Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2003-07-28 WC Recorded Document #3358655 - PUDSTATE OF 1VIINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF WASHINGTON ) ss. CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS ) 2003. fl {slsf y „ • r F e: NOTICE OF CERTIFICATION Planned Unit Development Permit For WATE Enterprises, Inc — 5610 Memorial Ave. N. Eric Johnson City Administra 11 11 11 3358655 11 1 1 11 i I, the undersigned, being duly qualified and acting as City Administrator for the City of Oak Park Heights, Minnesota DO HEREBY CERTIFY that I have compared the attached document: 1 Office of the County Recorder Washington County, MN Certified filed andlar recorded on: 2003/07128 3 :38 :00 PM 3358655 11 Cindy Koosmnnn County Rounder with the original thereof on file at the offices of the City of Oak Park Heights, and that the same is a full, true and complete copy of said document within the files of the City of Oak Park Heights. WITNESS my hand and the seal of the City of Oak Park Heights, this 9th day of June, Rile No.: 15;11 -] (1134. Date Issued: April 21, 2001 Legal Description: LOT 4, ELOCK 2, KERN CENTER 2 ADDITION Owner: CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PERMIT • FOR W.A.T.E. ENTERPRISES, INC, Address: 5_610 Me-mor al Avenue Permttee: W7A T.E Enterprises IUC • Present Zoning District: R • permitted uses set forth in Ordinance .40.x.". Section PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR: '.'.A.T.E. Enterprises Inc. general) iescript .on: ' . . PUD concept and General Plan of approval has been granted W.A.T.E. Enterprises, Inc. to build a .A office warehouse e and cold storage building on the property identified above. The development shall be coordinated with � `th and subject to the same cross easements and/or restrictions and covenants as the development that adjoins the lot to the north now located on Lots 1 through 6 inclusive, Block l , � W A. T.E Addition �9 ADDITIONAL RESTRICTIONS AND PROVISIONS. .. - --� of the City The terms and provisions of Resolution �o. o � o � 7 ty of Oak Park Heights relative to this project shall be complied complied wit b y Developer as Develo part of this agreement; the same specifying as follows: p . 1. The Developer shall identify the square footage of office space and warehouse space, which will determine the required parking spaces needed on the site. 2. The access and :circulation plan is subject to the approval of the City Engineer and 'Fire Chief. 3. The Developer shall identify the location of snow storage within the site plan, subject p to the review and approval of the City Engineer, 4 The site plan shall be modified to meet a 20 percent green space requirement. 5 . All curb barriers shall be set back at least 10' feet from lot lines. 6. The landscaping plan shall be subject to the review and approval of the City .Arborist. 7. . The Developer shall pay a tree replacement fee as determined by the City Arborist (the Arborist has determined the fee to be $10,070.00). 8. The drainage .and grading plan is subject to the review and approval. of the City. Engineer. 9. The wetland delineation plan shall be subject to the review of the City Engineer. 10, The applicant shall secure permits as necessary from the Brown's Creek Watershed District, 11. The utility plan for the site shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. 12. The locations of ire hydrants and sprinkler systems in both buildings shall be subject to the review and approval of the Fire ref and/or building official. 13. The applicant shall provide a lighting plan with all locations of lights and types of fixtures. The plan shall be subject to the review and approval of City Staff. 14. signage plans shall be subject to the review and approval of city staff. E. Reference Attachment: AU plans, special provisions, proposals, specifications and contracts for the improvements furnished and let pursuant to the Developer's Agreement shall be and hereby are made a part of this Agreement by reference as fully as if set out herein in full, Specifically the Planning Reports and Bnginneering report of May 27, 2003, are specifically incorporated by reference herein and included herein as if originally made part of this agreement. Date. °I (alb - ?3 Date: IN NESS WHEREOF, the parties have set forth their hands and seals. co 0 Erie Jo ' on City Administrator `mil Zintl, 'residi nt WeA;T.E. Enterprises, Inc EDIT "Bt' REFERENCE ATTACHMENTS BACKGROUND . NORTuWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. 5775 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 555, at. - Louis Patk, MN 55415 TeIeph•one: 952.595,9536 Facsimile: .952.595.9837 plarmers@nacplanning.com PLANNING REPORT TO: Judy Hoist, Acting Administrator FROM: • Mike Darrow / Scott Richards FILE: 798.02 - 03.04 Attached for reference: Exhibit A: Applicants Letter Exhibit B: Engineer's Report Exhibit 0: Title Sheet DATE: Apri14, 2003 RE: . Oak Park Heights - W.A.T.E PUD Concept and General Plan of Development Amendment, Site Plan Review - 5610 Memorial Avenue North W.A.T.E.' Enterprises, Inc. has submitted an apiolication for Concept and General Plan of Development and site plan review for the construction of an office/warehouse and cold storage building tothe west of 5600 Memorial Avenue North.. The property is zonedB-a Highway Business and Warehousing-District :This development is-part .of a larger development area that includes over 10.2 acres north. and east of the proposed site This area was annexed to the City in 1998.. Currently W.A.T.E. Enterprises, Inc. owns six buildings and H.S.I, Inc. owns one building in the W.A.T.E. Addition of the Kern Center. W.A.T.E. Enterprises has had the option to build additional buildings on Lot 4, which would make a total eight buildings, including H.S.1.'s bUilding. The applicant has submitted plans to build,a 12,800 square foot office/warehouse building and 3,816 square foot cold storage facility on Lot 4. Additional parking areas are also proposed. The Planning Commission and City Council reviewed and approved the Concept Plan for this area of the W.A. development in July 2002. This plan is • a significant departure from the previous plan because of the addition of the cold storage building. Proposed OfficeNVarehouse 12,800 = square feet ..Proposed Storage Area 3,81 . square feet , Parking and hard - surface area ..... :.,. -:..:. ;.. 77,4987 =square feet Total Impervious Surface. area , ., 04,114 square:feet. Non- Impervious Area Percent of Green Space 18 square feet 19 % Exhibit D: Exhibit E: . Exhibit F: Exhibit 0: Exhibit H: Exhibit 1: ISSUES ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive plan designates this area as highway business/warehouse. The proposal is consistent with the land use designation. Zoning. The property is zoned B -3, Highway Business and Warehousing District. The existing lots meet the lot performance standards of the B -3 District in terms of width and area requirements. Subdivision. This lot has been previously platted as Lot 4, Block 2, Kern Center, 2nd Addition. Lot coverage. Section 401.300 G of the Zoning Ordinance states that cots within the B-3 District must provide a total of 20 percent of the net buildable area of the parcel as green space. Below is .a breakdown of the area: Existing Conditions /Demo Plan Grading and Erosion Control Plan Utility flan Layout and Circulation Plan Planting Plan City Arborist's Comments Based on the proposed, figures, the applicant does not meet the 20 percent green space requirement. The applicant will be required to modify the plan to meet this requirement. Access/Circulation. Access and circulation within the proposed development is consistent with the overall circulation patterns of the existing buildings in that traffic will flow between buildings, Access and traffic circulation will be subject to the review and approval of the Fire Chief to determine if there is adequate turning radius for safety vehicles between the building and storage facility. The access and circulation plan will also be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer, Off- Street Parking and Loading. Off- street parking and loading is regulated under Section 401.15F of the Zoning Code. This requires, among other items, that the entire perimeter of the lot include concrete curb barriers that must be setback 10 feet from any lot line. The applicant does not meet the 10 -foot requirement on the .southeastern corner of the site. 2 A detailed analysis of the required number of parking spaces was provided by the applicant as part of the May 4, 2000 and June 28, 2002 PUD reports. According to the PUD, there are currently 260 parking stalls required. Currently 284 parking stalls exist. According to Section 401.15 F.9 of the Zoning Code, parking spaces required for warehousing. and storage is based on the number of employees of the largest shift or .one space per , 1,500 square feet of floor area. Additional parking requirements for areas identified as office space are also required. The applicant will need to identify the proposed square footage of all office space within the plan in order to calculate the total parking spaces needed for both uses. Currently, the applicant is proposing 46 additional parking spaces. The applicant is proposing loading docks as part of the warehouse structure. Four 12 x 12 and four $ x 9 foot overhead doors are located on the western side of the development. The proposed site does allow for adequate turning radius for trucks. The applicant should identify the proposed location of snow storage. Landscaping Plan. The proposed warehouse and storage buildings will result in a loss of 48 mature trees including Elm, Hackberry, and Oak with an average diameter of 13 inches. The applicant is proposing 32 shrubs to the south and east of the proposed building. Four Ash trees are proposed to the south ,and southeast of the proposed. building. The applicant will be responsible for all fees associated with tree replacement. The tree replacement fee will be set by the City,Arborist. A tree' replacement agreement and tandsca.ping pfatfwill, be subject to the review and approval of the City Arborist. .S,igna applicant .has, not submitted a ; sigr�,�plar�.. ; lf signs are proposedthey..wial, .,. be subject to r under Section,401.300.N of the Zoning Code. Trash. According to Section 401.300.K of the Zoning Code, trash' receptacles must be fully screened and be consistent with the design of the principle building. The applicant is proposing a trash enclosure area north of the proposed cold storage area. The exterior finish of the trash enclosures wiI( be painted concrete block and is consistent with the existing building to the east. The applicant is also proposing to have wood gates as part of the trash enclosure. Lighting. Two light poles exist on the eastern portion of the proposed warehouse building. It is unclear as to the location of security lighting on the eastern or western sections of the development. The application should identify the location of all lights and type of fixtures. A revised photometric plan is subject to the review and approval of staff and is subject to conditions under Section 401.300.1 of the Zoning Code. Grading and Drainage. A general grading and drainage plan has been submitted and is subject to the approval of the City Engineer. Additionally, the City Engineer will review the plan and make recommendations regarding the drainage and starmwater 3 requirements for the site. Brown's Creek Watershed District approval of the plan is also required. . Wetland Mitigat9on. The proposed parking area and buildings will include the construction of a retaining wall approximately 16 feet form the wetland boundary as • indicated on the plan. The applicant submitted wetland delineation information to the City on April 2, 2003. Currently, the City Engineer is reviewing the plan to determine appropriate buffer areas and setbacks. If additional buffer areas and /or setbacks are required as part of the review, this will significantly impact the overall plans submitted by the applicant and revised plans must be submitted to the City. Utilities. A utility plan has been submitted for the review and approval of the City Engineer. The applicant has identified a fire hydrant roughly 60 feet east of the proposed building. The Fire Chief should comment on the appropriate location of the fire hydrant. Design Guidelines. Building plans have been submitted for the proposed buildings. The applicant . is proposing a combination of concrete panels in colors that are consistent with the overall Design Guidelines. Awnings are shown over the main entrances on the principle building and a painted stripe is proposed on the structure. There are eight overhang doors proposed as part.of both buildings. The combination of. materials is consistent with the Design Guidelines and the building will be identical to the other structures in the W.A.T.E. development. Development Agreement Amenidment1 : A development agreement amendment will be required between the City and dev subject to review and approval of the pity. . ;, „Attorney, ey... cross, basements. will be .requ �; � for...t e,, joint ,a ce s.�.drive�nrays in. develo meint subJ j to the' approval p pp roval of the City . ; p . Y . , . Attorne Y CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION • In . order to proceed with Concept and General Plan Development Amendment and Site Plan approval, our office recommends that additional information be submitted to the City prior to moving forward with the applications. Below are additional issues that should be addressed. They include: 1. . The applicant should identify the square footage of office space and warehouse space to determine the appropriate parking spaces needed. 2. The access and circulation plan is subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer and Fire Chief. 3. The applicant should identify the location of snow storage within the site plan. 4. The applicant shall modify the site plan to meet the 20 percent green space requirement. 5. All curb barriers shall be.setback: at least 10 feet from all lot lines. 6. The landscaping plan will be subject to the review and approval of the City Arborist. 7. The applicant pay replacement shall a Y r a .tree lacement fee set by the City Arborist. R is sub to the review and approval of City �. The drainage and grading plan subject Engineer. 9. The wetland delineation information shall be subject to the review of the City Engineer. If additional setbacks or buffer areas are required, the applicant shall submit to the City remised plans. The applicant shall submit to the' ' Cit a signed permit from the Brown's Creek applicant Watershed District . . i . is the review and approval The utility plan �s subject to h pp roval of the City Engineer. 12, hydrant location .of fire h drant and sprinkler systems within both buildings shall be subjkt to the review and a roval of the Fire Chief and/pr Building official. approval of the City development agreement is subject to the review and app ...Attorney. - :...., ..., . . p l • ,3' 5 Ir . e• 14. Additional requests for information by * City officials or City staff, 4 • w AT:E.Efl±edses ,J fl c. 11255 50 STREET NO. * LA ELMO, MN 55042 *. 651- 439 -7973 March 7, 2003 Community Development Department City of OA: Park Heights 14168. Oak Park Blvd. North . P.O. Box 2007 Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Attention: Community Development Director Ar 32003 iu Reference: New 80" x 160' OEc e 'axehou-s e Building and 36' .x 106' Cold. Storage Building. W.‘A.,.T.E. "Enterprises, Inc Q owns six buildings mad R. S .x., Inc. owns one kildingin the ; dclifzon of th.. Kern Center.- At this tiMe *e, axe subxiditing plans . to build an 80' x 160' o f c e /wareho :s e bu ld ng and a 36' x 106' Cold storage building behind 5 6 0 0 Memorial. Avenue North. The new building would be 5619 Memorial Avenue North. Both, of the new buildings would be constructed of the sane materials to match 5600 Men::orial A - Venue North. The 80' x 160' building would be office/warehouse and the 36' x 106' would be used for cold storage . For your reference, atn enclosing a list of contacts , and information for the different areas that will be involved in the co istru.ction of the buildings. As we have proven in the past, we will d.o everyth pg possible to ensure that the job gets . done right. EXHIBIT A Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik �. Associates Engineers & Architects March 27, 2003 Ms. Judy Hoist Acting City Administrator City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Blvd.,.P. 0. Box 2007 Oak Park Heights, MN 55082-2007 and Employee Owned Principals: Otto G. Bonestroo, P.E, • Marvin L Sorvai.a. P.F.. Glenn R. Cook. P.E. Robert G. Sehurnehr, RE/ • Jerry A. Bourdon, P.E. • Mark A. Hanson, P.E. Senior Consultants. Robert W. Rosene, P.E, • Jose$. knderlik, P.E. • Richard E. Turner. P.L. • Susan M. Eberlin, C.P.A. Associate Principals: Keith A. Gordon, RE. • Robert R, Pfel<ferle, P.E. a Richard W, Foster. P.E. • David 0. Loskota. RE. Michael T Rautmann, RE. • Ted K. Field. P.E. • Kenneth P. Anderson. PE/ • Mark R. Rolfs. P.E. • David A. Bonestroo, M.BrA Sidney P Williamson. RE. LS. • Agnes M. Ring, M.H.A. • Allan Rick Schmidt, P.E. • Thomas W. Peterson, RE. James R. Maland, P.E. * Miles B, Jensen, P.E. • L Phillip Gravel Ili, P.E • Daniel J. Edgerton. RE. • Ismael Martinez, P.E, • Thomas A. Syfko, P.E. • Sheldon J. Johnson • Date A. Grove, P.E. • Thomas A. Roushar, P.E. • Robert J. Dever RE. Offices: St. Paul, St. Cloud, Rochester and Willmar. MN • Milwaukee, WI'. Chicago, IL Web site: www /bonestrao.corn „4 all C.- Re: T.E° Ente ri Inc. _ °face/Warehouse & Cold Storage Building `'.�.. rp ses 3 5 610 Memorial Avenue North Concept Development Plan Review Our File No. 55-03-000 . Dear Judy: We . have , rviewed the latest concept development plan for the .A.T.B,v Enterprises, Inc, prcpased o ° Avenue 13�'orth . 4s _ flee /warehouse acid :.,01d. :.,01d. • storage buildii . at. 5 610. Mer .orM.a.l. ` :Inc. for K: v'� intl , Inc.: . a .d 'have : the . followT g " ted : by ' Falz, Freeman,' Erickson, / F . subn I .. C oram ents /re cQ nun endations include constructing ° The proposed improvements �. g a retaining wall for the driving/parking from the. Wetland. Boundary as • shown on these plans, , As tie City of Oak Park area up � �3 ft' � o s Wetland Conservation Act agent, we recommend a wetland delineation be prepared Heights �' � . accurately define the existing wetland boundary and submitted for our revieww, Wetland to occur y existing boundaries undaries extend beyond the normal water level of a wetland. City does not have a formal Wetland Ordinance in place defining required � q Although the � � . . and/or setbacks, we have been requiring these elements 1 as ' part of Pis or buffers s � �. neer, nts to PUDs= The Brown's Creek Watershed District's (BCWD) engineer, ,Resources, Inc, (BOR), Bmxn�n.s & Olivier has indicated that since this "is not a DNR prole cted wetland", the BCWD buffer requirement rules do not apply. However, once a wetland delineation eation is submitted and reviewed, we will recommend minimum buffer andior setback requirements to the City, 3, The latest pl a n submittal has been revised as of 3/24/03 to increase the size of the fixture cold storage building. We require drainage calculations for our review. ,� ge g . . ' Administrator, reviewed the previous plans on October 11, �. ;Mrk a lJoneu� previous ECWD A.dm � p . d .. � ` ` } Pez�xn.it' issue ollowing commdn: on.. phis revious. rev and BCWD 00�.. We oiler the. � � on 9/30/02: er Mr. Doneux indicates, "It appears that all stormwater facilities for the site, were designed approved and constructed as part of the Kern Center ..b provements in 1999. 'r I believe this was the intent when the Kern Center Improvements were XH1BIT 2335 West Highway 36 3 St. Paul, MN 55113 M 61-636-4600 a Fax: 651-636-g;1 constructed, however that assumed the 42" outlet to the Kern Center Pond would be p opened and downstream improvements to the westerly wetland constructed for storm water retention.. Since that time, the BCWD has not allowed improvements to the existing westerly wetland. As 'such, the existing Kern Center Pond and outlet has reached its limit for any further development in the Kern. Center. As you know, the City of Oak Park Heights and the 3 CWD are cooperatively pursuing a project to tY expand the Kern Center Pond to allow for further development within the Kern Center to meet BCWD 's rules for rate and volume -control. However, until such time the Keth Center Pond is expanded, the existing pond cannot handle storm water runoff from additional developed impervious areas. • Mra Doneux o('� e/ ux j ut° lined a 100 High � (HWL) ear water Level of 927.68 fox the existing previously wetland. We have reviousl modeled this entire drainage area and are using a 100- year revised his drawings to reflect the 929.2 level, " and we suggest BCWD review the number they are using. A 1996 Washington • County topographical map showed the water level of the pond to be 9283, which is a V► good indication of the 'Normal Water Level (NWL) of the wetland. It appears that is the approximate NWL of the pond today, also. • A BCWD Permit was issued on 9/30/02 with six conditions and one special condition that references five more recommendations from Mr. Doneux's 10/11/02. memo. The applicant indicated in his 3/7103 letter to the City that' he has BCWD approval. It is my understanding from correspondence between Jay Johnson and Karen Kill, Washin Conservation District and BCWD Administrator, that neither p arty has 'i ed the e.�it as o f yet, and that she is verifying if any /all of the conditions of the P pest have been met. - 5. Driveway � parking and parkin g improvements im rovements are being proposed over the City's storm sewer easement for the existing 42" stores sewer along the north side of this parcel. Verbiage should be included in the developer's agreement (or PUD amendment) indicating -.that the responsible developer is onsible for restoring any of these surface improvements should repair or p p reconstruction of the existing storm sewer ever be required. 6. The nearest existing ire hydrant on this site is approximately 3100' from the proposed cold storage building. The fire department should review these plans to verify if additional fire protection is req rotection iused (we typically require hydrants with a 250' radius of buildings). If you any ou have questions or require additional information, please contact me at (651) 604 -4815. y q Sincerely, BO , TROO, ROS NE, ANDERLLK & ASSOCIATES :NC k 7f Dens M. Postier, P.E. cc: Jay Johnson, Public Works Director Jim Butler, Building Official Scott Richards, City Planner (Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc,) Mark Vierling, City Attorney (Eckberg, Lammers, Briggs, Wolff & Vierling, P.L.L.P.) DMP, DDH, File -- Bonestroo K: \55l0ld\W.A.T.E Enterprises - 5610� office- Warehouse & Storage Bids. eview_3- 27- 03.doc g211 MM . 4. 194 4.4 4.4 .0 0 ,0 A Ili 4: ttatUrrit ablri Don.140142 raur fteolorapg .crinxclagixa Lricsa 1::::: a • 1k iMfilo H I N ... WM nonaltrinasluxcenamrsomices OKTUDIONg ONIUMnt COMM/ 1:61V1 .3=1 ratziag fuss maxi "RDA tiics5'NW `3]YMT1ULS SWAY Tovew USSITARSI 0 ;N1 'UN1Z ° M 1 1 1 Y109NNiif1 ` iaLYMTIuS RLYON gi1N AY IVErlOYalfri OL9S 3031.BriMi'MO mom mamas m soma MEI :iuif!S;: 1. -NtP;? N /1/ N h e ee h4 � ,` O 0 1 MININIMMIIIIIIIMIIIIINIO HLANN 3fl AY IvisoyqN OL9S *D rLN1z n� 8 iluid WOG will itgl li ' PhirliDDVI ONCISAint raw NV " 3WMlU- HiNdN VII 014514 ;i:r:lrra: ONI i LNIZ NIRRITIUM Y1O53NMW"i -YM 1 'nib WON N 311NMY 1YRi©W Y 4 L 9S ffi5Oa N =ti grFlf G3SOdO d 4 •` a ti ti a. 1 0 el C� E win fp I id ig 5 ! F . H Grit eAY "IY110VOYY IgraFPNV 1 !NI ;i ! 111 E � 101 ;; 'DM •ts.s.aut; 7 u7ZZc1rar■ vvxa • NVId DNUUNYTd 4 From: ' kdwidin attbl.com Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 8:07 PM T Jim Butler, Judy Horst; Jay Johnson; Scott Richards; Mark Vierling Subject: , Zinti - 5610 ,Memorial Ave. 7 Tree Removal and Land. Plan :�: �� _!_ e:1.:Y�tr ti3 �i:i x.L a is= ' s -e ifalc�..�,�7�Ff"t ! i t Lf i.• -Ir Y . ..'! .1 " �f�fL"�,L'1 _t-..'y' 1^.� F: „ l _ ` •�• `=f �l. .. r ^. »7 . '�' � �Ls ,,� 3 •TF:3 :3:.;Ltt?t- __• ::�Lf= �fi•r-tl OPH Staff o the proposed office / *areho.use at 5610 .Memorial Ave. and made a • 1 have reviewed the plans for p p site condition. � have the recent site visit to. confirm the tree inventory , and view the site and the tree c n folioWing comments regarding tree removal and the land. plan, The project, if built as proposed, will result in the removal of 74% of the significant trees on the site. Eight large oaks (2O36 - in. in diameter) are being removed as a result of this . 9 9 , the proposed A few trees will remain by the pond edge, between the pond and th osed p p retaining � walls with most concentrated on the northern end of the site. Some of these trees the may the as a result of construction of th retaining walls 2. The complaint , e City received a laint• from a neighbor in 2002 about the large retaining wall at p 5630 and the high amount of tree removal on the sites on this side of the pond. �Jr� a Thirteen trees, hirteen trees most of which are oaks (8 -30 in. in diameter) are d esig nated. to be saved. The three largest trees will probably decline and die as a result of the construction of the retaining 0 p tee/ posts set at 6-8 ft. intervals, not , waifs. Tree protection fencing (orange snow fencing on s p silt fencin g) should be erected after tree removal and .prior to grading. The fencing should be placed at least 15 ft from trunks of trees greater than 15 in. in diameter, in order to p rotect some of the root system. A. Nine trees which are shown on the inventory on the eastern edge of the woodland have alread been removed, even though there was no tree removal indicated in the plan for the • ' • y These trees are included in the tree removal on the front part of the property. Th moval totals ro .." • for the current project If trees die as a result of construction of the retainipg walls, these will also be added to the tree removal totals for the current project. • . 5.. At the resent time, if the building is constructed as proposed,' 660 replacement diameter p cash in lieu of planting inches af•trees will be required or h p 9 ($33,00 6 The e landsca p . plan is acceptable regarding the proposed plant species and sizes and given very the ve limited 5 reenspace around the proposed building. It is recommended that some trees tolerant of wet sties be added between th e retaining walls and the pond to provide some screening for the walls. .. Kathy Widin Municipal Arborist City of Oak Park Heights �C� �a LGhn