Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
weekly notes - November 2nd 2018
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS EKLY ES r: o ember 2,2018 TO: City Co cil Memb �Jakta FROM: Eric obnson, A for Zonina and Development Items: 1. No new applications have een received. 2. The Building Official has sent a I the home gecoach TH.,commenting on vehicle parking and required practices. 3. The City has communicated with the MNT BIKING—SASCA Organization to please remind these participants of a few safety reminders. Also,note that the High Scho9ol and 8e Grade teams did win their respective State meets—this is the 2nd year in a row. See the enclosed letter. 4. Staff expects the curb and gutter at the Palmer Station to be completed in the coming days as well as the 1 st lift(base)course of asphalt, Also,that 60th Street is to reopen near the former Eagles site. OTHER ITEMS: i I Long Term Short T erm • The City has been supplied its annual BOND RATING review from Moody's Investor Baa Service.While certainly not a comprehensive analysis of the economic health of the y City, it is a positive indicator to the City's financial position, management decisions and prospective outlook.See the enclosed report with OPH being an"Aa3".Moody's nna Scale is generally as follows-> • Of course, the City's will be holding the elections on Tuesday, Jenni Pinski has $� y performed all the necessary tests on equipment and this will be the first general, z` election where the City has only one POLLING LOCATION.Vote early and often... as Mayor McComber provided: 1. NLC weekly for 10/27/18 and 11/3/18 2. METRO CITIES News for 11/2118 3. Greater MSP Annual Meeting Invitation 4. Invitation for Ribbon Cutting—Hotel Crosby. s� ex Please let me know if you have any questions-651.253.7837 Call Anytime. E Nil 1 of 30 CITY OF � OAK PARIS HEIGHTS a ,- 14168 Oak Park Boulevard No. Oak Park Heights,MN 55082-2007 • Phone:651/439-4439 • Fax:651/439-0574 October 31, 2o18 Micheal&Abby Brown 5844 Stagecoach Trail. N. Oak Park Heights, MN 55o82 Re: Parking on Yard Area Dear Mr.and Mrs. Brown: I am writing with regard to vehicles that have been parked upon the lawn area to the rear yard of your home at 5844 Stagecoach Trail, N. There is currently a boat and trailer parked on the lawn and recently a Jeep was. Please be advised that City Ordinance regulations direct that motor vehicles,boats,trailers and similar are to be parked upon your driveway or within your garage. City Ordinance 401-.sS F.4, h.13, requires that areas intended for parking use be of a hard surface(see below). This would include areas for parking/exterior storage of trailers. 401.15•F4•h•13 — Surfacing. All areas intended to be utilized for parking space and driveways shall be hard surfaced with materials suitable to control dust and drainage. Plans for surfacing and drainage of driveways and stalls for five (5) or more vehicles shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and the final drainage plan shall be subject to written approval. Hard surface is considered to be that of asphalt,concrete, cobblestone, paving block or crushed rock that meets minimum Class 5 materials and which has a minimum base depth of 4 inches. Please remove the boat&trailer from your yard and relocate them to your riveway or garage no later than the end of the day Wednesday November14 2o18. Please continue to keep vehicles, boats/trailers parked off the lawn area. A compliance check will be made after November 28tH Your prompt attention is appreciated Sincerely, PLANNING& CODE ENFORCEMENT Julie ' Itman Build g Official c: Eric Johnson,City Administrator First Written Request 2 of 30 Tree City U.S.A. su City of Oak Park Heights Page 1 of 1 14168 Oak Park Blvd. N e Oak Park Heights,MN 55082•Phone(651)439-4439•Fax(651)439-0574 10-30-18 TO: Mr.Matthew Lehmann via Email ONLY mattlehmann2180amail.com SASCA Dear Matt: Thank you for meeting with me last week to discuss the concerns that have been expressed to me relating to the SASCA team's use of the City trails.We understand that the SASCA team season is now completed and all look forward to the 2019 season ramping up in late summer. A few follow-up points to keep in mind for next season: 1. We would ask that when there is a SASCA group utilizing the City's paved trail ways,such as those used between the High School and the trails located at Valley View Park that an adult leader please be in front and in back and set an appropriate pace. 2. That all participants are reminded that pedestrians on the City's paved trails(as well as on the MNT BIKING Trails)have the right-of-way and bikes must yield/defer to them.And,that they be reminded to respectfully announce their presence and pass at a slow speed—slow enough so the pedestrian clearly can see that the bike is in control.Announcing°Bikes coming through"is not workable. 3. Please remind the SASCA participants to remain on the established MT Biking Track,we do not want any new trails forming that will not be maintained or sustainable. 4. 1 found this 3 MIN.video on YOUTUBE- Vis://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UUivvLKy3iy that seems valuable to share with your team;perhaps there are others, but always a good reminder. Overall,we believe much of the SASCA relationship with the City remains very positive,but we wanted to share these reminders with you so you could share with your teams. Lastly,from What I can tell from the MN High School Cycling League website, hftp://www.minnesotamtb.orci/race-results/SeF,f -i-7-2018-results-it looks like your crews won another championship... Congratulations!Lots of hard work went into that and something to be very proud ofl I would be glad to answer any questions you may have. Kind!Regards 4"" Eric Johnson City Administrator 3 of 30 About Moody's Ratings:Ratings Definitions-Moody's Page 2 of 3 About Moody's Careers I Regulatory Affairs I Terms of Use I Contact Us Find ratings,research,analysis and more GO Research&Ratings Products&Solutions News&Events Log In Register Ratings Definitions About Moody%Radngs The Commercial Group Purpose Ratings Piss The system of rating securities was originated by John Moody in 1909.The purpose of Moody's ratings is to provide Moody's Investors Serviceinvestors with a simple system of gradation by which future relative creditworthiness of securities may be gauged. Products Rating Symbols Rath go Dsfln1dons Ratings Performance credit of creditworthiness are indicated by rating symbols,with each symbol representing a group in which the credit characteristics are broadly the same.There are nine symbols as shown below,from that used to designate least Regulatory Requlremerds credit risk to that denoting greatest credit risk: Asa As A Baa as B Caa Ca C Moody's appends numerical modifiers 1,2,and 3 to each generic rating classification from As through Caa. Click hen to view Moodys Rating Symbols and DsRnlfJons Absence of a Rating Where no rating has been assigned or where a rating has been withdrawn,it may be for reasons unrelated to the -creditworthiness of the issue. Should no rating be assigned,the reason may be one of the following: 1.An application was not received or accepted. 2.The issue or issuer belongs to a group of securities or entities that are not rated as a matter of policy. 3.There is a lack of essential data pertaining to the issue or issuer. 4.The issue was privately placed,in which case the rating Is not published in Moody's publications. Withdrawal may occur if new and material circumstances arise,the effects of which preclude satisfactory analysis;if there Is no longer available reasonable up-to-date data to permit a judgment to be formed;If a bond is called for redemption;or for other reasons. Changes in Rating The credit quality of most issuers and their obligations is not foxed and steady over a period of time,but tends to undergo change.For this reason changes in ratings occur so as to reflect variations in the intrinsic relative position at issuers and their obligations. A change in rating may thus occur at any time in the case of an individual issue.Such rating change should serve notice that Moody's observes some alteration in creditworthiness,or that the previous rating did not fully reflect the quality of the bond as now seen.While because of their very nature,changes are to be expected more frequently among bonds of lower ratings than among bonds of higher ratings.Nevertheless,the user of bond ratings should keep Gose and constant check on all ratings—both high and low—to be able to note promptly any signs of change in status that may occur. Limitations to Uses of Ratings* Obligations carrying the same rating are not claimed to be of absolutely equal credit quality.In a broad sense,they are alike in position,but since there are a limited number of rating classes used in grading thousands of bontls,the symbols cannot reflect the same shadings of risk which actually exist As ratings are designed exclusively for the purpose of grading obligations according to their credit quality,they should not be used alone as a basis for investment operations.For example,they have no value In forecasting the direction of future trends of market price.Market price movements in bonds are influenced not only by the credit quality of individual issues but also by changes in money rates and general economic trends,as well as by the length of maturity,etc. During its life even the highest rated bond may have wide price movements,while its high rating status remains unchanged. The matter of market price has no bearing whatsoever on the determination of ratings,which are not to be construed as recommendations with respect to"attractiveness".The sib venae of a given bond may depend on its yield,its maturity date or other factors for which the investor may search,as well as on its credit quality,the only characteristic to which the rating refers. Since ratings involve judgements about the future,on the one hand,and since they are used by investors as a means of protection,on the other,the effort is made when assigning ratings to look at"worst'possibilities in the"visible"future, rather than solely at the past record and the status of the present.Therefore,Investors using the rating should not expect to find in them a reflection of statistical factors alone,since they are an appraisal of long-term risks,including the recognition of many non-statistical factors. Though ratings may be used by the banking authorities to classify bonds in their bank examination procedure,Moody's ratings are not made with these bank regulations in mind.Moody's Investors Service's own judgement as to the desirability or non-desirability of a bond for bank investment purposes is not indicated by Moody's ratings. Moody's ratings represent the opinion of Moody's Investors Service as to the relative creditworthiness of securities.As such,they should be used in conjunction with the descriptions and statistics appearing in Moody's publications. Reference should be made to these statements for information regarding the issuer.Moody's ratings are not commercial credit ratings.In no case is default or receivership to be imputed unless expressly stated. As set forth more fu&on the copyright,credit ratings are,and must be construed solely as,statements or opinion and not statements of fad or recommendations to purchase,self orhold any securities.Each mfing orother opinion must be weighed solely as one fectorin any investment decision made by or on behalf ofarry user of the information,and each such usermust accordingty make its own study and evaluation of each security and of each issuer and guarantor of, 4 of 30 https://www.moodys.com/Pages/amr002002.aspx 10/30/2018 U.S,PUBLIC FINANCE MOODYS INVESTORS ISSUER COMMENT City of Oak Park Heights, MN 29 October 2018 Annual Comment on Oak Park Heights RATING General Obligation(or GO Related)? Issuer Profile Aa3 No Outlook The City of Oak Park Heights is located in Washington County in central eastern Minnesota, and is a northeastern suburb within the Minneapolis-St.Paul metro area.The county has a population of 248,745 and a moderate population density of 635 people per square Contacts mile.The county's median family income is$101,629(1st quartile)and the August 2018 Antonina Peshkova +1.312.706.9977 unemployment rate was 2.3%(1st quartile) .The largest industry sectors that drive the Associate Lead Analyst local economy are retail trade,health services,and local government. antonina.peshkova@moodys.com Rachel Cortez +1.312.706.9956 Credit Overview Senior Vice President/Manager The credit position for Oak Park Heights is high quality. Its Aa3 rating matches the US cities rerheLcnrte7@moodys.com median of Aa3.The key credit factors include a very healthy financial position,a strong wealth and income profile and a modestly sized tax base.Also reflected are manageable debt CLIENT SERVICES burden and a mid-ranged pension liability. Americas 1-212-553-1653 Finances:The city has a robust financial position,which is a strep th when compared to the Asia Pacific 852-3551-3077 assigned rating of Aa3.The fund balance as a percent of operating revenues(96.7%)is far Japan 81-3-5408-4100 superior to the US median,and saw an impressive increase from 2013 to 2017 Additionally, EMEA 44-7.0-7772-5454 Oak Park Heights'cash balance as a percent of operating revenues(89.1%)is far stronger than other cities we rate nationwide. Economy and Tax Base:Overall,the economy and tax base of the city are very healthy,and are slightly favorable in comparison to its Aa3 rating.The full value per capita($165,022) is materially above the US median,and grew markedly from 2013 to 2017 In addition,the TKC C t14 WOvt-D t114E1-T median family income equates to a healthy 123.4%of the US level.However,the total full NOT- RtCiloe- 0. at_*✓L value($778 million)is below the US median. C40I T_ RMN6 Debt and Pensions:The debt burden of the city is manageable and is favorable in ( Acomparison to the Aa3 rating assi ped.Oak Park Heights'net direct debt to full value(1%) \ I I a 3 411@ 115 is consistent with t e S median,but contracted from 2013 to 2017 That said,the pension \ liability of the city is moderate and is slightly weak relative to its Aa3 rating.The Moody's- Tollr L V. 4 6G adjusted net pension liability to operating revenues(1.4x)is gn par with the US median. ess �764 ( � Management and Governance:Minnesota cities have an Institutional Framework score 01 . of Aa,which is high.Institutional Framework scores measure a sector's legal ability to increase revenues and decrease expenditures.The sector has one or more major revenue sources that are not subject to any caps.Revenues tend to be predictable,as cities rely primarily on property taxes and state Local Government Aid(LGA),which is distributed based on demographic and tax base factors. Revenue-raising flexibility is moderate as cities generally benefit from unlimited levying authority,except during years in which the state has 5 of 30 MOODY U-S. PUBLIC FINANCE imposed limits.Levy limits are not currently in place.Across the sector,fixed and mandated costs are relatively high. Minnesota has public sector unions,which can limit the ability to cut expenditures.Expenditures mostly consist of personnel costs,which are highly predictable. Sector Trends-Minnesota Cities Minnesota cities will generally benefit from an expanding state economy,especially around the Twin Cities metropolitan area. Expansion in manufacturing and healthcare,along with greater residential construction,are expected to drive job and income growth that is at least as strong as the U.S.average.Property tax revenues,which are the primary revenue source for cities,will remain sound due to tax base growth,increasing agricultural valuation,and unlimited levying authority for the current biennium.Pension costs will likely grow because statutory contribution levels have not kept pace with growing unfunded liabilities in state-wide pension plans,in which all cities participate. EXHIBIT 1 Key Indicators s2 Oak Park Heights Economy/Tax Base 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 US Median Credit Trend Total Full Value $665M $663M $726M $755M $777M $1,867M Improved Full Value Per Capita $145,103 $141,963 $153,323 $157,669 $165,022 $89,200 Improved Median Family Income(%of US Median) 121% 12396 113% 123% 123% 113% Stable Finances Available Fund Balance as%of Operating Revenues 712% 72.3% 165.1% 97.9% 96.7% 33.9% Improved Net Cash Balance as%of Operating Revenues 73.8% 65.5% 160.1% 89-4% 89.1% 36.9% Improved Debt/Pensions Net Direct Debt/Full Value 1.7% 2.2% 1.3% 1.2% 1.0% 1.1% Improved Net Direct Debt/Operating Revenues 2.25x 2.73x 1.45x 1.40x 1.31x 0.88x Improved Moody's-adjusted Net Pension Liability (3-yr average)to Full Value 1.0% 11% 1.0% 1.1% 1.1% 1.8% Stable Moody's-adjusted Net Pension Liability (3 yr average)to Operating Revenues 1.31x 1.35x 1.QSx 1.29x 1.37x 1.51x Stable Debt and Financial Data 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 US Median Population 4,586 4,671 4,737 4,790 4,712 N/A Available Fund Balance($000s) $3,624 $3,938 $10,743 $6,133 $5,866 $7,419 Net Cash Balance($000s) $3,757 $3,571 $10,414 $5,601 $5,409 $8,404 Operating Revenues($000s) $5,088 $5,448 $6,506 $6,264 $6,067 $21,930 Net Direct Debt($000s) $11,425 $14,885 $9,459 $8,770 $7,935 $18,580 Moody's Adjusted Net Pension $6 Liability(3-yr average)($000s) ,685 $7,370 $7,011 $8,068 $8,295 $32,507 Source.Moody's Investors Service This puburatwr,does not announce a credit rating action For any credit ratings referenced in this publication,please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page or, www.moodys com for the most undated credit rating action information and rating history 2 29 October 2018 City of Oak Park Heights,MN:Annual comment on Oak Park Heights 6 of 30 MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE U,S.PUBLIC FINANCE EXHIBIT 2 Available fund balance as a percent of operating revenues increased from 2013 to 2017 Available Fund Balance as%of Operating Revenues US Cities Median 200% 100% _ 0% 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Source:Issuer financial statements Moody's Investors Service EXHIBIT 3 Full value of the property tax base increased from 2013 to 2017 (millions) Total Full Value $800 $750 $700 $650 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Source:Issuer finandal statements Government data sources;Offering statements Moody's Investors Service EXHIBIT 4 Moody's-adjusted net pension liability to operating revenues increased from 2013 to 2017 ■Debt .Pensions 6.Ox 4.Ox 2.0., O.Ox - 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Source:Issuer finandal statements Government data sources;Offering statements,Moody's Investors Service Endnotes 1 The rating referenced in this report is the issuer's General Obligation(GO)rating or Its highest public rating that is GO-related.A GO bond is generally backed by the full faith and credit pledge and total taxing power of the issuer.GO-related securities include general obligation limited tax,annual appropriation,lease revenue,non-ad valorem,and moral obligation debt.The referenced ratings reflect the government's underlying credit quality without regard to state guarantees,enhancement programs or bond insurance. 2 The demographic data presented,Including population,population density,per capita personal income and unemployment rate are derived from the most recently available US government databases.Population,population density and per capita personal Income come from the American Community Survey while the unemployment rate comes from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The largest industry sectors are derived from the Bureau of Economic Analysis.Moody's allocated the per capita personal income data and unemployment data for all counties in the US census into quartiles.The quartiles are ordered from strongest-to-weakest from a credit perspective:the highest per capita personal income quartile is first quartile,and the lowest unemployment rate is first quartile. 3 The institutional framework score assesses a municipality's legal ability to match revenues with expenditures based on its constitutionally and Legislatively conferred powers and responsibilities.See US Local Government General Oblieatlon Debt(December 201 6)methodology report for more details. 4 For definitions of the metrics in the Key Indicators Table,US Local Government General Obligation Methodology and Scorecard User Guide(Iuly 2014).. Metrics represented as N/A indicate the data were not available at the time of publication. 5 The medians come from our most recently published local government medians report,Medians-Property values key to stability,but pension burdens remain a challenge(March 2018)which is available on Moodys.com.The medians presented here are based on the key metrics outlined in Moody's GO methodology and the associated scorecard. 3 29 October 2018 City of Oak Park Heights,MN:Annual Comment on Oak Park Heights 7 of 30 MOODY 2016 Moody's Corporation,Mnody's Investors Service,Inc,Moody's Analytics,Inc and/o,their licensors and affiliates(collectively,"MOODY'S") .All rights reserved ::REDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE,INC AND ITS RATINGS AFFILIATES("MIS")ARE MOODY'S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT TASK Or ENTITIES;CREDIT COMMITMENTS,t)R DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES.AND MOODY S PUBLICATIONS MAY INCLUDE MOODY'S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES,CREDIT COMMITMENTS,OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES MOODY'S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL,FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT.CREDIT RATINGS DO NOr ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO LIQUIDITY RISK,MARKET VALUE RISK,OR PRICE VOLATILITY CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OP.COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY'S ANALYTICS,INC CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE,AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOTAND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE:SELL,OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE IATABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FUR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR MOODY'S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL.WITH DUE CARE.MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION Or EACH SECURITf THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE,HOLDING,OR SALE MOODY'S CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAI,INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RFTAII INVESTORS"i U USE MOODY";CREDIT RATINGS OR MOODY'S PURI[CATIONS WHFN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW,INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO,COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED,REPACKAGED,FURTHER TRANSMITTFD,TRANSFERRED,DISSEMINATED,REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD,OR STORED FOR SUBSEQI IENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE,IN WHOLE OR IN PART;IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER,RY ANY PERSON WITHOU r MOODY'S PRIOR WRI ITEN CONSENT CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY ANY PERSON AS A BENCHMARK AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED FOR REGULATORY PURPOSES AND MUST NOT BE USED IN ANYWAY THAT COULD RESULT IN THEM BEING CONSIDERED A BENCHMARK All r•iforrnahon cuntained herein is ubtained by MOODY`-from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable Recause of the possibility of hurnan or mechanical error as well as other factors however,all information contained herein is provided"AS IS"without warranty of any kind MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable mrluding,when appropriate,independent third-party sources However, MOODY'S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate Wormation received in the rating process or in preparing the Moody's publications To the extent pernutted by law,MOODY'S and its directors,officers,employees.agents,representatives:licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect,special,conseooential,or incidental losses or damages whatsoever ansing from of in connection with tree information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such rotor matron,even if MOODY'S or any or its directors,officers,employees,agents.representatives;licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such lasses or damages including but not limited to (a)any loss of present or prospective profits or(b)any loss or damage ansing where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY'S To the Pxtrnt permitted by law.MOODY'S and its directors,officers.employees,agents,represenianves,licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity,including but not limited to by any negligence(but excluding fraud,willful misconduct or any other type of liability that,for the avoidance of doubt,by law cannot be excluded)on the part of or any contingency within or beyond the contrul•)f MOODY'S or any of its directors,officers,employees,agents, representatives,licensors of suppliers,ansing from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information NO WARRANTY.EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,AS TO THE ACCURACY,TIMELINESS,COMPLETENFSS,MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY'S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER Moody's Investors Service_Inc.,a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's C urpotation("MCO").hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities(including corporate and municipal bonds,debentures.notes and commercial paper)and preferred stock rated by Moody's Investors Service,Inc have,prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to Moody's Inv"stors Sewice,Inc for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from$1,500 to approximately$2,500,000 MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS's ratings and rating processes Infurmatinn regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCU and rated entities,and between erititres whu hoid•atings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%,is posted annually at www.mQgdo.com under the heading"Investor Relations—Corporate Governance--Director and Shareholder Affiliation Pnlicy" Additional teim<for Australia only Any publication,into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services license of MOODY'S affiliate,Mondy's Investors Seryr Pty Limi*d ABN 61 UO3 399 657AFSi 336969 and/or Mnody's Analytics Australia Pty!.td ARN 94105136 972 AFSL 383569(as applicable)Thu docunnent is intended to b,provided only to"wholesale clients"within the meaning of section 7616 of the Corporations Art 2001 By continuing to ao-ess this document from within Australia,you represent to MOOUPS that you are.or are accessing the document as a representative cf,a"wholesale rtient"and that nPither you nor the entity you represent will directly nr indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to"retail clients'within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001 MOODY'S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditwoi thiness of a debt obligation of the issuer,not on the equity securittes of the issuer or anv form of security that is available to retail investors It would be reckless and inappropriate for retail investors to use MOODY'S credit ratings or publications when making an investment decision If in douot you;horrid contact your financiai or other professional adviser Additional terms for Japan only Moody's japan K K ("MJKK')is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G K,which is wholly-owned by Moody's Overseas Holdings Inc,i•wholly-owned subsidiary cit MCO Mnudy's SF Japan K k ('MSFJ")is a wholly-uwred credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK MSFJ is not a Nationally Recogi uzed Statistical Rating Organization("NRSRO") Therefore,c rrdn ratings assigned by MSFJ are Mori-NRSRO Credit Ratings Non-NRSRO CI edit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and,consequently,the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of trvatzrwrit under LIS laws MJKK.and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan F11!3nclal Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner(Ratings)No Z and 3 respectively MJKK yr P9SFJ(as applicable)hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities(including corporate and municipal bonds,debentures,notes and commercial paper)and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ(as applicable)have,prior tc assignment of any rating,agreed to pay to MIKK or MSF)(as applicable)Ric appraisall and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from IPY200 000 to approximately IPY350,000,000 MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures,to address Japanese regulatory requirements REPORT NUMBER 1144067 4 29 October 2018 City of Oak Park Heights,MN:Annual Comment on Oak Park Heights 8 of 30 Eric Johnson From: Mary Mccomber<marymccomber@aol.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2018 6:10 PM To: Eric Johnson Subject: Fwd: Federal Advocacy Update:Week of October 30,2018 For weekly notes ----Original Message----- From: National League of Cities<advocacy@nlc.org> To: marymccomber<marymccomber@aol.com> Sent: Tue, Oct 30, 2018 5:51 pm Subject: Federal Advocacy Update:Week of October 30, 2018 If this message is not displaying properly,please view the online version. Federal Advocacy Update In This Issue - President Signs SUPPORT for Patients and Communities Act, But More Is Needed - NLC Comments on EPA Effort to Revise Vehicle Emissions and Fuel Economy - First Set of Rules on Opportunity Zone Funds Released - NLC Comments on EPA ACE Rule to Replace Clean Power Plan - Conference Delegates to Vote on Changes to NLC National Municipal Policy President Signs SUPPORT for Patients and Communities Act, But More Is Needed Stephanie Martinez-Ruckman, 202.626.3098 On October 24, President Trump signed the SUPPORT for Patients and Communities Act (H.R. 6), a bipartisan bill that is the culmination of months of work by the House and Senate. The bill provides for the reauthorization of funding i 9 of 30 from the Cures Act, as well as provides new guidance and programs in the areas of treatment, prevention, law enforcement and pain care. However, the legislation does not go far enough to address our nation's overall substance abuse and addiction problem. While it is important that Congress and the Administration are taking positive steps forward on this epidemic, the legislation does not go nearly far enough in terms of recognizing the scope of the problem nor providing significant additional funds to support the work being done. There is especially strong concern that the funds that are being provided are not making it down to the local level and are, rather, being held up at the state level. NLC applauded the bill signing, but we are calling on Congress and the Administration to do more. City leaders have been hard at work sharing this message with Congress and we will continue to push for language in the Fiscal Year 2020 appropriations process that will fully recognize the needs and challenges of cities. NLC Comments on EPA Effort to Revise Vehicle Emissions and Fuel Economy Carolyn Berndt, 202.626.3101 On October 26, NLC submitted comments on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's (NHTSA) proposed rule to amend existing Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) and greenhouse gas emissions standards for passenger cars and light-duty trucks and establish new standards, covering model years 2021 through 2026. In 2012, the agencies worked together to develop CAFE and carbon dioxide standards for Model Years 2017 and beyond. Under that rulemaking, EPA set carbon dioxide standards for Model Years 2017-2025, while NHTSA set final CAFE standards for Model Years 2017-2021 and put forth "augural" CAFE standards for Model Years 2022-2025. This proposed rule would revise the 2012 rule. Specifically, the proposed rule would: i 10 of 30 • Retain the Model Year 2020 CAFE and carbon dioxide emissions standards for passenger cars and light trucks through 2026. • Withdraw the California Waiver that allows the state to set its own standards for greenhouse gas emissions and zero emissions vehicles. Twelve other states plus the District of Columbia have adopted the California standards. NLC's comments underscore the actions that cities are taking to mitigate the effects of climate change, including through a variety of initiatives aimed at reducing emissions from the transportation sector, including reducinq vehicle miles traveled and increasing use of electric vehicles. These efforts alone, however, are often not enough to meet local emission reduction targets, and cities rely on vehicle emission standards to help meet their goals. Additionally, robust vehicle emission standards are key to ensuring cities are able to meet ozone requirements. Finally, NLC opposes withdrawal of the Clean Air Act California waiver, which would preempt local authority to tailor laws to the specific needs of their communities. The 2012 rule required EPA to issue a Final Determination by April 1, 2018 on whether the greenhouse gas emission standards for Model Years 2022-2025 light-duty vehicles remain appropriate. EPA's Final Determination issued earlier this year found that the current greenhouse gas emissions standards for Model Years 2022-2025 are based on outdated information, that the current standards may be too stringent and that they should be revised as appropriate. In September, NLC, together with 16 cities and counties, filed a motion for leave to participate as amici in California v. EPA, a case brought by 17 states plus the District of Columbia challenging EPA's Final Determination on greenhouse gas emissions. The local government motion for leave discusses the threat that climate change poses to cities, including impacts to health, the environment, infrastructure, natural resources and local economies. Because of these impacts, cities are taking action to mitigate and adapt to climate change. The weakening of vehicle greenhouse gas emissions would hinder local governments' ability to reduce greenhouse gas emission in their communities and render adaptation efforts less effective. 3 11 of 30 First Set of Rules on Opportunity Zone Funds Released Brian Egan, 202.626.3907 On October 19, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and the Treasury Department released the first set of proposed rules relating to Qualified Opportunity Funds. The Opportunity Zone program passed as part of last year's larger tax reform package. Qualified Opportunity Zone census tracts were selected earlier this year, but many investors have so far refrained from setting up qualified funds pending rules and guidance. While regulators will likely continue to issue clarifying rules and guidance, the investment community has so far welcomed this month's set of proposed rules as a first step. NLC will continue to analyze and provide resources on this program. For more information on Opportunity Zones, visit NLC's blog, CitiesSpeak. NLC Comments on EPA ACE Rule to Replace Clean Power Plan Carolyn Berndt, 202.626.3101 On October 30, NLC submitted comments on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) proposed rule to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from existing coal-fired electric utility generating units and power plants. The Affordable Clean Energy (ACE) Rule replaces the 2015 Clean Power Plan, which was stayed by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2016 and has not gone into effect. The ACE proposed rule takes a narrower approach to reduce greenhouse gas emissions than the Clean Power Plan. It focuses on making individual plants more efficient—a move that would achieve far shallower reductions compared to the Clean Power Plan, which sought to cut emissions across the power sector. The proposed rule would also give states more leeway in how they meet the more modest climate goals. Specifically, the proposed rule would: 4 12 of 30 Provide states with a list of"candidate technologies" that can be used to establish standards of performance and be incorporated into their state plans. States will have three years from date of finalization to prepare and submit a plan that establishes a standard of performance. The proposed rule does not set a standard of performance, but rather give states the flexibility to design a plan to achieve emissions.reductions at the source. • Revise the New Source Review to allow for an hourly measurement of emissions as opposed to an annualized accounting. The New Source Review program aims to protect air quality when factories, industrial boilers and power plants are newly built or modified. Under the program, a state. permit is required for any new facility or to renovate an existing facility if it will lead to an increase in annual emissions. The proposed change would apply only to power plants. It is significant because with the hourly accounting power plants can more easily show efficiency gains and therefore fewer sources will trigger the New Source Review requirements. NLC's comments, as well as pending litigation, support the Clean Power Plan as a means of nationally reducing greenhouse gas emissions and mitigating the growing negative impacts of climate change on cities. NLC urges EPA to take urgent action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions across the power sector, including through investments in and incentives for renewable energy and increased energy efficiency. NLC continues to urge the Administration to support and partner with cities to mitigate the effects of climate change. EPA plans to issue a final rule in early 2019. Conference Delegates to Vote on Changes to NLC National Municipal Policy Avery Peters, At NLC's 2018 City Summit, we have a robust line-up of speakers and sessions with innovative learning opportunities, mobile workshops, inspiring keynotes, skill- building NLC University seminars, and several chances to network with peers from across the country. In addition to those sessions, important governance activities will also take place at the conference. 5 13 of 30 During the conference's Annual Business Meeting on November 10 the entire NLC membership, including the State Municipal Leagues, will consider changes to NLC's National Municipal Policy (NMP). The NMP is NLC's comprehensive policy platform on federal issues directly affecting or of concern to cities and towns. It serves as the foundation for NLC's federal advocacy efforts on behalf of the nation's cities and is subject to an annual review by NLC's membership during the City Summit. As the foundation for our advocacy efforts, a relevant and robust NMP is essential to our effectiveness on behalf of cities on Capitol Hill. Over the course of this year, city leaders who serve on NLC's Federal Advocacy Committees have been hard at work reviewing the NMP and developing recommendations for changes. To allow you ample time to review the proposed changes that will be considered in Los Angeles, you can view them here. N *FCn= 9J You may opt out of email communications from NLC at any time. Update your communication preferences. This message was intended for. marymccomber@aol.com 660 North Capitol Street, NW, Suite 450 Washington, DC 20001 Privacy Policy ©2018 NLC, All Rights Reserved Powered by Higher Logic 6 14 of 30 Eric Johnson From: Mary Mccomber <marymccomber@aol.com> Sent: Saturday, October 27,2018 4:14 PM To: Eric Johnson Subject: Fwd: How Dayton Sets an Example on Transparency For weekly notes -----Original Message— From: National League of Cities<news@nlc.org> To: marymccomber<marymccomber@aol.com> Sent: Sat, Oct 27, 2018 8:11 am Subject: How Dayton Sets an Example on Transparency View in browser, A f _j A* it r 1"_he We- ekl 15 of 30 mil DI YiMYMn i. fir. DD• —. a M i Mayor Whaley: How Dayton Sets an Example on Transparency Transparency tools are powerful for our democracy, bringing vital information about local government to homes, libraries and community meetings. Mayor Nan Whaley of Dayton, Ohio challenged her city to prioritize transparency, resulting in an open data portal that enables residents to see the value and effectiveness of city services and investments in real time. 4 Takeaways from, Proposed Opportunity -- Zone Regulations The federal government proposed the first set of regulations around the Opportunity Zones program that would provide investors with more clarity over which investments qualify and which do not. Employee-Owned Businesses a Tool for Equitable Growth z 16 of 30 The new Shared Equity in Economic Development (SEED) fellowship program helps city leaders create pathways to democratic employee ownership in communities most affected by social and economic inequality. Tempe Brings Transparency to Small Cell Installation r+, With small cell deployment, Tempe found that local g l government can function as the connection between the community and industry, ensuring that both parties' interests are represented and accounted for. News NLC Applauds the Enactment of SUPPORT for Patients and Communities Act, But More Is Needed NLC Statement-- October 24, 2018 10 Years Later: Local Government Isn't All the Way Back Bond Buyer— October 25, 2018 New Report Says Autonomous Vehicle Pilots are Picking Up Speed Autonomous Vehicle Technology— October 23, 2018 Announcements Apply Now to Join the Early Learning Nation Technical Assistance Initiative We invite you to apply for our 18-month City Leadership for Building an Early Learning Nation Initiative, which is open to cities of varying sizes and geographic locations. Six selected cities will gain access to the YEF 3 17 of 30 Institute's nearly 20 years of experience working with local leaders to expand early childhood opportunities and will receive in-depth technical assistance focused on actionable strategies to advance early childhood efforts. Applications are due by 7 p.m. EST on November 19, 2018. Click here for more information and the application. Events Nov. 7-10 City Summit 2018 (Los Angeles) Job Postings Assistant City Manager— Leander, Texas County Administrator— Clackamas County, Oregon City of Detroit Homelessness Policy Fellow— University of Michigan - Ann Arbor C, ' iNWZNAL MES Q You may opt out of email communications from NLC at any time. Update your communication preferences. This message was intended for: marymccomber@aol.com 660 North Capitol Street, NW, Suite 450 Washington, DC 20001 Privacy Policy ©2018 NLC, All Rights Reserved Powered by Higher Logic 4 18 of 30 Eric Johnson From: Mary Mccomber <marymccomber@aol.com> Sent: Saturday, November 3,2018 3:12 PM To: Eric Johnson Subject: Fwd: Elon Musk at City Summit,#FutureofWork, Simplifying Community Engagement For weekly notes -----Original Message---- From: National League of Cities<news@nlc.org> To: marymccomber<marymccomber@aol.com> Sent: Sat, Nov 3, 2018 6:11 am Subject: Elon Musk at City Summit,#FutureofWork, Simplifying Community Engagement Vee M OPENING GENERAL SESSION FIRESIDE CHAT WITH • 1 r GARCETTI AND ELON REGISTER NOW Lh,eo-,wT W'x7e,me t k I y 19 of 30 s # FUTUREOFWORIK-1 President Stodola: The Future of Work is Change This year, NLC President Mark Stodola's focus has been to help city leaders prepare their communities for the #FutureofWork in cities. It's a complex issue with many perspectives and approaches, but ultimately, it's a conversation about change. In San Leandro, We Are Building on Public Broadband Investment for a Brighter Future The city of San Leandro, California has spent several years investing in fiber and wireless technologies to spur economic development and improve residents' lives, writes Councilmember Corina Lopez. How San Jose is Closing the Digital Divide Equity drives San Jose's approach to bringing new technologies to the city, and the deployment of 2 20 of 30 municipal broadband and municipal fiber lines are no exception. m How One Company is Simplifying Community Engagement NLC has teamed up with Polco, an organization that is changing the way local elected officials get input and buy-in from their constituents. News With 2020 Census Looming, Governments Face Many Unknowns Governing — November 2, 2018 State, Local Groups Bring Fight Against SALT Cap to IRS Hearing Bond Buyer— November 2, 2018 NLC Supports Cities With Autonomous Vehicle Action Guide Smart & Resilient Cities— November 2, 2018 Making Cities Safe By Helping People Connect Beyond Their Differences CitiesSpeak— October 29, 2018 Announcements NEW: Elon Musk Fireside Chat With Mayor Garcetti at City Summit 3 21 of 30 Elon Musk is the co-founder and CEO at Tesla, overseeing all product design, engineering and manufacturing of the company's electric vehicles, battery products and Solar Roofs. Hear his story and get insights on how technology will impact the future of cities during a fireside chat with Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti at City Summit's Opening General Session Thursday, November 8. Register here today! Expand your network. Join an NLC Group Some of the most valuable benefits of NLC membership are the relationships city leaders can form with their peers. Through our networks, council, groups and committees, municipal leaders share creative ideas, learn from peers, shape NLC policy on federal issues and grow as local leaders on the national stage. Apply today to be a part of NLC's signature networking and policy development groups. Applications are due Friday, November 30. Learn more here. Mayors' Institute on Opioids — Lessons Learned and Future Opportunities Cities confront the realities of the opioid epidemic each day and witness the devastating impacts on families and increasing toll on first responders, public safety officials, and many others. In May, six mayors came together for a peer-to-peer dialogue to share strategies and inform their respective efforts across access to treatment, harm reduction, prevention and recovery. In this new summary, NLC explores the lessons learned and future opportunities to better address the crisis. Download the summary here. Events Nov. 7-10 City Summit 2018 (Los Angeles) Job Postings Assistant Director - Recreation Division — Fort Worth, Texas County Administrator— Clackamas County, Oregon City Manager— East Grand Rapids, Michigan 4 22 of 30 NWIMINAL UMAM NLccpcnm M a IM You may opt out of email communications from NLC at any time. Update your communication preferences. This message was intended for: marymccomber@aol.com 660 North Capitol Street, NW, Suite 450 Washington, DC 20001 Privacy Policy ©2018 NLC, All Rights Reserved Powered by Higher Logic 5 23 of 30 Metro Cities News 11/2/18 Pagel of 2 METRO CITIES Member Login ® Search aur site ®4 as Home Metro Cities News About Us Meetings&Events Membership Advocacy Policies&Resources MAMA Return to the blog Upcoming Events Metro Cities News 11/2/18 by:Kimberly C!arrocchi Tue Nov 6,2016 categmy:Newsletter Election Da Category:Hordaye Show Tags _....__..._.._..---- Thu Nov 29.2018 I MAW Nov MA MALuncheon Category:MAMA 02 In This Issue: Thu;Mov 20,6—� Metro Realonal Meeting/Pollcy Metropolitan Council Committee Discusses Local Sewer Rate Trends Adootlon Meet[nd Category:Meeting Metro Regional Meeting/Metro Cities Policy Adoption Meeting ------ —-----I --- Wed Dec 12,2018 MAMA Holiday Social Metropolitan Council Committee Discusses Local Sewer Rate Trends ,,•.a,.,M„eg, The Metropolitan Council's Environment Committee recently heard a presentation by Council staff on View Full Calendar local and national sewer rate trends.The information is gathered via survey.Locally,the survey is conducted in even years and focuses on sewer charges to single-family homes.The survey showed that Announcements on average,the region's households have experienced a 3.3%increase in sewer charges.The survey showed a national average increase of 4.9%.MCES rates are typically lower compared to peer Metro Cities 2019 Draft averages.The annual MCES average retail charge is$274 per year,with the peer average aLegislative Policies will go beforet$468 per the full membership In November. year.This ranked MCES fourth out of 23 peer regions. Click r e for information on the Metro Regional Meeting/Policy For more information,click Adoption Meeting and how to register.Click to view the 2019 Draft Legislative Policies. Metro Regional Meeting/Metro Cities Policy Adoption Meeting Our Tweets Join your colleagues for the LMC Metro Regional Meeting and Policy Adoption Meeting on November 29th,2018 at Brookview in Golden Valley! Tweets by @MetmCifiesMN The cities of Minnetonka,Eagan,and Prior Lake will discuss their strategies for community engagement LMC and LMCIT staff will present on conflict in local government and how to work JME Metro Clues together for more effective governing and problem-solving.Metro Cities membership will also meet to @MetroCifiesMN approve the 2019 Legislative Policies for Metro Cities staff to use going into the 2019 legislative Metro Cites thanks @mndeed session.A membership quorum is required for policy adoption,so each member city should make Tor opportunity to present at their redevelopment conference. sure to send a representative!The event will end with a great networking social hour. Heard strong Iotal support for state redevelopment funding. Click for more information and to register.We look forward to seeing you there! Nov 1,2018 Share this post: Metro Cities Rebuseted nMary Gaasch @D,qaryGaasch I was nervous to chair my first meeting of such an accomplished group of advocates for clfies! Thanks to the @MetrocCifiesMN Board for pitching In to help me with procedure] Embed View on T'Mtter 24 of 30 https://www.metrocitiesmn.org/index.php?option=corn dailyplanetblog&view--entry&yea... 11/4/2018 Metro Cities News 11/2/18 Page 2 of 2 Metro Citles(Associatlon of Metropolitan Municipalities) 10 145 University Ave W,Suite 125 St.Paul,MN 55103 651-215.4000 Back to top A Powered Sy Q M Qidm 25 of 30 https://www.metrocitiesmn.org/index.php?option=com dailyplanetblog&view--entry&yea... 11/4/2018 Eric Johnson From: Mary Mccomber <marymccomber@aol.com> Sent: Friday,October 26,2018 4:15 PM To: Eric Johnson Subject: Fwd: Register NOW! 2018 GREATER MSP Partnership Annual Meeting For weekly notes -----Original Message----- From: GREATER MSP <infb@greatermsp.org> To: marymccomber<marymccomber@aol.com> Sent: Fri, Oct 26, 2018 2:15 pm Subject: Register NOW!2018 GREATER MSP Partnership Annual Meeting G ATER >>. M P1 Minneapolis Saint Paul Regional Economic Development Partnership 2018 GREATER MSP ANNUAL MEETING 26 of 30 D O (� D Q A D 0 , PLEASE JOIN US! THE 2018 GREATER MSP PARTNERSHIP ANNUAL MEETING NOVEMBER 14, 2018 5:30 pm- REGISTRATION 5:30-8:00 PM " 6:60 pm(sharp) -ANNUAL MEETING PROGRAM 7:00 pm-8.00 pm - NETWORKING RECEPTION ORCHESTRA HALL As part of the evening's program. we are pleased to 1111 N ICOLLET MALL, showcase a special performance by a string quartet MINNEAPOLIS, M N 55403 comprised of members of the Minnesota Orchestra. REGISTER Now GREATER >> MSP Yi nrre5.,.r::PYLA Peel-..a Lcn.nnmic Gnv opmenl P: r.er:Lin • - -• • • • - 111 • • - • • . - • -• • _ • - • speakers will include Tim Welsh, Rhonda Sivarajah, Ravi Norman, Michael Langley, and others who will introduce our exciting new vision for our region. BOLD. FORWARD. TOGETHER. REGISTER HERE Thank you to our Entertainment Sponsor e0e*� - -� - * We ORCHESTRA 1 �1 �1E� � 9001 .,. Questions?Contact Judy Johnson,at Judy.Johnson@greatermsp.org or 651-287-1362 Share this email- Manage yoiEr preferences opt out using TrueRemoveO Go'this as a forward?Sign up to receive our future emails View this email online 400 Robert St North Suite 1600 Saint Paul, MN 155101 US This email was sent to marymccomber@aol.com To continue receiving our emads, add us to your address book. 3 28 of 30 Eric Johnson From: Mary McComber Sent: Thursday, November 1,2018 10:01 AM To: Eric Johnson Subject FW: Ribbon Cutting - Hotel Crosby-Thursday, 11/15 @4pm - Please RSVP! For weekly notes From: Emily Sumner[membership@greaterstillwaterchamber.com] Sent:Thursday, November 1, 2018 9:00 AM To: Mary McComber Subject: Ribbon Cutting-Hotel Crosby-Thursday, 11/15 @4pm-Please RSVP! Event Invitation Ribbon Cutting-Hotel Crosby [https://chambermaster.blob.core.windows.net/userriles/UserFiles/chambers/257/Image/ribbon-cutting4.jpg] Join us to celebrate the BRAND NEW Hotel Crosby! Retreat to Hotel Crosby,where stress is unheard of and simplicity is the name of the game.With a blend of comfort and luxury,all are welcome to sit back,savor the day,and enjoy an unrivaled warm Crosby welcome. Come celebrate this new hotel addition to downtown Stillwater,and immediately after STAY for the Monthly Chamber MIXER!!! Date: November 15,2018 Time: 04:00 PM-05:00 PM CST Location: 232 Main Street North Stillwater, MN 55082 Contact: Greater Stillwater Chamber 651-439-4001 Date/Time Details: Thursday, November 15th 4:00 pm Fees/Admission: RSVPs requested to assist in planning this event! Click Here for More lnformation<http://greaterstillwaterchamber.com/events/details/ribbon-cutting-hotel-crosby- 29432> Add to Calendar<http://greaterstillwaterchamber.com/events/ical/ribbon-cutting-hotel-crosby-29432.ics> Sorry, I'm not able to attend<https://greaterstillwaterchamber.chambermaster.com/directory/jsp/events/dIg/Pubiic_Declinelnvite.isp?ccid=2 57&eventid=29432&crspid=519387> Register Online<https://greaterstillwaterchamber.chambermaster.com/directory/jsp/events/dig/Public_Add Reg.jsp?cid=X71NOh 7158a92ZUOrv257nJ31R17729432B6V8wf4M4714519387p657uOHv15Ox> [http://secure2.chambermaster.com/directory/servlet/blank.giRCCID=257&CorrespondencelD=519387] i 29 of 30 This email was sent on behalf of Greater Stillwater Chamber of Commerce by GrowthZone,24400 Smiley RD Ste.4, Nisswa, MN 56468.To unsubscribe click here<http://greaterstillwatercha mber.com/communication/subscribe?id=%2BG PeaTEg!nACbgUdQISUd3vrKCc7R3AV7Z xrNXNkkfgv9DcrENzkx)koijcFKlyQwgOCtQ4H1fRjL2iOjM16MIRVhgbHQYzNC4%2FuUFHP2ZfLNYGpo4C3yGcaUGquSbDjID HOfB5ZO6F8KArWRrUW1A%3D%3D>. If you have questions or comments concerning this email or GrowthZone services in general, please contact us by email at support@growthzone.com<mailto:support@growthzone.com?subject=Comments%20regarding%20email%20from%20 Greate r%20Stillwater%20Cha m be r%20of%20Commerce&body=[Start%20Yo u r%20Message%20Here]>. z 30 of 30