HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-10-2003 MinutesCITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
Thursday, April 10, 2003
Call To Order /Approval of Agenda Chair Dwyer called the meeting to order at 7:00
p.m. Present: Commissioners Liljegren, Runk and Powell. Acting City Administrator Holst,
City Planner Richards and Commission Liaison McComber.
Vice Chair Runk, seconded by Commissioner Liljegren, moved to approve the Agenda as
presented. Carried 4 -0.
Approve Minutes: Vice Chair Runk, seconded by Commissioner Liljegren, moved to
approve the Minutes of March 13, 2003 as presented. Carried 4 -0.
Department /Commission Liaison Reports /Other Reports
A. Commission Liaison None.
B. Other: None.
Visitors /Public Comment There were no visitors to the meeting or public comment other
than items upon the Agenda.
Public Hearings
A. Continued: Oakgreen Village To consider requests of Valley Senior Services
Alliance Housing and Community Services, LLC for site plan review, conditional use
permit, subdivision, planned unit development: concept plan for office condos,
commercial and retail use known as Oakgreen Village to be located at 58"' St. N. and
Novak Ave. N.
City Planner Richards reviewed the requests and prior outstanding issues, noting that some of
the issues have been addressed by the applicant's revised plans. Richards reviewed changes
made to the plans and provided an issue analysis with respect to the requests before the
Commission.
Chair Dwyer opened the hearing for public comment at 7:11 p.m.
Kenneth Hooge — Senior Housing Partners the applicant, expressed that he felt a cooperative
effort has worked well to deal with the project issues. He noted that they would prefer to
develop the entire area at one time and that they were still preferable to tax increment
financing for the project. Mr. Hooge responded to Commission Liaison McComber's
question regarding neighborhood meetings for the project area. He informed her and the
Commission that meetings were held nearly a year ago and at the time, primary concerns
seemed to be the location of an apartment building and the purchase of private residences
along Oakgreen Avenue. To that end, the apartment building was moved back and any
possible property purchases can only occur when the means possible to do so are available.
Planning Commission Minutes
April 10, 2003
Page 2 of 8
Brief discussion ensued as to building placement, potential development of Oakgreen Avenue
properties owned by Valley Senior Services Alliance, future of outlot under the power line,
future roadway changes being discussed for Hwy. 36 and frontage road area, right -of -way and
engineering issues and ponding placement possibilities.
Vice Chair Runk, seconded by Commissioner Liljegren, moved to close the public hearing at
7:30 p.m. Carried 4 -0.
Commission discussion ensued as to future change possibilities to Oakgreen Avenue, timing
for the project development, and the recommendations and conditions within the planning
report. Chair Dwyer acknowledged that change in this area, development and roadway, will
affect the city and expressed his appreciation for the residents in the area being involved even
when issues tend to run on for a long period of time.
Vice Chair Runk, seconded by Commissioner Liljegren, moved to recommend City Council
approval of the request, excluding Phase II and subject to the amended conditions of the April
3, 2003 planning report, specifically:
A preliminary plat shall be submitted as part of the general plan of development
process. Forty feet of right -of -way from the centerline of Oakgreen Avenue N. shall
be dedicated as part of the plat.
2. The extension of Novak Avenue N. must be redesigned to be completely on the
subject property, or the applicant must reach an agreement with the adjacent property
owner for the street to be partly on the adjacent property consistent with the
submitted plans.
The phasing plan must be revised to include all areas of the development, including
ponding and streets.
4. The Planning Commission, Parks Commission and City Council should make
preliminary comments regarding open space, public park land needs and sidewalk /trail
locations as it relates to this project.
The trail and landscaping south of 59` St. N. shall extend to Oakgreen Ave. N. and
shall connect to the existing trail east of Oakgreen.
6. Information related to land market value shall be provided to calculate park dedication
requirements for the subject property at the time of general plan of development
submittals.
7. All concept utility plans shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer.
Planning Commission Minutes
April 10, 2003
Page 3 of 8
All concept drainage plans shall be subject to review and approval of the City
Engineer.
9. Written approval from Xcel Energy related to construction of ponds and a roadway
within the power line easement shall be required with submittals of the general plan of
development application.
10. The Planning Commission and City Council should comment on the townhome
configuration and the proposed density of units.
11. Any other conditions of City staff, the Planning Commission, the Parks Commission
and the City Council.
Carried 4 -0.
B. WATE Enterprises To consider requests of WATE Enterprises for site plan review,
amended concept plan review and general plan of development /planned unit
development review for construction of a new office /warehouse building, including
cold storage building and parking at 5610 Memorial Ave. N.
City Planner Richards reviewed the applicant's requests, provided an issue analysis and offered
concluding remarks and recommendations.
Chair Dwyer opened the hearing for public comment at 7:45 p.m.
Todd Erickson — Project Engineer noted the highlights of the project and discussed drainage at
the site.
Vice Chair Runk, seconded by Chair Dwyer, moved to close the public hearing at 7:57 p.m.
Carried 4 -0.
Commission discussion ensued as to City Arborist report and its requirement of the applicant
to prepare a tree inventory for species category and trunk size, building color scheme, signage
and planning report conditions.
Chair Dwyer, seconded by Commissioner Powell, moved to recommend City Council
approval, subject to the following conditions:
1. The applicant should identify the square footage of office space and warehouse space
to determine the appropriate parking spaces needed prior to City Council review.
2. The access and circulation plan is subject to the review and approval of the City
Engineer and Fire Marshall.
Planning Commission Minutes
April 10, 2003
Page 4 of 8
The applicant should identify the location of snow storage within the site plan
subject to review and approval of the City Engineer.
4. The applicant shall modify the site plan to meet the 20 percent green space
requirement.
All curb barriers shall be setback at least 10 feet from all lot lines.
6. The landscaping plan shall be subject to review and approval of the City Arborist.
7. The applicant shall pay a tree replacement fee as determined by the City Arborist.
The drainage and grading plan is subject to the review and approval of the City
Engineer.
The wetland delineation information shall be subject to the review of the City
Engineer. If additional setbacks or buffer areas are required, the applicant shall
submit to the City revised plans subject to review and approval of the City Engineer.
10. The applicant shall submit to the City a signed permit from the Brown's Creek
Watershed District.
11. The utility plan is subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer.
12. The location of fire hydrant and sprinkler systems within both buildings shall be
subject to the review and approval of the Fire Marshall and /or Building Official.
13. The applicant shall provide a lighting plan with all location of lights and types of
fixtures. The lighting plan and a revised photometric plan shall be subject to review
and approval of City staff.
14. All signage plans shall be subject to review and approval of City staff.
15. A Development Agreement is subject to the review and approval of the City
Attorney.
16. All other conditions of City staff, the Planning Commission, the Parks Commission
and City Council.
Carried 4 -0.
Planning Commission Minutes
April 10, 2003
Page 5 of 8
C. WATE Enterprises To consider requests of WATE Enterprises for site plan review,
amended concept plan review and general plan of development /planned unit
development review for construction of a cold storage building and parking at 5670
Memorial Ave. N.
City Planner Richards reviewed the applicant's requests, provided an issue analysis and offered
concluding remarks and recommendations.
Chair Dwyer opened the hearing for public comment at 8:07 p.m.
Todd Erickson — Project Engineer discussed wetland and retaining wall issues. He noted that
they have met with the city's engineering firm and that Brown's Creek Watershed District has
review their plans and approved them subject to City of Oak Park Heights approval.
Additionally, Mr. Erickson discussed drainage, snow removal and signage plans.
David Beaudet — 6400 Lookout Trail expressed his concern of having snow piled in front of the
buildings. He stated that the City is in the process of developing a wetland ordinance and
expressed that he felt wetland protection should be considered whether or not the property is
situated in an area designated as a DNR protected wetland.
Commissioner Liljegren, seconded by Vice Chair Runk, moved to close the public hearing at
8:16 p.m. Carried 4 -0.
Commission discussion ensued as to snow removal /storage, wetland buffer and related
wetland issues and the ordinance being developed by Oak Park Heights, and maximizing use
of the property for its commercial use.
Chair Dwyer, seconded by Vice Chair Runk, moved to recommend City Council approval,
subject to the following conditions:
1. The applicant shall submit a revised plan indicating the percentage of buildable area
and green space pursuant to Section 401.300.G of the Zoning Ordinance prior to
review by the City Council.
2. The applicant shall identify the location of snow storage within the site plan subject
to review and approval of the City Engineer.
3. The applicant shall pay a tree replacement fee as determined by the City Arborist.
The landscaping plan shall be subject to review and approval of the City Arborist.
The drainage and grading plan is subject to the review and approval of the City
Engineer.
Planning Commission Minutes
April 10, 2003
Page 6 of 8
6. The wetland delineation information shall be subject to the review of the City
Engineer. If additional setbacks or buffer areas are required, the applicant shall
submit to the City revised plans subject to review and approval of the City Engineer.
7. The applicant shall submit to the City a signed permit from the Brown's Creek
Watershed District.
The utility plan is subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer.
The location of fire hydrant and sprinkler systems within both buildings shall be
subject to the review and approval of the Fire Marshall and /or Building Official.
10. All signage plans shall be subject to review and approval of City staff.
11. A Development Agreement shall be subject to the review and approval of the City
Attorney
12. A photometric lighting plan shall be submitted subject to review and approval of
City staff.
13. All signage plans shall be subject to review and approval of City staff.
14. Any other conditions of City staff, the Planning Commission, the Parks
Commission and City Council.
Carried 4 -0.
New Business
A. Hwy. 36 Partnership Study
Commission Liaison McComber provided a review of the Joint Planning Commission meeting
with the City of Stillwater Planning Commission and their discussion of the changes to Hwy. 36
and adjacent roadways. She noted that the City Council was seeking Commission feedback and
a recommendation.
Chair Dwyer stated that he felt the Stillwater Planning Commission put a lot of effort into the
process and expressed that he found what was proposed pretty favorable. He stated that he
found there was general agreement to many of the design aspects needed and pointed out that a
number of Oak Park Heights businesses are clearly affected and that he is optimistic that a firm
plan for the roadway changes would allow business held in limbo to plan for the future and
expressed that he was hopeful that many of those affected would be able to relocate within Oak
Park Heights.
Planning Commission Minutes
April 10, 2003
Page 7 of 8
Commission discussion ensued regarding the proposed changes including cul -de -sac placements
for maximization of frontage road use in some areas, mapping deadlines, potential traffic flow
with the prospect of a new St. Croix River Bridge crossing, the impact upon Oak Park Heights
businesses, pedestrian and vehicular safety on the roadway with and without change and such.
Chair Dwyer asked for visitor comments.
David Beaudet — 6400 Lookout Trail, N. discussed some of the historical information to the
project and expressed that he felt that transportation was the primary aspect of discussion and
earlier roadway studies and suggested that the Commission may wish to request the City
Council to update the studies as there are perspectives beyond transportation needing
consideration with any changes to be made. He discussed some of the viewpoints of neighboring
communities who are affected by Hwy. 36 changes and stated that the Oak Park Heights
corridor was significantly safer than other corridors of the highway.
Commission discussion ensued as to the costs of design change to Oak Park Heights, the feeling
that safety has been clearly considered along with the matter of transportation, built in safety
features as part of the design change and the general feeling that the public is asking for change
and that they should be listened to. Chair Dwyer encouraged all concerned to pay attention to
the issue and communicate their concerns to the City Hall. He added that there was information
available for viewing at the City Hall and that the City Council would be addressing the subject
at their second meeting in April.
Chair Dwyer, seconded by Vice Chair Runk, based on their meeting and discussion with the
Stillwater Planning Commission, moved to recommend that the City Council approve
alterations for Hwy. 36 as recommended by the Partnership Advisory Committee; which is
Concept F- Buttonhook Design, eliminating intersections along Hwy. 36 and replacing them
with overpasses, constructing the highway below grade to accommodate traffic and reduce noise
and to add cul -de -sacs at frontage road by Jerry's Auto Detail, Gardy's Sport Center and
McCormick's Furniture and to look at reducing the curve at the west side frontage road next to
McCormick's Furniture. Furthermore, the Commission asked the City Council to provide
comment on the recommendation.
Carried 4 -0.
B. Planning Commission Discussion of Zoning Ordinance Changes for 60 -12- Day
Development Review Timeline
City Planner Richards informed the Commission that the change was being requested so as to
make the City Ordinance language consistent with Minnesota State Statutes and to address
voting requirements for zoning changes.
Planning Commission Minutes
April 10, 2003
Page 8 of 8
Chair Dwyer, seconded by Commissioner Liljegren, moved to schedule a public hearing at the
May 2003 meeting for discussion of this proposed change. Carried 4 -0.
Old Business: None.
Informational:
A. Next Meeting May 8, 2003 - 7:OOp.m.
B. Commissioner Interview Scheduling Acting City Administrator Holst reminded
Commission and viewers that applications were being accepted for the Planning
Commission until 4:30 p.m., April 21, 2003 and that applications could be obtained by
contacting City Hall.
C. Arden Hills Touring Boutwells Landing Acting City Administrator Holst informed
the Commission that a tour of Boutwells Landing was being arranged for the City of
Arden Hills and their Planning Commission for Saturday, May 3 d at 11:00 a.m. She
asked the Commission if one of them would be interested in participating with the
tour. Chair Dwyer stated that he would check his schedule and notify Judy as to
whether or not he could attend.
Adjournment Commissioner Powell, seconded by Vice Chair Runk, moved to adjourn
at 8:47 p.m. Carried 3 -0.
Respectfully submitted,
iti0e A. Hultman
Community Development
Approved by the Planning Commission: May 8, 2003. 4 -0