Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2009-03-09 OPH Ltr to MPCAl a City of Oak Park Hei*ghts 14.168 Oak Park Blvd. N •Box 2007.Oak Park Heights, MN 550 82 •Phone (651) 439 4439 • Fax (651) 439 -0574 March 9, 2009 Mr. Robert Criswell MPCA- Metro District 520 Lafayette Road, N. St. Paul, MN 55122 -4194 RE: Xcel Energy Letter Dated 2127109. AS ling Ash Permit SW -54; Request for re- Issuance Dear Mr. Criswell: I am in receipt of my copy of the above dated letter from Xcel Energy seeking renewal of their Ash Permit. The following comments should be considered as part of any renewal of such permit. 1111111111111 111111111 11111li Section 2.0 Section 2.0 references the use of "Best Management Practices" (BMP) for dust suppression on the access roads "into and around" the Disposal Facility. There should be an explicit insertion that clearly defines what BMP in fact are. Section 2.0 also discusses the installation of a wheel wash at the exit of the gravel road. Any permit renewal should state that this shall be installed by a date certain and must be operable at all times fly ash is being hauled. Moreover, the subsequent water draining from the vehicles must be adequately dealt with, meaning it may not wash into the street and down storm sewers. This will be a violation of MSCWMO rules. A wash/storm retention basin should be installed and made part of this permit renewal Section 2.0 mentions the use of a watering truck for dust control. While this may be an acceptable method to control dust in some locations inside the facility itself, it is not an acceptable use for public streets (such as Beach Road which is a Washington County roadway) as this only carries debris into the storm sewer and subsequently into the St. Croix River. Moreover, as this dries on the public streets, additional dust is created. Instead, the permit should be explicitly revised stating that all streets shall be swept daily by means of a "street sweeper" that applies water, agitates and then picks up such debris. Simply applying water does not work on the public streets. Section 3.0 Section 3.0 discusses dust control techniques for "active area" surfaces; to date, dust control at the site has been poorly maintained and the City receives several complaints per year. The MPCA should implement specific and rigid standards that explicitly deal with this dust issue beyond the generalities discuss in this section. Moreover, to the city's knowledge, the MPCA has done very little to nothing in terms of enforcement or site review to spot verify dust control operations and must be addressed. If the MPCA has significant concerns about eliminating fly -ash from escaping to the atmosphere at the plant itself; it should express equal concerns and similarly address these for the fly -ash dust leaving this landfill site. Section 5.0 Section 5.0 discusses techniques for off -site Roads. To date, the City has received numerous phone calls from area residents regarding the dust, noise, lack of courtesy of the drivers., excessive speeds, uncovered loads, etc., stemming from the operations at this site. The MPCA must implement spot checks of this site to ensure that all aspects of any permit is implemented and followed through in detail. This section also mentions street washing and street sweeping. Carefully note, street sweeping as suggested in the letter would be satisfactory, but must be implemented EVERY DAY that xcel Energy does decide to haul fly -ash to and from this site. The use of the words "as- needed" is unacceptable to the City of Oak Park Heights and is vague phrasing. The MPCA must explicitly clarify when these streets are to be swept, by whore and to what degree. This section also mentions street washing, as discussed above any water applied to public streets will wind -up in the St. Croix River (which may be a separate pollution problem of fly -ash getting into the St. Croix River) and does little to actually control on- street dust as it just collets in larger piles down- grade. The use of a streets- sweeper that wets and then picks -up materials is psibly an acceptable alternative. Tease et m now if you have any questions. i erel — Eric . J nson, Ci A finis #rator Weekly Notes Manuel Castillo, xcel Energy Gary Kriesel, Washington county Commissioner Jeff Travis, Washington County Amy Carolan, MSCWMO Senator Kathy Saltzman Representative Julie Bunn Xcel Energy SM 414 Nicollet illlall Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 -1993 February 27, 2009 Robert Criswell Metro District Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, MN 55122 -4194 Re: A.S. King Ash Permit SW-54; Request for Re- issuance Dear Mr. Criswell: xcel Energy requesting uesting that the re- issuance of the King Landfill SW-54 continue under the q Application for Permit Re- issuance fled September 24, 2007. Included is a copy of the original re- issuance application cover letter. The submittals for expansion of the King Landfill are formally withdrawn. As rt of this request xcel Energy is including an updated dust suppression plan that corresponds to p q the existing application for re- issuance. Sincerely, Manuel Castillo Sr, Environmental Analyst 612-330-6506 Attachments: c: Roger Clarke Chuck Donkers Scott Thomas Tom Smith Jeff Travis Cary Bruns Eric Johnson ES Record Center MP 3 MP 3 MP King Plant Washington County Washington County City of oak Park Heights Dust Suppression Plan A.S. Ding Ash Disposal Facility Oak Park Heights, Minnesota MPCA Permit # SW-54 Devised 2009 UK The following document serves to provide a protocol for dust suppression at the A.S. King Ash Disposal Facility. The plan addresses techniques for dust suppression on road surfaces, in the active area and on closed areas. The dusting conditions at any particular time may require a subset of the techniques identified in this document and the attachments. �piiq V1111111117 1: Four techniques will be used for dust suppressio(fordusit access roads into and around the A.S. Ding Ash Disposal Facility. Thefined as follows: Road Maintenance /Grading: Roads will be d in a manner to conform to Best Management Practices (BMP's suppression. Such practices will include periodic removal of gravel that has been clogged with fines and replacement with fresh gravel. Minimize road development and remove roads that are no longer required and re- vegetate. Locate roads minimize exposure to prevailing winds and use temporary or permanent windbreaks or berms when applicable. A wheel wash, will be located on the gravel exit road.' All trucks shall pass over this wheel wash prior to exiting the site. The wheel wash will be re- constructed as needed. Daily Maintenance: Application of water will be the primary source of dust control for daily maintenance. A self-contained water truck will be on -site at all times. when conditions are right for dusting on the roads, additional personnel will be brought to the site to ensure watering is being done - throughout the daily operation of the landfill. Chemical Mainte nceo The application of chemical dust suppressants may be applied as needed, either by surface application or incorporation into the upper 2 - 3 inches of the surface gravel. The products can vary from salts to biodegradable products that meet specific safety requirements. The attached Bust Suppression Plan A.S. King Ash Disposal Facility Oak Park Heights, Minnesota MPCA Permit # SW-54 Page 2 document, "Techniques for Dust Prevention and Suppression ", (Publication Number 96 -433), Washington State Department of Ecology, provides a reasonable selection process for use of these products. Operational Restrictions: The operational restrictions that can be enforced include reducing the speed limit of the vehicles traveling on the unpaved portion of the facility roads, minimizing traffic on roads that are not required for active operations and limiting traffic of tracked vehicles on the unpaved roads. These restrictions will be used on an as- needed basis. 3.0 Techniques for Active Area Surfaces The techniques for the active area include daily maintenance using a watering true., chemical daily covers and operational restrictions. In addition, the following additional techniques can be applied to minimize dusting on the active area. Operation Planning: Through good operations planning, dusting from the active area can be kept to a minimum. Such items as using a small operations area, staging fill to provide protection from the prevailing wind and placing intermediate cover as quickly as practicable all serve to reduce dusting. In addition, proper conditioning of ash and compaction of ash to achieve high density is an excellent means to reduce dusting to acceptable levels. Also important is to eliminate traffic of nonessential vehicles across the active area either during or after daily operations. 4.0 Techniques for Closed Areas and Construction Activities Final closure serves to stabilize areas of the disposal facility on a permanent basis. The details of the final closure are fully discussed in the current permit application document. However, proper maintenance and access restrictions serve to prevent areas that are closed from becoming a dusting issue. Established vegetation should be mowed and watered as require to maintain a healthy vegetative cover at all times. Rutting and areas of surface erosion should be repaired and a new vegetative cover should be established as quickly as possible. + Traffic should be prevented from accessing the final cover. Appropriate postings and physical barriers should be placed to identify that the area is off limits to vehicle traffic. Dust Suppression Plan A.S. King Ash Disposal Facility Oak Park Heights, Minnesota MPCA Permit # SW -54 Page 3 Where stockpiles arg required for construction, the piles should be shaped and surface compacted. If the material is fine grained silt size material, tarps or other chemical covers should be used to stabilize the stockpile. The techniques for road surfaces should be applied to any area where construction has exposed underlying soils. In addition, proper construction staging to minimize dusting should be explicitly called out in the bid documents. 5 .0 Techniques for Off -site Roads In addition to the wheel wash identified in Section 2. several techniques will be implemented to control tracking of coal ash onto public roads and thus prone to dusting. Truck equipment: All trucks used for hauling will be fitted with oversized mud flaps to prevent ash from getting on the trucks under carriage during the dumping process. All trucks will be tarped (covered), 'n both directions, while traveling between the ADF and the Plant. '00 Street sweeping: The public roads between the ADF and the Plant will be swept as needed. A commercial street sweeper, utilizing a wet spray ,will collect any r aw irom the road and properly dispose of the sweepings. Street sweeping will be limited to the months April thru November when minimum air temperatures are above freezing. Street washing: A water truck will wet the street periodically from the Plant to the ADF on the r days ash is being hauled. Wetting the road surface will be lim to the months April thru November when minimum air temperatures are above freezing. Truck audits: A security system has been installed, and is being tested, for auditing truck compliance with tarping requirements. Random checks will be made each month to ensure all trucks are tarped. 19 xcelEnergy SM 414 Nicoliet Mali Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 -1993 September 25, 2007 Mike Lynn Metro District Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, MN 55155 -4194 Re: Application for Re- issuance Request: A.S. King Landfill SW-54; Dear Mr. Lynn: Xcel Energy y pp hereby applies for re-issuance of permit SW-54 for the operations of the A.S Ong Landfill. On August 22 2007 Xcel Energy applied for a minor modification. to Permit SW -54d The requested modification dealt with a change in the side slope of the landfill from the currently permitted 4H: IV to 3H: IV, and lowering the top elevation to produce a net zero change in permitted airspace_ WCA staff has conditionally approved the minor modification, and the application reflects the p changes. Enclosed for your revi are four copies of the application with a full size set of drawings. Additional materials included are the Delegation of Authority for Roger Clarke, and copies of the n otification letters sent to the local officials. The signed return receipt forms will be sent separately upon their arrival. Sincerely, 0" Manuel Castillo Sr. Environmental Analyst 612- 330 -6506 Enclosure 8 cc: Scott Th om.e s Roger Clarke Chuck Donkers John McCain Darrell Knutson ES Record Center NT 8 MP 8 MP 8 McCain and Associates King Plant w/o enclosure w/o enclosure w/o enclosure w/ o enclosure e a � �o ,ct` r� CL y� qb w tz m as } C co Ov C ❑ ❑ V � U h m 0 N Lij cc r. ift 6 � g tn 0 CD U) U) a) CU �U) cu W r (3) CL L 0 LrL � a cd r 0 o . C L ...�. Co C) C • .> w . 40.-; co (1) z U E CD ° Co (D ■0 ..3 cn D- x w E 0 w CO 0 *� W co p N ���� - _ > U) a.w� 0 W P\ .� 0 Co oU Co a a. 0 w ,�,..� E a) 0 (D CL c� ,CD C Co 0 0 Co C � 0 co 4 """ 0 W o a Co oo CD 0 C: Cl) : 0 � a ) o ^rt 0 CD 4-A -W L. '0 co WARM �: CD CD ..0 Co r °� M- M aw-so 0 E tl q .a) . v r r. c CD o. CU Co -4-j 0 C: C: co E 0 " cts ,� ..... Co E r M // O arf4 C $ co �0' .arcs ova) C) ri � t` aw V t!] `C� C6 >1 E < 0 0 � Co (, tL 0 Cl) 0 co co cn -a r.L C: ..... o 0% 3: cu C/) m � 0 C: W M Wh 0 0 C0 o 0) 4-1 20) (D C Q.0. 4- X 0 V Cl) .4..j (1) _U) m i� D U � C L . Y ID W tai �°°�°� -.��' ;� .0 CD �] 0� ��:�. x z z S - 5 V� . .O"a , C.) o C 6 -