HomeMy WebLinkAbout2010 MC Affordable Housing Production Survey 2010 Affordable Housing Production Survey Submit Form
Community name: Oak Park Heights
Name of primary person completing the survey: Julie A. Hultman
Telephone: (651) 351-1661
E-mail address: ihultman@cityofoakparkheights.com
1. The following table displays the information your municipality reported on the Metropolitan Council's 2009 Residential
Construction Activity Survey. Please identify, to the best of your knowledge, the numbers of units intended for owner-
occupied or rental property:
Housing Type Total units permitted Owner-occupied Rental
Single-family detached 0 0 0
Townhomes 0 0 0
Duplex, triplex, quad 0 0 0
Multifamily (5+) 0 0 0
2. According to HousingLink, financing closed in 2009 for the following affordable rental developments in your
municipality:
None
Are you aware of any additional affordable rental developments, including rehabilitations for which financing
transformed market rate units into affordable units?
Lx + No ® Yes (Please list below)
It Metropolitan Council
3. How many housing units have been built overall in your municipality through 2009 using zero-lot-line* or other atypical
detached housing site plan approaches to increase development density? (Through 2009, your municipality
reported 0 detached housing units developed using zero-lot-line or other atypical detached housing site plan
approaches in your municipality. Do not include manufactured housing units in manufactured home parks.)
* Zero-lot line: Parcels where detached units are sited/constructed near or at the boundaries of the lot, which leaves little space between the
units.
4. In the Metropolitan Council's Residential Construction Activity Survey, your municipality reported the following
quantities of housing units removed from the housing stock. How many housing units were removed from your
municipality's housing stock in 2009 due to city initiatives?
Removed from stock due to city
Housing type Quantity reported removed from stock initiatives*
Single family detached 6 6
Townhomes 0 0
Duplex / triplex / quad 0 0
Multifamily units (5+) 0 0
Manufactured housing units (not included in the 2009 Building Permit Survey)
*City initiatives: Any removal or demolition of a housing unit that is mandated by the city, i.e., to allow road construction; for development; or to
remove vacant or nuisance units.
* 6 residential dwellings that were vacant were required to be removed by developer for proposed
new development in site area.
You may need to return to Page 1 to submit this survey.
2010 Metropolitan Council Affordable Housing Survey 2
5. Please identify no more than five local fiscal tools or initiatives that are available from the city to assist/facilitate the
development or preservation of affordable or life-cycle housing. Clicking on the box turns on the check-mark.
Collaboration and participation with: a community land trust; philanthropic foundation; or other non-profit
organization to preserve long-term affordability
x Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds
Credit enhancements
X General obligation bonds
Housing revenue bonds
Land write-down, sale, or acquisition
Livable Communities Grants
Local fee waivers or reductions
x Local property tax levy
x Local tax abatement
Tax increment financing (TIF)
x Taxable revenue bonds
Other (please describe): 501 (c) (3) Bonds
You may need to return to Page 1 to submit this survey.
2010 Metropolitan Council Affordable Housing Survey 3
6. Please identify examples during 2009 in which your municipality reduced, adjusted, eliminated, waived, or in some
fashion was flexible in the implementation of a local official control, development, or building requirement; OR for which
it is the municipality's policy and practice to reduce, adjust or eliminate such requirement, when requested to do so, to
reduce development costs for the development of affordable or life-cycle housing. Up to five examples of the
application may be identified, but no more than two for any single housing project.
>.
a) Ia u a, v
C E X Q E V ,C V
o v v _c � o
w a avv L
y_ v o1 C v c v D o o v
E > CI' a) a) c -D � C C c 5 E c 72
o C al .0 E ro c V @ C i O YL
V a) C a 3 a >, .L O V " 2 E L. V
v v E > L 3 0 c o o v o :_' a ° a v
E '>to ro O up a) O O 'D a! r0 N ' : a) V L 'p
C
�' a>) �'' � V _@ C C N C a) O N a)
z L > . N i _O aJ a-,+ -D r0 0 0V ,-+ N O .0 a-.. m
a) 2 rD to a) L. 2 a) > V N -0 a O a)
. -D a) C v n - rn 2 0 > 30 .._ a
o rn 0 Na) r`a O in ul C a) v u aJ _ p r0 C Oi
a
-D r0 u +-� C C _C i
.� 3 , LO C v a) 00 C _ '> f V V N CC . (0 a)
O O v c a) a) V V X > 46 L v a) N N L a) N L
a QE U o o 0 f a cc cn can) `V cn w c'n aar`va O
Corblick, Doug x
Oakgreen Village • III IIluuM •'u'uluu
H
Illr
I II I 1 I I 1 r II7
II I Other:
2010 Metropolitan Council Affordable Housing Survey You may need to return to Page 1 to submit this survey. 4
A
7. Please identify the housing preservation/maintenance activities your municipality conducted or that were available in
your community in 2009 to maintain or improve your existing housing stock. (County-administered programs are
applicable.)
Available in
2009
Housing maintenance code and enforcement (includes inspections)
For rental housing (includes licensing) X
For owner-occupied housing X
Housing rehabilitation loan or grant programs
For rental housing x
For owner-occupied housing x
Local tool sharing center or program (includes fairs or advisors)
Acquisition/rehabilitation/resale initiative or program
Other (please describe)
You may need to return to Page 1 to submit this survey.
2010 Metropolitan Council Affordable Housing Survey 5
8. Please indicate the overall average net density* and number of new sewered residential units for which building permits
were issued in 2009. Please provide the density to the nearest one-tenth unit per acre.
NOTE: If your community participates in the Plat Monitoring Program, please do not fill out Question 8.
Number of sewered Number of
units permitted in unsewered units
2009 permitted in 2009
Single-family detached units
Number of units permitted (from the Building Permits
Survey)
Net density per acre
Attached units (townhomes, duplex, triplex, quad and multifamily
Number of units permitted
Net density per acre
*The formula for calculating net residential density is as follows:
Net Residential Density = Total Units - (Total Area —Total Area Adjustments)
** NA. No new residential units
Total Area Adjustments mean the exclusion of: in 2009
• Arterial road right-of-way
• Wetlands and water bodies
• Public parks and trails
• Natural resources mapped in the comprehensive plan and protected by ordinance
• Outlots for future or non-residential development
Local streets, alleys and sidewalks, as well as private parks, pools and tennis courts are not excluded from the total area.
You may need to return to Page 1 to submit this survey.
2010 Metropolitan Council Affordable Housing Survey 6
9. In 2009, did your community acquire land to be held for the development of new affordable family housing or any
senior housing (exclusively 55+) but for which no housing units have been constructed or started?
No a Yes If yes, describe the land acquisition and the intended development for such land:
10. In 2009, did your community approve the development, reuse of, or municipal reinvestment in existing housing for
future use as affordable family housing or senior housing where the development has not yet been undertaken or
completed for reasons beyond the municipality's control?
No x 748
Yes If yes, how many units are currently planned for development?
unit sr. housing coop and 110 unit sr. assisted living facility
11. During calendar year 2009, did your community expend local dollars toward affordable or life-cycle housing
representing at least 85 percent of your municipality's Affordable and Life-Cycle Housing Opportunities Amount
(ALHOA)* of $24,568 ?
x No . Yes If no, please explain why ALHOA expenditures were not made:
Continued loss of State aids & other funding constraints
*ALHOA: The Affordable and Life-Cycle Housing Opportunities Amount (ALHOA) represents the minimum amount of local discretionary
expenditures or contributions to assist the development or preservation of affordable and life-cycle housing for that participation year. The ALHOA
is not a grant from the Livable Communities Act (LCA). It is a required local contribution or expenditure of local dollars on affordable housing. In
order to continue to participate in the LCA program, communities must expend or contribute at least 85 percent of their ALHOA obligation for the
applicable year. Communities have some flexibility in determining which local expenditures fulfill the ALHOA contribution. Examples include local
dollars contributed to housing assistance, development or rehabilitation efforts, the costs of local housing inspection and code enforcements, or
local property taxes to support a local or county HRA.
2010 Metropolitan Council Affordable Housing Survey You may need to return to Page 1 to submit this survey. 7
Ai Metropolitan Council
Ali
November 19, 2010
TO: Local Officials CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
AM_ PM
FROM: Guy Peterson, Director, Community Development Division
The 2010 housing performance score for your community is enclosed. The scores were
determined based on several factors set forth in the Council's Guidelines for Priority
Funding for Housing Performance.
Seventy percent of the score came from the survey you completed about housing activity
in your community during the past two years. It included information about:
• local fiscal, regulatory, and housing rehabilitation initiatives to facilitate affordable,
workforce housing development and preservation
• the density of residential development
• the approval of affordable or life-cycle housing that has not yet been developed
The other 30 percent of the score was determined from data about your community's
housing:
• the affordability of owned housing units
• the diversification of housing type
• the number of affordable rental units
• the availability of housing in your community for persons with special needs
The performance scores are intended to reflect both the amount of affordable and life-
cycle housing in the community and the community's efforts to facilitate affordable and
life-cycle housing development and preservation. Scores range widely, reflecting the
variety of metropolitan area communities. The sparse population and scattered housing
locations of rural, unsewered communities tend to result in lower scores, while the
affordability and diversification of existing housing stock in urban, sewered communities,
combined with efforts to add and/or preserve such housing, yield higher scores.
As indicated in the Council's Livable Communities Act grant request solicitation materials,
the housing performance scores will be one of the factors considered in the evaluation and
ranking of applications for competitive funding programs.
If you have any questions or want to discuss your community's score, please call me at
651-602-1418.
Thank you.
Enclosure
n\eomrndev\Ilvcomrrrlca',lxtetsori 2O10`.housing heriurrnane,:,1119(Oloc;tl old fired haisinyherfbnnanceseores.doe
www.metrocouncil.org
390 Robert Street North • St. Paul, MN 55 1 0 1-1805 • (651)602-1000 • Fax(651)602-1550 • TTY(651)291-0904
An Equal Opportunity Employer
Final Housing Performance Score — 2010
Name of City/Township Oak Park Heights
Criteria — 100 points possible
1. Y
2.
3. F
4. 7
5. 3
6.
7. /5
8.
9.
a. 0
b. C)
10. /j
Total Final Score 73
Final Score 2009 65
N:\CorkunDev \\I.( ATt.JERS()N NI0\Housing Perfannance\Jinni Housing Periisrrnancu Scolv`heetc400 doC
AAA Metropolitan Council
AA
October 28, 2010
RECEIVED OCT 29 2010
Dear Local Official:
Enclosed is a preliminary housing performance score for your community for 2010, determined pursuant
to the Guidelines for Priority Funding for Housing Performance. In large part,the scoring is based upon
information provided for your community in our recent survey.
This past summer, we sent you an electronic version of the survey form and subsequently gave you an
opportunity to complete the form if you missed the first deadline.
The enclosed score sheet indicates the preliminary points by criteria for your community. Points for
criteria 1, 2, 3, and 5 are based on Council data compiled from information provided by state or county
agencies, local government,the Department of Housing and Urban Development,Minnesota Housing and
local Housing and Redevelopment Authorities.
Scores for the remaining criteria are based on the information provided to the Council via the survey. If
we did not receive a completed survey or information was not provided for any survey question,the score
for those applicable criteria will reflect this. The score sheet also indicates the final performance score for
your community in 2009.
If,after reviewing these scores you want to provide additional information in order to improve your score
in any criterion, or you believe you should have received more points in any criterion given your answers,
please send me the information or call me as soon as possible.
Please provide any additional information no later than Friday, November 5. Final performance scores
• for 2010 will be mailed to all communities later in November.
Please call me at(651) 602-1418 if you have any questions or want to discuss your community's housing
performance score.
Sincerely,
(/
Guy D. Peterson
Director,Community Development Division
Enclosure
www.metrocouncil.org
390 Robert Street North • St. Paul, MN 55101-1805 • (651)602-1000 • Fax(651)602-1550 • TTY(651)291-0904
An Equal Opportunity Employer
•
Preliminary Housing Performance Score — 2010
Name of City/Township Oak Park Heights
Criteria — 100 points possible
1.
2.
3.
F
4.
5.
3
6.
7.
7C
8.
9.
a. 0
b. 0
10.
Total Preliminary Score 7 3
Final Score 2009 65
•
,..:•,,linl.)ev\!...ivCointn'-.1.4.:ATE'l FRS()N V20101-lousing Perti)rmane6 Preliminary tiouirtg Performance ScoreSheet909 doc