HomeMy WebLinkAbout2018-02-08 Planning Comission Meeting Packet CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA
Thursday,February 8,2018
6:00 P.M.
I. Call to Order/Pledge of Allegiance
II. Approval of Agenda
III. Approve January 11,2018 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes(1)
IV. Department/Commission Liaison/Other Reports
V. Visitors/Public Comment
This is an opportunity for the public to address the Commission with questions or concerns not on the
agenda. Please limit comments to three minutes.
VI. Public Hearings
A. Fencing and Landscaping Ordinance: Consider amendment to Zoning
Ordinance 401.15.E,Fencing,Screening&Landscaping clarifying point(s)of
measurement from grade to highest point of fence structure and amending
definition of fence height in Zoning Ordinance 401.02.B,Definitions.(2)
VII. New Business
VIII. Old Business
A. Oak Park Heights—Comprehensive Plan 2018:(3)
IX. Informational
A. Upcoming Meetings:
• Tuesday,February 13,2018 City Council 6:00 p.m./City Hall
• Tuesday,February 27,2018 City Council 6:00 p.m./City Hall
• Thursday,March 8,2018 Planning Commission 6:00 p.m./City Hall
• Tuesday,March 13,2018 City Council 6:00 p.m./City Hall
• Tuesday,March 27,2018 City Council 6:00 p.m./City Hall
B. Council Representative
• Tuesday,February 27,2018—Commissioner Freeman
• Tuesday,March 27,2018—Commissioner Giovinazzo
• Tuesday,April 24,2018—Commissioner Kremer
X. Adjourn.
ENCLOSURE 1
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
Thursday, January 11,2017—Oak Park Heights City Hall
Call to Order/Pledge of Allegiance:
Chair Kremer called the meeting to order. Present: Commissioners Kremer, Freeman,
Giovinazzo, VanDyke and White; City Administrator Johnson, City Planner Richards, and
City Councilmember Liljegren.
II. Approval of Agenda:
Commissioner Giovinazzo, seconded by Commissioner White,moved to accept the Agenda
as presented. 5-0.
III. Approval of December 14, 2017 Meeting Minutes:
Commissioner Freeman, seconded by Commissioner Giovinazzo, moved to approved the
Minutes as presented. Carried 5 - 0.
IV. Department/Commission Liaison / Other Reports: Chair Kremer welcomed Commission
Liaison Alternate Councilmember Mike Liljegren. There were no reports.
V. Visitors/Public Comment: None.
VI. Public Hearings:
A. Continued- Small Cell Technology: Consider amendments to City Ordinance
section 704 and Zoning Ordinance section 401.15.P related to small cell technology,
with regard to public rights of way and placement upon private property.
Chair Kremer reconvened the December 14, 2017 public hearing.
City Planner Richards reviewed his January 4, 2018 Planning Memorandum and
discussed changes made to the language, following comment received at the
December Planning Commission meeting.
There being no visitors to the public hearing, it was closed.
Discussion ensued as to the process for the application as proposed and what current
application processes and typical fee ranges.
Commissioner Freeman, seconded by Commissioner VanDyke moved to recommend
the City Council approve the Ordinance amendments as set forth in the January 4,
2018 Planning Memorandum.
Carried 5 -0.
Planning Commission Minutes
January 11, 2018
Page 2 of 4
VII. New Business: None.
VIII. Old Business:
A. Fencing and Landscaping Ordinance:
City Planner Richards noted that the issue from December discussion appeared to be the
need for clarification of where fence height is measured from and reviewed his January
4, 2018 Planning Memorandum with regard to the same.
Discussion ensued as to the definition, how it may be interpreted, alternative wording,
with a suggestion to include a graphic in the definition section of the ordinance.
Situational contexts were noted such as fence installations upon retaining walls,
abutting properties with slopes that direct downward to one another, and the possibility
of variance approval to exceed ordinance heights with neighbor agreement.
City Planner Richards will work on revision of the language and bring back to the
Commission in January, where a public hearing on the proposed amended will be had.
B, Commission Attendance at City Council Meetings: Discuss whether or not to
continue having a Planning Commission Representative attend City Council
meetings.
Chair Kremer noted that the subject was discussed by the Commission a few months
back and that the City Council has also discussed it some. Kremer inquired of the
Commission, whether or not they found it beneficial and inquired of Commission
Liaison Liljegren of his thoughts. Liljegren noted that Commissioner attendance is
always appreciated, most of the time the City Council does not have a lot of
questions and City Planner Richards does a good job of providing an overview of
what transpired at the Planning Commission and that it is more a matter of choice of
the Commission as to whether or not they want to be present at the City Council
meeting.
Commissioner Freeman noted that his initial inquiry as to presence was not so as to
avoid attending but rather along the line of an observation that the City Planner, City
Administrator and Commission Liaison are always at the Planning Commission and
City Council meetings and that perhaps it was a bit much to also have a Planning
Commission Liaison attend unless it was something that the City Council wanted.
Chair Kremer noted that the Planning Commission Bylaws do require that the
Commission attend the City Council meetings and if desired the Commission can
recommend a change to Article 5. F. of the Bylaws.
Planning Commission Minutes
January 11,2018
Page 3 of 4
City Administrator Johnson discussed relationship dynamics between Council, Staff,
Commission structures, adding that he doesn't see issue with the present dynamics,
however overtime those could change and the Commission may desire to have that
voice,he did recommend that the Commission keep the representative language to
safeguard that but also did not see an issue with removing it for the foreseeable
future.
Chair Kremer stated that he felt that the City Council is comfortable with the
Planning Commission public hearing process and that they are receiving thoughtful
recommendations, noting that the personal give and take lends to that and is
beneficial. He suggested leaving it in the Bylaws but not as a mandate to attend but
rather a recommendation.
Commissioner Giovinazzo agreed with attendance as a recommendation rather than a
mandate,noting that when she attend the City Council meeting it was good to hear
the thoughts of the City Council and helpful to understand how they were thinking or
what their concerns were or may have need to know.
Chair Liljegren noted that the City Council doesn't want Commissioners from
Planning or Parks attend City Council meetings because they have to and then feeling
like they are not being used, adding that City Planner Richards really wraps up the
work the Planning Commission does and that they really do not want to have the
Commission be mandated to show up just to show up, without being called upon.
Commission consensus was to leave the Commission Bylaws as they are with
regarding to Planning Commission representation at City council meetings,with
attendance being recommended.
C. Oak Park Heights—Comprehensive Plan 2018:
City Planner Richards reviewed and discussed his January 4,2018 Planning
Memorandum with updated information to Parks and Trails Implementation section,
adding that there will be more to share at the next Planning Commission meeting,
following his meeting the Parks Commission on January 20. Richards asked the
Commission to share anything they desired to recommend/pass along to the Parks
Commission in the terms of trails connections,parks issues or related with him prior
to January 29th Richards reviewed the process moving forward for review, comment
and finalization approval.
IX. Informational:
The Council Representative schedule will be updated alphabetically for 2018.
Chair Kremer stated that he may not be at the February meeting and that Vice Chair Freeman
would conduct the meeting in his absence. Kremer thank the Commission for being present
and doing a great job, noting that they should be please with themselves.
Planning Commission Minutes
January 11,2018
Page 4 of 4
A. Upcoming Meetings:
• Tuesday,January 23, 2018 City Council 6:00 p.m./City Hall
• Thursday, February 8, 2018 Planning Commission 6:00 p.m./City Hall
• Tuesday,February 13, 2018 City Council 6:00 p.m./City Hall
• Tuesday,February 27, 2018 City Council 6:00 p.m./City Hall
B. Council Representative:
• Tuesday,January 23, 2018—Commissioner Kremer
X. Adjourn. Commissioner Freeman, seconded by Commissioner Giovinazzo, moved to
adjourn at 6:53 p.m. Carried 5—0.
Respectfully submitted,
Julie Hultman
Planning&Code Enforcement
Approved by the Planning Commission:
TPC3601 Thurston Avenue N, Suite 100 ENCLOSURE
Anoka, MN 55303
Phone: 763.231.5840
Facsimile: 763.427.0520
TPC@Planni ngCo.corn
MEMORANDUM
TO: Eric Johnson
FROM: Scott Richards
DATE: January 31 , 2018
RE: Oak Park Heights — Fence Height Amendments — Planning
Commission
TPC FILE: 236.01 — 18.01
BACKGROUND
The Planning Commission, its December 14, 2017 meeting, discussed the issues with
fence height and the starting point from which the height is measured. It was pointed out
that not all sites are perfectly level and the Zoning Ordinance should be clarified as to
where fence height is measured from. The Planning Commission discussed the wording
of an easy to understand and interpret fence height definition. The result follows in this
memo. It is nearly identical to the previous definition, although the order has been
changed.
In 2015, the fence regulations were amended to allow a maximum height of seven feet
to accommodate the posts and finials above a standard six-foot fence panel. The issue
of the starting point from which fences are measured from was not addressed at that time.
The current definition of fence height is as follows.
Existing Language:
401.02.B. Definitions.
3. Fence, Height: The distance from the adjacent finished grade to the
highest projection of a fence structure or support post.
Additionally, Section 401.15.E Fencing, Screening and Landscaping reads as follows:
401.15.E. Fencing, Screening and Landscaping.
4. Specific Fence Standards. The height of fence shall be the distance from the
adjacent finished grade to the highest projection of a fence structure or support
post and shall be restricted according to the location as follows:
a. Fences or walls located on or adjacent to any property line bordering a
public road or street shall not exceed seven (7) feet in height. However, in
no case shall any shrub, hedge or fence bordering upon any street or
sidewalk be constructed or allowed to grow to a height which could obstruct
safe driving visibility at intersections.
ANALYSIS
The language proposed by the Planning Commission would clarify the intent of the
ordinance and provide for easier interpretation by Staff and the public. See below:
Proposed Language:
401.02.8. Definitions.
3. Fence, Height: The height of a fence is measured from the highest projection of
a fence structure or support post to the adjacent finished grade.
The Planning Commission thought that a diagram in the definitions would help with the
interpretation. Here is a diagram that could be added:
Highest projection of a fence structure or support post
I y
Adjacent finished grade
If the definition changes, this section will also need to be amended:
401.15.E. Fencing, Screening and Landscaping
4. Specific Fence Standards. The height of fence is measured from the highest
projection of a fence structure or support post to the adjacent finished grade and
shall be restricted according to the location as follows:
2
a. Fences or walls located on or adjacent to any property line bordering a
public road or street shall not exceed seven(7)feet in height. However, in
no case shall any shrub, hedge or fence bordering upon any street or
sidewalk be constructed or allowed to grow to a height which could obstruct
safe driving visibility at intersections.
EXHIBITS
Please find as follows an Exhibit for your consideration on this matter:
Exhibit 1: Section 401.02.B.Definitions and Section 401.15.E.Fencing and Screening
and Landscaping—Existing/Revised Language.
CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission should review the proposed language and determine if this is
the course of action to address the fence height issue. A public hearing has been
scheduled for the February meeting.
3
OAK PARK HEIGHTS ZONING ORDINANCE
401 .02.B. Definitions.
Existing Language:
3. Fence, Height: The distance from the adjacent finished grade to the
highest projection of a fence structure or support post.
Proposed Language and Diagram:
3. Fence, Height: The height of a fence is measured from the highest projection of
a fence structure or support post to the adjacent finished grade.
Highest projection of a fence structure or support post
1
djacent finished grade
401 .15.E. Fencing, Screening and Landscaping.
1 . Building Permit. No person shall hereafter construct or cause to be constructed
or erected within the City of Oak Park Heights, any fence without first making an
application for and securing a building permit.
23, 352 Application Requirements. Each application for a permit under this section shall
be submitted to the Zoning Administrator on forms provided by the City. Each such
application shall include a site plan drawn to scale showing the location of
house(s), garage(s), and other improvements on the lot and the location of the
fencing to be erected, altered or relocated. A certificate of survey shall be required
for all fences (including hedges and plantings) to be constructed up to or on the
property line, unless:
a. Property stakes on the affected property lines are first located and
marked by a licensed and registered Minnesota surveyor.
1
b. Or, an agreement is reached between the property owners as to the
accepted or property line.
3. General Provisions. All fences within the City shall be subject to the following
general provisions:
a. No fences shall be placed on or extend into the public rights-of-way.
b. All fences shall be located entirely upon the property of the person
constructing or causing the construction of such fence.
c. That side of any fence considered to be its "face" (i.e., the finished side
having no structural supports)shall face abutting property.
d. Both sides of any fence shall be maintained in a condition of reasonable
repair and appearance by its owner and shall not be allowed to become and
remain in a condition of disrepair or danger,or constitute a nuisance, public
or private.
e. Barbed wire fences are only allowed in the City by conditional use permit.
f. No person shall construct or maintain or allow to be constructed or
maintained anywhere within the City any fence or metal construction which
is charged by or connected with an electrical system.
g. No physical damage of any kind shall occur to abutting property.
h. All man-made fences located in front of the rear building line shall consist
of materials comparable in grade and quality to the following: decorative
masonry, wrought iron or wood, provided the surfaces are finished for
exterior use,or wood of proven durability is used,such as cedar or redwood.
i. For the purpose of fence regulations, in the case of a corner lot, both yards
abutting a street shall be considered a front yard.
4. Specific Fence Standards. The height of fence is measured from the highest
projection of a fence structure or support post to the adjacent finished grade and
shall be restricted according to the location as follows:
35 a. Fences or walls located on or adjacent to any property line bordering
a public road or street shall not exceed seven(7)feet in height. However,
in no case shall any shrub, hedge or fence bordering upon any street or
sidewalk be constructed or allowed to grow to a height which could obstruct
safe driving visibility at intersections.
35 b. Fences or walls on or adjacent to the shore line of any navigable
lake, channel or stream shall not exceed four(4)feet in height. Fences or
2
walls on or along that portion of a lot line from a navigable lake, channel or
stream to the rear side of the average building construction line shall not
exceed four(4) feet in height.
23, 35 C. Fences or walls on or within ten (10) feet or less from a common
property line between two adjoining lots or parcels not owned by the same
person, firm or corporation shall not exceed seven (7) feet in height. The
property owner shall provide written notification to adjoining property
owners concurrent with the application for a building permit for a fence
installation which is less than five (5) feet from a property line. Fences or
walls shall be permitted except as prohibited in sub-paragraphs b. and d.
hereof.
35 d. Fences or patio walls not exceeding nine (9) feet in height may be
constructed without restriction on the interior of any lot or parcel, providing
no such fence or wall shall be closer than ten (10) feet to any common
property line between adjoining lots not owned by the same person, firm or
corporation (except as permitted under sub-paragraph c. hereof), and
provided further in the case of lakeshore lots, no such fence or wall shall be
located so as to block or otherwise adversely interfere with an adjoining
property owner's lake view.
35 e. Open wire fences not exceeding eleven (11) feet in height enclosing
tennis courts, pools, and similar uses, shall be permitted without restriction.
5. Swimming Pool Fences. Outdoor swimming pool fences shall be required as
outlined in Section 1303 of the City Code.
6. Non-Conforming Fences. It is the intent of this Ordinance to allow the
continuation of such non-conforming fences until they are discontinued as provided
herein. However, it is not the intent of this Ordinance to encourage the survival of
non-conforming fences and such fences are declared to be incompatible with
permitted fences within the City. Such fences shall be regulated by the following
provisions:
a. No existing fence not permitted by this Ordinance in the district within which
it is located, except when required to do so by law or ordinance, shall be
enlarged, extended, reconstructed or structurally altered unless such fence
is changed to one permitted in that district. Maintenance of a non-
conforming fence will be allowed, however, when this includes necessary
repairs and incidental alterations which do not expand or intensify the non-
conforming fence.
3
ENcLosuRETPC I
3601 Thurston Avenue N, Suite 100
Anoka, MN 55303
Phone: 763.231 .5840
Facsimile: 763.427.0520
TPC Plan ni ngCo.corn
MEMORANDUM
TO: Eric Johnson
FROM: Scott Richards
DATE: January 31 , 2018
RE: Oak Park Heights — Comprehensive Plan 2018
TPC FILE: 226.10
At the February 8, 2018 meeting, the Planning Commission will review the following
related to the Comprehensive Plan 2018:
Parks and Trails Implementation
Please find as attached the draft Introduction, Physical Profile, Issues Identification and
Goals and Polices sections of the Park and Trails Plan. Also, the Existing Park and
Trails map has been included. The Parks Commission discussed the plan at their
January 29, 2018 meeting and provided comment on the issues identification and
goals/policies. From this basis, Staff is currently working on the proposed parks and
trails map and the park system plan. The Planning Commission should review the draft
and provide any comments in advance of the next Park's Commission review at their
February meeting.
Implementation
Once the Parks and Trails Plan is drafted, the Implementation section can be
completed. It is expected that the entire draft plan, including the Implementation section
will be available for Planning Commission review at the March meeting.
Open House/Public Hearing
The Planning Commission should discuss holding an open house, possibly with the
public hearing for considering the draft plan. The announcement for an open house
could be included in the March newsletter that would be distributed to every household
in the City. The Planning Commission should also discuss other ways to obtain public
input on the plan.
Pc: Julie Hultman
PARKS AND TRAILS - INTRODUCTION
INTRODUCTION
The Parks and Trail section of the Oak Park Heights Comprehensive Plan is built on the
foundation created with the first Comprehensive Bicycle and Pedestrian Trail System
Plan of 1995, the 1999 Comprehensive Park and Trail System Plan and the 2008
Comprehensive Park and Trail System Plan. The 2018 Comprehensive Plan
acknowledges that the community is almost completely developed and anticipates that
there will be little, if any, expansion of the City limits in coming years. The population
growth and number of households is expected to grow slightly, to over 5,000 persons,
and remain stable. It is expected that the City's population will continue to age,
especially with the large numbers of elderly housing units. In 2000, 12.8 percent of the
citys population was 65 years and over, by 2010 that climbed to 23.0 percent and in
2015 it was 30.7 percent. In recognition of the demographics of the community,
especially the aging of the population, this plan seeks to provide opportunities for
recreation for all ages.
The 2017 Community Survey asked residents about the current park and trail system
and they stated that it was one of their favorite aspects of living in Oak Park Heights.
Respondents had the following opinion regarding the condition of City parks and trails:
1 . Excellent — 23.2 percent
2. Above Average — 56.9 percent
3. Average — 16.2 percent
Respondents utilization of a City Park or trail is as follows:
1 . Every day — 17.0 percent
2. A few times per week — 37.8 percent
3. On occasion — 26.8 percent
The City recognizes that the community is almost completely built out and new park
land will not be created as a result of land subdivision. The continuing emphasis in
coming years will be on improvements within the existing parks, trail connections within
the community, and addressing the park and recreation needs of an aging population.
iYtVf. Comprehensive Plan 2018
City of Oak Park Heights Page 145
PARKS AND TRAILS - PHYSICAL PROFILE
EXISTING PARKS AND TRAILS
The Oak Park Heights park system offers numerous City parks distributed throughout
the City and a trail system that nearly connects all parts of the community. The park
facilities offer a full range of recreational activities. A list of the existing parks is as
follows. A map of the existing park and trail locations is found on a following page.
The City of Oak Park Heights contains six established parks. The parks vary in size,
location, and service. Parks play an important role, not only in their overall recreational
benefit to the residents of Oak Park Heights but as a crucial destination point directly
related to the establishment of trails. All are interrelated and each portion from the park
land itself, all the way down to a single picnic table or foot of trail, plays an important
role in completing a recreational link, therefore adding to the comprehensive system.
Valley View Park is the largest park within the City and is intended as a City-wide
passive park for hikers, picnics and nature. It is viewed by the City as a very unique
and positive amenity in the community given its dense vegetation, variation in
topography, wetlands, and array of existing and potential uses. The park is an
important link between the east portion of the City and Osgood Avenue (via its entrance
drive, and/or through Brekke Heights or Valley View Estates residential subdivisions).
Adjacent to the Valley View Park is Oak Park Crossings Park.
Brekke Park is a high quality, intensively utilized City park intended as an active area
for field games and a playground area for toddler age and older. It is located adjacent
to State of Minnesota land controlled by the Department of Natural Resources (DNR)
and serves as a community playfield for residents in the south-central portion of the
City, primarily between Osgood and Oakgreen Avenues. The City will continue to work
with the DNR to allow utilization of the property for open space, limited recreation and
trails. In 2007, the City purchased the property at 5502 Osgood Avenue, adjacent to
Brekke Park and created a disc golf course.
Swager Park serves as a neighborhood playground along the linear park system. The
park is fairly centralized within the community and is located within an Xcel Energy
easement. A trail has been constructed within the easement from just east of Swager
Park, through the City to Highway 5.
u Comprehensive Plan 2018
� � City of Oak Park Heights Page 146
PARKS AND TRAILS - PHYSICAL PROFILE
Cover Park is the oldest and smallest park in the City and provides an active area for
residents in the Village of Oak Park Heights neighborhoods who are otherwise
somewhat segregated from the north and western portions of the City. A year-round
park building, and parking lot was added in 2017.
Autumn Hills Park and Haase Recreational Area serves as a neighborhood park and
is surrounded by the Boutwells Landing senior community. The park serves as a focal
point for residents from all areas of the City with the large play equipment area and a
park shelter with restrooms. The recreational area features trails, utilities and natural
areas adjacent to the Autumn Hills neighborhood and the Environment Living Center of
the Stillwater Area High School.
Oak Park Crossing Park is the City's newest park. It has a playground, park shelter,
walking trails, and prairie grass plantings. It was developed on the former Allan S King
ask disposal facility and is adjacent to Valley View Park.
On the following page is a list of the existing park components for each of the six City
parks.
Trail connections have been constructed over the past two decades to provide
important linkages between neighborhoods, commercial areas, and parks. In 1995,
when the Comprehensive Bicycle and Pedestrian Trail System Plan was completed, the
only trail routes available were a few sidewalks located in the area adjacent to the City
of Stillwater and limited trail connections to existing parks. In the last 23 years, the City
has developed an off-and on-street trail system that enables the pedestrian or bicyclist
to move safely throughout the City. There are many linkages and crossings that must
still be addressed.
Currently, the trail system in Oak Park Heights includes 10.5 miles of municipal
separated, off-street trails; 4.0 miles of municipal on-street trail routes; 5.8 miles of State
trails; and .3 miles of private trails.
The City will continue to focus on making linkages, especially with development and
redevelopment projects. North/south connections, especially along Oakgreen and
Osgood Avenues, as well as crosswalks on or under these roadways, will continue to be
a priority.
The Existing Parks and Trails Map on a following page indicates the system current as
of 2018.
Comprehensive Plan 2018
P''74. City of Oak Park Heights Page 147
PARKS AND TRAILS - PHYSICAL PROFILE
EXISTING PARK COMPONENTS
Valley Brekke Swager Cover Autumn Oak Park
View Park Park Park Hills Crossing
Park Park Park
Size 57 acres 13 acres 1.4 acres 1 acre 24 acres 35 acres
✓ '
Picnic Shelter ✓ with bath ✓ with bath ✓
with bath ADA
access ADA access
Baseball/Softball V
Hockey Rink ✓ ✓
free skate free skate
V
with shelter -%1 ✓
Warming House
ADA with bath with shelter
access
Basketball Court V V V
Tennis Courts V
Soccer/Open Field youthoY
only,
Fall
Play Set V V V V V ✓
Swing Set V V ✓ ✓ V
Spring Animal V
Horseshoe Pit V
Grills V V V V V
Picnic Tables V V V V V ✓
Bench/Seat V V V V ✓
Bike Rack/Stand V V V V
Trail/Path Connection V V V V V ✓
Disc Golf Course ✓
Signage V V V if V ✓
Source: City of Oak Park Heights
:44 Comprehensive Plan 2018
;4'4 City of Oak Park Heights Page 148
PARKS AND TRAILS - PHYSICAL PROFILE
INSERT EXISTING PARKS AND TRAILS MAP
Comprehensive Plan 2018
City of Oak Park Heights Page 149
_:,,6,1,2_--r....., _i-r.4"`a.\\.-.,,, FF iy Lake
h` -- ,1 O 1U �41 r� / I0.
� , WISCONSIN
F
� �,�J ; �:. _�_. CS_ lint y --L.. \y i -
/
gLak- tT` ri4-07, ,j,s �f\\ 161 -:' , �, -i_ �._ i.
Tniurf C
- _ . IO�''T—i ...... / s,
ce L quo °iii° i t �i
t
�y t
4
�`-- State Hl•hwa 36 f •
_
r•
`
iil
i U � + 2l .:lr o �S
40 , � Park Cover , li
a Park o S
e58th treat Swager Park �-- i Crossing Park o q�� ' e
r o 1 ..srv s
ot o
•��'•..
Aut'mn •
' Linear Park g.m 0
1 Ills P:rk �a Valley Viewi
Brekke Park Park i `
i I p, 1 1 i ,
LAKE �
ELMO .._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.y • : ! ' ,� �0 ! Bayport Wildlife ! ,nd :it, �'J
I ��, ! j Management Area i i -.�\ '
1
V
\ Eri —1116 1 • . , •
\ , ��` ___,„...„•L TOWNSSAYTOHIP P a a` _-.J_.__ BAYPORT
-i � — % • _'.—. T
t ` G"
Lake _ ' . ll 1,�___ • ♦ t "\'1r4r
�; ;iOIL _A
-)% dip�F'. `may . 1- -----
--4-1-____*'
City of Oak Park Heights
- Off Street Trail Comprehensive Plan
City of Oak Park Heights
On Street Trail
- Sidewalk N Existing Parks and Trails
TPC Stantec Parks
Source The City of Oak Park Heights,
•- •• City Limits 0 1,500 3,000 Feet The Planning Company,8 Stantac
—
January 2018 Page 7
PARKS AND TRAILS - PHYSICAL PROFILE
INTRODUCTION
The Parks Commission discussed issues relating to existing parks and trails in meetings
on January 29, 2018 and February 2018. The following is a summary of issues
raised by the Parks Commission and staff.
GENERAL PARK ISSUES
• Provide opportunities for all ages to participate in lifetime fitness through the use
of trails,park facilities,and other activities.
• With an aging population, assure that facilities and programs are designed to
accommodate people in this sector of the population.
• Develop recreational and environmental education programs to familiarize people
with the parks.
• Decide if and how coordination with the recreational needs of the County,athletic
associations,civic groups,etc.can be accomplished.
• Create Oak Park Heights monument signs with plantings welcoming visitors to
the City.
• Determine whether existing and proposed park areas are desired for year-round
or seasonal usage and what effect this will have on park facilities and design.
• Define the means by which park development can minimize impacts on adjacent
properties,i.e.,off-street parking,screening,landscaping,setbacks,etc.
• Continue to explore joint park use with Oak Park Elementary and adjacent
facilities.
• Link all parks within the City through a system of trails.
VALLEY VIEW PARK
• Replace easement trail from Ozark Avenue.
• Make building improvements to park shelter such as providing a deck on the east
side,extension to north side,installing gutters,and adding electrical outlets.
• Provide trail connections to the east of the park shelter.
• Provide trail connections to the north of the park shelter,across the ravine.
• Replace fencing
• Remove buckthorn from the easterly wooded area.
• Add picnic tables.
� , Comprehensive Plan 2018
City of Oak Park Heights Page 151
PARKS AND TRAILS - PHYSICAL PROFILE
OAK PARK CROSSING PARK
• Include exercise equipment along trail system.
• Determine if water fountains can be added.
• Provide a trail connection along the eastern border of Perro Pond.
• Add a swing set near the playground area.
• Add picnic tables within picnic shelters.
BREKKE PARK
• Continued maintenance and improvements to the existing Brekke Park picnic
shelter.
• Replace hockey boards.
• Work with Washington County on construction of a tunnel under Osgood Avenue
to provide safe access from Brekke Park to the trail and park system to the east.
• Improve and update play equipment as needed.
• Provide a connecting trail behind the baseball fields through the wildlife
management area.
• Replace easement trail and fence off 55th Street.
• Consider a trail with an east/west orientation along the existing parking lot and
edge of the park to provide a connection to the upper playground.
• Consider purchase, if available for sale, of the DNR managed property to the
south of Brekke Park.
SWAGER PARK
• Consider the park as a linear park segment within the trail system, rather than a
destination.
• Include exercise equipment along trail system
• Provide benches, picnic tables within the park as needed.
• Work with Xcel on planting prairie grass in that area north of City Hall.
• Install a community garden area.
• Replacement of fence as needed along the south boundary of park with
neighborhood involvement.
• Add water service with water fountain and hydrant.
• The City shall take park land dedication for potential redevelopment area north of
Swager Park.
Comprehensive Plan 2018
... City of Oak Park Heights Page 152
PARKS AND TRAILS - PHYSICAL PROFILE
COVER PARK
• Monitor maintenance and improvements to new park shelter including installing
gutters.
• Maintain/improve perennial planting slope.
AUTUMN HILLS PARK AND HAASE RECREATIONAL AREA
• Monitor condition of playground equipment and replace as necessary.
• Monitor condition of picnic tables and benches and replace as necessary.
• Provide additional tree plantings within the park and replace ash trees.
• Provide no smoking signs by playground.
• Add bike racks near the park shelter.
• Provide connections to the Boutwells Historic Village area to the south of the
park and explore programs and cross-utilization of both facilities.
GENERAL TRAIL ISSUES
• Restore prairie areas where possible along the trail system.
• Construct educational environmental kiosks and signs at Valley View Park, by
City Hall, at Oak Park Crossing Park, at Autumn Hills Park, and in other
appropriate locations along the east/west trail corridor.
• Provide benches, resting areas, picnic tables, water fountains, and exercise
courses along trails.
• Complete the striping of the southern edge of the Andersen Office Building
parking lot with a trail lane and stripe a crosswalk over Osgood with signage
between Osgood and Valley View Park.
• Improve trail signage where necessary to (1 ) denote the type of trail; (2) to give
direction as to where they lead; and (3) to warn vehicles of trail crossings, on-
street routes, etc. for safety purposes.
• Look at options and locations for lighting of trail corridors.
• Assure that all new trail construction is disability accessible.
• The size of trails involves two factors: width and length. The minimum
recommended width for multi-use trails is eight feet, although it is beneficial in
many situations to provide increased width depending upon the use and location.
The length of trails should be varied to provide choices for users.
• The location of trails within the community may be constructed in one of three
general ways: 1 ) on street, separated by a painted line, 2) off-street, but parallel
to the road surface like a sidewalk, or 3) completely separated from the road and
not necessarily parallel to it.
• Comprehensive Plan 2018
City of Oak Park Heights Page 153
PARKS AND TRAILS - PHYSICAL PROFILE
• Work with the City Engineer to define the right-of-way widths that are necessary
to establish trails along designated roadways; for instances: an eight-foot trail
necessitates, at a minimum, a 20 foot easement and 10 foot level bench
(construction) area. Many times, additional temporary easement areas are
needed to grade surrounding areas.
• Consider developing cross-country trails throughout the City.
NORTHERN OAK PARK HEIGHTS TRAIL ISSUES
• Provide interconnections with the Stillwater trail system whenever possible.
• Link Sunnyside to Mn/DOT's trail.
• Link Sunnyside to the bluff area by way of Lookout Trail.
• Find a way to link Lookout Trail to the west.
• Provide a trail connection to the Scenic Overlook.
EASTERN OAK PARK HEIGHTS TRAIL ISSUES
• Work with Washington County to providing trails along Osgood Avenue.
• Provide access for those residents east of Osgood Avenue to safely cross
Osgood Avenue and access the parks and trails to the west.
• Provide interconnection with the Bayport trail system whenever possible.
WESTERN OAK PARK HEIGHTS TRAIL ISSUES
• Connect the Highway 36 frontage road to 58th Street on the west side of
Menard's.
• Complete interconnections between the commercial and residential areas to the
58th Street trail and the Xcel easements trail system.
• Link Baytown Township and Stillwater Township with the Oak Park Heights trail
system.
• Provide interconnection with the Lake Elmo trail system wherever possible.
• Provide trails on both sides of Oakgreen Avenue.
• Connect the Pondview Condominiums at the southwest corner of Highway 36
and Oakgreen Avenue to the rest of the trail system.
• Provide safe crossings on Oakgreen Avenue.
Comprehensive Plan 2018
} City of Oak Park Heights Page 154
PARKS AND TRAILS - PHYSICAL PROFILE
INTRODUCTION
Goals and policies reflect the community's direction as it relates to its recreation system
and provides more detailed guidance on park and trail development. Park and trail
goals and policies were developed through an analysis of the issues identified by the
Parks Commission.
As with any policy plan, it is important to read the statements together rather than as
disjointed declarations. Although conceptual development may leave the map out of
date, it is expected that policies are more enduring.
SYSTEM GOALS
• Protect, preserve and improve environmentally sensitive areas and natural
resources in all parks and trail corridor areas.
• Establish and maintain recreation facilities that maximize participation and
overcome physical or economic limitations which may prevent equal opportunity,
regardless of age, race, sex, religion, or place of residence.
• Plan and maintain an attractive and diverse system of parks that address the
park needs of all segments of the community.
• Provide linkages within Oak Park Heights as well as to neighboring communities
and regional systems by a safe and convenient multi-use trail/sidewalk system.
SYSTEM POLICIES
• Develop an ongoing planning process for the establishment of parks and trails
which responds to the Comprehensive Land Use Plan Policies as well as those
identified herein.
• Identify present and future park/trail needs on a regular basis for evaluation by
the Park Commission and City Council.
• Review the established park/trail plans as needed to ensure that needs and
priorities are up to date.
• Prepare a master plan for each component of the park/trail system to be used as
the basis for development.
• Promote public participation in the planning process via the Park Commission
hosting forums for open discussion of issues, by newsletter, and the City's
website.
Comprehensive Plan 2018
City of Oak Park Heights Page 155
PARKS AND TRAILS - PHYSICAL PROFILE
PROGRAMMING/DEVELOPMENT POLICIES
• Create and maintain an attractive, diverse, and interesting system of urban
parks/trails.
• Create a City-wide park and trail system designed to minimize conflicts between
pedestrians and motor vehicles.
• Minimize park and trail construction costs by constructing trails in conjunction
with State, County, and City street improvements.
• Parks and trails are constructed on a priority basis, according to capital
improvement plan/available funds with the trail priorities as follows:
o Trails along major streets which focus on pedestrian and bicycle safety
and which provide direct access to City/regional destinations and parks.
o Trails that will serve the most intensely used areas.
o Trail construction within existing parks and upon municipal property.
o Trail inclusion within new park/subdivision development.
o Completion of links between existing trails and other communities.
• Park priorities may be:
o Establishment of parks in undeveloped areas or newer parts of the City.
o Creation of neighborhood and community-wide parks.
o Upgrade/improve upon existing park equipment.
• Encourage the private sector to provide recreational opportunities/facilities.
• Provide support facilities in conjunction with trail development.
• Determine where the establishment of user fees is appropriate to lower
recreation costs for the City.
• Determine under what circumstances unsolicited gifts and donations will be
accepted if they are free of obligations or potential future impacts.
• Determine under what circumstances volunteer efforts will be utilized to expand
the City's recreational elements.
• Active use recreation areas should be designed for year-round use.
• Park and trail development should minimize impacts on adjacent properties
through provisions for, but not limited to:
o Adequate off-street parking.
o Appropriate orientation and location of buildings and activity areas.
o Screening, buffering, and landscaping.
o Adequate setbacks and physical separation.
• Preserve existing physical site amenities (natural or man-made) and encourage
the establishment of new site amenities when planning and developing park
areas.
0 ,_4:.>; Comprehensive Plan 2018
r
City of Oak Park Heights Page 156
PARKS AND TRAILS - PHYSICAL PROFILE
FACILITY PURPOSE AND DESIGN POLICIES
• Establish park and trail facilities which provide recreational as well as functional
uses.
• Provide varying types of trails to be used as the basis of planning and
development for the multiple use trail system, defined as a comprehensive trail
system for the integration of a variety of compatible non-motorized trail uses
(pedestrian, bicycles, roller skating, cross country skiing, etc.).
• Grades of trails should not exceed five percent to ensure disability accessibility or
eight to ten percent for all others.
• Design and construct trails according to the standards established by the
National Park and Recreation Association, the State Department of
Transportation, and Rails-to-Trails Conservancy (see Trail Design Standards
attached herein).
• The inclusion of environmental sensitive areas (river frontage, native prairie,
bluffs, unique vegetative associations, etc.) into park or trail facilities should be
considered to contribute to the overall recreation system.
• Park facilities and buildings should be compatible with surrounding urban or rural
activities with regard to scale, design, color, setbacks, and materials.
• Potentially develop dual-use corridors incorporating bicycle and pedestrian
corridors with ski touring or sledding routes during the snow season.
• Maintain all trails in good repair and ensure that designated trail segments are
kept open and clear of snow throughout the year unless designated for winter
use.
• Consideration shall be given to safety, visibility, and emergency access into
parks when acquiring land or planning for their development.
• Bicycles shall only be allowed upon paved surfaces within the City as designated
by ordinance. Mountain biking is allowed on trails designated for this purpose.
• Develop, and update as needed, policies for mountain bike and in-line skate
usage.
MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION POLICIES
• Provide for the efficient maintenance and operation of clean, orderly, controlled,
safe, and attractive parks and trailways. Park maintenance and operation shall
safeguard the physical condition of trailways from deterioration or damage due to
weather, vandalism, or other natural or human causes.
• Develop a clear and concise system of park and trail graphics and signage that
direct people along trails and into parks to specific points of interest.
• Define specific park and trail safety rules.
t • {P4 •< Comprehensive Plan 2018
City of Oak Park Heights Page 157
PARKS AND TRAILS - PHYSICAL PROFILE
PUBLIC RELATIONS AND COMMUNITY ISSUES POLICIES
• Develop ways in which to promote citizen interest and involvement in the City's
park and trail system.
• Continue to update and distribute the pamphlet that shows the trail routes, parks,
service and public facilities.
• Monitor characteristics of use, safety, and other factors periodically throughout
the park and trail system.
• Provide facilities/services to all residents of the community.
• Develop ways to organize community recreation programs and facilities to
maximize participation and overcome physical or economic limitations which may
prevent equal opportunity, regardless of age, race, sex, religion, or place of
residence.
Comprehensive Plan 2018
144- ;3.0. City of Oak Park Heights Page 158