HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002-05-05 CA Email to OPHKris Danielson
From:
Mark Vierlin [mvierling@eckber
Sent:
Sunda Ma 05, 2002 3:13 PM
To:
'Kathleen M. MARTIN'
Cc:
Scott Richards (E-mail); Kris Danielson (E-mail)
Subject:
RE: Wal CUP
Kath
to respond to y our q uestions:
1. The CUP is effectivel dated as of the Date of Council Approval.
Bradshaws were in title at that time and will be listed as owners on the
CUP.
2. The blanks on P 3 below Net Lease was for desi of corporate
capacit of the person si on behalf of the Corporation
3. 1 will review Item 11. As the CUP will be recorded we should be able to
work somethin out.
4. Thanks for the le
Mark
-----Ori Messa -
From: Kathleen M. MARTIN [mailto:KMM
Sent: Frida Ma 03, 2002 2:42 PM
To: mvierling@eckber
Cc: jvitt@caprei.com gcc@semperdev.com; jkohler@semperdev.com
Subject: Re: Wal CUP
Mark,
Thank y ou for the CUP. Our client has confirmed that the substantive
provisions are acceptable, and we onl have a few questions/comments:
1. We are doin an escrow closin with Mr. and Mrs. Bradshaw ( the current
owners later this month, pursuant to which the will deposit in escrow the
deed and related closin documents, to be released in Au The escrow
acknowled that the CUP will be filed now ( in Ma Should we list Net
Lease or the Bradshaws as the owner? We would prefer to list Net Lease,
because Net Lease is the ultimate developer, but want to be able to record
the document in Ma before the deed is filed.
2. There are two blanks below Net Lease's address; if those are intended to
be completed with fax and phone numbers, those numbers are 612/313-2500
(phone and 6121313-0136 ( fax ) .
3. Item 11 calls for deed restrictions. Since the Bradshaws are not part
to the development and the Cit is not conve title, but we will record
the CUP, could we please replace the statement with the actual restrictions
the Cit is lookin for? Perhaps state: "An use of the propert other
than as a retail facilit and/or pharmac shall re approval of the cit
and such use must compl with the Cit parkin standards in place at the
time the use chan
4. 1 have attached the le description, Exhibit A, for y our use. It is
the same le description as was appended to the deed y ou previousl
approved with the exception that I corrected a t ("it intersection" in
the third to last line of the first para was chan to "its
intersection").
Thanks for your help.
Kathleen M. Martin, Esq.
MALKERSON GI LLI LAND MARTIN LLP
1560 AT &T Tower
901 Marquette Avenue
Minneapolis, MN 55402
612- 344 -1111
612 - 344 -1414 (fax)
kmm@mgmllp.com
The information contained in this message is attorney - client privileged and
confidential information intended only for use of the individual or entity
named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient,
you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of
this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please immediately notify us by telephone at
1- 612- 344 -1111 or reply e -mail communication and delete the original
message. Thank you.
>>> "Mark Vierling" <mvierling a@eckberglammers.com> 04/09/02 09:36AM >>>
Per the request of the city planner the Walgreens CUP has been modified to
exactly conforn to the wording in the resolution granting same. A copy is
attached
Mark Vierling