Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
weekly Notes- march 19th 2021 (002)
A CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS—WEEKLY NOTES for: March 19th, 2021 TO: City Council Members& Staff FROM: Eric Johnson,City Administrator Zoning&Development Items: 1. Staff does anticipate a garage construction CUP application for the home at the west end of 55th Street-west of Oakgreen Ave. There would be lot subdivision and side yard elements in question;they hope to buy some land from VSSA. Rough sketch(see image) 4 We will see if an application arises? _ry 2. The Developer of Palmer Station has submitted and application for a home and site amendments on LOT 8;which triggers a new CUP as it deviates substantially from the approved plan and including new 12'retaining walls.The application at this time is incomplete and we are awaiting new data—see the enclosed letter from Scott Richards dated 3/17/21. 3. The City will be hosting a neighborhood meeting on 3/25/21 at 4 pm for the Norell Ave.Backage Road Project—this will be a KK/ ZOOM meeting.See enclosed letter with meeting information and mailing listing—this included Xcel Energy.Or...follow this link:https://us02web.zoom.us/m/89711139552 COVID-19 Matters: • This is the Governor's-PORTAL https://mn.gov/covidl9—Many documents/Exec.Orders can be found. Washington County has initiated a County Dashboard containing more localized COVID-19 Impacts and rates LINK->>HERE. • The State has issued a general VACCINATION process for all Minnesotans-Sign up at Vaccine Connector (hftps://vaccineconnector.mn.gov/). o Unfortunately,we still cannot lock down vaccinations for City Public Works Staff,which I find difficult to understand...imagine if there was no water and/or if sewers were not operationally maintained. The County nor the State seem to be able to grasp this situation as to why these people are ESSENTIAL and how it could relate to future protocols. • Liquor License—refunds are issued. Cover letter to all parties is enclosed. Other Items: • Enclosed is the 2021 County Assessment Report that outlines property values throughout the City and County. • Washington County was sent a communication again commenting on pedestrian sight-line concerns on CSAH 26-east of the Holiday gas station,we asked that they review the matter and again consider a FLASHER system. • Spring Weight Restrictions have been applied to City Streets;you may see 5-TONS PER AXLE signs across the City. • The MAC was sent a letter letting them know of the City's Appointment to the Lake Elmo Airport Advisory Panel—See enclosed. • The City has been asked to reimburse a resident for a damaged and leaking WATER MAIN SERVICE line$4,998-Please see the enclosed memo from Andy Kegley.Considering the history with the water line installations from 2015 in this area the City likely has some responsibility to address this and we will make this payment. Other claims—with similar conditions were known much earlier and were under the warranty period.This one simply might have been slower to develop.The City will seek some level of reimbursement from our contractor. • The City received a thank you note from the local chapter of the COLORECTAL CANCER AWARENESS GROUP as the City participated in the installation of BLUE LIGHTS over a weekend at City Hall.Sandy Kruse of the OPH PD did coordinate all this work! Mayor McComber provided: 1. NLC Update. Please let me know if you have any questions-651.253.7837 Call Anytime. 1 of 63 TPC3601 Thurston Avenue N, Suite 100 Anoka, MN 55303 Phone: 763.231.5840 Facsimile: 763.427.0520 TPC0q PlanningCo.com March 17, 2021 Olivia Gavic Creative Homes, Inc. 707 Commerce Drive, Suite 410 Woodbury, MN 55125 RE: Oak Park Heights — Planned Unit Development Amendment -- Front Yard Setback Allowances and Retaining Walls for Lot 8 Palmer Station TPC FILE: 236.02 — 21.04 Dear Ms. Gavic: The City is in receipt of your application materials submitted on March 10, 2029 for a Planned Unit Development Amendment to allow a reduced front yard setback from 30 feet to 20 feet and for changes to the retaining walls for Lot 8, Palmer Station located at 5573 Oak Cove North. The Planned Unit Development Amendment is required to vary from the front yard setback standards and the approved retaining wall and drainage plan. With this letter we are notifying you that the application will be deemed complete if the following information is received by March 24, 2021. 1. An elevation diagram showing the heights of the retaining walls, the construction materials and any fencing required for the walls. Provide pictures of the site to provide context to the request. 2. Please provide mailing labels from Washington County for properties within 500 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property. 3. Provide the required fee and escrow of$1,700.00 and initial the front page of the application. The Planning Commission would consider the application at a meeting scheduled for April 8, 2021 at 6:00 PM by video/telephone conference. Review of the findings and recommendation of the Planning Commission is anticipated to be held by the City Council on April 27, 2021 at 6:00 PM by video/telephone conference. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 15.99, Sub. 3(f), the City of Oak Park Heights is herewith extending the period of time for agency/city review of the application for an additional 60-day period (for a total of 120 days from the date of a complete application) inasmuch as the City has determined that additional research and study by the City staff relative to the complexity of the project as proposed will be required. 2 of 63 Olivia Gavic March 17, 2021 Please do not hesitate to contact me at scoft@planningco.co or 952.221.0547 with any questions. Sincerely, Scott D. Richards (Planning Consultant to the City of Oak Park Heights) The Planning Company LLC c: Eric Johnson, Julie Hultman 2 3 of 63 City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Blvd. N•Oak Park Heights,MN 55082•Phone(651)439-4439•Fax(651)439-0574 3/8/21 TO: X X X RE: 2022 Backage Road Project-1st Neighborhood Meeting 3/25/21 The City will be hosting a neighborhood meeting to review the current plans and concepts of the anticipated re- routing of the frontage roadway at Norell Ave to be under-taken and completed in 2022.The image below shows a general layout concept. The Project Layout is expected to have further modifications and updates as the design proceeds and as the City receives feedback from you. The City Engineer will be presenting further details and timelines at the meeting. Accordingly, please loin us on Thursday March 251h—4 PM for a NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING about this Project. It will be held remotely-via ZOOM-and can be accessed at this link: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/89711139552 In the interim, please let me know if you have any other questions, 651-439-4439. Thankyou Eric Johnson City Administrator Proposed Project » 4411 • �w f /` � J Sp 5 _ N s.' _....._ ........ ALMART ';rytV n 4 of 63 City of Oak Park heights Mailing List-Backage raod-March 25th 4 pM MEETING TAX NAME TAX ADD Ll TAX ADD L3 ALDI INC(MINNESOTA) 4201 BAGLEY AVE N FARIBAULT MN 55021 ALDRICH RICKY &BRITTANY N 5936 OAKGREEN AVE N STILLWATER MN 55082 ALEKSIEV LYUBOMIR&MARIYA ALEKSIEVA 5940 OAKGREEN AVE N STILLWATER MN 55082 AMYS NICK&SARA 5007 S GRAPETREE BAY CHRISTIANSTED VI 00820 APPLE MINNESOTA LLC 6200 OAKTREE BLVD#250 INDEPENDENCE OH 44131 AUTOZONE DEVELOPMENT CORP PO BOX 2198 MEMPHIS TN 38101-2198 BAKER CYNTHIA A 13971 N 60TH Ci STILLWATER MN 55082 BIXBY DEBORAH K 1398160TH STREET Ci N#203 OAK PARK HTS MN 55082 BLAISDELL MICHAEL J 1399160TH ST#302 STILLWATER MN 55082 BLISS DAVID P&ALEXANDRA G 2065 BRIDGEWATER BLVD S CAMBRIDGE MN 55008 BOLAND WILLIAM M 1621 NAMEKAGON ST APT 46 HUDSON WI 54016 BRACKEY ROBERT 80 ARLINGTON AVE E ST PAUL MN 55117 BREMER BANK NA 8555 EAGLE POINT BLVD LAKE ELMO MN 55042 BRITZ CHARLES M&TIFFANY S CLARK 1399160TH STREET Ci N#308 STILLWATER MN 55082 BROCHMAN CATHLEEN H MICHAEL A BROCHMAN 1397160TH STREET Ci N#101 STILLWATER MN 55082-1046 BROWN LINDA M 5932 OAKGREEN AVE N STILLWATER MN 55082 CHAMPION LODGING LLC 3450 WASHINGTON DR EAGAN MN 55122 DOLPHIN REAL ESTATE MGMT LLC 17 WASHINGTON AVE N#500 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55401 EMMANUEL PROPERTIES MN#1 LLC 6955 LYDIA BAY WOODBURY MN 55125 FIRST STATE BANK&TRUST 950 HIGHWAY 95N BAYPORT MN 55003 FLATTUM TONY H&KIMBERLY E 1905 2ND ST N STILLWATER MN 55082-4256 GREEN TWIG LLC PO BOX 119 STILLWATER MN 55082 GREENE TAMMY M 1399160TH STREET Ci N#301 STILLWATER MN 55082 GUNEU US LAURIE 1 1398160TH STREET Ci N#201 OAK PARK HEIGHTS MN 55082 HALL&HALL PROPERTIES LLC 13999 60TH ST N STILLWATER MN 55082 HALLE PROP LLC 20225 SCOTTSDALE RD N SCOTTSDALE AZ 85255 HOM4ME INC 15185 CARROUSEL WAY#101 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 JADRE LLC 1360160TH ST N STILLWATER MN 55082 JENSEN STEVEN 1397160TH STREET Ci N#103 STILLWATER MN 55082 1G THOMAS LLC PO BOX 190 STILLWATER MN 55082 1G THOMAS LLC PO BOX 190 STILLWATER MN 55082 JOY IRIS U NDER TRS 1398160TH STREET CTN UNIT 204 STILLWATER MN 55082 KANE ASHLEY 5934 OAKGREEN AVE N STILLWATER MN 55082 KM SCHLANGEN PROPERTIES LLC 1404 SIERRA Ci W SARTELL MN 56377 KRUEGER LANE LLC 3999 FRANCE AVE S SUITE 216 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55410 LEONARD INVESTMENTS LLC 1000 CONCORD ST S SOUTH ST PAUL MN 55075 LOMBARDO KEVIN S 1399160TH ST CT N#305 STILLWATER MN 55082 LOWES HOME CENTERS INC 1000 LOWES BLVD MOORESVILLE NC 28115 MACDONALD DARREN A 13089 EUROPA TRL N#A HUGO MN 55038-4747 MARCO POLO INC PO BOX 13519 ARLINGTON TX 76094 MENARD INC&CORPORATE ACCOUNTING 4777 MENARD DR EAU CLAIRE WI 54703 MORCOS ZAKARIA K 5930 OAKGREEN AVE N STILLWATER MN 55082 MULVANEY DANI L 5942 OAKGREEN AVE N STILLWATER MN 55082 NEMEC DAVID M&POLLY L 850 BURKE Ci NORTH ST PAUL MN 55109 NH PARTNERS-OAK PARK HEIGHTS LLC 3405 ANNAPOLIS LN#100 PLYMOUTH MN 55447 NOVA SCOTIA PARTNERS LLC 971 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY#300 LILYDALE MN 55118 OAK PARK HEIGHTS LAND CO LLC 4815 KROLL RD SAGINAW MN 55779 OAK PARK HEIGHTS RETAIL CENTER 506TH STS#1418 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 OAK PARK HEIGHTS VAL LLC 3500 AMERICAN BLVD W#200 BLOOMINGTON MN 55431 OAK PARK HEIGHTS VAL LLC 3500 AMERICAN BLVD W#200 BLOOMINGTON MN 55431 OAK PARK PONDS LLC 4590 SCOTT TRL#103 EAGAN MN 55122 OAKGREEN VILLA LLC PO BOX 119 STILLWATER MN 55082 OAKGREEN VILLA LLC PO BOX 119 STILLWATER MN 55082 OLSON DAVID A 1397160TH STREET Ci N#106 STILLWATER MN 55082 OPC PROPERTIES LLC 4350 BAKER RD SUITE 400 MINNETONKA MN 55343 OPH PAT LLC&OPH VAL LLC 3500 AMERICAN BLVD W#200 BLOOMINGTON MN 55431 OPH PAT LLC&OPH VAL LLC 3500 AMERICAN BLVD W#200 BLOOMINGTON MN 55431 OPH60 LLC 1348160TH ST N STE 100 STILLWATER MN 55082 OPH60 LLC 1348160TH ST N STE 100 STILLWATER MN 55082 OSMUNDSON LAND CO LLC 5021 VERNON AVE S#128 EDINA MN 55436 PATON ROBERTA C 1397160TH STREET Ci N#105 STILLWATER MN 55082 PDG PA 2200 COUNTY RD C WEST#2210 ROSEVILLE MN 55113 PETERSEN JAMIE 5944 OAKGREEN AVE N STILLWATER MN 55082 PREMIER BANK 2866 WHTE BEAR AVE MAPLEWOOD MN 55109 REALTY INCOME PROPERTIES 3 LLC 11995 EL CAMINO REAL SAN DIEGO CA 92130 RT MINNEAPOLIS FRANCHISE LLC 150 W CHURCH AVE MARYVILLE TN 37801-4936 SANDERSON PAMELA S ETAL 14010 54TH ST STILLWATER MN 55082 SARLES ESTATES LLP 1422 SETTLERS WAY HOULTON WI 54082 SHATTUCK LORI 1 1399160TH ST CT N#306 STILLWATER MN 55082 SKINNER JASON L 1398160TH STREET Ci N#206 STILLWATER MN 55082 STATE OF MN-DOT 395 JOHN IRELAND BLVD ST PAUL MN 55155 STIFTLER EUGENE 13747 NORELL AVE N STILLWATER MN 55082 STILLWATER AERIE NO 94 FOE 13523 60TH ST N STILLWATER MN 55082 TCF NATIONAL BANK MN 1405 XENIUM LN N PLYMOUTH MN 55441 VALVOLINE LLC 3499 BLAZER PKWY LEXINGTON KY40509 WAL-MART REAL ESTATE BUSINESS TRUST PO BOX 8050 BENTONVI LLE AR 72716-0050 WAL-MART STORES INC 1861 PO BOX 8050 BENTONVI LLE AR 72716 WELLS FARGO BANK NA 3476 STATEVIEW BLVD FORT MILL SC 29715 XCELENERGY 414 NICOLLET MALL MINNEAPOLIS MN 55401 5 of 63 R 1. City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Blvd. N•Oak Park Heights,NEN 55082•Phone(651)439-4439•Fax(651)439-0574 3/17/21 TO: City Liquor License Holder: RE: Liquor License Refund— Nov 20th 2020 to Jan 11th, 2021 As part of the City's continuing endeavor to reduce COVID-19 impacts on its business community, the City Council has implemented prorated refunds for various liquor licensing you may hold and that were impacted by the second "shut-down" as a result of Gov. Waltz's order—with dates between November 20th, 2020 and January 11th, 2021. Please see the enclosed refund check. We hope the funds assist in your business recovery efforts. Thank you Eric Johnson City Administrator 6 of 63 r• City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Blvd. N•Oak Park Heights,MN 55082•Phone(651)439-4439•Fax(651)439-0574 3/18/21 TO: Mr. Joe Gustafson, Washington County Public Works Joe.Gustafson@co.washington.mn.us FROM: Eric Johnson, City Administrator RE: CSAH 26— PED CROSSING — NEAR HOLIDAY Dear Joe: The City wanted to reach back out to your office to update you on the status of the above- named PEDESTRIAN CROSSING. Generally speaking, this crossing remains treacherous as drivers cannot readily see people within the area. As I recall, the County did undertake some slope adjustments along the east side in an effort to improve these sight-lines. Unfortunately, reports to my office do not report a vastly improved condition. We would ask at this time that your office please revisit these conditions at the site; and perhaps we can discuss options— if any- in early May. Please recall that we have requested in the past is an installation of some form of flasher-system and for which the City has committed to 50%of such funding and we would continue to believe this may be reasonable and necessary installation. But perhaps your findings might tell us all something different. Thank you (for reference only-THESE ARE IMAGES PRIOR to 2020) ------- „ r - - u�� tiww=rtt � ,� F y I Ii�IV�I ISI �14 YI 7 of 63 ASSESSMENT REPORT L 2 () 2 1 This report includes specific information regarding the 2021 assessment as well as general information about both the appeals and assessment processes. 8 of 63 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction..................................................................................................................................................3 SalesAnalysis Section ...................................................................................................................................4 SalesAnalysis....................................................................................................................................................................... 4 SalesStatistics Defined..................................................................................................................................................... 4 Arm's Length Transactions............................................................................................................................................. 5 Residential Lender Mediated Sales............................................................................................................................. 8 County Sales Statistics by Classification ay2017-ay2021................................................................................10 ResidentialSales Statistics............................................................................................................................................11 Historic Average Sale Prices: Single Family&Townhome/Condo.............................................................12 Past & Current Year Adjustments/Parcel Count Section ............................................................................13 Agricultural Class Summary: Current Year Adjustments................................................................................13 Agricultural Class: Past & Current Year Adjustments ........................................................................14 Agricultural Class: Parcel Counts........................................................................................................15 Apartment Class Summary: Current Year Adjustments..................................................................................16 Apartment Class: Past& Current Year Adjustments..........................................................................17 Apartment Class: Parcel Counts.........................................................................................................18 Commercial/Industrial Class Summary: Current Year Adjustments.........................................................19 Commercial/Industrial Class: Past& Current Year Adjustments.......................................................20 Commercial/Industrial Class: Parcel Counts......................................................................................21 Residential/SRR Class Summary: Current Year Adjustments.......................................................................22 Residential/SRR Class: Past& Current Year Adjustments..................................................................23 Residential/SRR Class: Parcel Counts.................................................................................................24 Total Taxable Class Summary: Current Year Adjustments............................................................................25 Total Taxable Class: Past & Current Year Adjustments......................................................................26 Total Taxable Class: Parcel Counts.....................................................................................................27 Residential/SRR Class: Current Year Value Changes..........................................................................28 MarketValue Section..................................................................................................................................29 Distribution of Market Value by Classification.....................................................................................................29 MedianValues....................................................................................................................................................................30 Historical Median Residential Improved Value: Residential/SRR......................................................30 Historical Median Residential Improved Value: Town homes/Condos..............................................31 Historical Median Residential Improved Value: Single Family...........................................................32 9 of 63 Single Family and Townhome/Condo breakdown..............................................................................33 Historical County Median Residential Improved Value......................................................................33 Other Assessment Related Information .....................................................................................................34 NewConstruction.............................................................................................................................................................34 Current New Construction Starts: All Classifications.........................................................................34 Past& Current New Construction Starts: Single Family and Townhome/Condo..............................35 Historical New Construction Summary: All Classifications ................................................................36 Appraiser Activity: Permit&Quintile Review Counts......................................................................................37 Appraiser Activity: Tax Petition Related................................................................................................................38 Tax Petitions: Historical Petition Counts Payable Years 2016- 2020 ................................................39 Assessment Process: Statutory Requirements....................................................................................................40 Explainingthe Appeals Process..................................................................................................................................42 AssessmentCalendar......................................................................................................................................................44 10 of 63 INTRODUCTION The Washington County Assessor Division has prepared this 2021 Assessment Report for use by the County Board, City Councils, Town Boards, residents, and staff. This report includes specific information regarding the 2021 assessment as well as general information about both the appeals and assessment process. Minnesota statutes establish specific requirements for the assessment of property. The law requires that all real property be valued at market value, which is defined as the usual or most likely selling price as of the January 2nd assessment date. The estimated market values established through the 2021 assessment are based upon actual real estate market trends of Washington County properties from October 1. 2019 through September 30, 2020. From these trends, our mass appraisal system is used to determine individual property values. Detailed discussion of the sales analysis can be found in the "Sales Analysis" section of this report. The summaries breaking down the adjustments made in each community, by property use, can be found in the "Past and Present Adjustments" section of this report. Property owners who have questions or concerns regarding the market value that has been established for their property are encouraged to contact the property appraiser responsible for their area. In most cases, an interior inspection of the property will be necessary. For detailed discussion regarding the appeals period, please refer to the section of this report titled"Other Assessment Related Information." Bruce L. Munneke, S.A.M.A. Washington County Assessor 31 Page 11 of 63 SALES ANALYSIS SECTION Sales Analysis The assessment function is governed by Minnesota State statute. The law requires that all real property be valued at market value, which is defined as the usual or most likely selling price as of the assessment date of January 2nd of each year. Assessors are historians and measure the market based on sales which have occurred previous to the assessment date. Assessors do not create the value or predict what the market will do; rather, the assessor's job is to follow the patterns set by the real estate market. Information on the sales of real estate is of paramount importance to the assessors in a market-based property tax system. Sales information is required to be submitted electronically using the program developed by the Minnesota Department of Revenue. This program is known as the Electronic Certificate of Real Estate Value (eCRV).The Department of Revenue requires all County Assessors to utilize a specified time period for sales analysis. This time period of 12 months is from October 1st to September 30th preceding the assessment date. Sales within this time period will be used to determine the changes in assessed value that may be needed in each community for the impending assessment. For example, the sales that occurred between October 1. 2019 and September 30. 2020 are used to establish the January 2. 2021 assessed values. The assessor's office is charged with setting estimated market values for tax purposes at actual market value. The relationship between sales prices to estimated market value is called the sales ratio. The target median ratio range is set by the assessor's office for all Washington County communities (for all classes of property) the range established for the 2021 assessment is 93.0% - 95%. We make every effort to make certain that each municipality in Washington County falls within this range. In this way, we ensure an equitable distribution of the property tax burden for all Washington County taxpayers. Sales Statistics Defined In addition to the median ratio, we have the ability to measure other statistics to test the accuracy of the assessment. Some of these are used at the state level also. The primary statistics used are: Median Ratio This is a measure of central tendency. The median of a sample is the value for which one-half (50%) of the observations (when stratified) will lie above that value and one-half will lie below that value. The median is not susceptible to extreme observations referred to as outliers.We use this ratio,much like the mean,not only to measure our assessment level,but also to analyze property values by municipality, type of dwelling and value range. These 41 Page 12 of 63 studies enable us to track market trends in neighborhoods, popular housing types and classes of property. Within the county, we strive to achieve a ratio within the 93%-95% range for the median and mean. This allows us a margin to account for a fluctuating market and still maintain ratios within state mandated guidelines. Arithmetic Mean Ratio The mean is the average ratio. Unlike the median,the mean is influenced by outliers.We use this ratio not only to measure our assessment level, but also to analyze property values by municipality, type of dwelling and value range. These studies enable us to track market trends in neighborhoods, popular housing types and classes of property. Coefficient of Dispersion (COD) The COD measures the accuracy of the assessment. The COD indicates the spread of the ratios from the mean or median ratio. The goal of a good assessment is a COD of 10 to 20.A COD under 10 is considered excellent and anything over 20 will result in an assessment review by the Department of Revenue. Price-Related Differential (PRD) The PRD is used to measure value related inequities in the assessment, referred to as regressively or progressivity. Appraised values are regressive if high value properties are under appraised relative to low value properties and progressive if high value properties are over appraised relative to the low value properties. The PRD is found by taking the mean (average) ratio of the sample and dividing by the weighted (aggregate) mean ratio. The acceptable range is .98 to 1.03. Arm's Length Transactions The Department of Revenue requires all County Assessors to utilize a specified time period in their sales analysis. This time period is 12 months from October 1St to September 30tH preceding the assessment date. Sales within this time period will be used to determine the changes in assessed value that may be needed in each community for the impending assessment. The sales that occur within this October 1St to September 30th time period, each year, are closely scrutinized by the appraisers within the Assessor Division. Evidence suggesting a forced sale, foreclosure, a sale to a relative, or anything other than an arm's-length transaction requires the sales to be discarded from the sales study. This is important, because the real estate sales information constitutes the database for the statistical comparisons necessary to make the property assessment. 51 Page 13 of 63 An arm's length transaction is any transaction in which buyers and sellers of a product act independently and have no relationship to each other. The concept of an arm's length transaction is to ensure that both parties in the deal are acting in their own self-interest and are not subject to any pressure or duress from the other party. The following graphs and charts show the number of arm's length transactions that occurred within each sales period. Total Number of Arm's Length TransacVons Apartments & Commercial Property ay2017-ay2021 55 45 35 25 15 5 ay2017 ay2018 ay2019 ay2020 ay2021 -Apartment 7 8 13 12 10 -Commercial 39 39 37 51 49 Total Number of Arm's Length Transactions Residential Properties ay2017-ay2021 4500 4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 ay2017 ay2018 ay2019 ay2020 ay2021 F.esdertial 3736 3963 3907 4103 4004 Total Number of Arm's Length Transactions ResidenVal Property Breakdown ay2017-ay2021 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 ay2017 ay2018 ay2019 ay2020 ay2021 -Single Family 2523 2603 2648 2873 2719 -Townho mejCondo 1213 1360 1259 1230 1285 6Page 14 of 63 Residential f SRR (Seasonal Rec) sales count ay2017-ay2021 Sales Period 10/1/15-9/30/16 10/1/16-9/30/17 10/1/17-9/30/18 10/1/18-9/30/19 10/1/19-9/30/20 Difference from Previous Year ay2017 ay2018 ay2019 ay2020 ay2021 Afton 37 31 35 39 36 -3 Bayport 35 36 29 42 31 -11 Baytown 22 25 26 23 23 0 Birchwood 12 11 9 20 12 -8 Cottage Grove 528 550 513 577 527 -50 Dellwood 12 15 15 12 12 0 Denmark 17 19 12 8 15 7 Forest Lake 311 313 254 268 267 -1 Grant 42 46 43 50 45 -5 Grey Cloud 4 3 2 5 4 -1 Hastings 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hugo 307 369 348 337 323 -14 Lake Elmo 78 114 105 162 166 4 Lake St. Croix 15 18 12 13 17 4 Lakeland 22 24 25 19 22 3 Lakeland Shores 3 1 2 6 1 -5 Landfall 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mahtomedi 97 104 107 116 113 -3 Marine 14 12 14 17 15 -2 May 26 26 40 30 36 6 Newport 28 34 37 46 43 -3 Oak Park Hgts 62 59 65 53 69 16 Oakdale 439 438 452 439 391 -48 Pine Springs 5 4 6 4 5 1 St. Mary's Point 6 5 2 2 6 4 St. Paul Park 52 51 84 72 62 -10 Scandia 28 38 43 45 52 7 Stillwater 251 306 320 343 344 1 Stillwater Twp 21 18 16 17 14 -3 West Lakeland 45 44 32 38 41 3 White Bear Lake 3 2 4 1 2 1 Willernie 12 7 8 6 13 7 Woodbury 1,202 1,240 1,247 1,293 1,297 4 COUNTY 1 3,7361 3,9631 3,9071 4,1031 4,004 -99 71 Page 15 of 63 Residential Lender Mediated Sales Foreclosures Properties in which the financial institution has repossessed the home from the owner due to non-payment of mortgage obligations. Short Sales Unique arrangements where the financial institution and in-default home owner work together in an attempt to sell the home before it is foreclosed upon. In both situations, lenders are highly motivated "sellers", which can result in discounted asking prices as they attempt to move the assets quickly from the balance sheets. Lender mediated sales are not used in the sales study. Comparison of Lender Mediated & Arm's Length Transactions ay17-ay21 Arm's Length — Ler-ler f:1ed aTed Sales 3963 4103 '00' –3736 3907 –236 179 91 54 359 ay2017 ay2018 ay2019 ay2020 ay2021 8Page 16 of 63 Residential Lender Mediated sales count av2017-av20211 Sales Period 10/1/15-9/30/16 10/1/16-9/30/17 10/1/17-9/30/18 10/1/18-9/30/19 10/1/19-9/30/20 ay2017 ay2018 ay2019 ay2020 ay2021 Afton 4 1 2 3 0 Bayport 3 3 1 1 2 Baytown 0 0 1 0 0 Birchwood 1 1 2 0 0 Cottage Grove 69 37 23 18 9 Dellwood 2 1 2 0 0 Denmark 2 1 1 0 0 Forest Lake 37 29 24 8 5 Grant 5 0 0 3 3 Grey Cloud 1 1 1 2 0 Hastings 0 0 0 0 0 Hugo 30 14 12 4 2 Lake Elmo 2 6 3 2 2 Lake St. Croix 2 1 1 1 0 Lakeland 0 2 3 1 0 Lakeland Shores 0 0 0 0 0 Landfall 0 0 0 0 0 Mahtomedi 12 6 9 3 2 Marine 2 0 0 0 0 May 5 1 1 1 1 Newport 3 7 3 4 2 Oak Park Hgts 5 1 5 0 0 Oakdale 58 41 22 9 8 Pine Springs 0 0 0 0 0 St. Mary's Point 1 0 2 0 0 St. Paul Park 0 15 8 8 3 Scandia 1 1 2 1 0 Stillwater 29 16 11 7 2 Stillwater Twp 1 0 3 0 1 West Lakeland 5 3 0 0 0 White Bear Lake 1 0 1 0 0 Willernie 2 0 2 0 0 Woodbury 76 48 34 15 12 COUNTY 1 359 236 179 91 54 91 Page 17 of 63 County Sales Statistics by Classification ay2017-ay2021 The statistics listed for each use (classification) below are measured after the annual adjustments are applied to each classification of each property. Apartment Sales Statistics (After Annual Adjustments) Sales Period 10/1/15-9/30/16 10/1/16-9/30/17 10/1/17-9/30/18 10/1/18-9/30/19 10/1/19-9/30/20 ay2017 ay2018 ay2019 ay2020 ay2021 Number of Sales 7 8 13 12 10 Median 106.4% 99.1% 95.7% 94.3% 94.9% Mean 103.7% 98.9% 94.6% 96.3% 103.0% COD 4.7 4.6 5.3 6.1 5.7 Commercial f Industrial Sales Statistics (After Annual Adjustments) Sales Period 10/1/15-9/30/16 10/1/16-9/30/17 10/1/17-9/30/18 10/1/18-9/30/19 10/1/19-9/30/20 ay2017 ay2018 ay2019 ay2020 ay2021 Number of Sales 39 39 37 51 49 Median 102.5% 95.3% 96.8% 95.7% 95.5% Mean 99.5% 96.5% 98.5% 99.4% 93.8% COD 13.4 12.0 21.8 10.0 8.3 Residential Sales Statistics (After Annual Adjustments). Sales Period 10/1/15-9/30/16 10/1/16-9/30/17 10/1/17-9/30/18 10/1/18-9/30/19 10/1/19-9/30/20 ay2017 ay2018 ay2019 ay2020 ay2021 Number of Sales 3,736 3,963 3,907 4,103 4,004 Median 94.8% 94.9% 95.6% 95.2% 93.6% Mean 95.8% 94.3% 96.0% 95.7% 94.1% COD 6.2 6.6 6.5 6.1 5.8 101 Page 18 of 63 Residential Sales Statistics The sales statistics (Number of Sales, Low Sale Price, and High Sale Price) are based on data collected from sales that occurred between October 1, 2019 and September 30, 2020. The remaining statistics are measured after the percent of change factor (local effort) is applied to the going in ratio (previous year assessed value/sale price) in each community for the 2021 assessment. If there are 30 sales or less in a community the median is the only statistic deemed reliable. # of Sales Median COD PRD Low Sale High Sale Afton 36 93.81% 7.66 1.01 $ 225,000 $ 1,725,000 Bayport 31 93.81% 7.47 1.01 $ 158,952 $ 775,000 Baytown 23 93.43% $ 325,000 $ 905,000 Birchwood 12 93.15% $ 289,500 $ 890,000 Cottage Grove 527 93.39% 5.69 1.00 $ 96,000 $ 800,000 Dellwood 12 93.37% $ 416,000 $ 2,450,000 Denmark 15 93.93% $ 250,000 $ 3,900,000 Forest Lake 267 93.69% 5.68 1.01 $ 126,835 $ 1,350,000 Grant 45 94.09% 7.41 1.02 $ 215,000 $ 1,750,000 Grey Cloud 4 85.69% $ 181,869 $ 1,400,000 Hastings 0 0.00% $ - $ - Hugo 323 94.01% 4.33 1.00 $ 148,500 $ 1,150,000 Lake Elmo 166 93.87% 6.92 1.00 $ 170,000 $ 1,475,000 Lake St. Croix 17 94.75% $ 124,500 $ 593,000 Lakeland 22 93.92% $ 153,500 $ 1,900,000 Lakeland Shores 1 83.42% $ 1,625,000 $ 1,625,000 Landfall 0 0.00% $ - $ - Mahtomedi 113 94.00% 6.69 1.01 $ 201,500 $ 1,250,000 Marine 15 93.56% $ 141,000 $ 684,000 May 36 94.35% 9.59 1.00 $ 236,500 $ 1,350,000 Newport 43 93.80% 8.00 1.01 $ 118,200 $ 535,812 Oak Park Hgts 69 93.69% 7.17 1.01 $ 66,500 $ 510,000 Oakdale 391 93.53% 5.44 1.00 $ 81,000 $ 500,000 Pine Springs 5 91.99% $ 323,500 $ 476,750 St. Mary's Point 6 91.90% $ 189,300 $ 2,750,000 St. Paul Park 62 93.46% 7.12 1.01 $ 110,000 $ 360,750 Scandia 52 94.27% 8.24 1.01 $ 206,400 $ 1,075,000 Stillwater 344 93.60% 6.39 1.01 $ 145,000 $ 1,301,000 Stillwater Twp 14 94.31% $ 400,000 $ 1,285,000 West Lakeland 41 93.49% 7.16 1.00 $ 349,000 $ 939,000 White Bear Lake 2 95.37% $ 251,535 $ 275,000 Willernie 13 96.56% $ 179,450 $ 425,000 Woodbury 1,297 94.08% 5.02 1.00 $ 89,500 $ 1,075,000 COUNTY 1 4,0041 93.60%1 5.91 1 1.01 1 $ 66,500 1 $3,900,000 111 Page 19 of 63 Historic Average Sale Prices: Single Family & Townhome f Condo ay2017 ay2018 ay2019 ay2020 ay2021 Afton $ 509,500 $ 485,300 $ 555,200 $ 576,600 $ 604,345 Bayport $ 242,300 $ 312,900 $ 423,100 $ 355,800 $ 350,999 Baytown $ 588,700 $ 615,100 $ 603,200 $ 657,000 $ 687,415 Birchwood $ 338,600 $ 483,900 $ 393,700 $ 566,800 $ 384,548 Cottage Grove $ 244,200 $ 252,800 $ 266,400 $ 282,100 $ 303,060 Dellwood $ 459,000 $ 574,500 $ 740,400 $ 1,215,100 $ 969,333 Denmark $ 462,700 $ 505,700 $ 525,300 $ 466,100 $ 875,786 Forest Lake $ 257,200 $ 267,700 $ 265,400 $ 312,200 $ 294,563 Grant $ 458,900 $ 498,500 $ 619,500 $ 634,900 $ 673,901 Grey Cloud $ 346,300 $ 240,700 $ 298,500 $ 370,800 $ 561,717 Hastings $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Hugo $ 229,000 $ 249,600 $ 254,300 $ 277,300 $ 300,311 Lake Elmo $ 463,700 $ 470,900 $ 519,300 $ 480,600 $ 537,760 Lake St. Croix $ 225,900 $ 214,200 $ 215,800 $ 248,500 $ 266,870 Lakeland $ 460,700 $ 288,400 $ 444,600 $ 334,900 $ 414,202 Lakeland Shores $ 264,600 $ 313,000 $ 650,000 $ 356,400 $ 1,625,000 Landfall $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Mahtomedi $ 374,400 $ 385,400 $ 407,900 $ 421,400 $ 409,456 Marine $ 388,600 $ 316,900 $ 511,400 $ 366,000 $ 422,754 May $ 485,400 $ 544,400 $ 474,500 $ 587,800 $ 597,749 Newport $ 229,200 $ 211,000 $ 234,300 $ 257,500 $ 294,723 Oak Park Hgts $ 232,700 $ 230,400 $ 229,800 $ 244,500 $ 247,558 Oakdale $ 207,400 $ 215,800 $ 231,500 $ 240,200 $ 260,361 Pine Springs $ 418,500 $ 434,900 $ 426,200 $ 434,100 $ 408,850 St. Mary's Point $ 316,500 $ 390,600 $ 601,000 $ 954,900 $ 968,883 St. Paul Park $ 186,900 $ 195,100 $ 210,700 $ 230,400 $ 234,443 Scandia $ 407,500 $ 354,600 $ 387,200 $ 376,200 $ 448,700 Stillwater $ 305,300 $ 308,100 $ 340,400 $ 343,900 $ 352,427 Stillwater Twp $ 547,300 $ 488,600 $ 666,500 $ 542,500 $ 570,652 West Lakeland $ 471,600 $ 512,900 $ 523,100 $ 547,700 $ 585,678 White Bear Lake $ 232,900 $ 243,000 $ 270,100 $ 279,000 $ 263,268 Willernie $ 163,000 $ 223,800 $ 236,400 $ 210,000 $ 273,820 Woodbury $ 287,800 $ 306,700 $ 317,200 $ 346,500 $ 357,373 COUNTY AVERAGE $ 283,300 $ 297,000 $ 314,500 $ 337,000 $ 355,283 121 Page 20 of 63 PAST & CURRENT YEAR ADJUSTMENTS/PARCEL COUNT SECTION Agricultural Class Summary: Current Year Adjustments ay2021 Number of ay2021 ay2020 ay2021 New Construction Parcels Agricultural Value Agricultural Value %Growth Afton $ 1,032,000 172 $ 116,274,900 $ 111,627,300 3.24% Bayport $ - 0 $ - $ - 0.00% Baytown $ 50 $ 24,111,900 $ 22,812,500 5.70% Birchwood $ 0 $ - $ - 0.00% Cottage Grove $ 165 $ 119,727,000 $ 123,487,700 -3.05% Dellwood $ - 6 $ 3,973,600 $ 3,402,600 16.78% Denmark $ 1,218,500 338 $ 146,624,900 $ 141,133,700 3.03% Forest Lake $ 234,500 150 $ 58,748,400 $ 56,817,600 2.99% Grant $ 243,000 143 $ 87,461,200 $ 84,172,500 3.62% Grey Cloud $ - 10 $ 4,012,400 $ 4,006,800 0.14% Hastings $ 1 $ 23,800 $ 23,800 0.00% Hugo $ - 265 $ 120,676,600 $ 118,400,900 1.92% Lake Elmo $ 21,000 122 $ 83,352,500 $ 88,068,600 -5.38% Lake St.Croix $ - 0 $ - $ - 0.00% Lakeland $ 4 $ 1,503,100 $ 1,503,100 0.00% Lakeland Shores $ 0 $ - $ - 0.00% Landfall $ 0 $ - $ - 0.00% Mahtomedi $ 2 $ 384,700 $ 498,700 -22.86% Marine $ - 9 $ 4,613,000 $ 4,304,000 7.18% May $ 121,500 311 $ 150,235,200 $ 144,120,600 4.16% Newport $ - 3 $ 5,807,400 $ 5,688,000 2.10% Oak Park Hgts $ - 0 $ - $ - 0.00% Oakdale $ 7,900 4 $ 7,026,800 $ 17,889,100 -60.76% Pine Springs $ - 0 $ - $ - 0.00% St.Mary's Point $ 0 $ - $ - 0.00% St.Paul Park $ - 57 $ 3,200,900 $ 3,082,400 3.84% Scandia $ 490,400 327 $ 105,238,300 $ 103,288,100 1.41% Stillwater $ - 4 $ 2,945,400 $ 13,907,900 -78.82% Stillwater Twp $ 576,200 108 $ 63,265,200 $ 62,957,000 -0.43% West Lakeland $ - 47 $ 26,705,700 $ 26,646,900 0.22% White Bear Lake $ 0 $ - $ - 0.00% Willernie $ 0 $ - $ - 0.00% Woodbury $ 102 $ 157,015,200 $ 177,216,300 -11.40% COUNTY $ 3,945,000 2,400 $ 1,292,928,100 $ 1,315,056,100 -1.98% 131 Page 21 of 63 Agricultural Class: Past & Current Year Adjustments ay2017 ay2018 ay2019 ay2020 ay2021 5-Year Change Afton 1.40% 0.53% 3.61% 6.74% 3.24% 15.51% Bayport 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Baytown -0.50% 1.57% 0.70% 14.39% 5.70% 21.85% Birchwood 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Cottage Grove -1.90% -1.16% -3.62% 0.06% -3.05% -9.67% Dellwood -7.70% 9.60% 0.40% 2.75% 16.78% 21.83% Denmark -0.10% 0.67% -0.98% 6.43% 3.03% 9.04% Forest Lake -1.90% 2.56% 2.41% 2.09% 2.99% 8.15% Grant 1.60% 1.10% 0.18% 4.08% 3.62% 10.58% Grey Cloud 0.40% 5.83% 3.82% 0.96% 0.14% 11.15% Hastings 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Hugo 2.30% -0.62% -2.41% 6.27% 1.92% 7.46% Lake Elmo 12.30% 0.71% -6.60% 5.80% -5.38% 6.84% Lake St. Croix 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Lakeland 0.70% 0.48% -45.90% -12.26% 0.00% -56.98% Lakeland Shores 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Landfall 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Mahtomedi 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% -22.86% -22.86% Marine 17.00% 17.32% 0.92% 13.26% 7.18% 55.69% May 2.50% -0.03% 10.23% 8.44% 4.16% 25.29% Newport 1.00% -0.61% -7.74% 0.21% 2.10% -5.05% Oak Park Hgts 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Oakdale 18.30% 1.99% -25.01% 0.35% -60.76% -65.13% Pine Springs 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% St. Mary's Point 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% St. Paul Park 1.60% -0.04% 0.18% 0.07% 3.84% 5.66% Scandia -0.90% -1.10% 10.07% 5.45% 1.41% 14.93% Stillwater 0.40% 139.28% -1.21% 10.71% -78.82% 70.36% Stillwater Twp 1.10% 0.78% 4.55% 5.09% -0.43% 11.10% West Lakeland 2.50% 0.08% -4.24% 2.87% 0.22% 1.43% White Bear Lake 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Willernie 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Woodbury 17.70% -6.02% -5.98% 13.05% -11.40% 7.35% COUNTY 3.30% 0.00% -0.30% 6.30% -1.98% 7.32% 141 Page 22 of 63 Agricultural Class: Parcel Counts ay2017 ay2018 ay2019 ay2020 ay2021 # Parcels # Parcels # Parcels # Parcels # Parcels +�- Afton 161 160 156 170 172 2 Bayport 0 0 0 0 0 0 Baytown 44 44 43 50 50 0 Birchwood 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cottage Grove 186 180 175 170 165 -5 Dellwood 5 6 6 6 6 0 Denmark 344 341 334 339 338 -1 Forest Lake 145 145 145 148 150 2 Grant 144 146 142 142 143 1 Grey Cloud 10 10 10 10 10 0 Hastings 1 1 1 1 1 0 Hugo 264 257 251 258 265 7 Lake Elmo 113 129 113 117 122 5 Lake St. Croix 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lakeland 4 4 4 4 4 0 Lakeland Shores 0 0 0 0 0 0 Landfall 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mahtomedi 2 2 2 2 2 0 Marine 7 7 7 9 9 0 May 276 275 276 312 311 -1 Newport 3 3 3 3 3 0 Oak Park Hgts 0 0 0 0 0 0 Oakdale 4 4 5 4 4 0 Pine Springs 0 0 0 0 0 0 St. Mary's Point 0 0 0 0 0 0 St. Paul Park 57 57 57 57 57 0 Scandia 328 322 319 327 327 0 Stillwater 2 3 2 5 4 -1 Stillwater Twp 105 104 104 108 108 0 West Lakeland 41 47 44 46 47 1 White Bear Lake 0 0 0 0 0 0 Willernie 0 0 0 0 0 0 Woodbury 102 101 98 103 102 -1 COUNTY 2,348 2,348 2,297 2,391 2,400 9 151 Page 23 of 63 Apartment Class Summary: Current Year Adjustments ay2021 Number of ay2021 ay2020 ay2021 New Construction Parcels Apartment Value Apartment Value % Growth Afton $ 2 $ 2,168,100 $ 1,844,900 17.52% Bayport $ 22 $ 21,917,600 $ 20,680,900 5.98% Baytown $ 1 $ 684,800 $ 684,800 0.00% Birchwood $ - 0 $ - $ - 0.00% Cottage Grove $ 2,545,000 41 $ 143,757,200 $ 137,310,200 2.84% Dellwood $ - 0 $ - $ - 0.00% Denmark $ - 1 $ 1,033,800 $ 1,375,200 -24.83% Forest Lake $ 14,000,400 71 $ 221,171,400 $ 202,112,000 2.50% Grant $ - 1 $ 1,139,600 $ 1,089,300 4.62% Grey Cloud $ 0 $ - $ - 0.00% Hastings $ - 0 $ - $ - 0.00% Hugo $ 2,011,800 9 $ 24,655,100 $ 20,027,400 13.06% Lake Elmo $ 13,411,300 10 $ 35,532,600 $ 14,547,900 52.06% Lake St. Croix $ - 1 $ 504,800 $ 386,100 30.74% Lakeland $ 75,000 2 $ 742,500 $ 532,200 25.42% Lakeland Shores $ - 0 $ - $ - 0.00% Landfall $ - 0 $ - $ - 0.00% Mahtomedi $ 1,477,500 17 $ 63,023,900 $ 60,263,600 2.13% Marine $ - 2 $ 418,200 $ 388,100 7.76% May $ - 0 $ - $ - 0.00% Newport $ 18,207,400 42 $ 68,911,200 $ 49,792,900 1.83% Oak Park Hgts $ 4,792,500 33 $ 154,032,700 $ 145,468,500 2.59% Oakdale $ 3,516,700 51 $ 241,015,800 $ 228,135,600 4.10% Pine Springs $ - 0 $ - $ - 0.00% St. Mary's Point $ 0 $ - $ - 0.00% St. Paul Park $ 23 $ 7,674,800 $ 7,435,500 3.22% Scandia $ - 3 $ 525,200 $ 508,400 3.30% Stillwater $ 2,634,000 79 $ 127,292,200 $ 118,974,500 4.78% Stillwater Twp $ - 0 $ - $ - 0.00% West Lakeland $ 1 $ 708,800 $ 681,300 100.00% White Bear Lake $ 1 $ 14,195,500 $ 13,963,800 1.66% Willernie $ - 1 $ 1,016,000 $ 1,001,000 1.50% Woodbury $ 59,545,000 75 $ 829,509,400 $ 715,801,900 7.57% COUNTY $ 122,216,600 489 $ 1,961,631,200 $ 1,743,006,000 5.53% 161 Page 24 of 63 Apartment Class: Past & Current Year Adjustments ay2017 ay2018 ay2019 ay2020 ay2021 5-Year Change Afton 72.61% 5.11% 19.46% 15.86% 17.52% 130.56% Bayport 12.32% 28.41% 7.18% 8.09% 5.98% 61.99% Baytown 0.00% 0.00% 53.06% 0.00% 0.00% 53.06% Birchwood 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Cottage Grove 35.25% 5.02% 9.10% 3.74% 2.84% 55.95% Dellwood 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Denmark 6.80% 3.22% 7.77% 1.66% -24.83% -5.38% Forest Lake 29.11% 5.83% 11.02% 4.89% 2.50% 53.35% Grant 5.44% 4.34% 4.23% 0.01% 4.62% 18.64% Grey Cloud 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Hastings 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Hugo 1.50% 17.14% 10.41% 2.10% 13.06% 44.20% Lake Elmo 41.75% 30.34% 3.63% 15.80% 52.06% 143.58% Lake St. Croix 39.24% 16.65% 64.87% 16.67% 30.74% 168.17% Lakeland 6.22% 0.00% 23.52% 7.80% 25.42% 62.96% Lakeland Shores 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Landfall 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Mahtomedi 7.17% 6.99% 29.90% -10.67% 2.13% 35.51% Marine 32.00% 0.00% 49.65% 1.07% 7.76% 90.47% May 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Newport 32.91% 7.42% 13.04% 12.18% 1.83% 67.37% Oak Park Hgts 5.93% 10.78% 16.03% 3.05% 2.59% 38.38% Oakdale 28.79% 11.78% 12.46% 7.01% 4.10% 64.14% Pine Springs 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% St. Mary's Point 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% St. Paul Park 17.17% 3.72% 16.50% 6.42% 3.22% 47.03% Scandia 9.05% -0.26% 6.38% 5.67% 3.30% 24.14% Stillwater 24.31% 6.62% 18.27% 12.69% 4.78% 66.67% Stillwater Twp 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% West Lakeland 0.00% 100.00% 4.33% 100.00% 4.04% 208.37% White Bear Lake 68.49% 0.00% 0.00% -34.46% 1.66% 35.69% Willernie 15.78% 0.00% 28.27% 5.93% 1.50% 51.48% Woodbury 12.22% 13.13% 14.57% 5.30% 7.57% 52.79% COUNTY 18.78%1 10.63% 13.90% 4.65%1 5.53%1 53.50% 171 Page 25 of 63 Apartment Class: Parcel Counts ay2017 ay2018 ay2019 ay2020 ay2021 # Parcels # Parcels # Parcels # Parcels # Parcels +�- Afton 2 2 2 2 2 0 Bayport 24 22 22 22 22 0 Baytown 1 1 1 1 1 0 Birchwood 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cottage Grove 14 17 37 39 41 2 Dellwood 0 0 0 0 0 0 Denmark 2 2 2 2 1 -1 Forest Lake 66 67 71 71 71 0 Grant 1 1 1 1 1 0 Grey Cloud 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hastings 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hugo 4 5 6 6 9 3 Lake Elmo 6 6 7 7 10 3 Lake St. Croix 1 1 1 1 1 0 Lakeland 2 2 2 2 2 0 Lakeland Shores 0 0 0 0 0 0 Landfall 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mahtomedi 15 15 17 17 17 0 Marine 2 2 2 2 2 0 May 0 0 0 0 0 0 Newport 41 42 42 42 42 0 Oak Park Hgts 32 32 35 35 33 -2 Oakdale 48 48 50 51 51 0 Pine Springs 0 0 0 0 0 0 St. Mary's Point 0 0 0 0 0 0 St. Paul Park 23 23 23 23 23 0 Scandia 1 1 3 3 3 0 Stillwater 58 68 73 79 79 0 Stillwater Twp 0 0 0 0 0 0 West Lakeland 0 1 1 1 1 0 White Bear Lake 1 1 1 1 1 0 Willernie 1 1 1 1 1 0 Woodbury 51 54 60 66 75 9 COUNTY 396 414 460 475 489 14 181 Page 26 of 63 Commercial f Industrial Class Summary: Current Year Adjustments ay2021 Number of ay2021 ay2020 ay2021 New Construction Parcels Comm/Ind Value Comm/Ind Value %Growth Afton $ - 36 $ 32,721,600 $ 31,336,700 4.42% Bayport $ 42,100 107 $ 42,899,900 $ 41,049,400 4.41% Baytown $ - 10 $ 2,540,900 $ 2,401,900 5.79% Birchwood $ - 0 $ - $ - 0.00% Cottage Grove $ 25,981,700 567 $ 408,516,900 $ 357,198,300 7.09% Dellwood $ - 28 $ 15,821,900 $ 14,380,800 10.02% Denmark $ 1,075,500 66 $ 32,461,600 $ 28,202,900 11.29% Forest Lake $ 2,818,900 546 $ 291,686,300 $ 265,458,700 8.82% Grant $ - 95 $ 22,463,400 $ 21,115,100 6.39% Grey Cloud $ 21 $ 3,286,600 $ 3,336,300 -1.49% Hastings $ - 5 $ 1,837,500 $ 1,670,100 10.02% Hugo $ 2,792,800 194 $ 175,267,500 $ 162,831,800 5.92% Lake Elmo $ 2,542,600 201 $ 174,085,800 $ 159,254,600 7.72% Lake St.Croix $ - 9 $ 2,281,400 $ 2,078,200 9.78% Lakeland $ 38 $ 14,020,100 $ 13,412,300 4.53% Lakeland Shores $ 9 $ 2,814,000 $ 2,483,700 13.30% Landfall $ 7 $ 10,112,000 $ 9,193,600 9.99% Mahtomedi $ 78 $ 61,274,400 $ 58,222,800 5.24% Marine $ 17 $ 3,563,500 $ 4,399,100 -18.99% May $ - 8 $ 2,851,400 $ 2,663,100 7.07% Newport $ 1,108,300 197 $ 82,672,500 $ 77,464,300 5.29% Oak Park Hgts $ 1,830,400 220 $ 230,141,500 $ 208,585,100 9.46% Oakdale $ 2,071,000 398 $ 551,640,100 $ 508,318,200 8.12% Pine Springs $ - 0 $ - $ - 0.00% St.Mary's Point $ 0 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 0.00% St.Paul Park $ - 201 $ 56,546,800 $ 45,464,400 24.38% Scandia $ 355,700 77 $ 17,544,900 $ 15,816,000 8.68% Stillwater $ 1,120,200 400 $ 390,583,900 $ 356,989,800 9.10% Stillwater Twp $ - 6 $ 2,339,700 $ 2,141,500 9.26% West Lakeland $ 34 $ 16,163,500 $ 14,937,200 8.21% White Bear Lake $ 9 $ 6,741,800 $ 6,129,100 10.00% Willernie $ - 33 $ 6,230,200 $ 5,750,500 8.34% Woodbury $ 22,655,700 575 $ 1,615,978,300 $ 1,461,909,900 8.99% COUNTY $ 64,394,900 4,192 $ 4,277,189,900 $ 3,884,295,400 8.46% 191 Page 27 of 63 Commercial f Industrial Class: Past & Current Year Adjustments ay2017 ay2018 ay2019 ay2020 ay2021 5-Year Change Afton 1.77% 3.71% 3.36% 6.97% 4.42% 20.23% Bayport 3.23% 1.07% 1.85% 8.51% 4.41% 19.07% Baytown 2.87% 1.66% 0.00% 1.13% 5.79% 11.45% Birchwood 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Cottage Grove 2.14% 2.25% 1.17% 8.86% 7.09% 21.52% Dellwood 2.60% 4.21% 1.85% -0.42% 10.02% 18.26% Denmark 2.53% 0.66% 9.80% 9.46% 11.29% 33.73% Forest Lake 3.82% 3.02% -0.91% 3.50% 8.82% 18.24% Grant 2.17% 1.90% 0.48% 7.26% 6.39% 18.20% Grey Cloud 5.47% 1.75% 5.14% 15.78% -1.49% 26.66% Hastings 0.00% 4.00% -6.86% -4.74% 10.02% 2.43% Hugo 6.56% 2.15% 2.08% 11.78% 5.92% 28.49% Lake Elmo 8.45% 4.31% 2.77% 0.81% 7.72% 24.06% Lake St. Croix 2.60% 5.44% 0.20% 5.99% 9.78% 24.02% Lakeland 5.05% 3.27% 0.10% 0.65% 4.53% 13.60% Lakeland Shores 0.00% 1.73% 0.00% -9.17% 13.30% 5.86% Landfall 0.00% 3.67% 17.86% 0.00% 9.99% 31.52% Mahtomedi 5.51% -0.55% 3.57% 10.22% 5.24% 23.99% Marine 3.03% 3.86% -0.69% 32.44% -18.99% 19.63% May 0.92% 1.35% -0.49% -0.34% 7.07% 8.51% Newport 5.96% -11.11% -0.56% 7.33% 5.29% 6.92% Oak Park Hgts 6.09% 2.52% -0.84% 2.76% 9.46% 19.98% Oakdale 5.28% 1.77% 3.03% 6.84% 8.12% 25.03% Pine Springs 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% St. Mary's Point 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% St. Paul Park 24.40% 20.11% 18.98% 7.90% 24.38% 95.77% Scandia 4.62% 5.91% -0.12% 7.67% 8.68% 26.77% Stillwater 5.94% 3.69% 0.49% 6.22% 9.10% 25.44% Stillwater Twp -35.18% -30.55% -33.20% -31.44% 9.26% -121.11% West Lakeland 2.00% 3.64% 4.68% 8.71% 8.21% 27.23% White Bear Lake 0.03% 3.58% 0.67% -4.98% 10.00% 9.29% Willernie 1.83% 2.93% 3.02% 1.92% 8.34% 18.05% Woodbury 1 3.54% 3.90% 3.70% 5.33% 8.99% 25.460/o COUNTY 1 4.64% 3.00% 2.40% 5.88% 8.39% 24.31% 201 Page 28 of 63 Commercial f Industrial Class: Parcel Counts ay2017 ay2018 ay2019 ay2020 ay2021 # Parcels # Parcels # Parcels # Parcels # Parcels + - Afton 34 35 35 37 36 -1 Ba ort 110 108 107 107 107 0 Baytown 9 10 10 10 10 0 Birchwood 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cottage Grove 413 422 428 503 567 64 Dellwood 28 29 29 28 28 0 Denmark 58 65 65 66 66 0 Forest Lake 562 562 562 549 546 -3 Grant 93 93 94 94 95 1 Grey Cloud 24 24 24 24 21 -3 Hastings 5 5 5 5 5 0 Hugo 185 184 192 191 194 3 Lake Elmo 201 203 207 201 201 0 Lake St. Croix 9 9 9 9 9 0 Lakeland 39 39 39 38 38 0 Lakeland Shores 8 8 8 9 9 0 Landfall 6 6 7 7 7 0 Mahtomedi 77 76 77 77 78 1 Marine 16 15 16 17 17 0 May 8 8 8 8 8 0 Newport 222 221 219 205 197 -8 Oak Park Hgts 215 214 223 220 220 0 Oakdale 386 386 399 394 398 4 Pine Springs 1 1 0 0 0 0 St. Mary's Point 0 0 0 0 0 0 St. Paul Park 209 206 203 200 201 1 Scandia 76 76 77 77 77 0 Stillwater 391 397 397 408 400 -8 Stillwater Twp 6 6 6 5 6 1 West Lakeland 35 29 33 34 34 0 White Bear Lake 9 9 9 9 9 0 Willernie 34 33 33 33 33 0 Woodbury 549 550 574 577 575 -2 COUNTY 4,018 4,029 4,095 4,142 4,192 50 211 Page 29 of 63 Residential f SRR Class Summary: Current Year Adjustments ay2021 Number of ay2021 ay2020 ay2021 New Construction Parcels Res/SRR Value Res/SRR Value % Growth Afton $ 4,909,600 1,275 $ 604,582,500 $ 590,487,700 1.56% Bayport $ 12,447,800 1,030 $ 321,805,200 $ 296,661,900 4.28% Baytown $ 5,311,500 805 $ 444,783,600 $ 425,935,300 3.18% Birchwood $ 638,700 414 $ 170,804,600 $ 167,645,900 1.50% Cottage Grove $ 100,951,400 13,078 $ 3,715,521,400 $ 3,524,065,500 2.57% Dellwood $ 1,831,200 513 $ 369,830,000 $ 361,470,300 1.81% Denmark $ 4,552,100 737 $ 320,150,400 $ 307,400,400 2.67% Forest Lake $ 19,277,600 7,369 $ 2,057,527,900 $ 1,967,741,000 3.58% Grant $ 10,612,200 1,752 $ 842,463,600 $ 816,134,300 1.93% Grey Cloud $ 73,200 152 $ 42,694,600 $ 41,358,900 3.05% Hastings $ - 3 $ 633,300 $ 625,500 1.25% Hugo $ 45,725,300 6,286 $ 1,943,261,100 $ 1,809,896,100 4.84% Lake Elmo $ 100,848,800 4,579 $ 1,987,830,400 $ 1,791,103,800 5.35% Lake St. Croix $ 511,100 717 $ 134,469,300 $ 129,906,100 3.12% Lakeland $ 2,050,100 791 $ 266,269,600 $ 255,027,900 3.60% Lakeland Shores $ - 144 $ 63,445,300 $ 61,486,700 3.19% Landfall $ - 1 $ 166,000 $ 148,100 12.09% Mahtomedi $ 9,101,500 3,003 $ 1,110,388,300 $ 1,130,601,400 -2.59% Marine $ 275,300 518 $ 138,600,300 $ 140,631,700 -1.64% May $ 3,503,500 1,430 $ 612,739,100 $ 609,296,200 -0.01% Newport $ 17,223,900 1,424 $ 325,671,200 $ 301,174,300 2.41% Oak Park Hgts $ 2,478,100 1,564 $ 334,054,800 $ 322,769,300 2.73% Oakdale $ 3,626,000 9,524 $ 2,390,137,400 $ 2,326,876,100 2.56% Pine Springs $ 413,800 164 $ 62,530,900 $ 60,002,000 3.53% St. Mary's Point $ 198,300 305 $ 90,851,500 $ 81,406,400 11.36% St. Paul Park $ 1,384,100 2,005 $ 408,946,400 $ 402,336,200 1.30% Scandia $ 3,139,500 2,226 $ 679,064,200 $ 664,738,300 1.68% Stillwater $ 20,193,600 7,487 $ 2,399,588,900 $ 2,253,614,700 5.58% Stillwater Twp $ 1,674,700 814 $ 406,520,400 $ 390,889,900 3.57% West Lakeland $ 5,299,000 1,437 $ 736,110,500 $ 699,419,600 4.49% White Bear Lake $ 32,600 99 $ 26,833,300 $ 26,279,800 1.98% Willernie $ 687,700 312 $ 51,820,100 $ 48,196,600 6.09% Woodbury $ 131,094,100 24,981 $ 8,794,826,800 $ 8,378,460,400 1 3.40% COUNTY $ 510,066,300 96,939 $ 31,854,922,900 $ 30,383,788,300 3.16% 221 Page 30 of 63 Residential f SRR Class: Past & Current Year Adjustments ay2017 ay2018 ay2019 ay2020 ay2021 5-Year Change Afton 3.98% 1.20% 11.37% -1.55% 1.56% 16.55% Bayport 8.03% 7.83% 9.81% 1.93% 4.28% 31.88% Baytown 1.42% -0.24% 4.11% 3.02% 3.18% 11.49% Birchwood 4.41% 10.14% 9.07% 0.39% 1.50% 25.51% Cottage Grove 6.07% 7.10% 5.60% 5.37% 2.57% 26.71% Dellwood 2.25% 0.97% -0.23% 8.10% 1.81% 12.90% Denmark 1.64% 4.98% 8.84% 4.21% 2.67% 22.34% Forest Lake 7.45% 7.46% 3.93% 1.19% 3.58% 23.61% Grant 2.20% 2.80% 10.14% -2.02% 1.93% 15.04% Grey Cloud -0.58% 1.88% 4.20% 3.98% 3.05% 12.53% Hastings 6.53% 2.46% 5.21% 5.48% 1.25% 20.93% Hugo 8.30% 4.72% 7.77% 2.76% 4.84% 28.39% Lake Elmo 4.28% 7.72% 9.77% 0.64% 5.35% 27.77% Lake St. Croix 0.38% 13.37% 7.71% 4.18% 3.12% 28.75% Lakeland 6.48% 12.85% 0.90% 4.81% 3.60% 28.64% Lakeland Shores -0.36% 8.60% 3.78% 0.60% 3.19% 15.81% Landfall -0.21% 4.03% 0.54% 0.00% 12.09% 16.44% Mahtomedi 7.71% 1.64% 5.03% 4.80% -2.59% 16.58% Marine 10.60% 1.31% 9.98% -3.51% -1.64% 16.74% May 6.19% 1.85% 8.60% 0.33% -0.01% 16.95% Newport 9.00% 4.82% 11.00% 9.53% 2.41% 36.76% Oak Park Hgts -0.56% 8.61% 9.27% 2.50% 2.73% 22.55% Oakdale 5.35% 7.18% 7.95% 2.31% 2.56% 25.35% Pine Springs 12.90% 2.87% -0.45% 0.05% 3.53% 18.88% St. Mary's Point 7.93% -1.45% 4.42% 0.53% 11.36% 22.79% St. Paul Park 4.85% 3.20% 14.99% 3.20% 1.30% 27.53% Scandia 2.23% 7.24% 11.35% 2.71% 1.68% 25.21% Stillwater 6.93% 5.09% 7.94% 1.28% 5.58% 26.82% Stillwater Twp 8.49% 1.05% 14.61% -1.93% 3.57% 25.80% West Lakeland -0.72% 1.29% 7.72% 0.31% 4.49% 13.09% White Bear Lake -1.03% 7.54% 4.11% 2.48% 1.98% 15.09% Willernie 4.50% 11.77% 16.84% 2.65% 6.09% 41.85% Woodbury 5.20% 5.37% 4.98% 2.69% 3.40% 21.63% COUNTY 5.41% 5.36% 6.90% 2.44% 3.16% 23.27% 231 Page 31 of 63 Residential f SRR Class: Parcel Counts ay2017 ay2018 ay2019 ay2020 ay2021 # Parcels # Parcels # Parcels # Parcels # Parcels +�- Afton 1,288 1,283 1,275 1,276 1,275 -1 Bayport 979 979 1,003 1,030 1,030 0 Baytown 807 806 815 805 805 0 Birchwood 416 415 414 414 414 0 Cottage Grove 11,861 11,897 12,277 12,607 13,078 471 Dellwood 517 517 515 513 513 0 Denmark 707 717 744 740 737 -3 Forest Lake 7,352 7,352 7,369 7,369 7,369 0 Grant 1,734 1,733 1,746 1,757 1,752 -5 Grey Cloud 175 172 171 148 152 4 Hastings 3 3 3 3 3 0 Hugo 5,802 5,905 6,067 6,132 6,286 154 Lake Elmo 3,563 3,971 4,306 4,410 4,579 169 Lake St. Croix 725 722 721 717 717 0 Lakeland 788 788 785 791 791 0 Lakeland Shores 145 145 145 144 144 0 Landfall 1 1 1 1 1 0 Mahtomedi 3,000 2,999 3,001 3,003 3,003 0 Marine 529 528 526 523 518 -5 May 1,481 1,476 1,470 1,434 1,430 -4 Newport 1,250 1,237 1,289 1,388 1,424 36 Oak Park Hgts 1,554 1,551 1,560 1,558 1,564 6 Oakdale 9,521 9,515 9,527 9,527 9,524 -3 Pine Springs 164 163 164 164 164 0 St. Mary's Point 318 316 316 312 305 -7 St. Paul Park 1,998 1,989 1,984 2,007 2,005 -2 Scandia 2,244 2,238 2,240 2,232 2,226 -6 Stillwater 7,422 7,431 7,490 7,477 7,487 10 Stillwater Twp 817 815 816 815 814 -1 West Lakeland 1,429 1,431 1,437 1,435 1,437 2 White Bear Lake 99 99 99 99 99 0 Willernie 314 313 313 313 312 -1 Woodbury 23,241 23,624 24,206 24,500 24,981 481 COUNTY 92,244 93,131 94,795 95,644 96,939 1,295 241 Page 32 of 63 Total Taxable Class Summary: Current Year Adjustments ay2021 Number of ay2021 ay2020 ay2021 New Construction Parcels Total Value Total Value % Growth Afton $ 5,941,600 1,485 $ 755,747,100 $ 735,296,600 1.97% Bayport $ 12,489,900 1,159 $ 386,622,700 $ 358,392,200 4.39% Baytown $ 5,311,500 866 $ 472,121,200 $ 451,834,500 3.31% Birchwood $ 638,700 414 $ 170,804,600 $ 167,645,900 1.50% Cottage Grove $ 129,478,100 13,851 $ 4,387,522,500 $ 4,142,061,700 2.80% Dellwood $ 1,831,200 547 $ 389,625,500 $ 379,253,700 2.25% Denmark $ 6,846,100 1,142 $ 500,270,700 $ 478,112,200 3.20% Forest Lake $ 36,331,400 8,136 $ 2,629,134,000 $ 2,492,129,300 4.04% Grant $ 10,855,200 1,991 $ 953,527,800 $ 922,511,200 2.19% Grey Cloud $ 73,200 183 $ 49,993,600 $ 48,702,000 2.50% Hastings $ - 9 $ 2,494,600 $ 2,319,400 7.55% Hugo $ 50,529,900 6,754 $ 2,263,860,300 $ 2,111,156,200 4.84% Lake Elmo $ 116,823,700 4,912 $ 2,280,801,300 $ 2,052,974,900 5.41% Lake St. Croix $ 511,100 727 $ 137,255,500 $ 132,370,400 3.30% Lakeland $ 2,125,100 835 $ 282,535,300 $ 270,475,500 3.67% Lakeland Shores $ 153 $ 66,259,300 $ 63,970,400 3.58% Landfall $ - 8 $ 10,278,000 $ 9,341,700 10.02% Mahtomedi $ 10,579,000 3,100 $ 1,235,071,300 $ 1,249,586,500 -2.01% Marine $ 275,300 546 $ 147,195,000 $ 149,722,900 -1.87% May $ 3,625,000 1,749 $ 765,825,700 $ 756,079,900 0.81% Newport $ 36,539,600 1,666 $ 483,062,300 $ 434,119,500 2.86% Oak Park Hgts $ 9,101,000 1,817 $ 718,229,000 $ 676,822,900 4.77% Oakdale $ 9,221,600 9,977 $ 3,189,820,100 $ 3,081,219,000 3.23% Pine Springs $ 413,800 164 $ 62,530,900 $ 60,002,000 3.53% St. Mary's Point $ 198,300 305 $ 90,951,500 $ 81,506,400 11.34% St. Paul Park $ 1,384,100 2,286 $ 476,368,900 $ 458,318,500 3.64% Scandia $ 3,985,600 2,633 $ 802,372,600 $ 784,350,800 1.79% Stillwater $ 23,947,800 7,970 $ 2,920,410,400 $ 2,743,486,900 5.58% Stillwater Twp $ 2,250,900 928 $ 472,125,300 $ 455,988,400 3.05% West Lakeland $ 5,299,000 1,519 $ 779,688,500 $ 741,685,000 4.41% White Bear Lake $ 32,600 109 $ 47,770,600 $ 46,372,700 2.94% Willernie $ 687,700 346 $ 59,066,300 $ 54,948,100 6.24% Woodbury $ 213,294,800 25,733 $ 11,397,329,700 $ 10,733,388,500 4.20% COUNTY 1 $ 700,622,800 1 104,020 $ 39,386,672,100 $ 37,326,145,800 1 3.64% 251 Page 33 of 63 Total Taxable Class: Past & Current Year Adjustments ay2017 ay2018 ay2019 ay2020 ay2021 5-Year Change Afton 3.60% 1.21% 9.85% 0.03% 1.97% 16.66% Bayport 7.60% 8.08% 8.69% 3.01% 4.39% 31.78% Baytown 1.44% -0.14% 3.96% 3.55% 3.31% 12.13% Birchwood 4.41% 10.14% 9.07% 0.39% 1.50% 25.51% Cottage Grove 5.90% 6.28% 5.02% 5.44% 2.80% 25.44% Dellwood 2.15% 1.18% -0.14% 7.69% 2.25% 13.14% Denmark 1.11% 3.29% 5.65% 5.16% 3.20% 18.42% Forest Lake 7.72% 6.72% 3.82% 1.72% 4.04% 24.02% Grant 2.14% 2.61% 8.94% -1.28% 2.19% 14.60% Grey Cloud -0.15% 2.19% 4.22% 4.43% 2.50% 13.20% Hastings 1.30% 2.64% -4.29% -2.20% 7.55% 5.01% Hugo 7.69% 4.26% 6.74% 3.58% 4.84% 27.11% Lake Elmo 5.18% 7.00% 8.25% 0.97% 5.41% 26.81% Lake St. Croix 0.51% 13.24% 7.73% 4.25% 3.30% 29.04% Lakeland 6.33% 12.16% 0.42% 4.49% 3.67% 27.08% Lakeland Shores -0.34% 8.35% 3.65% 0.29% 3.58% 15.54% Landfall 0.00% 3.67% 17.54% 0.00% 10.02% 31.23% Mahtomedi 7.58% 1.75% 6.02% 4.17% -2.01% 17.49% Marine 10.59% 1.77% 9.53% -2.27% -1.87% 17.76% May 5.44% 1.49% 8.86% 1.81% 0.81% 18.41% Newport 9.77% 1.45% 8.61% 9.22% 2.86% 31.92% Oak Park Hgts 1.75% 6.98% 7.31% 2.69% 4.77% 23.51% Oakdale 6.89% 6.54% 7.18% 3.37% 3.23% 27.20% Pine Springs 12.90% 2.87% -0.45% 0.05% 3.53% 18.88% St. Mary's Point 7.93% -1.45% 4.42% 0.53% 11.34% 22.78% St. Paul Park 7.27% 5.13% 15.34% 3.67% 3.64% 35.06% Scandia 2.07% 6.02% 10.93% 3.16% 1.79% 23.97% Stillwater 7.26% 5.27% 7.25% 2.37% 5.58% 27.72% Stillwater Twp 7.10% 0.85% 12.93% -1.14% 3.05% 22.79% West Lakeland -0.54% 1.38% 7.19% 0.57% 4.41% 13.00% White Bear Lake 20.31% 3.84% 2.00% -13.16% 2.94% 15.93% Willernie 4.33% 10.42% 15.38% 2.63% 6.24% 38.99% Woodbury 5.57% 5.35% 5.18% 3.37% 4.20% 23.66% COUNTY 5.70% 5.09% 6.40% 3.00% 3.64% 23.83% 261 Page 34 of 63 Total Taxable Class: Parcel Counts ay2017 ay2018 ay2019 ay2020 ay2021 # Parcels # Parcels # Parcels # Parcels # Parcels +�- Afton 1,485 1,480 1,468 1,485 1,485 0 Bayport 1,113 1,109 1,132 1,159 1,159 0 Baytown 861 861 869 866 866 0 Birchwood 416 415 414 414 414 0 Cottage Grove 12,474 12,516 12,917 13,319 13,851 532 Dellwood 550 552 550 547 547 0 Denmark 1,111 1,125 1,145 1,147 1,142 -5 Forest Lake 8,125 8,126 8,147 8,137 8,136 -1 Grant 1,972 1,973 1,983 1,994 1,991 -3 Grey Cloud 209 206 205 182 183 1 Hastings 9 9 9 9 9 0 Hugo 6,255 6,351 6,516 6,587 6,754 167 Lake Elmo 3,883 4,309 4,633 4,735 4,912 177 Lake St. Croix 735 732 731 727 727 0 Lakeland 833 833 830 835 835 0 Lakeland Shores 153 153 153 153 153 0 Landfall 7 7 8 8 8 0 Mahtomedi 3,094 3,092 3,097 3,099 3,100 1 Marine 554 552 551 551 546 -5 May 1,765 1,759 1,754 1,754 1,749 -5 Newport 1,516 1,503 1,553 1,638 1,666 28 Oak Park Hgts 1,801 1,797 1,818 1,813 1,817 4 Oakdale 9,959 9,953 9,981 9,976 9,977 1 Pine Springs 165 164 164 164 164 0 St. Mary's Point 318 316 316 312 305 -7 St. Paul Park 2,287 2,275 2,267 2,287 2,286 -1 Scandia 2,649 2,637 2,639 2,639 2,633 -6 Stillwater 7,873 7,899 7,962 7,969 7,970 1 Stillwater Twp 928 925 926 928 928 0 West Lakeland 1,505 1,508 1,515 1,516 1,519 3 White Bear Lake 109 109 109 109 109 0 Willernie 349 347 347 347 346 -1 Woodbury 23,943 24,329 24,938 25,246 25,733 487 COUNTY 99,006 99,922 101,647 102,652 104,020 1,368 271 Page 35 of 63 Residential f SRR Class: Current Year Value Changes This table lists a breakdown of the number of value changes by percent change the residential and seasonal recreational properties in each community received for the ay2021 assessment. The percent change groupings are listed across the top row of the table. For the 2021 assessment 81.4% are receiving a valuation notice indicating an increase in their property value. h L G G L A d o N o o y o o N o y .ti y O y o y bA o O .ti L V A V N fn � fn rl y N fn L'. N h rl y � y N d V V V O V U oo Afton 3 1 1 35 74 1,018 101 22 20 1,275 114 1,161 Bayport 4 - 2 41 60 502 222 119 80 1,030 108 922 Baytown 2 - 5 41 602 132 5 18 80SI 49 756 Birchwood 1 - - 4 55 327 21 2 4 414 60 354 Cottage Grove 2 4 203 4,035 101 6,509 1,423 127 674 13,078 4,346 8,732 Dellwood 1 - 2 36 64 350 40 10 9 513 104 409 Denmark - - - 22 68 507 68 30 41 737 90 647 Forest Lake 3 7 58 1,317 502 3,790 781 584 326 7,369 1,887 5,482 Grant 3 - 3 31 163 1,477 37 6 31 1,752 201 1,551 Grey Cloud - - 4 18 119 1 7 2 152 22 130 Hastings - - - 1 2 - - - 3 1 2 Hugo 14 10 160 253 3,356 1,935 308 250 6,286 437 5,849 Lake Elmo 3 11 285 174 2,031 1,209 417 450 4,579 473 4,106 Lake St.Croix 1 6 6 185 416 83 12 9 717 197 520 Lakeland 2 - 3 47 623 100 2 14 791 53 738 Lakeland Shores 18 96 27 1 2 144 18 126 Landfall - - - 1 1 - 1 Mahtomedi 13 35 602 1,582 228 432 53 13 45 3,003 2,460 543 Marine 5 2 60 215 119 104 5 2 6 518 400 118 May 2 1 138 208 1,035 18 12 15 1,430 349 1,081 Newport 10 15 124 504 56 514 56 10 135 1,424 709 715 Oak Park Hgts 1 - 8 183 122 1,067 157 11 15 1,564 314 1,250 Oakdale 4 18 189 1,633 306 4,776 2,068 392 138 9,524 2,150 7,374 Pine Springs - - 1 - 3 128 11 2 18 164 4 160 St.Mary's Point 1 - 1 80 25 139 28 31 305 82 223 St.Paul Park 11 5 29 488 124 1,210 107 13 18 2,005 656 1,349 Scandia 1 - 2 133 432 1,440 159 26 33 2,226 568 1,658 Stillwater 6 3 1 13 300 2,983 3,740 247 193 7,487 324 7,163 Stillwater Twp - - 1 7 51 534 207 6 8 814 59 755 West Lakeland 4 3 4 44 641 704 17 21 1,437 55 1,382 White Bear Lake - - 1 - 1 93 2 1 1 99 2 97 Willernie - 1 1 1 22 43 190 3 50 312 25 287 Woodbury 7 - 6 1,037 648 18,732 3,756 170 625 24,981 1,698 23,283 COUNTY 107 94 1,326 11,922 4,567 55,482 17,550 2,609 3,282 96,939 18,015 78,924 0.11% 0.10% 1.37% 12.30% 4.71% 57.23% 18.10% 2.69% 3.39%1100.00%1 18.58% 81.42% 281 Page 36 of 63 MARKET VALUE SECTION Distribution of Market Value by Classification With new construction included, the pattern of change in the county's total value and classification value distribution can be seen in the following list of past assessment year data. Estimated Market Value (EMV) by Classification &Percentage of Total EMV(includes new construction) ay2017 ay2018 ay2019 ay2020 ay2021 Total EMV $30,819,820,200 $32,894,024,500 $35,654,881,200 $37,326,145,800 $39,386,672,100 Agriculture EMV $ 1,264,570,500 $ 1,263,774,600 $ 1,250,153,700 $ 1,315,056,100 $ 1,292,928,100 Agriculture%of Total 4.10% 3.84% 3.51% 3.52% 3.28% ApartmentEMV $ 1,154,829,300 $ 1,322,514,400 $ 1,600,537,000 $ 1,743,006,000 $ 1,961,631,200 Apartment%of Total 3.75% 4.02% 4.49% 4.67% 4.98% Commercial/Industrial EMV $ 3,260,159,800 $ 3,445,552,500 $ 3,607,962,900 $ 3,884,295,400 $ 4,277,189,900 Comm/Industrial%of Total 10.58% 10.47% 10.12% 10.41% 10.86% Residential/SRR EMV $25,140,260,600 $26,862,183,000 $29,196,227,600 $30,383,788,300 $31,854,922,900 Residential/SRR%of Total 81.57% 81.66% 81.89% 81.40% 80.88% 2021 EMV Distribution by Class as a Percent of Total 111% ■ Agriculture ■ Apartment Commercial/Industrial ■ Residential 291 Page 37 of 63 Median Values Historical Median Residential Improved Value: Residential/SRR CCombined Single Family and Townhome/Condo with improvement value_>$25,0009 Median % Median % Median % Median % Median % a 2017 Chan e a 2018 Chane a 2019 Chane a 2020 Chane a 2021 Change Afton $ 424,000 2.99% $ 443,800 4.67% $ 497,000 11.99% $ 484,600 -2.49% $ 489,100 0.93% Bayport $ 213,050 10.8S% $ 232,000 8.89% $ 262,900 13.32% $ 267,200 1.64% $ 288,200 7.86% Baytown $ 502,900 9.80% $ 516,200 2.64% $ 540,600 4.73% $ 573,700 6.12% $ 589,500 2.7S% Birchwood $ 297,150 3.21% $ 331,100 11.43% $ 358,500 8.28% $ 346,100 -3.46% $ 354,800 2.51% Cottage Grove $ 223,800 8.06% $ 238,900 6.7S% $ 253,800 6.24% $ 266,900 5.16% $ 270,700 1.42% Dellwood $ 546,150 4.08% $ 567,400 3.89% $ 553,000 -2.54% $ 637,600 15.30% $ 688,100 7.92% Denmark $ 381,200 0.24% $ 414,400 8.71% $ 439,900 6.IS% $ 456,500 3.77% $ 467,400 2.39% Forest Lake $ 233,150 11.24% $ 254,600 9.20% $ 270,700 6.32% $ 274,500 1.40% $ 281,400 2.51% Grant $ 427,600 3.86% $ 453,300 6.01% $ 507,800 12.02% $ 487,000 -4.10% $ 503,400 3.37% Grey Cloud $ 309,250 8.70% $ 324,700 5.00% $ 344,300 6.02% $ 359,000 4.27% $ 371,400 3.4S% Hastings Hugo $ 249,450 16.32% $ 260,500 4.43% $ 278,500 6.91% $ 290,000 4.13% $ 309,800 6.83% Lake Elmo $ 383,350 3.19% $ 401,600 4.76% $ 430,600 7.22% $ 434,800 0.98% $ 458,700 5.50% Lake St.Croix $ 181,800 8.02% $ 209,900 15.46% $ 230,900 10.00% $ 242,400 4.98% $ 250,000 3.14% Lakeland $ 229,250 -0.28% $ 269,800 17.69% $ 269,100 -0.26% $ 283,800 5.46% $ 297,000 4.6S% Lakeland Shores $ 290,300 -0.72% $ 325,300 12.06% $ 341,000 4.83% $ 343,900 0.8S% $ 358,500 4.2S% Landfall Mahtomedi $ 314,700 7.59% $ 324,900 3.24% $ 342,800 5.51% $ 360,100 5.OS% $ 351,200 -2.47% Marine $ 332,350 3.79% $ 342,300 2.99% $ 386,700 12.97% $ 373,300 -3.47% $ 379,900 1.77% May $ 401,600 5.49% $ 420,500 4.71% $ 454,600 8.11% $ 458,800 0.92% $ 452,100 -1.46% Newport $ 185,300 19.86% $ 195,400 SAS% $ 216,100 10.59% $ 226,600 4.86% $ 229,600 1.32% OakParkHgts $ 202,400 2.87% $ 215,500 6.47% $ 236,700 9.84% $ 240,300 1.52% $ 251,000 4.4S% Oakdale $ 216,400 10.13% $ 231,700 7.07% $ 252,800 9.11% $ 259,000 2.4S% $ 264,300 2.OS% Pine Springs $ 399,300 -1.2S% $ 413,700 3.61% $ 412,100 -0.39% $ 412,300 US% $ 429,200 4.10% St.Mary's Point $ 298,100 23.9S% $ 296,000 -0.70% $ 317,900 7.40% $ 318,400 0.16% $ 335,000 5.21% St.Paul Park $ 175,800 11.13% $ 180,100 2.4S% $ 211,100 17.21% $ 220,200 4.31% $ 221,600 0.64% Scandia $ 301,650 2.OS% $ 331,300 9.83% $ 365,500 10.32% $ 376,500 3.01% $ 375,500 -0.27% Stillwater $ 250,600 9.96% $ 268,300 7.06% $ 289,300 7.83% $ 294,700 1.87% $ 313,400 6.3S% Stillwater Twp $ 425,200 7.51% $ 437,300 2.8S% $ 505,700 15.64% $ 487,200 -3.66% $ 499,700 2.57% West Lakeland $ 425,800 1 0.32% $ 438,500 2.98% $ 476,000 8.SS% $ 479,500 0.74% $ 503,300 4.96% White Bear Lake $ 229,200 0.97% $ 252,100 9.99% $ 264,400 4.88% $ 269,500 1.93% $ 276,500 2.60% Willernie $ 151,800 8.90% $ 172,500 13.64% $ 202,500 17.39% $ 211,700 4.54% $ 226,300 6.90% Woodbury $ 296,700 7.07% $ 312,600 5.36% $ 327,400 4.73% $ 341,200 4.22% $ 351,100 2.90% COUNTY MEDIAN $ 258,200 8.26% $ 277,100 12.60% $ 296,700 7.07% $ 306,600 3.34% $ 316,800 3.330 301 Page 38 of 63 Historical Median Residential Improved Value: Townhomes/Condos (With improvement value_>$25,000) Median % Median % Median % Median % Median % a 2017 Chane a 2018 Chane a 2019 Chane a 2020 Chane a 2021 Change Bayport $ 297,800 24.29% $ 286,500 -3.79% $ 310,200 8.27% $ 352,100 13.51% $ 364,600 3.55% Cottage Grove $ 149,800 6.77% $ 169,800 13.35% $ 178,400 5.06% $ 190,700 6.89% $ 199,000 4.35% Forest Lake $ 166,700 8.95% $ 180,100 8.04% $ 189,600 5.27% $ 190,800 0.63% $ 196,800 3.14% Hugo $ 165,000 9.49% $ 179,800 8.97% $ 195,600 8.79% $ 199,800 2.15% $ 212,000 6.11% Lake Elmo $ 247,700 1.47% $ 230,900 -6.78% $ 285,500 23.65% $ 283,700 -0.63% $ 309,700 9.16% Mahtomedi $ 234,400 14.34% $ 264,500 12.84% $ 277,400 4.88% $ 289,300 4.29% $ 281,500 -2.70% Marine $ 198,100 8.85% $ 192,200 -2.98%1 $ 211,000 9.78% $ 211,000 0.00% $ 219,900 4.22% Newport $ 148,600 14.22% $ 149,100 0.34% $ 165,300 10.87% $ 170,000 2.84% $ 174,400 2.59% Oak ParkHgts $ 152,500 8.70% $ 161,700 6.03% $ 181,500 12.24% $ 197,900 9.04% $ 202,300 2.22% Oakdale $ 148,900 6.13% $ 163,900 10.07% $ 180,900 10.37% $ 185,500 2.54% $ 194,600 4.91% St.Paul Park $ 164,400 16.68% $ 169,700 3.22% $ 205,100 20.86%1 $ 205,100 0.00% $ 199,800 -2.58% Stillwater $ 203,900 8.75% $ 224,000 9.86% $ 249,100 11.21% $ 249,300 0.08% $ 262,800 5.42% Woodbury $ 179,000 9.28% $ 192,500 7.54% $ 207,800 7.95% $ 220,700 6.21% $ 231,700 4.98% COUNTY MEDIAN $ 168,000 6.33% $ 182,700 8.75% $ 197,100 7.88% $ 206,700 4.87% $ 216,900 4.93% 311 Page 39 of 63 Historical Median Residential Improved Value: Single Family (With improvement value_>$25,000) Median % Median % Median % Median % Median % a 2017 Chan e a 2018 Chane a 2019 Chan e a 2020 Chane a 2021 Change Afton $ 424,000 3.62% $ 443,800 4.67% $ 497,000 11.99% $ 484,600 -2.49% $ 489,100 0.93% Bayport $ 207,350 14.37% $ 227,000 9.48% $ 256,200 12.86% $ 260,800 1.80% $ 283,200 8.59% Baytown $ 502,900 1.04% $ 516,200 2.64% $ 540,600 4.73% $ 573,700 6.12% $ 589,500 2.75% Birchwood $ 297,150 6.01% $ 331,100 11.43% $ 358,500 8.28% $ 346,100 -3.46% $ 354,800 2.51% Cottage Grove $ 230,000 1 5.99% $ 245,600 6.78% $ 260,700 6.15% $ 274,700 5.37% $ 279,000 1.57% Dellwood $ 546,150 0.82% $ 567,400 3.89% $ 553,000 -2.54% $ 637,600 15.30% $ 688,100 7.92% Denmark $ 381,200 0.61% $ 414,400 8.71% $ 439,900 6.15% $ 456,500 3.77% $ 467,400 2.39% Forest Lake $ 252,400 5.12% $ 274,600 8.80% $ 290,800 5.90% $ 296,000 1.79% $ 302,800 2.30% Grant $ 427,600 1 1.54% $ 453,300 6.01% $ 507,800 12.02%1 $ 487,000 -4.10% $ 503,400 3.37% Grey Cloud $ 309,250 4.41% $ 324,700 5.00% $ 344,300 6.04% $ 359,000 4.27% $ 371,400 3.45% Hastings Hugo $ 313,100 8.75% $ 326,000 4.12% $ 348,400 6.87% $ 358,400 2.87% $ 372,100 3.82% Lake Elmo $ 389,900 1 0.54% $ 408,700 4.82% $ 438,800 7.36% $ 441,400 0.59% $ 464,600 5.26% Lake St.Croix $ 179,900 0.22% $ 209,900 16.68% $ 230,900 10.00% $ 242,400 4.98% $ 250,000 3.14% Lakeland $ 229,750 7.66% $ 269,800 17.43% $ 269,100 -0.26% $ 283,800 5.46% $ 297,000 4.65% Lakeland Shores $ 290,300 -1.09% $ 325,300 12.06% $ 341,000 4.83% $ 343,900 0.85% $ 358,500 4.25% Landfall Mahtomedi $ 325,700 10.18% $ 334,100 2.58% $ 351,600 5.24% $ 370,600 5.40% $ 361,600 -2.43% Marine $ 346,150 8.92% $ 342,300 -1.11% $ 386,700 12.97% $ 373,300 -3.47% $ 379,900 1.77% May $ 401,600 6.08% $ 420,500 4.71% $ 454,600 8.11% $ 458,800 0.92% $ 452,100 -1.46% Newport $ 187,100 1 10.64% $ 195,400 4.44% $ 216,100 10.59%1 $ 226,600 4.86% $ 229,600 1.32% Oak ParkHgts $ 218,800 0.00% $ 234,000 6.95% $ 257,900 10.21% $ 260,300 0.93% $ 270,600 3.96% Oakdale $ 230,700 5.05% $ 248,500 7.72% $ 270,700 8.93% $ 276,800 2.25% $ 284,600 2.82% Pine Springs $ 399,300 12.70% $ 413,700 3.61% $ 412,100 -0.39% $ 412,300 0.05% $ 429,200 4.10% St.Mary's Point $ 298,100 1 14.48% $ 296,000 -0.70%1 $ 317,900 7.40% $ 318,400 0.16% $ 335,000 5.21% St.Paul Park $ 176,650 5.97% $ 180,100 1.95% $ 211,100 17.21% $ 220,200 4.31% $ 221,600 0.64% Scandia $ 300,900 1.14% $ 331,300 10.10% $ 365,500 10.32% $ 376,500 3.01% $ 375,500 -0.27% Stillwater $ 260,200 8.51% $ 276,800 6.38% $ 297,000 7.30% $ 301,500 1.52% $ 321,800 6.73% Stillwater Twp $ 425,200 1 9.36% $ 437,300 2.85% $ 505,700 15.64%1 $ 487,200 -3.66% $ 499,700 2.57% West Lakeland $ 425,800 -0.47% $ 438,500 2.98% $ 476,000 8.55% $ 479,500 0.74% $ 503,300 4.96% White Bear Lake $ 229,200 -0.95% $ 252,100 9.99% $ 264,400 4.88% $ 269,500 1.93% $ 276,500 2.60% Willernie $ 150,450 3.83% $ 172,500 14.66% $ 202,500 17.39% $ 211,700 4.54% $ 226,300 6.90% Woodbury 1 $ 339,900 1 5.43% $ 358,100 1 5.35% $ 371,300 1 3.69% $ 382,800 1 3.10% $ 395,400 1 3.29% COUNTY MEDIAN 1 $ 288,500 1 2.49% $ 307,900 1 6.72% $ 327,900 1 6.50% $ 337,400 1 2.90% $ 348,000 1 3.14% 321 Page 40 of 63 Single Family and Townhome/Condo breakdown (With improvement value_>$25,000) Median Residential Value by Dwelling Type ■Townhome/Condo ■Single Family AY2021 $216,900 $348,000 AY2020 $206,700 $337,400 AY2019 $197,100 $327,900 AY2018 $182,700 $307,900 AY2017 $168,000 $288,500 Historical County Median Residential Improved Value (Includes both Single Family and Townhome/Condo with improvement value_>$25,000) County Median Residential improved Value AY2021 $316,800 AY2020 $306,600 AY2019 $296,700 AY2018 $277,100 AY2017 $258,200 331 Page 41 of 63 OTHER ASSESSMENT RELATED INFORMATION New Construction Current New Construction Starts: All Classifications SFR TH/Condo Comm/Ind Apartment Exempt Total 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 New Starts New Starts New Starts New Starts New Starts New Starts Afton 8 0 0 0 0 8 Bayport 28 0 0 0 0 28 Baytown 11 0 0 0 0 11 Birchwood 2 0 0 0 0 2 Cottage Grove 263 96 1 1 2 363 Dellwood 4 0 0 0 0 4 Denmark 13 0 1 0 0 14 Forest Lake 42 10 1 0 0 53 Grant 16 0 0 0 0 16 Grey Cloud 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hastings 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hugo 155 6 1 0 0 162 Lake Elmo 274 8 1 3 0 286 Lake St.Croix 1 0 0 0 0 1 Lakeland 2 0 0 0 0 2 Lakeland Shores 0 0 0 0 0 0 Landfall 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mahtomedi 13 0 0 0 0 13 Marine 0 0 0 0 0 0 May 3 0 0 0 0 3 Newport 67 0 0 0 0 67 Oak Park Hgts 6 0 1 0 0 7 Oakdale 4 0 2 0 0 6 Pine Springs 0 0 0 0 0 0 St. Mary's Point 0 0 0 0 0 0 St. Paul Park 0 0 0 0 0 0 Scandia 7 0 0 0 0 7 Stillwater 33 0 0 1 0 34 Stillwater Twp 1 0 0 0 0 1 West Lakeland 8 0 0 0 0 8 White Bear Lake 0 0 0 0 0 0 Willernie 2 0 0 0 0 2 Woodbury 1 2841 991 61 51 11 395 COUNTY 1,2471 2191 141 101 31 1,493 341 Page 42 of 63 Past& Current New Construction Starts: Single Family and Townhome/Condo 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 New Starts New Starts New Starts New Starts New Starts Afton 8 13 5 11 8 Bayport 14 26 34 26 28 Baytown 18 20 15 7 11 Birchwood 1 0 0 0 2 Cottage Grove 86 118 181 249 359 Dellwood 3 3 2 1 4 Denmark 8 8 9 9 13 Forest Lake 45 53 55 53 52 Grant 5 4 5 10 16 Grey Cloud 0 1 0 0 0 Hastings 0 0 0 0 0 Hugo 96 81 124 101 161 Lake Elmo 251 283 280 228 282 Lake St. Croix 0 3 3 0 1 Lakeland 0 0 0 3 2 Lakeland Shores 0 0 0 0 0 Landfall 0 0 0 0 0 Mahtomedi 6 11 11 9 13 Marine 2 0 1 0 0 May 5 10 8 8 3 Newport 4 7 20 46 67 Oak Park Hgts 0 0 0 4 6 Oakdale 11 4 2 3 4 Pine Springs 0 0 0 1 0 St. Mary's Point 0 1 1 0 0 St. Paul Park 6 7 3 9 0 Scandia 16 22 16 11 7 Stillwater 31 42 38 50 33 Stillwater Twp 1 3 6 5 1 West Lakeland 4 5 6 4 8 White Bear Lake 0 0 0 0 0 Willernie 0 3 0 0 2 Woodbury 320 326 445 4541 383 COUNTY 941 1,0541 1,270 1,3021 1,466 351 Page 43 of 63 Historical New Construction Summary: All Classifications Calendar Year 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 ay2017 ay2018 ay2019 ay2020 ay2021 Single Family 689 916 1,062 1,144 1,247 Townhome/Condo 252 138 208 158 219 Apartment 8 11 13 16 10 Commercial/Industrial 29 23 33 14 14 Misc Permits 2,688 2,377 2,830 2,690 3,250 TOTAL 3,666 3,465 4,146 4,022 4,740 Taxable Value Added $ 425,045,400 $ 537,246,400 $ 661,822,400 $ 620,711,300 $ 700,622,800 Historical Comparison of New Construction: ay17 - ay2l New Construction Reviews- Last 5 Years (New Starts & Misc.Permit Reviews) 4,740 —. 666 4,146 4,022 3,465 ay2017 ay2018 ay2019 ay2020 ay2021 361 Page 44 of 63 Appraiser Activity: Permit & Quintile Review Counts Current state law mandates that all property must be re-assessed each year and reviewed once every five years (aka quintile). Staff also inspects properties that have taken out a construction permit during the course of the year. During 2020 (for the 2021 assessment), the Assessor Division appraisers and locally hired assessors,reviewed 30,091 properties.The breakdown of the properties that were reviewed over the last five years. Calendar Year 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 ay2017 ay2018 ay2019 ay2020 ay2021 Residential Quintile 20,017 19,377 19,727 21,400 24,160 Apt/CI Reviews 994 676 1,190 970 1,191 New Construction Reviews 3,666 3,465 4,146 4,022 4,740 Misc Reviews 1 01 01 01 28 0 TOTAL 24,677 23,518 25,063 26,420 30,091 371 Page 45 of 63 A112raiser Activity: Tax Petition Related Minnesota Tax Court has been established by the Minnesota Legislature for the purpose of hearing only tax related cases. The Court's judges have expertise in tax laws and apply that knowledge in a manner to ensure that taxpayers are assessed in a fair and equitable way. The tax petition process is a complicated and ever changing part of our business. The entire process continues to consume a large amount of our Commercial/Industrial/Apartment appraiser workload. The table below summarize the petition filings in Washington County over the last five years. Petitions related to taxes payable 2020 shows an over increase in the filings of 16.1% with the largest increase shown in the commercial/industrial class of +26.8%. Also of note is the 32.5% increase in the value under petition for payable 2020 when compared to the previous payable year. The property use showing the largest increase in value under petition was the commercial/industrial property use showing a 51.3% increase. Petition Count Payable year 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 176 150 110 129 161 187 Petition Count by Class Payable year 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Residential 22 11 12 17 16 12 Commercial/Industrial 148 135 93 94 123 156 Apartment 6 4 5 18 22 19 TOTAL 176 150 110 129 161 187 Value Under Petition Payable year 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 $ 777,331,100 $ 784,158,900 $ 779,084,100 $ 967,278,300 $1,297,975,600 $1,719,577,900 Petition Value by Class Payable year 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Residential $ 18,515,100 $ 12,827,900 $ 20,168,200 $ 30,299,900 $ 18,568,700 $ 18,685,600 Commercial/Industrial $ 664,804,500 $ 654,608,900 $ 602,423,800 $ 660,500,500 $ 846,459,300 $1,281,098,600 Apartment $ 94,011,500 $ 116,722,100 $ 156,492,100 $ 276,477,900 $ 432,947,600 $ 419,793,700 TOTAL $ 777,331,100 $ 784,158,900 $ 779,084,100 $ 967,278,300 $1,297,975,600 $1,719,577,900 381 Page 46 of 63 Washington County Value Under Petition 2016-2020 2020 $1,719,577,900 2019 $1,297,975,600 2018 $967,278,300 2017 $779,084,100 2016 $784,158,900 Tax Petitions: Historical Petition Counts Payable Years 2016 - 2020 Petition Count by Class 2016-2020 2020 Petition Percent&Count by Classification 1M ,M 1096 160 _.I 140 120 100 ■He vdemidl •Residentidl Ne7 ■Commcrcoal/lndustrial 11 .Commcrcial/lndustrial G[I ■Apdr t IT**n1 •'Ap d rl rt le Ill 40 20 0 201G 2017 7018 2019 7020 84% 39Page 47 of 63 Assessment Process: Statutory eguirements Minnesota law establishes specific requirements for the entire property tax system, including the assessment of property (M.S. Chapter 273). These requirements have not changed during the past year. The laws require the following: 1. All real property is to be valued at market value,which is defined as the usual or most likely selling price at the time of assessment. Special qualified exclusions such as the Veterans' Exclusion are subtracted from the market value to arrive at the taxable value. 2. Property is classified according to state law, and the tax capacity is calculated. 3. The tax capacity is multiplied by the tax rate (the total of county, school, city, and miscellaneous levies) to determine the amount of property tax. The annual property assessment focuses on the very first step of this process—establishing an estimated market value for each parcel of property. Market values are assessed locally by either a county-employed appraiser or a locally hired assessor. The work of both county and local assessors is monitored by the County Assessor, whose work is in turn monitored by the Minnesota Department of Revenue. The monitoring agency is authorized by law to adjust the property assessment to help ensure county-wide and state-wide equalization of property assessments. The County Assessor has established the standard that all Washington County communities, with at least six(6) sales in their sales study, a community median ratio in the range of 93%- 95% of actual market values in relationship to time adjusted sales prices. At times, local assessment levels have been adjusted by the County Assessor or the State of Minnesota. State law also requires that each individual property be reviewed by the assessor at least once every five years. Each community has a rotating revaluation schedule to ensure that this requirement is met. WHAT IS MARKET VALUE? Minnesota Statue 273.03 defines market value as "... the usual selling price at the time of assessment." The Assessor's Office works throughout the year to estimate market values of each property for the following January 2 assessment date. 401 Page 48 of 63 How IS MARKET VALUE DETERMINED? Review Property: Approximately every fifth year, an appraiser working under the supervision of the County Assessor will review the property.Any property that had a building permit issued in a given year is reviewed and the new value calculated as of January 2nd following the construction. Gather Information: The appraiser gathers information on all characteristics of the property that affect market value, such as size, age, quality of construction, basement finish, and extra features, such as fireplaces, walk-out basements, et cetera. Compute Value: The characteristics are entered into a computerized system (CAMA). Information on actual market sales are used to establish the building and component rates used to calculate the property's value. The market value estimated by the appraiser in this way should be very close to the amount the property would sell for, if placed on the open market. WHY MAY MARKET VALUES CHANGE FROM YEAR TO YEAR? Property values change continuously depending on the economic conditions affecting the local housing market. In addition to market changes, physical changes made to a property can also affect its market value.All factors are considered in estimating the value of property. 411 Page 49 of 63 Explaining the Appeals Process In Minnesota, property tax laws provide the legal parameters that govern the work of assessors. These statutes lay down a cycle of assessment activities that are conducted on an annual basis. Each year, assessors are required to work on a number of tasks that include: listing, valuing, and classifying all taxable properties; processing both real and personal property transfers; analyzing market data; monitoring assessment levels for several different classes of property; and arranging and conducting an appeals process. The latter of these activities is a key part of the assessment cycle that provides property owners with an opportunity to review and, if necessary, challenge their estimate of market value and/or classification that will be used for taxation purposes in the following year. AT WHAT POINT IN THE ASSESSMENT CYCLE DOES THE APPEALS PROCESS BEGIN? The appeals process begins in March and extends through June. When property owners receive their Valuation Notices during the month of March, they should read them carefully for instructions about deadlines, filing procedures, meeting dates and times. If they are not clear, they should call the assessor's office for clarification and additional information because a missed deadline, an incorrect filing, or the failure to attend a scheduled meeting can cause an appeal to be dismissed. WHAT STEPS SHOULD PROPERTY OWNERS TAKE TO APPEAL THEIR ASSESSMENTS? There are two avenues of appeal that property owners may take to challenge their assessments. The first route is referred to as the three-step appeal and the second is known as the one-step appeal. These steps are illustrated in the flow chart on the following page. HOW SHOULD PROPERTY OWNERS BEGIN THEIR APPEAL? Property owners are encouraged to contact their appraiser to discuss their property assessment concerns.An informal meeting can be scheduled to review the property,examine market data, answer questions, and clarify the valuation and classification practices used. This discussion can also be handled by telephone, mail, or e-mail during regular business hours. 421 Page 50 of 63 Appeals Process: What are the options? First Contact the County Assessor's Office or your Local Assessor 651-430-6175 • Discuss your concerns with the assessor or an appraiser • Compare values of neighboring or similar properties • Review local comparable sales information If you and your assessor or the County staff do not agree, continue below: a a a a a Appeal to your Local Board of Appeal & Equalization (LBAE) or attend one of four regional Open Book meetings(meeting times& locations are listed on your valuation notice) 0 • Appeal in person, by letter,or by designated representative c • If your appeal is not addressed to your satisfaction,or you and the County staff U cannot agree to a change in valuation or classification, continue to the next X MI step 0 a i 16 d Q a Appeal to the Washington County Board of Appeal& Equalization (CBAE) a • You must have first appealed to your LBAE(unless your property is in an Open Book community)Check your valuation notice to verify • The CBAE meets in June-Call the Assessor's Office at 651-430-6175 by May 5, 2021 to make an appointment • If you still do not feel your concerns have been addressed to your satisfaction, you may next appeal to the Minnesota Tax Court Appeal in the Minnesota Tax Court • Appeals may be filed up until April 301h of the year when the taxes are due • The Tax Court can be contacted at 651-539-3260 for more information on procedures,forms,and filing fees Regular Division Small Claims Division • Can be used for any, property • All homestead property type o 1 unit/parcel/petition • Must be used for property • Homestead classifications assessed >$300,000 • Assessed<$300,000 • Can be appealed to the Supreme • All decisions are final Court 431 Page 51 of 63 Assessment Calendar 2021 January 2 2021 Market values established February 1 Last day to deliver assessment records to County Assessor March 31 Statutory deadline for mailing 2021 Valuation. Notices Local Boards of Appeal& F.yuali•ration & Regional Open Book meetings held April 5-April 26 April 30 Last day to file a Tax Court Petition for taxes payable in 2021 May 5 Deadline for property owners to notify County Assessor of intent to appeal at County Board of Appeal & Equalization May 15 First half payable 2021 taxes due Julie 15 County Board of Appeal & Equalization Meeting 5 p.m. July 1 2021 Assessment finalized August 31 First half payable 2021 taxes due for manufactured homes October 15 Second half payable 2021 taxes due November Mailing of payable 2022 Proposed Property Tax Notices November 15 Second half payable 2021 taxes due for agricultural property and manufactured homes December 15 Last day to file a Homestead Application for payable 2021 2012 January 2 2022 Market values established 441 Page 52 of 63 R 1. City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Blvd. N•Oak Park Heights,NEN 55082•Phone(651)439-4439•Fax(651)439-0574 3/15/21 TO: Dana Nelson Via email only Dana.Nelson(a)mspmac.org FROM: Eric Johnson, City Administrator RE: City Appointments-Advisory Panel —Lake Elmo Airport Dear Dana: The City has received your communication inquiring about appointments to the Lake Elmo Advisory Commission. The City has appointed Mayor Mary McComber as the City's designee with Council Member Mike Liljegren as the First Alternate and City Resident Jim Kremer as the Second Alternate. These are the same individuals that served on the JAZB process and you should have their direct contact information. Please let me know if you need any further information Thank you. 53 of 63 City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak.'Park Blvd No Oak Park Heights,MN 33082•Phone(631)439-4439•Fax 439-0574 Memorandum To: Eric Johnson,Administrator From: Andrew Kegley, Public Works Director Date: 03/1812021 Re: Water Service Leak— 15081 63r`' St N On Friday March 12, 20211aryd Marks and I responded to call from Robin Skorka re: a water leak at 15081 63`d St N. We verified the leak was on the street side of the owners water service line and advised her of the next steps to repair the leak. It is my understanding that Robin secured quotes from local excavators and chose the lowest quote. Ms. Skorka hired Miller Excavating to make the repairs, which was coordinated with the City and completed on March 18, 2021. Ms. Skorka submitted a request for reimbursement as the service line up to and including the curb stop was recently replaced in conjunction with 2015 street reconstruction in Area D. Recall there were about nine (9) other water services in the area that leaked within the contractors warranty period and were replaced by A-1 Excavating. The markings on the flared end connection to the curb stop at 15081 63rd St N indicate that this service line failed in the same manner as the nine (9) that were replaced/repaired under warranty. Loose sand grains appear to have been stuck in the flared connection and eroded the copper causing the leak. Although service lines are privately owned, In good faith, I recommend the City reimburse Robin Skorka $4,998.95, the cost to repair the leak. 54 of 63 Andrew Kegley From: Robo <yamahannarna2003@yahoo.com> Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2021 11:58 AM To: Andrew Kegley Cc: Skorka Robin R (DHS) Subject: 221146_skorkaucurbstop repair_oph, mn_2021.pdf Attachments: 221146_skorka_curbstop repair_oph, mn_2021.pdf City of Oak Park Heights, Attached is the invoice for repairs to the curb stop water supply to my home at 15081 63RD ST N. I am writing to ask for reimbursement for these charges. This is a relatively new replacement done when aii the streets were repaired in 2015.. A-1 was hired for the water valve replacements and several of them have failed since The time they were put in. My neighbor across the street had his replaced within a year of the work being completed. The connection that was leaking was on the street side which is what A-1 replaced. The metal Hats should have been installed initially to avoid this issue. Please consider reimbursement of the attached invoice. Sincerely, Robin Skorka Sent from my Wad Z 55 of 63 e a� c a a a I " a ` r, A d' t 2 4 w e I y - x , a «, r wiy R n n a m " " (Sa .t �km � J b 3 &ay t � " s 56 of 63 it so n � S31t � 1, m ,r. s, 'ate�� � a , f �ry ! a I a r , qu`r a r U a a o� 1 l , y. ♦Y� � � i M 4 el to Y M Ah � I { 1 ,i MILLER EXCAVATING, INC. 3741 Stagecoach Trail North Stillwater,MN 55082 Estimator: Steve St.Claire Phone I Fax: 651-434-1637/651-351-7210 Email: office@millerexc.com uote To: Robin Skorka Jab Name: Curbstop Repair 15081 63rd St N Job Address: 15081 63rd St N Oak Park Heights,MN 55082 Job Location: Oak Park Heights,MN Attn: Robin Skorka Phone: 651-206-7178 Date: March 15 2021 Email: varnahamama2003@yahoo.com Fstimate#: 221146 ITEM DESCRIPTION .%MOUNT 100 MOBILLZATION&PERMITS 110 SAWCUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT 120 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT 130 EXCAVATE EXISTING CURBSTOP 140 REPAIR CURBSTOP&INSTALL CASTING 150 BACKFILL W/SAND FILL 160 6"AGGREGATE BASE FOR DRIVEWAY SUBTOTAL REPAIR CURBSTOP "83,874.45 170 PATCH 3"BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SUBTOTAL REPAIR ASPHALT $1.124.50 GRAND TOTAL 54,998.95 NOTES: Quote valid for 30 days. Proposal based on TWO(2)mobilization(s)to complete the work. Additional mobilizations to be charged at$400.00 each. Retainage as withheld by Owner. Not to exceed 5%. Sales taxes included(if applicable) No bond included.If required,cannot deduct for one without prior approval of MEI. Payment due within 30 days of initial invoice. Past due accounts will accrue 1.5%per month, 18%per year service charge. Standard insurance included. Gopher State One Call locates included 4 business days prior to start of work. Miller Exe.is not responsible for weather,utility conflicts,other contractors,strikes,lockouts,material shortages,acts of god, or other circumstances beyond our control that may delay the completion of the work. All items listed above are tied,unless arrangements are made PR10R to bid opening. The information in this proposal is considered confidential between the two parties listed. All excess clean earthwork materials from the project are the property of Miller Exe. All work to be completed during normal business hours.(Monday thru Friday 700 am to 500 pm) Subcontract language is subject to approval by MEI and must he in accordance with AIA or AGC standard agreements. This proposal shall be attached as an exhibit to such subcontract. THIS PROPOSAL HAS BEEN PREPARED ACCORDING TO THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS: Page I of 3 58 of 63 tA� C�i4 h(kC[ 122 61 'U and DL k"ecO fyLb ct-q Vf7 VIC09 me L--4*1,& -Da'-Rt-M c"Ral kmwwj IIIN 1�0 C-64� aDid 59 of 63 From: Mary Mccomber To: Eric Johnson Subject: Fwd:American Rescue Plan Implementation Update Date: Tuesday,March 16,2021 1:37:50 PM For weekly notes -----Original Message----- From: National League Of Cities (NLC)<advocacy@nlc.org> To: marymccomber@aol.com Sent: Tue, Mar 16, 2021 1:35 pm Subject: American Rescue Plan Implementation Update Federal Advocacy Newsletter-Tuesday,March 16 COVID Relief 04 American Rescue Plan Implementation Update As local leaders begin to put the urgently needed direct aid from the American Rescue Plan Act into action for our front-line workers, emergency responders, residents, households and small businesses, the National League of Cities (NLC)will be here to answer questions and support your responsible stewardship with tools and guidance. Check in with our biweekly newsletter for the latest on recovery priorities, relief funds, bill summaries, and more! Here is how you can take action: NLC Member Call 60 of 63 NLC Update Call: American Ask Your Senators to State and Local Legal Rescue Plan Act Support Local Center: Supreme Court Implementation Transportation Priorities Midterm Webinar March 19th 1:30 PM ET TODAY! March 18th 1:00 PM ET ���i�i,{pi lUi i@ uu qu Uq U�99,U�i�i iiU iiU uU,uU,gU ����IIdYV111di���iGdifdifdildi�di�i�difdifdifdi�dili Response and Recovery Everything You Need to Know About COVID Relief The federal aid delivered to all 19,000 municipal governments in the American Rescue Plan Act is a FIRST for Washington, D.C. This money will go a long way towards protecting the health and safety of residents, helping municipal workers, renters and businesses get back on their feet. Learn more about the timeline and provisions of this funding, and what comes next for America's communities. Read more. UPDATED Estimated State and Local Allocation Outputs Released by the House Committee on Oversight and Reform The House Oversight and Reform Committee staff has provided updated estimates on state and local allocation outputs as of 3/08/21. These estimates are not final and are subject to change. Please review the Committee's notes related to the allocation and read their supplemental explainer, which offers an in-depth guide to interpreting the estimates. Top Moments from the Virtual 2021 Congressional City Conference Last week's Congressional City Conference (CCC)was a huge success, and it culminated in a virtual Capitol Hill Day that saw 350 local elected leaders from 37 states meet with 92 Members of Congress and 222 congressional offices to thank federal leaders for their support of the historic American Rescue Plan, as well as discuss next steps for recovery and rebuilding our nation. Learn more. Advancing Health Literacy to Enhance Equitable Community Responses to COVID-19 At NLC's CCC, Vice President Kamala Harris announced a new funding opportunity from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of Minority Health (OMH). The new initiative—Advancing Health Literacy to Enhance Equitable Community Responses to COVID-19—is expected to allocate $250 million to fund approximately 30 projects in urban communities and 43 projects in rural communities for two years. Applications are due April 20, 2021. Apply now! Complete the 2021 State of the Cities Survey The passage of the historic American Rescue Plan means over$65 Billion will be delivered directly to cities, towns and villages. Now the real work begins. What are your local priorities for this funding? To gauge how conditions, from the economy and infrastructure to housing and education, have changed this past year, and how new funding will be used to address these challenges, NLC is conducting a short survey 61 of 63 and we invite you to participate! Rebuild Community Project Funding: The New and Improved Earmarks Earlier this month, House Appropriations Chair Rep. Rosa DeLauro announced that they will be accepting Members of Congress' requests for Community Project Funding in appropriations bills for the upcoming 2022 fiscal year. This announcement is the first move in the 117th Congress to open up the reincarnated Congressional "earmark"funding process. Learn more about what this means for cities and towns and how to advocate for your community's priorities. New Federal Benefit for Digital Equity in Your Communities On February 26, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) announced the rules for a new Emergency Broadband Benefit (EBB), funded for six months after the COVID-19 emergency declaration expires. The EBB provides eligible low-income households with a monthly $50 discount for broadband service from participating providers, as well as a one-time $100 discount on an internet-enabled device. Cities will have a key role to play in the implementation of this emergency program. Learn more about this benefit and how to promote awareness within your communities. Helpful NLC Links: Articles Upcoming Events J8 L8 8 Resources &Training Advocacy If this message is not displaying properly, please view the online version. 8 You may opt out of email communications from NLC at any time. Update your communication preferences. This message was intended for: marymccomber@aol.com 660 North Capitol Street, NW, Suite 450, Washington, DC 20001 62 of 63 Privacy Policy I©2021 NLC, All Rights Reserved Powered by Higher Logic 63 of 63