Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutGrant 2010 r f DEP ARTMENT • �s OFP Office of the Commissioner w 445 Minnesota Street • Suite 1000 a Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 s t Phone: 651.201.7160 • Fax: 651.297.5728 • TTY: 651.282.6555 www.flps.state,mn.us April 16, 2010 Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Minnesota Law Enforcement Agencies Bureau of Criminal Apprehension Dear Chief law Enforcement Officer: Driver and vehicle Last Ma the Commissioners Office approached the Office of Traffic Safety OTS about Services Y, ' pP Y { } Emergency using federal funds to provide in -car cameras for law enforcement agencies. We shared our Communication goal with the OTS of having cameras in all vehicles within five years. Shortly after the Networks signing of the Primary Seat Belt Law the OTS sought and received a Section 1906 racial H om el a n d c ity a rofilin rant throw h the National Hi hwa raffic aet mnstraton Security and p rofiling g g Highway T Safe Administration NHTSA { }, The OTS Emergency proposed the idea of combining those funds with Seat Belt Incentive funds, impaired Driving Management funds and required matching funds to make available approximately 575 to 600 in -car Minnesota State Patrol cameras. Office of Communications There are many benefits of equipping law enforcement vehicles with in -car cameras Office of including: Justice Programs . Enhancing officer safety Office of • Recording an unbiased and accurate version of the traffic enforcement Traffic Safety action /public contact State Fire . Providing factual collection of evidentiary data for communities of color and court Marshal cases • Assisting in the investigation of alleged conduct violations /personnel complaints • Promoting positive officer behavior and compliance with departmental policies and procedures • Providing supportive documentation in lawsuits and protect the agency from liability Minnesota Statute 626.8471, Avoiding Racial Profiling and the Impartial Policing Policy of the Minnesota Board of Peace Officer Standards and Training, enhance our profession and reaffirm the State's commitment to the public that law enforcement is fair and equitable to all citizens of Minnesota. In -car cameras not only protect the public but also the officers by providing documented, factual representation of the interactions between officers and citizens at traffic stops. This eliminates guesswork and reduces preceived incidences of biased policing. The intent is to strengthen relationships between law enforcement and the community by Initiating productive discussions and improving the trust of law enforcement within the community. EOUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER April 16, 2010 Page 2 Much was needed to be accomplished to make this grant possible. A committee was formed that represented a diverse group of law enforcement and community organizations. The Committee first met in November 2009 to hear presentations from agencies that have an In -Car Camera Policy and discuss the elements that a model policy should have. The Committee decided to use the International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP) sample policy as a starting point to develop the Model Minnesota Policy. Committee members submitted their comments and edits to the OTS. A group from the Minnesota State Patrol (MSP), the Hennepin County Sheriff's Office and the OTS considered all comments and provided a model policy draft that was sent back out to committee members for their comments. The Committee met again on January 26, 2010 to discuss the Minnesota Model In -Car Camera Policy. The policy was also shared with NHTSA, the IACP, and the League of Minnesota Cities for their review. The Minnesota Model In -Car Camera Policy is Included in the grant application. Along with the Model Policy are further suggested considerations from the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT). An Agency In -Car Camera Policy is required for this grant. In order to meet Federal reauirements, the Aaencv In -Car Camera Policv must address the following core oolicv elements: 11 data access. 2) degaussine. 31 handling of evidence. 41 management of the digital media. 5) operational use, 6) retention. 71 retrieval of media, and 8) storage of the digital media. An agency may adopt the Model Policy as is, they may use the Model Policy and suggested LMCIT considerations to tailor an Agency In -Car Camera Policy that will best fit their community, or an agency may submit their current policy as long as it meets the Federal requirements. The Committee reviewed suggested guidelines for using in -car cameras for coaching and training. This included: • training new officers • assisting field training officers • serving as a part of an agency's in- service training The Committee also recognized that cameras can also be used as coaching and training tools In regards to the following: • high risk stops • pursuit review • search and seizure techniques • interview techniques April 16, 2020 Page 3 The POST Board Curriculum for new peace officers emphasizes the effect of biased policing and the problems associated with it, the need to eliminate it and the how important it is for officers to be ethical. The POST Board also provides the Chief Law Enforcement Officers and supervisors with information on how to eliminate biased policing and reinforce techniques that are lawful and appropriate. Review of in -car camera footage by each agency will help to provide coaching and training opportunities for new recruits and experienced officers and to ensure fair and impartial policing. As we move toward the goal of a camera in every vehicle, there will be fewer complaints about police actions and a faster resolution to those complaints. If disciplinary action is required, it will be covered in an agency's policy. Training on the operational use of the in -car cameras is also a requirement of the grant and should take place at the agency. Vendors will train a trainer designated by the agency or the vendor will provide on -site training. The vendor will supply all training materials. A vendor Request for Proposals was issued in January 2010. An evaluation team from the MSP, the Ramsey County Sheriff's Office, the St. Paul Police Department, and the OTS met to evaluate vendor proposals in March. They also planned and conducted the live testing and evaluation of all in -car cameras proposed. To help law enforcement agencies meet their different needs and requirements, seven different in -car cameras are available for agencies to select when completing the grant application. In an effort to streamline the distribution process, the OTS will contract with the Minnesota Sheriffs' Association to order, receive, and distribute in -car cameras to law enforcement agencies. I am pleased that the attached Agency In -Car Camera Grant Application is now available. I urge all municipal and county law enforcement agencies, the eight tribal agencies, and airport and university police that do traffic patrol to take advantage of this unique grant opportunity. Sincerely, hael Campion, Commis oner Attachment GRANT APPLICATION FOR IN-CAR CAMERAS The Department of Public Safety /Office of Traffic Safety is seeking In -Car Camera Grant Applications from municipal and county law enforcement agencies, the eight tribal agencies, and airport and university police that do traffic patrol. The digital in -car cameras are intended for vehicles used by line officers or deputies whose primary responsibility is patrolling public roads and interacting with the public, special unit vehicles such as canine or traffic units, and vehicles used by first line supervisors responsible for supervising the officers mentioned above. The cameras are not intended for vehicles used for investigative or higher -level executive or administrative officers. This grant will not provide in -car cameras for agencies to upgrade their existing system. The cameras can only be installed in vehicles that do not have an in -car camera. The goal of the Department of Public Safety In -Car Camera Initiative is to provide a way to enhance officer safety and enhance the public trust by preserving objective factual representations of officer - citizen interactions. In- car cameras accurately document statements and events during the course of an incident and enhance an officer's ability to document and review statements and actions for both internal reporting requirements and for courtroom preparation and presentation. Visual and audio information can be preserved for use in current and future investigations. In -car cameras also provide an impartial measurement for self- critique and field evaluation during recruitment and new officer training as well as identify training needs. 1. ELIGIBILITY Eligible applicants are Minnesota municipal and county law enforcement agencies, eight tribal agencies, and airport and university police that do traffic patrol. Private companies and organizations are not eligible. Eligibility is based on an agency's ability to meet all requirements set forth in this grant application. Final determination regarding an agency's eligibility will be made by the Office of Traffic Safety. To be eligible for an In -Car Camera grant, an agency must meet or agree to meet the following requirements. A. Requirements 1. An agency must currently have, adopt, or modify the Minnesota Model In -Car Camera Policy. The policy is required to address the following elements: data access degaussing - electronic cleansing by overwriting, erasing, and /or destruction of electronic storage media of analog and digital recording media that returns the media to its original state so it is ready for the imprinting of new images handling of evidence management of media operational use retention retrieval of media storage 2010 Minnesota In -Car Camera RFP Office of Traffic Safety, Department of Public Safety Page 1 of 27 1 / The policy must be submitted with the grant application. If an agency doesn't have an in -car camera policy, they may adopt or modify the Minnesota Model In -Car Camera Policy. Suggested policy considerations from the League of Minnesota Cites Insurance Trust (LMCIT) are also included. The Minnesota Model In -Car Camera Policy and suggested considerations from the LMCITare found in Attachment A. The Minnesota Model In -Car Camera Policy was developed from the International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP) sample policy by the Department of Public Safety Policy and Procedures Committee for In -Car Camera Training and Use. The policy has been reviewed by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), the IACP, and the LMCIT. If an agency needs to develop their in -car camera policy and is unable to submit it with the application form, the agency must agree to submit their in -car camera policy prior to receiving any in -car cameras through the grant program. A copy of the In -Car Camera Policy must be sent to: Hal Campbell MN Department of Public Safety /Office of Traffic Safety 444 Cedar St., Suite 150 St. Paul, MN 55101 -5150 2. An agency must agree that all Law Enforcement Officers (LEOs) whose primary responsibility is patrolling public roads and interacting with the public including first line supervisors responsible for supervising the officers mentioned above must receive training on the operational use of the in -car camera. The training will take place at the agency. It is difficult to estimate how long the training may take. Vendors will train a trainer designated by the agency or the vendor will provide on -site training. The vendor will supply all training materials. Within three (3) days after LEO training is completed, the trainer, shift supervisor or Chief Law Enforcement Officer (CLEO) must complete the Operational Use Training Form found in Attachment B and submit the name or names of the LEO(s)and supervisor(s) that have completed the training to: Hal Campbell MN Department of Public Safety /Office of Traffic Safety 444 Cedar St., Suite 150 St. Paul, MN 55101 -5150 Fax: 651 -297 -4844 This form may be copied and either mailed or faxed. 3. An agency must agree that each LEO that will be using an in -car camera obtained through the grant program will complete a 10 -12 question pre -post survey. Responses will be broken down by a profile of line officer survey respondents: a. assignment b. gender c. law enforcement experience d. camera experience 2010 Minnesota In -Car Camera RFP Office of Traffic Safety, Department of Public Safety Pape 2 of 27 t 1 The pre survey will address expectations while the post survey will address outcomes. The survey will be provided on SurveyMonkey. A link to the survey will be provided to each agency with instructions on taking the survey. The questions will address: • Line officer profile • Improving your effectiveness as a patrol officer? If so, how? • Enhancing the likelihood of a conviction? Provide examples: • Helpful in defending your actions and /or decisions from citizen complaints? Provide examples: Survey responses will be anonymous. The results will be aggregated, and there will be no reports generated for individual agencies. 4. Chief Law Enforcement Officer (CLEO) surveys are a requirement of this program. Six months after cameras have been installed, CLEOs from agencies receiving cameras will be required to complete a survey about tracking officer behavior complaints received, resolution of the complaints, whether cameras were used in the resolutions and if so, if the camera was useful. Questions will also be asked about other camera uses, challenges, problems and success stories; results will be compiled and consolidated from all agencies and summarized in a report to NHTSA. Questions will address: • Number of citizen complaints 6 months prior to in -car cameras being in use (this information is helpful if it is available) • Type of citizen complaints 6 months prior to in -car cameras being in use • Have in -car cameras been helpful in determining the validity of any racial profiling complaints or allegations? Provide examples: • Have the in -car cameras been helpful in investigating the merits of citizen complaints for general misconduct? Provide examples: • Have the in -car cameras been helpful to identify training needs for your officers based on a review of their recorded citizen contacts? Provide examples: • Have the in -car cameras been helpful in defending your agency against any formal legal action? Provide examples: • Do you feel that your officers are more professional and courteous during contacts with citizens knowing that the event is being recorded? Explain: • Has the recording of an event by the in -car camera been used to effectively educate /inform your citizenry (directly or via the media) about the actions and activities of your agency? Provide examples: • Have recordings of DWI cases been used in court? What percentages of the DWI recordings were helpful? • What other cases have recordings been helpful in determining the outcome in court? Provide examples: 2010 Minnesota !n -Car Camera RFP Office of Traffic Safety, Department of Public Safety Paqe 3 of 27 r 5. As part of the grant application, each agency is required to submit a description on how the in -car camera recordings will be used for coaching and training. This must include: • training new officers • assisting field training officers • serving as a part of an agency's in- service training • high risk stops • pursuit review • search and seizure techniques • interview techniques Attachment C provides suggestions intended for real time new officer training where the field training officer (FTO) can monitor the dialog and view the new officer during a traffic stop. Following the stop, the FTO can find a place to immediately review the stop with the officer. As part of the final report, each agency will be required to submit a description on the frequency that the in -car camera recordings were used for coaching and training for each of the situations above. Each agency will also be required to submit the following information: • Impartial Policing Policy • Current efforts to prevent biased policing • How the in -car camera will be used to prevent biased policing • Procedural components aimed at eliminating biased policing at traffic stops • What is considered to be appropriate, inappropriate, and unlawful conduct? • Guidelines for reinforcing techniques that are lawful and appropriate • How federal and state constitutional and statutory laws prohibiting discrimination by law enforcement are addressed 6. An agency must differentiate between how an in -car camera will be used for training new recruits, seasoned officers, and supervisors and include guidelines for reinforcing techniques that are lawful and appropriate. This is part of the grant application narrative. 7. An agency must describe their current efforts to prevent biased policing. This is part of the grant application narrative and part of the final report submitted by the 8. Following the cameras' distribution and use of the cameras for a period of six months, agencies will provide a final report within 30 days describing their activities and experiences using in -car cameras with an emphasis on use during traffic stops. The OTS will provide the reporting format by October 1, 2010. The agency final report will be submitted to: Hal Campbell MN Department of Public Safety /Office of Traffic Safety 444 Cedar St., Suite 150 St. Paul, MN 55101 -5150 2090 Minnesota !n -Car Camera RFP Office of Traffic Safety, Department of Public Safety Paqe 4 of 27 i 9. There will be a local match of $300 required per in -car camera. The installation of an in -car camera was determined to be $200 and this amount can be used toward the local match. As an example: Agency requests 10 in -car cameras Credit for the installation of 10 in -car cameras is 10 x $200.00 or $2,000.00 Receipt required as proof of installation Local match that is due from the agency would be 10 x $100.00 or $1,000. II. SELECTION OF IN -CAR CAMERAS An evaluation team comprised of LEOs that are experienced with in -car camera technology and a member from the OTS evaluated vendor proposals and conducted live testing of 11 in -car cameras during the day and at night. Live testing was conducted on March 22 and 23, 2010. Daytime testing occurred along the Frontage road at the Driver's Testing Facility in Arden Hills, MN during the hours of 1:00 — 5:00 PM. Nighttime testing occurred at the southest corner of the Driver's Testing Facility between the hours of 8:10 —10:00 PM. Evaluation of the live testing of in -car cameras included: • audio and video playback of the day and nighttime simulated traffic stop — the media was burned to a DVD and viewed • quality of the audio and video playback in the vehicle • ease of use • range and clarity of the audio from the use of the wireless microphone A variety of in -car camera technology options exist and local agencies will have different needs and requirements for camera systems. The following in -car cameras are available for agencies to select. DVD System • WatchGuard DV -1 Rearview Mirror System • Digital Ally DVM -750 Flashcard or Hard Drive System • Coban TopCam EDGE • ICOP Model 20/20—W • L3 Mobile Vision Flashback2 Laptop Integrated System • Panasonic Arbitrator 360 • DigitalSafety Technologies DP -2 Agencies will select one in -car camera model and the number of in -car cameras they are applying for on the grant application form. 2010 Minnesota In -Car Camera RFP Office of Traffic Safety, Department of Public Safety Page 5 of 27 Ill. FUNDING AVAILABLE AND GENERAL FUNDING RULES The DPS In -Car Camera Initiative is funded by monies received by the Office of Traffic Safety from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, a division of the Federal Department of Transportation. The OTS expects to send out notification letters on the In -Car Camera grant awards by the last week in May. Grant agreements with the Minnesota Sheriffs' Association are expected to be signed and in -car cameras requested by June 25, 2010. The OTS is not setting a lower or upper limit on the number of in -car cameras an agency may request for the In- Car Camera grant. Qualifying agencies may or may not receive all the in -car cameras requested. The OTS estimates that approximately 575 - 600 in -car cameras will be available through the In -Car Camera grant. In an effort to streamline the grant process, the OTS will contract with the Minnesota Sheriffs' Association to enter into an agreement with agencies to order, receive, and distribute in -car cameras.The OTS will provide the Minnesota Sheriffs' Association with a list of agencies awarded In -Car Camera grants. In -car camera orders can only be placed through the Minnesota Sheriffs' Association. Vendors will direct ship to the to the Minnesota Sheriffs' Association. Agencies located within 50 miles of the Minnesota Sheriffs' Association will be required to pick -up their orders at the: Minnesota Sheriffs' Association 1951 Woodlane Drive, Suite 200 Woodbury, MN 55125 The Minnesota Sheriffs' Association will notify agencies when their orders are available and schedule a pick -up time. The Minnesota Sheriffs' Association will invoice the OTS for orders that are placed. They will pay the vendors with monies received from the OTS and the local matching funds received from agencies. Agencies notified as an in -car camera grant recipient must enter into an agreement with the Minnesota Sheriffs' Association to order in -car cameras and place their request by Friday, June 25, 2010. IV. APPLICATION PROCEDURES Your Grant Application should be mailed (or hand delivered) to: Hal Campbell MN Department of Public Safety /Office of Traffic Safety 444 Cedar St. Suite 150, Town Square St. Paul, MN 55101 -5150 • Grant applications must be received at the Office of Traffic Safety no later than Friday, May 7, 2010 at 4:00 PM CST. It is each applicant's responsibility to ensure their grant application is received on time; if you are mailing, allow at least four work days for delivery. • Facsimile (Fax) and e-mail transmissions of a grant application will not be accepted and incomplete applications will not be considered. • One original and three copies of the complete grant application package must include: 1) Letter of Application, 2) Completed Grant Application Form, 3) Basic Agreement, and 4) Narrative. 2010 Minnesota In -Car Camera RFP Office of Traffic Safety, Department of Public Safety Paqe 6 of 27 • We may be photocopying your grant application for additional reviewers, please do not put the completed grant application in any sort of binder or cover, do not use legal size paper, and do not use more than one color. Negotiations on individual grant applications may occur; you may be asked to clarify statements. Saving a copy of your completed Grant Application Package will make it easier for you to make any necessary modifications. All complete grant aplications received by the deadline (4:00 PM CST Friday, May 7, 2010) will be evaluated by representatives of the Department of Public Safety's Office of Traffic Safety (OTS). Evaluation and selection will be completed by the fourth week of May, and you will be notified of the results by letter. QUESTIONS regarding the application procedures, grant application contents and evaluation /selection of the grant applications received must be directed to Hal Camobell at (651) 201 -7078 or e-mail at hal.camnbell0state.mn.us. Questions must be received by 3:00 PM Wednesday, April 20, 2010. Questions and answers will be posted to the OTS Web site htto: / /www.dr)s.state.mn.us /ots /enforcement orofarams /default.aso Friday, April 23, 2010 by 4:00 PM. Please note: discussions with others may not yield adequate, consistent, or accurate information. V. BACKGROUND In 2002, a national study was conducted by the international Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP) to measure the impact of in -car cameras on state police, highway patrol, and the communities they serve. The IACP found that in -car cameras lessened complaints, enhanced public opinion, promoted professionalism, and strengthened agency leadership and training. Research supports the equipping of all squads with in -car cameras in order to: • Record an unbiased and accurate version of the traffic enforcement action /public contact. • Provide factual collection of evidentiary data for communities of color. • Assist in the investigation of alleged conduct violations /personnel complaints. • Promote positive officer behavior and compliance with departmental policies and procedures. • Promote positive citizen response during contacts with law enforcement officers. • Provide supportive documentation in lawsuits and protect the agency from liability. • Assist in the apprehension of suspects when the officer is injured. • Aid the agency in evaluating performance and effectiveness of enforcement policies and procedures. Even as in -car cameras are now the norm and not the exception, many law enforcement agencies still find it difficult to budget for the in -car cameras. The Commissioner's goal is to have every squad car equipped with an in -car camera within five years. The DPS In -Car Camera Initiative is a major step towards accomplishing this goal. VI. FUNDING REQUIREMENTS Matching Funds (your agency's direct or indirect contribution). Expenses related to the grant program that are paid for with county, municipal and /or private funding clearly demonstrate a vested interest and real commitment to the DPS In -Car Camera Initiative. An agency's matching funds are $300.00 per in -car camera. An agency can claim $200 for the installation of an in -car camera. 2090 Minnesota In -Car Camera RFP Office of Traffic Safety, Department of Public Safety Pape 7 of 27 Y Y VII. GRANT APPLICATION CONTENTS The grant application must include the following information: Letter of Application • Purpose of the grant request • Brief description of how the request fits with the goal of the DPS In -Car Camera Initiative Completed Application Form found in Attachment D • Requires ink signature Basic Agreement (on application form) • The agency must have an In -Car Camera Policy that addresses the eight elements found on page 1. The agency's In -Car Camera Policy must be submitted with the application. If a policy is being developed, the agency's In -Car Camera Policy must be submitted to the OTS by the date the agency receives their in -car camera(s). • All Law Enforcement Officers whose primary responsibility is patrolling public roads and interacting with the public including first line supervisors responsible for supervising the officers mentioned above must receive training on the operational use of the in -car camera. Training and training materials will be provided at no cost to the agency. The agency has the option of having the vendor train a trainer designated by the agency who will then conduct training on the operational use of the in -car camera. The Operational Use Training Form in Attachment B must be completed and either mailed or faxed to the OTS, attention Hal Campbell. • The LEO(s) that will use the in -car camera(s) obtained through the In -Car Camera grant will complete a pre -post survey as described on page 2 of this Grant Application. • The CLEO will complete a survey 6 months after the in -car cameras have been in use. Questions will be asked about tracking officer behavior complaints that were received, resolution of the complaints, whether cameras were used in the resolutions and if so, if the camera was useful. Questions will also be asked about camera use, challenges, problems and success stories. • A designated representative of the agency will prepare and submit a final report to the OTS, attention Hal Campbell. The final report must be submitted within 30 days after 6 months of using the in -car camera(s) obtained through this grant. The report will describe the agency's activities and experiences using an in -car camera or cameras during traffic stops. Specific areas to address will be: • Current efforts to prevent biased policing • How the in -car cameras were used to prevent biased policing • Procedural components aimed at eliminating biased policing at traffic stops • What is considered to be appropriate, inappropriate, and unlawful conduct? • Guidelines for reinforcing techniques that are lawful and appropriate • How they address federal and state constitutional and statutory laws prohibiting discrimination by law enforcement The OTS will provide the reporting format by October 1, 2010. • A $300.00 local match is required for each in -car camera requested by the agency and ordered by the MN Sherriffs' Association on behalf of the agency. Of the matching funds required, $200.00 for installation per in -car camera can be applied toward the required match. The MN Sheriffs' Association must receive the matching funds before the agency receives their in -car camara or cameras. Proof of installation must be received by the OTS within 60 days of receipt of in -car camera(s). Otherwise, the agency will provide payment to the Sheriffs' Association the amout of $200 per in -car camera received 2010 Minnesota In-Car Camera RFP Office of Traffic Safety, Department of Public Safety Page 8 of 27 by the agency through the grant, and the amount allocated for installation cannot be applied to the required local match. • Each agency must enter into an agreement with the Minnesota Sheriffs' Association to order in -car cameras and place their order by Friday, June 25, 2010. The model and number of in -car cameras an agency may request will be provided in the grant notification letter sent to the agency. • In -car camera orders will be sent to the vendors by June 29, 2010. • Each agency must submit their Impartial Policing Policy with the grant application. Narrative (on application form) • Describe the agency's need for in -car cameras. • Describe the agency's current efforts to prevent biased policing. • Describe how the agency will use the in -car camera(s) for coaching and training. The agency must differentiate between how the in -car camera(s) will be used for training new recruits, seasoned officers, and supervisors. • Describe the agency's guidelines for reinforcing techniques that are lawful and appropriate. • Describe how the agency addresses federal and state constitutional and statutory laws prohibiting discrimination by law enforcement Applications will be evaluated by the OTS and award letters will be sent by the last week of May 2010. 2010 Minnesota !n -Car Camera RFP Office of Traffic Safety, Department of Public Safety Pape 9 of 27 ATTACHMENT A Minnesota Model In -Car Camera Policy February 5, 2010 Department of Public Safety A. Purpose The purpose of this policy is to provide Minnesota Law Enforcement agencies with guidelines for the use, management, access, retention, handling of evidence, degaussing, storage, and retrieval of audio- visual media recorded by in -car video systems. B. Definitions 1. Recorded Media —Means audio -video signals recorded on any of several storage devices, including, but not limited to, analog tape (VHS, SVHS, Hi 8mm), digital tape (DV),or other portable digital storage devices (CD, DVD, hard drive, flash card, etc.). 2. In -Car Camera System and Mobile Video Recorder (MVR) —These are synonymous terms and refer to any system that captures audio and video signals, that is capable of installation in a vehicle, and that includes at minimum, a camera, microphone, recorder, and monitor. 3. Supervisor— Licensed peace officers appointed with responsibility to serve as a supervisor. 4. MVR Technician -- Personnel, licensed or civilian, that are trained in the operational use and repair of MVRs, duplicating methods, storage and retrieval methods and procedures, and who possess a working knowledge of video forensics and evidentiary procedures. 5. Degaussing — Electronic cleansing by overwriting, erasing, and /or destruction of electronic storage media of analog and digital recording media that returns the media to its original state so it is ready for the imprinting of new images. 6. Activate —Any process which causes the MVR system to transmit or store video or audio data. 7. Law Enforcement Operator (LEO)— Primarily, a licensed peace officer, but on occasion may be a non sworn representative of the agency, who would be authorized and assigned to operate MVR equipped vehicles to the extent consistent with Minnesota Statute 169.98. 8. MGDPA —The Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13. C. Policy The use of the MVR system provides documentation of law enforcement interaction with the public by providing evidence for the judicial system, internal review, or review by the public through formal request by agency specific method. The primary function of the MVR is for officer safety and not to initiate disciplinary action against the officer, but the data collected on the MVR may be used as evidence relating to a complaint of misconduct made against an LEO by any person present at the scene of the incident when such complaint could result in additional training, counseling or disciplinary action in accordance with agency policy. 2010 Minnesota In -Car Camera RFP Office of Traffic Safety, Department of Public Safety Page 10 of 27 D. Procedures 1. Operational Objectives The agency has adopted the use of MVRs to accomplish the following objectives: a. To enhance officer safety b. To accurately document statements and events during the course of an incident c. To enhance the officer's ability to document and review statements and actions for both internal reporting requirements and for courtroom preparation /presentation d. To provide an impartial measurement for self - critique and field evaluation during recruitment and new officer training e. To preserve visual and audio information for use in current and future investigations f. To enhance the public trust by preserving objective factual representations of officer - citizen interactions in the form of video and audio recordings made via an in -car camera system, and g. To identify training needs 2. General Procedures It is the responsibility of this agency to ensure that the audio -video recording equipment is properly installed according to the manufacturer's recommendations. a. MVR equipment shall automatically activate when emergency equipment (lights, sirens) is operating or an LEO can start recording when they are outside their vehicle via a wireless transmitter. The system may also be activated manually from the control panel affixed to the interior of the vehicle. b. Placement and operation of system components within the vehicle shall be based on officer safety requirements and manufacturers recommendations. c. All staff shall successfully complete an approved course of instruction prior to being deployed with MVR systems in operational settings. d. The agency will establish and maintain a method for the public to view recorded events to the extent that such data is classified as public under the MGDPA. e. The agency will ensure officers, investigators, and prosecutors have access to the recorded events according to agency specific method for making the recordings accessible within the criminal justice system. f. The MVR System shall be configured to minimally record for 30 seconds, prior to an event. An agency has the discretion to increase the pre event record time. g. The MVR System may not be configured to record audio data occurring prior to activation. 3. Officers' Responsibilities Inspection and general maintenance of MVR equipment installed in agency vehicles shall be the responsibility of the LEO assigned to the vehicle. a. MVR equipment shall be operated in accordance with the manufacturer's recommended guidelines and agency training and policies. b. Prior to beginning each shift, the assigned LEO shall perform an inspection to ensure that the MVR is performing in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations covering the following matters: • Remote audio transmitter is functional and has an adequate power source • Connected to the recording equipment • The transmitter can remotely activate the system 2010 Minnesota In -Car Camera RFP Office of Traffic Safety, Department of Public Safety Pape 11 of 27 • The view of all cameras shall be free of obstruction • All camera lenses shall be operational • Camera facing intended direction • Recording mechanism capturing both audio and video information • System plays back both audio and video tracks Malfunctions, damage or theft of in -car camera equipment shall be reported to the immediate supervisor prior to placing the unit into service. 1. An agency specific report shall be completed documenting the suspected cause(s) of equipment failure or any recommendations for corrective actions. The supervisor shall determine if the vehicle shall be placed in service without an operating MVR and the emergency communications center shall be so informed. 4. Mandatory MVR Recording To the extent practical without compromising officer safety, the MVR system shall be activated and /or operated under the following circumstances and conditions: a. Traffic stops (to include, but not limited to traffic violations, stranded motorist assistance and all crime interdiction stops) b. Priority responses c. Vehicle pursuits d. Arrests e. Vehicle searches f. Physical or verbal confrontations, or use of force g. Prisoner transports h. Crimes in progress i. Any situation where a non prisoner is in the vehicle and being transported; e.g., a child, an elderly person, someone having a medical event j. Any situation or incident that the officer, through training and experience, believes should be audibly and visually recorded k. Law enforcement operators are encouraged to narrate events using the audio recording, so as to provide the best documentation for pretrial and courtroom presentation I. When the MVR is activated, law enforcement officers shall ensure that the audio portion is also activated so all events are properly documented m. And others at agency discretion 5. Operational Protocols a. To prevent bleed over and /or noise from other MVRs in systems using low band transmitters (analog), only the primary LEO initiating the contact shall activate his or her audio recorder. b. Law enforcement operators using digital transmitters that are individually synchronized to their individual MVR shall activate both audio and video recordings when responding in a support capacity in order to obtain additional perspectives of the incident scene. c. Law enforcement operators may have access to review the recordings when preparing written reports or statements of events to help ensure accuracy and consistency of accounts. 2010 Minnesota In-Car Camera RFP Office of Traffic Safety, Department of Public Safely Paqe 12 of 27 3 d. With the exception of law enforcement radios or other emergency equipment, law enforcement operators shall not use other electronic devices within the law enforcement vehicle in order to intentionally interfere with the capability of the MVR System to record audio data. e. Law enforcement operators shall not erase, after, reuse, modify or tamper with MVR recordings. Only a supervisor, MVR technician, or agency approved designee may erase and reissue previously recorded recordings and may only do so pursuant to the provisions of this policy. f. To prevent damage, original recordings shall not be viewed in any equipment other than the equipment issued or authorized by the MVR technician g. MVR recordings shall be considered evidence, designated by the LEO for the appropriate retention and be submitted to the agency approved designee to ensure that the recording is retained in accordance with the agency's policy. h. Any other activities when in the LEO's judgment it would be beneficial to do so. L When the MVR is activated to document an event, it shall not be deactivated until the event has been concluded unless: 1. The incident or event is of such duration that the MVR may be deactivated to conserve recording times 2. The LEO does not reasonably believe that deactivation will result in the loss of critical documentary information 3. The intention to stop the tape has been noted by the LEO either verbally or in a written notation j. The recording media shall be replaced at the completion of an incident when the recording time remaining is less than 1 hour, for long playing media lasting 6 -8 hours, or 30 minutes for H18 analog or digital media with recording time of 5 hours or less. 6. Supervisor's Responsibilities These may be agency specific, and in accordance with their policies an agency may incorporate some or all of the responsibilities if pertinent. a. Supervisors shall issue unrecorded media and when reasonably possible prior to issuance, shall assign and affix an identification number to the exterior of the media. 1. The numbered media is then recorded in the MVR chain of custody log 2. If the media is a computer hard drive, a computer generated file number shall be generated internally b. The chain of custody log shall include, but need not be limited to: 1. Tracking number of media 2. Date issued 3. Officer or vehicle issued 4. Date submitted 5. Law enforcement operator submitting the media 6. Hold for evidence indication 7. In the event an officer works at a remote location and reports in only periodically, multiple recording media may be issued. c. When an incident arises that requires the immediate retrieval of the recorded media (e.g., serious crime scenes, agency shootings, agency involved crashes, a supervisor shall respond to the scene and ensure that the appropriate supervisor, MVR technician, or crime scene investigator removes the recorded media. The technician or investigator shall then: 2010 Minnesota !n -Car Camera RFP Office of Traffic Safety, Department of Public Safety Paqe 13 of 27 1. Place the media into evidence and provide copies to authorized investigative personnel 2. Ensure the appropriate notation is made in the chain of custody log d. The supervisor shall periodically review the chain of custody log to ensure that issued media is surrendered in a timely manner. The supervisor is responsible for determining causes for such problems (e.g., unreported problems with the MVR equipment or equipment not being used in accordance with agency policy). e. Supervisors who are informed or otherwise become aware of malfunctioning equipment shall ensure that authorized personnel make repairs in a timely manner. f. Supervisors shall conduct periodic reviews of officer assigned media in order to periodically: 1. Assess officer performance 2. Assure proper functioning of MVR equipment 3. Determine if MVR equipment is being operated properly 4. Identify recordings that maybe appropriate for training g. Supervisors shall conduct bi- weekly reviews of personnel who are newly assigned MVR equipment in order to ensure compliance with agency policy. These reviews shall continue until such time as the supervisor believes new operator is competent. Supervisors shall thereafter conduct agency designated reviews. h. Ensure recordings that have been tagged for extended retention are tagged properly. I. Supervisors may activate the MVR system remotely to monitor a developing situation such as a chase, riot, or other event threatening public safety, officer safety, or both when the purpose is to obtain tactical information to assist in managing the event. Supervisors shall not remotely activate the MVR system for the purpose of surveillance regarding the conversations or actions of an officer. 7. Technician's Responsibilities a. The MVR technician is responsible for the ordering, issuance, retrieval, storage, degaussing, and duplication of all recorded media. b. The MVR technician shall be responsible for collecting all completed media or for over sight and verification of wireless downloaded media. c. Once the media is surrendered, the technician shall: 1. Ensure it is stored in a secured location with authorized controlled access; and 2. Make appropriate entries in the chain of custody log d. Recorded media may only be degaussed: 1. Pursuant to a court order 2. In accordance with established retention policies e. For the purpose of accountability, all media will be assigned an identification number prior to issuance to the field. The MVR technician will maintain a record database of issued media. f. The MVR technician shall coordinate with field supervisors to ensure that an adequate supply of recorded media is available. g. The MVR technician shall be responsible for the following: 1. Long -term storage of media deemed to be of evidentiary value consistent with the agency's evidence storage protocols and retention schedule 2. The degaussing and re- issuance of all other media deemed to be of no evidentiary value consistent with the agency's document retention requirements 2010 Minnesota In -Car Camera RFP Office of Traffic Safety, Department of Public Safety Page 14 of 27 8. Media Access a. All recording media, recorded images and audio recordings are the property of the agency and subject to the provisions of the MGDPA. Dissemination outside of the agency is strictly prohibited except to the extent permitted under the MGDPA, Peace Officer Disciplinary Procedures Act or other applicable law and without written authorization of the agency's chief executive or his or her designee. b. To prevent damage to, or alteration of, the original recorded media; it shall not be copied, viewed or otherwise inserted into any device not approved by the agency MVR technician or forensic media staff. c. When possible, a copy of the original media shall be used for viewing by investigators, staff, training personnel, and the courts (unless otherwise directed by the courts) to preserve the original media in pristine condition. d. At the conclusion of the trial proceedings or as otherwise authorized by the prosecutor's office for which the media was required, all copies shall be submitted to the MVR technician for further storage. e. An officer who is captured on or referenced in the video or audio data may review such data and use the data for any purpose relating to his /her employment. 9. Handling of Evidence a. The MVR equipment will be used in the prosecution of those who violate the law, and to provide objective information concerning police /citizen contacts. b. Recordings containing data which must be retained in anticipation of pending civil action or are collected as part of an active investigation for the commencement or defense of a pending civil action against the state shall continue to be in the control of the agency, in conjunction with the Attorney General's Office. c. When a recording contains evidence for a case which is being investigated by another agency, that agency shall be provided a duplicate copy of the recording with the approval of the Chief Law Enforcement Officer. 2010 Minnesota fn -Car Camera RFP Office of Traffic Safety, Department of Public Safety Pape 15 of 27 ATTACHMENT B OPERATIONAL USE TRAINING FORM Agency: Name In -Car Camera Model I Date Training Completed 1 2. 3 4 f 5 ti 7 8 I 9 I 10. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 2010 Minnesota In -Car Camera RFP Office of Traffic Safety, Department of Public Safety Pape 16 of 27 OPERATIONAL. USE TRAINING FORM Agency: Name In -Car Camera Model ( Date Training Completed 21. 22. I I 23. I I I 24. I 25. I I I 126. I 1 127. I 28. I I I 29. 30. 31. 32. I I 133, 34. I 35. Number of Law Enforcement Officers that completed the training: Signature /Title Date Send to: Hal Campbell MN Department of Public Safety /Office of Traffic Safety 444 Cedar St., Suite 150 St. Paul, MN 55101 -5150 Fax: 651 - 297 -4844 2010 Minnesota !n -Car Camera RFP Office of Traffic Safety, Department of Public Safety Page 17 of 27 ATTACHMENT C Suggested Use of In -Car Camera for Coaching and Training The following is not intended for all situations that an in -car camera can be used for coaching and training; e.g., high risk stops, two- officer stops, and pursuit review. The suggestions below are intended for real time new officer training where the field training officer (FTO) can monitor the dialog and view the new officer during a traffic stop. Fallowing the stop, the FTO can find a place to immediately review the stop with the officer that may include the following: 1. Whether the officer followed acceptable safety procedures 2. Positioning of their vehicle 3. Awareness of their surroundings, e.g., proximity to passing traffic 4. Approach S. Distance a. Positioning at vehicle when making contact with occupant(s) b. Positioning for better view of vehicle interior 6. Exchange with the driver, e.g., ability to maintain control of the situation through verbal instruction (Driver's reaction to being stopped) 7. Ability to perform under different conditions (low stress /high stress conditions) The in -car camera allows for immediate review of a traffic stop, frame by frame if necessary. Also, the FTO can document whether performance is on task or not on task. 2010 Minnesota In -Car Camera RFP Office of Traffic Safety. Department of Public Safety Paqe 18 of 27 ATTACHMENT D IN -CAR CAMERA GRANT APPLICATION FORM Law Enforcement Agency: MN Tax ID #: Federal Tax ID #: (only one Tax ID # is required) Mailing Address: Phone: Fax: Website: Name of Chief Law Enforcement Officer: Phone: Email: Application Contact & Title (if not the Chief Law Enforcement Officer) Phone: Email: 2010 Minnesota In-Car Camera RFP Office of Traffic Safety, Department of Public Safety Paqe 19 of 27 AGENCY INFORMATION Geoeraahic Area Served (specific to this proposal) Number of Law Enforcement Officers Full -time: Part -time: Number of Vehicles Currently equipped with in -car cameras: Not equipped with in -car cameras: Grant Request Information Name of In -Car Camera Requested (select one): ❑ WatchGuard DV -1 ❑ Digital Ally DVM -750 ❑ Coban TopCam EDGE ❑ ICOP Model 20/20 — W ❑ L3 Mobile Vision Flashback2 ❑ Panasonic Arbitrator 360 ❑ DigitalSafety Technologies DP -2 Number of In -Car Cameras Requested: 2010 Minnesota In -Car Camera RFP Office of Traffic Safety, Department of Public Safety Paqe 20 of 27 Basic Agreement (please mark an X in the boxes if the Chief Law Enforcement Officer or designee agrees with the following statements) In -Car Camera Policv ❑ The Agency In -Car Camera Policy is submitted with the grant application ❑ The Agency In -Car Camera Policy is not submitted with grant application. Our In -Car Camera Policy is currently being developed and will be submitted prior to receiving our in -car camera(s). Training on the Operational Use of the In -Car Camera ❑ All Law Enforcement Officers whose primary responsibility is patrolling public roads and interacting with the public including first line supervisors responsible for supervising the officers will receive training on the operational use of the in -car camera prior to use. ❑ The Chief Law Enforcement Officer or shift supervisor will complete and mail or fax the Operational Use Training Form found in Attachment B to the OTS, attention Hal Campbell, within three days after the training is completed. Law Enforcement Officer Pre -Post Survey ❑ Each Law Enforcement Officer that will be using an in -car camera obtained through the grant program will complete a pre -post survey of approximately 10 —12 questions through Survey Monkey. Survey responses will be anonymous. The results will be aggregated, and there will be no reports generated by agency. Chief Law Enforcement Officer Survey, ❑ The Chief Law Enforcement Officer or designee will complete a survey 6 months after in -car camera(s) use. Questions will be asked about tracking officer behavior complaints received, resolution of the complaints, whether cameras were used in the resolutions and if so, if the camera was useful. Questions will also be asked about camera use, challenges, problems and success stories. The survey is part of the Agency final report. Final Report ❑ The Chief Law Enforcement Officer or designee will submit a final report within 30 days after 6 months of using the in -car camera(s) obtained through this grant. The report will describe: 1) the agency's activities and experiences using an in -car camera or cameras during traffic stops, 2) current efforts to prevent biased policing, 3) how the in -car camera was used to prevent biased policing, 4) procedural components aimed at eliminating biased policing at traffic stops, 5) what is considered to be appropriate, inappropriate, and unlawful conduct, and 6) how the agency addresses federal and state constitutional and statutory laws prohibiting discrimination by law enforcement. The OTS will provide the reporting format by October 1, 2010. The final report will be submitted to the OTS, attention Hal Campbell. 2010 Minnesota In -Car Camera RFP Office of Traffic Safety, Department of Public Safety Paqe 21 of 27 Required Local Match u The required local match is $300.00 for each in -car camera. The Agency understands that $200.00 of the required match for each in -car camera may be used for installation. The Agency will send payment of either $300.00 or $100.00 and a receipt of $200.00 that shows the camera was installed to the Minnesota Sheriffs' Association. Money must be received by the Minnesota Sheriffs' Association before the Agency receives their in- car camara or cameras. Proof of installation must be received by the Minnesota Sheriffs' Association within 60 days of receipt of in -car camera(s). Otherwise, the agency will not receive credit for installation and will be responsible for providing payment to the Sheriffs' Association the amout of $300.00 per in -car camera received by the agency through the grant. Agreement with the Minnesota Sheriffs' Association D Agency will enter into an agreement with the Minnesota Sheriffs' Association to order in -car cameras. 0 Agency will request the model and number of in -car cameras by Friday, June 25, 2010. 0 Agency will agree to pick -up in -car cameras from the Minnesota Sheriffs' Association if the Agency is located 50 miles or less from the Minnesoat Sheriffs' Association. This will be determined by the OTS. 0 In -car camera orders will be placed by the Minnesota Sheriffs' Association June 29, 2010. Anti Biased Policing Policv 0 The Agency's Impartial Policing Policy is submitted with the grant application. 2010 Minnesota In -Car Camera RFP Office of Traffic Safety, Department of Public Safety Pape 22 of 27 Narrative 1. Describe the agency's need for in -car cameras. 2. Describe the agency's current efforts to prevent biased policing. 2010 Minnesota In -Car Camera RFP Office of Traffic Safety, Department of Public Safety Pape 23 of 27 3. Describe how the agency will use the in -car camera(s) for coaching and training and differentiate between how the in -car camera(s) will be used for training new recruits, seasoned officers, and supervisors. 4. Describe the agency's guidelines for reinforcing techniques that are lawful and appropriate. 2010 Minnesota !n -Car Camera RFP Office of Traffic Safety, Department of Public Safety Page 24 of 27 Grant Terms and Conditions Purchase of Equipment. Any equipment purchased under this grant shall be used primarily for traffic safety purposes during the life of the equipment. The Grantee may not deviate from this requirement and may not dispose of any equipment unless it has first obtained permission from the State. Only equipment specified in the grant may be purchased. Responsibility for Equipment. The Grantee shall be responsible for all operating, maintenance, and repair costs of equipment purchased under this grant unless otherwise specified. Title to equipment acquired under this grant shall vest upon the Grantee. This grant is subject to all applicable federal and state statutes and regulations, including, but not limited to the following: Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794) and 49 CFR Part 27 which relates to handicapped persons. 49 CFR Part 23 — Participation by minority enterprises in Department of Transportation Programs; 49 CFR Part 29 Subpart F — The Drug -Free Workplace Act of 1988; 23 U.S.C. 101 Note and 41 U.S.C.10a — Buy America Act; and 49 CFR Part 29 — Certification Regarding Debarment and Suspension. These provisions are incorporated by reference and made a part of this grant. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended. By signing below, I certify that the information contained in this application is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, that I have the authority to enter into this grant application as required by applicable articles, bylaws, resolutions, or ordinances, and the Grant Applicant will meet all the terms and conditions required of the DPS /OTS 2010 In -Car Camera Grant Application. Name /Title Date Please return completed grant application form and to: Hal Campbell MN Department of Public Safety /Office of Traffic Safety 444 Cedar St., Suite 1S0 St. Paul, MN 55101 -5150 Due by 4:00 PM CST May 7, 2010. 2010 Minnesota !n -Car Camera RFP Office of Traffic Safety, Department of Public Safety Paqe 25 of 27 ATTACHMENT E OTS Evaluation of In -Car Camera Grant Application The OTS estimates that approximately 575 - 600 in -car cameras will be available through the !n -Car Camera grant. Qualifying agencies may or may not receive all the in -car cameras requested. The following components of the Grant Application will be evaluated. Reviewers: Fill in the Lead Agency's name and rate the proposal on each of the listed points by circling the appropriate answer. Comments are welcome in the blank spaces of this form or on separate sheets. Agency's Name: Reviewer's Initials: r. i Purpose of the grant request No = 0 points Yes = 5 points Brief description how request fits with the goal of the DPS No = 0 points Yes = 5 points In -Car Camera Initiative Letter of Application Points (0 to 10): . Form........:. ... - n Agency name, contact, phone, and e-mail No = 0 points Yes =10 points Agency information No = 0 points Yes =15 points Grant request information No = 0 points Yes = 10 points Ink Signature No = 0 points Yes = 5 points Grant Application Form Points (0 to 40): 2010 Minnesota !n -Car Camera RFP Office of Traffic Safety, Department of Public Safety Pape 26 of 27 In-Car Camera Policy (only one box checked) No = 0 points Yes = 20 points Training on Operational Use of In-Car Camera No = 0 points Yes =10 points Law Enforcement Officer Pre-Post Survey I No = o points Yes = 10 points Chief Law Enforcement Officer Survey No = 0 points Yes = 10 points Final Report No = 0 points I Yes =10 points Required Local Match I No = o points I Yes =10 points Agreement with Minnesota Sheriffs' Association No = 0 points Yes = 15 points Anti Biased Policing Policy I No = 0 points Yes = 15 points Basic Agreement Points (0 to 100): Agency's need for in-car cameras Omitted = 0 Adequate = 15 Excellent = 30 Current efforts to reduce biased policing Omitted = 0 Adequate =15 Excellent = 30 Use of in-car camera for coaching and training Omitted = 0 Adequate =15 Excellent = 30 Differentiate between training new recruits, Omitted = 0 Adequate =15 Excellent = 30 seasoned officers, and supervisors Guidelines for reinforcing lawful and Omitted = 0 Adequate =15 Excellent = 30 appropriate techniques Narrative Points (0 to 150): Total Points for Grant Application ( 0 to 300 points) Proposal is complete and agency is eligible F YES ❑ N0 In-Car Camera Model In-Car Cameras Requested In-Car Cameras Allotted COMMENTS: 2010 Minnesota In-Car Camera RFP Office of Traffic Safety, Department of Public Safety Paqe 27 of 27 Brian DeRosier From: Ann Jarrett [ann @mnchiefs.org] Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 1:08 PM To: Brian DeRosier Subject: In -Car Camera Grant Clarification Hello MN Chiefs and Sheriffs, There have been a few questions arise regarding the In -Car Camera Grant application. 1. Is there a model policy that we can be adaptable to our agency. Yes, there is. Click here for a sample policy you can adapt as necessarv. 2. On the scoring system of the grant, there are areas in which agencies receive points for checking off boxes. Four of those boxes pertain to an agreement with MN Sheriffs' Assn. If you agree with all four statements, check them off. Once DPS has informed MSA of the agencies receiving grants, a more formal agreement will be sent to the agency. But for now —just check off the boxes that you would be willing to enter into an agreement. 3. This grant is not for replacement of cameras that are not working or partially working. It is only for cars that do not have any camera technology. 4. This grant cannot be used to reimburse recently purchased cameras. 5. As stated on the previous email — be sure to read the entire grant application packet. Do not just read the application form and turn it in. There has already been one application turned into DPS without the accompanying letter of application. They lost 10 points because of it. 6. No one should lose points from the Grant Application Form (0 to 40) or the Basic Agreement Points (0 to 100) if they double check their application and make sure all the items are filled in and boxes checked. You may want someone(who didn't fill out the application form) use the scoring system to proof your grant. Below is a link to the grant application package with a cover letter from Commissioner Campion. httn: / /www.dns.state.mn.us /ots /enforcement nroarams /default.asn. This email was sent to bwderos (acitvofoakoarkheiahts.com by annemnchiefs.orq powered by 0 membercucks Minnesota Chiefs of Police Association 1 1951 Woodlane Drive I Woodbury, Minnesota 55125 1 United States *Unsubscribe I AUDdate Profile I <E>Privacv Policv 1