The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About05-23-2017 Council PacketCITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS TUESDAY, MAY 239 2017 CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA 6:00 P.M. 6:00 p.m. L Call to Order/Pledge of Allegiance/Approval of Agenda Estimated times 6:00 p.m. IL Council/Staff Reports A. Mayor McComber B. Councilmember Dougherty C. Councilmember Liljegren D. Councilmember Runk E. Councilmember Swenson F. Staff 6:05 p.m. III. Visitors/Public Comment This is an opportunity for the public to address the Council with questions or concerns on issues not part of the regular agenda (Please limit comments to 3 minutes in length). 6:05 p.m. IV. Consent Agenda (Roll Call Vote) A. Approve Bills & Investments B. Approve City Council Minutes — May 9, 2017 (pg. 7) C. Approve City Council Worksession Notes — May 9, 2017 (pg. 11) D. Adopt Proclamation that June Shall be Small Cities Month (pg. 13) E. Authorize City Staff to Submit Data to NLS for Small Cities Month (pg. 15) F. Approve Summary of Ordinance 802 Amendment for Publication (pg. 17) 6:05 p.m. V. Public Hearings 6:05 p.m. VI. Old Business 6:05 p.m. VII. New Business 6:20 p.m 6:25 p.m A. Oak Park Senior Living — Phase V — Senior Apartment Building — PUD Development (pg. 21) B. Amended Planned Unit Development — Signage Amendment — The Driessen Group — 60th Street and Krueger Lane (pg. 89) C. Consider City Highlights for Upcoming St. Croix River Crossing (pg. 115) VIII. Other Council Items or Announcements IX. Closed Session A. Memorial Ave. Property (closed pursuant to MN Stat 13D.05, Subd. 3(c)(3)) 6:45 p.m. X. Adjourn Please mute or silence any cell phones, computers or other devices during meeting — Thank You. Page 1 of 116 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Page 2 of 116 �p Oak Park Heights Request for Council Action Meeting Date May 23, 2017 Agenda Item Recycling Award Time Req. 0 Agenda Placement Staff Reports Originating Department/Requestor Administration/Jennifer Pinski Requester's Signature Action Requested Receive Information Background/Justification (Please indicate any previous action has been taken or if other public bodies have been advised). See Attached. Page 3 of 116 May 11, 2017 Gabriel Heuer 14644 571h Street North Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Dear Mr. Heuer: Thank you for participating in the City's recycling program. As an incentive to recycle and to increase fire prevention awareness, the City rewards two residents each month with their choice of an award of $25.00 or a fire extinguisher and/or smoke detector(s). Your residence was checked on Thursday, May 11, to determine if you had your recycling bin out with your regular garbage. Your recycling was out and ready for collection; therefore, you are one of this month's winners. Please contact me at 439-4439 to let me know your choice of award. On behalf of the Oak Park Heights City Council, thank you for participating in the City's recycling program. Congratulations! Jennifer Pinski City Clerk Page 4 of 116 May 11, 2017 Heather Willingham 6195 Paul Avenue N Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Dear Ms. Willinaham: Thank you for participating in the City's recycling program. As an incentive to recycle and to increase fire prevention awareness, the City rewards two residents each month with their choice of an award of $25.00 or a fire extinguisher and/or smoke detector(s). Your residence was checked on Thursday, May 11, to determine if you had your recycling bin out with your regular garbage. Your recycling was out and ready for collection; therefore, you are one of this month's winners. Please contact me at 439-4439 to let me know your choice of award. On behalf of the Oak Park Heights City Council, thank you for participating in the City's recycling program. Congratulations! Jennifer Pinski City Clerk Page 5 of 116 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Page 6 of 116 �P-, Oak Park Heights Request for Council Action Meeting Date May 23, 2017 Agenda Item Approve City Council Minutes — May 9, 2017 Time Req. 0 Agenda Placement Consent Originating Department/Requestor Administration/Jennifer Pinski Requester's Signature Action Requested Approve Background/Justification (Please indicate any previous action has been taken or if other public bodies have been advised). See Attached. Page 7 of 116 CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS TUESDAY, MAY % 2017 CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES I. Call to Order/Pledge of Allegiance/Approval of Agenda: Mayor McComber called the meeting to order at 6:12 p.m. Present: Councilmembers Dougherty, Liljegren, Runk, and Swenson. Staff present: City Administrator Johnson, City Attorney Vierling, City Planner Richards, City Engineer Mann, Police Chief DeRosier, and Public Works Director Kegley. Absent: None. Mayor McComber added two items to the Agenda: "Resolution Supporting Police Department" as New Business Item D., and "Ordinance 802 Amendments" as New Business Item E. Councilmember Swenson, seconded by Councilmember Liljegren, moved to approve the Agenda as amended. Carried 5-0. II. Council/Staff Reports: A. Mayor McComber: She reported she attended a meeting to discuss the bridge opening on May 9; she would be attending the Chamber Eggs and Issues meeting on May 10; a ribbon cutting was scheduled for May 15 for Goodwill; a ribbon cutting was scheduled for May 18 at Simonet's Furniture Warehouse; and the Youth Service Bureau Gala would be at the Lake Elmo Event Center on May 18. B. Councilmember Dougherty: He reported the next Planning Commission meeting was set for Thursday, May 11. C. Councilmember Lilje ren: He reported that the next Parks Commission meeting was set for Monday, May 15 at 7:00 p.m. D. Councilmember Runk: He reported the Middle St. Croix Watershed Management Organization meeting was cancelled; and he attended the open house on the Osgood Avenue project, and the County said they would come to the City Council to do a presentation. E. Councilmember Swenson: No report. F. Staff: Public Works Director Kegley provided an update on the recent water sampling. He reported that the results came back positive for coliform bacteria, and the City would be chlorinating the water system beginning May 15 through October. City Clerk Pinski reported that there were 362 loads brought in at Spring Clean-up on Saturday, May 6. III. Visitors/Public Comment: None Page 8 of 116 City Council Meeting Minutes May 9, 2017 Page 2 of 3 IV. Consent Agenda: A. Approve Bills & Investments B. Approve City Council Minutes — April 25, 2017 C. Waive LMCIT Statutory Tort Limits for City Liability Insurance for 2017 D. Approve Purchase of Small Business Server Councilmember Runk, seconded by Councilmember Dougherty, moved to approve the Consent Agenda. Roll call vote taken. Carried 5-0. V. Public Hearings: None VI. Old Business: None VII. New Business: A. 591h Street Reconstruction (Cover Park Entrance): City Administrator Johnson suggested it would be a good time to consider reconstruction of 591h Street in conjunction with the Cover Park redevelopment project. Councilmember Dougherty, seconded by Councilmember Runk, moved to go forward with the reconstruction. Carried 5-0. B. Accessory Structures — Ordinance Amendments: City Planner Richards had submitted a proposal with estimated costs and a schedule for review of the ordinance relating to accessory structures. Councilmember Swenson, seconded by Councilmember Liljegren, moved to authorize the study for accessory structures. Carried 5-0. C. Approve Proclamation — Municipal Clerks Week M4y 7th — 13th 2017: Councilmember Swenson, seconded by Councilmember Runk, moved to approve the Proclamation. Roll call vote taken. Carried 5-0. D. Resolution Supporting Police Department: Councilmember Liljegren, seconded by Councilmember Dougherty, moved to approve the Resolution. Roll call vote taken. Carried 5-0. E. Ordinance 802 Amendments: City Administrator Johnson reported that the changes related to creating a tiered system between large and small park events and outlining a permitting policy through the City. Councilmember Runk, seconded by Councilmember Dougherty, moved to approve the changes that were presented to the City Council. Roll call vote taken. Carried 5-0. Page 9 of 116 City Council Meeting Minutes May 9, 2017 Page 3 of 3 IX. Other Council Items or Announcements: Mayor McComber reported that community surveys would be going out in the following couple of weeks as part of the comprehensive plan update. X. Adiourn: Councilmember Swenson, seconded by Councilmember Liljegren, moved to adjourn at 6:30 p.m. Carried 5-0. Respectfully submitted, Jennifer Pinski City Clerk Approved as to Content and Form, Mary McComber Mayor Page 10 of 116 �P, Oak Park Heights Request for Council Action Meeting Date May 23, 2017 Agenda Item Approve City Council Worksession Notes — May 9, 2017 Time Req. 0 Agenda Placement Consent Originating Department/Requestor Administration/Jennifer Pinski Requester's Signature Action Requested Approve Background/Justification (Please indicate any previous action has been taken or if other public bodies have been advised). See Attached. Page 11 of 116 CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION NOTES TUESDAY, MAY 9, 2017 Present: Mayor McComber, Councilmembers Dougherty, Liljegren, Runk, and Swenson; City Administrator Johnson; Police Chief DeRosier; City Planner Richards; Public Works Director Kegley; and City Clerk Pinski. Also Present: Planning Commission Chair Jim Kremer. 1. Call to Order: Mayor McComber called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. 2. Comprehensive Plan 2040: City Planner Richards provided the City Council with a draft community survey. Councilmember Swenson suggested that residents be notified that additional surveys would be available on the City's website in the event more than one member of a household wanted to complete the survey. Mayor McComber suggested the surveys be available at Party in the Park. The City Council discussed suggested changes to the draft survey. City Administrator Johnson stated that the City Council had discussed possible annexation and use of land west of Memorial Avenue. Richards stated that should be a part of the comprehensive plan update. Johnson also suggested there should be an improved sign at the bus stop at Highway 36 and Osgood Avenue. Councilmember Swenson requested staff ask Met Council how many people use the bus stop in Oak Park Heights. No action was taken. 3. SCRCP Celebrations — Ordinance Amendments — Park Uses: Mayor McComber provided the City Council with a draft outline of planned events for the celebration that she had received at a planning meeting that day. City Administrator Johnson reviewed proposed language for an ordinance change to Ordinance 802. No action was taken. 4. Adjourn: The meeting was adjourned at 6:10 p.m. Page 12 of 116 Oak Park Heights Request for Council Action Meeting Date May 23rd, 2017 Time Required: 5 Minutes . Agenda Item Title: CONSIDER THE ADOPTION OF PROCLAMATION Agenda Placement CONSENT AGENDA Originating Department/Requestor: Mayor Mary McComber Requester's Signature Action Requested Adopt Proclamation that June shall be "Small Cities Month" Background/Justification (Please indicate if any previous action has been taken or if other public bodies have advised): I would like the City Council to consider the adoption of the attached proclamation that demonstrates support that June shall be known as "Small Cities Month" and its support for all "Small Cities" in the United States for the work that these communities perform. This Proclamation is also supported by the National League of Cities. Page 13 of 116 PROCLAMATION NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES SMALL CITIES MONTH JUNE 2017 Whereas small cities and towns under 50,000 population are the home to millions of Americans and constitute the vast majority of municipalities across the United States; and Whereas small cities and towns strive to strengthen their communities through the provision of services and programs to improve the quality of life for all citizens; and Whereas the federal government is an essential partner in the success of small cities and towns, and must be encouraged to continue to support programs and legislation that strengthen small communities; and Whereas state governments are partners in the success of small cities and towns, and must be encouraged to continue to support key programs and legislation that strengthen communities; and Whereas organizations, businesses, and citizens are partners in the success of small cities and towns, and must be encouraged to continue to grow their efforts to make small communities a viable choice for people to live in; and Whereas during these challenging economic times, the need for a renewed intergovernmental partnership to support essential public services is more important than ever to ensure the safety and growth of small town America; and Whereas the National League of Cities President and the Small Cities Council of the National League of Cities have declared June 2017 as Small Cities Month; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Oak Park Heights does hereby proclaim June 2017, as Small Cities Month, and encourages President Trump, Congress, state governments, organizations, businesses, and all citizens to recognize this event, and to work togethcr this month and throughout the year to invest in small cities and towns to better the lives of all citizens. [Mayor's Signature] Page 14 of 116 Oak Park Heights Request for Council Action Meeting Date May 23rd, 2017 Time Required: 5 Minutes Agenda Item Title: NLC SMALL CITIES MONTH —"WHAT MAKES YOUR SMALL CITY PROUD" Agenda Placement Originating Department/Requestor: Ma or Mary McComber Requester's Signature Action Requested Authorize City Staff to Submit Data to NLC for Small Cities Month Background/Justification (Please indicate if any previous action has been taken or if other public bodies have advised) Authorize City Staff to submit information to the NLC- "WHAT MARES YOUR SMALL CITY PROUD The City has many things to be proud of and this submission should take minimal Staff time and will aid the NLC in its continuing advocacy for Small Cities. See the attached description of project. Page 15 of 116 June is Small Cities Month! Like last year, we're planning to feature a new small city, town or village on our Facebook page every day to show our appreciation for the communities that make up 80 percent of our membership. This year, our theme is "What makes your small city proud?" Send us a two -sentence description and a high-resolution photo of whatever you think makes your town special. Examples could be: • An event, like a parade or a holiday celebration • A program that benefits your community • A city leader or community activist who has created a strong sense of community in your municipality • Or your favorite park or structure Fill out this simple form (don't forget to add pictures!) by Friday, May 261' and you'll get your submission featured on our Facebook celebration of small cities during June. This year, we're also doing a Small Cities, Big Impact membership campaign, so stay tuned for more details on how you can get involved! In addition, I have attached a sample proclamation you may use in your community to declare June as Small Cities Month. I look forward to reviewing your submissions and highlighting small cities across the country! Sarah Sarah Lindsay Midwest Program Manager Member Services and Engagement National League of Cities 202-626-3067 I lindsay{c)nlc.org NLCNATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES CITIES STRONG TOGETHER www.nIc.org Register Today for Cite Summit 2017! The Annual Conference for City Leaders Page 16 of 116 ,.., Oak Park Heights Request for Council Action Meeting Date May 23, 2017 Agenda Item Approve Summary of Ordinance 802 Amendment for Publication Time Req. 0 Agenda Placement Consent Originating Department/Requestor Requester's Signature Action Requested Approve Administration/Jennifer Pinski Background/Justification (Please indicate any previous action has been taken or if other public bodies have been advised). See attached. Page 17 of 116 CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 2017-802-03 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 802 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS RELATING TO REGULATING THE USE OF PUBLIC PARKS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS, WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA, DOES ORDAIN: Section 1. Amendment. That Section 802.09 of Chapter 802 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Oak Park Heights is hereby amended to delete the same in its entirety and to substitute the following therefor: 802.09 Park Events and Alcohol Consumption Any person, entity or group desiring to rent or reserve a City Park Shelter and/or rent a City Park Facility shall first secure a permit subject to the provisions of this Ordinance. Unless a permit for alcohol use and consumption is granted by the City to be used in conjunction with the rental event, alcoholic beverages shall not be permitted within City parks. 1. Small Events: For small events that are anticipated to be less than 200 persons, an application shall be submitted on forms provided by the City and shall be fully completed and submitted not less than then (10) days prior to the event. In conjunction with reserving of the park shelter, an application for a permit to consume alcohol on the premises must be first applied for and obtained from the City. A non-refundable application fee for such permit shall be $15.00. No sale of alcohol will be permitted under any circumstances. 2. Large Events: Should an event at a park facility, or in conjunction with a park shelter reservation, be estimated to exceed 200 persons, the applicant shall first secure a park permit from the City to be issued by the City Council in its discretion. The following criteria should be followed by the application prior to and in any consideration by the City Council for such event: a. The application shall be on forms provided by the City and shall be fully completed and submitted not less than forty-five (45) days prior to the event. b. Any alcoholic sales and consumption shall be confined to a specific area of the event and shall be delineated with proper temporary fencing. c. A permit shall be secured by the Minnesota Alcohol and Gambling Control Division at least thirty (30) days prior to the event. d. All servers of alcoholic beverages shall have first passed the "SERVSAFE" Alcohol Training Program; provide documentation to the City. e. The Applicant shall provide proof of general liability coverage naming the City as an additionally insured party in an amount of not less than $1,000,000 covering any and all aspects of the applicants use of the City facility. Such insurance shall be provided at the time of the application. Page 18 of 116 f. The Applicant shall provide a deposit of $5.00 per planned attendee, but shall be not less than $500.00 nor more than $2,000.00. This deposit shall be refunded to the Applicant after the event is concluded subject to the following: The City will evaluate the site after the event and will deduct reasonable costs for any site clean-up not performed by the Applicant. Should clean-up or repair costs exceed the deposit balance, the Applicant does agree to pay any costs so deemed necessary by the City and shall waive any rights to appeal such enforcement. g. The City Chief of Police shall determine if any Police Services are required to be present at such event and the Chief shall estimate such costs. These Police Services costs shall be the sole responsibility of the Applicant and shall be paid in advance of the event and such fees are separate from the Deposit. h. The City Police Department may terminate this permit at any time and/or order the closing of the event should conditions warrant. i. The Applicant agrees that the City bears no responsibility to ensure the Park facility is set-up with any specific tables, chairs, port -a -pots, garbage facilities. It remains the Applicant sole responsibility to secure these facilities from other vendors. The City facilities is provided in an "as -is" condition under the permits issued herein. The Applicant bears the full responsibility to clean-up and repair all facilities and address any damages that occur upon the site during their event and at their sole expense. The Applicant is responsible for all elements of the event and the behavior of their patrons and guests. j. The Applicant shall provide an emergency plan — including an evacuation plan with complete contact information. The Applicant, it's statT and/or leadership shall be on the site at all times during any approved event. The general safety of attendees is the sole responsibility of Applicant. k. Use of City Park for a Large Event that is open to the general public and for a FOR- PROFIT purpose is strictly prohibited. 1. No one applicant or their related group(s) may secure more than two Large Event Permits during a twelve (12) month period. Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect after its passage and publication according to law. Passed by the City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights, Washington County, Minnesota, on the 23rd day of May, 2017. Attest: Eric Johnson, City Administrator CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS Mary McComber, Mayor Page 19 of 116 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Page 20 of 116 0 Oak Park Heights Request for Council Action Meeting Date May 23rd 2017 Time Required: 10 Minutes Agenda Item Title: OAK PARK SENIOR LIVING — PHASE V — SENIOR APARTMENT RT TIT 7 %TrV — PT TT] A A/IVN AA -PVT Agenda Placement _ Originating Departme Requester's Signature Action Requested Background/Justification (Pl�e indicate if any previous action has been taken or if other public bodies have advised): Please see the attached from City Planner Scott Richards: 1. Planning Report dated May 4th 2017 2. Planning Commission Resolution — Unsigned. 3. Proposed City Council Resolution Page 21 of 116 3801 Thurston Avenue N, 6uhe 100 Anoka, MN 66303 P C Phone: 763.231.6840 Facsimile: 763.427.0320 TPCOPlanningCo.00m PLANNING REPORT TO: Eric Johnson FROM: Scott Richards DATE: May 4, 2017 RE: Oak Park Heights — Oak Park Senior Living Phase 5 Senior Apartment Building and Enclosed Pedestrian Walkway — Planned Unit Development — General Plan and Amendment - Final Plat TPC FILE: 236.02 17.03 BACKGROUND Tim Nolde, representing Oakgreen Villa, LLC, has applied for a Planned Unit Development General Plan and Amendment and Final Plat for the Oak Park Senior Living, Phase 5 senior apartment building located near Nova Scotia Avenue and Lower 59th Street North. The application consists of a request for Building 5 as well as an enclosed pedestrian walkway between Buildings 1 and 2. The General Plan is generally in conformance with the Master Plan mated for the Oak Park Senior Living Development as approved by the City Council. This phase of the development will consist of a three story, 72 -unit senior apartment building with an underground parking garage. The building will require the removal of the two existing townhouse structures and the reconfiguration of the previously designated road alignment. There will be 41 one bedroom and 31 two bedroom units. The underground parking garage will provide 71 parking spaces. The PUD for the Oak Park Senior Living Development, which included the Master Plan and General Plan approval for portions of the project, was approved by the City Council on May 29, 2013. This also Included the Concept Plan approval for Building 5. General Plan approval for Building 6 is now required under this application. A Planned Unit Development Amendment is required to allow the enclosed pedestrian walkway between Buildings 1 and 2. The review is based upon the following submittals: Exhibit 1: Project Narrative, April 28, 2017 Exhibit 2: Oak Park Senior Living Phase 5, Unit Count, Parking Stall Count Exhibit 3: Title Sheet (TO) Exhibit 4: Master Plan (C2.1) Page 22 of 116 Exhibit 5: Site Plan (AS1) Exhibit 6: Site Plan with Basement (AS2) Exhibit 7: Landscaping Plan (1-1) Exhibit 8: Title Sheet Civil (T) Exhibit 9: Existing Conditions and Demolition Plan (Cl) Exhibit 10: Paving and Dimension Plan (C2) Exhibit 11: Fire Truck Turning Display (C2.1) Exhibit 12: Fire Truck Turning Display (C2.2) Exhibit 13: Grading and Erosion Control Pian (C3) Exhibit 14: Utility Plan (C4) Exhibit 15: Details (C5) Exhibit 16: Detail (CO) Exhibit 17: Basement Plan (A1.0) Exhibit 18: 1 st Floor Plan (Al .1) Exhibit 19: 2nd Floor Plan (A1.2) Exhibit 20: 3rd Floor Plan (A1.3) Exhibit 21: Unit Plans (A1.0) Exhibit 22: Unit Plans (A2.0) Exhibit 23: Preliminary Site Design Exhibit 24: Preliminary Building Design (Page 1) Exhibit 25: Preliminary Building Design (Page 2) Exhibit 26: Floor Plan (A1.0) Exhibit 27: Enlargement Plans (A2.0) Exhibit 28: Elevations (A3.0) Exhibit 29: Pedestrian Walkway Design Exhibit 30: Pedestrian Walkway Design Exhibit 31: Sign Plans (5 pages) Exhibit 32: Final Plat — Oak Park Senior Living Second Addition (2 pages) Exhibit 33: Memo from City Arborist - Lisa Danielson Exhibit 34: Memo from City Engineer — Lee Mann Exhibit 35: Memo from Bayport Fire Chief — Allen Eisinger — April 16, 2017 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Beth Diem of Archnet has provided the following narrative related to the PUD General Plan and Amendment request: The attached project represents the fifth and final phase of me Oak Park Senior Wing project and an enclosed pedeshlan walkway between buildings one and two. it is our understanding that the walkway and phase five building require a Plat Amendment. Please find enclosed, the application for the Plat Amendment, with the following serving as the project narrative. Phase five will consist of a three story, 72 -unit apartment building with underground parking. This facility will require the removal of the two existing townhouse structures and the reconfiguration of the previously designated road alignment The layout of the building is being used to create a large park that will serve as the central green space 2 Page 23 of 116 for the entire complex. The rzevised road alignment will ring the entire central park and accommodate the tuming requirements of the city's emergency vehicles. The dwelling unit count for the overall project under the previous plat was 359 (911312011), and would now total 346 units. This number includes the four townhouses remaining on the corner of Nova Scotia and 58th St N. The parking count for the overall project under the previous plat (9113/2011), was 308 underground stalls and 169 exterior stalls, for a total of 477. With the plat amendment, we are proposing 289 underground stalls and 176 exterior stalls for a total of 457 spaces. The exterior materials will remain the same as previous buildings/phases, with variations provided in color and configuration. The lighting for the building and site will also remain similar to the previous phases Currently, Building One provides a kitchen with meal services available for Buildings One, Two and Three. The popularity of the meal service, and the need to transport the meals on wheeled carts has created the need for the enclosed walkway between buildings One and Two. The location of the walkway was chosen to minimize the impact on Interior units, maintaining a conwenlent connection for the residents and providing the ability for the existing parking facilities to remain operational during construction. It should also be noted that the walkway cannot be located on the first floor (on grade) due to the security measures required for a memory care facility. Exterior materials will be consistent with the existing buildings ISSUES ANALYSIS Adjacent Uses. Uses adjacent to the subject site are listed below: North of Site: Present Zoning — B-4, Limited Business District Present Use — Highway 36 orientated commercial development, and the Xcel Energy power line easement South of Site: Present Zoning — O, Open Space and R-1 Single Family Residential District Present Use — City park land and a single-family neighborhood West of Site: Present Zoning — B4, Limited Business District Present Use — Lowe's/CSM Commercial development East of Site: Present Zoning — B-4/PUD, Residential Planned Unit Development Present Use — Existing Memory/Senior Care and Senior Living, and Oakgreen Avenue Comprehensive Plan. The 2008 Comprehensive Plan originally designated this area as medium density residential. The increase in number of approved units placed the area Into a high density residential classification for land use purposes. The land use classification of the Comprehensive Plan was changed to high density residential in 2011. 3 Page 24 of 116 Zoning. This property has been designated as B-4, Limited Business District which accommodates residential development as a conditional use. As such, the underlying base zoning district is B-4, Limited Business District with a PUD overlay. The B-4, Limited Business District lists two-family, townhomes and multiple family dwellings as a conditional use. The performance standards of the R-3 Multiple Family District must be complied with for residential development in the B-4 Limited Business District. Final Plat. The Applicant has provided a Final Plat for Oak Park Senior Living Second Addition. The Final Plat, as well as the dedication and vacation of any easements shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer and City Attomey. Park Dedication. Park dedication has been satisfied for this area. The applicant paid the maximum percentage (14%) of equivalent cash value as part of the original approvals in 2006. Project Density/Open Space. Section 401.15.0.3 of the Zoning Ordinance establishes the density thresholds for residential properties. Elderly housing requires 1,000 square feet of land area per unit excluding right-of-way and wetlands. The multiple family requirement is 2,500 square feet per unit. The property is 770,186 square feet. With a total of 350 units proposed, the resulting density is 2,200 square feet per unit. As long as the project stays as a senior rental complex, it would meet density requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. The development agreement has included a provision to assure that the project remains as senior rental and is not converted to non -restricted rental housing. Proposed Street Access. The existing roadway system that was developed for the Oakgreen Village and Oakgreen Commons projects will remain in place except for the closure of the access from Nova Scotia Avenue to Lower 59th Street North. The new building will block that entrance, so that all access to the development will be from Upper 58th Street North. The access at Nova Scotia Avenue will be 48 feet, 7 inches and narrow to the existing street network that is 28 feet wide. No parking will be allowed on the street network and there will be no street medians on Upper 58th Street North at the entrance to the development. Allen Eisinger, the Fire Chief of the Bayport Fire Department has reviewed the plans and made comments as found in the attached memo (Exhibit 35). The Applicant has altered the plans and provided turning movements diagrams to show how access will be provided for the ladder truck. Staff has Indicated that the access is somewhat tight in front of the new building adjacent to the parking lot medians. The Applicant will provide a revised plan, indicating a reduction In the median size or elimination of a parking stall. Additionally, the access between the new building and the dog park would be signed so that there is no left tum allowed. That would allow easier access and traffic flow through this portion of the development. Trails/Sidewalks. The Site Plan as attached includes the locations of the existing public trails and the proposed/existing concrete sidewalks for Building 5. The sidewalk 4 Page 25 of 116 system is well integrated with the City trail system and access is provided to the building entrance as well as around the dog park and park area. Overall the plan shows, a well- connected trail and sidewalk system. Setbacks. Within a PUD, the base district setback requirements (R-3) are applied only to the perimeter of the project. The R-3 District specifies setback requirements as follows: 30 feet front yard, 30 feet rear yard, and 20 feet side yard. If the lot is on a comer, not less than 30 feet from a lot line is required for side yards. The PUD section of the Zoning Ordinance specifies that buildings should be located at least 20 feet from the back of a curb line from roadways as part of the intemal street pattem. Additionally, the ordinance specifies that no building within the project shall be nearer to another building by one-half the sum of the building heights of the two buildings. Building 5 is setback between 20 feet to 27 feet, 8 inches from Nova Scotia North and 22 feet, 2 inches from the north properly line. Additionally, the building is setback 32 feet from feet from Upper 581' Street to the south. The side yard setbacks are met, but the front yard setback to Nova Scotia Avenue is less than 30 feet. The townhomes were previously approved with a setback less than 30 feet, but they are one story versus the three-story building that is now proposed. Staff has worked with the Applicant and the current site plan includes a five-foot increase in the setback to Nova Scotia Avenue North from the original application. Staff found that at least a 20-foot setback to the property line along with the wide boulevard (38 feet 9 inches) of Nova Scotia Avenue North will be more than adequate distance between the building and the roadway curb. This setback and wide boulevard situation was also allowed for Building 1 that is 60 feet from the curb line of Oak Green Avenue North. Building 1 is a four-story building. The distance between Building 3 and the proposed Building 5 will be 50 feet. Building 5 will have a building height of 38 feet and Building 3 has a height of 26 feet. With a total height of the two buildings at 64 feet, the distance between the two buildings is adequate. The Planning Commission should discuss the setback distance to Nova Scotia Avenue North and determine if it is adequate. Tree Preservation/Landscaping. The Applicant has provided a landscaping plan that includes detailed plans for the foundation plantings around Building 5 and around the dog parts and parts area. The City Arborist has reviewed the plan and found it acceptable with a request for additional planting schedule detail and changes to increase plant diversity. See Exhibit 33. The plan shall be subject to the final approval of the City Arborist. Grading and Drainage. Detailed grading and drainage plans have been provided as part of the development submittals. The City Engineer has provided a review of the plans found as Exhibit 34. The City Engineer and the Middle St. Croix Watershed Management Organization shall review and approve the grading and drainage plans. 5 Page 26 of 116 Utilities. A detailed utility plan has been submitted. The final utility plan is subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. Lighting. A lighting plan has not been provided, but the Applicant has indicated that that any new street light fixture will be identical to what has been used previously. It is a full cut-off fixture with a flat lens. The street lights will be maintained and all electricity costs will be paid for by the developer. The Applicant has indicated that the same wall light fixtures are to be used on the proposed building as what was approved for the existing buildings. As part of the PUD approvals, the Planning Commission and City Council will need to determine if these Mures are appropriate in that they are not full cut off. Signage. The Applicant has provided a signage plan for the development. All of the signs are freestanding with no building wall signage proposed. The signs are consistent with the size and height requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and are consistent with residential housing development signage. The sign posts at intersection comers will assist visitors in finding a speck building in the development. The plans do not indicate how the signage shall be lit. At the time of the sign permitting process, a plan for sign lighting will be required. Parking. The Zoning Ordinance requires the following for elderly housing: "m. Elderly (Senior Citizen) Housing. Reservation of area equal to one (1) parking space per unit. Initial development is, however, required for only one-half (1/2) space per unit and said number of spaces can continue until such time as the City considers a need for additional parking spaces has been demonstrated." A detailed review of the existing and proposed parking is found in the table that includes the parking stall counts (Exhibit 2). With an overall total of 457 stalls, and 350 dwelling units, the buildings in the project comply with ordinance standards for elderly parking and leave additional spaces for staff and guest parking. Of the 467 stalls, 281 will be underground and 176 will be exterior stalls. The Applicant has indicated that there is more than adequate lower level parking that can be used for residents and staff. Building 5 will Have 71 underground parking stalls and 73 surface stalls. Directly in front of the building will be 20 parking stalls, two of which are disability accessible. Snow Storage. The plans should be updated to indicate areas for snow storage. The City Engineer should comment on the adequacy of these areas. Mechanical Equipment. The Applicant's architect has indicated that the mechanical equipment is located within the buildings or at ground level. The ground level mechanical units would be placed on the north side of Building 5 and surrounded by landscape materials. Any mechanical equipment that is ground mounted or visible from adjacent streets shall be screened as required by the Zoning Ordinance. 51 Page 27 of 116 Trash/Recycling. All the trash storage and recycling will be internal to the buildings. Building Height. Building 5 will be 38 feet to the midpoint of then gable roof. The building is not in conformance with the 35 -foot height limitation of the Zoning Ordinance, but the PUD process has allowed the other buildings in the development to exceed that requirement. The Planning Commission should comment. Unit Types. Building 5 will have the following unit types: 1 bedroom 1 bath: 750 square feet 2 bedroom 2 bath Standard: 1,125 square feet 2 bedroom 2 bath Comer: 1,350 square feet 2 bedroom 2 bath Sound End: 1,400 square feet 2 bedroom 1 bath: 1,025 square feet The Zoning Ordinance Indicates that Elderly Housing must have a minimum floor area of 440 square feet for efficiency units and 520 square feet for one bedroom units. Building 5 as proposed is compliant with these requirements. Architectural Appearance. The application materials indicate elevations and perspective diagrams from various locations surrounding the development. The appearance of Building 5 Is similar to the existing buildings in the development. The building will be brick with upper level lap siding. The roof is hipped. The plans indicate the material types and specify colors. The project architect will provide a building materials board for review at the Planning Commission meeting. The residential units are not required to be reviewed under Design Guideline requirements, but as part of the PUD, the City can comment and require design and material changes. The Planning Commission and City Council shall comment further on the building appearance and materials as part of the review. Building Connection — Building 1 and 5 The submittal included plans to connect Building 1 and 2 with an enclosed walkway. Building 1 provides a kitchen with meal services available for Buildings 1, 2 and 3. The popularity of the meal service, and the need to transport the meals on wheeled carts, has necessitated the enclosed walkway between Buildings 1 and 2. The location of the walkway was chosen to minimize the impact on interior units, maintain a convenient connection for the residents, and provide the ability for the existing parking facilities to remain operational during construction. It should also be noted that the walkway cannot be located on the first floor (on grade) due to the security measures required for a memory care facility. Exterior materials will be consistent with the existing buildings. BA Limited Business Standards. Section 401.301.E.9 of the Zoning Ordinance provides the CUP standards for allowing residential use in the B-4 District. The standards are as follows: 7 Page 28 of 116 Two family, townhomes and multiple family dwellings provided that: a. At least two parking spaces per unit must be provided for on site, or proof is shown of arrangements for private parking nearby. The development will comply with the specific Zoning Ordinance requirements for senior housing. b. No physical improvements, either interior or exterior, may preclude future re -use for commercial purposes. The development could be converted to future office use, but highly unlikely. C. Unit floor areas must comply with Section 401.15.C.6. All of the elderly units are at least 750 square feet and comply with the Zoning Ordinance. d. Compliance with conditional use requirements of Section 401.03.A.8. The requirements will be complied with. e. The development does not conflict with existing or potential future commercial uses and activities. There would be no conflict. f. The density, setbacks, and building height standards imposed as part of the R-3 Zoning District are complied with. The building setbacks are not consistent The Planning Commission and City Council will need to comment on the setbacks. g. Adequate open space and recreational space is provided on site for the benefit of the occupants. Adequate open space is provided. The park and dog park will provide more than adequate active and passive area for the development. h. The development does not conflict or result in incompatible land use arrangements as related to abutting residential uses or commercial uses. No incompatible land use arrangements are created. 8 Page 29 of 116 i. Residential use can be govemed by all applicable standards of the Zoning Ordinance, Building Code, Housing Code and Fire Codes. Aff standards will be complied with. j. Residential and non-residential uses shall not be contained on the same floor. Not applicable. k. Residential uses shall be provided with a separate entrance, and separately identified parking stalls. Not applicable. I. The architectural appearance, design and building materials of residential structures shall be consistent with the Design Guidelines and subject to approval of the City Council. The Planning Commission and City Council should comment on the architectural appearance. Development Agreement. The Applicant may be required to enter into an amended development agreement with the City should approval of the General Plan and Amendment of the PUD be granted. The development agreement shall be subject to review and approval of the City Attomey. CONCLUSION / RECOMMENDATION Staff is favorable to this last phase of the Oak Park Senior Living project in that it will provide a more unified development in building type and scale. The removal of the two townhouse buildings is positive and the proposed Building 5 will provide a more consistent land use and development type for the overall project. The park areas will also create a central open space and gathering area for the residents. Upon review of the application for the Planned Unit Development General Plan and Amendment, as well as the Final Plat for the Oak Park Senior Living Phase 5 senior apartment building located near Nova Scotia Avenue and Lower 59th Street North, City Staff would recommend the project with the conditions as follows: 1. The Final Plat for Oak Park Senior Living Second Addition, as well as the dedication and vacation of any easements, shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer and City Attomey. 2. An amended development agreement, if required, shall include a provision that the Oak Park Senior Living Phase 5 will remain as senior rental and shall not be converted to non -restricted rental housing. The development Page 30 of 116 agreement shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Attorney and City Council. 3. A revised plan shall be provided indicating a reduction in the median size or elimination of a parking stall to improve access at the front of Building 5. Additionally, the access between the new building and the dog park shall be signed so that there is no left tum allowed. 4. The Planning Commission and City Council shall comment on the proposed setback from Nova Scotia Avenue North to Building 5. 5. The landscape plan shall be subject to review and approval of the City Arborist. 6. The grading and drainage plans shall be subject to City Engineer and the Middle St. Croix Watershed Management Organization approval. 7. All utility plans shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. S. The Planning Commission and City Council shall determine if the non - shielded, residential style light fixtures are appropriate. 9. The Fire Chief and Police Chief should review and approve the final plans to determine the accessibility of emergency vehicles throughout the development. 10. No parallel parking shall be allowed on the street network and shall be signed as such. 11. The snow storage areas and plan shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 12.A plan for sign lighting shall be provided at the time of the sign permitting process. 13. Any mechanical equipment that is ground mounted or visible from adjacent streets shall be screened as required by the Zoning Ordinance. 14. All trash and recycling storage shall be internal to the building. 15.The Planning Commission and City Council shall comment on the propsed building height of 38 feet. 16.The Planning Commission and City Council shall comment on the final building appearance, colors, materials and the variety between buildings. The Applicant shall provide a materials board for the buildings to be discussed at the Planning Commission and City Council meeting. 10 Page 31 of 116 1`11LCH E 1 333 North Main Street Suite 201 Stillwater, MN 55082 Revised April 28, 2017 City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Blvd. N. Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 RE: Oak Park Senior Living & The Villas of Oak Park c ure I 111terlorg Sustainable Design Phone 6511430-0606 Fax 6511430-2414 www.archnotusa.com The attached project represents the fifth and final phase of the Oak Park Senior Living project and an enclosed pedestrian walkway between buildings one and two. It is our understanding that the walk- way alkway and phase five building require a Plat Amendment. Please find enclosed, the application for the Plat Amendment, with the following serving as the project narrative. Phase five will consist of a three story, 72 unit apartment building with underground parking. This fa- cility will require the removal of the two existing townhouse structures and the reconfiguration of the previously designated road alignment The layout of the building is being used to create a large park that will serve as the central green space for the entire complex. The revised road alignment will ring the entire central park and accommodate the tuming requirements of the city's emergency vehicles. The dwelling unit count for the overall project under the previous plat was 351 (9/1312011), and would now total 346 units. This number includes the four townhouses remaining on the comer of Nova Scotia and 58th St N. The parking count for the overall project under the previous plat (9/1312011), was 308 underground stalls and 169 exterior stalls, for a total of 477. With the plat amendment we are proposing 281 underground stalls and 176 exterior stalls for a total of 457 spaces. The exterior materials will remain the same as previous buildings/phases, with variations provided in color and configuration. The lighting for the building and site will also remain similar to the previous phases. Currently, Building One provides a kitchen with meal services available for Buildings One, Two and Three. The popularity of the meal service, and the need to transport the meals on wheeled carts has created the need for the enclosed walkway between buildings One and Two. The location of the walkway was chosen to minimize the impact on interior units, maintaining a convenient connection for the residents and providing the ability for the existing parking facilities to remain operational during construction. It should also be noted that the walkway cannot be located on the first floor (on grade) due to the security measures required for a memory care facility. Exterior materials will be consistent with the existing buildings. Thank you for your consideration of the Plat Amendment, and we look forward to answering any questions you may have. Respectfully submitted, Beth Diem PrincipaVArchitect ARCHNET Page 32 of 116 OAK PARK SENIOR LIVING; - PHASE 5 31 4/25/2017 ASSISTED LIVING UNDERGROUND Amended PUD Proposed PUD TOWN HOME GARAGE Permit Amendment TOWN HOME DRIVEWAY May 29, 2013 April 2017 UNIT COUNT 43 44 EXISTING ASSISTED LIVING BUILDING 1 120 120 EXISTING TOWN HOME UNITS 11 4 SENIOR LIVING - BUILDING 2 62 62 MEMORY CARE - BUILDING 3 30 30 MEMORY CARE - BUILDING 4 30 0 SENIOR LIVING - BUILDING 5 (Phase 5) 32 72 SENIOR LIVING - BUILDING 6 (Phase 4) 5o 62 TOTAL UNIT COUNT 335 350 PARKING STALL COUNT ASSISTED LIVING EXTERIOR 31 91 ASSISTED LIVING UNDERGROUND 28 28 TOWN HOME GARAGE 22 8 TOWN HOME DRIVEWAY 22 8 SENIOR LIVING (2) - EXTERIOR 43 44 SENIOR LIVING (2) - UNDERGROUND 96 94 FUTURE SENIOR LIVING UNDERGROUND - BUILDING 5 48 71 FUTURE SENIOR LIVING EXTERIOR BUILDING 5 58 73 FUTURE SENIOR LIVING UNDERGROUND - BUILDING 6 75 8o FUTURE SENIOR LIVING EXTERIOR BUILDING 6 9 12 MEMORY CARE EXTERIOR 6 8 TOTAL PARKING STALL COUNT 438 467 PROJECT DENSITY SUMMARY [2013) Total prgwrty Currently in Control of Owner = 770,186 s.f. Total Proposed Units =,935 Total Area Per Unit = 2.259 s.f. Per Unit > 1,000 s.f. Per Unit as Required PROJECT DENSITY SUMMARY [20171 Total property Currently in Control of Owner 770,188 &f. Total Proposed Units = 348 Total Area Per Unit = 2,226 s.f. Per Unit > 1,000 0. Per Unit as Required Page 33 of 116 �fz � ed *A I -U t F- F - Z W Z W Q .5 CL km 0 1-4 Z �Wn V a 'Q 0 Ln LU oG V) LL CL N E cn �S W C {Qp N Q W C W H w1D Cj1 w PAR Ztn, W W � n Z W 3 n z � u:�� $N 2 tiis V, W� �� n Z d1z rab z�g o E Z rn a. d w d wuj �3 w LU zo3u; - im �i .. J Z N O O N O a Z W W Z Z rJ+ a Q HER 8 �OMnE 8aW r�n3 8dW 9N 8dW Z W Z W O 4 Z d UA oc z b � d r Z J Q � ujIL8 NQS G o U,.. F W O 00 lu a 3��zceZ WBZ�g ccWZZ QIC0IL99 N ss W cc g��EWEI .4 N w LU � O as ZZ .00 W m CG 99 mm N 0 d \ \ N W N N 009 aaa'o7 ce Z 5225NMWN wppZZZ Z W 20 ul (n ulil (A [A W a 4Z W n W Q fr 85 W } } } LU a�4�3 �z dy�jaa LUWoc in 000 cW.aaa�c`� <. Page 34 of 116 OL &�(• 4 - Page 35 of 116 Q. 5 Page 36 of 116 i 1 C4 F- Page 37 of 116 16 lE LU LO a a-IL OZ L I I I I 1 I i 1 1 r- c 0 6 —, IL - GGC"11.IEi Page 38 of 116 I ! J! 3 O ul ' !31 { HN all oil p11 fir.........■,. .. _ _ ��..�.�.....��. QCFO -04 00 0QQ J� r- c 0 6 —, IL - GGC"11.IEi Page 38 of 116 �6 pgpg f� 9 sill, R � p WJI J. lit �' aia if.11,11 d1 � �e �: 10d��ill Page 39 of 116 E K4 8 �,�, �uoiuvl w,w��wr oi+'siHOeH�urod7roo [� i 9 39VHd 1N3WdOl3A: 3115 sJ' li 1 0 LLJ z CL O{�g NU1112iOIN3S Idd Md'O i 1 a i LO W Q H Z w 0 w LU 0 w F— r� V z Z J ti) w F- 0 _ w w Cl) M: a. iLQ/� pQp� oa U s Z 0 LLJ z CL O{�g �rW O LLX ~� 0caJ � J Uz w Q Q Page 40 of 116 s DEBT �SFl��c�i3g Page 40 of 116 C�9 ....v.n �.wrs...wcg 'ON bld AV8 ONOW NN'6JN019HlRW WO wesuneb lM �w�Yt,lry mopM� tlpla�mtlsa�o 9 3SVHd �,l.suy,� ® -LN3YVdOl3A303118 fuowe-j IN - ONIAIl HOMS NbVd AVO l e ' 3 1 r !,,111 � C d U # ( f a fill Page 41 of 116 O Ai tA/ 18 Ahwww— �rurmin ,..dM.14 �o1e.•-n + � 'JNI'ONd AVG OMW Nw'eiNoeH Mu,waro B3SVHd j i tt o N a�ra�n++a+prt emnsm 11 y} 1 ,UoSJjI� ® �� oil -! M3Wd013A30 311S , i i ski , ski 16 s ONIAI1 NOIN38 NUVd M1 11111 S11 1 M w z 119 Ills ill h �_LLJ , a 1 ll 11 Page 42 of 116 Fly ll iun..' m'-^.: 9NNRit'aq+N.tliR mot�+srr� �� UU 'OWd.NB OHDW P *&LmOIi xwdwo 9 38VHd �1 a �y u ® -1NMdOl3A30 311S is ONIAII MOMS MiVd NVO1111,11, I Page 43 of 116 Q 12- xararoMaw N[6 uY[OmOCN11Yli wm"",M"m ■xoM�uwol � smmma�rio '=tw AV9OHDNV NHVLM OHMMdYM 5 IDNIAI-1 � ±I } i ,.Oil iV Uv uos18� + -1N3WdO-13AS(3 311S HOIN3S AHVd N ' �,�� , O ju� j l I f I f I I I I I I I I I I I 1 °5 Page 44 of 116 E41.5 —.&. wrFww.mm4�"" sxm �9— wm ■rmm-v uav�csiuen+uo�eawe MNVOWdAYROHONY M "SIWMH NWd XM 9 3SdHd t E I '' 'Jul'Oup-LO,3 Uos l� - .N3WdO 13/130 ails JtVUUl aaN3S NHVd }IVO fi ; , ' ii; i 1 ill $SIN i ; f' Q oil J ' aLL jllj ��i i � �■i E*q� � � �� _ �' I II I 01 4 a: a Page 45 of 116 4 14- w..�. w+..r.wrra moa.lw .w�vnn�cwo -NI'MMAWB OMORV W'SIMO RNMw3m }l Z zS - IRWMWn.uwu. S3SVHd S { � ,y. ,a a � 1N3WdOl3A3fl 311S { p i , :. u0sie-1 �., a JNI Nn aOIN3S MIVd >1VO 13 mill ia E � # H I� { i all ( ii i .1 loom 14ov I at s Page 46 of 116 r4 I a - FLA M�l ro Lu 01 im LL a 0 2 - c:! m Page 47 of 116 LO gaSVHd tj UOIRJB -IN3MO13A3O 311SA ji 12 ONIA11 >IkrVd NVO MOIN38 FLA M�l ro Lu 01 im LL a 0 2 - c:! m Page 47 of 116 ..W+wrw+wi°�+rY '9W'OQfdAYiOHDNV 5 3SMHd j 1i a �g I' I -�- y,,.y -1UNdo-am0 311S MOIN39 MHVc AVO; 'j;r il f uaSJal ONIA11 _ - f I Wee `All12 = I! HI� ut $ ! 9 ! d d d d d d d Page 48 of 116 4� �•' � ` . � . D y s . t�: til m, Page 48 of 116 Z a D 111111111111111 W17 Page 49 of 116 El�ltl Page 49 of 116 m I z L IL t4 if Page 50 of 116 G x Page 50 of 116 I i N z V Q I CL v rrr .rrrrrrrrr D 111111111111111 y Page 51 of 116 N a g Page 51 of 116 ri m � Q O g a "iy to Mod, Page 52 of 116 9 Mod, Page 52 of 116 z di VI oy z / ---- 0 r •� 1 TIA oy z / ---- I '1MR, Page 53 of 116 0 I '1MR, Page 53 of 116 N c� YUjQ�- Q�ara a�W� g' OsU IL Page 54 of 116 94 C4 i3 De z Z am !LU W Q oe O CL !'Anne ffiif[:. n ii paij mo� am j= r 1-1) LU z �— rr all wa 11 is rr an Is a, wr err RO,_ ,_ ;_„ ii paij mo� am j= r 1-1) LU z an Is a, wr err RO,_ ,_ ;_„ ILM wrrrl ii paij mo� am j= r 1-1) LU z j mail ::11= Mw N N 1 :11 � on: 1 1 N � I la: LN L TV, Wk pkC !9: a son me NMI mmi )MA! so ON lI an rr ( rri RP 'Wa mail ::11= Mw N N 1 :11 � on: 1 1 N � I la: LN L C"Q LU TV, a son me )MA! so ON an rr rr Ito: C"Q LU Z Hmm 4{gV}�mmw �z d� =w3 IL Ui"M Page 58 of 116 z WN Igo Page 59 of 116 O °I 0 L� i Page 60 of 116 4ZI 7- < Q � W LU aIL w m CL o �1 nef`ll. C4 30 0 OVAL, 0 2 I 15: LA I p I ; j wI QT -D) Page 66 of 116 uc 0 t� 0 o Lu z o Q � Oz oUa z U LLLI b- R J2 < O W <. z U q c 2 -s Q m : N N Z M FS n a 9 Page 67 of 116 tO4 32 V4 i t I i r R �� w• i -fss fi Jim o^I r---------L--------- I A I I to A I .,%%t, m T,rurr it" r ------ i I , r I I Q14i �, .... �I , . �:. XPi I a :.7;7 -tom._------ •,. 19 _ a _ AA A74FM;rA AVE RSH � I (*MM .w VAOMW oMorsJ Page 68 of 116 6 fill 4-� s Ir---------L----------- AflrAWff IlI_ Ilk i f I - -4- I--- �- - - -- -7-------------------------- I I - t,---------- - - ----- ----- Li --- .r.w. ,.,• I I LM .11 •I � I I L----- ;a •� I p At I------------------- _ __ _ ____ _ -- --- _------`- ---- — AiNfMMviiOi��N - +dK 00 JOi7M10U' lW9M dw a i Page 69 of 116 it City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Blvd Me Box 2007 . Oak Pok Heights, MN 55082 • Phme (651) 439-4434 • Fax 439-0574 Memorandum Tix Eric Johnson, City Administrator Ce.- Scott Richards, City Planner, Julie Hultmen, Building 01 ictal Frons: Use Danielson, Arborist Deft 04/24/2017 Ree Oak Park Senior Living Phase 5 Landscape Plan Review I have reviewed the landscape plans submitted by Tim Nolda/Arlc;hoBayPro Inc. dated 4/10/2017. The following includes my comments and/or recommendations: Landscape Plan (1-1) The submitted plan includes a very basic array of deciduous trees, coniferous shrubs and deciduous shrubs as shown in the landscape design and plant list The plant schedule submitted is also very basic and Incomplete. The following are items that must be included in the plant list: each of the symbols used on the landscape plan for the plant proposed to be planted must be included on the plant list, the size and type of planting stock for each plant and the quantities in the plant list must match with what Is shown on the landscape plan. The plant schedule shows (21) Red Maple trees to be planted, I would recommend substituting these trees with ginkgo or hybrid aim to add some tree diversity to the area. Planting Specifications (L2) The landscape notes submitted is acceptable. The landscape contractor is required to plant trees and shrubs according to the approved planting detail submitted with the approved landscape plan. This will be checked after planting and any deviations from the detail will need to be corrected before the landscaping will be approved by the City, this needs to be noted in the final plans. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this landscape plan review. Please forward my comments to the development team for this project. TREE CITY U.S.A. Page 70 of 116 Stantet, MaY 4, 2W7 Stadec Consulting Servkes Inc. 2335 Nghway 36 West St. Paul MN 55113 Tel: (651) 6364600 Fasc (651) 636-1311 Mr. Eric Johnson, Administrator City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Blvd. N., P.O. Boa 2007 Oak Park Heights, MN 55082-2007 Reference: Oak Park Senior Living Phase 5 — Plan and Drainage Design Review Dear Eric, We have reviewed the plans and drainage calculations submitted regarding the proposed Oak Park Senior Living Phase 5 development submitted 4/21/2017. Following are our comments and recommendations: ormwater/Draf nage Stormwater comments provided by Tyler Johnson - Tyler.Johnwn@atantec.com. 1. The project is subject to review by the Middle St: Croix Watershed Management Organization. The City shall be provided a copy of the permit approval letter from the MSCWMO prior to construction activity. 2. Due to the site being located within the City's DWSMA, and in particular, the 1 -Yr travel time emergency response area, infiltration is not allowed on this site based on requirements of the NPDES Construction Permit. 3. Water Quality: The site will be required to meet the MSCWMO standards for water quality. Filtration is allowed as long as the design prohibits infiltration. 4. Volume Control: The site is not required to achieve volume control due to no infiltration being allowed on site (see comment 2). g. Rate Control: The site layout has changed since its initial approval. The proposed design is still under the current threshold for approved impervious areas and discharge rates. As future develop occurs, more ponding and water quality features may be needed to account for impervious if it exceeds the original approved plans. 6. Based on the supplied soil borings from Braun Intra; tec, the area that is being constructed is primarily made up of Clayey Sand (SC) and Silty Clay (CL/1WL) soils. This displays a soil characteristic of HSG C. Please update the HydroCAD model to reflect this. 7. The proposed storm sewer system for Phase 5 ties into an existing system that currently rims through the site and outfaft into Pond 1 to the north. Calculations should be Design with community in mind Page 71 of 116 Mr. Eric Johnson Page 2of4 Reference: Oak Park Senior Living Phase g — Plan and Drainage Design Review shown that verifies the existing storm sewer system capacity so water does not back up at the upper end of the system during a io3►ear storm event. 8. Please indicate on the proposed and emisting HydroCAD areas maps where all the ponds are located. Currently ponds B3, B2, and City Pond are not shown on the maps. Also, please provide the overall drainage map for the overall site. 9. Emergency overflows should be noted on the plans. Sheet C1— Demolition Plan 1. Clearly delineate the method of bulkheading the storm sewer where the existing pipe is removed. Sheet C2 — Paving and Dimension Plan 1. At Nova Scotia Avenue, tie in matching pavement with a butt joint. Sheet C2 -i, C2.2 — Fire Truck Turning Display 1. Modify parking, island radii as discussed in the meeting with City staff on 4/26/2017- 2. Refer to the Fire Department review of fire lanes and circulation. Sheet C3 - Grading and Erosion Control Plan 1. The stormwater facilities proposed for the site, including facilities that encroach into the pond area at the north end of the property shall be considered private and shall be owned and maintained by the Owner. 2. The City reserves the right to require additional erosion control measures as detiumined/necessary during the constriction of the project. 3. The pond on the north side of the site will need to have sediment that has been deposited in the pond removed. Design with community in mind Page 72 of 116 Mr. Eric Johnson Page S of 4 Reference: Oak Park Senior Living Phase S — Plan and Drainage Design Review Sheet C4 - Utility Plan 1. Connections to the City's sewer and water systems shall be per the (qty's standards and detail plates. The City or its designee shall be present for water and sanitary sewer service connections to the City's systems. Testing will be per City requirements. 2. The watermain, hydrants and sanitary sewer that serve the site will be private and maintained by the owner. S. Add a valve to the water main just east of the relocated hydrant in front of the existing building that is east of the proposed building. 4. Submit a map showing the locations of the existing, unused water and sanitary sewer services along the existing building to the east of the proposed building. Sheet Cg and C6 — Details i. Revise Hydrant and Gate Valve installation detail to be consistent with City Standard Detail Plates WAT-3 and WAT-8. 2. Confirm that all details conform to City standard details. General Comments 1. The City reserves the right to inspect the construction of the project. The City or its designee shall be present for water and sanitary sewer service connections to the City's systems. 2. The Owner will need to comply with all requirements of the NPDES Construction Stormwater Permit and the Middle St. Croix Watershed Management Organization. The City reserves the right to require additional erosion control measures as determined/necessary during the construction of the project S. LAghting and landscaping to be reviewed by others. 4. The Owner shall be responsible for obtaining all required permits. Design with community in mind Page 73 of 116 Mr. Eric Johnson PaP4of4 Reference: Oak Park Senior Living Phase 5 — Plan and Drainage Design Review If you have any questions or require further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Regards, STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC. 4 --)VT ?114.4�� Lee M. Mann, P.E. City Engineer Phone: 651-604-4850 lee.maim stantec.com cc: Andy Kegley, Public Works Director Julie Hultman, Building Official Scott Richards, City Planner Markverling, City Attorney Lisa Danielson, City Arborist Page 74 of 116 G� 35 Julie Hultman From: Allen Eisinger <aeisinger@ci.bayportmn.us> Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2017 2:42 PM To: Julie Hultman Cc: Mike Bell; Jason Severson Qsbfd2103@yahoo.com) Subject: RE: OPH Site Review - Plan Feedback Requested Attachments: Turning radius..pdf Follow Up Flag: Follow Up Due By. Sunday, April 16, 2017 2:57 PM Flag Status: Flagged Julie, the attached file has red boxes at the areas I have concerns with our ladder truck being able to negotiate the turn into the parking lots with the proposed plan. It looks like they are deviating from the standard road width to a narrower road on upper 581. (Although I could not really tell due to the poor scan quality of the plans.) The data below is for our ladder and the access areas will need to be design to accommodate our ladder truck. Overall length is 47' 3" Turning radius Outside is 70' Turning radius inside radius is 53' Out riggers in the out position is 16' Vehicle Weight 80,000# 1 will be traveling on the 191^ so i will not be able to attend the meeting. Let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, Allen iElisinger Fire Chief Bayport fire Department Station ;1c dm, -s: Mail Address. _1194 \(,rrh 3rd St, Bayport, N4N 55003 Office: r)51.,275 -44(11(-7c]1651.-"000,2101 fax: E-mail- aeisinger@ci.bayport.mn.us 651-- 2175 -4402 Page 75 of 116 vawill11111all Page 76 of 116 A RECOMMENDING RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT THE REQUEST BY TIM NOLDE OF OAKGREEN VILLA LLC FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT GENERAL PLAN AND AMENDMENT FOR OAK PARK SENIOR LIVING PHASE 5, ALLOWING CONSTRUCTION OF A SENIOR APARTMENT BUILDING AT NOVA SCOTIA AVENUE AND LOWER 59TH STREET NORTH AND A PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY BETWEEN BUILDINGS 1 AND 2 SHOULD BE APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS WHEREAS, the City of Oak Park Heights has received a request from Tim Nolde of Oakgreen Villa, LLC for a Planned Unit Development General Plan for Oak Park Senior Living Phase 5, Planned Unit Development Amendment for an enclosed pedestrian walkway between Buildings 1 and 2, and a Final Plat, and after having conducted a public hearing relative thereto, the Planning Commission of Oak Park Heights makes the following findings of fact: 1. The real property affected by said application is legally described as follows, to wit: SEE ATTACHMENT A M 2. The applicant has submitted an application and supporting documentation to the Community Development Department consisting of the following items: SEE ATTACHMENT B and 3. The property was approved for General Plan approval for portions of the project and an overall Master Plan by the City Council on May 29, 2013; and 4. The approvals on May 29, 2013 allowed for Concept Plan approval for the area of development under consideration; and Page 77 of 116 5. The Applicant has now requested Planned Unit Development General Plan approval for Building 5, approval of a Final Plat referred to as Oak Park Senior Living Second Addition, and a Planned Unit Development Amendment to allow the enclosed pedestrian walkway between Buildings 1 and 2; and 6. City Staff prepared a planning report dated May 4, 2017 reviewing the request; and 7. Said report recommended approval of the Planned Unit Development General Plan, Final Plat and Planned Unit Development Amendment subject to the fulfillment of conditions; and 8. The Planning Commission held a public hearing at their May 11, 2017 meeting, took comments from the applicants and public, closed the public hearing, and made the following recommendation: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THE CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDS THE FOLLOWING: A. The application submitted from Tim Nolde of Oakgreen Villa, LLC for a Planned Unit Development General Plan for Oak Park Senior Living Phase 5, Planned Unit Development Amendment for an enclosed pedestrian walkway between Buildings 1 and 2, and a Final Plat, affecting the real property as follows: SEE ATTACHMENT A Be the same as hereby recommended to the City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights for approval with the following conditions: 1. The Final Plat for Oak Park Senior Living Second Addition, as well as the dedication and vacation of any easements, shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer and City Attorney. 2. An amended development agreement, if required, shall include a provision that the Oak Park Senior Living Phase 5 will remain as senior rental and shall not be converted to non -restricted rental housing. The development agreement shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Attorney and City Council. 3. A revised plan shall be provided indicating a reduction in the median size or elimination of a parking stall to improve access at the front of Building 5. Additionally, the access between the new building and the dog park shall be signed so that there is no left turn allowed. 2 Page 78 of 116 4. The Planning Commission was favorable to the proposed setback from Nova Scotia Avenue North to Building 5. 5. The landscape plan shall be subject to review and approval of the City Arborist. 6. The grading and drainage plans shall be subject to City Engineer and the Middle St. Croix Watershed Management Organization approval. 7. All utility plans shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 8. The Planning Commission was favorable to the non -shielded, residential style light fixtures. 9. The Fire Chief and Police Chief shall review and approve the final plans to determine the accessibility of emergency vehicles throughout the development. 10. No parallel parking shall be allowed on the street network and shall be signed as such. 11. The snow storage areas and plan shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 12. A plan for sign lighting shall be provided at the time of the sign permitting process. 13. Any mechanical equipment that is ground mounted or visible from adjacent streets shall be screened as required by the Zoning Ordinance. 14. All trash and recycling storage shall be internal to the building. 15. The Planning Commission was favorable to the proposed building height of 3 8 feet. 16. The Planning Commission was favorable to the final building appearance, colors, materials and the variety between buildings. The Applicant shall provide a materials board for the buildings to be discussed at the City Council meeting. Recommended by the Planning Commission of the City of Oak Park Heights this 11th day of May 2017 3 Page 79 of 116 Jim Kremer, Chair ATTEST: Eric A. Johnson, City Administrator Page 80 of 116 ATTACHMENT A Planned Unit Development General Plan Oak Park Senior Living Phase V Senior Apartment Building Located at Nova Scotia Ave. N. & Lower 590i St. N. And Planned Unit Development Amendment Oak Park Senior Living Buildings I and II Pedestrian Walkway Connection Located at 13936 Lower 591 St. N. & 13945 Upper 581 St. N. Washington County GEO Codes: 05.029.20.11.0143 05.029.20.11.0145 05.029.20.11.0146 05.029.20.11.0147 Legal Descriptions: Lot 1, Block 1, Oak Park Sr. Living Lots 1-3, Block 2, Oak Park Sr. Living Page 81 of 116 ATTACHMENT B Planned Unit Development General Plan Oak Park Senior Living Phase V Senior Apartment Building Located at Nova Scotia Ave. N. & Lower 591 St. N. And Planned Unit Development Amendment Oak Park Senior Living Buildings I and II Pedestrian Walkway Connection Located at 13936 Lower 59th St. N. & 13945 Upper 58a' St. N. Application Materials • Application & Fees • Plan Sets (3 Large Scale Sets/20 11X17 Sets) • Written Narrative and Graphic Materials Explaining Proposal • Mailing List from Washington County (500' from subject property) • Proof of Ownership or Authorization to Proceed Conference With City Staff Upon Application Submittal: April 26, 2017 Planning Commission Review & Recommendation: May 11, 2017 Required Approvals: City Council PUD Amendment: PUD Amendment 4/5 Unless a General Plan of Development covering the area designated as in the General Concept Plan as the first stage of the PUD has been filed within twelve (12) months from the date Council grants General Concept Plan approval, or in any case where the applicant fails to file General Plan of Development Stage and Final Plans and to proceed with development in accordance with the provisions of this Ordinance and of an approved General Concept Plan, the approval may be revoked by Council action. (401.06.C.2.e) Page 82 of 116 RESOLUTION NO. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL THAT THE REQUEST BY TIM NOLDE OF OAKGREEN VILLA LLC FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT GENERAL PLAN AND AMENDMENT FOR OAK PARK SENIOR LIVING PHASE 5, ALLOWING CONSTRUCTION OF A SENIOR APARTMENT BUILDING AT NOVA SCOTIA AVENUE AND LOWER 59TH STREET NORTH AND A PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY BETWEEN BUILDINGS 1 AND 2 BE APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS WHEREAS, the City of Oak Park Heights has received a request from Tim Nolde of Oakgreen Villa, LLC for a Planned Unit Development General Plan for Oak Park Senior Living Phase 5, Planned Unit Development Amendment for an enclosed pedestrian walkway between Buildings 1 and 2, and a Final Plat, and after having conducted a public hearing relative thereto, the Planning Commission of Oak Park Heights recommended that the request be approved with conditions. The City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights makes the following findings of fact and resolution. 1. The real property affected by said application is legally described as follows, to wit: SEE ATTACHMENT A and 2. The applicant has submitted an application and supporting documentation to the Community Development Department consisting of the following items: SEE ATTACHMENT B and 3. The property was approved for a Planned Unit Development General Plan for portions of the project and an overall Master Plan by the City Council on May 29, 2013; and 4. The approvals on May 29, 2013 allowed for Concept Plan approval for the area of development under consideration; and Page 83 of 116 5. The Applicant has now requested Planned Unit Development General Plan approval for Building 5, approval of a Final Plat referred to as Oak Park Senior Living Second Addition, and a Planned Unit Development Amendment to allow the enclosed pedestrian walkway between Buildings 1 and 2; and 6. City Staff prepared a planning report dated May 4, 2017 reviewing the request; and 7. Said report recommended approval of the Planned Unit Development General Plan, Final Plat, and Planned Unit Development Amendment subject to the fulfillment of conditions; and 8. The Planning Commission held a public hearing at their May 11, 2017 meeting, took comments from the applicants and public, closed the public hearing, and recommended the application with conditions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVES THE FOLLOWING: A. The application submitted from Tim Nolde of Oakgreen Villa, LLC for a Planned Unit Development General Plan for Oak Park Senior Living Phase 5, Planned Unit Development Amendment for an enclosed pedestrian walkway between Buildings 1 and 2, and a Final Plat, affecting the real property as follows: SEE ATTACHMENT A Be the same as hereby approved by the City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights with the following conditions: 1. The Final Plat for Oak Park Senior Living Second Addition, as well as the dedication and vacation of any easements, shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer and City Attorney. 2. An amended development agreement, if required by the City, shall include a provision that the Oak Park Senior Living Phase 5 shall remain as senior rental and shall not be converted to non -restricted rental housing. The buildings shall remain taxable or an equivalent payment in lieu of taxes shall be conveyed to the City. The development agreement shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Attorney and City Council. 3. A revised plan shall be provided indicating a reduction in the median size or elimination of a parking stall to improve access at the front of Building 5. Additionally, the access between the new building and the dog park shall be signed so that there is no left turn allowed. 2 Page 84 of 116 4. The Planning Commission was favorable to and the City Council approves the proposed setback from Nova Scotia Avenue North to Building 5. 5. The landscape plan shall be subject to review and approval of the City Arborist. 6. The grading and drainage plans shall be subject to City Engineer and the Middle St. Croix Watershed Management Organization approval. 7. All utility plans shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 8. The Planning Commission was favorable to and the City Council approves the non -shielded, residential style light fixtures. 9. The Fire Chief and Police Chief shall review and approve the final plans to determine the accessibility of emergency vehicles throughout the development. 10. No parallel parking shall be allowed on the street network and shall be signed as such. 11. The snow storage areas and plan shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 12. A plan for sign lighting shall be provided at the time of the sign permitting process. 13. Any mechanical equipment that is ground mounted or visible from adjacent streets shall be screened as required by the Zoning Ordinance. 14. All trash and recycling storage shall be internal to the building. 15. The Planning Commission was favorable to and the City Council approves the proposed building height of 38 feet. 16. The Planning Commission was favorable to and the City Council approves the final building appearance, colors, materials and the variety between buildings. The Applicant shall provide a materials board for the buildings to be discussed at the City Council meeting. Approved by the City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights this 23rd day of May 2017. 3 Page 85 of 116 Mary McComber, Mayor ATTEST: Eric A. Johnson, City Administrator Page 86 of 116 EV # .Ter. lu 1 DI �I[V-1 Planned Unit Development General Plan Oak Park Senior Living Phase V Senior Apartment Building Located at Nova Scotia Ave. N. & Lower 59tb St. N. And Planned Unit Development Amendment Oak Park Senior Living Buildings I and I1 Pedestrian Walkway Connection Located at 13936 Lower 59tb St. N. & 13945 Upper 58* St. N. Washington County GEO Codes: 05.029.20.11.0143 05.029.20.11.0145 05.029.20.11.0146 05.029.20.11.0147 Legal Descriptions: Lot 1, Block 1, Oak Park Sr. Living Lots 1-3, Block 2, Oak Park Sr. Living Page 87 of 116 ATTACHMENT B Planned Unit Development General Plan Oak Park Senior Living Phase V Senior Apartment Building Located at Nova Scotia Ave. N. & Lower 59th St. N. And Planned Unit Development Amendment Oak Park Senior Living Buildings I and H Pedestrian Walkway Connection Located at 13936 Lower 59th St. N. & 13945 Upper 58th St. N. Application Materials • Application & Fees • Plan Sets (3 Large Scale Sets/20 11X17 Sets) • Written Narrative and Graphic Materials Explaining Proposal • Mailing List from Washington County (500' from subject property) • Proof of Ownership or Authorization to Proceed Conference With City Staff Upon Application Submittal: Apri126, 2017 Planning Commission Review & Recommendation: May 11, 2017 Required Approvals: City Council PUD Amendment: PUD Amendment 4/5 Unless a General Plan of Development covering the area designated as in the General Concept Plan as the first stage of the PUD has been filed within twelve (12) months from the date Council grants General Concept Plan approval, or in any case where the applicant fails to file General Plan of Development Stage and Final Plans and to proceed with development in accordance with the provisions of this Ordinance and of an approved General Concept Plan, the approval may be revoked by Council action. (401.06.C.2.e) Page 88 of 116 0.". Oak Park Heights Request for Council Action Meeting Date May 23rd, 2017 Time Required: 10 Minutes Agenda Item Title: AMENDED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT — SIGNAGE AMENDMENT Agenda Placement New Busir. Originating Department/Requestor: Requester's Signature Action Requested Discussion Background/Justification (Please ate if any previous action has been taken or if other public bodies have advised): Please see the attached from City Planner Scott Richards: 1. Planning Report dated May 4th 2017 2. Planning Commission Resolution — Unsigned. 3. Proposed City Council Resolution Page 89 of 116 TPC3801 Thurston Avenue N. Sulte 100 Anoka. MN 68303 Phone: 783.331.6840 Facsimile: 763.427.0620 TPC@P1annlngCo.adt+ PLANNING REPORT TO: Eric Johnson FROM: Scott Richards &WIMAL 2. DATE: May 4, 2017 RE: Oak Park Heights - Oak Park Heights Retail Planned Unit Development Amendment for Sign Plan - Southwest Intersection of 60th Street and Krueger Lane TPC FILE: BACKGROUND 236.02-17.04 Chris Whitehouse of DJR Architecture Inc. has made application a for Planned UnIt Development (PUD) Amendment for a Sign Plan at the Southwest Intersection of 60th Street and Krueger Lane. Although a general signage plan was reviewed as part of the original PUD approvals, the Applicant has provided more detail and is now asking for building wall signage on three sides of endcap tenant wall spaces and signage on the rear of the two mufti -tenant buildings. The PUD Amendment will allow for additional signage not permitted in the sign regulations and set the allowable signage for the development. The development consists of three building of approximately 20,600 square feet, 6,000 square feet, and 6,600 square feet. The buildings are now under construction and the Applicant Is in the process of securing tenants. EXHIBITS The review is based upon the following submittals: Exhibit 1: Project Narrative, April 14, 2017 Exhibit 2: Comprehensive Sign Plan Detail, May 1, 2017 Exhibit 3: Signage Site Plan (AS100) Exhibit 4: Signage Elevations, Lots 1-2 (AS200) Exhibit 5: Signage Elevations, Lot 3 (AS210) Exhibit 6: Monument Sign, North Exhibit 7: Monument Sign, East Exhibit 8: Pylon Sign Page 90 of 116 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Project Narrative for the project is found as Exhibit 1. PROJECT: Brackey 4th Addition is a proposed retail development at the Southwest Comer of 60u; Street North and Krueger Lane in Oak Park Heights, MN. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed project is composed of three buildings of approximately 20,600 SF, 6,000 SF, and 6,600 SF. The site is located on in the southwest comer of the Intersection of 600 Street North and Krueger Lane immediately north of the Menards'store. The buildings will be privately developed, owned and leased to a mixture of retail, service and Quick Service Restaurant tenants. The applicant is requesting a PUD Amendment allowing for building wall signage on 3 sides of endcap tenant spaces and wall signage on the rear of the retail buildings See Signage Plans dated 4-14-97 attached with this Amendment application. SITE SIGNAGE: There are two site sign types proposed for the project; a pylon sign at the comer of Krueger Lane and 60th Street North and a monument signs at the entry drives of both Krueger Lane and 606" Street North. Pylon Sign: in compliance with Oak Park Heights sign requirements the proposed pylon sign is 20' high and has a signage area of 100 square fleet with space for project name and individual tenants. The base and sign box will be a metal with similar colors for the proposed buildings, and the top of the box will have an EIFS comice detail to match the cornice detail on the Lots 9 and 2 retail buildings Signage boxes will be illuminated during normal business hours in compliance with City requirements Monument Sign: In compliance with Oak Park Heights sign requirements the proposed monument sign located at the entrance drives ani 20' high and have sign faces of 100 square feet each with space for project name and Individual tenants. The signs are designed to match the brick columns and EIFS cornice details on the Lots 1 and 2 retail buildings. Signage boxes will be illuminated during normal business hours in compliance with City requirements. BUILDING SIGNAGE: See signage plans AS100, AS200, and AS210 for signage criteria for multi -occupant and single tenant buildings. This amendment is asking for endcap tenants to be allowed one sign on each of their three sides, and is also asking for each tenant to be allowed a sign on the rear elevation. Signage to be mounted on a raceway. Other criteria is in compliance with Oak Park Heights sign requirements. 2 Page 91 of 116 DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE: Direciron signs are shown on site and master sign plan for identffrcation of drive-thru access, one-way routing, etc. Additional directional signs may be added as required to direct motorists. Design and color of directional signs will be sfmllar to sign faces at monument signs. ISSUES ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan. The property is designated as Commercial on the Proposed Land Use Map. The use of the site as retail and restaurant buildings is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Zoning. The property is zoned B-4, Limited Business District. The retail and restaurant buildings are permitted uses within the B-4 Limited Business District. The development was approved as a PUD but the Applicant has now requested approval of an overall sign plan. The sign regulations are addressed as follows. Signage. Pylon Signs. The sign regulations allow one freestanding sign and two additional monument signs for developments in the B-4 Limited Business District. The proposed sign plan indicates a pylon sign at the intersection of 60"' Street North and Krueger Lane. The regulations allow one pylon sign no more than 100 square feet and 20 feet in height. The proposed sign will comply with these requirements. The pians indicate two monument signs to be used at each entrance to the site. The regulations allow these signs as monuments that can be a maximum of 100 square feet in size and be no more than 20 feet in height. The signs, as proposed will each be 100 square feet in size and just under 20 feet in height The approved landscape plan indicates plantings at the base of the pylon and monuments signs. Page 92 of 116 P Aon Monument Principal Structure Height Sign Size Height Copy & (Gross Square Feet) (Feet) (Square (Feet) Graphic Feet) (Square Feet Multiple Occupancy Business 20 100 20 100 Buildings The proposed sign plan indicates a pylon sign at the intersection of 60"' Street North and Krueger Lane. The regulations allow one pylon sign no more than 100 square feet and 20 feet in height. The proposed sign will comply with these requirements. The pians indicate two monument signs to be used at each entrance to the site. The regulations allow these signs as monuments that can be a maximum of 100 square feet in size and be no more than 20 feet in height. The signs, as proposed will each be 100 square feet in size and just under 20 feet in height The approved landscape plan indicates plantings at the base of the pylon and monuments signs. Page 92 of 116 Wall Signage — Multiple Occupancy Buildings. The sign regulations limit the number of individual wall signs to one (1) per entrance, and each sign shall comply with the maximum wall sign allowances permitted in the district. Tenants on building ends may have a maximum of two (2) signs each to be located at the front and side elevations of the tenant space. The individual signs shall be located only on exterior walls which they are directly related to the use being identified. Rear signage is only allowed if there is an entrance to the space, but not for tenants on building ends. The size allowances for multiple occupancy building wall signage in the B-4 Limited Business District is as follows: Principal Structure Individual Wail Sign Total Wall (Gross Square Feet) Calculation Signage For Property Multiple Occupancy Business 200 square feet or 10 percent of 500 squarefeet Buildin s I the wail face, whichever is less For the two multiple occupancy buildings, (Lot 1 and Lot 2 buildings), the table found as Exhibit 2 indicates the allowable signage for each of the building facades. The table corresponds to the building elevations found in Exhibit 4. The proposed signage would exceed the allowances for multiple occupancy buildings in that the Applicant is requesting three signs for and tenants, one on the front, side and rear. The tenants in the center of the buildings would also be allowed a rear sign under this plan. Staff has reviewed other sign plans and allowances for multiple occupancy buildings. Rear signage has been allowed for the CSM development that includes Buffalo Wild Wings, and the multiple occupancy building near Kowalski's that includes St. Croix Cleaners. The request that the Applicant has made is reasonable, but Staff would suggest the following limitations on size, in that the number of allowable signs will increase from what is permitted: 1. There shall be no allowed signage on the walls facing each other of Lot 1 and 2. The distance between the buildings is approximately 16 feet. Signage on these lots would not be highly visible. Signage on three facades would be allowed for the east fagade of Lot 1 and west facade of Lot 2. 2. One sign only shall be allowed per fagade per tenant. 3. The allowable signage for the east fagade of Lot 1 and the west fagade of lot 2 would be limited to no more than 75 square feet. 4 Page 93 of 116 Wall Sfangge — Single Occupant Buildino. The sign regulations allow three wall signs on any principal building and each sign shall be placed on a separate building fagade. A total of 300 square feet of signage and a maximum sign size of 120 square feet or 10 percent of the wall face, whichever is less is allowed. In this case, the limit would be 120 square feet per sign face up to 300 square feet total. Principal Structure Individual Wall Sign Total Wall (Gross Square Feet) Calculation Signage For Property 10,000-100,000 120 square feet or 10 percent of 300 square feet the wall face, whichever is less For the Lot 3 building, the sign plan proposes signs on the north, east and west facades of the building totaling 300 square feet. The second sign on the east fagade, above the entrance door, will be allowed if only directional signage with no advertising. The signs will comply with the sign allowances. Directional Sisanage. The sign plan indicates directional signage through the development for the drive thru restaurant. The directional signage is allowable but cannot contain advertising for the associated business. The detail plans for the directional signage will be reviewed as part of the sign permit process. Sign Illumination. The signs will be required to comply with the Zoning Ordinance lighting requirements. Staff will approve the lighting specifications for the signs at the time of permitting. The pylon and monument signage will be illuminated during normal business hours, but will be required to be shut off one hour after closing. The building signage will be individual Ift channel letters, mounted on a raceway attached to the face of each elevation. The sign lighting should be designed such that only the text and logo portions of the signs are to be lit at night. The sign background will need to be dark. CONCLUSION 1 RECOMMENDATION Subject to the preceding review, City staff recommends approval of the Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment for a Sign Plan at the Southwest Intersection of 601' Street and Krueger Lane subject to the conditions that follow: 1. There shall be no allowed signage on the building walls facing each other of Lot 1 and 2. Signage on three facades would be allowed for the east fagade of Lot 1 and west fagade of Lot 2. 2. One sign only shall be allowed per fagade per tenant. 3. The allowable signage for the east facade of Lot 1 and the west fagade of lot 2 shall be limited to no more than 75 square feet. 5 Page 94 of 116 4. For the Lot 3 building, the second sign on the east facade, above the entrance door, will be allowed if only directional signage with no advertising. 5. The proposed directional signage is allowable but cannot contain advertising for the associated business. The detail plans for the directional signage will be reviewed as part of the sign permit process. 6. The outdoor lighting shall be turned off one hour after closing, except for approved security lighting. 7. All signs shall be designed to comply with the Zoning Ordinance requirements for internal illumination. 8. The bases of the three freestanding signs shall be landscaped and subject to review and approval of the City Arborist. pc: Julie Hultman CI Page 95 of 116 GF i April 14, 2017 993 WwhkgwnAvsnus NoAh. 8WW 210, Union Plass. WnUpolh, MN 5501 T. 812.8763700 F: 812.878.2796 WWWA4n.mm PUD AMENDMENT NARRATIVE PROJECT: Brackey 4"' Addition is a proposed retail development at the Southwest Comer of 6021 Street North and Krueger Lane in Oak Park Heights, MN. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed project is composed of three buildings of approximately 20,600 SF, 6,000 SF, and 6,600 SF. The site is located on in the southwest comer of the intersection of 60"' Street North and Krueger Lane immediately north of the Menards store. The buildings will be privately developed, owned and leased to a mixture of retail, service and Quick Service Restaurant tenants. The applicant is requesting a PUD Amendment allowing for building wall signage on 3 sides of endcap tenant spaces and wall signage on the rear of the retail buildings See Signage Plans dated 4-14-17 attached with this Amendment application. SITE SIGNAGE: There are two site sign types'proposed for the project; a pylon sign at the comer of Krueger Lane and 601 Street North and a monument signs at the entry drives of both Krueger Lane and 60h Street North. Pylon Sign: In compliance with Oak Parts Heights sign requirements the proposed pylon sign is 20' high and has a signage area of 100 square feet with space for project name and individual tenants. The base and sign box will be a metal with similar colors for the proposed buildings, and the top of the box will have an E1FS comics detail to match the comics detail on the Lots 1 and 2 retail buildings. Signage boxes will be illuminated during normal business hours in compliance with City requirements. Monument Sign: In compliance with Oak Park Heights sign requirements the proposed monument sign located at the entrance drives are 20' high and have sign faces of 100 square feet each with space for project name and individual tenants. The signs are designed to match the brick columns and EIFS comics details on the Lots 1 and 2 retail buildings. Signage boxes will be illuminated during normal business hours in compliance with City requirements. BUILDING SIGNAGE: See signage plans AS100, AS200, and AS210 for signage criteria for multi -occupant and single tenant buildings. This amendment is asking for endcap tenants to be allowed one sign on each of their three sides, and is also asking for each tenant to be allowed a sign on the rear elevation. Signage to be mounted on a raceway. Other criteria is in compliance with Oak Park Heights sign requirements. DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE: Direction signs are shown on site and master sign plan for identification of drive-thru access, one-way routing, etc. Additional directional signs may be added as required to direct motorists. Design and color of directional signs will be similar to sign faces at monument signs. Page 96 of 116 C4 z mi fill14 N N �1 eel N r1 � ■i T lot a 5 "wasmm1 1 6 7 a"i -MiR a -.Dmw-.-M a flea. 7 I Adel«il a .m'C H N N N N N ij n n NN N A r r; 1 I jj r $ ■ $ __ �g TT E QQi gg p��i `g Z 1101010 4 5 :i �4q Qm pKm Ilia. m 11 Q �iG 1 7R�88 QF'101B all a QQ QQ s 88 p S Page 97 of 116 W W r a ___ MOO 644 . H V ed NeO Q LL CCZ �l1 Wa e�*i?IN�u3� I lit Mill 7-2 =W 3� Page 98 of 116 .. uALi WL IMOa S446!aH fed )I'B-O= Q as 19oil R ps if 1 Page 99 of 116 �" _�a•--�,•e �..« ;�; �,. I c ae�i sr�oournap�s r ra.. M�IMlw1V Page 100 of 116 W. b i e ei hil , 7-r° '"I IT u � Il ZJ N Page 101 of 116 1 lu rr^^ �J rr� SL 7 6 L LL C 7-r° '"I IT u � Il ZJ N Page 101 of 116 L Yr Jv 1 p ,di tfin: b" "r G, w„ tz v 7-r° '"I IT u � Il ZJ N Page 101 of 116 �• ! i a C v� QEa I �� 1lS: VAc. I !>, `a r Ni;b� � vp Page 102 of 116 0 I Jillg1lcjArfill 1W o g .moo < <1 A RECOMMENDING RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT THE REQUEST OF THE DRIESSEN GROUP FOR AN AMENDED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT TO APPROVE THE SIGN PLAN FOR THE OAK PARK HEIGHTS RETAIL DEVELOPMENT AT THE SOUTHWEST INTERSECTION OF 60TH STREET AND KRUEGER LANE NORTH SHOULD BE APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS WHEREAS, the City of Oak Park Heights has received a request from The Driessen Group for an Amended Planned Unit Development to approve the sign plan for the Oak Park Heights Retail Development at the southwest intersection of 60th Street and Krueger Lane North, and after having conducted a public hearing relative thereto, the Planning Commission of Oak Park Heights makes the following findings of fact: 1. The real property affected by said application is legally described as follows, to wit: SEE ATTACHMENT A and 2. The applicant has submitted an application and supporting documentation to the Community Development Department consisting of the following items: SEE ATTACHMENT B and 3. The property is zoned B-2 General Business District in which retail and restaurant uses are a permitted use; and 4. The City Council, at its June 27, 2016 meeting, approved the Planned Unit Development, Concept and General Plan, Conditional Use Permit for a drive through restaurant, Zoning District Amendment to B-2 District, Preliminary and Final Plat, and Design Guidelines/Site Plan review for the development; and 5. The Applicant has applied for an Amended Planned Unit Development to allow approval of an overall sign plan for the development; and 6. The Applicant is requesting building wall signage on three sides for endcap tenants and signage on the rear for all tenants of the two multi -tenant buildings. Page 104 of 116 7. City staff prepared a planning report dated May 4, 2017 reviewing the request; and 8. Said report recommended approval of the sign plan for the Oak Park Heights Retail Development subject to the fulfillment of conditions; and 9. The Planning Commission held a public hearing at their May 11, 2017 meeting, took comments from the applicants and public, closed the public hearing, and made the following recommendation: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THE CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDS THE FOLLOWING: A. The application submitted from The Driessen Group for an Amended Planned Unit Development to approve the sign plan for the Oak Park Heights Retail Development at the southwest intersection of 60"' Street and Krueger Lane North, affecting the real property as follows: SEE ATTACHMENT A The Planning Commission recommended the application subject to the conditions as follows: 1. The allowable signage for the west fagade of Lot 1 building and the east facade of Lot 2 building shall be limited to 25 square feet per wall. 2. The allowable signage for the east fagade of Lot 1 building and the west facade of lot 2 building shall be limited to no more than 75 square feet per wall. 3. One sign only shall be allowed per fagade per tenant. 4. For the Lot 3 building, the second sign on the east fagade, above the entrance door, will be allowed if only directional signage with no advertising. 5. The proposed directional signage is allowed but cannot contain advertising for the associated business unless necessary to differentiate more than one drive thru in the development. The detail plans for the directional signage will be reviewed as part of the sign permit process. 6. The outdoor parking lot lighting shall be turned off one hour after closing, except for approved security lighting. 7. All signs shall be designed to comply with the Zoning Ordinance requirements for internal illumination. 8. The bases of the three freestanding signs shall be landscaped and subject to review and approval of the City Arborist. 2 Page 105 of 116 Recommended by the Planning Commission of the City of Oak Park Heights this 11' day of May 2017. Jim Kremer, Chair ATTEST: Eric A. Johnson, City Administrator Page 106 of 116 ATTACHMENT A Planned Unit Development Amendment Related To Comprehensive Sign Plan Driessen Group LLC Oak Park Heights Retail Located at SW Intersection of 60th St. N. & Krueger Ln., N Washington County GEO Code: 05.029.20.22.0019 & 05.029.20.22.0021 Legal Description: Brackey 4th Addition Page 107 of 116 ATTACHMENT B Planned Unit Development Amendment Related To Comprehensive Sign Plan Driessen Group LLC Oak Park Heights Retail Application Materials • Application Form • Fees • Plan Sets • Written Narrative and Graphic Materials Explaining Proposal • Mailing List from Washington County (500' from subject property) • Proof of Ownership or Authorization to Proceed • Property Tax Statement(s)/Legal Description(s) Meeting With City Staff Upon Application Submittal: April 26, 2017 Planning Commission Review & Recommendation: May 11, 2017 PUD Amendment - Limitation on General Concept Plan Approval: Unless a General Plan of Development covering the area designated as in the General Concept Plan as the first stage of the PUD has been filed within twelve (12) months from the date Council grants General Concept Plan approval, or in any case where the applicant fails to file General Plan of Development Stage and Final Plans and to proceed with development in accordance with the provisions of this Ordinance and of an approved General Concept Plan, the approval may be revoked by Council action. (401.06.C.2.e) Page 108 of 116 RESOLUTION NO. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL THAT THE REQUEST OF THE DRIESSEN GROUP FOR AN AMENDED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT TO APPROVE THE SIGN PLAN FOR THE OAK PARK HEIGHTS RETAIL DEVELOPMENT AT THE SOUTHWEST INTERSECTION OF 60TH STREET AND KRUEGER LANE NORTH BE APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS WHEREAS, the City of Oak Park Heights has received a request from The Driessen Group for an Amended Planned Unit Development to approve the sign plan for the Oak Park Heights Retail Development at the southwest intersection of 60th Street and Krueger Lane North, and after having conducted a public hearing relative thereto, the Planning Commission of Oak Park Heights recommended that the request be approved with conditions. The City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights makes the following findings of fact and resolution: 1. The real property affected by said application is legally described as follows, to wit: SEE ATTACHMENT A and 2. The applicant has submitted an application and supporting documentation to the Community Development Department consisting of the following items: SEE ATTACHMENT B and 3. The property is zoned B-2 General Business District in which retail and restaurant uses are a permitted use; and 4. The City Council, at its June 27, 2016 meeting, approved the Planned Unit Development, Concept and General Plan, Conditional Use Permit for a drive through restaurant, Zoning District Amendment to B-2 District, Preliminary and Final Plat, and Design Guidelines/Site Plan review for the development; and 5. The Applicant has applied for an Amended Planned Unit Development to allow approval of an overall sign plan for the development; and 6. The Applicant is requesting building wall signage on three sides for endcap tenants and signage on the rear for all tenants of the two multi -tenant buildings. Page 109 of 116 7. City staff prepared a planning report dated May 4, 2017 reviewing the request; and 8. Said report recommended approval of the sign plan for the Oak Park Heights Retail Development subject to the fulfillment of conditions; and 9. The Planning Commission held a public hearing at their May 11, 2017 meeting, took comments from the applicants and public, closed the public hearing, and recommended the application with conditions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVES THE FOLLOWING: A. The application submitted from The Driessen Group for an Amended Planned Unit Development to approve the sign plan for the Oak Park Heights Retail Development at the southwest intersection of 60th Street and Krueger Lane North, affecting the real property as follows: SEE ATTACHMENT A Be and the same as hereby approved by the City Council for the City of Oak Park Heights with the following conditions: The allowable signage for the west fagade of Lot 1 building and the east fagade of Lot 2 building shall be limited to 25 square feet per wall. 2. The allowable signage for the east facade of Lot 1 building and the west fagade of lot 2 building shall be limited to no more than 75 square feet per wall. 3. One sign only shall be allowed per facade per tenant. 4. For the Lot 3 building, the second sign on the east facade, above the entrance door, will be allowed if only directional signage with no advertising. 5. The proposed directional signage is allowed but cannot contain advertising for the associated business unless necessary to differentiate more than one drive thru in the development. The detail plans for the directional signage will be reviewed as part of the sign permit process. 6. The outdoor parking lot lighting shall be turned off one hour after closing, except for approved security lighting. 7. All signs shall be designed to comply with the Zoning Ordinance requirements for internal illumination. 8. The bases of the three freestanding signs shall be landscaped and subject to review and approval of the City Arborist. 2 Page 110 of 116 Approved by the City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights this 23rd day of May 2017. Mary McComber, Mayor ATTEST: Eric A. Johnson, City Administrator Page 111 of 116 ATTACHMENT A Planned Unit Development Amendment Related To Comprehensive Sign Plan Driessen Group LLC Oak Park Heights Retail Located at SW Intersection of 60t' St. N. & Krueger Ln., N Washington County GEO Code: 05.029.20.22.0019 & 05.029.20.22.0021 Legal Description: Brackey 4h Addition Page 112 of 116 ATTACHMENT B Planned Unit Development Amendment Related To Comprehensive Sign Plan Driessen Group LLC Oak Park Heights Retail Application Materials • Application Form • Fees • Plan Sets • Written Narrative and Graphic Materials Explaining Proposal • Mailing List from Washington County (500' from subject property) • Proof of Ownership or Authorization to Proceed • Property Tax Statement(s)/Legal Description(s) Meeting With City Staff Upon Application Submittal: April 26, 2017 Planning Commission Review & Recommendation: May 11, 2017 PUD Amendment - Limitation on General Concept Plan Approval: Unless a General Plan of Development covering the area designated as in the General Concept Plan as the first stage of the PUD has been filed within twelve (12) months from the date Council grants General Concept Plan approval, or in any case where the applicant fails to file General Plan of Development Stage and Final Plans and to proceed with development in accordance with the provisions of this Ordinance and of an approved General Concept Plan, the approval may be revoked by Council action. (401.06.C.2.e) Page 113 of 116 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Page 114 of 116 0� Oak Park Heights Request for Council Action Meeting Date May 23rd, 2017 Time Required: 5 Minutes Agenda Item Title: CONSIDER CITY HIGHLIGHTS FOR UPCOMING ST. CROIX RIVER CROSSING Agenda Placement New Business Originating Department/Requestor: Council Member Mike Runk Requester's Signature Action Requested Discussion, possible action Background/Justification (Please indicate if any previous action has been taken or if other public bodies have advised): I would like the City Council to discuss the concepts and possibilities of the sponsoring of some SCRCP opening support. This would be outside of the Tier 1 or Tier 2 events. The City did budget $5,000 for such possibilities: Essentially it could include: (Some general ideas) 1. a gathering some of those people involved in the Tier 1 ribbon cutting — prior to such event. 2. Use of city funds to sponsor and/or coordinate the transportation of City Officials. 3. Creation and distribution of SCRCP opening souvenir / collectible that promotes the City and the City role in the event and the greater project. Of course, there could be other ideas or uses as well, but I would prefer to keep this relatively simple. Page 115 of 116 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Page 116 of 116