Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-11-2003 Planning Commission Meeting Packet• Estimated Times 7:00 I. Call to Order: II. Approval of Agenda: III. Approve Minutes: A. August 14, 2003 (1) IV. Department /Commission Liaison / Other Reports: A. Commission Liaison: B. Other: 7:15 V. Visitors /Public Comment: This is an opportunity for the public to address the Commission with questions or concerns regarding items not on the agenda. Please limit comments to three minutes. VI. Public Hearings: A. Continued - Dvorak - Rear Yard Setback Variance: To consider a request for a variance for a rear yard setback at 5898 Olinda Ave. N. (2) B. Menards Expansion: To consider requests for site plan review, zoning district amendment, subdivision, setback variance and conditional use permit for expanded warehouse and gardent center at 5800 Krueger Lane: N. (3) VII. New Business: VIII. Old Business: Adjournment. IX. Informational: CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA Thursday, September 11, 2003 - 7:00 PM A. Next Meeting: October 9, 2003 — Regular Meeting @ 7:00 p.m. B. Council Representative: September - Commissioner Powell October — Commissioner Runk A. Central Business District Workshop: Follow up of joint workshop with City Council and Planning Commission. (4) Call To Order: Chair Dwyer called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Present: Commissioners Oswald, Runk and Powell. City Administrator Johnson, City Planner Richards and Commission Liaison McComber. Absent: Commissioner Liljegren. Approval of Agenda: Vice Chair Runk, seconded by Chair Dwyer, moved to approve the Agenda as presented. Carried 4-0. Approve Minutes: Chair Dwyer, seconded by Commissioner Oswald, moved to approve the Minutes of July 10, 2003 as presented. Carried 4-0. Department /Commission Liaison Reports /Other Reports: A. Commission Liaison: McComber informed the Commission that the Hwy. 36 Advisory Committee was to resume meeting soon regarding the roadway mapping and environmental impact. McComber discussed the estimated timing for the mapping and addressed questions from the Commission as to process. B. Other: None. Visitors /Public Comment: None. CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Thursday, August 14, 2003 ENCLOSURE Public Hearings: A. Continued: Midas - Multi-tenant Retail Building: To consider requests for site plan review and conditional use permit for a one-story, multi- tenant retail building located between Applebee's and Jerry's Auto Detail at 60` St. N. City Planner Richards noted that the City Council acted to deny change to the Central Business District zoning that would allow minor auto. He stated that the City, has received correspondence, on behalf of the applicant, requesting a continuance to August 26, 2003. Richards pointed out that a regular scheduled meeting of the Commission was not scheduled until September and discussed additional information needed to the site plan that would not include a Midas in order for a proposed project at this site to be considered. Chair Dwyer opened the hearing for public comment. There being no visitors to the public hearing Commissioner Powell, seconded by Vice Chair Runk, moved to close the public hearing. Carried 4 • Chair Dwyer, seconded by Vice Chair Runk, moved to recommend City Council denial of the applicant's request for site plan review and conditional use permit. Carried 4 Planning Commission Minutes August 14, 2003 Page 2 of 7 B. Snyder's PUD Amendment: To consider a request for planned unit development amendment for redevelopment of existing strip mall, located at the corner of Osgood Ave. N. and 60t St. N., for a one-story, multi- tenant retail building. City Planner Richards reviewed his report, discussing some of the site history and providing an issue analysis. Richards discussed issues related to the project, including parking, drive through, hours of operation, design guidelines, signage, lighting and such. The Commission is being asked to consider approval subject to the conditions within the planning report. Chair Dwyer opened the hearing for public comment. Roland Swenson of JSSH Architects, Mpls. introduced himself as working on behalf of the applicant with respect to design and planning of the proposed project. Mr. Swenson provided a brief overview of the proposed project, discussing building and landscape elements as well as providing a sample of the proposed exterior building material. Mr. Swenson also addressed questions as to the existing pylon sign and alterations to it. Dave Leonard of Snyder's Drug discussed the sign in relation to the former St. Croix Mall lease agreements of tenants still operating at the site. He stated that they would work with the City to find a mutually satisfying design for the signage. Chair Dwyer, seconded by Commissioner Powell, moved to .close the public hearing. Carried 4 -0. Discussion ensued as to the pylon sign and what would be required to bring it into conformance with City Ordinance requirement and still service its businesses. Hwy. 36 and the 60t St. frontage road modification potentials were noted as an issue to be considered. Vice Chair Runk, seconded by Chair Dwyer, moved to recommend City Council approval subject to conditions of the August 5, 2003 Planning Report, specifically: 1. Proof of ownership by C & H Properties must be provided, or SC Mall LLC must provide written authorization for the application. 2. The applicant must provide color elevations and building material samples for Planning Commission review and approval. 3. Details of the existing freestanding sign must be provided and plans for bringing the sign into conformance with Section 401.15.G of the Zoning Ordinance must be submitted for City review and approval. The freestanding sign shall not exceed 100 square feet and a height of 20 feet. The freestanding sign base shall be surrounded with a landscape planter at least three feet in height and constructed of materials to match the principal building. The planter shall contain decorative shrubbery and/or flower materials. • • Planning Commission Minutes August 14, 2003 Page 3 of 7 4. A revised wall sign plan must be submitted for City review and approval. The plan must include a maximum of two wall signs. In addition, on- premises directional signs, each not exceeding four square feet in area, may be allowed to identify the pharmacy drive through. 5. The total cumulative sign area of wall and freestanding signs, except for on- premises directional signs, shall not exceed 300 square feet. 6. The landscape plan is subject to City Arborist review and approval. 7. The two proposed pole lights next to the east parking lot must be relocated to be no closer than ten feet from the property line. 8. A photometric plan must be submitted that complies with Section 401.15.B.7.d. of the Zoning Ordinance. 9. Light standards may not exceed 25 feet from the parking lot surface to the top of the light fixture. The lenses must be revised to be flat. The proposed wall lights must be revised so that the luminare contains a cutoff that directs and cuts off the light at an angle of 90 degrees or less. 110 10. The exterior wall treatment of the proposed dumpster enclosure shall be similar and /or complement the principal building. Details must be submitted for. City staff review and approval. 11. The location of the sanitary sewer line in relation to the proposed building addition is subject to review and approval by the Building Official. 12. Grading and drainage issues are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer and the Middle St. Croix Watershed District. Carried 4 C. Kohl's PUD - General Plan: To consider a request for planned unit development: general plan for construction of a Kohl's department store and four retail tenant spaces and rezoning from 0, Open Space to B -2, General Business, located East of Menard's at 60 St. N. City Planner Richards reviewed his report, provided an issue analysis and discussed the conditions within his report for the request. The Commission is being asked to consider approval subject to the conditions within the planning report. . Brief discussion ensued as to signage, parking and possibilities of a bus stop /unloading area. Chair Dwyer opened the hearing for public comment. Planning Commission Minutes August 14, 2003 Page 4 of 7 Jay Scott of North American Properties introduced himself as the project developer for the proposed project. Mr. Scott shared a materials board with the Commission and addressed the subject of a transit hub. Mr. Scott stated that they generally do not plan a transit hub as part of a project but have coordinated such stops with the transit authority at other locations. He stated that he would be willing to follow through with a communication to this end if desired. He addressed Commission questions and discussed 58t Street truck traffic, access to the site off of 58t St. and trail access to the retail center. Vice Chair Runk, seconded by Chair Dwyer, moved to close the public hearing. Carried 4-0. Discussion ensued as to planning report conditions, pedestrian travel and safety to retail center area and across from 58 St. The Commission stated that they would like to see staff work with the applicant on this and noted that they endorse looking at a Norell Ave. access as opposed to Krueger Lane. Chair Dwyer, seconded by Commissioner Oswald, moved to recommend City Council approval of requests for final plat and rezoning to B - 2, subject to the amended conditions of the August 7, 2003 Planning Report, specifically: A. Approval of the rezoning of the subject property from 0, Open Space Conservation to B - 2, General Business District. B. Approval of the "Shoppes of Oak Park Heights" final plat subject to the following conditions: 1. The City approve the PUD General Plan. 2. The City Engineer, City Attorney and MnDot find the final plat to be acceptable. 3. An access easement be acquired from the City to accommodate the proposed northerly Norell Avenue access to the property. C. Approval of the PUD General Plan subject to the following conditions: 1. The City approve the rezoning of the property to a B -2, General Business designation with a planned unit development overlay. 2. The City approve the proposed final plat. 3. The submitted traffic analysis is found to be acceptable by the City Engineer. 4. The six handicap stalls located along the east /west drive aisle directly north of the building be relocated to the interior of the parking lot. 5. A snow storage plan shall be submitted for City staff review and approval. Planning Commission Minutes August 14, 2003 Page 5 of 7 6. The grading and drainage plan shall be subject to review and approval of the Browns Creek Watershed District and the City Engineer. All required storm water improvements and /or payments shall be outlined in the development contract. 7. The utility plan is subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 8. The Parks Commission provide comment on the need for additional trails and sidewalks within the right -of -way of Krueger Lane and marked crosswalks on 58` Street at Krueger Lane. If a sidewalk is required by the City, it shall be constructed at the applicant's expense and subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 9. The applicant provide color building elevations and building material samples for Planning Commission and City Council review and approval. 10. The grading and placement of a retaining wall adjacent to the transmission line towers shall be subject to written approval of Xcel Energy. 11. City staff and the applicant shall determine if the truck access to 58th Street North shall be removed. 12. -. Seasonal planters be provided directly north of -the four retail stores within: the sidewalk area. 13. A landscape planter containing decorative shrubbery and/or flower materials be provided at the base of the proposed freestanding sign. 14. The landscape plan be subject to review and approval by the City Arborist. 15. Trash handling locations shall be indicated on the site plan. Trash receptacles shall be located within enclosures and not be visible to surrounding public streets subject to review and approval of City staff. 16. Outside storage on the property (including trailers) shall be prohibited. 17. All wall signs not exceed 15 percent of the area of an applicable facade or 300 square feet in size. 18. The proposed freestanding sign be reduced in size from 150 to 100 square feet. 4111 19. The City finds the percentage of glass illustrated upon the proposed building elevations (approximately 9 percent) to be acceptable. Carried 4 -0. Planning Commission Minutes August 14, 2003 Page 6 of 7 20. The future Kohl's expansion of 19,200 square feet is found to be acceptable with this approval. The expansion plans shall be submitted to City staff for review and approval subject to compliance with the Zoning Ordinance and this general plan approval. 21. The applicant enter into a development contract with the City subject to review and approval of the City Attorney and City Council All cross easements and other easement documents required for this development shall be subject to review and approval of the City Attorney. D. Dvorak Rear Yard Setback Variance: To consider a request for a variance for a rear yard setback at 5989 Olinda Ave. N. City Planner Richards reviewed his report and provided an issue analysis for the request, noting that there is no hardship shown. He added that the zoning ordinance would permit a free standing screen porch to be constructed as an accessory building. He briefly discussed that the accessory building could be connected to the deck as long as there were no breezeway or roof cover constructed that would attach it to the main house. Due to the lack of hardship shown, the Commission is being asked to consider denial of the request. Chair Dwyer opened the hearing for public comment. Mike Dvorak introduced himself as the applicant and a 2'8)-year resident of the community: He inquired as to whether or not the City received any objections to his request. It was noted that none had been received. Mr. Dvorak stated that he could not understand the logic of being able to build a free standing screen porch, which would bring him closer to his property line versus that of one connected to his home which would be further away from the property line. He discussed how access to the porch would occur from the home if built off the home. He added that he spoke with one of his neighbors, who is a property appraiser, about the concept of building a freestanding porch versus one off the home. He stated his neighbor did not see the logic in building a separate structure. Discussion ensued as to the original placement of the home on the property, similar placement throughout the neighborhood, hardship possibility based upon location of home on lot, setback issues and possibilities of other locations for a screen porch or room for growth. Discussion was also had as to the concept of deck design and a screen porch structure attached to it. Chair Dwyer expressed that he is interested in looking at a hardship versus having a deck with a screen porch but prior to creating precedence he would like more information about the neighboring lots. Chair Dwyer noted that based upon the Commission's charter requirements, they are forced to deny the request based on lack of a hardship being shown. However if there is a case for hardship he expressed his willingness to look at the neighborhood as a whole. • Commissioner Powell, seconded by Vice Chair Runk, moved to continue the public hearing to September to allow time for additional information to be provided. Carried 4-0. Discussion ensued as to information the Commission would like to see in September, including that of setbacks of neighboring homes, zoning regulations in place at time home was constructed. The Commissioners will take a closer look at neighborhood prior to the September meeting. New Business: A. Central Business District: Request for joint work session with City Council. McComber stated that the City Council would like to meet with the Planning Commission to discuss the Central Business District development and discussed possible meeting dates and times. Commission consensus was to schedule the work session for 5:30 p.m., August 28, 2003. Carried 4 -0. Old Business: A. Routson Motors /Denny Hecker - 14702 60t St. N.: Status of former Amoco site and signage issues. Richards informed the Commission that Hecker has been conducting business operations at the former Amoco site that signage has been installed and office space created within the building structure. Operating such as they are requires a conditional use permit as well as permits for work done to the site. Richards will prepare a letter to Mr. Hecker regarding_the violations of City Ordinance requirements. Informational: ➢ McComber noted the Hwy. 36 "prepare to stop" flashers were removed and that she is working to learn why. ➢ City Administrator Johnson provided an update on the former Rainbow Foods store vacancy. ➢ It was noted that Dollar Tree store has left the Oak Park Ponds retail center. A. Next Meeting:September 11, 2003 - 7:OOp.m. B. Council Representative: August - Commissioner Liljegren September - Commissioner Powell Adjournment: Commissioner Powell, seconded by Commissioner Oswald, moved to adjourn at 8:35 p.m. Carried 5 -0. Respectfully submitted, . t.Lcirro J A. Hultman Community Development Approved by the Planning Commission: Planning Commission Minutes August 14, 2003 Page 7 of 7 r • MEMORANDUM NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. 5775 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 555, St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Telephone: 9 Facsimile: 952.595.9837 pfanners @nacplanflifl9.com ENCLOSURE 2 TO: Oak Park Heights Planning Commission FROM: Scott Richards DATE: 0 September 4, 2003 RE: Oak Park Heights — Dvorak Variance: 5898 Olinda Avenue North FILE NO: 798.07 — 03.01 As per your request, I have researched the zoning history for the property at 5898 Olinda Avenue North. The house was constructed in 1957 when this neighborhood was still a part of Baytown Township and under Washington County regulations. At the time of construction, the County/Township did not have zoning regulations. In fact, the County's first zoning ordinance was not adopted until 1967..... Before that time, there were no setback :requirements. . • The first Village of Oak Park Heights Zoning Ordinance was .adopted in � November of g g 1964. The area that included the Olinda Avenue neighborhood was zoned residential. The residential standards of that ordinance specified a minimum lot size of 6,000 square feet and a front yard setback of 25 feet. The first City of Oak Park Heights Zoning Ordinance, adopted in March of 1972, zoned the area along Olinda Avenue as SFU, Single Family Urban. The current single family standards which include a minimum lot size of 10,400 square feet and a front yard setback of 30 feet were established at that time. All of the updates to the Zoning Ordinance have continued these base single family standards. 1 have also obtained copies of the section maps and aerials that include the subject properties. The Dvoraks own the properties located at the corner of 59 Street and p P ro p Olinda labeled as 0010 and 0047. The house is on lot 0010. If combined, both lots would be 13,000 square feet which would make the lot conforming in terms of lot size. The public right -of -way of Olinda Avenue varies in width and is approximately 30 feet wide adjacent to the subject property. The aerial photo indicates that the front yard setbacks of properties on the west side of _ Olinda vary .from 25 feetto 40 feet: - Most - -ef- the -he s- en- thatside -of- the-- b-Iook -w constructed with a 30 foot front yard setback. The Dvorak house was setback the greatest distance. Two other homes have 35 foot setbacks. Based upon this new background information, staff has not changed its original position that the variance for this property should be denied. Alternatives exist for an addition onto the house that will meet setback requirements. Additionally, a three season porch could be added to the property as an accessory building with required setbacks of eight feet from the rear yard, six feet from the principal structure, and five feet from side lot lines. In previous variance cases where there has been no hardship, the Planning Commission has recommended denial and the City Council has affirmed that decision. The City should avoid setting a precedence on setback issues that would not be favorable in all cases. The Dvoraks have a reasonable use of their property. They are not being denied its reasonable use, especially in light of the fact that the house can be added onto on the south or east sides and a porch could be constructed as an accessory structure in the rear yard. Attached for reference: Exhibit 1: Section Map Exhibit 2: Aerial Photo pc: •Eric Johnson J. Michael and Carolyn Dvorak 2 • • 5 • • • , cc 0 z c) a N 0 p, 0 3AV VHVINO (B0N) (/ 0 0) 0 0 h`) N 0 0 0 Go 0 0 0 0) 0 0 0 4 11•111MINI.P.- 5 0 0 0 () ( 0 0 0 8 E- 0 cv) 0 Li, C4 Go ON OLU tO Cs.) GGY t24 E— CNI 0 HI8ON 3flN3AV mum 0) I, 04 0 co 0 3M vaNno r _J 4 — 8 LI" tO rfa S MEM ao (s4 C 0 0 C:2; tra N Go 0 3AV 771 EXHIBIT' 1 og I is • .. �k ✓.;ro:. ,. s !^*'tom .y .. .. .. � ,.,.. >�i '.L r< ?J'f�ti . 4! Y ;. ,.>r �-... Julie Hultman From: Sent: To: Subject: Julie .com] , September 11, 2003 6:5 u tman; Dwyer, John (Planning) (E- mail)'; 'Liljegren -Mike (E- mail)'; 'Powell -Mark (E- mail)'; 'Runk -Mike (E- mail)' RE: Dvorak - Continued Public Hearing ...all Muo 1 , Thursda ie 1 would just like to caution everyone on how you handle the Dvorak situation. As we discussed at the last meeting, there needs to be a solid case for hardship to consider granting a variance here. Please take your lead from Scott on this matter, as I believe you may end up having to defer to the zoning ordinance if the case for a hardship can't be made. Good luck. John (\7\-/ \7\..,,f \ Original Message From: Julie Hultman [ mailto :jhultman @cityofoakparkheights .com] Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 1:34 PM To: Dwyer, John (Planning) (E- mail); Liljegren -Mike (E- mail); Powell -Mark (E- mail); Runk -Mike (E -mail) Subject: Dvorak - Continued Public Hearing Just a reminder to you folks that you should take a look around Mr. Dvorak's neighborhood on Olinda Ave. before tomorrow nights meeting. Mike - Jon has been called out of town, so you will be chairing. Jon - if you receive this and have any comments to share with the commission, e -mail me and I will be sure to copy them for the meeting. Thanks Gang - • PLANNING REPORT TO: Eric Johnson FROM: Cynthia Putz -Yang / Scott Richards DATE: September 4, 2003 RE: Oak Park Heights — Menards - Rezoning, Preliminary Plat, CUP Amendment, Variances and Site Plan Review FILE NO: 798.02 — 03.07 BACKGROUND The City of Oak Park Heights has received a request for rezoning, preliminary plat, conditional use permit (CUP) amendment for open and outdoor storage, variances, and site plan review to allow site and building changes at the Menards site located at the corner of 58 Street North and Krueger Lane. The existing Menards site is 11.9 'acres in size - and ItHzoned B -2, General Business District. A conditional use permit was approved for the Menards store in 1995. The applicant is proposing to add 2 % acres of land to the site. The proposed land addition was zoned Open Space Conservation District when it was annexed by the City; therefore, rezoning to B -2 is requested. The applicant is proposing to the move the lumberyard entrance to the east side of the building, construct a new garden center area, expand the outside lumberyard area, and construct a new warehouse. Variances are being requested to allow the lumberyard entrance canopy and parking to encroach into the front yard setback from Krueger Lane and to allow expansion of a screening fence that exceeds six feet in height. Attached for reference: Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC 5775 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 555, St. Louis Park, MN 55418 Telephone: 952.595.9535 Facsimile: 952.595.9837 planners @nacplanning.com Preliminary Plat Menards and Surrounding Area Phase Work Site Plan Landscape Plan Lighting Plan ENCLOS 3 Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit 1 " H � 'Eit J Exhibit K Tree Inventory Principal Building Elevations Yard Gate Canopy Floor Plan and Elevations Warehouse Floor Plan, Section, and Elevations City Engineer Memo City Engineer Memo ISSUES ANALYSIS Land Use and Zoning. The Comprehensive Plan guides the subject property for a commercial use; therefore, the proposed rezoning to B -2, General Business District, is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Open and outdoor storage is a conditional use in the B -2 District. Preliminary Plat. The Menards expansion shall be contingent upon the applicant submitting a revised preliminary plat and a final plat that combines the proposed expansion area with the existing Menards property. Conditional Use Permit. Within the B -2 District, open and outdoor storage, such as associated with the proposed Menards store, is allowed as a conditional use provided that: a. The area is fenced and screened from view of neighboring residential uses or if abutting a residential district in compliance with Section 401.15.E. of this Ordinance. Storage is screened from view from public right -of -way in compliance with Section 401.15.E' of this Ordinance. c. Storage area is grassed or surfaced to control dust. d. All lighting shall be hooded and so directed that the light source shall not be visible from the public right -of -way or from neighboring residences and shall be in compliance with Section 401.15.B.7 of this Ordinance. e. The provisions of Section 401.03.A.8 of this Ordinance are considered and satisfactorily met. Each of these conditions is discussed in greater detail below. Generally speaking, however, the submitted plans are generally in compliance with these conditions. Access. The Menards site is accessed from two existing curb cuts on Krueger Lane. The preliminary plat includes a cul -de -sac off of 58 Street North to serve future commercial development west of the Menards site. A condition of the Rainbow service station approval was that a road easement be provided across Oak Park Ponds (Rainbow site) to connect the subject site with Neal Road to the west. Bob Brackey, the 2 owner of the property to the west of Menards, has contacted the current Oak Park Ponds owner, Prudential insurance, regarding the potential access. As of the date of this report, Prudential Insurance has not responded to Mr. Brackey's inquiry. • The Menards expansion will not require any new accesses and the amount of land left to be developed in the future is not large; therefore, City staff feels comfortable with the proposed cul -de -sac from 58 Street and do not see a need for an easement to direct traffic to Neal Road. The City Engineer addresses the issue of the cul -de -sac in his memo attached in Exhibit K. Lumberyard Entrance. The required front yard (Krueger Lane) setback in the B -2 District is 40 feet. The lumberyard entrance canopy is proposed to be located approximately 28 feet from front lot line; therefore, a setback variance has been requested. The City Engineer initially had concerns about the relocation; however, the site plan has been redesigned to include adequate stacking space. City staff now view the relocation favorably provided that signage is installed to direct delivery trucks to use the north entrance on Krueger Lane, which will allow adequate truck maneuvering space. The variance may be granted based on a finding that the proposed lumberyard entrance location is the best location on the site due to physical constraints caused by the existing storm water pond, building design and location, and required truck maneuvering space. Fence. The applicant has requested a variance to extend the existing screening fence structure along the south and north ends of the outside lumberyard area. The height and design of the proposed fence is consistent with the existing fence conditions, for which a variance was previously granted. This structure serves a dual purpose in that it functions as a storage rack for materials on the.. interior side of:.the fence. Section 401.15.E.4.a of. the Zoning Ordinance states that fences or.. walls located on or adjacent to any property line bordering a public road or street shall 'not exceed six feet in height. Plans submitted by the applicant indicate that the screening' fence will be approximately ten feet in height along the south property line and approximately 14 feet in height adjacent to the storm water pond. The fence will be finished with 2' x 8' vertical wood siding. City staff believes that the height of the proposed screening structure is appropriate and necessary to ensure that the outdoor storage area is properly screened from adjacent uses; therefore, approval of the variance request is recommended. In order to ensure the proposed screening is effective, the applicant shall be restricted from storing materials in a manner that they extend above the height of the screening fence /storage racks. Landscaping /Screening. The applicant is proposing to transplant trees and shrubs into the areas surrounding the new construction. The proposed landscaping is consistent with the existing landscaping and serves to provide screening of structures and parking. Tree replacement and the landscape plan are subject to review and approval by the City Arborist. City Arborist comments are attached in Exhibit K. 3 Lighting. The proposed lighting plan appears to be a continuation of the existing lighting pattern. A photometric plan was submitted that illustrates zero illumination at lot lines. We recommend that lighting be required to be dimmed after 11:00 p.m. Parking. A variance was approved in 1995 to allow 405 parking spaces. The current plan shows 406 existing spaces and a proposed increase of 16 spaces to 422 spaces. As many as 607 parking spaces could be required based on current parking regulations and the size of retail and warehouse floor area in the principal building. In the past, the parking supply has been very adequate; therefore, staff finds the limited increase in parking spaces to be acceptable and in proportion to the expected limited increase in parking demand due to the new warehouse and enlarged lumberyard area. The new parking on the east side of the building encroaches into the required ten -foot property line setback; therefore, a variance has been requested. Staff does not expect the proposed encroachment to have a negative impact on any property or the public. The City may find the parking arrangement acceptable due to the lack of negative impact and the hardship created by the existing site arrangement and limited options for expansion. Signage. Signs are proposed on the new entrance gate canopy. Directional signs are allowed provided they do not exceed four square feet each. In 1998 a variance was approved to allow one "lumber yard entrance" sign that exceeded four square feet in size; therefore, the size of the "lumber yard entrance" sign currently proposed on the front of the canopy is consistent with past approvals. The sizes of the signs on the south side of the canopy are acceptable because they are located on the interior of the lumberyard and will be screened from outside view. The canopy elevation notes that all of the signs _. will be lighted, but does not provide details of the method of lighting. It appears that the signs do not comply with lighting requirements. If external lighting is proposed, there shall be no exposed light sources or fixtures unless decorative fixtures are utilized and the light source is fully concealed and diffused. If the sign is internally illuminated, there shall be illumination of the text only. The proposed "in" and "out" signs are directional and allowed, but must be revised because they are six square feet in size and appear to include lighting of the entire sign. One option would be to have lighted channel lettering with the canopy as a background. That option would reduce the size of the signs without reducing the size of the lettering and comply with lighting requirements. Two red flag -like banners are proposed on the lumberyard entrance gate. The sign ordinance prohibits the use of more than two banners on a property. Banners are defined as attention getting devices that resemble flags and are of a paper, cloth or plastic -like consistency. Four red flag -like banners already exist on the principal building; therefore, no additional banners are allowed. 4 • Public Address System. As with the original CUP application, the City reserves the right to require the applicant to reduce the output volume of the public address system or require the implementation of a radio pager system for all employees should the proposed public address system become a public nuisance. Hours of Operation. As with the original CUP application, in order to protect adjacent uses from negative impacts resulting from increased traffic and noise, the Menards store shall be required to maintain hours of operation within the period from 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday, and 10:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on Sundays. Delivery, unloading, and movement of goods and materials shall be limited to these times as well. Grading and Drainage. Grading and utility plans are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. We recommend that slopes be graded where the screening structure and storm water pond meet to avoid any potential flooding of the lumberyard area. Storm water management is subject to review and approval by the City Engineer and Browns Creek Watershed District. The adjacent storm water pond was designed to accommodate future development of the surrounding area. Building Materials. The submitted elevations illustrate that the garden center addition on the west side of the building and the lumberyard entrance canopy on the east side of the building are both compatible with the existing building and are acceptable. The new 10 warehouse building will be visible from both 58 Street and the newly platted cul -de- sac; therefore, its appearance is important. The south and west sides of the proposed warehouse building will be sided with vertical wood siding that matches the screening structures. Staff recommends that the roof be a dark green or dark brown color to blend with the surroundings. The applicant shall provide elevation.. drawings of the south and west sides of the warehouse building and provide building ..material . samples for Planning Commission and City Council review and approval. 1 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION The proposed rezoning from Open Space Conservation to B -2, General Business is consistent with the Comprehensive plan and adjacent land uses. The proposed subdivision and platting of a cul -de -sac street west of the Menards site provides for future development and associated traffic. The proposed relocation of the lumberyard entrance, construction of a garden center area, expansion of outside yard area, and construction of a new warehouse are all generally consistent with the previously approved conditional use permit and variances for the site. New variances are being requested to allow the lumberyard entrance canopy and parking to encroach into the front yard setback from Krueger Lane and to allow expansion of a screening fence that exceeds six feet in height. Based on the preceding analysis, our office recommends approval of the following: A. Rezoning from Open Space Conservation to B -2, General Business District. B. Preliminary Plat to divide property and add to the existing Mendards site. 5 C. Amended conditional use permit to allow expansion of open and outdoor storage. D. Variance from 40 -foot front yard setback requirement to allow the lumberyard entrance canopy as close as 28 feet from the east property line. E. Variance from the 10 -foot parking setback requirement to allow parking as close as three feet from the east property line. F. Variance from the fence height regulations to allow expansion of a 14- foot -high fence /storage rack surrounding the outdoor storage area. Approval of the amended conditional use permit and variances shall be contingent upon all the conditions of previous approvals and the following conditions: 1. The applicant must submit a revised preliminary plat and a final plat that combines the proposed expansion area with the existing Menards property. 2. Signage must be installed to direct delivery trucks to use the north entrance on Krueger Lane, which will allow adequate truck maneuvering space. 3. No materials stored or stacked in the storage yard may exceed a height of 14 feet, or be visible from outside of the storage yard. 4. Tree replacement and the landscape plan are subject to review and approval by the City Arborist. 5. All exterior. site lighting must be dimmed after 11:00 p.m. 6. The "in" and "out" signs on the lumberyard entrance canopy must be revised to not exceed four square feet in area. 7. All signs on the lumberyard entrance canopy must comply with sign illumination requirements. If external lighting is proposed, there shall be no exposed light sources or fixtures unless decorative fixtures are utilized and the light source is fully concealed and diffused. If the sign is internally illuminated, there shall be illumination of the text only. 8. No new flag -like banners are allowed on the property; therefore, the proposed banners on the entrance gate canopy must be eliminated. 9. The City reserves the right to require the applicant to reduce the output volume of the p ublic address system or require the implementation of a radio pager system for all employees should the public address system become a public nuisance. 6 • 1 0. Hours of operation, including delivery, unloading, and movement of goods, shall be limited to 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday, and 10:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on Sundays. • • 11. Slopes shall be graded where the screening structure and storm water pond meet to avoid any potential flooding of the lumberyard area. 12. Grading and utility plans are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. 13. Storm water management is subject to review and approval by the City Engineer and Browns Creek Watershed District. 14. The south and west sides of the proposed warehouse building shall be sided with vertical wood siding that matches the screening structures. The roof shall be a dark green or dark brown color to blend with the surroundings. The applicant shall provide elevation drawings of the south and west sides of the warehouse building and provide building material samples for Planning Commission and City Council review and approval. i L i 14 ho hit vot ;Jilt Nil a. > 1 311 bl o I I W V 1 W 0 a z goc 0 x 1 b gd # 111 1 1 r N N W V G ■ 1 rr w MIMIMMe r■1■wwMPww.wrrr•w• a • SW MINwONo ki ia X • • i 1 I 1 I.lJ , 1 3NV1 many)! sew uofte.tos - -.. sousZi AIM OM, - ♦ • ■ Mf/NIP....r May 4./.EI a sn IN 1 R wo111C1t1 ' 3O3 f 1 t80 . 1111 I li d 1 II 1 ffidi4 %'/'s•Y� ri€I' A •.AIM__. 1•1111111• ---oaG •Y 'a - t '1 • s/i wP ['//vt1 Flo airi tar WIN UOAoJ 1 taolilaad samad :aaid >Ivo "S 4 I :t :IL b F 41" PA � o. , ILA« 11.011••• .11=11111IND UNDO J•_ 1 b P 453 > z te) m P1 z 1 1 1 r z PHASE WORK - DAK PARK HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA DESCRIPTION 0, ik eg k e4 q g il ig 1 1 1, 1 g i 1 p Al 5 9 g d RI: 1 1 1 NI 6 IN /Pgi 1 4 igl 1 pi: did 1 0 1 O 1 ti iplil a e i ll i 1 did . 1 9g R �9I39E� ii � ����y Nwill � $� b y 5y � � � �� � g�a�lG �fi �e�k $� � g �9e� �[[[{ky��1yyy41 ii� 1S 1oF515 >; 3 �k 9�ea�g 14 l a ' 4 1 31'6. " 111 1 11 4 / IN id 0 iOnkk IL 1111 4 k N I h L .. 1 g f 1. i li il g 1 I 1 I h di d i i 1 1 11 1 I I ' g 1:1 ! i 1 1 it 11 1 plig Limil p� go a p 1° 1 6 1 1 1 i t1 � d 6 p� 11;11111. �ae i�yii4�OH `g 1 Rh :11/1 i id 1 .. kl DOOR WM 'III= ION 'TIMM 11013V.INO3 j MS 313112103 MOIE IINSONTI V i g 8 1 VP . i A I lig i li g 11 � E y gl g�e Hi t Ighl, ! 0 3 b nig ig 111 imill g li i n , g Trifsho � g x'� �� 1� �? � Jng 114011 T h ,ig i hi fk il i l r 1 *minim 1 5 .3. . k El 2 i V h •- 0 1 g g i i I g O I e � I ;; ti 111 .v ig ; I 4111 1 B P1 4 . g 1 ki I IA 11 : ltd. g ok. -d . 1 e: � ;B S � i� � i! � � 8 � g g rgis d �5 OM � 3 11:413)%11”.:4gli §�.gf4ii ii g 5 �p S ��9 k i 5 fi k ii,41 1 iii Wei + IP ii 566566666666666 6GG66EGb66 C4G.00 6 6 66666o66c[6 6 6 «66666 6 66 e 6666 66666 66 6a 6 b6 . __________ ______ o o nvveevevenv 0 2 ZZUZZZ L iL 2 4224 22222 22 22 2 L2 _p.q.........zz .....z ".y vys_t - ..yq.g...... r. _ .....Y.... I n-at I ya ;z g n4e At tp : o LEGEND. 3nn AMAMI 33N34 *CI NIVH3 321f113fULLS DNIN3383S A3N 3vni3nas 9NIN33V3S COACW3H 313V3NO3 A3N 381113r1IS 9NIN33213S '9X3 GAS METER TRANSFORMER PAD ii I ■■,./. WI • - U 7. ""U.1 11 '- ii oCI ,ESEP 'JINVdNO3 AlfUf1 /M NOUVOOI 1 3ZIS A JIlf3A 'ftlid 3N SNVlU fI3SOdOlfd 3Sf1OH3e1 M3N a /g N 51 g *IP i tiwZ 5 P t ION .6.0 J � Z J 0_ W 1-- f4 111•11 1:13 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TIT a rts z 70 0 0 0 z 03 %D a z •:.'n:•Th:fx 1 o' 01> M W M M c) - - xtammv) - M mm * •litm m 4 'rum 1...HI.< 4303'4 i . T .,A 3 mri -sz v- 1.1-- (4 x c) x.......-. nm<mm.ct o. -1 --1 z 2>mc Pi vm 0 H.z. b .-i -..c. e., H.? X/ cl m (4 z " • rn m v) 73 ''p r T i 0 . . ....,_, _,., z z>mz --1 -, ...,, wp c. ..743 .7 Z M MW—ir n --t --1 x -c m m -c n z I , i‘, ,V .....__ __,_.._._ - - 7- TRANSMISSION A i '..:,,'... Vi• - ,_": - .t . ::: _._ , 7 '7' 1 i• STATES RIVER --1 : cif z P1 3> 4392' z 40' 1 1 3eini3n&Ls ,LE,Stl.68 1 1 1 * I EX/STING 1 0 , r 1,45frs' I 0 ,a0 I I I 1 0 1 I SYMBOL I SIZE NEV 'HYDROSEED - 1 NEW SOD EXISTING GRASS 22 a i. TO 27 a 26 . 37 QUANTITY nkAPE LEGEND . TRANSPLANTED WHITE SPRUCE TRANSPLANTED EXISTING LANDSCAPE 'LITTLE PRINCESS' JAPANESE SPIREA 'DWARF AWNING SUMO EUONYMUS ALATUS COMPACTUS 'SINAI FIRE' FLOWERING CRABAPPLE BALSAM PINE 'PeOkR*Eafiv • COLORADO BLUE 'SPRUCE 1 .1 111•11 1:13 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TIT a rts z 70 0 0 0 z 03 %D a z •:.'n:•Th:fx 1 o' 01> M W M M c) - - xtammv) - M mm * •litm m 4 'rum 1...HI.< 4303'4 i . T .,A 3 mri -sz v- 1.1-- (4 x c) x.......-. nm<mm.ct o. -1 --1 z 2>mc Pi vm 0 H.z. b .-i -..c. e., H.? X/ cl m (4 z " • rn m v) 73 ''p r T i 0 . . ....,_, _,., z z>mz --1 -, ...,, wp c. ..743 .7 Z M MW—ir n --t --1 x -c m m -c n z I , i‘, ,V .....__ __,_.._._ - - 7- TRANSMISSION A i '..:,,'... Vi• - ,_": - .t . ::: _._ , 7 '7' 1 i• STATES RIVER --1 : cif z P1 3> 4392' z 40' 1 1 3eini3n&Ls ,LE,Stl.68 1 1 1 a gli • 1•■■■• 1 ' 1 I ' i 1 - - IL .... 1 . .EGEND I 3S110H3SVM NO 43.1Nnaw ONI.LHOI1 .114-10S A2LI A3N NEV 400W CUTOFF LUMINAIRE YARD LIGHTS EXISTING WALPAC LIGHTS EXISTING YARD LI GHTS • . • EASEMENT LINE NEW SCREENING STRUCTURE w I 1,10,4 I wry. 1 ScRiENINa STRUCTURE ItJ f•oe&rin,ut eveltti4,1br PROF'EfiTY LINE ° 33N34 NIVH3 111•11 1:13 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TIT a rts z 70 0 0 0 z 03 %D a z •:.'n:•Th:fx 1 o' 01> M W M M c) - - xtammv) - M mm * •litm m 4 'rum 1...HI.< 4303'4 i . T .,A 3 mri -sz v- 1.1-- (4 x c) x.......-. nm<mm.ct o. -1 --1 z 2>mc Pi vm 0 H.z. b .-i -..c. e., H.? X/ cl m (4 z " • rn m v) 73 ''p r T i 0 . . ....,_, _,., z z>mz --1 -, ...,, wp c. ..743 .7 Z M MW—ir n --t --1 x -c m m -c n z I , i‘, ,V .....__ __,_.._._ - - 7- TRANSMISSION A i '..:,,'... Vi• - ,_": - .t . ::: _._ , 7 '7' 1 i• STATES RIVER --1 : cif z P1 3> 4392' z 40' 1 1 3eini3n&Ls ,LE,Stl.68 U 2 u 0 si 3 .0 J U N 0 °o N W 0 z ti v 0 a z as 4 8 0 1') a f9 O i+ Y1 � O O .0. C d uu 0. O 3 p u1 ♦+u a1a a c 23azzgtatar. -mss >> oi i. u d ,..0 d a3 .� ` �`u i s _ L ,,�� o� 5 I t u kia � ; s� �s. C d. u d +� V V° o 4& • +' U d +' 4 , 0 d , C I .. o d i A V a l � �L d L E C � S U 2 t d i ii C E d 3 fti:21 x 11/ , •N 3 C S 4' 0 yl U 111.24114 ° u a : :Sli 0 0 d 3 N .fs C d a w 1 u ° v 4:1 2 - al m N g i'A St f' P d ogooel,L 3 d 6 : ° C 0 5 df li a u c 0+'0u d • J 111 V/ A V/ / V/ /A 40t, IIJIIU 1111111 111 111 r 0- o- o- o- o- o- (/-; V (/) A l� CY 1-1 Q L�J Z L1..1 X Q 0 Q g D U z z 225222 2522222522222222 . 3aaa932932A 359a22a Aa2a :9aaaa2R aaa2 aaa 21 2 2.2.)21A:.A4A aaa as 222222212222222,222212222 2223322 222222222 222222222222222222,22222 a a 22 ,2233a993393393399353332a2232a2 2` 2222 3222222222.0232222122225222322: 2 a As 2222 22222221222222122212122322 "2 a a32 219'31212a211asaaa92ass12s2a`a a 5z 2222222222222aa222222241222a22 ^ a a "23323929922222232221222213222 332 " a 33 a 22112222asa.a221222a222222AaOw. 2 a 229222222222222229s2322222222222 " a 211 93aaaaa331133331 -322322aa99a2a "a a i22a2,722a21222222222a2222a33a 2 a 2232222222222a2 2a2213252222221 a a 2,232 32,a2aa a 32222 il2a22222 22222 12222122 Iii a 2 > a �+ 222232w 2222 " 2 a �a�2�a,���2aa�22 2�� 222222222222221222222222222022222" a 2222299 .1322222222222a22a2AA222222 1 2 233223229993932339593233132212 223,22222222222222a222222222a2222 223 22222222222221222232222222a322 " 9 299 19311222223 33192323311122232.2 "2 a 32 a2222222aaa9332222 2s3933aa2a9aw' a a3a222222122 122222222222222922.aa9 a a 293239 2223222222aaaa22222223322 " 2 s 9 a a a a a a a a a 222 222 as 22 22 as aaa z V! g Lai i V g V i g A 11 22 32 22 22 2 9a 22 22 222 a a a a 2 a a a a 22 6222 .23, 3532 2223 2222 222 22 22 2 22 s 2 2 22 2 2. 222 92222a3222222 Ai - MN 2222222222 222222222222222222222222 2222,.0 2 222222222222222.0222 a a a 2 a 222 W 0 0 0 o• 31 o 0 to • a .... ••C2 ' n � � Z 53 NI i i Z c c 4 § gf 0 0 0 0 § 1 3 z 0 0 0 0 tAU) = o co 0 1.50d111 .13X lSOd VIRUS- -MIS dTO .0 ONRS013 IOVI'4i3LV* A 8NILSH° 'ON J LUIS HZ85 OX 9X 33rRh5.9 30I s.4 33118dS 31I4Vt 328V NMOHS S3381 1b .:310N 3311114.4 -� - - -- 34.,99 ='0/18.3 •- �_� O 6£•L5 ='3 139 =1 .90. OLD oo•os AIX Sd 33X H� DX X9 33 33X 33X DX I 3V 31 13X I11'40-6 HM O Ox 0 3, DX OX OAF: PART: PONS ADDITION SRADIMY ADDITION Sd SdX JACOB ADDITION 101.11.0 LMff 0X DRAC1EY AD0IT1DN 0o•o9Z M „c£,90.6e s - -1N3113SV3 39YNId80 — (MOM MN 'DOQ)1N3.13SY3 W3U0d SUM WHOM A0 am Nuios— r DX GNOd • OX DX OX 1 OX • • OX OX axe - --ems- — o OX OX OX OX OX / dflO3t-- 6 OX r r OX O 0X OX 0 aX OX ex 3 • 0 i 0 0 > 4 4t'-i' CONCH SLAB 40'.-0' 6 • Ci • • • • 4 • IIIIMK4D211MDX4111 rIigI 11111111111=11111111=11 111/111111191111 1111111111111111M11111111 111111111=1111111111 M11111=111111111 4 6H-1111111111111rallilliiil 111111111MENIENUMININ 11101111111=11111MTAIMI 1111011121111111112211;k1 111M1111111M1111121111101111 26 "1:111E4111E411Milill 111111110=4111MEMBIll .. 444 ME --_ im u i mlimramorkwu 77-71-7- AwAillimmoitainman. Miliiiii1111111111111111 rfinilmifflo MUMWEili Miran ii Rum • 11 •11111111 1•1111111M0111W2‘,11111MNOMM INIMMiorAmmorAiNwrAmmwrAimmi {Z..1111=111' CZA ott Richards rage i or 1 From: "Postler, Dennis M" <dpostler @bonestroo.com> . To: "Eric A Johnson (E -mail) <eajohnson©cityofoakparkheights.com>; "Scott Richards (E- mail)" <srichards @nacplanning.com> Cc: "Judy Hoist (E- mail)" < jholst @cityofoakparkheights.com >; "Mark Vierling (E- mail)" <mvierling©eckberglammers.com>; "Jay Johnson (E- mail)" < jjohnson @cityofoakparkheights.com >; "Jim Butler (E- mail)" <jbutler©cityofoakparkheights.com>; "Julie Hultman (E-mail)" <jhultman©cityofoakparkheights.com> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 12:08 PM Subject: Menard's Expansion I showed the Menard's Expansion site plan to Shelly Johnson our traffic engineer. I explained the following three traffic issues to him and noted below are his comments: * (Future cul -de -sac) Access to 58th Street North -- Although the separation between the proposed access and Newberry Ave. N. is less than what would typically be required, the amount of traffic potentially generated from the remaining portion of Outlot A should be low. The staggered accesses are at least offset in the right direction (i.e., traffic making left turns into each will be separated by the gap instead of overlapping as would be the case if the proposed access was east of Newberry Ave. N.). Should be o.k. as shown. * Cul de sac vs. through street/drive -- A through street/drive configuration would be better than a cul de sac, however Shelly did not have a problem with the cul de sac design (again due to the small area being served by this street). Any access to the cul de sac should be a minimum of 200' from 58th Street N. 4 1 s * elocated Yard Gate/Security Entrance -- Strongly recommend against the relocation to the east side of the building large delivery hown. Not only will lar a delive vehicles have difficulty making the turning movement, but the (lack of) paration for customers exiting the yard area and the main parking lot, combined with customers entering the main entrance, will cause congestion problems. Dennis M. Postler Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates 2335 West Highway 36, St. Paul, MN 55113 Direct: (651) 604 -4815 Office: (651) 636-4600, x4815 Fax: (651)636-1311 Cellular: (612) 865 -9187 E -mail: dpostler @bonestroo.com • EXHIBIT J 8/21/2003 Scott Richards From : <kdwid i n a©com cast. net> To: "Jim Sutler" <jbutler a@cityofoakparkheights.com >; "Julie Hultman" < jhultman ©cityofoakparkheights.com >; "Eric Johnson" < eajohnson ©cityofoakparkheights.com >; "Jay Johnson" <jjohnson a©cityofoakparkheights.com >; "Scott Richards" <srichards©nacplanning.com>; "Mark Vierling" <mvierling a@eckberglammers.com> Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 9:39 PM Subject: Menard's Tree Inventory and Landscape Plan OPH Staff - I have reviewed the tree inventory and landscape plan for the Menard's project, visited the site and have the following comments: 1. I confirmed the tree inventory and noted that a number of the trees are in fair -poor condition and do not have good form, 2. The landscape plan shows existing landscaping and areas where evergreens currently on site will be transplanted and also areas where evergreens from the acquired property will apparently be transplanted. Not all of these trees are in good condition or form; therefore some of them would not be acceptable as landscape trees for the new project. I propose that a representative of Menard's and I walk the area and choose which trees will be transplanted. For any trees which are not acceptable as transplants to the new landscape, Menard's would need to purchase planting stock of an appropriate species and size. 3. As part of the site and plan review, I inspected the existing landscape. Some of the evergreens originally planted on the south and east sides of the existing building are dead, dying or missing. Altogether there are 6 trees which need to be replaced (these will be marked 9/2 with orange paint (stumps/locations) or flagging (trees)). These should be replaced with 8 -10 ft. 'Black Hills' white spruce. The flowering crabapple tree ('B') which is indicated to be moved to a new position in the median at the NE comer of the parking lot, is not there. A new one (2 in. diameter) should be planted. 4. In addition, all existing evergreens should be re- mulched with 4 inches of wood chip mulch from trunk out to branch spread. Vines and volunteer trees and shrubs should be removed from around and underneath existing evergreens. 5. Until it is clear how many of the trees will actually be transplanted from the acquired property to the new project, I cannot calculate the tree replacement required. Kathy Widin OPH Arborist page 1 of s 1 i • EXHIBIT K 9/2/2003 MEMORANDUM NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. 5775 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 555, St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Telephone: 952.595.9636 Facsimile: 952.595.9837 planners @nacplanning.com TO: Eric Johnson FROM: Cynthia Putz -Yang DATE: September 10, 2003 RE: Oak Park Heights — Menards — Rezoning, Preliminary Plat, CUP Amendment, Variances and Site Plan Review FILE NO: 798.02 — 03.07 Menards has submitted a revised site plan, lighting details, a sample of the steel that will be used on the warehouse, and warehouse elevations. The revised site plan dated September 8, 2003, includes lighting in the building overhangs in the garden center area and behind the building. It also includes a four - foot -high concrete wall topped by a wrought iron fence with decorative lighting. This is located in the former yard entrance area. The top of the fence is approximately 13 feet above the ground level. Because it is more than eight feet in height, it is included in the fence height variance request for the site. j (, • We recommend that the decorative lighting be eliminated because it is not necessary and is not a hooded style. The warehouse elevations dated September 8, 2003, illustrate that the sides of the building that will be visible from adjacent properties, which are the south and west sides, will be finished with wood siding to match the adjacent screening structures. The siding is oriented vertically on the screening structures and south side of the warehouse. The siding is oriented horizontally on the west (rear) side of the warehouse to provide structural rigidity for the storage system on the interior of the building. • We recommend that the west (rear) side of the warehouse be sided with vertical wood siding to match the screening structures and south side of the warehouse. Lighting details have been submitted for all exterior lights. • Yard and soffit lights must be mounted horizontally (at a 90 degree angle to the wall or pole) and must be a full cutoff design (the lens must not extend below the fixture). The applicant has questioned the need for condition #10 in the planning report limiting hours of operation. Our concern is generally with the noise created by truck traffic and the beeping sound that is created by yard equipment when it backs up. • We recommend revising condition CO to read as follows: "Delivery, unloading, and movement of goods shall be limited to 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday, and 10:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on Sundays." The applicant has also inquired regarding whether the City's sign regulations apply to the signs on the entrance gate canopy because they are relocated signs rather than new sig ns. Section 401.15.A.4 states that no non - conforming building, structure or use shall be moved to another lot or to any other part of the parcel of land upon which the same was constructed or was conducted at the time of this Ordinance adoption unless such movement shall bring the non - conforming into compliance with the requirements of this Ordinance. • We continue to recommend that the "in" and "out" sings on the lumberyard entrance canopy be revised to each not exceed four square feet in area. We also continue to recommend that all lumberyard entrance canopy signs comply with sign illumination requirements. 16% "X32" LAE1 -YA LAE1 -YD LAE1 -YG LAE1 < PATTERNED POLYCARBONATE DIFFUSER PROVIDED WITH CAST ALUMINUM FITTER 3" LAE1 -YE 3" I.D.—•4 f-�•— 3" LAE2 The Lighting Tradition -- 0' -- SUITABLE FOR USE WITH TWIST LOCK PHOTOCELL SUITABLE FOR USE WITH TWIST LOCK PHOTOCELL LAE2 -YA - 4 1...*— LAE2 -YB -�-� -1 i.•.. -- 3" I.D. —...1 I.•. -3" ID. 3" I.D. —� F. -- --• .4 �-- 3" I.D. BALLASTS ARE H.P.F. / C.W.A. AUTOTRANSFORMER, -20' STARTING TEMPERATURE HIGH METAL PRESSURE MERCURY HALIDE SODIUM VAPOR 50W. 50W. 70W. 75W. 100W. 100W. 150W. 175W. 250W. 250W. 250W. 400W. 400W. 400W. (400 W. LAMP REQUIRES HEAT SHIELD) TO 200W. sun valley LIGHTING \jJLOU&Y Iccoo Fc E L(&RYS 14 "X27I+4" LAE2 -YD LAE2 -YE .4 L- 3" I.D. LAE2 -YC FOR FLUOR. LAMPS CONSULT FACTORY w t� for / . :... Job: MENARDS, INC /joke tih US Architectural Lighting � g LAE 1 YB CP WItiv MT PT STD FINIS: 2 TENON 10 (SPECIFYASSUFFIX tfl TO LUMINAIRE NO.) INTERNAL WIDE ANGLE LOUVER SYSTEM (LAE1 - YD, YE, YG ONLY) FINIAL ORNAMENTAL FINIAL HEAT SHIELD HOUSE SIDE SHIELD 90',135',180 660 WEST AVENUE 0, PALMDALE, CA 93551 (661) 233 -2000 FAX (661) 2332001 www.sunvalieytighting.com OPT PRISMATIC GLASS REFRACTOR PG-III TYPE III PG -V TYPE V it BF PF •t: FIT HS90' HS135' HS180' OPAL POLYCARBONATE WP PHOTO CELL + VOLTAGE (EXAMPLE: PC120V) PC +V TWIST LOCK PHOTO CELL + VOLTAGE (EXAMPLE: TPC120V) TPC +V (YD & YE FITTERS ONLY) SINGLE FUSE (120V., 277V.). ........ ........... S F DOUBLE FUSE (208V., 240V., 480V.) DF LA -11 DESCRIPTION The Prismatic High -bay combines the popular Stealer ballast housing with an acrylic reflector for maximum durability and photometric performance. U.L. 1572 listed and labeled for damp location. CSA Certified. APPLICATION The Prismatic High -bay is perfect for retail stores, wholesale warehouses, grocery chains, malls and auto showrooms. COOPER LIGHTING OVe?...,14--4k)(1- Ifrof SPECIFICATION FEATURES A..Mounting Easy slide -on die -cast aluminum mounting box with tapped opening for 3/4" conduit. B•. Housing Heavy -duty, formed steel housing with an open air ballast for cooler operation is finished in a white polyester powder coat. C•••Ballast High power factor ballast with class H insulation. U.L. listed for 40 °C (104°Fn ambient temperature operation. Minimum starting temperature is -40 °C ( -40 °F) for HPS and -30 °C ( -20 °F) for MH. CSA certified. 25' (635mmL 2Y (559mm1 or 16' 1406mm1 D •••Universal Brackets Universal ladder brackets allow for the flexibility to change out with other reflectors available in aluminum or glass. E•...Socket Mogul - base porcelain socket. F. Reflector Easily mounted prismatic acrylic reflector has multiple field - adjustable distribution • patterns for precision control. Maximum height with P016 is 26' (660mm1. Maximum height with PD22 is 28 1/2" 1724mm). Maximum height with P0251* 291/16" (738mm1. TYPE: 1B ! Job: MENARDS, INC • 4 � Cooper Lighting MPSS PD22M 350.277 OR FH1 PC9WHT SS 1 6", 22" & 25" PRISMATIC HIGH -BAY 175 -1000 High Pressure Sodium Metal Halide PRISMATIC HIGH -BAY INDUSTRIAL LUMINAIRE ENERGY DATA CWI Ballast Input Watts 250W HPS HPF (300 Watts) 250W MH HPF (300 Watts) 400W HPS HPF (465 Watts) 400W MH HPF (475 Watts) CWA Ballast Input Watts 175W MH HPF (210 Watts) 250W HPS HPF (300 Watts) 250W MH HPF (295 Watts) 320W MP HPF (365 Watts) 350W MP HPF 395 Watts) 400W HPS HPF (465 Watts) 400W MP HPF (448 Watts) 400W MH HPF (455 Watts) 600W HPS HPF (665 Watts) 750W HPS HPF 4850 Watts) 1000W HPS HPF (1100 Watts) 1000W MH HPF (1085 Watts) ADH990322 1I.,L1 OFA�Q PHOTOMETRICS CP/1000 MHSS- PD22.400 400 -Watt MH 36,000 -Lumen Coated Lamp* *Coated lamp recommended. ORDERING INFORMATION SAMPLE NUMBER: HPSS- PD16-M- 250 -MT -Q SS PD _1 HP -High Pressure Sodium PAH.Meta1 I�AP -Pulse Start (CWA Start MH (Linear Reactor)wL" SS- Steelef Catalog Number' 16" Reflector'' HPSS- PDI6 -M 250 HPSS- PDI6 -M -400 HPSS- PDI6 -M- 250 -01316 MHSS- PDI6 -M- 175 -SGB 16 MHSS- PDI6 -M- 250- SGB16' MHSS -PD16- M -400 MHSS- P016-M- 175 -DB16 = MHSS- PDI6 -M- 250 -D816 22" Reflector HPSS- PD22 -M-400 HPSS- PD22 -M- 400 -DB22 MHSS- PD22 -64-400 M HSS- PD22 -M- 400 -DB22 ' 25" Reflector HPSS- P025•1V1-400 MHSS- PD25 -M-400 HPSS- PD25 -M- 400 -D825 MHSS- PD25 -M- 400 -DB25 s Reflector Diameter Socket Position/ Distribution aced WITH 9 FOOT WHITE CORD AND GRAY PLUG Lamp Tvoe/Base HPS/Mogui HPS/Mogul HPS/Mogul MH/Mogul MH/Mogul MH/Mogul MH/MoguI MH/Mogul HPS/Mogul HPS/Mogul MH/Mogul MN/Mogul HPS/Mogul MH/Mogul HPS/Mogul MH/Moaui 250 400 250 175 250 400 175 250 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 UN-1 Cy- L 614TS Coefficients Of Utilization Effective floor cavity reflectance 80% 70% 70 50 30 10 70 50 30 89 85 82 88 85 82 79 79 74 70 82 76 71 67 71 65 60 76 69 63 59 65 58 53 70 62 56 51 59 52 47 65 57 60 46 54 47 42 61 52 45 41 49 42 38 57 48 41 37 45 39 34 53 44 38 33 42 35 31 50 40 34 30 10 49 39 32 28 47 38 32 28 Spacing Criterion 1.3 Zone %Lam Zone %Lamp 0-30 29.1 0-90 69.6 0-40 46.0 90-180 19.1 0.60 60.5 Total 88.7 rc rw RCR 1 93 _._. 86 3 79 4 74 5 69 6 64 60 I 56 52 480V 1000.1000W. MT -Multi -Tap' TT- Triple -Tap' Lamp Wattage 9/MH 120V 208V 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.3 1.2 2.1 2.0 1.8 2.0 M 38 M 42 M 30 M 34 Nat Wt. 22 30 25 20 22 22 20 23 Consult factory 20% 50% 10 50 30 10 78 75 73 70 66 63 63 59 65 58 53 49 53 47 43 48 43 39 45 39 35 41 36 32 38 33 29 35 30 27 1 71 69 68 64 61 59 59 55 52 54 49 46 49 45 41 45 41 37 42 37 34 39 34 31 36 31 28 33 29 26 Options (add as suffix) F1.Single Fuse --120, 277 or 347V (Specify single voltage only) F2 -Double Fused -208, 240 or 480V (Specify single voltage only) Q.Ouartt Restrike DC Bayonet Base 04ot strike only) QD -Quick Disconnect Die -Cast Pendant Mount Box-Specify single voltage (Not compatible with PC3, PHC, C3, MWS or HC) RIM •Remote Mount ENI. Quartz Restrike with "Delay Relay' (Strikes at cold start) EM/SC- Emergency Separate Circuit SCF 3• Safety Cable - (lousing to Ceiling SS -Space Saver Feature MWS- Modular Wiring Systems Available. Consult Factory P■Pre.set socket position from Factory. Specify desired position' HL.LumaWatt Fixture Control Module (Allows low voltage control wire to be daisey chained between fixtures outside AC conduit run similar to low voltage intercoms, fire alarms and phone systems)" HC- LumaWatt Fixture Control Module (Low voltage leads pulled out of top connection box for areas requiring all OR -Open rated socket for pulse start Meta Halide Shipping Volume (cult.) Dist. (Ibs.) Ballast Reflector 0.80 PD16.4.4 2/carton 0.80 PD22 -5.5 5/carton 30% 50 30 10 SS 16", 22' & 25' PRISMATIC HIGH -BAY 10% 0' 50 30 10 0 65 64 62 59 57 55 54 51 49 50 46 44 46 42 39 42 38 36 39 35 32 36 32 30 34 30 27 32 28 25 Candlepower Degree CP 0 12639 5 12639 15 12439 25 12629 35 9833 52 4858 46 55 1337 41 65 969 75 1025 37 85 1122 34 90 1154 30 95 1193 28 105 1175 25 115 1067 125 964 23 135 1054 145 1222 155 1161 165 897 175 192 180 129 Rtosseories to irate FH- 1- Fbtture =Fixture op S98( -Hook void~ Safety Screw PC3-3' Cord for with NEMA Plugs (120V- LS -15P, 206V- L6 -15P, 240V- L6 -15P, 277V4.7 -15P, 347V .L37 20P and 480WL8 -20P) Other Lengths Available. Requires FH-1 or FL-1. Use with TPPH -NEMA. Specify Voltage PHC- Power Cord and Plug (18' cord, non -NEMA plug requires FL-1 and TPPH) TPPH- NEMA -Thr -way Pendant Power Hook. Requires FL-1 and PC3. Specify Voltage TPPHI -Thru -Way Pendant Power Hook Requires FL-1 and PHC. Specify Voltage TPPH- F -Thru -Way Pendant Power Hook - Single Fuse, 120, 277 or 347 Volt. Requires FL -1 and PHC. Specify Voltage TPPH- F2 -Thnn -Way Pendant Power Hook - Double Fused, 208, 240 or 480 Vok. Requires FL -1 and PHC. Specify Voltage TPPH- F.QD..Thru -Way Pendant Power Hook - Single Fuse, Quick Disconnect. Requires FL-1 and PHC. Specify Voltage TPPH.F2. Thru -Way Pendant Power Hook-Double Fused, Quick Disconnect Requires FL-1 and PHC. Specify Voltage TWNIBS=Thru -way Mounting Box C3-3' Cord -No Plug- Requires FH -1 or FL-1 MST =Twin Mount Bracket (Fixtures must be same voltage and without hooks, bops or plugs) FWG22r.IMire Guard for 22" Reflector (not compatible with "DB22" or "SGB22 ") WG16-Wire Guard for 16' Reflector (not compatible with "SGB ") WG22 -Wire Guard for 2r Reflector (not compadble with "SGB ") WG2S Wire Guard for 25' Reflector (not compatible with 'SW") WG16 /GLC -Gym Wire Guard with Safety Glass Bottom for 16" Reflector (250W maximum) WG22/GLC -Gym Wire Guard with Safety Glass Bottom for 22" Reflector WG25/GLC -Gym Wire Guard with Safety Glass Bottom for 25" Reflector (400W maximum) SGB16-- Safety Glass Bottom for 16" Reflector (not compatible with "WG ") (260W maximum) SGB22- Safety Glass Bottom for 22' Reflector (not compatible with "WG ") (400W maximum) SGB2S- Safety Glass Bottom for 25' Reflector (not compatible with "WG ") (400W maximum) DB16-Drop Lents for 16" Reflector (250W maximum) DB22-Drop Lens for 22' Reflector (400W maximum) DB25 -Drop Lens for 25' Reflector (400W maximum) BZ- Bronze Finish LL•Lamp Included NOTES:. Multi -Tap ballast is 120/200/240C177V wired 277V. Triple -Tap ballast is 126/V7/347V wind 347V. Add desired voltage beMn'MT" or'TT% • Drop lens adds 3 overall height..Suppl'ied with safety glass bottom enclosure per lamp mekaa rsoonwnendadons..PD10 units standard 40•C U.L. and CSA Certified. P022 units with 0822 standard 40•C U.L and CSA Certified. P022 open units standard 40•C U.L and CSA Certified. PD2S standard 40•C U.L and CSA Certified for 400W and down, 40•C U.L. and CSA Certi1led for 1000W. "Putss sort Metal Halide only. ..Products also available M non.US voltages and SOHL for international markets. Various ballast configurations available. a 175, 200, 250, 320. 3.50. & 400W only..277V only, not available with Q or EM option.. Factory set for concentrated, medium or wide distribution otherwise future is shipped in medium setting for it reflec.tor. "" 30 Second time delay when switching from bright to dim above 400W. Consult ind'ividuai lamp manufacturer recommendations for compatible lamps. For use with CWA ballast only. NOT Specifications and Dimensions subject to change without notice. ...Not available with OD. PC3, C3, PHC or MWS..'°' Not available with Hl or HC.." Avialable only with P025. ^" Must specify "OR" open rated socket or safety glass bottom enclosure. Or Visit our web site at www.cooperlighting.com CO ER Lighting Customer First Center 1121 Highway 74 South Peachtree City, GA 30269 770.486.4800 FAX 770.486.4801 ADH990322 TYPE: DESCRIPTION The Lumark Warrior offers a variety of lamp and mounting options in high pressure sodium and metal halide, and can be installed, tamped and serviced with the most basic tools. U.L. listed and labeled for wet locations. CSA certified. APPLICATION The Warrior's versatility combines with its tough construction, polyester powder coat finish and adjustable light cutoff to make it the ideal floodlight for many area outdoor lighting.situations, including parking lots, construction and storage sites, rail yards, Tight industrial locations, marinas and service areas. A B C E F G H DIMENSIONS TRUNNION MOUNT 1 4" (102mm1 15" 7' (38l mml I178mm1 COOPER LIGHTING CATALOG S: SPECIFICATION FEATURES A- ••Retaining Screws Corrosion - resistant captive retaining screws. B•••Housing Weather - resistant, die -cast aluminum housing with integral door hinges is finished in dark bronze polyester powder coat. C•••Housing Door Watertight die -cast aluminum housing door is finished in dark bronze polyester powder coat. Cast ridge for water tight seal against gasketing. D.-Reflector Specular aluminum reflector delivers sharp beam cutoff. E•••Gasket Full circumference, high - temperature foam -in -place silicone gasketing seals out external contaminant's. . - s • 1/2' (38mm) SLIPFITTER MOUNT F- ••Lens Clear tempered -glass lens is heat- and impact - resistant. G •••Socket Mogul -base porcelain socket, except 150W Metal Halide and below has medium -base. H •••BaI last High power factor ballast with class H insulation. Minimum starting temperature is -40°C ( -40° F) for HPS and -30 °C ( -20° F) for MH, MP and ML. I•••Mounting Variable mountings of either 3116" galvanized steel trunnion (shown below) or integral die -cast aluminum slipfitter (shown in photo to right). Slipftter fits 23/8"- 3'4.D. tenon. Heavy -duty steel yoke provides flexibility in mounting and aiming from a variety of surfaces. DRILLING PATTERN FOR YOKE MOUNT 4 3/4' (121mm) 6 1/2' 1165mm) 15 314 A.) (1) Center Hole 13/16' (21mmI B.) (2) Holes 3/8' (lOmml C.) (2) Holes 7/1r I11mml YOKE MOUNT TYPE: 3 Job: MENARDS, INC Cooper Lighting XM4O (51 mml IES FILES Metal Hsade 250W (164995) 400 (764987) High Pressure Sodium 400 (764688) ADH011937 P aMptp 4 W� /D 8(e p?es WRWARRIOR 100 -400w High Pressure Sodium Pulse Start Metal Halide Metal Halide SLIPFITTER- MOUNTED TRUNNION- MOUNTED OR YOKE - MOUNTED FLOODLIGHT TECHNICAL DATA IP65 Rated 25'C Maximum Ambient Temperature. External Supply Wiring 90•C Minimum. Internal Supply wiring 150•C Minimum. ENERGY DATA High Reactance Ballast Input Watts 100W HPS NPF/HPF (130 Watts) 100W MH NPF/HPF (128 Watts) 150W HPS HPF (190 Watts) 150W MH HPF (185 Watts) C1M Ballast Input Watts 250 HPS HPF (300 Watts) CWA Ballast Input Watts 175W MH HPF (210 Watts) 200 HPS HPF (250 Watts) 200W MP HPF (232 Watts) 250W MH HPF (295 Watts) 320 MP HPF (365 Watts) 350W MP HPF (395 Watts) 400W MH HPF (455 Watts) 400W HPS HPF (465 Watts) 400W MP HPF (448 Watts) A sTe 4+ , f-►`i 1 SET PIIOTOMETRICS flAB="01111 ME MEI 1I1I �11L11/,t 11 41111 11 5 4 3 2 1 HPWR -65S -400 400 -Watt HPS, 45• Vertical Tit 50,000 -Lumen Clear Lamp ORDERING INFORMATION Lamp T ype HP -High Pressure m* Start MH ( A)a ML.Pulse Start MH (Linear Reactor)'' STOCK SAMPLE NUMBER: XS1S Series X- Slipfitter W =Trinnion Lamp Type S- -High Pressure Sodium M.IM etai Halide Stock Catelo ' Number XS15 XS25 XS40 XM17 WS15 WS25 VWS40 WM17 WM25 WM40 WIVI40 -5T COOS Lighting 0 1 2 3 4 SAMPLE NUMBER: HPWR -65S- 400 -MT 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 5 Voltage 120V on 208V Y -Yoke 240V 277V Lamp Wattage' 347V 100 -100W 480V 150 -1501 175 -175W 200 -200W 57.5-Tap 250 -250W 32a -3201 • 250/400.250/400W (wired 250) 5T Lamp Wattage 15 -150W 17 -175W 25 -250W 40 - 400W NOTES: Options not available with stock products. Order Accessories as separrs items for field installation. Refer to standard ordering information to add options and accessories. 1 5T.5 -Tap (400W Metal Halide Only) Lamp Lamp T I. /Base Watts HPS/Mogul 150 HPS/M • . ul 250 HPS/M • ul 400 MH/Mo • ul 175 MH/Mogul 250 MH/Mogul 400 M • • ul 400 HPS/M • ul 150 HPS/M • ! ul 250 HPS 400 MH/M • ! 175 MH/Mo • ul 250 MH/Mogul 400 MWMo ul • 400 HPS/M • , ul 100 HPS/M • . 1 HPS/M • ul HPS/M • . ul 250/400 100 250/400 400 250/400 250/400 Ballast Type/ Power Factor HL-X/HPF CWA/HPF CWA/HPF CWA/HPF CVWNHPF CWA/HPF CWA/HPF HL XMPF CWA/HPF CWA/HPF CWA/HPF CWA/HPF CWA/HPF Hi: X/HPF CWA/HPF HL X/HPF CWA/HPF CWA/HPF CWA/HPF CWA/HPF Mountin Slipfitter Sii • er Sli . utter Sii Slipfitter Slipfitter Sti Trunnion Trunnion Trunnion Trunnion Trunnion Trunnion Trunnion Sli • er 6x5 6x5 6x5 6x5 6x5 6x5 6x5 6x5 6x5 6x5 6x5 6x5 6x5 6x5 6x5 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 13 1.3 13 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 13 Net Wt. Shipping (lbs.) Volume (cu. ft.) 30 2.0 32 2.0 30 2.0 30 2.0 32 2.0 35 2.0 35 2.0 30 2.0 35 2.0 35 2.0 30 2.0 32 2.0 35 2.0 35 2.0 30 2.0 35 2.0 30 2.0 35 2.0 36 2.0 36 2.0 35 2.0 35 2.0 VAKD 6-H-Ts MH/Mogul HPS/Mogul MP/Mo I MP/M 5 4 3 2 1 0 MHWR -65S -400 400 -Watt MH, 45• Vertical Tilt 34,000 -Lumen Clear Lamp ul 400 CW PF 1 2 3 4 6 5 4 3 Mounting Footcandle Values for Height Isofootcandle Lines A B C D 2 20' 4.50 2.25 1.13 0.56 2S 2.88 1.44 0.72 0.36 1 30' 2.00 1.00 0.50 0.25 0 1 2 5 Options (add as suffix) EM /SC.Emergency Separate Circuit EM- Quartz Restrike (cold start with time delay) F1.Single Fuse (120, 277 or 347V) F2 -Double Fused (206, 240 or 480V) 023.3' of 12-3 Cord, Prewired (specify voltage) 042-2' of 14-3 Cord, Prewired (specify voltage) 043-3' of 14-3 Cord, Prewired (specify voltage) 0634' of 16-3 Cord, Prewired (specify voltage) PER -NEMA Twistlock Photocontrol Receptade Quartz Restrike DC Bayonet Base (Hot strike only) Sli • r 6x5 Trunnion 6x5 Trunnion 6x5 Yoke 6x5 Yoke 6x5 Trunnion 6x5 Sli • er 6x5 Footcandle Table p nduded WRWARRIOR Select mounting height and read across for footcandle values of each isofootcandle line. Distance in units of mounting heights. E 0.23 0.14 0.10 Accessories (order separately) 0A1014- Photoelectric Control, 120 Volt NEMA Type 0A1016- Photoelectric Control, 105-285 Volt NEMA Type OA1027.Photoelectric Control, 480 Volt NEMA Type 0Al201- Photoelectric Control, 347V NEMA Type PB -120- Button Photocontrol, 120V, Slipfitter Only PB,g/240.Button Photocontrol, 208/240V, Skp6eer Only PB-277- Button Photocontrol, 277V, Slipfitter Only PB- 347V- Phot000ntrol, 347V, Slipper Only OA1013- Shorting Cap TV/WR -Top Visor WG/WR -Wire Guard VG/WR.Vandal Shield FA5-2' Slipfitter For Trunnion Fixture RAB- Right Angle Pipe Bracket For Slipfitters .. For Trunnion NOTES: ' Not available in 175W. 200, 250, 320, 350 A 400W only (Limited lamp availability, consult factory).' 200. 250 & 400W only (Limited lamp availability. consult factory).' 277V only, not available with Q or EM. • Medium -base socket for Metal Halide 150W & lower.' Pulse start Metal Halide only.' Products also available In non -us voltages 0 5014t for international. • Mutt tap ballast 120/206R40/277V.' Triple-tap ballast 120/Z771347V. " S-Tap ballast 120/208R40/277/480V. 400W Metal Halide only. NOTE: Specifications and dimensions subject to change without notice. Visit our web site at www.cooperlighting.com Customer First Center 1121 Highway 74 South Peachtree City, GA 30269 770.486.4800 FAX 770.486.4801 ADH011937 DETAILS ORDERING INFORMATION ORDERING INFORMATION 'P" SERIES STEEL BRACKETS FOR WOOD POLES --HOT DIP GALVANIZED Catalog Number 'P125S020 P125S026 P125SO40 P125S060 P125S080 P200S020 P200S026 CATALOG B: Maximum Maximum Pipe Arm (A) Arm (B) Bracket Luminaire Luminaire Size (In.) Length (Ft.) Rise (Ft.) Net Wt (Lbs.) Net Wt (Lbs.) EPA 11/4 2.0 13 7 90 5.0 11/4 2.5 15 8 80 2.4 1 1/4 4.0 19 1 80 2.4 11/4 6.0 24 15 80 2,4 11/4 8.0 30 19 35 1.2 2 2.0 13 10 90 5.0 2 2.5 15 12 80 2.4 2 4.0 19 13 80 2.4 2 6.0 24 23 80 2.4 2 8.0 30 28 70 1.8 ng hardware not included. •S" SERIES SINGLE GUY ROD GALVANIZED STEEL BRACKETS 0 C=3 • Maximum Maximum Catalog Pipe Arm (A) Arm (B) Bracket Luminaire Luminaire Number Size (In.) Length (Ft) Rise (Ft.) Net Wt. (Lbs.) Net. Wt (Lbs.) EPA Single Guy Wire S125S060 1 1/4 6 24 20 80 2.4 S125S080 1 1/4 8 30 25 70 1.8 S125S100 1 1/4 10 35 30 50 1.5 Double Guy Wire D200S060 2 6 24 28 80 2.4 D200S080 2 8 30 36 80 2.4 0200S100 2 10 35 43 80 2.4 D200S120 2 12 40 50 80 2.4 NOTES: Mounting hardware not included. Available prime painted Consult your Cooper Lighting Representative. COOPER LIGHTING Woos 9D LE L 1 (1T 401 s C • Job ::MENDS, INC c 0 ( Cooper Lighting tt PZOOS(t0 ADH020034 BRACKETS AND ADAPTER WOOD POLES SPECIFICATIONS: HOUSING: ONE PIECE. DIE FORMED ALUMINUM CONSTRUCTION. ALUMINUM ODOR FRAME PROVIDED WITH SPRING LOADED HINGE AND A SPRING LOADED FASTENER FOR EASY ACCESS. OPTICS: SEMI - SPECULAR ALUMINUM REFLECTOR COMBINES WITH INJECTION MOLDED. PRISMATIC ACRYLIC LENS TO PROVIDE' SHIELDED WIDE ANGLE LIGHT DISTRIBUTION. 6A5KETIN6: CLOSED CELL EPOM 6ASKETIN5 COMPRESSED BETWEEN DOOR AND HOUSING SEALS OPTICAL CHAMBER. LAMP HOLDER: MOGUL BASE PORCELAIN WITH LAMP LOCKIN6 SHELL. LAMP: (BY.OTHERS) BALLAST: H.P.F. /C.W.A. AUTOTRANSFORMER. -20' STARTING TEMPERATURE. OPTION: CNP - CAST ALUMINUM CANOPY 1'X8'X10" 5C - HEAVY WALL ALUMINUM SURFACE COLLAR 2 FOR SURFACE CONDUIT. FOUR 7 /13" K.O.'S PROVIDED. -FINISH: POLYESTER POWDER COAT -STATE OF THE ART 20 P51 PRESSURE POWER WASH AT 140' TEMPERATURE INCORPORATES FOUR STEP IRON PHOSPHATE PROCESS TO CLEANSE AND PRETREAT THE METAL SURFACE FOR MAXIMUM PAINT ADHESION. ELECTROSTATICALLY APPLIED TEXTURED POLYESTER POWDER TOPCOAT 15 BAKED AT 400' TEMPERATURE FOR MAXIMUM HARDNESS AND EXTERIOR DURABILITY. Ci.VE- - :)JR t^ E ;. E v`:�i 'ti.LE {. CA. ;' WW NA/ . usattg co CHM -12 (175 WATT MAX.) is- 21' Sq e• j21/4. \&) ;-f= e" So F F 1 T 1 &II 11 Job: MENARDS, I1C eL US ° Architectural Lighting CHM 175MH 277 DBM LL • 1 Gila" DIA. K.O. (E) SUPPLIED \\\\\\ \\\\ \\\\\\ BACK SIDE 1"XB"X1 ' CAST ALUI INUM CANOPY [ CNP REQUIRED FOR COMBUSTIBLE CE1L.INE CHM E1-8 OPTICS OPTICS CLEAR PRISMATIC ACRYLIC CA ❑ CLEAR PRISMATIC POLYCARBONATE CP ORDERING INFORMATION WATTAGE TYPE VOLTAGE LAMP WATTAGE TYPE VOLTAGE ❑ 400 ❑ HPS 0 120 ❑ 250 0150 0100 ❑ 75 ❑ 70 ❑ MH ❑ 208 0200 ❑ MV ❑ 240 ❑ 480 ❑ MT f",;:_; 1 I,;1ldlllll INJECTION MOLDED PRISMATIC REFRACTOR. HINGED 6A5KETED DOOR FRAME. FINISH ()DARK BRONZE DBM IUM BRONZE MBM ❑BLACK BKM ❑WHITE WTM ❑SILVER SLM SEE PAGE 3 FOR ADDMONAL COLORS ■ OPTIONS OPTIONS ❑ #73 CRYSTAL TEMPERED GLASS TPG ❑ OPAL ACRYLIC DISH LENS OD ❑ SINGLE FUSE (120V. , 277V) SF ❑ DOUBLE FUSE (208V. , 240V) DF ❑ QUARTZ RESTRIKE QTZ ❑ SURFACE COLLAR 2 h /2 "X8 "X10" SC ❑ CANOPY CNP www.usa lg.corn W ArCE IIDUS - So FF L I 6-fT-S 'E LEGEND 31M11 L1213d0ad 331434 *Ma, NIVH3 1 3afl.lontlls ONIN3310 A3N . 3Ud 11VS'1Vl . I 31ddVilV l3 0NI213P 01.4 .3104 IVNZS. . 'DWARF D1JRNING RUSH' EUONYM US ALATUS COMPACTUS r 'LITTLE PRINCESS' JAPANESE SPIREA .. 1 331adS 3JIHA a3iNVldsNVai GRAsS 11 LE AS La N o 0 as Nd1 3zis es'y DNILSIX3 1088 iii 00 loot. cNlli • fi LEGEND 31M11 L1213d0ad 331434 *Ma, NIVH3 38nl3n2l1S 0N1N33I133 3afl.lontlls ONIN3310 A3N 3aru3rxus WHIR= PUN 3Nn 0043sw3 E%ISTDIG YARD LIGHTS EXISTING WALPAC LIGHTS NEW 4001 CUTOFF LUNINAIRE YARD LIGHTS NEV 400W CUTOFF LUNINAIRE MOUNTED ON DUILDING f NEW 175V SOFFIT LIGHTING I MOUNTED ON VAREHOUSE ' 3:N34 Now 1Horloan No I 031NflON Una Wm Nu A3N yy� 1 Y a ' I soNvHS3A0 , 1 a (a1fla' I 0' /A)..H11 MOP P3N 11 5' o O • .:. ti 3 W W U Z W L� Z 0 CY M Z V 0 W Z 0 H W W U Z� H Z W U 0 is xM a s31.vu vp , rn W 0-4 C 11 V - �n Z 0 W : W Q Zj tt I-- 3` X V W - Z =av CXX4ti—tai o¢�w Za •DUJOICtictO Z 3 CI 1 W 0 ~ 0 aL 1 � z �W ayig i* v wm - rra m�+4 octft W ue 0 Q D z 1— k N Iq RWP.MIrTI • MEMORANDUM RE: FILE NO: NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. 5775 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 555, St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Telephone: 952.595.9636 Facsimile: 95 planners @nacplanning.com TO: Eric Johnson FROM: Scott Richards DATE: September 4, 2003 798.11 As per the direction of the City Council and Planning Commission at their August 28, 2003 workshop, we have developed a proposal to change the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and Design Guidelines for the area now known as the Central Business District (CBD). This proposal outlines the general work program and number of hours required for each of the three steps in making the changes. The hours do not include the Planning Commission and City Council meetings required to discuss and approve the changes. Meetings or workshops for this project that are included under the monthly meeting retainer are already covered. Additional meetings or workshops that are not included in the retainer will be charged at the extra meeting rate of $200.00. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVISIONS Budget: Senior Planner 4 hours @ $76.50 /hour = $ 306.00 Planner /GIS Specialist 4 hours @ $38.50 /hour = $ 154.00 Secretarial 2 hours @ $30.00 /hour = $ 60.00 Sub -Total $ 520.00 Oak Park Heights — Central Business District: Comprehensive Plan, Rezoning, and Design Guidelines Proposal Tasks: • Revise /eliminate text in Land Use Plan section and Planning District 11. • Revise proposed Land Use Plan Map and Planning District 11 Map. • Draft resolutions for approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. ENCLOSURE 4 B-4, LIMITED GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT DESIGN GUIDELINES Tasks: • • Eliminate Central Business District Design Guidelines. • Incorporate selected CBD design guidelines into the general commercial design guidelines specific to the R -4 District. • Draft resolutions for approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. Budget: Senior Planner 10 hours @ $76.50 /hour = $ 765.00 Planner /GIS Specialist 6 hours © $38.50 /hour = $ 231.00 Secretarial 4 hours @ $30.00 /hour = $ 120.00 Sub -Total $1,116.00 REPLACE CBD WITH R-4, LIMITED GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT Tasks: • Draft new zoning district with a combination of B -2, General Business District and CBD permitted, conditional and accessory uses. No auto repair would be allowed. B -2 lot size, setbacks, and other performance standards would be included. • Revise zoning map. • Draft resolutions /ordinances for approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. Budget: Senior Planner 8 hours @ $76.50 /hour � = $ 612.00 Planner /GIS Specialist 4 hours @ $38.50 /hour = $ 154.00 Secretarial 2 hours @ $30.00 /hour = $ 60.00 Sub -Total $ 826.00 TOTAL $2,462.00 Expenses /Color Copies $ 238.00 GRAND TOTAL $2,700.00 The project would be completed with a not to exceed fee of $2,700.00. All final printing of the documents for distribution to the Planning Commission and City Council and for City copies will be billed separately at cost. If you have any questions about this proposal, please do not hesitate to call. 2 • • •