HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999 Comprehensive Park & Trail System Plan - NAC CITY
OF
OAK
PARK
HEIGHTS
COMPREHENSIVE
PARK
TRAIL
SYSTEM
PLAN
April21, 1999
NORTHWEST
...,
ASSOCIATED
CONSULTANTS
INC.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Oak Park Heights Parks Commission
Kevin Furlong, Chair
Margie Schwartzbauer
Liz Weaver
Darla Berger
Gina Bias-Zeuli
Oak Park Heights Mayor & City Council
Mayor David D.Schaaf
David Beaudet
Lynae Byrne
Mark Swenson
Jerry Turnquist
Oak Park Heights City Administrator
Thomas Melena
Community Development Director
Kris Danielson
Public Works Director
Jay Johnson
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
1999 COMPREHENSIVE PARK & TRAIL SYSTEM PLAN
RESOURCES
Trails for the Twenty-First Century: Planning, Design &
Management Manual for Multi-Use Trails.
Edited by Karen-Lee Ryan, Rails-to-Trails Conservancy.
Written by Charles A. Flink, Peter Lagerwey,
Diana Balmori, and Robert M. Searns.
Published by Island Press,Washington D.C., 1993
Recreation, Park & Open Space Standards & Guidelines.
Edited by Roger A. Lancaster.
Written and Published by the National Recreation & Park Association.
Alexandria,VA, 1983
Park Planning Guidelines, Third Edition.
By George E. Fogg.
Written and Published by the National Recreation & Park Association.
Alexandria,VA, 1981
Time-Saver Standards for Landscape Architecture.
Co-edited by Charles W. Harris & Nicholas T. Dines.
Published by McGraw-Hill Book Company.
New York, 1988
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
1999 COMPREHENSIVE PARK & TRAIL SYSTEM PLAN
ii
CONTENTS
Introduction
Park & Trail Inventory 2
Existing Parks 2
Existing& Proposed Park Components Chart 4
Maps of Existing Parks 5
Existing Trails 10
Map of Existing Trails I I
Issues Identification 12
Parks Commission Issues 12
City Council Trail Issues 16
Issues and Analysis 19
Planning Issues 19
Park Issues 20
Trail Issues 21
Acquisition Issues 12
Development/Maintenance Issues 23
Recreation System Policies 24
System Policies 24
Acquisition Policies 25
Programming/Development Policies 26
Facility Purpose& Design 28
Maintenance& Operation 30
Public Relations& Community Issues 30
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
1999 COMPREHENSIVE PARK & TRAIL SYSTEM PLAN
iii
Trail Facilities Masterplan 31
Muti-Use Trail System 31
On-Street Trails 32
Grade-Separated Trails 32
Overland Trails 32
Proposed Trail Routes 35
State Highway 36 Corridor 35
Oakgreen Avenue 36
Osgood Avenue 36
NSP Power Line Easement 37
Western Oak Park Heights 38
Central Oak Park Heights 39
Northeast Oak Park Heights 40
Southeast Oak Park Heights 40
Park and Trail Plan 42
Detailed Park and Trail Plan 43
Park Facilities Masterplan 44
Valley View Park 44
Brekke Park 45
Swager Park 45
Cover Park 46
Boutwells Park 47
Town Center 47
Potential Park and Recreation Areas 47
Proposed Park Plans 48
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
1999 COMPREHENSIVE PARK & TRAIL SYSTEM PLAN
iv
Park Guidelines & Classification System 55
Neighborhood Playground 55
Neighborhood Parks 56
Community Playfields 56
Community Parks 57
Mini-Parks or Tot Lots 58
Natural/Conservancy Area 58
Schools 58
City Park Service Areas Map 60
Implementation 61
Land Acquisition 61
Park &Trail Dedication Fees 61
Funding Options 62
Capital Improvement Process 65
Community Education 66
Signage 66
Appendix 67
Facilities Planning& Design Guidelines 67
Trail Guidelines 67
Trail Design Standards 71
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
1999 COMPREHENSIVE PARK & TRAIL SYSTEM PLAN
v
INTRODUCTION
The Oak Park Heights Comprehensive Plan,adopted in 1999, indicates that a Comprehensive Park and Trail Plan will be
completed in 1999. The Comprehensive Park and Trail Plan contains elements of the Comprehensive Bicycle and
Pedestrian Trail System Plan, 1995, and also looks at facilities in existing parks, potential for new parks, and provides
a clear implementation plan. The Comprehensive Plan indicates that the City's population is aging with a growing
number of two person households,where the children have left home. The City also has a growing amount of elderly
housing. In recognition of the changing demographics of the community,this plan seeks to provide opportunities for
recreation for all ages.
The first section of the Park and Trail Plan is a description and summary of the background inventory that provides the
basis for the Park and Trail Plan. The Inventory is followed by two chapters containing park and trail issues identified
by the City Council, Park Commission,City staff, and other residents. The Issues Identification chapter contains issues
identified for each park and area of the City. The Issues and Analysis chapter contains more general constraints and
opportunities the City faces in the implementation of its park and trail system. The Recreation System Policies chapter
contains policies that reflect the community's general treatment of its recreational services and provide more detailed
guidance on park and trail development standards. The Recreational Facilities Masterplan follows the policies and
provides the direction and recommendations for park and trail planning and development. The Proposed Multi-Use Trail
Routes chapter identifies trail routes that are part of the City's recreational facilities improvement plan. The Planning
and Design Guidelines and Standards follow for parks and trails. Implementation is the final chapter of the Park and
Trail Plan.
Provide recreational facilities for all ages and areas of Oak Park Heights and link all parts MAIN GOAL
of Oak Park Heights internally as well as to neighboring communities by a safe and
convenient multi-use trail system.
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
1999 COMPREHENSIVE PARK & TRAIL SYSTEM PLAN
PARK & TRAIL INVENTORY
The first step in determining the needs of the City's recreational system is the identification of the existing conditions.
The existing park and trail facilities were identified through site inspections by City Staff,Park Commission members,and
planning consultants. This identification process included both location, size and physical amenities of the facility in
question, as well as the condition and level of development of the facility, both of which may affect eventual use of the
park or trail sites. The items inventoried for each facility were gathered with the goal of being able to place the parks
and trails in the context of a system of recreational opportunities. The baseline data provided in this effort helps the City
to understand how its park and trail facilities fit together, and provides the information necessary to identify gaps or
areas of need.
The City of Oak Park Heights contains four established parks and one park that is in the EXISTING PARKS
process of being developed. The parks vary in size, location, and service. Parks play an
important role not only in their overall recreational benefit to the residents of Oak Park
Heights but as a crucial destination point directly related to the establishment of trails.
All are interrelated and each portion from the park land itself all the way down to a single
picnic table or foot of trail plays an important role in completing a recreational link,
therefore adding to the comprehensive system.
Valley View Park is the largest park within the City and is intended as a city-wide passive
park for hikers,picnics and nature. It is viewed by the City as a very unique and positive
amenity in the community given its dense vegetation,variation in topography,wetlands,
and array of existing and potential uses. The park is an important link between the lower
(east) portion of the City and Osgood Avenue (via its entrance drive, and/or through
Brekke Heights or Valley View Estates residential subdivisions). Adjacent to the Valley View
Park is the Northern States Power ash disposal facility. NSP will be closing portions of the
disposal site beginning in 1999. The City has plans in cooperation with NSP to create a
regional destination for residents as well as visitors to the St. Croix Valley integrated
through trail connections with Valley View Park and the rest of the community.
Brekke Park is a high quality,intensively utilized City park intended as an active area for
field games and a playground area for toddler age and older. It is located adjacent to
State of Minnesota land controlled by the Department of Natural Resources and serves as
a community playfield for residents in the south central portion of the City, primarily
between Osgood and Oakgreen Avenues. As stated in the 1998 Comprehensive Plan, in
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
1999 COMPREHENSIVE PARK & TRAIL SYSTEM PLAN
2
1999,the City will actively beworkingwith the Department of Natural Resources to release EXISTING
the property to the south and allow for extension of the City. This area has potential for PARKS,
preservation of open space and park land as well as a possible golf course/housing continued
development.
Swager Park serves as a neighborhood playground along the linear park system. The park
is fairly centralized within the community and is located within a Northern States Power
easement. A trail has been constructed within the easement from the east end of Swager
Park to Oakgreen Avenue. This trail has the potential to be extended all the way from
Valley View Park to the high school and western City limits. The park is located to the west
of the St.Croix Mall and has the potential serve employees and visitors of the mall if a trail
connection is provided.
Cover Park is the oldest and smallest park in the City and provides an active area for
residents in the surrounding neighborhoods who are otherwise somewhat segregated from
the north and western portions of the City. Cover Park will not be impacted physically by
the proposed Highway 36/95 bridge construction,but will ultimately lie in close proximity
to the realigned intersection. Beach Road may be terminated,thus eliminating an existing
connection to the northern part of the City, although access will be provided along 59th
Street (east-west)between Highway 95 and the Osgood Avenue/Highway 36 commercial
core and may ultimately connect with the NSP site. Peller Avenue will be designated as the
southerly access connecting Valley View Park and then through to the western portion of
the City.
Boutwells Park is a 24 acre park planned within the annexation area to the west of
Oakgreen Avenue. The park will be developed as part of the Valley Senior Services Alliance,
Boutwells Landing senior community project. The park will gain access from 58Th Street
and is intended to serve surrounding area neighborhoods. The park will also be the focal
point for residents from all areas of the City given the proximity/potential connection to
the high school and system of internal trails planned around the wetlands.
The table on the following page provides an overview of the existing and planned park
components/facilities within the community.
Maps of existing parks and trails are provided following the existing and proposed park
components table.
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
1999 COMPREHENSIVE PARK & TRAIL SYSTEM PLAN
3
N x x x k x
�
m
L1J CC
CC 2 X ) ) ) x EXISTING &
W
PROPOSED
�6
)k )xs K
PARK
W COMPONENTS
z o
X
O
V =
m
M � ) ) x
OC
Q
—
a.. E _
— =m =v, `"
W dr ) xN ) ) ) x
H
O ) ) ) k
OC
d.
alS Wd _
2 col
Z
nemu
VS 1 2 ) k
W
z — ^ — —
'� 3N N. N4 ) x
sC
se
W m
LA
d Q. z _
o41-4
g re
C
No
011/ 2X an
s s
ICC =
0
Wfie W -W Le) --Wcog
W mm ) X9 �Xo 7.7....
X8
VI _
Z " W
z m W m W
W iE ... S JSW s S !
3s )3.=.)� )m x3� s
W S
_ o
CD
cc
0 =s II
V k
Lei
...-IW 3 3 s .p u LIJ =
d N )m )m)e ) k m� z
P:
8+4 Letd o c — — C.4II
) 4
L.
re y 3
de .c .c and 3d mud m3 o4- Y
•
_,
.....,
______
1 State Highway 36
.I -
_.... __II
; I
II
NSP Ash
i Disposal Site
mall
Y- {f{ Ci over
•
1 Park
' ■ U
Iiir ,
t
o �. Trail Connection
t2 ,,•.
cu
j � L.J.. .�. 1 J,.t..,
laE r'',.;; IMMIIM
YI 11 r. v-.......:
J. .L'.L: L 1L nd
.%
.41
y t. , ,t-.73- .'1 '• J.•L. J.' 11.1.a.1 \4114
LL..
�� L. • 1•.1.'J..y1 +.J. L.
N . + L 1O t 1•.L 1. .L 11•J. 1.
O 1.),.1.J l. J.•LJ
.J. 1 J. J.•J.'L I J.'l.'1 ,.
■ :: L al E F 1
it U
�.,i✓ 1/4 ' Dirt Trail ! 1 .I...J • .•L-
\ '' `_ ' 1 ,,,
`• !_ _. J Al•1•J- ,,L• ' .-� - -- -
r i J J :1=J
�- w- !1 Creek \ ., '`L L1 .i I •J_, .L .1 I.;`-.` J :171
., 'L 1..1 1'J.'
' 1%• L ''L'J''J.'. I.L•1 I. i •' !' _-t'1� L ■
Picnic Area 4� `, ,'•J J; Lowlands.'.' 1. 1,...L.,. 1 :.-
,.7i•y. L'.1..1.... 1.,,..L J. 1,1:J.'1'-L, L•1
."--) III J.:C..
'.L
\ i•. ,.,�J,.1. l..!..J I..J.'.J-'1 L1 I J.11
11111‘)
1.'J,'J.'1.• I..1. J.'l 1.
I - Prairie !- J,. .. _ !• ,. 1.
Restoration A-........-•
I• _ ,, , .•I.'.. ,. 1 J,' L ,.
Former 1.• !-:1 1. .1.':. 1'
si irill ,. Area r Farm �'�,',..L.J. J. ,.
r Parking 4' 't,,,,\ site,1 site ,L•_t-iA......1--. J. J..,.
/� • • L L. J. L',. L. rII
S' j yl Picnic Area .LA'L J.l'L11L L.L.1•L L •
ate, - I Picnic Shelter I :L.+. I,il''a 1. L•1'L-1.1 1 l.',, �4111111166
tilt
J. L ' 11!L,.l..l.
LJ L..•. . 1'L •L 1 '1 .l .,
1Q 1� .. J,•411.1•,_ 1 y.1.1 •11_L.J . ,.. ,. II.
♦.L�.1..1. ,.J. .L.,- L. ,
— Trail Connection Op \ ,.'
rV ik
�1 -.1.„:"„."-%•••-i-J.. -L 2.41.., 1.
'O I 1/1_I
I ��� 1 I.-1 � 1-!.I .I.1!.'��� 170 i
---<44 -
Gate Paved Road 1
414
A
m Parlong . L 1
J '
01 .\iri
' D ^Q 34„�f �' ' E.
b Zf !.,t 1 t J 1 J. i 1 L , ! I 1.
i Q'� '.LL -'•
IJ.I1. 11 J 1 1 i J.1.
• •
° H 1. 1 1. 1,.
_Valley View Park Road J
State Correctional Facility
•1 iiic. Valley View Park
„x'„f.
y
NSC City - . .
0 150 300 FEET0 of Oak Park Heights Source:Aerial Photograph, 1996
City of Oak Park Heights
anuany poo6sp
U
1 ,:,11,4h,-,(:),- CJC jEc/ t mmI I-
( O
-. \-_-i\ QN O `
NY
,
, � m ' A
1 C J
w
ro
Q
ar.
CO\c :TirI
1 —
in
233
10 - � = c p ,, 4• Y
L�- N c� p ' Y
•N•and JewO ❑ .. o
CL- -..:4,
cn
o v.
U
Y
1CA ' O V
cIf1
a0 „000 °0 ° C
._ ' a 0 •- 0- o co
Z • w N
[____
a) =
in , E o
t F.....74 .''' : i -c 0
a3 cta
ff1=, 115z
i , m
= c„L
coin
]C F—
i D ,i,
0
CU c
I p--, O Ogi,
T m
N /7
0 i r -.<
N i�
1 U
0Y
m
LU
Lil
•Cc):/8". \ ,..... tu>.....: ,
Y 7\ ,
\\.S7- '
�`
- o
6
1
I.
Zii
L x
------:1-......"'-'"---1---(
�.Y
o �
L ° o
VI
a� 0
�
O G U
J 1iI CI)
C 2
o
CT) -t— 0- n_
x
— 7—..1 co ___•56_ --'--
U_ 1
' Q
1 co
. u) — C-I wi
•m
`m
I t
a. ]{
_ na
Q or i 4cco
0
76 V..
63 11E1 Lo
1
-t) i Y z U
L N
1 I N N
o
p U
z El
L)
in111 1 22 1Ef 9
Lo NtE
N
N
1 U
Q
../7:::-
( 4
/ .-°- 5
q-j2„ ,
U
_____ _ ,....,,_ .5 0
Cr) cfl
T(13 D C
N S. 0
•C Z
C
a)
f-
I a)
a) 1
N
W 1 Cli 0
— 0_
u)
0 Z w
LiII El DI Li.,
u_
...__
y1-10N anuany plaPtO
1 1 0 1
-O
1
i Parking Lot 411 *
1
. jr.
VP
., 1
, r ,1
,,
— Top of Slope
I jC
Perennial
Path Planting ,
Hockey
Rink Parking I Z
riPo
llpf tw
i I I Small
1 Rock Wall
—J I
(Perennial
Planting
.0
� Pleasure on Slope
1
Skating/
I Basketball N ,
I
*Al ' Play Structure
- CIO
and Swings
Park
Building
I
'
i �� 0 25 50 FEET
58th Street ' ;S,
'�
City of Oak Park Heights
Van Accessible
Handicapped Parking
Cover Park
Source:Aerial Photograph, 1996
City of Oak Park Heights
8
Brackey Addition
J
58''Street North
:::.-
..:':',.".',,,,s\.cis::.,,i,‘,,:,:,,,,\
TT *:Pi\• „ ,, ,,,,s,
, . ,
16
s. aii ,
• s. _
trt): 1:111 \ ‘...:"1?. -, • '' : I I'
i .„.,, 1 1'0,‘,f 'C'N .;',\\ s \ I, \ n, \ il.--:‘'-' ' ‘: i'('
% /f/ : \
•. „ ,,,,•• . , „. , , \ - :----,---' ;,:'
., •; .,, s ‘ ,
, ,, . • ,, ,_.... ____
...._._..., ..., ... .-..... _ -: , ,, ,,
______. . ; ._..... I .
,.. , ,„..
, , , ‘ ,
, , , . ,
, , ,
_____:.,_„_,_,__,._..,..... ..„.. , _ _____..„..„. _. . , .._ ...— -s• ‘....c:;),/• . ,, • , C) . ) , i
- /_ , \ J ! /, -,:' � :.'!,. 1•:--'' 1.,:l tel' p,i iliP:',
-I
/ ' o, i I
,1 \` \ A,' '
, , ,' ,
\ • -
_ •` 1 '1 V1
/ *** \ \ t, ,
110
... Nimiiiim.....00000: .::•1‘S i' 5.Z? -'- - - :- „, ......"......''''.."-
\‘:•„-1--:-•''...' .,, , / 44. . %,. -,,-_ _,_.2.,.
.....
::....._.........,.,;,.........„,I it
_ _ _
...
ii„r _v_- . s'irp'1'/ ...
__________ _.
f\___. c:::R.
Environmental /
/ /
*./
Learning Center /
n
I :,�P.
Boutwells Park
o 1 200 FEET City of Oak Park Heights
NrAC Source:Aerial Photograph,1996
...
Senior Life Community Plans, 1998
9
A number of trails have been constructed in Oak Park Heights in the past few years and EXISTING
more construction is planned. In 1995,when the Comprehensive Bicycle and Pedestrian TRAILS
Trail System Plan was completed, the only trail routes available were a few sidewalks
located in the area adjacent to the City of Stillwater and trail connections to existing parks.
Since then, a number of trail segments have been completed.
In 1991 atrail was constructed in central Oak Park Heights within a Northern States Power
easement. This trail runs from the east side of Swager Park to Oakgreen Avenue North. The
trail is heavily used and has potential for extension to both the east and west. In western
Oak Park Heights, trails have also been constructed or are in the process of being
constructed between Oakgreen Avenue and State Highway 5 along 58th Street and between
Norell Avenue and 58Th Street along Highway 36. A strip of open space 150 feet wide is
provided along a portion of the 58th Street trail west of Oakgreen Avenue. In eastern Oak
Park Heights, a short trail has been constructed next to a wetland to connect Stagecoach
Trail (CSAH 21) with 58Th Street North.
In addition to these trails, trail entrances into City parks connect 57th Street North to
Swager Park,connect 55Th Street North to Brekke Park,and connect Ozark Avenue and 57
Th
Street North to Valley View Park.
Washington County includes two trail corridor links through Oak Park Heights as
secondary trail components of the county-wide system. The trails are designated along
State Highway 95 (St.Croix Trail North) and County Highway 21 (Stagecoach Trail North)
which both run in a north-south configuration. The Highway 95 route runs parallel to the
river and is the most heavily used route by bicyclists who travel south though Bayport and
is a high priority bicycle route for the County. The Highway 21 route splits off from
Highway 95 in southern Oak Park Heights and runs more inland than the Highway 95 trail
through scenic areas of West Lakeland Township and Afton. Washington County also plans
to utilize the shoulders along Osgood Avenue as part of the secondary trail route.
The following map identifies existing trails in Oak Park Heights.
CITY Of OAK PARK HEIGHTS
1999 COMPREHENSIVE PARK & TRAIL SYSTEM PLAN
10
rn
T
i prgio$00 - .
romiltimmd...1.1IMINIIIIiiIilti
flllllllll'II���� a
g 1 1111
I IIIIIIIIIIIII ii11!li�l!11111 >' - "a
li 'g `�■�e- „IR\1w \\1\It ...,fI,ma y am II . is v
�j!� \\11� � 11\1U, IIIIIIIIIIIIIi
ppIIP 11 \\\\1�\�1\ 11\1\\\1f\1",11\1\\\`1\I�\0 1111111111111® . • r >
..� 1, .n•., \IV\\1 �l
u�10111 ••t \1 1\1\1 ®®I I�� N m
--,i0IIIIIIIi. it i.\\\\ \\\1\1 1\ \\\Oinn�. -. I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIII Illlllllllllll -m
t i llllll�lllllllllllli\\\11 \\\\" ''11111 \Willi\l Mill' i It'`61®®® IIIIIIIIIIII III1111111111 •aS (^
�ellllllllllll nul IIIIIIII�QIV\ v�
I' II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIill''•'. :1111111111111 _111111111111111EED[M]O l®1111111111111111111111111111® � Lc
I� 1111111 III-.,I II1 1111111 I I I IIIIIIII 1111111®®®IIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIII®� � �R
dIlIi11 1111111111Po il::ia i 111111 111111 `
®111111. 111111 111611 ®®1111111 immix'111111111111 ®-� c a
'IIIIIIIIIIIII 11!!!!i"1"5i 11111111111 11111111111111"111!1 1111111 111111 111111®"'III 1111111 minium!mums I I I I II I II111® E
ss „:- 1 IIIIIIIIIIII!1 IIII!!i,IIIII111I11111111111 " "'
��L —r 11111111111111 o E
III!AII!!II!!1 IIIIIIIII!!!Iii�ll!!!!I�����-'1111111 111111 IlU®®1111111 (1llIJ11LW1 llllllllLL11 IIIIIIIIIIII III_
I:iinnol111�I1!!i!i11111111�.'' 111111(11111 111111 111111 im nu"Arm ® ®IIIIIIIIIIII III 7-1 U N
I�1,a v 1111■1!1111. ■n Him hu,. 11111 111111 IIIIIIIIIIII® 111111111111 111111111111 N>`
uuIIII1111I111111111111111 .ter--111111 1111111
IIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIII 111111111u1111111 1111111 1�1 Illlllltllllllll cull IIIIIIIIIIII® IIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIII 0�
�,l I 111111 II'—'r11111!IIIIIIIIIII��I I j ��
_-- rgeolul . i���: nun:11111fIfl p
v ov, ..74,,,..001
0 41111141iwilli lit!
•
En
ipp �—I o•1 1tillti1,8 %.-- , rmr..-::.._ii: ..,,;",,... •'S. it am."�r -i
1 ls�,.._ \\ a III■ um
V Cr
„4"......--,,/ .1111/..11�I11 fll■I■�MINI
_-"� � / O
III '� �,
--__-_-_----.4.--,,-,
1�r.1■Ifllll■I■.1�1111■ IIIIf1•
1.111■ 'Willi
■ 1� \\ iPI
IPM'■/III \\` 11 t I
ie
�1■Winriti llu ■ �1 i�ill ---
i El Ell■p n111 ,SF Nil 11 O
���1'■■��is��11■II
u■ �:ill■EI!'fity
mil to..■.Bis ilii:i ` z
Ili us cs MO CZ
IAL •M.� moi■ i ir i Allikik 111°
, 1
■ . li
.■■iiii•BE i—m�—I- ill
�\II' �.1111/�U1114� irmlik
0 _
Ul MIEll NIM I,.+�. 1 �� 7=__err::: Mili
lilt i■ �r • „►•••id
■■wig-- 1 BIN or MI
la (NI
11 ff■I ■ !`l111M am IN I'kVA4N
II1'----_ , ! . EEIIIu cit_
■ iE■■a:__ ■''Mar I� , - - �II1111�� _
Bk
full
aim= �� i.i ii 2 o '
1111 till 1111
��'•B. W ` f►
't���� , i Wm gs� arN
ail"al il♦ i111111. Mil IIIIMW1 m-..EZ•I -:.%) - III*
IIii4r!I5IIIi !I!"i&>
°d -) ,
L
X111111111 — Vi s..dt..1LT, o . 0 .e �� N
,AT
".'----', i:Mill► . i ■.. Q
I�h.�� 0' ''. .
I � ■..1...111► ■...-.. N �� �
NovimiaIII was
IltMIA _ If:f /0.MIIPM1r4 II.NW lip 1i.lam a ��
iterd11111111111
■� v��f11�����1�i o O O�1 `. D\ to 0_
11 as
Pp 111111/All,p4 sommis. .r�Allt""Am.I , Oickl thIIIi•=
i.:NI --- ,,,,ibii. 'c7'
1P00
1211111.1111 •
r,. 10 - c' #11, 4
r., I—I .a.: . .,. �, a
�. pi ISI 411
�prilli Ink" 1., \�
.11 mmi so...1 iiii.ir 11
4 ti •
III : ,4*- ..„ --...,....1, .
,441. ...so IN 1 ' VA �,, / ��ry`�:Ills• TA itlia in----uP.-- :.--.. 0 ..'-of.' „ fir!° z N a>
1 mm ME__ oT : 7 c) MI�_ .�. a - om1- 11 �” CU
CL=-- Ilfff�i in 111 ./f... Iijj1IIIqs
��� ♦IettIl it �� z u'�_i.......„.IN I ,.�.;;�:ii
: w 0Lt $juPk1 . 1.,l �� 3 _ ir 1
�►c..,10%11. 1Im1Lli
if mip _, L — •,� J' . .�
1> i1 \ „ ��io, r�r.oV . .LTi
-ANN. wow
.....- z
iiiiilim'a D1►._ lAlk''''' s,- �il;�� � �iv,iiiiirtgillt � —
ill go 6 wilci 0 3 t°
,4, .0„ii&-..._.,..... I hid . 0 to
illictititio /I kitw41rf r� i7llii a .4 a •`l 1 "`111 0 v = . .1
CI-,
n pf 11111 ' i , I 1 , lI `_ a.V
ISSUES IDENTIFICATION
The Parks Commission discussed issues relating to existing parks and trails in workshops on February 9 and March I, 1999.
The following is a summary issues raised by the Parks Commission and staff.
• Provide opportunities for all ages to participate in lifetime fitness through the use GENERAL PARK
of trails,tennis courts, cross-county skiing,and other activities. ISSUES
• Develop recreational and environmental education programs to familiarize people
with the parks.
► A system of signage to identify parks and graphically inform people about the
location and extent of park and trail facilities is needed.
• Create Oak Park Heights monument signs with plantings welcoming visitors to the
City.
► Link all parks within the City through a system of trails.
► Year-round parking and indoor recreational facilities are needed.
• Plan for parks as a unified system with consistent hours of operation.
► Continue to explore joint park use with Oak Park Elementary and adjacent
facilities.
• Welcome the public to the park with an inviting landscaped entry. (Potential for VALLEY VIEW
cooperation with the garden club.) PARK
• Identify park boundaries and aid visitors in locating picnic and trail facilities with
improved signage.
• Allow safe access to the lower area of the park with an improved trail system.
• Provide trail connections to the east with a bridge across the wetland area.
• Maintain a natural aesthetic in the park,including trails that are integrated with
the contour of the land and wood chip paths.
• Consider handicapped accessibility in all decisions regarding trail and bridge
facilities.
► Develop recreation and environmental education programs that would familiarize
people with the park.
• Consider the park as a gateway to the community.
• Develop the Northern States Power property adjacent to the park as the disposal
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
1999 COMPREHENSIVE PARK & TRAIL SYSTEM PLAN
12
facility closes to create a year-round regional destination integrated through trail VALLEY VIEW
connections with Valley View Park and the rest of the community. PARK,
continued
► Work with the DNR to build additional ball fields, a golf course, and a club BREKKE PARK
house/concession stand on DNR land south of Brekke Park.
► Maintain longer bathroom hours (with an attendant to prevent vandalism).
► Explore trail/road access from the DNR land,even if additional facilities are not
built there.
► Explore expansion and improvements to the existing Brekke Park picnic shelter.
► Consider options for better accessibility to the lower level of the park shelter.
► Improve the park through identification and directional signage.
► Construct a hard surface under the hockey rink to provide a better and more long
lasting ice surface in the winter and to provide a skateboard/rollerblade area in
the warmer months.
► Consider improvements described in the DNR grant proposal of 1996 including the
following:
►
A trail with an east/west orientation along the parking lot and northern
edge of the park.
► Additional facilities in the eastern portion of the park including a picnic
shelter, landforms,tricycle raceway, and plantings.
► Reconfigure/move basketball court.
► Improve identification signage. SWAGER PARK
► Improve trail entrances to the park,especially the access from the St. Croix Mall
parking lot.
► Improve parking area.
► Consider the park as a linear park segment within the trail system, rather than
as a destination in itself.
► Create a unified theme throughout the park.
► Create a landscaping plan that provides additional trees and shrubs.
► Provide benches throughout the park.
► Plant 16 small trees provided through an NSP grant.
► Install tree/fence screening along the northern boundary of the park.
► Upgrade tennis courts.
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
1999 COMPREHENSIVE PARK & TRAIL SYSTEM PLAN
13
• Provide lighting along trail. SWAGER PARK,
• Improve visibility by removing buckthorn and other exotic species along the trail continued
west of the park and create a landscape plan.
► Provide additional play equipment for young children.
► Providing bathrooms in the park would be a useful addition.
► Install more picnic tables and benches throughout the park.
• Enlarge and improve parking lot. COVER PARK
• Provide garbage containers, especially in the summer when the hockey rink is
used to let dogs run.
► Improve existing warming house building.
• Construct a City-operated greenhouse attached to the warming house.
• Connect to the NSP property and Valley View Park by extending a trail from the
cul-de-sac next to Cover Manor.
► Evaluate long-term uses with expansion of Valley View Park and development
opportunities associated with MnDOT properties.
• Require the developer to provide a year-round community center/open air shelter BOUTWELLS
with bathrooms. PARK
► Provide a tot lot, play structure, and picnic tables.
► Develop the park in a way that allows sliding on the larger hills.
• Develop recreational programs.
• Encourage cross-country skiing by not clearing all of the trails in the winter.
• Provide trail connections to other areas of the City and the Environmental
Learning Center.
► Provide gathering areas, benches,and shade trees.
• Create trail connections to the Central Business District from Boutwells Park and TOWN CENTER
the trail that currently ends at Oakgreen Avenue.
► Design a town square with landscaping,fountains,a skating rink,benches/resting
areas,waterways and other attractions.
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
1999 COMPREHENSIVE PARK & TRAIL SYSTEM PLAN
14
• Cooperate with MN/DOT to construct a walking bridge or sidewalk as part of HIGHWAY 36
bridge replacement across Highway 36 near the Central Business District and in
eastern Oak Park Heights.
► MnDOT to beautify Highway 36 east of Norell Avenue by planting trees and shrubs
on both sides of frontage roads.
• Restore prairie areas where possible along the trail system. TRAIL ISSUES
► Construct educational environmental kiosks and signs at Valley View Park,by City
Hall, at Boutwells Park, and in other appropriate locations along the east/west
trail corridor.
► Provide benches/resting areas along trails.
► Link northern Oak Park Heights to the NSP property,Valley View Park, and Oak
Park Elementary.
► Re-stripe the southern edge of the St.Croix Mall parking lot with a trail lane and
stripe a crosswalk over Osgood with signage between Osgood and Valley View
Park.
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
1999 COMPREHENSIVE PARK & TRAIL SYSTEM PLAN
15
The following trail issues were identified by the City Council in a special workshop held on February 13, 1995:
Link Oak Park Heights to Stillwater and Bayport by way of MnDOT's proposed trail on NORTHERN
Highway 95. OAK PARK
HEIGHTS
Link Sunnyside to MnDOT's trail and to the proposed Stillwater park on the existing Aiple
Marine property.
Link Sunnyside to the bluff area by way of Lookout Trail.
Find a way to link Lookout Trail to the west via County 23, proposed frontage road, or
62nd Street.
Link the homes west of Osgood Avenue to the south and east and define the best trail route
along one or both sides of Osgood Avenue.
Provide access from the homes north of 62nd Street and east of Osgood Avenue to the area
south of Highway 36 using either trail along 62nd,Oxboro Avenue,or possible re-opening
of Panama Avenue.
Link Lower Oak Park Heights(eastern residential neighborhoods)on the south side of 59th EASTERN
Street to the rest of Oak Park Heights via a potential connection across the NSP Waste OAK PARK
Disposal Facility to the frontage road where it dead-ends at Club Tara. HEIGHTS
MnDOT should provide a bike trail along the south side of Highway 36 from Club Tara to
Osgood Avenue.
Provide easy access to the Holiday Gas Station at the southeast corner of Osgood Avenue EAST OF
and Highway 36 for the residents of this area to convenience food shop; potentially via OSGOOD &
internal traffic circulation using Osman Avenue,going behind Rapid Oil Change and linking SOUTH OF
this to Greenbriar Apartments and Valley View Estates. HIGHWAY 36
Find a way for Valley View residents to access Valley View Park's developed area by way of
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
1999 COMPREHENSIVE PARK & TRAIL SYSTEM PLAN
16
a paved trail coming out to Osgood Avenue and going in by way of 56th Street. EAST OF
OSGOOD &
Provide access for those residents east of Osgood Avenue to safely cross Osgood Avenue and SOUTH OF
access the mall,Swager Park,and Brekke Park. HIGHWAY 36,
continued
Define where the designated crosswalk(s) should be south of Highway 36 on Osgood
Avenue.
Utilize the NSP easement as an east-west link through the City. Explore using the mall NSP EASEMENT
parking lot as a link and evaluate the potential impacts to the parking lot. Address the
issue of pedestrians and bicyclists using the mall entrance at the same time as vehicles.
Connect the Pondview Condominiums at the southwest corner of Highway 36 and Oakgreen OAKGREEN
Avenue to the rest of the community. AVENUE &
VICINITY
Connect the NSP easement trail with the frontage road intersection at Oakgreen Avenue.
Connect the NSP easement trail with the entrance for the proposed 58th Street and the trail
along Oakgreen Avenue to the south.
Investigate the possibility of crossing Oakgreen Avenue at the NSP easement/frontage road
intersection and continuing further west in the narrow strip of land known as Registered
Land Survey No. 114,Tract A,then cut south to connect with 58th Street.
Study the need for trail(s) along one or both sides of Oakgreen Avenue.
Determine whether 58th Street or some other location such as 55th Street is the best place
to cross Oakgreen Avenue.
Define whether trails along 58th Street will adequately serve the annexation area between
Oakgreen Avenue and the high school.
Link Baytown Township with the proposed annexation area park and connect the park and
high school to all surrounding area communities.
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
1999 COMPREHENSIVE PARK & TRAIL SYSTEM PLAN
17
The City approved MnDOT's conceptual plan to rely upon 58th Street as the primary off- FRONTAGE
road trail area west of Oakgreen Avenue. ROADS
Define where trails should be along the entire length of Highway 36 frontage roads.
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
1999 COMPREHENSIVE PARK & TRAIL SYSTEM PLAN
18
ISSUES AND ANALYSIS
This section of the Park and Trail Plan develops the Inventory information and specific concerns identified by the Park
Commission and staff into a set of issues which the following Policy and System Plan sections will be designed to address.
A comprehensive listing of issues helps bridge the gap between raw data collected through site analysis/meetings and plan
development/prioritization. In other words, issues help to clarify the park and trail planning needs and desires of the
community which the inventory work finds.
Identify a planning process for review and update of the Park and Trail Plan. Review may PLANNING
occur yearly, for instance, and comprehensive update of the Plan may occur every five ISSUES
years. Future park and trail needs should be evaluated regularly by the Parks Commission
in comparison to the Plan.
Define the means by which public participation can be a regular part of the planning
process (meetings, surveys, etc).
Discuss the means by which to implement park/trail facilities(ie:policies vs.ordinances).
Encourage property owners to provide recreational opportunities/facilities. For example,
land owners in more rural areas may be willing to give up a 10-20 foot strip of land along
the periphery of their acreage for development of a trail.
Determine under what circumstances volunteer efforts would or could be utilized to expand
the City's recreational elements.
Consider including a map of the City park and trail areas, along with proposed routes,
within a newsletter on a yearly basis to make citizens more aware of recreational
opportunities.
Determine if and where the establishment of user fees may be appropriate.
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
1999 COMPREHENSIVE PARK & TRAIL SYSTEM PLAN
19
Consider having a master plan prepared for each parcel of land intended for park purposes, PARK ISSUES
to be used as a guide in the future development of such. It is crucial that the City plan for
recreational facilities prior to the acquisition of land.
Define park development priorities, ie: in new subdivisions, in older neighborhoods with
lacking facilities, in regions expected to develop, improve existing parks, etc.
Consider establishing more strict park dedication requirements which make it more or
equally as profitable for developers to dedicate land instead of money.
Determinewhether existing and proposed park areas are desired for year-round or seasonal
usage and what effect this will have on park facilities and design.
Discuss how park and playground buildings can be constructed to be compatible with
surrounding urban or rural activities in regard to scale, design, color, setbacks, and
materials.
Define the means by which park development can minimize impacts on adjacent properties,
ie: off-street parking,screening, landscaping,setbacks, etc.
Decide if and how coordination with the recreational needs of the County, athletic
associations,civic groups, etc. can be accomplished.
Identify in what park situations lighting would be appropriate or necessary. It is possible
that this may only be accomplished as plans for each park or trail are established.
Discuss how park and playground buildings can be constructed to be compatible with
surrounding urban or rural activities in regard to scale, design, color, setbacks, and
materials.
Define the means by which park development can minimize impacts on adjacent properties,
ie: off-street parking,screening, landscaping, setbacks,etc.
Decide if and how coordination with the recreational needs of the County, athletic
associations, civic groups, etc.can be accomplished.
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
1999 COMPREHENSIVE PARK & TRAIL SYSTEM PLAN
20
Discuss a system of signage which may serve to identify park areas,direct people to specific PARK ISSUES,
uses, and outline rules of use. continued
Discuss the types of parks that the City wishes to establish and develop policies for each
(see attached information).
Trail uses can vary greatly depending upon what is permitted by a municipality. Trail uses TRAIL ISSUES
can be either functional,recreational or both. Walking,running,bicycling,roller skating,
skiing,snowmobiling,and recreation vehicle trails are most common. It is beneficial in
many cases to separate the active or motorized uses from passive (walking) uses. In
developed areas it is wise to prohibit motorized trail usage altogether and instead allow
it within rural areas as an interim use until such time as development occurs.
The size of trails involves two factors: width and length. The minimum recommended
width for multi-use trails is eight feet, although it is beneficial in many situations to
provide increased width depending upon the use and location. The length of trails should
be varied to provide choices for users.
The location of trails within the community may be constructed in one of three general
ways: I) on street, separated by a painted line, 2) off street, but parallel to the road
surface like a sidewalk, or 3) completely separated from the road and not necessarily
parallel to it.
Define how railroad rights-of-way and utility easements may be utilized as trail corridors.
The surfacing of sidewalks or trails may be asphalt, concrete, brick, pavers, gravel,
woodchip,or grass depending on what their intended use is.
Trail signage should be considered for several purposes: I)to denote the type of trail and
permitted uses,2) to give direction as to where they lead,and 3)to warn vehicles of trail
crossings, on-street routes, etc. for safety purposes.
Snow removal from trails is another issue which must be considered. The location,width,
construction material,and use will all affect this decision. Many trails may be desirable
during winter months if left unplowed for use by skiers,sleds, etc. Others which connect
residential areas to schools or are heavily traveled by pedestrians for recreational purposes
may best be kept free of snow and ice. A plan for removal should be coordinated with the
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
1999 COMPREHENSIVE PARK & TRAIL SYSTEM PLAN
21
maintenance department which identifies high priority trails which demand immediate TRAIL ISSUES,
snow removal attention and those which are given attention only when time allows. continued
Lighting of trail corridors is an important factor which extends the usable time for
residents'use as well as aiding in the prevention of serious accidents and crime. It allows
the police visibility into many areas as part of their routine surveillance. The types of
lighting varies widely and is available for all situations, but in some cases lighting may
only be desired as a secondary benefit from street lights which already exist.
Handicapped access to at least a portion of City trails is an important issue to think about.
Keep in mind the surfacing,length/width,and slope of trails to be utilized by wheelchairs.
It may be beneficial to establish a policy for the establishment of handicapped accessible
trails; for instance: 50 percent of all trails constructed must be designed to accommodate
the disabled.
The types of auxiliary or support elements which can be provided in association with trail
corridors is also an issue. Benches,picnic tables,water fountains,exercise courses,and the
like may be positive additions to the City trail routes and possibly become a standard in
some areas.
Consider establishing a system for dedication of trail corridors or monies.
Identify the acquisition means for parks/trails(ie:dedication,purchase,eminent domain, ACQUISITION
donation),when each system is appropriate and what will be the priority process. ISSUES
Outlots vs. easements, what is more appropriate when land is dedicated as part of a
subdivision?
Work with the City Engineer to define the ROW widths that are necessary to establish trails
along designated roadways;for instance:an eight(8)foot trail necessitates a fifteen (15)
foot easement and ten (10) foot level bench (construction) area. Many times additional
temporary easement area is needed to grade surrounding areas.
Define the minimum width necessary for park access within a subdivision when located
between two lots, as well as the screening/buffering and maintenance requirements
(property owners may mow the grass up to the trail, but not want responsibility for tree
and shrub care).
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
1999 COMPREHENSIVE PARK & TRAIL SYSTEM PLAN
22
Discuss sources of funds to be utilized for acquisition of park and trail elements, ie: ACQUISITION
dedication monies, capital improvement program, bond issuance,grant programs, etc. ISSUES,
continued
Establish who is responsible for establishment of approved park or trail areas within
subdivisions (developer or City).
Discuss what amount of maintenance is possible at the current staff level and at what point DEVELOPMENT/
additional staff persons would be needed to maintain the recreational system as it grows. MAINTENANCE
Do we want to allow only low maintenance facilities at the current time or do we have the ISSUES
capability to maintain an intensely developed park system?
Define ways in which to minimize park and trail costs, ie: construction of trails in
conjunction with roadway improvements or at time of subdivision.
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
1999 COMPREHENSIVE PARK & TRAIL SYSTEM PLAN
23
RECREATION SYSTEM POLICIES
No matter how well done a physical Park and Trail Plan may be,no plan can anticipate every eventuality. Growth in the
City may occur in new locations which the Trail Plan cannot possibly anticipate or expect. Growth can also occur much
faster or slower than the Plan contemplates. Even though the physical Park and Trail Plan does not provide for facilities
in these new locations,the City's Comprehensive Recreation System Policies can still apply.
Policies reflect the community's general treatment of its recreation services and provide more detailed guidance on park
and trail development standards. Park and trail policies in this Plan were developed through the analysis of the issues
identified in the Inventory and Issues Analysis phase of work. Additionally, the policies which were adopted as part of
the City's 1991 Park Study for Newly Annexed Areas have been incorporated into the policy and park planning sections
contained herein to create a single,comprehensive park/trail planning and development guide.
As with any Policy Plan,it is important to read the statements together, rather than as disjoint declarations. Although
unanticipated development may leave a map out of date, it is expected that the Policies are more enduring. The City
should update the Policy Plan as new or amended policies are adopted.
Develop an on-going planning process for the establishment of parks and trails which SYSTEM
responds to the Comprehensive Land Use Plan Policies as well as those identified herein. POLICIES
Identify present and future park/trail needs on a regular basis for evaluation by the Park
Commission and City Council.
Review the established park/trail plans on a yearly basis to ensure that needs and priorities
are up to date.
Establish a time period for comprehensive update of the plan.
Prepare a master plan for each component of the park/trail system to be used as the basis
for development.
Promote public participation in the planning process via the Park Commission hosting a
forum for open discussion of issues.
Promote integration with other City activities, services, and facilities.
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
1999 COMPREHENSIVE PARK & TRAIL SYSTEM PLAN
24
Identify the means by which to implement park/trail administration and operations (ie: SYSTEM
by the Park Commission and City Council policies, procedures, and ordinances). POLICIES,
continued
Acquire park/trail facilities to satisfy the recreational and transportation needs of the ACQUISITION
residents on both a neighborhood and community-wide basis. POLICIES
Identify means for park/trail acquisition, ie: dedication, purchase, eminent domain,
donation.
Identify means for establishment of park/trail facilities within subdivisions, ie: outlots,
easements, etc.
Ensure that the proper right-of-way widths are dedicated for sidewalks and trails during
the subdivision process (see development standards contained herein).
Identify sources of funds to be utilized for acquisition, ie: trail dedication fund, capital
improvement program, bond issuance, grant programs,etc.
Establish who is responsible for park/trail construction within subdivisions.
Determine to what extent wetlands, drainage ways, floodplain areas, etc. should be
accepted as part of park and trail dedication within subdivisions.
Besides the standard programs and facilities typically recognized by the City,consideration
should be given to the following areas:
► Areas for nature preservation
► Historic preservation
► Cultural enrichment
► Facilities for the handicapped/disabled
► Public activity areas and facilities in employment centers
► Organized sports and recreational activities
► Teen programs and facilities
► Senior citizen programs and facilities
CITY Of OAK PARK HEIGHTS
1999 COMPREHENSIVE PARK & TRAIL SYSTEM PLAN
25
The inclusion of environmentally sensitive areas (lake frontage, forests, native prairie, ACQUISITION
bluffs, unique vegetative associations, etc.) into park or trail facilities should be POLICIES,
considered to contribute to the overall recreation system. continued
Consider acquiring land for parks/trails at an early date to meet long range needs before
development pressures render the property too expensive.
Consider accepting park land dedications consistent with the adopted park/trails plan and
accepting only cash in areas which serve no system purpose.
Consider crediting for dedication of park and trail lands only those parcels which are not
within delineated wetlands or which include slopes of no more than twelve (12) percent.
Create and maintain an attractive,diverse,and interesting system of urban parks/trails. PROGRAMMING/
DEVELOPMENT
Create a City-wide park and trail system designed to minimize conflicts between POLICIES
pedestrians and motor vehicles.
Minimize park and trail construction costs by constructing trails in conjunction with state,
county,and city street improvements.
Parks and trails constructed on a priority basis, according to capital improvement
plan/available funds;trail priorities may be:
► Trails along major streets which focus on pedestrian and bicycle safety and which
provide direct access to city/regional destinations and parks.
► Trails that will serve the most intensely used areas.
► Trail construction within existing parks and upon municipal property.
► Trail inclusion within new park/subdivision development.
► Completion of links between existing trails and other communities.
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
1999 COMPREHENSIVE PARK & TRAIL SYSTEM PLAN
26
Park priorities may be: PROGRAMMING/
DEVELOPMENT
• Establishment of parks in association with new subdivisions. POLICIES,
continued
► Establishment of parks in undeveloped areas or newer parts of the City.
• Creation of neighborhood and community-wide parks.
• Develop existing vacant parks.
• Upgrade/improve upon existing park equipment.
Utilize railroad and/or utility rights-of-way for trails or linear parks.
Identify types of financing to be utilized for park/trail acquisition and development.
Review park dedication fees in comparison to surrounding areas and in regard to the cities
needs (land vs. cash).
Encourage the private sector to provide recreational opportunities/facilities.
Provide support facilities in conjunction with trail development.
Fully organize and outline new recreation programs prior to initiation and implementation.
Determine where the establishment of user fees is appropriate to combat recreation costs.
Determine under what circumstances unsolicited gifts and donations will be accepted if
they are free of obligations or potential future impacts.
Determine under what circumstances volunteer efforts will be utilized to expand the City's
recreational elements.
Active use recreation areas should be designed for year-round use with an established
system of maintenance.
Park and playground buildings should be compatible with surrounding urban or rural
activities with regard to scale,design, color, setbacks,and materials.
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
1999 COMPREHENSIVE PARK & TRAIL SYSTEM PLAN
27
Park and trail development should minimize impacts on adjacent properties through PROGRAMMING/
provisions for, but not limited to: DEVELOPMENT
POLICIES,
► Adequate off-street parking continued
• Appropriate orientation and location of buildings and activity areas
• Screening, buffering, and landscaping
• Adequate setbacks and physical separation
Coordinate facility development with the needs of community residents, Parks Commission
services, athletic associations, civic groups, etc.
Maximize park accessibility by city residents to best serve the area.
Coordinate yearly park events.
Consider the long term costs of maintenance and operation in a facility's design and
development.
Preserve existing physical site amentities (natural or man-made) and encourage the
establishment of new site amenities when planning and developing park areas.
Ensure that the proper right-of-way widths are dedicated or easements are established for
sidewalks and trails during the subdivision process.
Establish park and trail facilities which provide recreational as well as functional uses. FACILITY
PURPOSE &
Provide varying types of trails to be used as the basis of planning and development for the DESIGN
Multiple Use Trail System, defined as a comprehensive trail system for the integration of
a variety of compatible non-motorized trail uses(pedestrian,bicycles,roller skating,cross
country skiing, etc.).
Grades of trails should not exceed five (5) percent to ensure handicapped accessibility or
eight (8) to ten (10) percent for all other areas.
Design and construct trails according to the standards established by the National Park
and Recreation Association,the State Department of Transportation, and Rails-to-Trails
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
1999 COMPREHENSIVE PARK & TRAIL SYSTEM PLAN
28
Conservancy (see Trail Design Standards attached herein). FACILITY
PURPOSE &
Land for parks will be acquired,planned and developed according to the Park Classification DESIGN,
System contained herein which specify the appropriate sizes, locations,service areas and continued
equipment to best serve the City.
Prior to the development of each park area,a design plan will be prepared which shows the
types, locations and sizes of proposed facilities and estimated costs.
Park facilities and buildings should be compatible with surrounding urban or rural
activities with regard to scale, design, color, setbacks, and materials.
Maximize park accessibilitiy by city residents to best serve the area in which the facitility
is located by requiring either vehicular or pedestrian access or both (depending on the size
and classification of the park.)
Promote and encourage the utilization of bicycle and pedestrian corridors as ski touring
or sledding routes during the snow season and consider other possible uses of such
corridors when safe and proper.
Maintain all trails in good repair and ensure that designated trail segments are kept open
and clear of snow throughout the year unless designated as winter use trails.
Consideration shall be given to safety, visibility, and emergency access into parks when
acquiring land or planning for their development.
Neither snowmobiles nor any other motorized vehicles shall not be allowed within or upon
City park or trail areas as designated by Ordinance.
Bicycles shall only be allowed upon paved surfaces within the City as designated by
Ordinance. Mountain biking is allowed on trails designated for this purpose.
Develop policies for all terrain vehicle, mountain bike, and in-line skate usage.
Define the types of parks which exist and are to be established in the City and develop
policies for each (see Park Design Standards herein).
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
1999 COMPREHENSIVE PARK & TRAIL SYSTEM PLAN
29
Provide for the efficient maintenance and operation of clean,orderly,controlled,safe,and MAINTENANCE
attractive parks and trailways. Park maintenance and operation shall safeguard the & OPERATION
physical condition of trailways from deterioration or damage due to weather,vandalism,
or other natural or human causes.
Develop a clear and concise system of park and trail graphics and signage that direct
people along trails and into parks to specific points of interest.
Define specific park and trail safety rules.
Develop ways in which to promote citizen interest and involvement in the City's park and PUBLIC
trail system. RELATIONS &
COMMUNITY
Publish a pamphlet that shows the trail routes, parks, service and public facilities. ISSUES
Monitor characteristics of use,safety,and other factors periodically throughout the park
and trail system.
Provide facilities/services to all residents of the community.
Develop ways to organize recreation programs and facilities to maximize participation and
overcome physical or economic limitations which may prevent equal opportunity,
regardless of age, race, sex, religion, or place of residence.
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
1999 COMPREHENSIVE PARK & TRAIL SYSTEM PLAN
30
TRAIL FACILITIES MASTERPLAN
The focus of the Comprehensive Park and Trail System Plan is to establish and develop lands devoted to public use to
service and physically link all areas of the community. The plan indicates the optimum location of future trail and park
facilities, in relation to existing City recreational elements. While the chosen locations for park and trail development
are based on a multitude of factors, including existing and anticipated subdivisions, residential distribution,
neighborhood size, available access, and local/regional facilities, the primary intent of the Plan is to provide an
equitable recreational structure based on park/trail types,functions,and service area/convenient access. Thus,both the
Plan text and map graphics simultaneously guide all future trail/park planning and development.
The graphic masterplan which follows identifies the varying types of trail facilities within MULTI-USE
what we will call a multiple-use trail system, made up of a variety of compatible non- TRAIL
motorized trail uses traversing upon multi-use/shared trail corridors including grade- SYSTEM
separated trails/sidewalks, overland trails, and on-street trails. Multi-use trail systems
invite various users - including walkers, joggers, bicyclists, roller and in-line skaters,
people in wheelchairs, cross-country skiers, hikers, bird watchers, parents with strollers,
and others -to share a trail corridor collectively. Throughout the planning, design, and
implementation of multiple-use corridors,the assorted needs of the trail users as well as
the various communities and landscapes through which they pass need to be taken into
account.
Coupled with these recreational uses is the functional role of virtually all multi-use trails.
Whether used for a shortcut to the store, for a leisurely walk, or for a 20-mile commute
to work,these trails serve an important transportation purpose. Because of their linear
nature, multi-use trails connect things together - neighborhoods to community and
cultural resources, towns to other populated areas, or city centers to country sides -
intrinsically serving as transportation corridors. Multi-use trails, which typically cut
through diverse areas, have the ability to connect historic structures to new ones,young
persons to elderly, busy highways to local streets and individual residences, etc.through
a common goal of creating a neighborhood amenity. Trail corridors also preserve open
space, promote non-polluting methods of transportation,and can generally enhance the
quality of life for local residents. The various types of multi-use trails are described in the
following paragraphs and are graphically depicted on the Park and Trail Plan which
follows.
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
1999 COMPREHENSIVE PARK & TRAIL SYSTEM PLAN
3I
On-street trails share the same paved surface as the roadway that they follow. They are ON-STREET
designed for multiple uses and should be a minimum of eight(8)to ten (10) feet wide for TRAILS
two-way traffic or four (4) to five (5) feet wide on both sides of the street for one-way
traffic. In residential areas (local streets)they may be unmarked,paved with a stripe,or
identified by a sign. On-street trails associated with collector or arterial streets or
highways should always have a specially marked shoulder area and/or be sign identified.
Grade-separated trails/sidewalks are separated from the adjacent roadway by a (varying GRADE-
width)strip of land/plantings or physical structure. They are designed for the integration SEPARATED
of a variety of compatible non-motorized trail uses. They shall be bituminous trailways TRAILS
having a minimum trail width of eight (8) feet for two-way traffic and generally follow
street rights-of-way. The existing sidewalks fall into this category but may only be four
(4) to five (5) foot wide concrete or asphalt pedestrian trails in established residential
areas.
Overland trailways shall provide a minimum of a ten foot wide bituminous trailway with OVERLAND
a significantly wider right-of-way and shall be located away from the street corridors,not TRAILS
typically parallel to the street surface. They should be designed to incorporate vegetation,
seating,and other supporting site elements and may serve a dual purpose as a buffer strip
or separated bikeway. Abandoned railroad rights-of-way and many utility easements fall
into this category.
Overland trails are intended to traverse across open land or through developments without
proximity to streets. They are positive in that direct connection can be made between two
or more destination points where road rights-of-way are non-existent or can be developed
with regard to the natural characteristics of the areas, resulting in a more aesthetic trail
setting. They should be designed to incorporate vegetation,seating,and other supporting
site elements and may serve a dual purpose as a buffer strip, linear park or separated
bikeway.
The overland trail widths can vary along certain segments where a more narrow trail
corridor may be needed through a residential area or where a wider trail corridor would
positively provide a buffer zone between differing development types, from unwelcome
sites,etc. Utility easements and abandoned railroad rights-of-way provide an attractive
potential for overland trails away from other modes of traffic. Oak Park Heights has two
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
1999 COMPREHENSIVE PARK & TRAIL SYSTEM PLAN
32
major utility(NSP)easements and a rail line which runs parallel to the river(although still OVERLAND
in use at this time, it provides potential for future recreational uses). In evaluating a TRAILS,
utility easement for possible trail use,several items must be considered: continued
► Easement routes that are in close proximity to streets would tend to duplicate
trail routes proposed along the street.
► While utility companies are generally cooperative in the use of the utility
easements for local pedestrian/bicycle trails,it is not unusual for these companies
to place user restrictions on trails to insure easement maintenance and safety.
► The easement width becomes a critical factor in the use of utility easements for
overland trails. The easement must have sufficient width for trail development
without interfering with utility maintenance. Also,the utility easement width will
determine the amount of available setback the trail will have from adjacent land
uses.
► The land use development adjacent to a utility easement also influences the
desirability of using the easement for an overland trail corridor. Generally,
easements in developed areas of the City follow street rights-of-way or lot line
arrangements. Trail developments can be viewed as an intrusion in areas of
urban development where an adequate setback separation between the trail and
land uses cannot be achieved.
► The easement represents only a utility company's right to use the property for the
utility purpose. The utility company does not hold fee ownership of the land in
easement. Fee ownership of the land in the easement typically belongs to the
property owner abutting the easement. Acquisition of the easement for trail use
would best occur as a trail dedication at the time of final platting. In areas
already developed, easement acquisition for trail use is complicated by the
multitude of property owners.
► Trail development along utility easements can be more expensive, as it is a
separate construction project requiring the breaking of new ground in areas not
readily accessible. Trails developed in street rights-of-way can be constructed in
conjunction with street improvements.
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
1999 COMPREHENSIVE PARK & TRAIL SYSTEM PLAN
33
► Trails along utility easements may result in a number of street crossings at OVERLAND
uncontrolled areas of the street which can present the potential for hazardous TRAILS,
conflicts between motorists and trail users if not designed properly. continued
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
1999 COMPREHENSIVE PARK & TRAIL SYSTEM PLAN
34
PROPOSED TRAIL ROUTES
The City of Oak Park Heights Parks Commission and City Council, together with the help of planning and engineering
consultants,have identified the following trail routes as part of the City's recreational facilities improvement plan. The
Park and Trail Plan is intended to be a long-term guide for the implementation of a system of multi-use trails and park
areas within the City. The plan is reflective of the City's goal to link all parts of Oak Park Heights by a safe and
convenient grade-separated (off-road) trail system. While this may not be feasible in all areas in the short-term, it
stands as the aspiration toward which to work in years to come. As today's priority trail routes and immediate
recreational needs become reality,other recreational segments will move forward as the next priority,thus moving toward
a comprehensive system of parks and trails.
North Frontage Road. The north frontage road is planned to encompass the entire length STATE
of Highway 36 through Oak Park Heights from the western City limits to its intersections HIGHWAY 36
with both Highway 95 and Lookout Trail. Along both sides of the frontage road,a six(6) CORRIDOR
foot paved shoulder will be provided by MnDOT in association with the upgrade of Highway
36. Where the frontage road swings out away from the highway corridor at the Oakgreen
and Osgood Avenue intersections, a four (4) foot sidewalk closes the gap and provides
access from the frontage road across the highway as well as to the proposed trails along
Oakgreen and Osgood Avenues.
South Frontage Road. The south frontage road is planned to encompass the entire length
of Highway 36 through Oak Park Heights from the western City limits to the Club Tara
establishment and NSP property on the east side of Osgood Avenue. A grade-separated
trail is existing along the frontage road from 58th Street to Norell Avenue. From Norell
Avenue east, a six (6) foot paved shoulder along both sides of the frontage road will be
provided by MnDOT in association with the upgrade of Highway 36. An overland trail is
expected on or near the frontage road from Osgood Avenue east to Stagecoach Trail.
As with the north frontage road, where the south frontage road swings out away from the
Highway 36 corridor at the Oakgreen and Osgood Avenue intersections, a four (4) foot
sidewalk closes the gap and provides access from the frontage road across the highway as
well as to the proposed trails along Oakgreen and Osgood Avenues. At the present time,
focus will be on the new 58th Street as the main east-west connection via a planned grade-
separated trail.
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
1999 COMPREHENSIVE PARK & TRAIL SYSTEM PLAN
35
Oakgreen Avenue is a highly used north-south collector street within the City which OAKGREEN
encompasses about three-quarters of a mile south of Highway 36. Reconstruction of AVENUE
Oakgreen Avenue from Highway 36 through Oak Park Heights will allow for construction
of an off-street trail, likely on the east side, by Washington County. The County has
proposed this reconstruction for the year 2000. Development of an off-street trail along
Oakgreen Avenue will provide important connections for Highway 36,to the existing NSP
Trail, and to 586 Street.
As part of the 1995 Trail System Plan,the joint Oak Park Heights- Baytown Township Trail
Committee agreed to establish a ten to twelve(10-12)foot overland trail behind the homes
on the west side of Oakgreen Avenue between the overland trail planned within the NSP
easement and the new 58th Street. The overland trail, with its wide right-of-way
(undetermined at this time) and associated landscape improvements,would double as a
buffer zone from the anticipated multiple family or commercial development behind these
homes. It will be necessary to obtain an easement or land dedication from the owner when
this land is platted.
The intersection of Oakgreen Avenue and Highway 36,as mentioned previously,is planned
to be shifted slightly east to allow for the establishment of frontage road connections
which provide ample vehicle stacking distance. In this regard,four(4) foot sidewalks are
planned to connect the frontage roads to the north side of Highway 36 as well as to the
stated NSP easement and overland trail to the south of Oakgreen Avenue. It is anticipated
that the street will ultimately be improved to include eight(8)foot grade-separated trails
on both sides in the long term. Any planned trails along Oakgreen Avenue should connect
to the existing 4 foot paved shoulders in place on Northbrook Boulevard in Baytown
Township (extension of Oakgreen Avenue south of the City limits).
North of Highway 36. Preliminary inspections of this corridor by the City Engineer indicate OSGOOD
that it appears feasible, although physically difficult and correspondingly expensive to AVENUE
construct trailways in this location given the existing businesses and right-of-way width.
Washington County has, however, expressed the intention to reconstruct this portion of
Osgood Avenue at some point in the future whereupon any desired trail construction could
be coordinated. The plan therefore shows three to four(3-4)foot sidewalks on both sides
of Osgood Avenue to the north of Highway 36 to infringe upon existing businesses as little
as possible,with added potential for re-striping of the street corridor to include four (4)
to six (6) foot paved shoulders for bicycle traffic.
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
1999 COMPREHENSIVE PARK & TRAIL SYSTEM PLAN
36
South of Highway 36. The establishment of an eight(8)foot grade-separated trail on one OSGOOD
side or four to six (4-6) foot wide sidewalks on both sides of Osgood Avenue between AVENUE,
Highway 36 and Upper 56th Street is the priority, as current pedestrian-vehicular traffic continued
conflicts in these locations is dangerous. At a minimum, four (4) foot sidewalks should
be installed on the east side of Osgood Avenue. From this point to the south there is a
fourteen (14) foot shoulder on the west side of Osgood Avenue which could accommodate
a two-way on-street trail, however,the preferred option is to provide a six to eight (6-8)
foot one-way shoulder on both sides of the road.
The area between curb and right-of-way line on Osgood Avenue from 55th Street to Calvary
Church on the east boulevard is approximately 8-10 feet in width but is congested with
power poles,street signs,private utility pedestals,trees,and shrubs. The City Engineer has
recommended that any potential trail be placed behind the power pole line within the
boulevard to avoid as many obstacles as possible. Regrading of the boulevard, earth
cut/fill,clearing of trees, and expansion of the public easement area is almost certain,as
is the potential need for expanded easements and retaining walls or other structural
devices to maintain the necessary corridor width in some locations (such as between 55th
and Upper 56th Streets, and along the existing home at 5725 Osgood Avenue). Other
obstacles related to the installation of a trail along the east boulevard include the Calvary
Church site where the existing parking lot is located 9 feet behind the curb of Osgood
Avenue and would result in the loss of 8-10 parking spaces, however, options may be
available in which to replace the parking either on or adjacent to the church site or re-
stripe the existing lot.
This route is proposed as an east-west overland corridor from Osgood Avenue at 58th NSP POWER
Street and the St. Croix Mall entrance to Oakgreen Avenue and slightly further west into LINE EASEMENT
the future development area. The City completed a major portion of the trail in 1991 by
paving from Swager Park to Oakgreen Avenue. The intersection on Osgood Avenue at 58th
Street/St. Croix Mall parking area is currently a heavily used, dangerous, unmarked and
unsignaled pedestrian crossing. Improvement of this area for use as a trail crossing is
highly desirable, although the location of the mall parking lot does not allow sufficient
width for inclusion of a pathway without changes to the parking lot configuration. The
City Engineer has indicated that the south border of the mall property, pending parking
lot revisions,could accommodate the desired ten (10) foot wide two-way multi-use trail.
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
1999 COMPREHENSIVE PARK & TRAIL SYSTEM PLAN
37
58th Street. The major east-west collector street will soon be completed between Oakgreen WESTERN OAK
Avenue and Highway 5. The street will incorporate an eight(8) foot grade-separated trail PARK HEIGHTS
on its south side and will serve to provide critical connection between the Stillwater Area (west of
High School area and the rest of the City. Oakgreen
Avenue)
Krueger Lane. Krueger Lane,which provides a connection between the Highway 36 south
frontage road and 58th Street,will include an eight(8) foot grade-separated trail within
its eastern right-of-way when that area is developed.
Norell Avenue. The construction of Norell Avenue did not make provision for a trail
connection between the Highway 36 south frontage road and 58th Street. In the future,
a grade-separated trail should be pursued along the west right-of-way line of this road
when the remainder of the Brackey property is platted and developed.
Centrail Business District. Development of the Central Business District,south of Highway
36 and between Norell and Oakgreen Avenues will emphasize pedestrian access throughout
and interconnections with existing and proposed trails. The City is developing concept
plans for the Central Business District during the Spring of 1999.
Autumn Ridge. The main local street loop within this plat will be designated as an on-
street trail system connection between surrounding residential lots within the plat and to
the Valley Senior Services developed to the east.
Boutwell's Landing/Boutwells Park. As a feature of the Valley Senior Services Alliance,
Boutwell's Landing development south of 58th Street at Norell Avenue,an extensive system
of grade-separated trails and on-street trails would be created. The trail system would
provide interconnections throughout Boutwells Park,the new development, Autumn Ridge
at 56th Street, River Hills at 55th Street,the High School's Environmental Learning Center,
and with the existing trail along 586 Street. Within the southerly, second phase of the
development a potential exists to provide trail connections into the undeveloped properties
that are currently within Baytown Township.
Kern Center. A trail connection from 58th Street into the Kern Center has been proposed.
The trail would be along one side of the street and provide the potential for eventual
extension south into undeveloped portions of Lake Elmo and west and north along Manning
Avenue back to Highway 36. This extension could have the potential to eventually connect
the Oak Park Heights trail system to regional trail systems existing to the west.
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
1999 COMPREHENSIVE PARK & TRAIL SYSTEM PLAN
38
NSP Powerline Easement. As mentioned previously, this route is an east-west overland CENTRAL OAK
corridor from Swager Park to Oakgreen Avenue. The ten (10)foot overland trail within the PARK HEIGHTS
central part of Oak Park Heights will continue through the south boundary of the St.Croix (Between
Mall to Osgood Avenue. Oakgreen &
Osgood
City Hall Property/676 Street Connection. An extention of 576 Street,through the City Hall Avenues)
property, is proposed for construction in 1999. As part of that street construction, a
grade-separated trail would provide a connection from Oakgreen Avenue,through the City
Hall property,to the existing NSP easement trail.
DNR Property. An existing system of undefined trails exists within the Department of
Natural Resources Property south of Brekke Park and west of Osgood Avenue. The City's
Comprehensive Plan includes the DNR property as a potential area for parks,open space,
residential development, and a golf course. The City will work with the DNR to develop
interconnections between the undefined trails and the City's trail system. A more defined
trail plan would be required if Brekke Park expands within the property or if it is
developed into more intensive land uses.
Local On-Street Trails. Local on-street trails make up the majority of the trail system
within the central portion of the City due to the fact that the area is predominantly
subdivided single family lots. On-street trails have been identified upon several local
streets,including 57th,part of 56th,55th,and 54th Streets and O'Brien,Oldfield,Omaha,
and Omar Avenues and Oakgreen Place. Local trails are not limited to these routes but
those mentioned provide the most direct connections between points of interest.
Existing Trails. Existing trails consist of 3-4 foot sidewalks in the northern most part of NORTHEAST
the City which borders with Stillwater. Sidewalks can be found along 65th Street,the far OAK PARK
west portion of Upper 63rd Street (less than a block long),the western most two blocks HEIGHTS
of 62nd Street,and far northern portions of Osgood and Osman Avenues. While all are not (north of
within the City's boundaries,connection and integration with the Oak Park Heights Trails Highway 36 &
Plan is imminent. east of Osgood
Avenue)
Connection to the City of Stillwater. Five trail connections have been identified in this
vicinity to provide pedestrian and bicycle access between the two communities: Osgood
Avenue, Beach Road, Lookout Trail, Oakgreen Avenue and Highway 95.
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
1999 COMPREHENSIVE PARK & TRAIL SYSTEM PLAN
39
Lookout Trail. Planned trails on this street segment will include four (4) foot paved NORTHEAST
shoulders on both sides from the northern City limits to the intersection with Beach Road OAK PARK
HEIGHTS
Beach Road. This street is planned to have four to six (4-6)foot paved shoulders from the (north of
Highway 36 frontage road to the intersection of Lookout Trail. From Lookout Trail to the Highway 36 &
north, Beach Road is planned for trail use as an on-street or paved shoulder connection. east of Osgood
The Beach Road overpass is expected to remain with the reconstruction of the Highway Avenue),
36/Highway 95 interchange. A paved sidewalk would be provided on the bridge to connect continued
with the south frontage road.
Local On-Street Trails. On-street trails in the north eastern part of the City include the use
of Upper 63rd and 62nd Streets as well as Oxboro Avenue. In the long term the City may
wish to consider establishing a grade-separated trail along Oxboro Avenue to connect
between Beach Road and Osgood Avenue or requesting the County to provide pedestrian
access through the Washington County complex by way of a sidewalk along the old
alignment of Panama Avenue.
Highway 36/95 Intersection.The Minnesota Department of Transportation is in the process SOUTHEAST OAK
of developing plans for a reconstruction of the Highway 36/95 intersection to be built in PARK HEIGHTS
conjunction with a new St. Croix River Crossing. As such, the Trail Plan will need to be (south of
updated as plans are finalized. Highway 36 &
east of Osgood
56th Street. On-street trail access is planned along 56th Street through the Brekke Heights Avenue)
subdivision which provides an access easement between lots into Valley View Park,thus
connecting Osgood Avenue to the park and eastern portions of the City.
58th Street/Ozark Avenue North. In the Valley View Estates subdivision, 58th Street is
planned to provide on-street trail access between Osgood Avenue and Valley View Park(via
Ozark Avenue and a trail easement between adjacent lots).
59th Street/Peller Avenue. Fifty-ninth Street serves as a critical link in the connection
between the southern frontage road of Highway 36 and Stagecoach Trail and Highway 95.
Depending on the approved connection from the frontage road(either as a paved shoulder
along an extended frontage road or an overland trail),59th Street will either serve as an
on-street route or be improved to include paved shoulders. Peller Avenue directly connects
with 59th Street to provide the north-south link through the surrounding neighborhood
and to Valley View Park.
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
1999 COMPREHENSIVE PARK & TRAIL SYSTEM PLAN
40
Beach Road. As indicated previously,the Minnesota Department of Transportation plans SOUTHEAST OAK
for the Highway 36/95 intersection and for Beach Road have not been finalized. The City PARK HEIGHTS
views a Beach Road or other alternative north-south connection as vital in retaining ties (south of
between the inhabitants of Oak Park Heights. Sidewalks on either side of a Beach Road Highway 36 &
Bridge have been planned. east of Osgood
Avenue),
Valley View Park. Valley View Park serves as a critical link between the far eastern continued
neighborhoods of the City and those which abut Osgood Avenue. In the interim,the park
will remain without defined trails but open to through access, however,the future may
bring some form of designated walking,hiking and/or biking trails. A vital link is a bridge
over Perro Creek Pond to connect with 56th Street. With development of the NSP ash
landfill site as a park area, critical overland trails would need to develop to connect the
landfill site and its potential park amenities to the south frontage road,Valley View Park
and Cover Park. A trail is planned on the west side of Perro Creek Pond with a connection
to Stagecoach Trail. This trail would require coordination with the State of Minnesota,in
that the access would be near the State Correctional Facility.
Connection to Neighboring Communities. Stagecoach Trail will provide connection to
Baytown Township via six (6)to eight(8) foot paved shoulders. Highway 95 will connect
the City with Bayport via ten (10) foot paved shoulders and possibly an eight (8) foot
grade-separated trail within its eastern right-of-way. A Highway 95 connection to trails
in Stillwater is also shown.
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
1999 COMPREHENSIVE PARK & TRAIL SYSTEM PLAN
41
co
0)
0) N
/ . N
r
o'
a
i�
••••
00" li R
/ i//' I 1111111i1ILJ MARL iiil }'
. /1�=u ihfilc,.u■ a)
-�•auwullii�� a
J, Agile ii uunnnlli i�:�u1,:al■1 toes
/ Am..al a)
7 --,,
\ ■�� nm�11� \1\11\N ��i�t,I' 1111111111iiiiII! W
uuunl®X1111 \\\1\\1\1 \I\\\\) Q\\\\1 ,\\\\ ►��\ 11n Frrilri I\11\1\\11+ i® Illllllll IIII l 1 _ tu
� IIII�IiII; \\\;" \\, ", 1\\111111 ®IIIIIIII'IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIII 1111 .((f •-m
ii01�i11I11U11111\\\\\\�`��,.!+o+, '.uu1 a 111111 mil 1:::11 III::1 151111111111 1111111111 II 111111111111 1111111111111 1111 L c a,
iik ✓.d111111ln Illlllllllllh Q\\1 : 111111 1111111 111111 111111 11111111 1111111 111111 11111!111111111111111111111111 111111111111 111111111111 1111 I—
ll 111111111111111 Ill:iil:iii:111111 11b:1111 111.1111 1111111 11111111 1111111 Min UM minium 111111111111 111111111111 111111111111 1111
I Alliin IIIIIIIIIIII1:i!ii!t:iiill 111111 111111 p `�
—L NM mm NM nolo mu nluu ulun ulnunlull nnnuuu nunuun unuuuu un
40-111 1u11iiaull:i mnnnn c E E
—�� 11111111111111:Illilllillll llllllllllll lllllll :::III11111111111111111111111111111111 IIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIII 1111
`s 1IIIIIIIIIU iiilllllt�111111111111
��m �in'� ���p�i 11111111111111 lin 111111 Lt: 111111 111111 1111111 11111111111111111111 IIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIII (III CC o y
I n�II1111111...,ii IIII,,, . 111111 111111 111111 111111 1 ■ 111111 Illld��llllll 111111 IIIIIIIIIIII 111111111111 111111111111 111111111111 1111 U N
ii !' mil 111I1ii1I111111 ��■1
�'u tllllllll IIIIIIIIIIIIIII� 111111 111111 mom■� :::IIII :o;Slllln 111111 111111111111 111111111111 111111111111 111111111111 1111 if)/j°' i „no I Hu 111111 11:1111 111 1111111 111111111 111111 111111111111® 111111111111 111111111111 1111 L �y
1111111111111111�II1111111111111I 11111 uuu m - c L.
�,. �� ce
o � m111111111111��1 G. ��
.fig,: �., S ,_,� u1uI�111111111
Z ► �'��,I i I : �lululr
Ili
l.
If
Y Ir gym,
cn
ft
,,' I ! a)
% � m
woo)��
,.IIII e•�eie .1 MI 1111 1111111 111■1■�m-Mr ' /'/
„gm
.r` 111■1d `1�1 i�■� •
dr 1LM111 pmanilln WA am mg am g;•I- ,' � :: d
un ism ■! =r --':III I I gm r..11 7,41111WT4 i ___ . , ,,.., ,.,i,los .__,, _ a Z u) z
1--Lace 10
■�■11 ifflow 1 JIII/' �1111111� - �i��� • oArr_
r " IiIIiUI';iI1ipJip:i: ,I N
IIS ti 1110: . Mali ��il IIi1 OAC II'i. 1■
u gam, N I. 11►, a'i .,v Igar-Ag - _ —_ III. Ci
=1111 II - -
-
iniEra' (%I■ ��■��1■ ■1111 _.� \ \ o 61111
mall
011 ��« W ' rc I
IOW,. ■■rrmm X� aN �Y O igt
t ..am§�mi.■.-cm Jru- (S O �
......
.160._NMI !I!.! I:I
1► I��t�� za. -)
Ii1i&L4r!I'!I ► #,A4 I- i 4'n °
MI I.;ay p_.. II■ra 4iii•/I■ a Zd "7
pi:
IIIIIH ■11111111 ■0■�1-■■ c Ho �'V• j _
92
IIr,�� \IIIII/�� 11111111 ■■.m�r. �VA ��A t
irm ..1-, I■. ■ dPlilill
!1i: ■ �ter,m 4 �■1■■e-_ ■r SWIM ��p sao Ill,mm� a■■ , oo c5 0Mll�� o� w °
b■AL1-- hh �► ■'..1 mi E 12
mm1.,1111111.t,: �` _Ili��1 =i► 1/11.■■:, _ �_ ► o °
mi numar.tou
tilL
X1111 r_ ill. T�` , �_
i*_IuiIII
`� .. ,. /�x • _._ , _iiuI1i ei1 I�•�.�r■-� .,
n17a iti ,-11 — ,
ium i
wmi mi.....1! I � 111111 WO is alai
LI11■ -- ■►JIII g`� �i .� �, 111
iIh
lir* o92Y =0III gem a o m•, 8 .s .7500
1i a
IMP4 01111111a ill '
II 111=�� ' III . 0 o ..... 0 a_•
O =
(A.,vil �■pp i .gyp= �l ' �, I Z W d W CO d 2
'in 1 1 /�--11. E , ♦4; wow
.. .1111lik11011111111� ___- %�•��1 zz
.II,i� _11' ► _MI� ► o I►
1k0111
i 1 )10011
t plibk-0,ffla--
' lIlltil.---
/ �� W
,si...f In '-- / 1 ii4 IN
Al �1 �.. ��,,�. J z
• 1 Ili_ s�— �, —�
101
��� 011/._. ��I�. ,.e _.1 I,.,/
644 0 <cc , . ,, cz
0 = .1c
to
I 0 �,�p jiliiiiro _
..
•6 i 1 lip./W&WAI ill IMF 111140rom ,•111 Ilik, ilirg 00 fid (TS44
to
0 11 '4iiimillai
0
IIID 1uIai. ii 1IIuIIItii _mu
0.)
cy)
(-- _
- M 0
piii 411011app/
.11,10iiimoilimumm
_
>,
a3
N- co
do A
Agalilp _0011111, 1,,,,.
PrO°000
0
0..°1
II ' bill11111 laii 6 -
0
-0
marl ..... - a)
../ ----C% ----
''-'11144r1 00- ..!:11111%::Iviligigii....11,,,,....,, 1
.5
, _ ...., H.....,,E.A.A..cr.4
c .
\ - ill•IpliVtirl "-- ,a 0,111401:1; 1 1 i7171[011011:111:1 itainiV74 13
' tul Oh'OA "'L. otO 0110 IIIIIIIIIIII Man 111111111111 RS >,
o
o 0 00
,
/ ,,,•., -::"''‘`'A'" ' A 0 0 i 00..--,(13=1111 1 11 miii1 minim iii IoN1
,,,..„, .....,
...-.1111111100 f. V,"WI*al=Minimum 1
11 11E --
>LO
1%111 i t I i i n \
7 iiiiillffiMIOA VO Cgit... 111111 Min mai 0131 101111111111 OMB 1 I DIE CC1 .-0)
Of co
//0%, Al *Nip,* ..6 ' ti mmi mm 111111 11111111 11,1111 FM 1111111111 111111111111111 111111111111 FffiffffIl
‘1)
111111.1 lil 11111011111111111Aig 11113 111q.EOM 111111 11101 11111i11 1111111 111111 MIDI 1111111111111 111111111111 111111111111 MBIGThl III i'"' =C
010" HIM Hffili film 111m 111111 111111 MD IBM 1111111 111111111111111 11111101111 =B-11=-1111 2 0
\ , Illompu dilibiliiii111111gmgm 1114111111111 11'1111 111111 111111 111111 OM ram 111111 111111111110 M11101111 Hum mum Ill 1:3 ma,
..)..otiiiigolnrimmpue ••• '1111111 111111 Coll Ii? Ell 1111111 .E__F.....H Ilall11111 111111111111 III 4:1) E
0,
r_2,...iiii., , ii,:iiiiiiIiiiiii:;iiiiii:11:: 4iv MI HIM i_iiiiiiiii mm illa IIIM:Hil !NI itii: 111111
MR= HUH=11111111:111111111 !III (13 0
/
. 11i111111111111 „,„„„„; 111111 MI 111.{{1111 III 4011111111 111111 111111111111u= imuimit mum! Eft *a ow
..._
""""""111111111111Elall 2 ir 0 ..-
I Lc,7,40
oi .,. .2,:, - 1-- 'imPinsmiss E
Elmo OP AI
CI
I- ..! ' _...• lk. 00/ , ...-1
..- • sms=4,0, 0. w
SI
00
m a)
_
r\A.\\. 0111#1.11.-1:1:;,,nly• ..40...-1°.--- - ..-....--.----irlp, .11,1PIP,,:..,'". f
*.,' '- i-L±I-u-_/•5141110_ -- 111111V 1,--
cL. 1111 HI us jirl -,-.. mi v
-.71-
Iii ii•EN -ik--.....---- ci. i
0' PI) tli i '- III NM In nu n 1111 NI mid
, . - tig .riLi ,,,,,..,..........:
. -, a mil ,
_ alio.. 1111111mhp
La __,-m-_. ••--1.
_ • 1 -- -,--,,,„„ ..•1 P A
ra III 11. -411 - 'Ill Plur
gm nu il- ti,m Al A "a-- 11 c\i
'Am NE mg on en PEI. ----•c l'Ir.--.7, ...... ci
am EF....is ei # -
iii --T-§MI 22 ma .74.-HWY '' g ri4)i. wigr _ _
,.. ..... z+
,.. HIE Mimi=ini MO- n a
if w z
1E111 ma 01 VI.mil i- re II°
w
- 22 ES ,..i•E =I L §i °a.<
III .•mm Ma:= . ------- a0°- 1 Aid 0
...-.......a
Ini 1 1=L.- MEd ; it-ir..-14P: 1 MI_RIX 1_1. 1, '--- 1111111.11c <:, °
1111 L_,_ NI MN=
P-- g I egg a Ego 11 g
.
LH . , a .wog=r, =fill& F
1.s.....„....... .. c\I
mil immisito lira. 4......,..sor._ mill 1111 • -
. .. . . ...a
,k.,_ IIIM 'on sralrae.• ' LIMAI a Mum IIIII C)
1111. smipw, •IN !Mew inousi Pa -,,:vrT,,7 ... - -- ___ ____
u MIN magi ,,-, LI '' ifill -di I
11111111111. 1,0All rA WAWA lin
I \ \
16111 1
NI
II 9.III ')ii.... LIT k gloats '2 (14 iil 0
..No•-I
VAL=1,mmrd r xl:e
c--, D 03 •\ A
a) <
ma..
NOME .0.28 Mil "gm m m 0.14 do -
%
0
0. 0
..,..-
ammonom 21111111_11.1 no, #11,*0 i'l
1
LI ninve ., tu 2 g ,\Z t--,. , 3 4
m"1111140 IIII=P2111111 ma malum: r.:. • 0 1-- .
... _ 4 mile villINI .. s: .mitAt 44a c) tg , \\
#_:;-, Y r' Q,
\ i 1 1
,,,.:NEI=*Wink BM mosianoonal -Mt # A ct. ,- 2 0-'2 -1 La.
not":0 EtTi IrIsi ai EIS=
2
Nimanso, a sa I. .
III bAs0i AIL;RN, mintran est EAR 0 i-w° c .w5,_
ill--
..,t-1-11111-1-J 0
111116". Itil gob IsrP:mei=....... a-
11111/4 L =AO. : e WA:loss=°MHO 7-1 ,
c%1
si iii 1111iNEW 1110•1, , 6.,Sopm_Emi Li...:.j ) , 0 c„, c.,
P-I I I 1-Al
PA on-Kr 111
IIMIlik WA.,11
all, IIIII r i 0%thiiiiiikViill CM In--1 CliialiMM tm.11111Piiii
IfilF.--.7-....-_-.=_.1.---, a a W
illird11111111 4 1111
.....401 rt.,* I :".11.1.... VIN:ra Ea. 0 ,
1°1- 2
RN 11111111
mai ,itirtrAT 1 11
itt. ing cc..9 ___,;_:::- ...-e-71,„e ii,
(-- 4 11111.1111111 ° 1 i--0 a)
C-0
c .... =
Pi„am /1111611111161 Sill 111 41k4& NI )' -,libji m 7: 0
i=== .1111 II OM ;WI 1 ReilipahrfW 1111141111111 I >0 13 E
mum Emilli 1 MIN IN ) i 0 PI Mr-3m Rah
III MEM=MEI i • I Tillik. °41.ire S S ca e 2,_$-
Ill Mil NM ,„ gia. 0 0 2 a 0 2
m
cr)>:),,,>•--d<8 wa:,. 766 lj:
HI •[p ,V, 0 1 11°"1 ....trAN"1-1111111 . .0 EM ."-.."--!..41!
.11 ......,,i imil . MY, sir:Jk. .•"' "40% 0 -LT.gg1W/Isb.. „;.°,'
I Ihr- in=atssli .-----11
• in min=or.1 1111 r ill* :.;„:' 1 'ow-1aq gi )
11 Nimii i
Es palm i ;
- - 1 Oa Irgrraft -c% 0
3 3 tl)= m(0
_
I
I - ..-,e--I 0,1,,_or .....,_
Ak,
lor (--) , 101 .-:
14.1.11111111161 11. mi_
°°.=•I-13 CO 0
I IM IIPMIT• 1
• et MIMI°11111
1-1- o E cow w
41
Ail i II! ii.*-11-1-.41M. 111 I CL-a 0)
Z ZZCOC'R 2 2
IIII Iff•.-,f,41,4, in a'.
1110141111111111111 •..404 i uj 2 2zDwa..a.
11 Ait‘' .11 I I 11.1111 1 I Items' ,F, I 1*41 o ZZ
is
:4frbe.ai . , „ divoim....., w
I AV
- %.mim i IIII liaimunkm Ili *IL eimerorai--&-ArgkArcL Mal
1, -J
dr i at T 1 1-1.
in
1111116 % 11414•-Niq'Ati*in- 3 H '11 1 r..' '''' Iiiir.A.411111111" 111111111111A
,11
i 4„,jv i abikA.111104
410....Amg 01
1
IL EMI ,.mit - &A--Ah ‘ 011F1
Iiipli in * ... . lit I hOIL
mom E. 1 0
ii \ „A*...i.•••••418=„oissn, Arim
iiii11708 .
.1' id lb, • N„,,,,,,, ,051,__ _k
.ffAe 'al '
111 wer$1111111 AIM Um
bk..,
1141 -mail,11111, 111
I
,inimmur,„,...11, • .
LLI 0
i.-.
LL=
I illepli% w
111111 ,I o 0 f") (11
rtr4 N , itri..witik ikok Ls_u_ 0)
zi
_ill. Z
1 , • to
.. ikok gillIEL&Im MAI"
%lin ll ›- E 4...
I
II..' i _, ) r 11111ffir 111 -1NT'ilil&a.m.11111111111\All _....mi EL 0
/ .'N .......‘ --,
PARK FACILITIES MASTERPLAN
Parks serve as important recreation nodes/open-space within a system of trails. The park facilities masterplan provides
proposed park locations and contains a list of improvements for existing and proposed parks. The park facilities
masterplan is based upon the information gathered and analyzed in the inventory, issues analysis, and policy phases of
the Park and Trail Plan. The following paragraphs describe improvements to be made to existing and proposed parks.
Valley View Park is valued for its dense vegetation,variation in topography,and wetlands. VALLEY VIEW
The masterplan proposes to maintain and enhance the natural aesthetic of the park. PARK
Improvements to the park focus on making the park better known in the community and
St. Croix Valley, more accessible, and a resource for environmental education.
To make the park better known in the community and to people passing through the City,
an inviting landscaped entry is proposed with a sign clearly identifying the park at the
entrance on Osgood Avenue. The garden club may be of assistance in the landscaping of
the entry. Once people enter the park,signage identifying park boundaries and facilities
would aid visitors in locating picnic and trail facilities. Currently, many people are
unaware of the lower portion of the park due to the lack of signage and the physical
separation from the upper portion of the park.
Valley View Park will be expanded to the north in cooperation with NSP as the ash disposal
facility closes. NSP will be closing portions of the landfill beginning in 1999 and
completing in the year 2011. This expansion provides an opportunity for trail connections
to allow easier access to the lower portions of Valley View,which are now difficult to access
due to a steep slope between the west and east portions of the park. Potential uses for the
NSP land include an amphitheater, a formal garden, and trails.
In the lower portion of the park,a bridge across the wetland would provide an important
connection to the east. In making decisions regarding trail and bridge facilities,
consideration of handicapped accessibility is important, especially considering the steep
slopes found within the park and the growing number of senior residents living in Oak Park
Heights.
Valley View Park provides a unique resource that is well-suited for recreational and
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
1999 COMPREHENSIVE PARK & TRAIL SYSTEM PLAN
44
environmental programs. The park contains areas of woods, prairie, and wetlands, VALLEY VIEW
creating a diverse natural setting. PARK,
continued
Brekke Park is intensively used for field games and as a playground for toddler age and BREKKE PARK
older children. The masterplan proposes to expand the park onto DNR land south of
Brekke Park. Demand exists in the City for additional baseball fields and soccer fields;
therefore, the masterplan proposes additional ball fields for the northern portion of the
DNR land. Other potential uses for the DNR land include a golf course and a club
house/concession stand. Even if additional facilities are not built on the DNR land,
trail/road access from the DNR land should be explored.
Other park improvements include making the park easier to locate and providing
additional and upgraded athletic and picnic facilities. Currently, the park has one
vehicular entrance on a small local road. To make the park more welcoming and easier
to locate, additional directional and identification signage is proposed.
Expansion/improvements to the existing picnic shelter may be explored, including better
handicapped accessibility to the lower level of the shelter. A shelter related topic is
maintaining longer bathroom hours (with an attendant to prevent vandalism).
Other improvements that may be considered include constructing a hard surface under the
hockey rink to provide a better and more long-lasting ice surface in the winter and to
provide a skateboard/rollerblade area in the warmer months. Other improvements to
consider were described in a DNR grant proposal in 1996 and include a trail with an
east/west orientation along the parking lot and northern edge of the park and additional
facilities in the eastern portion of the park including a picnic shelter, landforms,tricycle
raceway, plantings,and a different location or shape for the basketball court. A plan for
Brekke Park that was included in the 1996 DNR grant proposal is found on page 50.
Swager Park serves as a linear neighborhood playground along a trail that is within an NSP SWAGER PARK
easement. The trail currently extends from the east end of Swager Park to Oakgreen
Avenue. The masterplan proposes that the trail be extended and connect with existing
trails so that the trail extends all the way from Valley View Park to the high school and
western City limits. Extending the trail would bring more people to the park and make the
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
1999 COMPREHENSIVE PARK & TRAIL SYSTEM PLAN
45
park more accessible. SWAGER PARK,
continued
The St.Croix Mall is located to the east of Swager Park. Currently, no park identification
or access exists from the east. An attractive and accessible entrance at the east end of the
park would encourage employees and visitors of the mall to use the park. A small unpaved
parking area is located in the northeast corner of the park off of 58th Street North. An
improved parking area should be considered. A sketch illustrating an east entry design is
found on page 52.
The park currently contains little vegetation;however,sixteen trees will be planted in 1999
through an NSP grant. The masterplan proposes creating a landscape plan that provides
additional understory trees and shrubs and benches throughout the park. The plan for the
park includes creating attractive resting areas for trail users and for people who work at
the nearby St. Croix Mall and surrounding commercial areas.
Swager Park currently lacks screening from residential properties to the north, and
instillation of tree/fence screening along the northern boundary of the park should be
considered. West of the park, in the NSP easement, visibility could be improved by
removing buckthorn and other exotic species and creating a landscape plan including
native plants. Feelings of safety and visibility could also be enhanced by providing
pedestrian-scale lighting along the trail.
The park requires some maintenance improvements and has enough open space to allow
some additional facilities. The tennis courts are currently in poor condition and need to
be repaired. Some play equipment exists, but additional play equipment for young
children would provide more play options. An improvement that may be considered is
providing bathrooms in the park. The bathrooms could serve both users of the park and
people passing through the park on the trail system.
Cover Park is the oldest and smallest park in the City and provides an active area for COVER PARK
residents in the surrounding neighborhoods who are otherwise somewhat segregated from
the northern and western portions of the City. The park is located only two blocks east of
the NSP ash disposal site and Valley View Park. The masterplan calls for construction of
a trail extending from Cover Park through the cul-de-sac next to Cover Manor and
connecting to the NSP property and Valley View Park. The park has a small parking lot
and little to no room for expansion currently. The long-term uses and parking needs of
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
1999 COMPREHENSIVE PARK & TRAIL SYSTEM PLAN
46
Cover Park should be evaluated with the expansion of Valley View Park and with COVER PARK,
development opportunities associated with adjacent Mn DOT properties. continued
Improvements are constrained by the small supply of open space available at the site;
however,several improvements should be explored. The existing warming house is a simple
cement building located at the southern end of the park. The City may wish to explore
improvement of the building and constructing a City-operated greenhouse attached to the
warming house. Another improvement would be to provide refuse containers,which would
be especially useful in the summer when the park is used by dog owners.
Boutwells Park is a 24 acre park planned in the western half of the City. The park will gain BOUTWELLS
access from 58" Street and is intended to serve surrounding area neighborhoods and PARK
provide a connection to the Stillwater Area High School and Environmental Learning
Center. The masterplan proposes that the developer provide a year-round community
center/open air shelter with bathrooms,a tot lot,a play structure,picnic tables,gathering
areas,benches,and shade trees. The City may explore providing recreational programs in
the park, and the wetlands in the park may be used as a teaching resource for the
Environmental Learning Center. The park should be developed in a way that allows winter
sliding on the larger hills. Clearing only some of the trails of snow will provide
opportunities for cross-country skiing in the park.
Having an area in the City that could clearly be identified as a town center would enhance TOWN CENTER
the identity of the community, and creating a town square within the town center that
includes landscaping, fountains, a skating rink, benches/resting areas, waterways and
other attractions would create a unique gathering place in the City.
An area in Lake Elmo,west of Highway 5,could become part of Oak Park Heights. At that POTENTIAL
time, a neighborhood playground within a residential area is proposed for this area. PARK AND
RECREATIONAL
The DNR has been considering for a number of years building a boat launch east of AREAS
Highway 95 and south of the Metropolitan Council wastewater treatment facility.
An open space/park area is a possibility south of the State of Minnesota Correctional
Facility and west of Stagecoach Trail in an existing wooded area.
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
1999 COMPREHENSIVE PARK & TRAIL SYSTEM PLAN
47
03
et
sly61aH>lJed Neo to Apo slyBlaH Wed)/e0 Jo AiI0
9661 '4dei6ologd!euev:aoJnos ,✓ VAN 0 133 OOE OSl 0
rA
)P d Mal/ AOHHeA
uoi;oeuuo3 Ileal pasodoad IAIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
SI!eal ;aaa;s-up IND Ma1111111 11111111s
sfieal paned 6ui;slx3
I
i(I!i!oed!euotloanoo alelS
._. _ ..._. ........m___peod mJed matA AalleA—
r , r ,f f ' 'r i
io •''''TRrt . , ( fT11f f ( _f.r ' 'YIf ! r ail q4 It
tirtall_iiilik!
Uu�jed
* . •y
r oRLAIN eO paned
'att
• 1awe
Niii .
fT..-.r.T7r..tTt.T TT.,rf TTf,.7fI•Tr.1.I..-,fr.r'flrr,.T'
--''''-'111110111110Nfrillialliila i Pi (
iiir
iik
� `,
'
91174111111 1 �
1 0
LI
uooauuoa!e1 �
(
Q ii
\ I lepiqsOlUOd I
/ _ JC
Paiv mold6CD
Alt r 90P46 Pirelle,PA. . ii . " \:.t _.......;;. 2. 1.--
_,... __ .•.. easy
W.18 K...11101 6U14/ed ir 7- L
iii: •1 —
'' r t: r t;'' t , 40 kjawiod uoileWolsaa 1 l
h / au�e�d ITi t T T fr _ I . fIIf1Illikw
Y.T L r ..f •f'i II
- i eat •:'OI — — `
I 7 ( I I r T`'pu e!MO,. 'i • f w /i3 1
r 'I T'I ..T.r.r�, 1 .� I
I
. • -r fi7,'
I j5 1
J I la I 0.,' ',ill —rl \: ( IIST-
111 \--0"...'L
O
I .1 t. . J -
f•
yyy_ .7 T'rT T.f T •i" I. t :y _�_ CO
7C
'fO p r, —11:—!
C
I (D
.. f Z
1 uopoauuo3 I!e.t g 1
I 1 '�
I
Il'.NW II I
1
r
II1 i
l
IN
,1ed
a
lano� l!S lesods!Q
ysv dSN
JOAIH X10J3 •ls I I - ....
......*- pue easy a6ell!A of 1 I 1• -
�� �
1
....--i_r,
ON4
. S
6
ii o
, _
a6
9£A My6!H elelS I
IPPPir'
Jelemll!nS umolumoa of
sly6IaH)(Jed)1e0 0 APO
9661 '4deJ6ologd Ie!Jay:aaJnos sA/5/0H*led)/e0 Jo APO
ueid pasodoid • - - N c 1334 OOZ col o
*led 011)1018 �0.
xv: O\ N
C
cu
a. _ii
anuany poo6s0 _o-
a3 ilia u)
—3(1"AA 6/16ariplir
Q I
a I
m I I
_
...,••••1•:s1 :7-,:-:ig
11 -
a) a�
1 at;ro. N rT.
:::�•:: u;m: N co u- jer
v1 0
o O ' N N
•L:•::': ' L a I 1 2 H W
0
- Yyt.; (n cU9
EL ::':'.'.:!:::.::':::':::.:: :! ::,.I L'T, .i____
a I
Q
1---
L_
E _ c 0 1
22
vl o
Il
n .5 0 1 a
N'and�ewp iv Y o 1Tii
a) ‘g l
11Z2.
I1� CE.jO E. 1
1 1�''}� • ,,,, a O O O O O
Z 1 I I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 = -
li
: i .
, } :.!
.____
,_., LI s
i 1 1 I?cf ,
•....
•..
I Ii \i :. .,.,.
.t
. ...
► •. ,.,
.., El. 1 - v
`�
I I I
ill" . z
P1 .
cn a
v li
, U C
_�. Q / O m ............
A. -
2
V F" . N
,I C
O
co • 1111111
... .., 1' ' la I
Q I
\e" ).' ,,, \.• -- .. EL4,...:1,1 1
.a
/�\> I
J 1
1
co I
LQl d >)
Y
O
(9 1-
- -a• _
Y
O
-5
1 ,
o m co
,
U II Qom/
1
ni
— — Q
1 a�
il—
1
0:3
I di
i 1
1
)1-____.: --
1L ___,. l 1
1
,\ . ni
-,: -
i rill PUD]Io4u psa21
L-1-".G o af ` t
L,t) )),04111. c -• • • / , •-; ,
1/4 !P2'. ' (.."- •
o ..1 -. o
4
FQ,i:,-1,.,...,-..... . , I 1
%Ar .....„s..e.a. opiw..: •
_ 0 < 3 3 V * 4.
'0_:_i_i 8_ 1 ,„. E
•
Omar Avenue sh i s 3111 U tib. ,..:
I.
if 0 e v (:1'),__, .:i..‘‘''':
.ti� N d
Y—J . O U Y a - •-
1 T' 3 d ', ,til 0 : it
' •. A •i,,�1a'(' ILII 3
, orCi
,\ i,llia
D.
`?-• f\ I /i P
::
3 i 0 i I
C ..
;,,�,:'' a
s
f _
• [ .; rH...._+/
\. .� !I :
��\I 3
-0 tn .\ 0%
a-% 1 4/'// 04 . 3
i \,'\(>7.-..-6)A ! , , ...(Ths..z. ..., •-.
.A,. I lc ; i-,\_.;j:" . ,. -;., - . . . .. .- fail. ' . . . ' tt '1'.
i ' 1h /_ :11f
a o ° II?U
j f
d U v
cI om <
c
Z a` O Z 3 • . 1 m Cm
'._ rs .Wa m , ,` ` F
ii . l ,\. 'W F,�' 111f Vii
ec
_ ill
. y ,45li( I Ii °I.. -
.
-12, it , ;
C
) i
/ u
,C O N ,z 1 c v I u , ..� � 4_ ,,
V
_ 0 CL t C II II 2 - 5
(1)
U 0L0, Q0 Z a~hi
m U C'7 a d \is Y q c co
b G d
54
w
L
Il
`l a 1� L .0
— __
D. oa
41
Q11-
47.o...0..
.
p Q U
c — 5 =
Y —
(0
a ° E d
_ ! t 8
(---- W N c
•X N c (6
al
0 --1 .q—ti.
_ '+ m U �_ U
.E('<" o co
1 •
J N to w
c U C
CD CL III'fE =
4,
c\> at. ego
1QC
o c„ •j, �r • a
E Q p
~mu L `o
1 a) 11 o
6 ..le Z AN...,
co 'ai
] \=11=[ co
L U
O l' U 5
I
Z 0 Ij
I121 tf
0)
El 1 1 .6, lim
U
HIQ_ —
1 .
19
H T _0i 2
1
2 _ j '
� �,
< '55 F; a) 0
a c U I C
0• U
I (0 C
<T c Vi
d ,3) a.
U
m • c
C
N t ' m E
Q7
W J Itii
c
-- Z _ -c
>
i =
I–
'..-7;
u_
wc J
1
a.
Q IQ)
y1-1ON anuany PlaIIPIO r---
I
-o
51
•
•;.....,„--, • -1*''' '.V ik
.,.... *
---s„.-70,,,,,,, i lap
•,....; ----------- <Z
,,/7, ;.. -______. ,,i,-, 7, --,..__.....„ „...44. v •
• ..-;-,/,,- ,---.."- - 7,•,..... ,;--, ...„,„,. ..
•'111
, - , -„..5.---- 7-• ---%1_1114% :
,......„.. •. ...•=0""°°16".."......
- - , ‘,,/ ..,,/ v7, ; .....,w
k-
.
- - .........__......•
4<.14:1%, 4Vre•-• tpti
,,-11/4V AaA1-4.•;.0_, ---z--;..-,-07,
-,7 ., '• \ ",,,A. .4:..„,,,:t ..... - 1.._.--- _.......... ....,,..i......1....!,__....i.,....;•,rioce:(07. ,,, .:
- .0., \0...it::---:4•-.0* --:--?...:.. . .f.,.. _..h.w.m,,.......,—,,,...,....., ,,,, .‘,0,
...0..... .
- ir . ?,,o -,. ..---.--A,-/- ....- ::-,-,q,,m,.......v....•_-..-", 4%\o'; .., ,
liaili14,'FP If/'-/,:faie/
'., ...1 ,, / I gra ce34--i...,,11p.-.4_,,.• ,09". „0111.
Il 1000P It, i Ai , eel J--AAE
.., 7
A•rce ro opr„..i rd ray e : -,
r44.;,, ,Apprr„Aka 1.1*..6 I '1001161.4%. f
VIP Rap ,
I 0 #V1' .. - .•IiirlitelklW ''rPk V-ril - 717,
-.'- k4111PrN1.'I IP°1 ..°• A'11110\111ViiiklalCik, 4...4 e.:.,7ise.4% ....---
( i
1111P 111...0110. -,-1 ../a''' : '"•
Ig„*.-IVI,et!0` A • No. V!, `'.+N. -.WW1& ----IV: _ / „,-- ! NN
;)04;-‘; •-x;-77'jiiikiill& -'" Ir7I- *
,:• """" Ilieowl \\
...,,, ,:,,,-, za.•••-_ . ,,
_ - • ---.,--
41- Ilis — 4; iso ---- ,
A
--
..' --L--.^,,• 10 .
--- _.
ow vco. , 0„ •
/-
-.‘ \
/1 //
iiii 4,, .1"a(f;- ' 1-. --•r-r71 >4., t•-4.4.1---1.--
,
1 ilt• -
il "V ge
1 4 .
‘ P -
,ke .
Trail East Entry
Looking Toward Swager Park
52
( ______ )
1--- .
Enlarge
labil,
• Parking Lot
..
14. )
Top of Slope
I
Perennial
Path—.� Planting
_ u
Rink Hockey Parking Z
I 7( S,A (>5
II
1r14,4 Q
45
/Or 2
i 1 Small
I Rock Wall
L ___—) 1
(perennial
I Planting
on SlopelPleasure �/AID
Skating/ . !�
Basketball NXC
lb
Play1 Structure (
17 and Swings41"10
Improve
Park
Building/ r ' —_ 1 0 25 50 FEET
Add Greenhouse /'� - -- �
k--- 58�' Street
-- Connection to NSP Areas ',� y
City of Oak Park Heights
Van Accessible
Handicapped Parking
Cover Park
Proposed Plan
Source:Aerial Photograph, 1996
City of Oak Park Heights
53
Brackey Addition
58°1 Street North
_______ _ ________ r___ _ _______
___.....„
.._
. ir 4j
I
'- ______ \
I
' Potential Parking Lot /
and Community Center/Shelter
t
dirli ----
1
1111.20
\... Pond i/
1 u ,
, 4
it imp i
— — `,�y
Sliding Hill Pond
I i i
✓�
Pond
Pond
i
i ` Pond
it ` � /
if
�
I
Pond Will �/�
/ lir Ilk , _
. .14e- t /110/
, al, /
NN N... ....'...'..:----'---- ---- , _ „------
I cp 410441k ----______ -
' Note: This park is in the
Environmental process of being designed.
Learning Center
': /
/ More elements will be added.
i � �
Boutwells Park
� j_
0 100 200 FEET _ ,,- Proposed Plan
City of Oak Park Heights
_
Nr=kG
Source:Aerial Photograph, 1996
Senior Life Community Plans, 1998
54
PARK GUIDELINES &
CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
The following outline provides a summary of park classification guidelines for the various types of parks found in
communities such as Oak Park Heights. While these standards can be applied to existing conditions,their real asset is
as a planning tool in establishing needs for future recreational development. The standards which follow are
representative of those adopted in 1991 as part of the City Park Study for Newly Annexed Areas and can be used together
with the trail planning guidelines as a comprehensive tool for recreational planning and development.
This classification system is intended to serve as a guide to planning, not a blueprint. It is the variety and individuality
of park areas that make them interesting and exciting places. Sometimes more than one component may occur within
the same site and they may differ from what is specified here. A park system,at minimum,should be composed of a core
system of parklands with a total of 6.25 to 10.5 acres of open space per 1,000 population.
Use: Designed to provide mainly passive activities with some active NEIGHBOR-
short-term activities HOOD
PLAYGROUND
Service Area: Neighborhood size of 1,000 to 5,000 persons,within 1/4 to
mile
Population Served: Ages 5 to 15,with informal recreation for groups of all ages
Desirable Size: Ito 5 acres
Acres/I,000 population: 1.0- 2.0
Site Characteristics: Open space for spontaneous play, play areas for both pre-
school and school age children, multiple-use paved areas,
limited field games,small court games,ice rinks,within easy
walking/biking distance
Existing Playgrounds: Swager and Cover Parks
Proposed Playgrounds: None
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
1999 COMPREHENSIVE PARK & TRAIL SYSTEM PLAN
55
Use: Area for designated active and passive recreation areas NEIGHBOR-
HOOD PARKS
Service Area: % to I mile radius to serve a population of up to 5,000
persons (a large neighborhood)
Population Served: Focus upon ages 5 through 39 with emphasis upon ages 5
through 18
Desirable Size: 5 to 10 acres
Acres/I,000 population: 1.5 - 2.0
Site Characteristics: Suited for multi-use development, easily accessible to
neighborhood population, geographically centered with safe
walking and bike access, may include school facilities
Existing Parks: None
Proposed Parks: Boutwells Park
Use: A large recreation area with primarily athletic facilities COMMUNITY
designed to serve older children and adults PLAYFIELDS
Service Area: I - I%miles for urban areas/unlimited for rural communities,
a minimum of one per community up to 30,000 maximum
population
Population Served: All persons with focus upon ages 20 to 39
Desirable Size: 10 to 25 acres
Acres/1,000 population: 2.0 to 5.0
Site Characteristics: Athletic complex including lighted court and field games,
community center or indoor recreation facility, swimming
pool,ice rink,capacity for special events,must include support
CITY Of OAK PARK HEIGHTS
1999 COMPREHENSIVE PARK & TRAIL SYSTEM PLAN
56
elements such as restrooms, drinking water, parking & COMMUNITY
lighting. PLAYFIELDS,
continued
Existing Playfields: Brekke Park
Proposed Playfields: The planned annexation area park on the west side of
Oakgreen Avenue represents a combination of Community
Playfields and Community Parks.
Use: Area of diverse environmental quality which may include areas COMMUNITY
suited to intense recreational facilities such as athletic PARKS
complexes as well as passive type areas,depends largely upon
the site location, suitability and community need
Service Area: Several neighborhoods, I to 4 mile radius for urban
areas/unlimited for rural communities
Population Served: All ages,toddler to retiree, entire community for cities up to
25,000
Desirable Size: 20 to 35+ acres
Acres/I,000 population: 5.0- 10.0
Site Characteristics: Provides for a combination of intensive and non-intensive
development ranging from play equipment to trails, may
include natural features,such as water bodies or forested land,
must include support elements such as restrooms, drinking
water, parking, lighting, etc.
Existing Parks: Valley View
Proposed Parks: The NSP Landfill site in conjunction with Valley View will be a
Community Park.
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
1999 COMPREHENSIVE PARK & TRAIL SYSTEM PLAN
57
Use: Specialized facilities serving a limited population or specific MINI-PARKS OR
group such as tot lots for small children TOT LOTS
Service Area: Less than 1/4 mile, sub-neighborhood level of from 500 to
2,500 persons
Population Served: Toddlers through age nine
Desirable Size: One acre or less
Acres/I,000 population: .10 to .50
Site Characteristics: Within neighborhoods, in close proximity to intensive
residential developments
Use: Protection and management of the natural/cultural NATURAL/
environment with recreational use as a secondary objective CONSERVANCY
AREA
Service Area: No applicable standard
Desirable Size: Sufficient to protect the resource and accommodate desired
recreational uses
Acres/I,000 population: Variable
Site Characteristics: Variable,depending upon the resource being protected
Use: Facilities developed in association with schools which are SCHOOLS
intended for children's educational and recreational
instruction,which on a secondary basis,provide opportunities
for community residents,this shared usage is positive in that
it allows for daytime usage by students,evening,weekend,and
summer usage by all.
Schools: Oak Park Elementary (in Stillwater), Stillwater Area High
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
1999 COMPREHENSIVE PARK & TRAIL SYSTEM PLAN
58
School, and the Environmental Learning Center SCHOOLS,
continued
Facilities: Oak Park Elementary has three small baseball fields, a field
that is sometimes used for soccer, a small basketball court,
and a playgound.
Stillwater Area High School has facilities for softball,baseball,
football, soccer,tennis and track.
The Environmental Learning Center provides educational
training regarding environmental topics.
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
1999 COMPREHENSIVE PARK & TRAIL SYSTEM PLAN
59
0)
0)
m o
.�o�o'i'i'i1io,,illi'i'i'i'i'i'i'i'i'i'!'i'i1'i'i'o'i'1'i'i'i'Diii0'i'ii! 'i1o1'!'1'I,�,i1l1i111 `e,k
0 `°
/11!/1l.1lI/i1111111111111l1/11/1l111011.•J r:Lk••�+1 �►4.^.111A/!,10111//,I !111111111!1111111111Ii,♦•,,1*♦A0,,14, 4'004 licit 4,444 .. !! '111111/1!l111!!I! o11�i 11„'c���i �►���►i�1►1.1►►.' B % ,
♦1111!111 ► 0/11llIIi111!l1111�/11; F►1'1t1:, 47il►11�.►.-.� AA'Ar% •••• 1 1 IIi / 'Ie. 2
111111100 1 '111 1l11111111111111,�1 X11►1'.���,���*/,��,,.01,/•!�•.�.' !11'1 /01 '11lf, N
111!11111 /e1111111111l1/11111110�♦ IV 1141/1,.,.,I.!. n'e11!�I.!1��111111' � �0 c
11!01111 ♦1111 111!11111 111!111 ! ► 1'/1,1�.i1.keA►jY 0-j1..�1111/1/1 /1 1�'I�A'In1:*_
11111111 t 111 1�1111l11111111111 N.v ►1111 114.1�0'/,,--•..1.e11!1!1 /i11i,i1 ♦-• -'i '
111 111 1'111 '11•
!1 /#
111111'1/11 1►. �A►'1N► ,1.4.�a.k11l11/1111 '11 4. �' y,....-r, qlJ - mein I
1111111
1111' ILf►/11i1111111111/i111/IIIe1lx0,4;,d140.:46„;..-„V •••:'' �, �- •.'�
d .�111i11► 1. 7� 1 , v� '�uJ1:�1GNp/ -.I. 11''''�'i ''!I/' 1'1'11�� 1/ 11111il/11.•i►e ►11 Ii/111: ---
�!'11111111 .e 1 ! •�0,�c •.•t1�i'Ii1o11.•:!.l3�► +001 b 410,1.♦1/:_AA4 .,
111,11111111111 111' 1'11 1111,! -.�1110i ►o��i1/1/ 0111.1•,a►11111+1+41,4► �.ti��''''' EOf•� i j l °'
11. 111 11111 1' 111'!1 11111,11! 00 !, •1�1►1�fi11111l1►I1111o.� �0I �0.1�1� 4'i 1�10/0,,,.0� .C.,n �►;rm sc iiii0 1 i� 17 :\A Q
/I!�111t1111/111'�11111 �1111t1e111/111 ��1�►1/� .��t��1'IIII<!�i._1hv_� ♦".'.,►�a .ti _ _
111111111111111 1111111 1111111141 1Na�111.1:4�1'11'110/,►/••.��.°4�-74 *1.74t1►rrriNAV r1111�IL1 i r�l.• iii-4`41111- y C d
111111111111 08
11111'11! 111; 11111111111 111 ��.1.+ ►11 1,►Ll►!tp�l,..`�!!I,����,�t hyo�r�ti�1v'!r "��r'�y v : ;t�_I�!_!1!cail��um�:u>I �`/ v
11!11111!1111' 111/11�111,f110111111►//,11�+ ►1�y11 1 ..p. �,;+r. ; „ ,
111111111111110111 11 1111111.1 .11,'.11 @11101:1..x,!= ���lrrarro�►°-��` ,.� ,� ,
11!111111110 111111'1l101� 11111141�� ' 1 II�,,��i11/11' ;a►rrc11 •+i�,r r`+ ,rr, :•vi r."�1 •'►,`SII►�',111,�11111111►,►1i viinai; m
1111 11 I' 11111 i11� !!/1/11111.• r./�,►11'0 1/1AY1 =; +,►,rr;1v: 1►'d+�1�A err\►.+?X1 1 ., ,d!11 :1a i`:1:'��+I���aiului I °��
11111111'1'111'11'/1 1!!' 41
1101/11111v�:.�/��i1111s� a�alstll�it�lr �� �;;.•, ,, er e,1\' '�rR,\./ si�.. I„ 1, , ,
4-4 . II I, Wit_ ��r# •�..ay,,,.o\ �Uill'y1.0., a :u ilIF, ,Iiyuil41l.IIi�hRifi,A lini41III1.. II II II >L.
11/11111111l111!11 'N11 11111111,1•..rto4�,11e ,k.f.,J s!rur11l: :gtr',!` ,,,t,e, ,�.�+,��\r falls ,pal► /ai►1is_;►�rano
ir_,�_�I_�i I�:u_.il_�I_.�I _�i �_��_I u1� TE
111111111111111111111111111111'1'111' '1'1�1�1�1�1�1�1�0:_1��11•�&4 b ,�il'IIr_u�I III frul�►�r�,r/+ ���i', cRlr'a 1,11,1 d1'i l�liti�lll, °i,►.fa 1,,1,�,►1�1►�Iu�i!,►.ila'► 1►,I�,r,�1.J,mmmu Cl) o
111111111111111!l1111�i m....1'..•0•111•69111 iVI�;12�'R!iili FIllr lrl!",.110illg ilii=17.1 f 1111118 s!Is li!il4�fl`III'. lyi.hall f11ylE4 oirc 1►ARanr,alll!Illln 21111111111 I� y
1111111111/10111111N 1'111111111 . ,q-10,!,alil li l'anllI.'IP E1,1!llsfll,11 p�1¢... r,;, �r k' ;:%•.i�r i•1' %1L. '. n .iO�i��il...1004.A..4,..• 11111111! m
1111111111111111!111 �.1,I,/1 .�1j1,,, 111, , , ,1�._3_y1,, 1,1 li,s►, ,If,1► in , ..,► ��Incn.l .�,.�m�lust,-., ,_.1;, i,
4740111111/111��44*. mtilintst,I.IjigI111;,,I1l1.041s.1111:.1111111► 401; 1a►rA ilr �ugll ►'�fla'E..:af1 .n11il.RI11111 PIAI„i_f, +1411 il.4 uuau E
1111!1111111111111! � 111/1111/i,.,.,p;,,.,..........mil_,;_.,..,.11.11•!d•11 ,111unil,'a ;ke-- -vlr.;
IMPLEMENTATION
The final phase of the Comprehensive Park and Trail Plan establishes a process of projecting land acquisition and trail
improvements, setting priorities, and scheduling for their provision and financing over a period of time. This process
produces a long-range guide for recreation and requires that the City look toward the future to anticipate capital
expenditures and to provide revenues to meet them. This section does not take the place of a capital improvements plan
in that precise costs are beyond the scope of this document, however,the City must begin thinking about updating itsa
five year priority list, analyzing the financial situation, and obtaining cost estimates for the desired improvements.
Park and trail land dedication will play a major role in acquiring and developing park/trail LAND
facilities, although is not possible in all cases. Acquisition through dedication is a ACQUISITION
long-term process since land can only be obtained as the abutting land is developed.
While the outright purchase of land is prohibitive due to investment costs and anticipated
benefit per capita through the City,land acquisition will be necessary where developments
are already in place and lack recreational facilities or to acquire special,distinct pieces of
land which would otherwise be difficult or impossible to obtain through park dedication.
While the majority of Oak Park Heights contains developments that are already in place
where many of the trail corridors are proposed and will likely require land acquisition
through purchase,the utilization of road rights-of-way will provide an easy alternative for
establishing public trail routes.
For the most part, it is this Plan's intention to provide parks and trails which will not PARK & TRAIL
burden the City with high acquisition and construction costs. Land and right-of-way for DEDICATION
trail construction will be acquired as part of the dedication process of a subdivision or as FEES
an improvement to be included as roads are built or upgraded wherever possible. Due to
the obstacles that may arise through acquisition of a trail right-of-way,the Comprehensive
Park and Trail System Plan provides only a general layout of trail routes and proposed
park locations which may be altered at the time of actual acquisition and development.
At the present time, park land dedication contributions required of developers as a cash
donation is$450 per single family residential lot in the City. This fee is charged in those
areas where no park land is required,and is used for acquisition and development in other
areas where parks and trails are to be located. The Oak Park Heights fee schedule is less
than area communities and the amount as it stands makes it more advantageous for
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
1999 COMPREHENSIVE PARK & TRAIL SYSTEM PLAN
61
developers to pay the park dedication fee rather than dedicate land. Furthermore,no trail PARK & TRAIL
dedication requirements are in place to relieve the pressure for trail construction (that is DEDICATION
the current priority in the community)which results in the park fund monies which would FEES,
otherwise be utilized for park development, being eaten up for trail purposes. Based on continued
recent analysis of developer costs and park dedication requirements in various suburban
areas of St.Paul and Minneapolis as conducted by Northwest Associated Consultants,Inc.,
the City will raise the park dedication fee in 1999 and consider establishing a system of
trail dedication requirements.
This recommendation is made in an effort to provide equity between those land developers
who are required to donate land and those who pay the fee. In the past,the low level of
cash payments resulted in an unequal burden placed on those from whom land is required.
The higher fee is intended to accommodate the cost of land and its development,and the
opportunity cost of being deprived of that land through park land dedication. The
additional effect of this fee increase would be to accelerate the accumulation of funds for
acquisition and development. Adequate levels of park funds would be available for use
sooner to catch up and keep up with the pace of development,presuming that the fee itself
does not affect such,as it is not expected to do so. This assumption is made in light of the
fact that new development has continued in those areas where land dedication has been
required, and the fee is recommended at a level which approximates the cost of land
dedication to the developer.
While parkland acquisition and development are capital outlays that are typically FUNDING
financed with the revenues from City dedication or general funds,there are other methods OPTIONS
available to assist the City in raising necessary money for large projects. The following
grant programs may be available to the City if the intended project(s) comply with the
submission criteria.
DNR Outdoor Recreation Grant Program (LAWCON- Land and Water Conservation Fund)
The goal of the Outdoor Recreation Grant Program is to assist communities in acquiring,
developing,and/or redeveloping facilities for outdoor recreation use.The grants can fund
up to 50 percent of a total project cost,while the remaining local share can consist of local
funding, materials, labor, and equipment through local sponsors or donations. The land
must be owned by the applicant and must be developed completely within three years from
the date of fund acquisition. One or more of the following facilities must be included in
a proposed project.
CITY Of OAK PARK HEIGHTS
1999 COMPREHENSIVE PARK & TRAIL SYSTEM PLAN
62
Baseball/Softball Fields Basketball/Hard Courts FUNDING
Boat Launching Sites Campgrounds OPTIONS,
Canoe Access Sites Cross-Country Ski Trails continued
Fishing Piers/Shore Fishing Football/Soccer Fields
Nature Study/Observation Areas Picnic Shelters
Playgrounds Skating/Hockey Rinks
Swimming Beaches Tennis Courts
Trails Volleyball Courts
In addition, support facilities are also eligible for funding provided at least one facility
from the above list is provided. Support facilities include drinking fountains,fencing,fire
pits/grills, landscaping, lighting, roads/parking, benches/seats, trash receptacles,
restroom/shower/storage buildings, signs, sledding hills,warming houses, utilities, and
design/engineering costs (up to 10 percent).
DNR - Trails and Waterways Grants . In addition to the Outdoor Recreation Grant
Program,the following grants are also available through the DNR:
National and Scenic Area Grant Program
Regional Trail Grant Program
Cooperative Trail Linkage Grant Program
National Recreational Trail Fund Grant Program
TEA-21 - Transportation Equity Act for the 215` Century, signed June, 1998. The Act
reaffirms the priorities and funding flexibilities established in the Intermodal Surface
Transportation Efficiency Act(ISTEA)of 1991. The act provides,among others,the Surface
Transportation Program (STP), which provides federal funds on a reimbursable basis.
Transportation Enhancement(TE)activities are funded through a ten percent setaside from
STP funds. Proposals for trail projects may be submitted under the Pedestrian and Bicycle
project group of Transportation Enhancements. This project group allows for the provision
of facilities and activities that facilitate pedestrian and bicycle use, and provision of
abandoned railway corridors(including the conversion and use thereof for pedestrian and
bicycle trails).
Further information may be obtained from the Metropolitan Council.
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
1999 COMPREHENSIVE PARK & TRAIL SYSTEM PLAN
63
Legislative Commission on Minnesota Resources FUNDING
OPTIONS,
The LCMR program works toward enhancing and protecting Minnesota's natural resources. continued
One or more of the following strategies must be met in order to be considered for available
funds. The list is a partial list of strategies and represents the order of priority in which
funds are given. A complete list of project components, application requirements, and
funding cycles can be obtained from the State Offices.
I) Rehabilitate state and regional parks/trails.
2) Acquire and develop state and regional parks and trails.
3) Acquire, protect, and enhance critical habitat, native prairies, unique and/or
sensitive areas,scenic bluffs,aquatic resources,old-growth forests,and historic
sites.
4) Expand rural and urban revegetation with native species, including community
shade tree programs. Implement native species tree planting for energy
conservation, carbon dioxide abatement, erosion control,wildlife habitat, and
other benefits.
5) Research and demonstrate ecologically sound methods to control or eradicate
exotic species of plants or animals which are or may become a threat to the
environment.
6) Accelerate the implementation of measures to reduce non-point source pollution.
7) Provide for all types of wetland purchase, restoration and easement acquisition
to enhance wildlife habitat, erosion control, water storage, flood control, and
water quality.
8) Accelerate the use of farming practices consistent with wildlife habitat and
environmental and human health protection.
9) Create qualitative and quantitative benchmarks,including biological indicators,
for key natural resources to permit effective monitoring and assessment of
environmental trends.
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
1999 COMPREHENSIVE PARK & TRAIL SYSTEM PLAN
64
Capital improvements programming provides an instrument for carrying out the objectives CAPITAL
and recommendations of the Oak Park Heights Park and Trail System Plan. Through IMPROVEMENT
prioritization of five year capital needs for the City's park and recreational facilities and PROCESS
identifying the amount of money available to finance the improvements during this period,
the City will be able to determine which improvements are necessary in terms of their
ability to pay. The capital improvement program (CIP) is a flexible process,in that as the
social, physical and financial conditions change within the City, the priority of the
scheduled projects may also change. In response to the changes in the City,the CIP must
bean on-going process. Each year the OP should be re-evaluated for consistency with the
Plan, current recreational needs, and fiscal condition of the City. The Parks Commission
has previously developed CIP Programs for park and trail development. As a follow-up to
the adoption of this plan,the CIP will need to be updated.
The following process should be utilized by the Park Board when reviewing potential park
capital improvement projects.
I) Establish a five year priority list of park/trail capital improvements that reflects
current and projected recreation demands. Annually review and revise the five
year priority list to reflect current demand and needs.
2) Analyze the City's current financial situation.
3) Obtain up to date cost estimates for high priority items.
4) Develop project descriptions and plans for the desired improvements which
include proposed scheduling and phasing.
5) Make copies available of the CIP for public inspection prior to the City Council's
presentation of the annual budget at the required public hearing.
6) Begin the process over again following approval of the CIP and the beginning of
another calendar year.
It is recommended that a specific annual CIP review schedule be established for the review
of potential park/trail projects. This will enable persons who wish to request consideration
of new items to present their position in ample time to change the CIP, if necessary, in a
manner consistent with community needs and reducing or eliminating financial
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
1999 COMPREHENSIVE PARK & TRAIL SYSTEM PLAN
65
commitments being made for projects which might not proceed to the final construction CAPITAL
stage in the event that they are deleted or moved back on the priority list. IMPROVEMENT
PROCESS,
continued
An important aspect of park and trail development is user knowledge of the recreational COMMUNITY
facilities. To promote the use of the community recreational system, the City should EDUCATION
provide informational material to residents as the facilities are implemented. A newsletter
and map mailed to each household is probably the best means by which to accomplish
this. At the same time, the City should work to establish a list of rules and encourage
community awareness of such.
As indicated throughout this plan,a clear and concise system of park and trail signage is SIGNAGE
beneficial in any recreational system to assist users in finding and using the facilities.
Directional graphics may be in the form of painted pavement symbols/lettering or any
variety of regulatory, warning, or guidance signage. Signage should include general
identification of an area,layout and types of facilities present,directions for specific points
of interest such as handicapped areas, restrooms, or connections to destinations, trail
distances,and user/safety rules. The best location for much of this information is near the
entrances to parks/trail segments or near parking areas. The signage should be consistent
throughout the City and should be easily understandable and maintainable. The U.S.
Department of Transportation's Federal Highway Administration has outlined size,shape,
and color criteria for signs in the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD).
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
1999 COMPREHENSIVE PARK & TRAIL SYSTEM PLAN
66
APPENDIX
FACILITIES PLANNING &
DESIGN GUIDELINES
Numerous physiological and psychological factors are involved in the planning and design of park and trail areas which
will undoubtedly affect their desirability among residents and anticipated development if not handled properly. The
natural features both within and adjacent to a desired trail corridor or park site should be used to complement the
desired recreational activity and if modified,should be done without causing irreparable harm to the environment. These
include existing vegetation, topography, wetlands/water bodies/streams, or other natural features such as rock
outcroppings. Built features are equally as important in their effect upon recreational elements and include such items
as buildings,bridges,power substations,utility corridors,streets/parking lots,or other man-made and largely utilitarian
components. The age, dominant characteristics, function, and condition of built structures should be evaluated to
determine what, if any, modifications are needed (either to the structure itself or in areas surrounding it - such as a
buffer) so that the structure remains an asset for recreational use.
TRAIL GUIDELINES
Composition of proposed trail corridors refers to the original or altered surface upon COMPOSITION
which the recreational element will be constructed. The subsurface condition of areas such
as the NSP power line easement have most likely been altered and may require specialized
preparation or construction methods to establish them as a usable part of the recreational
system.
The cross sectional slope which is perpendicular to the trail corridor or development area SLOPE
may either be flat,convex(raised),concave(carved-out),or terraced(along a side slope)
and may affect access to a certain area or drainage patterns. As a general rule, an
acceptable cross slope for most trails is two (2) percent.
The longitudinal slope is one that runs along the center line of the path of travel, often
called the profile, and is comprised of flat, uphill, and downhill slopes. An equitably
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
1999 COMPREHENSIVE PARK & TRAIL SYSTEM PLAN
67
accessible longitudinal slope is generally five(5) percent or less,although up to ten (10) SLOPE,
percent may be acceptable in certain areas where access would otherwise be limited. continued
The sequence of different landscapes that compose a trail corridor makes it an interesting SPATIAL VALUES
place to walk, bike, and ride. Spatial components of recreational systems include:
► Viewsheds. Lines of sight within a corridor or out to a landscape or adjacent
built feature are called viewsheds. The views from adjacent lands into the trail
corridor are just as important as views from the proposed trail. This is
particularly important when you have a feature that should be highlighted or
when an adjacent landowner objects to the trail corridor. Safety and visibility
are the two viewshed issues of concern to future trail users. The need for
unobstructed forward and rear views should be provided for each type of trail
user classification: 50 feet for pedestrians and 150 feet for bicyclists/roller
skaters. Viewing opportunities from a trail affect the quality of users'experience
and are classified as either open or closed landscapes.
► Open &Closed Landscapes. These affect viewsheds and light,provide structure,
and heavily influence the spatial sequence of a trail corridor. An example of an
open landscape is an agricultural field or meadow,while a closed landscape may
be a segment of corridor surrounded by thick, overhanging trees or large
buildings. An ideal trail has a contrasting sequence of both open and closed
landscapes.
► Light & Dark Areas. These are determined by sun exposure, topography,
surrounding vegetation,and adjacent structures. Light and dark areas alter the
trail's environment, affect the soil's moisture content, influence temperatures,
and vary the quality of the trail's features (which may change from season to
season).
Intersections can pose challenges during trail design and development, but they can also INTERSECTIONS
provide trail access. Roads are the most hazardous and frequently encountered trail
intersections and things such as how the trail will cross(at-grade,under,over),the degree
of road traffic, alternative crossings, and money available to do the work will determine
how to best incorporate them into the overall plan.
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
1999 COMPREHENSIVE PARK & TRAIL SYSTEM PLAN
68
Driveways may be either residential, commercial or industrial in nature and will have INTERSECTIONS,
differing effects upon the trail corridors, depending upon their frequency of use daily or continued
monthly. If the traffic on the driveway is less than the anticipated trail traffic,then the
trail should be designed to have the right-of-way at this intersection. Other trail corridors
and nearby trails allow you to link trails together. Assess any intersecting trails for
compatibility and conflict, based on types of use,surface, signs,and regulations.
Like any major capital improvement,building a trail requires some thought about how the RECREATIONAL
facility will be used and by whom. In other words, you need to market the trail. NEEDS
Determine the ratio of existing/proposed trail miles to the user population. Compare this
to the National Recreation and Park Association's Open Space Standards which suggests
a ratio of one(I)trail mile per 2,000 people for multi-use(pedestrian-bicycle)trails. This
number is intended only as a rough guideline and does not necessarily reflect local
demographics,changing trends,uniqueness of the environment,or various other factors,
but may help in estimating the over or under establishment of trails in relation to the
number of residents. This, however, does not take the place of communicating with local
residents, user groups, etc.to determine interest and needs.
Land uses (existing and proposed) adjacent to or directly abutting trail corridors should ADJACENT
be evaluated to some degree relative to size, facilities, density, character, and type of LAND USES
ownership. However, unless safety factors prohibit such, the establishment of trails
through all land use types should be promoted. Opportunities for or constraints against
trail development exist in all areas of the community and depend more upon individual
situations. In some situations, safety hazards or undesirables can be avoided through
installation of a fence or berm while still allowing trail access and connections. Take
special note of vacant properties adjoining the trail corridor as they may provide
opportunity for public ownership and potential for establishment of sitting/picnic areas
or landscaping. Vacant areas that remain privately owned provide excellent opportunities
for additional trail links, access, or trail-related development.
Of all the obstacles trail developers face, opposition by adjacent landowners can be the ADJACENT
most troublesome. Regardless of the community-wide support for trails,opposition from LANDOWNERS
some adjacent landowners who will voice concerns about trail design, management,
quality of life,careless maintenance,land loss,decreased property values,increased crime
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
1999 COMPREHENSIVE PARK & TRAIL SYSTEM PLAN
69
and liability will be unavoidable. ADJACENT
LANDOWNERS,
This and many similar concerns have been documented among trail projects across the continued
USA and typically disappear once the trail is open but more commonly, the benefits
outweigh the problems. In surveys conducted across the nation, it was shown that the
vast majority of landowners living next to trail corridors were amenable to such and used
the corridors frequently. With regard to crime, a specific study conducted in Minnesota
showed that the incidence of crime is actually lower in homes near trails than those in
surrounding neighborhoods. Additionally,no negative effect upon property values has ever
been proven,either nationally or locally and in some cases neighborhoods adjacent to trail
corridors have been marketed using trails as an amenity with property values increased.
Finally, liability is not a valid concern thanks to the recreational-use statutes (RUS) in
place in Minnesota which does not make landowners liable for recreational injuries
resulting from mere carelessness. To recover damages,the trail user needs to prove"willful
and wanton misconduct on the part of the landowner". This would apply to easement
situations in the City where the City does not own the land,but maintains control for trail
access purposes via establishment of an easement.
In summary, problems may be exaggerated at the onset and others can be easily
controlled through design and/or management solutions. Physical separation of trails
from private properties via natural, vegetation or man-made means may also serve to
alleviate homeowners concerns. Landowner involvement is the best and first step to a
successful resolution.
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
1999 COMPREHENSIVE PARK & TRAIL SYSTEM PLAN
70
FACILITY DESIGN STANDARDS
Once a trail or system of trails is built, it will become an integral part of the community
which is part of an ever-changing environment. With this in mind,it is important to make
sure that the trails can adapt to changing needs. The best policy is to build a trail with
adequate capacity(width)initially. A multi-use trail shared by pedestrians and bicyclists
should be a minimum of ten(10)feet wide. If the budget only allows for an eight(8) foot
trail,obtain easements that will permit expansion of the trail to ten (10) or more feet in
the future.
Bridges,tunnels,culverts and other infrastructure should be made extra wide at the onset
to accommodate expansion. Deciding which components to build to wider standards first
will depend on the trail surfacing to be used. Concrete is virtually impossible to upgrade
safely once it is in place as joints create a hazardous situation for bicyclists. Widening an
asphalt or crushed material surface is not as difficult because the materials are less costly
and can be blended. Basic grading should also be designed for the maximum future width
if site conditions allow this.
Note that different segments of the trail are likely to have different levels of use,thus it
may be necessary to provide a ten (10) foot width only in areas where heavy travel is
expected to occur. Another option is to plan for two separate paths within the same
(easement) corridor, by separating users such as pedestrians from bicyclists. Individual
routes have been planned to vary as needed within the City,thus reference should be made
to the section within this document which describes specific routes and trail segments.
Decisions about widening a trail should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis based upon
a community's economics, politics, safety, and long-term project goals. Weigh the cost
of extra length against extra width prior to beginning a project. It may be beneficial to
construct an entire segment of the trail system at a less than optimum width in areas
where trails are presently non-existent to heighten the excitement and promote usage by
residents. But on the other hand, if larger than expected numbers of people use the trail,
it will pose crowding and safety problems. It is generally best to construct individual
portions of a trail (which maybe does not yet make a through connection) at the full,
long-term width desired. While this is somewhat dependent upon the material used,
maintenance needs, and material life, pressure will build (and money will become
available) to develop additional segments.
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
1999 COMPREHENSIVE PARK & TRAIL SYSTEM PLAN
71
At least a portion of your multi-use trail design should be accessible-free of barriers and HANDICAPPED
obstructions-and usable by people with disabilities. Most people have either permanent ACCESSIBILITY
or temporary disability at some point in their lives. The primary sources of information
for developing accessible standards for all facilities are the Uniform federal Accessibility
Standards(UfAS)and the Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines, both
published in the federal Register on 26 July 1991. These guidelines define what
specifications must be met in order to be classified as an accessible trail such as trail
width, passing space, surface, slopes, clearance, rest areas and signs.
Five feet is the minimum width to accommodate a wide range of users with disabilities in
a one-way scenario. Hard surfaces such as asphalt and concrete make a trail most
accessible. An accessible trail gradient should not exceed five(5) percent. Although UfAS
recommends a maximum grade of eight (8) percent, limiting this to six (6) percent is
highly recommended. Ramps,which should have a level landing for every 30 inches of
vertical rise,must have a hard,slip-resistant surface and railings. An accessible trail calls
for a rest area every 200 to 300 feet,preferably cleared with a bench located outside of the
trail tread. If numerous benches is not possible, the distances between stopping points
should be posted so that users will know what is ahead.
National standards for multi-use trail widths do not exist. The American Association of TRAIL WIDTH
State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) recommends a ten (10) foot trail
width, but some of these paths are too narrow to handle the ultimate volume of users and
may not take into account other factors such as the trail surface,speed of trail users,etc.
Consider the number of people who are likely to use your trail. Where"significant"trail
traffic is anticipated (one hundred (100) trail users per hour during peak periods),the
width of a two-way shared path should be at least ten (10) feet in suburban areas. In
rural and urban areas,the minimum trail widths change to eight(8)feet and twelve(12)
feet respectively.
Topography - the shape of the land - can be defined as flat, gently rolling, hilly, or SLOPE
mountainous. A physical assessment of a trail corridor determines the longitudinal and
cross slopes of specific segments. An accessible trail will have a maximum longitudinal
slope of five(5) percent(three(3) percent is preferred)and a maximum cross slope of two
(2) percent. The following table lists ranges of longitudinal and cross slopes acceptable
for specific trail user groups.
CITY Of OAK PARK HEIGHTS
1999 COMPREHENSIVE PARK & TRAIL SYSTEM PLAN
12
TRAIL USER AVERAGE SPEED LONG. SLOPE CROSS SLOPE SLOPE,
continued
Pedestrian 3 to 7 mph no restriction 4% maximum
Bicyclist 8 to 20 mph 3% preferred 2%to 4 %
8% maximum
Equestrian 4 to 8 mph 10% maximum 4% maximum
Skier 2 to 8 mph 3% preferred 2% preferred
5% maximum
There are many surface types available to complete the cross section of your multi-use SURFACING
trail, including granular stone, asphalt, concrete, soil cement,wood chips, and natural
surface. Surface materials are either soft or hard, defined by the material's ability to
absorb or repel moisture. Many single-use trails throughout the country, particularly
hiking and equestrian trails, have soft surfaces (natural earth/turf, wood chips, etc.).
These surfaces often do not hold up well under heavy use or varying weather conditions,
and therefore are not ideal for multi-use trails. Hard surfaced materials (soil cement,
asphalt, cement, etc.) are more practical for multi-use trails, especially in urban and
suburban areas. They are generally more expensive to purchase and install but require less
maintenance and can withstand frequent use. Hard surfaces also accommodate the widest
range of trail users.
Trail surfacing can be used to encourage or discourage use. If you want to encourage as
many users as possible, choose one of the hardest surfaces. If you want to limit the
number or speed of users, choose a soft surface. Recycling options should also be
considered when choosing a surfacing material. Car tires and other rubber products,
crushed glass/pottery, and ground asphalt shingles are some of the materials that have
been used in the construction of trails. The recycled products industry is expanding
quickly, with new manufacturers emerging constantly. It may be worth doing some
research into what types of recycled products are available to you and what type of
strength,longevity,and durability they have in relation to their cost,ease of installation,
effect upon the environment, etc.
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
1999 COMPREHENSIVE PARK & TRAIL SYSTEM PLAN
73
An often overlooked design factor is the long-term cost of operations and maintenance. MAINTENANCE
Prior to constructing trails, the City's public works department should be consulted
relative to their staffing,time,equipment,etc.to verify that the ability exists to properly
maintain the trails which will be constructed. Also consider the long-term replacement
costs of trail surfaces and other major recreation components.
• Asphalt needs resurfacing every seven to fifteen years, depending on site
conditions and construction quality. In 1992 dollars, it cost a minimum of$10
per lineal foot to remove and replace asphalt and$5 per lineal foot to overlay an
existing asphalt trail with a I % inch top coating.
► Concrete lasts approximately twenty-five or more years, but replacement costs
about$25 per lineal foot (in 1992).
► Crushed stone will typically last seven to ten years,although it requires frequent
patching and spot repairs. Replacement costs about$5 per lineal foot.
► Wood chips decompose rapidly under prolonged exposure to sun, heat, and
moisture,wash easily under moderate slopes and rainfall, and require almost
constant maintenance to keep the width and depth consistent. They are,
however, often available at no cost (or a nominal cost) from commercial tree-
trimming services.
The types of support facilities your trail will need - and their placement along the trail - TRAIL SUPPORT
depend on several factors: the setting and proposed uses of the trail,the trail's intensity FACILITIES
of use, the level of servicing/maintenance that the facilities need, and the
utility/infrastructure requirements of the facilities. Whatever the location, user groups,
and desired activities along the trail, you must plan for trail facilities from the start. If
you cannot afford to develop all facilities at the outset,know the types of facilities that you
and your community ultimately want.
To a large degree,the parks, schools and many commercial operations within Oak Park
Heights act as "built-in"trail nodes and stopping points where persons may rest,obtain
shelter from the elements,eat lunch,use a bathroom or get a drink of water. The distance
between these known points and exactly what they offer should be studied in the early
stages of trail design and implementation. In areas where distances are excessive or where
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
1999 COMPREHENSIVE PARK & TRAIL SYSTEM PLAN
14
easy access(either physically or at certain times of day)is a problem,consideration should TRAIL SUPPORT
be given to establishing support facilities to supplement the existing ones. FACILITIES,
continued
To get the most out of a trail experience, it helps to start with a beautiful trail setting LANDSCAPING
which offers exceptional landscapes and visual amenities. In reality,however,not all trail
corridors come with such benefits and require significant work in the form of landscaping
to give the trail a personality of its own. To create a successful trail experience,you must
consider the perspective of the user. Since the landscape is typically viewed while moving,
a sequence of views is more important than a single view in one direction. Trails are multi-
dimensional,with things to see, hear,and feel along the way.
In developing a landscape plan for trails in the community, you must think of it as a
phased process which is an on-going commitment. The overall intent and that of specific
areas may differ significantly based upon what land uses are adjacent to the trail,whether
it is along a roadway or not,as well as what environmental and soil conditions are present.
On-going maintenance is a major factor in a multi-use trail's landscape plan; even
"natural" landscapes require trimming,weeding,etc. Cleared and mowed trail shoulders
at least two (2) feet wide on either side of the trail provide a groomed look, offer better
visibility, and provide an option for those who like to utilize soft surfaces. It is best to
setback trees and shrubs, when planted, at least five (5) feet from the trail surface to
control the inundation of paved areas by tree/plant roots.
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
1999 COMPREHENSIVE PARK & TRAIL SYSTEM PLAN
75