Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1983-09-13 NAC Memorandum NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS INC. MEMORANDUM TO: Oak Park Heights Mayor and City Council FROM: Stephen Grittman/David Licht DATE: 13 September 1983 RE: Krongard - Variance FILE NO: 798.02 - 83.11 BACKGROUND Mr. Jack Krongard has requested a variance in the minimum lot width from 80 feet to 75 feet to construct duplex residences on the site. The properties are in the Oak Park Heights Addition, Block Eight, Lots 5, 6, 7 and 8. The zoning is R-2 for these parcels . ISSUES AND ANALYSIS The lot and building requirements for an R-2 district are as follows: Setbacks: Front Yard - 30 feet Side Yard - 10 feet (30 feet for corner lots) Rear Yard - 30 feet Minimum Lot Width: 80 feet Specifications of the existing lots show the lot width of both to be just 75 feet, thereby violating the Zoning Ordinance requirement of an 80 foot minimum lot width for two family dwellings in an R-2 district. Section 401.03.B.4.b. of the Oak Park Heights Zoning Ordinance makes provision for single family detached construction when, as they are here, the lots are of record before the date of enactment of the Ordinance. Additionally, Section 401. 17.D. enables the City Council to approve a variance in: ". . .a situation whereby some reason of narrowness, shallowness, or shape of a specific parcel of property or by reason of exceptional topographic or water conditions of a specific parcel of land or lot, the strict application of this Ordinance would result in exceptional and unique difficulties when utilizing the parcel or lot in a manner customary and legally permissable within the district in which said lot or parcel is located." 4820 minnetonka boulevard, suite 420 minneapolis, mn 55416 612/925-9420 Oak Park Heights Mayor and City Council 13 September 1983 Page Two Although the proposed construction is two family dwelling, and as such not strictly mitigated under Section 401.03.B.4.b. , the narrowness of the lots is a pre-existing condition and two family dwellings are a permitted land use in the R-2 district. The variance request is therefore recommended to be approved. It should be noted that if the variance is approved for the prescribed pro- perty, it will then be necessary for the applicant to request a resubdivision of the four lots into two lots. As the situation is now, it would be impossible for the applicant to meet the setback requirements of all four lots . cc: LaVonne Wilson Lyle Eckberg Frank Leier Jack Krongard . a ` Z W ' 0 3 W CC 0 cc 1 Zmy Za01—ZW i` a0Ill -- JCC f 28Q O.0CO ci)2 t'y -I__ §F y I a (01-8 / ` FOa a. GIli lihk, t. CS/ ,d I- .)('" - 0. 5 I z f� /f . [II / 7 W O NV_ N 11111111° 3 J POK PO\ j1)-/- / PERKIN AVE N z r IR Or. ,,,,sccow..,'4111111111111:0iscA\_ z t R - N3nL1a,3,N3d O B N -- 3AV 3SOa N3d 0� \ N '3AV a3T3d N ll 3AV _c E1313d 2' N N DAV AOOBtl31 N 3AV AOO9v3d '^ N 3AV NtlJtl3d bl '`� z a O N = _1 QD 170 z �. N 3n ,.J 1f1Vd 00. N -- ,Ii Slatld lv .�w � /A l N 3AV� VWtl NVd LI I z T lel ® N JAN' oaoexo i IFI z I EXHIBIT A QJ � N 3AV NVWSO v+, aQ N 3AV w 000Ss° SITE LOCATION MAP ¢ OREN z W 3 lL1v ntlW° I J O t 11' (Alik {� r'I z N °w° i 8 hill N m 3AV 3N310Im \ N 3AV VONI10 _ 3nv. �d UMI r�� o m N 3ntl 0,313°10 .W..1 4 - U ' a Q �r^ i aI ;WZ 3 ~ %A "1 : t $1 DIoD O g i a ,, .73.4,1 i J - UN 1.1 arts pax.1,1 .:.. -- ____ i' 4'_ 7 c"'-' r- - I .. __.., U i P ..... i ° . C. n i , , • ...._ .. -�. : \j i ., .. • -p 0 o . g- • K P' -'- LA , ;von .. , s, ,c)1 ,,. ,,,,;_-,, ....4--:. o K..-- ,,,. . . ----0, . DOr EXHIBIT B SITE PLAN