HomeMy WebLinkAboutLetter of Transmittal a �
- - -
I „1 II .LJ = ' =1i_ __
If
do pamd” Own No
b
a -
1
I
� IIIIYIIIJJdlllll� i '�IVId,iVVl.iihl� _ _ t
3
1
f
r
! .
I
9 i
' = i
1
1
�.. — — #
it mo i l do hoft imM" No
- s f _ - .,
- Wa mw3ft of VIM _' -. -
di so jama Woft UWAW VLft *m **WW tam A"
AM - -
.I
i
�u
1
• I
I
i
G
V
—
I I . 111.1I IW4JJIl JII' JI. .II:,.IIJIW,..�.,:CAL'JIIEIIIJI Wd. JiI. IJAt66' b6C1: IIII��.J4111,I�Liy'iII�LIIO,l.l 1, 1 plll:J'...1.'1_I - ' * I�III ^�.11.�.:�1= yIWI.ulllyluI LEI J'..IIIII,II J „�.I J _;-= ,a,- �
II
11
City of Oak Park Heights, Minnesota
Legal Compliance Audit, Page 2
FINDING: Collateral for investments not approved
CONDITION: The City Council or its designee currently does not approve collateral
changes.
CRITERIA: Minnesota Statute 118.01, Subd® 4 requires that collateral for invest-
ments be approved by the governing body of the City or its designee.
RECOMMENDATION: We recommend that the City Council designate staff responsible for the
investing of City funds and approval of collateral provided by the
institution with which investments are made. This designation can be
accomplished through a resolution which would officially recognize the
designated staff position(s) as having authority to invest monies in
qualified investments and to allow that position(s) to approve colla-
teral changes.
City of Oak Park Heights, Minnesota
Legal Compliance Audit, Page 3
FINDING: Lack of Endorsement on Claims
CONDITION: The City does not employ a claim system. This is not uncommon for
Minnesota cities. There is a statutory requirement which outlines the
disbursing process and refers to approvals based on a claim system.
The City does have alternate approval mechanisms which provide reaso-
nable — surances that authorized amounts are disbursed. The lack of
claim procedures as referred to in Minnesota statutes may be considered
non- compliance with statutes.
CRITERIA: MS 412.271 reads in part as follows:
412.271 DISBURSEMENTS.
Subd. 3. Endorsement on claims. The clerk shall endorse on each
claim required to be audited by the council the word "disallowed" if
such be the fact, or, "allowed in the sum of $ ," if approved in
whole or in part, specifying in the latter case the items rejected.
Each order shall be so drawn that when signed by the treasurer in an
appropriate space, it becomes a check on the city depository. Such
order -check may have printed on its reverse side, above the space for
endorsement thereof by the payee, the following statement: "The
undersigned payee, in endorsing this order - check, declares that the
same is received in payment of a just and correct claim against the
city of and that no part of such claim has heretofore been
paid." When endorsed by the payee named in the order - check, such
statement shall operate and shall be deemed sufficient as the
required declaration of the claim. Any order presented to the
treasurer and not paid for want of funds shall be so marked and paid
in the order of its presentation with interest from the date of pre-
sentation at the rate of five percent or such lower rate as is fixed
by the council prior to its issuance.
RECOMMENDATION: Our office has requested clarification of this issue from the
Legislative Committee of the Minnesota Government Finance Officers
Association. Additionally we have requested clarification from the
Office of the State Auditor regarding the applicability of the MS
412.271. Pending the results of these requests we will advise the City
of required corrective actions (if any).
City of Oak Park Heights, Minnesota
Legal Compliance Audit, Page 4
Based on these procedures and except as noted above, we noted no instances of non-
compliance with the Regulations for the CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA, for the
year ended December 31, 1985.
This report is intended solely for the use of City of Oak Park Heights and should not be
used for any other purpose. This restriction is not intended to limit the distribution
of this report, which is a matter of public record.
Respectfully submitted,
VOTO, REARDON, TAUTGES & CO., LTD.
Certified Public Accountants
February 15, 1986
\� ■ .
` �� j \� � � \ . � \ � � ' ' ( /
� , . � ^ \ ' \ � 2 � \ \ ;. \ a
'` \ � / \ \ : � ;� � ' \ �
` \ � \\ :, §�� � ..
\ � \ � � /;�\ > \ w \ ; ; � .
\ \ \� ~_� \ \ \ \�: \ \��
Doi
, \� \ . } \ ( � \ \ \ \. \ \ � \: / , \
\� \^ � � \
City of Oak Park Heights, Minnesota
Legal Compliance Audit, Page 2
FINDING: Collateral for investments not approved
CONDITION: The City Council or its designee currently does not approve collateral
changes.
CRITERIA: Minnesota Statute 118.01, Subd. 4 requires that collateral for invest-
ments be approved by the governing body of the City or its designee.
RECOMMENDATION: We recommend that the City Council designate staff responsible for the
investing of City funds and approval of collateral provided by the
institution with which investments are made. This designation can be
accomplished through a resolution which would officially recognize the
designated staff position(s) as having authority to invest monies in
qualified investments and to allow that position(s) to approve colla-
teral changes.
City of Oak Park Heights, Minnesota
Legal Compliance Audit, Page 3
FINDING: Lack of Endorsement on Claims
CONDITION: The City does not employ a claim system. This is not uncommon for
Minnesota cities. There is a statutory requirement which outlines the
disbursing process and refers to approvals based on a claim system.
The City does have alternate approval mechanisms which provide reaso-
nable assuranL2s that authorized amounts are disbursed. The lack of
claim procedures as referred to in Minnesota statutes may be considered
non - compliance with statutes.
CRITERIA: MS 412.271 reads in part as follows:
412.271 DISBURSEMENTS.
Subd. 3. Endorsement on claims. The clerk shall endorse on each
claim required to be audited by the council the word "disallowed" if
such be the fact, or, "allowed in the sum of $ ," if approved in
whole or in part, specifying in the latter case the items rejected.
Each order shall be so drawn that when signed by the treasurer in an
appropriate space, it becomes a check on the city depository. Such
order -check may have printed on its reverse side, above the space for
endorsement thereof by the payee, the following statement: "The
undersigned payee, in endorsing this order - check, declares that the
same is received in payment of a just and correct claim against the
city of ....... and that no part of such claim has heretofore been
paid." When endorsed by the payee named in the order - check, such
statement shall operate and shall be deemed sufficient as the
required declaration of the claim. Any order presented to the
treasurer and not paid for want of funds shall be so marked and paid
in the order of its presentation with interest from the date of pre-
sentation at the rate of five percent or such lower rate as is fixed
by the council prior to its issuance.
RECOMMENDATION: Our office has requested clarification of this issue from the
Legislative Committee of the Minnesota Government Finance Officers
Association. Additionally we have requested clarification from the
Office of the State Auditor regarding the applicability of the MS
412.271. Pending the results of these requests we will advise the City
of required corrective actions (if any).
City of Oak Park Heights, Minnesota
Legal Compliance Audit, Page 4
Eased on these procedures and except as noted above, we noted no instances of non-
compliance with the Regulations for the CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA, for the
year ended December 31, 1985.
This report is intended solely for the use of City of Oak Park Heights and should not be
used for any other purpose. This restriction is not intended to limit the distribution
of this report, which is a matter of public record.
Respectfully submitted,
VOTO, REARDON, TAUTGES & CO., LTD.
Certified Public Accountants
February 15, 1986
IFi 5 4
POIK4 IM6 UM6
- I - -- -- - - - -- — - - s - -
'�, n =:_.G6 �� ��wii•u_ _- -_ _. ., u:!wnilu,uu. w.�u:uus�e rae:uu�ma:uwuuu ...u.. m�.�.�,..,.�_a_�a,....,.,un a,.,x, _.._..�..n,._ ::._:: :: -. - � -�... e.,�e...,,. m.i dYeu ,�_ e:
•� i
9
` > R
! � P
A �
-
d
l
l M r'�i�4�5.9l��4 , � •
f 6 i
I d -
I] -- - _ - -- - - _
- - — - - - 9 - F "M r e
-9
NVOt .. — O WWWOM III Mtw OW MMOAMWAS WX Mdg M WANNOMM
wila t
-. MOAK" sto*awa 00 so wada"n, 44 an
Wu" BM
r _ _ a
1 l" � - ' r
-- -_.
-- _.
,•
I 3 — i
i
ti
4
I
I
m
I
I
I,� s
tl —
- uuunuiuu a.. r: n!uei €u:uin!�yse+aaan.n.ua -I, u l u �q - . n. . p- sis:n II uu a - _ , _ I��������� -���� .: _ r l � .��_�:_ey�•, i..,:� _ _ - __ - _ _
tl _ _ i`I �hIVIViW�''e�II�d�I 15I�f Pil�II�If6 � -� Y I`R
: tl dV�f V.IIi�Vl�Il4 � I ull9 �I I ��IId ��aullVlliolllll � ��LI G� riL Y�J�I;�I �
tl 1�i13Bl��l��ll,l i,�ll�� Wlllllli�ll�� lI�IIV!:���dI�Y�VIVIII�li � ' , �1f IW�. I�IVIV�III 'll�'p�l�'���V1�FWiV��Ij
City of Oak Park Heights, Minnesota
Legal Compliance Audit, Page 2
FINDING: Collateral for investments not approved
CONDITION: The City Council or its designee currently does not approve collateral
changes.
CRITERIA: Minnesota Statute 118.01, Subd. 4 requires that collateral for invest-
ments be approved by the governing body of the City or its designee.
RECOMMENDATION: We recommend that the City Council designate staff responsible for the
investing of City funds and approval of collateral provided by the
institution with which investments are made. This designation can be
accomplished through a resolution which would officially recognize the
designated staff position(s) as having authority to invest monies in
qualified investments and to allow that position(s) to approve colla-
teral changes.
City of Oak Park Heights, Minnesota
Legal Compliance Audit, Page 3
FINDING: Lack of Endorsement on Claims
CONDITION: The City does not employ a claim system. This is not uncommon for
Minnesota cities. There is a statutory requirement which outlines the
disbursing process and refers to approvals based on a claim system.
The City does have alternate approval mechanisms which provide reaso-
nable assurances that authorized amounts are disbursed. The lack of
claim procedures as referred to in Minnesota statutes may be considered
non - compliance with statutes.
CRITERIA: MS 412.271 reads in part as follows:
412.271 DISBURSEMENTS.
Subd. 3. Endorsement on claims. The clerk shall endorse on each
claim required to be audited by the council the word "disallowed" if
such be the fact, or, "allowed in the sum of $ ," if approved in
whole or in part, specifying in the latter case the items rejected.
Each order shall be so drawn that when signed by the treasurer in an
appropriate space, it becomes a check on the city depository. Such
order -check may have printed on its reverse side, above the space for
endorsement thereof by the payee, the following statement: "The
undersigned payee, in endorsing this order - check, declares that the
same is received in payment of a just and correct claim against the
city of ....... and that no part of such claim has heretofore been
paid." When endorsed by the payee named in the order- check, such
statement shall operate and shall be deemed sufficient as the
required declaration of the claim. Any order presented to the
treasurer and not paid for want of funds shall be so marked and paid
in the order of its presentation with interest from the date of pre-
sentation at the rate of five percent or such lower rate as is fixed
by the council prior to its issuance.
RECOMMENDATION: Our office has requested clarification of this issue from the
Legislative Committee of the Minnesota Government Finance Officers
Association. Additionally we have requested clarification from the
Office of the State Auditor regarding the applicability of the MS
412.271. Pending the results of these requests we will advise the City
of required corrective actions (if any).
City of Oak Park Heights, Minnesota
Legal Compliance Audit, Page 4
Based on these procedures and except as noted above, we noted no instances of non-
compliance with the Regulations for the CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA, for the
year ended December 31, 1985.
This report is intended solely for the use of City of Oak Park Heights and should not be
used for any other purpose. This restriction is not intended to limit the distribution
of this report, which is a matter of public record.
Respectfully submitted,
VOTO, REARDON, TAUTGES & CO., LTD.
Certified Public Accountants
February 15, 1986
Y =_i1 a i rZM_ 3 �• +�
—
s
f j
One z
._
.
tommol - AA - - - - -
-- e
4 44; _ _
ii.
Y
I'
o&
i
I
!
— — —
i.ee! esi_ �! im��n! �eYi�: uiu, _�e,�avY_�u3:�ie,x�!�s:�.�..u., :. ai3
- W
VOTO, REARDON, TAU]"GES & CO., LTD.
('EkTIFIED PUBI-IC ACCOUN I - AN 15
...........
Birch Lake Professional BLtild 1310 E. I Iwy. 96 o White Bear Lake, MN 55110 Phone 426-3263
it
ROBERT J. V010, CPA
TIMOTHY E. RUARDON, CPA
ROBERT G. TAUIGES, CPA
JAMES S. REDPA If I, CPA
June 26, 1986
Municipal Reporting Unit
Office of the State Auditor
555 Park Street, Suite 400
St. Paul, Minnesota 55103
Enclosed is a copy of the 1985 Legal Compliance Report for the CITY OF OAK PARK
HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA.
If you have any questions, please call the undersigned.
Very truly yours,
VOTO, REARDON, TAUTGES & CO., LTD.
Robert G. Tautges, CPA
RGT/smh
enc.
CC: Correspondence File
Financial Statement File
City of Oak Park Heights, Minnesota
N T S (A At, U-I'lCAN IM) I I i t j 11: 01' CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUN FAN IS PRIVATE COMPANIES PRACTICE SECTION
M, 1,N N FSOTA SOCIETY Or CI R i II ILD I )FILIC ACCOUNTANTS
GOVF RNM r N r V I N'A N(__ F 0111(.I K ti A` `()"! ', I i ( '; as Pv 11 N N ESO rA A560CI ATION OF SCJ 1001 131 1Y Nf OFF 1 : A LS