Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-16-2000 Planning Commission Meeting Packet CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS .:r PLANNING COMMISSION Wednesday, February 16, 2000 - 7 :00 PM 7:00 I. Call To Order /Approval of Agenda II. Approval of January 20, 2000 Minutes (1) 7:05 III. Visitors: This is an opportunity for the public to address the Commission with questions or concerns not on the agenda. Please limit comments to three minutes. IV. Public Hearings: A. Continued - Northern States Power Conditional Use Permit Request (2, 2A & 2B)) B. V S SA - PUD Amendment/Minor Subdivison Request (3) V. Old Business: A. Capital Improvement Budget Update (4) B. 2000 Goal Setting: (5) 1. Meeting Date; and 2. Commission Goals. 7:55 VI. New Business: A. Stillwater Area High School - Ropes Course (6) 8.00 VII. Informatiorial/Update: A. Lower Oak Park Heights B. Other VIII. Adjournment Reminder: Upcoming Meetings: March 9, 2000 Regular Meeting - 7:00 PM Council Representative: March - Commissioner Dwyer 4 ENCLOSWE Y CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS 16 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Thursday, January 20, 2000 — 7 :00 PM Call To Order: Chair Hedlund called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Present: Commissioners Dahlquist and Wasescha. Staff Present: Community Development Director Danielson, City Planner Richards Community Development Secretary Hultman, and Planning Intern Hoel. City Council Liaison Swenson. Absent: Commissioners Dwyer and Vogt. Approval of Agenda: Commissioner Dahlquist, seconded by Commissioner Wasescha moved to approve the Agenda as presented. Carried 3 -0. Approval of Minutes,: Commissioner Wasescha, seconded by Commissioner Dahlquist, moved to approve the Minutes of December 16, 1999 with a minor clerical correction to Circle of Friends hours of operation ending at 11 p.m. and not 11 a.m. as indicated. Carried 3 -0. Introduction of Planning Intern: Community Development Director Danielson introduced Matt Hoel to the Commission. She informed them that in the capacity of Planning Intern, Matt would be workin g with the Community Development Department 20 hours each week. The Commission welcomed Matt. Visitors: None. PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. Northern States Power - Conditional Use Permit Request: City Planner Richards informed the Commission that Northern States Power had contacted the City and requested a continuance of their hearing, allowing them time to reconsider their plans and specifications regarding the location and maintenance facility at their fly ash landfill facility. Due to the public hearing having been advertised Chair Hedlund opened the public hearing for comment at 7:06 p.m. Being no visitors to the public hearing, Commissioner Wasescha, seconded by Commissioner Dahlquist moved to continue the public hearing to 7:00 p.m., February 10, 2000. Carried 3 -0. PW# a - Planning Commission Minutes January 20, 2000 Page 2 of 3 Old Business: A. Post Office Update: Community Development Director Danielson that the City Council, at its January 11, 2000 meeting approved a development agreement with the U.S. Postal Service for construction of the Oak Park Heights Carrier Annex at the corner of 55 St. N. and Memorial Ave. N., within the Kern Center. Danielson displayed the concept drawing of the project, noting special criteria existing due to the Postal Service's federal agency status. She also outlined the agreement reached between the City and the Postal Service, noting that through the agreement significant improvements were negotiated resulting in an attractive addition to the Kern Center. Brief discussion ensued as to design, employment opportunities, and regulation of the project. Swenson complimented City Staff as having worked very well with the project. B. Planning Commission Meetinsz Day Chansze: Community Development Director Danielson advised the Commission that their recommendation to the City Council for amendment to the Planning Commission By -Laws to change the meeting date from the third Thursday of each month to the second Thursday of each month was approved. Accordingly, the next meeting of the Planning Commission will be February 10, 2000. C. Capital Improvement Budszet: Community Development Director Danielson reviewed, with the Commission, budgetary goals and breakdown per her enclosure to the meeting packet. Brief discussion was held as to project items. The Commission was pleased with the opportunity revitalization of the area known as Lower Oak Park Heights and expressed that they were looking forward to working on the project. Danielson also informed them that the Parks Commission would be meeting January 31, 2000 at 6:30 p.m. for the purpose of a Capital Improvement Budget workshop and extended an invitation to the Planning Commission to participate in the workshop. New Business: A. 2000 Goal Setting Meeting: Community Development Director Danielson informed the Commission that the date of March 10, 2000 has been tentatively set to discuss the goals for the City in 2000. She advised them that she would notify them of firm information as she received it. Danielson also indicated that the Planning Commission should begin thinking of goals for the Commission and suggested that discussion of possible goals take place at their meeting of February 10, 2000. Informational/Uodate : A. Citv Council /Commission Meetinia Follow Uv Agenda(s): Receipt acknowledged by the Commission. Danielson noted that beginning with the February agenda, this item would no longer be placed on the Agenda. The Follow Up Agendas will be distributed to the Commissions with their weekly mailing. Any discussion regarding them can be held during the Informational/Update section of each meeting. Planning Commission Minutes January 20, 2000 Page 3 of 3 B. Y2k and New Years Eve: Community Development Director Danielson reviewed packet enclosure memo regarding the preparations and activity that took place during the hours prior to the New Year coming in. She noted that preparation by the City for this event, resulted in better understanding the City's civil defense needs and added that the Civil Defense Director will be holding an meeting later this Spring and that she would update them as to this as she received information. C. Communication.: Community Development Director Danielson noted that requests for increased e-mail communication. She asked the Commission to review the Planning Commission Member List and update it as needed and provide their e-mail address if they would like it included as a tool to communicate with them. D. Other: 1). Northern States Power Park: City Council has approved moving forward to receive proposals for a park master plan. 2). Lower Oak Park Heights (Calthorpe Studv): Metropolitan Council will be holding a luncheon meeting at the Washington County Government Center to discuss their study and its implications to included communities. She indicated that she would provide them with more information upon her receiving it. Adiournment: Commissioner Dahlquist, seconded by Commissioner Wasescha, moved to adjourn at 7:30 p.m. Carried 3 -0. Respectfully submitted, 1- rna Julie A. Hultman Community Development Secretary Enclosure 2 NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS t4 F1 COMMUNITY PLANNING - DESIGN - MARKET RESEARCH PLANNING REPORT TO: Tom Melena FROM: Scott Richards DATE: February 3, 2000 RE: Oak Park Heights - NSP Fly Ash Disposal Facility: Building Relocation FILE NO: 798.02 - 99.23 BACKGROUND NSP has submitted revised plans as part of the request for a conditional use permit for • relocation of the existing storage building at their fly ash disposal facility located at 59th Street North and Peller Avenue. The building is to be relocated approximately 700 feet west of the intersection of 59th Street and Peller Avenue in a location more central to the active area of the ash landfill. The construction trailer is to be moved off of the ash landfill site and is not part of the current request. The Oak Park Heights Zoning Ordinance, under Section 401.15.C.8 does not allow for pole buildings unless they are to be utilized for farming operations or in highly unique or special cases requiring a conditional use permit. Additionally, Section 401.15.) requires a conditional use permit for relocation of any structure over 120 square feet on a lot or onto another lot in the City. Any new or relocated building would also be subject to the Design Guidelines of the City. The City recognizes this building as a unique situation in that it has existed on the ash facility for a number of years and that it is regarded as a temporary structure. Attached for reference: Exhibit A: Revised Site Plan Exhibit B: Letter from Michael Thomes of NSP Exhibit C: Letter from Paul Schiller of Barr Engineering Company Exhibit D: Existing Building Modifications: Plan and Elevations � Exhibit E: Existing Building Modifications: Footing and Connection Details 5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 555 ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 554 16 PHONE 61 2- 595 -9636 FAX 6 12-595-9837 E -MAIL NACU WINTERNET.COM • ISSUES ANALYSIS Proposed Building Location. The revised, proposed location of the storage building is in an area of the site that is considerably less visible than what is originally proposed. The building will be set to the west of Beach Road and the existing bed and breakfast. The structure will be approximately 38 feet below the elevation of the bed and breakfast and 45 feet below the elevation of the previously proposed location. In that the building is 20 feet in height, it is highly unlikely that it will be visible from the adjacent roadways or from . Y the bed and breakfast. Additionally, the landscaped area separating the residential area from the landfill facility will further screen any of the activities on the site. NSP indicates that the proposed location is temporary and the building will remain there only until future landfill development causes relocation. It is estimated that relocation or rebuilding will be required again in 2004 to 2005, if current landfill development rates continue. NSP has not indicated where a new or rebuilt building would be located, but they acknowledge that a structure would be needed to serve some post landfill and park related uses. Comprehensive Plan. As indicated in the previous planning report, the Comprehensive Plan discusses the recreational reuse of portions of the ash facility and the importance of its relation to Valley View Park. Concern was expressed with the previous location and its adverse impact to the neighborhood and park areas. If the building is located on the site so that it is not visible, there are no comprehensive planning issues. Zoning /Conditional Use Permits, The NSP building will be treated as a temporary structure with a definite date by which it will need to be removed or rebuilt. The City will require NSP to remove or destroy the building by December 31, 2005 or apply for an amended conditional use permit for its relocation and /or reconstruction on the site. The City will require the building to comply with Uniform Building Code and Design Guideline requirements when it is rebuilt, reconstructed, or replaced with a new structure. Health and Environmental Impacts. Moving the building to a new location on the site should not have any negative health and environmental impacts. The continuing operation of the ash facility does raise questions in regards to health and environmental safety. As part of this conditional use permit request, the City will require NSP to provide its health reports on fly ash including air quality monitoring reports. Additionally, it is recognized that the ash facility contributes to the runoff into the Perro Creek system. NSP has provided its storm water plans for the site as a part of this request. NSP will also be required to contribute its fair share of the costs related to improvements required to Perro Creek Pond to eliminate flooding issues. In that the ash facility, especially those portions that are "capped ", contribute to the runoff and flooding problems along Perro Creek, NSP will need to be a participant in the solutions to the problem. It is suggested that a development agreement between NSP and the City outline the required information and the cost sharing for the storm water improvements. 2 Design Guidelines. The Design Guidelines indicate that industrial and warehouse buildings must use at least two different Grade I or II materials of which at least 65 percent will be Grade I and II, and not more than 35 percent Grade III and IV materials. The building is a typical pole barn with steel siding, no windows and two doors one large access and one entry door. The building is comprised of almost 100 percent Grade II materials (exterior finish installation system) and would in no way a of the other y design requirements related to composition and detailing, especially the blank g p y wall surfaces. Variations to the Design Guidelines can be permitted b the City Council. In Y ty that the building is recognized as temporary and that it will be out of sight from g the neighborhood and adjacent roadways, staff recommends that the building be allowed . g d without major upgrades to comply with the Design Guidelines. Once the conditional g use permit, if approved, has expired, any new or relocated building ould need to be upgraded g pg ed to Design Guidelines standards. Fencing, Screening, and Landscaping. The natural elevation of the ro osed building P p g site should satisfy any screening requirements of the Zoning rdinance. NSP has g proposed the installation of security fencing and signage related to landfill operations to commence this Summer. The City would request that NSP add landscaping aloe the p 9 g northerly berm area of the ash facility and provide required landscape and prairie seeding a p p g plans subject to City Arborist approval. The site plan, labeled Exhibit A indicates the ar for 2000 construction activity. NSP will meet with City taff within coming months Y g the to discuss landfill development plans and landscaping. g Building Code Requirements. The building will be required to meet all Uniform Buildin Code requirements once it is placed on the site, includin g an adequate foundation. Plans a have been produced by Barr Engineering Company for the foundation and other required code improvements. The plans shall be subject to review and approval of the Building ... .. pp g Inspector. Restroom facilities and utility connections will not be required for the building g i in that t will not be used for office or meeting space. If any portable toilets are to be used on the site, they shall be located within the building. Billboard. A non - conforming billboard exists on the NSP roe adjacent to Highway p p ttY J g Y 36. As a part of the conditional use permit, the City require uire the billboard to be removed a within six months after the conditional use permit is approved. The terms of the billboard removal will need to be agreed to by the City and NSP as part of an overall development agreement. Fly Ash Facility Access. The site plan indicates the access driveway nto the fl ash Y Y facility along Beach Road. A short asphalt apron is in place to facilitate tire cleaning efore g trucks enter City streets. City staff recommends that the asphalt driveway be extended at least 120 feet to facilitate tire cleaning. Additionally, the City will re . ... i Y �v re quire that all tire a washing act as required in previously approved conditional use permits for the site . p , be utilized. NSP will also be required to add a stop sign at Beach Road so that trucks come to a complete stop before leaving the property. 3 Trails. To provide access through the NSP property and provide connections with existing ng and proposed trails, the City will require the construction of trails on the fly ash site and along the power line easement area within lower Oak Park Heights. The City has g tY plans p to construct a trail system within lower Oak Park Heights and Valle View Park in the • .. Y Summer of 2000. Linkages with the fly ash facility and along the power line corridors will . g p be critical to completing the overall connections between east and west Oak Park Heights. Additionally, the trails will be necessary for completing the links between the planned ark p p areas on the fly ash facility to Valley View Park. The specifications and locations of the trails shall be outlined in the development agreement. Conditional Use Permit Criteria. The judgement of the Planning ommission and City tY Council regarding the application is to be based upon, but not limited to, the followin factors outlined in Section 401.03.A.7 of the Zoning Ordinance: a. Relationship to the specific policies and provisions of the municipal Comprehensive Plan. b. The conformity with present and future land uses in the area. C. The environmental issues and geographic area involved. d. Whether the use will tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is ro osed. p p e. The impact on the character of the surrounding area. f. The demonstrated need for such use. g. Traffic generation by the use in relation to capabilities of streets servin g the property. h. The impact upon existing public services and facilities including arks schools streets, and utilities, and the City's service capacity. i. The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained herein i.e. parking, loading, noise, etc.). Based upon the previous analysis, the revised, proposed location could be approved. The pp building will be located on the site such that it will not be seen from the surrounding neighborhood and adjacent roadways. In that the structure will be temporary, it will not have long term consequences for future land uses in and around the site. Additionally, the building should not change the character of the area or have a negative impact on traffic • .. g p generation or public services or facilities. The City Council will need to determine if the Design Guidelines are to be enforced for this structure. 4 Section 401.15.C.8 specifies criteria for conditional use permit approval related to pole building exceptions and other building type and construction standards. These criteria are as follows: C. Exceptions to the provisions of Section 401.15.C.8 of this Ordinance may be granted as a conditional use permit pursuant to Section 401.03 of this Ordinance, provided that: 1) The proposed building maintains the quality and value intended by the Ordinance. 2) The proposed building is compatible and in harmony with other existing structures within the district and immediate geographic areas. 3) The provisions of Section 401.03.A.8 of this Ordinance are considered and determined to be satisfied. The building is considered a temporary structure that will be totally screened by the natural elevation and existing vegetation. City staff suggests that the building be allowed with no major exterior upgrades but any relocation, reconstruction, or new construction of a building after 2005 be required to comply with all Design Guidelines. Section 401.15.J.2 of the Zoning Ordinance specifies performance standards relating to conditional use permits for relocating buildings within Oak Park Heights. The standards are as follows: a. Upon relocation, the building shall comply with the applicable requirements of the Uniform Building Code in effect in Oak Park Heights. b. The proposed relocated building shall comply with the character of the neighborhood in which it is being relocated as determined by the City Council. C. The relocated use will not result in a depreciation of neighborhood or adjacent property values. d. The relocated structure shall be similar to the market valuation of adjacent principal structures as determined by the City Assessor. Again, because of its isolated location, the building should not adversely affect the character of the area or result in depreciation of property values. The Building Official will review the building plans to assure compliance with all Uniform Building Code provisions. • 5 RECOMMENDATION Based upon review of the conditional use permit criteria specified in this re ort our p p u office recommends that the revised, proposed building location be approved. We would further recommend that the City Council allow the existing structure to be relocated without strict conformance to the Design Guidelines. Details related to erosion control health reportin � p g on fly ash, storm water issues, funding of Perro Creek imp rovements , and billboar removal will need to be discussed with NSP and finalized in a development agreement. The approval of this conditional use permit is subject to the followin g conditions: 1. NSP shall destroy or remove the building from the ash landfill roe and the C property rtY CUP shall expire by December 31, 2005 or NSP shall apply for an amended conditional use permit for its relocation and /or reconstruction. The City ill require the building tY q g to comply with Building Code and Design Guidelines requirements when it is rebuilt reconstructed or replaced with a new structure. 2. NSP shall provide health reports on fly ash including ir quality monitoring g q Y g p as required by City staff. 3. NSP shall contribute a proportionate share of the costs related to storm water runoff improvements required for Perro Creek Pond. A g development agreement shall be p executed between NSP and the City outlining the cost sharing or storm water i g improvements. 4. The building shall be required to comply with all Uniform Buildin g requirements uirements q as approved by the Building Inspector, including an adequate foundation once its replaced on the proposed site. Any portable toilets to be placed on site shall be within the building. 5. Landscaping shall be placed on the northerly berm area of the ash facility. All tY plans p for landscaping, including areas that have been seeded as prairie and the berm p area shall be subject to City Arborist review and approval. 6. The access from Beach Road shall be paved by NSP with an asphalt surface and extended at least 120 feet to facilitate tire cleaning. A stop sign shall be installed at the intersection by NSP. 7. Trails shall be constructed within the fly ash site and along NSP power line corridors to provide connections with existing and proposed City trails. The trail locations and specifications shall be subject to approval of City staff and included in the development agreement with NSP. 6 8. The City will require the non - conforming billboard on the ash landfill site to be removed within six months after the conditional use permit is approved. 9. The construction trailer shall be removed within ten days following approval of the conditional use permit. Relocation of the trailer on the ash landfill site shall require conditional use permit consideration. 10. Any other conditions of the Planning Commission, City Council and City staff. pc: Kris Danielson Mark Vierling • Mr. Scott Thomas January 31, 2000 Page 4 Site Location ore we were unable to show We did not have access to a site map, and theref location of the plan view locati the structure on the site. We did discuss the location with ou during o visit. y g ur site visit. It is our understanding that you will obtain a site - map and sketch the ro osed location f ' P P or the building inspector. A hand sketch was provided for the original building permit, and should . g pe be adequate for the current evaluation. Conclusion It is our opinion that the existing structure requires modifications to the lateral bracing system, and should have the intermediate trusses positively attached to the walls in order to meet code requirements. We have included details for a footing system reviousl described. W P Y e have prepared drawings that can be used for construction of the footings and bracing/connections. g If you have any questions or comments regarding this letter, lease contact us at the ' P number listed below. Sincerely, Paul Schiller, P.E. Civil Engineer (612)832 -2668 attachments EXISTING POSTS 5'x6' (TYp) M 1 1 1 11 I 1 1 1 4 I 4 I I I o i t t I _ KV 17E RODS .00 0 000 D ENO CONNECTIONs •• ,r I REMOVE EbS nNG (CAC) _, 1 I C WOMEN BRACING � ! I ♦ i of I �� f ! ! o �, I I t I ♦ REMOVE EXISTING O s . w 0 00 � ` WOODEN 9RACI LOA k000, O vet I O � 2 • W t Wm. I i 0 1 5 ! t t I + SCALE IN FEET r 1 1 1 I I - 1 . W s 0 1 5 4 " I i f 1 I 4 SCALE IN FEET / REMOVE EXISTING 4 1 1 1 1 WOODEN BR A CING ROLL ODOR 6 1 (REPLACE WITH - 1 TIE R00) • � REMOVE DOSTtNG 4 WOODEN BRACING ` SERVICE (REPLACE WITH ♦ / DOOR TIE ROD) 3 7 ♦ / F ADO NEW TIE Raos I ♦ AND ENO CONNECTIONS RE } I MOVE EMSntyG ( � REM C OSTING . o vE � ♦ WOODEN BRACING 3 2 2 5 L 1 1 1 I SCALE N FEET r t t t r I Exhibi D t t 1 1 j j t t 1 i I t I 1� TYPICAL FOOTING ammm Nom. SEE 1. BUItDING 01MENS1oNS AND LAYOUT SHOWN 014 SKETCH M PARK H EIGHT'S DECEMBER, 1990. FRO ME�OPOttfAN GRAVEL CO.. PER BUILDING PERMR 890 -176 (OAK VW JANIUAR'Y 27. 2000. ) PLAN CIMENSIONS AND GENERA. LAYOUT' AND MEMBERS REVIEWED AND VERIFIED OURINC SITE Z REQUIRED MODIFICATIONS FOR EXISTING STRUCMRE TO MEET CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR LOADING ARE DETAILED ON SHEET S-02, 0 1 5 INCLUDING NOTES. MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS. FWTIH4S. AND CONNECTION DETAILS. Lai.1 1 ' ' I 1 13ULDING REYIEIMED PER U.B.C., 1997 EDMON. WIND LO SCALE IN FEET SP v�ING ANALYSIS USING NORMAL FORCE METHOD. 60 MPH SPEED. EXPOSURE C. STANDARD OCCUPANCY STRUCTURE (CATEGORY 4), BASIC WIND IF i r+a0r CUBW twit rm wow an PRa rrr 11E a u min w oICI SAM arrp 1 - f Mf A ow fmp I Ina FPMFCMNX AS SHOWN 1��Elt 1fE two CF THE sWE Or YME9OTA MINNEJIPOuS. MINNEsou 1 /29/00 No. Storage Building Evaluation � MINNESOTA r op , Co. 29 �� oloE �► e c o 2 DULUTH M." " PHS Northern States Power Ok Mum �E �" 9�. MN •,: _ .: 1p 3 JvrcnsON CtT'I' MMSOUN Q t ULN;tr I No. PHS CAN P " ' FU IN r bwt No. HLV. No. POST . POST POST (TYP ) T1fPICA< POST OONNECTIOM N* LAC BOLTS (TI � �A AIA i SPF UM NO VE ROM SEE / aECOM � A • SA EEAS TO FOOTING 3/4'* ANC nP'E HORS CLASS V AGGREGATE 2 PER POS (TYP.) • -- COMPACIION MN /DOT QUA1M COMPACTION METHOD T �' ® �. ,� p TAB FOR CLEWX CONNECTION 28 -•OAY COYPRESSNE SnWNGit� Mt1�NYW 3.000 PSI MINIMUM .�' .. ; T - SAME AS COARSE AGGREGATE - . 3/4 TYPKJIL AIR CONTENT 5x - 8x . • "- REINFORCING BARS ASIA A515 GRADE 60 , • '� '' • 1 FOOTING ANCHOR BOLTS 3/4 ASTM A36 GALVANIZED RMS AN11 MNNFF11n14e- 4-#5 BARS 4 - Q' LONG .. STEl. PLATE • •' • ASTM A36 (1 THICKNESS Sl'PICAL) (t N EACH CORNER OF TIES] , • • i ••"�� ; TIE ROD ASTM A36 � 0 • 4 MAN ' P"�h`T cxFvls MU Th PIN No. 2 1/2 (MINIM SAFE woRSCING LOAD 5 Las) ' • - - - - - 3/ 4- 0 0 AM AM BOLT 0 i 2 3 (3 PER F - 3/4• (MINIMUM SAFE WORKING LARD 5.000 LBS) #3 SQU TIE '} •:• • :, COMPACTED CCLAW V ABATE I! . , . t I t 0011NC)1, . :. TYPK.A L TO 6' BELOW FOOTING DEPTH SCALE IN FEET �. ••� • MODIFICATION POST - Q ADO CONNECTION FROM m B muss TO CROSS -BEAM - CONNECTION LOAD 430 L POST (TI u PUFT ENO TRUSS !.I 80IT5 (TYP. ) �2 ADO POST -TO- FOUNDATION CUPS - SEE DETAIIS 1 AND 2 2x I0 ' Q3 ADD POST -TO- FOUNDATION CUPS. CORNER POST WITH TIE ROO CONNECTION - SEE DETAIL 4 C x Q ADO TIE ROD CONNECTION AT CORNER POST - SEE DETAIL 5 ? 3 t`RP!T1F11�I TAI FOR CLEVISF CONNECTION SCALE IN FEET � SAME AS � �5 ADO POST -TO- FOUNDATION CUP. WITH DOUBLE TIE ROD CONNECTION - SEE DETAILS 1. 2 AND 3 w © ADO DOUBLE TIE ROO CONNECTION. SEE DETAIL 3. INVERTED (FOUNDATION BOLT HOLES NOT REQUI 41 /2- RED) 21/r Q7 ADO POST -TO- FOUNDATION CUP. MODIFY DETAIL. 3 FOR ONE TIE ROD ONLY POST Ile PLATE 3/4.O FOR 5/r 1/2 • s LOW LAG BOE.TS (TYP.) n"AM ! 0 PAST MNWMo ! AT RAFTERS 4 t 0 1 2 3 v C t i t A l SCALE IN FEET FOR 3/4 0 A cc w � ac 1 s v � o f9 4 SMTION 2 1/r nFTAr ! PW UAr Wf;1K Tn Fvvf 0 1 2 3 SCALE IN FEET POST _ 2'R T1rP VERIFY POST VA07H 3 / . — 4 1L�NBUCILLF AT � PRIDR TO FABRICATING MATCHES TYPICAL BASE COIINEC110N (Tvp•) DETAIL. FACE FLUSH Y&TH 1.1 OF POST 1 P 1/2 CLEI 1/4' PLATE 14 112'x9' 3 /ro ROD. 3/4'A A325 PIN moym �a Exhibit E 0 1 2 3 SCALE IN FEET n tw'wr AS SHOWN T ... .. T f A� >m .o a Bu �`w o `" o "" MR04EAPOM MINNESMA � 1 �29�00 g ilding Ev"Olucion "°- "NM M um W Im � of 100 E! =A b PMS Northern States Power Co. _ � P= MN — 317 ODUAK MINNESOTA . MN No. DEMO oK1* Boa. �N �1 A C O 1 2 3 J �:�nt� b..��r 1 OIOEOf 10 OpE AEIF3FJED '' PHS AM No. IS 0..N... . •ii ,..,"�',� .. . ,1 .G Kris Danielson From: Jim Butler abutler@cityofoakparkheights.com Sent: � Th u r Thurs February 03, 2000 3:34 PM To: kdanielson @cityofoakparkheights.com Subject: RE: NSP Conditional Use Permit Update Kris, In reviewing the report and building plans submitted by Barr Eng ineering g g Com an p y, I have found them to be i compliance to the MN State Building Code. A permit is required for the alterations and th contractor must be licensed with the City. Should you have any further questions, please contact me. Thank you, Jim From: K.D. Widin [kwidin @mmmpcc.org] Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2000 4:48 PM To: kdanielson @cityofoakparkheights.com Subject: NSP Fly Ash Landfill - Landscaping 2/2 /00 Kris - I have reviewed the plans which the City of Oak Park Heights has received to date for the NSP Fly Ash Landfill. Since the pole building will be moved to a less prominent location on the site, which will be screened in part by topography, it does not appear that NSP will need to put in landscaping to screen that structure. Regarding other landscaping for the site, I would like to see planting detail for the long berm which runs NE -SW through the site and which will serve a screening function for the still active portion of the landfill. I would also like a list of the plant species which were seeded in the "prairie" area in the SE portion of the site. Plans for other site landscaping would also be helpful. Kathy Widin Arborist City of Oak Park Heights 1 r. Kris Danielson From: Lindy Swanson [ imswans @cityofoakparkheights.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 05,2000 10:35 AM To: Kris Danielson Subject: NSP SITE PLAN REVIEW MEETING I have no issues, from a public safety perspective, regarding the location of the NSP pole building on the NSP Fly Ash Disposal Facility site. From: Carmichael, Brad [brad carmichael c andersencorp.com] Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2000 8:04 AM To: 'kdanielson a@cityofoakparkheights.com' Subject: RE: NSP Conditional Use Permit Update I still don't see any issues with the new location. Will we* have access to the property and building at all times, or will there be a fence and gate? Thanks, Brad Carmnichael 1 Enclosure 2A Northern States Power Company 414 Nicollet Mall — RSQ 10 Minneapolis, MN 5540' Telephone (612) 330 -7657 February 10, 2000 Ms Kris Danielson Community Development Director City of Oak Park Heights PO Box 2007 _ Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 -2007 Phone #: 651- 439 -4439 Fax #: 651 -439 -0574 RE: King Plant Ash Landfill — Relocation of Equipment Storage Garage: Request for Continuation of Conditional Use Permit Decision Dear Kris; NSP requests that the Hearing for its Conditional Use Permit for the Kin Landfill Garage be continued to the Planning Commission's March meeting. The reason for this continuation request is to provide time to assess p ermit conditions recommended in Scott Richards Planner's Report. This Report was submitted to Tom Melena on February 3 and was forwarded to NSP on February 7 Recommended permit conditions that NSP believes need clarification include the following: g • "NSP shall contribute a proportionate share of the costs related to storm water runoff improvements required for the Perro Creek Pond." While NSP recognizes there are storm water management problems associated with the Perro Creek Watershed, NSP has not been directly involved in developing improvements nor assessing the Landfill's role. • "Landscaping shall be placed on the northerly berm area ..... subject to the City Arborist review and approval. Landscaping requirements are influenced by MPCA Permit conditions, site security needs, possible future use of closed areas, and other factors. It ma y be that landscaping should have both short and long term plans. • "The access road from Beach Road shall be paved ...." q and "The City will require the non - conforming billboard to be removed .... NSP expected both conditions would have been addressed via the South Frontage Road plan that was part of the original St. Croix Bridge design. Mile it i Vb/ 1V/ VV ALAV L'2 . NV A'&'&,& V16 VVV I V I .L U Ms Kris Danielson `C February 10, 2000 Page 2 of 2 may no longer be appropriate to link resolution of the proposed conditions to the eventual Bridge event, NSP wants to assure that any modifications to entrance areas on both ends of the site are consistent with the City's and MnDOrs plans. • Trails shall be constructed within the fly ash site and along NSP power line corridors .... subject to approval of City staff and included in the development agreement with NSP." NSP has indicated willingness to cooperate with the City's trail plans, but we are not sure of the specifics of those plans. l expect we share the same absolute requirement that any trails must be seasonably safe. Additionally, the landfill site and the power line corridors are managed by separate areas within NSP, thus there may be the need for separate development agreements. I appreciate the City's patience as we work through this permit process and look forward to meeting-with City staff to resolve the issues. I further appreciate your advice as to how to make the process as efficient as possible. Sincerely, r Michael R. Thames Energy Marketing and Fuel Resources 612-330-7657 Enclosure 2B C ity o Oak P 14168 Oak Park Blvd, Box 2007 Oak Park Heights, N N 55082. 65 1 439 -4439 • Fax 439- 8 ( ) 0574 M emo: February 10, 2000 To: Planning Commission Mayor and Council Tom Melena From: Kris Danielson, Community Development Director ....... .. s . ..................... .. ..... �•..Y• . . t. ..............- ...- ..........r .. n......:.. .. ... : . .+........ ................: ... .... ... .. .. .. r...r .Nf 4 .t. f....n .Y. -: r: iv:.. .. 8.. r::}> - .:: :::.�:. �: r:: - .. n. 1 .�+ ......... ..... ....x T ,. ...z............,.............. ......- ..- ....... .. ... ..... ... .n. ......... . -.. } .. •.. ... r. .:A. ....S... r.`Yd�. ..Y'... .. £v :• %S l+y: - !r.Y /. ^ %.: >i:'voi:::M' .f :.. ;. : .::::::•:: ..... ..L.. d r2j',. . .T... ... .. ....- -::.: v : .. -.. .. ..... }. :dr ....... .. ..Y .� . 5... .. /... .f.. '.TiX'- .... f..:C -..... . ., ... .. ........n....... J. r.. .. .... .. .... .. .. ... ..v .r.. ..... n........... .... .. ....:., ... .. Y....... y, '� : Y..... 4.�` -Y: j }: :'r.•:: L::M ••X'.:::. _ • . : -- r ..f. ...,.,.> ...::............ .........................:........:.: �r::::.:: r:.::..:::::+:;::. t:• � Fr.•>::+ 3C` t sr:::.,.:. �:::.: r: r.. a>...:..•..• rR-}: r: n}}: �:>::r}}:.}:,:< �:::::_::::.::.. r.... Y;: ?4: <kr.K�:�:vwsr:H:{ =:c- >:c:::Y 2c::! ��.�.• c} Please be advised that Planning Commissioner Ann Wasescha contacted me today to let me know that her family has a direct interest in the billboard property at the NSP fly ash disposal site. Commissioner Wasescha was concerned that there would be a conflict of interest for her in considering the NSP application. I have spoken with the City Attorney who has advised me that since Planning Commissioners are not elected officials, individual members are not subject to the State of Minnesota Conflict Rule. The Conflict Rule applies to decision makers only (City Council) , not recommending bodies (Parks and Planning Commissions) . However the Attorney considers this to be a circumstance where personal ethics need to be applied and from the standpoint of comfort and fair dealing recommends that Commissioner Wasescha abstain in the deliberations and in the recommendation on the Conditional Use Permit. Please contact me with any questions you may have at 439 -4439. TREE CITY U.S.A. Enclosure 3 NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS INC COMMUNITY PLANNING - DESIGN - MARKET RESEARCH PLANNING REPORT TO: Tom Melena FROM: Scott Richards DATE: February 3, 2000 RE: Oak Park Heights - VSSA PUD Amendment/Minor Subdivision FILE NO: 798.02 - 00.02 BACKGROUND Valley Senior Services Alliance (VSSA) has requested a minor subdivision of Lot 1, Block 2, Boutwell's Landing which would result in splitting the lot on which the main campus will be constructed. The division of Lot 1, Block 2 into Parcel A and Parcel B would separate the 104 unit assisted living facility from the other building sections only by legal description. VSSA has made this request to facilitate financing of the Boufinrell's Landing campus. City staff has determined that an amended PUD will also be required to process this request. The subdivision would result in a change to the lot lines of the development and those lines would pass directly through the building. The City Attorney has also raised issues that must be agreed to by VSSA and the mortgagee before the City will approve the subdivision and PUD amendment. Attached for reference: Exhibit A: Proposed Subdivision Exhibit B: Letter from City Attorney, January 26, 2000 Exhibit C: Application for Minor Subdivision 5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 555 ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 554 16 PHONE 61 2- 595 -9636 FAX 61 2- 595 -9837 E -MAIL NAC@ WINTERNET.COM ISSUES ANALYSIS Minor Subdivision. The Oak Park Heights Subdivision Ordinance allows for minor subdivision of previously platted lots if no more than two lots are created and they conform to the Zoning Ordinance lot size minimum standards. The property is zoned PUD but the lot area and setback standards of the R -B, Residential Business District have been used in the past to evaluate this project. Parcels A and B are over 7 acres in size each; the R -B District requires a lot size of at least 15,000 square' feet or .34 acres. q The Zoning Administrator (City Administrator) can approve the subdivision, provided that it complies p with applicable provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance. The subdivision complies with all ordinance requirements although a PUD amendment is also required in this case. As a result, City staff suggests that the Planning Commission make a recommendation on the subdivision and the City Council include the subdivision request with the PUD amendment as part of the action they will take on this matter. PUD Amendment. The PUD amendment is required in that an additional p arcel has been added to the development and the lot lines would be changed as they relate to the proposed building location. The PUD section of the Zoning Ordinance requires that front rear, and side yard restrictions on the periphery of the site be imposed, but interior setbacks are not required due to the flexibility provisions of the PUD section of the Zonin Ordinance. As a result, no variance will be required to accommodate the zero lot line situation that results from this subdivision. Sidewalks. To encourage a pedestrian friendly environment, City staff has reviewed the development plans for the Phase 1 development of the VSSA campus relating to sidewalks and has identified additional locations for pedestrian access. The City Engineer has reviewed the potential of adding sidewalks to Norwich Circle North (the northwest development area) and along Norwich Avenue North (the easterly twinhomes ) and has determined that adequate area exists o construct sidewalks. As . t t art of this PUD p amendment, the City will require that these sidewalks be constructed this Summer as art p of the continuing development of the VSSA campus. Additionally, the City will require Y Y q sidewalks along the access roadways as part of the Phase II development review. City staff is also requesting that VSSA consider upgrades of the asphalt trails to concrete sidewalks in those areas outside of the park and open areas. Specifications and locations for the sidewalks would be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. Clean Up of VSSA Property. Staff has recognized that property owned by VSSA, south of 58th Street and within the former Ritzer property contains a building, structures and debris that are hazardous and should be removed. As a condition of approval of this PUD amendment, staff recommends that the building, structures and debris be removed prior to May 1, 2000. 2 City Attorney Requirements. Upon review of the subdivision request and considering . the impact on the established development agreements and permits, the City Attorney has developed a list of conditions to be applied to the request consideration. A summary of these conditions is as follows. The letter from the City Attorney is found as Exhibit B. 1. An amendment to the PUD is applied for and secured. 2. A written consent from the proposed mortgagee acknowledging the priority of the City's development control and agreement as it affects the VSSA project. 3. The mortgagee will also need to acknowledge the easements that are due to the City of Oak Park Heights in the form of roadway, trails, and potentially other park easements. 4. Trail easement conveyance as it affects established roadways should be completed before any subdivision will be allowed. 5. Impacts on the building that will be constructed across the property line will need to be addressed by the Building Official upon permit application. RECOMMENDATION Based upon the previous analysis, City staff recommends approval of the PUD amendment and minor subdivision based upon the following conditions: 1. An amendment to the planned unit development must be applied for and secured. 2. That a written consent will have to be received from the City of Oak Park Heights by the proposed mortgagee acknowledging the priority of the City's development contract and agreement as it affects the VSSA project. Specifically, the mortgagee should be required to execute a consent and acknowledgment that the obligations of the developer to the City of Oak Park Heights have priority over the mortgage as proposed to be placed upon the property by the developer and the mortgagee, and that the mortgagee shall not do any act to obstruct, impair or otherwise limit the ability of the developer to fully perform all of its obligations to the City of Oak Park Heights under the terms and conditions of the development agreement as originally executed and as may be subsequently amended between the City and the developer. 3. That the mortgagee will also have to acknowledge that there are easements yet due to be conveyed to the City of Oak Park Heights in the form of roadway and some trail easements and potentially other park easements. That we will need the commitment from the proposed mortgagee that they understand that releases as against the mortgage or deed of indenture will be freely granted by that mortgagee on behalf of the property to release same to the City of Oak Park Heights so that proper recording of easements unencumbered by the mortgage can be implemented. Further, it must be understood that there will be no fees or costs assessed to the City of Oak Park Heights by the mortgagee for those releases. 3 4. Further, it should be noted that final easement conveyance as it affects the established roadways should be completed before any subdivision shall be allowed. 5. The nature of the subdivision will have an impact on the building to be constructed across the property line. Those impacts will be addressed by the Building Inspector upon permit application. 6. VSSA shall construct all bicycle and pedestrian trails as sidewalks on those properties that will comprise the main campus and adjacent residential development. The specifications for sidewalk construction and exact locations shall be subject to City Engineer approval. 7. Sidewalks shall be added by VSSA to Norwich Circle North and along Norwich Avenue North subject to City Engineer approval of specifications and locations. 8. VSSA shall remove the building, structures and debris on the former Ritrer property, south of 58th Street, prior to May 1, 2000. 9. Any other conditions as required by the City Council, Planning Commission, and /or City staff. pc: Kris Danielson Mark Vierling 4 0 MINE r ' Soots tti real a ZESiiL -1 L.I r.1 r .� toll 0 r ne t 40 Oo 120 1 60 zoo 1�A+�wfa�(f L � y3 i•«�� flaasraBl,6 1110 erdad wt +sroef. 11�dlll+ata n tirlrlx � U NOW � �j N 2� \J I .. �YdtTGtrltl acne. 1f"�� PtyfTia7N l� - s ' ar s! n�" `ems e. • • dena/M iron YeraaNnsant fenaN "+� O • denote• 3/4 s 14' ho Pipe Yan�•n! ° a Tilet W d fuel 1. aeCfc 2. d0U1MEtLS LANOINP "01h an Cool 1Mnnssete ■Aioh ties awlsrtyr d � sat ! n�orksd ► tdbr< Rag. too. 1 0669 a UW 10ml 6 +, dssartb d Lbw A. 9 and G ` 4 1 �P ,< t �� E - d of the alertl+eaetariy earths► d add twat 1. TMwae SswM flit dagnw w +✓tithe« 15 soW a soea Orientation d this drvwi�q b f►M wds West SM27 Net al" the no►i h Ins d sow Lot 1!1ume smel 1p 10633 Net shell* "M � \ R•41Mas0 tend Surve %9 ttA. 0� " T as 17 ~#a 42 1 NZ north 6" eI Lei 1 an a 5506 feet radius tesvion ld snare oswasve s•rtheafy with a sewird gill of t» dsgrws 176 n+ilewlw 5i weends to the feint of begilalbw for add LM A to N dwerOee!< Tl+erteo South � ` � tent 00 de4► w oen do Ea bi 125.00 foot nd Line A there twegnotin¢ ® Data!se ismim" owwret• surfooe Lbl,A = of the Navin Mora des- ib point at torwiadin for saw LM A. Tema• Nartlt M � VICINITY MAP • Densities •atstMq santlNery earth s tricture a wlbtstw 10 o•eends East 37.32 (got thefts SoutA 45 dip see 17 Rllnutso u seconds East 4s d. limbs 109 N t1•eotw •slating ht4ant and late rely • �as►W M; Tbonce South 44 dogrel <2 min wconde Nest . Net: S�ss 17 Theme 42 e n i de East SWIS foal; Thanes South 44 42 rninut« IS. sso•we• Nut de s 22 u 4S ■ Donets swiet4w match bas, 11.32 +..Theme . Sol qr•.. 41 n,Mt« 42 .. aond . Ea tit a N•/; r South s? d!¢� �,. __ o ` \ 41 wivrtw 17 *soon& wbt 15S13&93 fast; Uwmo South N degree 42 ani,ut« 14 news& Mast 35.10 1 2 ' -.- tlsnotw frxlsti►q traffic sign foot'. and said M B thee ten„i+otinq; '' ` ., UU-2 at the heroin bolt' e (1 } Mateo for wrtMr lntor*eatlon. • BN�tn dsserlbed feint art tsnr+i+etten for said li+• B. TNsne• SswM 00 Sea General Not ` � ` J t d@W nli�ut•s 42 i Pc d East tsa34 fort to the south Ann of sod Lot 1 and sdd LM C the 4 b ' 0 ` • Dewst wood 4• :4' ebo eund f �. PROPOSED LOT L INE Cc subjs•! u •asow+•nts. reservations and r••tricikdns of recall M OVA BRsani+eels Powawsnt pees101e undsrgrounl ut /h sarNC � a SOW fart✓ aentein• 732 oeswl wore or Ian bohq 31 x693 s pwo fast aware or less. k OF THE Rf'lfANiNG Thenc South 45 dorww 41 mi 106 ,ecensa west 11.32 Thence So 406 d I 109.22 42 C. WiDoIC. pb T PfteorRTr- a►awaYn w (L }. `� -• ` i -- 6et d Let 1 Bloch 2. MWELLS el+ g ~ bs•ai+q Lines; A. B and dal' CountX �Uw+wote wl�lel+ 11ss .wterly et 1M L ^` 11 .. e/ _ -� 5 8TH STREET _ ` t � PuBttc STREET b L C. Will iel ao q M w Read .eW Ld '' tl+�ww So b aSS� m 44 nnb+wtso 1s �� ,�% `` ` ay,� nav +I frls{y� Ry■ySp pO - - - - - da� An 1 •os t BNern h&M Pavewenl W W t►� of tot 1 on .530.00 toot reekae la:tq•ntlat eurre eaneere aiorth.afy aft ccan" rd en4t d Oi on ; ; i ��j�� o'*0f , ~•. f• A "'b.�� L•tasS t S- -♦*�Md tktwwor Aeon P� � Ae•w g 1 lD e+b+ule 56 e.ea+ds to the Point Of for said tam A t o M deedxtbsa: Tltotee SSouth OD dar•w 17 / R - _- _►aRT►+ LiNE a Lot i Estatbq anent. Cur - - -•.w C"2 0 t w+iwl« <Z ascends East 123.09 Nat end L1ne A thlere t•rrrtirwtb� � � 7 ' � `�� s' 40 w ':. T - - - E,stslln BRuaninous Slda -_ -'� � 1+. b Lb+a R M9b"b'9 al the herein beta d•eabed Point Of termination for add Line A. Thence North N � ' _- : �1J 3069 of 7' I .xlY.al � • •r • dsgr a 42 anbwte td soeands East 37.32 feet Th Vi South 45 degrees 17 wl so 42 oe do East salt / . + YaSe~ -- - 42 Th 3ti -- W q Wit 166.03 hs� aanee South 4t degree ani+tai.o td sseonds Wed T � � � � • �Qe� - / r � �`'' � •� A - - Na4: Theses South as daq••w 17 -"cD S �� .. wtlltlrtss 42 T CORNER. ascends East 61 sal: •gr •e• 42 artblu~" Nat. , NOT 1 BLOCK NORTHEAST eae 1 - - - -' Q irswae minute 42 ss cora do East 61.26 last: e South 52 dares 41 animates 17 . - - - t •� onds 95 l.at+ th«+ce Sarut 069 dagrse a ntbtwte /B •acands Mast 36.10 hat; and saW lb,e B �f % % ;• p ; ; • �, - - +` - ��., - 2 , 4 there torminotim 3 - t - 22 1211 {I {Ill {N� 13 i (.bl,.L 8egk..h.q st the twain bNare deal ibed point of tonwbaotba ter aadd Line e. lttwnoe South 00 . .� .,�r ,,.may PAft1t1NG - dsq►sss 17 anbwtw 42 seconds East 150.34 feet to the south Ili d POW Lot 1 and amid Line C then 0't I S07 tearnb+ating; _ Subject to sosorontm6 ►@"Watk.ae and rastrie'tions of wallow . N alp G P I i 1 PRC O 1 • Said parcel eoMab+s 7.27 maws. more or isms � ' 4 c t i • � I Q. V t►ekq 316606 sefuars hat aa+ore or laws. NiRtAL NOTS .0.B. �, O O ..J tr 1. This property Is vacant land. The buldhgsl sii nNis driveways and parka. f _f 4.4 ° { J onms ors proposed. . V w • tfe9•iYt6'E o p �� L This property Is toned R -B ResWo+thd 8usinsss TrCnsRlonaf DlslrkL . v .. d" LL! S The building setback are 30 test fra nt yard (dal the strarls) and 10 \ ( �" .. last side Yard ( d woes side of Lot t )• for pw;sosas of this .I ` 4 . �. �` / ♦ i ' surrey Li A. B and C we not bean a wWwvd an o ties lot ibtee4 since ars �, i \ \ \ \ ` , \ LL ~ { R appe that said Lot 1 Is in cornron ow and the proposal ` ; 1 description In d•fininq on some which all be artart 4. The parking sst (dew Nest l of t.a tfron yord (long siboola) I �`` / /J/ FUTtyRE 2-STORY \ "\ - -L►*iE '9 f_ 1 p., , j and 10 fast, side S ttU1tD1NC 1 Q 51 TMs o mini i t k Rood :one C. t -= - _ - , `! 42 Z V on area of f ani+iw flood l ood hathazard. w eve shown + the fined Insurance FOR NURSING su►anee Rats �, � f L r � G NOW Z Z A rlIM Cit Of Oak Pork "sights. iA'�sal Parts No. 270612 -00018 doted ` ` c - - - - _ - S NO OW Parkway and Norwich Avenue Mel are public streets a i do e� / � �� �• I � ^ \ � � \ • , \ I W ax < nstru Oak by the city of k Park Nights and apan is trawl t ra y ✓ < .• \ \ 7. TM vislWe sua•foss appu►tsnoncee for ssiatlnq trtMtiw were IOtotaO O c show TM n. location of uwder¢aund wimtin were not West State law " • `", 1 i C requires that prior to any e�acavotkn the eucaval Is "fired to contact ►- % e O Copi State Ona l� at 431- 434 -0002 for awsrt nq d the wl W%WV o o • t \ �� ^� ♦"••\ t (� U B. Poi s wrtrnary `� \\ ♦! W W Prapoeed R P�Stdle v N 1 Z Q # 5 �� \, Z Propwee Ilanidloopp•d ¢ Stalls a i. a► w ant the Stolle �^ \ % r 32.tZ9.31 sq. z G Q arras a less. buldinq ar e an Parcel A Is 3y129 sq uare tai. � PA v \•�� `• •'`, 0674 aexsa _ PARCEL Q PROPOSED < STORY BUILDING w I O to Inlsntiondy left Ofank, _ . ` it. kt•ntkndy Ion bia+k. . FOR ASSISTED UNIMi 04 1 ( �„j. . Z A se�er �l�rdi+e icon+: AM= to scha�e It M moo Insuran" Lam- Y Me ca u A. No, 140.w � ( rUAW 4 -STORY BUiLl JC fM f � � � UMTS i U a d tt]_ 1994. Ill ( V NOEPENOENT tMtl�100 UNITS r f 12. Oroine" and Utility Easanents era show+ an the recorded plat of U , y = 4b Z u to to t he lendn¢ r �� O Q 13, Subject the turns and eondklons of the D•reiopas Agroan+•wl $ 316.09 51 sesLfL 12.00 .�,_,__ x 727 oe>rw \ a _ -:r 31116611 all te66�6'29rE " .; -� 1 > J V � 14. Parcel A Is wA)wt to an unr000rded mom mot for kWow and 7.32 serve 1 �\ Q �"" tO oars: ter 3 t the 1 os M w+ Parch e. J• ` _ - W Or sasant for iew and agree at Parcel !M B for � ! L - - - baaalR of Pero A. IL Proposed Cllr pork hall to be oasis ruct•d. _ VIN n Z Q WX Z 1 h...►y 001 11 i to V61147 Senior Mwto Senior Services Alliance. a Ye nonproilt f 1 , V � ... esrporoRichfield tko, Rfield Bonk and Trust Canapony. Conrnerdd Partners Tift nd s ec LLC a Chicego Title ksursn" Conaponyc I FUflJR£ 25.00 •:;; -- _ W or t That ve ; c lhi. ep hat awe the - - -- ', l surrey on which R is hosed .sr• ends ti - • r _ . TONN CENTRE eu1tD.4c ( y •. s with 'ba++ Standard ORION Rsqub•eawents fear ALTA /AC511 Lots ! • f Q Q Z Z W lhtis Sdrrays.' p►tly b 00OhOW ad and adopted by A.LT.A. A.C.S.Nt nd N end W - �.,r us IN 19 07. and b.a ludw Rows 1. Z 3. 4 . S. 7. S. 0 106 11 . 1 13. end /4 of � r` W Vwook 'Iftk V Cr. ` ^ d. end ACSW and In ailao on dente of tNs o d ied by ALTA W �♦ / i urban Se SvGr*pory ~ Cc Vaster Z O L v / ...�� . Del `'��� � Q V W �. P.O.L e i t = arSwivel MMESOTA LICENSE t4 11889 ) POSED P Fib i• UWm 1 r 1 e .R�• _ .� z N i O Q 11 14 K N H H p t t... L CL .3 LL W a to V >R90 illill Q � I IfIlI � sti •.� I I I I • DRAINAGE AND URJTY t ., ,• .''� -` - p / y tS 91 EA ENT 2 - ------------------------- e - 40J 4 S in o Jill -• @ , R A 11D11TY EASE t t 1 7723 - 6 / $ all t - all e 1 f 1 t 1su. - _ -- SOU1N t,JNE OF LOT 1 600�T0 - -� -= • � - 1 NORWICH g t PARKWAY Ing-" I DOW i fM0 No. 99 -7445 EXHIBIT A LAW OFFICES OF EcLber L ammers. Bri s, Wolff & Vie rl - in 8 , P.L.L.P. 1835 Northwestern Avenue -.1cirnes F. L Stillwater. dnimers Ykinnesotd 55082 PdUl A. Wolfr Rokert G. Br' 4,710.# (6 51 459-2878 Mdrl< J. Vlerl' ------------------------- Greo i n.9* F A X (6 5 1) 439-2925 We J. Ecli6er g or y G. Gdller* Thomas •_j. Wutclner* Direct Dial No.: ( 651) 351-2118 Of counsel S usdn D. Olson* *QuediffeJ NeatrA ArLitralor David K. SnAer Januar 26, 2000 *Qudl1f1e-J Neutral Ar6titrator *(ertlfleJ Re -al Estate Speelillst Tdnya E. 1AdU1*1ce &Qvdliflecl Xevtral `Jejsctlor Mr. Thomas Melena Cit Administrator Cit of Oak Park Hei 14168 - 57th St North P.O. Box 2007 Oak Park Hei MN 55082 Re: VSSA Subdivision Re Dear Mr. Melena: we have reviewed the proposed division as set forth in y our correspondence forwarded us on Januar '14, 2000 b Mr. Grover C. Sa III of lands -within the Valle Senior Services project. After reviewin the documents enclosed * and considerin the -impact of same on the established development a and permits alread issued b the Cit of Oak Park Hei we find that the council ma in its* discretion g rant the minor subdivision re but would recommend the followin be included as part of an g rant so issued: 1. An amendment to the planned unit development must be applied for and secured. The same will be the subject of a separate correspondence to be received from the Cit Planner. 2. That a written consent will have to be received from the Cit of Oak Park Hei b the proposed mort acknowled g the priorit of the Cit development contract and a as it affects the Valle Seniors project. Specificall the mort should be re to execute a consent and acknowled that the obli of the developer to the Cit of Oak Park Hei have priorit over the mort as proposed to be placed upon the propert b the developer and the mort and that the mort shall not do an act to obstruct, impair or.otherwise limit the abilit of the developer to full perform all of its obli to the Cit of Oak Park Hei under the terms and conditions of the development a as ori - executed and as ma be subse amended between the Cit and the developer.. EXHIBIT B 4 January 26, 2000 Page 2 That the mortgagee will also have to acknowledge that there are easements yet due to be conveyed to the City of Oak Park Heights in the form of roadway and some trail easements and potentially other park easements. That we will need the commitment from the proposed mortgagee that they understand that releases as against the mortgage or deed of indenture will be freely granted by that mortgagee on behalf of the property to release same to the City of Oak Park Heights so that proper recording of easements unencumbered by the mortgage can be implemented. Further, it must be understood that there will be no fees or costs assessed to the City of Oak Park Heights by the mortgagee for those releases. 4. Further, it should be noted that final easement conveyance as it affects the established roadways should be completed before any subdivision should be allowed. 5.. The nature of the subdivision will have an impact on the building to be constructed across the property line. Those impacts will be addressed by the Building inspector upon permit application If you have any questions with regard to this, please el free to con ct me directly. Yours ry truly, M k J. Vierling MJV/jp cc: Scott Richards Kris Danielson Lj AMMO JAN I U zout ciri Y OF OAK PA RED t� �S .n vE�oPm r�T ice■ �r .. ^. i ...++ ..�� .�.. ��r r ... .... ■ _NMI . . 14168 Oak Park Boulevard P.O. Box 2007 Base Fee: $200 _ Pd. Oak park Heights, MN 55082 Escrow Amount: $ Pd. (651) 439 -4439 Fax: (651) 439 -0574 Date Filed: Please read each section carefully and answer all questions thoroughly. Only complete applications %I'll be accepted after validation by the City Administrator a.nd P rior to i acceptance of required processing fees/deposits. Street Location of Property: Legal Description of Property (attached additional sheet if necessa • Lot 1, Block 2, Boutwell's Landing, according to the recorded plat g g P thereof, Washington County. Owner: Name: Val lev Senior Services Alliance Address: 3220 Lake Johanna Boulevard City: Arden Hills State: MN z1p: 55112 Telephone: (Home) P (Fax.) (Other) Applicant (If other than owner); Name: Address: City: State. ' Zip: Telephone: (Home) (Business) (Fax) (Other) Type of Request(s) Zoning District Amendment Home Occupation Conditional Use Permit Home Occupation: Minor Variance: Single Family Residential Site Plan Review Variance: Other Residential/Commercial/Industrial PUD: Concept Plan Subdivision PUD: General Plan X Subdivision: Mi Street Vacation Comprehensive Plan Amendment Description of Request(s) We request a minor subdivision for the above- ..—. described property to enable us to obtain financing for construction of an assisted living building to be located on the subdivided parcel. EXHIBIT C If a request for planninglzoning action on the subject site or any part thereof has been previously sought, please describe it below: What? Final Plat Approval Given . Where? Boutwell's Landing Plat W}1CII? 1999 The undersigned acknowledges that (s)he understands that before this request can be considered and/or approved, all required information and fees, including any deposits, must be paid to the City and if additional fees are required to cover costs incurred by the City, the City Administrator has a right to, require additional payment from one or more of the undersigned who shall be jointly and severely liable for such fees. Please refer to the attached fee schedule, made part of this application. The undersigned applicant farther acknowledges and consents that all unpaid fees owing the City of Oak Park Heights shall be treated as unpaid utility fees and may be certified for collection as with delinquent utility billings and maybe assessed against the subject real properly rf unpaid by October 31" of each year, An incomplete application will delay the processing and may necessitate a re- scheduling of the review time frame. The application approval time line commences and an application is considered complete when all required information and fees are submitted appropriately to the City. Sixty (60) Day Waiver: The C!ry hereby nottfres the applicant that development review may not be completed within the required 60 days due to public hearing requirements and agency review; therefore, the City is exercising an automatic 60 day extension for development review. Development review will be completed within 120 days unless additional review extensions are approved by the owner /applicant, Owner(s) Signature(s): Vall Senior S ry lliance av: �oVv�•� . Date: Its: P".1 ►; Date: Applicants) Signature(s): Valley Senior Services Alliance BV: Date; z is : Date: Approved Denied by the City Council on this day of SJShucd/ Shared /Forms/Developmenc Application Enclosure 4 CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS PROPOSED 5 YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEIMENT PROGRAM C OT � RI- ETA..; NU.-' so UA C�"S DLW T R UNN.ING Y. INST. TOTA14 T : STAGECOACH TRAIL INDUSTRIAL PARK PROPERTY ....... .. .... .... ... . ` LOAN FROM EDA (>> 8'x POTENTIAL SALE PARK IMPROVEMENTS: OF LAND, NOTE: FOR SALE AT 5140,000 PATHWAYS (VALLEY VIEW BRIDGE, SWAGER TRAIL) 150j)(u) PARK AND RECREATION DEVELOPMENT SIGNAGE FUND DNR GRANT WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS 1,760,000 UTILITY REVENUE BONDS WELL (0) 780 L INES (u) q &)1000 UTILITY FUND BALANCE 980 000 , V.S.S.A. MAIN LINEAR PARK AREA DEDICATION, TOT LOT'S � 300 VSSA GENERAL PARK IMPROVEMENTS 7 8 0 AND TRAILS VSSA DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, FOR YEAR- AROUND SHELTER 140,000 PARK SHELTER ($811,19 )0), OTHER 520,000 DEDICA'T'ION AND PARK AND RECREATION ( DEVELOPMENT FUND ($40,010) EMERGENCY GENERATOR AND CONNECTIONS FOR LIFT 30,000 REGULAR OPERATION FUNDS (10 ,000) S'T'ATION RENEWAL REPLACEMENT FUND (20,0(9)) 2 "" PHASE OF ROAD CONSTRUCTION AT V.S.S.A. • - 1,500,000 100' /,SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CITY STREET RECONSTRUCTION LOWER OAK PARK HEIGHTS 1,(►OO,00t) '/z SPECIAL ASSESSMENT STREET LIGHTING 100 '/a G.O. BOND 550,000 GENERAL PARK IMPROVEMENTS — NSP LINEAR PARK I00100t GENERAL FUND BONDS 100,Otw CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT: - ---- -- 100%SPECIAL ASSESSMENT (INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS — STORM WATER 1,()()()$000 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 1 000 Ou 0 PONDING AND TRAILS) , HOUSING AND COh1MERC1Al. AREA SOIL CORRECTION TIF 500,001► HOUSING DISTRICT TIF 500,000 k 4 k t y 2001 f FIRE STATION 50 CITY CAPITAL RESERVE PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING 50 0,000 LEASE PAYMENT OF 50,000 PER YEAR, 15 YEARS PUBLIC SAFE'T'Y TRAINING FACILITY JOINT G.O. BOND CITY S'T'REET RECONST'RUCTION NORTHEAST OPI i 1,000,01 ►1► 'h SPECIAL ASSESSMENT STREET LIGHTING 200 Va G.O. BOND DNR PROPERTY/ BREKKE PARK EXPANSION 100,000 PARK AND RECREATION DEVELOPMENT P0 JO INT DEVELOPMENT OR CITY /REGIONAL PARK FUND. (ATHLETIC FIELDS) SEWER LIFT STATION UPGRADE AND SUNNYSIDE FLOW 25,000 RENEWAL REPLACEMENT FUND METER OAKGREEN /OAK PARK BOULEVARD AREA SIGNALS COUNTY ROAD AND DEVELOPER LONG LAKE STORM SEWER PROJECT R 100 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT, STORM WATER UTILITY, HOOK UP CHARGES PARK IMPROVEMENTS: NSP —PHASE l (ATHLETIC FIELDS) 80,000 NORTHERN STATES POWER LOWER OAK PARK H REDEVELOPMENT AREA CONTINUATION FROM YEAR 2000 (SECOND YEAR) COVER PARK HOCKEY RINK & WARMING HOUSE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT: 100",► SPECIAL ASSESSMENT COMMERCIAL SOIL CORRECTION TIF HOUSING HOUSING DISTRICT TIF EAST 1/3 s ::002 OSGOOD IN'T'ERCI IANGE (wITTi -i IMNACT ON THE MAIL) 3,000,000 8 0"„ STATE, 20"x, SPECIAL ASSESSMENT PARK IMPROVEMENTS: NSP — PHASE 2 GRANTS, DONATIONS JOINT PARK DEVELOPMENT IN NORTHEAST OPH 100 PARK AND RECREATION DEVELOPMENT PARK SHELTER — BRF.I:KE PARK FUND BROWNS CREEK STORM SEWER PROJEC 500 SPECIAL TAXING DISTRICT ESTABLISHED t AND ADMINISTERED BY BROWNS CREEK GRAVITY LINE FLOW METER 33 RENEWAL. REPLACEMENT FUND STREET LIGHTING 500,000 '/2 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT; '/Z G.O.. BOND OSGOOD AND MALL REDEVELOPMENT SPECIAL ASSESSMENT OAKGREEN INTERCHANGE 300,0011 STATE COUN'T'Y AND PRIVATE DEVI:I:OPMEN'1' FUNDS CENTRAL. BUSINESS DISTRICT ". 100"„ SPECIAL ASSESSMENT SOIL CORRECTION TIF WEST 1/3 HOUSING DISTRICT TIF : : NOTE: CAPI"If y AL, IMPI`OVhMI�N I~ D�I�INII � � � � � S1_)AN � � i , � � y ON. $25,000 OR MO1`h AND /OL L�IF14 Off' IO Y hALS OR MOLD 9/0799 : 1» iyJUCUni� »t�:apita�ii��hrUVe.c�oc CITY OF OAK PAR HE IGHTS PROPO 5 YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROG YEAR PR OJECT 0$ T I �� ()NO�1�� R v�NU � SOURC S Dr;WT RUNNING INST. TOTAL TOTA REPLACEMENT aC�ELh ... .. ..... ,...... ......I .... .... ..:.. � , 11113 75(),000 REPLACEMENT FUNDS OAKGRE -N AVE. TAKEOVER BY COUNTY AND COUNTY AND PRIVATE DEVEOLPMENT RECONSTRUCTION OSGOOD AVE. SEWER REPLACEMENT 50 RENEWAL AND REPLACEMENT FUND 980,000 . I. 78c1,000 PARK IMPROVEMENTS: SOUTHERN TRAIL I.00P AROLIND PERRO POND PARK ND RECREATION DEVELOPMENT FUND 51 000 NSP - PRASE 3 (SCULPTURE GARDEN /REFLECTIVE PARK) GRAN S $50,01)0 • 1110, 000 i CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT: 100% SPECIAL ASSESSMENT MIDDLE: 1/3 SOIL. CORRECTION T1F HOUSING DIS'T'RICT TIF j 2 t it -- I - •• 2004 NSP PARK FACILITY STRUCTURE 120,000 NORTHERN STATES POWER I . 6o"' STR SEWER MAIN REPLAC 100,000 RENEWAL REPLACEMENT FUND SOUTH BYPASS ROAD FROM STAGECOACH TO OSGOOD 2,000,000 MSA MONIES RIVER ACCESS PARK AND PARK SMELTER 500,000 DNR AND MND0T CENTRAL BUSINESS DIS fRICf: 100"„ SPECIAL ASSESSMENT MIDDLE 1/3 SOIL CORRECTION T1 F HOUSING DIS`T'RICT I'IF b f I I I I II . : . I NOTE4 CAPICI'AL IMPROVhMI NT DhI�INITION: ) ' , X25,(00 OI.. MOI�I� AND /OIL I.II�"� SPAN OF 10 YEARS 9: \111) , do ti lI lei lt\capitalomprvve.doc '00 Enclosure 5 TEN GOALS FOR 1999 - 2000 • Highway 36/Frontage Road_ Improve traffic accessibility along with bridge construction. Work with MnDOT to plan an alignment that serves Oak Park Heights and its business community while allowing for the construction of a roadway that facilitates smooth - flowing traffic. * Implementation of New Well Project With two wells over twenty years old, the City needs to plan for future water supply storage as well as the area that will be allowed to be served with these new wells. Purchase land and implement the concept plan as approved by Council. * City Identification Promote Oak Park Heights' identity. With our location and development, it is important to make sure that we are able to promote and sell Oak Park Heights as a residential and business community. This can be done through city identification signs, certain development requirements and other promotional tools. * Road Reconstruction With some older areas of the City, roads are deteriorating and it is important to implement the policy that the City Council has adopted. * CBD Development/Redevelop existing businesses/Econ. &Jobs Development • With the growth and development opportunities the city is facing, it is a perfect time to take a proactive stance and decide what sort of development will be beneficial to the city and its future. NSP Deregulation/Franchise and other issues Proper preparation will leave the City less dependant on utility revenues with a more diversified tax base and therefore less impacted if personal property taxes and commercial property takes continue to be lowered. * Completion of Perro Creek project The money has been allocated by the State. This project needs to be finalized and construction needs to be completed. * St. Croix Mall use Along with other development, we need to evaluate the St. Croix Mall and how it will exist competitively with other Oak Park Heights businesses. * Improve Relationships with Neighboring Communities With shared concerns and common borders, it is important that we focus on the benefits of relationships with neighboring communities. * Plan for redevelopment of Lower Oak Park Heights /acquire land With the consensus bridge alignment, the City would like to reacquire property purchased by MnDOT • for the previous bridge alignment. This would give us the opportunity to redevelop existing as well as potential residential development. NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS INC COMMUNITY PLANNING - DESIGN - MARKET RESEARCH MCLOSWE MEMORANDUM TO: Oak Park Heights Planning Commission Chair and Members FROM: Scott Richards DATE: 14 January 1999 RE: Oak Park Heights - Planning Commission Projects for 1999 FILE NO: 798.04 As an update for Planning Commission members, I have developed a list of projects that have been previously discussed or considered at meetings in 1998. With the near • completion of the Comprehensive Plan, the Planning Commission should start considering and prioritizing the projects to begin working on in March. These issues are also addressed in the Comprehensive Plan as projects for the City and specifically, the Planning Commission beginning in 1999 and beyond. The listing below contains primarily those issues that the Planning Commission worked on in 1998 or have been targeted by the Parks Commission as a priority. These listings, as well as any additions, should be discussed and prioritized by the Planning Commission at their 21 January meeting. • Park Dedication. Recommend changes to the park dedication formulas found in the Subdivision Ordinance. Formulas should be made more equitable for land versus cash dedication. This should also be discussed by the Parks Commission. • Commercial Zoning District Review. The Planning Commission should review all of the commercial zoning districts and their current application within the community. Consideration of an additional commercial zoning district may also be reviewed. • 5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 555 ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 554 16 PHONE 61 2- 595 -9636 FAX 61 2- 595 -9837 E -MAIL NAC@ WINTERNET.COM t f jo • Lower Oak Park Heights Rezoning. Residents within the lower Oak Park Heights neighborhood have requested a rezoning from R -2 to R -1. This action should be studied by the Planning Commission with neighborhood involvement. • Sign Ordinance, Reconsideration of the existing Sign Ordinance has been a priority of City staff for some time. Business owner involvement on this process will be necessary. • Park and Trail Plan. The Parks Commission is beginning work on a Comprehensive Park and Trail Plan beginning in January. The Planning Commission will need to provide comment and suggestions as it relates to the overall Comprehensive Plan. • Central Business District Design and Market Study. Two architectural firms will be submitting proposals for design work and a market study for the Central Business District. The Planning Commission will be involved in this process. Also, for your information, these are the topics to be considered by the Plannin Commission at their 25 February 1999 meeting: 1. Ryder Student Transportation Facility on Stagecoach Trail - requested Conditional Use Permit. 2. Valley Senior Services Alliance - General Plan of Development for Phase 1. 3. Comprehensive Plan adoption. 4. Stillwater Area High School - Conditional Use Permit for ropes course. pc: Kris Danielson 2 1875 South Greel St e'y reef Stillw (� 3 4 ater Minnesota � t FEB — 420 STILL WATER A REA SC r s �ooL� c 5082 Effecttye Learning Through Excellence in Educatid ; l� Phone: 651-3,51-8340 Fax: 651-351-8380 Kathleen Macy Superintendent V - TDD: 651 January 27, 2000 Mr. Tom Melena, City Administrator City of Oak Park Heights 14168 57` Street Forth Enclosure 6 P.O. Box 2007 Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 RE: Goverance of the use of the ropes course be ' P provided by the same District 834 Communi Education and general education policies and use guidelines � our facilities, fief ds, apparatus etc g Ines that prescribe the use of all of . Dear Mr. Melena, During the past year, I have met with you and members of our respective staff each month to discuss areas of mutual concerns and to develop more active communica between our organizations. The goals of our meetings are to serve our communities better and to re- establish strong, positive relationshi s between our organizations. The meetings have been hel ful t P p o us as a way to resolve problems and chart the future. I am grateful for your commitment to this work. As a result of our ongoing conversations and as art of our annua 1 review, I report that we have met the conditions of the permit awarded by the City of Oak Park Heights g on Apnl _9, 1999 for the use of the ropes course. Any issues, and there have been very few, that have arisen have been discussed and resolved. The only issue unable to be resolved is the requirement to train City police and fire �' P officials for potential rescue activities on the course. At this time, our prescribed hours of operation do not al schedule the training at a time that the firefighters can partici P low us to pate. As per our conversation and at your directive, I am writing to request that we be able to use the ropes course on the grounds of Stillwater Area High School under the same D' that govern all of our facilities. istnct 8-34 policies and guidelines What this means in this case is that: • Hours of use would be expanded with safety of artici ants as t would P he benchmark of when the course be in use. • Availability of natural daylight and high standards s of safety and supervision would prescribe the hours of use. The current guidelines limit the use of the course to 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., or dusk, whichever occurs earlier. This restriction prohibits some of our students and parents from participation, one of the federal requirements of the grant that supported the development opment of this course. • This is not a request for lighting. An Equal Opportunity Employer Afton - Lakeland Elementary • Andersen Elementary Area Learning Center • Early Childhood Family Cent • Lily Lake Elementary Marine Elementary Oak Park Elementary Oak-Land Junior High er Lake Elmo Elementary g Rutherford Elementary 9 Stonebridge Elementary Stillwater Area High School Stillwater Junior High Valley Crossing Community School • Withrow f E ementary s Mr. Tom Melena, City Administrator January, City Administrator January 27, 2000 Page two Independent of this request, I ask that the foilowing . be considered by the City as an Item discussion. of future .d any changes to the ropes course, including tructures ap o an am 8 p fencing, access or security measures, shall require a PP f nded conditional use permit by the City C ou n cil • �' C ncil unless the City Council amends the conditional use permit to exclude recreational structures from its application. Conditional Use Permit, April 1999 Thank you again for your commitment to our shared responsibility of service to the comma ' forward to the action of the City Council on this request. na ry' I l ook Sin eiy Ka hleen P. Macy Su erintendent of Sch ols KPM:dkh c: Board of Education Ms. Teri Lewis, SAHS Ms. Mary Pat Cumming Juhl. Assistant Principal SAHS Mr. Paul Westmoreland. Community Education Dr. Mary Jo Weingarten, Deputy Superintendent ' A CITY OF OAK P ARK HEI S FIRST MENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS FOR STILLWATER AREA HIGH SCHOOL/ INDEP ENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 834 File No. : Date Issued: Legal Description: (Washing~ �.on County Geo. Code See Ex hibit "A" attached hereto Owner: St Area H4c.• n School/ ndecendent School. D4 strict No. 834 Address: 1975 South Greelet� L : St .� e�.t St- _ Minnesota 55082 Present Zoning Distri p Perim tted uses set f ortli in Ordinance 400 Section 401 _ et . sear_ . I • CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR* All uses shall be subject to the fo llowing conditions T _ imposed by the Cit Co u n cil g nditzons and Heights. Y ncil of the City f Oak ak Para General Description 1.. Amendment to that cert independent Schoo Z tarn Conde t zonal Use Pe . District No . 834 and dated rMzt issued to incorcoratzd herein by re f a o December t 0 19 91 w ' that 't ; r nc` and reaffirmed in w '�;' - hic :h ..s, is mcd +find within this am who ? ceot to the extent a m en dment. • 7.1. ADDITIONAL RESTRICTIONS AND PROVISIONS . The f o l lcwincr additional res . tract Ions and proveS ions be ' Fir st Amendment to Conde Iona being part of the l Use Permit t be issued ed herein shall, be Amending said Condit +ora? Use PerLnit dated December 10 �, e and a Stillwater Area School Ind 1 for t•. / In dependent School Distr _mow the r oces course as an access �-rzct #834 to permit condit+cns : ` orY use subj ect to the following ti w i a. That access to the ropes course be maintained year emergency vehicles Y round fa b. Gate to the ropes course shall be close and lock?d a . when the facility is not in use • t all ti c . T�15t i CP_ o1.. a?:y future li b li p at �n r g g , tile ..oneS cour reguire approval oL an amended conditicna+ uSZ sha p =mi Count t cY the CI J" l ; y d. Any changes to the roces course l _ inc a�� .d +no str�;ctures , f enc ' na, access or security measures, shall rem.: ;r` acorova1 �- conditional use permit by the City Cou i � ` - ° L an a mended amends t h y nc - - unless the C 4 ty Counc e c onditi onal ional use perm, t to exclude � r i �' structures fr s application om it app Iude + �-cl eatzQna e. The hours of operation of the roes tours T • e shad be established as occurring from 8:00 A.M. until. r S : 0 0 P.M. or dusk whichever oc ea l ier , Monday through Fri day, with no use allow curs legal. holidays; e� on wee.�ends or i. c The final landscaping plan to be im r �- . + leme.jted on she roces tour site shall be sub- ec - to the revs ew an d r se app�oval of the Cit-,r Arborist; _ g. School District personnel shall. work w Police �.. officials it h Ci ty - olive and r�.r e train -Lng for potential rescue act +vZt r ., _.o.. the ropes c.�urse . All further use of the ropes course sh a r° Y� t t e__ . r om the , - % '� approvals f Po +ice and F� r�� C�, � o- �• �' _ wr� +- ___ -I s L_r'l adeouat act e4b sa.ety and rescue plan s are in pla for t he ropes course. use. • Annual review should be imposed as a condition � �- � . . n��.tion os this conditional use perm -it to assure compliance and provid a met hanism to deal with any ,issues that may arise aff-ectin �e } • + g t."`' use of the ropes course vis a vis the neighboring proper � � es n the future . III. REVIEW Pursuant to Order of the C; ty Council of the City of Oak Parma Heights, a periodic review of this First Amendment to C imposed as a condition Conditional Use Permit is of its grant. This Conditional Use be reviewed annually at the Direction T T Petit shall. o z the City Cler , which shal notify the permit holder of the date of the annual s ( 10 days prior to the review hearin g• re r +ew at least ten IN WITNESS WmzxEOF, the part have set forth the hands and seals. CITY 0 F OAR PARR I t7rs 1 S Date: By ? . David - S ch i May ` V Date: B y �. C-I Thomas Me I ena —" C' Z A ' inist for Date: 9 - 17 -99 By A pp Z cant. Igo Date: 9'17 -99 c1pr B r 40� i APPlicant /Permit Ho lder der ...�#0 , are or the Northeast Quarter or Soat*ion 6 To Coin, C Y, Ninnesot o ► desaribed s follows, Tow nship 29 North, gang• 20 Wes t o Was[ ing Beginning at 1116 Nortltoaat cot meosurail at a rl 1 t °r of rile South 496 girt onelo !:u tiro Soutit lilt° of as 00 foot 'Of sold Northeast �Isgroos 45 tl111111tos 42 secotnda Vs.. " id Nort.ltoaet tterter Quarter, ' tiro soarer 11114 u � assurnod i,ewrltn Q f tltolte♦ 6out11 dogro 17 0 1111ltes 12 f t aQO If t,Lllwo 8► 010118 aw td Mortis l trl• 2342. rldn Fast t 41nva g 42 luontod feet and Lrawoiled l ttlettC K ld ooltter line 536. feet$ t1i"" 8 r N"ctlt degrees 42 ntttutoe 48 secol,dg c 0111 55 Of Bald Nortllea•t Quarter, es rod gnat 278 leer to the No degrees 45 oitlutea mOQ'u et rth line of tl,e 8011111 771.07 42 eer.oltds go a a r181tt angl to Sala lloutlt t laid Northeast Quarter 10118 Bald Hortil line line, t.ltencs Nort line 25.01 � tlteltce Boutlt OZ 1800 [eat to h less, Post, more or !.sea to dOSreer 00 tslnut6s 03 sec the Qoat line the point of be oi '`!s East along ,said F 111gilwe g irtn ing , containi 14 , 7 9 a cr08 a more to Trunk r estrictions end oaeemo,l Y 5 along rile Nortltwsiter is of roco�rd, lr 78 6 00 fast thereof a Together vlth All 6426 a nd IUL,aQt repair of utllittoa ut d c o for the tit• tusos 1 1 of colts true t ion, 1110 t� to the Easterly uN °u ottd over• 1112 Baatorl llntiolt. mafr/tonat lino �lteroof of Lila tile Y 30 feet an tn° • B descr t.bed , Tl1at port of tlts Northeast - P eet moa�tucn►1 at right •ne I county, Hinnesots, describ °d d ter of Section Section 6, T ownship .s follows, 19 Nortlt, gai,gs 20 Wear Beginning at tits No WaSittngt rtliea s t corne of the Bough measured st s rigi►t angle to 771.0] degrass 4S a gout!► line of said feet °f salt! Northeast t us 4lnutos 42 seconds West id Northeast Qtlorte 1 rter, , thence North SS Jegrpe2 42 ► assulnecl beeri r; tilence gout!, i tligliws Y S � ee proe minutus 48 seconds g' along sold Nortlt line 1800. ]9 el,tiy located e»li tr Nest 278.00 feet to t! fsel East along osier cente 11„6 118 aveled; thisttcA a captor lilts or Tru1 ttorttteest Quart as 5 Foet to North 34 degrees 17 minutes 1 tnoastired rite 6outli limo 2 seoottJ thence North 99 degrees 54 at 4 right art to to o the North 801 .66 mttlut:oa 56 6 tite Nortlt 11 of said Northe foot of Sol Best litre of the tfurtlleast~ seeoltct♦ •aid East l ute Qttartwr Bo ar 4 101111 saki South 11tie 1 °aOt Q11ortor 1017 . U7 l tit °r,cttl boutlt 02 1383 , 19 f to 2111 second* feet to tlto o dogmas 00 n,inut 03 n 1111 of hegtttltittB, contslrtlrt last aloft 9ubjsot to Trunk Itigltw s 8 41 •20 acres, more o less restrictions end "a".... "a".... Along the Nortllweeterl of record. Y 18.00 feet: tl,sreof and Sub AND J eo t t, That part of tile li ast the 8outttesat half of the 8out"68t Quarter of Section 6 Qua of sec t ton s Southwest Quarter of sa ► diet part: of J tilat part o Nortltweat id Section 6 the Northeast C Quarter of aeid Section ' tilst Ps of ttte 8otlttle Quarter of the said Suction 6 6 and that alt Qu nF t H11,ltoavta, a in Townsllt P O f tite Northeast Ire described as follows, 29 No>rt1 pangs 20 quarter of W est GurnTO11Q l it a yo t ► u4sitirt18LO11 0o I:ite .9utlt.t�unet: cord u f salt 1 1 f ado t' t ost 5 . along � tlret�ue Nuct:l� Ut cicl � WaMt: Ii�llf oP • 6 l•!ro Los 11" of 1, o gree 4a rnlc,tttoe 09 tiro Sotttl►yast {l or at��,� 173 1. 20 feet uapt: 11 ►t1 f ++eebl►cla Wnol•, ne !►oar 111 to the ►n 4t t" n" ticlnrt:c►r ft socot :clo West parallel Nlc ul �eglltttitlg; thance S outh a 1 fletollc; o 0 Qttartor h d t!► the 8 out.lt tt 89 c18 Kt'°ns 50 f tsl•anoe of 132 I I11e of s/tld feat tntrtllr.e i, l 9 out11wosC Q t1ACtot l.39 feat: to tite Weatarl half crE c:1to y�ttt wt t:l, tiro 900111 i ' ttteltce,Soutl, 88 d Y lino of 9614 Heat °t ins of 9Ajd Soolloll 6SroO8 51+ rolnllCoe 1S eecvnde llel f of t:lte 1 Ina of Old Trurlk ill ! ° 'dlsretto © Wea t par degrees 16 6 1118 111 as looet;ec! Ac11! f 3332, 4 7 feet to t11e sot mtliutes 30 segonda gapl n traveled ltl 197:1 ttor North 34 degrees 17 Irlltut: loltg BAid aent:o r thaime 'Nortlt 33 to the Nortlt limo of 9e. 12 e©oonda K 1ln6 996,03 feet said Nurt:itoaet goat: alol,g said Center ttlorice Soutil 08 degcAeo 45 tut8s 42 rt000n of !inn 1(10.41 feet tlto c=enter l lrlo of Tr'nk 11f cle Woe( olu/t 1;110 sou et Q CitNOy g aN g said ltorl•!1 llr,ne3r69; tltertoe 110 171'11 34 dogro"n 11 mill"toa to the tlort�lt 1 tno of 1.110 12 °p�nt,clo F tct °0111 :iy 1uR,lt [cA1_ to .f10 C a l O11 111111 t' r Ave I oil !loft!! 88 -q4tith 446.00 K "" la c:ntlt:ec 1 f clo tS(t9 � ���, Icut,co cJogreen 45 tnirttrtos foot: of ant 1 li►►t r fu►►t- to ttte F,aar ti r,w 42 secotrd gnat ?u►Irt:ot . 03 aeeoricle !Lest uE anlct tlot'ttt0e nto sate! tlo�•Ctt 1 13 42-42 tl►�+rt�:w AIU Berle! Quarter; tltottco Sot :lt n2 do trio foot currier of sort! West East 1111 496 f gra : more or seconds m nn Half o f tilu Notlt:itHeAr ® Ot THOS - in l cct,l:oe mittur 17 to t Ito 1101r.1 �u4rter Eaq t: ul.urtg Lit feat Nort11 R t for • t:lrortc.ct t A dietgnee of 1t110 of solcl llurt:lt 89 cingruns 46 tlty 9otttltweat QuArto 132�i . 32 f eat to West "n "n it of ttto S ()1 1t 1 l w e 9t: of 4411d, East line o f r ' tltnnce SOUt 01 degree 411 f A1tic1 Weot: lla the WeAtr Half of t minutes d9 seconcis 1f o feet to the Nolut of 6e � 9 out:llwesC (u Eno t a loft ginning, arter a distAnee of 91 0.86 1U.8bt EXHIBIT "A" __. .r EXCEPT that port thereof being the tr aot described in Document Ho. 468927 recorded and on file in .the Office of th© County ltocordor, Was hin gton cottlit Y . Hinuanots. Bub j eat to Truask Highway 5 Along the Hortliwostarly t ale Llltrsof . The total area of I tltixt paraa►l is 118600 acres, more or 1099. SubJ ec t to ree tr i c t 1 ori9 and ea s otmellts of record and 9ul)j nr. t to it as uarter of dra t tla a Atl 4886ment ovor that part: of t1je llorthanst Q S lion 6, 'faatiel�i 1x 29 North 20 Want # W4811ington County, M111neeota lying Utterly of tl�s Eae tarl Y 8 Y y rigtlt tr Trunk Highway 5 deeoribod sa f ullowg i , COmm l ag at tii i ntartec tion of cositer 1 ins of S a i d Trunk Hi. liven 5 a y a� pronently tr aveled, and the Sotlttl line of tie Hort h Half of eatd Seotion b thence North 34 dagrood 17 utlnutisa 12 0400nds Faot, assilmod banrfiqt aluri cetstor 1 ! it* 288 . 78 t'eo t t:o tlle poittr of l,ogirtttl lIr ; t:i�o��ce :3out:It 5S dos g reen �� A rainut:Aa 48 a ©cu :r�l9 Lxodt: 056 Foot tl��rrco Qc,tttlt 1.1 rho rAr�A jiZ n�i ntrt:wo � O 8 r a�conda East 11 S .00 t oot ; t:lkorj(.0 NoW Is 04 daiSroett 42 m1mitea t,8 am)(11 Fast 110.00 rivet thattco Hor UU dograda 21 minutaa 42 anconds EnoL 248.93 fee thetrcA tlorL11 S_5 degrees 42 minutea 48 xeconds Want: 125.00 foot to said cetst ar l l tto • thence Sout 34 degrees 17 mLittttoa 12 aeconds West nlotl i g s t l ld oont:e 1 ttte 2N4 . QQ f to tlte point of beginning, containing 0.11 &cram, more or Loss, AND 0ut10t 'A' and outlah 'Bi , duoa tia and � Kern � 11dd i t�f on a e on file �e and Of record in t; � p �. a � tad c he Office ice of the Count Recorder n.�Lon County, Mi� �nesola. Y er Of f wael�l