Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2021-03-11 Planning Commission Meeting Packet CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA Thursday, March 11, 2021 6:00 P.M. This meeting will be conducted by video/telephone conference due to the ongoing COVID-19 health pandemic. The meeting will follow the provisions of Minnesota Statute § 13D.021. If practical, members of the public may be permitted to remotely listen to the meeting as provided in 13D.021, Subd. 3, subject to such person paying for any added cost incurred by the City as a result of the additional connection. The open meeting can be viewed remotely online at: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/89724727178 or by calling(312-626-6799) and entering meeting ID 897 2472 7178. Please contact the City at 651-439-4439 or eajohnson(acityofoakparkheights.com in advance of March 11, 2021 if you have any questions about access. I. Call to Order II. Approval of Agenda III. Approve February 11, 2021 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes (1) IV. Department/ Commission Liaison/ Other Reports V. Visitors/Public Comment This is an opportunity for the public to address the Commission with questions or concerns on or not upon the agenda. Please limit comments to three minutes. VI. Public Hearings A. Roy E. Crist C.U.P.: Review and consider Conditional Use Permit requests for a rear yard setback reduction of 8-feet and to construct a 1, 395 s.f. garage at 6188 Beach Road N. (2) B. Palmer Station P.U.D. Amendment: Review and consider a Planned Unit Development Amendment request to allow a reduction to the front yard setback from 30-feet to 25-feet at Lot 10, Palmer Station, located at 5613 Oak Cove N. (3) VII. New Business VIII. Old Business IX. Informational A. Upcoming Meetings (4) B. Council Representative • Tuesday, March 23, 2021 —Commissioner White • Tuesday, April 27, 2021 —Commissioner Freeman X. Adjourn. _.nd,(lau I CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Thursday, February 11, 2021 Held Via Video Conference Per MN Statute 13D.021 Call to Order: Chair Freeman called the meeting to order @ 6:10 p.m. Present: Commissioners Husby, VanDyke and White; City Administrator Johnson, City Planner Richards, and City Councilmember Liaison Representative Liljegren. Commissioner Van Denburgh arrived at 6:17 p.m. II. Approval of Agenda: Commissioner White, seconded by Commissioner VanDyke, moved to approve the Agenda as presented. Carried 4-0. III. Approval of November 12, 2020 Meeting Minutes: Commissioner White, seconded by Commissioner Husby, moved to approve the Minutes as presented. Carried 4-0. IV. Department/Commission Liaison/Other Reports: City Administrator Johnson & Commission Liaison reported on the City Council decision to engage a lobbyist to work on the City's behalf with regard to issues pertaining to the A.S. King plant. City Administrator noted that three priorities for the lobbyist is to have them seek LGA payment to offset tax revenue loss from the A.S. King plant if and when it closes; to begin talking about future utility needs at the site; and getting structures down and the site cleaned up at such time the plant closes. General discussion ensued as to current utilities serving the site, the target audience for the lobbyist to engage, and the need to for all to work together, over what will likely be a long process, for a successful outcome at the site over. Chair Freeman noted that several advisory committee meetings had been held and those have largely been educational and that Xcel Energy has been great in their participation to date. V. Visitors/Public Comment: None. Planning Commission Minutes February 11, 2021 Page 2 of 3 VI. Public Hearings: A. Menard's: Review and consider a request for a Conditional Use Permit for an outside materials yard express an addition and reduction to number of parking spaces at 5800 Kreuger Lane N. City Planner Richards reviewed the February 4, 2021 Planning Report to the request seeking Design Guidelines/Site Plan Review and Conditional Use Permits for Setback and Parking related to the addition of an automated express lane to the east side of the Menard's site. Richards provided a brief history of the request, an issue analysis and discussed the same. Brief discussion was had wherein it was clarified that the gate house would be expanded as part of the project. Chair Freeman asked if the applicant had anything to add before the public hearing was opened. Tyler Edwards—Menard, Inc. introduced himself and noted that Menard's tried to get 300 plus remodels like this done and just couldn't accomplish all of them. He briefly described the project, noting that the automated entrance is being added to the gate and that the automated lane will be closest to the building, with the other lanes being shifted eastward. Chair Freeman opened the public hearing at 6:29 p.m. and invited visitor comment. There being none, Commissioner Van Denburgh, seconded by Commissioner VanDyke, moved to close the public hearing. Carried 5-0. Discussion ensued as to the public hearing mailing notices being mailed to those within 500-feet of Menard's; the traffic volume at 58th St. N. and how it seems to have increased since the bridge opening, and the turning activity to and from the road at 58th St. and Krueger Ln. At the inquiry of the Planning Commission, the applicant discussed signage to the project and how the automated process is designed to work, adding that the end goal is to expedite the process. Commissioner White, seconded by Commissioner VanDyke, moved to recommend City Council approval of the request, subject to the conditions of the February 4, 2021 Planning Report, specifically, that: 1. All light fixtures shall be full cut off and be consistent with Section 401.15.B.7 of the Zoning Ordinance as it relates to lighting requirements. Planning Commission Minutes February 11, 2021 Page 3 of 3 2. All signs shall be designed to comply with the Zoning Ordinance requirements for size, number, placement, and internal illumination. Staff will approve the lighting specifications for the signs at the time of permitting. The sign lighting should be designed such that only the text and logo portions of the signs are to be lit at night. The sign background will need to be dark. 3. The Planning Commission was favorable to the building design and building materials. 4. The grading, drainage and utility plans shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. 5. The landscape plan shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Arborist. Menard's shall remove and replace the trees along Krueger Lane as recommended by the City Arborist. The trees would need to be guaranteed for one year after replacement or if they are moved. Carried 5- 0. VII. New Business: None. VIII. Old Business: None. IX. Informational: A. Upcoming Meetings: Meeting list packet enclosure noted. B. Council Representative: • Tuesday, February 23, 2021 —Commissioner Husby • Tuesday, March 23, 2021 —Commissioner—White The Council Representative schedule was reviewed. X. Adjourn: Commissioner White, seconded by Commissioner Van Denburgh, moved to adjourn at 6:42 p.m. Carried 5-0. Respectfully submitted, Julie Hultman Planning& Code Enforcement Approved by the Planning Commission: T P C 3601 Thurston Avenue N, Suite 100 Anoka, MN 55303 Phone: 763.231.5840 Facsimile: 763.427.0520 TPC( PIa n ni ngCo.com MEMORANDUM TO: Eric Johnson FROM: Scott Richards DATE: March 4, 2021 RE: Oak Park Heights — Conditional Use Permits for Rear Yard Setback and Size of Garage — 6188 Beach Road North TPC FILE: 236.02 — 21.03 BACKGROUND Roy Crist has made an application for Conditional Use Permits (CUP) to allow a garage addition at 6188 Beach Road North. The application is to allow a reduced rear yard setback and garage size for an addition to the existing house. The detached garage will be removed. The existing house was constructed approximately one foot from the rear property line. The property is zoned R-2 Low and Medium Density Residential District. Single family dwellings and their accessory structures are permitted uses in that District. EXHIBITS The review is based upon the following submittals: Exhibit 1: Project Narrative from Roy Crist Exhibit 2: Air Photo Location Map Exhibit 3: Site/Grading Plan Exhibit 4: Main Floor Plan Exhibit 5: Elevation Plans PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project description for the CUP from Roy Crist is as follows: Why I want to build an attached 3 car garage: 1. The existing garage is falling down. 2. My wife and I are getting up in age. I want to have the laundry room on the first floor for her, so she does not have to go to the basement to do laundry. 3. A three-car garage will add value to the property, allow my wife and I to park inside and for me to put my utility trailer in the garage. 1 have also designed a room for a workshop for me to use, stay active and enjoy my hobbies. 4. I want to also add a bathroom in the garage because we have one full bath for the house currently. This too will add value to the property and be useful to us and future owners. I understand there are two reasons that are requiring me to have a CUP: 1. Due to the lot size and layout in the old part of town, as the current code requires a 30-foot setback from the rear lot line, and this is not possible on this lot. The best that I could get is an eight-foot setback from the west (rear property line). 2. The total size outside dimensions is 1395 square feet. The garage is connected to the house with a new mudroom, within the confines of the new garage 1 plan to add a laundry room and a new bathroom for the house. The square footage of the new laundry room and the bathroom do reduce the total square footage of the garage and increase the square footage of the home, which will improve the value of the property. ISSUES ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan The property is designated as low density in the Land Use Map. The request for the garage addition is consistent with the policies related to low density land use. Zoning The property is zoned R-2 Low and Medium Density Residential District. Single family dwellings and their accessory structures are permitted uses in that District. The principal building setback requirements are found below in the table. Additionally, the limit for attached and detached accessory building size on a lot is 1,200 square feet and the proposed size is 1,395 square feet. Exceptions to these provisions can be made by CUP. Zoning Requirement Proposed Addition Front Yard Setback — 30 feet 30 feet Side Yard Setback — 5 feet 20 from North Property Line Rear Lot Line — 30 feet 8 feet (Existing Structure 1 Foot) Maximum Attached/Detached 1,395 sq ft Accessory Building — 1,200 sq ft 2 The proposed building will comply with all of the setback requirements except for the rear property line. A concrete pad is proposed outside of the mud room door near the rear property line. That pad will be required to be five feet from the property line. The criteria for reviewing the CUP request are found as follows. Conditional Use Permits Section 401 .15.C.1.e.5) provides criteria for review of a reduction in a required lot in a yard. A review of the criteria is as follows: a) The reduction of setback requirements is based upon specific need or circumstance which is unique to the property in question and which, if approved, will not set a precedent which is contrary to the intent of this Ordinance. Comment: The property is unique in that there is an existing single-family structure that was constructed one foot off the rear property line. Beach Road is at an angle to the property leaving the north property depth at 57 feet. There is limited area to add on to the house within the 30-foot front and 30-foot rear setback areas. The addition to the house will replace an existing nonconforming shed that is partially on neighboring properties. The garage, although it exceeds the allowable size, will not be at odds with other similar requests. b) Property line drainage and utility easements as required by the City's Subdivision Ordinance are provided and no building will occur upon this reserved space. Comment: The proposed house will not conflict with the property line drainage or easements. c) The reduction will work toward the preservation of trees or unique physical features of the lot or area. Comment: The Applicant should comment on any proposed removal of trees. d) If affecting a north lot line, the reduction will not restrict sun access from the abutting lots. Comment: The proposed house will not impact sun access for the adjoining property. e) The reduction will not obstruct traffic visibility, cause a public safety problem and complies with Section 401 .15.6.6 of this Ordinance. Comment: The setback of the house addition will not create safety issues. f) The conditions of Section 401.03.A.7 of this Ordinance are considered and satisfactorily met. Comment: The criteria are reviewed below. 3 The conditional use permit criteria, found in Section 401.03.A.7 of the Zoning Ordinance, are found as follows: 1. Relationship to the specific policies and provisions of the municipal comprehensive plan. 2. The conformity with present and future land uses in the area. 3. The environmental issues and geographic area involved. 4. Whether the use will tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. 5. The impact on character of the surrounding area. 6. The demonstrated need for such use. 7. Traffic generation by the use in relation to capabilities of streets serving the property. 8. The impact upon existing public services and facilities including parks, schools, streets, and utilities, and the City's service capacity. 9. The proposed use's conformity with all performance standards contained herein (i.e., parking, loading, noise, etc.). Comment: The Planning Commission should comment if any of these criteria will be at odds with the Conditional Use Permit proposed for the site. As indicated, the shape of the lot and the required setbacks provides difficulties in allowing for an addition to the house. The existing house is currently set back one foot from the property line. The garage size request is reasonable based upon previous requests. City Staff does not see any issues with approving the application. CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION Upon review of the request for the Conditional Use Permit to allow a garage addition at 6188 Beach Road North, City staff would recommend the application with the following conditions: 1 . Any exterior mechanical equipment associated with the garage addition shall be screened. 2. The exterior of the proposed garage addition shall be finished with siding to match the current house. 3. The Applicant shall apply for and receive a building permit for the structure. 4. The concrete pad proposed outside of the mud room door shall be required to be five feet from the property line. 5. The Applicant should comment on any proposed removal of trees. 6. Any other conditions of the Planning Commission, City Council and City Staff. Pc: Julie Hultman 4 From: Roy Crist<crist.roy65@gmail.com> Sent: Friday,January 29, 2021 3:17 PM Why I want to build an Attached 3 car Garage: 1. The existing garage is falling down. 2. My wife and I are getting up in age, I want to me the laundry room on the first floor for her so she does not have to go to the basement to do laundry. 3. A 3 car garage will add value to the property, allow my wife and Ito park inside and for me to put my utility trailer in the garage. I have also designed a room for a workshop for me to use, stay active and enjoy my hobbies. 4. I want to also add a bathroom in the garage because we have one full bath for the house currently.This too will add value to the property and be useful to us and future owners. I understand there are 2 reasons that are requiring me to have a CUP: 1. Due to the lot size and layout in the old part of town, as the current code requires a 30 setback from the rear lot line and this is not possible on this lot.The best I could get is an 8 feet setback from the west (rear) property line. 2.The total size Outside dimensions in square feet of 1395 sq ft,This garage is connected to the house with a new Mudroom, within the confines of the new garage I plan to add a laundry room and a new bathroom for the house.The square footage of the new laundry room and the bathroom do reduce the total square footage of the garage and increase the square footage of the home, which will improve the value of the property. I hope that this is useful to the board in reviewing and approving my permit application. Respectfully Submitted Roy E Crist. fiL t ,,y A # 1 �fe [",v' .# ill 4. 39 1/1 a # 01. — -.. • 4 4 111 It* y a, ............. i 5r- t' r t n 4 v J . '," i �' "�. if r t . R_. W A 1"_ * O " �,� �.... ;. r r. , V +. � ....---------------L. . ,, Mme" e k M . ..... . . , .. .., , „oil, % . , _v.0,,„:,.. , . , '` q . . ,' g g P` ,! d. t, . ,._-. '; 1 \\ • .•,,t3 / \ I \ LEGAL DESCRIPTION' ,CONTACT: \`I \\ w SHOWN w ohm DOC NO.•:xssm oy Griot \ vMI NMRaO a Lot,S ane q Mno Wen a So.Avenue,RM 6188 Beach Road c I \ Ean•1 32 sen w la,IS.16 a no.,alley between Oak Park Heights,MN 55082 ..;, NB8'42"d8"E I.._ \ •! \ Is 16.na'1i:aRba k2o M. Ce1651-248-2190 . 7. Amo.61 0m rare mum...m.5 ofW.1.nr.,Ca�nN LOT IT .� I--° , — 4. — — Highway Right / Minnesota COUNTr/clTr: • • \ + / \ TITLE NOTES. C O IL..r,..2 TY i NO TITLI OIT OR TITLE OPINION WeS OR FENNBRANCES Y � DIST THAT ARE NOT RECEIVED N pxm,.V I � \ THAT GE `VEFFECIING THE MOFATT SURVEYED.EASEMENTS MAY CB TY O/ § I \ OAK PARK HEIGHTS 2.."42' i \i ' FF._ p. / • :_ c AREA. \ 1� \ TOTAL AREA AS SHOWN-11,552 SOFT. II I: h, R 'I -,()t/ \1,s,,'''''' ,: \\ SURVEY NOTES 0 N10 TM 20 Lm •II BEARINGS ME RASED ON THE WASHINGTON COUNTY -- X — "1 ♦. .m — —— J,__ • .�. — COORDINATE SYSTEM IUD 1983. ) i; IC.1 a ; .. X. ® ' \ vI UNDERGROUND UTILITIES NOT SHOWN _ ' / ��k • !� sj!� 'iU, Su .;e =. szX{i'. +sA \\ ��XISTING IMPROVEMENT AREAS: ��!: L I N -_ IgUSE- �3 'a' 559 9 ON SQUARE FUTI 1 3 I / GARAGEDRIVEWAY-I e35 REVISIONS. \ CONCRETE-31) ! P - % � • \ TOTAL IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN PARCEL-••1S SO.FT DA REVISION � iIE.S< -3B.2X DI OF TOTAL/MCRMDV 0 PRELIMINARY Is. 9 ti r'..,-, \\ 11139 I ATTACHED0.Y RITE .. ^'0 „T, ORAL:' T 1.9X / wMGF .p ''®' \\ • �, isX e� �• '' : „„,„ Lal 16 . 22,„22, L'////////////////// / . \ and lo<N Lm 6 — \ • • ' AWN Deemed WM Sweeter under.law•of aaiaii� > 11 @ CERTIFICATION: :: m,5a 4 l• �. \ O4..10-19_20 \ PROJECT LOCATION: \ 1 $ , \ 130.34 \ ses•s 138.34 I \\ \ BEACH ROAD N. I \ \ PID#3403020330139 I \ I \ O 6MR<R:DD RNOnkae<,<.D AYe. IIh<a3er,MN 55083 Phone 651.2]5.8969 UNDERGROUND UTILITIES NOTES: IIILEGENDS 1 can®a:na.•ey ♦ + PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT AREAS: PROPOSED BUILDING ELEVATIONS: .66F THE UNDERGROUND UOUTIE5 SHOWN HAVE BEEN LOCATED FROM FIELD SURVEY INFORMATION AND DIVING DRAWINGS.TME SURVEYOR MAKES NO T.molten vNDR6E TO RFFMIN�I]d dN SQWRE FRT TOP OFWMGFSW.9J).0 GUARANTEE THAT THE UNDERGROUND MITES SHOWN COMPRISE ALI SUCH ® PT < GARAGE-1,193 © 317� � UQ np 0e1�w..a NEW DIWEWAY-1,0SO NRTNFR DOES NOT WARRANT THAT THE UNDERGROUND 1PIt111FS SURVEYOR an CONCRETE TO REMAIN-1lT I .cm NarosEO EUwrION O ARE IN THE FKAC3 LOCATION INDICATED ALTHOUGH HE DOES CERTIFY THAT NEW CONCRETE-119 ...930......NOOXOCOrrtou THEY ARE LOCATED AS ACCURATELY M POSSIBLE FROM THE INFORMATION a"'•'� n TOTAL IMPROVEMENTS �} MOOED AVAILABLE THIS SURVEY HAS NOT PIYSKAIIY LOGTED THF UNDERGROUND _ -•03X 060E TOTAL PARCFI MDV •_ UTILITIES.ADDITIONAL UNLPIFS Or WHICH WE ARE UNAWARE MAY KIST 0 ' DEPPI-ESCOSTINC FIE, __ Q CORNERSTONE p�.. ® I �.� _.D_P.,.comroufts LANE)SURVEYING,INC. , 0.1111P.YOU OM Ilunlefff KOWA �`It Gopher State One Call ® `"ff'""�` �K M.vuasi ay" ,M<9RI.�.ne,a<_I1N Da°o I I.`"-- axasi It- 1,... D u m°,..,nn SITE/GRADING W PLAN -# EV i1'}IIil1+7111 I 11i l l'egweldeS'AepNj ZBOSS 9 1'1 llNl,l({ 1'�I III i )l31NOIMS.U.YN AS ,XVA Y3OS3NNIW lialtGa owning 39 '� MOSS �E 11.01�1I1+1111 i 11111 yy0 tl3 VMIILLS MUJa J WOJ'NSY1®AIWV�IS YJU 01003NNIW 1+11U+:,1111++a tII11�1111 BISCSEPlSg:3NOHd MOJOO HoM010002 'XVH SN00H MNYd MVO 3�Jtld .0-.l=.bn �' Fl31N33 CJNIO1If19 MOt11�b' alec�es asel:3NOHd NON HOY3B 0919 30N3aIS31:11SI1:10 +, z P UO = GO 0N W 5 +n o C 10 0 20 q~"Q LL O C mA ON Z N N NN � C = N . = CC Q Six -1 a� 0 II fn o p§ c-2.1 ao§xE Z F 8c1 x �— F Z d Q igLLo Z W Z 2 w -o U N r o-,04 .0-.02 . 1.. .o-.oz —/ \ 8-.6 .9-.0T II611' V Z4 9 0 .1 S0 on oe g. g .'9§a 4 a o 8 h e OSXZ-C .0.29.09 it __,,. Sp i'9q 4 n aD a w CD < g CC '_ :SR+ Cal 9 CAbn n O 9 5 oo • .H z I --- _N IR 9 ti .o-.e ' 1 .0.0 n O oiI¢-z ¢¢ qf .0-.41 L .94 l ' .6.9T .Ob } I. i n 7 U) 5 w 'I„ 1 q 'I.I.MOWeldeS'A:BOI:JA 28055 VOC/ lyp111 111hill 4 - ANNOW > :X4 Ntltl1OS3NMNIW r 0MUS w LEN ® VW V4 S1HDRH Ntltld M q1VRLNonsuvw BS9E1S9:3NOd M3N3NMlLLISOOOZ MOJIV Vtiti Z .aIg9)3 OHd N MI!MR !MRS SVLS I111111'.Ufl,'if 1111 1111113JVd � peoN''VNDS LN33owing M0f:1�1d LEL30N3CIIS31S11:10 Z 1f 0 .41.":i' — il 1,1 I !I > Wo � ll,;i LV ft I—\ U =-, ' 0 _J 1 =8 11!1111111 1 ! Il 1 J1! 1 I Z J � � z 01 9 ] 1 O 3 i , ' '1 � f= IIIIIIIIIJIIIIIIIIIII Q Q _ > > / w= ,I / JQ I'' r J� LV II BNB w;—l .,i,, i; 0 ,Oci Z'.- OLi 1 I' 1, J I ' W ,I WQ '/r�J ill F V ' I I Ii Q (Q 1 V I i (n I I L I I 1 � I a 4) , z O 1 I, � 0❑ > > _I u in= LU ao \K ' �\ c-I w '� W J" • TPC3601 Thurston Avenue N, Suite 1001CQ,(` � Anoka, MN 55303 Phone: 763.231.5840 Facsimile: 763.427.0520 TPC@PlanningCo.com PLANNING REPORT TO: Eric Johnson FROM: Scott Richards DATE: March 4, 2021 RE: Oak Park Heights — Planned Unit Development Amendment — Front Yard Setback Allowances for Lot 10 Palmer Station. TPC FILE: 236.02 — 21.02 BACKGROUND Olivia Gavic, representing Creative Homes Inc. has made an application for a Planned Unit Development Amendment to allow a reduced front yard setback from 30 feet to 25 feet for Lot 10, Palmer Station located at 5613 Oak Cove North. The Planned Unit Development Amendment is required to vary from the front yard setback standards in that a PUD was originally granted to allow for variations for side yard setbacks with the original development approvals. The City Council approved the request for the rezoning, Planned Unit Development, and Preliminary and Final Plat for the thirteen-lot subdivision of the Palmer property at their July 22, 2014 meeting. On July 28, 2020, the City Council approved a Planned Unit Development Amendment for reduction in the front yard setback for 5606, 5573 and 5608 Oak Cove North. The property is zoned R-1 Single Family Residential District. The review is based upon the following submittals: Exhibit 1: Certificate of Survey for Lot 10 - Building Footprint at 30' Setback Exhibit 2: Certificate of Survey for Lot 10 - Building Footprint at 25' Setback Exhibit 3: Elevation Plan (1 of 7) Exhibit 4: Foundation Plan (2 of 7) Exhibit 5: Mail Floor Level Plan (3 of 7) Exhibit 6: Report of the City Engineer, March 2, 2021 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Ms. Gavic has indicated that the reason for the request is to amend the setback to a minimum of 25 feet to allow the home to fit within the wetland buffer setback requirement. ISSUES ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan 2018 designates this area as Low Density Residential. The Palmer Station development is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. Zoning. The property is currently zoned R-1 Single Family Residential District. The R- 1 District requires a front yard setback of 30 feet, side yard setbacks of 10 feet and rear yard setback of 30 feet. If the lot is on a corner, the required setback is 30 feet from the lot line. The 2014 approvals for Palmer Station allowed for reduced side-yard setbacks. The approved condition is as follows: 17. The City Council agrees to the request to reduce the allowable setback on the garage side of the home to a minimum of 5 feet. The setback to the dwelling portion of the home would remain at 10 feet. A garage-to-garage setback would be required to be 15 feet. The current request reduces the front yard setback by five feet to 25 feet. A Planned Unit Development Amendment is required to reduce the setback. Exhibit 2 shows the proposed building footprints at the 25-foot setback. The reduced setback will allow for more back yard space to comply with the wetland buffer setback of 20 feet and allow enough space on the driveway to park cars and small trucks. Planned Unit Development Amendment Review. The Planning Commission and City Council should review the criteria for a setback Conditional Use Permit in considering the Planned Unit Development: Application for a setback Planned Unit Development/Conditional Use Permit shall be regulated by Section 401.15.1.e.5). of the Zoning Ordinance. A Planned Unit Development/Conditional Use Permit may be granted provided that: 5) A required yard on a lot may be reduced by a conditional use permit if the following conditions are met: a) The reduction of setback requirements is based upon a specific need or circumstance which is unique to the property in question and which, if approved, will not set a precedent which is contrary to the intent of this Ordinance. Comment: As indicated, allowing a 25-foot setback will allow for the home to comply with the wetland buffer, as well as provide for a more useable back yard, and will keep homes more in line with existing/proposed homes on Oak Cove. 2 b) Property line drainage and utility easements as required by the City's Subdivision Ordinance are provided and no building will occur upon this reserved space. Comment: The required easements have already been dedicated and no construction will occur within these easement areas. c) The reduction will work toward the preservation of trees or unique physical features of the lot or area. Comment: Additional useable back yard space will be provided for this lot. d) If affecting a north lot line, the reduction will not restrict sun access from the abutting lots. Comment: The structures should not impact sun access for abutting lots. e) The reduction will not obstruct traffic visibility, cause a public safety problem and complies with Section 401.15.8.6 of this Ordinance. Comment: The addition will not impact traffic visibility (Section 401.15.B.6) and not create any public safety concerns. f) The conditions of Section 401.03.A.7 of this Ordinance are considered and satisfactorily met. Comment: The criteria are reviewed below. The conditional use permit criteria, found in Section 401.03.A.7 of the Zoning Ordinance, are found as follows: 1. Relationship to the specific policies and provisions of the municipal comprehensive plan. 2. The conformity with present and future land uses in the area. 3. The environmental issues and geographic area involved. 4. Whether the use will tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. 5. The impact on character of the surrounding area. 6. The demonstrated need for such use. 7. Traffic generation by the use in relation to capabilities of streets serving the property. 8. The impact upon existing public services and facilities including parks, schools, streets, and utilities, and the City's service capacity. 9. The proposed use's conformity with all performance standards contained herein (i.e., parking, loading, noise, etc.). Comment: The Planning Commission should comment if any of these criteria will be at odds with the Planned Unit Development Amendment proposed for the site. The reduced setback will not negatively impact any of the above criteria. City Staff does not see any issues with the request. 3 Grading and Drainage. A grading plan has been provided as part of the submittals. The City Engineer shall review and approve all of the grading and drainage plans. The City Engineer has provided a letter that is found as an Exhibit 6. Easements. No existing easements will be impacted, nor new easements are required with this request. CONCLUSION / RECOMMENDATION Upon review of the request for a Planned Unit Development to allow a reduced front yard setback from 30 feet to 25 feet for Lot 10, Palmer Station located at 5613 Oak Cove North, City staff recommends the application with the following conditions: 1 . The final grading and drainage for the lot shall be subject to approval of the City Engineer. 2. Any other conditions of the Planning Commission, City Council and City Staff. pc: Julie Hultman 4 Revisions: N Certificate of Survey for: 1 Client lit Comments- 220 2City 12/16/2020 CREATIVE HOMES, INC. 5 House Address: House Model: 5613 Oak Cove North,Oak Park Heights,MN Victoria 9s,.o 9 T oQA Q°t'o () () od s 9\ocPq 9\oc '9� 3\ r l\c d�` oA '° 9,' 1 J /r '��0�e ql �,! • x cr 1.. // la Ott` ., a0 �- �p /� i a m dd°"dF.6 , 44'1\I‘kb x07', cA Lo` / \0,6 i\z aq6 } 9 s�x°°,�`A�y r w ,N4 SO s 9/�\ 0. xcl'°. 7.IT y4, 9�p7 9p a9 (M�— 1-1---- j C // i� I f rn �/ // U X )',o,5, X99,\S/gpa9 m \\ a ns , p' ' ••In ' ' C BENCHMARK ,��\/[// /v // '\ <01'3%I 9p62 $ `� O "J .<�� TOP OF SPIKE -�\ `���!(I�s // p9A 040 �� 25.5256 ,,o \) 6...,,-' (/I ^ EL 957.92 0 45./ 9 VIP c a / 01 9 \ \ rn xi on \ // 4 P` x Z� °P V i i O I `E �L 0 0�0� \i' 4 O ��� \ ��, 9ci ,n ET % , /\i •'57.9 -Y/2.0 /�.c a' `� �._ 9 , •ET,0 lo �° y x \ Tc do uk. y° . x 948.6 • S� u \\ Tj g�B 948.4 9p u\ G r) 4. \ �. \ 957 4 \'').............\r. O 957.8 .Spy �k 948.2 \ 9 \ y 9ssssi1" \ "'r L�' I J`� pe 99 •55.2 ,,. • 1f\ \ (2.I 35'B - . o m m �, \ S�' q� �w� '° mss\ �,•. nrnr, ^' I °�P4p� .,'1 6 '° i /--V `r • ® ^0 rn m 0 oo cc C\\ :ti /3 xqy.?��c\^,F'.L O� ^\ .p 1' 9rr� g5� \A 996 e\o^d 5�9n 9 N -*i1 •^I fi L7, �� iJ•�'SO' m \. 957.4 Sg�4 u,W i11� 1!;e° C��\ 957.6 ' 6P i \ iV%ice �� \1'� — L s S '\ U • TG 9 , ! �Lam \ l\\`\\v' m\95H• 4 sB �, -r o 995.7.9 :���% i/,...... ...° _' 7777/7- 77�.., 95;C o 1'3 I I Exist.House J m (under construction) a a Denotes Existing Tree Locations / i U Denotes Existing Contour 1 BENCHMARK /A o TOP OF SPIKE e; u N' Denotes Existing Hydrant EL = 958.02 E om 0 Denotes Existing Electric Box A Denotes Existing Television Box .<Q TB ❑ Denotes Existing Telephone Box LEGAL DESCRIPTION: a0 .6.1!XX Denotes Existing Light Pole Lot 10, Block 1, PALMER STATION, N ; o Denotes Existing Service o o Denotes Existing Curb Stop Washington County, Minnesota X 000.0 Denotes Existing Elevation x<9ao.d) Denotes Proposed Elevation Minimum Lowest Floor Elevation: 949.0 Denotes Direction of Drainage PROPOSED BUILDING ELEVATIONS Denotes Drainage & Utility Easement Lowest Floor Elevation: 951.8 (per recorded plat) Top of Foundation Elevation: 959.5 t Denotes Iron Monument Garage Slab Elevation (at door): 959.1 Bearings shown are assumed NOTES: 1. Proposed building site grading is in accordance with the I GRAPHIC SCALE grading plans prepared by Elon Design Lab, lost revised i 0 15 30 60 8/23/18 2. Contractor must verify sewer depth. 3. Driveways shown ore for graphic purposes only. Final driveway I design and location to be determined by owner/builder. (IN FEET 4. All building foundation dimensions shown on this survey I. (8.5x14 sheet) include exterior foundation insulation widths, if applicable. 1786 7708.010 GJS Refer to final building plans for foundotion details. CARLSONI hereby certify to Creative Homes, Inc. that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am o duly licensed land -'� C � �CA1 N surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. - .• :Fv,uiMBEAIt�IG\iURVEYING ENVIRONMENTAL Dated this 30th day of October, 2020. Signed:MSUITE rl.•n M c. SO VN RIDGE DRIVE / NE f ELAINE,MN 55449 By 1 TEL(763)499-7900,FAX(763)419-7959 Thomas R. Balluff, L.S. a No. 4036) GRLSONMCGIN.COM Peter J. Blomquist, L.S. Reg. No. 51676 L/ Revisions: N Certificate of Survey for: 1 Client Comments-12/10/2020 2 City Comments-12/16/2020 3 City Commenteo2-12/16/2020 CREATIVE HOMES, INC4 New Hoose Poe"`°° 2/15/2021 House Address: Model: 5613 Oak Cove North,Oak Park Heights,744,94,Ho, ictoria �'\ 951.0 IA A� A / \ O ( sed et / 0 91'5 \ -- 1 J ii)lsoi Q<°QoLp,Q "V \ x !J_ 1 O, ,2 \m �/c„,o Le `/ °' •r I 0? x '' y�Z o MCO C ntiki X h 'y ,, 46 �(�, {yy�s %/9 r ''.0:11',-- m "9m a,v y (�MO tJ� C %a \ %� . " -2. -?Si `, ' ?'p' IIo1/p / '\fief 01. 24.5\` -# i m '9 d \ y _pct x/l / A1D0 0 \ x / 344.--.2<°"\\ y ,IN i s�� - �.� ��� 4� 10 I o .o,,i. ,/ - �QO \ .o �,t// m g. �y 1c I �ET %p yzi A 40�F \3s - �/' y`,,,,,,- > '_'/� �' ss f•1 / 'A:S `� /(\,I 9 �i TA ai ,, x 94 6 l , C C \ Op E OG \ 4j a\ F __ (,`, ci x�9 48.2 957.4 \ -5p,� , \lf(,• x \ f\pp ` ,-1�\ l \ I,. 94.6 v x v �� \ I --AA i9q.1 \, . a 913 �Qe. �\ \ \ 386 es y m ' V-is 7.0P J cc^ p h' ?\ '.1 a a M ry b .� O 110 J ,yp \ 1 \\ W'6.. 46. e' 1 ui ii L ) - Oso® ,0 0-° \ ' / 1-g5 0 ..,:,ss9^ NI I +i p `9is `r'i. \. i 59!. 06 4 9 ` W +i f� 957.6 'v. i, i A.�. . \ a s rc ., \5l.\�49 %' \ •\`\uk • \ - ` ,' 11 \ -r o X7.9 .(�� %i. If 5,///77/7777:::777711—_, \ \� 1.0 o c 11 ' [� Exist. House m J E 111 (under construction) LuU if Denotes Existing Tree Location A } U /rz,e,,.' Denotes Existing Contour Y ce Denotes Existing Hydrant E HYDm 0 p Denotes Existing Electric Box E 0 8 Denotes Existing Television Box Q Q p Denotes Existing Telephone Box LEGAL DESCRIPTION: o o i t Denotes Existing Light Pole Lot 10, Block 1, PALMER STADON o R Denotes Existing Service a p Denotes Existing Curb Stop CS Washington County, Minnesota f'?'- x 000.o Denotes Existing Elevation oa.0 Denotes Proposed Elevation Minimum Lowest Floor Elevation: 949.0 Denotes Direction of Drainage PROPOSED BUILDING ELEVATIONS Denotes Drainage & Utility Easement Lowest Floor Elevation: 951.8 (per recorded plat) Top of Foundation Elevation: 959.5 t Denotes Iron Monument Garage Slab Elevation (at door): 959.1 Bearings shown are assumed NOTES: 1. Proposed building site grading is in accordance with the GRAPHIC SCALE grading plans prepared by Elan Design Lab, last revised 0 1530 60 8/23/18 I 2. Contractor must verify sewer depth. 3. Driveways shown are for graphic purposes only. Final driveway design and location to be determined by owner/builder. (IN FEET 4. All building foundation dimensions shown on this survey (8.5x14 sheet) include exterior foundation insulation widths, if applicable. 1786 7708.010 GJS Refer to final building plans for foundation details. CARLSONhereby certify to Creative Homes, Inc. that this survey, plan or report was le M p/s► prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed land ar���N surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. ENGINEERING\SURVEYING\ENVIRONMENTAL Dated this 30th day of October, 2020. ign Sed: rlI5 n Me I c. 3890 PHEASANT RIDGE DRIVE NE ? SUITE 100 BLAINE,NN 55449 By. r- TEL(763)489-7900, N7633 )489.7959 Nomas R. Balluff, L.S.'eg. No. 40361 Peter J. Blomquist, L.S. Reg. No. 51676 J„( 43 NOIld15 M3WTdd'I)18 bi 101 Niiiiiiiiimitiliiiii L8o55 NW'S1+:13H cladd;,2 ... .a., # �` E g 1 d r .o Ir 11111 i ig I' N 3M'J Nd0 5I95 Lid iA0181818 E! + A' s # # I 3 e kc�yy t i1!eyjpEE! aattk NaIS�J —f4J11 F �.. §n dg3i q3� 1 11IC11611dI11llll o ,o 119j Lwu. vn w.w 1*1 i c y f LU IIF a i i li. I III, /,IiIIIIIll,.t PO - Q 1- �C V1 I �� � O 1111 } - •p tllHill 01 2 } S Iz o I//Lr- x i III SI QW ,E Iv s Li \ iQ /4IIII'IIHii.Iuill I::IIIooImlJIIM IO III::I Eir Id tu II Ii ' n■uuIli Q . • _ i rAll 00010 ' 'A1! 001 ■ IIIIIIIIIII / -i . \ a IImo.tt 10010 ,„ \ II „ gall , rm:,,, i.i : a1111 " AlNo iiI \--- k:f i LL® w J \31 i li ' o Il3 �;- ismilir , p i 1 " i eo l W / , 1 I I II W6 1 Ij 1111:•`._ J & q� ilii € € I ii ! I IIS I!V1° } 1-11 iig a !=11 ti-4- 4011 14111.61 ,4 NOI1d15 M3WTld'I)119'01 101 «.m. , E ari�°I+�$6� /$!t L@055 NW' J.H913H) Yd +O +�u 1p t- 1111Fdithigll ie N3/07�IvOEI95 °°. �a s g :i ° 9 n q n e a i� €��6 #lg�i L..w. gra ; a qa a ; a � 5 fly;lac#tt�11! a 3N3oIG2N -Q311 Iii '11 l¢i4 14 1111 a4 411111/1111it r!I/ . —-r . N Gl, -GIM..•1W1'"' fl_2f i.a.2 F i. r$ $a$ d 3_ 8q3 [ cS 11 r §\ . . 4,i1,-.LQ Q e ;, t : ' J mow,. « R , Q / 0 ,, am 4E 9g rt ,.41 . <1g 11 .a �: ."h� 1F 3 0 il h /11 N M��ichims, �� m LL {\e1LG► Q 1 , rr El_ uLu' <e. . m >: 11 3 v g3 ¢Q F� 1 4 Pi ri id 11 Br n Ing ' i �: i ii At 1 3? 1 l; 1, � 1 241 e,o •... 6 o•or ' s,. ee ' (Daus sw - A-R _- 1P I t e 1 l i •K / 2; 1 lee 1 111 1 1 ; ii o — Z Q111 A 3Yz W a 1 Y O K v Q .I Lu UJ Ul N IIIUl W to .4SS4StSSDtt.4•IS- ;i—,nJ Z :::'.�F.rr!2.!17:.,.'), IS J q W IGS.. ®��_ J F 11 li dB ¢ 8tl � f �� li 1 AS i § b €34i Alai 1/1 tfSi Lfait 111111 1r ii ASa.§ ASn Az • e 111 {i0 if 1 gill 1;s it t 0 a 1 ! ail Illii 11/0 Ji : Z i PYP 1t • B ; a 231112 212 As2:' Ma.'�"""" JO ANt » J l9 / l.uG € c id # r I€ Z 40' !"- !i'liir ! NOLLVIS 213.41V '1'P79'01 101 — + t 6;18§il!•ltiliP�lit Leos*i'S1N913N:421Vd WO 1=1 .. ,.a. 4 � G y t— MIitII1iE! 1i1 1 ' 1 N 3n07 WO 6195 �aww wr.w G � � k� ' k k k k k � 3 � is I qA 3�N! k wwwv Lwmnawioa ariw y ! � � �8 i� ! 8 . 2 i 1 e'L'.tel a "Tl`-'\I oro. 9 / 1:_-_t • z fir . 1 .(D. 6.04 i 1_ ' il I ki \ .e GI - owo-o o- o-4 J l , ® �� -� z^ O S ° (-10 ii r ar�•� no w ig — J(4_21'..1 •01— I 411 1?11 , Vs-' I 1 1 4il.te - ~ 9 313• n asst —r n 3 �il - _' ,u III t r i .V d s2r 'I 3 --�: 51� u, i a� a i' . :* $ I r 1s $ iI ; ss a,w �0 1 I ;MI! I. . �k 1 • Stantec Consulting Services Inc. Stantec 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 1000,Minneapolis MN 55402-2309 March 2, 2021 File: 193800151 Attention: Mr. Eric Johnson, City Administrator City of Oak Park Heights 4168 Oak Park Blvd. N. Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Reference: Palmer Station: Certificate of Survey Review, Lot 10— Revised Setback Dear Eric, We have reviewed the certificate of survey submitted for Lot 10, Palmer Station (as revised with the new setback, revision date 3-2-2021, attached). The survey for Lot 10 is in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. As a condition of the permit for this lot, include the requirement that the City be notified when the final grading of the lot is completed (before the sod is placed) so that the grades and drainage can be confirmed before the sod is placed. If you have any questions or require further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Regards, Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 4)30.1 Lee M. Mann, PE City Engineer Phone: 612-712-2085 Lee.Mann@stantec.corn c. file Julie Hultman, Building Official Andy Kegley, DPW Olivia Gavic, Creative homes Design with community in mind Revisions: Certificate of Survey for: , Client Comments-12/10/2020 N 2 City Comments-12/16/2020 3 City Comnients,2-12/16/2020 CREATIVE HOMES, INC. 4 New CommePts °; ;02/202, 1 House Address: House Model: 5613 Oak Cove North,Oak Park Heights,MN Victoria 951.0 1. (i') <_ 47 �( �e\'o °"4 p ye /,,,.° , aGJ�� v ^ e �Y=, ee dl ` Y o 9 O ...5,-P..5.,L. x QtoQ l°\oV'e •_ ? 'S 462 "� �i \ w C /� 4 x s 9 j \\ ) x9 /r l `�Z\amp \\ t �j7 I,_ c) ,C(‘/,(4,42,41,_ :,,,, �i ,t7 \ ' ,5° 42� sz \) .57::&!, U) 'c \ � // �ccf\�~-0.124.5 ° / . %, : i .4 '� 1 kz° •�'S x%,�''',1,% �`� 10 Tots,F7 94 6 F o 'o,'b 4 / L ---- os„ O < \ �, g/ ` G 9e a\ <ti I_--- i (,() C \ \ \h 0 x�g48.2 .. 957.4 ``\ 34' / ��\°5) 0' `\\ \\ I 94 .6 C�\� x9j\� p 7P /Y//Y. ,,\ \ \ 38g� I N y,e e� 1 d`\ l.,1 ^\\ o(J is I- �o '9 0 /i/// \ '''`l\\�-- /,, •• ® All 6, LC)N 4, .\_O'O. /O 1�" �5�� E�'1 519 NI cl ii s w - 59� '‘Al., „vN r�, 957.6 J� _s 'o\,, 3 rc ;D� / s °49 \ �. 51 T o ,� �p 5 p \\ %V' 95g 2T.. 'fls I v Lam\ • a o® I7� \I �J m0 /2')\ 957.9 11`07 �N r //,„-,./?7,;:\. L;.a 2 II at. e H / (under construction) L a Ii, Denotes Existing Tree Location YV/L / U //--qizi,, Denotes Existing Contour 2x 0 q Denotes Existing Hydrant o m p Denotes Existing Electric Box o a 2 O ® Denotes Existing Television Box ,¢ `Q p Denotes Existing Telephone Box LEGAL DESCRIPTION: o 0 0 X> Denotes ExistingLight Pole g Lot 10, Block 1, PALMER STATION, o a> sp Denotes Existing Service (..'15-)o C8 Denotes Existing Curb Stop Washington County, Minnesota x 000.o Denotes Existing Elevation x 900.0 Denotes Proposed Elevation Minimum Lowest Floor Elevation: 949.0 Denotes Direction of Drainage PROPOSED BUILDING ELEVATIONS Denotes Drainage & Utility Easement Lowest Floor Elevation: 951.8 (per recorded plat) Top of Foundation Elevation: 959.5 + Denotes Iron Monument Garage Slob Elevation (at door): 959.1 Bearings shown are assumed NOTES: 1. Proposed building site grading is in accordance with the i GRAPHIC SCALE grading plans prepared by Elan Design Lob, last revised 0 15 30 60 8/23/16 2. Contractor must verify sewer depth. 3. Driveways shown are for graphic purposes only. Final driveway design and location to be determined by owner/builder. (IN FEET) 4. All building foundation dimensions shown on this survey (8.5x14 sheet) include exterior foundation insulation widths, if applicable. 1786 7708.010 GJS Refer to final building plans for foundation details. CARLSON I hereby certify to Creative Homes, Inc. that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed land (I,\) MCCAI N surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. - ENGINEERING\SURVEYING\ENVIRONMENTAL Dated this 30th day of October, 2020. Signed: rl�n McI c. 3890 PHEASANT RIDGE DRIVE NE / , / SUITE 100 TEL(763)489-7900, AX(763)489-7959 BLAINE,MN 55449 BY: CARLSONMCCAIN.COM homes R. BauL.S. eg. No. 40361 PetereterJ. Blomquist, L.S. Reg. No. 51676 LA CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS CPCQ CITY COUNCIL & COMMISSIONS MEETINGS & WORKSESSIONS HELD VIA VIDEOCONFERENCE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED MARCH/APRIL 2021 Tuesday, March 9 6:00 p.m. City Council Meeting Thursday, March 11 6:00 p.m. Planning Commission Meeting Monday, March 15 6:00 p.m. Parks and Trails Commission Meeting Tuesday, March 23 6:00 p.m. City Council Meeting Thursday, April 8 6:00 p.m. Planning Commission Meeting Tuesday, April 13 6:00 p.m. City Council Meeting Monday, April 19 6:00 p.m. Parks and Trails Commission Meeting Tuesday, April 27 6:00 p.m. City Council Meeting Tuesday, May 11 6:00 p.m. City Council Meeting Thursday, May 13 6:00 p.m. Planning Commission Meeting Monday, May 17 6:00 p.m. Parks and Trails Commission Meeting Tuesday, May 25 6:00 p.m. City Council Meeting POLICY NOTE: Items in red are expected to be SOCIAL EVENTS in nature and not an official City Council meeting. No official action or discussion may be undertaken by City Council Members who may attend such events. The City is listing such events so as the public is generally aware that there may be occasions when City Council members may desire to attend functions that are purely social-events.