Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2012 MC Affordable Housing Production Survey
2012 Affordable Housing Production Survey (collecting data on Housing Production in 2011) Community name: Oak Park Heights Name of primary person completing the survey: Julie Hultman Telephone: 651.439.4439, extension 1105 E-mail address: jhultman@cityofoakparkheights.com 1. The following table displays the information your municipality reported on the Metropolitan Council's 2011 Residential Construction Activity Survey. Please identify, to the best of your knowledge, the numbers of units intended for owner- occupied or rental property: Housing Type Total units added Owner-occupied Rental Single-family detached 0 Townhomes 0 Duplex/ triplex/ quad 0 Multifamily (5+) 0 2. Are you aware of any affordable rental developments, including rehabilitations for which financing transformed market rate units into affordable units? Please do not include the preservation/stabilization of existing affordable units. No Yes (Please list below) tMetropolitan Council 3. In 2011, how many single-family detached housing units were built in your municipality using zero-lot-line* or other atypical detached housing site plan approaches to increase development density? Please do not include manufactured housing units. None. Through 2010, your community reported 0 single-family detached housing units developed using zero-lot line or other atypical detached housing site plan approaches in your municipality. * Zero-lot line: Parcels where detached units are sited/constructed near or at the boundaries of the lot, which leaves little space between the units. 4. In the Metropolitan Council's Residential Construction Activity Survey, your community reported the following quantities of housing units removed from the housing stock. How many housing units were removed from your community's housing stock in 2011 due to city initiatives? Removed from stock due to city Housing type Quantity reported removed from stock initiatives* Single family detached 0 Townhomes 0 Duplex / triplex / quad 0 Multifamily units (5+) 0 Manufactured housing units (not included in the 2011 Building Permit Survey) *City initiatives: Any removal or demolition of a housing unit that is mandated by the city, i.e., to allow road construction; for development; or to remove vacant or nuisance units. 2012 Metropolitan Council Affordable Housing Survey 2 5. Please identify instances in which your community: • Allows and encourages the use of a local fiscal tool or initiative through language adopted in your comprehensive plan or local housing plan AND • Has used such a local fiscal tool to assist affordable workforce or life-cycle housing development and/or preservation. Housing rehabilitation projects are not applicable (they are included in question #7). Up to five examples of these applications may be identified. Collaboration and participation with: a community land trust; philanthropic foundation; or other non-profit organization to preserve long-term affordability x Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds Credit enhancements General obligation bonds Housing revenue bonds Land write-down, sale, or acquisition Livable Communities Grants Local fee waivers or reductions Local property tax levy Local tax abatement Tax increment financing (TIF) Taxable revenue bonds Other (please describe): 501 (c)(3) Bonds 2012 Metropolitan Council Affordable Housing Survey 3 6. Please identify examples during 2011 in which your community: 1. reduced, adjusted, eliminated, waived, or in some fashion was flexible in the implementation of a local official control, development, or local code requirement; OR 2. has formally committed (through policies or official controls) to make such reductions, adjustments or eliminations of requirements at the request of developers in order to facilitate the development or preservation of affordable or life-cycle housing. Up to five examples of the application may be identified, but no more than two for any single housing project. 4 :'- I 0 C - �, 4.,, c_ a) L U N E O) C a) o Q.) > E n M .7) v v .E C L „_, 3 a) a 2 a) (O 2 .(O u C .„ -0 o V a) C a I L L1 -0 (O a) tp O' L 2 — 01 _ 0 _ C +-+ a C > L ( c E a`1 a) .F • ac) c I E n a' r a) v U o o, a) CO O a) > L E (0 N .— O V C O O E C L V 0) (O C CT a 3 .— V V L C a) ro L CO a T `) E ro V E j•. 3 c _0 0 E .E, 0) v. (0 o (o w o ro v a) L - a, c _ o — - 3 a) V > v o o v (o O c a) .0 E > -o v V 10 a 0 3 n L oEv a) o o o m30` v a) C 0 C C 2 i L a) .0 .0 Q. �1 _a � V .0 i, '� O .V L 4c2 N L 0 a) C - ((i) C CTi) in v M 3 C 2 p C Ol > N L 0 a) a) O_ O L O o • Q ,O - > (9 O I ? Q) .+ 0 N V) U a) In O .O 0 L L ? Fag a CT L '6 U7 V1 i C (0 '0 (0 7 0 aJ U 16 a) V OV .5 L L C C •-Te C i o L U C C O L a) > -2 10 Y L 3 — a) 17 -0 L L a, L L E < a 0 c i a` cC ce 2 o) cn cn o cn E v) cna cT3 3 a f0a o a O Oak Park Sr. Living PH II x Tire Pros Retail & Auto Svc x MCF - OPH Exterior Site Imp. x Xcel Energy -Max Todo Interim Use x Other: 2012 Metropolitan Council Affordable Housing Survey 4 7. Please identify examples in which your community has in place and promotes locally-initiated or administered (city or county) housing preservation, home improvement and/or rehabilitation programs, or other tools available to its residents to keep their housing stock in sound condition. Available in 2011 Housing maintenance code and enforcement (includes inspections) For rental housing (includes licensing) For owner-occupied housing x Housing rehabilitation loan or grant programs For rental housing For owner-occupied housing x Local tool sharing center or program (includes fairs or advisors) Home improvement loan or grant program (rhrn„gh County) x Home improvement resource center Other (please describe) 2012 Metropolitan Council Affordable Housing Survey 5 8. Please indicate the overall average net density* and number of new (or re-use) sewered and unsewered residential units for which building permits were issued in 2011. Please provide the density to the nearest one-tenth unit per acre. Sewered units Unsewered units permitted in 2011 permitted in 2011 Single-family detached units Number of units permitted Net density per acre NA Attached units (townhomes, duplex, triplex, quad and multifamily) Number of units permitted Net density per acre *The formula for calculating net residential density is as follows: Net Residential Density = Total Units- (Total Area - Total Area Adjustments) Total Area Adjustments mean the exclusion of: • Arterial road right-of-way • Wetlands and water bodies • Public parks and trails • Natural resources mapped in the comprehensive plan and protected by ordinance • Outlots for future or non-residential development Local streets, alleys and sidewalks, as well as private parks, pools and tennis courts are not excluded from the total area. 2012 Metropolitan Council Affordable Housing Survey 6 9. In 2011, did your community acquire land to be held specifically for the development or redevelopment as affordable senior housing (exclusively 55+)? ElNo Yes If yes, describe the land acquisition and the intended development for such land: 10. In 2011, did your community approve (permits may be drawn at any time) the development or local financial participation in a proposed development of new affordable of senior (exclusively 55+) housing? No 1111 Yes If yes, how many units were approved? 62 units were approved for Sr. Rental 11. In 2011, did your community approve the involvement of the municipality in the preservation and reinvestment in affordable or senior housing which has not yet been undertaken for reasons beyond the municipality's control? No Yes If yes, how many units were approved? 12. During calendar year 2011, did your community expend local dollars toward affordable or life-cycle housing representing at least 85 percent of your municipality's Affordable and Life-Cycle Housing Opportunities Amount (ALHOA)* of $24,492? No L Yes If no, please explain why ALHOA expenditures were not made: Continued loss of Local Gov't Aid & Other Funding Constraints *ALHOA: The Affordable and Life-Cycle Housing Opportunities Amount (ALHOA) represents the minimum amount of local discretionary expenditures or contributions to assist the development or preservation of affordable and life-cycle housing for that participation year. The ALHOA is not a grant from the Livable Communities Act (LCA). It is a required local contribution or expenditure of local dollars on affordable housing. In order to continue to participate in the LCA program, communities must expend or contribute at least 85 percent of their ALHOA obligation for the applicable year. Communities have some flexibility in determining which local expenditures fulfill the ALHOA contribution. Examples include local dollars contributed to housing assistance, development or rehabilitation efforts, the costs of local housing inspection and code enforcements, or local property taxes to support a local or county HRA 2012 Metropolitan Council Affordable Housing Survey 7 ;;A Metropolitan Co AA , 112012 Dear Community Official, City of Oak Park Heights The Livable Communities Act of. 1045 reauirkthe Metropolitan Council to report to the Legislature annually on the progress of Twin Cities metropolitan area communities toward providing affordable and lifecycle housing for their residents. This report requires information on the production and affordability of new housing in each community. The definitions of affordability for owner-occupied and rental housing units are available online at http://www.metrocouncil.org/services/livcomm/AffordabilityLimits.pdf The Metropolitan Council reports on housing development in all communities, whether or not communities participate in the Livable Communities program. (Last year's reports are available online at http://stats.metc.state.mn.us/stats/pdf/AffordableHousing MS2010.pdf and http://stats.metc.state.mn.us/stats/pdf/AffordableHousingTools MS2010.pdf .) Your responses on the attached survey help the Council determine local housing performance scores (see the Guidelines for Priority Funding for Housing Performance available online at www.metrocouncil.org/housing/HousingPerformanceGuidelines.pdf). This can be critical if your community is contemplating applying for any Livable Communities Act or other Metropolitan Council funding over the next 12 months. Council Research also uses the information on housing development collected through this survey to develop our annual population and household estimates. Mandated by state statute, the Council's annual estimates are the official population numbers for state government purposes, including distribution of Local Government Aid, distribution of Local Street Aid, and calculation of tax-base sharing under the Fiscal Disparities Program. We ask that you complete the attached Annual Affordable Housing Production Survey, which can be returned with the enclosed envelope. You will also be receiving an electronic version of this survey, which can be returned via email. Please choose the method that is most convenient to you. Please respond no later than July 27`, 2012. If you are no longer responsible for this information in your community, please forward this request to the appropriate individual(s). If you have questions on how to respond to the survey, please contact Joel Nyhus at (651) 602-1634 or ioel.nyhus©metc.state.mn.us Thank you for your invaluable assistance. Sincerely, Joel Nyhus Research - Metropolitan Council www.metrocouncil.org 390 Robert Street North • St. Paul, MN 55101-1805 • (651)602-1000 • Fax(651)602-1550 • TTY(651) 291-0904 An Equal Opportunity Employer Julie Hultman From: Julie Hultman Sent: Friday, July 27, 2012 4:50 PM To: joel.nyhus@metc.state.mn.us Subject: 2012 Affordable Housing production Survey Attachments: 1807_001.pdf Joel, Attached is the survey for 2012. Have a nice weekend! Julie Hultman, CBO Planning&Code Enforcement City of Oak Park Heights 91Z`Phone:651.439.4439,ext. 1105 651.439.0571 :jhultman@cityofoakparkheights.com From: canon(acityofoakparkheights.com [mailto:canon©cityofoakparkheights.comj Sent: Friday, July 27, 2012 3:53 PM To: Julie Hultman Subject: Attached Image 1 11A Metropolitan Council u RECEIVED DEC 21 2011 December 20, 2011 Dear Local Official: Enclosed is the final housing performance score for your community for 2011 determined pursuant to the Guidelines for Priority Funding for Housing Performance. The score is determined by both information provided to us by your community in our annual survey and data gathered from other sources. This 2011 score will then be used in Livable Communities Act grant funding prioritization and decision making following adoption of the 2012 LCA Fund Distribution Plan. Please email me at quy.petersonmetc.state.mn.us if you have any questions. Thank you for your efforts in helping us compile this information. Sincerely, Guy Peterson Director, Community Development Division Enclosure www.metrocouncil.org 390 Robert Street North • St. Paul. MN 55101-1805 • (651)602-1000 • Fax(651)602-1550 • TTY(651)291-0904 An Equal Opportunity Employer Final Housing Performance Score — 2011 Name of City/Township Oak Park Heights Criteria — 100 points possible 1. 7 2. / 3. 0 4. 5. 3 6. (5 7. 8. 7z 9. a. b. 10. (.7 Total Final Score .7 Final Score 2010 73 n:\commdev\Iivcomm\lca\peterson\2011\housing performance\final housing performance scoresheet201 l.docx