The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2020-06-10 WC Recorded PUD Amendment #1266142Receipt:# 478592 USE $46.00 Return to: E - SIMPLIFILE 4844 North 300 West Suite 202 Provo UT 84604 1266142 111111 VIII VIII IIII IIII VIII VIII IIII IIII Certified Filed and/or recorded on: 6/10/2020 3 34 PM 1266142 Certificate #: 73462 Office of the Registrar of Titles Washington County, Minnesota Jennifer Wagenius, Registrar of Titles NOTICE OF CERTIFICATION STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF WASHINGTON ) ss. CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS ) I, the undersigned being duly qualified and acting as City Administrator for the City of Oak Park Heights, Minnesota DO HEREBY CERTIFYthat I have compared the attached document: Amended Planned Unit Development Permit Allowing Replacement & Enlargement of Sign at NW Corner of Oak Park Commons Property Located At 5991 Norwich Ave. N. with the original thereof on file at the offices of the City of Oak Park Heights, and that the same is a full, true and complete copy of said document within the files of the City of Oak Park Heights. WITNESS my hand and the seal of the City of Oak Pdk,�reiAts, this I' day of June, 2020. Johnson �. Administrator J CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS AMENDMENT TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PERMIT ALLOWING REPLACEMENT AND ENLARGEMENT OF SIGN AT NORTHWEST CORNER OF OAK PARK COMMONS PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5991 NORWICH AVENUE NORTH Planner's File No.: 236.02-20.02 Date Issued: March 24, 2020 Legal Description: (Property Identification No. 05.029.20.12.0046) Lot 4, Block 1, Oak Park Commons, Washington County, Minnesota Owner: OPC Properties, LLC Attn: Chad Anvary 4737 County Road 101, Suite 243 Minnetonka, MN 55345 Applicant: Same Site Address: 5991 Norwich Avenue North, Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Present Zoning District: B-4, Limited Business District Permitted Uses set forth in Ordinance 401, Section 401.301.B I. AMENDED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PERMIT: The property is located in the B-4 Limited Business District, in which a shopping center is a permitted use. The property was approved as a Planned Unit Development ("PUD") and has an existing sign on the northwest corner property, which advertises the businesses in the shopping center. The property owner applied to the City to replace the existing sign with a new sign that is taller and has more square feet of signage. The new sign will include 63 square feet of signage and be up to 15 feet tall. Pursuant to 401.06.G of the Zoning Ordinance, any deviation or modifications from the terms or conditions of an approved PUD shall require an amendment of the original PUD. Pursuant to the March 24, 2020 Resolution of the City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights, the City grants the Amendment to the PUD Permit to allow the expanded replacement sign, subject to the following conditions and/or restrictions: 1. The proposed sign shall not exceed 16 feet in height and 70 square feet of signage per sign face. 2. All proposed signage shall require a sign permit and shall be in compliance with Section 401.15.G of the Zoning Ordinance. 3. The sign panels shall be illuminated in conformance with Section 401.15.G.4.K of the Zoning Ordinance. II. Reference Attachment: The City Planner reported dated March 5, 2020 and all exhibits therein are annexed hereto by reference as "Exhibit A." IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have set forth their hands and seals. CITY OF, OAK PARK HEIGHTS Date: -1 boB , y' Date: l 2,Q By: Eric A. J �ity Administrator OPC Date: 1- y: This instrument drafted by: Kevin S. Sandstrom Eckberg Lammers, P.C. 1809 Northwestern Avenue Stillwater, MN 55082 2 its:.- r4 kcjmdx Anoka. MN 55303 Phone: 7S3.231.51340 ?W.427.0520 TO: Eric Johnson FROM: Scott Richards DATE: March 5, 2020 RE: Oak Paris Heights — Oak Park Commons — Planned Unit Development Amendment for Signage — 5991 Norwich Avenue North TPC FILE: 236.02 —20.02 1:�' ; • ► • Chad Anvary, representing OPC Properties, LLC, owners of the Oak Park Commons shopping center, has made application for a Planned Unit Development Amendment for signage. The request would allow replacement of a sign at the northwest comer of the property at 5991 Norwich Avenue North that will be taller and Include more square feet of signage area. The sign will Include 63 square feet of signage and would be up to 15 feet tall. The site is zoned B-4 Limited Business District in which the shopping center is permitted use. The development was originally approved as a Planned Unit Development (PUD). The PUD amendment process may be used to allow sign alterations and to increase the amount of signage. The review is based upon the following submittals: Exhibit 1: Project Narrative Exhibit 2: Picture of Existing Monument Sign Exhibit 3: Aerial Photo Indicating Location of Existing Monument Sign Exhibit 4: Proposed Monument Sign Exhibit 5: Sign Example Chad Anvary has provided the following narrative describing the request: Page 140 of 164 1 am writing you on behalf of OPC Properties to request a PUD Amendment for the current monument signage (Attached as Exhibit A and Exhibit B) to allow for' Oo square fleet of signage. The current monument sign does not provide adequate visibility and signage for our tenants. The new monument sign would replace the currant monument sign and would be in the same location. I have engaged the service of Signs Now to provide a mockup of a new monument sign (Exhibit Q with a design that wiff reflect the same high-quality materials of the current monument sign and property. I have also attached an example of another monument sign (Exhibit D) that we could work from. We are proud to be a part of the Oak Park Heights community and ownership vW# spare no expense in Etre design/construction of the new monument. !f approved, we will work closely with the City of Oak Park Heights on the final design/cons6vctlon of the new monument sign. ISSUES ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan designates this area as Commercial on the Proposed Land Use Map. The use of the property for a retail, services and restaurants is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Zoning Ordinance. The property is zoned B-4, Limited Business District in which the shopping center has been approved by a PUD. An amendment to the PUD is required to make sign changes to the freestanding signage. Signage. The existing freestanding sign was constructed at the northwest comer of the property at Bot' Street and Norwich Avenue North. It is eight feet tail and includes 48 square feet of signage. The Zoning regulations allow a freestanding monument sign of up to 20 feet in height with 100 square feet of signage. The existing Lowes freestanding sign was constructed with the original development. Additional freestanding signs may be constructed in a shopping center development. The sign.regulations for multiple occupancy business buildings are as follows: 4) In any multiple occupancy building qualifying as a shopping center, signs shall be permitted for each common public entrance. Each sign area shall not exceed a fatal of W (50) square feet and shall be located within fifty (50) feat of the common public entrance being served. Attention shall be given to the possible number of tenants or occupant bays which may be served by the common public entrance for which the sign is intended. The proposed sign is designed as a monument sign up to i s feet tall with 83 square feet of signage. The PUD is required to make sign alterations and to allow the proposed sign tc) exceed the allowed 50 square foot allowance. 2 Page 141 of 164 A review of the Conditional Use Permit criteria within the Zoning Ordinance should be considered as part of a PUD request. Any signage allowed for the development shall also require a sign permit. Conditional Use Permit The Planning Commission should consider the fallowing issues and impacts of the proposed project in making its recommendation. The conditional use permit criteria, found in Section 401.03.A.7 of the Zoning Ordinance, are found as follows: 1. Relationship to the specific policies and provisions of the municipal comprehensive plan. 2. The conformity with present and future land uses in the area. 3. The environmental issues and geographic area involvred. 4. Whether the use will tend to or actually depreciatae the area in which it is proposed. 5 The impact on character of the surrounding area. 8. The demonstrated need for such use. 7. Traffic generation by the use in relation to capabilities of streets serving the property. 8. The impact upon existing public services and facilffies Including parks, schools, streets, and utr bs, and the City's service capacity. 9. The proposed use's conformity with all performance standards contained herein (I G., parking, loading, noise, etc.). Comment: The expansion of the freestanding sign size and height should not create an issue for neighboring properties and will be beneficial to the shopping center tenants. The additional signage should not create any visibility issues at the Intersection In that it is adequately set back from the roadway. There should be no environmental Issues with this request. The request is minor and not out of nature with other requests that have been granted to vary from the sign regulations within the Highway 38 corridor. City Staff sees no Issues with the request as proposed. . 0 Upon review of the request for a Planned Unit Development Amendment for replacement of a sign at the northwest comer of the Oak Park Commons property at 5991 Norwich Avenue North, staff would recommend the project with the conditions as follows: 1. The proposed sign shall not exceed 16 feet in height and 70 square feet of signage per sign face. . All proposed signage shall require a sign permit and shall be in compliance with Section 401.15.G of the Zoning Ordinance. Page 142 of 164 3. The sign panels shall be illuminated In conformance with Section 441.15.G.4.K of the Zoning Ordinance. c: Julie Hultman Page 143 of 164 Dear City of Oak Park Heights, I am writing you on behalf of OPC Properties to request a PUD Amendment for the current monument signage (Attached as Exhibit A and Exhibit B) to allow for 1ODsf of signage. The current monument sign does not provide adequate visibility and signage for our tenants. The new monument sign would replace current monument sign and would be in the same location. I have engaged the service of Signs Now to provide a mockup of a new monument sign (Exhibit C) with a design that will reflect the same high-quality materials of current monument sign and property. I have also attached an example of another monument sign (Exhibit D) that we could work from. We are proud to be part of the Oak Park Heights community and ownership will spare no expense in the design/construction of the new monument. If approved, we will work closely with the City of Oak Park Heights on the final design/construction of new monument sign. Sincerely, A& Chad Anvary OPC Properties Y �� °t RECEFEB 12 IAM 147 of 164 2020 Iw-Iv Exh• r t C Monument pylon sign r e vin -.a RECEIVJ104 " 2 2020