Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-08-2004 Planning Commission Meeting PacketEstimated Times 7:00 I. Call to Order: II. Approval of Agenda: III. Approve Minutes: A. March 11, 2004 (1) IV. Department I Commislion Liaison / Other Reports: A. Commission Liaison: B. Hwy. 36 Subcommittee: C. Other: CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA Thursday, April 8, 2004 - 7:00 PM 7:15 V. Visitors /Public Comment: This is an opportunity for the public to address the Commission with questions or concerns regarding items not on the agenda. Please limit comments to three minutes. VI. Public Hearings: A. Continued: East Oaks P.U.D. 2nd Addition: To consider requests for subdivision and p lanned unit development: concept plan to allow construction of two office buildings and one residential condominiums building, located south of 60 St. and East of Osgood Ave. N. (2) B. Shoppes of Oak Park Heights — Phase II: To consider requests for planned unit development: concept & general plan, conditional use permit and variance for Phase II development of Shoppes of Oak Park Heights for commercial, retail & restaurant use at Krueger Lane and 60 Street N. ( VII. New Business: VIII. Old Business: A. Ordinance Violation Enforcement Options Adjournment IX. Informational: A. Next May g Meetin : Ma 13, 2004 Regular Meeting @ 7:00 p.m. -- B. Council Representative: April -- Commissioner Oswald May -- Chair Dwyer Call To Order: - -Chair Dwyer called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Present: Vice Chair Runk and Commissioners Oswald. City Administrator Johnson, City Planner Richards and Commission Liaison McComber. Absent: Commissioners Liljegren and Powell. Approval of Agenda: Commissioner Runk, seconded by Commissioner Oswald, moved to approve the Agenda as amended, adding Denny Hecker (Routson Motors) to Old Business. Carried 3 -0. Approve Minutes: Chair Dwyer, seconded by Commissioner Runk, moved to approve the p Minutes of February 12, 2004 with clerical amendments. Carried 3 -0. Department /Commission Liaison Reports /Other Reports: A. Commission Liaison: None. B. Hwy. 36 Subcommittee: Commission Liaison McComber reported that there was a St. Croix river crossin g stakeholders meeting scheduled for 4:30 p.m. on May 4, 2004 at Stillwater City Hall. C. Other: None. Visitors /Public Comment: There were no visitors to the meeting other than those present for items upon the published Agenda. Public Hearings: A. East Oaks P.U.D. 2n Addition: To consider requests for subdivision and planned unit p development: concept plan to allow construction of two office buildings and one residential condominiums building, located south of 60th St. and East of Osgood Ave. N. (2) City Planner Richards reviewed the March 4, 2004 planning report, provided an issue analysis and recommended conditions for approval, should the Commission wish to recommend approval of the request. Chair Dwyer opened the hearing for comment and invited the applicant to speak. J eff Hause -River Valle y Rentals introduced himself as the applicant and addressed issues per the planning report. Mr. Hause stated that he could go with a flat roof and utilize some construction techniques to reduce the building height; however a reduction of a full story would not work because the developments viability is dependant upon it. He suggested that he could increase green space some by reducing the amount of excess parking and noted that the building exterior will be of hardy plank. As to landscaping, he stated that he felt there weren't any significant trees of issue but yp that he would connect with the Arborist on the trees and working to create a nice tree buffer from Hwy. 36. CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Thursday, March 11, 2004 ENCLOSI l l Chair Dwyer addressed the lack of green space and pointed that area use is obviously maximized and dense. City Planner Richards clarified that removal of parking, which is considered hard space, will not affect the green space calculations, as hard space is not used in the calculation. Planning Commission Minutes March11, 2004 Page2of4 ' introduced himself as working with Mr. Hause on the ) aie s DeBenedet — Steven En eers introd a market DeBenedet noted that the project is trying to achieve meeting development process. Mr. D d density is essential. To the per unit and that in order to do so, the propose ty need cost of $180,000 p menu for the buildings and of the er he inquired as to minimum square footage require City Planner q stated that they are open to decreasing building square to move lot lines • Mr. DeBenedet sta y possibility footage and taff on density lot lines and will work with City staff tY alleviating issues. He asked for g allow for a more attractive building design. • on on the building height requirement to all considerate g City remin • Commission that the original application for this development City Richards reminded the C e City Attorney that some verification from the e' ected as it was felt by both himself and th ty y the was rejected the access could be worked through in order for East Oaks Homeowner's Association that th Homeowner's that a letter was received from the East Oaks Homeo develo meet to proceed. He added th work with the P Nye, indicating that the Association was willing to Association President, Jonathan y � g agreement of any kind from the Association guaranteeing the applicant access. • letter was received. The letter was gr y applicant at the time the l not a binding e _ pP and that uti117in the existing J ff j jau se expressed that he had access to the west of the property g feels that he could go through the north entry and work it access was not mandatory. Mr. Hause fee g into the development. his concern about traffic implications at 60th St. N. Paul Leidel — 5860 Oxboro Ave. N. expressed his co the difficult. He is concerned about the loss of th d Osgood Ave. N. that he feels are already the an g existin tree buffer and sees no benefit t o association in sharing their private access with existing applicant. • should the application proceed to the general plan City Administrator Johnson pointed out that sho PP P f tri s City A d traffic analysis in the terms of trips would be required to provide a more detailed y stage, the applicant q ' 'son McComber added that if the private to and from the particular site. Commission Liar generated P e an access from the frontage road, he would road access is not used and the applicant wished to use from MnDOT for a curb cut at the access point. be required to obtain a p meetin held with the East Oaks residents and Ken Neumann — 5852 Oxboro Ave. N. discussed a g • mixed reaction was had as to increasing traffic on the area the applicant, last summer, where a mix . P the Commission to approve any setback variances. roadways. He discouraged th p • � SkN odu ced himself the owner of a business neighbor to P hie Baxbatsis —Club Tara 15021 60 . introduced what was site. He stated that he found no objection to East Oaks and the proposed development osed development site is a tough one, that it is not wanted to point out that the proposed g proposed and P attractive there would be a benefit to the rl part�.cula. y attractive now and that he felt that something area. . expressed her concern about sharing the private road and Angela Racine — 5902 Oxboro Ave. N. expresse e taller buildua • homes due to the loss of green space, trees and the g the loss of privacy to existii�.g ho lookin g down to their lower level units. trees were to be removed but that he expected all eff Haase stated that he wasn't sure how many tr and the build added that he felt that the changes to landscaping an g larger trees would be kept. He changes to Hwy. 36• g g wY would work as a better bu ffer for noise and so forth with the anticipated Planning Commission Minutes March11, 2004 Page 3 of 4 ' letter of agreement would ultimately be required City Administrator Johnson clarified that a specific left gr uld City perpetual term before anything could being place in some form of easement and or covenant for a peril be finalized with development approval. Marge Neumann — 5852 Oxboro Ave. N. expressed her concern about the easement and loss of ' neighborhood. Mrs. Neumann discussed how they are space on the roads for vehicles to the n g care and snow P how they used and particularly y are used by service vehicles such as lawn removal service providers. ' n President -- 5862 Oxboro Ave. N discussed a J onathan Nye, East Oaks Homeowner's Association y homeowners and the applicant regarding the proposed s ecial meeting held last August with the hom pp conditions p g work with the applicant and that certain conch Mr. Nye stated that they did agree to pp between project. y removed being replaced and the use of Pine trees b were discussed, such as any trees to be r g p consensus at the time at East Oaks. Mr. Nye pointed A and the north units a ointed out that general c� was that the Association would expect a return on anything taken away. • he felt the existing trees were pretty much scrub trees Personally speaking, Mr. Nye expressed that g . y p el be an improvement. As to the building versus tree He is concerned about losing and that any landscaping change would likely p the turn y a problem either way. buffer, he stated that he did not have p �' d his belief that the a licant would work with the association and that he around space and expresse pp him. also expected they would need to have some additional residents meetings with Richard Racine — 5902 Oxboro Ave. N. addressed her concerns a bout parking and the frontage road g absent nei hbor, who has voiced concerns about drainage. as well as spoke on behalf of an Brief discussion grading ensued as to ading and holding pond expansion. q e Neumann- 5852 Oxboro Ave. Marge inquires as to the use of the commercial buildings. ' ere for offices, including his construction business. J Jeff Hause stated that the commercial buildings :were site and the construction vehicles /equipment at the sit It was clarified that they could expect to not see he be granted use up gr likelihood of Mr. Hause picking p the maintenance of the private access should of it. Chair Dwyer, seconded by Vice Chair Runk, moved to close the public hearing. Carried 3-0. • need to bring the project into compliance for density, ec Commission discussion ensued as to the ne g p � hicles to • ern was ex ressed as to snow removal, storage, and service ve height and setbacks. Conc p the area as well as the matters of access and easement understandings. Chair Dwyer ex p ressed his • of the property doubts as to condominiums being the best use o p p ty but that he was encouraged by the Oaks residents to speak willingness of the East eak and work with the applicant. p Oswald moved to recommend continuance of the Vice Chair Runk, seconded by Commissioner � p public hearing i to April 8, 2004 at which time they wish to see the property redesigned so that it is in ' The also wish to receive information on the buffer compliance with density, height and setbacks. y applicant p n update on progress of easement /access issues between the pp between the properties and a p p gr and the Association. Carried 3 -0. New Business: None. Old Business A. Denny Motors): Discussion was had as to the ongoing lighting ordinance y Hecker (R outson Motors ) lation at the Denny ecker (Routson Motors) site. The Commission expressed that they vio y found discouraging and it discoura ' to see that enforcement wasn't working to bring the site into compliance. City Administrator Johnson informed the Commission that the conditional use permit was granted nted to Denny Hecker and that it was recorded unsigned, as they would not sign it. He stated that compliance ance with the ' ht shields was to be done in He added that Denny s p � . Hecker is in violation of their conditional use permit, that letters have been sent requesting compliance on a number of issues and that they were cited for the lighting violation though it was dismissed when they brought the canopy lighting into compliance. City Administrator J o � hnson expects that the conditional use permit violations will move into court proceedings Discussion sign age ssion was had as to the si a. a at the site and the use of flags to advertise used car sales. The flags are in violation of si gn a g e re q uirements. Denny Hecker has been notified in writing that the flags city s are a violation of ci ordinance requirements. Chair Dwyer inquired as to any other recourse to have things brought into compliance other than legal action. City Planner oth g g Richards stated that there really wasn't any other recourse unless they come in with another application when compliance can be required before granting of anything new. Chair Dwyer said he would like to see some teeth P ut into requirements for enforcement and asked that di scussion of ordinance violation enforcement options be placed on April Agenda under Old Business. Ci ty Administrator Johnson will check on the city's capacity to cite for ordinance violations. Informational: A. Next Meeting: April 8, 2004 -- 7:00 p.m. -- Regular Meeting B. Council Representative: March -- Vice Chair Runk April -- Commissioner Oswald Adjournment: Vice Chair Runk, seconded by Commissioner Oswald, moved to adjourn at 8:02 p.m. Carried 3 -0. Respectfully submitted, rrluuChl e A. Hultman Community Development Approved by the Planning Commission: Planning Commission Minutes March11, 2004 Page 4 of 4 ENCL 'SURE NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. 5775 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 555, St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Telephone: 952.595.9636 Facsimile: 952.595.9837 planners @nacplanning.com PLANNING REPORT TO: Eric Johnson FROM: Bob Kirmis / Scott Richards DATE: April 1, 2004 RE: Oak Park Heights - East Oaks PUD 2 nd Addition: PUD Concept Plan FILE NO: 798.02 -- 04.04 BACKGROUND River Valley Rentals, LLC is requesting approval of a mixed use, Planned Unit Development {PUD} Concept Plan for a development entitled East Oaks PUD 2nd Addition. The development includes a 32 unit residential condominium building, a 2,065 square foot office building and a 4,658 square foot office building. The site area is located east of Osgood Avenue and south of Highway 36. This request was continued from the March 11, 2004 Planning Commission meeting at which a number of outstanding issues were identified primarily in regard to setbacks, residential density and building height. Thus, revised plan submission attempts to address previously cited concerns. Attached for reference: Exhibit 1: Exhibit 2: Exhibit 3: Exhibit 4: Exhibit 5: ISSUES ANALYSIS Previous Site Plan Revised Site Plan Grading and Drainage Plan Condominium Building Elevations Office Building Elevations Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan designates the entire project area as commercial land use. Should this project move forward, the Comprehensive Plan land use map should be amended to address the residential land use if this project. Zoning. The northern portion of the subject property is zoned B -2 General Business while the southern portion is zoned R -B Residential /Business Transitional. Within such districts, a PUD is listed as a conditional use. The use of the PUD allows multiple buildingston one property with shared parking. The current zoning is consistent with the proposed project. Density. Section 401.15.C.3 of the Zoning Ordinance requires 2,500 square feet of lot area per multiple family unit. In the R -B District, apartment density bonuses are available to allow a maximum 20 percent reduction in square feet of lot area per unit for multiple family dwellings of ten units or more. Bonuses are granted for features such as type II construction, an elevator serving each floor, and one -half of the required free parking underground or within the principal structure. As a result of a reconfiguration /adjustment of the lot areas devoted to residential and commercial uses, the amount of lot area devoted to residential or common open space has been increased from 56,287 square feet (in the previous submission) to 67,744 square feet (see Use Detail diagrams on Exhibits 1 and 2). The basic requirement of 2,500 square feet of lot area per multiple family unit results in a maximum of 27 units being allowed. Provided the building is type II construction with an elevator and underground parking, up to 32 units are allowed. Thus, the proposed number of dwelling units is considered acceptable. Setbacks. The front of a lot is defined as that boundary abutting a public right -of -way having the least width. The roadway along the west boundary is a private road; therefore, the only boundary with frontage on a public road is the north boundary. The front yard setback requirement in the B -2 District is 40 feet. Like the previous submission, a setback of 25 feet is proposed. The Planning Commission should comment on this arrangement. The proposed setbacks may be allowed as part of the PUD and may be considered appropriate because the property will be fully developed with this project and the buildings will be set back over 60 feet from the pavement of 60 Street North. The project complies with the minimum side yard setback of ten feet on the east side of the property. Setback flexibility has however, been requested to allow a side setback of five feet, rather than ten feet, froth the west property line. Of particular concern with such setback is the adjacency of a 35 foot tall structure to the roadway surface. This issue should be subject to additional comment by the Planning Commission. The rear yard building setback has been increased from 21.3 feet to 30 feet in compliance with applicable ordinance requirements. Building Height. The maximum building height allowed in the R -B and B -2 Districts is 35 feet measured from the mean ground level to the midpoint of the roof. The height of the condominiums has been reduced from 36' -6" to 35 ". Such change has been 2 • accomplished via a change in the grade surrounding the building. Thus , the proposed height of the condominium building is considered acceptable. Landscaping and Tree Preservation. General tree cover is illustrated on the concept plan. A detailed tree inventory and landscape plan will be required with the general plan of development. As part of such plan submission, particular attention should be given to the screening of the swimming pool area from the adjacent private roadway. Grading, Drainage, and Utilities. As required, a grading and drainage plan has been submitted for review. In the initial submission, the applicant had requesting that part of a drainage and utility easement be vacated to allow construction of a swimming pool and retaining wall. While the proposed retaining wall remains on the revised plan submission, the swimming pool has been relocated to the west side of the site. The submitted grading and drainage plan should be subject to comment and recommendation by the City Engineer. The applicant is also proposing to add fill on top of an existing sanity sewer pipe. The applicant should provide information about this pipe's ability to accommodate the additional weight. The City Engineer should likewise provide comment on the acceptability of such action. 110 Exterior Building Materials. Proposed exterior materials are rock face C.M.U., cultured stone, and cement board siding and are consistent with ordinance requirements. While the submitted building elevations are considered generally acceptable, some question exists in regard to the elevations for the condominium building. It appears that the elevation labeled "north elevation" is actually the south elevation and the elevation labeled "south elevation" is actually the north elevation. This should be corrected. Parking. The parking area and associated access previously proposed in the southwest corner of the site have been eliminated. Additionally, the parking area in the northwest area of the site has been reconfigured to provide a loop -type circulation pattern. Such changes are considered positive. In regard to the off - street parking supply, at least 2 spaces are required per multiple family dwelling unit. Therefore, at least 64 parking stalls are required for the 32 -unit condominium building. With a supply of 67 stalls (35 of which are underground), this requirement has been satisfied. It should be noted however, that some question does exist in regard to the usability of the proposed row end stalls (due to a lack of backing area in the garage). This issue should be addressed as part of PUD development stage plan review. For the office buildings, 3 parking stalls plus one parking stall per 200 square feet of 410 floor area are required. Based upon the building areas indicated on the concept plan, 13 parking stalls are required for the smaller office building (2,065 x .9 / 200 sq. ft. + 3), 3 and 26 parking stalls are required for the larger office building (4,658 square feet x .9 / 200 + 3) resulting in a total off- street parking supply requirement of 39 stalls. With a supply of 40 stalls for the office building component, this requirement has been satisfied. In total, 103 off - street parking stalls are required on the site. The concept plan includes 107 stalls, 35 of which are underground. Condominium Trash Enclosure. The proposed trash handling area has been relocated from the center of the site (adjacent to the previous swimming pool location) to the extreme eastern boundary of the site. Such relocation is considered positive as the visually dominance of the enclosure will be significantly lessened. As part of the PUD general plan of development submission, the applicant should provide trash enclosure details. The trash enclosure materials should be consistent with the materials used on the condominium building. Lighting and Signage. With the general plan of development, the applicant should submit information related to lighting and signage. RECOMMENDATION The Comprehensive Plan designates this area as commercial, while the zoning separates the property into commercial and residential /business districts. If residential use is approved for the site, the Comprehensive Plan map will need to be revised to address the use. The applicant has addressed the majority of issues previously raised most notably in regard to building height and density. Issues related to setbacks and engineering issues do however remain. The Planning Commission should comment on the acceptability of the proposed setbacks and the possibility of providing flexibility through the PUD process. If the Planning Commission determines it is appropriate to move the project forward, approval of the PUD Concept Plan shall be subject to the following conditions: 1. The City's Land Use Plan be amended to accommodate the proposed residential use component of the project. 2. The applicant demonstrate eligibility for the residential density bonus. 3. The Planning Commission and City Council determine the acceptability of the proposed building setbacks. 4 • • 4. As part of the PUD development stage plan submissions, a detailed tree inventory and landscape plan be submitted. As part of the landscape plan submission, particular attention should be given to the screening of the swimming pool area from the adjacent private roadway. 5. Issues related to grading, drainage and utilities be subject to comment and recommendation by the City Engineer. 6. The labeling of the condominium building elevations be corrected. 7. The applicant address concerns over the usability of the row end parking stalls within the condominium building's underground parking garage. 8. As part of the PUD general plan of development submission, the applicant provide details of the trash enclosure. The enclosure materials shall be consistent with the materials used on the condominium building. 9. With the general plan of development, the applicant submit information related to lighting and signage. 5 • • to • 0 = 4: 5 n 0.4 1 IL MI >. Id8d P §; In • 0 0 a 0 Og f • v Ott4 Mg o m 0 v -on•� la a rp il s wv ? I W Nf P 1 z 1 >,I, 5ga NgT ii1 , ogC O O P A . r t i V � 1 11280 v ZR:" -! 0 4 $ R C N d 1 * g w 1 b b c a. o gs g cg Ng § I§ i P Y 8 ® gl e. r ( 7p b Q 8 2 9 6 P g g V 4 ._. - -• ti f 85 Z 0 • 45 r PIV r M N Q g kir g px BN & A 416" ELI ; • sA � 0 0 1 -0 V ?2 NN N il la I-pl.-. M C § **e r z GIN5II 0Z W11112$ v .. ii2i1 m 11 il Z Z 4 grx g ga M t 1 11 a 8 70 m -4 0 8.52 k D n g ig T a) A .a� N -� a o E o �P m m "i x C u Z n , ?o o x Z I •• a v '1 g V z 4;111 WON • I; I; It O 8 8 82 880 A t73�^iA3' 3 ! , Y I J „ a b/64( •. • • • 31V0 Y Vs:.a a€ : *. oad : is (.3jrall-to • ��m.V�- •.L..y �ti0 • Kos3NN V$ jo'31p1S 114i.'46 .sogri 3141 a3Odt6 2333NtON3 ::1VN015S33021d.03434 1O 2f=A1f10 • *NHt. oNV wistAtacins 103aJ0 An' ei3C1Nh 210 3W -- 0 03IYd38d SYhk ■V1d SIHL 1VHl; A LW30' A83a3H 1 . N11 . 'SiHD13N }ladd ?MVO • . • 'and SNVO 1Sd3 •V1d :DN10V89 1d33NO3 • - NQud18 %0 1.3HS • 6499,999(911.):01 • 6T99- 9909TL) 9;L02- 96fi(T9a) 1103! 91034 NISN0JSI11& '!1030!1H QV03i 21(O3 st»nAn 9991 • SNJ1S hhe U • r� 0 2 , • i t . 11 Ii OI � l si t 4 ;off 1 ,lil�lll�l�l� 1111C11n1111!lllli w i ?1;j' , w o ;j 4 ;=1, 11 11!1 w L II �1�IlLl��1 111111111111111111 i(( �i�t I i■wi RIO , 1[111111E1H SAI III1I(I ;tI ?� Ii11f 11Nilill f 'l r 1 P II1,01 1 111111111i1T1 III, [ ILllill11r Ell 1 3 Q C 0 � Nrn o 6 A mk z, tO sa m x x AA 2 Z. z CA X A O g 0 LO CO X W 0 m I Igo Si ON 1 d it II . 1 01111 ,1 1; 11111 Ill ''. 111i11111513Fila ' i iffillill111111111 i itti l l ELI , �► i I r j L ,J IH R. r� w a� 1 1% tag iffs Itli i1 ifl - U F 5 g a 0 3 II if IP AER 1 I • 0 z 0 21 CD 2 ENCLOSURE 3 NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. 5775 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 555, St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Telephone: 952.595.9636 Facsimile: 952.595.9837 planners@nacplanning.com PLANNING REPORT TO: Eric Johnson FROM: Scott Richards DATE: April 1, 2004 RE: Oak Park Heights -- The Shoppes of Oak Park Heights: Phase 2, Planned Unit Development -- Concept and General Plan FILE NO: 798.02 -- 04.02 BACKGROUND The Shoppes of Oak Park Heights, LLC has requested PUD concept and general plan approval to allow the construction of the second phase of the Shoppes of Oak Park pP Heights development on a 5.7 acre site south of 60 Street and west of Norell Avenue North. The subject site is directly north of the Kohl's Department Store and associated development that is currently under construction and constitutes the first phase of the overall development. The ro'ect would consist of a multi use restaurant pad, a retail building with multiple p 1 tenants, a tire store, and a single use restaurant pad. The total proposed building area is approximately 28,700 square feet and the site will include 300 parking stalls. In conjunction with the concept and general plan approval, the following additional approvals have been requested: • Conditional use permit for an automotive tire store in the B -2, General Business District. • Subdivision approval for a plat referred to as The Shoppes of Oak Park Heights 2" Addition. • Variance to allow additional signage than which is allowed under Section 401.15.G, signs of the Zoning Ordinance. A PUD plan t lan for this Phase 2 development was approved in July of 2003. That concept consisted of three restaurant pads and a bank. The plan submitted here is Exhibit 1: Exhibit 2: Exhibit 3: Exhibit 4: Exhibit 5: Exhibit 6: Exhibit 7: Exhibit 8: Exhibit 9: Exhibit 10: Exhibit 11: Exhibit 12: Exhibit 13: Exhibit 14: Exhibit 15: Exhibit 16: Exhibit 17: Exhibit 18: Exhibit 19: significantly different from the approved concept plan for the project. The applicant has applied for a new concept plan approval in conjunction with the general plan review. Attached for reference: ISSUES ANALYSIS Boundary and Topographic Survey Civil Site Plan Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan Utility Plan Landscape Plan Plat Sketch /Preliminary Plat Restaurant Building Elevation Plan Retail Building Elevation Plan Discount Tire Elevation Plan Ruby Tuesday's Elevation Plans (two sheets) Lighting Plan /Photometric Plan Lighting Fixture Specifications Overall Parking Count Plan Pylon Sign Plan Ruby Tuesday's Wall Sign Plan (two sheets) Discount Tire Sign Plan Letter from Project Engineer Memo from Jay Johnson, Public Works Director Memo from Kathy Widin, City Arborist Zoning. The subject site was rezoned to B -2, General Business District as part of the Phase 1 development. A PUD overlay is applied to the property to accommodate the phased development and to allow the multi lot shopping center with shared access and parking. Subdivision. To accommodate the proposed development, platting the property into four lots and one block is necessary. The lots are configured to allow for one of the four buildings and associated parking on each lot. Access and parking easements will be provided to allow for joint use of the parking and access by each business and to be shared with the Phase 1 portion of the development. The plat indicates a utility easement in the north /center portion of the plat. This accommodates the existing sewer lift station. The applicant has requested that a portion of the utility easement be provided a right -of- access easement to allow for completion of a section of the parking lot. In return, the Public Works Director has requested a larger utility easement to the east of the lift station for better access. The final plat and all required easements shall be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer, City Attorney and MnDOT. • Park Dedication. Park dedication requirements for the property were previously satisfied as part of the original Brackey Addition plat. Project Proposal. Of the four buildings in the project, two have committed owners. The building on the east side of the development (Building "D ") will be a Ruby Tuesday's restaurant. The building will be 5,780 square feet. Building "C" will be a 7,860 square foot Discount Tire location. The building will have three service bays. Building "B" is proposed as a 7,200 square foot retail building currently planned with six bays. Depending upon the potential tenant mix, some of the bays could be combined to provide larger retail tenant space. The restaurant building (Building "A ") is 7,820 square feet and is designed with four bays. Site Access. The primary access to the site will be from driveway accesses off of 60th Street and Krueger Lane. Many of the parking aisles will line up with the drive aisles within Phase 1 of the development. The City Engineer has indicated the need for two exiting lanes out of the development to 60 Street. The site plan will need to be revised to reflect this change. A MnDOT permit will be required for the 60 Street North access. Once a permit is issued, a copy should be forwarded to the City. Traffic Generation. A traffic analysis was provided in June of 2003 for the General Plan approval for Phase 1. The only intersection significantly affected by the development would be at Norell Avenue and 60 Street. The traffic analysis indicates that easterly traffic movements at that intersection would drop to level of service "F ". The analysis also provides alternatives to address that traffic issue. Highway 36 Improvements. The latest alternative from MnDOT for potential roadway improvements will significantly impact the Phase 2 development. The east bound off ramp for Highway 36 will access through the site. At least two of the buildings may need to be removed to accommodate this roadway. The other two buildings will remain with adequate parking and access. - Off- Street Parking. According to Section 401.15.F of the Zoning Ordinance, shopping centers must provide six parking spaces per each 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. As part of the Concept Plan approval for Phases 1 and 2 of the development, the Planning Commission and City Council agreed to vary that requirement and determine an appropriate ratio for the development. At a minimum, it was agreed that the retail standard of five spaces per 1,000 square foot should be maintained with the specific restaurant standards remaining applicable. As show in Exhibit 13 and below, a total of 1,077 parking spaces for the entire development is required. This requirement is based upon the standard of 1 stall per 40 square feet for restaurants. The parking requirements will allow for the restaurant 3 Site Use Gross Building Area (SF) 90% Building Area (SF) Required Parking Spaces (Ratio) Provided Parking Spaces Phase 1 Retail 156,260 140,634 703 (1/200 s.f.) 867 Phase 2 Retail 15,060 13,554 68 (1/200 s.f.) 300 Restaurant 13,600 12,240 306 (1/40 s.f.) TOTAL 184,920 166,428 1,077 1,167 space to be separated with a lesser standard of 1 stall per 80 square feet for the kitchen area. The retail standard of 1 stall per 200 square feet is utilized for the retail space. A breakdown of the required and provided parking spaces for both phases of the development is shown below. Phase 1 of the development provides 867 spaces and Phase 2 an additional 300 for a total of 1,167. There should be more than adequate parking within the development to support the retail and restaurant uses that are proposed. Overall, the design of the parking lots and how they relate to the access points is positive. The parking aisles of the second phase line up with those in the first phase. Twelve disability accessible stalls are provided in compliance with Minnesota Council on Disability standards. Grading and Drainage. As required, grading, drainage and erosion control plans have been submitted for review. The plans indicate a stormwater pond in the northwest corner of the site. This is consistent with the location designated for a stormwater pond in the City's Stormwater Management Plan. The grading, drainage and erosion control plans are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer and Browns Creek Watershed District. Utilities. The City Engineer and Public Works Director have indicated that the existing utilities can adequately serve the proposed development. The submitted utility plan should be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. Trails /Sidewalks. Trails presently exist on the south side of 60 Street and south side of 58 Street. There are no existing sidewalks along Norell Avenue or Krueger Lane. The proposed development includes a sidewalk in the front of the retail and two restaurant entrances. As part of the approvals for the General Plan of Phase 1, a sidewalk will be provided from 58 Street to 60 Street on Krueger Lane. A trail will 4 i also be constructed from 58 Street to 60 Street starting at Norell Avenue on the south and extending along the east edge of the Shoppes development. These trail /sidewalks were recommended by the Parks Commission in the overall review of the project. Loading Areas. There is adequate area near the service doors for each of the four buildings to provide for delivery unloading. There should be few traffic conflicts with delivery trucks except possibly during peak lunch and dinner hours for the restaurants. As a rule, restaurants will not take any type of deliveries during peak hours. Building Height. The B -2 District specifies a maximum building height of 35 feet. The buildin g elevations indicate building heights of 26 feet and lower, depending upon the store facade. Thus, the proposed building heights are considered acceptable. Architectural Appearance. The proposed development is subject to the City's Design Guidelines that apply to all new commercial development in the City. In regard to architecture, the Guidelines state that buildings should be designed for the site and relate to surroundin g buildings. Functionally speaking, the design of the building responds will to various site design parameters including the power line easement access limitations and site visibility. In regard to building design, the Guidelines state that "franchise architecture" (building design that is trademarked or identified with a particular chain or corporation) is prohibited. While the Ruby Tuesday and Discount Tire buildings are similar to other prototypes that are constructed throughout the country, their architecture and colors are not at odds with what is already found in the newer developments in Oak Park Heights. The color schemes and materials will all be similar throughout the development, while maintaining a reasonable amount of architectural difference to distinguish each of the buildings. The Guidelines also state that commercial uses must use at least three "Grade I" materials and must be composed of at least 65 percent of "Grade I" or Grade II" materials. The Guidelines state that "Grade I" materials include the following: • Brick • Glass (minimum 20 percent) • Natural stone • Masonry Stucco • Ceramic or terra cotta • Copper panels According to the submitted building elevations, the four structures are to be finished in a combination of brick, glass, EIFS (exterior insulating finishing system) and decorative work, all grade I materials. The Guidelines also require that at least 20 percent of the front building facade must be glass. All of the buildings will meet this requirement, the 5 buildings are all well articulated, and all facades that face the public right -of -way have an adequate variety in materials and architectural features. The Ruby Tuesday building is especially distinctive with the use of brick, stone and glass. The Discount Tire building could be improved with the use of glass /partial glass overhead doors on its east elevation. The solid overhead doors detract from the otherwise attractive facades. The Guidelines further state that the color of commercial building should blend with the architecture of the area. The proposed building is to be finished in various earth tone colors and is considered compatible with the area and the Phase 1 development. The applicant should provide color building elevations and building material samples for Planning Commission and City Council approval. Landscaping. As required by ordnance, a landscape plan has been submitted for review. The comments on the landscape plan have been provided by the City Arborist as found in Exhibit 19. The landscape plan is subject to review and approval by the City Arborist. The landscape plan (Exhibit 5) indicates a significant use of plantings with good variety and interest. The pond area, site edges, buildings and parking lots are all well addressed in the landscape plan. Trash Enclosures. Trash enclosures have been provided adjacent to the buildings for the three buildings other than Ruby Tuesday. The enclosures are of the same building materials and are architecturally incorporated into the structures. The trash enclosure for Ruby Tuesdays will be a stand along structure on the southeast corner of the building. The applicant will be required to submit details of the enclosure for City staff review and approval. Lighting. As required by Ordnance, a lighting plan has been submitted for review. According to the Ordinance, no light source or combination thereof may cast light on a public street that exceeds one footcandle meter reading as measured from the centerline of such street. Light standards are proposed to be dispersed throughout the off- street parking area while wall - mounted security lighting will be mounted on the buildings. The parking lot lighting will be the standard shoe box fixture with full cut off. The total height to the top of the fixture will be less than 25 feet. The applicant will need to provide specific detail on all of the lighting attached to the buildings. The Ruby Tuesday building will feature architectural lighting on its front to highlight the facades. The City Council can approve the architectural lighting if it finds that it will not violate the lighting provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. Staff does not see an issue with the decorative lighting. The photometric plan, found as Exhibit 11, is consistent with the Zoning Ordinance lighting standards. 6 Building B (Retail) Allowable Sign Area Sign Area Proposed Number of Signs Allowed Number of Signs Proposed 1 per tenant East Facade 300 sq.ft. 336 sq.ft. , 1 per tenant South Facade 180 sq.ft. 88 sq.ft. 1 for corner tenant 1 proposed _ West Facade None Proposed North Facade 180 sq.ft. 88 sq.ft. 1 for corner tenant 1 proposed Building A (Restaurants) Allowable Sign Area Sign Area Proposed Number of Signs Allowed Number of Signs Proposed East Facade 300 sq.ft. 240 sq.ft. 1 per tenant 1 per tenant South Facade 180 sq.ft. 48 sq.ft. 1 for corner tenant 1 proposed West Facade 300 sq.ft. 240 sq.ft. 1 per tenant 1 per tenant North Facade 180 sq.ft. 48 sq.ft. 1 for corner tenant 1 proposed Signage. Wall signage and a freestanding sign have been proposed for the development. The freestanding sign would be located at the northwest corner of the site near the intersection of Krueger Lane and 60 Street North. A freestanding sign was approved as part of the Phase 1 development. That sign will be located near the project entrance off of Norell Avenue. The second sign for Phase 2 will be identical to the first. The sign, as proposed, complies with the Zoning Ordinance sign requirements of a 20 foot height limitation and 100 square foot maximum of sign area. The sign base will be landscaped. For wall signs, the Ordinance allows a total sign area of up to 15 percent of a facade, not exceeding 300 square feet of total sign area. The calculations of allowable sign area and what is proposed for each building is as follows: The sign area and numbers proposed for this building are compliant with the Zoning Ordinance. The applicant will need to slightly reduce the sign area proposed for the east facade. Otherwise the sign plan is compatible with the Zoning Ordinance. 7 Building C (Discount Tire) Allowable Sign Area Sign Area Proposed Number of Signs Allowed Number of Signs Proposed I proposed East Facade 300 sq.ft. 98 sq.ft. 1 allowed South Facade _ None Proposed West Facade 300 sq.ft. 98 sq.ft. 1 allowed 1 proposed North Facade 234 sq.ft. 98 sq.ft. 2 allowed per building 1 proposed Building D (Ruby Tuesday) Allowable Sign Area . Sign Area Proposed Number of Signs Allowed Number of Signs Proposed 1 proposed East Facade 278 sq.ft. 132 sq.ft. 1 allowed South Facade None Proposed West Facade 300 sq.ft. 216 sq.ft. 1 allowed 3 proposed North Facade 120 sq.ft. 20 sq.ft. 2 allowed per building 1 proposed The applicant has requested consideration of a variance to consider the third sign for this building. All of the proposed sign areas are compliant with the Zoning Ordinance. While all of the sign areas proposed are in compliance with the Zoning Ordinance, the applicant is asking for six signs as opposed to the two that are allowable. A sign variance has been applied for to consider allowing the added signage. A review of the sign variance criteria is as follows. Sign Variance. The applicant has requested sign variances to allow one additional sign at Discount Tire and four additional signs for Ruby Tuesday. Section 401.15.G.16 of the Zoning Ordinance lists criteria for consideration of variances. The criteria are as follows: 1) That particular physical surrounding, shape, or topographical conditions of the specific parcel of land involved exist. 2) That the condition involved is unique to the particular parcel of land involved. 3) That the purpose of the variation is not based exclusively upon a desire to increase the value of income potential of the business involved. 4) That the alleged difficulty or hardship is caused by this Ordinance and has not been created by any persons presently having an interest in the parcel. 5) That the granting of the variation will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other land or improvements in the neighborhood. 8 6 That the proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or interfere with the function of the Police and Fire Departments of the City. The Planning Commission and City Council should consider the above listed criteria in determining whether a variance is justified. Both buildings are in-highly visible locations along the Highway 36 corridor. The City should be careful in granting variances from a relatively new Sign Ordinance unless the conditions are very unique to the site or business. If the Planning Commission is considering allowing a variance for one or more signs, it should be limited to permitting the 40 square foot awning sign on Ruby Tuesday on the west facade advertising the "To Go" door. This is a sign that is informational and would assist the customer. The other large wall "To Go" sign would not be justified. The additional sign for Discount Tire would not be necessary and is difficult to justify based upon the variance criteria. Discount Tire — Conditional Use Permit. The B -2 District of the Zoning Ordinance list auto repair minor, such as tire and battery stores, as a listed conditional use with conditions. The conditions from the Ordinance that are applicable to this request are as follows: 1) Sales and storage area is blacktopped or concrete surfaced and all paved areas are surrounded by concrete curbing. 2) The architectural appearance, scale, construction materials, and functional plan of the building and site shall not be dissimilar to the existing nearby commercial and residential buildings, and shall not cause impairment in property values, or constitute a blighting influence within a reasonable distance of the site. 3 All lighting shall be hooded and so directed that the light course shall not be visible from the public right -of -way or from neighboring residences and shall be in compliance with Section 401.15.B. of this Ordinance. All automobile repair activities shall be conducted within the principal structure and the doors to the service bays shall be kept closed except when vehicles are being moved in or out of the service areas. 5) Facilities on a site contiguous to any residential district shall not be operated between the hours of 10:00 PM and 6:00 AM unless otherwise allowed by formal action of the City Council. 6) Provisions are made to control and reduce noise in accordance with Section 401.14.8.11 of this Ordinance. 9 7 Vehicular access points shall create a minimum of conflict with through traffic movement, shall comply with Section 401.15.F of this Ordinance and shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer. The building as designed is an attractive addition to the overall Commercial Center. The applicant should consider the use of glass or partial glass doors for the east facade. Conditions will be placed upon the PUD /CUP approvals related to hours of operation, exterior storage, and keeping the service bay doors closed. The applicant will also need a Hazardous Waste Generators License from Washington County. CONCLUSION /RECOMMENDATION The proposed development is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the B -2 District zoning for this property. Based upon the preceding review, our office recommends approval of the following: • Planned Unit Development — Concept and General Plan of Approval, Shoppes of Oak Park Heights, Phase 2. • Conditional use permit for an automotive tire store in the B -2, General Business District. • Subdivision approval for a plat referred to as The Shoppes of Oak Park Heights 2" Addition. • Variance to allow additional signage than which is allowed under Section 401.15.G, signs of the Zoning Ordinance. With the following conditions: 1. The final plat and all required easements shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer, City Attorney and MnDOT. 2. The site plan shall be revised, subject to review and approval of the City Engineer, to incorporate two exiting lanes from the main access at 60 Street. 3. A MnDOT permit, for access to 60 Street, shall be forwarded to the City once received by the applicant. 4. The grading, drainage and erosion control plans are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer and Browns Creek Watershed District. 5. The utility plans are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 6. The Planning Commission should comment on the building architecture, materials selection and colors for conformance to the City's Design Guidelines. 10 410 7. The solid overhead service doors on the east facade of the Discount Tire building should be replaced with the use of glass /partial glass doors, subject to review and approval of the City staff. 8. The plan a lan shall be subject to review and approval of the City Arborist. nt shall submit a trash enclosure 9. The applicant plan for the Ruby Tuesday building, p subject to review and approval of City staff. 10. All lighting fixtures shall comply with Section 401.15.B.7 of the Zoning Ordinance g g related to type of fixture and allowable footcandles. 11 The Plannin g Commission and City Council should comment on the use of decorative architectural lighting for the Ruby Tuesday building. 12. The Planning City nnin Commission and Cit Council should comment on the request to allow one additional sign for Discount Tire and four additional signs for Ruby Tuesday. 13. All automobile repair activities shall be limited to within the principal structure and the doors to the service bays shall be kept closed except when vehicles are being moved in or out of service areas. 14. There shall be no exterior storage of automobile parts, parked cars, or related items on the site. All storage shall be internal to the building. Any cars to be stored outside of the building shall be in full working order. 15. All noise created from operations on the site shall be in conformance with Section 401.15.B.11 of the Zoning Ordinance. 16. The applicant shall receive and retain, if required, a Hazardous Waste Generators License from Washington County for the Discount Tire operation. : � CP V o ° • W S i z • . ID .7 i a ei.X w l t 0 a • ■ N 0) { C Nr sz'zs t 3Mez,£z o1v `930•'~ ,.. ••926 -• ! 0 J 1 80.76 •• --• .�.� S6'9£ EXISTING BUILDING .....f. «...r O a W 0 d In ££'09 3„ 9Z,£Z 0, to In N 0 0 t0 -394CZ o oON I I \ I I i 1 k 1 OD d•"•' r ./ I £t•Lbt 3 „C1,£Zo00N a) � f V 0 0 22 - =•�~- ........ ,,.. _..�.___ ,, 1....._. r.r�r....r.:.r....._..__.r...._ 209-9_2 0 ,�„” . . g .---_-:— ca � lila. 1 1 ct 0 ...' . ,,, 1 1 Li ci >40 Az 71Z 1 1 \ i Qi 0 L . i t f 0. (r / j . 1 ' S- n ,...- .:r. ;.-;� 2 - ......� r-Dr r g –W Nit q " Eo sem en t ( ► `, ''. ... .�.....�r.�.._...M ... �..,r,., .... '�. F— GKrE Y -•ADD 1(517T _ __.... _.. - • 0 Nr►t- war r � 171.90 0 01 M co z 0 C) = 0) ecl co co c ... fir // //.. t MP r W N to t0 M 0 L_ M�At �s • ma y .. • • 111"111 1• 6 .. KRUEGER LANE 10 NV 82C2'60 P1)02/80/CO 0 MP• I0dX3 10 \ OAP \IO'620tC002Vd 411 -I' to " i i o t ci) C a x ,15 rf • o g r Ci rg 4t4 V !-1 a ;Li ccs 0 1 w � 0 a 0 a a .ti hi il I 11, i C . v vs TO 5. C {� cu H � 4- K O 0 0 0.°' 0, • �Qozw' Q � V A a V KRUEGER LANE "Ti (4% 0 R.. ( 4. 4 r rt r PA20031029 .01\dwg\20031029.01SPP01.dwg 03/09/2004 09+2504 AM CST 1S3 WV E1.92'60 0002/80/E0 6MP' IOdO710 '62OIEOO2 \6MP \1O'6201E002 \id all.11111111111111•111111111 414111111110211M1111116. 40 '40 W 2 3 t. 018 tuiw o 0 ro t!i 111 { pi (D PA20031029.01 \dwg\20031029.01UTPOt.dwg 03/08/2004 09.27 AM CST z r r m. g. t w P awl. pit> ilt " 4 ti!L!• IIilii li 111. :I; !II 411 � I. 9 ft gy qi.ne� �° 1 4"1-14 I: !il ti 14 4:4 Pao WWI 1 : lit 11 1:1 itti ;!if - fill 0: 4 Iiiis It trat 2 .. g g • tf " 40 $ x l'il . a !!tpill It if la I.' 14 - 141 '4 4: I ". i � ! Ii " w E!l E. I . 11 14 ofi sk - . 0141 i 11 tg fi ! 44 R ril !ill 1 1 4 tif:if 1 ! w flit g °. i w i i7 w ! ° Nl "V . n t O' 11 11 ' il ill 1 t . 4 1 ° r ' iI p !! l JJ 1 ;1:111 Ralfillj.011 ". "I f 2 11 it "Wil af if ri glaTti t IL. 4.21e r s 3f O�r^a� p 8nM &3' 1 g fiat � i r� g t il IF.: i . g� li c ~1� �i : 1; flI "WI ifi 14 l $ tol rgv,p.i VI r ft. C f i'T irti. 11 a l 2 b :. 4 Z sl h rti [ 12 : '.11= litt.a :al! ix gs a :1 �soc $o flit 1 t; � o o!r ~~ c ° °�i+d 'J 3: w u$ as film i• •r i 5 qtg : !77; t 014 gi t i li ' I v 10 te gi 1.5 1 el s E - i 411 : i ; ' 3 c .li 1 : rid g O CS p d '4> wi w f 0. ov 43 IR ' Q C?4 rt to P 9 r Z 0 ig E w y h., ( i ) j 0 8 - c v O .Q ur 0 ' g P Q 3 0 L iji; Mfr. SRO �'fC?�f -� =P''f�P!►mti.�x kill [ k l l 0 i pi t 101- ��, �` .O � � � Ld s 5 11 a ,� t. A el 1 1, r p piq t C " .w N I ts A _ V i► A p flliq _ � i � r �' Y� g? 8. A .' 4. T q il a a� . • $ o a R i i wn t �t ; 1 0i a; • 1 gg 9 di 101 I.1 1 t 11! r1 g it g fit iI! M tij :1 I- I ii ° 0 § n ±.0 44 1 1 J1. KRUEGER LANE co • 1 1 10) I . 5 cr) m rn z H O i = fix Nm r t io 1 0 N A 1 • 3 . • Q _t1 _� XI f 2 1 (n to 8i M .1 rn s0 o 1 owl s) rz ca r.° a.w i. •w. as i * - ��_ 3 ? oa ,fixiispirce," - - - t_tetmezaGGiroftwo r_ ..*ItaiI► - -•- -'`""_ ►�' tip r .1, Wm!, fttiff 'Now- 1.11 0.1 *Tal lgt Otti Otte O o � / firANOwv - : „I ' 161i t4 1.1111 0" ,tar : Tom! r L- 1 3 NV (rt1I Er zariiiiirctalureinvivoat =Noel L _ _ 1 1 ti� 1 l I •L.° � 1,�6 � � Cn ` Q M t 1 c' w I. f1 1J- r _F 41.1N - Ogg' J 1 -. r f `. 1/4 7 - ` .- tLI- I" i ". ..- * - LI . ,. \ , :,., t ------,... J r , �' • N��: M /• • A r • I - t / E,• I • . I ::r ~I f e i cks \ -- f t • • fer4 ,= o 3N`cri oo3ne 1 • g 2 2 e r- M"RAN4 SSB� 0 N - 31 , . O - ! ' I J� 1J ' Ala§ Itt4 Aiiiiii ki Et a w� �w ii I i I 1.! 1.1 I 61 16 11111 of sit I 1.4 III gi 0 rimq Li gt lit . E, 3 " 1•.• x w MS MESE O b =r! 1Pl 4n 1r1 'r1 1c1 F i re, i i1 1 a ` w x 2 g 2 1 d ui111 O pt...0 .5 I • b o+ 1S7 $v 2V£0.11 *002/60/£0 6M1.10d1 d1(1620)E002\ 3 V Ga Va 0 E o /u- "J $ =�- OI'� M Orjei Pp* , etl&ET 0 -40 -.0 O O. RI ° , O 1D N 5 A I i 0 m x �� x RV a' 'ti m W i o:. w I cla A"43 —i IR: trig a) 0 1 .. o tv o g* 9 9 *s z 0 H 7d n 0 0 w 3 v Ls r .to IQ O) to / t / i / / b 1 {1 1 . (3 (�per O co i LA co tn qrsk;) r r1 • v • C' / 4" 4" co r w 61'91 ta O N0O ° 23'1 J "E 147.13 1♦ r t' oba :15 z T SA g i Q. pT. ° �f 4 ^' 1 .^ n i n • vv. 18 VIZ M„ so, 9s0 ION 9 NOO ° 23'28 "E 60.33 b NO0 °23'28 1" 36.95 . 1) - 11 n r o §4. o j o f r` co ft NO0 ° 23'241 "E 76.48 ' --- - -� -- 1 � ‘ \� \ at C C$ gt C 0 CO 'A c O . O • • V w O ` ` : v N 500 °23 _W % 1 I 76.52 ,J � r. { 2 ♦ `/A V' ` <y N00 °23'28'x' 152. 5 rrics) • 16.45 -d • � r k • ♦ I" (4 a' ` A ■ ` • P 44 • • i2 I �o y3 1� (II CO , § i O 14. 00 Z -" N4. ' -,. ii ,i 1v 4 Z o 1 a ka !;ll li ii i iiillill 1 1$ • I i• ae . w.. n....-w•. �.:. r:. e.. v..... n+.:. r-. �. +ta,...,.w...w..r.�wux:.w »ea.. wren. wver.. w+ e- ....ar...nw..a�w- new... � ..rw..nr. »wn.s......wn.w.�:.;.. spa..: a. xe...... w. w........ ............. n.. w.«....- s... >w.........n.....�.— .- .. «...... Y1C6 NNV4 'WHO )•!r►d WO I SVHd - SIHOBH )lEIVd )IVO dO SddOHS I 11 I! 1 , 1[ l } 11;11 1 , °1111 1 ", P.1 sill Ilmli 11ili mail! II 1,1�' ,, ��1 111 '111,1 i II kl1 frt - . fi Il' 'k 11 [n if ill r I H iililllill 11111111119 11 1;11 11 I` h'1 iM 1 111 d I 11; it, W tib Ilia ti 106 tr it,r , N i il I k + "1 j'3 I 1 1''.1 }li l Il�ili� ] ..,1,4,E 4' IIII •lf hl C . .1 I'z :'il'd 1:11i i wpm II I.11! , 1.UG1:I1 1 .-'=,Dill E iii ii 1-• MINO I1-I 1c ill Il Ve 1 I1'� fi! 1,11{, 1 li er.4 i ■[I -- i[ —1 I I •.- =IN ill '.: C r , 1 m. IN ot — 4111ilil r 1 � N. imili E I —I ,....— il• il: iY y: i11 11 Isll!1i111 1, i ,,,11111ik i lI i fs III F.C. i , � la IP • � 1-41-1: I X1 l'1J�111i�11111i11'1111" �i a`1li'i 11 u�' li 111111111 ;mu min II i'1} ik`lllr 11 !silk;! l dl k ,11 I} • 4 CD r : r ) I e Si a . omcnrs myawi i i !us ilwil i �l II! III' i } .11 Ill, 'r plL I ll% iI` I i i' I ICJ f il' min i 1111 imil I l, i61J 'u I 1 jl [ 1 , �rarr■ ldi I111��1I91 11 111 Isllll �i l �ll�ll} I 11 '! i 11,,l 11 l l F11T, }1111 illill�1111 s i1 IIIoI a } 1I]I1'r1G1'�''i; I ll!i ''� 1111 o' � I q Cu • CD 1- V . 10W...W _ , 1 1 j r.S .1 -1-- 1 1 1 4 . g P . 1 _ 1 .r,It - ac ' .�-,►' .pt ;L. - , n 1 _ 0 _ _- I It - • . . A'S mit i _ - _._ �1 � 1 ,__,.., _ , 1 1 M ' 1 )11 . 3 n = vt Mini 1 111111M1 I 1 1 - - , ....‘,111,11 a ka !;ll li ii i iiillill 1 1$ • I i• ae . w.. n....-w•. �.:. r:. e.. v..... n+.:. r-. �. +ta,...,.w...w..r.�wux:.w »ea.. wren. wver.. w+ e- ....ar...nw..a�w- new... � ..rw..nr. »wn.s......wn.w.�:.;.. spa..: a. xe...... w. w........ ............. n.. w.«....- s... >w.........n.....�.— .- .. «...... Y1C6 NNV4 'WHO )•!r►d WO I SVHd - SIHOBH )lEIVd )IVO dO SddOHS I 11 I! 1 , 1[ l } 11;11 1 , °1111 1 ", P.1 sill Ilmli 11ili mail! II 1,1�' ,, ��1 111 '111,1 i II kl1 frt - . fi Il' 'k 11 [n if ill r I H iililllill 11111111119 11 1;11 11 I` h'1 iM 1 111 d I 11; it, W tib Ilia ti 106 tr it,r , N i il I k + "1 j'3 I 1 1''.1 }li l Il�ili� ] ..,1,4,E 4' IIII •lf hl C . .1 I'z :'il'd 1:11i i wpm II I.11! , 1.UG1:I1 1 .-'=,Dill E iii ii 1-• MINO I1-I 1c ill Il Ve 1 I1'� fi! 1,11{, 1 li er.4 i ■[I -- i[ —1 I I •.- =IN ill '.: C r , 1 m. IN ot — 4111ilil r 1 � N. imili E I —I ,....— il• il: iY y: i11 11 Isll!1i111 1, i ,,,11111ik i lI i fs III F.C. i , � la IP • � 1-41-1: I X1 l'1J�111i�11111i11'1111" �i a`1li'i 11 u�' li 111111111 ;mu min II i'1} ik`lllr 11 !silk;! l dl k ,11 I} • 4 CD r : r ) I e Si a . omcnrs myawi i i !us ilwil i �l II! III' i } .11 Ill, 'r plL I ll% iI` I i i' I ICJ f il' min i 1111 imil I l, i61J 'u I 1 jl [ 1 , �rarr■ ldi I111��1I91 11 111 Isllll �i l �ll�ll} I 11 '! i 11,,l 11 l l F11T, }1111 illill�1111 s i1 IIIoI a } 1I]I1'r1G1'�''i; I ll!i ''� 1111 o' � I q Cu • CD 1- CO • iiin Hun I' 111 111111 1111 1ill J,11 1[ [l I !11111111 M1111111111 1111 II III III IL Hi H Il I I I rri • . I I i - 65 1 1.1 -1 1 HI iHI 111111 111111 1111 I 1 1 1,11 ti "'" -- NEW nETAL. BUILDING IG PANNINIOTA ;ill I SHOPPES OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS - PHASE 2 1 OAK PAC HEIGHTS. • itstii*M.421‘1° 411111111i I I a1J N Iv • 111 111 101 1 3 a cgs • iii OMB 1111111111111111 11 11111 '' 1111111111 11111 •; t di! •••■••■• whi(garca.mvaltemer - - iiiiMP11111111111.1111111 Ki ..F7: •=1.4li, 1 °Il liiglii'Lli/iiii1C11110ilill'sil CI 11111!!!IIIIIIii:11111-1, 1 il! ii Pi I A: iii! Ii I A !ill IV 1 l i lallliri S li 1 1111 - "I ; 1, :-; 1 r; ill ' I i•t . • ii 1 1 l i .• a, 1 31 il 21 . it. Pi = = .. = "ii P. ii:111'1' 11 31 1 ?E : 'I: 11131 1111 :=. 4 , : : I . l i 1 31 1 i t I ; 1 " ,t il I 1111 FIV EE d 1 11 ! ii : 1 : 11111'111 1 11 ll NIV. sr i i 11 i 1 i l II 31 i': r.!! 11 , 1 4- - 2 4 !, II Ai " lierk I 3 ; Align MI I4 111111111111111111111111 1 1 1".= dig? ;W is 1=1 .1,11 I. .1311-inii -.s :1 il• • . I! 12 i g 1 1 1 0 P cil iV N T I 1 10 1'0 0 11 11111111 I:1111111 11 111111111 111 IJlIIIIIJIIIIIIjlIlIjIIlUJIJJJJIIIJiJ • • . .. v • 111 111 1111 111 ujwww 1 6111111a ■■•■■■■i■lrr EXTERIO ELEVATIONS IcilliTiliiiv,Ilii1141 , - 1�� 1; TIt�,' ��t��r� IIIIII 111 .J II b ill fLI � I � I!L,I)! 1IAJ1�I�(i�'��� .1 _ or e Y-4 M A 4 ! Vim"' - !41111rA tt ymmm 48081 m .a•wN -► r� P r 1' d 40 I Luminaire: Location Summary • I s 4.�� I 4.111 I 00000 0000000000000 Signed: EXHIBIT I I 0 000000000000 4.uai -1D 1 SaS'ILa 1 004000000000 I o81 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 06 g 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A nt sa S2 } sa 2 szI SZI sal se I f csaI Sai sal . S2 • Sz S2 sa sa, sz • s2 SZ Sz . ✓ SZ 2 S2 � Sz i • sz [— sz � sz r S2 i 88619611 1,L01:1E6I 1 9I£'i£6I 621 LI2'IL81 Lt8"8E8t I 20Z'IE81 d ��8b0'L08I E6L'I6L11 F65t'09LI,I 1 1732.571 1 1728.147 99'IOLI 1 IiILS'8691 .1656.741 110S'2a91 (89E'819i I L29191 (rcz9t9t 1 11 1188'0911 ItBE'OLSI Ovum '1549.27 I Ir26'961►1 1494.82 ►1494.821 .28'1'61+1 1494.82 Z8'i'6i►t ►1494.82 tiaos►z 1 i09'ELE2 :49'29SZ' - '8S'69P2 1S8'1+s22 I [2184.85E 1 2374.25! >Ea'S2SZ 1'8's2C2 I r6 191,2'1612 I 181'L'I902 I I'08Ea ] 2643.621 Ib8L'SI61J 1�S'8S i j r 2010.719 9C62i2 92'98£Z [861 1)1£'1 ESZ*S9L2 1.61 E9'E6t2 z2•beei 1>581 13SC12£2_ bti >z 2644.86 FiEr2 ProJects . Att Probe lagnl I W Q . evl L HA Ed I cv Pirt - - cvl I (I.D2J281 I ( j I (Id>£d 1 L _ (1d)2e I '. - Cid)2V I CId >2V I _ (Id}£d i «d L _ (Id)EV I _ (toot i «tee (td)eV 07)as .... CU 1 * an .c■ N. co co+ Oi TI zt £i • ►t st 9i LI _ r 8 ' I . 6i _ T i • zz • Fri] ra • sz • • lZ • • 82 ie 400 Watt Metal Halide Fixtures Phase 2 - Shoppes Atll ---; yak Park Heights, MN II ';r Ai kjri::C ►: 0 r .ii�1+'.w 1.!'.:2. «�3.`l L?'7ti P: .v:i • �t a On Site Lighting & Survey,LLC Wayne Tokkesdat - PH: 763- 684 -1548 Signed: EXHIBIT I I (Aan,ins 6up.gb!1 a4ds up C., I \I V \I 4.. vs C 0 Co N . d N. A (.3 I N. ci 8 0 0 �. 0 8 6 N. 0 8 L7 CI, u. It h h h i i i gi > N 41 41 , • 41 41 0 0 0 0 0 * * IP 0 * * WwWxWf....1 R L7 W L7 L7 1.7 > i i g , .t. ..., 0 z z 'C 4 4 < ) 4:2 Z X0X X * 0 I C. f 1 _ . ,s I 1. :.-.., s . = 6 S 5 g 6 5 5 5 II $. II ID • zs la w w I ! 2 13 1 6 i 13 %II le ei W W It V I I I . ,F. I.0 I. 1.3 1.0 004.1dd L L I L . L. . k U 0 U U Z t. Z X vs 4' C. a . 0 0) a, .0 d CS CO CS >. • cs on co 01 C. 0. IA et a. C. C 3 U C. UI 4' 0 C. O. 4 4. (L. X X d X C X 8 ci 0 0 c5 co ci 0 > 4 -- e ta. q a R 0, q 0 CI 0 0 Cl/ q orc. on. od 14 lid ec q 't ea • 0 e ca a .0 .0 .8 .8 .8 .8 .8 .8 .8 so .8 .8 e* Sc, q .0 .8 .3 .8. .0 e* .0 R .0 .0 .3 .3 .8 q .0 .0 q . .2 ea • Sc, .8 Sq Da .0 S. ea .0 .0 .2 A .8 id ag .2 .8 .3 .3 ee ---; sa4,1ado„id uroppawv q q oc .8 .13 NH s ul ! H >1- >1 .8 .8 q .8 .3 .3 .2 .g .2 .8 .8 o S c, or; S d .8 .5 .8 0: o pd V \I q .0 .0 a 4.DaroJd 4.uan3 6 IA 4) 2f2 .0 .0 a; .1 ,o A •56 . .2 .2 .8 qqqR ea • c, tcs .a .a 11 1'1 Ifi .2 .3 11 2 Ai v? as •e) eq • 1 IA k:W 1 Li 'I' .0 Des .0 50 e. ,a .4 .1 41 as se •. . .8.8 .3 .8 . q d * 2 . .g .83 .8 .e5 .02 to co a! 40 o 0 .3 e3 .3 0:38 .6 q q .0 I I k 3 e 90 DEGREES Illuminance TYPE: DETAILS REFER TO CHART FOR DIMENSIONAL INFORMATION MH (mounting height) a 0. 0 handhole 12 5/16" l,l ** COOPER LIGHTING 4 3 2 5 CATALOG #: SPECIFICATIONS 1 •••ASTM Grade steel base plate with ASTM A366 base cover. 2•••Handhole assembly 3" x 5" on all RTS poles. 3-Steel shaft minimum yield 55,000 PSI. Shot blasted and painted with polyester powder coat. RT57A22.5 -SX -MX COOPER LIGHTING HANDHOLE (section through standard handhole) Handhole reinforcing ring welded to inside of shaft Cover retaining screw Stamped handhole cover Ground lug receptacle 4••• Drilled or Tenon (specify). 5--Anchor bolt per ASTM A576 with (2) nuts, (2) flat washer, and (1) lock washer. Nuts, washers and threaded portion of bolt are hot dip galvanized 3" hook for 3/4" bolt. 4" hook for 1" bolt. RTSROUND TAPERED STEEL FINISH COLORS F =Dark Bronze . G =Galvanized H =Red I =Royal Blue L=Buttercup Yellow N =Olive Green P =Prime O= Designer Beige S =Silver Y =Grey W =White X =None Y =Black 20' - 50' Mounting Height ROUND TAPERED STEEL EXHIBIT 12 ORDERING INFORMATION The following information illustrates the correct way to enter an order for RTS8A3OSF2XXG. The ordering designation is detailed as follows. Round Tapered R T Base Mtg. Catalog 1 . 2 Wall Square Height Number Thickness (In.) MH S 20 RTS6A2OSF .120 25 RTS7A25SF .120 30 RTS8A3OSF .120 35 RTSBA35SF .120 35 RTS9D35SF .180 39 RTS9A39SF .120 39 RTS9D39SF .180 45 RTS0A45SF 5 .120 45 RTSOD45SF 5 .180 50 RTS0A5OSF 5 .120 50 RTSOD50SF 5 .180 NOTES : Catalog number includes pole with anchor bolts with double nuts (BEFORE INSTALLING ANCHOR BOLTS MAKE SURE PROPER ANCHOR BOLT TEMPLATE IS OBTAINED FROM COOPER UGHTING HEADQUARTERS). 2 Tenon size or machining for rectangular arms must be specified. Handhoie is located 180' from single arm. 3 Shaft size, base plate, anchor bolts and projections may vary slightly -ell dimensions nominal. EPAs based on shaft properties with wind normal to flat. EPAs calculated using base wind velocity as indicated plus 30% gust factor. 5 1Wo piece pole. Shipped in two sections and is easily joined together at the job site by slip - fitting together. DRILLING PATTERN Type "M" 2 7/16' Designation Letter & Number M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6 M7 0 COOPER 4 7/8' Cooper Lighting Steel S 3/4' dia. hole (2) 518' dia holes Shaft 3 Size 8 101/2 11.0 101/2 11.0 12 1/2 12.5 121/2 12.5 121/2 12.5 121/2 12.5 121/2 12.5 131/2 13.5 13 1/2 13.5 131/2 13.5 13112 13.5 Type "E" Bolt Circle Dia. (In.) BC Wall Thickness A Bolt Proj. (In.) BP 4 1/2 4 1/2 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 5 6 Designation Letter & Number El E2 E3 E4 E5 E6 E7 Shaft Size (In.) B 314" die. hole (2) 318" dia. holes 6.3 x 3.5 7.0 x 3.5 7.7 x 3.5 8.4 x 3.5 8.4 x 3.5 8.9 x 3.5 8.9 x 3.5 10.2 x 4.2 10.2 x 4.2 10.2 x 3.5 10.2 x 3.5 MACHINING FOR RECTANGULAR ARMS (add as suffix) Mounting Height (ft.) 30 Anchor Bolt Dia. &. Length (In.) AB 3/4 x 25 x 3 3/4x25x3 1 x 36 x 4 1 x 36 x 4 1 x 36 x 4 1 x 36 x 4 1 x 36 x 4 1 x 36 x 4 1 1/4 x 42 x 6 1 x 36 x 4 1 1/4 x 42 x 6 MOUNTING OPTIONS (add as suffix) ' Fixed Tenon Designation. O.D. Number r 1 2 3 9 Base Type S LENGTH NOTES : Arm mourning holes located 45' from base holes. 2 First drilling is 180' from handhole. Net. Wt. (Lbs.) 173 214 290 342 482 341 536 546 682 550 719 Finish F Quantity & Location Single 2 @ 180° 1 0 4 90� 2 2 0 1 90 ° 3 90° 2 @ 120" Fixture Mounting & Type 2 EPA At Pole Top. (Sq. Ft.) 80 90 100 26.1 20.1 23.8 18.1 20.1 15.2 18.8 14.1 40.6 31.4 18.6 14.1 33.7 25.9 19.8 14.9 31.6 24.5 11.4 8.1 21.1 16.0 15.9 14.2 11.9 10.9 25.1 10.9 20.6 11.5 19.6 5.8 12.5 No. & Location of Arms X ACCESSORIES RTSROUND TAPERED STEEL EPA (Sq. Ft.) 4 2' Above Pole Top 80 90 100 23.7 22.0 18.8 17.8 38.4 17.7 32.0 19.0 28.5 11.0 19.4 • 18.2 16.8 14.3 13.3 29.7 13.4 24.7 14.2 22.2 7.8 14.7 Arm Lengths X Q.D. (ln.) 2 3/8 2 3/8 3 1/2 3 14.4 13.2 11.1 10.3 23.7 10.4 19.6 11.0 17.7 5.6 11.5 Max. Fixture Load-Include Bracket (Lbs.) 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 450 450 450 450 Accessories (Ground Lug) G Length (In.) 3 1/2 4 5 4 A = /2" tapped hub 1 B=3/4" tapped hub 1 C=Convenience outlet 2 G-Grounding lug (max. wire #8 AWG) H- Additional handhole and cover- - 12" below pole top -90° from handhole. NOTES : Location is 3' above base -90' from handhole. 2 Outlet is located 4' above base and on same side of pole as handhole, unless specified otherwise. Receptacle not included, provision only. NOTE: Specifications and dimensions subject to change without notice. P.O. Box 820824 Vicksburg, MS 39182 601.638.1522 FAX 601.634.9606 ADH960004 TYPE: DESCRIPTION McGraw - Edison's Galleria combines beauty and versatility to make it an excellent choice for architects, specifiers and contractors in today's energy- and design- conscious environment. An aesthetic reveal in the formed aluminum housing gives the Galleria a distinctive look while a variety of mounting options and lamp wattages provide maximum flexibility. APPLICATION The Galleria achieves superior light distribution by utilizing a seamless reflector system, making it the optimum choice for almost any small, medium or large area lighting application. DIMENSIONS FDCI URE ma rn. (mm) Medium (in.) (mm) Large (in.) (mm) Arm Mount A 235 11 279 141R 368 COOPER LIGHTING B 38 31/2 89 4 1/4 108 CATALOG #: SPECIFICATION FEATURES A -• •Housing Formed aluminum housing with stamped reveal has interior-welded seams for structural integrity and is finished in premium TGIC polyester powder coat. U.L. listed and CSA certified for wet locations. B- ••Ballast Tray Ballast tray is hard - mounted to housing interior for cooler operation. C•- •Ballast Long -life core and coil ballast. C 327 19 1/4 480 25 7/8 657 E NOTE: Top cap used on GSM with 1000W flat glass vertically tamped optics only. D 397 213/4 552 27 686 D...Refiector Spun and stamped aluminum reflector in vertical lamp units, or hydroformed anodized aluminum reflector in horizontal lamp units. Rotatable optics standard. E• -•Door Formed aluminum door has heavy-duty hinges, captive retaining screws and is finished in premium TGIC polyester powder coat. (Spider mount unit has steel door.) F -• -Lens Convex tempered glass lens or flat glass. Spider Mount E 1F or 152 or 229 337 6or14 15or16 152 or 356 361 or 406 6 or 14 18 3/4 or 193/4 152 or 356 476 or 502 McGRAW- EDISON° GSS /GSM /GSL GALLERIA SQUARE 7 O- 1 0 0 0 W Metal Halide High Pressure Sodium ADH012827 ARCHITECTURAL AREA LUMINAIRE Dark Sky Friendly DARK SKY FRIENDLY in all Rat glass configurations. ENERGY DATA CWA Ballast Input Watts 150W MH HPF (210 Watts) 175W MH HPF (210 Watts) 175W MH HPF (210 Watts) 250W MH HPF (295 Watts) 250W HPS HPF (300 Watts) 400W MH HPF (455 Watts) 400W HPS HPF (465 Watts) 1000W MH HPF (1080 Watts) 1000W HPS HPF (1100 Watts) WATTAGE TABLE • Fixture Size Wattage GSS 70W-175W GSM 175W -1000W GSL 400W- -1000W PHOTOMETRICS t ■t■ SEM MUM Wiill 4 0 1 2 3 4 5 GM - 1 GSS.AM- 175- MH -MT-3F FG 175 -Watt MH, Type Ili 14,000 -Lumen Clear Lamp Footcandle Table Select mounting height and read across for footcandle values of each isofootcandle line. Distance in units of mounting height Mounting Height Footcandle Values for GM-1 isofootcandle Lines A B C D E 10' 11.25 4.50 2.25 1.16 0.45 15' 5.00 2.00 1.00 0.50 0.25 20' 2.80 1.12 0.56 0.28 0.19 ORDERING INFORMATION SAMPLE NUMBER: GSM -AM- 400- MH- MT- 3V- SG -BK -L Product Family GS3.Gallerie Square Small GSM.Gallerie Square Medium GSL=Gailerie Square Large Mounting Method AM•Arm Mount' SM1••Spider Mount (2' O.D. Tenon) SM2.Spider Mount (2 3/r 0.0. Tenon) SNI3•Spider Mount (3 1/2" O.D. Tenon)' Lamp Wattage 70.70W 100.100W 150.150W 175.175W 250 -250W 400.400W' 1000- 1000W' 2 1 0 1 2 3 Lamp Type MN -Metal Halide HPS•High Pressure Sodium CIP.P Mal Lens Type FG•Flat Glass" SO-Seg Glass 3 6 0 1 2 3 4 GM - 2 GSM -AM- 400- HPS- MT -3F-FG 400 -Watt HPS, Type IIi 50,000 -Lumen Clear Lamp Footcandle Table Select mounting height and read across for footcandle values of each isofootcandle line. Distance in units of mounting height Mounting Height Footcandle Values for GM-2 Isofootcandle Lines A B C 0 E 30' 2.00 1.00 0.50 0.25 0.10 35' 1.46 0.73 0.37 0.18 0.07 40' 1.12 0.56 0.28 0.14 0.06 120.120V 208 -208V 240.24W 277.277V 480s480V MTTMulp -Tap wired 2771/' 7T•Triple -Tap wired 3471/' Distribution 1 F=Type l Formed (Horizontal)* 2F•Type II Formed (Horizontal) 3F=Type pl Formed (Horizontal) Fr-Forward Throw Formed (Horizontal) AR•Aree Round (Vertical) AS•Area Square (Vertical)' 3V =Type III (Vertical)' RW=Rectangular Wide (Vertical)" 'AN MN ERN 'ill • 17/11/1 Or/0711111 BEM ABC D 4 0 1 2 3 4 5 GM GSM- AM- 10000MH -MT-3Y FG 1000 Watt MH, Type Ill Vertical 110,000 -Lumen Clear Lamp Footcandle Table Select mounting height and read across for footcandle values of each isofootcandle line. Distance in units of mounting height. Mounting Height Footcandle Values for GM-3--5 lsofootcandle Lines A B C D 30' 3.50 2.00 1.00 0.50 35' 2.60 0.73 0.37 0.18 40' 2.00 1.00 0.50 0.20 A :CD E 0.20 0.07 0.10 Colors (add as suffix/ must specify) " SIC -Black AP.Grey BZ.Bronze WH- Architectural White Options (add as suffix) F- Single Fuse (120, 277 or 347V) FFFDouble Fused (208, 240 or 480V) EM•Quartz Restrike with Delay (Also Strikes at Cold Start) R•NEMA Twistlock Photocontrol Receptacle G.Ouartz Restrike (Hot Restrike Only) HS-House Side Shield VS•Vandal Shield (Arm Mount Only, 400W Maximum) L•Lamp Included NOTES: Arm not included. See accessories. ' Available on GSL housing only. ' Medium -base lamp for GSS housing. Mogul -base on GSM and GSL housings. Requires reduced envelope EO-28 lamp when used with GSM housing and flat glees vertically tamped optics. ' Requires reduced envelope ST-37 lamp when used with GSM housing. ' Product also available in non-US voltages and 50H1 for international markets. Consult factory for availability and ordering information. I Multi-Tap ballast is 120J208/240/277V wired 277V. Triple -Tap ballast is 12 7/Z77/347V wired 347V. • Available on GSM and GSL housings only. ' RW optic not available with flat glass. ' 1000W GSL with flat glass requires ST-37 lamp and is not available in AS. RW. 3V distributions. "Other finish colors available. Consult McGraw. Edison Architectural Colors brochure. GSS /GSM /GSLGALLERIA SQUARE 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 GM-4 GSM -AM- 1000- MH- MT-AS -FG 7000 -Watt MH, Area Square 110,000 -Lumen Clear Lamp 3 4 5 0 1 2 mmain mum wenn Emu U!III Tana MUM MOM 3 4 GM - 5 GSM-AM-1000-MH-NIT-AS-SG 1000 -Watt MH, Area Square 110,000 - Lumen Clear Lamp Accessories (order separately) MA1004.14" Arm for Square Pole. 1.0 EPA MA1005 -6" Arm for Square Pole. 0.5 EPA MA1006- Direct Mount Kit for Square Pole MA1007.14' Arm for Round Pole. 1.0 EPA MA1008•'6' Arm for Round Pole. 0.5 EPA MA1009•Direct Mount IGt for Round Pole MA1010•Single -arm Tenon Adapter for 3 1/2' O.D. Tenon MA1011 -2 @ 180° Tenon Adapter for 3 1/2" 0.0. Tenon MA1012.3 @ 120' Tenon Adapter for 31/2" O.D. Tenon AMU/13.4 @ 90' Tenon Adapter for 3 1/2' 0.0. Tenon MA1014.2 @ 90• Tenon Adapter for 3 1/2' O.D. Tenon MA1015.2 @ 120' Tenon Adapter for 3 1/2' 0.0. Tenon MA1016.3 @ 90' Tenon Adapter for 3 1/2" 0.0. Tenon MA1017 =Single -arm Tenon Adapter for 23/8" 0.0. Tenon MA1018.2 @ 180° Tenon Adapter for 2 3/8" 0.D. Tenon MA1019.3 @ 120' Tenon Adapter for 2 3/8" O.D. Tenon MA1021.6" Arm for Square Pole. 0.5 EPA (GSS Only) MA1022.6" Arm for Round Pole. 0.5 EPA (GSS Only) MA1023• 9" Arm for Square Pole. 0.5 EPA (GSS Only) MA1024.9" Arm for Round Pole. 0.5 EPA (GSS Only) MA1029•Wall Mount Bracket with 10' Arm (Specify color) MA1045.4 90' Tenon Adapter for 2 3/8" 0.0. Tenon MA1O46•Walll Mount Bracket with 9" Arm(GSS Only, Specify color) MA1 048 =2 @ 90° Tenon Adapter for 2 3/8" O.D. Tenon MA1049.3 @ 90' Tenon Adapter for 2 3/8' O.D. Tenon MA1060•House Side Shield for GSS (Field Installed) MA1061•House Side Shield for GSM (Field Installed) MA1062 =House Side Shield for GSL (Field Installed) 0A 1016.Photocontrol -Multi -Tap 0A 1027 =Photocontrol -480V 0Al201 =Photoelectric Control, 347V NEMA Type NOTE: Specifications and dimensions subject to change without notice. Visit our web site at www.cooperlighting.com COOPER Lighting Customer First Center 1121 Highway 74 South Peachtree City, GA 30269 770.486.4800 FAX 770.486.4801 ADH012827 • • TYPE: DESCRIPTION McGraw - Edison's Gaileria combines beauty and versatility to make it an excellent choice for architects, specifiers and contractors in today's energy- and design- conscious environment. An aesthetic reveal in the formed aluminum housing gives the Galleria a distinctive look while a variety 'of mounting options and lamp wattages provide maximum flexibility. APPLICATION The Galleria achieves superior light distribution by utilizing a seamless reflector system, making it the optimum choice for almost any small, medium or large area lighting application. A- C --- 235 11 279 141/2 368 COOPER LIGHTING Arm Mount ........... C D FIXTURE A B ma in. (mm) Medium (in.) (mm) Large (in.) (mm) 38 31/2 89 41/4 108 CATALOG #: SPECIFICATION FEATURES A••- Housing Formed aluminum housing with stamped reveal has interior - welded seams for structural integrity and is finished in premium TGIC polyester powder coat. U.L. listed and CSA certified for wet locations. B— Ballast Tray Ballast tray is hard - mounted to housing interior for cooler operation. C-- •Ballast Long -life core and coil ballast. D--- Reflector Spun and stamped aluminum reflector in vertical lamp units, or hydroformed anodized aluminum reflector in horizontal lamp units. Rotatable optics standard. E -- -Door Formed aluminum door has heavy -duty hinges, captive retaining screws and is finished in premium TGIC polyester powder coat. (Spider mount unit has steel door.) F •••Le ns Convex tempered glass lens or flat glass. z A ... ................... E C D 327 19 1/4 480 25 7/8 657 NOTE: Top cap used on GSM with 1000W flat glass vertically tamped optics only. 397 21 3/4 552 77 686 E F or 152 or 229 337 6or14 15or16 152 or 356 381 or 406 6or14 183/4or193/4 152 or 356 476 or 502 McGRAWEDISON' GSS /GSM /GSL GALLERIA SQUARE 7 0- 1 0 0 0 W Metal Halide High Pressure Sodium ADH012827 ARCHITECTURAL AREA LUMINAIRE Dark Sky Friendly DARK SKY FRIENDLY In all flat glass configurations. ENERGY DATA CWA Ballast Input Watts 150W MH HPF (210 Watts) 175W MH HPF (210 Watts) 175W MH HPF (210 Watts) 250W MH HPF (295 Watts) 250W HPS HPF (300 Watts) 400W MH HPF (455 Watts) 400W HPS HPF (465 Watts) 1000W MH HPF (1080 Watts) 1000W HPS HPF (1100 Watts) b� FPI IA WATTAGE TABLE Fixture Size Wattage GSS 70W --175W GSM 175W -1000W GSL 400W 1000W PHOTOMETHICS MEM SEEM rs MI DI WM ME1111111 3 Product Family GSS=Galleria Square Small GSM=Galleria Square Medium GSL.Galleria Square Large Mounting Method AM-Arm Mount' SM 1=Spider Mount (2" O.D. Tenon) SM2=Spider Mount (2 3/8" O.D. Tenon) SM3=Spider Mount (3 1/2" 0.0. Tenon)' Lamp Wattage 70 -70W 100 -100W 150.150W 175 =175W 250.250W 400=400W 1000 =1000W' 4 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 0 1 2 GM - I GSS -AM- 175- MH -MT-3F FG 175 -Watt MH, Type Ill 14.000 -Lumen Clear Lamp Footcandle Table Select mounting height and read across for footcandle values of eat:h isofootcendle line. Distance in units of mounting height Mounting Height Footcandle Values for GM-1 Isofootcendle Lines AB C D E 10' 11.25 4.50 2.25 1.16 0.45 15' 5.00 2.00 1.00 0.50 0.25 20' 2.80 1.12 0.56 0.28 0.19 ORDERING INFORMATION SAMPLE NUMBER: GSM -AM- 400- MH- MT- 3V- SG -BK -L Lamp Type MH=Metal Halide HPS-High Pressure Sodium 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 3 4 5 0 1 2 0 1 2 GM-2 GSM -AM- 400- HPS- MT-3F -FG 400 -Watt HPS, Type Ill 50,000 -Lumen Clear Lamp Footcandle Table Select mounting height and read across for footcandle values of each isofootcandle line. Distance in units of mounting height Mounting Mounting Height Footcandle Values for Height Footcandle Values for GM-2 isofootcandle Lines GM -3--5 lsofoatcandle Lines A B C D E A B C D E 30' 2.00 1.00 0.50 0.25 0.10 30' 3.50 2.00 1.00 0.50 0.20 35' 1.46 0.73 0.37 0.18 0.07 35' 2.60 0.73 0.37 0.18 0.07 40' 1.12 0.56 0.28 0.14 0.06 40' 2.00 1.00 0.50 0.20 0.10 Voltage' 120.120V 208=208V 240.240V 277 =277V 480.4480V MT-Multi -Tap wired 277V' TT =Triple -Tap wired 347V• Distribution 1F=Type I Formed (Horizontal)' 2F=Type II Formed (Horizontal) 3F=Type tll Formed (Horizontal) FT- Forward Throw Formed (Horizontal) AR=Area Round (Vertical) AS=Area Square (Vertical)' 3V =Type III (Vertical)' RW =Rectangular Wide (Vertical)... Lens Type FG=Flat Glass" SG-Sag Glass MI" MGM EWEN • I"; , • ■/ /►III ABC DE 4 3 4 5 GM GSM -AM- 1000- MH -MT -3V FG 1000 -Watt MH, Type III Vertical 110,000 -Lumen Clear Lamp Footcandle. Table Select mounting height and read across for footcandle values of each isofootcandle line. Distance in units of mounting height. Colors (add as suffix/ must specify) " Blb=Bleck AP=Grey BZ=Bronze WH=Architectural White Options iadd as sufilx) F=Single Fuse (120, m or 347V) FF - Double Fused (208, 240 or 480V) EM=Quertz Restrike with Delay (Also Strikes at Cold Start) R•NEMA Twistlock Photocontrol Receptacle Q=Quartz Restrike (Hot Restrike Only) HS=House Side Shield VS=Vandal Shield (Arm Mount Only, 400W Maximum) 1. -Lamp Included NOTES:' Arm not included. See accessories. ' Available on GSL housing only. ' Medium -base lamp for GSS housing. Mogul-bus on GSM and GSL housings. • Requires reduced envelope ED-28 lamp when used with GSM housing and flat glass vertically tamped optics. • Requires reduced envelope BT-37 temp when used with GSM housing. • Product also available in non -US voltages and 50Hz for international markets. Consult factory for availability and ordering information. Multi Tap ballast is 120/208240/277V wired D7V. Triple -Tap ballast is 120/2771347V wired 347V. *Available on GSM and GSL housings only. RW optic not available with flat glass. 1000W GSL with flat glass requires ST-37 lamp and is not available in AS. RW, 3V distributions. "Other finish colon available. Consult McGrew - Edison Architectural Colors brochure. CD 3 4 GSS /GSMIGSLGALLERiA SQUARE 5 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 GM-4 GSM -AM- 1000 -MH-MT AS-FG 1000 Watt MH, Area Square 110,000 -Lumen Clear Lamp mil NE 111.111111 SLUM BMWS MEM 3 4 5 2 3 4 0 1 GM-5 GSM-AM- 1000 -M H- MT -AS-SG 1000 -Watt MH, Area Square 110,000 -Lumen Clear Lamp Accessories (order separately) MA1004.14' Arm for Square Pole. 1.0 EPA MA1005.6" Arm for Square Pole. 0.5 EPA MA1006=Direct Mount Kit for Square Pole MA1007.14" Arm for Round Pole. 1.0 EPA MA1008.6" Arm for Round Pole. 0.5 EPA MA1009. Direct Mount Kit for Round Pole MA 1010=Single -arm Tenon Adapter for 3 1/2" O.D. Tenon MA1011.2 @ 180' Tenon Adapter for 3 1/2" O.D. Tenon MA1012.3 @ 120' Tenon Adapter for 3 1/2' O.D. Tenon MA1013.4 @ 90' Tenon Adapter for 31/2° O.D. Tenon MA1014=2 @ 90' Tenon Adapter for 3 1/2" 0.0. Tenon MA1015.2 it 120' Tenon Adapter for 3 1J2" 0.0. Tenon MA1016.3 @ 90' Tenon Adapter for 3 1/2" O,D. Tenon MA1017=Single -arm Tenon Adapter for 23/8" 0.D. Tenon MAA1018.2 @ 180° Tenon Adapter for 2 3/8" O.D. Tenon MA1019.3 @ 120° Tenon Adapter for 23/8" O.D. Tenon MA1021 -6" Arm for Square Pole. 0.5 EPA (GSS Only) MA1022 =6" Arm for Round Pole. 0.5 EPA (GSS Only) MA1023.9" Arm for Square Pole. 0.5 EPA (GSS Only) MA1024.9" Arm for Round Pole. 0.5 EPA (GSS Only) MA1029=Wall Mount Bracket with 10" Ann 1Specify color) MA1045.4 @ 90° Tenon Adapter for 2 3/8' O.D. Tenon MA1046=Wall Mount Bracket with 9" Arm(GSS Only, Specify color) MA1048.2 @ 90° Tenon Adapter for 2 3/8" O.D. Tenon MA1049.3 @ 90° Tenon Adapter for 23/8" 0.0. Tenon MA1060=House Side Shield for GSS (Field Installed) MA1061=House Side Shield for GSM (Field Installed) MA1062 =House Side Shield for GSL (Field Installed) 0A1016.Photocontrol -Mufti Tep 0A1027=Photocontrol -480V 0Al201 =Photoelectric Control, 347V NEMA Type NOTE: Specifications and dimensions subject to change without notice- .° Visit our web site at www.cooperlighting.com COOPER Lighting Customer First Center 1121 Highway 74 South Peachtree City, GA 30269 770.486.4800 FAX 770.486.4801 ADH012827 1D v) N V' d .- N to 0 c4 (0 0 m 0 0 In vi .i ea 0 a wl) —I _.a = ta! W U) a ac a a Ia 0 KRUEGER k,,,, j,�,�w•wr••�•LR�rr�w ": �-�w �W F'"r..rY„SN'ruW.w•�+r•• �^..........•,« _ _ .« 7 �ALLf.�A ` y \ \\ , \ • \•`, NORELL= AVENUE NORTH Itli Neallall AIM ..r • :- n /.rte' •, .'' �• f' � ; �� y �........... »....»..• 1 .-.. w� --- i . l 1�� .... r .,. �. I it 1S3 Mr OVP2°20 •002/90,10 6+ P`EOdSSi201(00" J KK architects North Rmerican Properties 952 -974 -9300 .p.2 minneapolis neapart beach LACE Architects, Inc 300 fi rst avenue north min palls, ma 55401 pbam 612/ UU9 -43130 flat 4120 9287 THE SHOPPES OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS OAK PARK HEIGHTS, WI Pivjecr Die Aik5tk3T lb, 2003 Mahn by Gt44 Checked by kA 0306.1212.01 Drawing Number SIGN 01 EXHIBIT 14 1 C . limigliliptigliMintil i C r X11 .11 ,t11' i rzinno = � �[ �fl�r'�G�IY � ���!IlalitiitIIIE ;wi _ ■ s ■ w li al 1 1 1 , 1 , 1 l r i i ll I V 1 11 ili 1 ii PI' I I i i i o i I i l I I t i 1 / 1 I I IV lull 1iiii 1 sts { . Oilli III 1Illli +, ..,� J� ow. dim 1=liilllllil� E .w■i llt� imillipcplogiiil iiii iI� i' `y� pil■.-, ..■ — � � � Icy l I� 1 1 —. ETE:oiiiihi �iiiihi � � l igililllMil liilillllE s M� i w 7�■. _ r � w �r i M • _ M iw 1 1 a.■ ■ice r � Z ��. i , I M 111111111111111111010111E 1 o :1�l1.i1 • 1 � � �. ray � ��� �i � � �, ��� #� �= ��,i,. �: fir .""■■ I. -2 Ili li li I1 1IIlI IIIII1 IIIIII1 11111IIIIIII1IIIIIII1 I1111I111111 f: 1 IlIIf11l 11IlI1I111111111I111I111111II11I II II1IIIIIII= I 11 ■ M ■ ■ MA r• �A Atr M■ rr w Ill illAl�il� I , .■� v ■ r 11 �■■ . v I • � SY r Y _ y �■ c � M ■ r ! f I' ... w � 11lI II! ^ a � ■ ■ s ■ .. « ru ■ a ■ r � � r r. - i r* >r r 1 71 a -11I 111111=1,111 llii^IIF li111 )1.•= a: - iii la liil' Ilil11F111LLli IMM 1 ' 1 1111111111111 r _ « ■ ■ ra w w r � M . r IllIllll1lluh w «r w � C -1 C m CD m r cn 111111111111111111161 . immiiiimir "111 014 • o f 11 m s; 0 z JI1L yi 11000E:4 1E1 Alir gli 51,R gi=A Pia N co • • • O ap a O 0 o I -,:,:.-,..1 .0_ � NO NJj O a °D m 0 O -43- "o a � i I a I W 1 11) a ca ;On o N Q C.; O Z U W J CO U • v) a ti Z J z 0 F— W W S F- 0 z z 0 F--- Q W W I F— 0 (f) 0 II U 0 00 0 0 O a f woo • ay 0- W CO CYX a z 0 w w w s CO 111111111111111 • J U to CO um t w Westwood Professional Services, Inc. PLANNING • ENGINEERING • SURVEYING March 9, 2004 Mr. Eric Johnson, Administrator City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North PO Box 2007 Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Re: The Shoppes of Oak Park Heights, LLC The Shoppes of Oak Park Heights - Phase 2 Revised PUD Concept & General Plan Application Dear Mr. Johnson: Attached please find revised and additional documents and drawings in support of a PUD approval for the subject project. The documents include the following: • Development Application • PUD Concept & General Stage Plans (3 full size and 20 - 11" x 17" reductions) • Architectural Elevations - Buildings A -- D (3 full size and 20 - 11" x 17" reductions) • Architectural Elevations / Colored Drawings -- Buildings A - D • Photometric Plan and Fixture Details • Pylon Sign Plan • Project Narrative Please note that the Application Fee of $1,700 and mailing lists were submitted in a previous application dated February 9, 2004. We understand that those materials will be applicable to this application. We are requesting that the previous February 9, 2004 application be withdrawn and substituted q g p with this application request. In addition to the PUD Concept and General Plan approvals pp q application this a lication includes a request for a Conditional Use Permit for Lot 3 (for Tire Sales) and a Variance for building signage along Krueger Lane. Please see the Project Narrative for additional information. Please review this information at your earliest opportunity and schedule the project for the April 8, 2004 Planning Commission meeting. If ou have any questions or need additional information, please call me at (952) 906-7435, or y yq Steve Johnson at (952) 829 -7448. Sincerely, WESTWOOD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, INC. Daniel M. Parks, PE Attachments cc: Steve Johnson 7599 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Phone: 952 937 - 5150 Fax: 952- 937 -5822 Toll free: 1-888-937-5150 E -mail: wps ©westwoodps.com TWIN CITIES/INETRO ST, CLOUD BRAINERD EXHIBIT 17 Designing the Future Today...since 1 PUD -- Concept & Development Plan Application Narrative The Shoppes of Oak Park Heights -- Phase 2 March 9, 2004 Introduction The Shoppes of Oak Park Heights, LLC is submitting the attached application for development of a 5.7 -acre site in Oak Park Heights, Minnesota. The City reviewed applications for development of Phase 1 and Phase 2 of this project in 2003. This narrative describes the Phase 2 site development and the application request. Location The site is located at the southeast corner of 60 Street North and Krueger Lane. State Highway 36 is directly north of the site. Through the center of the overall property is a 200+ foot overhead electric transmission easement and a city water tower is south of the subject property. Menards is located west of the site and Walmart is located to the east of the property. Site Development As shown on the Site Plan, the proposed commercial site will include a variety of retail users including a multi -use restaurant pad, a retail building (with multiple users), a tire store, and a single -use restaurant pad. The total proposed building area is approximately 28,700 SF and the site will include 300 parking stalls. Primary access to the site will be from driveway accesses off of 60 Street and Krueger Lane. Two other access locations proposed with the Phase 1 development will provide internal circulation pathways to Norell Avenue and Krueger Lane. The property is currently platted as one outlot. As shown on the proposed plat the site will be platted into four separate lots for each of the proposed site users. Site Guiding and Zoning According to the City's Comprehensive Plan, the site is presently Guided for a Commercial Use. As part of the approvals granted for the property in 2003, the site was rezoned to "B -2" General Business District. Development of the site will likely include a Planned Unit Development (PUD) overlay. Building Architecture As shown on the Architectural Elevations, the architecture and storefronts of the proposed buildings will generally be consistent with each other to provide a unified appearance. The architectural materials will consist primarily of brick, rockface block and synthetic stucco (eifs). The various storefronts will be tied together through the use of decorative brick p iers and stucco cornices. The brick piers and cornices will continue on all sides of the building. Conditional Use Permit and Variance Requests To accommodate the proposed Tire Sales store on Lot 3, a request for a Conditional Use Permit is being requested with this application. To improve the street appeal for the proposed restaurant building on Lot 1, building signage proposed a g e is ro osed on all sides of the building. The proposed signage area will be consistent with City standards, and be divided between the fronts, sides and backs of the building. To accommodate the signage on all sides, a request for a sign variance is being requested with this application. Roadway Access The roadwa y system stem surrounding the property provides ample access to the proposed site and primary access will be from 60 c � Street and Krueger Lane. The Traffic Study submitted with the previous Concept Plan Application provides additional information on existing and proposed traffic conditions. Site Utilities Public utilities for sanitary sewer, watermain and storm sewer service are presently available to serve the site within the adjacent roadway right -of ways. Gas, electric, and telephone service are also available to serve the site. As shown on the Grading and Utility Plans, stormwater drainage from the site will be ed west towards an existing on -site stormwater directed g and near Krueger Lane and 60 pond The pond drains west of the site via storm sewer piping into a regional pond created with development of the Menard's site. The Menard's pond was studied by the City and the Brown's Creek Watershed District as part of the Phase 1 approval process and found to be adequately sized for the Phase 1 and Phase 2 projects. Easement Relocation As shown proposed plat and site plan drawings, there is an easement covering the existin g lift station adjacent to 60 Street. The lift station is currently accessed by a driveway off 60 th street. With development of the site it is proposed to reconfigure the easement area to better utilize the available site area and to allow a potential driveway access to the lift station from the proposed site. The proposed easement area will be approximately the same as the existing easement area. To facilitate the new easement location, the City will need to grant a right of access on the existing easement (for parking purposes) and accept the new easement proposed with the plat. It is understood that specific details for the easement issue will be addressed with the development agreement • cott Richards From: To: Jay E. Johnson, P.E. Public Works Director City of Oak Park Heights 651 -439 -4439 651 - 642 -7213 Pager 651-429-0574 Fax EXHIBIT 18 i u5 1 vi 1 "Jay Johnson" < jjohnson @cityofoakparkheights.com> "Dennis Postler (E- mail)" <dpostler©bonestroo.com>; "Scott Richards (E- mail)" <srichards @nacplanning.com >; "Brad Carmicheal (E- mail)" < brad .carmichael @andersencorp.com >; "Eric A. Johnson" <eajohnson©cityofoakparkheights.com> Cc: "Julie Hultman" <jhultman©cityofoakparkheights.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 2:47 PM Subject: Shoope of oak park Heights 2nd Addition Utility comments 1. Rather than removin g existing e existin hydrant near the lift station it could be relocated a few feet east of the new parking Y lot. Having the hydrant near the lift station is useful for maintenance. The hydrant SE of Bldg "A" could be used but would be a private hydrant. It would be better to use a City owned hydrant and we would not have to stretch fire hoses across the parking lot. 2. A new turn around area for the lift station needs to be designed and shown. More detail on the grading near the lift station is required to show water flow to the beehive manhole inlet (which is not shown on the drawing either). 3. The area is shown to be serviced by four new fire hydrants. The new hydrant near the SW corner of Bldg. "C" is located such that the line leading to it will have two storm water crossings and one sanitary sewer crossing. The other three hydrants are within 300 feet of each building. If this hydrant were removed and Bldgs "B" & "C" were feed from the north end of the building we would avoid the crossing of the water main with sewers, reduce the total amount of water main to be installed, decrease hydrants and valves by one, and have better water flow to the buildings as each building will have its own 6 inch line coming from the 8 inch loop. 1 am assuming that each of these buildings are 410. ing to have fire sprinklers. Of course the fire marshal will need to review and comment on the adequacy of the aining three hydrants to cover fire fighting needs for the four buildings. 3. Where storm sewers cross over the top of water mains, insulation should be installed between the storm sewer and the water main. 4 Where sanitary sewer cross water mains the top of the sewer must be 12 inches below the bottom of the water main. 5. Sanitary sewer for Bldg. "D" must be a minimum of 50 feet away from McCormack's well. 6. More temporary construction entrances will be needed if more than one bldg. is built at a time. Currently, the Kohl's contractor is ignoring the erosion control entrances. I think these are most of my comments. I think Dennis will mention increasing the width of the outbound lane onto 60th to 24 feet for 2 lanes. 2/18/2004 cott Richards rage 1 or From: <kdwidin@comcast.net> To: "Jim Butler" < jbutler @cityofoakparkheights.com >; "Julie Hultman" < jhultman @cityofoakparkheights.com >; "Eric Johnson" < eajohnson @cityofoakparkheights.com >; "Jay Johnson" < jjohnson @cityofoakparkheights.com >; "Dennis Postier" <dpostler@bonestroo.com >; "Scott Richards" <srichards @nacplanning.com> Sent: Subject: Monday, February 23, 2004 12:14 PM Shoppes of Oak Park Heights - Landscape Plan OPH Staff - I have reviewed the landscape plan for Shoppes of Oak Park Heights and have the following comments: 1. The plan as a whole looks good, will be attractive and complement the site and usage 2. The plant species and cultivars are acceptable as to aesthetics, hardiness, adaptability and disease resistance, except for the following: a. Velvet Pillar Crab - highly susceptible to the common disease apple scab. Only disease resistant cultivars should be used to avoid maintenance issues. I recommend the use of either "Sugar Tyme" or "Thunderchild" instead. b. planting a few Colorado green spruce is o.k., but the number of these trees should be proportionately less than the Austrian pine and 'Black Hills' spruce due to problems with fungal diseases on Colorado spruce. os n several medians in or near the parking lot areas there are large shade trees specified for medians. Large shade should not be planted in areas or medians where the rooting space is less than 20 ft. x 20 ft. . In medians and areas smaller than that, ornamental trees or shrubs should be used instead. 4. "Planting Detail" sheet should be included as an attachment to the landscape plan. 5. Numbers of each specific cultivar should be listed in the "Plant Schedule" and the specific locations of each species /cultivar should be indicated on the landscape plan. 6. I would like to see a list which details the species / cultivars of tall grasses and wetland seeding mix specified for the ponding area on the west side of the property. Kathy Widin Arborist City of Oak Park Heights • EXHIBIT 19 2/23/2004