HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-12-2001 Planning Commission Meeting Packet•
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
PLANNING COMMISSION
MEETING AGENDA
Thursday, April 12, 2001 - 7:00 PM
7 :00 I. Call To Order
II. Approval of Agenda
III. Approve Planning Commission Minutes - March 8, 2001 (1)
7 :05 N. Yisitors/Public Comment
This is an opportunity for the public to address the Commission with uesti
or concerns not on the agenda. Please limit comments to three minutes. ons
V. Public Hearings
A. 5525 Memorial Ave. N. - Request for Planned Unit
Development and General Plan Approval: To consider ra
request for planned unit development and eneral plan
g p
approval to construct an office /warehouse building. g
B. Motor Fuelin • Facili - Re . uest for Conditional Use Permit
Planned Unit Development and Possible Sign Variances: To
consider a request for conditional use permit, planned unit
development and possible sign variances for a motor fueling
facility near Rainbow Foods at 5801 Neal Ave. N. (3)
8:30 VI. New Business
VII. Old Business
A. Goal Setting - 2001 Follow Up
VIII• Informational
A. Public /Institutional District: City Council approved with
Planning Commission recommendations on March 27,
2001.
B. Anticipated May Public Hearings (4)
C. Kern Center Parking (5)
III. Adjournment
Upcoming Meetings: May 10, 2001 - Regular Meeting - 7:00 P
� g PM
Council Representative: April - Commissioner Vogt
May - Commissioner Wasescha
1
• PLANNING COMbIISSION MEETING MINUTES
•
•
Visitors: None.
Public Hearings:
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
Thursday, March 8, 2001
Call To Order: Chair Hedlund called the meeting to order at 7 :00 p.m. Present:
Commissioners Dwyer, Runk, Vogt, and Wasescha. Staff Present: City Planner
Richards and Council Liaison McComber. Absent: Community Development Director
Danielson
Approval of Agenda: Commissioner Wasescha, seconded by Commissioner Dwyer,
moved to approve the Agenda as presented. 5 -0.
ENCLOSURE 1
Approval of February 8, 2001 Minutes: Commissioner Wasescha, seconded by
Commissioner Dwyer, moved to approve the minutes with typographical correction to
page 2 under New Business, paragraph two, changing the word "nothing" to noting.
Carried 5 -0.
A. R -1, Single Family Residential Zoning District: To consider an ordinance
amendment and /or adoption of a resolution expanding the R -1 zoning district to
include Bed and Breakfasts as a conditional use.
City Planner Richards informed the Commission that he had amended the language of
the proposed ordinance amendment to reflect their February meeting
recommendations.
Chair Hedlund questioned the intent of the amending the zoning to include bed and
breakfasts as a conditional use within the R -1 zoning, the maximum number of unit
criteria, owner occupancy issues, historical significance and the matter of special
events and possible limitations.
Chair Hedlund opened the hearing for public comment.
Pam Patrick of 15365 58th St. N., was present and expressed her concern as to parking
issues and the reasoning for establishing a room maximum of ten. She stated that she
is concerned about what future use a structure of this size will have and how it will
affect the residential are of her neighborhood.
Chuck Dougherty of 15330 58th St. N. and owner /operator of the Cover Park Manor
Bed and Breakfast stated that he sought ten rooms as he felt that would work the best
for his business needs and that a fewer number of rooms would not work. He stated
that he currently had 20 off - street parking spaces and that the number of spaces is to
remain the same.
Planning Commission Minutes
March 8 2001
Page 2 of 4
With respect to special events, he indicated that he would anticipate a maximum of 35
people per event and would be willing to be limited to 52 events a year or 1 per week
with special arrangements to be made for larger open house type events, whereas he
would arrange for off site parking and transportation for the guests to the Inn.
Commissioner Vogt, seconded by Commissioner Wasescha, moved to close the public
hearing. Carried 5 -0.
Discussion ensued as to room numbers, structure size, parking, primary
owner/ occupant criteria, nature of reasoning for zoning amendment, historic
significance and original structure percentages required to meet the requirements of
historical, future use of the dwelling in relation to the composition of the neighborhood,
bed and breakfast policies of other communities, special events and limitations, and
communication received from community with respect to Mr. Doughtery's plans for his
Inn.
Commissioner Vogt, seconded by Commissioner Dwyer, moved to recommend the City
Council approve the amendment as requested with changes to section 1 criteria g, h
and k of the proposed ordinance. Carried 4 -1, Hedlund opposed.
Chair Hedlund called a five - minute recess.
B. P -I, Public Institutional Zoning District: To consider an ordinance and/or
adoption of a resolution establishing a P -I, Public Institutional zoning district
and 0, Open Space zoning district revisions.
City Planner Richards informed the Commission that the matter was being returned
from the City Council with respect to their concern of making sure that all entities
affected had been contacted as to the proposed district and as to the impact of the
proposed district upon special existing church facilities.
Chair Hedlund opened the hearing for public comment. There being no public wishing
to comment, Commissioner Vogt, seconded by Commissioner Wasescha moved to close
the public hearing. Carried 5 -0.
Brief discussion ensued as to the non - conformity issues of the City's zoning ordinance
for pre - existing uses and questions regarding open space zoning situations.
Commissioner Wasescha, seconded by Commissioner Runk, moved to recommend City
Council adoption of the P -I, Public Institutional District zoning as presented by the City
Planner. Carried 5 -0.
• New Business:
•
•
A. Organizational Meeting:
Planning Commission Minutes
March 8 2001
Page 3 of 4
Chair Hedlund explained the process of the Commission conducting an annual meeting
at which a new Chair and Vice Chair are elected for the term of one year and opened
the table for nominations.
Commissioner Wasescha asked that she be removed from consideration due to her
heavy work schedule and availability. It was noted that per the .Bylaw 's Commissioner
Hedlund could not be nominated as Chair as he has served two terms.
Commissioner Runk nominated John Dwyer. John Dwyer nominated George Vogt.
Commissioner Wasescha, seconded by Commissioner Hedlund, moved to close
nominations. Carried 5 -0.
Commissioners Runk and Vogt gave brief statements regarding their ability and
willingness to serve as nominated.
An individual vote was taken for Commissioner Vogt to serve as Chair and
Commissioner Dwyer to serve as Vice Chair for the 2001 -2002 year.
Commissioner Wasescha, seconded by Commissioner Hedlund, moved to accept the
nominations as voted upon. Carried 5 -0.
At this time, newly elected Chair Vogt begin presiding over the meeting.
B. Planning Projects /Public Hearings - 2000:
City Planner Richards explained that the enclosure regarding this item was for the
Commissions information. Chair Hedlund asked if there were any comments. No
comments were made and information acknowledged as being accepted.
Old Business:
A. Goal Setting - 2001:
City Planner Richards stated that the City Council is requesting that a date be
scheduled for a goal setting session and that such session would be a good time to
work through the years goal setting.
Commissioner Runk noted that a previous motion had been made by the Commission,
requesting a joint meeting with the City Council and Parks Commission to discuss goal
setting, CBD issues and items of mutual concern.
Brief discussion ensued as to the nature of concerns needing to be discussed and
budget information needed prior to being able to determine realistic goals for the year.
The matter of comprehensive plan review was discussed as a possibility in relation to
the CBD.
Informational/ Update:
A. Brown's Creek Watershed Plan:
City Planner Richards notified the Commission that the City Council has requested
that the City Engineer review the plan and provide them with comment.
B. Tree Talk: Tree Selection, Planting, 86 Care Presentation:
City Planner Richards stated that City Arborist Widin would be conducting a workshop
at the City Hall, March 15th at 7:00 p.m. regarding tree care. He stated that the
workshop is anticipated to very imformative and encouraged anyone intersted in tree
care to attend.
City Planner Richards provided the Commission with an update of potential p ublic
hearings for their April, 2001 meeting.
Chair Vogt asked for a motion, which was provided by Commissioner Wasescha and
seconded by Commissioner Dwyer, acknowledging and thanking Commissioner
Hedlund for his stewardship as Chair the past years. Carried 4 -0 -1, Hedlund
abstained.
Adjournment: Commissioner Hedlund, seconded by Commissioner Wasescha, moved to
adjourn at 8:59 p.m. Carried 5 -0.
Respectfully submitted,
scHt-u o cl
Julie A. Hultman
Community Development Secretary
Approved by the Planning Commission:
Planning Commission Minutes
March 8 2001
Page 4 of 4
•
PLANNING REPORT
TO: Tom Melena
FROM: Cynthia Putz -Yang / Scott Richards
DATE: April 5, 2001
RE: Oak Park Heights — DDD Office/Warehouse Building; CUP /PUD
and Site Plan Review
FILE NO: 798.02 — 01.02
BACKGROUND
DDD L.L.C. is proposing to build two office /warehouse buildings on a property located
within the Kern Center at the intersection of Memorial Avenue North and 55 St. North.
The building proposed for the western portion of the site is 14,500 square feet in size
and will be constructed in Phase 1. The eastern portion of the site is proposed to
contain a building that is 12,500 square feet in size and will be constructed in Phase 2.
Approval of the project as a Planned Unit Development (PUD) is necessary because
two buildings are proposed on one lot. The subject site is zoned B -3, Highway
Business and Warehouse, in which commercial PUDs are conditional uses. As such,
the proposed addition requires CUP /PUD approval and site and building plan review for
consistency with the City Design Guidelines and Zoning Ordinance performance
standards.
Attached for reference:
Exhibit A
Exhibit B
Exhibit C
Exhibit D
Exhibit E
Exhibit F
Exhibit G
ENCLOSURE 2
TH EST ASSOCIATED CONSULTAN . INC.
5775 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 555, St. Louis Park, MN 55416
Telephone: 952.595.9636 Facsimile: 952.595.9837 planners@ nacplanning.com
Site Location
Site Plan
Grading, Erosion Control, Drainage and Utility Plan
Original Landscape Plan
Revised Landscape Plan
Floor Plan for Building #1 (western building)
Elevations for Building #1
Exhibit H Floor Plan for Building #2 (eastern building)
Exhibit 1 Elevations for Building #2
ISSUES ANALYSIS
Comprehensive Plan. The subject site is guided for Highway Business/Warehouse by
the Comprehensive Plan. The current B -3 Highway Business and Warehouse District
zoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed office /warehouse
land use is also compatible with adjacent uses in the Kern Center.
Lot Performance Standards. The Zoning Ordinance defines the front of a lot as the
boundary abutting a public right -of -way having the least width. Based on this definition,
g
the front of the subject property is the south lot line. However, the primary orientation of
the lot and building #1 is toward Memorial Avenue; therefore, the City may wish to grant
Y Y g
flexibility as part of the CUP /PUD and consider the west property line to be the front.
The following table is based on the assumption that the City will grant this flexibility nd
tY
illustrates the required lot performance standards of the B -3 District.
Impervious Surface. Section 401.300.G of the Zoning Ordinance states that Tots within
the B -3 District must provide a total of 20 percent of the buildable area of the parcel as
green space. The site plan is compliant with this standard. Within the buildable area of
the lot, 26 percent of the area is green space.
Access /Loading. Automobile access to Building #1 is from Memorial Avenue North.
Truck access to Building #1 and all access to Building #2 is from 55 Street North.
Loading areas face the middle of the site, which minimizes the visual impact to adjacent
properties. The loading area has not been designed for semi - trucks because the
occupants of the buildings are not expected to require them.
Parking. Office uses are required to provide at least three arkin spaces, plus one
g p , p e
stall for each 200 square feet of floor area. Warehouse uses are required to provide at
least one space per each 1,500 square feet of floor area. The site plan indicates that
Building #1 contains 4,350 sq. ft. of office floor area and 10,150 sq. ft. of warehouse
floor area. The following formulas illustrate the calculation of required parking for
Building #1:
2
Lot
Width
(west)
Setbacks
Front
(west)
Side interior /corner
(north /south)
Rear
(east)
Parking
Required
15,000 sq. ft.
100 ft.
40 ft.
10 ft.interioN20 ft.
corner
20 ft.
10 ft.
Existing/
Proposed
2.5 acres or
108,965 sq. ft.
395 ft.
48 ft
10 ft. interior /25 ft.
corner
64 ft
10 ft.
Exhibit H Floor Plan for Building #2 (eastern building)
Exhibit 1 Elevations for Building #2
ISSUES ANALYSIS
Comprehensive Plan. The subject site is guided for Highway Business/Warehouse by
the Comprehensive Plan. The current B -3 Highway Business and Warehouse District
zoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed office /warehouse
land use is also compatible with adjacent uses in the Kern Center.
Lot Performance Standards. The Zoning Ordinance defines the front of a lot as the
boundary abutting a public right -of -way having the least width. Based on this definition,
g
the front of the subject property is the south lot line. However, the primary orientation of
the lot and building #1 is toward Memorial Avenue; therefore, the City may wish to grant
Y Y g
flexibility as part of the CUP /PUD and consider the west property line to be the front.
The following table is based on the assumption that the City will grant this flexibility nd
tY
illustrates the required lot performance standards of the B -3 District.
Impervious Surface. Section 401.300.G of the Zoning Ordinance states that Tots within
the B -3 District must provide a total of 20 percent of the buildable area of the parcel as
green space. The site plan is compliant with this standard. Within the buildable area of
the lot, 26 percent of the area is green space.
Access /Loading. Automobile access to Building #1 is from Memorial Avenue North.
Truck access to Building #1 and all access to Building #2 is from 55 Street North.
Loading areas face the middle of the site, which minimizes the visual impact to adjacent
properties. The loading area has not been designed for semi - trucks because the
occupants of the buildings are not expected to require them.
Parking. Office uses are required to provide at least three arkin spaces, plus one
g p , p e
stall for each 200 square feet of floor area. Warehouse uses are required to provide at
least one space per each 1,500 square feet of floor area. The site plan indicates that
Building #1 contains 4,350 sq. ft. of office floor area and 10,150 sq. ft. of warehouse
floor area. The following formulas illustrate the calculation of required parking for
Building #1:
2
All parking areas comply with the required ten -foot setback from lot lines. Perimeter
concrete curb and gutter are indicated surrounding all pavement areas as required.
Building Height and Design Guidelines. The proposed one -story buildings are 20.7
feet tall, which does not exceed the maximum height of 35 feet. The exterior building
materials include painted rockface concrete block and painted single -score concrete
block. These materials in addition to glass windows are compliant with the standards
for a warehousing building. The applicant must submit color samples to ensure that the
colors comply with Design Guideline standards. The color must blend with the
architecture in the area. The primary color must be soft, warm earth tones. The
facades of the buildings are broken up with windows, entrance areas with canopies, and
a different block finish in the entrance area. The facade of Building #1 is also broken up
by each of the three sections of the building being stepped back slightly. We
recommend that the applicant explore incorporating this feature into Building #2.
Landscaping. A landscape plan has been submitted and is attached as Exhibit D. A
revised landscape plan for the west half of the property has been submitted and is
attached as Exhibit E. The revisions were made based on comments by the City
Arborist. Although the revised plan includes the entire area that is included in the first
phase of development, it would be best to review the landscape plan for the entire
property as a whole. The landscape plan is subject to City Arborist review and
approval. Additionally, a few oaks will be removed to construct the entrance from 55
Street North. The City Arborist may wish to review and comment on this.
•
Office area: 3 stalls + 4,350 sq. ft. of floor area /200 = 25 spaces
Warehouse area: 10,150 sq. ft. of floor area/1,500 = 7 spaces
A total of 32 spaces are required for Building #1 and 38 spaces are proposed.
Therefore, the amount of parking proposed for Building #1 exceeds the minimum
number required.
The site plan notes indicated that Building #2 contains 3,750 sq. ft. of office floor area
and 8,750 sq. ft. of warehouse floor area. The following formulas illustrate the
calculation of required parking for Building #2:
Office area: 3 stalls + 3,750 sq. ft. of floor area /200 = 22 spaces
Warehouse area: 8,750 sq. ft. of floor area /1,500 = 6 spaces
A total of 28 spaces are required for Building #2 and 33 spaces are proposed.
Therefore, the amount of parking proposed for Building #2 exceeds the minimum
number required.
3
Lighting Plan. The site plan and building elevations ' lights
are planned. The lights are shown at front and illustrate that 150 watt wall li g
nd rear doors. Details of the fixtures have
not been submitted. The lights must comply with •
lighting). One requirement y Section 401.15.7 of the Zoning (outdoor lighti uiremen g
q t is that the luminaire shall contain a
cutoff which directs and cuts off the light at an angle of 9
g g 90 degrees or less.
Signage. The building elevations show example signage •
p gn age and a change in exterior
building finish that creates a color band within which the signs would be placed. The
Zoning Ordinance allows 64 square feet of wall signage •
g ge or 10% of the front building
facade whichever is less. Ten percent of the front building •
d ng facade for each bay is 88.2
square feet, which is more than 64 square feet; therefore, •
,each business is allowed 64
square feet of wall signage. Based on the size of the
sign band shown on the
elevations the signage is not expected to exceed 64 square •
q are feet for any business. The
applicant has not submitted a plan for a monument sign. •
gn. If a monument sign is
proposed, a plan must be submitted that complies with Ordinance •
p nce regulations. The sign
must not exceed 50 square feet in size.
Trash. The site plan indicates two exterior trash locations. ocat�ons. Details of the trash
enclosures are shown at the bottom of the site plan. The enclosures will closures will have concrete
block painted to match the building on three sides and
a cedar gate on the fourth side.
These materials are consistent with the rinci al building materials.
p g materials.
Grading, Drainage and Plans. A grading, • •
, g g, erosion control, drainage, and utility
plan has been submitted and is subject to the approval •
. J pproval of the City Engineer.
Additionally, Watershed District approval of the lan is required.
quired.
Phasing. The applicant is planning to construct Building #1 •
g 1 first and construct Building
#2 within the next two years. A phasing plan must be •
g p e submitted illustrating what
construction will take place in Phase 1 and what construction will take place in Phase 2.
The plan is subject to City Staff review and approval. If Phase •
pp hase 2 does not begin within
three years of PUD approval or if the lans substantially change, y hange, approval of Phase 2
will be cancelled and the project must o through the review
g g process again.
Development Agreement. A development pment agreement will be required between the
City and developer subject to review and approval of the
pp City Attorney.
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
The proposal by DDD L.L.C. to construct •
two office /warehouse buildings on a ro ert
p p y
located within the Kern Center
at the intersection of Memorial Avenue North and 55 St.
North is generally consistent with the provisions of the Zoning •
g Ordinance and Design
Guidelines. If the City Council grants flexibility o consider the e front of the lot to be the
side abutting Memorial Avenue North, the ro osed setbacks •
p p comply with B -3 District
standards. As such, our office recommends approval of the
pp CUP /PUD and site plan
subject to the following conditions:
4
•
• 1. The City Council grants flexibility to consider the front of the lot to be the side
abutting Memorial Avenue North.
•
2. Building elevations are revised to note the proposed colors of the painted
concrete block and trim. The primary color must be a soft, warm, earth tone.
Color samples must be submitted for City review and approval.
3. Building #2 is revised to include at least one stepped back break in the facade
that is similar to Building #1.
4. The landscape plan for the entire property including all phases is subject to
review and approval of the City Arborist. Landscaping must include screening
of trash enclosures and loading areas.
5. Details of the proposed wall lights are submitted and are compliant with
Section 401.15.7 of the Zoning Ordinance.
6. Wall signage must not exceed 64 square feet for each business. If a
monument sign is proposed, plans must be submitted showing that the sign
does not exceed 50 square feet. The plans are subject to City review and
approval.
7. All grading, drainage and utility plans shall be subject to review and approval
of the City Engineer.
8. Watershed District approval is required.
9. A phasing plan is required and is subject to City review and approval.
10. If Phase 2 does not begin within three years of PUD approval or if the plans
substantially change, approval of Phase 2 will be cancelled and the project
must go through the review process again.
11. A development agreement will be required between the City and developer
subject to review and approval of the City Attorney.
12. Comments of the Planning Commission, City Council and other City Staff.
pc: Kris Danielson
5
I re '� n.111� 11 s aw
� n ter..
- -- 1111/ i !1111 11■ -
Ifllli �!■ 1■ 1111 11111111 �.P
1111 Ili %i��1 •'uii1■
OIL 'n
111 ■11/`1111■ 1/
is Ea 11 :tang:
I C ii i■ !■ ifirr'
ill !■ ■■ !: L
11 � � f1111t 111111�
111 ■ _��� , t� I� _t`��1111 ■■ 1111 ■: ■■ •. �� .,11 ! ■�I' ELI j ` ` . Mi Tani cm EmMia M i ■ r��� / I �■ 111 ■riu I1 I �1 ■ �� It■
11 111 �. ' • �� '
1111 , ■■'� f� ■����>•
I:.dal
•11 I i i: !! Ir 111 � I ' �• ■:
LO / I
�_ ,
!� 1 11111111 �11
�� • ���
Prill �� ■ �/1111111/�■ r � •"/1/
Illll \� � � �r-■ ► // ,-■■ . 111 �\ f� � C ► �'��Ai ■11i X111 ,V/�� ■ U1111.
1 L__ �1r� :I,.��1�
/ 1111111/11111 '1 �Io° il'. ; 1
1 a� uu'_m _ . - 111 111 1111 MI
-i uI11
I1 ij : I ll I1I
—. — I.1 .d.
111 -. ��1
111 NE
111 tea, I ! I.
.._
f ■
us
1
_ III ''' � ►��•
1 Ir riteor
��f ullf��. IIL.�,,,_ ,,, In
„Allard I
1' --.. !Munn{{ ?ice
IltNlllll i i;.!!ii.!!II�I ' �' t '
Illi..lri.. -� L
iii.„,,,: fa
1 1111
Illiilllll :,1111
II III 1 11111 1111 111
III
111111 111111 al 111
III 111111 ;;1111 1 1 1111 !::
11 tlill llllll :.�f l 1� "'
111 I, "!II IIH IUI1
• I.. i . 1 111:111
Z1!IIf111111 C
111111 11 111
111111 111 III
.: 1111111111Illlllllll
11111t lf
11_II Illllt111111111
VP
1 11111 1 1 111
Vr# � 1
4 q
sat i
+ 1��� • fir , ' d
..arIVA ii .detttost-aulook 4 44
lar
1 4- 6 6
ir i\#4 , 0 11 . 4 ..■
d i e ..ffoug
N I
■:i: ■:. 4..�:HnIII�i
� 11 \1\ 1►1� ; \ 11\1 11N \\ 111\1A
_,- ; 11111 11r 1111 ,.,,;; .., a u r
, 11�t,,�l 1 \11 \ \' 11'11 \ \�
1 �• ,,,,, �, 111 � .;�
nuliiii11
� �_ 1N t� 1; ; :: ;;;111 t1 111 +�• 111 1`;
.�i11111111111111111 ► \ ""� ®ii�i11 111 �, 1!::11
nn -- Il l 11111 1 111 i, 111th 111111 1 11 1 11 111
� I I IIIIIIIIII ••
a�ill IIIIIIIIII 1 llf I 1 II (1111 1 111111cull nail ® 111111 .`1111 II III
I IiIllUllllll IU!,,, "!i 11111111111 III mill um, 1 111) 'III
IIINIIIIIP!! IIIR!;�tl 1111{ III IIIIIIII ® ••�
--�- Iltlllloud
11 +!�i� i i 1111111 111
�':,iIII 111111IIn:;;ili'I III
v g ill ! II11l I! IIIII 111 I I
(IIIIIIIIIIIIiI IIEiI 1 IIII11! I iu • '
111111111111
11111111 111
11 11111 1
111111 11111
1111111111 1
I " {1111 11 1
1111 1! 1111
1111111111
1 1111111
1111111 111
111111111111
1111111111 I
111111111111
1111111 1111
1111 11
111111111 11
111111111111
111111111111
111111111111
111111111111
111111111111
111111111111
III/
111 i1
1 11111111111 111
11111111111 111
111111111111
111111111111
111111111111 111111111111 111111111111
111111111111 111111111111 111111111111
1111111111111111111 111111111111 111111111111
111111 111111111111 111111111111 111111111111
9)
J
Z U
0
J
co
0
Z
•
EXHIBIT A
r
W
0
2
W
cc
L
0
u
J
1
W
>
w
Z
2 a
-1
J a
a �
0
J U
—
U 0
IY 0
W U
c
00
W
U
W
U
4
W
W
Z
O
z
5
n
as
n v v$ 'o .ovvvv
W ;'W W W,,•, W
n 5 aov+aoo,o,na000�o,
,� o, o,o►v,rno,v,v,rnv,v,
O . � .,d
I = " .li
a o El
• 3 ri v u a', v 1
N es. b i t, v- iO a
p .-
J o m M W
1�v en =Su � o j � oO0 t r
p O H N 4 u g ft-41'U'; g 2 :":"4"")
t w 2
u � �S� �'iuu v
p Q p frAoa w`I`± o r.tLD
o o _vv000l+ -oo�
E v J V u� Eo � v` �
N b u t_auvanu a a �
z -' rj C 0 J OY C C C C C E•C �Q_ g O•''
O a .- cJMi °: N O O N
a J N x
O
0
J
Z
h
co
r
N)
o
al 0
c o
Z .--
• O (0
0
ci
c
E 0
C
m U
O
la..
w
w
z CL
a
J J
0. La
J >
Z
aw
U
W
2
O 0
U m
0
2
0
-J
m
s
0
0
0
z
5
0
N
V
25
L=J ti
8
v
E
La
O I o
N
2
A
§ I
8
r.,
o
.-) 43
U a g
m a
u
0 v,
r
W .'
(n to
} m
a b
U to
0 z
-i
elosauuw 's1421aH 1pO
�11 000
aoJ U!pI!flJ pasodoid
L 5
CD
J
i� W
I .. .12.!. 1 ..•22'. . .y. V' J
(0 5 55ti8 a te -
8tEu N � t
E eL L
< ggggg
<xi = 1Y d' « �4. �
m 222 2�n° N
„0-.1
•
_ 0
V- W 8"
Q
IX I 8
z 0 0
:?4, ,.,,,_
/ •• \ e* 1 / •
/. • `.` . /O,4
/•
// • ., ,�p
` . O .
C tn _
vi Q O 8
In 1 h 5
2,
p a p
I Y��
O IB a ` o m <3`'G
w 0 N 8 I O
J vv_ b MO u L h
1� d. P° i Q N .� O i
Q � ;am
vim to k �o. s >.
.' "6 'r 5 a ^O ^gU guti
U s p. '? ` u O O v co I t�i
c a u �a V O " � '.' O Y►"Tiff� b� O Q m �C pm Y-7c.JO u~ � _W b J o ax I `15o 18:1 W ,� d }. � _ O +U � �►� O� a
U o o
a i 014:p c �. W O 5 h
a.
V z U - 2 W p Z O $ i m t 2
0
0 O X _ cv ri + vi
„Zl
•
IN„6£,b0.ZON ZZ 991
�.i
xvn oz:1
do dPIV
- t1►W�+ - 4 - -I -- -_ _
a Q N
pp 0�
�f)in10
.09 - „fib
-$
0
30VJafS ONI)WWVd 3A08V
- .<2 63 1 813S 9NI01In8 „0 - .OZ
>134813S 0NIN8Vd „0 -,01
T J = •
„0 -,9
V38V ONI1NVld
in
ae
Q
-J
11
W
()
0
•
N
NMOi4D —
„8/
d6
0
In
„9 -,£
„0 .01
xvn 0Z
do &IV
7
i►
43
ta.
-,0
O
„9 - ,Z
„9
�
cD
td - 000 :awol.al!J
1
I rDa
u f
-- 3 3 3 1 3
g
w g
,.
k 3 9 4 1
f
III z
o
3 3 33333 3 3
I 5 111 11 1 1
felfiff ?i)
g
II
.
1 8
1
J►
Pr
' 1 Pt 7)
so
rl 1 1
,. 14 P
1 * yil
r53,9,
a �
x
i R
oc
O
D
C
0
,„
x Y
n
D 'A
9,
v -4C)
&3
r Z
Z C)
r
$ ■
om
Z
Z
o r
O
to
ES
C
A
P 1
0
0)
0
z
Ili I
g omit �y .r N .. .. .+ N .+ N ..► 9-1)4 41140ga204 .i.cg 0 a - 1
P 1 li 11 dt
- ; 4 4 I
ell 11 It r I: :Oh
voi 1 I gt
oda
u EA g 8P 8 ff 1 112, 1 1 1 11
111 , A 01 ; 0 E 37 g it/
N V � n1 C O
i
Xn1 te 1 A ibg
OQ S P J� 3s'•4Q
Ea °""" g f
NIVY4Id3LYM dI0 .Zt '43
tD
W
N
to
W
N
O
•
w
(LD
0)
to
w
O
0
z
0
z
1
0
D
1
0
z
ry
0
r
s n
1
t1.1
tj
tx1
o tz1
R
b "
T o -
()
t•i 110
y
tti
4
„cp
� v o
c)
n
PLANTING SCHEDULE
Y
L
W
.-
N m
O
z
co m
N . co m
:
N i
E
z
N O
�J.lOI
11
Po
Ni
in
00
—
c–
w
Z
Z
O
O
U
d
U)
w
a
3
=
)< UJ
W
<Q
Uf )m�
QU) d
oao °�
v c4c8( a
o
w
N %
W
U
W
i w
W4«
(fl
ON
Vfp
�Q3
moo
z c,z
v
d
v1
V }
=U Wa
m
1 _ J
1 J <5 d
Tit, WO < L i
is "
J wv�v3?
� - Y
W a'd�
<Q
���o
z �m.mi45Tdo
o
Lai
a
x 0
U
I
N d
mm`_
� W S
=4 OWW
, T , Egp
W
gy�o
U91eO
%'5,,, .(
L`JNm�
;�w�3
cah
4J
d
U
W O
o 3
U Z Z
1 d p
O
a`�oa d0
i� JJQ'
N J4
8 4162
0 3waJ
p Ov)
�jZY <W
O� XFS-
;i3Q�
ddolz
va
1<
m
0
0
w
L
/./
: . = .T :_ ......... -._:a
R ep
0 4 ,
.�� t0S9
k
' V , N 0
W3W
elosauuryN 'slOaH lied le()
acici
aoj U!pI!flJ posodoJd
5
z
z
Q z
U
J
W 2
3
'Fi
a
d T
a tv/1i
\
•
49
o 0
—49
0
M„ 6£.ti0.Z0N ZZ'99 t
•
2
is
z
19
0
a
k
dQ,(^,
1 5 x N
2m
fivl u ON Z 22
-- <
E -dZ :OWZZ�d
c tSnZJ<;
Q W O J W I J O d
° °a °zero
o
m d J X YY W Q
�
AT,��OWWO
1- O z
J <O�Rd -- W J
cn dLOOOLz5d
C� wdUUWC�O�
Owwm0�0
z cn moo c:.a�
O
•
ti -000
LANDSCAPE
Checked By: LLAML
Drown By. TKN,KMB
REMOVE WIRE AND PL
1' .
1 r' AI
t
■
1
' 1 • •
II 0 •
,
• 2.f.
•
•
: I . •
S
• ;
4.
•
•
..; :,,,_•,. . •..;.4.,..
...;::•;i:;'' '?..,•
r,'•'••''''*: " •
. ' • ' i!,,....,, ::: .! ..: .,),•:,;;.;
.,..,;! ,•,..
i':';)..-•
';',.`7 '
0, :,:. , • . •:-;' - ," :,,'
'i .. • ..,• .
:;:••• .... ,
''•:''';',''''i
•'...,,,,,,
,
". •
• • •
•
DRAWN FO R
,r
•
v, :L r
?„,./ 7 - r,
DRAWN BY
LANDSCAPE PLAN
El 1) 1..) 1 . 1. - . ;
SC A L E
1.1
$ �
O§
g$
Z
C
$Sg
§`
S
� ■II
A
g �
O §§
g _ p
Y
3'- 0 "x7' -0"
12'- 0'x14' -0"
12'- 0`x14' -0"
.0 .Lx-0 - .F
.0 .Lx.0 - S J
12' -0 "x14' -0"
12'- 0"x14' -0"
3'- 0 "x7' -0"
12' -0 "x14' -0'
12' -0 "x14' -0"
3'- 0 "x7' -0"
I I
I 11
1
A
I I?
A
1 1
P A
I 1
A
CD W
0 CI
W CD
c) c,
m CD
n Cl
m>
D D
, ULE
1DOOR
I I
1 I
1 1
:2
I I
1 1
-2
:2
I I
1 1
-2
11
11
7 1
:2
7
1 1
1 1
11
INSULATED
INSULATED
INSULATED
INSULATED
INSULATED
INSULATED
INSULATED
INSULATED
INSULATED
INSULATED
INSULATED
INSULATED
L INSULATING GLASS
INSULATED
INSULATING GLASS
INSULATING GLASS
t
Fileiome: 2
0
O
Q O
Z
v
r*t
rn Dv
OC
r Z
FA;
11
0
0
70
Z
0
0
D
O
O
O
O
O
w a'
N
o
4
c
Z
rn
w
ee
s' -0
Proposed Building For
DDD L.L.C.
Oak Park Heights, Minnesota
ea
1.3g m
4u Z 0>
v �s m
p :: z (
hxu+ m
N � I
0
r 0
�O •
•
BAN
pormliii
42 MINH
y,� U
zfp
U Z
O <
rra
W
W J �
N }a
elosauuiw 'suySiaH ) I»d �I�O
071 aaa
aoj U!pI!fl pasodoid
-- i
4B
z
0
w
J
W
� M
O <
z cn
d9
z
0
I=
< 0
>
LAJ
J
W N
0
U) to
6
O
u
n
46
• •
d"
Proposed euilding For
•
ODD L.LC,
40
r C,
V ^
mitzvw
@ 14 46
i412
!RIC%
ar
e
11
11
11
11
11
II
Ii
11
1t
II
11
11
ii
5 2
t B
aS
a
R12
nlosauvH4 'sqyfi!aH �
'3'1'1 000
Jod Gv ! p p ne podoJd
t:
ip
od 1
AI
.z
Ais
sr
i
41
11
11
11
11
11
it
11
11
11
11
11
11
I 1
11
11
11
I1
1,
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
If
1 11
I1
r �
J
LU
-(1
11
11
11
11
11
1
11
11
1 1
11
11
11
ff
11
It
— fl
ii
11
11
t1
II
ii
11
it
11
11
-�1
11
11
I1
11
II
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
1 1
1
1 1
•
Kris Danielson
Planning Commssion Members
ject: Rainbow Foods
Please be advised that I received a message from Councilmember Lynae Byrne regarding the proposed Rainbow Foods
gas station facility. Byrne will not be able to attend the Planning Commission meeting on 4/12/01, but wanted the
Commission to know that she would not be in support of a 24 hour operation that may be unattended during certain hours
of operation.
•
•
1
04/12/01 07:29 FAX 9529331153
KYJUSISTV LTD
DATE:
TO:
RE:
PROJECT NO.: I
PURPOSE:
❑ AS YOU REQUESTED
❑ FOR YOUR INFORMATION
❑ FOR YOUR APPROVAL
REMARKS:
C ;\My Docurrwr ts\Fax, doe
RLK- KUUSISTO
Engineering • Planning Surveying Landscape Architecture
FAX TRANSMITTAT.
4!iz.)CJ
)�f15
DirWel.sOn / Oa t. .r � G5 . - ' - G1574
€49mPAN*7 I i( Oaf �i,t( kLt1t3 (051 439 -o5
ce?-r: CC: Jason Cox. 452 - 5959837
N444BER: CC: ��, �tG(S A�S cvr �'l5 g52.595.4g37
FROM: X4'1 c::1t2.m
IMr
CDYJAI 13
Number of pages including ages includin this cover letter •
Offices: Hibbing • Minnetonka • St. Paul • Twin Ports
REVIEW AND RETURN
REPLY TO SENDER
OTHER (SEE REMARKS)
(9s;) 933.0972 • 6110 Blue Circle Drive • Suite 100 • Minnetonka, MN SS343 FAX (952) 933.1153
0 001/005
0 04/12/01 07:29 FAX 9529331153
IaJUSISTQ LTD
MEMORANDUM
RLK— KUUSISTO
Engineering •Planning •Surveying - Landscape Architecture
Date: April 12, 2001
To: I{nis Danielson, Community Development Director, City of Oak Park Heights
Tom Melena, City Administrator, City of Oak Park Heights
Cc: Jason Lindahl, Northwest Associated Consultants
Scott Richards, Northwest Associated Consultants
From: Leon Opatz, P.E.
ill Re: g
Response to Planning Report (dated April 5, 2001, File No. 795.02- 01.01)
1P
Rai]ibow Fuel Station, Oak Park Heights, MN
Conditional Use Permit/Planned Unit Development Amendment/Sign Variance
RLK- Kuusisto, Ltd. Project No. 2001- 256- M/Phase 13
RLK - Kuusi sto � appreciates support Ltd_ a reciates the su ort and assistance provided by City staff and consultants
regardin g the above referenced project. We are pleased to offer the following comments to the
conclusionlrecommendation section of the above referenced planning report from Northwest
Associated Consultants. The numbers correspond to the conditions as listed in the report. The
condition has been restated in Italics for easy reference.
basins and the existing stormwater
1. Both the catch g and shall be improved to prevent and pond
fuel spillage prior to their entrance into the City's system. The drainage plans shall be
u� l sp a g p
subjec` to the review and approval of the City Engineer.
RLK-Kuusisto, Ltd. proposes Stormceptor system to collect and filter site drainage before
p p oses a P
discharoin into the existing storm sewer. Because the Storrceptor will prevent any
discharging
gasoline or oil from entering the pond, modifications to the pond will not be necessary. RLK
has discsussed the ro osed storm system ith the City Engineer and he concurs with our
P p
proposal.
Offices, Hibbing • Min etonka • St. Paul • Twin Ports
(95!) 933.0972 • 6110 Blue Circle Drive • Suite 100 Minnetonka, MN 55343 • FAX (952) 933..1153
2]002/005
Page 1 of 4
, 04/12/01 07:29 FAX 9529331153
' ' - Surveying . Landscape Architecture sca
= r Engineering • Planning • Survey g p
•
S•r. 19
CKT.JUSISTO LTD
RLK- KUUSISTO
Z. Access to this site . is subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer.
1
RLK is working City's g v the Ci 's consultin engineer to address any site access issues there
g
the City's consulting engineer be. We understand th y g ineer is currently reviewing site access and g
will address this issue in his report.
e plan shall be subject to final review and approval. by the City Arborist.
3. The lunc�scap p .l .�
The City Arborist has r commented on the location oi'the proposed trees. RLK- Kuusisto, Ltd.
plan revi,�ed landscape landsca a lan to be consistent with the Arborist's direction, and will present
the revl,,ed plan a t Th y Planning Thursday's Plannin Commission meeting. The landscape material will
be consistent with the existing site landscaping.
4. Prior .f the proposed signs, ro osed the applicant must receive approval of a variance
to installation o
for the number of signs requested.
have four Rainbow logo displays (each 7' 10" x 2') and
The proposed fuel center canopy will 11 g
p P
two scrolling g asoline price signs (approximately 7'•-10 " x 2'). The total sign area will not
exceed the maximum allowable area per Code of 150 square feet.
5. The applicant shall submit and receive approval ive a proval of detailed lighting and photometric plan
that demonstrates that the li hts om the proposed canopy are in conformance with the
t g �' p
outdoor lighting standards outlined in Section 401.15.B. 7 of the Zoning Ordinance.
g o
A S p ec
�ite ific photometric plan will be submitted to the City from the owner's electrical
p
t. Rainbow Foods is committed to incorporating R rporating a lighting /photometric plan that is
cofslstont with the City's zoning requirements.
6. The applicant shall renderings hall submit color renderin s and material samples that demonstrate the kiosk
will comply with the design guideline's standards.
The architectural material for the kiosk will be consistent with the existing building facade
and consistent City's with the Cit 's desi gn standards. A detail elevation identifying material type
and color will be submitted upon building permit application.
Offices: Hibbing • Minnetonka • St. Paul • Twin Ports
(952) 933.0972 • 6110 Blue Circle Drive • Suite 100 • Minnetonka. MN 55343 - FAX (952) 933-1153
0 003/005
Page 2 of 4
04'/12/01 07:30 FAX 9529331153 RLK— KUUSISTO
KUlISISTU LTD )
004 /005
Engineering •Planning •Surveying •Landscape Architecture
7. The Ci ty Engineer En shall approve the design of the pump islands.
PP
orking with City is working an acceptable pump island design. The City
ty staff to verify
Engineer- will address this issue in his report.
8. Use of an outdoor speak system is prohibited.
The ro posed fuel center will not use an outdoor speaker system.
P l
9. Should 'he applicant request an outdoor storage area, they must apply for and receive
upprovGil of an additional conditional use permit under Section 401.30.E.5 of this Ordinance.
The applicant does not require outdoor storage as part of the fuel center request.
10. Thy .f ues' service center must have an attendant on duty during all hours of operation.
I t sRa Rainbow's desire to provide 24 -hour fuel service. During non -peak store hours (11:00
is
p.m.-6:00 a.m. ), the fuel center will be unattended and patrons will be able to refuel by
paying card). To ensure a safe and secure environment, the fuel
g at the pump credit card }
center will be PP
a �! ui ed with closed - circuit television and patrons will be limited to 30
gallons per of fuel er transaction. Additionally, the fuel center will provide a centrally located
emergeac shut -off and a direct dial phone to the store. Furthermore, during non - attended
c y
hours, Rainbow staff from the main store will be available to assist customers with fueling
concerns and to handle fuel center maintenance and security issues. Rainbow Food
r • rese:atatives will be available to address this concern in further detail.
11. The applicant icant shall designate an off-street loading area in conformance with Section
p�
401.1 S. F.1 o f the City de or schedule all gas deliveries during off -peak hours.
t3'
Enclosi:d lease find an exhibit identifying turning movements for a refueling truck.
P
Refueling will be limited to off -peak hours whenever possible.
Offices: Hibbing • Minnetonka • St. Paul • Twin Ports
(952) 933 -0972 • 6110 Glue Circle Drive • Suite 100 • Minnetonka, MN 55343 • FAX (952) 933.1153
Page 3 of 4
04/12/01 07:30 FAX 9529331153 RLK— KUUSISTO
4
CRUU SiSir 0 LTD
Engineering • Planning - Surveying • Landscape Architecture
12. The owners of the s ite property 2, Block 1, Oak Park Ponds Addition) shall agree to
p ry
future private roadway access from the northeast corner of the property to the property
directly
to the east (Outlot A, 13rackey 2nd Addition).
'th the adjacent property RLK ha met wl � p p Y owners regarding a future private roadway access.
•.� . Rainbow Foods are in agreement adjacent property owner and Ra reement that the construction of a
g
private ioadway will occur sometime in the future. Rainbow Foods will be present to address
the ornmission meeting. The adjacent property owner has been meetin
this matter at the Pla1ning C g
invited lo attend the Planning Commission meeting as well.
• demonstrate that the site has adequate 13. The applicant shall demonst ate trash storage. This area should �'
be inside the proposed building . ed buildin or in a trash enclosure that is constructed of the same
material as the building.
will e t trash receptacle. Individual windshield service
The fuel center will z�ot have an independent p
facilltaes will be available for fuel ce • - ter customers. Furthermore, a trash receptacle will be
�. center
in the kiosk. Maintenance and collection of fuel center trash will be conducted by
Rainbow Food emp employees, and placed in existing Rainbow Food trash receptacles.
P
is and enclosures as the applicant's response to the Oak Park Heights
Please accEpt our comments PP
Planning Report. Rainbow Foods appreciates the comments provided by City staff and is willing
to comply • vith City requirements for the proposed fuel center.
Please con
•:act our office with questions or if additional information is required.
Enclosures (Corresponding Condition No.):
1. Stormceptor System Information
11. Re: ueling Truck Turning Movements Exhibit
Offices Hibbing Minnetonka • St. Paul • Twin Ports
(9.2) 933-0972 •0972 • 6110 Glue Circle Drive • Suite 100 • Minnetonka, MN S5343 • FAX (952) 933.1153
X1005/005
Page 4 of 4
•
NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSTANTS, INC.
5775 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 555, St. Louis Park, MN 55416
Telephone: 952.595.9636 Facsimile: 952.595.9837 planners @nacplanning.com
PLANNING REPORT
TO: Tom Melena
FROM: Jason Lindahl / Scott Richards
DATE: April 5, 2001
RE: Oak Park Heights — Rainbow Fuel Station Conditional Use Permit,
Planned Unit Development Amendment, & Sign Variance.
FILE NO.: 798.02 — 01.01
• BACKGROUND
RLK Kuusisto, LTD, has filed an application on behalf of Rainbow Foods and Oppidan
Investment for approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP), an amendment to the
existing planned unit development (PUD), and a sign variance to allow the
construction of a fuel service center in the parking lot of the existing Oak Park Ponds
Shopping Center. The fuel service station will have three fueling pumps, a covered
canopy, and a 64 square foot kiosk station to provide customer services. The subject
property is located just east of Highway 5 at the intersection of Neal Avenue and 58
Street.
Attached for reference:
Exhibit A: Site Location Map
Exhibit B: Concept Exhibit
Exhibit C: Master Site Plan
Exhibit D: Grading, Drainage, & Erosion Control
Exhibit E: Topography Survey
Exhibit F: Exterior Elevations
Exhibit G: Canopy and Pump Elevation
Exhibit H: Narrative
ENCLOSURE 3
•
ANALYSIS — SITE PLAN
Comprehensive Plan & Zoning. The Proposed Land Use Map guides the subject
pg J
property for Commercial use. In addition, the site is zoned PUD, Planned Unit
Development District. According to Section 401.33.B, all permitted uses in all
commercial districts are potentially allowed in the PUD District. The PUD, as
approved, utilizes the B -2, General Business District as the basis for land use and
performance standard approvals. A fuel service facility is a conditionally ermitted use
in the B -2, General Business District.
Grading & Drainage. According to the applicant's survey, this site will drain to the
two existing storm water catch basins in the parking lot. These catch basins then
drain to the site's storm water pond on the south side of the property. The City
Engineer indicates that potential fuel spills could easily enter the storm water system
Y
with the current drainage design. The storm water catch basins will need to designed
with devices to catch and hold fuel spills. Additionally, the outlets in the storm water
ponds may need to be adjusted so that the ponds hold spills until the environmental
hazard can be removed. A revised drainage plan will need to be reviewed and
approved by the City Engineer.
Setbacks. The proposed fuel station will be internal to the Oak Park Ponds Shopping
pp g
Center and therefore setbacks are not an issue.
• Parking. The table below illustrates the required parking for the Oak Park Ponds
Shopping Center. As a result of this development, the site will lose 32 of its 611
existing stalls. In addition, Rainbow operates a seasonal garden center that occupies
approximately 50 stalls. As illustrated below, even with these additional uses the site
still provides 539 stalls and is well above the required 443 stalls.
Required Parking Standards for the Oak Park Pond Shopping Center
Use Size Required Provided
Shopping Center 88,313 443 539
Access. As designed, this site will have access from the main access drive for the
Oak Park Ponds Shopping Center. The applicant's plans illustrate removal of two
parking islands and the creation of a 147 -foot wide access point to this drive lane.
The City Engineer should comment the proposed design and how it will effect traffic
movement through the shopping center.
Bob Brackey, owner of the property directly to the east of the Oak Park Ponds
development, has proposed access to the northeast corner of the Rainbow parking lot.
This drive would eventually connect 58 Street to the existing development and
provide access for the Brackey property. As a condition of approval for the CUP /PUD,
the applicant would be required to allow this access drive connection.
2
Loading. The site does not have a designated off- street loading area. Given the
small size of the kiosk, no significant deliveries of retail products for sale is likely.
Y
However, the site will have regular delivery of gas. Staff recommends that a condition
of approval require the applicant to either designate an off- street loading area in
conformance with the Zoning Ordinance or schedule all gas deliveries during off -peak
hours.
Landscaping. To allow for access to this site, the applicant will remove two parking
islands and four existing trees. The landscape plan indicates these trees will be
replaced with four new Autumn Blaze Maple trees on the east side of the fueling area.
These trees will add decoration and shade to the site. The landscape plan shall be
subject to final review and approval by the City Arborist.
Architectural Appearance. According to the Design Guidelines Ordinance, the
standards shall be enforced in all commercial and industrial areas. The Design
Guidelines require that office and commercial buildings contain at least three Grade 1
materials and be at least 65% Grade 1 or Grade 11 materials. Glass must make up
30% of the 65 %. Not more than 35% of the building shall be Grade 11 or 111 materials
and not more than 10% of the building shall be Grade IV materials. The applicant's
elevations do not detail the materials to be used in the building. Staff recommends
that a condition of approval require the applicant to design the kiosk to match the
existing Rainbow building and comply with the Design Guidelines standards. The
building should have a brick or rock faced block base with glass windows.
Signage. This site must comply with the sign standards outlined in the original PUD
agreement for the Oak Park Ponds Shopping Center and the standards for properties
in the B -2 District as outlined in Section 401.15.G. These standards limit this site to
one wall sign no larger than 150 square feet. The applicant is proposing three canopy
signs totaling 46.8 square feet. While the total size of these signs conforms with the
City's standards, the number of signs does not. As a result, the applicant is
requesting a variance for the number of signs (see variance section of this report).
Lighting. According to the applicant, lighting of the site will utilize the existing parking
lot lights and lights within the overhead canopy. The applicant must submit a detailed
lighting and photometric plan for review and approval by the City in conformance with
the outdoor lighting standards outlined in Section 401.15.B.7.
Hours of Operation. The fuel station is proposed to be open 24 hours a day. A
Rainbow employee will occupy the kiosk during the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.
Staff is concerned about the potential for over -fills during the hours when no attendant
is on duty. Staff recommends that, as a condition of approval, the site shall have an
attendant during all hours of operation.
Noise. The performance standards related to noise are outlined in the Zoning
Ordinance. Staff recommends that a condition of approval prohibit the use of outdoor
speaker systems on this site.
3
•
•
Trash Enclosure. The site plan does not show an area for trash storage. Staff
recommends that a condition of approval require the applicant to designate an area for
trash storage. This area should be inside the proposed building or in a trash
enclosure that is constructed of the same materials as the building.
ANALYSIS — SIGN VARIANCE
Section 401.04.A.5 states that a variance from the terms of this ordinance shall not be
granted unless it can be demonstrated that:
1. Undue hardship will result if the variance is denied due to the existence of
special conditions and circumstances which are peculiar to the land, structure,
or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures or
buildings in the same district.
2. Literal interpretation of the provisions of this Ordinance would deprive the
applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district
under the terms of this Ordinance or deny the applicant the ability to put the
property in question to reasonable use.
3. The special conditions and circumstances causing the undue hardship do not
result from actions of the applicant.
0 4. Granting the variance request will not confer on the applicant any special
privilege that is denied by this Ordinance to other lands, structures, or buildings
in the same district under the same conditions.
5. The request is not a result of non - conforming lands, structures or buildings in
the same district.
6. The request is not a use variance.
7. The variance request is the minimum variance necessary to accomplish the
intended purpose of the applicant.
8. The request does not create an inconvenience to neighboring properties and
uses.
Finding: The applicant is proposing three canopy signs totaling 46.8 square
feet. While the total size of these signs conforms with the City's standards, the
number of signs does not. Staff finds that granting a variance from one to three
signs is justified in that the fuel service station is located off of the right -of -way
in the center of the shopping center. Neal Avenue is located approximately 250
feet from the canopy. Multiple signs are necessary for identification of the fuel
service station from either entrance into the Oak Park Ponds development.
4
ANALYSIS — CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
Section 401.30.E.3 of the Zoning Ordinance outlines the standards to review when
considering a conditional use permit for a motor fuel station. These standards, along
g
with staffs findings for each, are outlined below.
1. Regardless of whether the dispensing, sale of offering for sale of motor fuels
and /or oil is incidental to the conduct of the use or business, the standards and
requirements imposed by this Ordinance for motor fuel stations shall apply.
These standards and requirements are, however, in addition to other
requirements which are imposed for other uses of the property.
Finding: The motor fuel station as proposed will be required to comply with all
ordinance standards or variances will be required for those elements that do
not comply.
2. The architectural appearance and functional plan of the building and site shall
not be so dissimilar to the existing buildings or area as to cause impairment in
property values or constitute a blighting influence within a reasonable distance
of the lot.
Finding: According to the Design Guidelines Ordinance, the design guideline
standards shall be enforced in all commercial and industrial areas. The
applicant's elevations do not detail the materials to be used in the building.
Staff recommends that a condition of approval require the applicant to design
the kiosk to match the existing building and comply with the Design Guidelines
standards. The building should have a brick or rock faced block base with
glass windows.
3. The entire site other than that taken up by a building, structure or plantings
shall be surfaced with a material to control dust and drainage which is subject
to the review and approval of the City Engineer.
Finding: According to the applicant, with the exception of the parking islands
that will be landscaped with trees, the site will be covered with bituminous
paving.
4. A minimum lot area of twenty thousand (20,000) square feet and minimum lot
widths of one hundred fifty (150) feet.
Finding: The proposed motor fuel station will be part of Lot 2, Block 1, of Oak
Park Ponds Addition. According to the applicant, this lot is approximately 14
acres in size and 920 feet wide. These dimensions meet the lot requirements
for properties in the B -2 District.
5
•
5. A drainage system subject to the approval of the City Engineer shall be
installed.
Finding: As called for above, staff recommends that a condition of approval
require the applicant to submit a storm water drainage plan for both the catch
basins and pond that addresses how to handle potential fuel spillages. All
drainage plans are subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer.
6. A curb not less than six (6) inches above grade shall separate the public
sidewalk from motor vehicle service areas.
Finding: This area of the site does not contain a public sidewalk. As a result,
this provision is not applicable.
7. The lighting shall be accomplished in such a way as to have no direct source of
light visible from adjacent land in residential use or from a public right -of -way
and shall be in compliance with Section 401.15.E of this Ordinance.
Finding: This site is not directly adjacent to a residential district or public right -
of -way. However, the applicant must still submit a detailed lighting and
photometric plan for the overhead canopy to demonstrate it will comply with
Section 401.15.E of this Ordinance.
8. Wherever fuel pumps are to be installed, pump islands shall be installed.
Finding: According to the applicant, the pump islands will be installed on
concrete to comply with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements.
The design of the pump island must be approved by the City Engineer.
9. At the boundaries of a residential district, a strip of not less than five (5) feet
shall be landscaped and screened in compliance with Section 401.15.E of this
Ordinance.
Finding: This site is not directly adjacent to a residential district.
10. Parking or cars magazine storage space shall be screened from view of
abutting residential districts in compliance with Section 401.15.E of this
Ordinance.
Finding: This site is not directly adjacent to a residential district.
11. Vehicle access points shall create a minimum of conflicts with through traffic
movement, shall comply with Section 401.15.E of this Ordinance and shall be
subject to the approval of the City Engineer.
6
Finding: The applicant's plans illustrate that they intend to remove the concrete
parking islands between the proposed site and the access drive lane for the
shopping center. The City Engineer should comment as to the appropriateness
of this design.
12. All signing and informational or visual communication devices shall be
minimized and shall be in compliance with Section 401.15.G of this Ordinance.
Finding: Signage on this site must comply with both the standards of the
original PUD agreement for the Oak Park Ponds Shopping Center and the
standards for properties in the B -2 District as outlined in Section 401.15.G.
These standards limit this site to 150 square feet of wall signage. The applicant
is proposing three canopy signs totaling 46.8 square feet. While the total size
of these signs conforms with the City's standards, the number of signs does
not. As a result, the applicant should seek a variance for the number of signs
(see variance section of this report).
13. Provisions are made to control and reduce noise.
Finding: Staff recommends that a condition of approval prohibit the use of an
outdoor speaker system on this site.
14. No outside storage except as allowed in compliance with Section 401.30.E.5 of
this Ordinance.
Finding: According to the applicant's proposal, no outside storage is anticipated
for this site. Should the property owner wish to have an outdoor storage area,
they must apply for and receive approval of an additional conditional use permit
under Section 401.30.E.5 of this Ordinance.
15. Sales or product other than specifically mentioned in this subdivision be subject
to a conditional use permit and be in compliance with Section 401.15.E.6 of this
Ordinance.
Finding: Sales or product other than specifically mentioned in this subdivision
shall be subject to an additional conditional use permit and shall be in
compliance with the fencing, screening, and landscaping requirements outlined
in Section 401.15.E.6 of this Ordinance.
16. All conditions pertaining to a specific site are subject to change when the
Council, upon investigation in relation to a formal request, find that the general
welfare and public betterment can be served as well or better by modifying the
conditions.
Finding: The conditional use permit is subject to review and modification by the
City Council.
7
•
17. The provisions of Section 401.03.A.8 of this Ordinance are considered and
satisfactorily met.
Finding: The provisions of Section 401.03.A.8 were reviewed and are
satisfactorily met.
CONCLUSION /RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP), an amendment to the
existing planned unit development (PUD), and a sign variance to allow the
construction of a fuel service center in the parking lot of the existing Oak Park Ponds
Shopping Center. This recommendation is based on the findings contained in this
report and subject to the conditions outlined below.
1. Both the catch basins and the existing storm water pond shall be improved to
prevent and treat fuel spillages prior to their entrance into the City's system.
The drainage plans shall be subject to the review and approval of the City
Engineer.
2. Access to this site is subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer.
3. The landscape plan shall be subject to final review and approval by the City
Arborist.
4. Prior to installation of the proposed signs, the applicant must receive approval
of a variance for the number of signs requested.
5. The applicant shall submit and receive approval of detailed lighting and
g g
photometric plan that demonstrates that the lights from the proposed canopy
are in conformance with the outdoor lighting standards outlined in Section
401.15.B.7 of the Zoning Ordinance.
6. The applicant shall submit color renderings and material samples that
demonstrate the kiosk will comply with the design guidelines standards.
7. The City Engineer shall approve the design of the pump islands.
8. Use of an outdoor speak system is prohibited.
9. Should the applicant request an outdoor storage area, they must apply for and
g � Y pp Y
receive approval of an additional conditional use permit under Section
401.30.E.5 of this Ordinance.
8
10. The fuel service center must have an attendant on duty during all hours of
operation.
11. The applicant shall designate an off- street loading area in conformance with
Section 401.15.F.12 of the City Code or schedule all gas deliveries durin g off -
peak hours.
12. The owners of the site property (Lot 2, Block 1, Oak Park Ponds Addition) shall
agree to a future private roadway access from the northeast corner of the
property to the property directly to the east (Outlot A, Brackey 2 Addition).
13. The applicant shall demonstrate that the site has adequate trash storage. This
area should be inside the proposed building or in a trash enclosure that is
constructed of the same materials as the building.
14. Any other conditions of the Planning Commission, City Council and City staff.
pc: Kris Danielson
9
•
1•
IP a le 'M
0
o "4
o
0
a a
!� tl
dllla11IHIIIIIIU1f�:1:i�1
w II II II III I I I IiI "illli) !i° 11111111111
111 . :°IIti 11111111111
11!ii!1i 111111
I IIIIII
1" II� ;!illlllllll '
1 II I I IIINtlAIII)1 �
IIIIIIIIIIi1111 1111111111
�: ' "�r�i"Ilrl■
0.■
1� � in.11:1�11::11 �11`
.. (oUi ■"I■11 ■I■ ►
■1■ ! 1. 111, 111 r 1111
1111 / ■��
111■ 1111■ r•
_ w1■
i �
■ ■111111111 w �
IN
„p
r �
AMMAN ; V ■1//11111 ■ ■� �� ��
a11111/111� ■.�.�>..■
1111 ►�`.f' 1 4 ' AIN i I I L 111M I r
■.■.uii
.ens �
00.
' ,r '��11111I IIIIIIII111111��Illuill mam.
�� �allzti 11
#•+ �� 11
i --� !11111111! nii�
i 1111!11! I ii::!li�:!n■��
,. N 111 Rittri1111111‘,.. . ! �u° "' �� 1 \ \1�1� 1 \ 111111 I1111G:
1111 110.1 11 ��.� � ..
�1U11 1111 r� "" 111 � 1 1'1
11111 I 11111II
.iulll�l�111111'�111,` !1,111k 1 1 \;�",' 111111 IIIII
IIIIIIIIII �__i 1111�t ;111 illlllll� 11111111111 ►1111 1.11 1 1 1 11 11 1 11 11 1 .°!! iIillug lll111111111,111 111 1 1 11 1 11 Itt 111111 1111 11 1111 t 11111 11 1
IIUN11111i11 {i Il! :iii!;,' li t X11111 11111 1111 1 11111 111111 111111 1111111111 I IIIII1111111
11 111 111111 1111
111
111111 ; :1111 111111 •: :::
11QII a it tll1111 111111 : : :1 1 111
11 11 1 1111111 `""� 1 11 IIII 111
:111111111
:1!11111111 D
1 WI
1 11111 11
1111111 111
111111111111
111111111111
111111111111
1111111111 1
111111111111
1111111 1111
111111111 11
11111111111!
111111111111
111111111111
111111111111
11111111111
111111111111
11111111111
111111111111
I IIIIIIIIIII 1111
1 1111111111 1111
111111111111
!11111111111
1111111111111111111 111111111111 111111111111
111111 111111111111 111111111111 111111111111
111111111111 111111111111
111111111111 111111111111
111111111111
111111111111
111111111111
111111111111
111111111111
111111111111
w
E
J
0
Z U
0
W
J
co
0)
EXHIBIT A
1
0
0
w
3
0
1
•■•1
C)
• yci;4
EXHIBIT B
•
•
SHEET
C2
I PROJC;CT NC:.
•
JWHL
T
—
— 111111111111111111 i1111 11
N N N
• •
(4)
m
0.; 0
-4
o o
( r )
5r-9
14,4
DAN MASTER SITE PLAN
3/23/01
RETAIL
RAINBOW FOODS
IMPROVEMENTS
OAK PARK HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA
1
A
1
8
8
9
8
rn
0
m
2
411.11.1.
EIJ
0
..WY REVISIONS
DESIGNED _
DRAM _
CHEC.0 rale.
----- -.-- _
/
/
//
/ / /,
V V '
-- v
v ,,,,
v -,-- 7 7
, .
. /
_ ___ - _ - ,
---
___. --- /
-
- v
-
------- --
...----•: - -
..,,,............ ..... _., ----
n 0 <2
0 =
89 1
- a
m
(/)
■ g E
z
rn
r
r
1 NNW. .C."
NIL
R.I.K -.........1
Mow.. bill.M. AL
,.......-
\/ Zrzirai=1....1611
EXHIBIT C
•■■••■■■•••
ViEET
C4
RAINBOW FOODS
IMPROVEMENTS
OAK PARK HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA
POKLECT MO.
2 Q°1 25 2. A 13 GRADING, DRAINAGE, AND
3123/01 EROSION CONTROL PLAN
Ei
M
8 8 g 94, g
Ii
Ic
tml
I G
I
11 li ii gN li r i ;Ili pi ir piP 1 il i
, . 4 lib ; i i A g% I ill 1,1 All 11 9 6
;! 1 2) Oil :PI gh ii A '
r a I 11 T 0 FA idi ;11 xri' 1 Al 9
, '1 li es.glii - c-
I 1 1 1 1 1 I I l i 1 i i 1 1 1 ; il i ; 1 3 : il ii l i; L 2
A a last 1:
/13 1 g Sg 1 1, xX il I '
lii 1 rg §PN Rh ii 11
i OM ; ! If il ri fl i e 1
; ad lill 1 i I 11 1 il 3 g51 3 al i
SURVEY REVISIONS
ESIONE Zrry=f .i thr own ...
D
=Vt. s Eas"sar e*"
DRAM Lcyt
Mot Noma
CliECtr,D PC C=4Erie
.1Pahwel
Octa Lbw.
g
0 =
P1
—16-
>;;
Pl
rn
.;
0
r
r
sta..
Twist Poeta. liN.
WismAsaka. i1N.
adgbta. MI4.
Otte 10.. C.. Dr. • Sal. #10••11hump.sks. MIL $524$
EXHIBIT D
•
•
� N
a g s A
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I IN I
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11
' ' . 1 I 1 pl 1 1 g
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1
x 1
1
+ , x • y M ��
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 y 1 1i I l I y l
Q. 1 1 1 1! 11 1 1 1 I I I =1
it I I I wl I\ I =1 I II I =1
� 1` I
o �
'I I( I I IV I {' F I I
y
a x it s x
N ^ / O
� N II
I I I I I' I I I I I I r I I
I Iw 1 1( I I I I is 1 I I
*-}- --f —I — f— ±4--,.— Ii— H-'�-+H
1 1 1 1 1\ 1 I 1 1; I. I I�S1 1 N
1 I I 1 I\ 1 1 1 II 1 1 1 1
N o O
EXHIBIT E
Ed WdSP : Z0 TOW 8F ' --rr'W
m �
r-
A
0
z 33
0 -
32
›R
O
0
32
1■■•■■01
•
rcr
EXHIBIT F
•
L008 b2b 292. : 'ON 2N0Hd Q ` OIS I Slfl>i- /BN I d0 : Wald
•
•
•
z
x
z
m
0
rn
m
z
rn
m
0
1 : 7
0
z
0
(r)
0
m
0
15'
CANOPY EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - UNATTENDED
19,g
15'
STREET ADDRESS
CITY, STATE ZIP
f
0
>
0
-n
0
z
m
0
FLEMING FUELS
GAS STATION ADDITION
0
A
m
;Fleming
FLEMING RETAIL GROUP
MASTER SET
BLIZIONS
loytylcs Maim
2
3*-8
5
5
EXHIBIT G
s
9
KUUS7ST0 LTD
-ST. 19
INTRODUCTION
On behalf of Rainbow Foods (Rainbow) we are pleased to submit this application for a
Conditional Use Permit (CUP) and an amendment to the existing Planned Unit
Development (PUD) to allow the placement and use of a fuel service center. The fuel
facility will be placed at the existing Rainbow Food store located at the intersection of
58 Street North and Neal Avenue North. The fuel facility will have three fueling
pumps, a covered canopy, and an 8 -foot by 8 -foot kiosk station to provide customer
service.
A CUP is required for this facility in the B -2 zoning district, as well as an amendment to
the existing PUD.
PROJECT REQUEST
Twin Cities based Rainbow Foods started in September 1983 and has grown to 45 stores,
located mainly in the Minneapolis /St. Paul metropolitan area. Rainbow Foods currently
holds 30 percent of the Twin Cities market share.
An emerging and growing trend among grocery store facilities is the inclusion of fuel
service centers at existing and new stores. There are currently 1 400 supermarket Y p fue l
i
centers in the United States, and that number is expected to be more than 5,000 by the
Year 2005. The reason for this trend is convenience. Grocery store customers are telling
store operators they want more convenience in the shopping experience, and they want
"one- stop" shopping. To remain competitive in the ever - changing retail environment,
grocery store operators must add fuel service centers.
Hibbing Office
303 East 19th St.
PO Box 656
Hibbing, MN 55746
Phone: (218) 262 -5528
Toll Free: (800) 520 -3824
Fax: (218) 262 -5059
Creating extraordinary
Communities
for our clients
RAINBOW FOODS -FUEL SERVICE CENTER
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT / PUD AMENDMENT
PROJECT NARRATIVE
Minnetonka Office
6110 Blue Circle Dr.
Suite 100
Minnetonka, MN 55343
Phone: (952) 933 -0972
Toll Free: (888) 884 -9678
Fax: (952) 933 -1153
Prepared by RLK- Kuusisto, Ltd.
March 23, 2001
St. Paul Office
2060 Centre Pointe Blvd.
Suite 1
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
Phone: (651) 454 -4554
Toll Free: (800) 847 -8532
Fax: (651) 454 -4608
Twin Ports Office
101 West Second St.
Suite 205
Duluth, MN 55802
Phone: (218) 720 -6219
Toll Free: (877) 720 -6219
Fax: (218) 720 -6267
RLK— Kuusisto Ltd. is an equal opportunity employer.
En gineerin
g •
I, ' annin
9 •
Suryeyin • Landscape Arc r ttec t � Ce
Ham Lake Office
Caine & Associates
Land Surveyors, Inc.
17720 Highway 65 NE
Ham Lake, MN 55304
Phone: (763) 434 -7646
Fax: (763) 434 -8007
b ,
A Subsidiary of
RLKKuusisto, Ltd
EXHIBIT H
•
•
Rainbow Foods -Fuel Service Center
Conditional Use Permit
Project Narrative
March 23, 2001
Page 2 of 6
The fuel service center will be located on the Rainbow Food property, and will be fully
integrated into the existing Rainbow Food store. The architecture of the kiosk and
canopy will be consistent with the Rainbow Food store design. A Rainbow employee
will attend the kiosk during the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. The pumps will stay
open 24 hours. The fuel center is ADA compliant. The underground fuel tanks and
piping are double insulated with an uninterrupted monitoring system that includes an
automatic shutdown feature.
EXISTING CONDITIONS
The fuel facility will be located on the Rainbow Food property. This Rainbow Foods
is part of the Oak Park Ponds Shopping Center. The shopping center is accessible from
58 Street and Neal Avenue. Adequate water, sanita ry sewer and storm water facilities
currently serve the area.
ZONING CODE
The property is zoned B -2 "Retail Business District ". The purpose of the B -2, General
Business District, is to provide for high intensity retail or service outlets, which deal
directly with the customer for whom the goods or services are .provided. The uses
allowed in this district are to provide goods and services on a community market scale,
and be located in areas, which are well served by collector or arterial street facilities.
The fuel service center and existing Rainbow Foods store are consistent with the intent of
the City's B -2 zoning category. However, the fuel service center, defined in the code as a
Motor Fuel Station, does require a Conditional Use Permit.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
The following addresses the specific review criteria for a Conditional Use Permit.
Criteria A: Regardless of whether the dispensing, sale or offering for sale of motor
fuels and/or oil is incidental to the conduct of the use or business, the
standards and requirements imposed by this Ordinance for motor fuel
stations shall apply. These standards and requirements are, however, in
addition to other requirements which are imposed for other uses of the
property.
It is the intent that the proposed Fuel Service Station meets all
requirements of the Zoning Code, except for the pump islands (See
Criteria H).
Rainbow Foods -Fuel Service Center
Conditional Use Permit
Project Narrative
Criteria B: The architectural appearance and functional plan of the building and site
shall not be so dissimilar to the existing buildings or area as to cause
impairment in property values or constitute a blighting influence within a
reasonable distance of the lot.
Criteria G:
March 23, 2001
Page 3 of 6
The canopy and kiosk will have an exterior finish to match that of the
existing shopping center.
Criteria C: The entire site other than that taken up by a building, structure or
plantings shall be surfaced with a material to control dust and drainage
which is subject to the approval of the City Engineer.
The entire area will be paved with bituminous except the islands shall be
landscaped with trees and sod.
Criteria D: A minimum lot area of twenty thousand (20, 000) square feet and minimum
lot widths of one hundred, fifty (150)feet.
The proposed Fuel Service Station is part of Lot 2, Block 1, of Oak Park
Ponds Addition. This lot is 14 acres +, and has a lot width of 920 feet +.
Criteria E: A drainage system subject to the approval of the City Engineer shall be
installed
The existing drainage system will be utilized which consists of a storm
sewer with two catch basins within 40 feet of the site.
Criteria F: A curb not less than six (6) inches above grade shall separate the public
sidewalk from motor vehicle service areas.
A sidewalk is not applicable to this site.
The lighting shall be accomplished in such a way as to have no direct
source of light visible from adjacent land in residential use or from the
public right-of-way and shall be in compliance with Section 401.15. R. 7 o f
this Ordinance.
The existing lights within the parking lot will remain in place and will be
utilized for this site. The canopy will have additional lighting, which will
meet the requirements of Code 401.15.B.7.
•
Rainbow Foods -Fuel Service Center
Conditional Use Permit
Project Narrative
March 23, 2001
Page 4 of 6
Criteria H: Wherever fuel pumps are to be installed, pump islands shall be installed
The fuel pumps will be constructed on a concrete slab, not a raised island.
This is to allow for ADA compliance.
Criteria I: At the boundaries of a residential district, a strip of not less than five (5)
feet shall be landscaped and screened in compliance with Section
401.I5.E. of this Ordinance.
This Fuel Service Station is not adjacent to a residential boundary.
Criteria J: Parking or car magazine storage space shall be screened from view of
abutting residential districts in compliance with Section 401.I5.E. of this
Ordinance.
Again, this station is not adjacent to a residential boundary.
Criteria K: Vehicular access points shall create a minimum of conflict with through
traffic movement, shall comply with Section 401.15.F. of this Ordinance
and shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer.
Traffic movements and access points will be generally the same as with
the current parking lot.
Criteria L: All signing and informational or visual communication devices shall be
minimized and shall be in compliance with Section 401.I5.G. of this
Ordinance.
It is the intent of all signing to meet this ordinance.
Criteria M: Provisions are made to control and reduce noise.
The only noise generated will be that of the cars, which is acceptable in a
retail area.
Criteria N: No outside storage except as allowed in compliance with Section
401.30.E.5 of this Ordinance.
No outside storage is anticipated.
Rainbow Foods -Fuel Service Center
Conditional Use Permit
Project Narrative
March 23, 2001
Page 5 of 6
Criteria 0: Sale or products other than those specifically mentioned in this
subdivision be subject to a Conditional Use Permit and be in compliance
with Section 401.30.E.6 of this Ordinance.
Acknowledged.
Criteria P: All conditions pertaining to a specific site are subject to change when the
Council, upon investigation in relation to a formal request, finds that the
general welfare and public betterment can be served as well or better by
modifi>ing the conditions.
Acknowledged.
Criteria Q: The provisions of Section 401.03.A.8 of this Ordinance are considered and
satisfactorily met.
Acknowledged.
Criteria R: The City may allow a motor fuel pump canopy to encroach ten (10) feet
into a required setback provided the canopy support structure does not
encroach on the setback and the setback encroachment will not result in
an obstruction of traffic visibility.
The canopy is approximately the same size as the concrete slab, and is
approximately 30 feet from the property line.
PARKING FACILITY
The Rainbow Foods lot contains the following uses, approximate square footage of each
q g
respective building, and number of parking stalls required by City Code:
USES
SIZE REQUIRED
_PARKING STALLS
* Rainbow Foods 64,313 S.F. 322
* Retail A 9,600 S.F. 48
* Retail B 10,500 S.F. 53
* Retail C 3,900 S.F. 20
TOTAL 88,313 S.F. 443
Existing Parking Spaces -- 611
Total Parking Spaces after the Station is Added - 583
•
•
Rainbow Foods Fuel Service Center
Conditional Use Permit
Project Narrative
APPLICANT AND DEVELOPMENT TEAM
Applicant
Brian McFadden
Preconstruction Development Services
C/o Fleming Companies, Inc.
1034 East Hiddenview Drive
Phoenix, AZ 85048
Civil Engineer/Landscape Architect/Surveyor
Leon Opatz, P.E.
Steve Schwanke, AICP
Kurt Kisch, P.L.S.
RLK-Kuusisto, Ltd.
17720 Highway 65 N.E.
Ham Lake, MN 55343
Attorney
David Sellergren
Greg Munson
Fredrikson & Byron, P.A.
1100 International Centre
900 Second Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55402
Tel. 480- 283 -8963
Fax 480-283-8913
Tel. 763-434-7646
Fax 763 -434 -8007
Tel. 612- 347 -7000
Fax 612-347-7077
March 23, 2001
Page 6 of 6
•
•
City of
" Oak Park Heights
Memorandum
To: Planning Commission
From: Kris Danielson
Date: April 5, 2001
Re: May Public Hearings
ENCLOSURE 4
At this time the following Public Hearings are anticipated for placement on
the May 10, 2001 Planning Commission Agenda:
1. Village Area -East Rezoning Request: City Council directed the
Planning Commission to hold a public hearing for rezoning of the
Village Area -East from R -2 to R -1.
2. Sprint Conditional Use Permit and Height Variance: For consideration
to construct a 160' telecommunications monopole at 5920 Memorial
Ave. N.
•
•
City of
Oak Park Heights
Memorandum
To: Planning Commission
From: Kris Danielson
Date: April 5, 2001
Re: Kern Center Parking
ENCLOSURE 1.5
At their March 27, 2001 meeting, the City Council held a public hearing
regarding on- street parking at the Kern Center area.
As a result of the public hearing, they unanimously passed a resolution
prohibiting on- street parking on the south side of 58th St., both sides of 55th
St., and on the east side of Memorial Ave.
The parking enforcement will be 24 hour and become effective July 1, 2001.