Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Hasse Property
------"-------------- - 0 Prepariog the n ansp Tr ortat of n -he Elelnen sire p1a \ ' 4 o�nhrehen � o `� , ItS _ A 1998 Oilla Agenda X ,,C ❑ welcome Feb.18,1998 Richard Thompson eview Process is dplanR Planner 9 on- noliVednesdaon ❑Richard Introduction. r d Thom Senior Transportation 9 on• nOO Ann Brad Council Chambers un, iimaterials Metropolitan C ❑ Adeq of Impacts Ea t Fifthalk Centte, 1st t.-Paul atdEv apron Analyst Mesa tStteet,St. Carl phrn, Planning C°unity 230 E m�but Your : sted thatwe °nningAnano COs �oneedsfAnalysttForecast preregistration presentatiosens Nancy Mark Fillipi, F t C° ectingLan can tailor five of agemely Bees. oval Assistance ❑ tion tten ccessM of theKruge in the Office o to rep to reserve A e dTt3 p an 1ta ur sector US Planning Director PeB�'Reichert, Management ortation 60_1633 at to forum. Access Transportation your place Officeof Department of Guy-Peterson ,Bicycle ❑ Transit,'i'�anFacilit1es 602-1418 lnetc.state.mn us nsit,T tM it Planner guy,peterson aC Senior Trans TomCa5we11 Karen Lyons, m nus 'Technical Assistance 602-1319 etc.state.m ❑ Other Communications Caswell@ Hing Resources and tom• plan ice of Ken Reddick, John Kari 602-1548 nletc.state.mn.us john kms'@ oPPortut11�'for provide an of many Carl Schenk outside in 1998 to P T11is series is one S Chambers one ou key issues.This Metropolitan suggestions for 602-1410 te.mn.0 b and lore etc.sm and explore and a sugg cache Metropolitan ate' forums in the Cham information wetomeson at 602-1457 tanning ff to share sof local communities We Council will host four planning co ap. eat n tanning effort meat is N° Richard ' Coua moony comprehensive P July a"d redCon of e t in November. or �y-sass The Mea0Politan sultan d community density O etto Info Line local Planners,consultants cit is Iftaking to support r April, lease all Linda or 29 and • M forum topics will include agriculture. or questions,P Fax�2-lsso initiatives the s If you have Ideas bot-lo00 • Fuge at future forums. 55101-1626 • (612) topics tSn CO�C11 • $1 pau1,M'nneSo� leettOpo 230 oUnch gtreeL Me xspatkCenae . DEC-15-1997 11 14 iiACACLT A N T 5 ` 0 b14 ,, _ NORTH �NEST AS SOCIATED CONSULTANTS ONSU RESEARCH PLANNING - DESIGN - MARKET N ING MEMORANDUM- Via Fax Transmission TO: Judy Hulst hards FROM: Madhulika Singh i Scott Ric DATE: DeCerr1 cr 15, 1997 Oak Park Heights - Comprehensive Plan Update (iuvcntury) FILE NO: 798.04nal base office regarding additional ton County Surveyors offs for the following: bas at the Washing S ,,cifically, I reyucsted d Judy,I called Mak t wean art of our study. p- inzip information that we rcyuircd as p' 1 5, 6,7, 8,9, 10, 11, .14, 15, lb, 17, l8. this 3, The uttcnt of getting Section 2, c maps as shape files. rationed that the parcel maps and street centerlin P City wide Map. Marh.� d for We would like ptwith the existing and that the City mend be billed able to merge havevis made by the City information is to be Maps would to be address: request for. the GoulIS fax a request memorandum to the following. the same. You Attention J.K'a • Kra...F•1-hc•Fc r Fax No. 43S-6888 delivered• Surveyors Department s would be given as the contact person to whom the map 1Viadhulilca)could be g „ this request ucst please call Scott or mc at 595-9636. My Name regarding ul If you have any questions rcb. K MINNESOTA 55416 T. LOUIS PAR YARD, SUITE 555 595_9837 p,01 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, FAX 61 2 TOTAL 5775 61 2-595-9636 PHONE " a T 1 �i 74 mo • w. ,`_ , ° �� 439 4439 •FAX 439 05 • �, OAK PARK HEIGHTS hts,MN 55082 •Phone: (612) b* Box 2007 •Oak Park Heights,"s`y 14168 N. 57th Street' FAX REQ December 15 , 1997 J• Reyor'sartment Fax f Dep SurV Y430_6888 fanners for our planners Dear Mr. Krafthefer: I would ome base map information Sin f i order f o 1, 15, 16 , 18 I would lioursexisting Citywide map 14, 17 , to update 9 , 10 , 1 the maps 5, 6 , 7 , 8 ,_ this while Sections 2, 3 ' 4 City will be billedrs�r Please.. send: the that the the City' s P I under sentddirectlY to can b maps to: . Consultants Associate Northwest Madhulika Singh 5775 Wayzata Suite 555 St . 55416 Louis Park MN Thank questions, please feel free to contact me.yyf you hyve aassstance in this matter. :.. . ou for your Very truly yours, ii-'444 _ udy Holst Interim Administrator Tree City U.S.A. • CONSULTANTS • D p�SSOCIAE - .MARKET RESEARCH - DESICOMMUNITY PLANNING''NpkG----------------------------------------------NORTHVVEST MEMORANDUM Mike Robertson TO: Scott Richards FROM: 14 October 1997 DATE hts - Comprehensive Plan Oak Park Heights RE: 798.04 - General FILE NO: the following is a summary Council members, attached map indicates upon Pof future growth and land use. previous discussions with City Pdesignated for currentlfuture annexation. Basedeven in termshas des g of the direction given Township the City the area within Bay Center - State Highways 36 and 5 Kern st of property owners to and south. orfs the annexation request of OakSupp to the Lake Elmo boundaries on the westwa 36 tend the The CouncilHeights borders of Park H 9 uses Highway South fromof 5 H would 6 that it would like to see est corneran to act as a buffer The Council stated t for the northwest residential south to 55th street except e for residentialu cluding designated to the Kern Center development. Brekke Park - Osgood Avenue Below space. DNR Propertyproperty remain as open ted it would ideally like to have this p P The Council stated prison. or to provides a buffer to the p property to hold as open space This area p acquiring this prop y ment in the distanto land as low density residential develop The Council was f the la d in acq develop portions future. K MINNESOTA 554 16 5 T. LOUIS PAR BOULEVARD , SUITE 55 5775 FAX g5 9636 FAX 612-595-9837 12 595 9637 PHONE 612 5 • • • T own Woods 3rd on Oakgreen Avenue Area Between River Hills and Batt of this land south of River Hills before it lot standards (five acre lots). he Council was interested in annexa ion is developed at Township residential. d should be designated as low density This Ian ' The p developing their land at thecurrent time, however, the City would like to be prepared for the future possibility. property owners are not interested in Baytown Township boundaries in this area, west to expand the Oak Park Heights See EhiS The o would like small commercial . The► The City � south to 40th Street and witha Lake ll Stagecoach Trail likely land uses in this area will be residents onions of this area near their s. Comprehensive Plan claims p residential area The City of radar s Comp expansion of its urban boundaries fors futureBort anOak Park Heights will have to settle their existing The Cities of Bayport Exhibit B). expansion. similar claims on City ex p onion of the area OaklPark arHeights he etropolin a Council has set asides w t i ee Exhibit C). a040 sewer Oa The M � as Urban Reserve that i�Ru a�A ea (s has interest m as Permanent remaining area is shown 2 • a • 1-- a3 W • "-- /' ''1:4''''''' ___:::_,••,,, -- - ' ' - .---- -'1.---t, .,,..._, ...... ----:, / 77 /f ,1 yq)'!�� ,q�^4: [' ' q ... r e'r 'r, ,'.,,` ••''„,arc_;s.,, aspe5 s `� ,w �1 }” •k4"" a.'f''r 1 'i�'' �a �f x i w" ;�� 4 f I ,- oS$l t V s41t c ,- s 83+" 4 i . s r S t 111111 3 0,B°` :TM e '.,4, Q .r: t f +Tr'h'"�'fx i t Saka f t' 1,. 1/ i _ 14. .. .it r a p�. A c+ t% "a � ^F w. ,',"tfr U Hua6 G U s 4001T1,7' 'tS L G ' � c. �� . Z N ..- •3nr SM7 ► N _ ® ®3soaK3d Or r�•Yr« a3T13d N y :. C w E urn , ',00.111111011f.1.0 r' as -- ♦n - O -3nr rnr7rd 11111 101 11 IN! s• 3nr von . fN so � 1f L .N ]N 13nY 08009nt : O _ OnOj ' N �N c <:4) 11 1.1f... _ Um C MO Elko Om Ow r ca-P yr N3N0 ,;n, ,N= nr N3YO NO W d as • `o a ( '37.r i_ yTl \ ® 2 rt rNrwO '� ®v_yr i o w N3 ` 11 N N f e _ SISVO N.,,, .>+•roa„N ��f-.i; 4,313 il 1 �u 110 '\: *li N rr6UtJO L L � ` J -am N33aONtl0 11,'X.. 11300 r .� ,,Tit, 4ry 'N �'';i t TTt t '4 . "1 11 r�-1111111164 cm. cis 1rtalSnt ,t It 1. .O^ . „ lo ,rnON �+ N- uiOG 1 7 47i •3nr xr • g ., vogafl"1d0" Cl') kair3MN1Y0N '^ Eq[ i 4 A . -.'1113 '.1111 AQA71a,11 ILI W N d .34 r d7,.., CC 1c':-.4.. % PL. /100014Ti •3nr .C77 No Z4 1 N •—• O IA T7-, Y VI yly C •r►I D•IEJ O Ha 1-v f: 4.,�, 0 - 'N'3ntl'K�'7 I I -: e` rO b C� x yr , ����`111 3 I ?� S o 4 I 3nr E 1-- N �/ 1 atrM O s =I4 1 CL.1;..V 'i 0-Zr.--0 E.. d W \:-.7.. p I o Y Cd Z 44\Ily i Z s N D V -N"01.130N371 N }F Q • Z N • • t Z Z L x Ui 11.111CIS J • • Figurc `1 y„,„% ,, , ,,,, /,,, HEJgj15 if 4. 14 /fi: *- / '// --- / 0,40, 1 . i / __------- i-• ,� ../1 , aaa bus . /41.1— — -------- _------- ,../ _ --- i _,1 . 1 1 i `� 1 1 cI�d 1 '�` 1� 1 1 dc�cloyoLl 11111 1hf Y'rk ]snd and �, *uc5 •t un i 1 �/ smca4 1 • 21 po°S1 L __ ,� yNSA 1 . �cludas -. 202 1 T� Y 1 '',..1/:..1 t�� zoo l�us� �•- -- r ' yil 2000 )(USA ' �,a.. oup �C y:quat OSA �1 r_,,^`" '»aolelnSt°1,, B ,.�,T,a�...�.. EXHIBIT N�9J O _ pYrt �K 1 T�oY"a L'.y� 1&V "P ���` . 1\151 strk City of 13�•�'�jO��--- • • Vai 14 il 4i E— s 40111 11 i V �'� m. \ ..r.rrr. ar 1:. __-aZI , api 6. itti IL y 1 i tea. ,' _:: f -i, t II ',. ',. Ilia $1114 ` ;:' 1 1 ViliiPi I I .404 iinrolililliat ;, illgiAWilk it I 5...% dill d . ••$•'.. 1"11 Ai a. / fa: . A . ..,. ,:leglilia.l.„1:,, \iit.. ., : polo 111% 01114 ,\ c Z."." ..11• 4 Is IA cnCA Cqi. 04-4 1.1 ,f) i a) i d r4 i Fcl §Ac5,,o. IV a� 0 Po 01_, 440 re) C:: C4,A p:1° g ID 8_, %.67;% ....‘ it SZ ••-•4 4114 IS % P ;15 1 .0 le . v A 0 ...... cd § .. , 0 (I) R. § a % 0..... 0 sj2 ;-'1 P4 P.4 P'4 pzi (9 a-81 1.1 i _♦ TC p'-' p ., . ,... z Z * ?°2 is IXHIBI h � `` - CI'�Y 0 V 11, S FAX 439-0574 ' ,...4---i PARK HEI G 082 •Phone: (612) 439-4439 ' OAK d Heights,MN 55 tti "'e ` ' ,' Oak Park Heig � � 4. r " 57th Street•Box 2007 -" 14168 N. 8 August 1997 AUG - ti 1991 d 1'I'til.._---- ►� Ms. Linda O'Connor Office of Lot Assistance Metropolitan 230 E. Fifth Street St. Paul, MN 55101-1634 Application RE: Oak Park Heights - Local Planning Assistance Grant App Assistance Dear Ms. O'Connor: application for Local Planning with the Heights appe CityThis of Oak Park He19 it resolution that is to be included foe12 August forwards the Council scheduled app letter n will Please note, the City CityCouncil meeting Grant Funding. Bred at the next the Metropolitan Council the next day. forwarded to application will be const lease 97. The approved resolution will be forwa nor require further information, p If this application questions regarding If you have any q ontact me at your earliest convenience. do not hesitate to c Sincerely, 0 \Oc,...Q,,,A..-4 co)...iv-- , Michael Robertson ge____.--- City Administrator Pc. Mayor and City Council Tree City U.S.A. i • RESOLUTION NO. 97- CITY OF OAK PARING APPLICATION HEIGHTS RESOLUTIONRAMETROPOLITAN COUNCIL FORA PLANNING ASSISTANCE GRANT local units of government Minnesota Statutes Section 473.851 requiresns. and inland use controls that are consistent nt with WHEREAS, M rehensive plans with metropolitan system p pto prepare local comprehensive development and with planned, orderly and staged .ons 473.854 and 473.867 authorize the uniform procedures for WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes dtadopt guidelines establishinandg oans; and assistance grants theaward Metropolitan Coicil disbursement prepare lanning Metropolitan the award and of p amend their local 473.867 authorizes the WHEREAS, Minnesota StatutesuSection overnment to review and give funding to local units of g Council toe s fiscal devices and official controls; and assistance grant to comprehensive plans, requires a planned date Heights Comprehensive Plan grant the City of Oak Park He1g ecifically the WHEREAS, planning activities, specifically complete comprehensive and engineering studies. Administrator is hereby THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City planning assistance NOW, Metropolitan Council for a p authorized to submit an application to the sive Plan; and City's Comp grant to update and revise the a certified copy of this resolution shall be RESOLVED that BE IT FURTHER assistance grant application. submitted with the planning is resolution was adopted by the City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights on the Th 12th day of August 1997. David Schaaf, Mayor ATTEST: Michael Robertson, City Administrator • • APPLICATION FOR LOCAL PLANNING ASSISTANCE GRANT Name of Community: City of Oak Park Heights Name of Contact (Contract Administrator): Mr. Mike Robertson Address: 14168 North 57th Street, P.O. Box 2007 Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 TelephonelFax: 612/439-4439 612/439-0574 GRANT AMOUNT REQUESTED: $18,750 ram.) (Total amount may not exceed 75% of the total cost of work program.) FUNDING CRITERIA AND OBJECTIVES and Regional Blueprint: (90 possible points) 1. Relationship of Regional Growth Strategy Does your community include the Illustrative 2020 MUSA? No Does your community include the Urban Reserve? of annexing land within the Urban No - However, Oak Park Heights is in the process Reserve. Isour community within the Redevelopmentsuburbs)ea or Inner Ring? (Minneapolis,olis, Saint Paul and adjacent rowth center Yes - Oak Park Heights is part of a free standing g 2. Relationship to Regional Systems: (6 possible points) Do you have Regional Wastewater Inflow and Infiltration Reduction Goals? Yes a al a aterirMahag completed a management plan) Are you required to prepare ement g naement Plan? (Only if watershed management Yes Have you adopted Transportation Initiatives (Trails, Transit, Park and Ride, etc.)? Yes • 3. Relationship to Innovative and Creative Planning: (8 possible points) Will you include Compact Design and Mixed Use Development? Yes Will you include Life Cycle Housing? Yes 4. Relationship to Economic Development: (12 possible points) Will you include Economic Development in Transportation and Transit Corridors? Yes Will you include Economic Development Plans or Policies: Yes Will you identify Economic Development in Brownfield Redevelopment Areas? Yes 5. Relationship to Life Cycle Housing: (6 possible points) AreY ou, or will you be in a Livable Communities Participant, or have a Life Cycle Housing Plan? Oak Park Heights is a participant and has adopted a Housing Action Plan. Will your ordinances provide opportunities for Life Cycle Housing? Yes, a review and possible amendments of ordinances will occur as part of the implementation of the Comprehensive Plan. Willou develop and implement a plan to make rural development densities consistent with the Y Regional Blueprint? Not Applicable 6. Relationship to Intergovernmental Coordination: (4 possible points) Will you work with neighboring communities to share services? (1 to 3 jurisdictions? More than 3 jurisdictions?) Yes - Baytown Township, City of Stillwater, the City of Bayport S points) 7, Relationship to Cluster Planning: (2 p ossibleIan for Transportation, Sewer, Water or Will you cooperate with neighboring communities to p Housing (Other)? Yes g, Planning Assistance Loan Request: Not Applicable • Oak Park Heights Comprehensive Plan Update Local Planning Assistance Grant Introduction sive The City of Oak Park Heights is in the process of updating its Compre Action Plan as n, and rt of has updated a Parks and Trail Plan aThese Documents have been reviewed to nd a Housing Policy the Livable Communities Program in 1996. basic compliance with the requirements of the Metropolitanoo CCouncil's Reg onal determinethe Metropolitan Blueprint, subject to further review and comment by ues riot to the 31 December 1998 identified through this review that remain be Plan e addressed upd es have been outlined below as deadline for Metropolitan Area p ehensi part of a work program intended to part of the update of the Oak Park Heights Comprehensive Plan. Need for Funding y ant The Cit of Oak Park Heights is requesting Local Planning Aehens ve Plassistance n andrelated documents in conformance with money to assist in funding the costs of completing l Metropolitan Land Planning Act. Oak Park Heights has funded approximately $26,000 of comprehensive planning activities over the last nd an years. These activities included the preparation and updateHousing Action Planlasl part of , the work to date on the Comprehensive Plan update, and participation in the Livable Communities Program. Thest grant rant funds being requested by the City will be used for resolving outs far ding issues ues thatt must be addressed prior to submission to the Metropolitan approvalprior to the 31 December 1998 mandated deadline. thiss such, , the tasks a of Anye the work program will be undertaken regardless of the success costs not funded by the grant money requested and/or received will be paid for by City of Oak Park Heights. Grant Authorization They t Council will adopt a resolution at its regularly scheduled meeti g Ai to be held 12 request and accept Local P Funds. A copy of this Resolution w Auugg usst 1997 to authorized the City toil) be forwarded to the Metropolitan Council Office of d Local Assistance. The Resolution will include authorizatiofor Mayor yorhDavi the MetropolitanSchaaf d City Administrator Michael Robertson awa�dedn a grant agreement Council for any grant fun 1 . . • • Work Program Task 1 Finalization of Population and Employment Forecasts in Association with the Metropolitan Council. Comprehensive Plan art of its Comp While the The City of Oak Park Heightprojections for the City. numbersamendment, has updated w tthe population ro projections of the Metropolitan relating numbers are consistent with the p 1 Metropolitan CouncilAgreement uncil, discussion with Metrop there has not been any for the community. Ag to population and employment projections d the Metropolitan Council on this k Hes fscsitical d between the City pan ro ections impact Oak impacts for importance to both parties. Thep 1 regional use and public facility planning as well as having 9 development within the Metropolitan Area. Task 2 Land Use Plan Issues of Oak Park Heights has The City. This Surface Water water n gement plan for the existing City. in the a local surface water management plan will need to be expanded to include growth areas identified land use plan. Historic Preservation. The issue of historic preservation is not specifically addressed within the Comprehensive Plan. Historic t preservation will need to be evaluated and included within thi he Comprehensive Plan prior to final submission Council for approval. olar Access Protection. The provision for solar access protection will need to be evaluated and included within the Land Use section of the Comprehensive Plan. Task 3 Public Facilities Plan Trans ortation Plan. The transp ortation element of Comprehensive to include more detailed ds ssueion of and include roadways, will be expanded otential transportation systemfuture traffic roadways, iuentify p analysis as a means of projecting a traffic volume trend roadways. Projections for traffic on major volumes majunty or MnDOT roadways will also be incorporated. Washington n Co Y 2 • l Aeration Regional Plan. The guidelines of the Aviation Development sSection Guide of theil be incorporated within an ui.red by the Regional Blueprint. Comprehensive Plan as required art of dev the Regional Systems section of th Wastewater Plan. A Wastewater Plan he will beComprelope Planed The uture flows and Vlasrewa ter Plan will address the issues of projected f I include areas infiltration and infiltration guidelines. The Plan otential annexation outside the City of Oak Park Heights within p areas. er Su I Plan. The City of Oak Park Heights is req uire d to submit a Water Supplyan Wat Plan to the Metropolitan Area Community Water amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. This Plan will address the requirements outlined Guidelines.etropolitan Supply Plan Cont Task 4 Implementation ls iew. Implementation of the Comprehensive Plan ► ffical ControRev will include a review of the City's existing Zoning Ordinance and with the Plan as Subdivision Ordinance to ensure consistency required by legislation. ital Im rovement Plan. The City of Oak Park Heights is currently ► Ca part of the establishing a Capital Improvement Plan program. A te Capital process to complete the Comprehensive updated to include any Improvement Plan will be rev elements of the Comprehensive Plan that are not currently identified. overnmental oordination. The City of Oak i Park B Heights will Inters cooperation with the Y seek to establish ongoing and to create common development Stillwater and Baytown Township edestrian links. These patterns, compatible street accesserehens, and v a Plan. issues will be identified in the Comp Task 5 Submission of Plan to Metropolitan Council At such time as the elements of the Work Program are completed, the Oak Comprehensive Plan will be submitted to Metropolitan Council Park Heights Com p 3 4110 • for review, comment and approval. This task will include all necessary steps needed to organize the City's submission. Project Personnel City program will be completed in a coordinated effort between City Engi Staff, City The workgConsultant, Inc. and City sneering ring Northwest Associated Consultants, Planning and Eng Consultant,anningof Park ed long term relationships with the City ofOak fields. Bonestroo, Anderlik and Rosene, Inc. The � respective Consultants each have establish and provide on-going technical assistance to the City in their Heights Budget reared for each of the Tasks of the Work orklP planning activity A preliminary amo budget has been prepared Specifically, the 'n and publishing costs. SP As amounts below reflect the anticipated cost and expenses ofe budget consultant fees and printing related to Staff salary, a remaining portions of the Oak Park Heights receives would fund the costs of Tasks 1, 2 and discussedrant money the Cityof Oak Park Heights will fu previously, Work Program. 4 • • Staff Projected Task Costs Population and NAC,Inc. $1 000 1, Finalization of Pop City Staff Employment Forecasts $1,000 Total Projected Cost-Task 1 NAC,Inc. A. Surface $2,500 2, Use Plan Water Management ement Plan Bonestroo, Inc. A. City Staff NAC,Inc. $500 B. Historic Preservation City Staff NAC,Inc. $500 C. Solar Access Protection City Staff Total Projected Cost-Task 2 $3,500 3. Public Facilities Plan Bonestroo,Inc. $2,500 A. Transportation Plan City Staff NAC, Inc. $500 B. Aviation Plan City Staff Bonestroo,Inc. $5,000 C. Wastewater Plan City Staff Bonestroo $5,000 D. Water Supply Plan City Staff Total Projected Costs-Task 3 $13,000 4. Implementation Plan NAC,Inc. $2,000 A. Official Controls Review City Staff City Staff $1,000 B. Capital Improvement Plan $2,000 C. Intergovernmental Coordination City Staff NAC, Inc. Bonestroo,Inc. Total Projected Costs-Task 4 $5,000 olitan Council $2,500 Task 5-Submission and Coordination of Plan to Metrop $25,000 Total Projected Cost-All Tasks $18,750 ,000 Total Grant Funds Requested 1%of Work Program Budget 5 M • • • Page 3 - City Council Minutes 02/25/97 Public Hearings: Willi-m -nd Debor-h Re•ue t for M' n•r Su••ivisi•n & Varian e - Simonet 5976 Stagecoach Traml Acting William andor DeborahuSimonetnof the public hearing at 7 :30 p • Dan Rosen were present 5976 Stagecoach Trail and tplannereir attorney Richards reviewed the staff to answer questions . City subdivision wuld report . Richards stated that the proposed ususue feet, with a width create two lots . Lot 1 would be 1010 sq 010 square feet, with a width 2of 64 feet, and Lot 2 would be 12 , e of 67 .44 feet . Richards rindthe listedainancehis eeportntadddue to the specific hardship conditions compliancethe statedconditions that thelisted Simonetsthe havereport . requested Administrator Robertson that the payment of the park dedication fee be delayed until they file for a building permit . Council had no objection to this request . Councilmember Swenson, seconded by Robert, moved to close the Public Hearing at 7 : 35 p.m. Carried 4-0 . Councilmember Swenson, seconded by Robert, moved to approve the Request for Minor based on Subdivision and ri ationselistedlinam thend stafforah reportmocontingent the hardship co upon compliance with the conditions listed in the staff ' s report, and with those conditions to be complied with upon split approval . Carried 4-0 . ' t .u.r- - 9 - f. !i_ - Che ity Mayer TurnquRichardsed Plan Amendment City Planner Councilmember Swenson, for District 13 . Hearing no objections, seconded by Robert, moved to close the Public Hearing at7 :46 p.m. Carried 4-0 . Councilmember Swenson, seconded byRobert the moved to adopt Resolution 97-02-11, A Resolution Approving Comprehensive Plan Amendment for District 13 . Carried 4-0 . • -_ Am- . n- of •m•reh-n iv- Plan f.r D . r- - - r..o at 7 :47 p.m. Acting Mayor Turnquist opened the Public Hearing City Planner Richards revinwoethe reCouncilmemberPlan ASwensont for District 15 . Hearing objections, seconded by Councilmember Robert, moved to close the Public Hearing at 7 : 50 p.m. Carried 4-0 . Councilmember Robert stated that residents affected by the Comprehensive Plan an attencilded attended a Council Workshop prior to the City and that all in attendance were supportive of the amendment . Councilmember Swenson, seconded by Robert, moved to adopt Resolution 97-02-12, A Resolution Approving the Comprehensive Plan Amendment for District 15 . Carried 4-0 . III 110 Ilo 0 OAK PARK HEIGHTFEBRUARY 11, 1997 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES, TUESDAY, 7 : 00 p .m. by Call to Order: The meeting was called to order at7 : 00 Robert , .m. by Beaudet, son Present : Councilmembers Administrator Robertson, andMaySchaaf . City and City Robertson, City Attorney Staff Present : CityCaron, Engineer Attorney Vierling, City Anderlik. Employee Recognition: and Police The Council recognized Police eOaTsiofrservice.ck Buckley Officer Mike Hausken for 10Y Questions, or Concerns: Visitor Comments, Comments . There were no visitor Reports: that the Parks Commission will Department Rep Councilmember Robert said 6 :30 p.m. at City Hall . Park - Coay, Febr 1997 at meet Tuesday, February 18 , - Councilmember rk Ha.itat R-st•rati•n Committ-efor volunteers Va11- Vi-w P- looking a plan for on a committee that will develop Park. Robert stated that nhe Parks Commission a Y habiatted ro emenseryg habitat improvement and restoration at ked Councilmember Robert Mayor Schaaf as ro osed new _ . Ark- 'or recommendations for the p p �- n-x lthat the Parks Commission about the Parks Commission' s includeson �� park last year. The plan Councilmember Robert statedon how much land the City park. plan for the new plan at presented a ark depending will review the wantsvarto optionshfor thet park Council purchase for the p the next City Council workshop. _b e '_ i•n - Councilmember Turnquist statedF that thel9ext Commissionn meeting is scheduled Wednesday, CableortCity Hall . 1997 at Bayport Council is ch-•ul" - The next City Hall Workshopih the ' 1 W.r eh February 25 , 1997 at City of the Haase Co n - discussion 6 :30 p.m. scheduled workshop schedule: 4 :30 p.m. and a llowing workshop representatives,land, 5 :30 p .m. - Cable Commissiepsland. - Comprehensive Plan and the Baytowne the - Administrator Robertson stated Chan. - change receivedthat Fun• a request Councilmember Robert to Cl. by no objections, e the name of the Closed Bond Hearing moved to change of the obe t, seconded by Swenson, Capital Fund. nameftheCouncilmember Robert, name of the Closed Bond Fund to the Revolving Carried 5-0 . Mid•1- roix W. . - Councilmember Beaudet stated -r Maria.- -n •r•anizati n that the next WMO meeting is scheduled on Wednesday, ebruary 26 , 1997 . .0"F-sot, Minnesota Dep ent of Transportation Enclosure A tipMetropolitan Division of Waters Edge 1500 West County Road B2 Roseville, MN 55113 -------- 121 1997 ' � --- April I!�� � APR 2 4 19g7 \\L_. .___ Mike Robertson City of Oak Park Heights 14168 57th Street North Oak Park Heights,MN 55082 Dear Mike Robertson: Subject: Haase Property Mn/DOT Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review CPA97-009 Southwest Quadrant of Trunk Highway(TH)36 and Oakgreen Oak Park Heights,Washington County CS 8214 nsportaton(Mn/DOT has reviewed the Haase The Metro Division of the Minnesota Departmentwith thetMetropolitan Council's review Property comprehensive plan amendment in conjunction (Referral File No. 14735-3). We have the following comments on the proposed amendment. • We request that a copy of the site plan and grading/drainage lan havefor this been proposeed. You d development be forwarded to us for comment,when suchplans may be aware that if the property is to be platted,ll he ity must minary Piers for thirty-day to our Mn/DOT review period before approving the pNarusiewicz, at the above address. Local Government Liaison Supervisor, Sherry • It is not clear how the conclusion"overall there has be assume been percetnt decrease ethe i n traffic on the adjacent roadways" (page 15)was reached. Al so, s shown on page 16 are based on the new St Croix river crossing we project the 2017 traffic bridge and associated improvements are constructed as planned volumes on TH 36 to be: west of Nowell, 56,000 O�OOTADTwaneen Norrell and Oakgreen, d east of Osgood, 46,000 53,000 ADT;between Oakgreen and Osgood, , ADT. Questions may be directed to Adam Josephson of our Planning Section at 582-1320. • Thejro ect proposer should be aware that any use of or work within Mn/DOT right-of-way, P including Mn/DOT-owned frontage roads, requires a permit. The type of permit t required and depends on the nature of the proposed work. Further information aonhur Une it it process, d the appropriate forms, may be obtained from Lars Impola of r the above address. An equal opportunity employer • • Mike Robertson April 18, 1997 page two • It is Mn/DOT's policy to assist local governments in promoting compatibility between land use and highways. Locating residential land uses adjacent to highways(such as the proposed 3.23 acres of multiple family) often results in complaints about traffic noise. Traffic noise from TH 36 could exceed noise standards established by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, the U.S. Dept. of Housing and Urban Development, and the U.S. Dept. Of Transportation. Mn/DOT policy regarding new developments adjacent to existing highways prohibits the expenditure of highway funds for noise mitigation measures. The project proposer should assess the noise situation, and take the action deemed necessary to minimize the impact of any highway noise. If you have any questions about this review, please contact me at 582-1383. Sincerely, Adt 14410107 Elizabeth Malaby Transportation Planner/Local Government Liaison c: Tori Boers,Metropolitan Council-Local Assistance Ann Braden,Metropolitan Council-Transportation MetroP olio Council 0 Enclosure A Working for the Region, Planning for the Future March 28, 1997pn r LL, Mike Robertson , �R — 1997City of Oak Park Heights ," ' 14168 57th Street North ' i, �� Oak Park Heights MN 55082 RE: City of Oak Park Heights Comprehensive Plan Amendments(3) 1. Non-Point Source Pollution Control,Referral File No. 14735-3 2. Haase Property,Referral File No. 14735-5 3. NSP Property,Referral File No. 14735-6 Metropolitan Council District No. 12 Dear Mr.Robertson: comprehensive n ments The Metreferenced n Council ttamendment was received on Ochave reviewed the city's tober 5, he others on March 18, 1997. referenced above. The firs The first amendment adopts the Council's Interim Strategy for Non-Point Source Pollution Control standards. The second amendment(Haase)changes the land use of 53.8 acres from commercial and residential to highway commercial,mid/high density residential and business/warehousing. The third amendment(NSP)changes the land use of 2.2 acres from residential to industrial. We have determined that the three proposed amendments have no potential impact upon any of the regional system plans or policies. The amendments are consistent with the Regional Blueprint,the Regional Growth Strategy and with chapters of the Metropolitan Development Guide. Therefore,the Council will waive further review and comment on the proposed amendments and the city may pe them into effect. The Haase amendment proposes land use changes for a 53.80 acre site. 3.26 acres of the site is outside the city's municipal boundary and is within Baytown Township. Although Oak Park Heights designates this part of the township as a future annexation area, the land is not currently part of the city. Therefore, the Council cannot review and comment on land use plans for this area because it is outside the city's boundary and jurisdiction. The Council will review the city's land use plans for the townshipproperty once it officially becomes a part of the city. The amendment information,explanatory materials and submission forms will be appended to our records. If you have any questions please call Victoria Boers,principal reviewer at 291-6621. Sincerely, "i/� Thomas C.McElveen,Deputy Director Housing,Development and Implementation cc: Charles Amason,Metropolitan Council District 12 Lynda Voge,Victoria Boers,Metropolitan Council Staff Sherry Narusiewicz,MN Department of Transportation 230 East Fifth Street St.Paul,Minnesota 551014634 (612)Equal 291-6359 Fax 291-6550 TDD/TTY 291-0904 Metro Info Line 229-3780 • • CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PROPOSED AMENDMENT OF CITY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The City of Oak Park Heights will hold a Public Hearing on Tuesday, February 25, 1997 at 7 :30 P.M. at Oak Park Heights City Hall at 14168 North 57th Street to discuss a proposed amendment to the City' s Comprehensive Plan. The proposed amendment would change the designated land use in the areas highlighted on the attached map. All who wish to comment are asked to attend and be heard. Date: February 7, 1997 BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL 1 _. 1. Michael Robertson City Administrator FEB-07-1997 10:46 NAC F-,12 595 9837 P.03/03 • ,-- , „-, = e•V e ,, ± 47-3 ; I I I r-E k .5 s F. e s - . Z w— / g 1 , 1 ICC iu ol r- I , 1— ecc rn 4t.r . ... a... I a. 1 0 1-- c..)z 1 ., re” ,-..,..„.,;. 1-- k 1 • -N, ) ' - N! L SA . (//--___,77 „,a441Lisl,ft%:” -‘;1 °Ill-III in js—El _ 0 ›... 1. II...... I ,/...___ ::,.. ii; EN 1 10 ___, ., ,... ..... 1'HI i RU111111111 In I I I i:-*".5.;e- .': '' I II 11%11 0111::'"I:illilill ,-•, 1 Z IL...) iS-':- -..:- - - 11 _, ! • rirrff----- ' T.;:,,:,„ 1 MIMI hid r .._/- . < 1.---; : „ , 1 _ n- - - - L .- ._- 1 -Tt_3 jtfil.:0[11..1-.15 - --I I- .-- --3jou - -;..____.......:_i. li , 1. airj :74 g; lain IT - 1..: i:s; _so a F z I ! -- b' s- As FIE I —,.j L•::-Saillir,.. ------- I 'I, 111 173- 1,1 is L. 11 I , Li ill, • I _ i 0 C., .3 Arnow j r L! ! . • 1- S 71 1 /1 trot 54 tztil sr 1 Q.LNI....70.. E — .. ._ as = ▪ .., ...., Ofr a• zig •E' 6 z g a . ..., E .7., . N.,,......,....i - ,.../. r------- _ 1 _ i_... TOTAL P.03 FEB-07-1997 10:45 NAC 612 595 9837 P.02/03 . . • 0 - 1 - - 1 ."--1,- ..„_,.__,-,„,-,--- I .7- 5 2 1 = IJJ Z t (i i'l Z 1 . ! Ce ICC . elms .....-(- •-•".' ...-..:- .--•_,:, ...., /4 - . ulet "1 >••• - ./11 l . /.".,f.-..5.-2--"•""_-..-.70fi.g-..11:0::111111:111 ,i,',_,.-1 11 0.1 sa1t11111 %111111!VII/I 3111111 NI ' IMIi' 1 11011M 1310 ''-- .911.v --P-'.11 ' c: 4,2 ai_ 7 17.7.2 1 1 1 0Iii ilaill; ;11 --2 '; 1 ZuP. -.,,,,,:•.1111 Ili MIt.:,..IdEr0 ,-------,‘ 7, ‘ %. 7.1El-Eq.:njt un T __. TORFILT.17 MTE 1H _'\: = `1 - '''tra,Pm CEigjr, !;i0 El -:-,a11 -r- \,., H-1 j 6-7 !I I - i -- , IL ,..Iii d E-ii- 51 1 , —,--v, L. C--,_:,_--q--1 • purmi t:III 11‘111 a 4 E.til- I, -1- If,11_: '3-.. Rii+ Lt"), Ir.40 I .1•- rl _,,,,, , ,....., \ ....: p.:?,,, _ . ._ _, , . —-'6' i .. '' • '-' ';71 ! Fe- =. 1 , ,ii , bt:-,,•• tip ! • i L,7 ,Il r 6 Z W. --.<71. Z no .....J ,..- -r-- - 1 ., I i -v- /1 m rz V I v ,,, ..• .., . d., 'A. % .= id:::• 4,46,. I. 1 M 41 X 0 E •... .. W z N iz • 4 I • ', ,' ''",-,;<-4., i I 1 i 1 , . 41,), vc�4 CITY ID aki OAK PARK HEIGHTS - ,IJ.'kti,.'.."' 14168 N. 57th Street••Box 2007 Oak Park Heights,MN 55082 - �:� Phone: (612) 439-4439 •FAX 439-0574 ' liiiFebruary 13 , 1997 Re : Proposed City of Oak Park Heights Comprehensive Plan Amendment Public Hearing Dear Baytown Resident : This letter is to inform, you that the City of Oak will be holding a public hearingon Tuesday, Prk Heights 7s P.m. to consider an amendment to its Comprehensve February Plan. at 7:30f the areas described as part of the proposed amendmentOne of area of Baytown Township is that surrounded by the City ofaOak gPark gHeights.Avenuereen whichrise totallyvn this letter because you live within that area.You are receiving Though the officialpublic hearing for this issue is p.m. , the City Council invites all who are interested to 7:t an informal discussion meeting on this issue at 6 :30 to atordr those of you who have not been to Cityocat For 14168 North 57th StreetHall, it is located at , just under the old water tower. If you have any questions, m a please give me a call . Sincerely, Michae Robertson City Administrator cc City Council Tree City U.S.A. 12-23-94 0 : 36 PM FROM JA R4BERT,6 27 51 0727T'J6?? 43905i40 PO 3 Property owners under the NSP easement: Mr. Brad Henning Watson Centers, Inc. 3033 Excelsior Blvd, Suite 420 Minneapolis, MN 55416-4676 Mr. and Mrs. Allan Connel, Jr. 1433760thStN Oak Park Heights,MN 55082 Property owners along Oakgreen Ave from NSP easement South to 53rd S, Mr. Joseph Ackerman 5769 Oakgreen Ave N &/cfr o es Stillwater, MN 5508 Baytown Township ► - ' r. Simon Johnson 5725 Oakate,, Men Ave NBaytown Township 134A`ce � Stillwater, MN 55 ./ c:5- 6*, ? Mr. and Mrs. Allan Palmer E5 11 Grp 625 Oakgreen Ave N P?7 , Stillwater, MN 55082 Baytown Township 6�- , Mr. Quentin Nordeen �,5665 Oakgreen Ave N Baytown TownshipStillwater, MN 55082 411Z.....Hiitt' lof,:t. ' -/ �� Mr. and Mrs. David Fedie l- 8 5/gcy syr 5531 Oakgreen Place N Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 "rK tel/ Mr. and Mrs. Henry Gullickson (.7eit 2Cq 5535 Oakgreen Place N Oak Park Heights,MN 55082 /PP17 G� I/1>2,. Mr. and Mrs. Paul Slowey ,/^��1 ,I4 -51(5114 ,5:5&i_ 5471 Oakgreen Place N �7G Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 (3e// en-7r Mr. Delray Espelien /4 >r, jc e,K iJ `e ie r .5 5474 Oakgreen Place N A -f, �� - i 150,2' >Z, 1-5/ Sr t � Vt AlIck �,1e s iSalci e /9/11 ��o5‘- � 6716 altgs.weeii nr/ / 411 Page 4 - City Council Minutes 01/28/97 oak P- _k -i•hts Bu • • - Mayor Schaaf reported that the OPHBG will meet at 7 :30 a.m. , Wednesday, February 5, 1997 at Applebee' s . Representatives from the Fire Department will discuss commercial fire inspections . G 1deT Committee - Councilmember Robert repo99tedtthat0th5 : em.arden Committee will meet Saturday, February 1, at Applebee' s . Consent Agenda: 1 . Approve Bills and Investments 14, 1997 2 . Approve Council Meeting Minutes - January 3 . Approve Public Works Truck Purchase 4 . Request for Payment - Autumn Ridge 3rd Addition - Tower Asphalt - $2, 164 . 10 Councilmember Turnquist requested Council pull Item 2 for moved discussion. Councilmember Turnquist, seconded yCarSwen 5-0 . to adopt the remainder of the Consent Ag Councilmember Turnquist statedthat he shouldabenClisteouncidmas the er League of Local Governments Liaisonmoved to Beaudet . Councilmember Turnquist, seconded by Robert,ms approve the Council Meeting Minutes - January 14, amended. Carried 5-0 . •••_ - . •t 4— — ' t• — Administrator Robertson reported that a joint meeting of the Oak Park Heights City Council andthe 1997 Council will be held Thursday, February Bayport City or Schaaf encouraged all at 7 . 00 p.m. at the Bayport Library. Mayor members of the City Council to attend the meeting. Unfinished Business There was no unfinished business . New Business: planner Richards reviewed the •t ,._ _ ,_ 9 _ 'v— _ - s 41 - 40_11—i — City draft of the Comprehensive Pl includean nthe Baytown island on t . Council was in consensus to direct Richardsto Oakgreen Avenue in the plan amendment, and to describe the area as residential south of 58thand SwensonersecondedubyrRobert, ial north of 58th Street . Councilmember moved to set a Public Hearing for the 9Comp7 . reh ns eiied 5_Plan Council Amendment on Tuesday, February 25, directed Administrator Robertson send a letter othearresidents of the Baytown island informing them of the public Enclosure B • ` , � CITY ; ' OAK PARK HEIGHTS :t-I , �' eights,MN 55082 •Phone: (612) 439-4439 •FAX 439-0574 ,�, 14168 N. 57th Street•Box 2007 •Oak Park H January 23 , 1997 Baytown Town Board Clair C/O Town Clerk Pat St. . 14949 North 30th Street Stillwater, MN 55082 Re : City of Oak Park Heights Comprehensive Plan Up te Dear Pat dating its Heights is in the process of updating the_ The City of Oak Park Ihavecopy of a summary I enclosed a topic at a City Council discussionComprehensive wh ch occurredit Council answers questions meeting weiem . sabout should help future direction in ain o tembe of Oak Park Heights �'" - have about the City ., may, terms of growth and annexation. are within , 2, 3 4, & 5 described in the summar are locatedse ca within , hin ,- Areastown Township• r lea in ournte _ the current borders: of >Bay _ _ this point we have received annexationt though an area these -areas'will be_ included for future g Comprehensfve Plan, Please also note inquiries shown from Area 2only.omprehensive plan as part: of the future may be on ,a city' s not mean that annexation of that le I believe that the area of growths imminent . For examp an the area of area a rowthat is currently being rehent e Cityan otillwater Township of Stillwater s Comp of Stillwater has been a part for at least two decades . questions please give me a call . If you.. have any qu '., Sincerely, Michael Robertson City Administrator • Tree City U.S.A. • CONSULTANTS C � ATE � t NORTHWEST ASSO COMMUNITY PLANNIN G - DESIGN - MARKET RESEARCH MEMORANDUM 1 . - 7 Mike Robertson TO: Cary TeaguelScott Richards FROM: 6 January 1997 DATE: Summary of City Council Meeting Oak Park Heights - (18 December 1996) _ RE: 798.04- General FILE NO: 18 b the City Council, at their the potential is a summary of the discussion Y amendment a T99he following the Comprehensive Plan of amethe ndment sitesad the are meeting, ecember regarding town Township. Each 1996 onions of Bay annexation of portions discussed separately. property, AREA #1 HAASE PROPERTY ht industrial land uses o rang H shown nin the family residential uses, as cur The City Council was in favor oflight instead of the multiple Comprehensive Plan. proarty west of the existing connection from the NSP easement to ► The Council would like to see a trail on the Haase p P homes on Oakgreen Avenue to make a trail 58th Street. ercial area on Highway 36 and the comm stated that it would like toe development, located at the intersection of ► The Council multiple family to extendTen and existinghhway 36 frontage road. Oakgre Single family residential will remain the preferred land use south of 58th Street. ► along 58th Street in order to screen The City will require buffers (landscaping) t from any residential area to the south. construction ► industrial development pro-active approach to the should take a p They Mayor felt that the City ure development on the Haase property. of 58th Street to en 55416 MINNESOTAST. LOUIS PARK, SUITE 555 7 BOULEVARD , FAX 612-595-963 1 2 5g5 983 5775 WAYZATA 595-9636 PHONE 6' 12- a • • AREA #2 - KERN CENTER The Council desires to extend the borders of Oak Park Heights to the Lake Elmo Boundary to the west and south. ► Annexation will be a difficult battle in this area due to the current and potential tax base of this area for Baytown Township. The City will require the Screatons (land owners in this area) to pay for any sewer • studies that will determine the cost for extension of sewer and water to their property. ► The Council was concerned about the proposed County improvements to Manning Avenue and its potential re-location. ► The Council stated that it would like to see industrial land uses frome Hg a\I ay uses. 36 south to 55th Street. South of 55th should be designated for re Multiple family residential may be located south of 55th Street toso t the existindens tg boundary of Oak Park.Heights, the remainder shall be designated residential. AREA #3 - DNR PROPERTY ► The Council desires to have this property remain as open space. ► This area provides a buffer to the prison. ► The Council was interested in acquiring this property to hold aas in the spaceen r to develop portions of the land as low density residential development nt future. AREA #4 - NORTH OF BAYTOWN WOODS 3RD ► The Council was interested in annexation of this land south of River Hills to Baytown Woods 3rd Addition. ► This land should be designated as low density residential. • The property owners are not interested in developing their land at the current time, however, the City would like to be prepared for the future possibility. 2 ti • • AREA #5 - BAYPORT AREA ► The City would like to expand the Oak Park Heights boundaries in this area, west of Stagecoach Trail south to 40th Street/Olinda Boulevard and to Lake Elmo. The likely land uses in this area will be residential. ► The City of Bayport's Comprehensive Plan claims this area for future City expansion of its urban residential area. ► The Cities of Bayport and Oak Park Heights will have to settle their similar claims on City expansion. (Meetings with a facilitator is likely). pc: Mark Vierling Joe Anderlik 3 • Page 3 - City Council Minutes 12/18/96 New Business : Resolution 92-12-42 - A Resolution Approving the 1997 Tax Levy - Councilmember Robert, seconded by Swenson, moved to approve Resolution 92-12-42 . Carried 5-0 . Resolution 92-12-43 - A Resolution Approving the 1997 Budget - Councilmember Swenson, seconded by Robert, moved to approve Resolution 92-12-43 . Carried 5-0 . Comprehensive Plan Update - City Planners Richards and Teague discussed the Comprehensive Plan Update with Council . Richards noted that the Metropolitan Council has designated Oak Park Heights-Stillwater-Bayport as an independent growth center in its ' most recent plan. The Met Council has also designated some of the land surrounding Oak Park Heights as being within the Metro Urban Services Area (MUSA) 2020 line, and so designated for future urban growth. The Met Council has also recommended that Oak Park Heights establish agreements with Bayport and Baytown on future boundaries . Population Projections - Richards indicated the current City population is about 3 , 800 . He estimated that the City' s population will be between 5, 200 and 5, 600 by 2020, depending on how fast it grows . Future Land Use - Council discussed how the following areas should be designated in the Comprehensive Plan; 1) Haase Land. Council was in consensus that a strip of land along the Highway 36 Frontage Road should be designated Commercial, and that all remaining land south of that strip to the future extension of 58th Street should be designated for Industrial uses. Councilmember Swenson, seconded by Beaudet , moved to direct staff to prepare an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to reflect this direction. Carried 5-0 . 2) Land west of Highway 5 . Council was in consensus that the Comprehensive Plan should designate the future west boundary of the City to be the Lake Elmo border. Land west of Highway 5 and north of 56th Street shall be designated for Industrial uses, land south of 56th Street shall be designated for Residential Uses. Councilmember Robert, seconded by Swenson, moved to direct the City Engineer to do a feasibility study for providing utilities to the David Screaton property, contingent upon the Screaton' s paying for the study. Carried 5-0 . • Page 4 - City Council Minutes 12/18/96 3) DNR land & other land south of City boundary along Osgood. Council was in consensus to include this area in the Comprehensive Plan and to go as far south as 40th Street . Mayor Schaaf noted that the City easily had sewer capacity to serve this entire area . 4) Lands south of City boundaries along Oakgreen Avenue . Council was in consensus to include all lands on the west side of Oakgreen Avenue south to the Baytown Woods addition and to designate it for Residential uses . 5) Lands south of City boundaries along Stagecoach Trail . Council was in consensus to include all land west of Stagecoach Trail south to 47th Street . Richards noted that some of this land was included in the Bayport Comprehensive Plan. Administrator Robertson noted that the City had communicated their desire to discuss this area with the City of Bayport and that he and Bayport Administrator Hartung had held some preliminary discussions . Council directed Robertson to set up some formal discussions on this topic with Bayport . Simonet Request - Debbie Simonet of 5976 Stagecoach Trail was present to discuss problems she and her husband were having with MNDOT. She said MNDOT had commenced a condemnation action on their property. She also indicated that MNDOT said that they would only treat the property as residential, even though the Simonet ' s had a plumbing business. She also noted that though it was a six bedroom house that MNDOT was saying they would only treat it as a four bedroom house . She said that she had heard that the neighborhood had be rezoned from commercial use to residential use several decades ago without proper public hearings and asked that her property be returned to commercial use . City Attorney Vierling noted that, while he could not speak for what happened several decades ago, the City has recodified its ordinances twice in the last fifteen years, each of those recodifications had proper notice and public hearings, and both of the recodifications would have designated the Simonet ' s property as residential zoning. Council expressed sympathy with Simonet and asked staff to assist her in any way they could. Building Permit Software - Councilmember Swenson, seconded by Kern, moved to approve the purchase of building permit software for the Building Department . Carried 5-0 . • • Enclosure 6 N NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS INC COMMUNITY PLANNING - DESIGN - MARKET RESEARCH MEMORANDUM TO: Mike Robertson FROM: Scott Richards DATE: 12 December 1996 RE: Oak Park Heights - Comprehensive Plan FILE NO: 798.06 In preparation for the 18 December 1996 meeting in which the City Council will discuss Comprehensive Plan issues, I have prepared maps for your review and to aid our discussion. Previous meetings and discussions with the City Council have lead to the identification of five areas, one within the City and four adjacent to the City boundaries that will need to be reviewed next week. The first area is the Haase property between Walmart and Oakgreen Avenue, north of the proposed 58th Street right-of-way (see Maps 1 and 2). The current Comprehensive Plan calls for a mixture of commercial and mid/high density residential in this area. Council members have expressed concerns with this designation and many would prefer a combination of frontage road commercial and light industrial. Also, the Council should discuss the single family dwellings within Baytown Township along Oakgreen Avenue. Annexation and possible redevelopment of this property would be necessary if the Haase property becomes an industrial area. The second is the area west of Highway 5 including Kern Center and property to the south in Baytown Township (see Maps 3 and 4). The City of Lake Elmo north and south boundary follows a line approximately consistent with Manning Avenue to 50th Street North. Included in this area are the Screatons, who have requested annexation in the past and a owner of property in Kern Center who is interested in developing with City utility services. Annexation proceedings for this area could be difficult and time consuming in that the Township is not interested in discussing annexation because this area represents significant current and future tax base. The City has since 1991, when the area east of 5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 555 ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 55415 PHONE 612-595-9636 FAX 612-595-9837 • • Highway 5 was annexed, considered this area for extension of boundaries and sewer service. The third area is south of Brekke Park and west of Osgood Avenue North in Baytown Township which includes the DNR reserve area (see Map 5). Past discussions with the Township Board have resulted in an understanding that if the DNR released ownership of the property, that both jurisdictions would work to keep parts of the area in its natural state. Additionally, there are developable properties south of the DNR land. The fourth area is west of Oakgreen Avenue North between the Oak Park Heights boundary and Baytown Woods 3rd Addition (see Map 6). The area is relatively small and the current property owners likely have no intention of developing this area or becoming part of the City. The area could be easily served with City utilities and would tie in well with the eventual development of the southerly Haase property. The fifth area is west of the City of Bayport and south of the State of Minnesota Correctional Facility in Oak Park Heights (see Maps 7 and 8). As you are aware, the draft Bayport Comprehensive Plan has included this area within their potential growth area for 2010, 2020 and beyond. As indicated in previous meetings by the City Engineer, the City of Oak Park Heights has in place the sewer utilities to serve development south of the prison. Council discussion as to changes to the existing Comprehensive Plan or inclusion of Township areas into the planning study is necessary at this time. Also included for your information is population projections and land absorption tables from the Inventory section of the Comprehensive Plan. These projections will help us determine the amount of land necessary to accommodate the continuing growth of the City. • • SOCIAL PROFILE Population Growth 1960-1994 Oak Park Stillwater Bayport Washington Lake Woodbury Oakdale White Heights County Elmo Bear Lake 1960 332 8310 3205 52432 550 3014 4297 12849 1970 1238 10191 2987 82948 3542 6184 7818 23313 1980 2591 12290 2932 113571 5296 10297 12123 24400 1990 3486 13882 3200 145896 5903 20075 18374 24704 1995 3776 15649 3181 175441 6148 31258 23935 25804 Average Annual Population Growth Time Oak Park Stillwater Bayport Washington Lake Woodbury Oakdale White Frame Heights County Elmo Bear Lake 1960-1970 90.6 188.1 21.8 3051.6 299.2 317.0 352.0 1046.4 1970-1980 135.3 209.9 -5.5 3062.3 175.0 411.3 430.0 108.7 1980-1990 89.5 159.2 26.8 3232.5 57.5 948.9 620.0 30.4 1990-1995 58.0 353.4 -3.8 5909.0 42.2 2236.6 1092.2 110.0 Percentage Growth Time Oak Park Stillwater Bayport Washington Lake Woodbury Oakdale White Frame Heights County Elmo Bear Lake 1960-1970 272.9 22.6 -6.8 58.2 544.0 105.1 81.9 81.4 1970-1980 109.3 20.6 -1.8 36.9 49.5 66.5 55.0 4.7 1980-1990 34.5 12.9 9.1 28.5 10.9 92.2 51.0 1.2 Effective (compounded) Growth Rates Time Oak Park Stillwater Bayport Washington Lake Woodbury Oakdale White Frame Heights County Elmo Bear Lake 1960-1970 14.06 2.06 -0.83 4.69 20.47 7.45 6.16 6.13 1970-1980 7.66 1.89 -0.19 3.19 4.10 5.23 4.48 0.45 1980-1990 3.01 1.22 0.87 2.53 1.09 6.90 4.24 0.12 1990-1995 1.34 2.01 -.10 3.12 .68 7.65 4.43 0.87 Source: U.S. Census, 1960, 1970, 1980 & 1990; Metropolitan Council; Minnesota State Planning- Demographers Office; Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. OAK PARK HEIGHTS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE INVENTORY 5 ECONOMIC PROFILE The table below projects Oak Park Heights' future household and population growth through the year 2020. In projecting this growth, the number of residential units added to the City's existing housing stock from 1990-1995 is converted to households by applying the City's residential occupancy rate of 86 percent (U.S. Census, 1990). The resulting household figure is converted to a population estimate by multiplying it by the median household size for the years 1995, 2000, 2010, and 2020. In order to anticipate a potentially stronger future growth rate, both slow growth and strong growth scenarios have been calculated. The slow growth scenario does not include the two highest building permit numbers in order to eliminate any temporary fluctuations in the development trends. The strong growth scenario conversely, includes these numbers in anticipation of a trend towards an increasing growth rate. Growth in Oak Park Heights will be based upon the following factors: • The City's ability to provide utilities and service to all new development. • Adequate land will be available to satisfy the need, market variety, and variable residential environments. • The provision of a diverse housing supply to satisfy a range of family and lifestyle needs. Population and Household Trends and Projections 1980 1990 Jan.1, 2000 2000 2010 2010 2020 2020 1996 (slow) (strong) (slow) (strong) (slow) (strong) est.* House- 955 1,322 1,466 1,587 1,638 1,852 1,954 2,117 2,270 holds H.H. 2.71 2.63 2.60 2.55 2.55 2.50 2.50 2.47 2.47 Size Popula- 2,591 3,486 3,721 4,046 4,177 4,630 4,885 5,229 5,607 tion Source: U.S. Census, 1980, 1990 *Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. OAK PARK HEIGHTS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE INVENTORY 58 • • ECONOMIC PROFILE Land absorption rates (the conversion of rural/vacant land to an urban use) were developed for residential and public uses and a determination was made on how these uses would impact the vacant/rural areas of the City. Again, to anticipate possible fluctuations in the future growth rate, both slow land demand and strong land demand scenarios have been calculated. Land Demand in Acres(Slow Growth) Based Upon Residential Residential Commercial Public Streets Park Total "Slow"Growth Single Multiple (3) Scenario Family(1) Family(2) 1995-2000 35 2 45 4 9 4 99 2000-2010 70 4 60 8 17 8 167 • 2010-2020 70 4 40 8 17 8 147 (1) Based on one (1) lot per 12,500 s.f. (2) Based on one (1) unit per 5,000 s.f. (3) Based on one(1) lot per 5 acres and allowances for large lot developments Land Necessary(in acres)for"Slow"Growth Development 1995-2000 • 99 2000-2010 167 2010-2020 147 1995-2020 413 5 year"overage" 512 Sources:City of Oak Park Heights Permit Data, U.S. Census, 1990, Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. • OAK PARK HEIGHTS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE INVENTORY 60 • • • ECONOMIC PROFILE Land Demand in Acres(Strong Growth) Based Upon Residential Residential Commercial Public Streets Park Total "Strong"Growth Single Multiple (3) Scenario Family(1) Family(2) 1995-2000 41 17 60 7 14 7 146 2000-2010 82 34 80 13 26 13 248 2010-2020 82 34 60 13 26 13 228 (1) Based on one (1) lot per 12,500 s.f. (2) Based on one (1) unit per 5,000 s.f. (3) Based on one (1) lot per 5 acres and allowances for large lot developments Land Necessary(in acres)for"Strong"Growth Development 1995-2000 146 2000-2010 248 2010-2020 228 1995-2020 622 5 year"overage" 768 Sources:City of Oak Park Heights Permit Data, U.S. Census, 1990, Northwest Associated Consultants,Inc. While residential development is currently the most predominant urban land use within the community, the City is experiencing an increase in commercial development. This trend is anticipated to continue for the remainder of the decade and into the next century. • Using the building permit data, the population and household projections developed earlier in this section, and the existing breakdown of housing unit type, the future absorption of residential and commercial land may be calculated. As with the population and household projections, both slow and strong demand projections were calculated. Under the slow growth scenario, it is projected that the City can anticipate a residential and commercial land absorption of between 413 and 512 acres by the year 2020. These projections include land necessary for public buildings/facilities, streets, and parks. This calculation is based upon the amount of land necessary to accommodate and provide services for the projected growth (30 percent). The anticipated residential land demand with overage for the strong growth scenario is between 622 and 768 acres. OAK PARK HEIGHTS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE INVENTORY 61 4;14-44 C ,1" ilk , [ 'N..., 1 ,', ---", 0 s 1 0...,., -0- , t II ?., ) moi` $ . -- ii 0 .,-,� II i •a I _ ` : 1 • •1,;.;".4.1. 1%.4; \ •vw�r"ir ,`r \ ,I. II }11;�Iltl i .Y 'II . 7:'.:�- `"`�: II0111001j�j1 Pili 1i,11I=,11 fish{�I�III:i,'� .n 9 'I I iF s- i it . it ,.. ),. _ . ..,.. ....---:--. _ ;cu...., . fr,----:.-----_-:-. _ _ , --,s.s., 1_, . i :1 I 1 • 1 i• \ , .., 1 . . •:.;: ,.x `\ . I Ifi • IC` 0 � i;,l _ .' �td --• _ J - - �� I. or..e " " 1 N• •••'•....1//0 tiPtItt,If • 1Z 7'.-----— :47-7-L---- .-.:*:-. . . , ....'",' . ,.7.....11....: .,.!9. i ,!‘.....,,, ,,,.:). ,\ ;S:„..t...I....7:V.r.'.----.. ....... 3 -------_----_-.•:.-„---0. 7 _�� 7N _.._ A� u r. : • 1.- - /�G ,r\ / Slt3 -,� moi? 1 1 sf • r(f( ; . O r•ri... ,\k. � O • t ;�' 1�®®®1,, r 1 \\�.\ 1` O� r• II 1 • ` ..� ❑,p'I 1 � v' Q ®I f f. IIr !_:.i : . . // �`\y; ► •Vt'I K� V i�'' e f S � al -p �, x =1 1 1!>? ;Y,. I ,Yfk, ! ® , _ .` imi . t •�ti`�j-' ii. s is .-.: ..... , •\ �•:� %:. �" r ,. ` i fx '1 7• !/ jo _ _ -7-7---,-,---.ArirEi•W.-77/tr.\•• -:;•, �L'+�• - \ e�t� 11. I\ IIC� �`. •. • \.tip .� .... .,�`..1-..:. •!. •11 I �I Il•,,Ire I .+./, --- ill M • . "---( : _.7:e.)..,,i,..• ill ;. i-. \ ,' -.•:- r: il A . 1' !'iliN • � • .1....... a. Ilf ��\ ® , I.�? 'I .....44 • lop . sou lik4IL libilL`- q ' \`1«. \ `s V(1� ---\ EL) .L-1---!- -,:.--- -�- - ----- -3--- - -C.. .. r1 es lit _ -;\�� �� , ,\\''.\�\ll) 1 i. i, t /�I�r1• •f ' ;+ s:. O`'▪ ICf I ;ti 1!ii i ` r i I \{� l r 1, I� 0 • ,h' f---....-..,�. it I i 111 tl • 1 i, 1 E.‘'/ .1//.1 .1 w--__,. .\;mml 1":V_.,,:i. "'.. '. 1''''...111 I) *:1 4 i i/611 15). .<.1 % C--) 11101.11 ---,_-. 6, 4 io t. .‘ il i - .. ft ti . ii : il / ' •- 4 to*. :!„. \'� ---f l i I I . .y: (415 4 ' 14% 1' 9 .ii . . r ii ill/‘' ''‘ •-•' ,. , ,.. ,.., .....%_.: -.- -1,1 tWili'll . I b-----t .1 fr• - lic ' j,,, i,1,,,,,,..,..iiiii.,,l_ i ..‘"--7 I ' 44104 1111 l 14 , ,.* .iiclaN' ell) ? 44 j , 1441-- ; -•.4..,,‘, :1-v-v-.1.: ! I i !MI 4411\000_sdipm...immi% , Ro if __,.., gig , 1::-. 'IA , --s' -..,5,'0 ite.g. .-ivi:co '''. 1 Ntl.k. •N-j• i i; I - ' ►�'I.' l g �,� _11:1'4-mo:)',---4. �'•4-• -y+AVENUE J ' 'kms S' `t!�--ria ..0- 7Wft;.4/. ,) •; ., s-kEi ,- • - �. _ L .I� ;, -' .. ;- -+�' pitit?,..7.1 aprowiti.A.. lij 1r .p.iw- - • . -'..-Tr•-•--, . - 4,4; lit. it, p - .._ : . I- I+.� ` + _� j�d,�� ���� - � I,�li i %��-1` �,�'7��� I t ' ::`s i,.., . , • ,, - _ 1/0 ' �• 1. li is ,„,,-..?... ....,,/ 'mg., iiiirt , ily ala f� �JJ//���i_®AirrYAV-.9- 90,* .417t, --All '' '\ ' 4.1,0917,-..._•,/z1 t,..1. a • 74. ....,_... .i 1 i I ..! . ,-.'. I i il 1yi'fi��^,Y I ( I !11\P ' ' ��"�f///�/1 am iyrj + l�_r'_;# a . � ...7.1...A.-.;r1 �� i a-;: 1 N .1 �_ I.j M/ttT�I� �(�� 1 `t J(itir s/�I _� o ' r" _s t :, rte 1. ' , ,,,,„ii .47.(k - NE-, '''''''..414:.1 `� •-�� =�s+�/ ��� l AarisD„k ir ............... . _ .I Y Ya I I 0 rt��� - �l : — jur inVIII ��! s ,�ommi = NOVAK n\Ae.vt:e t vievi r„,,,,,, _ _..._„, �ear �.�i lmEl / + ' - - z2 _ r • �1�� ®� _ /,%/I+ r. -�' -��� \ ,1 IIIIENIENEM.:11/1_. • •! I• "/ I Y 1 `m is igo )4 /, A's- „--/ -'. :1 • / .11 , : -I-nssrA,____,.._. , 1 , ,„ ..:. r mittui __11 . -.--\ _,_____,. ! . : :. . 0 - - If u )1 , 0 . ...... L, 1 1 ..___.„ 1 1:„.....2,...5.AV li.„,....i.:51.......!.. ...... : . a 411‘ rn i, _,. _ _ k, \ ( . , . 11110 ,�_ , • o•! 1 _ rF `o I ril- 1: ill f •gg' ( i,r1 I '-- - k .\KO I ,.....eirtigokii..: :1111 !c, D t.N,,,__ ___, -,.."--0 • VC ' \"-----�`t 0..; -_ ,! ,---- 1 p i l.'d `-�^ •.s \ 'Jr. TI/ /R 41 iii*I4a..... 2.. : : a 1 I I• .z......,r.1 .: .! , ar741---- , 1 7.- ':' .rirle!''''.1: - r__ .: gill...... EN N.... . ,,:, r ), _ . ( .,..?,, •41/ e ' :':-.3.1-iiirr.,-4,ir -,:-.:.:1 v . , (IN . , . r _ ...:4. 'F.”. r -,7,..,: N lialik '4 ' •5., - . il ...,_._ __ .11, ......iii , . i I : -... 11 . . _.,. ,.. • ,..: nu i. -.:1-_. . . ...... i ..... . „sot _ty__.: k .......,„..._ i -- . itie-*_:q er dii Ii 1 ...1-1_, p io,b0 ••• I j ili : I aN 1 s• ' I -.... . . : if :-- o .. • I _ ) _�- ' I., - les-- � � 11.0!.-4% - - If ____.,inj,,,f7irr,..__ ; d �"` �, wart 11%,1110) ii �I ip ...t....:...: - __��_. �u —__*- �. — — -r nR' r , 1 ' � '' 1 `>a ,...-QC'''s V I I V'\l I r 4 1,0 /r•11 r • • I ill F, r.__ / r •L\\k"--\\C ti:i? •: ••.iti?:tiff:• ::: o ...::::::.:::::::!:::;?..;:::::::11:1:::::::!:::::. Ir :;i,:;1'':ii'•ii.i.i.�is . \ :............,:?.............::::.t... :•'J:;:;�!:;: ,V ••1}ti: N 4ir:•: is ii:iiiiii:':iiiiiiii :i:ii ii::`iiii:ilii:}: • `O\\ \\ \ ........•••• ...off ::•:•M; ({v >:iii}.}:{•}'}?:.',::::i:?:::::: ii:::::ii: :'{:;:;i!:riii::iiii:ii'+'Gii:J, .....•::::•....i...: ...:. \ .•.'.. \ `\ .. .:;;.;•. .....:..�.::. ti?::^:+L:ti!ti•iitiii:.i:�::ti•i:•�titititi^:•i:ti•::?•ii .•. • jp,..;.... «ti:•»:•i>i:•>:ti a: i:>i:a::•r::i:iitiii i::;•i;:• is \ \\\\\ :. :. • •. 1?Y \ \\ ....•:.:............:Z!'.:::.::::: i :::::.:�:..:::::•!.i1::.:1:::.:::::::.!::•.:::.::•:. 4:ii:•:�ii:ry}:.i::.. ... {i•i �iii:i�i:�ii::i} all ....... :. • 1 / ;i;Y.i ji:::;: iii;':;i:';. "�'ii:��.:; .}:'Ti:•ii:^ ::ii:' : ::::::::::::i::j::::::>:::: :•:'':•.. ... 144 ii:;HY:i;Y;±:;::-ii:�:v; !{::'Y!ii: ..I4.... ;151. •{ii:^i:iti{v:�i:ftii ;vi: •::�':'•:' • •:••,•Q•'' 'i:ti ;;iJ :;:i ii•i:. !^.> : ':'::•:::.:.i:.>:�;ti.;:.:<.:ti.i:.i:.i::.i:ti.>:.:titi.>:. ... : k Z a :•:•:•:•:•::is:!!• ::•:•:!•:•W ::•:•:•:•:•:•i:• ::••:ti• •••••: O ........:::::iiNi.::::!!....i.:•. ::::::1 cL .i: ti:::::::::�::ii::>::ii::iiii:ii iii • .CF: F:1 14. ........................................... . ..... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. s. .. .. .. .. .. ............ I W C-3, T 4F+ I V L Z J C Q ca ^ 'l*�►7► 1111111111111111:1111110111:1111111111111111:1111111 ...fi ■ ct .......... ........ .. .. .. III:brIN a. Ui ‘Ilklifti .Z + ■ as/ � O ■ a U m , ® a 7 Lu , � . cc W >- w cf1 LTJ — O O w w z o Q 0 w o ....... :. .......... a i -J 1— (/) = z n _ : I ? m �T sem: MAP 2 28 0. 4 i II CO .' W ,-- :-. ''''........ ......":.• >I. . vi : /. t. 1°4:, '' ''-'-;: -- . ' ".----'--------,4 . 1.... .--. , S l.r,� o' rigerbirrop ' -ciamismolk,>---- - -- - . / Cm :s��`u�l �; c r1o531aIF Q ■ O ,..,5_ ,.........tvi werdifia kb,, M ,.- irilir, ,. Prior'', j>---- 1 v �' ' aL 1f ui9I m a .... o, •.r113,pfa� ®til1f �� ;• CO11 4 I RI 5 a d°,�/'rc'~ YS w■ K U/rir tea. PKa4T1 !S W6 �- EMI C.- e A PM melanin res..4 .; IN .7 / - ft 4 IME4 L .....•'°*"..Ziummi �� 1: 'NI*3A1' wt110 ■ C,., CUI51 R "N 'NJ 3i. I 3i1::._Tio.. i. ;‘7,. 7:‘ ,.., I: �3M YFrFrI s n ', ®NYi J•'h C ® t r z j � r•••�r i ■ '3LY pDOpSp -- *{ ■ rN Ar NINA 3^'434 • li 1 ■ � i _ : � { IAY t 1\g- �v"IAr � ,, I F 3F7,0 R -N '■ O 11 ■ IN C • 'YO 37Nsh , Ivo rum _ ■ too LI'. A•IFq.11J■�I'p z ■1, ■-+ ■F L 7r 3nYN33H'JNYO As,rlwsnaf ,■ ■N Nil '.:P '''sr, ..tats.N1w7+ 7A►magi u, = iss... ..„14 x� 'w •3nr rApw N 40. 'save 1 -'ti Achn„ •oN Lf)Z ot• : y ti )Ar wvwwoN . i,J,� a h a -� /jam :LPN% : Ai:: J 0-4 CD,1!` wiM y ^l�� 2 • \ `r `V z 1 , O 4 o ci rr � r /-�Cyd'� _o v. V MI illii--IP-1 W : WE .� • ••■ k 'M 3e1'�17p1p1 Y v c = c r ^ i �.•(� In M '�� '+arlMNr� g :\>/:• N cIs W \''''', J u .rJwr.rCa1, 2 . _ _. ._ ____..... ___ •••._ . .. . . . . ___ . , . _. -- ________ , . SECTION 6 , .. . : • , . . . . . . • . . r 7.: --- ''- = :_::� - �, ___ •• .L_---I 'I.rl' eo r. .....,w....,L,. 11*15 - - �..xgwu'r -._-.-f-•. by _._.• I 0,7nTA'44,'.• , - --. _ .__•.,: -.-_ . ._ _ ''' i a.OtravxF. ! , . STATE NOWT _. /-- ---_-- •170 OF 001'FAP[$050010 ••••••_ ._ ._. .:... l- �Mr L —� F ,, �-I; —;— KERN CN\TFR ,/ r T,,..i ,i I / .(00:13a I a _- r I m I 9 mama,nom Tema owe mew `/ .00 a 11101100a1110110011101100 .0. 10101 101000 1.000,1a Y a 10,4 MI ' 110/11100 01110,•mm 011100111111101 0 0..1110,.01 y T. ma dy O. Taft Ia. ata ..1..ti R f ..4 TT • r'.• k BAYTOWN TOWNSHIP . /' I • r...;; e a CC ', .- d% \ ? , :,-,-N _ :,J.._._._... 2 r/ ,1 t :j t1-."'/ -- i Of KERNS EDUCATION ADDITION F "r '/ ®y ,` ".... L' -�' ...• Pi w� 106.021-30-'1-OMS T. 1 / ai , \ •� "0••• R _r +.,P ,,2' (0°01; . /I/ ii . d.min v ' _ — ,-- OAK PARK HEIGHTS-------------- . — ) ;CIO! nl 4 I ! J r = • l O i.. yyyr,YII lIr." '<A 1 lj ,my0. ✓ , W IF 1 . -.. .. e / / F 7 11 I 0x-021-2°•,-Moi — I r._. . / HIGH SCHOOL • , j k • / .. _. //A. / • (0002;. - (020!, / / • � /, sr / /if / .9 / I • �!/ ."' / • r.< — 0A•'on IYAA •' r \ , h1,w ••••• :`�% 4T A�TIOi �BLACKWOOD D r I -oft..... \ p ADDITION °1 Iaaas i �! B1ACK�0� P 20-4:- IV/ }I • __ :, • r 1\ 1 i1 (Ooo3r a (0°021 i food) ;0001) !/ �• % r�MOO I w/0 BLACK I - l li i/ 1 -� , 0 6 • .lib r:_rs •_•. 771y1 ... 1 BLA( / ' l. . 2' ?tea "• .n..m..: .4. - ' / �I! 1210.1 / ,, 1 / /•„ ') (°001) 1 IT 01::4-:0.16 o0n il • + Ness,• ..• f ! 1 r 4' . alkM 4`\iQ .1173 i&u_, l i3 '� IG00 j 6 Yl• •• ✓ if " . �/i! `' '" - /I , \\0120'7) °I:_ .Xr (ca01). I „OS.113.20-•0 lout•) // i 4 70, r.(,' „'.. _ 1 \ r"',./...., A� / P , i ii I --- . , / .„...• t-,„. i i �Ii • ,(' ��0a ;Ml, j � /:11C .. '\ 1 • II 1/ ?;`/ /I l._. _ - +`t.; It i ,'� ';`.,4 .. '.—, - • •/ / .722: r , " 0007) • ' /T 1: 'h,.. '' 4 ..•.270 ! by\ ,, H L--'-- t (maw YOra ^n. 11 o'0.001f.r OS-023-70-1.-0 7 f t w, m _ u?ae 1l�iiwSFiT - ;S.m a -„n_� . •-'i M ipis • i t Y' \ 'w„ '. .,'CP-0.4, . \. e' /� .. awAerr / .w ___.__ -___ _..- y�� 4 ,p BI K11�I,G1/' '� I 2 y,�\. 's MA A ! .a LAKE ELMO \ J ' '� QUARTER QUARTER INDEX • 22 21 12 11 - - 1 INCH.200 FEET 0E00000 THIS DRAWW0 IS THE RESULT OF A EXwr mwle . m i. 23 2/ 19 N OF LAAO RECORDS AS THEY ' IRVEYOR'S OFFICE M , 1411111//X �" : �2 THE DRAWING R1a� °USD s WASHINGTONrs NOT NTER FnwO. APVISZtritIferlAratilitnuwnasrF,ma <?2<C .." MAP INFORMATION CURRENT ! 9 ,^$L;.".,<a9 F'•tP'. DATE MINTED:.k*25$995 E a . U, • • ' . . ._. . • „;-;-„„„.3..-E . . . • • . . . I - •••.,, . _.t. .,s 4 1 3 .... ., - , " " SECTION 4 • , IT . ,I i ,. ,, L ___L_I I 1 , I , ........: /...'• , . • .;.,..z. • 1 it ---..,--- 141iElliEllITS1 • __r STAG K IIIIS Dili ADDITION BREKKE PARK . 1 1 , N...--__,...2%...__ToRR___ _-....0._____.____.!•••!_.__--" ----,,, —11.1 7•Th 1 -..13 i- i,---- -- • -.9.... .- . - I "•_„•_"--'--..-1.1..-: ..... : s_4:-.1.41:.-..-ii 1 •Okle NM I .I M )N FT TONT•..lo al IN ';...-21 t . T-,-,- . . 13 ! . I . . .i .l . , ;•\,-..;...•00, , . , 1 3 ; 3 : 3 • i • •\ .\ z :3 i, , 1 " 1 I , sucek Er#nu'01)1110N i 1 1 % :.. I I i I --w ,„„. •. . .; -•-•-- -• i • I i ,'- ••-, / ,,.,0 CO 30.II'OW, I .4- 2 I 1 — ,- . . _. ', ,...• . . _ L.....\—• , .- : -------. .- ; A „;, • .133.1111S 14.13,11., ,..• o •••• o mo• OX eo,'.,*, j 3 ..•..,, .33i,•', • I „*,, 1 47 i ._._..._.._. Z 1., $ •I • ‘• 3 I • 1. 1 , ,.' ...., „., ,..- i...,'. ,*.I—, ' ' MIR ,...•••-- . • : ..... , • R •• ' ..,•,• ;.R., i.! I ! ,. i 4,, '....„ ,f.,..\'''' 4 1,... . r t .,_1•_,_,,_•,,1 , , i I , , , °-'._ I . . 12. •""' ', '''' '- '"' : '`"" • 1.4,,.. . :,„..,,,., „ 1.,,,,uoto pow , 44‘,..., . 1 , I ! '*`': 1 I I 1 ."'". I .."2.'..fl. sf''..•'.. 1, .1"..'1 '• .-.' .I, . . 1 ... Mut NOM .11 'at 15 ... t , 3 ; Ial OAK PARK HEIGHTS I . . • • - . 3 3 , • • 3 I 3 3 co •,...' O.,.1 oto',x...:,I4A1,442,I 1.1,11 ,•01, .•.3 • 1 oo,' I .. owl, ;., . ''' - i. l' 13'I ! it . . - ! , 14 I 1/0.1•: it...: ." " i "; "I o ,73.7, n s. o 1 , . ,, .7... .2.1 ,....!too.I \t,V ow ,or) ..edi . IM 1 a .„*,? "..... DNR PROPERTY . -. , ! i ,Nz.-, 1 , 1 — , •.,,.. . •I . WM Mil NOIN . i •. I 1."..' I. • I . 70 fPIS1 ----- . 'NO 70 LIJ • 1 3111/1 ' M LIJ • ••,,,........- : ,..,,, ......... / ) >. . ... . / .. - I. • c . ,a) 1 0 • . ,_ .. ........,....• . 0 • . / , (5 co 0 . . . . ... ........... . , , I ... . . ,.:,. - 0 1, I • ; . f I . . i.,. . • ...., ' . .• , . . - I " .........' i I -—--• ' .'.. ..,. , . I 1 • • I i • • - ... - I , )',V.I1 II.\... ' ! I ' -------71......(7?. Y '17.; ''.,...;:i.1•••••,.1,1 .,_- 11-172.f_r"`"...,_..............n.0_,.;%,.... "" -1.-- , '•'.:, 1 1.' • ••••"-• - 7-.Z.1.'.....1•...:-:-.7.,;-: •'.. .;..--ci-.;-:3= . . . . ..._; •-='•--•I AI 1.12ao NI pg,,,,,I I xi. L. _ ...... . (.3, ! ; -.737.,r 1........ •1• II •- -. C3tan, 1 * I I M0 '1 _ •'... / ". 1 1*I. 37. 'iI f.s : 3; . . 7-:-2—-.---V.n'!',1-i.:.-•Atc:',..„37,77 L:7- * . , at . N\ • I . „ r IC337; . i I , • 31 • ‘,‘ 11 i': 1 ' BAYTOWN TOWNSHIP •,, I /,... ,••••t i !! I •, t I , • . -- ---..---- _,........ ., '. .iiii – ' . i' i ; 1,, ...33'1 71 • I I 1'l';I 1. 1 • 1 • . ---..- "... -—----.1.• ''.'o* ' I.1 I. -4 ...!,•.! 1., I ion', 4 i . . . •. - • OW. It .'...."73;I:o , . • A I ". . . . . . [. -, •. ......,.....-4.y.iii....-.1.-ai«-4.- 1 .1••• ;,,-...-T-- - -•-7-7:71 . $ ;.. ,.:833. ;1 - . •• ...----'II its',t • ..-- . 1.":1 . .. . , . .04.5• ...AN ... I. , • . . . ' .1 .•••..„, I:, . . :'. 1 II-17..- i -..13Ni • ' •- 0* 13%.‘ • 1 o . _.1 s ,., , . a \ *.. :,..,..-1: os -,:t \A., . •, 1 . •• 1 1. . ,1042, . , VI ' 1.°' . . • N. 7,30•31 i .; 1 ... • 4.4 p.° . /,•2 . •4 -,-I .4"..r;O 1 - o . . - • . : s••••1'‘ . i . . .. . • . . •1,, -n .....—-—.. ---4,:-.--4116% .., i.,..:1.t.ii:.i 30.71 f.,.."'",......47,,,......:1 .........--33...........„,-;..- ........„:**"%,•O'7.t....., '•-• . . . 1 • . . " 1 • ., „', . , 1 70':• ..---, 4: • I L I, "'*--,, '""*.*••::o„,, • —, -. ,.....,..c7.;•' , . MA, ,o .....-4:'. M • • . •.-.-•••• 330.......;.""" . • ... 7 . 0°.;;;*. • . , • • • . . / I t- .....- , .. • ..;;""i• ..... 1. oro o o • "" -7 '' . . .. . .. ii I ,' '17 •; . ., ,'' .. , , • . . . . .. . de;* . ' I. S.^ i ; r .„.•• / , . . .:;:::.•,;_csr.4.t.,.1. .. ,,,.„ ,..,.. i , •I . ,.....-.•- ... i QUARTER QUARTER INDEX ...I.71....%,...i.,-;:. ..i.,....,.. . ..4 .21:st:U.....li . 1 RICH.200 FEET GEOCODE ,,..:0,.,,,,,,r•::.-....•• THIS DRAWING IS THE RESULT Of A COWART' 41...!,11-.1,03• M, Of LAND RECORDS AS THEY APPEAR MV ..,'.V....,.'.,I.......-:"..,2.. .THE DRAWING SHOULD BE • COUNTY SURVEYOR'S OFFICE . • .--3213 • CI COM 32 ' 31 42 41 WONFiGTONPUMIY IS$10RETIRE F' •• NO . NI GOVERNMENT CENTER ....r.V.7.4:=17:;:mahiarr,....... AMP INTONATION CURRENT. July 31, DATE PR M 33 R WO , 34 13 41 MTED..A . ural 261 . 996 '. . OTA 650824006 . ._... ... .. ... . ...... .. .. ,_.. , .,......... ....... .....- . . . • • ' . . • . • • • , . • • . . . . E . • cii • . ., .. ' . . .... . • • . ' • . • . . . • • • . . , • . : 1 • .,.' • , . I i .asl.tf. • , • 1 1 1 arzlv . i • ! , est.°-:' ,.• , , ! ;114;2 c) 4 ' ....?„,. __ _ • ,...,--,,,,.....! l'` '••wit.....--:-....e. , IF3'";,•?.. Z : .•- 1 :. ' - ; :i ri• 1; ,' ' %,* I i1;!;1' dakgh.,).,z''c•Gn&t'':)')','•,Cc-.'...' • --TII1;..c-.......,..->"..' ,E".E•.,-..-<l"-,-7S,,Il-,,'al1i7-4.-.'T,\-•,..\\Pi'.:,'.1..,,.,.;:.:;:l'/,/p',- :::-'`l.:'.•j,'.'• , _._''.'..2c;;.... - - L l• t. , ; t .•.}, \I.. ir443's iiII - - 1 J.L_ ' 1 I 0 \ .••"‘---;1`... -7.}...- • i ;; ----- I ; rn ;;,.: - • ..4„.„--• , , ; ....< .._ - , co, : A '• ...i", ,,:•••,•,,•;........!‘:•;-;-:--",- i •,.:. , - -• • cii ; ", 'i •••.....•••:••• ... \‘1,„\c7.------- ' -,... ;•1 .. i , ; ! •-• , ; 0 -.>" ' '-, ';•\ , z.:•,-• r', ,41 '•ri ,7'. 41 e.-)i;!. ) \ : •- ;t! 4-- ---ii-•F--- 1 I • i r • --. ..: -.;0 -,2 '.. ';',. • ri . 1 , if: f7 .,.• 2 Ill i I 4, .-c--" ---4-••" 6 If' ' v .4, c.=, ,., ; ;,.., „,„ ... , 7,.., ': 6 \ ,„--..,.••• • .,,,, c=:•a I os .--,__. "I cs•-,.-/.-..... .; \* t-- `, •'„ Ks .... I: ' ...:,- , •!-. -2 ,.;,--- ,,:,, -..", -";- i ' 'r.-- '1 ; , \ \ ....; • '. '* m a!..'..' c.....D i `?..-•'; • , ,, , ! I \ •-. - - .1 '-.\ g `'.-, 'V' ! ,, 1 ; \:„ ! - /. ••••• .„,; • , !,, ,"s• . '7'. 1 I \‘•• i 1 .1 ::".. '''.$:,'•• ,..,' ..!A. ".,I --------1 ,,,... .:,:t 1 i ' i'L 4,'" -,... ,T, LI. i =' <•=, t's'!,'' i 1 I ;': --..". .„.; ...,#,:44 ../.....:,<..... 4 ' - ,I.‘'•. 1 ...'i ....---.-. ; s•S - •...-• ' ' ::6-"-••••1:.•,.., ..r.---: :', !:. I , , ., %-,. . .... ,, , ,,,.„ - 1 i „- --, E., 1 , " gr. \ .. , , , . •,..7,,.., _...-_,,••••4 0' ..„...„ i • . . V Z - rg • •,,• ---,,,-- !ii; '''1 ''. _. • , ':.7. ; - ";- ' 1 ' j:, • ..1„ - , ', '''... __,4 , 4! -,-,..„. ••••4.,,. ' .r. \ 2 " '' : 1 ! :'•,' ' ,• „,„ *. 1'7. ! • %.'. 1 ' '''... C. , . :••.! \ ...-?. I ; • ..P. , ..4., „.. .. , ! laiiiiNC•i ", 9.1 IX .51.7. i • MN _...___ .................-- . ... --;;;: , ., ,•i•0 0;.4,,,,0‘!:•1',, ,,„ I ''''' •'‘. I I ..... • ;... I f 7= '• I:1\.1& _ 7-, ' ‘• • il1 co .... , .:Si , :•. ,.. • ; a . . 1 . ,.......:.,t.' A.., ,........, _,. ...... :, , .• , . , 1. 1 _____ • ._-- ,.. A „. ..; -- ,,,, •,..., , . , ...... , ,, i , . . , i . . . '3 .• I. ,, ' ti K If R :: 11 1 ___.-,›.i .- ,,-- - \ . I ,t `••• .! ........._.3,; / „ 1 ; • ' .! , -; ,/ !s. i - ..-- N .,. , N t,.! ;I, I • .= ; 1 A --. ._. I7. „,_ 1 1 ri • E. - .' •50' • ..,:: ••,•. ,,,.. 5 •'„ - ,. ,.,../ ... • , - . • , ,', %: • ', '•,'•,.. 2 ! ,.- /''-*---' • ..,„ • `',.., ''... „., • .6 •:.- ..!.• .c.- ... cn . , I .,, 4. ! ,.. ... . . 1 I I = . . / , •I i. I \ mmil- ,,, , .4. . o i I I , il ,„;. miom . /- 4 ,-.: . .. .1.'i ' , \ ''.I i .-; ; . . ,\ '‘,. . ••,!:-,.......,,,,ii.ikr, . • t'- 7„.,...-:-%','•- •'\ ': :\I; , -, ‘,.-7 4,.17.A,i.if'.'•••''', I 0 :; . 7,,,•,,,,,,,.,....;..,„.• _ i '41:F.4'..,,•;• ,.. A; ri<'s --- - ----- ---- -- ----- -- - - .----- -/-_ -\----..::"... ' •-t,:.... A.. 3: ; -. -I .: ry ‘, - ' 4.' ' l:,'''.4,:::.'!",•','.i ! - ;3 'Li,. . :-.!--b . , , • ;;..:'•.... - •• -•..•, \EE,....•.-,- •.o•::, . • . ,.._----- • ;:.,,' -r••:.-...;: 6f ;- ;!j..•g,...,., 1.,, :.:4:„, ;i- .,,.1 • al . '; •-- •;,..," i. %: ; ;" i 1.'' * '. . 1 ... '. a:. . , ' ft. .. .. 4 :' ''". ' . 03 ----; ' -...--- ''- \ ,.. 4‘.....„ ;..." \ i > I 1 . ..., ,,,•t , 1 . , i ro •i --I H ..-%c'' 16 '-• .:!;" . 1 g •- ta - .... •,.. __ ., : , II/50,7 I ;;; ''.Z 1 . %.,---,,,", ., „ • m - ••••.. • z M.O.151711715 7.- I - 7.: i/.1\•,-,:.• .•:, i , .... .'. • . :' ; a/ k '; 0 i i 1 . ..,•:1- ...__•..'" -4_ - /1, c:::,. .,,, - • , - , /.. .. .... , . 11 . , I• ',/' /'it/ `-.7., '4.-..---.1 _„ f . I Z I ___, • i „.... . . • . 9 --:-..., *• ,.; ......„(-„.,,,,r., ..„..„ , ,,,, \ , ..1, / i I ; * it/z ,„---,.- ; •••./ •-...`,.$ 1 .. f I : / ' •".'," ,`A,',-. \ ..` , .. .„3.. .... . ., • ,.„...,- r -- -....-\----- --"----••....,r . rt,- _2:4:.°1- - I ',ie./ , ', $ 1 1 / 1 • ----- _ : e • P • 4,,,'. 7?-. /1/i ';', ' I I er 1 i 1 4......„,, r Y, 1! ,I.,„ .„. ,----...„,....,.____;, , .... • \ , a g -.. i ';'•••,/ •4. j , A. x .. .,,..' - • ' 1 • • • . --„.••-• , - . ',. 7 - ./ ..• I'. 41 1 I ''-'' i •,• t : ;-...- I • ,..,,••••;;,,-•,.. - .I.E 5 •, / 1.': ' -• 'i i I Y: I '" ,A, ,i ; ,o,'‘ ;'''''-\:".'1. !.. "- ;z'o * ; i':'• ; 11 ‘ -.1 ...-,,, •.:.; , ,il„..f I .- ,. I • ; • .... *40,t,, 41"."6L--../ A"-- AV.,' F, !!./! 1 1 , ----- 00.,.. ; / _.; .,. -,- . . • !: -li! 1 ,"; ;/roi....__1 • ......, ''"of:;',',..; -.' ...7: , : i 1 , i• : ; • , ...?.,- ;:. • 7' /::, ....2 /i," • -'1 •H:, i 7. s,-,'"X .s.4.., -,.•,;6,;---..- ,: ' I 1 / I 's ,' -4k 40%',. ..:: , '•I .0 . • .L., . I,. --,t 6-n, - ; •••••.„., "-:_,....*::,,,,-„,: , t ...1.....14_,_.1.,_*1 ! -,,- ! , • , CO C- I i ' • ;t2 " 6. -6..6, f i '• , . . 1 . 1-'1 t ,*.i .ei? • . 1, -- .---.. • / // ;- -- .2 ' 72 -4 22'* i• :„.1S. \-N, 1 .; i ; 1.0 ,..g, . !. • :614,.x- ..R.16"‘"' • . . , 1 .ai„tr i ...„.....Nr),,,// i . - 1 ..„.. i 5„--: .. ....,....„ .....i....,, 1 --•^3 4 ;,.. - - I i; 1 1,4. oip I - I f-----.:- ...- __. -iri„, •,.. ' .-,• 1 Ari • -:•!..!-R- 0 ke:A'' • . F. . -4! . 11-- : , z .00, ,4:!„. -?!..• ! ';' I "r4• : - It ' - • I 2.2 i i .4.! - 4E,.. ..., 7 ! V+ -I ' ! :It... o •tp... 1 ; . 0 ; ; 151•-,, 'A -; I -4-1 Iti: i I .i 1 1;-LI 1 g i 5 „: "---".... I '... :: ! '9j, I \I 0 ! ; ' , '-'1. -- -- --! 2 e #. •-• - 1 1 ...„ i , _ ,•_......: . i t E,r,ii•SE§ -- I ; ''- I _ _ I .7 1 „„ t••'•- m„ _- ; ' •R,c12=-1 ; I FAI'10,0,Iiwi',,.:r I -:" ----------:7--- -7---- -1_.---- .45 Cn ZD .!, u'^"2 .... • ,... .„ , ,,.,!0, A,,IRx W.it.::,;) •_7, ,,..,-. .. ,.,„• f ... '. ,* "' I . aEt 4,;„Jt --. - 1. .---.. _ .= . -..\,. -Li, ;.•!.. - 1 ./- -; . '; -: 1 - :-I_ ii _.: ri III. 2' 1 ! ! '. sf,t. I '4....]:. . C .118 . -___ ;It? .. : P. ' ' '. - -'e, i I a a*. 1 ..,, . .'.•*,\I •I P s i ..P.t__!-----------.,. ::::„" ,;;•,e-.,11.1!;!..E. I,,., ...I, . .:,,_ ....„,,, 1 , ea • - , . I ....I ! 1 i . Ma SA • 0) , al ';•;-,':, ••' • - ',,••• •:' - l'' A i, s 1 ..;•:...,'. •; ,' a ; "------- .;; ; ..... 1 ' '; *::. -I I* --- ••'-i, ' . ' a; : ' - ,1 .1! l' 'II .\ ‘ ...'" ' s \ ;.'• \ 1; 7.i 1 li 9 il 1,. !S IN ?, '3 '. 13 :.•,': !la tda f.-; It 1 , , \ : ,, ••.-• • , aA; . .,•,. a ..,. 1. .,.._, ., , i, ....,. . ...... ,„..1,,,, ...., ; , • •-• , , .. I . I I 1 . , . 1 , ! . .• . .......---4.-7---.--„,.... .titt sum;: I1ESTN -----, -- ' ----.-----__:j.. .7 -....-'11--...--1,rr-1‘, 1 '..--711::17:---- -7-jalL7"; --' -' -1‘-ii\.ii OSGO0D AVENUE-"..:,.',...b,f''-'-'1 ms!'''''',...-- -' "4•1--'-'-"'-'-'"a'`.''''.".....,•:.:...P. 1... ----Tda"------jgc'---- . . - - --T---i---- , t, 1 ,1 i n .1 i ill' 7 t,. ;- 1-.1'1'. '..1 ! 'I 7!: ;; v 6.1,i _ • \I, t.. ! ; 'Eij 1 : • i '. ,..• : 0--'=-;; :;r;F-. ir num i :I - .74:-..- ; ' i 0=-'.4 ii '.1. '. I 11 • .: '-•': ,, : , ' -ft, . • ,:.-, :,;: . .,:!. 1 0 • : 4 i: ' - -thi, f I'A Rol:4 i .. ' ___-_-____. ,1 ..' . N .-2.• .. , Ai-- : , , ....,._.1 i 1 • , 'r- • ',.'' ! A 11 Ir„.Vi•I IM, 1 1 ; !. * I, • 1."; •7 ' 1 "•.i : I I 1 t 's _ ; il 1. 1. •1-----"-;,?-7---1 I , :', " I ..,.• j:• ! •4',''':::_:2_1, imm I • .1 "------ .!•'• .1*;;4‘.----'-'.- - ,*• . j ,.z:',, . . 0 . .1 • • A I le.41 , i i -., s i.. ... ••••• ... • !.. - :. - ; ! .t:, ,a. ‘ 1 1 -1 1 SliAt• 11' 7 ' / 7 .',Br-''4`.,,, % 1 i 1 1 !,.1 I.: 1 . 1 ;./ - -. • 1 1 : 1 ..1 -.,. 0, N. •.- 1 1 i ' ',--•1 .., •-.1 : :, 11 .1 .; /7 ,' / ..; . 1 ;4_ _, ;1 . 1 z); r: i.: • '- I 1 / ,,,, ,...>. .. !--- - , , , , • ! ? .1 . s A :5Tig1 - / /1 /://' ._. S.\ ; ; ,. !•• 7: L '. • I .§,.. 1. ....:..i 1: CO . ..., .. ,I II • * .. .,‘ ,,..• • ...I.., .....4. - . - .: .,.., •;',-' _,,,,. L.,; 5 . ;7. • p ,•• . • .-;-c'.,.\. !I.... ! ' ! : : • !-1 ;1 - - - .. i . . .. ....]: Ravg // 41: •.. !1:, ' : --- ' . :;.! l'; • r. :! / / , • ,, i'-' ! • : Ii • • : .: 1-.----;71 ??,t 1 _i•- ,2 1..' \ ' .; o' • i -„,c2' ,r,'" •• ; : I„f I > ' z.i )•,,? i•••' • i , 1 3 a -x 1 c, • - .-/ #0.' ; I ; I 11.., ,1:1 .-;•- -;-• : I „,,,-;•-* #0•-'; - i • il i I ' 71, Cr) : ; ; 1 ;-.^-:-• ,..",'-" ! " I - - • -:''' I II: . ' '';', 1- , 7 ' .,s1 -..'' 1' .' ' . , 0 • • • -:,• . -----r--____ , X IT,. --• :i el mil -- -HI ----/ .. e.,-,- ----7 II - Nom 't -4 1 i .1 0 . lir t Pal' •,s ------- ----' -:7;,:l"-"HI * ---L-_, - , i i i z . ! . STAGe° „--------- ‘. • I -i- .n.1 N. 4 \------\--41 -- - ..; "-------- *•------v• -7:117--- :5 -....--- 0.7-7--- . ••ty • ! ..--r--,.., _.---- -" I - :- .... .1 : ` . ,..................- : * V., :g EMIL............ ..... ! \ ,; 1 . ••• •'...''''''''. l' / Z \ \4*\ .i ' i i l'1 H • "-----1 x \6''Se.\ • 0 it ,i1g 9' ! . '0 \ • *\,. `. I 3 ! ! 1.! °111 -. i". • -17".•-- . ,, ---. ., ; ' '`. 1 X .. i ; • : ; , 1 ,...-„ .---;-, - • i it Is 'i"a:.•••ljtr, c 0 . i • til';`-1... .!.,;••• : Ill -.:!-------- * W . ti ,"..It...1.I' I'. ...:74 I. .8 I • -• .4.J.444'.#,!` 6" ' \ EC ' s '\.-- - I , a a :•,:.:i*:,4,::: >7.2 , x, N7 - • • : - -, • •ki;k4.:A:,*.,: ;>, -4 , 1 t t..• ,i,;„,;&..:..g.ii,,,,„;,;,:. ;74 -ci 1 r , 1 ' '-'•-- " ' 0 it ; I • •... ./......-. ! . ..- . • • • ' ' ' .i'!" .':::" '...1---jt- , : I . #. ; 4•,-,-N4--,t---•••,.--\----:-N. , -7-k. • ' • • t ' , Fi 3 i 18, ' Ya'•I'a!'s 1 '' 1 '.1).,!'. 5••••I k. :-- • ,.:- . . ....1 p All iT103 ! • .014,,,----7- #* • 1 . i : cro UpPONT i _ 1 ^ • I . 1 •--.- . le I le i ye i le I le I le; le! Ie .4. if y ;_i..•:. _ J 2._ : - 1.:::''‘i !- 1 ' - i j•---1.--•2---7. -!s-1.1,11, 1.4';- . • s '. '•2 -.• I 11,1:1 /7- -! --Ire- ; '9..1.1 11. 4.1:;':jsi!'•-at..''1';`..4!.::*'5''ej .;'e'4 tisk ••I .7-- • ee$111 ,,' , ; • .:: • ,ti .: _A-.0. ! ; : • . ' 1.1 liti 1,4i!'.:.: . 411B*I . 4° 1 :52 j ii • ...„.... een. en-...baa, - -- iiiig . . : • +- • , . . ; , , „, : • : , . ; -1-;•• -,• ; ,z.; _ -1-,_4,-,. -4.a'. _,..0::' ''.•-•ti. ;I -:'- r I • • s .•, . ,_.$•• - ,, I....„; ! ..:- . ..,i..t...„.,.... -...a.ii ."! a A a --!" ,..4..e.,, I....... ,0 . J! 1 ! ' , ,', ., A i-i I _..2.14,6_22.:, • `.. • - ' A . ' " . ir PI ' ' . - * '2.* ' : -,:'1--,-, -"' ''''''-- -c--- + - ---7-t,i• , ."-A-1. , 4 , , • - --- • , .11 ,„.,, r-, - • --, :i ,".. ;".:•• -••;:: •q•-p • ri---• $! ., , : : --, • , . :-.i., i !.' ...,•,--7-..L.,-,.....3 3 j .13.1.,,, . • - -!!..4.I _ • • .!:,..; .44.;;,-.,..t. . Ti , . . i ilcoe e e•p p: ....1 , •• 8, 3 A ' ..,--A .:1 A-3!e• 0, ,-1.a, --.1.... .;;i.i. ii"l• .,-' 1' , ° 4:3.1 Tr 1 ; j 1 /milli! . -1- '-,- .. . : •L:.; ;,_,,,;..,--. 1-- _: . •tt-:}1::::=,- .._,.94, ,,,L4,..,, -4: ; .4. n.. ..... i. _ _ -,..____--. a......1.1:4....10 ' . , 1 ?7 4 ••••7-:-. ; ,. , .1. ,,.., \",1 # ! . , . 1 -., ; ; ; 11+44":-t; •• ; : ; : •-1 •-• :-' a -•; :11.1;•;it i ' : 1#;; •1.1*-! 1 It ! ;i'it; .a6. ;. . ,,...-...; g.,!-0-,:a;i:2.•:„! B i:j!.•'•••441 T:14' i. I .•.;.. . . • . . 4 ..!.; . ,* t.!..•7.;••••• ••.; -.I • i:1..,, .1 1 .1, • ,..".1 .1., , .,.! ) :- • .'; -• o ...:•;...i2 : l• , , .i.:,... • 1 ; . . ' ' . '''' 1' . - •11-:•:,,i-_\!,4" .... `?„ : .. ,,, , =4-, 1 ,.., 1 ,z.: : , N. m;.11 1 : IV.11 :Ii 1.1 ii : # 11. ‘i! )- 1.i -4l 1•4•1: ; #A1-41-144 .1 l ,..1.. • 7''l•::11 ..A:1‘4 '.:11 lir''rg '.1 ''''11 !''' ' ' I±. ji i -l'' .'1'''.' ; -..s.''r‘1*ri I I.1:I.!.. l'I .....i...'.. ; I . i 1 1 gi61 ' ' ; ' ' 1 •,,,,.. ..-..."--.;',-.. ,•__ !, 1 _ i._ 47.j.• ;aaa. au 0,4-a-i' - --4-- ---i-- '--!-""!-!'"--"*"• '4---------- * "; , IHN; ..< ..<1 ; 1 ' e gigzi •----- 7- -- . .• 1 -''T T • , I - 1 0 I :g - , : : ..... ; •i, : -1...,s, ' „„ 1 ; :: a -1-1"al" "..1 ' : ! r5.41 Z." ''' 9)T., i.;..!...ri•-.:. : !.;.'"'.:«:?.! ....''.,1--"-:-' - '1 -24.1.4 41.,::A.1,1 i.,. I 5.1„.i.r.i.i.4.,,,ci. 3 41:1.); 2:/„._I iii,- :1.1 .1.1 7:14.- :1 1-II .,,..,....;...h.. 1,1-,.1.177-Th7-:,•I ...!•_,,.:.;.., % c.) , : -,-.1, •-: . ,• , 4, ,. ,..;,:: , , ,„. 5 , ;.1 ‘1••_. ••• 1,,.. .1 q.* • • . ...11.7 • •• ., , ; eb -tW, : • ' ' - ' ' -- 1 co 11 , •• r • • :A -: . '1 ! 7 . '.. ` •' ,. -- -- j ,s .. ll; I _ 1:-;!_: ;'.-. , i!;. 1- ',.. . :,- .Ji •r"..2 :•'3 - ! • .•: .; a•.:#.. • i..1•3-11.1;a:#.1#, ii :!..Z*it...1!.1-..••== 1. ti ,tti'lle: =la 1 alf-if•:.: .1!-; .1 • =••1!•*:: .e... 7. WO' ''#' : r • : 17-''' .9E'4-- . ' 1 ; ; : I 's '• : :' ''"''''';;;* .I-';;; ; -i •-; ' i! - ; :: ••i: ; ,2 ! ' , ' • !2 i • je ' : .:- --'-, ----1 . .-- ; ___ ____;___ ..,,....a, amp_ 1._____ ___________ ..',......aaa___Pa.._/aat,-__÷._.._---,.... • 1,.4.--..tbit--.01-- Uga--•-:------T--:,-- • :Ali.:,..., ...< .. • j 1 13.3 ,,'. '''''.'.*.''*•-• 1 'P ' i . •' 1 ' ' i.: • ..-. ' ' -i h k 1 ..- .- . '. '.^e!!ls _..::!....--.1 - i ''' 44e't5 !"*j.'"I ..!" i 4..':-'1g-1F!,,!!! " ?-1'11 1!"1:41 - ; :;-:',..:4,:,"71:':-,:-.1'r i ;-'1, t's=!';;:!,=- ; :',;,:•-1.'.'i 4,' r -•,:: 'I is , _---.. •:.--i : ' 1 t%'1-5. : : ' ; ' • _ l' ; ' -,-. : ; ' '.'' I - '.' ! • .... . ' ,t.,,,... ---t...-!‘ le • ' '' • 2111a1MIPIPIIP '• , ' 'i.,-. -•,1 I PUMPIIIIIM , i • , i• - : ,-•- ,.. 1 : ,.:...,.. ., , ----- -4 1 lim.,;:i ..,, ; :••; • . . • , a . • • • - . -- ;- - ; • , ; . 1 •• ; I 10 ;c:•.,: I . . , , • , 110 ;cs. . • i . !CO 'eS . • ta i . . . .. ... . ._..... .._ ... I 0 ` • Figure 27 i /.. '3 / # /.. %/ ,r.OAK PJ3tK H 14 A. h. '.,/,/ / '/./ / ,' 021 2010 :;• je F�QSTuusII;� i r ,i/i, ' -'1 • • • -,••;-,0-:•-;•-;-:-.--,-..,•:......t.....\ /. •.71• 1'98 ., , OA°. • • • ' • • . • • • • ' • • • • 4 / j,/ 1.••••• • • • ....-:. . • • •1•.•:.-.-..... . • • • ---..-/V/ ...,,,, /,, 4,——— _— • t.•. • .QRBAN I ON ARS ` t 1 11 ,t unde�eloPeble lid �. ll 1i . dudes 27 acres Pt park timid and 91 '� woo ��i810x/ TJ_ ; Y8 2020 WJSA ' ' ' fox osk i�l, rr� YShg 2010 USA ��,/...� 0 ylAS 2000 musk uusi ,,.„,,,.,...............--Odra' Group Inc.__ er.+the WA r� 1101.511110,031 $oe= Wig MAP 8 SA EANSION TM, .. c oistipitEREN SIVE City of Bayport.• Minnesota III III City Council Minutes 11/26/96 Page 5 - for Dir-ct• n' . a Procedure to th- Cit 96-11-37 - A.O. in. Pr cedar Mayor Schaaf , seconded No . .n Inf.rm-1 M. .hts _ Adopting a CouResncil cil fo i he f Oak P_rk Hei _11_37 Staff Ac the Citmatters Council formoVed to adopt Resolution g6 informal Park Heights . by Robert, staff activitieha City procedure directing Council for Robert , moved presented to seconded by money Carried 3-0 . recon with the Mayor Schaaf , 61, 000 , . 1 th Tr Lev 1997 tax levy by $ Pro••se proposed Carried 3-0 - to reduceothe p balance. Dat- from fund ive plan W•rksho- meeting to come _ Com,reh-n Taxation Me-tin. and Truth-in-Taxation Hall . •., r h that the r 7 : 00 -Ta at Tax Lev A Schaaf stated Taxation Chan es - Mayor Tuesday, December 3 , 1996 a is Truth.m. at previously will be held with Washington doption meeting p e moved• a conflict Tax Levy needs to b Due d the 19971996 Hearing date, December 10 , Ve plan Tuesday, Comprehensive omprehensi needs to be Work scheduled for noted that the3rd also Mayor Robertson December two events . AdministratorRobertson scheduled for 1997 Tax Levy rescheduled originally combining set the for Wednesday, Robert, moved plan Workshop Adopt seconded by he Comprehensive Schaaf , 3-0 . and Carried Adoption date 1996 at 7 :00 p .m or Schaaf , Time - Mayor time of the December 18 , in• t.r to 7 :00 Co nci M-- approve changing 6 :30 p.m. p.m .e in t moved to pp fromTuesday, Ch-n Robert, Council meetings seconded by City meeting is scheduled for regularly scheduled Council The City uist next 7 : 0 0 p .m. Turnq Dec 1996 at elect December 10 , - Councilmember- meet with .ntract of the Council and then make a Admini that one two members contract that Mayor Cit or go over his suggestedwas in consensus Robertson Council will meet their Administrator Council . Turnquist Council at Counhen b ber-elect recommendation 0 Schaaf and then bring a receTm10 ,a1996 tion to Robertson ar eeting on December Schaaf noted a next regular • .n - Mayor MNDOT bridge gridie Dis uss the proposed. by Robert, New S • rep er article that stated secondeddtht a er Mayor Schaaf , recent newspaper Tanned. 11_40 a resolution into negotiations mayonot proceedpv as p Heights enter to approve Resolution park explore options ne for moved City of Oak firm to proposed river authorizes the Hannan law any new O' Connor, ' s interests in with the the City representing Carried 3-0 . crossing. III III g6 Council Minutes 11/12/ City Co reviewed the page 5 Engineer Ander? 1 ted that City Eng Anderf ik stated by the h With -a• Protection Plan proposal ; on plan is mandated City proceed the we11h d protec Wellhead Protection the includes Wellhead t °f a We ad erlik recommended which development tat oofeMinneso,Itellh P Protection Wellhead phase I of the on area. area. the wellhead protection managementty. following: er supply vulnerability.• Delineation on of drinking `''agement area member • Delineate water supply man Councilmember• Drinking f findings .hidings estimated at $26 , 480 .00 . 6, 8 he expenditure Pas Protection • Repapprove 1 cost of this phase nson' moved o f Phase of the Wellhead ed the The c by completion Council review seconded Kern, s comp - for the 5-0 Re••rt e $26 ,480 Carri Financial budget figures . a Bud.- rd third quarter 1996 b Robertson ons • memo 1.96 B o f the th Administrator SalabY and am�,,rorkshop summary Recommendati•n 199/ employee tabled Mayo Sal.r ding the proposed tha this issue and salaries budget or Schaaf requested the Mayor Schaaf ed to requested discuss the 199 _ May and schedule a Cit be scheduled and Bud.e item City and -d 1' . x L discuss on this d budge os tax levy work Council table scuss the 1997 t tea that tl'h proposed Taxa ion Hearing workshop t° di Robertson ri d before the Truth an. Administrator should be reviewed lar R_commen•a seconded by budget December 3 , 1996 . f 1.9/ S - Mayor Schaaf ,ember 26 , scheduled f.r Discu vio and Bud.et o f Tuesday, 199 Salary Worksho• Date 1• •� Tax Lworkshop date o discuss th and Budget . for he Pro 0smoved to et a 7 :00 osed 199 Tax Levy Council meeting Robert 6 :00 p .m. the Proposed p0 p.m. 1996Recofrom riaatoriThe degu1996yw ll begin at ve Plan _ a workshop Worksh Carried 5-0 . November 26 , C.m•reheris Dyed to set review the Tuesday, he b Kern, m t° to f.Swenson, seconded y Kern, 0 P 'm' date o• D- er Swenson, er 3 , 1996 d 5-0 CounC o mTmb Tuesday, December • Carrie date s Comprehensive City' • Enclosure E • Associated Consultants , Inc . - . Northwest Ass • DESIGN • MARKET RESEARCH AC COMMUNITY PLANNING I `'�� AUG 1 41996 � i \), MEMORANDUM TO: Mike Robertson FROM: Scott Richards DATE: 13 August 1996 RE: Oak Park Heights - Stagecoach Trail North - Land Use FILE NO: 798.04 - 96.16 yourAs request, I have reviewed the issues related to sub eine Bellision n r edevelopment of per q owner of the of residential properties along Stagecoach Trail North. the City regarding the processof property at 5416 Stagecoach Trail has made an inquiryroperty th for r esidential subdivision. The parcel is 1.44 acres and e southern ern most pomes s a four residential homes along Stagecoach Trail. Surrounding sla the wetland and Valley View Park to the west, the reclaimed NSPFacility toto the south see north, Stat State of Minnesota Prison to the east and the United a eattachments). prP slag site, our ocess the of adopting a conditional use permit forth TheNComprehensive Pice recommended a change of land use for this residential areause of the site for low (1979) and East Area Concept Plan (o9f the Comprehensive) indicate a lnuinPlanu pdate, it may be more density residential. We believe as part o riate that the area south of the pond on the NSP site aswell as industrialefour use.residential The ppor p properties be programmed for eedand to Wastes site are not conducive to surrounding uses, especially prison family residential use. Additionally, the existing wetland tothe the est a dt the and park ngle f y area of the NSP site provide adequate test in seal ng the developable opable portion of its site and has uses. NSP has expressed an sidential p encouraged ed the City to look at options for redevelopment of the re Comprepropevei s to the south. These recommendations will likely be Include plan for consideration by the property owners, surrounding residents and the City Council. I would recommend that staff review these issues with Mrs. Bell to help her understand the process and options for her property. 5775 Wayzata Blvd.• Suite 555 • St. Louis Park, MN 55416 • (612) 595-9636•Fax. 595-9837 1 ,1 ,i'` NSAI I\ \ ./,SJ,� t :1 ; ' ,o,_ 3600 3552.:- aNs' •l ; , it 1 i � ..161 f e .` - -- - r� D: t 4` _ a 'uWj i e _/`� t �. �Q � ,+alit9 • ' '7 50..••..+.1 • int \ .111 /0 , t-1 . r0 .6 01) la : sioo •.- , ,ttoo •' " L___/5.. .._511I -i--.. \ 57 th S7 R N. '•.�• - n � 2050 '�\ �+ 2, - 4 t sa�W ,,�/ �.:�.... e , \ • �® \ \\�" Enien-to-07, e d t � µ • <� � lC - _i_- G L ` yC t /O CSO __CD iL1L/7ne4 t..,."01 't '.'L 10 maw ptt i t 56th SI . N. �./ / t �' ill I ��� \\ \4655 4600 2 / E ®Q ;'� - t•et �. 122 l41 ''''---•.._.----- MEMd tWIER LL REsVt4T 0M 6th -ST. N. - • \ t o ••' ) t t o ...3:*_ 'w ' ��M --' _ r SITE �� 1 � I , NSP �N , • _ • 4500 / .. !TATE OF YINME SOT \ SI t. ) / 2 • 2074 1 • / '.co I2/ 4550 2 3950` Q ` (31 �{ PAiK NSC GN TS I P OiERTY / / `� ,.'''p • / l31 • (/4/ 1 .. - • I .r - t0 .... :R:Nm EVAN ITITMERAM NURD! _ ,1,,,rT/r, t'tt•5 ..y•r i,....7. I% /F7iii�i Fi5>FFFF///(ITYJ Q� • - ----------'I---- �- vi"- ,_._22003.2403 / :0%5,,.ff%.-'--'.'�! -._2200)-=fro • .T,..,� 3 ;...Fr I °A // 1_ '3456 /* _-jjpui-2406 / / j 6 gs BELL PROPERTY lzi -. •rte I.t i In I` STATEPRISON 12 . MINNESOTA I T •I 60003- . '/ 22003-2410 1 4250 (/1 \ 1. 60003-2070 (31 j-/ 1i . \ II .i 6CA:103- 4350 4350).;\ (4/ (y• .....) i Y i 60003 v ,) '14\ 4400 V - - 1. /5/ Qi'---......„ �y 1 1 7 rGGyy "-Ns_5 t t i o i /-1-1/ ~ � 22320\ 3 22003 2330 • (/i rE. 60003-2072 1 {•• l21 1 1 I t• :I •/ 1J v� •ii, i 7/el • 1 /----------------- • c . 0. -- I t- \--;-------- -------:--1 ...---. 4....E 7777Ti//r 3 = • CITE OT OAR PARR M�GNTS- %7/7- //771177/1T17T1 /7-l.'///lJJlr//// Ill/!/T7%):17T/7/ '1 • CE • TIFICATE OF SUR EY ARTHUR M. HOLM • LAKE ELMO, MINNESOTA Minnesota Registered Land Surveyor No.7447 Wisconsin Registered Land Surveyor No.S-845 FILE NO. None Laverne Bell , 541b Stagecoach Trail No . , SURVEY MADE EXCLUSIVELY FOR: Firs. Stillwater,- ,'.inne so to 55032 DESCRIPTION: Survey of part of the NE1,4 of the SW;.; • MEMORANDUM • rikC Mike Robertson Tp: �g121595-983 Scott Richards 595 997 FAX (612) F 45: 18 February 1 Comprehensive Plan Amendment pATE NSP .04 - 7 .0 RE: 798 04 _ 97 .06 Np.: for the FILE Amendment e. e plan ft Comprehensive amendment serves to the dra The amen hat will be included in d attached P reZon�n9• d text t N 13 9raphi cs an is please fin ted by the at the publ area affec pistrict e• amendment e amendment omprehensive Plan Updat the Planning this rove royal . C to consider 1f approved, and approval .the will need City Council for 25 February 1997 . g97 Council for re Tear n9 scheduled to the Metropolitan r hearing will l be forwarded [ ��1=� w� Council Mayor and city lt, ___JEB , 9 pc: Mark Vierlin9 0:11 ‘1\ ' Joe Anderlik T LOUIS PARK,MN 55416 ARO • SUITE 555 • SAIN 5j75WAYZATABpUWEv ORIGINAL YELLOW • FILE COPY PINK C FILE Y HEIGHTS OAK PARK CITY OF AN REHENSIVE PL CAMP AMENDMENT /-47i ..,...111:2,%,,,. � ,�, NNING DISTRICT 13 114\k,''VS,Bialtaz,,,,.„, p 111,1 sa ®1,--,v,:4,;,-t.,.__�`oNE 't 1111111111 .ir y.k �� r_IIIIIIIni" / t { { ) Rte. �x I xN 24 a tttg i.h-t ,x+1 9 :.;7-,k;:‘,,,,‘1 ,835:4,-,:z.-j4:,,,, , ,,i6!:,'::' ,.1T-,=',-..,7',:,:,''''.i ,',f.,'_-_,I:p. 111111... .. �,�p�� MI it :mss ,x ..... .............t...,,,i„., :um: ,,,p,...... .. . 4/ 1 41', -��-�i „ Iwo , ,511.:v „fa: j. g. po•. '� . nl .cplPu• -� '_��. / t • FEBRUARY 1997 T AS50c ' ATED CONSULTANTS N O R T t-1 W E S . TABLE OF CONTENTS FLagg 1 Introduction. 4 Housing......................... 5 TranSPodation......................... 7 Sewer Flow Allocations.......................... 9 District 13.............................. AMENDMENTCp�APREHENS PLANNING DISTRICT 13 P OAK PARK HEIGHTS • • INTRODUCTION to its Comprehensive South of an amendmentlocated north iv acres Heights is proposing Ian for property subject area an 2.2 The City of Oak Park He19he City's land use p 2) oral Facility. (Seelan for map on page A.S.The ing Ash arep the purpose of amending art of the 59th Street ands of ofh Beach Road tilized as p Duvet Northern States P in size, 1.9 acres of which is owned by Ash Disposal Facility 1.9 acres), A.S. King shedeused r north of 59th Street ( small utility The property utilized as an entrancele and contains a for Cover Park. The (NSP) and ►s u el vacantarea Company ( This site is largely parking ted by NSP). purchased by NSP and had er h s opera is also utilized as a soccert'field p north of and (operated property (.3 acres)was recently 1 9 acres located NSP' frontage road extension Street land south of 59th Street 36 and 95 realignment, homele which has been removed.36 The family part of the Highway proposed to be acre area land use designation of the eequested land use construction of the St. Croix Bridge. es in the la ur nae of theA.S.area from Ash id Chang Thep p industrial area This amendment proposes is to be utilized for landscaping mid-density residential of the existing and the lDi to m provide for a expansion areazed Facility amendment is toY) p exp A.S. King Ash Disposal Disposal screening Much of the proposed Disp toprovide for a buffer between the t of the and le family system single family residential uses to the s transportation the first three sections include transpe impact in 's housing opportunities, District 13, reportln use ad into four sections,tamendment to Planning proposed Oak andThis proposed land use amendment final section is an be inserted within the entire Planning r flow at and i ns. This Section may description andsewerewe pct land is located. which the subject Plan and it includes a Park Heights District. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PLANNING DISTRICT T OAK PARK HEIGHTS 1 s ° N =& o3a CC CI CC . 0 . / 0�Pu- / /" �� G /../ \\C\\\ \\ Z 0 ui • l�li���'11;1�� 005 \ \.. _- cc n n • V a. j ����111,1�'1,�,1c� W I '�I��\\\\ �111111 _ _Illy` ••I '=Z¢y\,1 :1;4. r0a u/ t'11 1�I +'.f>�\P\ `,1 X11 .erli g1 a; WT \\\ ��� 11 •.' 'ySJs� — D O i ),.. �1 ,4 �'•i itdis C �` • l 1 'il} �1 '' y • r. m V V 111 44p/ .1\ ''11 j1k\t1411. .Ai 4 ••df Q :ice•` — ^ E 76 074441:Ng% / ,,,,\ it ,�y� t'.tiv�° •�+.J'.!.'�.l '''\\\\'\\ tijI ,. } �1fl�. rO,r�•a�aa4'�:•;;� lrir 7a .rJ�%'•I:� ` � 1 1�1d� ♦• , 1 \ 1 .titin ••oi:4••. 0 .111.41111111111110Iiili!!!!;;-' i.. �e al ••i\"40#41.$1.44y i m \ 431411 tui•'�%�'':!: d •fir?;•ti. �.s ,.....WWW::....? I- a 3 i1 fir.• t, N s�'i.t4•.v , < :<•_ ^ i— I \\\; ' i - f ` ' S L"f?�• \\ i4§Y; ,- '''..-.1- .M......% \,Ni'...•'...., :2-:•.:.:if:A.0.-§.5t....Orr:""•%. --- -- -----: 2-- • .0 0 'N cD. 'V d • p3Y'•:"•'3� .< i?:iii ,�V•ror•1i''.'�•r�+i'.� _13 tr. .� b J ::z;;: ;:y d:•:' F:LY ..1 t[ <: i`:i'i ; •�►��rt••1 y+Ild••.� —_ p •-0 ..' 41.` ixSiI • + ___.________._.--__.__.____ 0 E\ ..... :4 :.it..k_____--,_______._._.________________________:: imiriljI I . Ir', I Ts.El I .... L_- -Ilittlb ..:... ..,:,...,.„,_,I.. .. -------------- niii CC�Y i _ ,.,1 ' T I \____1 7.1.7.:::-.7;:- 4,, 7;::-_-.:,':.:,•••,:•:',,•:-:;:,•••:',•.Ail: -7-',-, • ,i:. N (n (.41, 1k ': ' : ,,.4::::::..:,.:.:„.-:::..„.:Al , :: 1.. m -;. ., wvf .i.'\7,.,\ I is _ -§ SL 1 .. ti..------r----mgas-am. , , •••,:.\ atta. a) SC-1"- . \\,, 4ssif.a li \ -,,,:',.t,.,..... 740 ❑�0O0oOD ,\ ll • • , _,.______-, . ,___,..._ (I) 1 z- :,_.- -5. ei ,..7'4,' L.V 1 g ",,. :„. _ .. 5 g F. i Z E r 6 ) g Q W //‘ ra R m NZ 1K\ - -.O m. 1 0 11...... //� ul�77 .I u1n u IIIif1 wa 11111(11 I •• �-- Z u i, p 111. �..... -�_� �d I AttmI f ii i� , \ Z Nf-vWIiW;:L ._.1 NII,• y- • 2 tT t-,I l 1 Q MMillia ,i . I�.1 l 1 `--cam . L.l'iL.l1L':i:LIC V _3. LLi_��Il —��— — .r.... ;,--_.—_.__._0-0_11 s .. ,� 1 • ■ =. 1I^ WO •.W tk- 11 L.---,7,,, 11 — 1 il il10, Q ,__L-_;77,;%;5-:,,,J. L I1llill I G ri-.:l n 1 f 0 I Pm:E'ID a I „iimm::., - I �: amm Iii' d •= _ ._ ..., .5. 1r/ ®W V ® igi 2 .=. L' t' ! : IA Ill 3 d 1 1 I hoc II ir • . HOUSING The proposed land use amendment eliminates 2.2 acres of land that is currently designated for low/mid density residential development within the City's Comprehensive Plan. However, 1.9 acres of this land has been utilized for industrial uses as part of the A.S. King Ash Disposal Facility, and will eventually be part of the construction area for the MnDOT Highway 36 and 95 realignment. Therefore, the majority of this area will never be utilized for any type of residential development, no matter what the proposed land use is. The City is a participant in the Metropolitan Livable Communities Program which encourages the development and maintenance of affordable and life-cycle housing in the Twin Cities. The City of Oak Park Heights has established future housing goals for affordable and life- cycle housing through negotiations with the Metropolitan Council. The City's current Metropolitan Council indexes, regional benchmarks and negotiated housing goals are currently within or exceed all of the Metropolitan Council's regional benchmarks for affordable and life-cycle housing. The City is currently in the process of amending its Comprehensive Plan, a portion of that amendment will include annexation of portions of Baytown Township. Designated land uses in these areas will include single family and medium density, therefore, the potential for additional residential housing within the City will be available. Because of the pending roadway improvements and future annexation potential, the proposed land use amendment to reduce the potential acreage for medium density housing by 2.2 acres will not impact on the accomplishment of the City's established goals for housing. OAK PARK HEIGHTS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PLANNING DISTRICT 13 4 III • TRANSPORTATION Road and Highway Network The and subject area is served by State Highway 36, Beach Road (County RoadStr Thesndroa h s Street. Direct access is available ff of buth ncBonahc classification ication of roadways as follows: are defined by the Metropolitan Council's ► Highway 36 - Principal Arterial ► Beach Road - Local Roadway ► 59th Street - Local Roadway Thep urpose of this section is to determine the impact on the proposed land use amendment on the existing and future roadways in the area. Trip Generation projections following are based upon the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation forecasts: TRIPS GENERATED BY THE SUBJECT USES ACRE OR UNIT UNDER THE CURRENT PROPOSED LAND LAND USE AVG.WEEKDAY VEHICLE TRIP TRIPS GENERATED ENDS SINGLE FAMILY(2.2 ACRES) 6.5 TRIPS PER UNIT 11111111 BASED UPON A MAXIMUM OF 10 UNITS PER ACRE AS ALLOWED UNDER THE CURRENT PLAN) SOURCE: INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS NEE .RIP GENERATION FORECASTS NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CO TRIPS GENERATED BY THE SUBJAMENDMENT PERACRE OR UNIT UNDER THE PROPOSED LAND USE AVERAGE WEEKDAY VEHICLE TRIPS GENERATED TRIP ENDS INDUSTRIAL(2.2 ACRES) 59.9 TRIPS PER ACRE SOURCE: INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS RIP GENERATION FORECASTS NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED Based upon the above trip generation rates developed by the Institute of Transportation ineers the land uses at full development, under the proposed land use amendment Eng , COMPREHENSIVE NL N AMENDMEING DISTRICT 13 OAK PARK HEIGHTS 5 • • TRANSPORTATION will generate less trips than would the full development under the existing land use plan. As shown above, the land uses under the current plan potentially will generate 143 trips per day, while the land uses under the proposed amendment will generate 132 trips per day. Therefore, the proposed amendment will lessen the impact on the local and regional transportation system. Improvement Plans As previously indicated and shown on the following page, the subject amendment area is located within the Highway 36 &95 improvement area. Improvements for Highway 36 & 95 and the St. Croix River bridge were programmed by the Minnesota Department of Transportation to begin construction in 1997. Highway 36 is to be reconstructed through Oak Park Heights (to a limited access highway) with intersection improvements at Norell, Oakgreen, Osgood, and Highway 95. Highway 36 will continue east across the St. Croix River and touch down on the Wisconsin side. Highway 95 and Stagecoach Trail are to be realigned within Oak Park Heights, and an east-west frontage road is to be constructed to connect Highway 95 and Stagecoach Trail with Osgood Avenue. The extension of the frontage road to Highway 95 will create the most impact to the area affected by this Comprehensive plan. As shown on the map on the following page, this roadway will run through the 1.9 acres of land located north of 59th Street. However, recent events involving the construction of the bridge over the St. Croix River may delay the timing of this construction project. OAK PARK HEIGHTS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PLANNING DISTRICT 13 6 • • PLANNING DIST CT 13 AMENDMENT HIGHWAY 36 / 95 PLANNED RECONSTRUCTION 1.--1 HIGHWAY 36/95 PLANNED REALIGNMENT ROUTE NFAAC AREA OF NSP PROPERTY This map is for planning purposes only and sheuld not be utilized when out measurements an required. eeeeeeo mum= 400' 0' 400' 800' f, ' \ 0 ' ire p "11` e= �•♦ �. - 'r '- ,;i., a—u ‘.__ =9 6....In == i -` �A .,..4,„,,, ,,,,m,� � •a 0, Ik.,.. )111. NSP PROPERTY I 1 11 00irimil � ; IIIIM IIIIMI M \ 4... * —wilt ima,:w YI dw `s„..,I _` •1'. .. NOM I INIIIII '' �j rol=111 mi tam I. am 1 2 - \_ r ' , - 1\ \\‘ SOURCE: MNDoT and Washington County Highway Department • SER FLOW ALLOCATIONS Within the proposed land use amendment area it must be determined if the change in the land uses can be handled within the existing system and sewer flows projected for the City by the Metropolitan Waste and Control Commission. Total sewage flow rates within the amendment area have been determined for the uses under the current land use plan and the proposed land use plan. The two rates are compared to determined the effect of the proposed land use amendment on the system. Current Land Uses Proposed Land Use Single Family 2.2 acres Industrial 2.2 acres Sewer Capacity in the Land Use Amendment Area Projected flows based upon complete lot occupancy for current and proposed land uses in the amendment area are as follows: Current Land Use Plan Low-Mid Density (10 units per acre maximum allowed -2.2 acres) 22 units x 2.5 persons/unit - 55 persons 55 persons x 100 gal/person/day = 5,500 gal/day Proposed Land Use Plan Industrial No development is proposed on the site at this time, the land is to be utilized as an ash disposal site. However, general industrial development would generate the following flowage: 2.2 acres x 1,500 gal/acres/day = 3,300 gal/day As demonstrated above, the total projected flow under the proposed land use plan is 2,200 gallons per day less than under the existing land use plan (assuming complete lot occupancy under both development scenarios). It is unlikely that this property will ever be developed with an industrial use that will generate sewer or water flow due to the fact that this site is located within the future construction area for the Highway 36/95 improvements and the St. Croix Bridge. Therefore, the proposed land use amendment will not have a negative impact on the projected sewer flow in the area. OAK PARK HEIGHTS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PLANNING DISTRICT 13 8 • ti PLANNING DIS CT 13 AMENDMENT EXISTING LAND USE PLAN non= PLANNING DISTRICT BOUNDARY D LOW/MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL NMC WAN COMMERCIAL This map isfor planning purposesonly MININDUSTRIAL and should non be utilized when exact measurements arc required. OPEN SPACE 400' 0' 400' 800' ma .OM \ 0f% 111 At 11, / =w. newiewom mar •'R m eAmer maw mime gma a+: w �e>..=... son :1111,,, •'0.71:1A .111,,‘ 1 ....„..." 1I \ •,,,,,,a: tip.= == ,,,\. ®a sant . ,ems= 3 � �. v same I.4, 0 amen Inn \ • 1-.<:--,:'‘‘,..i.1.;,:_:,..,::::,..,:::.:_.',:."::::::i:r",,.1,,„ iiii fi _:,...,Y,::::1.,'",::iLLI:;1::::,,,::.:',.. ,:!",.;,;,,,,,,,:ilii,..;.::'..-:,:,',.:',',,,,P.ii,#4,- ,,,.,Milialso Eiltraj 111FAMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiii ' t k ,, 'iJ SOURCE: City of Oak Park Heights Comprehensive Plan,1979 9 • DISTRICT 13 District 13 is an older neighborhood consisting of single family homes, type uses, a bar, and a small neighborhood park (Cover Park). Consid several industrial devoted to the street system and NSP easement. Significant to o ra erable land is also characteristic of the district. p 9 phy variations are The neighborhood is linked to the rest of the community by means of Highway 36. Zoning within the district is as varied as the land use itself. he majority of the neighborhood is zoned low and medium Beach Road across of land zoned Industrial, Residential Businessnsity residential, and thereTs a scattering Business. Transitional, Open Space and General Several significant problems have been identified as occurring in the neighborhood. significant is the advanced state of deterioration evident in Most many of the district's single family homes. However, as part of the Highway 36 & 95 im ro construction of the St. Croix Bridge, many of these homes have been purchased Minnesota Department of Transportation for road right-of-way, p vement plan and and have been demolishede It is estimated that 37 percent of this district is devoted to street right-of-way, potential for construction of the St. Croix Bridge, this percentage ill increase.and with the the district's streets are relatively steep and narrow. Many of This district has traffic and circulation problems due to the lack Stage Coach Trail and Highway 36. Stage Coach Trail carries nearly all of thetion betweenr ' heavy truck traffic generated from NSP. As part of the MnDOT 5 Realignment, a connection between Highway arty all of area's will be constructed. g Y 95, Stagecoach Trail andlOsgood Avenghway 36 & ue Incompatible land uses, such as industrial uses located residential, have been sited as an issue within District 13. Landscaping adjacent to single family must also be maintained in order to provide a continuing buffer between these The expansion of the A.S. King Ash Disposal Facilityrequired p g and screening landscaping along the southeastern propertylines in land uses. quired considerable screening and residential uses located south of site. order to provide a buffer between the As a means of facilitating pedestrian circulation, the City hasro ose in the location of existing Highway 95. This trail would be constructed realignment of Highway 95, and continu p p d an overland trail following the Additionally, on-street trails a to the north and south alloong Highway 95. (paved shoulders) are proposed along realigned Highway 95, realigned Stagecoach Trail, and the Highway 36 Frontage Road. OAK PARK HEIGHTS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 10 PLANNING DISTRICT 13 • DISTRICT 13 Planning recommendations for the district call for a vigorous program of rehabilitation and redevelopment. Creative design approachesg housing it system redesign would create a favorable opportunity to provide new housing. A street mixture of new single family homes as well as mid-density owner occupied clustering housing would be desirable. OAK PARK HEIGHTS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 11 PLANNING DISTRICT 13 Enclosure is 0 MEMORANDUM 411 t Mike Robertson TO: irITA FROM: Scott Richards 18 February 1997 CDATE: Amendment (612) 595-9636 FILE NO.: Oak Park Heights - Haase Comprehensive Plan Am FAX (612) 595-9837 RE: P 798.04 - 96.20 the revised Comprehensive laneAmendn entdrafor tthe Hlaae/ find attached The primary c g on Osgood Avenue Haase/ to includeg erict area area. town Township d business/warehousing land use classiSficatio . has been. to the shown as Bay traffic generation,as part of the desigr 1 ned ewer flows, All of the eencadjusted aul ations ccordinglyea, etc. have b Mayor and City Council pc: ` Mark Vierl ing N---f6T----i 5W ' ' U L._ 7,, FEB 19 �qgj << Joe Anderlik \.\t 5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD • SUITE 555 • SAINT LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 WHITE - ORIGINAL YELLOW - FILE COPY PINK - C FILE . 0 T • M C ITY :OF oAK PS •RK HEIGHTS COMPREHENSIVE ; PLAN AM j d STATE TRUNK HIGHWAY 36 �, PLANNING Z)IS RIC l Yt -.,--,-,-,;--,,,‘,,,:(;.„-..::::,..c P ' 3Ft A�y 1 f� F(1RES6TflSTRfT- i .s LMI t k �Hyl „ , ,.i ��i. I I i J7 1� , I'l �II I z � \\4 i 'mos !IC '� , ®�® h —_L'i �( �� Gt• �� ® ��'veve _ Z. �� � ,•�_� - - [V.49C- :' nru..-,-1iii.niii:=sin �11111gIIlltr.4. ®�� �� � �`1 -vryp nu I r ii.Z nP � nnr�ri'31H1P1I \ • ... rar rm � ....,%. n w rr f MI err "��V� I 7 .11111111 i11r GS. ; 1 FEBRUARY. .. 9 7 lS.. 'T°' H W . E .S T A S ..S O C I A :T .E' D C : }; N S U LTA .N T _S • • TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction 1 Housing 6 Land Demand and Absorption 11 Transportation 14 Sewer Flow Allocations • 18 District 15 20 OAK PARK HEIGHTS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PLANNING DISTRICT 15 • • INTRODUCTION The City of Oak Park Heights is proposing an amendment to its current Comprehensive Plan for the purpose of amending the proposed land use plan for property located south of 60th Street, east of Oakgreen Avenue and north of future 58th Street (See maps on pages 3-4). The subject area is 53.80 acres in size and includes the following uses: existing commercial development along 60th Street ranging from U-Haul rental to a multi- tenant office complex, a multiple family development on 60th Street, six single family residential homes on Oakgreen Avenue, and a legal non-conforming salvage yard. The land on which the salvage yard exists, is zoned 0, Open Space Conservation and is designated for mid/high density residential use within the Comprehensive Plan. The single family homes are located within Baytown Township, however, shall be designated for future annexation into the City of Oak Park Heights. This amendment proposes changes in the land use designation of this area from mid/high density residential to business/warehousing. The commercial land is zoned B-2 General Business, however a portion of the B-2 District is designated within the Comprehensive Plan for mid/high density residential use. This amendment proposes a land use change in this area to highway commercial to coincide with the existing land uses. The land on which the multiple family residential development exists will remain the same. The following provides an acreage breakdown of the proposed amendment: PROPOSED LAND USES UNDER THE CURRENT LAND USE PLAN HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL 20.66 ACRES MID/HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 29.88 ACRES SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL(BAYTOWN 3.26 ACRES TOWNSHIP) TOTAL 53.80 ACRES PROPOSED LAND USES UNDER THE PROPOSED LAND USE AMENDMENT HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL 11.41 ACRES MID/HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 3.23 ACRES BUSINESS/WAREHOUSING 39.16 ACRES TOTAL 53.80 ACRES OAK PARK HEIGHTS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PLANNING DISTRICT 15 1 • • INTRODUCTION ACREAGE CHANGES WITH THE PROPOSED LAND USES HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL -9.25 ACRES MID/HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL -26.65 ACRES SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL -3.26 ACRES INDUSTRIAL +39.16 ACRES The purpose of the requested land use amendment is to provide Oak Park Heights with land available for business/warehousing. Currently the City has no vacant land available for these types of uses. This report is divided into five sections, the first four sections include the impact of the proposed land use amendment on the City's housing opportunities, land absorption, transportation system and sewer flow allocations. The final section is an amendment to Planning District 15, in which the subject land is located. This Section may be inserted within the proposed Oak Park Heights Comprehensive Plan and it includes a description of the entire Planning District. OAK PARK HEIGHTS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PLANNING DISTRICT 15 2 • RASE PROPERTY DETAIL Existing Land Use Plan HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL NAG BAYTOWN TOWNSHIP N ,1 MID/HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL —••—••- CITY LIMITS This mnp is br plonnin{purposes only and should not he utilized when enact meuurements zee required. NOT TO SCALE 0 STATE TRUNK HIGHWAY 36 fir. , r,, " .,, . {•�� ��" -....-A340.4;:::,,,,,*. �,,. i ..;", ., ;1,4,;!",:+''';';',„i''''''''0‘;:i:i.„';'.;t74'led?-1::111flitti, ILL:-'f-1:::::11-1i'"A,:'4,"1:::t:?'''';':,:ilittilii}-::;.14,7Z,Ir;;I:1!,4;!:f'''-'';t:-.'":,;g'i:tfrit:;i;,;;-,<'7414:417:::;:::,,,11":"ItitCrl: A Ale,A II ._,,i,,..,,,.,:e,,,47-.... „ik*,.$4,42:„Ir: 1_,,,...44i,,,,.,mv„..7,..„,„,,,e:4,,,,‘,147;t4.4)„,,..c, ,,,,...00,,,,-,_Al igr ,„ -,,-ns do t er ''x'3- "- � f* § .7 -• t �''4'4 I .;-'.AT $ . , '' i r .z • wt a Ott� � sa S e ' �� �"�. �-�,�2 'dam -� f a� x, ,s � 3a f• i� "ta „ �a c rte. , ft„ a„• nx ¢�n's w4)v - ,� bS p"e?'' 40..,E ,-, 1 I , , I 1 I , , L.Li ... I W ;1' Atifd , Ae-- A' I d t.,7 act INIgr ....—......•II Q FUTURE 58TH STREET SOURCE: OAK PARK HEIGHTS HIGH SCHOOL ANNEXATION AREA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3 • • &EPROPERTYDETAIL Proposed Land Use Plan f ,1 HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL N '"` BUSINESS/WAREHOUSING This nip is for phoning purposes only rkk' :IMID/HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL and shoukmrheutilized when exact measurements are required. NOT TO SCALE 0 STATE TRUNK HIGHWAY 36I kW e9Ae41;".4111killir411111 , , �tx r „=0-717.,:".1,-: r ,""„,'- E s, l Y ,a a '^r'fit § „,3i ' _, „ r ,sk i m ' 3 "`"sh w T'^ € " F z wa ;. Y,`,'Cs t 5-�Y J" z;> x .,4.: . - a ' ,,,.„4 t - .tc " �,� �., } ` 4 .' , . ',7,,,,,'°'ec .r'x > *, mss,,S4... res c"' `' �a sot 9a 44,�h` xgwn y',a� j2 y, 2 't �+}d fwd ruAL" y�'�h _ `�'' "'^ am 1.. ' .w� '‘,2±:', 2'. , a a " ' �`s a :. "' ��,r ; t °.Le t a,.,.,�"" t. : - 7' st 7 sv,, - j sC a,4-kR- h y 4 ,; +.e �4....' 5 4,4:r.s 8 "Axl��'w`'"; �t.:4 b 4 i ,it "2. "l � h � „ ,, fix + <- « ma '' � �a" ,,, q._, .,,%,. '� `meq Lyi 'ram ,,�a ��a '" q� y ria e i :- ' '�' a. ';4 fit' a., d 4 n h '''',15,41,, ,�:44, , t,i,a�°�P .z : t ,. R '-t t-:2,...."4,,,Z.- ; '7 g , r. i t sv) '1'.-- i 4 ��,,1,,F' p - '''.ii''''',-':'41."'? ,,, �,s,,, sa`,)0"` btu' r+ -t s:£-;.7,- i,v 6 �1 1.4. a -�.- 4 ' we-i y �"' ,;?.- a'4�' ,' A ".Z 4*' s 'rt' c,, `-, -4,d �r 1 ra ,-,. "�" sj , r, a� t% g 5`, ��3 ;, LU y e tlk .., ' , t^'a.� s3i' 4 t*"'s" y NZi y -u ,, -414' -..,' P " : L.7 3 F " € -- *a 3 . t,1:ry.0a t - s, 4 v, ,� .syn , ..,.v p �# �,.'�y i ,..,.„,.: !LANNING DISTRICT 15 Existing Zoning B-2,GENERAL BUSINESS BAYTOWN TOWNSHIP N R-I,SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL -••-•-- CITY LIMITS This mop is for phnnissjpurposes only and should not k utilised when entt / R-3,MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL masnitaessire required . I 0,OPEN SPACE 0' 400' 800 RT STATE TRUNK HIGHWAY 36 sr d: YC s hex 4 ` dsa' z a� qr�✓ � 2 a�tn; '� FU RE58THSTREET • L. SOURCE: OAK PARK HEIGHTS ZONING MAP 5 • • Livable Communities ActHOUSING In 1996, the City of Oak Park Heights elected Communities Program which encourages the developmentto and life-cycle housing in the participate In the maintenanceceo of an Livable and eaffordable requires participating Twin Cities. The Metropolitan Livable Communities 9 communities to negotiate goals for affordable and based upon current indexes and regional benchmark Act goals. life-cycle housing cycleThe City of Oak Park Heights has established future cycle housing through negotiations with the Met housing politan Council indexes, regional benchmarksg goalsn for affordable and current provided po below for reference: rOpantan Council. The and negotiated housiriCity's C ggoalsare AFFORDAgLE/LIFE-CYCLE INDI y OF BEOAK P RK HEIGHTS MARKS& NEGOTIATED HOUSING GOALS AFFORDABILITY III CIN INDEX MIMIIIIII GOAL Ownership 90% alletal IIIIIIMEI 75-80% _____Iiim_____52-68% MIIIIIIIIIIMIIIMIIIMIIIMMIIIIII Type (Non-single family detached) mix 50% 29-36% Owner/renter 50% DENSITY (68-77)%/ (68-77)°.6/ (23-32)% (23-32)% Single Family Detached MillitIMMENEEkenam.____1111111MEM IMMeall1122211.11111NM= 1.111111:0 SOURCE: CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS METROPOLITAN COUNCIL As illustrated by the above table, Oak Park Heights' all of the Metropolitan Council's regional benchmarks indexes are currently all thently 90% of the City's o arks for affordable and life-ch orh exceed Y owner-occupied housing is considered affordable, 55% its rental housing is considered affordable. life-cycle housing. maintain the current benchmarks for affordable andand toof The City's future housing goals are The City's indexes for the life-cycle housing. Currentlyeof the City's efe cycle housing s of life-cycle housing snon-single family detachedlhousing.ed above. OAK PARK HEIGHTS The COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 6 PLANNING DISTRICT 15 • • HOUSING benchmark for this type of housing is 29-36%. In terms of owner/renter life-cycle housing, 56% of the life-cycle housing stock is owner occupied, which is below the benchmark. Conversely, 44% of the City's life-cycle housing is renter occupied, which exceeds the benchmark of 23-32%. These figures are explained by the large number of multiple family structures within the City. The City should work, as market factors and resources allow, to improve the ratio of owner occupied versus renter occupied life-cycle housing in the City. The best means of accomplishing this goal is to promote increased availability of single family detached, medium density townhouse units, and condominiums. The City is currently in the process of amending its Comprehensive Plan. The amendment will suggest annexation of portions of Baytown Township. Designated land uses in these areas will include single family and medium density, therefore, the proposed land use amendment will not negatively impact on the accomplishment of this goal with new areas to be annexed. In regard to housing densities, the City of Oak Park Heights is within or exceeds the Metropolitan Council's regional benchmark. The density of single family homes in the community is currently 2.3 units per acre, which is within the benchmark range established by the Metropolitan Council. The density of multiple family housing is 15 units per acre, while the established benchmark is 13-14 units per acre. Based upon household projections developed by the Metropolitan Council for the year 2010, the City will need to maintain its existing renter and owner occupied housing supply and as a goal, will work to provide an additional 150 owner-occupied housing units which are considered affordable, in order to maintain the established housing goals. CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS ADDITIONAL/NEW UNIT ESTIMATES BASED ON NEGOTIATED LCA GOALS City HOUSEHOLDS FORECASTED ADDITIONAL(AFFORDABLE) ADDITIONAL 1990 HOUSEHOLDS RENTAL UNITS (AFFORDABLE 2010 1990-2010 OWNER UNITS 1995-2010 OAK PARK HEIGHTS 1,322 2,000 0 150 SOURCE: METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Therefore, as demonstrated above, and in the City's Livable Communities Action Plan (approved by the Metropolitan Council), the elimination of 10.83 acres of available hi h density residential development, will positively affect the negotiated LCA goals. g OAK PARK HEIGHTS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PLANNING DISTRICT 15 7 HOUSING • Housing Goals and Policies Comprehensive Plan, City of Oak Park Heights is in the process of updating its Comp The C y policies shall be revised and updated. The housing therefore, specific housing goals and Comprehensive Plan, adopted in goals and policies listed below, are from the existing will be incorporated within he December of 1979, and additional goals and policies policies shall be used as a guide by City Comprehensive Planupdate. en f ethe needs goals evaluate housing related applications. decision makers to identify Goals: t Cit of Oak Park Heights benchmarks for affordable life cycle • Maintain the Curren Y housing. es and styles to meet the Provide sufficient housing and suffuiationent �notedly groups with specialized housing • using sizes, typ needs of all segments of the pop needs, such as the elderly. • Provide housing in cost ranges affordable to low and moderate income households (as regionally defined). • Provide safe, healthy and attractive residential environment which offer a broad and full choice of housing types. Policies: tin renter and owner occupied housing supply, except for the 1. Mats tthe existing removed by the Minnesota Department of Transportation units toon be purchased and for the St. Croix Bridge. 2. Promote the development of an additional 150 owner occupiedordable housing units by the year 2010 to maintain the established housing goals. b case basis, the addition of affordable rental units within the 3. Allow, on a case y City. for ersons of an housing, low an including rental housing and housing p 4. Ens that all ne income, adheres to the highest possible standards of planning, d moderat design and construction. apartment-type housing in proximity to areas which offeecentrate 5 Cohigher of existing supportive service, commercial and recreational r a wide range facilities. COMPREHENSIVELAN AMENDMENT T PLANNING OAK PARK HEIGHTS 8 • • HOUSING 6. Plan and develop residential neighborhoods according to determined planning/development district boundaries. 7. Protect residential neighborhoods from penetration by through traffic. 8. Provide for access to major streets on the periphery of residential neighborhoods. 9. Provide high density development with reasonable, but not necessarily direct, access to major thoroughfares. 10. Preserve and maintain the existing density character of residential neighborhoods. 11. Achieve and maintain a high quality residential environment through rehabilitation or where necessary, redevelopment, of substandard units. Undertake such actions through private means or if necessary, public action. 12. Protect low density residential neighborhoods from encroachment or intrusion of incompatible higher use types and by adequate buffering and separation from other residential as well as non-residential use categories. 13. Provide sufficient housing options to meet the needs of all segments of the population, including the elderly and those of low and moderate income. 14. Encourage and promote adequate living space and fully utilized housing through the provision of a range of choice among housing types and options. 15. Existing undeveloped single family residential lands shall be developed in a manner responsive to determined needs and compatible with surrounding development. 16. Ensure that all new housing, including housing affordable to low and moderate income families and individuals, adheres to the highest community design, planning and construction standards. 17. Encourage design and planning innovations in both housing units and land development. 18. Encourage innovation in subdivision design and housing development through the use of devices such as the cluster and planned unit development concepts. 19. Encourage the development of patio homes, townhouses, quadraminiums and condominiums to supplement conventional single family homes and apartments, giving due consideration to local market demands. OAK PARK HEIGHTS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PLANNING DISTRICT 15 9 • • HOUSING 20. From a cost per unit perspective, planned unit development shall be promoted in order to: (a) reduce unit land costs, (b) lessen the amount of new dedicated streets (thereby reducing on-going repair and snow removal costs e cost lowed (d)r ty costs (through reduced footage and hence lower main duce additional run-off resulting from development. 21. From a revenue per unit perspective, planned unit development shall be promoted based upon the higher revenue contribution to the City in comparison with conventional comparable density subdivision. Densityincentives shall be offered for the development of mid-densitycluster nhoowner-type r r-ype 22. uadraminiums, patio homes units, such as townhouses, q 23. Mid-deny p sit develop ment shall be encouraged on a planned unit basis and shall alll nd specifically include provisions for traffic circulation that would mitigate any affects on existing single family residential neighborhoods. 24. Prohibit residential development on wetlands, floodplains and other natural features that perform important protection functions in their natural state. 25. Locate multiple family housing in areas not inferior to those generally used for conventional single family housing. COMPREHENS N NG D E DM OAK PARK HEIGHTS 10 • • LAND DEMAND AND ABSORPTION Due to the City's proximity to State Highway has received several inquiries gfor Y 36' Oak Park Heights over the past few business/warehousing.received hossin development of light industrial usessearr g. Unfortunately, the City of Oak Park Heights, does vacant land available for these types or industrial development since 199 (see buildinguse ' and as a result has not had have any demonstrate the City's shortage of vacant land availableany new the next 25 permit data below). years. for anticipated development oversall Recent Development within the City Commercial development had been limit development before utility service was provdidedtt ere was no large annexation area. o the 1991 StillwaterAreaHigh Schools available r This trend has reversed as the annexation area available for commercial development include land available for industrial development).g included land that is along Highway 36 (the annexation area did not New single family residential development ademonstrated below. has remained steady over the past eight This is due in part to the infill development and land available within the annexation area for singleg years trend is available conne vacantre land remainsthe additional as family residentialbdevelopment.oThis the City has seen a total of 33 multiple family available. As last eights years. residential housing unitsitconstructed inithe mthe BUILDING PERMIT SUMMARY SINGLE MULTIPLE FAMILY- COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL 1989TOTAL HOUSING FAMILY #OF UNITS 19 1990 11111311111mminlINIII311111111�® 19 1991 20 6 26 111 ® 26 1112111111111 1993 intowechminammismas �® 26 1994 ® 1995 39 6 28 28 199611111111111111111 NE 46 IIIIMMIIIIIIML•m..IMMIMMMIIII 11113 TOTAL 65 1989-96 AVERAGE IIIIM 29.5 SOURCE: CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS BUILDING PERMIT DATA .26 34.4 33.6 OAK PARK HEIGHTS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PLANNING ANNING DISTRICT 15 . • LAND DEMAND AND ABSORPTION The land absorption rates (the conversion of rural/vacant land to an urban use) for multiple family residential, commercial and public uses are found below. Single family residential absorption rates are not calculated as they are not effected by the proposed amendment. Additionally, because of the lack of industrial development over the past eight years (only two new construction starts), industrial absorption rates are not calculated, as past development trends would not provide an accurate estimate for future development. It should be noted that these projections may be influenced by trends beyond the City's control, such as regional growth trends and mortgage rates. In consideration of this, the projections contain an inherent degree of uncertainty. The following projections are based upon the building permit data on the previous page. These projections reflect current development trends and current land use policies in the City. LAND DEMAND IN ACRES-RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL PUBLIC STREETS PARK TOTAL MULTIPLE YEARS FAMILY(1) 1997-2000 17 1 2 1 21 2000-2010 34 2 5 2 43 2010-2020 34 2 5 2 43 (1) BASED ON ONE(1)UNIT PER 5,000 S.F. Based upon the above, it is projected that the City can anticipate a multiple family residential land absorption of 107 acres by the year 2020. These projections include land necessary for public buildings/facilities, streets, and parks. This calculation is based upon the amount of land necessary to accommodate and provide services for the projected growth (30 percent). While the City does have available vacant land for development of multiple family residential uses, it does not have the necessary 107 acres, as anticipated for growth through the year 2020. However, Oak Park Heights is anticipating an expansion of its boundaries within the next 25 years into Baytown Township. This expansion will include provision for multiple family residential development, which will accommodate the anticipated growth. The City of Oak Park Heights is currently in the process of updating its Comprhehensive Plan, a portion of the update will include the potential of annexation of Baytown Township. OAK PARK HEIGHTS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PLANNING DISTRICT 15 12 • LAND RAND AND ABSORPTION LAND DEMAND IN ACRES-COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL PUBLIC STREETS PARK TOTAL (1) YEARS 1997-2000 60 4 9 4 77 2000-2010 80 6 12 6 104 2010-2020 80 6 12 6 104 (1) BASED ON ONE(1)LOT PER 5 ACRES AND ALLOWS FOR LARGE LOT DEVELOPMENT The commercial land demand has been increased, based upon the large lot commercial development (a large grocery store and a Menards) that is expected to occur within the next few years. Therefore, based upon the building permit data and the expected large lot development that will occur, it is anticipated that 285 acres of land is to be absorbed by commercial development by the year 2020. While there is a large supply of commercial land that is vacant at the current time, there is not 285 acres of land that is designated for commercial uses. In total the City of Oak Park Heights has 296.7 acres of vacant land, therefore, the 285 necessary for commercial development and 107 necessary for multiple family in addition to the land necessary for anticipated single family residential and industrial cannot be accommodated by the 296.7 acres of current vacant land within the City. Again, additional commercial acreage will be discussed as part of the potential annexation of a portion of Baytown Township, within the City's upcoming Comprehensive Plan amendment. OAK PARK HEIGHTS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PLANNING DISTRICT 15 13 • • TRANSPORTATION Road and Highway Network The subject area is served by Highway 36, the Highway 36 frontage road (60th Street), Oakgreen Avenue, State Highway 5 and 58th Street. Access is available off of Oakgreen Avenue, 60th Street and future 58th Street. Development of this site will generate the need for the construction of the connection of 58th Street (a collector street) with Oakgreen Avenue. These roads are defined by the Metropolitan Council's functional classification of roadways as follows: ► Highway 36 - Principal Arterial ► Highway 5 - Minor Arterial ► Oakgreen Avenue - Major Collector ► 58th Street - Minor Collector ► 60th Street - Local Roadway The purpose of this section is to determine the impact on the proposed land use amendment on the existing and future roadways in the area. Trip Generation The following projections are based upon the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation forecasts: TRIPS GENERATED BY THE SUBJECT USES PER ACRE OR UNIT UNDER THE CURRENT PROPOSED LAND USES LAND USE AVG.WEEKDAY VEHICLE TRIP TRIPS GENERATED ENDS INDUSTRIAL(0 ACRES) 59.9 TRIPS PER ACRE 0 TRIPS LIGHT INDUSTRIAL(0 ACRES) 52.4 TRIPS PER ACRE 0 TRIPS (1)COMMERCIAL 66.7 TRIPS PER 1,000 SQUARE (10.00 ACRES SHOPPING CENTER) FEET 9,684 TRIPS (10.66 ACRES GENERAL RETAIL) 546 TRIPS PER ACRE 5,820 TRIPS (2)MULTIPLE FAMILY(29.88 6.1 TRIPS PER UNIT 1,588 TRIPS ACRES) (260 UNITS) SINGLE FAMILY(3.26 ACRES) 10 TRIPS PER ACRE 60 TRIPS (6 EXISTING UNITS) TOTAL(FULL BUILD OUT) 17,152 TRIPS PER WEEKDAY (1)SHOPPING CENTER CALCULATION IS BASED UPON A 145,200 SQUARE FOOT SHOPPING CENTER ON A 10 ACRE SITE (2)CALCULATION IS BASED UPON 1 UNIT PER 5,000 SQUARE FEET OF LAND SOURCE: INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS TRIP GENERATION FORECASTS NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS INC. OAK PARK HEIGHTS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PLANNING DISTRICT 15 14 • • TRANSPORTATION TRIPS GENERATED BY THE SUBJECT USES PER ACRE OR UN UNDER THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT IT LAND USE AVERAGE WEEKDAY VEHICLE TRIP INDUSTRIAL(39.16 ACRES) ENDS TRIPS GENERATED COMMERCIAL 59'9 TRIPS PER ACRE (11.41 ACRES GENERAL RETAIL) 2,346 TRIPS (1)MULTIPLE FAMILY 3, 546 TRIPS PER ACRE (28 UNITS) ( 23 ACRES) iimo6,230 TRIPS 6.1 TRIPS PER UNIT TOTAL(FULL BUILD OUT) (1)CALCULATION IS BASED UPON 1 UNIT PER 5,000 SQUARE FEET OF LAND 8,747 TRIPS PER WEEKDAY SOURCE: INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS TRIP GE NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS INC. NERATiON FORECASTS Based upon the above trip generation rates Engineers,ased u the land uses at full ration developed will gneerless trips than fllwould the full de by the Institute of Transportationmdt development, under the proposed land use amendment As shown above, the land uses under the curreelo rips per day, development under the existing land use plan. while the land uses under the proposed plan potential) day. Therefore, the proposed uses dnmendmpr will lesseny will generate 17,152 ip t P posed amendment will generate 8,747 trips per day. tion htem. pr the impact on the local and regioal Traffic Volumes The growth of population within the City of has been Oak Park Heights and Stillwater in recent highways. accompanied by a slight increase in traffic volumes Y The map on the following years hion Highway 36, Higher g page shows a comparisoncarried by the traffic volumes ands Highway 5 and Oakgreen Avenue for the years 1990 and 1994.of average volnmes the traffic volumes have remained stead Highway 36 east of Oakgreen have experiencen the adjacent roadways. In general Avenue and the of Oakgon of Highwaed y Highway 5 and d Norell Avenue volumed, while in traffic volume. Overall there has been a 9 Y 36 and Norell Avenue show a decrease ' percent decrease in traffic on the adjacent roadways. OAK PARK HEIGHTS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 15 PLANNING DISTRICT 15 vl Vr�, _� • W eII 1 c. iZ .._ Q� ger s rig 1-61 O I ` -F _i s E c o a ›UWf A 3 W V = z 111 o (r1 = O € o Z . 1 z O wct o `n �`/ a� a 00 •�- a) lif O ilial s = a p ^� '� 11- cc W a 0 a� 1s, 1111/lq.. 1b/M N n/�wh\\\l\�I���O 01111 No o tll WIN loom®®•III .- TII tltlnl� ,^r,"-IIII O �IIIIII N L/11 '�_ Illllltl llln• 111111 IIIIIIIIduutl Wlljj 41111 1_N I O 0ffi Z �_ a O � in,-anni Qom l d QM 2.i 7 4lx111 \ I' " sT O - m i _i Cl. 3-24.0...,7 ❑ •r � I . �U/�I EUEJ � �� ;.: - j O (0 O . 0 O. O WI : :lc, " o = LI ' "i" I , 2 'llp �' -aa T 1�„y h-r N ci 1 i Wsdi. ml1. ::.i -VII Ill ,C1 1� I A..�.d. 4.t E'- 1 \ :.: CJI "� his: o 21 ® jI o Cu�} _ 'iiia o Lri alN O Q 41,, •'� •---- II91GQ=-J'1 m g �0Ql •,/ ► '1[I c s:\ �_ •. O Q •:a oo ,} , OlMiaIc olTT 00. - I MI 11000 Ii 16 TRANSPORTATION Improvement Plans Improvements for Highway 36 and the St. Croix River bridge were programmed by the Minnesota Department of Transportation to begin construction in 1997. Highway 36 is to be reconstructed through Oak Park Heights (to a limited access highway) with intersection improvements at Norell, Oakgreen, Osgood, and Highway 95. Highway 36 will be lowered at Osgood Avenue to accommodate the new bridge. Highway 36 will continue east across the St. Croix River and touch down on the Wisconsin side. However, recent events involving the construction of the bridge over the St. Croix River may delay the timing of this construction project. • OAK PARK HEIGHTS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PLANNING DISTRICT 15 17 • SEVR FLOW ALLOCATIONS Within the proposed land use amendment area it must be determined if the change in the land uses can be handled within the existing system and sewer flows projected for the City by the Metropolitan Waste and Control Commission. Total sewage flow rates within the amendment area have been determined for the uses under the current land use plan and the proposed land use plan. The two rates are compared to determined the effect of the proposed land use amendment on the system. Current Land Uses Proposed Land Use Commercial 20.66 acres Commercial 11.41 acres Mid/High Density 29.88 acres Mid/High Density 3.23 acres Single Family 3.26 acres Business/Ware- housing 39.16 acres Sewer Capacity in the Land Use Amendment Area Projections for households and persons to be served are calculated to determine the projected flow in 2010 when the area is expected to be completely developed. Current Land Use Plan High Density 8.7 units per acre x 29.88 acres = 260 units 260 units x 2.5 persons/unit = 650 persons Low Density 6 units x 2.5 persons/unit- 15 persons Proposed Land Use Plan High Density 8.7 units per acre x 3.23 acres = 28 units 28 units x 2.5 persons/unit = 70 persons Projected flows based upon complete lot occupancy for all land uses in the proposed amendment area are as follows: Current Land Use Plan High Density 650 persons x 100 gal/person/day = 65,200 gal/day Low Density 15 persons x 100 gal/person/day = 1,500 gal/day OAK PARK HEIGHTS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PLANNING DISTRICT 15 18 • SEWER FLOW ALLOCATIONS Commercial 20.66 acres x 1,500 gal/acres/day = 30.990 gal/day Total Projected Flow: 97,690 gallons per day Proposed Land Use Plan High Density 70 persons x 100 gal/person/day = 7,000 gal/day Commercial 11.41 acres x 1,500 gal/acres/day = 17,115 gal/day Business/Warehousing (light industrial) 39.16 acres x 1,500 gal/acres/day = 58.740 gal/day Total Projected Flow: 82,855 gallons per day As demonstrated above: the total projected flow under the proposed land use plan is 14,835 gallons per day less than under the existing land use plan (assuming complete lot occupancy under both development scenarios). Therefore, the proposed land use amendment will not have a negative impact on the projected sewer flow in the area. Capacity of the System In 1991, when the land surrounding the Stillwater Area High School was annexed into the City of Oak Park Heights, the land west of Oakgreen Avenue was estimated to contribute sewage flows shown in the following tabulation at saturation development: Area Flow Avg.Daily Flow Land Use Acres Gal/Acre/Day MGD Low Density Residential 224.0 235 0.053 High Density Residential 89.5 1,050 0.094 Commercial 94.0 1,500 0.141 Senior High School 121.3 EAW 0.046 Public Park 10.2 0.000 TOTALS 589.0 acres 0.334 MGD The wastewater flows from the land west of Oakgreen Avenue, south of Highway 36 are to be conveyed through an existing trunk sewer located along the south side of Highway 36. The trunk sewer was designed to accept the flow from the Oak Park Heights area east of Oakgreen Avenue plus an average daily flow of 1.035 MGD. As shown, this area only utilizes one-third of the available capacity. OAK PARK HEIGHTS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PLANNING DISTRICT 15 19 0 • • low.•.. \ = rel 11 I i Z o W -4--1 g F.13' i ii f4, OG 1.1 T Z $ r CI . E C n u W2cc Co Z Z --a a x W � Q Q Vf -aj1jNM t.1.1411 111111 �-r Illi fI's®®101:um IISimu 4 r v + m' rna .-.Et--.—=e.-,...--_-..-f.:---s r il ( 11 ilk ...." •• 11- C4 rg iie II 1 .... '61 .0. !. r.: --1 ,/.\ii g fi V II �� ii '� 1"a-if "l • 1 ALAI \ • .• ,.1 ,FAL ,r1-,,,'",,-', \ .1:7C LLJ c� ce at �� a . I-- i....) I.../.1 I 1 \ W r '� �r ■= ,:}11111 G = 1� �'� N __ 1w Ili r- = z c E ZC �_ Ili C C ,-- I d J V Iii 0 20 7. i • • PLANNING DISTRICT 15 Proposed Land Use Plan sv PARK SEARCH AREA NrAG- , HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL BAYTOWN TOWNSHIP BUSINESS/WAREHOUSING '"` SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Thu Rap ubr slam inj p,upnes odr • CITY LIMITS and sMnknot kutilizedwknentt measurements Me requied MID/HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 0' 400' 800' 44 STATE TRUNK HIGHWAY 36 r►iE .,_ ,,,,[, ,.. ,. ,, , , ... .. , . ., , ,_.,...„ Ailmr4 11 ; --1 r eE�i�3.L � A �s5*x mss. 10 *' ' ? x 11414‘11411r. - ' . 'N ‘114 11‘116116'‘ \ 1 ‘fkiik'N. ilMkoilliklibiblilliki I 111111L,'IvILAftliiiii iiiklat .1►1►1► SOURCE: NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS,INC. 21 • • • DISTRICT 15 District 15, annexed in July of 1988; is located bordered by Highway 36 on the north, Oakgreen Avenue west of District 5. the center line of Section 5 on the south and a line extIt is McCormack Furniture ti property on the west. and the ppr limits en the east,e ending south approximately from the st. Existing land uses within the District consist of se residential, medium density residential and an auto salt' r i NSP easement s overheadpower vvag yard. Othl uses, single family the remainder of the District being a antlnes that run east-west Other h uses consist District with The intended land.uses for the District include highway frontage road, a small mid/high density residential 9 way commercial justwst of Oakgreenng the Highway Avenue,36 business/warehousing immediately to the south of siugle family residential south of 58th area just west of ilarea, and the highway commercial and District 15 Conceptual Land Use Plan on the preceding Street. These uses are illustrated in the Planning The auto salvage p ding page. g yard shall be encouraged for redevelopment as it conforming and incompatible land use. The Bayport exists as a business/warehousin y on which it is located is intended for Such redevelopment will allow the property to be for higher and more efficient level of use. The within Baytown utilized at a AtY wn Townshi single family residential homes, which are located the time the Bayportp, are also designated as future business/warehousing.they comprising Planning District 15 was annexed, the owners along Oakgreen chose not to be included. It is recognized that properties will be broughtof these properties will into the City's corporate boundaries to provide htheseh them with A community park facility is also to be located within the District. The proposed site is located in the southwest corner of the District and was determined through a report identifying potential park site areas for this part of the environmentally sensitive land consisting of wetlands andyThe l include both active andpare will encompass some a mature tree stand. The park passive activity areas. The zoning that is to correspond to these land uses the current City Zoning Ordinance. will consist of existing districts with' use, i.e., single family residential may be zonede "R-1",c zoningIn per designated land use is illustrated below: may vary per individualeland yr "R-2, the recommended zoning Land Use Single Family Residential High Density Residential Zoe General Business R-1 Business/Warehousing R-3 B-2 B-W OAK PARK HEIGHTS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 22 PLANNING DISTRICT 15 1110 S DISTRICT 15 Due to the size and intended uses within the District, development of a traffic circulation network must be carefully planned and include collector streets to route traffic onto Oakgreen Avenue and the Highway 36 frontage road. The collector streets provide access to future areas of annexation to the west and to the south. must also Collector streets in Planning District 15 include 58th Street which connects Avenue with County Road 5, and Norell Avenue which connects Highway36 and 5th Avenue. The Street. Currently 58th Street has been constructed from Highway 5 to Norell Ave and 8e final connection of 58th Street, from Norell to Oakgreen Avenue, shall occur in co with development of the area. njunction As a means of facilitating pedestrian circulation, the City has proposed an over west of Oakgreen to 58th Street, a grade separated trail along future 58th Street to trail Park Search Area, an on-street trail along Highway 36, a grade separated trail the Avenue, and overland trails within the Park Search Area. along Norell • OAK PARK HEIGHTS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 23 PLANNING DISTRICT 15 Page 5 - Minutes /22/96 AAE - Surface Water Man_.- an - Anderl presented a Surface Water Management Plan ydesignedrto guidek development of a stormwater drainage system for the annexatioth ns area extended (AAE) . Anderlik discussed the reports recommendations, including the proposed increase in area storm sewer charges . He noted that most of the stormwater ponds were situated in natural depressions or low areas . Councilmember Schaaf, seconded by Swenson, moved to approve the plan as presented. Carried 5-0 . C.m•r-hensiv- Plan C.ntra t with Northwest Associa ed Con lt-nts - City Planner Richards presented a contract for professional planning services to develop an updated Comprehensive Plan for the City of Oak Park Heights . Councilmember Kern, seconded by Robert, moved to approve the contract with Northwest Associated Consulting. Carried 5-0 . Pr..o ed Chan.e Order - 1995 tre-t Recons ruction Pr. 'e t - Removal of Ex e s Muck •n •arts of 56th Street Olene Av-nue ••er 56th treet ourt an. • 'Brien Avenue - Councilmember Robert, seconded by27 257 ' 4 - aprve change order to the 1995 Street Reconstruction Project Carried 5-o . Re•u-s for Pa -n - Tower As.halt - 1.95 Stre-t Re •n Pro ' t - 35 78 . 0 - Councilmember Kern, seconded b ru ti.n moved to approve payment of $35, 785 . 50 to Tower Asphalty. SwC 5-0 . P Caarrrried 'ro.o -. •mmunit Ce er - R-view of Stillwa er A ea Hi• D-eValopmen Aaraement - Robertson noted that, due to recent ch.. articles in the newspaper regarding a possible move of the community center from its proposed location in Stillwater to high school property, he had asked City Attorney Vierling to review the City' s development agreement with the School District regarding the High School property with the Council . Vierling reported that as part of the development agreement under which the high school was constructed area utility connection charges were only assessed on the portion of the high school land that was developed. Based on the development agreement any development of vacant areas of the high school property will be subject to area connection charges . City Planner Richards said that parking would be a major issue if the community center were constructed on the high school land. Since they could both conceivably have events going on at the same time, parking for the high school would have to separate from the community center. Correspondence: J n - -ni - i.n - Pro.. -d 19.6 the schedule was reviewed by the Council . SCouncil requestedqcopy of Robertson include the schedule in the February newslee .that Robertson reported that Junker is planning to send the schedule to residents . • • Enclosure 11 q Northwest Associated C COMMUNITY PLANNING Consultants G DESIGN f Inc .MARKET RESEARCH MEMORANDUM TO: Mike Robertson FROM: Scott Richards DATE: 11 January 1996 RE: Oak Park Heights -Comprehensive Plan: Issues Identification FILE NO: cation 798.06 As a first step in the Comprehensive Plan process, We must and discussions with community leaders and City staff. a and cu through many hs oquestioning conduct the Councilou intnd staff that it is necessaryuto discussoland use, t Although and staff as part of other visioning sessions, we feel an individual and group basis for planning and community facilities issues 9 purposes. on A list of those to be interviewed is as follows. If there in this list, please let us know. are others that should be included Elected/Appointed Officials Mayor and City Council Members - all on an indivi Park Commission - as a group - 19 Februa dual basis Staff �Y 1996? Mike Robertson Mark Vierling Joe Anderlik Lindy Swanson Charlie Schwartz R �-�, M 0 W E Roger Benson Jim Butler JAN 16 1996 5775 Wayzata Blvd. • Suite 555 • St. Louis Park, MN 55416 • (612) 595-9636•Fax. 595-9837 • i Other Bob Brackey Rick Packerfficers Township School Superintendent NSP Representatives Prison Representatives DNR Representatives Mall Owner provide from previous visioning sessions or the information that you can p planning process ld bho consolidation lidatiAdditionally, anyt d pertains to the comprehensive consolidation study that 2 • ITZC Northwest Asso •• Enclsoure B COMMUNITY ciated Cons PANNING • DESIGN . uQ Inc . MARKKEETT RR EE SEARCH MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor& City Council FROM: 2 71995 Cary TeagUe/Scott Richards DATE: %�i_____0!________2 _ ll 'I 26 December 1995 RE: Oak Park Heights - Stillwater Comprehensive FILE NO: Plan 798.02 - 95.23 `'` OurCity office has reviewed the copy of the November of Stillicewater. TheeComprehensive Plan 15,1995 for land use around the City's Comprehensive is expectedn for the and community appears addresses consistent with what is o with the City opaktpark sues.boundaries, and the The Plan does not mention anyappropriate transportation Heights. potential boundary issues The onlyand a relating plant Oak Park Heights mentioned within the of parksion of the Cil planning. Plan "Coordinate Plan isthat Specifically,to an objective stated wand the Tay plans Sectwith Oak Park Heights, Township Ci the Park, Heights, Stillwaterand Trails section they bikeway and pathway the school district and Washington of and Washington County." Y with Plan is to "WorkY Also, a goal stated in facilities hington Countyto with other local governments, Pathway/Bikewaylan." Designated on the Bikeways/Pathways a St. Croix in the Plan recreationi shown running parallel with Osgood Avenue.within the Plan is and The Plan contains a Section titledCity responsible for implementing teeResponsible risible Agencies ini which agencies ogra are listedeas of Oak Park Heights is listed as a Responsible Comprehensive Plan policies and programs. The City Other than for recreational Agency and purposes, the Plan does not stress the need for cooperationk Possible sharing of services and facilities with o jurisdictions Heights has Cowast n s advocated the need for cooperationther juriheicti ighbor n g avings and/or level of efficienc aamongOak Y and improved seh►vice neighboring pc: Mike Robertson 5775 Wayzata Blvd. • Suite 555 • St. Louis Park, MN 55416 • 61 � 2) 595-9636•Fax. 595-9837 Enclsoure 11A • • Inc . Northwest Associated Consultants , COMMUNITY PLANNING • DESIGN • MARKET RESEARCH C 12 January 1996 CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL PLANNING SERVICES � 1996, by and between AGREEMENT, made This thiday of WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINN SOTA, hereinafter referred to as OAK PARK HEIGHTS, (here: ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC., follows: hereinafter referredto Client, and NORTHWEST of Consultant a as the Consultant, relating to the employment A• OBJECTIVE AND SCOPE OF SERVICES al for a 1. The Consultant has completed and submitted a propos er du consideration, Comprehensive Plan Update dated 12 October 1995, and the Int n, after due consideration, has authorized Plan Update to be erformed based to obtain a completed Comprehensiveproosal. upon the services described in detail in the p p Exhibit A and The proposal dated 12 October 1995 is attached hereto as the scope d 2, purposes of determining of incorporated tod be rthe proposal is considered to be an integral part services to performed, of this Agreement. B. PRODUCTS TO BE PROVIDED BY CONSULTANT all rovide an updated Comprehensiv s Ps described Clientlan for the a 1. Consultant n p the products and service along with and based upon proposal which is attached as Exhibit A of this Agreement. p project. The cost to twenty-five (25) copies of each stage or draft ed in the cost of services 2. Upcan be provided of printing the final draft of the plan is no amount listed in Section F herein. Final ation F.3.document printing by the Consultant as provided for in 5775 Wayzata Blvd.• Suite 555 •St. Louis Park, MN 55416 • (612) 595-9636•Fax. 595-9837 • City of Oak Park-Heights Page Two C. PRODUCTS TO BE PROVIDED BY CLIENT The following products are to be furnished to the Consultant by the Client: 1. Available relevant material pertaining to completion of the project. 2. Background information and Consultant product review through meetings and interviews with officials, staff and designated citizens and other interested groups as specified by Exhibit A. D. PROJECT SCHEDULE The Consultant shall begin work on the project within two (2) weeks following the Client's approval of this project agreement, and shall be totally completed within twelve (12) months of that date, unless delayed for reasons of unexpected emergencies, forces beyond the control of the parties, or by request of a party acquiesced in writing by the other party. E. DELAY CAUSED BY CLIENT In the event the Consultant's performance of services hereunder is delayed due to acts of the Client or at the request of the Client and such delay exceeds forty-five (45) days, the Consultant shall have the right to renegotiate the contract to account for rising costs before resuming work and shall not be penalized for any delay resulting therefrom. • F. COST OF SERVICES The Client shall pay the Consultant: 1. On a monthly basis, based upon invoices submitted for percentage of work completed, to an amount not to exceed Twenty-Three Thousand Dollars ($23,000) for work described within Exhibit A of this Agreement. 2. All costs incurred will be due and payable to the Consultant upon receipt of an invoice showing the work completed and the cost of said work. For any invoice not paid within thirty (30) days, the Consultant will have the option of interrupting work without termination of the contract. A service charge of one (1) percent per month will be added to each invoice not paid within thirty (30) days from the date of invoice. 0 • City of Oak Park-Heights Page Three 3. For any work authorized by beyond that described in this Agreement the Client, documented in s the maximum , such work shall not berInclud d is partrrof the ed dollar limit stated in e compensated Rate Schedule established billingParagraph 1 d ine, but to h d rates as described in the attached (Exhibit B), G. RELATIONSHIP OF PARTIES 1• It is mutually agreed that this Agreement to a third party without the written consent of the transferable 2. t of other. by either party The Consultant's reports and other materials of this Agreement are instruments of services and remain the performance °f these re ° prOpertY of the p rts by the Client must note the Consultant as the source. 3. In the case of lawsuits or legal Client which tue actions by a third Client yod expensetConsultant is Party brought against mthe lawsuit or legal for legalnamed, the Client shall assue defense of the Consultant, unless such action is the result of the actions or inactio H. TERMINATION ns of the Planner. 1• This Agreement mayparty writtenenotice o termination,e ced by either party ed as of 9:00 party delivering to the other �n which case thisol winAgrg receipt shalls bed written AM on the thirtieth (30th) day following write additional notice (termination date). Once termination notice done unless the of said the termination.wwork parties agree in writing to Wthd� w 2. In the event of termination by withdraw for work compered the Client, the Client shall suchprior to the termination date on pay the Consultanter basis,f a s ch payment ce show to be made within thirtya mu plus materials the Consultant until shall g Work completed. All (30) days after receipt by All materials shall be retained by Consonaut payments due from Client have been received dbythe In the event of termination by the Consultant, to the Client on or the Consultant shall forward ers held byprior to termination date anyswerd the Consultant. All materials held theherned fees or shall be returned to the Client within thirty (30 d y Consultantdtshall be days of termination date. , • • City of Oak Park Heights Page Four NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. , rer David R. Licht 'resident Date CONDITIONS HEREIN AGREED TO: CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA -aat- Barbara O'Neal, Mayor Date ichael Robertson, City Administrator Date Please Sign and Return One Copy • • q Northwest Associated C Consultants , Inc . COMMUNITY PLANNING DESIGN • MARKET RESEARCH MEMORANDUM TO: Mike Robertson FROM: Scott Richards DATE: 12 October 1995 RE: Oak Park Heights - Comprehensive Plan Update FILE NO: 798.02 As per your request, i have developed a project estimate Heights Comprehensive Plan. The current plan, completed ino197p9 and the Oak Park community has grown, does not address the land use and transportation implications the upgrades to Highway 36 and the St. Croix river and updated as the is not consistent with Metropolitan Council updates, of crossing. Additionally, the current plan jurisdictions to completely revise their plans by 1998. s' especially the requirement for The estimate below reflects the reduced "city rate" that Northwest Heights for City initiated projects. Cost savings can also be will offer Oak Parke presentations would likely occur at regularly scheduled Councils meetings d in t many h the participation would be otherwise required. We would propose to co in which our the not to exceed fee listed below. The fee would include complete the project for and expenses. all changes including staff work Issue Identification Senior Staff: 47 hours Support Staff: 10 hours @ $40/hr $ 2,350.00 400.00 --------------- $ 2,750.00 EXHIBIT A 5775 Wayzata Blvd. • Suite 555 • St. Louis Park, MN 55416 • (612) 595-9636•Fax. 595-9837 • •• • Inventory Senior Staff: Spport Staff: 25 hours @ $50/hr 120 hours @ $40/hr $ 1, 00 4,80000.00 Policy Planning ------------ Senior Staff: $ 6,050.00 45 hours @ $50/hr Support Staff: 20 hours @ $40/hr $ 2,250.00 800.00 ----------""- grams $ 3,050.00 Plans and Pro Senior Staff: Spport Staff: 100 hours @ $50/hr 50 hours @ $40/hr $ 5,000.00 2,000.00 Implementation $ 7,000.00 Senior Staff: Support Staff: 20 hours @ $50/hr 30 hours @ $40/hr $ 1,00 00 1,200.00 SUB-TOTAL $2,200.00 Secretarial/Expenses* $21,050.00 1,950.00 ---- $23,000.00 * The expenses in this category expensesTee provided in this g y include mileage, quote include the costs orall reportsion andcosts, na the plan or its individual Printing due ton uncertain nature elements.what City preliminary drafts of The cost of printing a final draft of the plan is printing,to the u number uncertain of copof ttheexcluded, will want in the final document such as color Due to budget considerations needed, and the document length. e issue identification stage,and need for intensive citizen and officials Comprehensive plans for communities it is expected that the updateparticipation in th . similar to Oak Park Heights generallywould early twelve months to complete depending upon shorter schedule could be set, likely 1996 butP the schedule set for citizen take ten to If you have any unnecessary for Oak Park Heights. A to call. questions on the proposed Comprehensive Plan budget, do not hesitate. 2 • • NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. RATE SCHEDULE * Effective 1 July 1993 Staff Member Rate Per Hour Principals (Directors) $50.00 to $95.00 Associates $50.00 to $95.00. Senior Analyst Senior Landscape Architect Senior Planner $35.00 to $60.00 Senior Urban Designer Senior Public Administration Specialist Analyst Landscape Architect Planner $20.00 to $45.00 Urban Designer Public Administration Specialist Aide Technician Secretary $15.00 to $35.00 Outside Consultants Per Job Basis Supplies Actual Cost + 15% Mileage $.35 Per Mile Expert Testimony Hourly Rate - Minimum Charge $500.00 * Classification ranges and individual staff rates are subject to change on a semi-annual calendar year basis. EXHIBIT B III Page 3 _ M1nut • es 10/23/95 U.date on Desi.n eCommittee would be Review Committee - Cit notedmit ee meeti g copies the minutes of Planner Richards noted thaRevie that ng to of at the City Council be Council . Counci the Design reconstruction several design reviewissues ss esr uction set foorkshop onRobert Monday, the bridge and hat 7:3 discussed presentation °r�S Conference - November 6, 1995 a highway MNDOT and at the Mayor O � p.m. Minnesota Ma surrounding Neal disc new St . Croix River Bridge.communitMes° °nferenceuoned her Bridge. during the working with Review Minutes discussions of by Schaaf, moved Doctber 10, the 0 ' approve 1995: Council memberthe minutes as presented. Kern, seconded Public Presented Carried 5_ Hearings: A..lebee 's Inter Licenses� - Mayornational Inc. City - e 'Neal opened the eiUest For Li•uor Citythe Attorney Vierling noted that Applebee 's & ted a tte licenses.necessary forms and that theypplebee 'hearing at 7:35 the Councilmember met all requirements e had submitted all the public hearingKern, seconded quiremoved at 7:37 by Robert, for Councilmember Carried moved member Kern 5-0 • to close an Car iedciga5-0te licenses co d A by Swenson, moved liquor to Applebee 's International, Inc. •m. ehensive Plan Richards discussedUeda e Comprehensive - Estimated Cost nsive his estimate of under Metropolitan etz. Plan. $23, 000City Planner Comp °Polita Robertson noted to update the established this as Council mandate andh the the update was City Robert Ric pining peecess •e of its top priority's City Council hadquired movedpdirectpouncilmember prepare an updateNorthwest Schaaf,during the update not of the Associated Seconded by to exceed City's Comprehensive $23, 000 . Consultants, Inc. to M-tro•olitan Carried 5_0 Plan with said Council Livable on a ommunities Act representative meeting that he - Robertson Communities Act . and City Planner updatedrdthe with the Metropolitan of the tropolitan Council on had Polita noted Oak on the held afford n Counc ' 's benchPark Heights Livable o Metropolitan withinthe lmarksHfor already met Oak Park Heights ' had City limits. providing ng all housingghts favor agreed to modifyHe further noted reconstruction. which would be to take into those bench that a uction, Cou lost duringaccount the affordable marks in approve Resolution ncilmember Schaaf, se ridge and by K in the localeshousing a resolution by Kern Metropolitan Livable ince ution electingmoved to revives accounts Communities Ac program under de participate Act . Carried r the 5-0 . • NA Northwest Associated C Consultants ' Inc . COMMUNITY PLANNING • DESIGN • MARKET RESEARCH 7pECMOWLE ,rr , MEMORANDUM i\cOCT 161995 TO: Mike Robertson FROM: Scott Richards DATE: 12 October 1995 RE: Oak Park Heights - Comprehensive Plan Update FILE NO: 798.02 As per your request, I have developed a project estimate for updating the Oak Park Heights Comprehensive Plan. The current plan, completed in 1979 and updated as the community has grown, does not address the land use and transportation implications of the upgrades to Highway 36 and the St. Croix river crossing. Additionally, the current plan is not consistent with Metropolitan Council updates, especially the requirement for jurisdictions to completely revise their plans by 1998. The estimate below reflects the reduced "city rate" that Northwest will offer Oak Park Heights for City initiated projects. Cost savings can also be realized in that many of the presentations would likely occur at regularly scheduled Council meetings in which our participation would be otherwise required. We would propose to complete the project for the not to exceed fee listed below. The fee would include all changes including staff work and expenses. Issue Identification Senior Staff: 47 hours © $50/hr $ 2,350.00 Support Staff: 10 hours @ $40/hr 400.00 $ 2,750.00 5775 Wayzata Blvd. • Suite 555 • St. Louis Park, MN 55416 • (612) 595-9636•Fax. 595-9837 • Inventory Senior Staff: 25 hours @ $50/hr $ 1,250.00 Support Staff: 120 hours @ $40/hr 4,800.00 $ 6,050.00 Policy Planning Senior Staff: 45 hours @ $50/hr $ 2,250.00 Support Staff: 20 hours @ $40/hr 800.00 $ 3,050.00 Plans and Programs 5,000.00 Senior Staff: 100hours ours @ $ 2,000.00 Support Staff: 50 @ $40/hr $ 7,000.00 Implementation Senior Staff: 20 hours @ $50/hr $ 1,000.00 Support Staff: 30 hours @ $40/hr 1,200.00 $ 2,200.00 $21,050.00 SUB-TOTAL 1,950.00 Secretarial/Expenses* $23,000.00 * The expenses in this category include mileage, reproduction costs, etc. Printing expenses provided in this quote include the costs for all reports l ndtppreliminary e plan is excluded,aftsof the plan or its individual elements. The cost of printing a fin due to the uncertain nature of what the City will want int final i th.document such as color printing, the number of copies needed, and the document9 Due to budget considerations and need for intensive citiznndwould officials particiin eapation in the issue identification stage, it is expected that the update 6. Comprehensive plans for communities similar to Oak Park ighcstg erallen paryc take ten to o twelve months to complete depending upon the schedule et fshorter schedule could be set, but is likely unnecessary for Oak Park Heights. If you have any questions on the proposed Comprehensive Plan budget, do not hesitate to call. 2 • • ECKBERG, LAW OFFICES OF LAMMERS, BRIGGS WOLFF" `, 1838 NORTHWESTERN AVENUE VIERLING LYLE J. ECKBERG STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 JAMES F. LAMMERS ROBERT G. BRIGGS PAUL A.WOLFF (612)439- MARK J. VIERLING 2A78 FAX(612)439-2923 VICKI L. GIFFORD November 4, 1988 GREGORY G. GALLER PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL Frank Sommerfeldt Frank North Parkak Heights Ms . Barbara O'Neal 14168 Stillwater, MN h Street 6215City of Oak Park Heights City of 55082 Panama Avenue Mr . JosephStillwaterNorth Car ufel , ' MN 55082 City of Oak Park Heights Mr . 14625 North ghts Barry Torark He Oak Park9hts Street 15�44of Oak Councilman Heights, Park Heights . MN 55082 North Upper Mr . Jack Stillwater, MN 63rd Street Doerr, Councilman 55082 City of Oak ParkMs . 14520 North Upper Heights LaVonne Wilson Oak Park 57th St . City of Oak Park HeightAdministrator Heights, MN 55082 14168t - 57th Street Heights Stillwater North RE: Stillwater-Oak � MN 55082. File No. 1501- 709k Heightss Annexation Municipal 5709 File Municipal Board File No. D-240 Oak Stillwater Park Heights/ Dear Mayor and Council :O conference n Monday, meetingy' October 31 , issuance of of the Municipal1988 I attended the expansion . the order affecting Board proposed irelates final a By twoone to the PProve the issuance of a the Municil Commission o courthouse finally the former Kennethpal Co of The one descendingHeuer its order allowingmm i ssi on did the vote property to the annexation Municipal dommission came from attorney City of S Y member Stillwater . John Carey of enclosed, I am recommending order has been issued in final form and copies o are proceed ahead on mm ending the council allow this office to My rationale for o appeal of this time requesting that order to the to pursue the g authorizationDistrict Court . appeal is basically from the council at Y twofold, 'd . III 110 Mr. Frank Sommerfeldt Pity age of Oak Park Heightsayor Council Memberstubers 4, 1988 First , it proceedings has become om e withoutincurring g that apparent incurran the City of Stillwater throughout City of Stillwater tremendous cannot serve doubttthese C suspect that will voluntarily I ratherhproperty and the litigation Y assume that the Chat oflitigation Stillwater will be forthcomingthat expense Park to attempta by Washingtonand I feel provideutility expense to mandate County appealP to the p the litigationmay be in a property. lty ,of Oak expense. position to I avoid that future that Secondly, and of the hat thdunperhaps more important) Mu is pas Board has done is accept it appears ss me othe matter purely At the to there per and the Y a zoning dispute jurisdiction was no issue City of Oak Park pate betwObv a land municipal servicesoin these hearings Heights . needingudevelopment . inability gs affectingObviously, proceedings pment . Further, to provide servicesssue e lack of from gs as fara , there wasto an development due property beingno issue area attentiveness. ° restrainedin these developedThis a lack economically es subject property municipal velsingle family returning Y is clearly capablecm ern td i /owner under current cityg a substantial of being. code. income to its Commissionhe hasoncern I have annexation or traditionally sincere) detachments not sincerely is that the Municipal necessary ordunlessggotten into services and it affected an area affecting of ecjurisdictionsrmunicipal particular case appears utilities. the Provision in whereby this andif allowetome Their involvementndtheir in Y disputing otbe annexation to land to be pursued would seteYOnd to the owner/developers will situ municipality Municipal Commission a Precedent This Aalit down their andlPetition avoids protections turns eachfor ment . withinProrectionn of Particular everyvtime a law ctionthe city that proposed erd eveeo disputes the and avoids affecting appeals to are otherwise set zening dispu es the process District Courtf forth Y of the judicialfrom the rationality city legislation process of reviewing cening municipal or Zone in and ordinance the decision, planning standpoint ,the area and projected that created if allowed to point , it its es that From stand , does appears to me a considerable damagethis to the - 2 - 4 III 110 Mr . Frank Sommerfeldt, Mayor City of Oak Park Heights Council Members Page 3 November 4, 1988 ability of municipalities throughout this state to reasonably control properties within their jurisdictions . If an appeal is to be pursued , I would request that we be all. -d to pursue same promptly so as to expedite this matter for •arties concerned . Yours truly ...:f:) ar J. Vierling MJV:bs - 3 - mETRC»OLITAnn WA/Tr. • • COf 1TROL COmmltlion Twin Cities Area December 27, 1982 Ms. LaVonne Wilson, City Clerk City of Oak Park Heights 14168 - 57th Street North Stillwater, MN 55082 RE: Canprehensive Sewer Plan City of Oak Park Heights Dear Ms. Wilson: The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission has approved the Comprehensive Sewer Plan for the City of Oak Park Heights. The attached Resolution (MCC Resolution No. 82-305) transmits the action taken by the Commission at its December 21 , 1982 meeting. In accordance with the provisions of the Metropolitan Commission Act, the City may undertake the sanitarye Waste Cements as programmed in the Canprehensive Sewer Plan. sewer improvements The Commission has approved sewer service only within the present corporate limits of the City. Should portions unincorporated areas be annexed to the City, the C tasy should ienndddi ng s Comprehensive Sewer Plan prior to providing sewer service to these areas. The City should operate its sanitary the "Sewage and Waste Control sewer and Regulations accordance r with Metropolitan Disposal System". The Commission wishes to thank the City of Oak Park Heights for the submission of its plan and the assistance provided the Carenission during the review process. If you require any additional information, please feel free to contact the Commission. Sincerely, George W. Lusher Chief Administrator cc: Iawell Thorson, Metropolitan Council Commissioner Patrick J. Roedler, MCC 350 METRO/QUARE BLDG. Enclosure 7TH&ROBERT/TREET/ MIT PAUL mn 55101 GWL:EJB: , 612/222.8423 recycled ZJ • • Bssi:reSs It�'Tl K-3" METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION 350 Miro Square Building, Saint P1.11 , Minnesota 55101 222-8423 RESOLUTION ND. 82- 305 RESOLUTION APPROVII COMPRaiENSIVE SEWER PLAN FOR THE CITY CII' OAK PARK HRTGIILS WHEREAS, The City of Oak Park Heights had its previous Canprehensive Saner Plan approved by the Caimission in September, 1972; and WHEREAS, Th` current plan is submitted in response to the requirements of the Me`ropolitan Reorganization Act and the Metropolitan Land Planning Act; and WHEREAS, The Metropolitan Council made final comments on the plan and the City has since adopted the plan and has submitted it to the Cannission for approval; and WHEREAS, All new development is required to connect to the local sewer system; arra WHEREAS, The subject Camprehensive Sewer Plan conforms to the Metropolitan Disposal System Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission hereby approves the Canprehensive Sewer Plan for the City of Oak Park Heights , provided the City operate its sanitary sewer system in accordance with the "Sewage and Waste Control Rules and Regulations for the Metropolitan Disposal System". Adopted this 21st day of December, 1982 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION g1/1/41. By By Salisbury, Chairman George W. Lusher, Chief Administrator GWL:CLL MEMORANDUM TO: LaVonne Wilson • ifvc FROM: David Licht Ave DATE: 18 June 1982 NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS RE: Oak Park Heights Comp Plan Referrals- Incorporated Baytown Plan 4820 Minnetonka Boulevard, Suite 420 FILE NO: 798 .02 Mpls., Mn. 55416 612/925-9420 At Mark Vierling's reqest we have sent a letter to the Metro Council concerning the Baytown Comprehensive Plan. Copies of the letter are attached for your file and for distribution to the Mayor and niembers of the City Go-ucil Staff copies have been mailed direct. NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS INC. 18 June 1982 Mr. Charles Weaver, Ch Twin Cities Metropolitanr Council SohMetro Square tro Squa7 Robert Streets Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 Re: Baytown Township Comprehesive Plan File No. , 798.02 Dear Mr. Weaver: We are writing on behalf of the the directive of the City Attorney of Oak Park Heights at Comprehensive with regard to the Baytown Planomwas referred Plan.O Note should bep by the Cityand has been formally reviewedthe Township commentedp upon of Oak Park of 1982. Heights duringand the early months Cit purpose of this letter Y of Oak Park Heights' is to reiterate and highlight the Plan. The two g concerns relative to the Baytown ayport Wildlifeosues viewed as Management andprimary ares the onso While not Area, and annexation/consolidation. Wildlife recognized as a regional facility, the DNR' hunting whichallowedis of strong local concern due Bayport thehuntin which hon ngthaf crelatively uncontrolled property and the stresulting, mutual ° to the City, the Townshipihas indicated. In past alt pposition to hunting and use ofirearmson its City beleives that this Theue which e a is a significant landthe Property. byis the hconsequence should be recognizuse addressedr Township Plan. and Relative to the matter of the Baytown Plan, the Cityvexation/consolidation raised by accommodateheexisting or has clearly stated its o ts borders. Resultingorproposed urban policy to basis due development adjacent to the annexation has occurred on basis due existfailure of the Town to recognizea sporatic possible and needs to beto thato urban Baytownpossible future development. servedit ' andposition plan for should The City•s and take a practicalast�an°dledge the realiieswhich sexist that the demands attention and needs ttotberbandevelopment and use addressed. 4820 minnetonka boulevard, suite 420 minn eapolis, mn 55416 612/925-9420 Mr. Charles Weaver 18 June 1982 Page 2 1 participated Note should be made that Oak Park Heights has willingly in the governmental consolidation c ysideration, ands whichrhaHeights. taken place relative to Bayport, While such a combination of government and services the praticality is questionable appears to ce in be of great benefit in theory, the great difference due to a number of factors including N ever- the type and style of develoment in thethreeunits. has lived theless, the City is open to exploring astid up to its commitments on assembling background data req process. To the City's knowledge , this has not as part of the City' s position b and the casen witherdithe Town.eWe tionlas welleasconsolidation and commitment yegorumng the attachments to this ter are sufficiently documented in and which have been previously supplied to the T wonship. Should you have questions concerning these points or require lease contact our office accordingly. further information, p Sincere yours, ' tants, Inc. so -/I'( Northwest As , / 41, • .vid R 1 ht, AICP Preside cci Mayor and City Council LaVonne Wilson Mark V ierling Brad Lemberg , . „, • 111 1111' 11 March 11, 1982 Mr. Dennis O'Donnell Planning Department Washington County Court House 14900 61st Street North Still r, Minnesota 55082 yn f • Oak Park Heights - Plan Referral Baytown TOwnshlp File No: 798.02 Dear Mr O'Donnell: On 8 March 1982, the Oak Park Heights City Council acted upon the review of the Baytown Township LandPlanning ht Comprehensive Plicwas received through Metropolitan referral under the We have attached a copy of staff comments, dated 25 January 1982, on the Baytown Plan's consistency with plans of Oak Park Heights. As can be seen, physical planning aspects of the two jurisdictions are viewed as compatible. Relative to policies, there are, however, some issues. The City Council directed that its recently approved comprehensive plan amend- ment addressing annexation be reiterated to the Townbsip. This policy is as follows: "It should be emphasized that the areas specifically noted in this text (Comprehensive Plan-Policy Plan/Development Framework) are not intended to be inclusive of all future annexations to Oak Park Heights, and that the City remains open to consider all lands for which annexation petitions are made. Proposals for annexation that arise init►ef'ru� studied individually and position of the City will included in appendlxtothrepothe t A final item is that the Township plan promotes the consolidation koftB Bayport, ort, Baytown Township and Oak Park Heights. The City Council on record noting that this matter has been considered in the past by the three jurisdictions, Park Heightsthat is, hdate owever,, hopenotoaaions are at continuationnof suche• The City o discussions. 0:fJ • Mr. Dennis O'Donnell Page Two March 11, 1982 comments, please contact Should you have questions relative Heights City°Cleor our office. Mrs. LaVonne Wilson, Oak Very truly yours, NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. David R. Licht, AICP President DRL/nd cc: LaVonne Wilson Lyle Eckberg Brad Lemberg Charlotte Kirby, Tow shipl 1 i Tom Caswell , Metropolitan off-- CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS P�1 MINUTES OF MEETINO HELD MONDAY, MARCH 8 , 1982 Meeting called to order at 7 : 00 P.M. by Mayor Sonnnerfcldt . Present. : O' Neal , Sengelke , Fckberc7 and Wilson. Absent : Lang and Westphal . Bids were opened for spring street sweeping project . O ' Neal moved to accept bid from Allied Blacktop co. at $48 . 00 per hour . Seconded by Seggelke. 3 ave votes . Carried. Seneelke moved to approve ;Spring Training . Seminar for Chief Osteu- dorf at a cost of $75. 00 Seminar to be held inr'B3iookll . ;naCentere�; • er March 31 through April 2 , 1982 . Seconded by Carried. O' Neal moved to accept: the minutes of February 8th and 22nd with the addition in the minutes of the 8th. State to• pay costs of installation of roadway delineators along the curvaturelke.of 3t hearontage road at. Oakgreen and Highway 436 . Seconded by :eg..a Carried. SengE:lke moved to anthsitl-ec'fort ya]E Attorney propadaltittochcel►r.eturned Wastee City Treatment Plant Carried . to the council May 10, 1982 . Seconded by O' Neal. 3 aye votes. Segnelk.e moved to accept quote from St . Croix Body Works in the amount of $1260. 00 for repair of 1974 one ton truck and authorizing the work to commence. Seconded by O' Neal . 3 aye votes. Carried. Seggelke moved to table the sign ordinance until fulld. council is present . Seconded by O' Neal . 3 ave votes. • Lang arrived at. 7 : 40. P.M. Sequelke moved to respond to the BaytnTnshpComprehensive ompreivPlan • by reiterating the City of Oak Park Height ' sihensel andn noting that efforts amendment concerning annexation to the Township consolidation of the 1., had been made in the past. regarding the sugg City with Baytown and Bayport . After several discussions the Cissued . 0 has remained at an impasse. Seconded by Lang . aye • Seclgcelke proved to adopt a resolution approving the Memorandum of. Under- 411X nder- 1 y standing which makes the Joint and Coolerativen Agreement establishing 4 `� the Central. St . Croix Valley Joint. `� effective on the 1st of February , 1982 and directing Mayor and Clerk to sign same. Seconded by O ' Neal . Roll call vote taken with 4 aye votes . Resolution adopted . l kation from Clerk to respond with note of appreciation for appli Kenneth Jerzak for the Cable Comrnunicaion C • NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS INC. MEMORANDUM TO: Oak Park Heights Mayor and City Council FROM: David Licht/Anne Bronken ph1—" DATE: 25 January 1982 RE: Oak Park Heights Comprehensive Plan Referral - Review of Baytown Township Plan FILE NO: 798.02 As part of the Metropolitan Land Planning Act requirements, the Baytown Township Comprehensive Plan has been referred to the City for review and comment. In the following report, we have first briefly reviewed the major concerns of the plan which impact Oak Park Heights. In the second portion of this memo we identify policy issues and questions which we believe the Council should comment on and communicate their position to the Township. PLAN REVIEW The following paragraphs summarize the Baytown Township Comprehensive Plan with regard to its compatibility and consistency with the Oak Park Heights Comprehensive Plan. Utilizing the standard Metropolitan Functional Classification System, the designation of the roadways in the Township's Plan at all the intersecting points with the City of Oak Park Heights are exactly consistent with the City's plan. Although it is of no consequence to the plan, it should be noted that the Baytown Township Plan does not show the collector jogging through the East Area at 59th Street in Oak Park Heights, but rather continues north on Stagecoach Trail . The Baytown Plan has indicated the future land use of the Township. The land to the west of and including the Anderson/Linquist annexation property, has been appropriately designated for commercial use. The proposed land use of the remaining area west and adjacent to the City is low density residential , which has been defined as one unit per 22 acres. This is the highest residential density the Township plan provides for which is dictated by the lack of public sewer (there are no future plans for public sewer in the Township). This abuts the low residential density of three units per acre in Oak Park Heights. The Township's low density residential has also been proposed for the land adjacent to Oak Park Heights south of the State Prison property. 4820 minnetonka boulevard, suite 420 minneapolis, mn 55416 612/925-9420 le Oak Park Heights Mayor and City Council 25 January 1932 Page Two The land south of the DNR Wildlife Refuge, in which the Kimmel Annexation property is located, has been designated for agricultural use. This designation allows a residential density of one unit per acre and possibly clustering on smaller lots. In sum, the proposed land uses of the Township appear to be compatible with the Oak Park Heights Plan. A point of major difference between the City and Township is that Baytown Township's Plan stands in opposition to parcel by parcel annexation by Oak Park Heights or Bayport. The Township only supports a total consoli- dation of Oak Park Heights, Bayport and Baytown into one municipality. ISSUE It is believed that the City should reiterate its recently adopted plan amendment concerning annexation to the Township. This statement reads as follows: "It should be emphasized that the areas specifically noted in this text (Comprehensive Plan-Policy Plan/Development Framework) are not intended to be inclusive of all future annexations to Oak Park Heights, and that the City remains open to consider all lands for which annexation petitions are made. Proposals for annexation that arise in the future will be studied individually and the position of the City will be included in the appendix to this report." Additionally, a comment from the City is believed advisable on the suggested consolidation of the City with Baytown and Bayport. While this matter was discussed and considered several years ago through an effort initiated by the Metropolitan Council , we are uncertain if any formal statement or policy was issued by the City. We therefore recommend that the City Council review and discuss this issue and formulate a statement which can be provided to the Township. Upon resolution of the issues, it is requested that we be authorized to communicate the findings of the Plan review and comments by the Council to the Township. cc: LaVonne Wilson Lyle Eckberg Brad Lemberg • • • olitar f 4 Tit May 20, 1982 a ¢� 'et IN Cil TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: 300 Metro Square Building Saint Paul,Minnesota 55101 RE: Review of Local Comprehensive Plan Telephone 612/291-6359 Baytown Township Date Received December 15, 1981 Metropolitan Council District No. 14 Metropolitan Council Referral File No. 8642-3 The above plan has been submitted to the Metropolitan Council for review under provisions of the Metropolitan Land Planning Act. • This plan has been approved by the planning commission and considered by the governing body. The applicant has stated that they have sent two copies of the plan to adjacent units of government and affected school districts at least six months prior to and at the time of sending it to the Council for review. Notified units of government have 30 days subsequent to the receipt of this notice in which to express questions and concerns about the plan to the Council and to request a hearing before the Council. A hearing request must be made by resolution of the requesting unit's governing body. It should be noted that regardless of whether a public hearing is formally requested by any of the notified communities, the Council will , in accord with its procedure governing Local Plan Reviews, hold at least one public meeting regarding this plan. Notice of this meeting will be published in the Metropolitan Council Review that is mailed every other Friday. Listed below are all units of government that have received this notice: Minnesota Pollution' Control Agency; Minnesota State Planning Agency; Minnesota Department of Education; Educational Cooperative Service Unit; Minnesota Energy Agency; Minnesota Historical Society; Mn/DOT; Minnesota Environmental Quality Board; Minnesota Department of Natural Resources; Metropolitan Transit Commission; Metropolitan Airports Commission; Metropolitan Parks and Open Space Commission; Metropolitan Waste Control Commission; the cities of Stillwater, Oak Park Heights, and Lake Elmo; the townships of Stillwater, West Lakeland, and Grant; Washington County; Washington County Soil and Water Conservation District; School District No. 834; Valley Branch Watershed District; St. Croix County Planning Office; U.S. Department of Interior - St. Croix Valley; and Minnesota-Wisconsin Boundary Commission. An Agency Created to Coordinate the Planning and Development of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Comprising: Anoka County 0 Carver County 0 Dakota County 0 Hennepin County 0 Ramsey County 0 Scott County 0 Washington County An Equal Opportunity Employer 1110 0 400111 I 0 0 2 �P a 0 w��� i• Baytown Township ° Comprehensive Plan w� May 20 1982 Page Two r. 'iSq ciT1S 300 Metro Square Building Saint Paul,Minnesota Telephone 612/291-6359101 Units of government arangements to secure or have not received a co Mto s cu anr examine the copy of the Council plan with the a plan must make offices, Sincerely, pplicant or examine the Plan in the john Rutford Referral Coordinator JR:bm • cc: Mary Hauser, Metropolitan Council District No. 14 • AAnoka n Ageneq Gated to Coor�3in County O Carver Count � ate the Planning o Daketa Count and Development of the Twin Cities County O Hennepin Count An E Y O Ramsey CountyMetropolitan Area Comprising: Equal O 0 scot-Count Opportunity Employer.. Y 0 Washington County Bonestroo,Rosene,Anderlik and Associates is an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer Bonestr. Otto G.Bonestroo,P.E. Howard A.San Robert W.Rosene,P.E.* Keith A.Gordon., amesian eR.Ma and,P.E.l C.Lynch,P.E. Fr Todd Foster,RE. Rosene Joseph C.Anderlik,P.E. Robert R.Pfefferle,P.E. Jerry D.Pertzsch,P.E. Keith R.Yapp,P.E. EIMII Marvin L.Sorvala,P.E. Richard W.Foster,P.E. Scott J.Arganek,P.E. Douglas J.Benoit,P.E. Anderlik & Richard E.Turner,P.E. David O.Loskota,P.E. Kenneth P.Anderson,P.E. Shawn D.Gustafson,P.E. t Ceci101ivier,P.E. 11 Th mas E.Noyes,P.E. JerryrA Bourd n,P.E. Mark A.Seip,P.E. Kent'Jo.Wagner,F E. Associates Robert G.Schunicht,P.E. Mark A.Hanson,P.E. Gary W.Morien,P.E. Paul G.Heuer,P.E. Susan M.Eberlin,C.P.A.* Michael T.Rautmann,P.E. Paul J.Gannon,A.I.A. John P.Gorder,P.E. Engineers &Architects *Senior Consultant Ted K.Field,P.E. Daniel J.Edgerton,P.E. Dan D.Boyum,P.E. Thomas R.Anderson,A.I.A. A.Rick Schmidt,P.E. Jeffrey J.Ehleringer,P.E. James R.Rosenmerkel,P.E. Dale A.Grove,P.E. Joseph R.Rhein, Donald C.Burgardt,P.E. Philip J.Caswell,P.E. Lee M.Mann,P.E. P E Thomas A.Syfko,P.E. Mark D.Wallis,P.E. Charles A.Erickson Frederic J.Stenborg,P.E. Miles B.Jensen,P.E. Leo M.Pawelsky Ismael Martinez,P.E. L.Phillip Gravel,P.E. Harlan M.Olson (� Michael P.Rau,P.E. Karen L.Wiemeri,P.E. March 1, 1796 A .Ring Thomas W.Peterson,P.E. Gary D.Kristofitz,P.E. Jagmes nes F.Engelhardt Mr. Mike Robertson City of Oak Park Heights P.O. Box 2007 1i [IP Stillwater, MN 55082 u �T Re: Draft Comprehensive Street PlanCITY OF j Our File No. 55111 OAK PARK HEIGHTS I Dear Mr. Robertson: Transmitted herewith is one copy of the Draft Comprehensive Street Plan for the City of Oak Park Heights. Please call Joe Anderlik if you have any questions. Sincerely, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK&ASSOCIATES, INC. di,a,-/ue-,.. 79;--4A-- Diane M. Hudoba enclosure 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MN 55113 ■ 612-636-4600 , • ak ark:� d� '� eights minnesota Comprehensive Street Plan Oak Park Heights, Minnesota September 1993 File No. 55111 t e • 0 : Otto G.Bonestroo.P.E. Howard A.Sanford,P.E. Agnes M.Ring,A.LC.P Miles B.Jensen,P.E. Bonestroo Robert W Roselle.PE' Keith A.Gordon,PE. Philip J.Pyne,PE. L.Philip Gravel,P.E. Joseph C.Anderlik,PE. Robert R.Pfefferle,P.E. Thomas W.Peterson,P.E. Karen L.Wiemeri,P.E. Rosene Marvin L.Sorvala,PE. Richard W Foster.P.E. Michael C.L nch,P.E. . Y Gary D.Krfitz,P.E. Richard E.Turner,P.E. David O.Loskota,P.E. James R.Maland,P.E. F.Todd Foster,P.E. Anderlik & Glenn R.Cook.P.E. Robert C.Russek,A I.A. Jerry D.Pertzsch,P.E. Keith R.Yapp.P.E. Thomas E.Noyes,PE. Jerry A.Bourdon,P.E. Scott J Arganek,P.E. Douglas J.Benoit.PE. Robert G.Schunicht P.E. Mark A.Hanson.PE. Kenneth P.Anderson.P.E. Shawn D.Gustafson,P.E. Associates Susan M.Eberlin,C.P.A. Michael T.Rautmann,P.E. Mark R.Rolls.P.E. Cecilio Olivier,P.E. 'Senior Consultant Ted K.Field,P.E. Mark A.Seip,P.E. Paul G.Heuer,P.E. Thomas R.Anderson,A.I.A. Gary W Morien.P.E. John P.Gorder,P.E. Engineers & Architects Donald C.Burgardt,P.E. Daniel J.Edgerton,PE. Charles A.Erickson Thomas E.Angus,P.E. A.Rick Schmidt,P.E. Leo M.Pawelsky Ismael Martinez,P.E. Philip J.Caswell,P.E. Harlan M.Olson Michael P Rau,P.E. Mark D.Wallis,P.E. James F Engelhardt September 3, 1993 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Oak Park Heights P.O. Box 2007 Stillwater, MN 55082 Re: Draft Comprehensive Street Plan Our File No. 55111 Dear Mayor and Council: In accordance with your authorization, we are pleased to submit the Draft Comprehensive Street Plan for the City of Oak Park Heights. This plan addresses the needs for rehabilitating the older streets in Oak Park Heights. The primary purpose of this plan is to provide the City Council and its staff with a planning tool to assist them in discussing street rehabilitation projects with its residents. The plan discusses street rehabilitation, cost estimates, assessments and a recommended capital improvement program for 1994. Please feel free to contact us at your convenience to discuss any portion of this plan. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. A G4n l - . /.1, tr.-4,, Mark A. Hanson MAH:po Encl. _. r, • OAK PARK HEIGHTS COMPREHENSIVE STREET PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS page No. 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 INTRODUCTION 3 Street Life Cycle 4 Figure No. 1 Street Life Cycle 5 Figure No. 2 Seal Coat Projects 6 EXISTING CONDITIONS 6 Street Areas/Conditions 7 Figure No. 3 Street Areas 9 Evaluation Figure No. 4 Pavemnet Condition Index 10 11 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 11 Street Figure No. 5 Typical Street Sections 12 13 Storm Sewer Figure No. 6 Storm Sewer Extensions - Area A 14 13 Utility Repairs 15 COST ESTIMATE 17 ASSESSMENTS 20 REVENUE 55111\comp.rpt { • • Page No. STREET PROJECT - 1994 22 Figure No. 7 Street Project 1994 23 APPENDIX A Deflection Testing Analysis/Core Samples 24 APPENDIX B Cost Estimate 26 APPENDIX C Properties in Area A 29 APPENDIX D Sample Notice for Area A 31 55111\comp.rpt • EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In May 1993 the City of Oak Park Heights authorized the preparation of a Comprehensive Street Plan to develop a street rehabilitation program for its older streets. pavement condition for each street and at what point in a street's The plan identifies the pa life is the most cost effective maintenance. The Comprehensive Street Plan proposes a street reconstruction project for the streets in Area A, as presented on Figure No. 7 (Area A includes 296 parcels). It also recommends the streets in Areas B and C be reviewed further in 1995 to develop a program for rehabilitating these streets. Listed below is the estimated cost to completely reconstruct the 9.16 miles of streets reviewed in this plan and the City's cost based on the assessment policy presented in this plan. In the event certain streets are not totally reconstructed, the total cost and the estimated cost to the City may be reduced. Amount % Assessed Assessed Total --- ed Length C� Cost ----- 45.0% Areas A-E 9.16 miles $2,371,768 $1,939,662 $4,311,430 The proposed assessments are based on a front foot basis, assuming a 75' minimum • and 90' maximum assessable footage to residential property where new concrete curbs are constructed and existing concrete curbs are repaired. The assessments to residential property are summarized below. New Concrete Curb remove existin bituminous curb $2,250.00/lot 75' minimum $2,700.00/lot 90' maximum 1 55111\comp.rpt A • • Existing Concrete Curb (repair only deteriorated curbs) 75' minimum $1,237.50/lot 90' maximum $1,485.00/lot The street project proposed in 1994 is presented on Figure No. 7 and its cost is summarized below: Length Year (miles) Project Cost City Cost % Assessed 1994 3.18 $1,795,350 $1,089,119 39.3% The Comprehensive Street Plan also suggests the City has different options how it elects to rehabilitate its streets, because many of its streets have not deteriorated to a point where total reconstruction is required. However, the streets recommended for consideration in 1994 are proposed to be reconstructed. The streets included in future projects may not require total reconstruction and should be reviewed further. It's recommended the City conduct an informational meeting with the residents in Area A, presenting the Draft Comprehensive Street Plan and the project being considered for 1994. If the City Council is comfortable with the results of the informational meeting, the preparation of a feasibility report would be authorized in conjunction with the required formal public hearings. Appendix C identifies the properties in Area A impacted by the project proposed in 1994. Appendix D presents a proposed sample notice to be sent to the properties in Area A notifying them of the informational meeting. 55111\comp.rpt 2 • • STREETINTRODUCTION L IFE CYCLE The City of Oak Park Heights similar to other communities approaching the end of their useful life, must consider other other than routine seal coats. programs to Figure No maintain street its and the required 1 identifies the life c maintenance based on cycle of a typical street street's life, its condition. As noted ' crack repair/seal coat is the recommended maintenance. routinely seal coated its streets eve The City of Oak Park more recent seal coat ro every 5-7 years. projects since Figure NO. 2 identifies the The recommended 1987 and the recommended m1ended interval between seal coat a seal coat Project for 1993. As noted applications is 4-8 on Figure No. 1years. as the pavement condition become older, seal coat a begins to deteriorate and streets applications are no longer recommended maintenance. In addition, a street's condition of life, will deteriorate 40% while the next 12% of its life it during will deteriorate the first 75% 's Condition will deteriorate quitequickly another 40%, Therefore, a street's this point, beyond 75% of its life. When City officials and a street approaches staff are expected to aintn their streets, make difficult decisions how to maintain Basically, three maintenance programs can be considered for maintaining Each program is listed below, noting at what Publicstreets. program should be considered a street s life each maintenance yard. 511 llcomp,rpt 3 i • NUMBER -� VERBAL C .E1T__I N ONDITION lYP I AL SAA 1 biTFNA__IV_( 100--- i.Q REPAIR_ 1VUMBFR Qe COSTS Excellent '�� / q .Yd . 90 Pavements that 80 hove little or Typical Street Life no distress. N. O 70 Very Good \ \ Seal Coat (j0.45—j0.80) Pavements that have \♦ (50-100) F— a significant level of distress. N. Z 60 Good nts non—load related. Pavemethat have ` 0 a significant level `� 50 of distress. 1 LZ load related. Fair Overlay (j2.00—j7.00) Q 40 (30-4 CI- Poor Pavements that have u 3 Q major distress. 20 Very Poor \♦ Pavements that have Reconst40ction \ j9.00—j15.00) (0-40) significant amounts \ 10 of major distress, \ \ Q Failed 3 15 (YEARS) 20 25 • STREET LIFE CYCLE OAK PARK HEI jJj Bonestroo HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA 0 Rosene COMPREHENSIVE STREET PLAN FIGURE 1 111 Anderlik d Associates K:\55\55111\55111F01 JULY 1993 COMM. 55111 1. • 110 1989 z o _ _ < / ill • OAK PARK HEIGHTS E. 65th ST. N EVERTT oa 1 01 1 z l\ . 64th ST. N r �� g 63rd ST. N D❑© 83rd ST. N � PSflLLWATER , . EAST 62nd SI N MI \ )IkME O ST. Cf. ,"ir •,.t 1 N. �., ST. N � � � STA . - �rii1®► *-- - 1 . z z 7-- -,- ..... tti IT frik\ w wiw w s 7.10 Pi a A , 38th ST. N o ,7th sr. .. 4:7 0 56th ST. N. 43 S7th Sr. N• �r 38th ST. N. 1 14 elli= 68th ST. N.D COURT = I_I .\\.i AV �/� ,r 1461* WOS4< 55th ST. N. ilir y � � i '16,111 I eAYrowN < N. PROPOSED �� a Pt.uue 1161514?:: T. .�_ A� 19930 • OAK PARK HEIGHTS FAFin W YTOWN 5th AVE.N. N 0 730 1500 lieSiiiQiiii Soots in fog SEAL COAT PROJECTS (1987-1993) itiBonestroo Rosen° • 11 OAK PARK HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA FIGURE 2 Anderlik b Associates COMPREHENSIVE STREET PLAN K:\55\55111\55111F02 JULY 1993 COMM. 55111 • R�timated Cost Percent in Life Cycle per Sa Yd• Maintenance to be Considered 75% $0.45 - $ 0.80 Crack Repair/Patch/Seal Coat 0 - 85% $2 00 - $ 7.00 Patch/Overlay Existing Surface 60 - $9.00 - $15.00 Reconstruct 80 - 100% and varies considerably, due to the amount of patching The estimated cost per square Y rovement. and drainage improvements that are being considered as part of each imp Typically, communities like Oak Park Heights will finance seal coat projects internally through their general fund. However, due to the cost of overlay and reconstruction type projects, it's difficult for cities to finance these types of projects internally. Therefore, the abutting additional revenue sources must be considered,which typically means assessing property. EXISTING CONDITIONS STREET AREAS/CONDITIONS have been divided For purposes of this report the older streets in Oak Park Heights on Figure No. 3. The area designations for the most part into five areas (A-E), as shownand E correspond with Oak Park Heights' Seal Coat Program. In addition, Areas A, D, have bituminous curb, while Areas B and C have concrete curb. General information pertaining to each area is listed below. 6 55111\comp,rpt { TD • otan i z .ez 111211 1 i z W g • _ _ Z = It as / lU IL4P da VI 1211i NI . ,y WI : Ill 11 ORM 11211i i 8 a� Z II0II ) fr"....3111 EMI 11!11; waft I . 51LLWA . 1,1211PPir iv j. ____wrialiP alan mei",n ® 4.10.1 tiLthE4Eirei.1, - . dairixamk,disai:vir i st , , , i, s. : 4 melet OUu58tN. i ,. . n , ntil 44. `►`36thSTN. 7tN SST1% �r RT III . 4 �YTOWN I \10 lith ds g AVE. N . I � � Pt�B ST �_ � A �+ IP OAK PARK HEIGHTS oil ®®© BAYTOWN all BB N ' AVE N. I t► � Ism Scan n Ifast STREET AREAS OAK 4Boneetroo MINNESOTA Rosene COMPREHENSIVE STREET PLAN FIGURE 3 Anderlik d PARK HEIGHTS Associates K:\55\55111\55111F03 JULY 1993 COMM. 55111 • • Length Age of Streets miles Years Last Seal Area A auj. Coated 3.18 �-----)- Cur_bType Area B 16-26 1987 0.97 3-15 Bituminous 37 1987 Concrete Area C p 10-18 1987, 1989 Area D 2.27 26 Concrete 1989 Bituminous Area E 2.37 26 9.16 Proposed 1992 Bituminous The condition of a street will vary for a number of reasons. A few of these reasons are listed below. -- Surface condition (amount of cracking) -- Drainage (street profile/cross-section/storm sewer) -- Street section (bituminous/gravel base thickness) Subgrade soil (sand, clay, silt) -- Amount/type of traffic -- Age -- Maintenance (seal coat/patching) All of the above items contribute to whether a street will be in poor or good condition. In addition, it's not uncommon for streets in the same area and constructed at the same time to vary in condition,which makes it difficult to develop an efficient street rehabilitation program that will satisfy everyone. S5111\comp.rpt 8 • • EVALUATION The City of Oak Park Heights evaluated the condition of its streets in 1987. The study, for the most part, indicated the streets were in reasonablyt 987 another seal coat application good condition, such that tion over the next 4-8 years would maintenance. As part of this be the plan a similar evaluation was done cost effective a for the streets in were last seal coated in Area A because these streets condition than streets in other are 1987 and for the most part are in a poorer as. The results of that evaluation are presented on Figure No. 4. The pavement condition corresponds nds to the rankings which are presented on Figure No. 1 and summarized below: Maintenance Recommended Pavement Seal Coat Condition Overlay SO - 100 Reconstruct 30 - 60 0 - 40 In addition to the pavement condition dition eValuation, a deflection testin ana samples were taken in each roadwayg lysis and core and are presented in Appendix A. The ets in Area results of each analysis indicate the stre A are beginning to approach a t• a seal coat application is not the line in their life where most cost effective maintenance. The street conditions in Areas B, C, D and E are also deteriorating, but not to the extent they A. The pavement condition for these appear to be in areas wasArea completed in 1987. for these It's recommended a similar evaluation be done considered. areas before their next Seal coat application is 55111\comp•rpt 9 . • Z • at in \ I ( II OSGOOD AVE. N Co. Rd. 67 psif-• vle I oREN 0 zi_: 6 OMAR AVE. N tnn iii5-c in co re) SOMAHA AVE. H Z OLENE AVE. N SI:mr--4111 S (E.,+ li i 1 &,pA OLINDA AVE. N 'Q Z 6 . t OLDFIELD Z AVE. N OLDFIELD AVE. Nit) (ID w ti. , .)1:: \ 2 & g • 8 __ O'BRIEN AVE. N K Z_-._.__ 0 ,0_ ...... _._--___E..rd. �`°'°'" '°°` _:_5,),0 41g Bonestroo PAVEMENT CONDITION INDEX Rosene 0 Anderlik & OAK PARK HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA FIGURE 4 itiAssociates COMPREHENSIVE STREET PLAN K:\55\55111\55111F04 JULY 1993 COMM. 55111 • • PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS STREET-- _ Various street improvements can be considered when a seal coat application PP icati on is no longer cost effective. Each improvement is discussed below. -- Mill, patch and overlay existing bituminous surface if existing street condition will accept an overlay. Specific areas may have to be reconstructed; however, it's not expected these areas will be more than 25% of the total street surface area. -- Remove existing bituminous surface and upgrade existing gravel base where required. Construct a new bituminous surface over existing gravel base. -- Remove existing bituminous surface and gravel base. Construct newravel g base and bituminous surface to required thickness. Figure No. S presents each typical section for each street improvement.p ement. It should be noted the cost for each improvement is substantially higher when moreatchin reconstruction is done. In addition, on streets with bituminous curbs in Areas A, D and E, it's recommended the bituminous curbs be removed and new B618 concrete curb and gutter be constructed. If a B6 bituminous curb exists, it is feasible to construct a B618 concrete curb and gutter adjacent to the existing bituminous surface and match the existing boulevard grades, allowing a new bituminous overlay to be constructed over the existingbituminous surface. If this construction is considered, it will have to be reviewed further during the preparation of the feasibility report. For streets with existing concrete curbs it's recommended only the curbs in disrepair be removed and replaced. 55111\comp.rpt 11 • Variable Variable Existing Concrete Curb and Gutter 0.02'/ft. 0.02'/ft. ler M"' PATCH AREA Type 41 Bituminous Wear Course Type 31 Bituminous Base Course Aggregate Base Course - MILLED AREA MILL. PATCH AND OVERLAY e:,'....<: ...:l,.,e. ..... .<?}.•:tn..<,.Y<a+k.di A.ttrM>.t.: .,xMx.ay. 5 9b:...?:.rotH ::C.sr..,.�d3^. .� U,RL,... CL Variable Variable _ Existing Concrete Curb and Gutter 0.027ft. 0.02'/ft. \ I Type 41 Bituminous Wear Course Type 31 Bituminous Base Course Ex. Aggregate Base REMOVE EXIST. BITUMINOUS SURFACE, CONSTRUCT NEW BITUMINOUS SURFACE OVER Ex. GRAVEL BASE CL NEW CONCRETE VariablePM MO Variable CURB & GUTTER Existing Bituminous Curb (REMOVAL RECOMMENDED) 4,r, 0.02'/ft. 0.02'/ft. Cirr l" Type Type 41 Bituminous Wear Course Type 31 Bituminous Base Course Aggregate Base Course REMOVE EXIST. BIT. AND GRAVEL SURFACE CONSTRUCT NEW BIT. AND GRAVEL SURFACE TYPICAL STREET SECTIONS Bonestroo • Rosana OAK PARK HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA FIGURE 5 Anderlik Associates COMPREHENSIVE STREET PLAN . • '.•• .-...\ rr• 4 rnr II IIV '10(1Z rsrne+4 FFA 11 • • STORM SEWER When street improvements are being considered, it's also existing storm sewer system. necessary to review the Y The design standards for storm sewer construction have improved since many of the streets and storm sewers were constructed it's recommended the upstream drainage in Oak Park Heights. Presently i area from the end of the storm sewer system not be larger than 3-S acres. In the case of the existingstorm many of the upstream drainage areas are larger than sewers in Area A, g 10 acres. The benefit of extending storm sewer is to reduce the amount of storm water runoff being c surface and improve conveyed down a street's intersection drainage. Figure No. 6 shows the proposed storm sewer extensions in Area A. A brief review of Areas B, C, D and E indicates additional storm extension won't be required to the extent they are proposed in Area A. However, a more detailed review preparation of the feasibility reports for these areas. In addition is recommended during to storm sewer extensions, draintile construction may be required in isolated areas toro It's also recommended the discharge of sum p perly drain the subgrade soil. p pumps into streets and backyard drainage problems be reviewed to determine if additional storm sewer extensions are required. UTILITY REPAIRS When overlay and reconstruction type projects are re considered for an area, it's also recommended the existing sanitary sewer and water main system sanitary sewers will be televised and the history of watery em be reviewed. Typically, main breaks will be reviewed. After this review, if repairs/upgrades are required, it's recommended they be done as part of the street improVement project. 55111\comp.rpt 13 • • .. • _________ ci L) L JL 1 t ST. N 1 - \�" S ill ST. CT. E----------i Ex. 36" STORM SEWER L �ssr1$rrrrrrr r _....eatealto ,' in' NT IP ..,.,�..,.....,..••. - ---i 60th ST. N ^•--.w __„•,..•. STATE T.H. 36 7-PROPOSED 11 STORM SEWER 1z z IziILi z z W Z J 1 j <>/l Z di O fo c^p Q '� cr Y WI tj PROPOSED o o o mfl •• _-57th ST. N. STORM SEWER Z 58th L ST. N le 56th ST. N. z Ii... w if 56th ST, N. 0 1 57th ST. N. •_• OLDFIELD x. 36” —...—J l � '� \QQ _ L STORM SE T '" COURT f Nr. ST. N Ex. 33" STORM SEWER h.� <z o Q cr z 56th ST. N. PROPOSED 0' alYtr Ex. 3." STORM SEWER STORMS a - rn 'r EWER 55th ST. N. Lii] .- 1 rrr erftra�a��anrr , 1 ------j a __„.........„................................. ....,.......1 :0 4 z I N w Z /Lea 0 •rrrrrrriM Q 0 0 0 ca o o � eoo Sco1e aoMo feet STORM SEWER EXTENSIONS EXTENSIONS (AREA A) OAK PARK HEIGHTS, B::: -oo COMPREHENSIVESMINNESOTA FIGURE gRne STREET PLAN 117111 Anderlik d K:\55\55111\55111F06 ,111111 ,g a A880CI$te8 • • COST ESTIMATE The costs associated with street rehabilitation will vary, depending upon the construction. The costs to remove and reconstruct the existing bituminous and gravel base surfaces will obviously be much greater than milling, patching, and constructing a bituminous overlay. In addition, streets with bituminous curbs where it's recommended they be removed and reconstructed with new concrete curbs will be much greater than areas which have existing concrete curbs and only the curbs in need of repair are removed and reconstructed. The pavement condition will determine if patch and overlay is feasible. Therefore, for purposes of this report, the estimated cost for lineal foot of street rehabilitation is separated into streets with existing bituminous curbs and existing concrete curbs. The cost for street repair between the curbs is separated into streets requiring mill, patch, overlay and streets requiring total reconstruction. Estimated costs for mill, patch, overlay assume 5% of the existing concrete curbs and 15% of the existing bituminous surface, including gravel base, will be removed and reconstructed. A detailed cost estimate for each construction is presented in Appendix B and summarized below: Areas with Existing Bituminous Curb (remove/reconstruct concrete curb) Street New Concrete Curb Total Reconstruct $54.00/L.F. $36.00/L.F. $90.00/L.F. Mill, Patch, Overlay $33.00/L.F. $36.00/L.F. $69.00/L.F. Areas with Existing Concrete Curb (remove/repair only bad curbs) Street (includes 5% curb repair) Reconstruct $44.00/L.F. Mill, Patch, Overlay $33.00/L.F. 55111\comp.rpt 15 • • • In addition to the above costs for street, storm sewer costs also need to be determined. Storm sewer costs are estimated at $60/lineal foot for the lineal feet of main storm sewer line constructed, which includes manholes, catch basins, catch basin leads and drain tile. It should be noted the above cost estimates per lineal foot include 10% contingencies g and 30% indirect costs, which include legal, engineering, administrative, construction interest, and all miscellaneous costs not directly related to construction. The estimated project cost for Areas A-E, assuming total street reconstruction and new concrete curb in Areas A, D and E, is listed below: STREET RECONSTRUCTION STREET STORM SEWER Street Length Rate/ Total Lineal Total Area L,F. L F Rate/ Storm Street Feet L.F. Sewer Area A 16,815 $90.00 $1,513,350 4,700 Total Area B 5,110 $60.00 $282,000 $1,795,350 44.00 224,840 Area C 1,960 44.00 224,840 86,240 --" --- 86,240 Area D 12,000 90.00 1,080,000 . --- --- 1,080,000 Area E 12 500 90.00 1,125,000 -__ Total 48,385 --- --- .._2___125._000 $4,311,430 As noted, storm sewer extensions are not included in Areas B-E. When Areas B-E are considered for street improvements in the future, storm sewer extensions will have to be reviewed at that time. The total estimated project cost is approximately $4,300,000 which assumes no storm sewer extensions in Areas B-E, new concrete curb andutter construction onstruchon in Areas A, D, and E, and total street reconstruction in all areas. In the event the City 55111\comp.rpt 16 • • elects to mill, patch, overlay those streets where the pavement condition is greater than 40, the project cost will be less, and is listed below. STREET MILL, PATCH, OVERLAY STREET STORM SEWER Street Total Length Rate/ Total Lineal Rate/ Storm Area (L.F.) L.F. Street Feet L.F. Sewer Total Area A 3,200 $90.00 $288,000 2,100 $60.00 $126,000 $414,000 13,615 69.00 939,435 2,600 60 156,000 1,095,435 Area B 5,110 33.00 168,630 --- 168,630 Area C 1,960 33.00 64,680 --- 64,680 Area D 12,000 69.00 828,000 --- 828,000 Area E 12.500 69.00 862,500 --- 862.500 Total 48,385 $3,433,245 As noted, the project cost is about 20% less (approximately $900,000 for 9.16 miles) if street rehabilitation includes mill, patch, overlay as opposed to total reconstruction. However, in the event the patching effort is more than 15% of the total street surface area, the cost difference will be less. The cost for utility repairs (sanitary sewer, water main) is not included and will have to be considered at the time each street project is developed. ASSESSMENTS Street improvement projects, whether new or reconstruction, are typically assessed in part to the abutting property. These costs are typically assessed on a front foot basis. The City of Oak Park Heights needs to develop a policy for assessing street reconstruction type projects. The purpose of this Comprehensive Street Plan is to present a proposed 55111\comp.rpt 17 410 assessment policy which can be developed in more detail beyond the scope of this report and adopted by the City Council in accordance with its requirements. It's recommended the City assess property abutting street reconstruction projects on a front foot basis in accordance with the rates established in this Comprehensive Street Plan. For areas with existing bituminous curb it's recommended 75% of the new concrete curb rate be assessed to residential property (75% of$18/FF = $13.50/FF), while 100% of the rate for mill, patch, overlay be assessed for the street portion (100% of$16.50/FF). For areas with existing concrete curb it's also recommended 100% of the rate for mill, patch, overlay be assessed for the street portion. The intent in assessing only 75% of the concrete curb rate is that the City prefers concrete curb construction over bituminous curb. Therefore, having the City participate in its cost will encourage thero er p P ty owners to accept the concrete curb construction over bituminous curb. The intent in assessing 100% of the mill, patch, overlay rate is that the City will assume any additional cost for reconstruction above the overlay rate. Therefore, if the City prefers reconstruction, it will assume the additional cost for reconstruction versus overlay. In addition, if the property owner feels, based on a street's pavement condition, that only an overlay is required and the City prefers reconstruction, the property owner will not be responsible for the additional cost associated with reconstruction. It's recommended residential property be assessed a minimum 75 front feet (F.F.) and a maximum 90 F.F. on its short side, regardless of sideyards or backyards. Listed below is the assessment range for residential property for areas where new concrete curb is constructed and areas where concrete curb already exists. 55111\comp.rpt 18 . • • Curb Rate Mill/patch/Overlay Total Total Rate A/ ssotal 75%=l 100% Total $2,250 New Concrete Curb $16.50/FF $30.00FF ent $13.50/FF 30.0 /FF 22 00 Residential Min. 75' FF 13.50/FF 16.50/FF Residential Max. 90' FF Total Mill/Patch/Overlay, TTotal Total it Existin Concrete Curb 100%$1650 $1,237.50 Residential Min. 75' FF 1,485.00 Residential Max. 90' FF 16.50 It's also recommended multiple density property be assessed similar to residential property. Listed below is a suggested front ont foot amount for each unit based on property e of value compared to residential property. type and the estimated percentage FF Unit 60 FF Duplex (80% of 75 FF) 45 FF Townhomes - Less than 12 units (60% of 75 FF) 30 FF Apartments - More than 12 units (40% of 75 FF) It's recommended all other property(commercial,industrial,school,and City[pari and other])be assessed the full rate,based on the construction incurred. It's also recommended their entire frontage abutting the street project. However, these properties be assessed for 1 frontage abutting a street project, it may if commerciaUindustrial properties have minima appropriate assessed valuation. ro to assess on a per lot basis or based on a be a pp P rades to the existing storm sewer In the case of storm sewer extensions and repairs/upg a airs to the system,it's recommended these costs not be assessed. It's also recommendedrepairs 19 55111\comp.rpt • • sanitary sewer and water main system not be assessed, unless it's felt a benefit or upgrade results to the abutting property. REVENUE The project costs will be financed in part through special assessments. However the , estimated assessments presented herein will not finance the cost of the entire project. Therefore, the City will have to finance a portion of each project. We have estimated the City's financial responsibility for Street Reconstruction and Mill, Patch, Overlayprojects for each area, which is summarized in the following tables. It's assumed, for purposes of the Comprehensive Street Plan, only 70% of the total front footage for each area, which includes residential property, is assessable. Non-assessable footage includes front footage g abutting intersections and lots with front yards, including sideyards, having more than 90' of front footage. In addition, we have attempted to estimate front footage where property P nY other than single and multi-family exists to estimate the City's responsibility. STREET RECONSTRUCTION CITY COST Area Storm City Amount Curb Street Sewer Total AssessedTotal % Assessed. ,428 Area A $287,540 $519 $282,000 $1,088,968 $706,362 $1,795 350 Area B ___ � 39.3% 106,800 --- 106,800 118,040 224,840 52.5% Area C -- - 0 - --- - 0 - 86,240 86,240 Area D 100.0% 205 200 370 800 ILI '''Lel-1504 000 1�r f G576,000 1,080,000 46.7% Area E 213,750 386,250 I u '__ ,, 383 000 33 000 7r ovv -- 500.000 525.000 Totals 1 125.000 46.7% ..... $2,371,768 $1,939,662 $4,311,430 45.0%___� Nor lnt.uDIN( ST STiG a�p z, IS` 1(,,',/ 1,7491101 3,qog.t/ scpue mRtuBR C 55111\comp.rpt 20 ` • • STREET MILT. PATCH OVERLAY CITY COST Storm City Amount % Assessed Assessed Total s Street Sewer Total -------- 46.8% Area Curb 803,205 $706,230 $1,509,435 $287,535 $233,670 $282,000 $ 168,630 70.0% Area A 50,590 118,040 __ 50,590 - 64,680 64,680 100.0% Area B _ ___ --- --- 828,000 60.0% Area C ""- _-_ 324,000 504,000 Area 205,200 118,800 525,000 800 6�.0% Area D 33 213,750 123,750 55.9% Tota s $1,515,295 $1,917,950 $3,433,245 Totals As noted, the amount assessed for Street Reconstruction and Street Mill, Patch, el the same ($1,900,000), because it's intended to assess more Overlay is approximat y cArea C,which for the most part than the mill, patch, overlay rate. It should also be notedcost. includes commercial/industrial dustrial property, is proposed to be assessed the full project Ci 's cost for Street Reconstruction and Street Mill, Patch, The difference between the tY Overlay, is approximately $900,000 000 for 9.16 miles of street. The additional cost for street . reconstruction is approximately $98,000/mile versus a mill, patch, overlay project, assuming the street is in a condition that will accept an overlay. 21 55111\comp,rpt • 1111 STREET PROJECT - 1994 It's recommended each street project be developed based on the condition of the street. Figure No. 7 identifies a proposed project in 1994. The street project for 1994 is summarized below and assumes complete street reconstruction. In the event portions of the existing gravel base can be maintained, the City cost will be reduced. .Street Length Amount Year L.F. Proiect Cost Assessed Ci Cost % Assessed 1994 16,815 $1,795.350 $706,231 $1,089,111 39.3% 55111\comp.rpt 22 c).. 0 5 \ ,„ 61st 61st 1 ST. N S\\"\r ST. CT. 60th ST. N 1 / STATE T.H. 36 I > z z w > > Q z > ¢ m < �.i ¢ ¢ w 0 n > o z w ¢ W p p z -6 Q 0 ', LJ N 0 ��x > 6 0 _ v N 58th ST. n ¢ y 0 z z 57th ST. N. Lo ccz oti:V W ¢ " Z Y 0°> z F N o ¢ 56th ST tt;1,3 57th SI. o ST N 56th xac �w�`-w OLDFIELD ; JST N QQ c COURT ) � � (0 COURT 56th ST. LI 5 55th S \----, r movi 1 1 i 1/1, I z w 1a 2 0 0 0 0 (,) 0 ,c0\14V\ ", - 0 300 600 �� ageeliaMMEiga Scala In feet 1994 PROPOSED STREET PROJECT Rosestroo osene is Anderlik b OAK PARK HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA FIGURE 7 VII Associates COMPREHENSIVE STREET PLAN 07 JULY 1993 COMM. 55111 • • Soil Sampling Results for Oak Park Heights Road Termini Bit. Base Subgrade Thickness Thickness Soil (inches) (inches) 55th St 1750' W of E end of pvmt 6 10 Gravelly SC Upper 55th St 250' E of Osgood Av ME 8 Gravelly SC 56th St 250' W of Oldfield Av 3 8 Upper 56th St 500' W of Osgood Av 5 8 Gravelly SP-SM Upper 56th Ct No core taken 11111111 57th St 950' W of Oren Ave MEI 10 Gravelly SM 58th St 125' W of Olene Av 3 1/2 9 SM w/ Gravel 59th St 200' W of Olene Av 3 10 O'Brian Av 615' S of 57th St 6 10 Gravelly SC Oldfield Av 700'S of 57th St 7 10 Gravelly SC Oldfield Av 490' S of 60th St 3 5 SM w/ Gravel Oldfield Ct 250' W of Oldfield Av 6 10 NM Olene Av 500' S of 60th St 3 1/2 10 Obstruction Olinda Av 250' S of 59th St 3 1/4 9 SM w/ Gravel Omaha Av 500' S of 57th St 6 10 Gravelly SM Omar Av 225' S of Upper 56th St 6 10 le= Oren Av No core taken 5* * Thickness assumed for analysis r • ! 0 C •ed 8 Fri t° u 4 a a X H ril tnt t t :iW > 3 � a im C ,..„ 3 \;t' o o uCIS •a.+ N u N E o u -o c 0 0 00 Cd O a e u CJ W to 6 di o v SU $ b C z G O ¢ ¢ = 1 u NN ulil d O CILCn LL3 4-; N N Na > v ° o -v OO Ts 3if,0ooaIn '^ ti N y 3 o � ' U Q 5 g > o0 0 -5 •5 4).- di $ S ¢ ov, E • a ¢ Q ¢ o '� ¢ N N N °3N N N a ell 'IS 4ID g s) 8 • F3 d • o Q. • 2O s O O O O O F" c u ,_ .. N d > •> w N > > N ii • • APPENDIX B COST ESTIMATE OAK PARK HEIGHTS COMPREHENSIVE STREET PLAN I. AREAS WITH EXISTING BITUMINOUS CURB A. Remove Existing/Construct New Concrete Curb Quantity Item Cost/Lineal Foot 2 LF B618 Concrete curb @ $6.00/LF $12.00 0.019 EA Driveway apron repair @ $500.00 EA 9.50 1.6 SY Boulevard sodding @ $2.00/SY 3.20 $24.70 + 10% Contingencies 2.50 $27.20 + 30% Indirect Costs 8.80 TOTAL $36.00 B. Street - Reconstruct Quantity Item Cost/Lineal Foot 3.6 SY Remove bituminous @ $1.50/SQ $ 5.40 ' 1.3 TN Class 5 aggregate base (6" thick) @ $9.00/TN 11.70 0.75 TN Bituminous surface (31/2" thick) @ $24.00/TN 18.00 0.006 EA Adjust structures @ $200.00 EA 1.20 $36.30 + 10% Contingencies 3.70 $40.00 + 30% Indirect Costs 14.00 TOTAL $54.00 55111\comp.rpt 26 • • • C. Street - Mill/Patch/Overlay Quantity Item Cost/Lineal Foot 0.7 SY Remove bituminous @ $1.50/SQ $ 1.05 0.20 TN Class 5 aggregate base @ $9.00ITN 1.80 0.173 TN Bituminous patch (estim. 15%) @ A$40.00/TN 6.95 0.10 TN Bituminous leveling @ $25.00/TN 2.50 0.40 TN Bituminous wear course (2" thick) @ $24.00/TN 9.60 0.006 EA Adjust structures @ $200.00 EA 1.20 $23.10 + 10% Contingencies 2.30 $25.40 + 30% Indirect Costs 7.60 TOTAL $33.00 II. AREAS WITH EXISTING CONRETE CURB A. Street Reconstruct Quantity Item Cost/Lineal Foot 0.1 LF Curb removal & replacement (estim. 5%) @ $10.00/LF $ 1.00 3.6 SY Remove bituminous @ $1.50/SQ 5.40 0.572 TN Class 5 aggregate base @ $9.00/TN 5.15 0.75 TN Bituminous surface (31/2' thick) @ $24.00/TN 18.00 0.006 EA Adjust structures @ $200.00 EA 1.20 $30.75 + 10% Contingencies 3.10 $33.85 + 30% Indirect Costs 10.15 TOTAL $44.00 55111\comp.rpt 27 • s B. Street - Mill/Patch/Overlay Quantity Item Cost/Lineal Foot 0.1 LF Curb removal & replacement (estm. 5%) @ $10.00/LF $ 1.00 0.25 TN Class 5 aggregate base @ $9.00/TN 2.25 1.7 SY Mill @ $1.00/SY 1.70 0.101 TN Bituminous patching (estim. 15%) @ $40.00/TN 4.05 0.10 TN Bituminous leveling @ $25.00/TN 2.50 0.40 TN Bituminous wear course (2" thick) @ $24.00/TN 9.60 0.006 EA Adjust structures @ $200.00 EA 1.20 $23.10 + 10% Contingencies 2.30 $25.40 + 30% Indirect Costs 7.60 TOTAL $33.00 55111\comp.rpt 28 • • Registered Land Survey (R.L.S.) N 1/2 Section 4 T 29 R 20 R.L.S. No. 19 Tract A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J R.L.S. No. 53 Tract A, B, C, E, G, H, I, J R.L.S. No. 70 Tract A R.L.S. No. 76 Tract A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M Tract E (parcel in southwest corner County Road 67 and Upper 56th Street N.) Unplatted Parcels North 1/2 Section 4 T 29 R 20 Parcel 2550, 2800, 2900 Parcel 3400, 3410, 3450, 3550, 3600, 3650, 3700, 3750, 3800, 3850, 3950, 4000, 4200 55111\comp.rpt 30 • • APPENDIX C PROPERTIES IN AREA A OAK PARK HEIGHTS COMPREHENSIVE STREET PLAN PARCEL DESCRIPTION Platted Parcels Alberts Addition Swager Bros. 7th Addition Block 1 Lots 1-10 Block 1 Lots 1-5 Block 2 Lots 1-9 Block 2 Lots 1-5 Block 3 Lots 1-9 Swager Bros. Addition Block 4 Lots 1-4 Block 1 Lots 1-7 Block 2 Lots 1-6 Swager Bros. 8th Addition Lots 1-4 Swager Bros. 2nd Addition Block 1 Lots 1-5 Brekke's Garden Hills Block 2 Lots 1-19 Block 1 Lots 1-21 Block 2 Lots 1-10 Swager Bros. 3rd Addition Block 3 Lots 1-6 Block 1 Lots 1-12 Block 2 Lots 1-2 Brekke Heights Block 3 Lots 1-7 Block 1 Lots 1-7 Block 4 Lots 1-5 Block 2 Lots 1-6 Swager Bros. 4th Addition St. Croix Mall P.U.D. Block 1 Lots 1-7 Block 1 Lots 7, 8, 9, 10 Block 2 Lots 1-7 Swager Bros. 5th Addition Block 1 Lots 1-12 Block 2 Lots 1-7 Block 3 Lots 1-7 Swager Bros. 6th Addition Block 1 Lots 1-14 Block 2 Lots 1-18 Block 3 Lots 1-12 55111\comp,rpt 29 • • APPENDIX D OAK PARK HEIGHTS INFORMATIONAL MEETING EXISTING STREET CONDITION/IMPROVEMENTS PLACE: DATE / TIME: Dear Oak Park Heights Property Owner In Area A: The City of Oak Park Heights has scheduled an informational meeting for the residents in Area A (shown below) to discuss the existing condition of your streets. The purpose of the informational meeting is to present information on the older streets in Oak Park Heights and streets in your neighborhood. Street improvements, their estimated cost, and proposed assessments to the benefitting property will also be discussed. After a short presentation, we welcome your input and will answer any questions. City Clerk, LaVonne Wilson I ( I 60th I I ST. N 1 / STATE T.H. 36 w z z a a a m t z Qo Z z � °„ � ' J z � z o z rN a3 AREA "A" s N- tat Z z 's �. �'- 57th ST. N. 0 0 O O'Q ' 56th S N. o 57th ST N• - OLDFIELD Q�Q ST N a 56th ST. N. Q n ImiCOURT 0��'< 11 r—. m NM 1 ........."___,.,) iiii AREA Aet v 55th ST. N.