Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007-09-21 OPH Ltr. to Applicant Forwarding Documents for ExecutionCity of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Blvd. N • Box 2007 • Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 • Phone (651) 439-4439 • Fax (651) 439-0574 September 21, 2007 Mr. Jeff Almstead Frauenshuh Commercial Real Estate Group 7101 West 78th Street Suite 100 Bloomington, MN 55439 Dear Mr. Almstead: Enclosed you will find three copies of the Planned Unit Development Permit and Variance. Please have executed by both CSM Equities and the ultimate owner of the Bremer Bank Property (see the fourth page) on each of the three copies and mail all copies back to my attention at the above address. Do not remove any pages or remove any stapes as this will void the document and will cause delay. Once these are returned, the City similarly sign and will submit one original copy for recording with Washington County, one will be placed on file crt City Hall and one will be returned to you. Once this is completed, you will then have permission to begin the process to secure a building permit, although you may have had some communication on this matter to date. Please let e) know if you have any questions Sincere Eric Joh City Administrator Cc: Mark Vierling, City Attorney - no enclosure Scott Richards, NAC - no enclosure Julie Hultman, Planning Dept. iv Owner: CSM Equities Inc PL File No.: 798.02-07.07 Date Issued: gust 28,2007 Legal Description: (Washington County Geo. Code 05-029-20-11-0055) Applicant: Bremer Bank N.A. Address: 225SouthSixthStreet Minneapolis, Minnesota Site Address: 5990 Nova Scotia Ave Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Present Zoning District:13-4 Limited Business District L PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPEMENT PE CITY OF OAK PA HEIGHTS WASHINGTON COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA BREMER BANK NED UNIT DEVELOPEMENT PE And VARIANCE Lot 6, Block 1, Oak Park Commons Permitted uses set forth in Ordinance 401 Section 401.301 IT: IT NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVES THE FOLLOWING: A. The application submitted by Bremer Bank for a Planned Unit Development general plan approval, site plan review, and a variance for wall sign to allow a bank with a drive-through at the corner of 60 Street and Nova Scotia Avenue North within the Oak Park Commons and affecting the real property as follows: SEE ATTACHMENT A The City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights approves the Planned Unit Development general plan approval, site plan review and variance for the third wall sign subject to the following findings of fact for the third wall sign variance: 1. The applicants have proposed a total of three wall signs, each on different facades of the building. 2 The total square footage of each wall sign is less than 33 square feet each or a total of less than 100 square feet. 3. The third wall sign ensures visibility of the bank and drive - through from both east and west bound traffic on Highway 36. The City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights denies the request for a monument sign subject to the following findings of facto 1. A. freestanding sign for the development is already located within the subject property. The applicant may have the opportunity to advertise on this sign. 2. The bank shall be adequately visible from Highway 36 and local roadways with the two allowable wall signs and a wall sign allowed by variance. 3. Allowing a monument sign variance for this business will set a precedence for all shopping center businesses to request individual freestanding signs. The approvals are subject to the following conditions: 1. The property owners shall finish the construction of the private road with curb and gutter along the property line of the subject property. The outdoor lighting for the parking lot shall be turned off one hour after closing, except for approved security lighting or as directed in the Planned Unit Development approvals. 3. The lighting shall be arranged to deflect light away from adjoining property or public right- of-way, so the luminaire shall contain a cutoff, which directs and cuts off the light at an angle of 90 degrees or less. 4. The maximum height above the ground grade permitted for light sources mounted on a pole is 25 feet. 5. The trash receptacle shall be fully screened from view of the adjacent property to the west. Additional landscaping shall be added between the trash receptacle and the property line to the west. 6. The Landscape Plan shall be subject to approval by the City A.rborist. 7. If any of the mechanical equipment located on the roof is visible from the street level or from neighborhood properties, it shall be screened with a material designed to blend harmoniously with the building facade materials. 8. A revised parking plan shall be submitted that indicates the following a) The east and west driveways shall be signed, indicating that the east is entrance only and west is exit only. Al! directional signage shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. b) The concrete curb setback shall be subject to approval of the City Engineer. c) The site plan shall be updated to indicate a sidewalk entrance into the parking lot for pedestrian access to the bank preferably along the east side of the property near the handicap parking subject to approval of the City Engineer. d) Due to the significant amount of impervious surface, staff is recommending that the parking area on the south side of the property be shifted to the north approximately two feet to ensure the drive aisle width requirement of 24 feet is met. This will add increased green space to the subject property. 9 The address sign numbers shall be metal, glass, plastic or durable material. The numbers shall not be less than 15 inches in height, in a contrasting color to the base or made of some reflective material, and so placed to be easily seen from the street. 10. The Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan shall be subject to approval by the City Engineer. 11. Comply with City Engineer comments outlined in. September 20, 2007 letter attached Approved by the City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights this 28' day of August 2007. All uses shall be subject to the following conditions and /or restrictions imposed by the August 28, 2007 Resolution of the City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights as follows III. Reference Attachment: The reports of the City Planner dated July 6, 2007 and July 31, 2007; Report from. the City Engineer, Bonestroo dated July 28, 2007 and site plan approved by the City Council are annexed hereto by reference. No Abandonment: This permit requires continuous use in order to preserve the Conditional. Use granted by the City under the terms hereoli Any discontinuation or abandonment of the uses permitted hereunder upon the site for a period of 12 continuous months shall constitute abandonment and void the permit V. .Annual review: Annual. review is not imposed as a condition of this permit The approvals stated in this Permit may grant specific benefits and/or site specific authorizations. Unless specifically listed herein, all nrnprovennents and site conditions must remain compliant with City ordinances. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have set forth their hands and seals. Date: By David Beaudet Mayor Date: By CITY F OAK . HEIGHTS Eric Johnson City Administrator Date: By Date: By Bremer Bank N.A. Its CSM Equities, Inc Its EXHIBIT "A" PLANNERS REPORT AND SITE PLANS MEMORANDUM RE: FILE NO: TO: Eric Johnson FROM: Scott Richards DATE: July 31, 2007 NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. 4800 Olson Memorial Highway, Suite 202, Golden Valley, MN 55422 Telephone: 763.231.2555 Facsimile: 763.231.2561 planners@nacplanning.com Oak Park Heights — Bremer Bank Planned Unit Development: General Plan Review, Site Plan Review, and Variances for Signage 798.02 — 07.07 Please find attached the July 6, 2007 planning report for the Bremer Bank request. As you are aware, the applicants asked that this issue be continued to the August 9, 2007 meeting. The plans remain as submitted with no changes from the July meeting. The delay in consideration will allow for representatives of Bremer Bank to attend the August meeting. They are especially interested in explaining to the Planning Commission why the additional monument sign and wall signs are necessary. The City has extended the review period for this application to the 120 day allowance. The City Council will need to take action on this request no later than October 10, 2007. BACKGROUND NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. NAC FILE: 798.02 -- 07.07 4800 Olson Memorial Highway, Suite 202, Golden Malley, MN 55422 Telephone: 763.231.2555 Facsimile: 763.231.25'61 planners@nacplanning.com MEMORANDUM TO: Eric Johnson FROM: Carle Fuhrman /Scott Richards DATE: July 6, 2007 RE: Oak Park Heights -- Bremer Bank -- Planned Unit Development: General Plan Review; Site Plan Review, and Variances for Signage Application. Frauenshuh Corinercial Real Estate Group, on behalf of Bremer Bank, has applied fora PUD, general plan approval; site plan review; and a variance for signage. Bremer Bank is proposing a single story bank with a drive - through to be constructed on Lot 6, Block 1 of Oak Park Commons. The site is approximately one acre in size and is located on the corner of 60th Street North and Nova Scotia Avenue North. The bank is proposed to be 4,400 square feet, contain a four -lane drive - through, full - service banking floor inside with a walk -up teller line, offices, meeting facilities, vault, and safe deposit boxes, Bremer Bank is also requesting to place a second freestanding, monument sign on the northwest corner of the site, which requires a variance due to the fact that the Ordinance only allows one freestanding development sign on a site. In addition, Bremer Bank is requesting three wall signs on the exterior surfaces of the building, while the Ordinance only allows two wall signs total. Attached for Reference. Exhibit A — Title Sheet (A0) Exhibit B — Topographic Survey (CO) Exhibit C — Grading, Drainage, & Erosion Control Plan (C1) Exhibit D — Utility Plan (C2) Exhibit E —Civil Details (C3) Exhibit F — Watershed Plan (C4) Exhibit G — Landscape Plan (L.1) Exhibit H Site Plan dated 6- 28- 07(A1.0) 1 Page 71 of 96 City Council Agenda - 8/28/07 Regulation Lot Line Re uired Proposed Front Setback North (60th Street N.) 40 feet 40' East (Nova Scotia Ave. N.) 40 feet 67' South (Private Street) 40 feet 96' 9" ... Side /Rear Setback West (Lot 5) 20 feet 09' 6' Lot Area N/A 1 5,000 sq. ft. 100 feet 100 feet 41,817 sq. ft, 190 feet 215 feet Lot Width 60th Street N. Nova Scotia Ave. N. Building Height N/A 35 feet 24.5 feet ISSUES ANALYSIS Exhibit 1— Floor Plan (A2.0) Exhibit J — Roof Plan (A21) Exhibit -1 -- Exterior Elevations (A3O) Exhibit K-2— Exterior Elevations (A3.1) Exhibit L --- Photometric Plan (P1) Exhibit M-1 — Colored East Elevation Exhibit M-2 — Colored North Elevation Exhibit M -3 — Colored West Elevation Exhibit N - Sign Detail Exhibit -1 — Photograph of existing bank Exhibit 0-2 — Photograph of existing bank Exhibit 0 -3 -- Photograph of existing bank Exhibit P -- City Engineer Comments Zoning. Lot 6, Block 1 of Oak Park Commons is zoned B -4, Limited Business District. "Banks, savings institutions, credit unions, and other financial institutions, including drive-throughs" are permitted uses in the B -4 District. Concept Plan approval was already received for the proposed bank as part of the Oak Park Commons Planned Unit Development review. The following table illustrates the required and proposed general zoning regulations for this site: Parking Lot Design. The parking stalls are 9 feet wide and 20 feet in length, which meets the Ordinance requirements. The access aisle widths are 26 feet, ten inches wide and 22 feet wide, which both meet the minimum Ordinance requirement of 22 feet. Number of Spaces. The parking lot is proposed to have 26 parking spaces, including two handicapped accessible parking stalls. Ten parking stalls are proposed on the south side of the property, 12 of the parking spaces are proposed on the east side of the property, and four parking stalls are counted within the drive - through lanes. The Ordinance requires one space per 250 square feet of floor area. The proposed bank is 4,440 square feet in area. 4,440 x 0.9 = 3,996/250 = 15.98 -3 16 parking spaces Page72of96 City Council Agenda - 8/28/07 The Ordinance also requires two spaces for each drive -in unit plus drive aisle stacking space of 180 feet for each drive-in unit. 4 drive-in units x 2 spaces = 8 parking spaces Therefore, the Ordinance requires a total of 24 parking spaces, which is met by the proposed parking plan. Entrance /Exit. The site will be accessed from the south, off of the primary east - west service drive (private street) that traverses the north end of Oak Park Commons. The entrance to the site shall be from the southeast corner of the property, and the exit shall be from the southwest corner of the property. According to the applicants, a variety of site access studies were completed, which analyzed both single and double points of entry and egress. However, circulation clarity and safety were maximized with the configuration that is utilized in the proposed plans. The Ordinance requires all off - street parking facilities to be designed and constructed with appropriate means of vehicular access to a public street. Except in the case of a planned unit development, each lot shall have access directly onto an abutting, improved and City - accepted public street. The proposed access off of the private street meets the Ordinance because this is a proposed planned unit development. The property owners shall finish the construction of the private road along the property line of the subject property. Intersection Separation. Initially, the applicants proposed that the east driveway be an entrance and an exit to the property. However, that curb cut access into the parking lot is proposed to be approximately 40 feet from the intersection of Nova Scotia Avenue North and the private street (measured from the intersection of lot lines), which does not meet the Ordinance requirement of a 60 foot setback. Therefore, staff suggested the applicants turn the entrance /exit at the east driveway into strictly an entrance in order to alleviate congestion with vehicles that would be exiting the parking lot at this point. The applicants revised the site plan, and this change is reflected in Al .0, Curbing. The Ordinance requires that a continuous concrete perimeter curb barrier be located around the entire parking lot and shall not be closer than 10 feet to any lot line. A portion of the concrete curb is located within 5.5 feet of the west property line. The concrete curb setback will be subject to approval of the City Engineer being this is a part of a PUCE application. Sidewalk. The submitted site plan indicates an existing sidewalk that runs along Nova Scotia Avenue North and 80th Street North. There is no indication of a sidewalk entrance into the bank parking lot. The site plan shall be updated to indicate a sidewalk entrance into the parking lot for pedestrian access, preferably along the east side of the property near the handicap parking. 3 Page 73 of 96 City Council Agenda - 8/28/07 Impervious Surface. According to C4, the proposed site will contain 0.69 acres of impervious surface, which is 72% imperious surface. Due to the significant amount of impervious surface, staff is recommending that the parking area on the south side of the property be shifted to the north approximately four feet to ensure the drive aisle width of 22 feet is still met. This will add increased green space to the subject property. Lighting Plan. Fixtures. The submitted photometric plan indicates five single shoebox fixtures on 25 foot poles, to be located as follows: one on the north side of the property, two on the east side of the property, one on the south side, and one on the west side. These shoebox fixtures are shielded fixtures, with fully recessed lamp sources. The lighting shall be arranged to deflect light away from adjoining property or public right- of-way, so the luminaire shall contain a cutoff, which directs and cuts off the light at an angle of 90 degrees or less. The maximum height above the ground grade permitted for light sources mounted on a pole is 25 feet. Lighting is also proposed on the exterior of the building in three locations. Recessed cans in the soffit, above the main entrance (fixture type 'DV); recessed square canopy fixtures installed inside the drive - through canopy structure (fixture type D2'); and surface - mounted fixtures, above the emergency exit door (fixture type `L'). All exterior fixture types will utilize fully shielded lamp configurations. The fixtures located within soffits are also fully recessed in their locations and shielded from view. Intensity. The submitted photometric plan meets the Ordinance requirements for lighting intensity. Location. The single shoebox light fixture proposed on the west property line does not meet the required setback from the side property line. The Lighting Plan indicates that this light fixture is proposed to be located directly on the west property line adjacent to Lot 5. The Ordinance requires the light source of an outdoor Tight fixture to be setback a minimum of five feet from an interior side lot line. Therefore, the revised Lighting Plan shall indicate that this proposed light fixture meets the required setback from the side lot line. Hours. Outdoor lighting for parking Tots shall be turned off one hour after closing, except for approved security lighting. Landscape Design. The Landscape Plan shall be subject to approval by the City A rb o rist. Signs. The site plan indicates two "exit only" signs proposed at the west driveway. The east driveway shall also be signed, indicating that it is an entrance only. The site plan also indicates an address sign on the east elevation of the building, facing Nova Scotia Avenue North. The elevation notes indicate that the numbers will not exceed three square feet, which meet the Ordinance requirement. In addition, the 4 Page74of96 City Council Agenda - 8/28/07 numbers shall be metal, glass, plastic or durable material, and the numbers shall not be less than 3.5 inches in height, in a contrasting color to the base or made of some reflective material, and so placed to be easily seen from the street. The submitted site plan also includes a proposed monument sign on the northwest corner of the site. The sign is approximately eight feet tall and 52 square feet. However, the subject site already contains an existing monument sign advertising the entire development on the northeast corner of the property. The Ordinance only allows a maximum of one freestanding development sign; therefore, a variance is required. The site plan also indicates three walls signs proposed on the bank. Each sign is on a separate building facade: one on the north, east, and west elevations of the building. Each sign appears to be approximately 31 square feet in area. The Ordinance only allows a maximum of two walls signs on any principal building; therefore, a variance is required. All illuminated on- premise and off - premise signs for advertising purposes shall be turned off between 11:00 PM and sunrise, except that said signs may be illuminated while the business facility on the premise is open for service. Building Type and Construction. Quality. The proposed building meets the quality standards of the ordinance, which states that buildings in all zoning districts shall maintain a high standard of architectural and aesthetic compatibility with surrounding properties to ensure that they will not adversely impact the property values of the abutting properties or adversely impact the public health, safety, and general welfare. Photos of another recently completed Bremer Bank have been included with the report. The photos illustrate the bank's size, scale, composition, colors, and exterior materials. Exterior Finishes. The exterior of the bank is proposed to be finished with the following materials: ashlar gray rock face concrete block; jumbo modular face brick; vertical windows with insulated glazing; synthetic stucco with a sandpebble texture. The roof structure is proposed to be composed of bare galvanized sheet metal roofing with insulated glazing windows that are exposed between the walls and the roof structure. All of the proposed exterior building finishes are consistent with the Ordinance standards for grade and quality. Trash Enclosure, The proposed trash enclosure meets the following Ordinance standards: a. The exterior wall treatment is similar to the principal building. b. The trash receptacle area is located in the rear /side yard. 5 Page 75 of 96 City Council Agenda - 8/28/07 c. The trash enclosure is in an accessible location for pick up hauling vehicles. It is located near the west entrance /exit to and from the parking lot. d. The trash receptacle is screened from view of the public rights -of -way to the north and east and also the private road to the south of the property. However, the trash receptacle is not fully screened from view of the adjacent property to the west. Therefore, additional landscaping shall be added between the trash receptacle and the property line to the west. Mechanical Equipment The roof plan indicates several items that are proposed to be located on the roof. If any of the mechanical equipment located on the roof is visible from the street level or from neighborhood properties, it shall be screened with a material designed to blend harmoniously with the building facade materials. Grading /Drainage. The Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan shall be subject to approval by the City Engineer. See additional engineering comments in Exhibit P. Variance. Variance criteria is provided in Section 401.04 of the Oak Park Heights Zoning Ordinance. The Planning Commission and City Council should review the following criteria and conditions to determine if the variance is justified. Review Criteria, The Planning CornnissiorI and City Council should make a finding of fact that the proposed action will not: a. impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property. b. Unreasonably increase the congestion in the public street. c. Have the effect of allowing any district uses prohibited therein, permit a lesser degree of flood protection than the flood protection elevation for the particular area, or permit standards which are lower than those required by State law. d. Increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety. e. Unreasonably diminish or impair established property values within the neighborhood, or in any way be contrary to the intent of this ordinance. f. Violate the intent and purpose of the Comprehensive Plan. Violate any of the terms or conditions of Item 5, below. Conditions for Approval. A variance from the terms of this Ordinance shall not be granted unless it can be demonstrated that: a. Undue hardship will result if the variance is denied due to the existence of special conditions and circumstances which are peculiar to the land, structure, or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures or buildings in the same district. 1) Special conditions may include exceptional topographic or water conditions or, in the case of an existing at or parcel of record, narrowness, shallowness, insufficient area or shape of the property. Page76of96 City Council Agenda - 8/28/07 2) Undue hardship caused by the special conditions and circumstances may not be solely economic in nature, if a reasonable use of the property exists under the terns of this Title. 3) Special conditions and circumstances causing undue hardship shall not be a result of lot size or building location when the lot qualifies as a buildable parcel. b. Literal interpretation of the provisions of this Ordinance would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of this ordinance or deny the applicant the ability to put the property in question to a reasonable use. c. The special conditions and circumstances causing the undue hardship do not result from the actions of the applicant. d. Granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this Ordinance to other lands, structure or buildings in the same district under the same conditions. e. The request is not a result of non - conforming lands, structures or buildings in the same district. f The request is not a use variance. g The variance requested is the minimum variance necessary to accomplish the intended purpose of the applicant. h. The request does not create an inconvenience to neighboring properties and uses. Comment regarding the second monument sign: In response to the criteria and conditions listed above, granting the variance request to allow a second monument sign would be awarding the applicant a special privilege that is denied by this Ordinance to other lands, structure, or buildings in the same district under the same conditions. The site and building are highly visible from Highway 36. A freestanding sign that exists on site could advertise the Bremer Bank. Allowing the bank to construct an additional freestanding, advertising sign without a justified hardship would set a precedent for future requests. For these reasons, City planning staff recommends that the second monument sign variance be denied. Comment regarding the third wall sign: In response to the criteria and conditions listed above, the proposed wall signs are fairly small in size and granting the variance request to allow the third wall sign will not create an inconvenience to neighboring properties and uses. The City has granted a third wall sign to allow better visibility from Highway 36 for other businesses in this area. For these reasons, City planning staff recommends that the third wall sign variance be approved. RECOMMENDATION AND CONCLUSION After reviewing the request and the criteria and conditions for variance approvals, staff recommends denial of the request for the additional freestanding, monument sign on the subject property. Page 77 of 96 City Council Agenda - 8/28/07 After reviewing the request and the criteria and conditions for variance approvals, staff recommends approval of the request for the third wall sign on the proposed building. After reviewing the request for the PUD, general plan review, and site plan review, staff recommends approval of the proposed Bremer Bank. The recommendation is made with the following conditions: 1. The property owners shall finish the construction of the private road with curb and gutter along the property line of the subject property. 2. The outdoor lighting for the parking lot shall be turned off one hour after closing, except for approved security lighting. 3. The lighting shalt be arranged to deflect light away from adjoining property or public right-of-way, so the luminaire shall contain a cutoff, which directs and cuts off the light at an angle of 90 degrees or less. 4 The maximum height above the ground grade permitted for light sources mounted on a pole is 25 feet. 5. The trash receptacle shall be fully screened from view of the adjacent property to the west. Additional landscaping shall be added between the trash receptacle and the property line to the west. 6. The Landscape Plan shall be subject to approval by the city Arborist. 7. If any of the mechanical equipment located on the roof is visible from the street level or from neighborhood properties, it shall be screened with a material designed to blend harmoniously with the building facade materials. 8. A revised parking plan shall be submitted that indicates the following: a) The east driveway shall be signed, indicating that it is an entrance only; b) The concrete curb setback shall be subject to approval of the City Engineer; c) The site plan shall be updated to indicate a sidewalk entrance into the parking lot for pedestrian access to the bank, preferably along the east side of the property near the handicap parking; and d) Due to the significant amount of impervious surface, staff is recommending that the parking area on the south side of the property be shifted to the north approximately four feet to ensure the drive aisle width requirement of 22 feet is still met. This will add increased green space to the subject property. 9. The address sign numbers shall be metal, glass, plastic or durable material. The numbers shall not be less than 3,5 inches in height, in a contrasting color to the base or made of some reflective material, and so placed to be easily seen from the street. 10. The Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan shall be subject to approval by the City Engineer. 11. Any additional comments or conditions of the City Council, Planning Commission, or City Staff, 8 Page 78 of 96 City Council Agenda - 8/28/07 Lq U dh h c '‘P D c) pc1 o r:4 ca A Aq � O ig, N hi P Oflgi m E w v O$'OQ 3„17 L Q. f.d5 \ D 1 a , -vGa z , fl H anNaAv V11008 VAON EL 3.1,1,Zg.LOS Cry . - .e -:/-1 ^-i �+'""�i°' ��'�i ° �,, Qa; '�l 't 'S f all 33J N ^ 0 -- - -_ i - 1SY3 3h1 30 3„ it 1,Zg.10S 0 c .-- 07 .00 1 t It. dfd Hirg LL - 17/1 3N 3H1 40 Z/1 N 3H1 30 .133J 00'2101 ISY3 1 113�33i531� -� 1r-66'f1Z M„>�L,Oo oN 7 a f i I I 0 S L' °° J J tiu 17 L � F J M f �� .f '03S z'0 t/i 34 ja J 33,A 00 - 1 .&t 1 f 31111 A1831.S3M NOI1.03S 1 �l- n 1.333 2611 r i "' 15Y3 3Hi JO �► 3NI1 ,LS3Nt ¢ 4 7 , 9111Z 3.80,00.00S 'AP 7 F c) 6.609 {H11110) Y . F.H3. 0a = .nl0)[il LZ.00N , 1 _L d O N 3 i N •.3 A c1 ♦] r' i‘ r i N TT d ii ti SA R 4 q qgc"t g2 11.] NOLL1QOV 3SVV1-I ;10 J.V ld 83d 1N3313SV3 u1111f1 3OVNIVLIO .100.E O fi 91 8autA% ag i \c :‘, 4 t _ °o �9'8Q£ 1 a !��SL'2ZZ� 4 4-1..a E'T Lt 8. f' D rri ,ri 0 "' U j 1 1 'P; Ij ..< anp N ow °l x o x 1 0 � n " }. g', ry d � v ~ � i.3 §4 ,2),,.' p Lt! as ti 0 � � e� i5i � \\ L,1 r �`Cil '- tit Q IJI 0 : - , ! ' x EE : ;n1;!, 1 L� ,� 0z o r- °1wzF Lai 1*.m 0 ':A1 , L'2i z »=0 U.Q a >J, a § L a p- J i 11 -J o Q v' sa•eot r/D tag Nd ( 11 , g <111aaaaa<mi<1 g! 1 ( t ) cci ›.. >.< 8 `' - u t" Vul I E90, gg U iq i ig flie! g ii e 3 3 i y di N t - c°v 0/ € x J 10 d 1: 181lllgii €"ii g g dY I IP 4 $ a Hi. ' z 4 N. N it 151 1 g ,1; i lb ; 41 ql IP ; I :. i it ij ! a vg.* 1 101 ;IP A Y 'i'.' E 1 a er ildi N il IA h 1 ibb ' 1 id 1 1; 4 '' :gi4 4 ; iiii i 1 101 igt 0. 1 .1 hi !, 1 wH 1 V is x 4 i ,,. It i w req1E i 8ili ;8 (61 gq 11 gl ON d'Ilei r1 g IrtiPir i 0.119/Jpilggl 11! 1 1 � ` 91 J. H'Iln!fl!gi ' 1,15120 '.s Elk t 444444444444444 \s > r— I I 1 ,i1 1 ii ii '4g 1 1;i Q !° 1 s :i 1 :i §,1 1 :h: ; .11 ; ics, 1 f4 IN P g 4 ; .. i 0, 11141 E i i W ilig ; igig g 4 q dti i Ix gq:11 e ' lal y 41 , Mil 4p1 'jI k iiE4 11 il qj 1 fi 0 i 1I l 1! i le N l q b ;igl"ligEIVPgieg 1 Nir g 1 01 1 114131!: fi r !hi ; NIN:q4gillill drgily gj ii1110$04111.,1 11 Pillitk -,I / f tE (E 2 ES 2c tc es I 9 Efi 0 q g Y ! A 2 § g tl , $ i 1 0 1 g ?., p L, ig 1 a n R g0 g X 6 Li gg o i 5 ! 111;5 1 if IVH OW tq g! g P hilPt '' 1 !ePN1 4 fr r. 51Ed §' li gPig, B i's00€ 4 wh, kl 6:;e1g a Ight.ws .14 . id!gliiWp., 5g lOniii I i4rAiY4 .4.,.1 E rt- H --- 4 i,,, 4 i hi lig.. ig ligli 'd,1 h I; !ig 41 ii 4 li! n , • Iiiii iih I: r. ili e e " - 1 i 'i ig., OW P " lxz 1/4gg fry5 g el,§ pt i k 1,1 pRk g p k T !ig!! 1 1 10 1 h ,1 i 1 ' ivi le . p 4 OR §Og giq ! ig if ,.! 'ilgli h q 5i q / i0, h kni; ti ill liN ilh v 8 Et ID El 0 0 8 Ei 0 131 13 I E 444 1 -- .•. 41! 8 N V) 0 0 e 1 1 ; 4 0 t 9 LO --l) D--- L co ED 1 2 = g >< L.L.1 N t I e E k digh ili t 1h ir11 1:!' g 01 i 4 t .011 Ihp 1 i I <411114 <110 4 0 114 Q yp gz 4 oi 4 101 g EXTNe gi! giN1 EA igiqg DLANTEN 12,I2 "Tt2.•51 7rn elm - tr2srr, 1111111=31 . ...1o4 - max [ s wry zwri-awr .rmirsz craw:oar' cftra./ar saa N.LaS• .7C 'P.0 eigPrOP 54rp4 YD. 1.:Lin orc rrazig xprig4 Vrai v,v`r, 1 N2111 X•in .402 2.4rte DM.. 1222 17:44,5 IIIMEEEE1131■1== 1111111•0 C.14 44.47:0 .ANNL.44,7 Z4TN 20:0 1391-LLS glarNilg vriom "P•C411,... 2,7rt Cr3bri mac. axr 1 . ..cos 2P 1,17T [ • • .trrn rf2. lacr, hclawr rms.. warsi 1-701 P014172 I 21..liter122Th09 .1.6irCne, Mfic 1.241 Kr • 1 ill 1 t i 0 h III oo PM 1 . IN hh ties 11•111111111•11 Wig AP% : • ..: . - ' t ' ' ' ' '• , , 1-$.4t • ,5Ar 4 , ,-, w 6CAPE 1='1_ AN li fl /- ^ •- 1-11U0A1 .717Ng A V VII ODS' VA ON < 1 < ELI 171 ti y 9 jtv z 1 z 1 0 0 0 1 th 11 d 8 12_,MMtm E <11114 < 4-1•14 <1 thiraaTssfmz ;Tizigia cn U tligh. § 4 t ; il e l pi 1 q. B ,i o ga A H i it p t r y tg ! .g il hhX11 0 e 000® oe ® a 0 L „■' g aaaaaaaaaaaaaa❑ I-1- J-4 �.n J 1- L J ! I L 0 0 g g hh 441.1 j'1111 1 1 1 ° ; D 01 g b I . o Yhi 11011 glrj a o o a a08 € � ® c 1 dith 1 ru7 g v � S 4444444 ©444444❑ g 0 0 fT, C ca f s 2r gi 114 r 111wg 1 n� n Phl NE O D O O 0000 00® 4,0 az) .; ;)) az) .Q .6 .6 2 e az , .6 11 tb)g Roth tr: d <1414 <1.14114114 to N t- r---4 • 1 CO = i 2 ›< L.., A o z = g 0 t? EXHIBIT 1 = fl ; t-• .1 ,u 'awaczmaw.tom ,L....zot, -. ,...- Q.. < 0 --- x4'21:220' ...„.., ,, .... Xt.J 4‹,,,, E.. 4w mm -'.°- ' . .. Mip2 -iL.4z6 w !;,,TY 4 g ° P14 2 "15 :1 21 1 z 0 1 (i) w cc 0 0 0 7.0 kij ci), D.Z co n ii-i •Z) • t C*,: -- < ,-, ....:::: , zr: Ill L.) t-- < ▪ u2 '-'," L V 1— W Z D :4: -1 Lb LC) • 0 :0 -- ▪ CI- H ---‘. LU z >---:: • in W Li = 11.1 L. ----; t--- tZ Z._. 0 < Fi < LL 1-. Lti $-: :5: 1_12 Lill S _1 C, ',el 11.1 -.4 ILLI >- < :: '- IL u j (..) T. EXHIBIT 1 8 ), BIT "B" City Engineer Letter September 20, 2007 September 20, 2007 Mr. Eric Johnson City Administrator City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Blvd., P.O Box 2007 Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 -2007 Re: Bremer Bank City of Oak Park Heights Bonestroo file No. 55 -07 -000 Dear Eric: We have reviewed the Site Development Plans, dated September 4, 2007, for Bremer Bank as submitted by Welman Sperides Architects, LLC. We have the following remaining comments and/or recommendations. Sheet A1 1. We recommend the pavement marking for the parking lot striping be changed from 3" lines to 4" lines. 2. Show 4" white pavement hatch markings in the van accessible isle between the two handicapped spots. General Comments 1. As directed by City Council on August, 28, 2007, submit an auto turn analysis showing that a fire truck is capable of making a left turn into the parking lot from the east driveway entrance. 2. Provide the City with a copy of the approval letter from the Browns Creek Watershed District. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me at (651) 604 -4788 or Dennis Postler at (651) 604 -4815. Sincerely, BONESTROO Karen S. Erickson, P.E. cc: Tom Ozzello, Public Works Director Jim Butler, Building Official Scott Richards, City Planner Mark Vierling, City Attorney Eric Reiners, Welman Sperides, Architects DMP, BMK, CWL2, File Bonestroo 2335 Highway 36 W St. Paul, MN 55113 Tel 651 - 636 -4600 Fax 651-636-1311 www.boryestroo.corn Bonestroo St. Paul 5t. Cloud Rochester Milwaukee Chicago Engineers Architects Planners June 28, 2007 Mr. Eric Johnson City Administrator City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Blvd., P.O. Box 2007 Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 -2007 Re: Bremer Bank City of Oak Park Heights Bonestroo file No. 55 -07 -000 Dear Eric: We have reviewed the Site Development Plans for Bremer Bank as submitted by Welman Sperides Architects, LLC on June 20, 2007. Following are our comments and /or recommendations, Sheet C1 1. The development is constructing the drive thru lane and storm sewer within the City's utility easement and over the existing trunk sanitary sewer and water main. If in the future the City ever needs to replace /repair /maintain the trunk utilities the development will be responsible to repair all of their items in the easement including, but not limit to, pavement, curb and gutter, landscaping and storm sewer /catch basin. 2. At critical areas, such as the driveway aprons and grade breaks, add the percent of slope at the drainage arrows. 3. Spot elevations should be added to the trash enclosure. 4, The elevation of the concrete drive thru is not clearly identified on the plans. Spot elevations should be placed at each corner to show the grade of the concrete pad. 5. Identify grades on the west side of the property in the landscaped area. Sheet C2 1. Verify the structure size of CB2. It appears the top of the 18 inch pipe to the south will be in conflict with the bottom of the 15" pipe to the southwest, 2335 Highway 36 VV 5t. Paul, MN 55113 Tel 651 - 636 -4600 Fax 651 - 636 -1311 www.bone5troo.com # Bonestroo St. Paul St. Claud Rochester Milwaukee Chicago Engineers Architects Planners City of Oak Park Heights Bremer Bank Page 2 June 2a 207 2. It is assumed that the canopy for the drive thru will have footings five feet deep. If in the future the water main requires repair in this area the footings for the canopy may be undermined. Research the possibility of placing the water main more than 5 feet from the canopy. 3. Contact Alliant Engineering to verify the water main stub from the south that is identified by keynote number 2. The construction plans at our office for this development does not identify a water main stub at this location. 4. Contact Alliant Engineering to verify the sanitary stub from the north that is identified by keynote number 1. The construction plans at our office for this development does not identify the sanitary sewer stub at this location. 5. Insulation shall be placed at all storm sewer /water main crossings. Sheet C3 1. The detail sheet appears to have details that will not be used. For example there was no call out for a wet tap on the utility sheet. In addition, there are details that are missing such as a 2 x 3 box structure that is called out on sheet C2 for structure CB5. 2. A typical section for the concrete drive apron should be added to detail 13. 3. Detail 4 is a storm manhole with a 27" opening. This structure should be revised to accommodate the Neenah casting R3067 as called out on sheet C2. 4. Add a detail showing the section for the concrete pad at the drive thru. 5. A detail is required showing the drive thru islands. Sheet C4 1. Submit rational design calculations for the storm sewer, Sheet A1.0 1. To minimize turning movements on the thru street for the overall development it is recommended that the east driveway is narrowed and restricted to "in" movements only. This entrance should be signed appropriately. 2. There is a large radius on the northwest side of the drive thru lane that creates a bituminous bump out. Is this additional bituminous really required? 3. The radius in the northeast corner appears small. Verify that all vehicles using the drive thru lane are able to make the radius. 4. There is only 3' between the northerly drive thru lane and the existing bike path. It is recommended that the site plan is revised to provide more distance between the bike path and the drive thru lane. City of Oak Park Neigh is Bremer Bonk 5. The existing bike path on the east side of the property should be shown on the drawings. The pathway is on the plans on sheet C1. 6. Reference the detail locations on the keynotes. 7. identify the size and color for the pavement markings. General Comments 1. Provide the City with a copy of the approval letter from the Browns Creek Watershed District. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me at (651) 604 -4788 or Dennis Postler at (651) 604 -4815. Sincerely, BONETROO ; =, Karen 5. Erickson, P.E. cc: Torn Ozzello, Public Works Director Jim Butler, Building Official Scott Richards, City Planner Mark Vierling, City Attorney Eric Reiners, Welman Sperides, Architects DM P, BM K, CWL2, File Bonestroo Page 3 June 28, 2007 Final Site Plans approved by the City Council Subject to Verification and Compliance with City Ordinances and Approved Deviations as stated in Permit Igii ann � S f F ff 1<<<44 2 t A ' ':" - = 1- g ' D '71t ! .2 P hi i hig Y 3 i t 2 ." V W V CL� Q w E ❑ u 6 W § d t c0 n 9 iL -❑ ` T u - w °' [5 � U _.3 J .di U W ~ o fY 0.,- rA W ' d ,- `- .;, u ` jL v d Q t o a , w w ul ` _ �- 4 T_ U mi ll 1',' 1 9 rn f r2 '.- n W u Q w r* , '�'w - �.. i ! � o V E 1 11 n a F m u 6 w ww� =' D r ¢ X 41 ci7 ' tL IL : � w Igii ann � S f F ff 1<<<44 2 , ±1 (i) lj • 1 -; ; • • HSU. 3r1N3AV VII,. V AON —4 19k , - • - -- ' - 1-ill 3riN3AV V1.1.009 i V AON ?..1 ..,. _,.,,,.,, ..,_, _,_,,:,,„__:„.,-_ - •-- - , - _:- - -_,_,-. - - , :: : ,77,:: ' - . ...'• "•---- .'. — e; _. , • ',e i -- - -- r ' '-, '-'- ,:f•, -;-!, J 1 n =;:ii• I '. ! 1:.: •, :i.)- / 66 ,V,S1,00.001-1 L 1 '2 N ! g P v ;.■ 0 g Z H • -., , L c. ,=.', O i ILI 31 rid gL Hr' '3 c, .44 10 .41 - • :1T 1 CfD 1, P 1 1 - i i 11 p Ng[ ,4 ii g lg , two . ,A u ho 1 il !li illdht I Fi lb q !li!! '' ? hi i '.1; n , b i 4 r, i , ! , i , i ,.!:;!: , eil: la g!: „,, ,,,, x id,11,1 ih 1! ! r hi p NF - j 1i r? lg ,d O g A.! qOP gyD Y xle 5 tP h V 1 Eilr i g ! E e 0 ii T'q' % ,ON?s n 'hi!; .r.4 ,gr n r5 lig', § Mhtqi i a,,i ANa° i J o / vTgighii 1 dOi!! greol$Pi I 1 E ,4..0 h rghX4“ gli b- ........ . • . - g's'or:3_,s - L.., gg 49t llhh 1h i 1 it lb 1 il .. t h l i i 1 b Q. We . 1 ilq ili! !.,-.! h / 40 r h 10 1 x4, . Lto x , ;s1po il Yaqi d : R; •2§- h' Mr: •d% - i !,k 0,:,g,,agi t U : . N1: ! y q i hi.gY! ' gi p p, a g ,_ , x:::41:::::: Il ' b4i I ' whx1 qi . ih pg ! k ti r .., .1, t, , 0-, k'qg':g 0 2 ' ■'' i W Wi l q; '' NR$PhibijOk Wig t ill /qihr84PXAhrhf. : iii BE@ CI SO • -•• 1 01 Ighhl 10.14 g I 1 0 0 EE Kr IhiI 2 I II g K ,ffi Ohl I 11 11! N4 U 4 H i 1 1. ❑Og4O044g44444❑ 1 0 91EBILMIEBIlf. , wITERETINNi 9 i § . ° , _ § t 4 6 ! ?0 fliW Iik L0000000e000e00o000c40 .•-... /,''.. 32,72 _ _ - _ - r 1- / .0 / 1 T ..._ ..} // /t / i f•- „ /.../ i , r) ,, U/, i ,m..i..1.,,g.:.5:1,.:) v ,,, , f I/ 4----..T.'" .-A,,,,,As I ' ..'-'..-.----..- - ----,-// / "/ 1 .07, .0 ! 1 i 1 1 1 0 • II HIZION 9 VICLOdS VAON gg EMI 0 0 d"\\ 0 ' f C5-0 7 6.) 11) ER Ili ,1 L) :1, a f• a . t i _ 1 ' 6 i ! t •k '1 , ;iikFg9? t'.`,1 i' " i -1 g 1 !i:F 1 ' i r, 3 ', 1 2 ,i' g , z v P li ;gii , als . 6 '4i tiii0 q ! 1 gg;.iil es000 ocso$ a o cpaeooci a 0 0 000 et° ;ffozin fo) 00) MEM g 0•41 , A c .e, h P "6' N i n i , .,, t' :', 0, '5 9 t: ) _., . 'CA) a 1.7Z:11 .s , I 11 ; . C=7) C1 E 0) E67,7:2 W.WION," 0 o JI 11. _ILI -.--.- ,.,L.... I 1 .---- 1 _....-.--„_ ± 1 : _1_ _ _ ._ . ._ - ,.._ M ..- . .1j- r 'It NM ,.. if IF --- 1,._...._,.. - 11 - I 71 1 . ,1 i i i 1 i H . --- N _ .......,, l - 1 .- - ---- IF --- :,111.1j .,111 - - - - 1 6") q> 0 IJLIL Li r L I .1i. it.. 1 .9•At . . - [41 ...---- ; ,11 ill Fl Lir311_ 8 z 1- 0 c•> 0 0000 0 0 a 0 StORY PLAN1 rimg, C.4•011.) am i dxi -- g . '.`' .., 1 0 1 r b h P.' th ii ... uri 1 (I .,--A --Hi- iil ia .,,,, A J .,111 - - - - 1 6") q> 0 IJLIL Li r L I .1i. it.. 1 .9•At . . - [41 ...---- ; ,11 ill Fl Lir311_ 8 z 1- 0 c•> 0 0000 0 0 a 0 StORY PLAN1 rimg, C.4•011.) y - E/) • 1'. i,1! a _ [;J \ ‘' ‘ L_ I ) :I 2 .1 MI_ 4 N • I. 90 5 E VIERNEABIN Wu I s P9. • 111111111W 1 ELI t ) 3 ILI 0 . •J Li r 8 e