HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007-10-02 OPH Ltr. to Applicant 2nd Forwarding of Documents for ExecutionCity of Oak Park Heights
14168 Oak Park Blvd. N • Box 2007. Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 • Phone (651) 439 -4439 • Fax (651) 439 -0574
October 2, 2007
Mr. Jeff Almstead
Frauenshuh Commercial Real Estate Group
7101 West 78th Street
Suite 100
Bloomington, MN 55439
RE: PUD Permit and Variance Permits - 2nd Attempt for Signature.
Dear Mr. Almstead:
Enclosed you will find three copies of the Planned Unit Development Permit and
Variance. Please have executed by both CSM Equities and Bremer Bank (see the fourth
page) on each of the three copies and mail all copies back to my attention at the
above address.
If you have already closed on the property in question and you are unable to secure a
signature from CSM Equities you may alternatively provide to my attention a full and
complete set of the closing documents that demonstrate that Bremer Bank is in fact the
owner of the property. However please be advised that you must either secure the
signature of CSM Equities or provide these closing documents as requested.
Once these are returned, the City similarly sign and will submit one original copy for
recording with Washington County, one will be placed on file at City Hall and one will be
returned to you. Once this is completed, you will then have permission to begin the
process to secure a building permit, although you may have had some communication
on this matter fs date.
labs¢ let e .o if you have any questio
Si
Si
n
City • / istrator
Cc: Mark Vierling, City Attorney - no enclosure
Scott Richards, NAC - no enclosure
Julie Hultman, Planning Dept.,
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
14168 Oak Park Blvd, N.
P.O. Box 2007
Oak Park Heights, MN 55082
File No.: 798.02-07.07
Legal Description: (Washington County Geo. Code 05-029-20-11-0055)
Owner: Bremer Bank N.A.
Applicant: Bremer Bank N.A.
Address:
8555 Eagle Point Road
Lake Elmo, MN 55043
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
WASHINGTON COUNTY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
BREMER BANK
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPEMENT PERMIT
And VARIANCE
Site Address: 5990 60 Street North
Oak Park Heights, MN 55082
Lot 6, BlockA,
Oak Park Corrnill' s
Date Issued: August ,28, 2007
Present Zoning District: B-4 Limited Business District
Permitted uses set forth in Ordinance 401 Section 401.301
L PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPEIVIENT PERMIT:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF OAK PARK
HEIGHTS THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVES THE FOLLOWING:
A. The application submitted by Bremer Bank for a Planned Unit Development general plan approval, site
plan review, and a variance for wail sign to allow a bank with a drive-through at the corner of 6e Street and
Nova Scotia Avenue North within the Oak Park Commons and affecting the real property as follows:
Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance
Page 1 of 49
SEE ATTACHMENT A.
The City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights approves the Plauned. Unit Development general plan
approval, site plan review and variance for the third wall sign subject to the following findings of fact for the
third wall sign variance:
1. The applicants have proposed a total of three wall signs, each on different facades of the building.
2. The total square footage of each wall sign is less than 33 square feet each or a total of less than. 100
square feet.
3. The third wall sign ensures visibility of the bank and drive - through from both east and west bound traffic
on Highway 36.
The City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights denies the request for a monument sign subject to the
following findings of fact:
I. A freestanding sign for the development is already located within the subject property. The applicant
may have the opportunity to advertise on this sign.
2. The bank shall be adequately visible from High. '''3 al roadways with the two allowable wall
signs and a wall sign allowed by variance.
3. Allowing a monument sign variance far phis will set a precedence for all shopping center
businesses to request individual freestan:se
The approvals are subject to the following.: nd o
1. The property owners shall finis construction of the private road with curb and gutter along the
property line of the subject property
2. The outdoor lighting for the parking lot shall be turned off one hour after closing, except for approved
security lighting or as directed in the Planned Unit Development approvals.
3. The lighting shall be arranged to deflect light away from adjoining property or public right -of -way, so
the luminaire shall contain a cutoff, which directs and cuts off the light at an angle of 90 degrees or less.
4. The maximum height above the ground grade permitted for light sources mounted on a pole is 25 feet.
5. The trash receptacle shall be fully screened from view of the adjacent property to the west. Additional
landscaping shall be added between the trash receptacle and the property line to the west.
6. The Landscape Plan shall be subject to approval by the City Arborist.
7. If any of the mechanical equipment located on the roof is visible from the street level or from
neighborhood properties, it shall be screened with a material designed to blend harmoniously with the
building facade materials.
8. A revised parking plan shall be submitted that indicates the following:
a) The east and west driveways shall be signed, indicating that the east is entrance only and west is
exit only. All directional signage shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer.
b) The concrete curb setback shall be subject to approval of the City Engineer.
Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance
Page 2 of 49
c) The site plan shall be updated to indicate a sidewalk entrance into the parking lot for pedestrian
access to the bank, preferably along the east side of the property near the handicap parking
subject to approval of` the City Engineer.
d) Due to the significant amount of impervious surface, staff is recommending that the parking area
on the south side of the property be shifted to the north approximately two feet to ensure the
drive aisle width requirement of 24 feet is met. This will add increased green space to the subject
property.
9. The address sign numbers shall be metal, glass, plastic or durable material. The numbers shall not be less
than 3.5 inches in height, in a contrasting color to the base or made of some reflective material, and so
placed to be easily seen from the street.
10. The Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan shall be subject to approval by the City Engineer.
11. Comply with City Engineer comments outlined in September 20, 2007 letter attached
Approved by the City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights this 28 day of August 2007.
All uses shall be subject to the following conditions and/or restiOtions imposed by the August 28, 2007 Resolution
of the City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights as follows:
IIf e Reference Attachment:
The reports of the City Planner dated July g 0 n .d July 31, 2007, Report from the City Engineer,
Bonestroo dated July 28, 2007 and site plan appro ' d: b the City Council are annexed hereto by reference.
TV. Abandonment: This permit requires co : uou.: ::€use in order to preserve the Conditional Use granted by the
City under the terns hereof : Any di ont:ir tion c ii abandonment of the uses permitted hereunder upon the
site for a period of 12 continuous continuous..:06ntbo abandonment and void the permit.
Annual review: Annual •evie r is not posed as a condition of this permit
The approvals stated in this Permit may grant specific benefits and/or site specific authorizations. Unless specifically
listed herein, all improvements and site conditions must remain compliant with City Ordinances.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have set forth their hands and seals.
Date: By
Date: By
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
David Beaudet
Mayor
Eric Johnson
City Administrator
Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance
Page 3 of 49
Date:
Date:
Bremer Bank NA.
By
Its
CSM Equities, Inc
By
Its
Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance
Page 4 of 49
EXHIBIT "A
PLANNERS REPORT AND SITE PLANS
Bremer Bank PU D Permit and Variance
Page 5 of 49
EMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
FILE NO:
NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC.
4800 Olson Memorial Highway, Suite 202, Golden Valley, MN 55422
Telephone: 763.231.2555 Facsimile: 763.231.2561 planners@nacplahning.com
Eric Johnson
Scott Richards
July 31, 2007
Oak Park Heights — Bremer Bank Planned Unit Development
General Plan Review, Site Plan Review, and Variances for Signage
798.02 — 07.07
Please find attached the July 6, 2007 plannirqTp '6 the Bremer Bank request. As
you are aware, the applicants asked that Mjs isue be continued to the August 9, 2007
meeting. The plans remain as submitted with dOjianges from the July meeting.
The delay in consideration will allow . 1 ..... f:, : f.ppresentatives of Bremer Bank to attend the
August meeting. They are "s0 in explaining to the Planning
Commission why the additionaiiion:um6a.sign and wall signs are necessary.
The City has extended the revie*„period for this application to the 120 day allowance.
The City Council will need to take a':ton on this request no later than October 10, 2007.
Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance
Page 6 of 49
MEMORANDUM
TO: Eric Johnson
FROM: Carle Fuhrman!Scott Richards
DATE: July 6, 2007
RE:
NAC FILE: 798.02 -- 07.07
BACKGROUND
NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC.
4800 Olson Memorial Highway, Suite 202, Golden Valley, MN 55422
Telephone: 763.231 .2555 Facsimile: 76323 1 .2 561 planners@nacplanning.com
Oak Park Heights --- Bremer Bank — Planned Unit Development: General
Plan Review; Site Plan Review, and Variances for Signage
Application. Frauenshuh cornnerci :l::::: ::: _e Group, on behalf of Bremer Bank,
has applied for a aYt ,F"1 ___.__t royal site Ian review and a variance for , genera
}
si na e. Bremer Bank is propo : STrli i story bank with a drive -- through to be
constructed on Lot 6, Block 1 of_: ak Par : Commons
The site is approximately one acre in size and is located on the corner of 80th Street
North and Nova Scotia Avenue North, The bank is proposed to be 4,400 square feet,
contain a four -lane drive - through, fuir- service banking floor inside with a walk -up teller
line, offices, meeting facilities, vault, and safe deposit boxes.
Bremer Bank is also requesting to place a second freestanding, monument sign on the
northwest corner of the site, which requires a variance due to the fact that the
Ordinance only allows one freestanding development sign on a site. In addition, Bremer
Bank is requesting three wall signs on the exterior surfaces of the building, while the
Ordinance only allows two wall signs total.
Attached for Reference. Exhibit A —Title Sheet (AO)
Exhibit B Topographic Survey (CO)
Exhibit C — Grading, Drainage, & Erosion Control Plan (C1)
Exhibit D — Utility Plan (C2)
Exhibit E — Civil Details (C3)
Exhibit F — Watershed Plan (C4)
Exhibit G — Landscape Plan (L.1)
Exhibit H Site Plan dated 6- 28- 07(A1.0)
`l
Page 71 of 96
Bremer HYIIR)615
Page 7 of 49
Regulation
..... ,:x:,...
Lot 1, ine
North : (6ot r_ trees . [ ::
Re uired _..,�
40 feet
Proposed
40'
Front Setback
East:: (Nova Scoti Ave . N.)
40 feet
67'
.V. •'^ Y^f. Yr
S th (? vate Street)
40 feet
20 feet
90' 9"
09' 0"
41,817 s•. ft,
Side /Rear Setback
ilv a: ':ot
Lot Area
NJA
15,000 ss. ft•
Lot Width
60th Street
Nova Scotia Ave. N.
100 feet
100 feet
190 feet
215 feet
Building Height
N/A
35 feet
24 5 feet
ISSUES ANALYSIS
Zoning. Lot 6, Block 1 of Oak Park Commons is zoned B-4, Limited Business District,
"Banks, savings institutions, credit unions, and othe..,r.financial institutions, including
drive- throughs" are permitted uses in the B -4 District Concep Plan approval was
already received for the proposed bank as part .of the cDak rk Commons Planned Unit
Development review.
Exhibit I — Floor Plan (A2.0)
Exhibit J — Roof Plan (A21)
Exhibit K-1 -- Exterior Elevations (A3,O)
Exhibit K-2— Exterior Elevations (A3.1)
Exhibit L -- Photometric Plan (P1)
Exhibit M-1 — Colored East Elevation
Exhibit M-2 — Colored North Elevation
Exhibit M--3 — Colored West Elevation
Exhibit N — Sign Detail
Exhibit 0-1 - Photograph of existing bank
Exhibit 0-2 — Photograph of existing bank
Exhibit 0-3 — Photograph of existing bank
Exhibit P -- City Engineer Comments
The following table illustrates the required a general zoning regulations for
this site:
Parking Lot Design. The parking stalls are 9 feet wide and 20 feet in length, which
meets the Ordinance requirements. The access aisle widths are 28 feet, ten inches
wide and 22 feet wide, which both meet the minimum Ordinance requirement of 22 feet.
Number of Spaces. The parking lot is proposed to have 26 parking spaces,
including two handicapped accessible parking stalls. Ten parking stalls are proposed
on the south side of the property, 12 of the parking spaces are proposed on the east
side of the property, and four parking stalls are counted within the drive - through
lanes.
The ordinance requires one space per 250 square feet of floor area. The proposed
bank is 4,440 square feet in area.
4,440 x 0.9 = 3,996/250 = 15.98 16 parking spaces
2 Page 72 of 96
Bremer%*ikN
Page 8 of 49
The Ordinance also requires two spaces for each drive -in unit plus drive aisle
stacking space of 180 feet for each drive -in unit,
4 drive -in units x 2 spaces = 8 parking spaces
Therefore, the Ordinance requires a total of 24 parking spaces, which is met by the
proposed parking plan.
Entrance /Exit. The site will be accessed from the south, off of the primary east -
west service drive (private street) that traverses the north end of Oak Park
Commons. The entrance to the site shall be from the southeast corner of the
property, and the exit shall be from the southwest corner of the property. According
to the applicants, a variety of site access studies were completed, which analyzed
both single and double points of entry and egress. However, circulation clarity and
safety were maximized with the configuration that is utilized in the proposed plans,
The Ordinance requires all off - street pa rk: facilities to be designed and
constructed with appropriate means of vehiculaess toa public street. Except in
the case of a planned unit development, e90h lot 'ha! :: : � ve access directly onto an
abutting, improved and city -- accepted publi f�r t: e proposed access off of the
private street meets the ordinance becar l e: ]"" his is a proposed planned unit
development, The property owners shl::ini. the construction of the private road
along the property line of the subject rope'
>:.:.:..
intersection Separation lniti y, t : a pplicants proposed that the east driveway
be an entrance and an exit tc tho property; However, that curb cut access into the
parking lot is proposed to approximately 40 feet from the intersection of Nova
Scotia Avenue North and :' rivate street (measured from the intersection of lot
lines), which does not meet thy:: ;Ordinance requirement of a 60 foot setback.
Therefore, staff suggested the applicants turn the entrance /exit at the east driveway
into strictly an entrance in order to alleviate congestion with vehicles that would be
exiting the parking lot at this point. The applicants revised the site plan, and this
change is reflected in Al .0,
Curbing. The Ordinance requires that a continuous concrete perimeter curb barrier
be located around the entire parking lot and shall not be closer than 10 feet to any
lot line. A portion of the concrete curb is located within 5.5 feet of the west property
line. The concrete curb setback will be subject to approval of the City Engineer
being this is a part of a PUD application.
Sidewalk. The submitted site plan indicates an existing sidewalk that runs along
Nova Scotia Avenue North and 60th Street North. There is no indication of a
sidewalk entrance into the bank parking lot. The site plan shall be updated to
indicate a sidewalk entrance into the parking lot for pedestrian access, preferably
along the east side of the property near the handicap parking.
3 Page 73 of 96
BremerTB �kJ
Page 9 of 49
Impervious Surface. According to C4, the proposed site will contain 0,09 acres of
impervious surface, which is 72% imperious surface. Due to the significant amount
of impervious surface, staff is recommending that the parking area on the south side
of the property be shifted to the north approximately four feet to ensure the drive
aisle width of 22 feet is still met. This will add increased green space to the subject
property.
Lighting Plan.
Fixtures. The submitted photometric plan indicates five single shoebox fixtures on
25 foot poles, to be located as follows: one on the north side of the property, two on
the east side of the property, one on the south side, and one on the west side.
These shoebox fixtures are shielded fixtures, with fully recessed lamp sources. The
lighting shall be arranged to deflect light away from adjoining property or public right-
of-way, so the luminaire shall contain a cutoff, which directs and cuts off the light at
an angle of 90 degrees or less. The maximum height above the ground grade
permitted for light sources mounted on a pole is 25 feet.
Lighting is also proposed on the exterior of the b tong in.:: h ree locations. Recessed
g � p ro p
cans in the soffit, above the main entrance • (fixtui`y :05e 'DI); recessed square
canopy fixtures installed inside the drive-U :: y structure (fixture type ‘D2');
and surface - mounted fixtures, above the emG nc exit door (fixture type L I. All
exterior fixture types will utilize fully 'fielded. lamp configurations. The fixtures
located within soffits are also fully roesseh::::th 4ir locations and shielded from view
Intensity. The submitted photoie.tric I.an meets the Ordinance requirements for
lighting intensity.
Location. The single shoe o. i ht fixture proposed on the west property line does
not meet the required setba:.:.. rom the side property line. The Lighting Plan
indicates that this light fixture is pi?'posed to be located directly on the west property
line adjacent to Lot 5, The Ordinance requires the light source of an outdoor Tight
fixture to be setback a minimum of five feet from an interior side lot line. Therefore,
the revised Lighting plan shall indicate that this proposed light fixture meets the
required setback from the side lot line.
Hours. Outdoor lighting for parking lots shall be turned off one hour after closing,
except for approved security lighting.
Landscape Design. The Landscape Plan shall be subject to approval by the City
Arborist.
Signs. The site plan indicates two "exit only" signs proposed at the west driveway. The
east driveway shall also be signed, indicating that it is an entrance only.
The site plan also indicates an address sign on the east elevation of the building, facing
Nova Scotia Avenue North. The elevation notes indicate that the numbers will not
exceed three square feet, which meet the Ordinance requirement. In addition, the
4 Page 74of96
Bremer % P-015i l AWAY nc i gr(ance
Page 10 of 49
numbers shall be metal, glass, plastic or durable material, and the numbers shall not be
Less than 3.5 inches in height, in a contrasting color to the base or made of some
reflective material, and so placed to be easily seen from the street.
The submitted site plan also includes a proposed monument sign on the northwest
corner of the site. The sign is approximately eight feet tall and 52 square feet.
However, the subject site already contains an existing monument sign advertising the
entire development on the northeast corner of the property. The ordinance only allows
a maximum of one freestanding development sign; therefore, a variance is required.
The site plan also indicates three walls signs proposed on the bank, Each sign is on a
separate building facade: one on the north, east, and west elevations of the building.
Each sign appears to be approximately 31 square feet in area. The Ordinance only
allows a maximum of two walls signs on any principal building; therefore, a variance is
required.
Ali illuminated on- premise and off - premise signs for advertising purposes shall be
turned off between 11:00 PM and sunrise, except..,.that said signs may be illuminated
while the business facility on the premise is open for
Building Type and Construction,
Quality. The proposed building meets : ilfty standards of the Ordinance, which
states that buildings in all zoning distils.. call maintain a high standard of
architectural and aesthetic compatafttr Wiff0gtirrounding properties to ensure that
they will not adversely impact At .e ... pr.perty values of the abutting properties or
adversely impact the public he aety'nd general welfare.
Photos of another reoenti: :pr:leted Bremer Bank have been included with the
report. The photos illustrate tl''::b size, scale, composition, colors, and exterior
materials.
Exterior Finishes. The exterior of the bank is proposed to be finished with the
following materials: ashlar gray rock face concrete block; jumbo modular face brick;
vertical windows with insulated glazing; synthetic stucco with a sandpebble texture.
The roof structure is proposed to be composed of bare galvanized sheet metal
roofing with insulated glazing windows that are exposed between the walls and the
roof structure.
AM of the proposed exterior building finishes are consistent with the Ordinance
standards for grade and quality.
Trash Enclosure, The proposed trash enclosure meets the following ordinance
standards:
a. The exterior wall treatment is similar to the principal building.
b. The trash receptacle area is located in the rearlside yard.
5 Page 75 of 96
B rem er Nrm� anFa
Page 11 of 49
Mechanical Equipment. The roof plan indicates several items that are proposed to
be located on the roof. If any of the mechanical equipment located on the roof is
visible from the street level or from neighborhood properties, it shall be screened
with a material designed to blend harmoniously with the building facade materials,
Grading /Drainage. The Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan shall be subject
to approval by the City Engineer. See additional engineering comments in Exhibit P.
Variance. Variance criteria is provided in Section 401,04 of the Oak Park Heights
Zoning Ordinance. The Planning Commission 4nd City Council should review the
following criteria and conditions to determine if the vfiance i:ustified,
Review Criteria. The Planning Cornrnrssion and City C60'6'
proposed action will not:
b.
c. The trash enclosure is in an accessible location for pick up hauling vehicles.
It is located near the west entrance /exit to and from the parking lot.
d. The trash receptacle is screened from view of the public rights -of -way to the
north and east and also the private road to the south of the property,
However, the trash receptacle is not fully screened from view of the adjacent
property to the west. Therefore, additional landscaping shall be added
between the trash receptacle and the property line to the west,
Unreasonably increase the conger r � tIlSlic street.
a. Impair an adequate supply of light and air to.. edjaent property.
:T ! rn Tike a finding of fact that the
•
c. Have the effect of allowing any di kri.ct use : .prohibited therein, permit a lesser degree of flood
protection than the flood rotectio��1evation for the particular area or permit standards
which are lower than than regu:wd by tate law.
d. Increase the danger of fire 'o ndanger the public safety.
e Unreasonably diminish or impair established property values within the neighborhood, or in
any way be contrary to the intent of this Ordinance.
f. Violate the intent and purpose of the Comprehensive plan.
g
Violate any of the terms or conditions of Item 5, below,
Conditions for Approval. A variance from the terms of this Ordinance shall not be granted unless it can
be demonstrated that:
a Undue hardship will result if the variance is denied due to the existence of special conditions
and circumstances which are peculiar to the land, structure, or building involved and which
are not applicable to other lands, structures or buildings in the same district.
1) Special conditions may include exceptional topographic or water conditions or, in the
case of an existing lot or parcel of record, narrowness, shallowness, insufficient area or
shape of the property.
g Page 76 of 96
Bremer% ana
Page 12 of 49
2) Undue hardship caused by the special conditions and circumstances may not be solely
economic in nature, if a reasonable use of the property exists under the terns of this
Title.
3) Special conditions and circumstances causing undue hardship shall not be a result of lot
size or building location when the lot qualifies as a buildable parcel.
b Literal interpretation of the provisions of this Ordinance would deprive the applicant of rights
commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of this ordinance
or deny the applicant the ability to put the property in question to a reasonable use.
c. The special conditions and circumstances causing the undue hardship do not result from the
actions of the applicant.
d. Granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is
denied by this Ordinance to other lands, structure or buildings in the same district under the
same conditions.
0. The request is not a result of non - conforming lands, structures or buildings in the same
district.
The request is not a use variance.
g The variance requested is the minimum variance necer accomplish the intended
purpose of the applicant.
h. The request does not create an inconve:i.ence't r'ieighboring properties and uses.
Comment regarding the second 'h: In response to the criteria and
conditions listed above, granting tl :.a40.ice request to allow a second monument sign
would be awarding the applicant that is denied by this Ordinance to
other lands, structure, or buildir7 in throne district under the same conditions. The
site and building are highly vigb Ie from Highway 36. A freestanding sign that exists on
site could advertise the Br er t :x :: ank, Allowing the bank to construct an additional
freestanding, advertising sign wits .f a justified hardship would set a precedent for
future requests. For these reasons, City planning staff recommends that the second
monument sign variance be denied.
Comment regarding the third wall sign: In response to the criteria and conditions
listed above, the proposed wail signs are fairly small in size and granting the variance
request to allow the third wall sign will not create an inconvenience to neighboring
properties and uses. The City has granted a third wall sign to allow better visibility from
Highway 36 for other businesses in this area. For these reasons, City planning staff
recommends that the third wall sign variance be approved,
RECOMMENDATION AND CONCLUSION
After reviewing the request and the criteria and conditions for variance approvals, staff
recommends denial of the request for the additional freestanding, monument sign on
the subject property.
7 Page 77 of 96
Bremer 14F41PanR
Page 13 of 49
After reviewing the request and the criteria and conditions for variance approvals, staff
recommends approval of the request for the third wall sign on the proposed building.
After reviewing the request for the PUD, general plan review, and site plan review, staff
recommends approval of the proposed Bremer Bank. The recommendation is made
with the following conditions:
1. The property owners shall finish the construction of the private road with curb
and gutter along the property line of the subject property.
2. The outdoor lighting for the parking lot shall be turned off one hour after closing,
except for approved security lighting.
3. The lighting shall be arranged to deflect light away from adjoining property or
public right --of -way, so the luminaire shall contain a cutoff, which directs and cuts
off the light at an angle of 90 degrees or less.
The maximum height above the ground grade permitted for light sources
mounted on a pole is 25 feet.
5. The trash receptacle shall be fully screened from view of the adjacent property to
the west. Additional landscaping shall be , between the trash receptacle
and the property line to the west.
6. The Landscape Plan shall be subject to
7. If any of the mechanical equipment lock
level or from neighborhood properties,
designed to blend harmoniously with
8. A revised parking plan shall be submittec
The east driveway shall Wri
b) The concrete curb tbak::hall be subject to approval of the City
Engineer;
c) The site plan sh li r be,, to indicate a sidewalk entrance into the
parking lot for pedestrian • access to the bank, preferably along the east
side of the propertY"h0qr the handicap parking; and
d) Due to the signifiant amount of impervious surface, staff is
recommending that the parking area on the south side of the property be
shifted to the north approximately four feet to ensure the drive aisle width
requirement of 22 feet is still met. This will add increased green space to
the subject property.
9. The address sign numbers shall be metal, glass, plastic or durable material. The
numbers shall not be Tess than 3.5 inches in height, its a contrasting color to the
base or made of some reflective material, and so placed to be easily seen from
the street.
10. The Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan shall be subject to approval by
the City Engineer.
11. Any additional comments or conditions of the City Council, Planning
Commission, or City Staff,
a)
rovatr : e City Arborist.
: e
to of is visible from the street
a1('be screened with a material
of ding facade materials.
tha tindicates the following
dicating that it is an entrance only;
e
8 Page 78 of 96
Bremer% An8
Page 14 of 49
h
Fhln
T.1
Lj
1
g Iiv gi
81 11;i 'A
,1 Jp.iii «14«41•11<4.11,1
i Illii ii glli 1! 1 1
• A
r• • • .•
iNi.1111:MY .1.V1()
• Hi 1 3141 40 A33J
0'17 S
D ION 9nNaAv MOOS VAON
Z9
1 3SVVH .1V1d
11 . 43N3SV3 unan
70 20VNIVO 1003
91:LLT 1 \.i
wireicriril
()
2
fr — — — 1 1
00 .)4 I n 0 'q '035 20 P/1 14q4: I
3111 .0 Z/1 N 31i1. 1331 00T6011 gl
ISVB 3H1 .40 3H11 AlH31S3 A , A i
1 T,, ......._. .__ _.. _...._ ..
1 -..., ____--- 7 1 .
3 :mit J0-.
9 .1.33 '' . 0 -1 1) ) 9 63 ) 1.
sv 1 T i 1 .1, IP,
[
.., 31111 ISTA
_ 0, r 0
p -1 V.
I b
P t'T: v• rP' /,..
I
ciii \\
L,, ,
,.,-, s,
1
%Z ,.#30,00.00Si, - - — 7 /: , N 17 9 - 1./.1.z n.eo,00.00s
,,,, ,
c s'-'-- 6):;
) ',,/,o/
_,........
, ,
Lci4-!,,' ,..,,_ -
. u.,,,.; , ..,< .
9V < , i 4
. ' P )
..-r: 71,
g " '0
'q r; 9 .6 q I ow
=9 I n.
0 1
g,,.1Z
c
690Z Z
c--
- 6609
9 181
i _12 . 019S1
uremer Bank PUD Pn iIl and Variance
Page 15 of 49
[
/
Il
' g
11 hL
f
......_...,..1 ____
1
o . 7,'J 1 I
111
t
I
1
.14 4 , 1 , 141<411.1111
g H H 111111 1
4. I
Hi. N MIN]AV V1100 AO
i N 1 -ill
- I-
.:::: ::: - : -3 . 1 ....: . -..... i., - ,,.. ‘ • '..- " "
.. ' : ''• ..:'. ' '
.. ,.
...,.... .. ,.:.....„.i:i:iii... ,
I..
..: -
:
.....1
. .]:i ': •
. :;: '.4.....
i '''::::::::::.....
i".::::::•....,
.:1
/ • -
/ :
'/
/ • • • -./
0.
a
u
It
SI
E.'
nd Variance
Page 16 of 49
N
— l Tsar
rr
`06r
g
Rggh
{i1 -.4. PI gala 700.
•
f x 8
4 1! •d! 4'
1 ;1 ! 1 5 $ i
x Pit !fp
!ig P 3 ;
h id! ` X1.11 E $
tvl V. u
tg j1 ji !h pia ;1
41vilif q!lii
n mph! w„„ a�
40141g40.31 ! fowl
p o.y, s iii.0 1 , 1 :m 40 4 0 1 ,1 1
JiPtioTi ;1
p44 E 0'e 111
pp r
- i8r tr €VIr .bd s _ ei
1L ld. Drf- - 1•. « ( ] 1 �1
i
9
CQ
Fa
g J � j i ? Ik j fi 1
IN uui; l i} i s�' , a
4 j ! i1 ; 99999499999999
g
1 . ! 4!4 1 !!!
ti
h, Nogivgi4
Y ��
rli
L i
W4h[4
P1
}
z f
f
r
7 ,
1/
i
1 g 1-
M ],� L)
g L
g
Brcrnor Bank -PUD Permit and Variance
Page 17 of 49
C/D
41.111WPAIII.
8
'a
RI 1
5
1—
an d Variance
Page 18 of 49
N
gi
;
vi
g
1111 0
c .
IX1h
4 4,4
I e,
u ilk '. a3
4 :+3 e
ht
q2 ha 1, b
C
;
LCD
Cr)
>.<
LLJ
g
1.2
_ s.
110 111
d Variance
Page 19 of 49
• 1
4
, 1
1 1 '
1 1 Eifi 'i
111,1 if -fl,; : iiii<i
B fl 1 , s 2 11 , !ii 1 g .1 ini 111 <
b(z1111 'Ili 1 ' 1111 1!111111
g-, ' il i di till! a , 2 :•i
•
:,,
iii : 1( . ..,, : 11 v 110: i
_..i..-1 N . ......_., i _ 4 ' • —...,,...-- -
- 7 1---L--,-----
:"...' -A ---- --I ""' — Li.:A — IY. , i / 2 ---- 7„ —
iril "--.'-- .•''''' -
5
5
5
5
"I g
5
a_o
1 1P1
!IN!'
5
5 wg
• g'
1 .,41
,11
hu.iR
I
MO
NO .4 • •
d Variance
Page 20 of 49
ri)
T
ti
•
L
t
111 1 <14
.1.111111111I111
4
•
•
11
remer
=JJ
an
J
u.
•
ermi and Variance
Page 21 of 49
Q
- a^:.ri ncrr, oxwa i r.J+'.+Kr17.. 7411Y.70) .
��u :n p•e ; wrn'r, rra:s � a�:rva>•ao�rac Gcc+C .
Qf7 T:.C'C} wcrS]IH+Y. t9Li��7+Ya'rr.T.M
I I `r} ci¢ •ca..0 t sa7rn f rwn ticnw
LLlri f
l •aaJ •ax ..c � o� armu� Iwo• tx.s�r r�ogvnr S.+4a - asc wx:�oxn v++ina w � ;�7
F • ,' ^• _ ..s ]'a a anrsr >ws.iorr mr swJ k �a as nccwa a>•caaorr - .. Y , ; N
f s+n+ �.uoa
xlv :Ni S aus.477 VR IM7i - ofii27 i '�I14]i z.tM I i ca lW+l4
,orar- mwl Nw Craw F.coC orw mar..., 1 :Ls.' r ji
1
0
fi
tit
NI
ri)
T
ti
•
L
t
111 1 <14
.1.111111111I111
4
•
•
11
remer
=JJ
an
J
u.
•
ermi and Variance
Page 21 of 49
Q
ftlw
Fffin
A
\\,
\1„
t
8"
A J
-
•
'..!
!1-d
(-!
0 N /11 V1.1.00,9 VAON
I I
,_. ...i
- 1 1
...) }
4
!
• • , •
,-. ,-.. ,,, 1 -
, .• - ,•
5 -'.: thIlll 11 !!
111
(r.
irxx.w2
„))
j
cf
w
Bremer BanFPUD Permit and Variance
Page 22 of 49
dith 2
p
.4 • Al
gtv7Traral4
-
.,
1 1 1<<11
OH H 1111 H
ri r ! ? '11
.1.A1
0,1
,
MN=
0-
KI)
Bremer Bank PUD Permit' and Variance
Page 23 of 49
0-
0
0--
JJh 1 1!
8
t
cliaie-111C1
5
0
63
>.<
LsJ
1ED
. Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance
Page 24 of 49
(u
iJ
H( p
dith
4 4
9 I
444444444444
N I I I !
44
3
O
111
ff •
.LJ
e O O O OCOC (30®0c
Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance
Page 25 of 49
; s
{
ir:. � Y. Sif L1�11 ij�T
0- - -
Lx
CI]
PC
F t
FH
.A�
00
i
a
f tfr.
8 tsii
P 11111
'g f lu !
t
a
444•44[144444444
7
aaD
Pi
a - 41
PR
z. $ gi 1 Ep
g ti
d! J
i 9
!
NI ii! o,1
11 D O 000G C Q4Bd
,.r
Z
CSl
111
6
0
u
Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance
Page 26 of 49
.6
0 6
ci
__–
,,E'i ,,'• 6:
,, .--
:t 0; _.,.i „ „ , :i&' .; .,....,._'- e • .
0 ________—
„,') „-',. „;•• „t4 ,ra '
„"o ,,`) 0i, 07] .'j 0 `, 0 `i: 0Zi 0,.. 0 ',; ,.`
.,::::.,...
.° ..•
,> r,;
_ .
.6 A;
0 ;1
.0
ij
g' g
=6
o
,6 o o
o r kl
0 0
0 +a '
4 . I
.0
^
a
1
0 6
06 •
0 '3
o
o o
5
.6
.0
- 01
tr.--
\- P -4 –i
a po
,..
(L ›.<
c ,!
0
o 6
EB
Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance
. Page 27 of 49
3
0
j
Ai .1
F---
r
Liii„
t,—
Bremer Bank PUD Per
0
0
0
w
u.
0
)-
‹
0
1-
LU
z
1;rerner Bank PUD Per
w
Bremer Bank PUD Per
0
0
LT.
-1
0
0
0
1
w
cc
0
0
0
LLJ
d NI
r-
I
11111111M
uj
uj
14'
0
5
0
w
LLI
w
0
ua
0
Li
z
-3
Z 0
w
c)
0
1
3
33 0
z
0 ,
EXHIBIT
Bremer Bank PUD Permit
'Bank ' UD PerPic
Page 32 of 49
•
PUD PerrrEMISITa24
Page 34 of 49
4'
City Engineer Letter September 20, 2007
EXHIBIT "11"
Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance
Page 35 of 49
September 20, 2007
Mr. Eric Johnson
City Administrator
City of Oak Park Heights
14168 Oak Park Blvd., P.O, Box 2007
Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 -2007
Re: Bremer Bank
City of Oak Park Heights
Bonestroo file No. 55 -07 -000
Dear Eric:
We have reviewed the Site Development Plans, dated September 4, 2007, for Bremer Bank as submitted by
Welman Sperides Architects, LLC. We have the following remaining comments and/or recommendations.
Sheet A1.0
1, We recommend the pavement marking for the parking lot pi> -''be changed from B" lines to 4"
lines.
Sincerely,
BONESTROO
Karen S. Erickson, P.E.
cc Tom Ozzello, Public Works Director
Jim Butler, Building Official
Scott Richards, City Planner
Mark Vierling, City Attorney
Eric Reiners, Welman Sperides, Architects
DMP, BMK, CWL2, File --- Bonestroo
2. Show 4" white pavement hatch markings::.the vaccessible isle between the two handicapped
spots.
General Comments
1. As directed by City Council on.Au } . 28; , 2007, submit an auto turn analysis showing that a fire
truck is capable of making i ft turr rr t the parking lot from the east driveway entrance.
2 Provide the City with a cop the approval letter from the Browns Creek Watershed District.
If you have any questions or require addition information, please contact me at (651) 604-4788 or Dennis
Postler at (651) 604 -4815.
Engineers
Architects
Pl
2335 Highway 36 W
St. Paul, MN 55113
Tel 651- 636 -4660
Fax 651 - 636.1311
www.boriestroo.com
4- 1. Bonestroo
51. Paul
St. Cloud
Rochester
Milwaukee
Chicago
e Ot
June 28, 2007
Mr, Eric Johnson
City Administrator
City of Oak Park Heights
14168 Oak Park Blvd., P.O. BOX 2007
Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 -2.007
Re: Bremer Bank
City of Oak Park Heights
Bonestroo file No, 55 -07 -000
Dear Eric:
We have reviewed the Site Development Plans for Bremer Barks 4. : submitte :byWelman Sperides
Architects, LLC on June 20, 2007. Following are our comments an f t,reeommendations.
Sheet C 1
1, The development is constructing the drive tl t;u lan i nd storm sewer within the City's utility
easement and over the existing trunk sanitary: ewer nd water main, if in the future the City ever
needs to replace /repair /maintain thee tUrk:tti t t e development will be responsible to repair all
of their items in the easement in;c.lud n : not limit to pavement, curb and gutter, landscaping
and storm sewer /catch basin.
2. At critical areas, such as :tip driveway aprons and grade breaks, add the percent of slope at the
drainage arrows.
Spot elevations should be added t6'ihe trash enclosure.
4. The elevation of the concrete drive thru is not clearly identified on the plans. Spot elevations
should be placed at each corner to show the grade of the concrete pad.
5. Identify grades on the west side of the property in the landscaped area.
Sheet C2
1. Verify the structure size of CB2. It appears the top of the 18 inch pipe to the south will be in
conflict with the bottom of the 15" pipe to the southwest.
2335 Highway 36 W
St, Paul, MN55113
Tel 651.636 -46(30
Fax 651 - 636 -1311
www. Ib o n es t roo. co rig
stt` Bonestroo
St. Paul
5t. Cloud
Rochester
Milwaukee
Chicago
Engineers
Architects
.''trrfr.��•s
City of Oak Park Heights
Bremer Bank
2. It is assumed that the canopy for the drive thru will have footings five feet deep. If in the future
the water main requires repair in this area the footings for the canopy may be undermined.
Research the possibility of placing the water main more than 5 feet from the canopy.
3. Contact Alliant Engineering to verify the water main stub from the south that is identified by
keynote number 2. The construction plans at our office for this development does not identify a
water main stub at this location,
4. Contact Alliant Engineering to verify the sanitary stub from the north that is identified by keynote
number 1. The construction plans at our office for this development does not identify the sanitary
sewer stub at this location.
5. Insulation shall be placed at all storm sewer /water main crossings.
Sheet (3
1, The detail sheet appears to have details that will not he used. For example there was no call out
for a wet tap on the utility sheet. In addition, there are details that are missing such as a 2 x 3 box
structure that is called out on sheet C2 for structure CB5,
2. A typical section for the concrete drive apron should be 0ed t!;;,,:i0etail 13.
;tre should be revised to accommodate
3. Detail 4 is a storm manhole with a 27"
the Neenah casting R3067 as called out.:9R sheen:
4. Add a detail showing the section font e cpnc.r q the drive thru.
5. A detail is required showing thedu:ve tt:::lands.
Sheet (4
1. Submit rational design eaulatirns for the storm sewer.
Page 2
June 28, 2007
Sheet A1,0
1 To minimize turning movements on the thru street for the overall development it is recommended
that the east driveway is narrowed and restricted to "in" movements only. This entrance should
be signed appropriately.
2. There is a large radius on the northwest side of the drive thru lane that creates a bituminous bump
out. Is this additional bituminous really required?
3. The radius in the northeast corner appears small. Verify that all vehicles using the drive thru lane
are able to make the radius.
4. There is only 3' between the northerly drive thru lane and the existing bike path. It is
recommended that the site plan is revised to provide more distance between the bike path and the
drive thru lane.
Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance
Page 38 of 49
City of Ook Pork Heights
Bremer Bank
5, The existing bike path on the east side of the property should be shown on the drawings. The
pathway is on the plans on sheet C1.
6. Reference the detail locations on the keynotes.
7. Identify the size and color for the pavement markings.
General Comments
1. Provide the City with a copy of the approval letter from the Browns Creek Watershed District.
If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me at (651) 604 -4788 or Dennis
Postier at (651) 664 -4815.
Sincerely,
BONESTROO
. .
i /
f =t, '
Karen S. Erickson, P.E,
cc: Tom Ozzello, Public Works Director
Jim Butler, Building Official
Scott Richards, City Planner
Mark Vierling, City Attorney
Eric Reiners, Welman Sperid.e ; Arcthtea s
DMP, BMK, CWL2, File —.& nestr.00
Page 3
June ?.-S, 2007
Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance
Page 39 of 49
Final Site Plans approved by the City Council
Subject to Verification and Compliance with City Ordinances and
Approved Deviations as stated in Permit
Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance
Page 40 of 49
VD
!
tEbA t
uj
'
zr,
6
8 c s fl
41
K1<<111
'
§
..,
-
° V
1 pa .. i_ 1
HiAilo, P 1 /0 4 i
f i IR .,
uvr Hikiiv r '
o v
g BW:a5,rEvA,Ai9.E,051iLk :_-', i
U
;4.
lL
I ba I am ova ilisauslO • Pa .6. a
Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance
Page 41 of 49
--;
- 1 ...... . • - L ■
HJ,ON VILODS VA./
.:::::::::,-,-•
`-' 1 ::::::-:=--:-:::17-:±— . ,,,.. . ...,„..._.-„,.....::.
I t I , / •
1 '. ,•—,-,„-
i
; i'
I -- l , , _ . __ , , _ _ ___. _._ .,
. ' ' A ir , ..
' - 1 . . , :i.„......,
1-11:10N 311N9AV VlitiAS \ 1
, ,.. ..,......•
---• ' :: ::4
.1 ,-; I.,... '• - .., -....fr •---
1
1
•
'h
cO
1 1 ' ,,,..,,...
L
I
'I
fr-
Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance
Page 42 of 49
2
FI
1! 0
U
i g
Fqii?
A
'- 1 ): ' ------ :
4 .
1 -- • •------ • E - • , -•--- I -- I
.
, . • ........i
, \
, i r itfii 1 ..... ........, ....,:: '
. , S
1111 ^IV
.7)
.11
hibh 1 1 1
- I
=:=
- K•
remer an
1
- ID
ermt and Variance
Page 43 of 49
t
•
ij
'0
A
"
Li!
diM e, [`a
c,
g
yw
,
I
q 7 e. K ': N, • i'li,eli Piili H 1 ! r' 'g C 4 !'
oi
; ;
k r
ill !, bi ,4!!igidl ,1
k ; ig E 0 1
Y, fi rrg qi f h ti 11 i J) , ,41. i i ; Oh
did
ID El 000 0 00 DEMEIDMOWEINO .t1)11
0' 0
Er:;3
ffi
‘‘. "
-1- • • •
remer an
L)
ermit and Variance
Page 44 of 49
• 11 )1 04,
4 . .
• flith
a t §
s ,
•.$ g
g !,
1
g g
'I t
0000.0000® (.906)(00C0(M)as)(,
5
.o
// (.4
// •
i t
110
/
1
. _
H.LYON EIANHAV VI.LOON VAON
\\[
L
O
0
r
, g
0
cil<11<<<pl<c.)
tJ
•-;.• 1 1 1 1 1
O
(2)
0
•
Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance
Page 45 of 49
IF 11111111h W.11/0111
1 ,
,
9 [
/ /
'
g
5 K i ;1 51k i'r 7 •.F.. t . ' tgi i . r
.. r? ,3 —',',2 5 ' i
• i ; i i i = ,,.%, i - ,. r H , r .1
i
i 1 i K 4 10'4 HI ' :q '' l
8 t. ii;i1.2'i t-,i '4;,;•! 5 k. ,,, i
g o ‘ 5 i ,,,
• ' i X VI ',-, ' S,, 5, ,_ ; k c,' bt.4,:•1 I 1 ', .-. % il
1 k t v
.1_ 'eQ)o®(1) (or_ o (o,i, ® 0 (2)C( 000 0 ,, rt)
-
OK'
\I I
(M
1?! 11 1 I
•
11
< «1< < <ci< <
' hk •
.7. A
▪ ) 0)
.7,
1,1
E)
J..
]. A
1
;
6
E (),
11
Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance
Page 46 of 49
)
f
lorsonworsoni..
, E;‘
(;)
cf
6-
1
.
4 .
i g
9 i gr •,.1
i i
1 , t L ib i l
!— f ''' \
Liu
''''' - 1
.F.1 1,11 I . , j t
1 j
(..;
<11
'1 kl6h 1 1 1 11
0
0 z
7 !id!li
t i I
g-11
gi ' tV
_ 00 0 0 0 0 000
Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance
Page 47 of 49
C)
(D)
z
jij
, ,h2
i 1 11 11
„ `i i 1 P
oz?.. , P EP
-
6
14
E
0
0,1 cl< c l< 1 <i<VV )< <
5
cn
Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance
Page 48 of 49
•,1
'11
111)
c/)
< )1
I, it,
fim
- 1—
(1 cl<-1,1c1<<1.11•1
0
0
I.!
5
t
s
Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance
Page 49 of 49