of a curb line from roadways as part of the internal street pattern. Additionally, the ordinance specifies that no building within the project shall be nearer to another building by one-half the sum of the building heights of the two buildings. Building 5 is setback between 20 feet to 27 feet, 8 inches from Nova Scotia North and 22 feet, 2 inches from the north property line. Additionally, the building is setback 32 feet from feet from Upper 58th Street to the south. The side yard setbacks are met, but the front yard setback to Nova Scotia Avenue is less than 30 feet. The townhomes were previously approved with a setback less than 30 feet, but they are one story versus the three-story building that is now proposed. Staff has worked with the Applicant and the current site plan includes a five-foot increase in the setback to Nova Scotia Avenue North from the original application. Staff found that at least a 20 -foot setback to the property line along with the wide boulevard (38 feet 9 inches) of Nova Scotia Avenue North will be more than adequate distance between the building and the roadway curb. This setback and wide boulevard situation was also allowed for Building 1 that is 60 feet from the curb line of Oak Green Avenue North. Building 1 is a four-story building. The distance between Building 3 and the proposed Building 5 will be 50 feet. Building 5 will have a building height of 38 feet and Building 3 has a height of 26 feet. With a total height of the two buildings at 64 feet, the distance between the two buildings is adequate. The Planning Commission should discuss the setback distance to Nova Scotia Avenue North and determine if it is adequate. Tree Preservation/Landscaping. The Applicant has provided a landscaping plan that includes detailed plans for the foundation plantings around Building 5 and around the dog park and park area. The City Arborist has reviewed the plan and found it acceptable with a request for additional planting schedule detail and changes to increase plant diversity. See Exhibit 33. The plan shall be subject to the final approval of the City Arborist. Grading and Drainage. Detailed grading and drainage plans have been provided as part of the development submittals. The City Engineer has provided a review of the plans found as Exhibit 34. The City Engineer and the Middle St. Croix Watershed Management Organization shall review and approve the grading and drainage plans. R Utilities. A detailed utility plan has been submitted. The final utility plan is subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. Lighting. A lighting plan has not been provided, but the Applicant has indicated that that any new street light fixture will be identical to what has been used previously. It is a full cut-off fixture with a flat lens. The street lights will be maintained and all electricity costs will be paid for by the developer. The Applicant has indicated that the same wall light fixtures are to be used on the proposed building as what was approved for the existing buildings. As part of the PUD approvals, the Planning Commission and City Council will need to determine if these fixtures are appropriate in that they are not full cut off. Signage. The Applicant has provided a signage plan for the development. All of the signs are freestanding with no building wall signage proposed. The signs are consistent with the size and height requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and are consistent with residential housing development signage. The sign posts at intersection corners will assist visitors in finding a specific building in the development. The plans do not indicate how the signage shall be lit. At the time of the sign permitting process, a plan for sign lighting will be required. Parking. The Zoning Ordinance requires the following for elderly housing: "m. Elderly (Senior Citizen) Housing. Reservation of area equal to one (1) parking space per unit. Initial development is, however, required for only one-half (112) space per unit and said number of spaces can continue until such time as the City considers a need for additional parking spaces has been demonstrated." A detailed review of the existing and proposed parking is found in the table that includes the parking stall counts (Exhibit 2). With an overall total of 457 stalls, and 350 dwelling units, the buildings in the project comply with ordinance standards for elderly parking and leave additional spaces for staff and guest parking. Of the 457 stalls, 281 will be underground and 176 will be exterior stalls. The Applicant has indicated that there is more than adequate lower level parking that can be used for residents and staff. Building 5 will have 71 underground parking stalls and 73 surface stalls. Directly in front of the building will be 20 parking stalls, two of which are disability accessible. Snow Storage. The plans should be updated to indicate areas for snow storage. The City Engineer should comment on the adequacy of these areas. Mechanical Equipment. The Applicant's architect has indicated that the mechanical equipment is located within the buildings or at ground level. The ground level mechanical units would be placed on the north side of Building 5 and surrounded by landscape materials. Any mechanical equipment that is ground mounted or visible from adjacent streets shall be screened as required by the Zoning Ordinance. G Trash/Recycling. All the trash storage and recycling will be intemal to the buildings. Building Height, Building 5 will be 38 feet to the midpoint of the- gable roof. The building is not in conformance with the 35 -foot height limitation of the Zoning Ordinance, but the PUD process has allowed the other buildings in the development to exceed that requirement. The Planning Commission should comment. Unit Types. Building 5 will have the following unit types: I bedroom 1 bath: 750 square feet 2 bedroom 2 bath Standard: 1,125 square feet 2 bedroom 2 bath Comer: 1,350 square feet 2 bedroom 2 bath Sound End: 1,400 square feet 2 bedroom 1 bath: 1,025 square feet The Zoning Ordinance indicates that Elderly Housing must have a minimum floor area of 440 square feet for efficiency units and 520 square feet for one bedroom units. Building 5 as proposed is compliant with these requirements. Architectural Appearance. The application materials indicate elevations and perspective diagrams from various locations surrounding the development. The appearance of Building 5 is similar to the existing buildings in the development. The building will be brick with upper level lap siding. The roof is hipped. The plans indicate the material types and specify colors. The project architect will provide a building materials board for review at the Planning Commission meeting. The residential units are not required to be reviewed under Design Guideline requirements, but as part of the PUD, the City can comment and require design and material changes. The Planning Commission and City Council shall comment further on the building appearance and materials as part of the review. Building Connection — Building 1 and 5 The submittal included plans to connect Building 1 and 2 with an enclosed walkway. Building 1 provides a kitchen with meal services available for Buildings 1, 2 and 3. The popularity of the meal service, and the need to transport the meals on wheeled carts, has necessitated the enclosed walkway between Buildings 1 and 2. The location of the walkway was chosen to minimize the impact on interior units, maintain a convenient connection for the residents, and provide the ability for the existing parking facilities to remain operational during construction. It should also be noted that the walkway cannot be located on the first floor (on grade) due to the security measures required for a memory care facility. Exterior materials will be consistent with the existing buildings. B-4, Limited Business Standards. Section 401.301.E.9 of the Zoning Ordinance provides the CUP standards for allowing residential use in the B-4 District. The standards are as follows: 7 Two family, townhomes and multiple family dwellings provided that: a. At least two parking spaces per unit must be provided for on site, or proof is shown of arrangements for private parking nearby. The development will comply with the specific Zoning Ordinance requirements for senior housing. b. No physical improvements, either interior or exterior, may preclude future re -use for commercial purposes. The development could be converted to future office use, but highly unlikely. C. Unit floor areas must comply with Section 401.15.C.6. All of the elderly units are at least 750 square feet and comply with the Zoning Ordinance. d. Compliance with conditional use requirements of Section 401.03.A.8. The requirements will be complied with. e. The development does not conflict with existing or potential future commercial uses and activities. There would be no conflict. f. The density, setbacks, and building height standards imposed as part of the R-3 Zoning District are complied with. The building setbacks are not consistent. The Planning Commission and City Council will need to comment on the setbacks. g. Adequate open space and recreational space is provided on site for the benefit of the occupants. Adequate open space is provided. The park and dog park will provide more than adequate active and passive area for the development. h. The development does not conflict or result in incompatible land use arrangements as related to abutting residential uses or commercial uses. No incompatible land use arrangements are created. 0 i Residential use can be govemed by all applicable standards of the Zoning Ordinance, Building Code, Housing Code and Fire Codes. All standards will be complied with. j. Residential and non-residential uses shall not be contained on the same floor. Not applicable. k. Residential uses shall be provided with a separate entrance, and separately identified parking stalls. Not applicable. I. The architectural appearance, design and building materials of residential structures shall be consistent with the Design Guidelines and subject to approval of the City Council. The Planning Commission and City Council should comment on the architectural appearance. Development Agreement. The Applicant may be required to enter into an amended development agreement with the City should approval of the General Plan and Amendment of the PUD be granted. The development agreement shall be subject to review and approval of the City Attomey. CONCLUSION I RECOMMENDATION Staff is favorable to this last phase of the Oak Park Senior Living project in that it will provide a more unified development in building type and scale. The removal of the two townhouse buildings is positive and the proposed Building 5 will provide a more consistent land use and development type for the overall project. The park areas will also create a central open space and gathering area for the residents. Upon review of the application for the Planned Unit Development General Plan and Amendment, as well as the Final Plat for the Oak Park Senior Living Phase 5 senior apartment building located near Nova Scotia Avenue and Lower 59th Street North, City Staff would recommend the project with the conditions as follows: 1. The Final Plat for Oak Park Senior Living Second Addition, as well as the dedication and vacation of any easements, shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer and City Attorney. 2. An amended development agreement, if required, shall include a provision that the Oak Park Senior Living Phase 5 will remain as senior rental and shall not be converted to non -restricted rental housing. The development 9 agreement shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Attorney and City Council. 3. A revised plan shall be provided indicating a reduction in the median size or elimination of a parking stall to improve access at the front of Building 5. Additionally, the access between the new building and the dog park shall be signed so that there is no left turn allowed. 4. The Planning Commission and City Council shall comment on the proposed setback from Nova Scotia Avenue North to Building 5. 5. The landscape plan shall be subject to review and approval of the City Arborist. 6. The grading and drainage plans shall be subject to City Engineer and the Middle St. Croix Watershed Management Organization approval. 7. All utility plans shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 8. The Planning Commission and City Council shall determine if the non - shielded, residential style light fixtures are appropriate. 9. The Fire Chief and Police Chief should review and approve the final plans to determine the accessibility of emergency vehicles throughout the development. 10. No parallel parking shall be allowed on the street network and shall be signed as such. 11. The snow storage areas and plan shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 12.A plan for sign lighting shall be provided at the time of the sign permitting process. 13. Any mechanical equipment that is ground mounted or visible from adjacent streets shall be screened as required by the Zoning Ordinance. 14. All trash and recycling storage shall be internal to the building. 15.The Planning Commission and City Council shall comment on the propsed building height of 38 feet. 16.The Planning Commission and City Council shall comment on the final building appearance, colors, materials and the variety between buildings. The Applicant shall provide a materials board for the buildings to be discussed at the Planning Commission and City Council meeting. IR ] ' ._ ... ...... ..a . µ 333 North Main Street Suite 201 Stillwater, MN 55052 Revised April 28, 2017 wHm�uuuuumuuuuuwmow�muuuuuuuumwmemmuunmummuuuuuuuuuummuum�muuum City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Blvd. N. Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Oak Park Senior Living & The Villas of Oak Park �Mii; �umuiuiu Sustainable Design Phone 6511430-0606 Fax 651!430-2414 www.archnetusa.com The attached project represents the fifth and final phase of the Oak Park Senior Living project and an enclosed pedestrian walkway between buildings one and two. It is our understanding that the walk- way and phase five building require a Plat Amendment. Please find enclosed, the application for the Plat Amendment, with the following serving as the project narrative. Phase five will consist of a three story, 72 unit apartment building with underground parking. 'chis fa- cility will require the removal of the two existing townhouse structures and the reconfiguration of the previously designated road alignment. The layout of the building is being used to create a large park that will serve as the central green space for the entire complex. The revised road alignment will ring the entire central park and accommodate the turning requirements of the city's emergency vehicles. The dwelling unit count for the overall project under the previous plat was 351 (911312011), and would now total 346 units. This number includes the four townhouses remaining on the comer of Nova Scotia and 58th St N. The parking count for the overall project under the previous plat (911312011), was 308 underground stalls and 169 exterior stalls, for a total of 477. With the plat amendment we are proposing 281 underground stalls and 176 exterior stalls for a total of 457 spaces. The exterior materials will remain the same as previous buildingslphases, with variations provided in color and configuration. The lighting for the building and site will also remain similar to the previous phases. Currently, Building One provides a kitchen with meal services available for Buildings One, Two and Three. The popularity of the meal service, and the need to transport the meals on wheeled carts has created the need for the enclosed walkway between buildings One and Two. The location of the walkway was chosen to minimize the impact on interior units, maintaining a convenient connection for the residents and providing the ability for the existing parking facilities to remain operational during construction. It should also be noted that the walkway cannot be located on the first floor (on grade) due to the security measures required for a memory care facility. Exterior materials will be consistent with the existing buildings. Thank you for your consideration of the Plat Amendment, and we look forward to answering any questions you may have. Respectfully submitted, Beth Diem Principal/Architect ARCHNET OAK PARK SENIOR LI 1 4/25/2017 ASSISTEDI I Amended r HOME GARAGE Pennit Amendment DRIVEWAYTOWN TOWN HOME May 29, 2013 April 2017 UNIT COUNT EXISTING I LIVING lL I 1 120 120 EXISTING IT 11 71 SENIORfIBUILDING 2 62 62 MEMORY BUILDING 75 80 MEMORY BUILDING 1 SENIORLIVE BUILDING pj 72 TOTAL PARKING pn SENIORII BUILDING ( ) 50 62 TOTAL UNIT COUNT 335 350 0,fii►Vx--113411115410111 iiii ASSISTEDLIVING f 1 31 ASSISTEDI I HOME GARAGE 22 8 DRIVEWAYTOWN TOWN HOME SENIORLIVING () - EXTERIOR SENIOR LII () - UNDERGROUND 96 94 FUTURE SENIOR LIVING - BUILDING 5 48 71 FUTUREI LIVING EXTERIORBUILDING FUTURE SENIOR LII - BUILDING 6 75 80 SENIORFUTURE LIVING EXTERIORBUILDING 1 EXTERIORMEMORY CARE TOTAL PARKING E 770,186 Total Proposed +, Total Area Per Unit = .. s.f. '- 11 s.f. Per Unit as Required IF61al property • 770,186 Total•ped Units = 346 Total 1,000 Per Required LU U) 1-� E 0 N E E LU 8 0 L! z uj U— S 2 4z LLJ LU f 00Y 'o r ®lam00 a C, 2 N in LL' Ln z LUX, -� t Ln U- Q X --f E z xo Lij in a) z W. o 2 < L-" in Z z z I z I Z ua Z :j oz Lo. jparr T !:� Z < O'Nool R � z -sb j Ln z ZO< X z V UA ZO< 0 < UN- R < OR 0 d, (P, ox x Ln E U. r -j 0 X- 2: 0 0 m ul u CL uj M CIL LU U.14U CL Uj CL z 0,2 z LLJ ui (D W uC3U) g) > LL LU LU CL ED 0 cy- 99 z z 0 xUi LU (n 0 cl z z Uj Z 0 o 5 P z 0. ui le § d z zMD Z m uj LU P -i uj 92.122 LIJO n 2 0 << :Z3 x:5 oz ce "� z 0 uj �Z uj Z 0 05� Fs L) !In - Z. LU F- U - <•Z LU LLJ UZ) 2 2 CL CL < z o Mz ul (h LU m x z z 0 o o LDOZZOD WEE t W;2 Lij w C�EEOOOZZ LU CL O Z <5 Q� w z z CL 0- w uj Inn <Uz, 5�0<(Dm Z LU Z -j -j w LU Ln (n -j L.LJ CL C'L a' rA U) U, uj W LU I,- 0005 acuiH LLJ LU 000 w z z 9SO Z) qwn uj o 0 'n wwwzzzzz MCL LU LIJ C) 1-1 N C7 C7 tJ Cry R q �_�iNmltLntD 19 -4 r4 Pi VA u F- < < ®1 UUUUUU all w w u") c�n 5�3 UM u�) < < I Ila' tDo[I x Ilwm §w=WNwI:ffx areudmm m OWNWICIM . .. ......... 1� . . .......... .... .............. ..................... Nr, Z 0 Jar .............. . ................... tit cc a11 . ......................... .......... Ird 1c,uj 0 .. ........ ....................... .. . . . . . . . . . . . . I . 111Lr 7 . ...... ..... . -1 Nr, Z 0 Jar .............. . ................... tit cc a11 11P, 1 ................ u IIw. ............. Ff: J 0 .. ........ ....................... .. . . . . . . . . . . . . I . 111Lr 7 . ...... ..... . -1 W, Z Jar E �Z- tit cc a11 0 .. ........ ....................... .. . . . . . . . . . . . . I . 111Lr 7 . ...... ..... . -1 W, Jar cc a11 A: ................ u IIw. ............. 0 .. ........ ....................... .. . . . . . . . . . . . . I . 111Lr 7 . ...... ..... . -1 ... ........... .... ........................ . . .... . . ................. . ......... ..... . . ........... ------ lis I IIir Nf........... . . . ... . .. .. .. .. .. . ry II -v. yo ............... IF1.1, I r ru I . . .. . ... ..... 111!1 nr" 0-1 . . .. . ... ..... oc) ................ ..................... IL 6 60 'ONI'Obd AV8 OFt3NV WO All -IN3V4dOl3A3(1:qilS ------------------- l7uo;—�, P 04 OD lU co J Z J LO J a �J �M �m E _ u°m rs mem wee®x pLr3,2.? s LO am02 Y�C4 aWm WGJmm � c m a a m o a W T Q o e W a C,m T W W m M E c m C > F >'U F v c U m v m y c vi 2 2 c a w m 0 F w eL C M 0 0 I-- U N U r V N V m U U m... ..................m............ Nd AVE I.tYE&•u8Y"u�35 PdY gits•b8Y4:>9 ....'Ir.�xm!na gastro ��pI� '... ,rix uaaa�P.wravu,arnw�m raaPtnt+zs}+nr�tt dl�� ,... CANS Zg .' III inllll {f4L�NP9 •�W"Ia WfNdM1�A4sS ......................... WIA. '"V �,'.�.N'M7"• SwF � Jf .Kd" VL �. !IY a+wn�ineu 'nR ........................................... . ..................... . . . . .............. I� roA3gml bZadC M 4 •. .11 w.'. d ... .. v,wuaPePrxxoxavn Pd�RAN"J63'V'19 r'fl ' 1 n 4 n' III !! a. ..........F O U"I 3 AVS t g �g �a �y PP �I.AIwID9Fpnn h� P...... I•- ...................................... . ............. . ...... Ir n "' Fes. IAP irP1 k::::::::::::::::�:::::........................................ � n`E *�a F 11 1 1 1 V I l i I I I 1 t t It t rt"5}t4} 5� 5 I� V Y I I I 1 1 I V V I f! LU IS 0 800 @80 "1111 V If YIIII +III+7 t l M: l i I I I I I I I I Y I l f l l l r l 1 I l �I1 I it i � IYrlrl " l y l l VI I I" I I f l 11 Il 1 l�,l i i iii"I l� tlrin r I 11 V i ll l ;+ 4 1 I I I I I lI f 1 I I l 1 l Il "; I I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I I 11Y I l I I I I I l l I f V II i 11 l Y l l 11 f 1 "V II 11 i IV � it It 1 f { }III I t rr I If tlllt411111; II I 1 y; tt � 1 1411,"�Ir; tII / ! .......... ur t11 t1 Ii r Ra �11114 dJ 11 II l l If f I ,,IIII iil'iili I If lir I r Inuit I 1111111 III I l l I � 1 YIIl l""lyi5 111 i p ""+I 111I11 11 "'ll Ill 11` 11511 N11 11 1111114 ! +"Iii41111111 Ill Jill ll',i,T, li 1g 1 1 l �l 117yry11 illi 11�I11111 Y1 1 1 15 11 M 1 ff _ 11111111""i" llllull 14111 ii 1 iM1 y ,\ I I ! Illi II II Illlyll IIII} 4 1 4 7�ee 1 ,5 'iilJilijl' lliliiiiil/r!!!! �I I 1 �\ I 1 nilll�lll"ii illiii�r`rr/ir 11 I 1 11 ,tom n111 IIr"u nulru r � !! \ 1181 1"l lllpl lr !! ! I + 1 I Irllrl "Iljlr Ilan r'l11 Iol1iflii�ii 11111 �f � ! ! r ! 1111 l+ 1111+ I 1 Ill 111 111 frill 111 fl ! !il ` °\ II+I{4III"!I IIIfI III f! , r 11 �q l! III IIII+I fI li 1 I II 'I It \\2 \ Iliillllllll 111 lll�111 1"" I I pf I �\�� a'^j r IIII�"I+III IIII II /1 r l !gf I r •� II 11i,f1ll Ij1!/If+K �rlaIr/ �rri Illr{{11111 111111 111 � / r!/ '� p r r ! \11 II IIIII IIIPI II Illll r 1 I f 1!I !! 111111 � II I i�l II � i i i i'i . 11 I � 1"5145 IIII1 t" Y "! IYIII I Illi 11,1114 y I II III S 0 Z z 0 i= O LU LU 0 d a Of 4 I .............. . ........ ( 1 i H d' "w NpNyNve"' 4Y �� u..M '�... ,aP� IAIIIIPiiil N � E) r�yfn w d a Of 4 I .............. . ........ ( 1 i , 11 1 I r I E) 5 1 � I I 11 114 + + 1 I I I U Im �y I l IAS 1 I 1 i l is tit '! a 11 I _ r I 1 1 ! I I 1 i 1 I 9 r__________—� \ r I I I I I I 11 i O E) ! ! I I ! I I 1 i 1 I 1- WON Ga t/j 10 'DWOUd AVG OHONV ' HN'91HEH3HN9VdNW0 ; V�� 4"� ' m Igo z ca Mow 9 3SVHd I H & 'W'" ' , 15s a M'Wm"' al - i zW IM-WIM N3"dO 3A2 UPGGUISU3 ®� 3AS 0 3 iIS 1_1 1301 8) R 0 U UOSJL,-1 &�lq� JU =9N1An1J01N3SA11hVdNjV0 IN 1 HIM 0 Jul v 6 I . Ing z maw �3 U5 11 W jig W Q01 A a 1 i [T W I T 1 11111 jillh 1, lj RIAT 1 A I 15 1{g 401H Hy 'm � 0 'HWIS HUMA 1 �1011111' 111"ni I W 'l ummly glow " I Ample, WHIs NRIMST OWNS jy�jilllo jjjj11jlll/ e , 11 ll' I Il! ljj"�Iii milli, W# Q ni NO Mm imam . . . . . . . . . . n' jll+ll mill" r'�I VIII qj \i�k\' 1 1 III 111 !owl/ '�'"j OEM, SO vs I! I" "q0 Hill W W" 11 "is H; will) olf .00 lit ----------------- -------- ----- ---------------- LPJDN 0 ............ NN *S.LHVRH XWd WO R 93SVHd -iN9VldOl3A9G 31lS m . .............................. 'DWOMd AVG OHONY NW'SlHDJ3HMWVdWO 9 DSVHd -lN3V9dO-l9A9Cl gilS I Ml 1 11 . .. ........................................................... . 1 jt III"IU 1 s .•••••••••••••••••••••••••.......................................... w •�. ��mm Um MM 61 uE66t%Ir IPlYA �k 4YFYWAFi1X91 R nju n ro W rxvsv I� t rkapn a .... fig' h &R IMIYq "��wa1.W4 yJ11�3%V'E�p I px8 ���. I.p�Cv I.R6'15R4141z4&"t&'0•I.RN m "4 ::':II'b'n qP if -'hl® �"��fl�� � µ US auuru0 ia- ....................._.... II�6N 11 HOMS 'd MVO �,Mr•,� m. &� _............••••••........................••_..••••••........................•••••• w - ....... N. ase .� °CIO 2.zr I 1 III IC � Z ,h' fl� gU •''s Ohm w N onu { I t 1 t l lii11 I I r 1 1 tl I WIN t .,\'v\ l ... '' I I I I i i i I i l f I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 � '� ��,"+,✓ '_ fl 1 . li{I i 1{ ili'I{i IIrii i 1111! �r I I, I'll II Illi I I `s �s, I, Ill a,l III!�I,I I11lir `1 it IY I{ X 1 1 II 1 1 I I 1 1 Y I { {! I' ` 1 1 1 V} 4, Y Y 1 1 { 1 1 1 { 1 11 , r l S �.'."'... '. .. 5 t t f!! /� 11 14 I I I I { •�,.,.,- A ,,�`—�::,t—_ - -- nn.a� 4 .... I__ ----- f i Hall 11 III 14 I � ; t �! 1 J i �` - ._( f .r....... .... ...II 511II,1I1 ....... I r J }�rri II i IliIt it II . And t l �}t Xt ill J tt t � t ,,41 l b 1 1 117 IIU1,1}y,�p I 111{115 � R I I a IlUll r}Iiil Illl,t I I li I l r �� I II (. R V e� iilli �i i 11 4 Vt h , 1 I ljp11llll, iiliil i`ytt ztXXy }I 14 t 9 ( I .. F '� 'I i Jr%'�, If'1111111 I,II„Ilytt Cyt I , 5 ... V } r , `� I II'iili'ii 111 Illllillitl '{ iiIw ll % ` IIII 711111 ILII CI }t y 51 } , , 11 `1141 ill{I !IIIII II }t ' 11 1X F t ✓ ... � I1 n�„1111 I,un 11ti a �' ` `t 11 II ii' I it 44 t I t Y ,r I.�nl II 111 tk 1y 11'81^�al�lmlm I�lb�ml .. .. ,} --- --- , ' l,lllhllllll IIIIIIIlrfr+rr ff f 1 I th ...._C � ,, � ✓ ____� � '`,, r r!I 1 II II YIII lYIl [ ff 1� �1; '� I. I rf ilfXlq illllll IIIIIIYFrr rrrt+ lrrr fx�'k,{/ � � .. - `. l��k-�.. .r III I1f 11 Ilia! i r r k � I $) ! 111! rtlll 1 NINON I1I 1!I 1fl 1{l 1lI 1i ll 1Itt rr fItt! tff frr r ! i ) ¢ 1iIf t•�.k� `r^�.��, t•t. ... - ����� _ -,.,.. m�'� ��� t _ I1Illll, 111! rr f t f •w .� '%. P ri ., •� f .- I� � ' Y fl h!IIII; IIII+'ttrl ii1 ,' if 1 ,1'``.- _ .. r Ill,rl,lll! Illllllt rfr 1 t r�Ilrr t 6 �llili i�iiaill f+Fr d yllliilili tlillli II' fFfrrYJrf' r rf r •i �a"-- ".�-�...�..w �- �5'f�''lli I Illil It�{ii II III{I f r rr t r F r ` ' R � �, ' • ._... �ltylt ltt t{t y I1 IIIII Hill II! -,I t��Vtyt1 XL• -`"r Illl`�ljI f + kti0 Wa T .. ••••.1,.. - —............. if"�"f - ......• tt -ry r` ptf ski! il .;, `V'_ �rd 1l` f e r-- q,- �"a•�y �` 1 16••••1(.—'""::::::6--1i •••:5 : a --- 1(........ .....;....... ter- ----. Jr- - --- _ ..... I ....._..� ty { lot \e ! 5`,• J -II 1„ k um 0 0 13 4 OV 1 0 I I � !v will Nilm.74.1 HI, A 9 P 1 -3 om'oud AVG ONONY Vd ccwmrorcaa� to mvy's.LHE? �aH Al NVO v1m"tmffn2mmjmwz 9 -3;VHd LO vJ MOM -lNgVqdO-13A3a 31ls ate,+ j 1_1 130 3S)i 8,V 11S u0sio-1 a ED)NIA11 =MOIN3S X8Vd NVO 'MO HIM -<j I[Z C90 Xm wig; LU L) z LU Z -j ouJ Ow ro— w LIJ i 13 05 a LL N, LU . 40 L> 0 Df Ell E 5) ED I Ut+m.�a: Z!2 LU LLI 0 LU r: I L) p ZO on 00 zU) 0 0 Q Ut+m.�a: Ux 11ro I * 4 9 tl x Hill P I fill . fill ��' a 1,1111 fa 11 flit H 11111- 111 1 1 1111.1111111flf R! 1,11,1lig I � 60- J Z WLu h WO go WaWF Y m0 R ZO OZ UZ In a m If';iflNl�N 60- J Z WLu h WO go WaWF Y m0 R ZO OZ UZ In , IN ( . � z [_ \ $ F } £ . � }\ .p, }U } \\\/) . � }\ )2 {� \\\/) ��I�111' `� 0/ �1 6 I A, \/ f 815P. IE m \/ �5�( m '�'�'�Ylllllllllllry rvni °uuuuuu hi IIIIilil aMl 1111111111111^ u11111�1111� � � ' ouuuuuuuuuum u� 'I A f ISI II Nd� I�+�r° 1'i•, h � � 11.1111 I� uuuu luuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuummuuuuuuuuuum ................... i�w��xi'�f(I�R�IIIIIPM I� mu W® 1= G I py a VI I�I� I�IyUnL �i �N II y d m 1 s+OA.� its , : IIIIIIIIIINIII rclllllllllllllllllllllll ("N'd ..N.II ........ If (5"T'`NNN r. ("N'd �u PIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIRIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIRRIIIIIIIIIRRRI ("N'd or) Lb. r I ��ddllllll� P I III�IIIII � I IuIIIIII � ��yy VIII IN� ,�^ YA7 VIII VIII D ° IIID IIII 'II Numlliiol� uu���� P luuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuounummuuumumnuoulmuummmuuuuuunnmuuuuuuuuuuuuu dddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd CT lug: IIOr III II II M1IRII uouuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu ( ............. IIr v dYa' & IMj1N, ryi 1; � P� N � 0 tld�IM luuummulmxxaannmuuwummnmuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuum tlF ium ul� muuuuuu�ummmuuuuuoimlluuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuumomuuuuuuuuuuu�l IIr ti Il m R ryi 1; � P� N ' 0 tld�IM luuummulmxxaannmuuwummnmuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuum tlF ium ul� � �I ti .......... ILII YID ��I 91 Inll U.11 no m I Illllllllllllllllllllllmlllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll III 22 U.11 no T:: 1111111111111MMUMINEEM11 llllllll Illllllllllllllllllllllmlllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll III 22 W fe 4 IN up ........... II.IAlll...... IIIII . .III 'llllllllu IIIII I� T"'i. II� IIIII IIIII II � IIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIVUWIIII di, III IXu� Imo II la I Illus Env ""VVI rl 10 E J Ire No.0 l I. IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII..........I111111IIIIIIIIIIIII yrII ................................................................................................................ TI',l di, IIt'M1 �u� I Env ""VVI N hI �1MI q� yrII III UA IYYYRYY I � Kh IIIII, IXh 0 nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnl nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn nnn IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIt'M1 �u� I Env ""VVI III" �1MI q� yrII IYYYRYY I II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIt'M1 �u� I usp ...............................................................I �I � pp llllllllllllllllllllllllllmlllllllllllllll ME is f% �j I I Ili ������/, � �%� i1i KIIIIIIISIM I I M, N n I m T till L---------®® _ got I t I I T I r I Ir------rr! -0-0 -- JEW't3 I ISIlot; II Ea ___d 1.7 - 111--:-_� wmwxw ii...Woo T till L---------®® _ got I t I I T I r I Ir------rr! -0-0 -- JEW't3 I - - - - -- -------- --- A&VA ArM Af—AYOUSSe Jnr zm ___d 1.7 - 111--:-_� - - - - -- -------- --- A&VA ArM Af—AYOUSSe Jnr zm 14168 Oak Park Blvd N.a Box 2007.Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 a Phone (651) 439-4439 • Fax 439-0574 $ #V1,111 Eric Johnson, City Administrator Scott Richards, City Planner, Julie Hultman, Building Official Lisa Danielson, Arborist 04/24/2017 Oak Park Senior Living Phase 5 Landscape Plan Review I have reviewed the landscape plans submitted by Tim Nolde/AnchoBayPro Inc. dated 4/10/2017. The following includes my comments and/or recommendations: Landscape Plan (L1) The submitted plan includes a very basic array of deciduous trees, coniferous shrubs and deciduous shrubs as shown in the landscape design and plant list. The plant schedule submitted is also very basic and incomplete. The following are items that must be included in the plant list: each of the symbols used on the landscape plan for the plant proposed to be planted must be included on the plant list, the size and type of planting stock for each plant and the quantities in the plant list must match with what is shown on the landscape plan. The plant schedule shows (21) Red Maple trees to be planted, I would recommend substituting these trees with ginkgo or hybrid elm to add some tree diversity to the area. Planting Specifications (L2) The landscape notes submitted is acceptable. The landscape contractor is required to plant trees and shrubs according to the approved planting detail submitted with the approved landscape plan. This will be checked after planting and any deviations from the detail will need to be corrected before the landscaping will be approved by the City, this needs to be noted in the final plans. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this landscape plan review. Please forward my comments to the development team for this project. TREE CITY U.S.A. nnN.n,� �muAHP moi: May 4, 2017 Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 2335 Highway 36 West St. Paul MN 55113 Tel: (6511636-4600 Fax: (651) 636-1311 Mr. Eric Johnson, Administrator City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Blvd. N., P.O. Box 2007 Oak Park Heights, MN 55o82-2007 Reference: Oak Park Senior Living Phase 5 — Plan and Drainage Design Review Dear Eric, We have reviewed the plans and drainage calculations submitted regarding the proposed Oak Park Senior Living Phase 5 development submitted 4/21/2017. Following are our comments and recommendations: Stormwater/Drainage Stormwater comments provided by Tyler Johnson - Tyler.Johnson@stantec.com. 1. The project is subject to review by the Middle St. Croix Watershed Management Organization. The City shall be provided a copy of the permit approval letter from the MSCWMO prior to construction activity. 2. Due to the site being located within the City's DWSMA, and in particular, the 1 -yr travel time emergency response area, infiltration is not allowed on this site based on requirements of the NPDES Construction Permit. 3. Water Quality: The site will be required to meet the MSCWMO standards for water quality. Filtration is allowed as long as the design prohibits infiltration. 4. Volume Control: The site is not required to achieve volume control due to no infiltration being allowed on site (see comment 2). 5. Rate Control: The site layout has changed since its initial approval. The proposed design is still under the current threshold for approved impervious areas and discharge rates. As future develop occurs, more ponding and water quality features may be needed to account for impervious if it exceeds the original approved plans. 6. Based on the supplied soil borings from Braun Intertec, the area that is being constructed is primarily made up of Clayey Sand (SC) and Silty Clay (CL/ML) soils. This displays a soil characteristic of HSG C. Please update the HydroCAD model to reflect this. 7. The proposed storm sewer system for Phase 5 ties into an existing system that currently runs through the site and outfalls into Pond i to the north. Calculations should be esil, in wRh an°Norlh'i fly quru rniu 'i 10n Ju �4��IIIIIWb�r�rrrr�(r��l" � Mr. Eric Johnson Page 2 of 4 Reference: Oak Park Senior Living Phase 5 — Plan and Drainage Design Review shown that verifies the existing storm sewer system capacity so water does not back up at the upper end of the system during a io year storm event. 8. Please indicate on the proposed and existing HydroCAD areas maps where all the ponds are located. Currently ponds B3, B2, and City Pond are not shown on the maps. Also, please provide the overall drainage map for the overall site. 9. Emergency overflows should be noted on the plans. Sheet Ci — Demolition Plan Clearly delineate the method of bulkheading the storm sewer where the existing pipe is removed. Sheet C2 — Paving and Dimension Plan 1. At Nova Scotia Avenue, tie in matching pavement with a butt joint. Sheet C2.1, C2.2 — Fire Truck Turning Display 1. Modify parking, island radii as discussed in the meeting with City staff on 4/26/2017- 2. Refer to the Fire Department review of fire lanes and circulation. Sheet C3 - Grading and Erosion Control Plan 1. The stormwater facilities proposed for the site, including facilities that encroach into the pond area at the north end of the property shall be considered private and shall be owned and maintained by the Owner. 2. The City reserves the right to require additional erosion control measures as determined/necessary during the construction of the project. 3. The pond on the north side of the site will need to have sediment that has been deposited in the pond removed. awn i''a y.� re=n irreo�n'd � re��reill��inmry.ww.nh ��� u �arrrn� Mr. Eric Johnson Page 3 of 4 Reference: Oak Park Senior Living Phase 5 — Plan and Drainage Design Review Sheet C4 - Utility PIan i. Connections to the City's sewer and water systems shall be per the City's standards and detail plates. The City or its designee shall be present for water and sanitary sewer service connections to the City's systems. Testing will be per City requirements. 2. The watermain, hydrants and sanitary sewer that serve the site will be private and maintained by the owner. 3. Add a valve to the water main just east of the relocated hydrant in front of the existing building that is east of the proposed building. 4. Submit a map showing the locations of the existing, unused water and sanitary sewer services along the existing building to the east of the proposed building. Sheet C5 and C6 — Details i. Revise Hydrant and Gate Valve installation detail to be consistent with City Standard Detail Plates WAT-3 and WAT-S. 2. Confirm that all details conform to City standard details. General Comments 1. The City reserves the right to inspect the construction of the project. The City or its designee shall be present for water and sanitary sewer service connections to the City's systems. 2. The Owner will need to comply with all requirements of the NPDES Construction Stormwater Permit and the Middle St. Croix Watershed Management Organization. The City reserves the right to require additional erosion control measures as determined/necessary during the construction of the project. 3. Lighting and landscaping to be reviewed by others. 4. The Owner shall be responsible for obtaining all required permits. :)e, sign ,oath COMTUIRY 1r Ii i,ind Mr. Eric Johnson Page 4 of 4 Reference: Oak Park Senior Living Phase 5 — Plan and Drainage Design Review If you have any questions or require further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Regards, STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC. Lee M. Mann, P.E. City Engineer Phone: 651-604-4850 lee.mann@stantec.com cc: Andy Kegley, Public Works Director Julie Hultman, Building Official Scott Richards, City Planner Mark Vierling, City Attorney Lisa Danielson, City Arborist esli u'°u wu'%Ih'r ,c i'iruu"1"jiu..u0.'YiM"I!" m ,Jullie Hultman From: Allen Eisinger <aeisinger@ci.bayport.mn.us> Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2017 2:42 PM To: Julie Hultman Cc: Mike Bell; Jason Severson Osbfd2103@yahoo.com) Subject: RE: OPH Site Review - Plan Feedback Requested Attachments: Turning radius..pdf Follow Up Flag: Follow Up Due By: Sunday, April 16, 2017 2:57 PM Flag Status: Flagged Julie, the attached file has red boxes at the areas I have concerns ho ladder truck being able to negotiate the turn into the parking lots with the proposed plan. it looks like they are deviating from the standard road width to a narrower road on Upper 581". (Although i could not really tell due to the poor scan, quality of the plans.) Overall length is 47' 3" Turning r.adius Outside is 70' Furning radius ir6de rafflus is 53' Out rigpers in the out position is 1.6' Vehicle Weight 80,000# I will 1..)e traveling f,.)n the 1.9" so ( will not be able to attend tti[e rneefing., Let ai(" know if you have any questions., Sincerely, Allen Ebsinger Fire, Chief Baypom li IDepartment 2. 51 101.ArC i:w-Ilvlail: aeisungeir@ci.bayport.mmus ................................ I. Iw Ito ............. fin ........ ... .............. ..... .... .... ............. 0 . ... . . . . . . . . . . ........ '45 ........ ........ ....... pjlj� I- . . . . . .. lln. . . . . . . . . QUID ti111 q1 . . .. ....... .......... .. . .. .... . ..... . .... . .... .......... . ............ - 3601 Thurston Avenue N, Sufte .• Anoka, MN 55303 Phone: 763.231.5840 Facsirn e: TP • r TPC@PlanningCo.com MEMORANDUM TO: Eric Johnson FROM: Scott Richards DATE: May 4, 2017 RE: Oak Park Heights — Comprehensive Plan 2018 TPC FILE: 226.10 At the May 11, 2017 meeting, the Planning Commission will discuss the following related to the Comprehensive Plan 2018: Issues The Planning Commission, at their April 13, 2017 meeting reviewed the list of issues that were identified as part of the Comprehensive Plan 2008 process. They discussed the new issues that need to be addressed as part of this planning process. The City Council will review the issues at their May 9, 2017 Worksession. Community Survey Staff has worked with Jim Kremer on drafting a format and questions for a community survey. Before it is distributed and placed on the City website, the Planning Commission should comment and make suggestions. Please review for discussion at the meeting. Social Inventory Staff is currently working on the social inventory that includes demographic data and tracks changes in the community over the last 10 years. A draft of the inventory will be provided at the meeting. Pc: Julie Hultman 1090 City of Oak Park Heights Community Survey The Oak Park Heights City Council would like your input, ideas and thoughts to help it plan for the future. 1. Are you a: Resident ❑ Business Owner ❑ Both ❑ Visitor ❑ 2. If you are a resident or business owner, how long have you lived or worked here? Less than 5 years ❑ 6-10 years ❑ 11 years + 3. Are you: under 18 ❑ 18-24 ❑ 25-34 ❑ 35-45 ❑ 45 -54 ❑ 55+ ❑ 4. Do you have children in your home who are under 18? Yes ❑ No ❑ If so, how many? ............... 5. From your point of view is Oak Park Heights a better place to live and work today than it was when you first moved or worked here? i 6. Please list in order the top three things you like about Oak Park Heights (with #1 being the most important). The St. Croix River _ Engaged residents _ Other (please list): City parks and trails Schools —The people Community events Small town feel Retail businesses Restaurants Location 7. In your opinion what is the general condition of our streets? Excellent Good Average Below Average Poor 8. Understanding that most of the funds for our streets come from our property taxes, are there any specific roads that you think need to be improved? If so, please list them below. 9. In your opinion what is the general condition of our parks and trails?