Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Untitled (2)
L r ,0,,,pp,,,_ WASHINGTON SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT IIIIIr 1825 Curve Crest Blvd.,Room 101 St(61l2)43 . 61MN 55082 (617)139.6461 MINNESOTA 4 SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICTS October 14 , 1992 To: MSCWMO Members From: Tim Fredbo Re: Perro Creek Implementation Study Breakdown of SEH Study Cost by Community Costs are based on total cost of project divided by acres of each community in the Perro Creek Watershed. W/DNR Grant $88, 540.00 + 1646. 5 total watershed acres = $53. 77/Ac Stillwater - 66 Ac x $53 . 77/Ac. = $3 , 548.82 $ 1 , 774.41 Oak Park Heights - 728. 5 Ac x $53 . 77/Ac =$39, 171 .44 $19,585 . 72 Bayport - 300 S. Ac x $53 . 77/Ac = $16 , 157 .8 I $ 8,078.94 Baytown - 551/5 Ac x $53. 77/Ac = $29,654. 15 $14,827.07 If we receive a Flood Hazard Reduction Grant from the DNR, these costs would be reduced by 50%. These figures are shown in the last column to the right. • • ):11/ AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER • 4�l I ��5 40 /44 t'a`PLY Middle St. Croix WMO Perro Creek/C.R. 21 Presentation Outline January 27, 1993 1. History a. Previous flooding b. Pumping by prison during winter months c. Prison pump 1920 vintage d. WMO organized/SEH Preliminary Study 1988 e. Study indicated inadequate culvert capacities downstream f. May be some inadequacies in the initial model g. Recommendations included obtaining aerial photo contour mapping h. Washington County 21 highway reconstruction 2. Agency Contact a. Mn/DOT letter b. MDNR meeting (summarized in handout) 3. Washington County 21 Schedule a. R/W acquisition 1993 b. Construction 1994 4. Project Options 5. Long-term Maintenance a. City of Bayport has assumed these costs in the past 6. Legal Aspects a. Negotiating easements/purchase of property b. Condemnation c. Legal advice/research d. Costs 7. Project Costs a. Area breakdown 8. Funding a. Flood hazard/damage reduction grant b. 50% MDNR, 50% local funds for study, $75,000 maximum c. May be monies available for construction the following year d. Funds not available until July 1993 1/1 0 p -4'5E1-1 ENGINEERS N ARCHITECTS N PLANNERS 3535 VADNAIS CENTER DRIVE.ST.PAUL.MN 55110-5108 612 490-2000 800 325-2055 January 11,1993 RE: Middle St.Croix Watershed Management Organization Perro Creek Scoping Study P.C. 1911-71 Mr.Tim Fredbo Washington Soil and Water Conservation District 1825 Curve Crest Boulevard,Room 101 Stillwater,Minnesota 55082 Dear Mr.Fredbo: This letter is written to summarize the status on the Perro Creek Scoping Study project. As discussed at the November 4,1992,MSCWMO meeting,Option 2 and Related Borings have been eliminated from the study scope.Total estimated fee is now summarized as follows: 1. Contour mapping and related $23,000 2. Givens $28,164 3. Option 1 $6,985 4. Option 2 ELIMINATED 0 5. Option 3 $8,073 6. Option 4 $5,102 7. Option 5 $8,018 8. Borings($2,500 Option 5) $2,500 Total Estimated Fee $81,842 Deliverables on this project will include six (6) copies of the report and one (1) set of contour mapping reproducibles.We understand the next presentation to the MSCWMO is scheduled for January 27,at 7:00 p.m.in the Stillwater City Council Chambers. If you have any questions or concerns,you may contact me at 490-2025. Sincerely, Jeff Davis,P.E. Project Manager JTD:11c cc: Ken Hartung,City of Bayport Ann Terwedo,City of Stillwater SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. ST CLOUD,MN CHIPPEWA FALLS,WI MADISON.WI S Middle St. Croix Water Management Organization Agenda November 4, 1992 1. Review flood prone areas identified in 1988 study a. Public/private facilities b. Private property c. Assessment of potential damage d. Input into Flood Damage/hazard Reduction Grant 2. Joe Gibson, MDNR a. Flood Damage/Hazard Reduction Grant Program 1) Study 2) Construction 3) When are funds available? 4) Questions 3. SEH Recommendations a. Mapping/Givens b. Option 1 and Option 4 c. Consideration of other options • 4. Washington County 21 a. Right-of-way Acquisition 1993 b. Construction 1994 5. Questions 410 • I. Givens A. Develop contour mapping B. Hydrology/hydraulics (H/H) 1. Runoff characteristics 2. Rainfall events 3. Culvert and ditch capacities 4. Water surface profile 5. Field surveys 6. Design new outlet for prison pond 7. Look at 5-and 10-year storm for MDNR 8. Design ditch on 100-year, Type 1, AMC 2 precipitation event II. Options Option 1. A. Review capacity of existing culverts and ditch. B. Make recommendations for improvements. C. Raise road or build berm. Option 2. A. Determine effect of additional storage on H/H B. Soil boring program Option 3. A. Review capacity of existing culverts and ditch. B. Make recommendations for improvements. Option 4. A. Preliminary design of diversion structure and outlet B. Diversion and outlet will hopefully eliminate need for improvements on Option 3 reach. C. Maintain base flow in Option 3 reach. Option 3 reach would also be used if the design event were exceeded. Option 5. A. Preliminary design of gravity or pumped outlet for prison pond. B. Recommendation for improvements. C. Phase I environmental site assessment of Trinity Lutheran Church property. D. Preliminary operation plan based feasibility of gravity or pumped oulet. E. Soil borings on Trinity site. - • WASHINGTON SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT 1625 Curve Crest Blvd..Room 101 Stillwater.MN 55082 (612)439.6361 MINNESOTA SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICTS October 14, 1992 To: MSCWMO Members From: Tim Fredbo Re: Perro Creek Implementation Study Breakdown of SEH Study Cost by Community Costs are based on total cost of project divided by acres of each community. in the Perro Creek Watershed. W/DNR Grant $88,540.00 1646.5 total watershed acres = $53.77/Ac Stillwater - 66 Ac x $53.77/Ac. = $3,548.82 $ 1 ,774.41 Oak Park Heights - 728.5 Ac x $53. 77/Ac = $39,171 .44 $19,585.72 Bayport - 300 S. Ac x $53.77/Ac = $16,157.88 $ 8,078.94 Baytown - 551/5 Ac x $53.77/Ac = $29,654. 15 $14,827.07 If we receive a Flood Hazard Reduction Grant from the DNR, these costs would be reduced by 50%. These figures are shown in the last column to the right. AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER • Aarsai ENGINEERS I ARCHITECTS I PLANNERS 3535 VADNAIS CENTER DRIVE.ST PAUL.MN 55110-5108 612 490-2000 800 325-2055 September 16, 1992 RE: MIDDLE ST. CROIX WATERSHED MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION PERRO CREEK SCOPING STUDY P.C. 1911-71 Mr. Tim Fredbo Washington Soil and Water Conservation District 1825 Curve Crest Boulevard Room 101 Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 Dear Mr. Fredbo: SEH is pleased to be able to assist the Middle St. Croix Watershed Management Organization (MSCWMO) in development of the Perro Creek study scope. A copy of the 1992/1993 Study Scope discussed at the August 25, 1992, MSCWMO meeting, as well as the 1988 Study Scope is included for your review. Upon comparison of the Study Scopes, it can be seen that the 1992/1993 Study Scope provides much more information than was originally anticipated. Scope changes can, in part, be attributed to the following: 1. Request(s) from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) . 2. Improved technology. SEH now has the capability to provide a continuous water surface profile along the entire creek. 3. Options 2, 4, 5, part of Option 1 and the "Givens" as well as the borings, were not previously included in the 1988 scope but were identified as deserving consideration in the scoping study. SEH has also estimated our associated study costs with regard to the referenced project as requested. Costs for each of the study options is provided. This allows the MSCWMO to direct where the study dollars are expended. The following is a summary of the study costs. SHO?"ELLIOT7 -_ _ —... .... r:,;�--•.1 rolls WI MADISON.WI S MR. TIM FREDBO September 16, 1992 Page 2 1. Contour mapping and related $23,000 2. Givens $28, 164 3. Option 1 $6,985 4. Option 2 $4, 198 5. Option 3 $8,073 6. Option 4 $5, 102 7. Option 5 $8,018 8. Borings ($2,500 Option 2, $2,500 Option 5) $5,000 TOTAL ESTIMATED FEE $88,540 Our estimated fees are based on the assumption that the study would not proceed until July of 1993, at which time monies from the MDNR Flood Hazard Reduction Grant would be available. Based on the assumption that a matching grant would be provided on this project, cost to each of the communities would remain within $2,000 to $3,000 of those estimated in 1988. The fee could be reduced by the MSCWMO. For example, the MSCWMO may choose not to study Option 2 and 3. This would reduce the total estimated fee by $14,771. The MSCWMO may also consider eliminating all of the options and borings. This would still provide an updated creek model, identified as needed in 1988, from which to select options to study further. Estimated fees include a report and cost estimates. We propose to bill on an hourly basis which may reduce the total estimated fee even further. This study will provide a document that the MSCWMO can use to manage Perro Creek now and in the future. Based on the potential for development in the watershed, an ever increasing demand will be put on the prison pond and Perro Creek. MR. TIM FREDBO September 16, 1992 Page 3 If you have any questions or concerns, you may contact me at 490- 2025. Sincerely, Jeff Davis, P.E. Project Manager JTD:llc Enclosures: Perro Creek Scoping Study Option Map Potential Flood Damage Map for the City of Bayport 1992/1993 Study Scope 1988 Study Scope S • MSCWMO Presentation Outline Perro Creek Agenda August 25, 1992 1. Project Introductions 2. Letter to Mn/DOT 3. Meeting with MDNR 4. Project Options (Handout) 5. Funding 6. Long-term Maintenance 7. Legal Aspects 8. Comments • • MSCWMO Presentation Outline Perro Creek Agenda August 25, 1992 1. Project Introductions 2. Letter to Mn/DOT 3. Meeting with MDNR a. Concerned about the Road raise/berm b. Maintain existing conditions as much as possible. gOak Park Heights has potential for increased development. However, if OPH requires pre-development discharge rates(on-site storage), additional develop- ment should not be a problem. This is the same for all communitielinvobved. d. MDNR requested hydrologic analysis of 5-and 10-year events to determine impact on wildlife adjacent to prison pond. e. Prison would like pipes at prison pond plugged. f. New outlet for the prison pond should have the capability to draw down the pond for maintenance and wildlife management purposes. Should be able to mimic a drought to reestablish fringe vegetation. g. A DNR Protected Waters permit will be required to construct a new outlet. Time frame is 60 days±. h. A formal operations plan should be developed in conjunction with the outlet design. This plan should address who is responsible for operation and mainte- nance. 4. Project Options (Handout) a. Contour mapping b. Project Options 1 through 5 5. Funding a. MDNR, flood damage reduction grant b. New money available next July c. 50/50 MDNR/local funding studies. Max. $75,000 d. Maybe monies available for construction following year. e. Need to estimate damage potential. f. Cannot start study until after appropriations. g. Joe Gibson, MDNR, will attend meeting if interested. h. May require a revision to WMO plan in terms of CIP plan. 6. Long-term Maintenance a. City of Bayport has maintained the creek. At present, the City is reconstructing two box culverts along the creek. 7. Legal Aspects a. Negotiating easements/property purchases b. Condemnation c. Dealing with State of Minnesota on Option 2 d. Who will provide legal advice? 8. Comments - Are there any options that the WMO does not want investi- gated? • n • Azirsai Aninster ENGINEERS N ARCHITECTS■PLANNERS 3535 VADNAIS CENTER DRIVE.ST PAUL.MN 55110-5108 612 490-2000 800 325-2055 August 10, 1992 RE: MIDDLE ST. CROIX WATER MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION PERRO CREEK STUDY SEH FILE NO. 93014 Mr. Mike Louis Minnesota Department of Transportation Metro District 3485 Hadley Avenue North Oakdale, Minnesota 55128 Dear Mr. Louis: In 1988, SEH was retained by the Washington Soil and Water Conservation District to perform a hydrologic and hydraulic study of Perro Creek and its tributary watershed. The results of our initial study indicate that a number of the downstream culvert crossings are grossly inadequate. However, our initial study was based on very general information and may contain some inaccuracies. Conclusions from the initial study included the recommendation to conduct a detailed study in orders to obtain more accurate information. SEH has recently been retained by the Middle St. Croix WMO to perform a scoping study which will define the options to be investigated in the detailed study. We understand that Mn/DOT intends to direct runoff from the new bridge and associated highway improvements east along Highway 36, through a treatment pond, and into the river. One of the options we would like to investigate is the possibility of discharging the runoff from the hatched area north of Highway 36 (see attached drawing) into the conveyance system to be constructed by Mn/DOT during the Highway 36 construction. This could have a significant impact on the runoff rate and volume entering the prison pond outlined by the blue dashes on the attached drawing. By means of this letter, we are requesting, on behalf of the Middle St. Croix WMO, that Mn/DOT review the possibility of intercepting the runoff from the area north of and including Highway 36. SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. ST CLCJD.MN CHIPPEWA FALLS.WI 11ADISON.WI 411 v. L Mr. Mike Louis August 10, 1992 Page 2 If you have any questions or concerns, you may contact Mr. Tim Fredbo at the Washington Soil and Water Conservation District, telephone 439-6361, or myself at 490-2025. Sincerely, Jeff Davis, P.E. Project Manager JTD:llc Enclosures cc: Tim Fredbo, Washington County SWCD O • "47 IP/6(./ MEETING MINUTES of 4 November, 1992 for MIDDLE ST. CROIX RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION at Bayport City Hall Present: Ken Hartung Bayport Bev Schultz Bayport Ann Tervedo Stillwater Tim Fredbo U.S. Soil & Water Conservation District Diana Wirth Lakeland Gene Worrell West Lakeland Township Joe Gibson MN Department of Natural Resources Jeff Davis SEH (Short, Elliott, & Hendrickson) Victoria Popov Afton Barbara O'Neil Oak Park Heights The meeting vas called to order at 7:05 PM by Chair Ann Tervedo at the Bayport City Hall. No minutes were available. The Treasurer's Report was addressed later in the meeting. PERRO CREEK SUB WATERSHED • Jeff Davis reviewed the Flood Prone Areas identified in a 1988 study. • The area of County Road 21 from 14th to the prison at County Road 28 vas discoed. • Discussed reconstructing the outlet of the "prison pond" . In 1973, substantial flooding vas experienced in this area. • A study has been conducted re: water precipitation into the prison pond and drainage into Perro Creek. • Reviewed the five Options presented at the 8125192 meeting. Briefly:. Option 1: Raise roadbed or build an embankment. Option 2: Construct additional storage of water. Option 3: Improve existing culverts and ditch. Option 4: Design storm sever diversion with an outlet to St. Croix River. Option 5: Establish a gravity system bypass pump north of the prison pond. ID • WMO Minutes:page 2 • Private and public facilities endangered by flooding were indicated on a map. 40 Joe Gibson explained the "Flood Hazard Mitigation Grant Assistance" program. He encouraged setting up the program so there is state assistance in case of flooding. He further recommended establishing flood control programs to prevent/reduce damage from flooding. [ refer to a 3-page hand-out from the MN DNR concerning this program]. • Tim Fredbo inquired about funds availability. Joe Gibson explained that funds have been decreased due to state budgeting. Grants should be submitted by June or July, 1993, with disbursements occurring approx. Sept. 30, 1993. Grants are not prioritized by time of submittal and the grant application has been simplified. "Big" projects are defined as those over $75,000. Molly Shodeen, the Area Hydrologist, must be contacted in regards to"big" projects. • SEH Recommendations: Jeff Davis recommended Options 1 and 4. Further discussion on the overlapping of options and cost breakdowns. Davis explained that if Option 4 succeeds, then Option 3 may be eliminated. Option 5 vas considered to be expensive since the current prison pumps work inadequately and are near obsolete. Tim Fredbo concluded Options 1 and 4 were for certain with a"maybe" on Options 5 and 3, and eliminating Option 2. • Ken Hartung commented on the necessity of discussing costs to our respective communities and considering means of funding. If we consider only Options 1, 4, 5, and 3 and eliminate Opt. 2, then costs will come down to approx. $80,000. (down from a previous estimate of $88,500. for all five options) • Tim Fredbo volunteered to submit the grant application. • MOTION: Bev Schultz moved to proceed with all options except Option 2 and the boring that go with Opt. 2 ($2500), seconded by Barbara O'Neil. The motion was passed umanimously. • Jeff Davis suggested another presentation to all concerned city councils i.e., Stillwater, Bayport, Baytown Township, and Oak Park Heights. • Concern vas expressed at the last meeting that Baytown acreage does not contribute to Perro Creek. It was pointed out that if that acreage floods, it will flow into Perro Creek. • Treasurer's Report: Ann Tervedo reported that the organization has approx. $2200. Study presentation materials, transparencies, and visuals will be approx. $300. . • • WMO Minutes:page 3 • MOTION: Bev Schultz moved that the MSCRWMO pay for the study presentation materials up to $300. from general funds, seconded by Barbara O'Neil. Discussion folloved regarding costs shared by the involved communities. Schultz rescinded the prior motion. A rev motion by Bev Schultz that the four cities involved (Stillvater, Bayport, Baytovn, and Oak Park Heights) pay the costs of the presentation materials up to $300., seconded by Tori Popov. The motion vas passed unanimously. • Next meting is tentatively scheduled in January (to be notified later of the date) to be held at the Stillvater City Hall. The meeting vas adjourned at 8:25 PM. Respectfully submitted, t)' R.kl.... .(:::: Victoria Popov Acting Secretary RFCEIVEE /salLP 819? ENGINEERS 1 ARCHITECTS 1 PLANNERS 3535 VADNAIS CENTER DRIVE,ST.PAUL,MN 55110-5108 612 490-2000 800 325-2055 September 16, 1992 RE: MIDDLE ST. CROIX WATERSHED MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION PERRO CREEK SCOPING STUDY P.C. 1911-71 Mr. Tim Fredbo Washington Soil and Water Conservation District 1825 Curve Crest Boulevard Room 101 Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 Dear Mr. Fredbo: SEH is pleased to be able to assist the Middle St. Croix Watershed Management Organization (MSCWMO) in development of the Perro Creek study scope. A copy of the 1992/1993 Study Scope discussed at the August 25, 1992, MSCWMO meeting, as well as the 1988 Study Scope is included for your review. Upon comparison of the Study Scopes, it can be seen that the 1992/1993 Study Scope provides much more information than was originally anticipated. Scope changes can, in part, be attributed to the following: 1. Request(s) from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) . 2. Improved technology. SEH now has the capability to provide a continuous water surface profile along the entire creek. 3. Options 2, 4, 5, part of Option 1 and the "Givens" as well as the borings, were not previously included in the 1988 scope but were identified as . deserving consideration in the scoping study. SEH has also estimated our associated study costs with regard to the referenced project as requested. Costs for each of the study options is provided. This allows the MSCWMO to direct where the study dollars are expended. The following is a summary of the study costs. SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. ST.CLOUD,MN CHIPPEWA FALLS,WI MADISON.WI • • MR. TIM FREDBO September 16, 1992 Page 2 1. Contour mapping and related $23,000 2. Givens $28, 164 3. Option 1 $6, 985 4. Option 2 $4, 198 5. Option 3 $8,073 6. Option 4 $5, 102 7. Option 5 $8,018 8. Borings ($2, 500 Option 2, $2, 500 Option 5) $5,000 TOTAL ESTIMATED FEE $88,540 Our estimated fees are based on the assumption that the study would not proceed until July of 1993, at which time monies from the MDNR Flood Hazard Reduction Grant would be available. Based on the assumption that a matching grant would be provided on this project, cost to each of the communities would remain within $2,000 to $3,000 of those estimated in 1988. The fee could be reduced by the MSCWMO. For example, the MSCWMO may choose not to study Option 2 and 3. This would reduce the total estimated fee by $14, 771. The MSCWMO may also consider eliminating all of the options and borings. This would still provide an updated creek model, identified as needed in 1988, from which to select options to study further. Estimated fees include a report and cost estimates. We propose to bill on an hourly basis which may reduce the total estimated fee even further. This study will provide a document that the MSCWMO can use to manage Perro Creek now and in the future.. Based on the potential for development in the watershed, an ever increasing demand will be put on the prison pond and Perro Creek. ! 4 MR. TIM FREDBO September 16, 1992 Page 3 If you have any questions or concerns, you may contact me at 490- 2025. Sincerely 0 44# Jeff D s, P.E. Project Manager JTD:llc Enclosures: Perro Creek Scoping Study Option Map Potential Flood Damage Map for the City of Bayport 1992/1993 Study Scope 1988 Study Scope .1992/ 1993 RRO CREEK STUD! SCOPE I. Givens A. Develop contour mapping B. Hydrology/hydraulics (H/H) 1. Runoff characteristics 2. Rainfall events 3. Culvert and ditch capacities 4. Water surface profile 5. Field surveys 6. Design new outlet for prison pond 7. Look at 5- and 10-year storm for MDNR • 8. Design ditch on 100-year, Type 1, AMC 2 precipitation event II. Options Option 1. A. Review capacity of existing culverts and ditch. B. Make recommendations for improvements. C. Raise road or build berm. Option 2. A. Determine effect of additional storage on H/H B. Soil boring program Option 3. A. Review capacity of existing culverts and ditch. B. Make recommendations for improvements. Option 4. A. Preliminary design of diversion structure and outlet B. Diversion and outlet will hopefully eliminate need for improvements on Option 3 reach. C. Maintain base flow in Option 3 reach. Option 3 reach would also be used if the design event were exceeded. Option 5. A. Preliminary design of gravity or pumped outlet for prison pond. B. Recommendation for improvements. C. Phase I environmental site assessment of Trinity Lutheran Church property. D. Preliminary operation plan based feasibility of gravity or pumped oulet. E. Soil borings on Trinity site. 1988 PERRO CREEK STUDY SC E VI . IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM A. Implementation Program for Perro Creek The following implementation program has been adopted by the MSCWMO to establish a plan to solve the flooding problems that occur along Perro Creek. 1 . Where necessary have the affected communities of Bayport , Oak Park Heights and Stillwater establish a sub-watershed taxing district for the Perro Creek minor watershed. 2 . Undertake the additional studies recommended in the Perro Creek Study dated 11/8/88. Those studies include: a. Topographic mapping and horizontal-vertical controls. $19,840.00 b. Update existing SCS TR-20 computer model for the watershed and subject watershed to a 100-year Type 1 • rainfall event. $ 7,000.00 3. Identify extent and specific locations for required improvements and flood storage areas. $ 5,000.00 4 . Develop a Capital Improvement Program (CIP) based on the findings of the additional studies and their recommendations . $ 2 ,000.00 Total . Estimated Cost for Implementation Program $33,840.00 • • WASHINGTON SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT 1825 Curve Crest Blvd.,Room 101 Ada Stillwoter,MN 55082 (612)439.6361 MINNESOTA SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICTS November 6 , 1992 7. `mow To: Ann Terwedo, O'Neal ,Barb 0 Beverly Schultz From: Tim Fredbo . Re: MSCWMO Costs for SEH Inc. At our last MSCWMO meeting on November 4, 1992 , it was decided that the WMO would provide SEH Inc. with an additional $300.00 for their work on the Perro Creek study. It was the feeling of the WMO members that this cost should be charged to only the three cities of Bayport, Stillwater, and Oak Park Heights. Listed below is each city's portion of the $300.00 based on acres in each city in the Perro Creek Subwatershed. $300.00 - 1095 Ac. = .274 cents/Ac. Stillwater - . 274 cents/Ac. x 66 Ac. = $18.07 Bayport - .274 cents/Ac. x 300.5 Ac. = $82.33 Oak Park Heights - . 274 cents/Ac. x 728.5 Ac. = $199.60 If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 439-6361 . 0 '` AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER • •, r • 410 MIDDLE ST CROIX RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION MEETING MINUTES AUGUST 25, 1992 Members Present : Andy Hansen BAYTOWN TOWNSHIP Ann Pung-Terwedo STILLWATER Tori Popov AFTON Jerry Burton LAKELAND Barbara Cobb ST. MARY'S POINT Barbara O'Neil OAK PARK HEIGHTS Beverly Schultz BAYPORT Ken Hartung BAYPORT Tim Fredbo Soil & Water Conservation Dist . Jeff Davis Short , Elliot , Hendrickson The meeting was called to order at 7:06PM by Acting Chair , Anders Hansen. MOTION WAS MADE by O'Neil and seconded by Schultz to approve the minutes of the April 21st and June 23rd meetings. MOTION CARRIED. TREASURER'S REPORT Terwedo reported a balance of $3,379.04 ( including $1096.00 that must be paid out for Perro Creek Phase I expenses) . Bills, above that expense , included $480 .00 to Tim Fredbo, Soil & Water Conservation District , for services rendered and $30 . 18 to Barbara Cobb for postage & envelopes. MOTION WAS MADE by Schultz and seconded by Popov to approve payment of the bills. MOTION CARRIED. ELECTIONS • MOTION WAS MADE by Cobb and seconded by Burton to call the office of Chair vacated due to absence. MOTION CARRIED. Nominations from the floor were requested. MOTION WAS MADE by Hanson and seconded by O'neil to elect Ann Pung-Terwedo as Chair for the Middle St . Croix WMO. MOTION CARRIED. MOTION WAS MADE by Hanson and seconded by Burton to table election of Treasurer and Vice Chairman to the next meeting. MOTION CARRIED. FERRO CREEK REPORT --MNDOT CONSIDERATION Jeff Davis, SEH, presented a copy of a letter sent to MNDOT, on behalf of the WMO, regarding the interception of water 411 . run-off north of HWY 36 by the " new bridge" highway water drainage system so that it would not further contribute to the Perro Creek problem. MNDOT would decide if there is, in actuality , such a run-off problem and/or If the watershed had to contribute any monies for its control . *Insert . . . (This secretary detected some discord within the membership for a letter sent on behalf of the WMO prior to its Ok as a formal group . I did not press the issue as that time , but in thinking it over , this acts as a reminder to bring before the Board, a policy of restraint by hired personnel regarding action taken without board or sub-watershed board approval . This would not , in any way , reflect on our positive relationship with the people "who keep our WMO afloat" , nor hinder S & W action regarding permit projects, but act merely as a reminder of the proper steps to follow for such representative communication . ) O'Neil stated that new drainage pipes have been laid under Hwy 36 with the construction of the new city building and that run-off north of 36 may not, be a problem at all . She suggested that Davis speak to Lewis about both "bridge scenarios" ( the staging & the ultimate) ---PERRO CREEK AGENDA Davis presented the "givens" for Perro Creek final stabilization and five (5) options for specific control ( the Option sheet attached to these minutes) . ( It was a GREAT presentation ! ! ) ---MN DNR CONSIDERATION (Letter to augment minutes ??? attach) The DNR concerns regarding the Perro Creek project are as follows: a) Maintain a reasonable status quo regarding the raising of Cty Rd. 21 . b) develop a hydrological analysis for the 5 and 10 year storm event c) wants control to be able to simulate drought conditions at the prison pond and allow wetland type surrounding growth d) wants a maintenance plan developed for the pump or gravity outlet and specification of who is responsible . DISCUSSION FOLLOWED on the various "givens" and " options" . Hartung questioned the necessity of further contour mapping after emphasizing what was already available . Davis said it was necessary to verify storage areas and land 411 • elevations, acreage for e outlay , the basis for estimating ditches and a base for further hydrological studies, etc . Much discussion around this issue . . . O'Neil & Schultz brought forward budget needs - due for all cities in early October . They asked that estimates follow as soon as possible. O'Neil asked if the dollar outlay needs to be allocated specifically in the budget as a capital improvement? Funding options were discussed: i .e . DNR Flood Hazard Elimination grants by the DNR (Joe Gibson) - 50% matching grants - Fredbo will see to obtaining grant forms, and reminded us that a project cannot start prior to grant acceptance. Davis will have dollar estimates to appropriate peoples within 2/3 weeks. Cobb reiterated that this project ONLY INVOLVES the sub-watershed of STILLWATER, BAYPORT, OAK PARK HEIGHTS, AND BAYTOWN TOWNSHIP (or as the last three municipalities are so fondly called: BOB ! ) Continuation of discussion (not formally resolved) revolved around a) the long term maintenance issue , *** b) the " damage" estimates <I can' t read my own notes - what was that all about ??? > and c) the legal aspects and costs: i .e . may involve easement acquisitions, condemnation , contracts, etc . As Barb O'Neil so beautifully put it - four different cities, with four different attorneys, will come up with four different considerations of the action to be taken , along with four different bills . . .Davis wonders if one lawyer might be assigned the project for all four municipalities in a bill -share capacity . . . reflection for future consideration ! ! ! ADJOURNED: MOTION Hanson , seconded Cobb. MOTION CARRIED: 8:30PM • NEXT MEETING: TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 1992 7:00PM BAYPORT CITY HALL 4 411 MIDDLE ST CROIX RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION AFTON Tori Popov 436-1194 4099 Penfield Court So Afton , MN 55001 BAYPORT Beverly Schultz 439-2530 297 North 4th St . Bayport , MN 55003 BAYTOWN Anders Hansen 439-1881 TOWNSHIP P.O. Box 135 Stillwater, MN 55082 LAKELAND Gerald Burton 436-7990 16111 First St . North Lakeland, MN 55043 LAKELAND SHORES Janet Giuliani 436-5641 15 Lakeland Shores Road Lakeland Shores, MN 55043 LAKE ST. CROIX Stan Suedkamp 436-5313 BEACH 1420 Riv iera Ave South Lake St . Croix Beach , MN 55043 OAK PARK HEIGHTS Barbara O'Neal 439-3381 6213 No. St . Croix Trail Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 ST. MARY'S POINT Barbara Cobb (Secretary) 436-8953 2170 Itasca Ave South P.O. Box 302 Lakeland, MN 55043 STILLWATER Ann Pung-Terwedo (Chair) 439-6252 15157 North 63rd St Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 STILLWATER Clerk , Pat Bantli Need Rep TOWNSHIP P. 0. Box 117 Stillwater, MN 55082 WEST LAKELAND Clerk, Nancy Magler 436-5904 TOWNSHIP 13228 20TH St . North Need Rep Stillwater, MN 55082 WASH.CTY SOIL & Tim Fredbo 439-6361 WATER CONSERVATION 1825 Curve Crest Blvd. Rm 101 DISTRICT Stillwater , MN 55082 • WASHINGTON SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT 1825 Curve Crest Blvd.,Room 101 (612)Stillwater,39- 61MN 55082 439.6361 MINNESOTA SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICTS September 9 , 1992 To : MSCWMO Members From: Tim Fredbo" i Washington SWCD Re : Perro Creek Study; Short , Elliot , Hendrickson, Inc. As requested, at the last meeting of the Middle St . Croix WMO on August 25 , 1992 , enclosed for your information are copies of the correspondence from Jeff Davis concerning Perro Creek. You will also find copies of the correspondence I have received from Marty Rye from the D.N.R. The Flood Damage Reduction Grant is discussed in Marty' s May 12 , 1992 letter. If you have any questions , please feel free to call me at 439-6361 . cc : Ken Hartung , Administrator, City of Bayport AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER • • ��nn��STATEnnOF DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DNR METRO WATERS - 1200 WARNER ROAD, ST. PAUL, MN 55106 PHONE NO. 772-7910 FILE NO. June 23, 1992 RECEIVEn Mr. Tim Fredbo Washington County SWCD JUN 2 5 f992. 1825 Curve Crest Blvd, Room 101 Stillwater, MN 55082 RE: POTENTIAL OUTLET RECONSTRUCTION, PRISON POND (82-310P) , BAYPORT, WASHINGTON COUNTY Dear Mr. Fredbo: I am writing in accordance with your June 3, 1992 request to attend this evening's Middle St. Croix River Watershed Management Organization meeting. I will not be able to attend the meeting, but I have summarized the Department of Natural Resources' concerns below: 1. A study performed by the Middle St. Croix WMO which examines the water resource concerns and potential solutions may be appropriate. There appears to be problems with the downstream channel hydraulics which need to be addressed. It would be appropriate to address these problems in the study. 2. Any new outlet should serve to stabilize the water level. Large fluctuations in water levels is not an attractive condition for the management of wildlife. 3. The new outlet should have the capacity to draw the pond down for maintenance and wildlife management purposes. The ability to mimic a drought to re-establish emergent fringe vegetation on an as-needed basis is a valuable management tool. It would be necessary to keep the pool level down over the summer or at least from July to the fall of the year. 4. A DNR Protected Waters Permit will be required for the outlet reconstruction. It typically takes 60 days for a final decision to be made on permit applications. 5. A formal Operation Plan should be developed in conjunction with the design and construction of the outlet. This Plan should specify if/when drawdowns are to occur, who is responsible for the operation and maintenance of the structure, etc. AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER • June 23, 1992 Mr. Tim Fredbo Page Two 6. There may be funding assistance in the form of a Flood Damage Reduction Grant (see enclosed copy of May 12, 1992 letter) . The grant requests are prioritized by the DNR and submitted to the legislature for funding. It may be appropriate to notify the local legislators of the grant request. I look forward to continuing to work with the Middle St. Croix River WMO on the design of the proposed outlet. If you have any questions, please call me at 772-7910. Sincerely •M ty e Hydrologist cc: Tim Wallace Jeff Davis, SEH • DNR METRO WATERS - 1200 WARNER ROAD,. ST. PAUL, MN 55106 772-7910 May 12, 1992 Mr. Tim Fredbo Middle St. Croix River WMO 1825 Curve Crest Blvd. , Room 101 Stillwater, MN 55082 RE: PRISON POND (82-310P) OUTLETRECONSTRUCTINON, COUNTY ROAD 21 IMPROVEMENT, OAK PARK HEIGHTS, Dear Mr. Fredbo: I am writing in accordance with the April 28, 1992 meeting at Washington County Public Works regarding the potential reconstruction of Unnamed Wetland (82-310P) outlet. A Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Protected Waters Permit will be required for work below the ordinary high water (OHW) elevation of the pond. i strongly suggest you work with DNR Area Wildlife Manager Tim Wallace (296-5200) in design of the structure and determination of the ultimate outlet control elevation. A study sponsored by the Middle St. Croix WMO which s ch be the water resource concerns and potential appropriate. It appears there are some problems with the downstream channel hydraulics which also need to be addressed. There may be some matching funds available to assist with the study and construction costs. I have enclosed a copy of a capital request form I have submitted which lists the total project requirements as $90,000. The WMO Plan does not identify the outlet reconstruction (or any other project) as a capital improvement project within the watershed. In order to qualify for the matching funds, the WMO plan will have to be amended to include this project. I suggest this section of the WMO Plan be re-examined to determine if other projects would be beneficial in achieving the WMO's goals of minimizing flooding potential and improving water quality. k•� e ant For more informtaCtnJoeregarding Gibson ofthe ourstatus Floodplain Unit atrequest I m4 suggest you con 296-2773. Sincerel Marty E. Rye Hydrologist - • cc: Middle St. Croix River WMO file f . • III tHIESOYA,STATE OF EPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DNR METRO WATERS - 1200 WARNER ROAD, ST. PAUL, MN 55106 PHONE NO. 772-7910 FILE NO. RECEIVED May 12, 1992 flAY 1 3 tt^2 Mr. Tim Fredbo Middle St. Croix River WMO 1825 Curve Crest Blvd. , Room 101 Stillwater, MN 55082 RE: PRISON POND (82-310P) OUTLET RECONSTRUCTION, COUNTY ROAD 21 IMPROVEMENT, OAK PARK HEIGHTS, WASHINGTON COUNTY Dear Mr. Fredbo: I am writing in accordance with the April 28, 1992 meeting at Washington County Public Works regarding the potential reconstruction of Unnamed Wetland (82-310P) outlet. A Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Protected Waters Permit will be required for work below the ordinary high water (OHW) elevation of the pond. I strongly suggest you work with DNR Area Wildlife Manager Tim Wallace (296-5200) in design of the structure and determination of the ultimate outlet control elevation. A study sponsored by the Middle St. Croix WMO which examines the water resource concerns and potential solutions may be appropriate. It appears there are some problems with the downstream channel hydraulics which also need to be addressed. There may be some matching funds available to assist with the study and construction costs. I have enclosed a copy of a capital request form I have submitted which lists the total project requirements as $90, 000. The WMO Plan does not identify the outlet reconstruction (or any other project) as a capital improvement project within the watershed. In order to qualify for the matching funds, the WMO plan will have to be amended to include this project. I suggest this section of the WMO Plan be re-examined to determine if other projects would be beneficial in achieving the WMO's goals of minimizing flooding potential and improving water quality. For more information regarding the status of the grant request I suggest you contact Joe Gibson of our Floodplain Unit at 296-2773. __ --- -_.. Sincerely, ,:.--� ,. ./0. MarR fe Hydrologist cc: Middle St. Croix River WMO file AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER L. 000 - - il.i.j...;,. Stal Request Form - Waters /0- s, - 1.T1TLE PR (56ki P61\I) Cs2- 3109) . 0q-ruF' • i/rlONST)2tl.Cr • 2.ID # 40 dwacter Alex 3.ACTIVITIES (In order of cost) 4. UNITS (wnote numbers) . Major 3 f)Development Acres acq w62 2)Acquisition Second _5_ ,• 3)Faality Renao Non-structural sites dev or rehab '3." 4)Resource Renal) Thirdu 5)Feasibility Ping Miles dev - "" 6)Final Engr Plan I Structures dev or rehab 4347 S.NARRATIVE �� 4- A_ CsZ-310 P t ot.t-r -r . -r rH ,n,, . i.e • 200 Maraca(max D n S-�/u t r i<P,n r^� . (about 25 words) ff 1,11.237 (1O.vrI S�P'i,YI lnnelitl /n 1- a.t/0-.^/.4. / i 6. TOTAL COSTS Amount" Source\ 7. BENEFITS (from ExnlbltA) Development i401 0'645 4." `c r• ,quote • #1 3 .w, - Rehabilitation ,,.0 u 2)prey bid #2 ,•,,, • 1 Acquisition ,r43 ,,, 3)bur of engr • #3 • 22.13 Legal fees 1 w 4) BREM (74'1''''-4.. � 5) Initiator's est. �9et engineering a„ „ 8. PREREQUISITE PROJECTS 64.4 6)Other (Aire(A.Pala,Wks Other projects that must be completed cw( �" Real estate mgmt' 13.2e 21 before this one can begin • Ping &admin costs mu x • Use 1992 prices. If you #1 s.s, Other �ala�ri(c4-0 n 50 000 3141 --.3, prefer not to estimate the Total Cost 10 aa040.43cost, enter'yes"instead #2 Id s••' of a dollar amount. -see not 9.TOWN 10. REGION ,s 11. AREA ,,•« ' g►i1 tc:...}}._"V-W''' 4x•11 :::; 41.P. }+'':'y;;.y.W.:V§4t{;: (nearest 30 charktro from Exhibit 8 :}:.. ''Y:i::•::4{ •.;:;;.•; ,�'fi••""K}r•''i' • ,•:.,,,,,,.....-6.,:._ :I�;c :: ''''`;:r.#::::..:::: •;{;iii: 14.S-T-R section Twp Rna t&liii.f: ::tip .rotor' r<%<;%l tee{ 0103 04.07 01.11 }:} y:>'r.'{:::cri}i$;:::?:{;:::>:•r::::::•{:} :X:{: Xit: r.};nn'•... ::::t §:.. l :} . v r }S{r � fi 15.COUNTY (from Exhibits c:181.1.0041. 04t4.t84 c �. :.0.;:. ,*? r ,: W:% ; ' ? li :.•r: .r.; ..:::$:: �:i?:i:::'• :+j ;•{.}}.{•:'J •h? ?.•r.•r .•.s;:•:fi �: : :;. ?.{.:: } }i { ,•;: Major 12•,3 ttai :. 0.0 '•}� li:fVh 4};::::i:i ?:W,VVY�:1.R6y00f.M>:is ti: ~WY!kiteigit** ?ibiii: r : Second 1r11 IC •.vk ?r{ { ti rd Third Itil, • . ?:•:::::::::?i:: .: :::.... . r.i•:r.'.•.•.•.•:•r:::.•r.,. .}.}r .;.}::.giii. :rr{riii§i}{•:}•::ni ii:•i:•:•{'r,::gli::{} 17.SPECIAL FACTORS (check ail mat appy) (� Is•S S i A. a opt+ . bldg code violations _3e CAPRA eligible -t3 grant to others ^L-01 '51.....-a•1 rrnw OSHA violations -21 prior committment _24 incr.access to disabled _27 other health&safety 122 req'd by legislation _21 listed historic site _22 18.SPONSOR(from ExhlbitD) 19.INITIATOR 20.FIELD PRIORITY 2- as division 32 2„e first initial ..1.33 • . HI9h'.1 -. , . • • section 31 last name FRE D BO, .e• • • -Med s 2 • program a phone (C IZ )439 » (,3(o I ,.,, -Lows 3 month ,4,s day n„ -- :.32*: rn• si rur Ciao 3aidty PrOiert:is. ,.:uril)}icia Iavais0-4ine ' ........7-" -; :1:. • - / • REr . . .. 7D AUG c=12 ENGINEERS I ARCHITECTS I PLANNERS 3535 VADNAIS CENTER DRIVE.ST.PAUL.MN 55110-5108 612 490-2000 800 325-2055 August 5, 1992 RE: MIDDLE ST. CROIX WATER MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION PERRO CREEK STUDY SEH FILE NO. 93014 Bill Mordick Minnesota Correctional Facility - Stillwater P. O. Box 55 Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 Dear Mr. Mordick: On behalf of the WMO, we are requesting that you provide the following for the area within the Perro Creek tributary watershed: 1. Existing land use map. 2. Future land use map. 3. Storm sewer map. This information should be sent to: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. C/O Jeff Davis 3535 Vadnais Center Drive St. Paul, Minnesota 55110-5108 We would appreciate receiving this information at or prior to the August 25 WMO meeting. If you have any questions, you may contact me at 490-2025. Sincerely, Jeff Davis, P.E. Project Manager JTD:llc cc: Tim Fredbo, Washington County SWCD SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC ST CLOUD.MN CHIPPEWA FALLS.WI MADISON.WI • • =58 ENGINEERS I ARCHITECTS■PLANNERS 3535 VADNAIS CENTER DRIVE,ST.PAUL,MN 55110-5108 612 490-2000 800 325-2055 August 5, 1992 RE: MIDDLE ST. CROIX WATER MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION PERRO CREEK STUDY SEH FILE NO. 93014 Anders Hansen Baytown Township P. O. Box 2007 Oak Park Heights, Minnesota 55082-2007 Dear Mr. Hansen: On behalf of the WMO, we are requesting that you provide the following for the area within the Perro Creek tributary watershed: 1. Existing land use map. 2. Future land use map. 3. Storm sewer map. This information should be sent to: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. C/O Jeff Davis 3535 Vadnais Center Drive St. Paul, Minnesota 55110-5108 We would appreciate receiving this information at or prior to the August 25 WMO meeting. If you have any questions, you may contact me at 490-2025. Sincerely, Jeff Davis, P.E. Project Manager JTD:llc cc: Tim Fredbo, Washington County SWCD SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. ST CLOL O.MN CHIPPEWA FALLS.WI MADISON,WI S • -4:581 ENGINEERS I ARCHITECTS I PLANNERS 3535 VADNAIS CENTER DRIVE.ST.PAUL.MN 55110.5108 612 490-2000 800 325-2055 August 5, 1992 RE: MIDDLE ST. CROIX WATER MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION PERRO CREEK STUDY SEH FILE NO. 93014 Ms. Ann Terwedo City of Stillwater 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater, Minnesota 55082-4898 Dear Ms. Terwedo: On behalf of the WMO, we are requesting that you provide the following for the area within the Perro Creek tributary watershed: 1. Existing land use map. 2. Future land use map. 3. Storm sewer map. This information should be sent to: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. C/O Jeff Davis 3535 Vadnais Center Drive St. Paul, Minnesota 55110-5108 We would appreciate receiving this information at or prior to the August 25 WMO meeting. If you have any questions, you may contact me at 490-2025. Sincerely, Jeff Davis, P.E. Project Manager JTD:11c cc: Tim Fredbo, Washington County SWCD SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. ST CLOUD.MN CHIPPEWA FALLS.WI MADISON.WI RECEIVED /, AUG 1 1 1992 1- E1 ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS•PLANNERS 3535 VADNAIS CENTER DRIVE,ST.PAUL,MN 55110.5108 612 490-2000 800 325-2055 August 10, 1992 RE: MIDDLE ST. CROIX WATER MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION FERRO CREEK STUDY SEH FILE NO. 93014 Mr. Mike Louis Minnesota Department of Transportation Metro District 3485 Hadley Avenue North Oakdale, Minnesota 55128 Dear Mr. Louis: In 1988, SEH was retained by the Washington Soil and Water Conservation District to perform a hydrologic and hydraulic study of Perro Creek and its tributary watershed. The results of our initial study indicate that a number of the downstream culvert crossings are grossly inadequate. However, our initial study was based on very general information and may contain some inaccuracies. Conclusions from the initial study included the recommendation to conduct a detailed study in order to obtain more accurate information. SEH has recently been retained by the Middle St. Croix WMO to perform a scoping study which will define the options to be investigated in the detailed study. We understand that Mn/DOT intends to direct runoff from the new bridge and associated highway improvements east along Highway 36, through a treatment pond, and into the river. One of the options we would like to investigate is the possibility of discharging the runoff from the hatched area north of Highway 36 (see attached drawing) into the conveyance system to be constructed by Mn/DOT during the Highway 36 construction. This could have a significant impact on the runoff rate and volume entering the prison pond outlined by the blue dashes on the attached drawing. By means of this letter, we are requesting, on behalf of the Middle St. Croix WMO, that Mn/DOT review the possibility of intercepting the runoff from the area north of and including Highway 36. SHORT ELLIOTTMADISON.Wf HENDRICKSON INC. ST CLOUD.MN CHIPPEWA FALLS.WI 411 Mr. Mike Louis August 10, 1992 Page 2 If you have any questions or concerns, you may contact Mr. Tim Fredbo at the Washington Soil and Water Conservation District, telephone 439-6361, or myself at 490-2025. Sincerely, Jeff Davis, P.E. Project Manager JTD:llc Enclosures cc: Tim Fredbo, Washington County SWCD \:., \ \\ o V Ai II �1t?d ,u � ' \/,), „,,,,,--- ,...,\1n1 }I. �. © o ° ,• ,I �_ #41 c ji' R:_""\-‘7-..-;;:i;p0�)��,:„ snoTo 1 i II `-` ,; , ‘,....A q ���� b fir.• _, iii ii i .......:_i „ J, u , , ,,,,,,,,,,,,,„ . , , • ,, ..:: \,.,, __ _ 111 q ( Sf? \* !Y !!.-1,0 /0 - 1 IP' '!' k''k\- r rt% 0 o= Q 0 •1Pk' !.,. 0 *. I- �� ,, i, L. ,. , v \., „AI 0 1 ......... ., •• 's -""'"‘0/4„,•- ' ' \ /1/1 '40' ,,A I ' ;'‘ i ' — ' A '' '-' to 0. --' . 0 r 0 ° - ' .... . °0 'CIO . ip W- I : ,i �. C(7-)1 T fr4 / .• ro.••'. ' © - / `/ �, fir - � T. ' •�� ' 1it TA A ," 4 1 \ I( ,1 hib ,k, � VII ( � ois „ , Ii iI � 14111h1N1a iliv'tv',,,,,,,, ,N. l 1I \(� 1„,,, ,- ..,...1000, : ,e) -fr-.1 I fit.. 02 1' •g .\\ , , V , .,• I :I!IIPP:Ii I.0111: • 011, 9 `1, .e..... . el ,ti '71, . . 11 ok' Iv le VI 113\7 • • I\ •dri \,4 ' r © ,. , _ Q, • J� /i(/ it ;,'. -•: