The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutFully Executed Final PUD and Variance DocumentPlanned Unit Development Permit and Variance Return: $46 Eckberg, Lammers, Briggs, Wolf & Vierling 3666638 Receipt#: 51517 VAR $46.00 Certified Filed and/or recorded on: 10/19/2007 11:35 AM 3666638 Office of the County Recorder roperty Records & TaxpayerServices Return to: BRIGGS WOLFF 8 1Nashington County, MN ECKBERG LAMMERS 1809 NORTHWESTERN AVENUE Kevin J Co"bid, County Recorder SUITE 110 STILLWATER MN 55082 Planned Unit Development Permit and Variance Return: $46 Eckberg, Lammers, Briggs, Wolf & Vierling CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS 14168 Oak Park Blvd, N, P, 0. Box 2007 Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS WASHINGTON COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA BRE MER BANK PLANNED UNIT I)EVELOI'I+JMEN T FERMI' ' And VARIANCE File No.: 798.02.07.07 Legal Description: (Washington County Geo. Code 05-029-20-11-0055) Owner: Bremer Bank N.A. Applicant: Brenner Bank N.A. Address - 8555 Eagle ddress:85551agle Point Road Lake Elmo, MN 55043 Site Address: 5990 60"' Street North Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Present Zoning District. B-4 Limited Business District Permitted yeses set forth in Ordinance 401 Section 401.301 1. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPEMEN T PERMIT: Date Issued: August 281 2007 NOW, "THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF OAK PARI HEIGHTS T HAT 'TME CITY COUNCIL APPROVES THE FOLLOWING: A. The application submitted by Bremer Bank for a Planned Unit Development general plan approval, site plan review, and a variance for wall sign to allow a bank with a drive-through at the corner of 606' Street and Nova Scotia Avenue North within the Oak Park Commons and affecting the real property as follows: Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance Page 1 of 49 SEE ATTACHMENT A The City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights approves the Plat -died Unit Development general plan approval, site plan review and variance for the third wall sign subject to the following findings of fact for the third wall sign variance; The applicants have proposed a total of three wall signs, each on different facades of the building. The total square footage of each wall sign is less than 33 square feet each or a total of less than 100 square feet. The third wall sign ensures visibility of the bank and drive-through from both east and west bound traffic on Highway 36. The City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights denies the request for a monument sign subject to the following findings of fact: A. freestanding sign for the development is already may have the opportunity to advertise on this sign. 2. The bank shall be adequately visible from signs and a wall sign allowed by variance. 3. Allowing a monument sign variance -for ... thi businesses to request individual freestandii' : s The approvals are subject to the following,,onditbtls. within the subject property. The applicant roadways with the two allowable wall will set a precedence for all shopping center 1. The property owners shall finish.01.116 `construction of the private road with curb and gutter along the property line of the subject property:"'....: 2.. The outdoor lighting for the parking lotshall be turned off one hour after closing, except for approved security lighting or as directed in the Planned Unit Development approvals. 3. The lighting shall be arranged to deflect light away from adjoining property or public right-of-way, so the luminaire shall contain a cutoff, which directs and cuts off the light at an angle of 90 degrees or less. 4. The maximum height above the ground grade permitted for light sources mounted on a pole is 25 feet. 5. The trash receptacle shall be fully screened from view of the adjacent property to the west. Additional landscaping shall be added between the trash receptacle and the property line to the west. 6. The Landscape Plan shall be subject to approval by the City Arborist. 7. if any of the mechanical equipment located on the roof is visible from the street level or from neighborhood properties, it shall be screened with a material designed to blend harmoniously with the building facade materials. 8. A revised parking plan shall be submitted that indicates the following; a) The east and west driveways shall be signed, indicating that the east is entrance only and west is exit only. All directional signage shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. b) The concrete curb setback shall be subject to approval of the City Engineer. Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance Page 2 of 49 C) The site plan shall be updated to indicate a sidewalk entrance into the parking lot for pedestrian access to the bank, preferably along the east side of the property near the handicap parking subject to approval of the City Engineer. d) Due to the significant amount of impervious surface, staff is recommending that the parking area on the south side of the property be shifted to the north approximately two feet to ensure the drive aisle width requirement of 24 feet is met. This will add increased green space to the subject property. 9. The address sign numbers shall be metal, glass, plastic or durable material. The numbers shall not be less than 3.5 inches in height, in a contrasting color to the base or made of some reflective material, and so placed to be easily seen from the street. 10. The Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan shall be subject to approval by the City Engineer. 11. Comply with City Engineer comments outlined in September 20, 2007 letter attached Approved by the City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights this 28"' clay of August 2007. All uses shall be subject to the following conditions and/or restrions imposed by the August 28, 2007 Resolution of the City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights as follows: III. Reference Attachment: The reports of the City Planner dated July Bonestroo dated July 28, 2007 and site plan a IV. Abandonment: This permit requires City under the terms hereof Any di; site for a period of 12 continuous'...... V. Annual review: Annual review is July 31, 2007; Report from the City Engineer, e City Council are annexed hereto by reference. in order to preserve the Conditional Use granted by the abandonment of the uses permitted hereunder upon the itute abandonment and void the permit. as a condition of this permit The approvals stated in this Permit may grant specific benefits and/or site specific authorizations. Unless specifically listed herein, all improvements and site conditions must remain compliant with City Ordinances. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have set forth their hands and seals. Date: Date: it , By OAK P. Cric Johnson City Administrator Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance Page 3 of 49 Bremer B�nk 1�i.A. `/ BY �—' Date: Its f C! f Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance Page 4 of 49 EXHIBIT "A" PLANNERS PORT AND SITE PLANS Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance Page 5 of 49 NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. 4800 Olson Memorial Highway, Suite 202, Golden Valley, MN 55422 Telephone: 763.231.2555 Facsimile: 763.231.2561 planners( nacplanning.com NFINXIM ON M I TO: Eric Johnson FROM: Scott Richards DATE: July 31, 2007 RE: Oak Park Heights — Bremer Bank Planned Unit Development: General Plan Review, Site Plan Review, and Variances for Signage FILE NO: 798.02 — 07.07 :. rep * ...... f, As Please find attached the July 6, 2007 pIannirt9'..::.:. or the Bremer Bank request. you are aware, the applicants asked that:.::-.Wis i'9""AL-le be continued to the August 9, 2007 ..... meeting. The plans remain as submitted . .... hanges from the July meeting. The delay in consideration will allow f6fixepresentatives of Bremer Bank to attend the August meeting. They are ::;�spllly >nterested in explaining to the Planning Commission why the additional oor.:t:ym6l�t :: sign and wall signs are necessary. ...... .... The City has extended the revi e' ::Period for this application to the 120 day allowance. The City Council will need to take a .61ton on this request no later than October 10, 2007. Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance Page 6 of 49 NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. 4£300 Olson Memorial Highway, Suite 202, Golden Valley, MN 5542.2 Telephone: 763.231.2555 Facsimile: 763.231.2561 planners@nacplanning.com MEMORANDUM TO: Eric Johnson FROM: Carie Fuhrman/Scott Richards DATE: July 6, 2007 RE: Oak Park Heights — Bremer Bank — Planned Unit Development: General Plan Review; Site Plan Review, and Variances for Signage NAC FILE: 798.02 — 07.07 BACKGROUND Application, Frauenshuh Comrnercia;I: a:lt Group, on behalf of Bremer Bank, has applied for a PUD, general plan"'a"p al; site plan review; and a variance for signage. Bremer Bank is proposin l z s1ftq1e story bank with a drive-through to be constructed on Lot 6, Block 1 of<Oak Par# :.: mons. The site is approximately one`"a"" r in size and is located on the corner of 60th Street North and Nova Scotia Avenue Noi h,,. The bank is proposed to be 4,400 square feet, contain a four -lane drive-through, full-service banking floor inside with a walk-up teller line, offices, meeting facilities, vault, and safe deposit boxes. Bremer Bank is also requesting to place a second freestanding, monument sign on the northwest corner of the site, which requires a variance due to the fact that the Ordinance only allows one freestanding development sign on a site. In addition, Bremer Bank is requesting three wall signs on the exterior surfaces of the building, while the Ordinance only allows two wall signs total. Attached for Reference. Exhibit A — Title Sheet (AO) Exhibit B -- Topographic Survey (CO) Exhibit C — Grading, Drainage, & Erosion Control Plan (C1) Exhibit D — Utility Plan (C2) Exhibit E — Civil Details (C3) Exhibit F — Watershed Plan (C4) Exhibit G -- Landscape Plan (L1) Exhibit H — Site Plan dated 6-28-07(A1.0) Page 71 of 96 Bremer 98ii Pibll�RVAn-Sq��iance Page 7 of 49 Exhibit I — Floor Plan (A2.0) Exhibit J — Roof Plan (A2.1) Exhibit K-1 — Exterior Elevations (A3.0) Exhibit K-2-- Exterior Elevations (A3.1) Exhibit L — Photometric Plan (P1) Exhibit M-1 — Colored East Elevation Exhibit M-2 -- Colored North Elevation Exhibit M-3 -- Colored West Elevation Exhibit N — Sign Detail Exhibit 0-1 — Photograph of existing bank Exhibit 0-2 — Photograph of existing bank Exhibit 0-3 — Photograph of existing bank Exhibit P — City Engineer Comments ISSUES ANALYSIS Zoning. Lot 6, Block 1 of Oak Park Commons is zoned B-4, Limited Business District. "Banks, savings institutions, credit unions, and othe:r.,financial institutions, including drive-throughs° are permitted uses in the B-4 District i> Concept Plan approval was already received for the proposed bank as part.of,the 0k:F ; rk Commons Planned Unit Development review. The following table illustrates the required a''cl,,pra}s?sed general zoning regulations for XX this site: Regulation Lot Lino`;...... Required Proposed Front Setback North:,::: oNi tr..eeti Ns :> 40 feet 40' ---.._._...._.._._._ East:; (Nova SUiia Ave. N.) .............� 40 feet 67' Sairfh (Rf-Nate Street) 40 feet _ _...--. — 96' 9 -- - --- _. — Side/near Setback —._._...-.._._ Ws;:;:::( of 5) 20 feet 69' 6" Lot Area N/A 15,000 sq. ft. 41,817 sq_ ft. Lot Width 60th Streef':N. Nova Scotia Ave. N. 100 feet 100 feet 190 feet 215 feet Bd1 n 35 feet _ .24.5 feet Parking Lot Design. The parking stalls are 9 feet wide and 20 feet in length, which meets the Ordinance requirements. The access aisle widths are 26 feet, ten inches wide and 22 feet wide, which both meet the minimum Ordinance requirement of 22 feet. Number of Spaces. The parking lot is proposed to have 26 parking spaces, including two handicapped accessible parking stalls. Ten parking stalls are proposed on the south side of the property, 12 of the parking spaces are proposed on the east side of the property, and four parking stalls are counted within the drive-through lanes. The Ordinance requires one space per 250 square feet of floor area. The proposed bank is 4,440 square feet in area. 4,440 x 0.9 = 3,996/250 = 15.98 -> 16 parking spaces 2 Page 72 of 96 Bremer' �nkk n6'F�gMiY%ng'� fiance Page 8 of 49 The Ordinance also requires two spaces for each drive-in unit plus drive aisle stacking space of 180 feet for each drive-in unit. 4 drive-in units x 2 spaces = 8 parking spaces Therefore, the Ordinance requires a total of 24 parking spaces, which is met by the proposed parking plan. Entrance/Exit. The site will be accessed from the south, off of the primary east- west service drive (private street) that traverses the north end of Oak Park Commons. The entrance to the site shall be from the southeast corner of the property, and the exit shall be from the southwest corner of the property. According to the applicants, a variety of site access studies were completed, which analyzed both single and double points of entry and egress. However, circulation clarity and safety were maximized with the configuration that is utilized in the proposed plans. The Ordinance requires all off-street parkpg facilities to be designed and constructed with appropriate means of vehicularai;-�.ess tiaiia public street. Except in the case of a planned unit development, each. lot shjl::<Ive access directly onto an abutting, improved and City-accepted publi'>sfrt:;;TE1e proposed access off of the private street meets the Ordinance becat>'this is a proposed planned unit development. The property owners shy l;finis the construction of the private road along the property line of the subject property Intersection Separation. Initiolly,, th" Iapplicants proposed that the east driveway be an entrance and an exit tQ>the'peif'y': However, that curb cut access into the parking lot is proposed to:,::.b,. e approxi ately 40 feet from the intersection of Nova Scotia Avenue North and`'te R.0 vate street (measured from the intersection of lot lines), which does not meet the*rdinance requirement of a 60 foot setback. Therefore, staff suggested the applicants turn the entrance/exit at the east driveway into strictly an entrance in order to alleviate congestion with vehicles that would be exiting the parking lot at this point. The applicants revised the site plan, and this change is reflected in A1.0. Curbing. The Ordinance requires that a continuous concrete perimeter curb barrier be located around the entire parking lot and shall riot be closer than 10 feet to any lot line, A portion of the concrete curb is located within 5.5 feet of the west property line. The concrete curb setback will be subject to approval of the City Engineer being this is a part of a PUD application. Sidewalk. The submitted site plan indicates an existing sidewalk that runs along Nova Scotia Avenue North and 60th Street North. There is no indication of a sidewalk entrance into the bank parking lot. The site plan shall be updated to indicate a sidewalk entrance into the parking lot for pedestrian access, preferably along the east side of the property near the handicap parking. Page 73 of 96 Bremer'��MYPVRYIhRc 'Ence Page 9 of 49 Impervious Surface. According to C4, the proposed site will contain 0.69 acres of impervious surface, which is 72% imperious surface. Due to the significant amount of impervious surface, staff is recommending that the parking area on the south side of the property be shifted to the north approximately four feet to ensure the drive aisle width of 22 feet is still met. This will add increased green space to the subject property. Lighting Plan. Fixtures. The submitted photometric plan indicates five single shoebox fixtures on 25 foot poles, to be located as follows: one on the north side of the property, two on the east side of the property, one on the south side, and one on the west side. These shoebox fixtures are shielded fixtures, with fully recessed lamp sources. The lighting shall be arranged to deflect light away from adjoining property or public right- of-way, so the luminaire shall contain a cutoff, which directs and cuts off the light at an angle of 90 degrees or less, The maximum height above the ground grade permitted for light sources mounted on a pole is 25 feet. Lighting is also proposed on the exterior of the b cans in the soffit, above the main entrane canopy fixtures installed inside the drive-thtCugf and surface -mounted fixtures, above the err'rg exterior fixture types will utilize fully hielde located within soffits are also fully re,Gessed':1:n::Jh Tiding in;three locations. Recessed ctir:;,type `D1'); recessed square wy structure (fixture type `D2'); ncy'exit door (fixture type 'L'). All amp configurations. The fixtures it locations and shielded from view. Intensity. The submitted photometriciMan meets the Ordinance requirements for lighting intensity. Location. The single shod'bax,.41 ht fixture proposed on the west property line does a'. not meet the required setbfrom the side property line. The Lighting Plan indicates that this light fixture is pfiposed to be located directly on the west property line adjacent to Lot 5. The Ordinance requires the light source of an outdoor light fixture to be setback a minimum of five feet from an interior side lot line. Therefore, the revised Lighting Flan shall indicate that this proposed light fixture meets the required setback from the side lot line. Hours. Outdoor lighting for parking lots shall be turned off one hour after closing, except for approved security lighting. Landscape Design. The Landscape Plan shall be subject to approval by the City Arborist. Signs. The site plan indicates two "exit only" signs proposed at the west driveway. The east driveway shall also be signed, indicating that it is an entrance only. The site plan also indicates an address sign on the east elevation of the building, facing Nova Scotia Avenue North. The elevation notes indicate that the numbers will not exceed three square feet, which meet the Ordinance requirement. In addition, the 4 Page 74 of 96 Bremer�'Ai ftnbl i iing%'Ence Page 10 of 49 numbers shall be metal, glass, plastic or durable material, and the numbers shall not be less than 3.5 inches in height, in a contrasting color to the base or made of some reflective material, and so placed to be easily seen from the street. The submitted site plan also includes a proposed monument sign on the northwest corner of the site. The sign is approximately eight feet tall and 52 square feet. However, the subject site already contains an existing monument sign advertising the entire development on the northeast corner of the property. The Ordinance only allows a maximum of one freestanding development sign; therefore, a variance is required. The site plan also indicates three walls signs proposed on the bank. Each sign is on a separate building fagade: one on the north, east, and west elevations of the building. Each sign appears to be approximately 31 square feet in area. The Ordinance only allows a maximum of two walls signs on any principal building; therefore, a variance is required. All illuminated on -premise and off -premise signs for advertising purposes shall be turned off between 11:00 PM and sunrise, except,.that said signs may be illuminated while the business facility on the premise is open for'' grvice. Building Type and Construction. Quality. The proposed building meets'fk:qualjy standards of the Ordinance, which states that buildings in all zoning distrfcts„ Shall maintain a high standard of architectural and aesthetic compa#ifftfy'`t+ifhi rrounding properties to ensure that they will not adversely impact 'Ie hppr,perty values of the abutting properties or adversely impact the publichlth;';f.:ety end general welfare. Photos of another recentljicorleted Bremer Bank have been included with the report. The photos illustrate tfi.:;bank's size, scale, composition, colors, and exterior materials. Exterior Finishes. The exterior of the bank is proposed to be finished with the following materials: ashlar gray rock face concrete block; jumbo modular face brick; vertical windows with insulated glazing; synthetic stucco with a sandpebble texture. The roof structure is proposed to be composed of bare galvanized sheet metal roofing with insulated glazing windows that are exposed between the walls and the roof structure. All of the proposed exterior building finishes are consistent with the Ordinance standards for grade and quality. Trash Enclosure. The proposed trash enclosure meets the following Ordinance standards: a. The exterior wall treatment is similar to the principal building. b. The trash receptacle area is located in the rear/side yard. 5 Page 75 of 96 Bremer' �6096l flgrrm an ar0iance Page 11 of 49 The trash enclosure is in an accessible location for pick up hauling vehicles. It is located near the west entrance/exit to and from the parking lot. The trash receptacle is screened from view of the public rights-of-way to the north and east and also the private road to the south of the property, However, the trash receptacle is not fully screened from view of the adjacent property to the west. Therefore, additional landscaping shall be added between the trash receptacle and the property line to the west. Mechanical Equipment. The roof plan indicates several items that are proposed to be located on the roof. If any of the mechanical equipment located on the roof is visible from the street level or from neighborhood properties, it shall be screened with a material designed to blend harmoniously with the building fagade materials. Grading/Drainage. The Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan shall be subject to approval by the City Engineer. See additional engineering comments in Exhibit P. Variance. Variance criteria is provided in Section 401,04 of the Oak Park Heights Zoning Ordinance. The Planning Commission and City Council should review the following criteria and conditions to determine if the variance is justified, Review Criteria. The Planning Commission and City Col Ycr :,,W7. a,uld Ariake a finding of fact that the proposed action will not: a. Impair an adequate supply of light andaitltt: adjent property. b. Unreasonably increase the conget?t'`#31E1'pik'fic street. C. Have the effect of allowing an.y dtliri:ct use ::.prohibited therein, permit a lesser degree of flood protection than the flood;: Totectio6i Ie anon for the particular area, or permit standards which are lower than tha ;e'requli�d by''State law. d. Increase the danger of fire 'i idanger the public safety. e. Unreasonably diminish or impair established property values within the neighborhood, or in any way be contrary to the intent of this Ordinance. f. Violate the intent and purpose of the Comprehensive Plan. g. Violate any of the terms or conditions of Item 5, below. Conditions for Approval. A variance from the terms of this Ordinance shalt not be granted unless it can be demonstrated that: Undue hardship will result if the variance is denied due to the existence of special conditions and circumstances which are peculiar to the land, structure, or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures or buildings in the same district. 1) Special conditions may include exceptional topographic or water conditions or, in the case of an existing lot or parcel of record, narrowness, shallowness, insufficient area or shape of the property. 6 Par�ge 762o�f 96 Bremer>3nk6lE'egrm�t an/Va/r0iance Page 12 of 49 2) Undue hardship caused by the special conditions and circumstances may not be solely economic in nature, if a reasonable use of the property exists under the terms of this Title. 3) Special conditions and circumstances causing undue hardship shall not be a result of lot size or building location when the lot qualifies as a buildable parcel b. Literal interpretation of the provisions of this Ordinance would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of this ordinance or deny the applicant the ability to put the property in question to a reasonable use. C. The special conditions and circumstances causing the undue hardship do not result from the actions of the applicant. d, Granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this Ordinance to other lands, structure or buildings in the same district under the some conditions. e, The request is not a result of non -conforming lands, structures or buildings in the same district. f The request is not a use variance. g. The variance requested is the minimum variance neces�f;.!;ifo accomplish the intended purpose of the applicant. h. The request does not create an inconvenience tfirleighboring properties and uses. Comment regarding the second mr;rzt:n:fn: In response to the criteria and ce conditions listed above, granting tha;yrt:request to allow a second monument sign would be awarding the applicant a s6ia(iiT)viiege that is denied by this Ordinance to other lands, structure, or buildin 8 in t13e<s:an'ie district under the same conditions. The site and building are highly vis - )e from Highway 36. A freestanding sign that exists on site could advertise the Bremcia!>i#anlc Allowing the bank to construct an additional freestanding, advertising sign wit h-u.f. a justified hardship would set a precedent for future requests. For these reasons; "City planning staff recommends that the second monument sign variance be denied. Comment regarding the third wall sign: in response to the criteria and conditions listed above, the proposed wall signs are fairly small in size and granting the variance request to allow the third wall sign will not create an inconvenience to neighboring properties and uses. The City has granted a third wall sign to allow better visibility from Highway 36 for other businesses in this area. For these reasons, City planning staff recommends that the third wall sign variance be approved. RECOMMENDATION AND CONCLUSION After reviewing the request and the criteria and conditions for variance approvals, staff recommends denial of the request for the additional freestanding, monument sign on the subject property. 7 Page 77 of 96 Bremer n �l PI(Y FiI an�/V�tQiance Page 13 of 49 After reviewing the request and the criteria and conditions for variance approvals, staff recommends approval of the request for the third wall sign on the proposed building. After reviewing the request for the PUD, general plan review, and site plan review, staff recommends approval of the proposed Bremer Bank. The recommendation is made with the following conditions: 1. The property owners shall finish the construction of the private road with curb and gutter along the property line of the subject property. 2. The outdoor lighting for the parking lot shall be turned off one hour after closing, except for approved security lighting. 3. The lighting shall be arranged to deflect light away from adjoining property or public right-of-way, so the luminaire shall contain a cutoff, which directs and cuts off the light at an angle of 90 degrees or less. 4. The maximum height above the ground grade permitted for light sources mounted on a pole is 25 feet. 5. The trash receptacle shall be fully screened from view of the adjacent property to the west. Additional landscaping shall be added between the trash receptacle and the property line to the west. 6. The Landscape Plan shall be subject to approval' y. the City Arborist. 7. If any of the mechanical equipment loc.4r1:;:#h:."'ioof is visible from the street level or from neighborhood prcperties,'` Vit., h I.. be screened with a material designed to blend harmoniously witt't ;e b041d.ing fagade materials. 8. A revised parking plan shall be sub mitteth6'>indicates the following: a) The east driveway shallk i'g`rrlicating that it is an entrance only; b) The concrete curb s:tbacf;<::s.hall be subject to approval of the City Engineer; c) The site plan sh.].f be;:;updMod to indicate a sidewalk entrance into the parking lot for p ,:estrian access to the bank, preferably along the east side of the prope rty`rfar the handicap parking; and d) Due to the signifi'da"M amount of impervious surface, staff is recommending that the parking area on the south side of the property be shifted to the north approximately four feet to ensure the drive aisle width requirement of 22 feet is still met, This will add increased green space to the subject property. 9. The address sign numbers shall be metal, glass, plastic or durable material. The numbers shall not be less than 3.5 inches in height, in a contrasting color to the base or made of some reflective material, and so placed to be easily seen from the street. 10. The Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan shall be subject to approval by the City Engineer. 11. Any additional comments or conditions of the City Council, Planning Commission, or City Staff. Page 78 of 96 Bremer'�Mn�Mbl14%niq anRW&ce Page 14 of 49 -A ,I hHuH }':£::3N 311 n 3HI AO 1321 Z z 0 v'6M:.Jjl I.,mms tTON "St'ga- H-18ON snNnAV V1100S VAON'- 'v'o J— T Oz v/I 3o c2 3111 30 Z/' II AIU 1331 OOT601,1 Isy 3 3111 2013H A1H3153A 1331 Mt I ui pz 4 1.00'OuDs i'11Sz � day%' '" l iill }$ �:� � :1 \ap C-4 gv -CK) Im 11SY3 AJIVII, IJ31 Illli'l'" 30 3 01, v 301/1,11YUG 100 , to y m3 C6609 j..,_ ]"cc, 2.00N sreffler Bam ttft"P d Variance Page 15 of 49 kil N- InN3AV V1100Si /AON 2rQpQer Bank PI In Permit and Variance Page 16 of 49 C) HIMMIJ, < (n < kil N- InN3AV V1100Si /AON 2rQpQer Bank PI In Permit and Variance Page 16 of 49 W;;-Ak DIInRwgwit a d Variance Page 17 of 49 -11ITFT-H �-Fv Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance Page 18 of 49 IT 4 - Ni N F, 0 a rj c -11ITFT-H �-Fv Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance Page 18 of 49 Z C/) qN, I WI iE m FY fit 13 M Prnrnar PemnL pi Irl Permit and Variance Page 19 of 49 gg WI iE m FY fit 13 M Prnrnar PemnL pi Irl Permit and Variance Page 19 of 49 H ' aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Ery' RrpmpL R^nk,PI ID Permitq Variance Page 20 of 49 �� t�ii� aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa w i�ati a t nd Variance ige 21 of 49 ------- -- - - - - -- H1 90H :71)1v_7A v VIJODS' VA ON (i _FB Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance Page 22 of 49 Li ZiZ0- LLJ ------- -- - - - - -- H1 90H :71)1v_7A v VIJODS' VA ON (i _FB Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance Page 22 of 49 Li ZiZ0- ------- -- - - - - -- H1 90H :71)1v_7A v VIJODS' VA ON (i _FB Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance Page 22 of 49 NMI Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance Page 23 of 49 Ito 00 O 00C) OOOn coo Oe 00 Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance Page 23 of 49 P �a e¢` yH ��'� acoaaacccaacaca °' �- N O- O o - $' I(D Bremer Bank PUD Permit s P nd Variance age 24 of 49 q" a � Hill � � a�'i aoaaaaaaaooaoao I ` = �_ s I ORp Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance Page 25 of 49 CEJ r/� a W Imo' V x�� a �� #'•;, 3 a� E � � e� � Cr1] gt 8 r 3�('ri� oaaoaaaaaaaaaaa ' ? °' Iv z 0 �5 q i it N I li III � w -n w_ `Y VIC i U M Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance Page 26 of 49 Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance Page 27 of 49 r� Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance Page 27 of 49 fi fln 0 j 0 z 0 1 U) U) z 0 yW vl cc 0 J 0 u ndZ 3geE I Xe EXHIBIT I 0 j 0 z 0 1 U) U) z 0 yW vl cc 0 J 0 u ndZ 3geE I Xe z Ej 0 J 0 C) w z IL -1 D I - u 0 (C IL z 0 z LU Ei 0 .1 0 u 0 w nd Z/ 3gE& I *1 Z' Z�t Qc pi7 a' 0,01x5 >4 0 J 0 C) w z IL -1 D I - u 0 (C IL z 0 z LU Ei 0 .1 0 u 0 w nd Z/ 3gE& I *1 I w w Et m Cod UMBIT ti 6 Is I:c 0 J 0 U z LL LL nd � ageM� ui J CC WW 2. l 52� <�xm—r r, _X4 I:c 0 J 0 U z LL LL nd � ageM� ui a n W N u l7 D x IQ 151 � W s p 111 W y U U.) LL1 tV 5 w J y}L w Z u L7 Dz z O w w t U -.I w m m z z x3 U IA > W W L z O tU is J [L1 11i J Q LL. U W � :`L (�^^ O T WAft n Wq.� CWOgZq Gwg Nq 'W 'u Zq4 N 1ZW qOC —'] OC 7 K� X �pOr4,xVat h•paW ti?C XHI B IT p9?��c�L zwoLz `r Q t -w wf•Npc-]W N40gwN ggxX aG y0 g4�FmFKu�U =�Jv.n up. )Uops ?. p01"LLLL"PCVwY NmNF 7$"Lga CGa Nw ZS 7 r A � Q¢2x6 :p �C�Qp�Z7.o Qti�mu]F"o `S si e o y �- a•` 2w�'x'q a a` ? NG xY;p/]utl Wm'4Q UiTW2s ^q4w n a _x �'] Ha4SFU0 cQ4Fw0 `F R�' 1 '4eeYNN,,� k ymx +'r� 3 TY 73WOU M' Bremer Bank PUD Permit � u 4 s p 0 z O t?.0 w d � a Rt] O Wq.� CWOgZq Gwg Nq 'W 'u Zq4 N 1ZW qOC —'] OC 7 K� X �pOr4,xVat h•paW ti?C XHI B IT p9?��c�L zwoLz `r Q t -w wf•Npc-]W N40gwN ggxX aG y0 g4�FmFKu�U =�Jv.n up. )Uops ?. p01"LLLL"PCVwY NmNF 7$"Lga CGa Nw ZS 7 r A � Q¢2x6 :p �C�Qp�Z7.o Qti�mu]F"o `S si e o y �- a•` 2w�'x'q a a` ? NG xY;p/]utl Wm'4Q UiTW2s ^q4w n a _x �'] Ha4SFU0 cQ4Fw0 `F R�' 1 '4eeYNN,,� k ymx +'r� 3 TY 73WOU M' Bremer Bank PUD Permit 01% •l 1,#. i } "ax.•r r.f Hit tFb F :'•� ( iy SmqLi tib •'. So' r qn ffi c �c F a r m t 9 gy...",�U Y�y rya 't :�A• �•� 6�r y p `�" c �zY• to-'�.tta'j'j.F.kb ` . t r '►.�,gg .ti .r'rt � � � � 6 � ''fir tt{{� t ?. RINK off . �, .. irks E 1 E . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . h� ► -' 01% •l 1,#. i } "ax.•r r.f Hit tFb F :'•� ( iy SmqLi tib •'. So' r qn ffi c �c F a r m t 9 gy...",�U Y�y rya 't :�A• �•� 6�r y p `�" c �zY• to-'�.tta'j'j.F.kb ` . t r '►.�,gg .ti .r'rt � � � � 6 � ''fir tt{{� t ?. RINK off . �, .. Kam w F - F 6 y�, Monis `}Is„-�34 �. i t> ° iZ- ire �(I. 4 4 � �.yF``B�•b . �L�> s•� � t t � PUD PerrrWi 8 ar U Page 34 of 49 City Engineer Letter Septembers 20, 2007 Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance Page 35 of 49 September 20, 2007 Mr. Eric Johnson City Administrator City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Blvd., P.O. Box 2007 Oak Park Heights, MN 55082-2007 Re: Bremer Bank City of Oak Park Heights Bonestroo file No. 55-07-000 Dear Eric: 2335 Highway 36 W St. Paul, MN 55113 Tel 651-636-4600 Fax 6S1-636.1311 wwwbonestroo.com 41 Bonestroo We have reviewed the Site Development Plans, dated September 4, 2007, for Bremer Bank as submitted by Welman Sperides Architects, LLC. We have the following remaining comments and/or recommendations. Sheet A1.0 1. We recommend the pavement marking for the parking lot'sttipii2g'be changed from 3" lines to 4" lines. 2. Show 4" white pavement hatch markings::".IRthe vaCr accessible isle between the two handicapped spots. General Comments ...,. 1. As directed by City Council on: August 28 2.0.07, submit an auto turn analysis showing that a fire truck is capable of making a4i'ft turn fthe parking lot from the east driveway entrance. 2. Provide the City with a If you have any questions or require additi Postler at (651) 604-4815. Sincerely, BONESTROO Karen S. Erickson, P.E. e approval letter from the Browns Creek Watershed District. I information, please contact me at (651) 604-4788 or Dennis cc; Tom Ozzello, Public Works Director Jim Butler, Building Official Scott Richards, City Planner St. Paul Mark Vierling, City Attorney St. Cloud Eric Reiners, Welman Sperides, Architects Rochester DMP, BMK, CWL2, File — Bonestroo Milwaukee Chicago 2335 Highway 36 W St. Paul, MN 55113 Tel 651.636-4600 Fax 651-636-1311 www.bonestroo.com " Bonestroo June 28, 2007 Mr, Eric Johnson City Administrator City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Blvd., P.O. Box 2007 Oak Park Heights, MN 55082-2007 Re: Bremer Bank City of Oak Park Heights Bonestroo file No. 55-07-000 Dear Eric: We have reviewed the Site Development Plans for Bremer Bankla&,:submittf by Welman Sperides Architects, LLC on June 20, 2007. Following are our comments affi:Aq X `6mendations. Sheet C1 1, The development is constructing the dhl rive Tu lani ,::and storm sewer within the City's utility easement and over the existing trunk sanitari-e.wer%nd water main. If in the future the City ever needs to replace/repair/maintain theft£ tt h: t tj�..;the development will be responsible to repair all of their items in the easement inc:lud i t ) not limit to, pavement, curb and gutter, landscaping and storm sewer/catch basin.,. 2. At critical areas, such as j.M driye iday aprons and grade breaks, add the percent of slope at the drainage arrows. 3. Spot elevations should be added to'Ithe trash enclosure. 4. The elevation of the concrete drive thru is not clearly identified on the plans. Spot elevations should be placed at each corner to show the grade of the concrete pad, 5. Identify grades on the west side of the property in the landscaped area. Sheet C2 1. Verify the structure size of CB2. It appears the top of the 18 inch pipe to the south will be in conflict with the bottom of the 15" pipe to the southwest. St. Paul St. Cloud Rochester Milwaukee Chicago City of Oak Pork Heights Bremer Bonk Page 2 June 28, 2007 2. It is assumed that the canopy for the drive thru will have footings five feet deep. If in the future the water main requires repair in this area the footings for the canopy may be undermined. Research the possibility of placing the water main more than 5 feet from the canopy. 3. Contact Alliant Engineering to verify the water main stub from the south that is identified by keynote number 2. The construction plans at our office for this development does not identify a water main stub at this location, 4. Contact Alliant Engineering to verify the sanitary stub from the north that is identified by keynote number 1. The construction plans at our office for this development does not identify the sanitary sewer stub at this location. 5. Insulation shall be placed at all storm sewer/water main crossings. Sheet C3 1. The detail sheet appears to have details that will not be used. For example there was no call out for a wet tap on the utility sheet. In addition, there are details that are missing such as a 2 x 3 box structure that is called out on sheet C2 for structure C135. 2. A typical section for the concrete drive apron should be ia4Jed to #etail 13. 3. Detail 4 is a storm manhole with a 27" opening; T(iSl'S €itrre should be revised to accommodate the Neenah casting R3067 as called out::99sheet' r 4. Add a detail showing the section fg.r.. I , concret ::pa `at the drive thru. 5. A detail is required showing W`-:'::. tht;:.islands. Sheet C4 1. Submit rational design calculations for the storm sewer. Sheet A1.0 1. To minimize turning movements on the thru street for the overall development it is recommended that the east driveway is narrowed and restricted to "in" movements only. This entrance should be signed appropriately. 2. There is a large radius on the northwest side of the drive thru lane that creates a bituminous bump out. Is this additional bituminous really required? 3. The radius in the northeast corner appears small. Verify that all vehicles using the drive thru lane are able to make the radius. 4. There is only 3' between the northerly drive thru lane and the existing bike path. It is recommended that the site plan is revised to provide more distance between the bike path and the drive thru lane. Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance Page 38 of 49 City of Oak Park Heights Bremer Bonk Page 3 June 28, 2007 5. The existing bike path on the east side of the property should be shown on the drawings. The pathway is on the plans on sheet C1. 6. Reference the detail locations on the keynotes. 7. Identify the size and color for the pavement markings. General Comments 1. Provide the City with a copy of the approval letter from the Browns Creek Watershed District. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me at (651) 604-4788 or Dennis Postler at (651) 604-4815. Sincerely, Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance Page 39 of 49 Final Site plans approved by the City Council Subject to Verification and Compliance with City Ordinances and Approved Deviations as stated in Permit Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance Page 40 of 49 Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance Page 41 of 49 H O A 5 no � 5a �y7 d LO Ig p zLU 7� . � ��49�$ Y 999499499eeii�¢ tl 9 � JS � ti��4� N Z a Y yi J v 5 ' tl� 2iB IL fvyR ILL INA �� ¢�$ �Y�a�i..oi�@s,�,i :� a�Q�:86sffi$�?€.€�@ O F ?&i U P. ,u iia.- W� o E's12, a'"£a �i2 Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance Page 41 of 49 Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance Page 42 of 49 -- -- ------------- LU �11�� ............ ----------------pp ijl ------------------ I 'll' .. �`li I -------------------- ------------- I 1 '�i A A I , - ------------------ Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance Page 42 of 49 LU ------------------ IV, .. �`li I r by I 1 '�i a n lup A I Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance Page 42 of 49 v /$;a\ƒ �| � ) |§d §R �! � I i • '�� ! 0 Bremer MR PUM P -e -r -FT -and Variance Page 43 0 49 �ju 3p z aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa e y V@@ U Cn 1I 1p RIB tII 10 q WI , SS§ % !�! i Ni So 'a a o a a 66 B o woo N ow m m mrjme� n Bremer an PUM Permit and Variance Page 44 of 49 u l� III .`� P z E - -- HJYON 17n N3AV VI.LOOS VAON 1� 0 f Lam- 1' 2 Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance Page 45 of 49 Y I � �5Y Ei e 34: Cj i � gE �> g%�g�gCPqng;eb 3 N � 000�00000(9000000UOOb�O - -- HJYON 17n N3AV VI.LOOS VAON 1� 0 f Lam- 1' 2 Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance Page 45 of 49 Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance Page 46 of 49 00 04 8 G. lu! i4 8 2�0 (DO�OID _IDO -0(DlOO(D(D--- (DO@ 0 00000 C, Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance Page 46 of 49 ------------ - --------- ------- lu n N Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance Page 47 of 49 iA 14,i ------------ - --------- ------- lu n N Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance Page 47 of 49 Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance Page 48 of 49 6 > II I j z. 6 fill IR rc Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance Page 48 of 49 d i fli4� �� 01% it c ty Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance Page 49 of 49