Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2003-04-22 CC Meeting Packet EnclosureMeeting Date April 22, 2003 Requester's Signature ,4t ; Oak Park Heights Request for Council Action Agenda Item Title WATE Enterprises, Inc. Concept and General Plan of Development Amendment and Site Plan Review -- 5670 Memorial Ave. N. Time Required 10 Minutes Agenda Placement New Business Originating Department /Requester Administration -- Judy Hoist a Action Requested Approval with Planning Commission Recommendations Background /Justification (Please indicate any previous action, financial implications including budget information and recommendations). Please be advised that the Planning Commission held a public hearing at their meeting April 1 0th to consider this request and voted to recommend approval of the concept and general plan of development amendment and site plan review with conditions as stated in the Recommending Resolution. Please refer to the enclosed resolution and attachments. Your April 10, 2003 planning packet contains the planner's report for this application. Please bring this report to the Council Meeting. and request; and RESOLUTION NO. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL THAT THE REQUEST BY WATE ENTERPRISES INC. FOR CONCEPT AND GENERAL PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT AND SITE PLAN REVIEW AT 5670 MEMORIAL AVENUE NORTH SHALL BE APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS WHEREAS, the City of Oak Park Heights has received a request from WATE Enterprises, Inc. for concept and general plan of development amendment and site plan review for a cold storage building at 5670 Memorial Avenue North; and after having conducted a public hearing relative thereto, the Planning Commission of Oak Park Heights recommended that the application be approved with conditions. The City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights makes the following findings of fact: 1. The real property affected by said application is legally described as follows, to wit: SEE ATTACHMENT A and 2. The applicant has submitted an application and supporting documentation to the Community Development Department consisting of the following items: SEE ATTACHMENT B 3. The site is zoned B -3, Highway Business and Warehousing District and is part of an approved planned unit development project of office and warehousing use; and 4. The City staff prepared a memorandum dated April 4, 2003 reviewing the 5. The memorandum dated April 4, 2003 recommended that additional information be provided before the Planning Commission take action on the request; and 6. The applicant provided information satisfactory to City staff, prior to the April 10, 2003 Planning Commission meeting, for the City staff to make a recommendation of approval with conditions; and 7. The Planning Commission held a public hearing at their April 10, 2003 meeting, took comments from the applicants and public, closed the public hearing, and recommended that the application be approved subject to conditions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVES THE FOLLOWING: A. The application submitted by WATE Enterprises, Inc. for concept and general plan of development amendment and site plan review for a cold storage building at 5670 Memorial Avenue North; and affecting the real property as follows: SEE ATTACHMENT A Be and the same as hereby approved by the City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall submit a revised plan indicating the percentage of buildable area and green space pursuant to Section 401.300.E of the Zoning Code prior to review by the City Council. 2. The applicant shall identify the location of snow storage within the site plan subject to review and approval of the City Engineer, 3 The applicant shall pay a tree replacement fee set by the City Arborist. 4 The landscaping plan shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Arb orist. 5. The drainage and grading plan shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. The wetland delineation information will be subject to the review of the City Engineer. If additional setbacks and/or buffer areas are required, the applicant shall submit revised plans subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 7 The applicant shall submit to the City a signed permit from the Brown's Creek Watershed District. 8. The utility plan shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. 9 The location and/or addition of fire hydrants shall be subject to the review and approval of the Fire Chief and/or building official. 2 10. All signage plans shall be subject to review and approval of City staff. 11. A Development Agreement shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Attorney. 12. A photometric lighting plan shall be submitted subject to review and approval of City staff. 13. Any other conditions of City staff, the Planning Commission, the Parks Commission, and the City Council. 2003. ATTEST: Approved by the City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights this 22 day of April Eric A. Johnson, City Administrator David B eaudet,Mayor 3 and request; and A RECOMMENDING RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT THE REQUEST BY WATE ENTERPRISES INC. FOR CONCEPT AND GENERAL PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT AND SITE PLAN REVIEW AT 5670 MEMORIAL AVENUE NORTH SHOULD BE APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS WHEREAS, the City of Oak Park Heights has received a request from WATE Enterprises, Inc. for concept and general plan of development amendment and site plan review for a cold storage building at 5670 Memorial Avenue North; and after having conducted a public hearing relative thereto, the Planning Commission of Oak Park Heights makes the following findings of fact: 1. The real property affected by said application is legally described as follows, to wit: SEE ATTACHMENT A and 2. The applicant has submitted an application and supporting documentation to the Community Development Department consisting of the following items: SEE ATTACILMENT B 3. The site is zoned B -3, Highway Business and Warehousing District and is part of an approved planned unit development project of office and warehousing use; and 4. The City staff' prepared a memorandum dated April 4, 2003 reviewing the 5. The memorandum dated April 4, 2003 recommended that additional information be provided before the Planning Commission take action on the request; and 6. The applicant provided information satisfactory to City staff, prior to the April 10, 2003 Planning Commission meeting, for the City staff to make a recommendation of approval with conditions; and 7. The Planning Commission held a public hearing at their April 10, 2003 meeting, took comments from the applicants and public, closed the public hearing, and made the following recommendation: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THE CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDS THE FOLLOWING: A. The application submitted by WATE Enterprises, Inc. for concept and general plan of development amendment and site plan review for a cold storage building at 5 670 Memorial Avenue North; and affecting the real property as follows: SEE ATTACHMENT A Be and the same as hereby recommended to the City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights for approval subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall submit a revised plan indicating the percentage of buildable area and green space pursuant to Section 401.300.G of the Zoning Code prior to review by the City Council. 2. The applicant shall identify the location of snow storage within the site plan subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 3. The applicant shall pay a tree replacement fee set by the City Arborist. 4 The landscaping plan shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Arborist. 5. The drainage and grading plan shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. 6. The wetland delineation information will be subject to the review of the City Engineer. If additional setbacks and/or buffer areas are required, the applicant shall submit revised plans subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 7 The applicant shall submit to the City a signed permit from the Brown's Creek Watershed District. 8. The utility plan shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. 9 The location and/or addition of fire hydrants shall be subject to the review and approval of the Fire Chief and/or building official. 10. All signage plans shall be subject to review and approval of City staff. 2 11. A Development Agreement shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Attorney. 12. A photometric lighting plan shall be submitted subject to review and approval of City staff 13. Any other conditions of City staff, the Planning Commission, the Parks Commission, and the City Council. Recommended on a 4 to 0 vote by the Planning Commission of the City of Oak Park Heights this 10 day of April 2003. ATTEST: ................. Judy ; 1st, A City Administrator 3 WATE PUD Concept and General Plan of Development Amendment, Site Plan Review — 5670 Memorial Avenue Concept and General Plan of Development Amendment and Site Plan Approval Subject to the Following Conditions: 1. The applicant shall submit a revised plan indicating the percentage of buildable area and green space pursuant to Section 401.300.G of the Zoning Code prior to review by the City Council. 2. The applicant shall identify the location of snow storage within the site plan subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 3. The applicant shall pay a tree replacement fee set by the City Arborist. 4. The landscaping plan shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Arborist. 5. The drainage and grading plan shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. 6. The wetland delineation information will be subject to the review of the City Engineer. If additional setbacks and/or buffer areas are required, the applicant shall submit revised plans subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. T The applicant shall submit to the City a signed permit from the Brown's Creek Watershed District . 3. The utility plan shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. 9. The location and/or addition of fire hydrants shall be subject to the review and approval of the Fire Chief and/or building official. 10. Alt signage plans shalt be subject to review and approval of City staff. 11. A Development Agreement shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Attorney. 12. A photometric lighting plan shall be submitted subject to review and approval of City staff. 13. Any other conditions of City staff, the Planning Commission, the Parks Commission, and the City Council. baoav7 F,oNrl6 310 .p kuS�3f 3f+ = Ifi� 6bLx b i LgB3:Xd� DOBt"1 9 (1.90) dLL &4 NW In.cile ogee 1,entrlirciatoD 6UIlV'i. +ate' I5 A r 3IS WI SNOIS!A2 0 i' H L b --1 $ 1 1 a J'il 11 Wil 08 filliON 3A V Wid01 0299 9NICI7IllG, O !`O1S VUOSSNNIN 'SIFIEN31001lid>IVO NY 1d 3!!5 71aIRA0103cd w ff7117Ci _ c- v.. mm . 8 0 t1: �t v . 7 , sue laesslaiYxlaar� � aiognxi�t �t! Ps3acss x�H 02/14/2003 15:14 FAX 551 484 2248 Fab-14-03 03 :3Tpm .From iking E a ttic RtSCRtrridN The i.umark Hammer's nne *piece die -cart halAdrsO provides smooth, c1@sn -iine sitsthettcswhite ensuring watcrticht Pretccticn af•tte cTeclrlQ5t c omponents‘. A computer - designed opt[aat . assembly delivers r4rpaa abirr photometrlas tr! fott• bay, fl i1 pattern?, for mm cclm[1m� } 9 �i�x1b1t1W U rL the for wat i, Catio n3. CSA oortlfled. APPLICATION Superior beam utilization and smooth dlstributia Parking the Hammer Want for areas. accts l'o dway$ and other general rfstraet art W&tex righting appthEtions. F/ r, .r p S7. C ;to P41 . catrErt LIGHTING �.s �s * 1 1mr L__- flOT DiMt1`'z$i[]NS +r-� 1 �ml SPECIFICATION rEA UREs GEYbA.1t'.1.' EL:C R1 .4 12 On TOOT • A—LtrAches URri Ida entry without has provide tap C Weetherwrasietant, ranappiece d#o,eestxtumtnum housing is finiehed in dark bronzo polyester powder coal ad standard. OritiOnal Colors avaiiabi!). . I. tGr tiyd1'Qfa mewl Arodixad aluminum ret1ggtor delivers rapeatxUia Type 411, 'tr�btarciona. Forward Thf 4 D.r.c a114Qt Die-art, daarritl pattiiister gasket tutisout external cot nLyy IVIATa.k ci Kai% rret:1" /to). .,.. W rLL e 1 B 1[a�remI C2 1Mrrl HAT MaONT ALLACT WALL MOUNT DRILLING 112 tam: Yp 9J l s" rvirt ij dig. he 1 t4} E ...C}o or RemoV4bl die-oast eturn1rtukdvo w3x firm ri tempered suss ions, F...$deket Magul -baSe porceisin.goticzt a� vo 1 'Metal H:11 9 ©r l4mpa- ROAM /able swtnclr down belesx assembly standard on arm mount Units, Optlonai hard mount avanab #e. Hard Mcnir i baTia> ossembiy stalidsrd bet trtternai *lipfittee optfon. ARM M - 0 UNT 1M fLUt4 MOW .7 4 mrrii N 7111" #!mTT3 47/8'` 1124rnmi ,111 Y ['term 411, Ntia �L 1N'1'L r -ZSr P.002/003 F-13e5 LU MARK uUZ 7 0 4 0 0 W HI g h Pr,Juc[re Sodium !Anta1 Hat ;tie A FMr1YtOX) AngAisITE tUG!HT 1ERGie DATA f iliwetar.swilarciriput Mitt W tiPSF tinsW.atml ,: OW IIPS liPIt IUD Wattr.) it taw >iPS (Ica Watts) itAWMH 11 OAS View) fi M input Wogs 1w HP'S HF VMS Waft? CNA B.631 Enput �tsttttc TIMM NTH H?V t2[a wartr1 low MPS HIT (232 Wativ) )ttW *1 s c284 Waist MOW MFt Hrg txae,Wats.1 1t 2 W NOM PIZ Watt low MP KW CMS Watui 411111W M['" ISPF tdd$ Wm/ ti Qf3W Ar1H HP1 foswatte .100w HP 3 Hrr ii8!rWidty} ,t�b�t0't��51i To Den Pastier Project Name: rna. Zlnti- Proposed Storage Building 5670 Memorial Avenue North Fran: John Smyth Re: Wetland Review and Recommendations Remark s: The .. . project of sponso h submitted bzxziated develop ` �• To accomplish this plans to dev a storage building is located on the has a retaining wall v is p along wetland proposed to ong with a parkin edge for p avoid direct f g area a No direct wetland fill a length o f app impacts to the nd driveways to act ill zm ppz'°ximatel wetland. Currentl ess the storag wetland delineatio • pacts are proposed as Y 60 feet. y the proposed canary the field and determined s part of this project. p posed retaining Y grass, swamp proposed as it to be accurate. As required by etlan Conservation panded portion of the mp nulkweed� ainerica ccuz'ate. the y the w e basin contained wetland is a deep d on Ac . ewed the yellow elxrz, common but marsh t w Y low water lily and p arch w a wet meadow we have reviewed The proposed retaining d Jes se s common dandelion, fring nge deminated axn lesser d uckweed. °n � camn�on burdock by does g 'mall will be adjacent ck and red retain • not have direct impact t as the wet d elder. The retaining proposed due to its location to the e Hand, it meadow portion of the vegetatio lion the is lzlCel e wetland in the I the getatiozz t provides g wetland Y there will be some station s p lot drainage ides co for along food ed ge. Indirect impacts impacts h °m on removal of x the u g will be od for wildlife as nipacts ao the wetly -� cts ao the wetland . enstwhile the upland be geta on t routed into a storm well as wetland will n der c recd le the adjacent u °te pond s fzltei'zzz I occur from recommended to z prior to discharge g for the adjacent m t er h v fi o f th minimize and rnl • upland is not direct to the jacent runoff. It adjacent mitigate the indirect directly regulated some and this t zs my understand " 1 • It is m t impacts the following °f Ovid indirect will mitigate the izig that Y un derstandin g allowing- be provided impacts caul filtering aspect of from the delineated g fz'a.rn discussions p vided by t h e d be mrnirn.rz ed. It is moved away tee wetland edge rather th project sponsor: Y from n the s aher then d • project sponsor that the Currently wetland boundary on the he retaining w all could be Y the planting as much as wetland beunda g moved been changed g plet shows seeding possible to rY• It is recommended led at least one d by �.�p�, and °f �DQ� Seed minimize tempor n that the retaining foot aw or the ntl he plate d xs now o e d Mix 25A s per and indirect restored � be extended to s called A at 3 Q lbs rest impacts to the g w all be and then how MNDOT Mix 25B per acre ad' weal seeded if disturbed. th e wetland area directly zn the 2 ��p adjacent to the storm and. The planting la - d. So dire DQ� rm and p n indicates that 3p me era ctl adjacent to the manual. p -his seed rung drill and Ibs per area sheltie be • retain' It is rev °zrzri�.en may be a little light if p acre will be included in the retaining Fall (Approximately that a note increase the rate the s i utilized for e bid tab to ppz'oxzmatel . ng to 40Ib s going r the seeding accomplish this seeding 6Q feet) as being • Currently th per acre to insure g t° be broadcast. grate. This s eedin ' planting schedule indicates adequate growth .�f broadcasting of seeding rate is typically g xf necessary. shrubs that can tolerate dzcates hand g the seed - � utilized lerate the conditions Red osier dogwood oil stabilization. d is going Y lazed for a seed dogwoods as well ens fo g od wil g ao occur it is r 1 as other shrubs and within the w I be planted in u r ecommended to mitigate same aft and tree et meadow plane locations. ans. Red aster zone include: he lost cover for s tolerant of wet '�'� eSpeciall tz da. Red as le wildlife rue and help conditions adjacent Y near the upland fall dogwoods l and would are wetland Maple, Green p and the retaining to the retaining fringe. ashy Fussy willow, wall g wall and Planting Red osier .ze plans are � an d S ilky do Some other id within the wetland to irico dogwood. species that could H extentpossible while � °rate the recommendations uld be planted in this and by still maintaining rnmendations of di Y fi lli ng it does not g What the o his memo the a wner needs for th b • e proposed environmental impacts � p permit. building will be minimized g site. Due to the nuni rogresslzintie Proposed Storage prefect not t ae BuiIdizxa directly irnpactzn @St1"p pr RCS @!7 @ ,4n ��ostier JS ^Wetlaltd Rer� g the derlik a w.do � s soCiates Paul Office: , Inc. a 'hest Highway Milwaukee �f Y 3 Office: 0 Rochester 651-636-4600 � 5 13 1 s36- Mequon, Mequon er Office: Q quon r Wl 5 3992 112 7 n Will Phone: Street NE ►aest►-o C 26 2 -241 mar Office: wwW bo 131 R ochester ►77 Fax: 262 -241_ ` , MN 55906 205 5th Street SW St. Cloud Office: 4997 Phone: 59 -282_ Willrr-mar, MN 56 3 721 23 Q Graysl fr� "— Fax: sn 7_,a ., 2109 pti�_ 201 .Stl'Pt�f C Client: Oak Park Heights File No: 55-03-000 Date: April 14, 2003 Bonestroo Rosene wit Anderlik & Associates Engineers & Architects