HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-14-2006 Planning Commission Meeting PacketV. Public Hearings:
IX. Adjournment.
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA
Thursday, December 14, 2006 — 7:00 p.m.
I. Call to Order / Approval of Agenda
II. Approve Minutes of November 9, 2006: (1)
III. Department / Commission Liaison / Other Reports:
A. Commission Liaison:
B. St. Croix Crossing Update:
C. Other:
IV. Visitors /Public Comment:
This is an opportunity for the public to address the Commission with questions or concerns
regarding items not on the agenda. Please limit comments to three minutes.
A. Joel Nichols Kott Conditional Use Permit for attached/detached garage
in excess of 1,000 sq. ft. at 15118 64 St. N. (2)
B. Stillwater Motor Co. Conditional Use Permit- Interim Use for installation
of five flags and poles at 5900 Stillwater Blvd. N. (3)
C. W.A.T.E. Enterprises Inc. Planned Unit Development: Concept &
General Plan Approvals, Minor Subdivision and Site Plan Review for
construction of two office warehouse buildings and a cold storage
building at the west side of Memorial Ave. N, between 5 520 and 5 620
Memorial Ave. N. (4)
VI. New Business:
VII. Old Business:
A. Comprehensive Plan Update
VIII. Informational:
A. Next Meeting: January 11, 2007 — Regular Meeting @ 7:00 p.m.
B. Council Representative: December — Commissioner Runk
January — Commissioner LeRoux
Call to Order / Approval of Agenda:
Chair Runk called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Present: Commissioners LeRoux, Liljegren,
Powell and Wasescha; City Administrator Johnson, City Planner Richards and Acting
Commission Liaison McComber. Absent: Commission Liaison Doerr.
Commissioner Powell, seconded by Commissioner Wasescha, moved to approve the Agenda, as
presented. Carried 5-0
Approve Minutes of September 14, 2006: Commissioner Powell, seconded by Commissioner
LeRoux, moved to approve the Minutes as presented. Carried 5 -0
Department /Commission Liaison Report /St. Croix Crossing Update & Other Reports:
Acting Commission Liaison McComber updated the Commission as to the St. Croix Crossing
project and Department of Transportation's activity.
Visitors/Public Comment: None.
Public Hearings:
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
Thursday, November 9, 2006
ENCLOSURE
A. Buffalo Wild Wings Variance to signage regulations & Design Guideline deviation.
City Planner Richards reviewed the October 27, 2006 planning report relative the request, noting
that three wall signs were being requested, two of them in excess of allowable sign area. He also
discussed issues of signage design that would not be allowable per the City Design Guidelines.
Richards provided an issue analysis, discussing hardship criteria and Design Guidelines
requirements and provided his recommendation of denial to the request. Discussion ensued
clarifying the issues of concern.
Chair Runk opened the public hearing and invited public comment.
Glen Remmus of Buffalo Wild Wings and Scott of Lawrence Sign Co. were present and
addressed the issues noted within the planning report. Both indicated that it was their
understanding that the City had been made aware of the signage desired by Buffalo Wild Wings
through the Developer, with whom they have been working with for the past year. It was noted
that they had received the Sign Ordinance but not the Design Guidelines and that they based their
signage on the Sign Ordinance.
Discussion ensued as to the report, signage desired and allowable signage. It was noted that
during the concept plan review of the development no specific tenant action would have been
undertaken. The method of building facade percentage determined was discussed as was the
yellow background inclusion to total sign calculation.
Planning Commission Minutes
November 9, 2006
Page 2 of 5
Scott Tubman of CSM reviewed the elevations for the store location, added that Buffalo Wild
Wings has been on board as a tenant since the conceptual stage. He addressed the planning report
issues, disagreeing with the content in general and proposed a possible compromise, adding that
he was unable to speak for Buffalo Wild Wings brand identity and what they could or could not
live with in the way of signage.
General discussion ensued as to the bright colors, precedence establishment, 5% rule, number of
signs, the yellow background inclusion in total signage calculation, allowable signage size and
numbers for the location and potential alternatives for the signage so that it would comply with
the City Ordinance requirements.
Commissioner Powell, seconded by Commissioner Liljegren, moved to close the public hearing.
Carried 5 -0.
Further discussion ensued as to the signage size allowed, reduction of yellow background, a
variance needed for a third sign at the site, the black and white checker color to the building,
comparable locations and aesthetic fit to the Oak Park Heights business community. It was noted
that the two primary issues to the request were the signage itself and its visual impact upon the
community.
Commissioner Liljegren, seconded by Commissioner Wasescha, moved to recommend denial of
the request for sign variance to allow a total of three wall signs. Carried 3 -2; Commissioners
Runk and Powell opposed.
Commissioner Powell, seconded by Commissioner LeRoux, moved to recommend denial of the
request for deviation from Design Guidelines, allowing decorative color bands on the outdoor
seating railings. Carried 5 -0.
Commissioner LeRoux, seconded by Commissioner Powell, moved to recommend approval of
the request for deviation from Design Guidelines, allowing decorative color wrap on the
awnings. Carried 3-2; Commissioners Liljegren and Wasescha opposed.
Commissioner Wasescha, seconded by Commissioner Liljegren, moved to recommend denial of
the request for sign variance to exceed square footage allowance for wall signage. Carried 5 -0.
Commissioner LeRoux, seconded by Commissioner Wasescha, moved to recommend that the
black, white and yellow colors proposed on the building facade be considered as signage and
included as part of the square footage calculation for signage allowance. Carried 5 -0.
A. Goodwill request for street vacation.
B. Goodwill Conditional Use Permit for donation center drive- through and replat of a
portion of Oakgreen Village.
City Planner Richards reviewed the October 25, 2006 planning report relative the requests for a
conditional use permit, preliminary and final plat approval, street vacation, and site plan review.
t
Planning Commission Minutes
November 9, 2006
Page 3 of 5
Richards provided an issue analysis to the request and discussed questions to the same from the
Commission.
Chair Runk opened the public hearing and invited public comment.
John Patterson, the applicant, introduced himself to the Commission, addressed the planning
report and discussed matters of concern or question with the Commission, including exterior
material composition, entry location and path of travel at site, drop off center location and
operation plan, hours of business operation, delivery times, screening and landscaping, lighting
and similar matters.
Missy Anderson of Pondview Condominiums stated their her home faces the proposed dock area
and inquired about the lighting for that area, she also asked what time was anticipated for truck
activity in the docking area and how the development in general was going to affect her property
value.
Todd Erickson, the Engineer to the project, discussed the sites building location and grading
elevations, he address questions as to the landscaping elements, to lighting and how the site was
anticipated to fit to the area while being a good neighbor to the Pondview Condominium
development.
Mike Brochman of Pondview Condominiums stated that his home was in the area where a 25-
foot light pole was being planned. He questioned what kind of light was going to come from the
pole light, what business hours were expected and how trash was being facilitated. He inquired
as to how the landscaping between the business property and his neighborhood was going to be
done, expressing concern about water run off toward his neighborhood.
Joy Linder of Pondview Condominiums inquired as to what the plan was for snow storage and /or
removal. She also asked if there would be trucks running for periods of time, on a regular basis,
at the loading dock in the morning hours.
General discussion ensued addressing the matters of concern brought forth, including the
possibility of constructing a retaining wall to the north of the loading dock to buffer the
residential area from the dock site.
Commissioner Liljegren, seconded by Commissioner Wasescha, moved to close the public
hearing. Carried 5 -0.
Discussion ensued as to the conditions of the planning report and amendments based on the
audience comment received.
Commissioner Wasescha, seconded by Commissioner Powell, moved to recommend City
Council approval of the requests, subject to conditions as noted:
1. The applicant shall file the final plat for Oakgreen Village prior to City Council
approval of the Goodwill Industries application.
2. The landscape plan shall be revised to provide additional planting along the north and
Planning Commission Minutes
November 9, 2006
Page 4 of 5
east property lines to include spruce trees of 8 to 10 feet. The plan shall also be
revised to provide screening plantings on the south property line. The revised plan
shall be subject to review and approval of the City Arborist.
3. The lighting plan shall be revised to remove the parking lot light in the northeast
corner of the site. The parking lot light in the northwest corner shall be lowered to a
total height not to exceed 18 feet. All lighting fixtures shall comply with the Zoning
Ordinance requirements of full cut off and fixture height.
4. Site lighting shall be dimmed or shut off one hour after store closing. Minimum
lighting for site safety or security shall be maintained.
5. The Planning Commission approves the building design and materials based upon the
sample materials presented at the November 9, 2006 Planning Commission meeting.
6. Signage posting the hours of operation shall be placed at the entrance to the donation
building, as well as language to deter after hour drop offs.
7. Delivery, unloading and drop offs shall be limited to 9:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., Monday
through Friday, 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturday and 11:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on
Sunday. Utilization of audible back up moving devices shall not be used on site if a
reasonable OSHA approved alternative exists.
8. Snow shall be stored in the northeast corner of the site, according to a plan to be
approved by City staff.
9. The applicant shall provide detailed plans of the trash compactor and recycling area
for the site. If the compactor is to be placed outdoors, a plan for screening and
specifications on noise generation shall be provided prior to City Council review.
10. All grading, drainage and utility plans are subject to review and approval by the City
Engineer.
11. All signage shall require a sign permit and shall be compliant with the Zoning
Ordinance and Design Guidelines requirements.
Carried 5 -0.
Commissioner Wasescha, seconded by Commissioner Liljegren, moved to recommend City
Council approval to the request for street vacation. Carried 5 -0.
New Business:
A. 2007 Planning Commission Meeting & Representation Schedule
Commissioner Wasescha, seconded by Commissioner Powell, moved to accept and adopt
the schedule as presented. Carried 5 -0.
1
Old Business:
A. Comprehensive Plan Update - Work Schedule
Planning Commission Minutes
November 9, 2006
Page 5 of 5
City Planner Richards reviewed a work schedule and guidelines for working through the update
process. He noted that the work program will be going before the City Council, and upon their
approval; staff will commence advertisement for volunteers to the Citizen Advisory Committee.
Richards discussed some of the areas and issues that will be subject to consideration, adding that a
January start is anticipated to begin the updating process.
Informational:
A. Next Meeting: December 13, 2006 7:00 p.m. — Regular Meeting
B. Council Representative: November — Commissioner Wasescha
December — Commissioner Runk
Adjournment:
Commissioner Powell, seconded by Commissioner Liljegren, moved to adjourn at 9:21 p.m.
Carried 5 -0
Respectfully submitted,
Julie A. Hultman
Planning & Code Enforcement Officer
Approved by the Planning Commission:
BACKGROUND
Attached for reference:
ENCLOSURE
NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC.
4800 Olson Memorial Highway, Suite 202, Golden Valley, MN 55422
Telephone: 763.231 .2555 Facsimile: 763.231 .2561 planners@nacplanning.com
PLANNING REPORT
TO: Eric Johnson
FROM: Carie Fuhrman /Scott Richards
DATE: December 6, 2006
RE: Oak Park Heights—Kott Conditional Use Permit: 15118 64th Street North
NAC FILE: 798.07 -06.01
David Kott is requesting a conditional use permit for the property located at 15118 64th
Street North. The conditional use permit would allow the construction of a 220 square
foot addition (22' by 10') onto an attached garage to be located within the required 30
foot setback of the two front yards of the corner parcel in the R -2 Zoning District, Low
and Medium Density Residential District.
Essentially, three conditional use permits are necessary: (1) to exceed the total square
footage requirement (1,000 square feet) for attached and detached accessory buildings;
(2) to reduce the front yard setback requirement of 30 ft. from the south property line
(64th Street); and (3) to reduce the front yard setback requirement of 30 ft. from the east
property line (Paris Avenue).
The subject property currently contains a dwelling with an attached garage, a
freestanding deck, and a detached garage. Some existing features of the property are
considered legal, non - conforming already, such as certain setbacks and the accessory
building sizes. The applicant is requesting an addition onto the existing attached
garage in order to make the home disability accessible by placing a chair lift in the
garage and yet have adequate space for parking a van.
Exhibit A: Site Plan
Exhibit B: Colored Aerial Photograph
ANALYSIS
Accessory Structure Size. The applicant is proposing an addition on the east side of
the existing attached garage. The following table illustrates the existing, proposed, and
allowed square footages of the accessory buildings on the property:
Existing Existing Total Proposed Proposed Allowed
Detached Attached Existing Addition to Total Total
Garage Garage Area Garage Area Area
952 sq. ft. + 297 sq. ft. = 1,249 sq. ft. + 220 sq. ft = 1,469 sq. ft. > 1,000 sq. ft.
(34'x28') (13.5'x22') (10'x22')
As the table illustrates, the proposed total area of the accessory structures is 1,469
square feet, which exceeds the allowed 1,000 square feet. According to the Zoning
Ordinance Section 401.15.D. 6 of the Zoning Ordinance, the total area of attached and
detached accessory buildings cannot exceed 1,000 square feet, except by conditional
use permit as provided for in Section 401.03 (see below) and Section 401.15.D.13 (see
below). The square footage of the existing accessory structures already exceeds the
requirement of 1,000 square feet, and the proposed addition would only be increasing
the area by 220 square feet.
Setbacks. The parcel is located at the corner of 64th Street and Paris Avenue;
therefore, two front yard setbacks will be enforced. According to Section 401.15.C.1.d
of the Zoning Ordinance, the front yard setback requirement in the R -2 Zoning District is
30 feet, but a required yard on a lot may be reduced by a conditional use permit
(401.15.C.5). As it exists, the house and attached garage are already non- conforming
regarding the front yard setbacks. The existing attached garage is approximately 22.5
feet from the front yard of 64th Street (south property line). The proposed addition will
not encroach any further onto this setback.
The existing attached garage is approximately 28 feet from the front yard of Paris
Avenue (east property line). The proposed addition will be located approximately 18
feet from the front property line. However, the proposed addition will not encroach any
further than the existing detached garage encroaches onto the front yard setback.
(Please note that the submitted site plan appears to indicate setbacks to the curbs of
64th Street North and Paris Avenue and not to the property lines. Staff has estimated
the setbacks to the property lines using the scale submitted on the colored aerial
photograph.)
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CRITERIA
Accessory Structure Size Increase. Section 401.15.D.13 of the Zoning Ordinance
states that conditional use permit applications under this subsection may be granted
provided that:
a. There is a demonstrated need and potential for continued use of the structure
for the purpose stated.
b. In the case of residential uses, no commercial or home occupation activities
are conducted on the property.
c. The buildin g has an evident re -use or function related to the principal use.
d. Accessory building shall be maintained in a manner that is compatible with
the adjacent residential uses and does not present a hazard to public health,
safety and general welfare.
e. The provisions of Section 401.03.A.8. of this Ordinance shall be considered
and a determination made that the proposed activity is in compliance with
such criteria.
Setback Reductions. Section 401.15.C.5 of the Zoning Ordinance states that a
required yard on a lot may be reduced by a conditional use permit if the following
conditions are met:
a) The reduction of setback requirements is based upon a specific need or
circumstance which is unique to the property in question and which, if
approved, will not set a precedent which is contrary to the intent of this
Ordinance.
b) Property line drainage and utility easements as required by the City's
Subdivision Ordinance are provided and no building will occur upon this
reserved space.
c) The reduction will work toward the preservation of trees or unique physical
features of the lot or area.
d) If affecting a north lot line, the reduction will not restrict sun access from the
abutting lots.
e) The reduction will not obstruct traffic visibility, cause a public safety problem
and complies with Section 401.15.B.6 of this Ordinance.
fl The conditions of Section 401.03.A.8 of this Ordinance are considered and
satisfactorily met.
General Criteria. Section 401.03.A.7 of the Zoning Ordinance states the City Council
and Planning Commission shall consider the possible adverse effects of the proposed
conditional use, and their judgment shall be based upon the following factors:
a. Relationship to the specific policies and provisions of the municipal
comprehensive plan.
b. The conformity with present and future land uses in the area.
c. The environmental issues and geographic area involved.
d. Whether the use will tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is
proposed.
e. The impact on character of the surrounding area.
f. The demonstrated need for such use.
g. Traffic generation by the use in relation to capabilities of streets serving the
property.
3
h. The impact upon existing public services and facilities including parks,
schools, streets, and utilities, and the City's service capacity.
i. The proposed use's conformity with all performance standards contained
herein (i.e., parking, loading, noise, etc.)
CONCLUSION /RECOMMENDATION
Staff supports the conditional use permit request for the following reasons: (1) the total
square footage of the existing accessory buildings already exceeds the allotted amount,
and the proposed addition will only be adding 220 additional square feet; (2) the
proposed addition is not encroaching any further onto the south property line (64th
Street) than the existing structure already encroaches; (3) the proposed addition is not
encroaching any further onto the east property line than the existing detached
accessory structure already encroaches; (4) the proposed conditional use permit
request will accommodate a person with disabilities and will make the structure disability
accessible; and (5) the proposed conditional use permit meets all of the criteria
established in the Zoning Ordinance:
Therefore, staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit request, with the
following conditions:
1) The addition shall be constructed according to the plans submitted.
2) A building permit shall be obtained before construction begins.
Pc. David Snyder
Joel Nichols, 15115 64th Street North, Stillwater, MN 55082
4
k
72.
e so r oi d
c4,
.3
E-1
Pa
pta
.
ENCLOSURE 3
NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC.
4800 Olson Memorial Highway, Suite 202, Golden Valley, MN 55422
Telephone: 763.231 .2555 Facsimile: 763.23'1 .2561 planners @nacplanning.com
PLANNING REPORT
TO: Eric Johnson
FROM: Scott Richards
DATE: December 7, 2006
RE: Oak Park Heights — Stillwater Motors: Interim Use Permit for
Installation of Flags and Flag Poles
FILE NO: 798.02 -06.11
BACKGROUND
Stillwater Motor Company has made application for an interim use permit for installation
of five flags and poles at 5900 Stillwater Boulevard North. The interim use permit would
allow for the display of two American flags and three vehicle product flags including
Jeep, Chevrolet, and Buick.
The property is zoned B -3, Highway Business District. The vehicle dealership received
a conditional use permit in July of 2005 to allow for expansion of the existing building, to
allow for a sales lot expansion, and for a variance to allow additional wall signage.
Attached for reference:
Exhibit 1:
Exhibit 2:
ANALYSIS
Site Plan
Flag Pole Specifications
Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan guides the subject site for highway
oriented business and warehouse uses. The car dealership is an allowable land use
under the Comprehensive Plan designation.
Zoning. The subject site is zoned B -3, Highway Business and Warehousing District.
The vehicle dealership and outdoor sales lot is a conditional use permit within this
district The conditional use permit granted in 2005 allowed for expansion of the building
and open sales lot.
Project Request. The applicant is proposing to display two American flags and three
vehicle roduct flags at the front of the dealership building. The two American flags
p g
have already been installed and are on 40 foot poles. The flag pole height is consistent
with the height standards of the Zoning Ordinance. The American flags are 10 feet by
15 feet in size. The three product flags are to be flown on 35 foot poles. The poles
have been installed but the flags have not and will not be allowed to be flown unless the
interim use permit is approved. The flags are to read Jeep, Chevrolet, and Buick and
will be 8 feet by 12 feet in size.
Sign /Flag Allowances. Section 401.15.G.5.n of the Zoning Ordinance allows the
following:
n. Flags. No more than three (3) flags may be displayed outside of a
building. This number may, however, be increased provided an
interim use permit is issued in compliance with Section 401.05 of
this Ordinance and the following standards are met:
1) Where multiple flag poles are used, there shall be a
maximum spacing of twenty (20) feet allowed between the
poles.
2) Where appropriate, the U.S. Flag Code, Minnesota Statutes
or Executive Order shall apply to Federal and /or State flag
displays.
Three flags could be flown within an interim use permit although the applicant has
installed five flag poles and requests to display five flags. The poles have been installed
more than 20 feet apart. The Planning Commission and City Council should comment
on this issue, but approval for the spacing could be incorporated into the interim use
permit. The flag poles have been installed so that the flags can be lowered and raised
in accordance with the U.S. Flag Code.
Interim Use Permit. Section 401.05 of the Zoning Ordinance indicates the procedures
and standards for interim use. An interim use differs from a conditional use in that the
City can place a date or event that will terminate the use. A conditional use permit is
recorded against the property and could continue forever if the conditions continue to be
met. The Plannin g Commission and City Council should consider an appropriate period
of time for this interim use permit. Staff recommends a time limit of 10 years. After that
time, the applicant can request an extension from the City.
Other Si na e. The conditional use permit in 2005 required the removal of the large
g g
pylon sign at the northeastern corner of the site and all checkered banners prior to the
issuance of the certificate of occupancy for the remodeled building. The applicant has
complied with these conditions. The applicant is using temporary banners on the
fencin g and freestanding advertising signage or other messages related to the
business. Many of these signs have exceeded the time allowances for temporary
2
signage. As a condition of granting the interim use permit, all use of temporary signage
will be required to comply with Sign Ordinance requirements.
CONCLUSION /RECOMMENDATION
Based the analysis-and-review of thy -- conditions for_an - -iu #earn use- permit, staff
recommends approval of the request to allow the display of five flags subject to the
following conditions:
1. The Planning Commission and City Council should comment on the placement of
the flag poles more than 20 feet apart.
2. The flags should be displayed in accordance with the U.S. Flag Code, Minnesota
Statutes, or Executive Order.
3. The interim use shall be in effect for 10 years from the date of approval by the
City Council. An extension may be requested from the City Council.
4. All temporary /special event signage shall be displayed in accordance with
Section 401.15.G.8 of the Oak Park Heights Zoning Ordinance.
3
REVISION 38
gi
a
et
141.111.1.
Oct, 27. 2006 9:20AM Sessing Architects
.40
P40.
STILLWATER MOTORS
OAK PARK HEIGHTS, MN
ikethyouRifyilutildtplosop
naY dr.4 tag am* 410 %Mid Phttadopktrehlket wk. an
WOK Cd the ithte 4,1 wantents. PdM H.mu WA
11..- kW 14. AWL.
No. 0985 P. 2
1
IND _ ENDENCE CONCEALED HAL ARD
GROUNDSET FLAGPOLE INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS
1. Dig foundation as detailed in section A Foundation Specifications, set sleeve in center of hole with top 2" above
grade. Plumb, brace, pour concrete; trowel to desired finish. Keep inside of sleeve dry and free of debris be covering
opening. Allow concrete to cure for 48 hours.
2. Remove shaft from shipping tube, lay on sawhorses. Unwrap paper from around the very top, the bottom, and around
the handhole. If this is a multi -piece pole, carefully read and follow the assemble instructions on the reverse side.
NOTE: A multi -piece shaft must be assembled completely before the installation of the truck and cable
assembly. PLEASE REFER TO SECTION B MULIT- SECTION FLAGPOLE ASSEMBLY IF YOU POLE IS
MULTI_PIECE. If there is any suspicion of damage to the finish, completely unwrap and inspect all shaft sections
prior to assembly. Rewrap to protect the finish during assembly and installation.
3. Locate the truck and pre - strung cable assembly in the parts box. Remove the two screws holding the truck cover to
separate it from the body. By hand only, screw the threaded ball -stem into the top of the truck. Use Lok -tite or similar
stud cement if available. Do not let the stem protrude more thatn 1/4" inside the cover. CAUTION: Excess stem inside
may cause the cable to wear prematurely or break. Use a wrench to securely tighten down the jam nut against the truck.
Using the two screws reassemble the truck cover to the body, being careful not to pinch the cable. Uncoil the cable leg
extending from the spindle. Fish that cable down inside the shaft from the top. Screw the truck spindle into the threaded
top of shaft, using a pipe- wrench to tighten.
4. To connect cable to the winch, first remove the bolt in front of winch. Rotate the mounting plate 1/4 turn
counterclockwise to expose the barrel of the winch. Bring the cable end down behind, under, and up in front of the
winch. Lay the copper cable -stop on the end into the slot in the barrel, pointing upwards. Making certain that the cable
stop is not cocked, tighten the cap -screw to hold the stop in place. (NOTE: the cap screw is a trust head %- 20x1/4 ".
A spare is included in the spare parts bag. Use of a longer screw will cause the winch to slip)
5. Rotate the winch 1/4 clockwise, back to the original position with the slot in the mounting plate over the threaded bolt
hole. Insert the bolt and tighten. Insert the crank handle into the hole in the center of the winch. Slow crank
CLOCKWISE only enough to take up the slack in the cable.
6. Uncoil the outside leg of cable and stretch out along side the shaft. With the inside swivel pulled up against the truck
spindle, the yoke connecting the cable to the flag arrangement should fall just above the top of the access door. If the
outside cable end falls too low, it may be necessary to shorten the cable.
7. Use the quick -link, attach the flag arrangement to the counterweight. Undo the quick link attached to the retainer
ring, releasing one end. Wrap the retainer ring around the shaft and reattach to the bottom of the counterweight.
Temporarily tape the counterweight and cable assembly to the shaft close to the access door. Slip the flash collar up
from the bottom end. Tape that in place above the tarred portion of the shaft.
8. Using a nylon sling, carefully pick up the shaft. Orient the access door in the desired direction, and set the shaft
vertically into the foundation sleeve. If the shaft is a multi -piece shaft, a nylon choker must be used to insure the
sections won't separate when lifted. Plumb the shaft upright. Insert wood wedges (not furnished) between the shaft and
the sleeve, making certain it is well compacted. Leave a 1 " -2" void at the top for sealer (not provided). Remove the
wood wedges. Fill the void with waterproof cement sealant. Slip the collar down the shaft. Caulk the collar into place at
the concrete shaft joints.
9. Attach the flag to the flagsnaps on the flag arrangement. Insert the crank handle into the hole of the winch and crank
the flag to the peak. With the flag at the peak, check to make certain that the inside swivel is still clear of the winch. If
the swivel is touching the winch, crack cable all the way down. Cut off the yoke at the end of the outside leg and
shorten the cable. Re- attach a yoke to the cable end using spare parts provided. Crank the flag to peak and re -check
winch and swivel clearance.
10. Remove all remaining paper wrapping. When everything is in order, remove the crank, lock the access door in
place and turn over the keys (2), crank (1), spare pared bag, spray -lube (1) and maintenance /operation manual to owner.
25'
30 ,
i - -
II'S Fl.46,-4 1 40' ! 8"
45' ' 8"
50' 8"
Collar
Ground
Sleeve
Sand-
Concrete
Wedges
Base
Plate
50' 10"
60' 10" - 12"
70' 10" - 12"
SECTION A
Foundation Specifications
B
Groundset
40' 7" r
Sealant
Shaft Foundation Dimensions
BUTT SLEEVE DEPTH DEPTH
HEIGHT
DIAMETER I DIAMETER A
6" 10" 3' 6" 30"
6" 10" 3' 6" 30"
36"
35' 6" - 7" 10" 4' 0"
10" 4' 6" 42"
12"
15"
15"
4' 6" 42" 36"
6' 10"
8' 0"
12" 5' 0" 48"
12" 1 5' 6" E 48"
15" 5' 6" 48"
DEPTH
24"
24"
30"
36"
48" 1 42"
60" 48"
42"
42"
42"
PLANNING REPORT
TO: Eric Johnson
FROM: Laurie Shives / Scott Richards
DATE: December 6, 2006
RE:
FILE:
BACKGROUND
Attached for reference:
ENCLOSURE
NORTH II3x
&%!t $kL!&!% a MC%
4800 Olson Memorial Highway, Suite 202, Golden Valley, M N 55422
Telephone: 763.231.2555 Facsimile: 763.231.2561 planners@nacplanning.com
Oak Park Heights — W.A.T.E Office Park PUD; PUD Concept and
General Plan Review; Site Plan Review and Minor Subdivision
798.02 — 06.10
W.A.T.E Enterprises, Inc. has submitted site and building plans for the construction of
two 14,720 square foot office warehouse buildings and one cold storage building within
their existing office warehouse campus located off of Memorial Avenue North. The
request is for PUD Concept and General Plan Review, Site Plan Review and a Minor
Subdivision.
The subject site is currently vacant and is zoned B -3, Highway Business and
Warehousing District. The Planned Unit Development (PUD) will allow for a shared
parking arrangement with the existing lots in the office warehouse campus and to allow
for a lot which does not have frontage on a public street. The subject site is guided for
highway business and warehouse development by the Oak Park Heights
Comprehensive Plan.
Exhibit 1 — Existing Conditions/Removal Plan
Exhibit 2 — Site Plan
Exhibit 3 — Grading and Erosion Control Plan
Exhibit 4 — Utility Plan
Exhibit 5 — Lighting Plan
Exhibit 6 — Floor Plan
Exhibit 7 — Building Elevations
Exhibit 8 — Landscape Plan
Exhibit 9 — City Engineer's Comments
Exhibit 10 — City Arborist's Comments
ANALYSIS
Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan guides the subject site for highway
oriented business and warehouse uses and, as such, the proposed office warehouse
use is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan.
Zoning. The subject site is currently zoned B -3, Highway Business and Warehousing
District. The applicant is proposing to have general office, warehousing and cold
storage uses occupy the available spaces in the proposed three buildings. The
applicant is requesting approval of a PUD in order to allow for a shared parking
arrangement amongst the proposed new buildings and the existing buildings within the
office campus and to allow for a lot without frontage on a public street. The purpose of
a PUD is to allow for greater flexibility in the design of neighborhoods or other sites and
is intended to encourage, among other things, a more desirable environment than would
be possible through the strict application of the City's zoning and subdivision
regulations.
Lot and Setback Provisions. The proposed buildings and site design meet the
required lot area and setback standards for the B -3 District.
As stated in Section 401.15.F.4.h.17, the parking area setback is 10 feet for all uses
except single and two - family uses. The site plan indicates a parking area setback of at
least 10 feet from all property lines.
Minor Subdivision. The applicant is requesting a Minor Subdivision to allow for the
creation of two separate lots for the proposed office /warehouse buildings. The applicant
is ro osin to subdivide Lot 3, Block 2 Kern Center 2 Addition into two separate lots.
p p g
Both proposed lots are consistent with lot area requirements in the B -3 District.
Building Design. The submitted plans indicate that the proposed office and
warehouse buildings located on Lot 1 and Lot 2, Block 1 will be one story with a total of
10,240 square feet and 15,360 square feet, respectively. The cold storage building
located on Lot 2 is proposed to be 6,800 square feet.
The primary facade material is proposed to be precast concrete panels. Building facade
accents will be provided in the form of windows and vinyl awnings over each exterior
door entrance. The applicant has also submitted colored building elevations indicating
that the primary building color will be gray with maroon accents. The proposed
buildings will be consistent in appearance with the existing buildings in the business
park. The proposed office condominium buildings are consistent with the requirements
of the B -3 District and the City's Design Guidelines.
The buildings are proposed to be 20 feet in height at the highest point, compliant with
the 35 -foot height limit in the B -3 District.
Impervious Surfaces. Section 401.300.G of the Zoning Ordinance requires that all lots
within the B -3 District to maintain at least 20 percent of the total lot area as green
space. According to the submitted site plans, with the addition of the three new
2
buildings and parking areas, the entire campus area provides a total of 224,139 square
feet of green space. As the total development is 673,013 square feet in area, there
remains to be a total of 33 percent green space, which is consistent with Zoning
Ordinance requirements.
Access. The applicant is proposing one ingress /egress driveway off of Memorial
Avenue North. This proposed access will be located approximately 120 feet north of the
nearest existing access of off Memorial Avenue North. The site plan illustrates
minimum 24 -foot drive aisles along the building sides and loading areas and a 30 -foot
drive aisle within the proposed 25 stall parking area adjacent to Memorial Avenue North.
Off- Street Parking. The proposed buildings will add a total of 9,600 square feet of
office space and 16,000 square feet of warehouse area. These totals translate to a
need for an additional 46 parking spaces for the office use and ten parking spaces for
the warehouse uses. Additionally, the proposed 6,800 square foot cold storage building
is required to provide another four parking spaces. The current proposal provides for 58
parking spaces plus three proof -of- parking spaces, which is one space over the number
required.
Overall, the office warehouse campus currently has a total of 278 parking spaces and
only requires 266 spaces, leaving a surplus of 12 spaces. Following construction of
the proposed new office /warehouse and storage buildings, the entire development
would still maintain an excess of 13 parking spaces. As such, the development
maintains adequate parking as required by the Zoning Ordinance.
Some of the submitted plans indicate that the parking spaces will be 18 feet in length.
However, those spaces are positioned abutting the proposed building and sidewalk and,
as such, will have an available two -foot overhang. This parking configuration is
acceptable in accordance with the City's parking standards.
Signage. The applicant is proposing the addition of a multi- tenant monument sign. The
sign is proposed to be located within the required front yard adjacent to the driveway
entrance. The sign shall be located at least 10 feet from all property lines and 10 feet
from the driveway entrance.
The applicant is proposing to have a white background with tenant names in black
letters for the monument sign. The City's sign ordinance does not permit white
backgrounds for signage. While the existing signs in the business park have white
g g
backgrounds with black lettering, those signs were in place prior to the adoption of the
current sign ordinance. The applicant shall be required to revise the signage plans to
indicate a dark background with white letters, or the applicant shall seek approval of a
variance.
Lighting. The applicant has submitted a lighting plan including the proposed
photometric plan for the site. The lighting plan indicates that the exterior lights'
illumination will extend beyond the sites property line, however, the subject site is
adjacent to commercial /industrial properties that are jointly owned and operated and, as
such, the lighting consistent with Section 401.15.B.7.d of the Zoning Ordinance.
3
The applicant is proposing to install four shoebox style parking area lights mounted on a
25 -foot pole and 38 building mounted fixtures with full cut -off. There will be no lighting
along the west side of the property, which is adjacent to residential properties. The
proposed parking lot light fixtures are consistent with the Zoning Ordinance
requirements.
Landscaping. The applicant has submitted a landscape plan showing the addition of
perimeter plantings around the proposed buildings as well as along Memorial Drive and
the south and west property boundaries, which will provide screening of the parking
areas and storage building. There are 37 existing trees on site, all but eight of them are
proposed to remain as they are or to be relocated somewhere else on the site. As
stated in Section 401.06.B.12 of the Zoning Ordinance, the City Council shall consider
the natural features of the particular site, the architectural characteristics of the
proposed structure and the overall scheme of the PUD plan when evaluating the
proposed landscape plan. The proposed landscape plan appears to be consistent with
Ordinance requirements and similar to the landscaping provided at the other properties
within the business park. The landscape plan shall be subject to the review and
approval of the City Arborist.
Trash Enclosures. The applicant is proposing to have a 900 square foot trash
enclosure located along the southern property line in between the two proposed
office /warehouse buildings. This trash enclosure is intended for shared use by all
tenants. The proposed trash enclosures appear to be consistent with the requirements
of the B -3 District including be located in an accessible location for pickup and hauling.
Grading, Drainage & Utilities. Preliminary construction plans have been submitted.
All grading, drainage and utility plans are subject to the review and approval of the City
Engineer.
CONCLUSION /RECOMMENDATION
The applicant has submitted the necessary materials for the proposed application. The
proposed use and site design are consistent with the requirements of the Zoning
Ordinance and the direction of the Comprehensive Plan. Based on the information
contained in this report, our office recommends approval of the requested PUD Concept
and General Plan Review, Site Plan and Minor Subdivision of the W.A.T.E Office Park
project, subject to the following conditions:
1. The grading, drainage and utility plans are subject to the review and approval of
the City Engineer.
2. The proposed signage for the site shall be consistent with Section 401.15.G of
the Zoning Ordinance. The sign face shall include a dark background with lighter
colored lettering. A sign permit shall be obtained prior to the erection of any
signs on the subject site.
4
3. Landscaping plans shall be subject to the review and approval of the City
Arborist.
4. All lighting fixtures shall be full cut off and be consistent with the lighting
requirements found in Section 401.15.B.7 of the Zoning Ordinance. The lighting
fixtures shall not exceed a height of 25 feet.
5
I
NW `S1HDI3H )I21dd NVO 3O Ai ID
3Sf OHDIVM/3DI330 '31VM
ids
MONV SiXINM0
3WVN 1310111
S3 S I I d ?131 N 3 TIYM
MAW/IMO
NNId 1VAORI V SN011lONOD DNIEDG
zz
Q7t
w w
cc
s CV
ao
a0
r- co
O O
VIOS3NNIW `SIHDI3H NNW )IVO
3AY 1VI21OW]W OL9S
NW `S1HDI3H )I21dd NVO 3O Ai ID
3Sf OHDIVM/3DI330 '31VM
ids
MONV SiXINM0
3WVN 1310111
S3 S I I d ?131 N 3 TIYM
MAW/IMO
NNId 1VAORI V SN011lONOD DNIEDG
-- OK
i££6'007 (159) .d MR-6£t 1159) auogd
Z8055 'ED/MULLS 111,110N IINIAV 1VI2I0}^I 1 0295
z
0
z
0
U)
H
0
z
cC
0
z
0
U)
0
2
C/)
W
cY_
0
Q z
W
U)
J
J
ONDIaaNIONIa
OMLUA21f1S 3
ON1NNVld WNW_' NN
-auI ' ioslai..Ij 'umcuaa.J3 `zIod
X33
w
0
0
w
z
w
w
0
2
w
W
a
Nt
ids
i££6'007 (159) .d MR-6£t 1159) auogd
Z8055 'ED/MULLS 111,110N IINIAV 1VI2I0}^I 1 0295
z
0
z
0
U)
H
0
z
cC
0
z
0
U)
0
2
C/)
W
cY_
0
Q z
W
U)
J
J
ONDIaaNIONIa
OMLUA21f1S 3
ON1NNVld WNW_' NN
-auI ' ioslai..Ij 'umcuaa.J3 `zIod
X33
w
0
0
w
z
w
w
0
2
w
W
a
� 2
1 q
mom �,,
4i-Ii-, �_ boo
-� }ooe
U � Q t/i Z
� N 0! Z � L
�UQ^ocw�W
� v� � ~O
v
� ,_ wo
YLOG
r_ OO�q
_c_�2cnga�cn
1vc NOIlCI, JSAO NOISIAJei ON
9, - V - 0, -I d11Ib i his J.1 I:; c'is ,' L
v
w
6
. L]
55mm0aY WNW)
i
S3SIId`H1N3 '3'1VM
NV1 d l(1 OAV1
I13JO13A3G/EIN O
3WVM 1331-IS
1
� 2
1 q
mom �,,
4i-Ii-, �_ boo
-� }ooe
U � Q t/i Z
� N 0! Z � L
�UQ^ocw�W
� v� � ~O
v
� ,_ wo
YLOG
r_ OO�q
_c_�2cnga�cn
� �
Q o
h- �
v
w
6
. L]
V1OS3NNIW `S1HDI3H Nbbd ) WO
3AV 1YIIIOW3W OL9S
NW `SIHDI3H NIIVd ) WO 30 1.11J
3S11OH31b'M/3D1330 - 3'IVM
55mm0aY WNW)
3Yrh'N L jp4
S3SIId`H1N3 '3'1VM
NV1 d l(1 OAV1
I13JO13A3G/EIN O
3WVM 1331-IS
moa�ut a}I :aatstiaM
i££6 (I59)" I E£88 (i59) auotld
ZBO55 MIN `2IILVMTILLS'H.LIIOiu of N AV'IVRi01H31H OZ95
cf
0NInH 3 IIt Ia
ONIAJAZIRS a +,e
fN1NNV1d QNVl n
- auI 'uoslaip `zioa
("S 1� O
C7 tD O
ui ui
rn v
w
V
�t
X33
ui
ow oo oo
W 2 W =
j U U W
0 u- Q O u O
A "+ w oc O�ti
F
0
V1OS3NNIW `1131YM1111S
3AV 1YI2IOW31A1 OL9S
NW `S1HDI3H )111Vd NYO JO ALIT
3Sf1OH3S'M/3DI33O 71VM
'ON
bocr I s
3WVN 1D31O11
S3SI?1d2131N3 •3•1VM
NV1d DNICGVND
I13413AKVII MO
WAN 1331-IS
1
1
1
1
iavit :no
zS6
It
11
PS6
7
1 I
zQ °
W E W
z Z0
_.
i££6 (ISO xE3 ££88'60 (ISO auogd
DOS 111110N f[ N AV OZ95
0Oua
ONLUAIMS
ONINNV1d QIV"I
' oslopi.3 , uumoaI'A 'zI[7I
zg6
r)
Z
0
U
0u
wU)
_
U
d �
O
O�
w
J Z
0)0)
J Z
Q W
z -
�m
z ❑
U r W
Oa
cew
0 0
O
Q (T
1
S
1
1
1
1
1
Z Z °
0
UW O
❑U 001-
2
cto
9
\ 4 x
d
O
0 0
F
O :
m
Z C]
Lu
aE
0.<
z
gi
NOIld1OS30 NOIS1A36
'ON
id111VVefS ,.110 G S[A3i
- 1
i I
1
1
1
1
iavit :no
zS6
It
11
PS6
7
1 I
zQ °
W E W
z Z0
_.
i££6 (ISO xE3 ££88'60 (ISO auogd
DOS 111110N f[ N AV OZ95
0Oua
ONLUAIMS
ONINNV1d QIV"I
' oslopi.3 , uumoaI'A 'zI[7I
zg6
r)
Z
0
U
0u
wU)
_
U
d �
O
O�
w
J Z
0)0)
J Z
Q W
z -
�m
z ❑
U r W
Oa
cew
0 0
O
Q (T
1
S
1
1
1
1
1
Z Z °
0
UW O
❑U 001-
2
cto
9
\ 4 x
d
O
0 0
F
O :
m
Z C]
Lu
aE
0.<
z
gi
V1OSJNNIW `1131YM11I1S
IAd 1YI11OW3N1 OL9S
NW `SIHDI]H NWd )WO AO AID
3Sf10H321'M/3DI330 "TIVM
NOIlcILDSAO NOISAJe ON
SSDOCIv UJM O
3YWN 1MO44
S3SIIdI31N3 '3'1VM
NV1d Al-nun
29d013A30/D O
WI 1331-IS
8
i ££6 - 0£b 059) .,4 ££88'6£b (159) aU0id
28055 NN LVA I'IIIS'H.LIION afINAAY TVIIKAPi OZ95
0NRHANION3
0NIARAlifls
•:1i 'uc�s�Iat.�� 'uEtx aax I `zI°
X33
NOIlcILDSAO NOISAJe ON
ArA
90-1r-01
vJ 11 ns Al 0 aISA1zi l
8
i ££6 - 0£b 059) .,4 ££88'6£b (159) aU0id
28055 NN LVA I'IIIS'H.LIION afINAAY TVIIKAPi OZ95
0NRHANION3
0NIARAlifls
•:1i 'uc�s�Iat.�� 'uEtx aax I `zI°
X33
ar
J ouBrae°
z
T
4
0
T
I
u)
0
woo oe fepugdeB•inunnn
eti'ZZ-vev (699) :XVd ("so)
0'199 NW 'lned"l8 • psoti O.10 1 099E
1 — '1
1avo[Hd3
8
w
cc
1
6
a
1
O�tD
t S
3
0
1
g
2
3
2
<0
3
P g P P P P r' �� ; P
\.>
✓ P 4; P ; ; P ; ; ;
A. ;Qa ; rm 9 ; ; ; 9
1i
IL o t ; o M a w
P , p
P
o d p
v d v ; P P if P
VIOS3NNRYV `SIHJI3H NIziVd )IVO
n
1:131N30 SS2NISfl8 Nbidd NNIM
3 p 9 9 9 r ;;
O P R n �i R 4 4 h R �\ �G.' ` I a r F i
o f� P r r r r r 4'� p� �
q 4q qq 3 1
a P P 9 ; C !a ; s i ; 'F--�
a a ; o o ; ; s> a r n t w
O ; 9 P P ; P i+ P P ; p p A !+
P P O ; P ; d P P d P P ; ; I fs
R ^ � R R
P O r r ;
P ; P d P P ; P P d ij d d ; ;
i r r ;
r 9 ; 9 9 9
C P
A r p T
A
; �, - ; r r
; O ; ; � r a O ; p P ! O P ; ; A r r � f+ ; ; r
p r 9 ; v ; d d d v ; a P v 9 a ; r ' r a
; ; ; ; ; r d ;
i� P� r rr ; r r r it r p
r • ; a � r• e}
is ; r 9 P sti p " p ; ; o P P - O o P
r; r a ; a.a a a ; ; a;
r p ; ; d ; d d
p ; w / . _ . � d 4 d d ; ;
; A ; ! m r st v d P P
0 ;; -;;
�► M si O r r {w R i l i r � o qq
GD
r •\ O d Ff i� P
C •., �• a p Cli P r i GOii P d 9 9
y
0 i„ 9 •S / .1 ; ; p P
qq d o v s�
::;
9
q
'
€;1 ` d d s� + r s r a
„ � P v L;j�Q P r s� „ p L.L o � � r r - - d v v°
ti 9 e € \ % t :: V I �' r „ O
is.
V� \i JI r , ,f
0 q4
M
P P r ' -- 1 r d
�
0 p P d P r
0- r
a 9
\ � qq q qq qq
A ; F+ r 1� �� - a P P P P P
a a a a a a r % a a= = a 9 a
; r 9 /r ; ; a , 9
9 9 9
; ; � r d ; ; ;
; •i / a a= ; a a ; ; a
d a p; 9 a
r ; ; ¢ qq qq :
r P a p P a
; a c+ 9 0
S qq
STATISTICS
Arm - Mounted Drop or Flat Lens Cutoff
M4\ W. W.\\•. VAyWN. N\ Y.\•.\\ w. n\ nhYA\ Wrn\ n\\ Y. N: V.• M\\ Y.\ KWM\ YN1J•\ nV.'.\ Y.\ V.\ IY. Nn•. Y. 1N\•. Y.\: N1N'. nnl\ Y.\ 4Y.•.: YN. 1NNn• ANM1Y. hW.\: Y. W. nNY.' M\ Y. NNLW. IN'+. N'. N. n:\'.'.\\::•.\ l'+::. nY. nY .n\NN \'Y AY. \N.1\\:V.v+:.11 \ \\ V.`.Y: A"+ M. VNn\ nn• N.\ \N \nY. \ \Ni \IY+AV.11W.\V. \\\N \n'
KAD
KAC
Contour®
Ordering Information
KAD
KAC
High pressure sodium
70S
1005
1505
250S
4005
Metal halide
100M
150M
175M
200M
250M'
320M
350M
400M
1
.\ wn, N+.• x. NN•.\ Y. NYrv. NNV+.\ nv.: n: w. Y++.:.+ w.. Nnw.+ vnwx. w. w. Y..•. Y .:
fA L /THGl11/0,.4 Llamizii/G`
r eqr :. • 5; i•
KAD -- standard reflector
R2 Type II roadway
R3 Type III asymmetric
R4 Type IV forward throw,
sharp cutoff
R55 Type V square
KAD — high performance reflector
5R2 Type II asymmetric
SR3 Type I11 asymmetric
SR4SC Type IV forward throw,
sharp cutoff
KAC — prismatic Tens
FP Flat C73T
DPA Drop acrylic
DPP Drop polycarbonate
For parking areas, street lighting, walkways and
car Tots.
:.: ,.....E
120
208
240
277
347
480
T85
Housing — Rugged, die -east, soft- corner alumi-
num housing with 0.12" nominal wall thickness.
Extruded 4" soft corner arm for pole or wall
mounting is standard.
Door Frame — KAD die -cast door frame has im-
pact- resistant, tempered glass Tens which is fully
gasketed with one -piece bonded silicone. KAC
die -cast aluminum door frame has prismatic, im-
pact- resistant, tempered glass, drop dish acrylic
lens or drop dish polycarbonate lens. Door frame
is fully gasketed with one -piece silicone.
Optics — KAD reflectors are anodized hydro -
formed or segmented aluminum. Four cutoff dis-
tributions available: R2 (roadway), R3 (asymmet-
ric), R4 (forward throw) and R5 (symmetric).
High - performance, segmented reflectors are ro-
tatable and field- interchangable. KAC reflector
is optical - quality aluminum that works in tandem
tiO.L. A.
• � 1
Included
SPD04
SPD09
RPD04
RPDO9
WBDO4
tto
Mq
4" square pole arm (std.)
9" square pole arm
4" round pole arm
9" round pole arm
4" wall bracket
WBDO9 9" wall bracket
Shipped separately
KMA Mast arm adapter
KTMB Twin mounting bar
DAD12P Degree arm (pole)
DAD12WB Degree arm (wall)
NOTES:
1 May beordered with SCWA.
2 Must be ordered with SCWA.
3 Requires ED28 lamp when ordered with SR2, SR3 or SR4SC distributions.
4 Consultfactoryfor availability in Canada.
5 Optional multi-tap ballast (120V,208V,240V,277V). In Canada 120V,277V,347V.
6 SPD09, RPD09orWWD09mustbeused when luminaires are oriented onDM29,
DM39 or DM49 drilling pattern.
7 QRSTD available in select wattages .Consultfaaory.
Only available with SR2, SR3, SR4SC optics.
9 Maybe ordered as an accessory.
10 Includes mounting arm.
11 Onlyavailable with SPD04 an d SPD49
Dimensions are shown in inches (centimeters) unless otherwise noted.
KAD&KACFP KAC DP
EPA: 1 ' 1.211' (.110) 1.4 ft (.13 m
Square: 17- 1/2(44.5) 17 -1/2 (44.5)
Height: 7- 1/8(18.1) 11- 1/8(283)
Max.weight: 421bs(19.1 kg) 40Ibs(18.1 kg)
www.lithonia.com, keywords: KAD and KAC
with a Tight- diffusing prismatic Tens.
Electrical — Ballast is high - reactance, high power
factor (70 -150W HPS,100M and 150M) or high
power factor constant - wattage autotransformer
(175 -400W MH and HPS). Ballast is copper wound
and 100% factory tested.
Finish — Dark bronze corrosion - resistant polyes-
ter powder finish (DDB), with other architectural
colors available.
Socket — Porcelain, horizontally (position) ori-
ented mogul -base socket (100M and 150M are
medium -base) with copper alloy, nickel- plated
screw shell and center contact. UL Listed
1 500W-600V. 4KV pulse rated.
UL Listed (standard). CSA Certified or NOM Certi-
fied (see Options). KAD UL Listed for wet loca-
tions. IP65 Rated.
Example: KAD 400M R3 120 SPDO9 LPI
Installed
LPI
LAP
SF
DF
PER
QRS
NIGHTTIME
FRIENDLY
v:.
k .V
Lamp included
Less lamp
Single fuse, 120V, 277V, 347V (n /a TB)
Double fuse, 208V, 240V, 480V (n /a TB)
NEMA twist -lock receptacle only (no photocontrol)
Quartz restrike system (250W max., 120V lamp not
included)
PD Power trays
wTB Terminal blocks
EC Emergency circuit
SCWA Super CWA pulse start ballast (n /a HPS, 100M or
175M)
CSA CSA Certified
NOM NOM Certified (consult factory)
For optional architectural colors, see page543.
Shipped separately
PE1 NEMA twist - lock PE (120V - 240V)
PE3 NEMA twist -lock PE (347V)
PE4 NEMA twist -lock PE (480V)
PE7 NEMA twist -lock PE (277V)
SC Shorting cap for PER option
HS House -side shield (R2, R3, R4) (5R2, 5R3)
KADVG Vandal guard for KAD
KADWG Wireguard for KAD
KACVG Vandal guard for KAC
KACWG Wireguard for KAC
KADWBA Decorative wall bracket for KAD' 1
Consistent with LIED' goals
& Green Globes " criteria
for Tight pollution reduction
Applies to KAD only.
. r+\ n. YrnxNwn \w..w+. \nv.u.�.w.•n \Y.tinw::vA\u r+mw� V.Nk \vnMM1\NWIn \ N\ N5M\ YM1• A•. 11 \NM1V•Y.:V.Nn\n: \N1 \Y:.Y.N \N:V
PSG9
1 a 4■ a avv
sorsa (ors sawn
VMS ,111 RIPP
a
PINS..pors treippap wow, ..1.1.1
a pef 1 nat Jo •wa+w
Giznsoirepas `map
It
2 ?
a..
1 0 Z
•
rc. L- bL-- ikk -.1,,' ''�_ .. .' etg
se-Les s r.4 r411.1
!a 'a..'se i . u ca . sue
it
t
_ L
4D
Q. OT/ ..
Itt 1 —4. <113
h 111
MOW
11111•Midr
0 la
1
•
i
a
1
TIttleMP
-WIN
l i r
ri
E
T`, . 1
1 ii.' cii 111 mil • .. .., ..... ..� k
f t: 1JE r �
4i; la I I
14, l il
, I
4
1
r � t
111111 j II
II iini 1 II
1 II
11 t � �
• liuilul
1111111 11 II
t
i
Ii" I i:.; z T
1 it II ►R
1
t! F 1” i
1 =SI
I II
lira
--, F ,r,,wn is
.4M1MF.o 4 ..74
4R .t.i 414`J1 -a Jf t „
fair, 1: �Lt� AI
_t - 1 , 111 ....!_ - 4 iAla +_.1.--
arm
impsaribr
whim vewmplit
4 • r .n rani
'sn! - viol a . rl - i�_'
•
crl.bl -b��► -tom!
ficutleArrgeovictmvu
•
o8s, . HAWN I elevalVir - 1
• n asecwavenVi-maAD trasocetict
4 Aa ° i° ;►
CPS
II
{
sir ao..��..� A*r111.11 ,+_:...
esna} e'en
•
�iaiirpb►' : _
oafs. magi p
�, & "Mall o op
vommeln. Org tut ague as emit „
4
•
8
•
•
r .
1'
UMW Ny e
a000 ..........
u
Alts
's
i1.1$. ��w� '
1 ��
"a **Ira,
�..
- --"�-
_.
^ .
��
___ ..
-- .
-.W�l � -: -:
. r ` .
-. .�
,,n ..
�,e,
��•- �''
. ":
.rte .
o �s
l $ 11:4
l:1 ' *11; . StiJ+CI'1
� .�h1 ?yi 91 ' .�Ivnl�o�► . Q
arINSAY. "'-- "or1if11114
—
D'
74 .
. -fir
� ,
i .
a'""`
, i ' . `
: .
/53. 1sf:xl- - Or - -c3riltE-- • e
4
J
x
d1OS3NNIW `SIHDI3H )121Vd VIVO
and 1VINOW3tAl OL95
NW `SIHDI3H )IIIYd ) WO 3O AIID
3S110H3WNV3DIJA0 "3'1YM
5s3a0v 03NMO
31W'N 1J1Oxd
S3SI21d?13IN3 '3'IVAA
NVld 3dVDSC1 NV 1
1134 MO
3YWN ilEIVIS
0.10 Nown
ArA
Al V CI
NOI1dl 3S3J NOlS1A3N ON
1v11Iv rs 1110 CI1S'A3?_]
w
w
tuoa �u� -a� Ana :74sgaA
T££6'0£b (159).1 ££88'6£4 (i59) auoq
Z805s 1 ia.LVMTILLS'H.L2IOH 111 11/1110 113E OZ9s
•:rnI 'uasYpiLia 'uacieuxaa.x3 'zjo3
.». NI2IdaNIJNd
DNI33AUIIlS a >
ONINNV1d CINV1 N
X33
CJ
w
m
2
0
O
z
U)
w
0
w
❑
W
U
❑ ❑ 0
W
¢ O ¢
r (n c-
Memo
Project Name: W.A.T.E- 5550 5580
To: DMP
From: KSE
Re: Preliminary Review
Remarks: Preliminary Review of W.A.T.E. Properties
Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and Associates, Inc. www.bonestroo.com
0 St. Paul Office:
2335 West Highway 36
St, Paul, MN 55113
Phone: 651 - 636 -4600
Fax: 651 - 636 -1311
• A 1' freeboard between the building FFE and the EOF was not maintained for the East building and the south side of the
west building.
• What is the concrete slab at the south end?
• Verify north side of the driveway is not greater than 10 %.
• Show spot elevations for retaining walls.
• The grading extends off the property lines in the southwest corner of the lot.
• Extend silt fence on the south side approximately 100 feet.
• Show a Rock Construction Entrance.
• Place Rip Rap at the Flared End Sections.
• The sanitary service to the west building is over 100' so a clean out in the bituminous pavement is required. The clean
out should have a solid casting cover over the PVC.
• Place a Gate Valve on each service to the buildings.
• Need a note stating the bury depth on the water main.
• Submit rational sheet for storm sewer design.
• The note on plans for storm sewer should state that 12 ", 15" & 18" RCP shall be Cl. V. The 21" and 24" RCP shall be
RCP IV.
• Verify CBMH sizes required due to storm sewer pipe angles.
• All details for utilities and pavement sections need to be reviewed.
• Submit a copy of the approval letter from the Browns Creek Watershed District.
0 Milwaukee Office:
12075 N. Corporate Parkway, Ste 200
Mequon, WI 53092
Phone: 262- 643 -9032
Fax: 262 - 241 -4901
0 Rochester Office:
112 71h Street NE
Rochester, MN 55906
Phone: 507 - 282 -2100
Fax: 507 - 282 -3100
Client: Oak Park Heights
File No: 55- Private
Date: 11 -19 -06
0 St. Cloud Office:
3721 23rd Street S
St Cloud, MN 56301
Phone: 320 - 251 -4553
Fax: 320- 251 -6252
liji Bonestroo
n
Rosene
Anderlik &
Associates
Engineers & Architects
EXHIBIT 9
0 Chicago Office:
1860 W Winchester Road, Suite 106
Libertyville, IL 60048
Phone: 847 - 816 -1631
Fax: 847 -816 -3762
Julie Hultman
From:
Sent:
To:
kdwidin @comcast. net
Tuesday, November 21, 2006 5:36 PM
Tom Ozzello; Julie Hultman; Dennis Postler; Eric A. Johnson; Jim Butler; Scott Richards; Mark
Vierling
Subject: W.A.T.E. Enterprises - 5570/5580/5590 Memorial Ave. N. - Landscaping and Tree Replacement
OPH Staff -
Page 1 of 1
I have reviewed the plan for the minor subdivision project at 5570/5580/5590 Memorial Dr., submitted
by W:A.T.E. Enterprises. The landscape plan looks fine for an office /warehouse project. Screening is
proposed for the west side of the property, which abuts a residential area. The plant species are
acceptable, being hardy and requiring little maintenance. It is proposed to relocate some 3 in. elm to the
south edge of the property. I recommend planting nursery stock of other tree species instead, such as
linden, honeylocust or hackberry, which will have better form, function, and longevity than volunteer
elms. As far as a tree replacement requirement, most trees to be removed are not of a significant size or
species. Consequently, many more diameter inches of trees are being planted than are being removed,
so there is no tree replacement requirement for this project. As the project moves forward, the developer
will need to submit the specific sizes of plants being used, and a "Planting Detail". If you have any
questions regarding this report, please contact me.
Kathy Widin
Arborist
City of Oak Park Heights
11/22/2006
.EXHIBIT 10
CC
ILI
H
Z
ILI
Co)
c1)
cn
Cn W
z
123
%••••
oc
CL
z
z
I— H 1—'
Z ct co
Z Z
ww W
H H 1-
-