HomeMy WebLinkAbout2018-06-26 CC Meeting Packet Enclosure Oak Park Heights
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date June 26th 2018
Time Required: 5 Minutes
Agenda Item Title: Palmer Station-Developer Request for Extension&Consideration of
Rebid of Public Elements
Agenda Placement Old Business
Originating Department/Requesto c .•.stion Ci Administrator
/-
Requester's Signature //
Action Requested Discussion, ossible Action
Background/Justification(Please indicate if any previous action has been taken or if other public
bodies have advised):
PLEASE SEE THE ATTACHED MEMO Dated 6/19/18.
Page 57 of 146
of
t .
.
•
City of Oak Park Heights
14168 Oak Park Blvd. N•Box 2007.Oak Park Heights,MN 55082•Phone(651)4394439•Fax(651)439-0574
6-19-18
MEMO
TO: City Council Members
•
FROM: Eric Johnson, City Ad n'- • s
RE: Palmer Station-Upda for C/� rl on 6/26/18
At the May 22nd 2018 City Council meeti . : ='I ouncil received information from City Staff related to the
continued pursuit of the Palmer Station Devel• iment being that the Developer was not prepared to move
forward based on the costs of the received bids but that would in essence create another timeline extension.
There, the Council did reject the bids(at the request of the Developer)that were received and directed that
the Planning Commission hold a public hearing with the neighborhood so as to offer a forum to determine if
there are any new or unforeseen issues that have arisen since the project original approval in 2014 and which
received three extensions. The question at hand again was does the City allow another extension or require
a re-submission. (This was summarized in the enclosed memo dated 5/18/18)
As directed, the Planning Commission held the specified public hearing on 6/14/18 and the following is a
summary of the comments received:
1. Four residents spoke about continued concerns related to storm water and generally thought that
the Developer should re-submit a new plan.Similarly, residents felt that the site was not maintained
very well.
2. One resident further desired that the project simply move along as the site was becoming an eyesore.
3. The Planning Commission did discuss the comments and did review the City Staff notes(as above)
on the matter relating to the historical context,the past plan reviews related to utilities as well as the
current relationship with the Comprehensive Plan and Land Use requirements.
Ultimately, the Planning Commission concluded that a granting of a 60-day extension is reasonable, but not
longer—but should be contingent upon:
i. That the City Engineer first re-affirm and further darify their findings in which they
essentially find that the Project does propose a sound plan to address storm water
that will not result in impacts to the adjacent properties and that the City Engineer
shall also re-affirm that there is downstream capacity in the sanitary sewer as well.
fi have asked that the City Engineer provide this documentation for the Council and
is pending as of the date of writing this memo)
Page 58 of 146
ii. That the City implement further enforcement upon the site —to be sure it is better
maintained - prior to any construction beginning, as well as during and after.
At this time, the Council certainly has the legal authority to not provide an extension as the Developer has
exceeded their one-year deadlines and/or not complied with the terms of the last extension. Three previous
extensions have been granted. It would seem unreasonable to suggest the City has not been flexible with
the Developer to date. In fact, the City has even granted easements to the Developer connecting to Oak Park
Blvd.
Despite the lack of moving forward to date, requiring a re-submission may result in a very similar if not
identical project and the effort could largely be an administrative exercise. There are not materially new City
Codes or watershed rules that would appear to alter the site concepts as currently proposed. But,sometimes
re-engagement itself can be valuable when things are looked at with a fresh perspective, it is hard to say.
Finally, in either case the City, at the request and expense of the Developer, has re-bid the project with the
possibility that the City Council may authorize the project to move forward. If the Council believes that the
Developer can move forward without a re-submission, then the Council is asked to award the bid as outlined
in the City Engineer's letter dated 6/20/as enclosed. The City is now advised by the Developer that they
are now fully prepared to move forward with the new bids and sign any necessary documentation
and provide all necessary escrow funds/letters of credit.
So... a decision is required-generally:
1. Allow the Developer to move forward at this time—with a 60-day extension and Award on
the New Bid.
2. Require the Developer to submit a new application and Reject the new Bids.
Enclosures:
City Staff Memo to Council Dated 5/18/18
City Staff Memo to Planning Commission Dated 617/18—Includes Maps.
City Engineer Review—2014 Process—Dated 6/261/14
City Engineer—RE-Bid results Summary and Possible Award/Dated:6120/18
City Engineer Memo Dated Relating to Storm water. 22 1 8
Page 59 of 146
City Of Oak Park Hei hts
14168 Oak Park Blvd. N• Box 2007 Oak Park Heights, MN 55082• Phone (651)439-4439 • Fax(651V39-0574
5/18/18 -- MEMO
TO: Mayor and City Council members
FROM: Eric Johnson, City Administrator
RE: Palmer Station Update— Bid Rejection and 4th Extension
ISSUE #1
The owner/developer of the Palmer Station Development, Creative Homes is requesting that the City reject the bids received from
the recent process as they are beyond their anticipated budget The Low bid was $585,047 out of a total of three bids received.
These would be costs to the Developer for the required streets, water, sanitary and storm systems. The City should take a formal
action to reject any bids as received at this time. Staff would recommend the rejection of the bids. Bid Tab is enclosed.
ISSUE#2
A second issue is that the developer is requesting that the City rebid these elements in hopes of receiving a more favorable price.
However, this in-effect would be fourth project extension as the last extension granted by the City in January 2017 required that
the Developer was obligated to move forward after the receipt of the bids and its Immediate construction thereafter". This timing
and information was also relayed to the public.
Moving forward, rebidding of the project has no material economic effect on the City as these costs are those of the developer;
however, Staff would recommend considering that a communication be made to the neighborhood inviting them to a public hearing
on what is essentially a fourth project extension and to determine if there are any new issues or matters that have arisen since the
initial Council approval in 2014.
Reasonably, the City would be well within its rights to require the Developer to proceed through the development review process
again and re-open the project to public engagement, as the City has provided three extensions in the past. However, practically -
if the Developer resubmitted a similar package for the City's plan review process, it is likely that the outcome would be similar as
the land uses remain compatible with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning elements.
Accordingly. is sagaestino a middle.9r -begin a slmr allowonce of a fourth extension and an entirely newprocess
which Is: Hold a public hearing on June 12, 2018 and invite the neighborhood to comment on a fourth extension and see
if there are any new elements or concerns that have arisen;and, if there are, that these either be addressed immediately
by the Developer as deemed reasonable by the Council or perhaps — based on that feedback - the Council may then
determine to reject the fourth extension and require the developer to re-submit Its plans and under MN Stat 15.99 and the
City's review process.
Either way, Staff is suggesting some further public engagement before any extension is granted.
(Note: in the interim: The Developer has requested that the City Engineer issue the ra id package, which may include some
adjustments to sanitary sewer routing and construction, and the Developer has acknowledged that this re-bid cost is entirely at the
developer's own financial risk and does not circumvent any action that may take place as discussed above. This is a separate
track that may offer some faster tiering if#ti City allows are-bid or•a:further extension of some form. There is no financial cost or
risk to the City to perform this)
Page 60 of 146
City of Oak Park Heights
14168 Oak Park Blvd.N•Box 2007•Oak Park Heights,MN 55082•Phone(651)439-4439•Fax(651)439-0574
6.7.18
MEMO
TO: Planning Commissioners—6-14-18 Meeting
FROM: Eric Johnson,City Administrator
RE: Palmer Station—Extension Request
In 2014 the City was approached by the Property Owner(Creative Homes)of the above property to consider
the placement of 13 single family homes on the site generally known as the'Palmer Site".This is the 7+1-
acre site located at the southeast corner of Oakgreen Ave and 58th Street.At that time a number of public
hearings were held and while there were some concerns,the Project was viewed as generally favorable by
the neighborhood and was subsequently approved by the Council.
Since that time,the Developer has obviously not moved forward with their project and has continuously
sought extensions to their approvals,with three extensions being granted.In early 2017,the City informed
the Property Owner that if it did not complete the necessary steps to commence the project by October 318,,
2017—by executing the necessary Developer's Agreements and posting required financial securities AND
proceeding promptly with construction following any bidding that such approvals would lapse and the Council
would not consider any further extensions precipitating a new application.
The Developer did post such securities and the Project was bid for a Spring 2018 construction.But as we
see the Developer has not moved forward as they have indicated that the bids received for the public
elements(roads&utilities)exceeded their anticipated budget.The Developer has now sought to have these
rebid by the City with possible construction later this summer;but essentially is another extension with no
assurance as to when the project may proceed.
Considering the history,the City may certainly require the Developer to re-submit for a new full development
application under MN Stat.15.99 rules and is something the City Council is considering or it could simply
allow another extension. Prior to making such a decision the Council has directed that a Public meeting be
held with the neighborhood on Thursday,June 14th,2018 at 6:00 PM to take input on what is essentially a
fourth timeline extension for the Developer.This will be held at the Oak Park Heights City Hall with the
Planning Commission and notices were sent
The Planning Commission Is requested to:
1. Receive any commentary relative to the timelines noted above,and or any other comments
that it may deem relevant or reasonable about the Project.
2. Consider giving direction to the City Council if the City should allow a fourth extension OR
require the Developer resubmit the project in its entirety.
Page 61 of 146
Staff would note that the underlying zoning of the site has not changed (R-1), nor has the City's
comprehensive plan directing the land use as low-density residential which the Development remains in
compliance with. Theoretically, an entirely new application will need to be reviewed under the same zoning
codes and their guidance and may result in a very similar, if not identical Project. However, there could be
new concerns or other unknown issues that have arisen in the past 48 months that the City is unaware of.
Please note the City did allow a re-bidding of the project at the request and expense of the developer with
bids due on June 29th. If the Council allows an extension, it is possible the bids if received are favorable to
the Developer that the project may proceed. If the Council determines that new application is necessary then
these bids will be rejected in total regardless of their costs.
The enclosed maps generally show the approved layout which remains the only approved layout as
well as the Planned Land Use Map showing Low Density residential. On June 26m, 2018 the Council
will review any comments received will determine if a new development application is to be required
under MN Stat. 15.99 or if It will allow the re-bid to continue and allow construction under another
extension,presumably this summer.
Page 62 of 146
••• - .
. 1
- rt
, 1„ ., 1 111, Tit I t'
_ .. ..-t
... ....---__
_ ., 40 - - - _ __
........_ I ft .
, , •
--, c.
,.
_
4 0 **,-.....1.- - --i ..,:-. - .- , ./ .
.:. •444 , .
' ' ' '1',". - ' - — 14 •-, '• ., . - e 1 i i ;1 -Ok * '
..
' 4•
• -.- •
_If`. 4 , . ,,,% -4.
• .. N. ill.,,...
_
''.
i
t. .
-- --b- -is(
Low, ...
,..
- 1 .
, - Paltriet stte , .
I .111. • . ,
, f
v; * • p
. .
. .,. ._.. ..4i
- , ..x.
p
.
414, lk 0-t- - -
i - ' .., . ..
if ' . . • - , "4- -,,,i "- * ' '.- °L., " • - - ' . ,-„IL° _i :,_31, '.- - ,,v, . .I _ a - •-•, ..„. ,,f* -*- kett ,f ,---
-c•
,
t4
4411P -
„,. ,
*
.
4 1 . • i .N., .. 1
_. . „, , T. -..• ,
"N
‘..
___ , t., ..,,..;. .... .,. j. •
.- s los
- . a
, 1 -, ,
..,
.. 1i ailai /
•— mt i
•
.- t34t
4
aPt . ...&-
• toe,
7---43-1 1 --- Fei2t4witi . *1
abt _
. . , .
. %.' . ,. . km
1111UUlt ' ' ' I
.......... —,,...._ - -
-...........=
1 i vti 1.- ....-1,---'" --
_I 9 L 1%74••0 eta:p..0-o c 0 -.,.
4 *" .,0 0 0 C ille ,7,40 C•.)i . . . * 03 ---,,,. i ' ":,, ‘14:: __4.•••,--- is• 0 et
1 i
( - •
4 t 1
* , '
1 %
01
• •• A t -•
1• 111%
1 1
1
' . . ,/ Ike; •••• D ''' 1 11
... .........,_o' iriur it, 41 COY )
• ,,
•
• 1 \ \
• •
•
‘ \
• • 1 ,
‘ ,
\ 1, ii. , \
ti t.
\ \
%
t 1
..) a
..... ...#: '
•
i 1• 12 , 4 • ky; -..4,:‘.4PP . a, ok I , . • • .ff4.Lr.... , • ..
t.- -
2. . . • it fiP41 _ •
' 42:c i Ione eiriedi war%i ,,, I, _ , elo. 4, • M''' "M404,1114.1 1...k,:h.. . ..•.., ‘
N • lti -•110,44011as;!:. .„ ‘1.-4' 4 k 1 -; Nee %
.4,06-1, ill1111114:. 01.44,.. -t t i ••• ili. ... 112)
9C‘.0 1/00V‘
t -414141-4' 4/6 itii -' .... 4 -,11-Intior• 17-.., I. _..,
.... ..-
.‘ . ,4, , r:-.4"... __.it 6 ..., '''— • o A ic ° °.' .4 '\ ' 4 ° .0, -; ,- .
7 r
4:11 \ \
. ,
Ci •
X c) 0 • -' eta-
1 I
I , \ 0, \
A 6 „ \
• t ' I k.
I 4 i
r'S.,••%••• \ I, I. A
\\ I\
I
1 .) l I • I I
I ‘
C,
l 11,0 1 : : I
N •••'''')
I ; I„
1 5 • V
\ •
l c, 1 2 1 t--
•
•
r ;
3 '1
1 ‘4 %, •\ 1 • .)
-- • ii
I I 1 1
I i \ 4 \ \ --... 1
• S
I 1 i I
1 .110 : t I 1
I ,
Ili
11 .....e•
4
• , , . III ,c) 11,2:, ' 41110.•" ;1•4
i i• .a i j• • 'hit),0• es,.., " %k ° •`8°V11 I , el7:9P11
i
• t"
eel I ..._ t .,,_ ,..:014), 02`,•Oi- *I I • ..•Iv:,
.1 -, • di. _
0\ •
It alai
11 ALF'',4` lir
vonnim•ii414 .41INPIE• - 'CZ•,, ‘...0.1•0.
••••••„;
... / ,
T./.. .
. '
....
,_.........
... -----'' WOMEN
_T________,,AAVE" "11 ---. 0 immarasum
'-' 7.-----
Sikargniantangli" ' 11"12111111.211.1""6111441: CD-
Page 63 of 146
From Comp.Plan _i_'"
-..Land Use Map � "'" _ ,,�f_�
ti,
_3Low Density .ft ...... -;(iResidential ..�.., �, :Ss'., ,.... ,r...;.,....,..
/Ira.• ,_ , — - —.Mit
i.
C _ •
eli ..ur ull
1 , war-ii
III
N, i(-2ii, ..����`Arils
lir �inimit r ,.
aft wriirkklirmlw ,., , : . .
1-.11F., :�
:. � (n.—
:
EXHIBIT 2
Slanfec Consulting Services Mc.
2335 Highway 36 West
St.Pouf MN 55113
CIOTel:1651 j636-�tbOp
Stantec Fax:{651)636-1311
June 26, 2014
File:193800151
Attention: Eric Johnson
City of Oak Park Heights
14168 Oak Park Blvd. N
P.O. BOX 2007
Oak Park Heights,MN 55082
Reference: Palmer Station-Plan Review
Dear Eric,
We have reviewed the site Development plans for Palmer Station as submitted by
Creative Home Construction investments on May 14. 2014. Following are our comments
and/or recommendations.
Storm Water Construction Permit Comments(provide previously on June 6,2014):
As the development creates 1.24 acres of new impervious area, construction activities
wil be subject to the requirements of the MPCA NPDES Construction Permit.
• Per the Construction Permit, "Where a project's ultimate development replaces
vegetation and/or other pervious surfaces with one (1) or more acres of
cumulative impervious surface, the Perrnitee(s) must design the project so that the
water quality volume of one (1) inch of runoff from the new impervious surfaces
created by the project is retained on site."
o Rased on 1.24 acres of impervious area,4501 cf of volume must be
retained. This required volume is achieved in the larger infiltration basin
(6100 cf capacity).
• However, as shown in the City of Oak Park Heights Wellhead Protection Plan, Part
2, the project area is located in the City's High Vulnerability DWSMA (see attached
DWSMA Figure). Section IIID.l.j.vi. of the Construction Permit states "Infiltration is
prohibited when the infiltration system will be constructed in areas with a Drinking
Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA) as defined in Minn.R.4720.5100,subp.
13.,unless allowed by a local unit of government with a current MS4 permit.
Design wlth community in mind
Page 65 of 146
June 26,2014
Mr.Eric Johnson
Poae 2 of 4
o As the development area also falls within the Emergency Response Area
(approximately 1-year recharge time), the City will not allow for infiltration
on the project. (See attached ERA Figure)
• As infiltration will not be allowed, the City recommends that the plans be revised to
treat the required water quality volume of one inch over the impervious (4501 cf)
through filtration. Any filtration system should be designed based on the most
recent update of the MN Stormwoter Manual.
Sheet C1.2-Demolition Plan
1. Clearly label and identify all trees being removed as well as all site clearing areas.
2. For the installation of the sanitary sewer,full width removal of the street will be
required at the intersection of Oak Park Boulevard and Oakgreen Avenue North.
3. Remove and replace curb and gutter along Oak Park Boulevard per City standard
detail STR-31.
Sheet C3.1 -Grading Plan
1. Provide detail on the emergency overflow for Wetland 1. Is the overflow planned
to be to the north into the proposed infiltration basin?
2. Due to existing storm water drainage concerns to the south between the
properties of 5523 Oakgreen Place North and 5519 Oakgreen Place North, please
provide details on how the storm water overflows will be controlled.
a. The current proposed design of the emergency overflow from the
redevelopment site continues to the south, and the City is requiring the
installation of a storm sewer pipe between the properties to address a 100-
year storm event (see attachment for the general installation location of this
Pipe).
b. All easements for the properties to the south of the redevelopment need to
be identified on the plans.
c. As discussed in the stormwoter construction permit comments above. the
infiltration basins must be redesigned to filter the storm water.Therefore,the
infiltration basin identified to the north of Wetland 1 will require redesign and
may require a drain tile pipe and outlet.
3. The mill and overlay patch shown on Oak Park Boulevard needs to be shown for
the full width (end radii) of the proposed Oak Cove street.
Design with community in mind
Page 66 of 146
June 26,2014
Mr.Bic Johnson
Page 3 of 4
Sheet C3.5-Grading Details
1. Provide a geotechnical report with soil boring data.The proposed street typical
section will be reviewed after receiving this information.
Sheet C4.1-Utility Plan
1. It is typical City standard to install drain tile uphill of the catch basin low point
locations. Following storm water filtration revisions this detail and the remaining
storm sewer can be reviewed.
2. Sanitary sewer MH-2 needs to be located in the center of the roadway alignment,
while maintaining 10' separation between the new water main and sewer.
3. Water main shall be installed at a minimum cover of 8.5'.
4. Pipe materials:
a. Water Main:CL 52 DIP with polywrap
b. Storm Sewer: RCP
5. The connection to the water main on Oak Park Boulevard via wet tap is not
allowed.The new water main shall be connected with a sleeve and tee,and gate
valve to be located at the end radius of Oak Cove.
6. Standard hydrant and casting specifications will be provided and plan notes wit
need to be revised.
Sheet C5.1 -Preliminary Plat
1. Consider providing easement for future trail connection to the south of the
development.
General Comments
1. Additional standard details will be provided from the City.
2. Consider providing a sanitary sewer service to 5565 Oakgreen Avenue North.It has
been the intention of the City to provide service to this property upon the
redevelopment of the proposed Palmer Station site,as a grinder pump is currently
utilized to lift sewage to a higher elevation on 56*"Street North.
Design with community in mind
Page 67 of 146
June 26,2014
Mr.Bic Johnson
Page 4 of 4
If you have any questions or require further information please call me at (651)604-4808.
Regards,
STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC.
Christopher W. Long,P.E.
Attachments:STR-31;Sketch of Storm Sewer Connection to Oakgreen Place North
c. Andy Kegley,Julie Hultman-Oak Park Heights;Scott Richards-City Planner;Mark
Vierling-City Attorney;Kathy Widin-City Arborist;Brad Reifsteck, Rob Monk,Lucas Wier
Stantec.
Design with community in mind
Page 68 of 146
3 Stantec Stantec Consulting Services Inc.
2335 Highway 36 West,St.Paul MN 55113
June 20,2018
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Oak Park Heights
14168 Oak Park Boulevard
Oak Park Heights, MN 55082
Re: Palmer Station Street & Utility Improvements
Stantec Project No. 193804151
Re-Bid Results
Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council:
Bids were opened for the Palmer Station Street & Utility Improvements on June 13,2018.
Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Bid Tabulation for your information and file.Copies will also
be distributed to each Bidder once the Project has been awarded.
There was a total of 5 Bids.The following summarizes the results of the Bids received:
Contractor Total Ease Bid
Low Miller Excavating, Inc. $599,881.66
#2 A-1 Excavating, Inc. $658,039.00
#3 EJM Pipe Services, Inc. $675,128.42
#4 Dave Perkins Contracting, Inc. $763,913.00
#5 Meyer Contracting, Inc. $822,627.18
The low Bidder on the Project was Miller Excavating, Inc.with a Total Base Bid Amount of
$599,881.66.These Bids have been reviewed and found to be in order.
If the City Council wishes to award the Project to the low Bidder, then Miller Excavating, Inc.
should be awarded the Project based on the Total Base Bid Amount of$599,881.66.
Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC.
4_31/1 mez,v,.....,,,
Lee M.Mann, P.E.
Principal
lee.mann@stantec.com
(651) 604-4850
Enclosure
Design with community In mind
Page 69 of 146
CO �y� Protect Wm.PALMER MT=STREET a UITLITT 1NPRWBI61T8 10ve ero'Ny0560 NA Non and
.r7ta rgd s*Allav of Ms=deal
Ott'Pf0leti No: StarLtec PraJeC No.:199004151 . e,
30 Op ,
Opening:Wednesday,line 13,2018 et 10 A.M.,�T Omer.any of 008 Park*Wets 47/
.At97n45 Moser,PF
Manse M.46753
MiM,No.1 !adds Na,2 Eider No.3 Eider No.4
MID TABULATION 8600 Excavating,Inc. A-3
+1Nin ENS Pipe pa MrlInc Dave Partkw ContisMIng Inc.
Neel
Man 2090 Wills UV WI W$sa TOW( Ur*Price Ted LIME Prke Tony IIASI MkNN Orbe Total
PARTS-SANITARY EE11,191.
1 REMOVE SANITARY SEWER PIPE If 16 $10.00 $160.00 $10.00 $160.00 $33.00 M60.00 $S0.1X1
2 CONNECT TO MISTING SANITARY SEWER NM(CORE EA 1 $1,600.00 $1,600.00 $13,100,00 913,10103 $6400000 44 $8,500,0) $8,500.000
DRILL)
3 r PVC SWITARY SEWER PIPE-500 35(13-15 Dom) LF 786 $se.4 $45,58843 $4600 $36,156.00 $66.00 $51,876.00 $38,00 $29,8611.10
4 8'PVC SANITARY SEWER PIPE-SON 35(15-18'De) if 86 $55.00 $4,988.00 $13600 $13,656.00 $85.0 0470.00 $6.00 $5,500.03
5 8'DI SANITARY SEWER PIPE-CI.52(15-18'MEP] LE 20 $56,00 $1,16040 $154.00 $3,080.00 0100.03 $2,100.00 $16540 $3,303.00
6 4 DIAMETER SANITARY SEWER MN EA 7 $2,900.00 $20,300.00 $3,400.00 923,8444 $3,730.00 $19,250.00 $5,600.00 $39
7 SAMTAR'I!WAICLEOVERD®Rt IF 42.3 $190.00 $8,03710 $240.00 $10,152.00 $170.00 $7,191.00 $750.00 $
E OCNSTRUCTOITTSIDE DROP,ICL MASE E 79 5385.00 $3,04150 $350.40 $7.785.00 5750.00 $5,923.00 $900.00 $7,110.00
9 QDSED CIO=TV I4SPECTICN IF 592 $2.00 91,784.00 $100 9892.00 $303 $2,67640 $2.00 $2,784.00
10 IMPROVED PIPE P00NOATWN4 IF 892 $345 11.65020 $240 61,784.03 $0.01 $8,92 $500 67.136.00)
701211 PANT 1-4ANITARY SEWER $84908.70 5103,686.06 $157,756.92 $112,863.00
PART 2-WATER MAIM
11 COPBWCT TO 011311 0 WATER MAIN-CUT IR 1716 Eat 0 $450010 $6,500.03 $2,000.00 82.000.03 $17,005.00 $12.060.00 57,500.00 $7,50040
TER
12 CCIRE TTO 8X151143 WATER NREM-1215 WET TAP EA 1 $6,500.10 $6,502.00 15,000.00 $5,0130.00 $8,50040 $8,503.00 $5,800.00
1712.0?GI AND BOX
13 6'DIP WATER MAIN,(LASS 52,INCL TRACER WIRE LF 78 $S4g $4,290.0 $55.00 $4,290.00 $90.00 $7,00.00 $75.00 $5
AND 1551 80550
El 8'DW WATER MAIN,cuss 0,1NQ TRACER WIRE LF 550 $48.40 $31,200.00 $56.00 $36,100.0o $60.00 $39,003.00 $63.00 $10,
15 6'GATE VALVE 67I1801 FA 4 91,845.00 31,380.00 $1,27040 $5,000.00 $1,200.00 91,800.00 52,500.00 511,200.00
16 MUNI EA 9 0,160.00 $14380.00 94,50010 $13,500.03 $4.100.00 $12,300.00 $1,50500 $13,500.00
17 DUCTILE ICON FITTINGS 18 699 57.45 $5,2,1755 $10.00 $4990.03 $610 $4,543.50 $5.03 $3,495.00
18 ERTHO HYDRANT BARREL 1F 3 51,04510 $3,285.00 $76010 $2,29443 $1,40040 $3,003.0) $$50.00
19 IMPROVED PIPE FOUND/AVM $2.00 $700.4
TOTAL PART 2-WATER$4A5N lF 350 $1.85 $8LENA5 $74240.00 $0.01 $91,1670) f840 $93,645.60
PART 1-M5140$
70 3'04'PVC IIWS WYE,SCR 26 EA 13 $190.00 $2.47040 $16400 $2,40.00 $750.00 $3,25040 $66040 $e,
21 1'X6'PVC MWS WYE,SCR 26 EA 1 $22843 $22400 $21510 $21520 51,100.00 $1,200.00
21 4'PVC,
901 4 SANITARY
R SEWER
189155 PIPE,$4Q LF 550 $2640 $14,30040 $3920 $21160.00 00 $20.15480
$21.00 $11,550.30 f37A0
OX
23 4'PVC,50140 SANITARY SEWER SERVICE RISER PIPE 1F 6 $50.00 $340.' $39.03 $234.0 $1(5.00 $450.
14 6'PVC,501 40 SANITARY SEWER 175611E PIPE,ENO. IF 50 $3200 $1..''.. 5424 $2,10020
$as 4 $4,216.03
TRIV(HR WIRE AND TEST B0)( $66.00 $3.250.
25 1'COR6004AT100 STOP FA 13 $22$.00 52,925 $065.00 12,145.00 $310.00 $4,030.03 $75003 $9,750.00
26 0'QIT5 STOP AND BON EA 13 *4,0.7400 $340.00 $4,420.00
150.00
27 1•TYPE V'COPPER PIPE IF 550 $21.00 511,50.00 $73.900.00 $22.00 $12.100.00 $7510 $100 133.750.5
TOTAL PART 3-SERVICES $39,305.00 $43,154.00 044390.01 $63,300.00
PART 4-STORM SEWER
28 REMOVE FLARED BLD SECTION EA 1 $350.00 $35010 $300.00 $30044 $40040 $400.00 $230.30 $750.00
29 98407E CRC CJST7NG ANO ADAJS781EIT RINGS EA 1 $400.00 4400.00 $100.4 $100.00 $40400 $44400 $625.00 $62510
30 SALVAGE AND REINSTALL STORM SEWER,MO.AFRON LF 20 $45.00 $900,00 $5500 $1,100.00 $115.00 $7,30.00 $75.4 51.5440
31 COMER TOIXISTINO STORM SEWER STRUCTURE EA 1 51,54.00 $1,50040 $80020 $9343 $6,00440 $6,030.00 $1,20040 $1,24043
32 CCNNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEVER PIPE EA 1 $750.4 $750.00 $60040 $50400 $1,25400 $2,250.00 $65040 565440
vdrolluiis 0.,l. Br-1
Page 70 of 146
!Udder No.1 Bidder No.2 Itllr/1n 3 Bidder No.4
BID TABULATION 94$er EmrWo,Inc A-1 E36a4wtIng,Inc. EON Wye 5sMcr;Doc. Dew Pridr CitnT ratting Inc.
Don
Nem ben) Urdu Q$Y UeQ Prim Total Unit Prion Tsai Un!Price Tedi mat Moe TodH
33 12HDPE 51004 SEWER,DIRECTIONAL CRiIILED IF 416 $11400 $48,255.00 $102.00 $42,432.00 $98.00 $40768.06 $120.00 $49,920.00
34 1.2'POPE STORM SEWER,OPEN CUT(RESTRICTED LF 63 9100.00 $6,300.00 $85.00 $5,355.00 $05.00 $5,353.00 9175.00 $7,875.00
TREtiCH)
35 12'RCP STORM SEWER,a 5 IF 118 $38.00 $4,484.00 $48.00 $5,66.00 $55.00 $6,490.00 $4500 $6,310.00
36 15'RCP$70100 9191E14,a 5 LF 10 942.00 $420.01 $77.00 $770.00 $57.00 $570.00 05.00 1750.00
37 18'RCP STORM SEWER,a 5 LF 39 $44.00 $1,716.00 $81.00 0159.00 $80.00 $2,340.00 575.00 $7,925.00
38 ZT3 CATOI BASIN EA 2 91,90000 $3,800.00 $1,875.00 $3,750.00 $1,550.00 63,100.00 91,90400 53,80100
39 4'00AMET135 STORM SEWER MH OR COMM EA 5 0,610.00 03,000.00 0450.00 02,250.00 $2,05000 51425400 94,800.00 924,00000
40 S DIAMETB(STORM SEWER COOL AHC,5 SUMP EA 1 $3,00000 $3,500.0) $4,15000 $4,150.00 $3,350.00 X1,55400 $6,50).00 $6,500.00
41 4'DIAMETER STORM SEWER OUTIETTRROL EA 1
CO $3,900.00 $3,900.00 55,300.00 $5,300.00 $4,15400 $4,150.00 $6,600.00 $6,800.00
STRUCTURE
42 17 RCP FLARED 0040 SECTION,INCL TRASH GUARD EA 2 $920.00 $1,840.00 91,00.00 $2,800.00 $1,050.00 $2,106.00 $1,500.00 $3,000.00
43 18'RLP FLARED FIND SECTION,1444 TRASH GUARD EA1 $1,070.00 $1,070.00 $1,70050 91,700.00 91,2.9000 91,250.00 51.950.00 0,950.00
44 51555 III RIP RAP CY 10 9100.00 91,00050 $11050 $1.100.00 $11050 0100.00 $15050 $1.50050
45 CURE DRIL CONNECTION TC STRUCTURE(4' EA 4 $175.00 $700.00 $600.0 $2,400.00 $20)50 $800.00 $440.00 0000.00
ORAINTILE)
46 CORE MAL CONNECTION TO STRUCTURE(8' EA 1 $:90.00 $190.00 $900.00 $900.00 $75400 $250.00 $1,200.00 $,200.00
DRA1NTILE)
47 PARISH It INSTALL NEN 5TORE SEWER OWN EA1 9490.00 549550 $80050 000.00 $1,00000 9,0046 $80.00 585500
05
CASTING
TOTAL PART 4-STORM SAYER $64,671.00 $65,438.00 $93,422.00 $122.4$5.60
PART 6-WIREBgB
48 MOBILIZATION IS 1 623,50400 924500.00 534,950.00 936,950.00 915,000.00 915,00340 $35,000.00 $35,,•••.
49 TRAFFICCONTROL LS 1 $7,50400 $7,500.00 $14000.00 $10,000.00 $7,500.00 97,50050 57.500.00 93•••,•
50 5AWBNG BINMINOUS PAVEMENT LF 415 $235 $975.25 $250 9833.00 $4.00 $166460 $3.00 $1, •
51 REMOVE 110120O6]I3 PAVEMENT SY 1050 $2.00 010050 $3.00 0.150.00 $3.00 $3150.00 $5.00 $5-...
52 MILLBITW416U1 PAVEMENT(1.5'DEPTH)-2019 N 170 $220 937450 $4.00 $680.00 $3.00 $515.00 $10.00 $1,706,•
53 REMOVE CONCRETE PAVEMENT Wi TRUNCATED DOMES SY 4 $5401 $200.00 $50.00 $200.00 $5400 $200.00 $1050 $40."
•
54 REMOVE CONCRETE CLRB APO GUTTER,ALL TYPES IF 215 $5.01 $1,07550 $406 $1,29400 $5.00 $1,075.00 $3.0) $64550
55 SALVAGE AHD R 104515EL SIGN EA 3 $250.00 9750./30 $20050 $60400 05.00 $245.00 $150.00 $450.00
56 MARION EXCAVATION(EV)-STREET PATCHES CY 650 512.00 $10,200.00 $3550 $12,750.00 $14.00 $11,900.00 $2000 917...,,
57 SUBGRADE EiAVAT10N(EV) CY 120 $12.00 91,44056 $15.00 $1,80025 $14.00 $1,600.00 936.00 .,.,
58 UNMADE PREPMHATIDN 5Y 3540 $2.00 $7,080.00 $2.00 $7,083.03 $3.00 $10,62400 $2.00 $7,O...'
59 4'PVC PERFCRATED ORADI TILE,WITH 0CIARSE FILTER LF 125 $11.00 $1,37550 $16.00 92,000.00 $1250 $1,500.00 $36.00
AGGREGATE MO FILTER MAK
60 SELECT GRANULAR 80RRO V(MODIFIED) IN 2970 912.95 $3596156 $11.30 $33,581.00 $1350 $38,610.00 $1250 $54,644,•
61 AGGREGATE8ASE,CLASS s TN 2076 $22.06 945.54400 $185 00 0 $38,256. $22.00 $45,S90.00 $25.00 $51, , .
52 TYPE SP 12.5 NON'WFAR IG COURSE MIXTURE(2,0) TN 225 $9295 $20,91375 991.00 920,47550 $83.00 $240$50 $18050 $33,750••
63 BITUMINOUS WEDGE,0Na RH404AL IF 1310 080 $11,528.00 $9.00 $11,790.00 $8.00 $10,480.00 $550 $6y5,,•
64 TYPE SP 12.0804-91548542000955 MIXTURE(3,0)- TN 100 $99.75 $9,975.00 99900 $9,90050 $95.00 $9,500.00 $15400 $15,000,•
STREET PATCHES
id 8111114010US MATHtV.I TCR TACX CHAT GAL 210 92.00 94050 $400 $530.00 $2.00 $420.00 $5.00 $,''...
ES ADJUST MH RINGS AND CASTING TO WEAR COURSE EA 7 $450.03 $3,15000 $28050 $1,960.01 $750.00 $4,25051 9450.00 $3, •...
GRADE
67 TYPE SP 95 WEARING COURSE PERIRE(2.0)-2019 TN 215 $116.00 $24,940.130 $115.00 924,72550 $11400 $23,1290.00 $150.00 $32...'..
68 TYPE SP 95 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE(2,0)-TRAIL TN 60 $99.75 $5,905.00 $9950 95,94050 $95.00 55.700.00
;150.00 $9,,,.,.
69 TYPE SP 125 WEARING COURSE NOCTIRtE(3,0)- TN 150 $116.00 $17,40000 $115.00 $17,250.00 $11050 $16,500130 $110.00 $1..,•,,
STREET PATCHES
70 SAW AND SELL TRANSVERSE MINTS NTS 04 BITUMINOUS LF 600 $335 $2,010.00 $3.50 $2,10406 $4.00 $2,403.00 $6.00 A• ,
WEAR ODURSE
71 SURMOUNTABLE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER IF 1235 $15.65 $19,327.75 00.00 $20,995.00 $16.50 $2437750 $19.00 $23,466,•
72 8618 CC/CRETE CURB NC GUTTER IF 100 922.25 0,27550 $2150 010400 921.00
73 6624 CONCRETE CURB AND CURTER IF 65 $25.00 $1,625.00 $42.00 0,73000 $7250 $1,4$1M $$2,00 AIM
74 7'CONCRETE VALLEY GUTTER(6'WIDE) SF 500 $11.10 $6,55050 SILO) $40400 $1200 $6,000.00 $25.00 912,500.00
75 P CONCRETE PEDESTRIAN RAMP 5F 420 $9.15 $3,643.00 SIAM $7,56400 $10.00 $4,200.00 $850 $3,360.00
76 TRUNCATE)DOME SUNHCE SF 46 $61.02 0928.96 $57.0) $2,73400 $5650 $2,78400
$6050 0,680.00
111001151-oraerwm„ UT-2
Page 71 of 146
Maim No.1 Bidder No.2 Blddr Ivo.3 Hilder Na.4
Ben TABULATION Miler Extavaidnp,Inc. A-1 Evarapep,LIM. ON Pipe[endow Inc Dare Peddle Orrrnafnp Lac
Iter
!tae Item Delta QOp Ura[Price Total URN]POP TAM Unit Prim
T Unit Price TMC$
77 SMN wets SF 22 $8255 $1 B1S3O s16030 42,200.00 $60.00 S1920.06 $ 36 $770.00
7B STREET NAME BLADE MGMEA 1 4440.03 $443.00 $500.00 $58400 $300.0 $30100 $358.00 $350.50
79 r SOLID LINE,MUTE EPDXY LF 50 $6.3) $38830 $7.00 $350.00 $4.00 $24403 $103 $50.00
80 24*SCUD IDLE,WHITE MOM(SOP BAR) IF 55 $14.02 $770.00 $14.00 $770.00 $11.00 $605,00 $230 $118.50
81 4'DOUBLE SOLID 411.,Y81DW EPDXY IF 50 $1210 $81403
- SF 252
82 PAYMENT M 3 0 6(ROSSWALX BUMS $13.00 t7400 $53o 26030 $3.00 $150.00
!�(Y 51495 $3,74213 $15.00 $3,78030 $Sm $1,,26450 $5.00 $1,260.03
83 CULVERT!MET PROTECTION EA 3
04 CATCH 11440,1 BEET PROTECTION-BEFORE PAYIEG EA 9 $180.00 $1,82036 $160.00 ;44030 $150.00 $1041CO.00 $ 00 $4,35030
SS CATCH BA51)4 DIET PROTECTION-AFTER PAYING EA 9 $180.00 $1,620.00 $23400 $2,07030 $15400 $1,350.00 125400 $2,250.00
86 TEMPORARY ROCK TRuCT10N ENIRAM0 EA I
W16 $850.00 495030 $400.50 $400.00 $1,50030 $1,50400 $1,20400 $1,200.00
87 SI Ntt1 SWEEPER(WITH PILTOA BROOM) HR 20 $100.00 $7,100.51 $12000 $2,40400 5150.00 $3,000.00 $150.00 $3,00400
88 TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL(D15C-419O40RM1 SY 4300 $0.35 $1,505.00 $0.01 K330 $1.03 $4,303.03
MUICK HYOROPAILO0 OR EROSIDM CONTROL $2.03 $8.60403
MANKETT
B9 0901110,HHRH DSC5NCHORED 191101 AND SEED MIX SY 3450 $1.66 55,692.50 $6.50 $22475.00 $103 $3,450.00 $3,00 $10,3.5400
25.141
90 SEECMG,Bio EROSION CORROL 9ANXT AND SEM) SY 350 $2.10 $735.0 4850 $2,975.00 $240 $700.00 $2.00 $10400
MIX 25-141
91 SEEDING,TNQ KID R 0478.T1 AND SEM)MIX 25-151 5T 50) $490 $2,47133 4650 $3,25036 52.00 $1,000.0 $4.00 42,00400
TOTAL PApr 5•BTREET5 $297,306.81 $920,188.00 1281,451i41 $170,20000
BABE BID SUMMARY:
TOTAL PART 1-SANITARY EEWFA $88,308.70 $103,5115.00 $157,755.92
TOTAL PART 2-WATER MAIN ;81,390.05 $76,24400 $91,167.00 $$'93,6100
$93,6630
TOTAL PART 3-ST3RYUF5 $38,385.03 $53,154.00 441,330.00 S63,e0)m
TOTAL PART 4-010RM SHYER $94,571.00 495,43400 $93,423.00 $171,403.00
TOTAL PARTS-STREETS ,297,306.9) $329,630.00 $291,45150 537020%00i
TOTAL WE BIO $599,881.66 $818,139.00 $675,12832
$767,91]30
ContrsOto Nerne and AodreiM POW 8mW89,InC. A-1 EaMtBp Mc. E14 PNpe Sevk45,Mc. Dare Pandas Cantrauhp,Inc..
3741 gap:midi Tial 496 26th 314► 14461 take Or. 19745 Nowthee Blvd.NW
Stillwater,M4 53082 96 r ,WI 54724 Columbus.MN 55025 NOMNby MN 55300-905
Phone: 501439-1697 715358.4141 651-786-8041 763-427-0109
Emet ,.Pmi5eF6XC,com ssIhff1O(rZ0lexcaveti[ID.S.orp ---eimppe.con: - -
Slpiled By:Stephen SC QOM Tiny Pelle Mark MorM00rnry Rena Pedals
TIM Preadult Pristine Vie Assent Resident
Bid Security Bs Bond ON Mid Bid Bald Bid Bond
Response*Caaencmr Cetlimmn:Reed Reed Reed Reed
Addenda Adoaarledpad:Now 190ne None None
rada4redn+` 8T-3
Page 72 of 146
V Stant.c
Helm Ro.3
BID T UVU ATUOM FIN.r Oantradkm I .
Non
Na" Item UnTota!
BASE RID:
PARI 1-SANITARY SEWER
1 REMOVE SANITARY SEWER PIPE LF 16 $18.02 $288 •
2 CONNECT TO MISTING SANITARY SEWER MM(COPE EA 1 $1,470.25 $1,470.25
DRILL)
3 r PJC SANITARY SEWER PIPE-SDR 35(13-15'DEW) LF 786 $69.66 950,836.4
4 r PJC SANITARY SEWER PIPE-SDR 35(15-16 DEW) LF as $13033 $11,20338
5 r D1 SANITARY SEWER PIPE-CL 52(15.18 DEEP) LF 2D $124.03 $2,460.60
6 4'DIAMETER SANITARY SEWER NM EA 7 $4749,55 $33,248.96
7 SANITARY MAN101F OVERO6ATN LF 42.3 $38929 $16,466.97
8 CONSTRUCT OUTSIDE DROP,IAN BOISE LF 7.9 $4,81221 $38,016.46
9 CLOSED CIRCUIT TV INSPECTION LF 992 10.00 $2,676.00
10 INPR OVER PIPE FOUNDATION LF $92 $14.41 _853.7
TOTAL PART 1-SANITARY SEWER $169,348.13
PART 7-WATER NADI
11 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER FAIN-CUT IN 1206 EA 1 $8,606.87 $8,618
TEE
L2 CONNECT TO FOISTING WAT IR MAIN•1218 WET TAP EA 1 $4,54580 $4,545
mar ay AND BOX
13 6'DIP WATER NADA OAS6 CL 52,INTRACER WIDE LF 78 $66.16 $5,316.46
AND TEST BOXES (N
14 8'DIP WATER MAINAS INA 57, TRACER WIRE LF 650 $6086 $39,572
NA
15 6"GATE VALVE ABC0( EA 4 $1,804.72 $7,218.88
16 HYDRANT EA 3 $6,85080 $14552.41
17 DUCTILE MDR RUMS LB 699 $14.10 $9,8505..
18 EXTEND HYDRANT BARREL LF 3 $1,152.02 55,456.
19 DIMMED PTE HOUNDAT1ON LF 350 $14.41 65.041
TOTAL PART I-WATER MAIN $104,187.89
PART S-SWIMS
20 8914 PVC HW5 WYE,SDR 26 EA 13 $34582 $4,495
21 8'X6'PVC HWS WYE,50R 26 EA 1 $141.49 844
22 4'PVC,501 40 SANITARY SEWER SERVICE PIPE,INC.. LF 550 $44.67 $24,5685
SPAM WIRE MD TEST 8001
23 4'PVC,50140 SANITARY SEWER SERVICE RISER PIPE IF 6 $40.92 $MS
24 6'PVC,50140 SANITARY SEM SERVICE PIPE,1NQ LF 50 $39.70 $1,
TRAM WIRE AND TEST ICO(
25 1'CORPORATION STOP EA 13 $85736 $11,149
26 1'OHNE STOP AND ECK EA 13 $031.45 $8,
27 1'TYPE TC COPPER PIPE IF 550 $38.61
'TOTAL PART 3-89EV1 $72,323.20
PART4-STORM SEWER
28 REMOVE RAPED END SECTION PA I $354,05 $35025
B ROVE(841 CASTING AND AOR)STMEYAT RINGS EA 1
EM $118.31 $11831
30 SALVAGE AND REINSTALL STORM SEWER,IVO.APRON LF 20 $86.97 $1,779.40
31 CONNECT TO E)C6TINX;STORK SEWER STRUCTURE FA 1 $1,5i6.74 $1,58524
32 CONNECT TO EXOSTD)STORM SEWER PIPE EA1 $1,493.52 $1,49352
I>QD31441MfMin PT-'
Page 73 of 146
Misr No.8
RIO TABULATION Moyer Cootnuens,Inc
N01I
Num nen LIMN UNAPrlu Eclat
33 12'HOPE STCOM SEVER,DIRECTIONAL DRILLED IF 416 $118.18 $49,162.88
34 12'NIPS STOW SEVER,OPER CUT(RESTRICTED IF 63 $54.15 $3,411.5
TRENCH)
355 12'RCP STORM SEWER.0.5 U 118 $53.31 $6,29055
36 15'RCP STORM SEWER 0.5 IF 10 $10157 $1,015.•
37 18'RCP STM SEM;0.5 LF 39 $70.08 $2,733.12
36 250'CATO1 BASIL E6 2 $2,42551 $4,851.02
39 9'DIAMETER STO01 SEWER MH OR 0411 86 5 $3,771.73 $18,858.66
40 S DIAMETER SLOW SEWER X81,D4a.T SUMP EA 1 $6,15838 60,15835
41 4 MARVEL STORM 58606E DUI►ET CONTROL EA 1 $5,75739 $5,757.39
STRUCTURE
42 12'RCP EARED END 6EC1871,1NCL TRASH GUARD EA 2 $1,682.30 $3,364.60
43 15'RO RARE)END SECTA74,IMO.TRASH GUANO EA 1 $1,946.16 $1,946.16
44 0.095 III RIP PAP CY 10 $216.52 $2,165.20
45 CORE OMCDNNE LION TO STRUCTURE Cl' EA 4 51.276.12 $5,112.48
DRAWEE)
46 CORE DR11.COFl?85TTDN TO STRUCTURE(8' EA 1 $1,372.59 $1,37289
DRAINTOt)
47 Riwasrt a INSTALL NEW STORM SEWER 0941 EA 1 $758.55 $75855
CASTING
TOTAL PART 4-STOW SENOR $118,386.07
PARTS-516EEI6
48 14081117AT33N {5 1 $40,000.00 $40,...5.
99 'MARCCONTROL LS 1 $17,134.87 $17,134.$7
50 SAWING BTUMINOSA PAVEMENT IF 415 $4-12 $1,709
51 REMINE MTUMDNOUS PAVEMENT SY 1650 $4.25 $4,46250
52 NIL BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT(15'OElTH)-2019 SY 170 $2.00 $340.00
53 REM1OME CONCRETE PAVEMENT W7 TRUNCATED DOME5 SY 9 $2512 $100.48
54 REMOVE WNO11E CURB AND GUTTER,ALL TYPES LF 7..15 $5.31 $1,141.65
55 SALVAGE AND REDdTIYL SIGN EA 3 $195.00 $685.00
56 COMMON RECAVATION(ES)-STREET PATCHES CY 850 $25.81 $21,935 M
57 SU5GMDE ECCAVATEDN(EY) CY 120 $31.63 $3,795.
58 SUEGRACE PREPARATION SY 3540 $1.94 $6,867
59 T PVC PERFORATE)ORAM TILE,WITH COARSE FILTER IF 125 $26,18 $3,315 5'
AGGREGATE AND FILTER FABRIC
60 501107 GRANULAR BD98DW(NODh1®) IN 2970 $17.42 $51,737 '
51 AGGREGATE BSE,0.95 5 TN 2070 $22,15 $45,.
52 TYPE SP 12.3 110IPMEARING 000R5E MIXTURE(2,C) IN 225 $8861 $19,937.25
63 &TU)4INOIb WEDGE INCL RB9JVAL LF 1310 19.73 $12,74630
64 TYPE SP US NON-WEARING COURSE MIXTURE(3,0- TN 100 $95.11 55,51100
STREET PATCHES
65 OR UZ/U5 MAIERLLL NCR TAC X COAT GAL 210 $1.40 -.• fill
66 ADJUST NH RDIGS AND CASTING TO WEAR(IWRSE EA 7 $524.82 $3,673.74
GRADE
67 TYPE 995 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE(2,0)-2019 TN 215 $110.13 $23,677
68 TYPE 5P 95 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE(2,C)-TRAIL TN 60 $85.11 $5, 5..5
69 TYPE 9 125 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE(3,C)- TN 150 $110.13 $16,519 .
STREET PATCHES
70 SAW MD SEAL TRANSVERSE 30811514 9TUM940)5 LF 600 $4.10 $2,460..
WEAR COURSE
71 SURMOOUNTABLE WNOLETE CUR8 AND GJTTT9R LF 123$ $15.60 $1' .....
72 B6111 CONCRETE CRS AND GURIR LF 100 $1425 $ :•• '•
73 8629 OOMILT+FIE CURB AND GUTTER LF 65 $38.00 V.,...
74 T CONCRETE VALIEYGITIER(6'WIDE) SF 500 $980 ..
75 6'CONCRETE P80RE1RIAN RAMP SF 420 $15.55 $6,53 5•
76 TRUNCATED DOME SURFACE SF 48 $5280 - -5'
vsMw4.edn.sM. 1A.0
Page 74 of 146
Bidder No.I
BID TA8UTATIOM Mayor Contract.o.Inc.
Man
11UO1 Item Unita ..., Uat be Total
77 SIGN PANELS SF 2Moe 895.00 82,090.03
78 STREET 8831 BLADE SIMS EA1 8415.00 $475.00
79 4 SOLS LINE,TANTE EPDXY LF SO 85.50 8275 P,
80 24'SOLO)LIE,WHITE BOXY(STOP BAR) IF S5 SI25S $6e750
el 4'DOUBLE SOLID IDE,relax EPDXY IF 50 511.00 $550.00
82 PAVB80ff MESS88W.3'X 6'CROSSWALK BLOCKS- SF 252 $13.50 $3,402..
BOOTY
83 CULVERT MET PROTECTION EA 3 5635.95 $1,907.85
84 CATCH OWN IS.ET PR7TECTION-BL3T]RE PAVIG EA9 5195.86 51,762.7
85 GINAFTER
1O1 BASIN ET PROTECTICM- PAVDOG EA 9 $195.66 $1,762.7
56 1194,0 UAY ROCK CCPLSTRUCTTOl ENTRANCE EA 1 91,817.32 $1,817 •
87 STAN SWEEPER(WITH P1001P BROOM) DSR 20 $150.00 83,003,.
88 TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL(DISC-A11CfOR1D SY 4300 50.75 r i ,
MUL01,MVRCORPIP,00 EROSION ODNTROL
BLANNET)
89 SEEDING,DM DISCARD-10RED MULCH AND SEE)MTX IT 3450 $1.25 $1,31250
25-141
90 SES DCL 1342663•7 CONTROL BLANKET AND SEED SY 350 $250 8675.00
MIX 3-141
91 SEEDING,DEL IDDROMLLD1 MD S®MIX 25-151 SY 500 82.75 91,37500
ODTAL PART S-STREETS $358,295.89
MASS SRO SRMMARYO
TOTAL PART 1-SANITARY SEVER $169,348.13
TOTAL PARR 2-WATER MUM $104,167.9
TOTAL PART 3-SERVICES 87;326.20
TOTAL PART 4-STORM SEWER $118,356.07
TOTAL PART 5-SMITS 5356.298191
ram MARROW $522,827.11
Contractor Name and Adrnew Meyer DortraCip,Inc.
11000 93M Ave.K
Maple Croom PSI 95389
POMC 753.391-5932
Coma: v9 _. TDeYe000.com
Sped. Year Wimp
1115 PresMen 070
Rd Santa:MtlE t1$
Reparable Contractor cstylmtbn:Rend
Addenda AdnooIedg0:None
Nsl+onsl-e.etae6. 8T.
Page 75 of 146
Slantec Consulting Services Inc.
2335 Highway 36 West
Stantec St.Paul MN 55113
lr June 22,2018
File: 193800151
Attention: Mr.Eric Johnson,City Administrator
City of Oak Park Heights
14168 Oak Park Blvd. N., P.O. Box 2007
Oak Park Heights, MN 55082-2007
Reference: Palmer Station Storm Water Analysis
Dear Eric,
We have reviewed current the storm water system plans for the Palmer Station development, including both
the private and public elements. Our modeling analysis shows that the impact of the proposed storm water
systems to the existing downstream City storm sewer system is insignificant. As such, the analysis shows
that the proposed additions to the City's storm sewer system will not change any storm water issues that
may currently exist downstream of the Palmer Station Project.
In summary, the Palmer Station development's storm water system improvements, as proposed,
adequately address the runoff coming off the site and will not have an adverse impact on neighboring
properties.
If you have any questions or require further information, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Regards,
Stantec Consulting Services Inc.
Lee M. Mann, PE
City Engineer
Phone:651-604-4850
Lee.ma nn@stantec.com
c. file
Design with community in mind
Page 76 of 146