Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFully Executed Final PUD and Variance DocumentCITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS 14168 Oak Park Blvd, N, P.O. Box 2007 Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 File No.: 798,02-07.07 Owner: Bremer Bank N.A. Applicant: Bremer Bank N.A. Address: 8555 Eagle Point Road Lake Elmo, MN 55043 Site Address: 5990 60" Street North Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS WASHINGTON COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA BREMER BANK PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPEMENT PERMIT And VARIANCE Legal Description: (Washington County Geo. Code 05-029-2041-0055) Lot 6, Blocicl, Oak Park Commatm.,.. Present Zoning District: B-4 Limited Business District Permitted uses set forth in Ordinance 401 Section 401,301 1. PLANNED UNIT DEVEL PEMENT PERMIT: 1,. 1-2) 599 novo_ SurttL, Date Issued: Au_gast 28, 2007 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVES THE FOLLOWING: A. The application submitted by Bremer Bank for a Planned Unit Development general plan approval, site plan review, and a variance for wall sign to allow a bank with a drive-through at the corner of 60 Street and Nova Scotia Avenue North within the Oak Park Commons and affecting the real property as follows: Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance Page 1 of 49 SEE ATTACHMENT A The City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights approves the Planned Unit Development general plan approval, site plan review and variance for the third wall sign subject to the following findings of fact for the third wall sign variance: 1. The applicants have proposed a total of three wall signs, each on different facades of the building. 2. The total square footage of each wall sign is less than 33 square feet each or a total of less than 100 square feet. 3. The third wall sign ensures visibility of the bank and drive-through from both east and west bound traffic on Highway 36. The City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights denies the request for a monument sign subject to the following findings of fact: 1. A. freestanding sign for the development is already located within the subject property. The applicant may have the opportunity to advertise on this sign. 2, The bank shall be adequately visible from 11ghwky 36 nd local roadways with the two allowable wall signs and a wall sign allowed by variance. 3. Allowing a monument sign variance for this buines will set a precedence for all shopping center businesses to request individual freestan The approvals are subject to the followingOnd.iii* 1. The property owners shall finish construction of the private road with curb and gutter along the property line of the subject property 2. The outdoor lighting for the parking lot shall be turned off one hour after closing, except for approved security lighting or as directed in the Planned Unit Development approvals. 3. The lighting shall be arranged to deflect light away from adjoining property or public right-of-way, so the luminaire shall contain a cutoff, which directs and cuts off the light at an angle of 90 degrees or less. 4. The maximum height above the ground grade permitted for light sources mounted on a pole is 25 feet. 5. The trash receptacle shall be fully screened from view of the adjacent property to the west. Additional landscaping shall be added between the trash receptacle and the property line to the west. 6. The Landscape Plan shall be subject to approval by the City Arborist. 7. If any of the mechanical equipment located on the roof is visible from the street level or from neighborhood properties, it shall be screened with a material designed to blend harmoniously with the building facade materials. 8. A revised parking plan shall be submitted that indicates the following: a) The east and west driveways shall be signed, indicating that the east is entrance only and west is exit only. All directional signage shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. b) The concrete curb setback shall be subject to approval of the City Engineer. Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance Page 2 of 49 c) The site plan shall be updated to indicate a sidewalk entrance into the parking lot for pedestrian access to the bank, preferably along the east side of the property near the handicap parking subject to approval of the City Engineer. d) Due to the significant amount of impervious surface, staff is recommending that the parking area on the south side of the property be shifted to the north approximately two feet to ensure the drive aisle width requirement of 24 feet is met. This will add increased green space to the subject property. 9. The address sign numbers shall be metal, glass, plastic or durable material. The numbers shall not be less than 3.5 inches in height, in a contrasting color to the base or made of some reflective material, and so placed to be easily seen from the street. 10. The Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan shall be subject to approval by the City Engineer. 11. Comply with City Engineer comments outlined in September 20, 2007 letter attached Approved by the City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights this 28 day of August 2007. All uses shall be subject to the following conditions and/or restri4ipns imposed by the August 28, 2007 Resolution of the City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights as follows: III. Reference Attachment: The reports of the City Planner dated July July 31, 2007; Report from the City Engineer, Bonestroo dated July 28, 2007 and site pip4pprdVO:...„ by City Council are annexed hereto by reference. IV. Abandonment: This permit requires coiitipuolAgse in order to preserve the Conditional Use granted by the City under the terms hereof. Any d*Ontat,40961: abandonment of the uses permitted hereunder upon the site for a period of 12 continuous abandonment and void the permit. V. Annual review: Annual review is noilihp.osed as a condition of this permit The approvals stated in this Pennit may grant specific benefits and/or site specific authorizations. Unless specifically listed herein, all improvements and site conditions must remain compliant with City Ordinances. Date: By Date: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have set forth their hands and seals. OAK P eaudet ric Johnson City Administrator IEIGHTS Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance Page 3 of 49 Date: Date: Bremer 7 By Its r7 CSM Equities, Inc Its 3 )4.5, 11-0 t 1 I Ylv.p.era '• • CSM EQUITIES SIGNATURE NOT REQUIRED By PROPERTY HAS BEEN SOLD TO BREMER BANK, NA Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance Page 4 of 49 EXHIBIT "A" PLANNERS REPORT AND SITE PLANS Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance Page 5 of 49 EMOR NDUM TO: FROM: DATE: RE: FILE NO: NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. Eric Johnson Scott Richards July 31, 2007 4800 Olson Memorial Highvvay, Suite 202, Golden Valley, MN 55422 Telephone: 763.231.2555 Facsimile: 763.231.2561 planners@nacplanning,com Oak Park Heights — Bremer Bank Planned Unit Development: General Plan Review, Site Plan Review, and Variances for Signage 798.02 — 07.07 Please find attached the July 6, 2007 planning the Breme Bremer an request s you are aware, the applicants asked that this is be confirmed to the August 9, 2007 meeting. The plans remain as submitted with blhanges from the July meeting. The delay in consideration will altqw for .:;fppresentatives of Bremer Bank to attend the August meeting. They are ..: ,,ps060ipj . V . interested in explaining to the Planning Commission why the additionpfnorpm6i#:.sign and wall signs are necessary. The it has extended the review period for this application to the 120 day allowance. The City Council will need to take tion on this request no later than October 10, 2007. Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance Page 6 of 49 MEMORANDUM RE: BACKGROUND NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. TO: FROM: DATE: July 6, 2007 4-800 Olson Mennri81 Highway, Suite 202, Malden Valley, MN 55422 Telephone: 763.231 .2 555 F=acsimile: 763,23 `l .2561 planners 3nacplannifg.cann Eric Johnson Carle Fuhrnnan /Scott Richards Oak Park Heights — Bremer Bank - Planned Unit Development: General Plan Review; Site Plan Review, and Variances for Signage NAC FILE: 798,02 -- 07.07 Application. Frauenshuh Corn erci :l:. has applied for a PUD, general plan signage. Bremer Bank is proposing:: constructed on Lot 6, Mock `l oak PEir The site is approximately one in size and is located on the corner of 60th Street pp y North and Nova Scotia Avenue 14644,. The bank is proposed to be 4,400 square feet, contain a four -lane drive - through, full :service banking floor inside with a walk -up teller line, offices, meeting facilities, vault, and safe deposit boxes. Bremer Bank is also requesting to place a second freestanding, monument sign on the northwest corner of the site, which requires a variance due to the fact that the Ordinance only allows one freestanding development sign on a site. In addition, Bremer Bank is requesting three wall signs on the exterior surfaces of the building, while the Ordinance only allows two wall signs total. `l Group, on behalf of Bremer Bank, : p . raval site plan review; and a variance for sin le story bank with a drive-through to be :commons. Attached for Reference. Exhibit A —Title Sheet (AO) Exhibit B -- Topographic Survey (CO) Exhibit C — Grading, Drainage, & Erosion Control Plan (C1) Exhibit D — Utility Plan (C2) Exhibit E —Civil Details (C3) Exhibit F — Watershed plan (C4) Exhibit G -- Landscape Clan (L1) Exhibit H Site Plan dated 6- 28- 07(A1.0) Page 71 of 96 Bremer g86P615 Page 7 of 49 Regulation Lot L.inGG:::::.... Re uire �..w. ,..__Proposed 40 feet ----- • 40' ront Front - Noah :::::(boff treet East:r (Nova S ti Ave. N. 40 feet 07' So h (P fvate Street) 40 feet 96' 9" Side/Rear Setback Lot Area Vvat::;:::::at 5) 20 feet 1 5,000 s.. ft. 09' 0" N/A 41817 sq. ft. Lot Width 60th street f Nova Scotia Ave. N. 100 feet 100 feet 190 feet 215 feet Building Height N/A 35 feet 24.5 feet ISSUES ANALYSIS Exhibit ! — Floor Plan (A2.0) Exhibit J — Roof Plan (A2,1) Exhibit KM1 — Exterior elevations (A3.0) Exhibit K -2-- Exterior Elevations (A3.1) Exhibit L — Photometric Plan (P1) Exhibit M -1 — Colored East Elevation Exhibit M -2 -- Colored North Elevation Exhibit M -3 — Colored West Elevation Exhibit N — Sign Detail Exhibit O -1 — Photograph of existing bank Exhibit 0-2 — Photograph of existing bank Exhibit 0-3 — Photograph of existing bank Exhibit P —City Engineer Comments Zoning. Lot 6, Block 1 of Oak Park Commons is zoned B -4, Limited Business District. "Banks, savings institutions, credit unions, and othe institutions, including drive- throughs" } are permitted uses in the B District :: oncept Plan approval was • already received for the proposed bank as part:of the Oak P rk commons Planned Unit Development review. The following table illustrates the required . n:.proosed general zoning regulations for this site Parking Lot Design. The parking stalls are 9 feet wide and 20 feet in length, which meets the Ordinance requirements, The access aisle widths are 26 feet, ten inches wide and 22 feet wide, which both meet the minimum Ordinance requirement of 22 feet, Number of Spaces. The parking lot is proposed to have 26 parking spaces, including two handicapped accessible parking stalls. Ten parking stalls are proposed on the south side of the property, 12 of the parking spaces are proposed on the east side of the property, and four parking stalls are counted within the drive - through lanes. The ordinance requires one space per 250 square feet of floor area. The proposed bank is 4,440 square feet in area. 4,440 x 0.9 = 3,996/250 = 15.98 -3 16 parking spaces 2 Page 72 of 96 BremerTI&POU6 Page 8 of 49 The ordinance also requires two spaces for each drive -in unit plus drive aisle stacking space of 180 feet for each drive -in unit, 4 drive-in units x 2 spaces = 8 parking. spaces Therefore, the ordinance requires a total of 24 parking spaces, which is met by the proposed parking plan. Entrance /Exit. The site will be accessed from the south, off of the primary east - west service drive (private street) that traverses the north end of Oak Park Commons. The entrance to the site shall be from the southeast corner of the property, and the exit shall be from the southwest corner of the property. According to the applicants, a variety of site access studies were completed, which analyzed both single and double points of entry and egress. However, circulation clarity and safety were maximized with the configuration that is utilized in the proposed plans. The ordinance requires all off - street parki:1. facilities to be designed and constructed with appropriate means of vehicular ess tWa public street. Except in the case of a planned unit development, each lot s1 .I:::bbve access directly onto an abutting, improved im roved and City-accepted publ is s r t ,., proposed access off of the private street meets the Ordinance ,. ecai phis is a proposed planned unit development. evelo . The property owners sh U fini :..the construction of the private road p p Y along the property line of the subject.._proper Intersection Separation. lnitia. tl .pplicants proposed that the east driveway be an entrance and an exit to the pto,pef : However, that curb cut access into the parking lot is proposed to :06 e approx t ately 40 feet from the intersection of Nova Scotia Avenue North and . :: vale street (measured from the intersection of lot lines), which does not meet t li Ordinance requirement of a 60 foot setback. Therefore, staff suggested the applicants turn the entrance /exit at the east driveway into strictly an entrance in order to alleviate congestion with vehicles that would be exiting the parking lot at this point. The applicants revised the site plan, and this change is reflected in Al 0. Curbing. The Ordinance requires that a continuous concrete perimeter curb barrier be located around the entire parking lot and shall not be closer than 10 feet to any lot line, A portion of the concrete curb is located within 5.5 feet of the west property line. The concrete curb setback will be subject to approval of the City Engineer being this is a part of a PUD application. Sidewalk. The submitted site plan indicates an existing sidewalk that runs along Nova Scotia Avenue North and both Street North. There is no indication of a sidewalk entrance into the bank parking lot. The site plan shall be updated to indicate a sidewalk entrance into the parking lot for pedestrian access, preferably along the east side of the property near the handicap parking. 3 Page 73 of 96 Bremer � J lnaVa Page 9 of 49 Impervious Surface. According to C4, the proposed site will contain 0,69 acres of impervious surface, which is 72% imperious surface. Due to the significant amount of impervious surface, staff is recommending that the parking area on the south side of the property be shifted to the north approximately four feet to ensure the drive aisle width of 22 feet is still met. This will add increased green space to the subject property. Lighting Plan. Fixtures. The submitted photometric plan indicates five single shoebox fixtures on 25 foot poles, to be located as follows: one on the north side of the property, two on the east side of the property, one on the south side, and one on the west side. These shoebox fixtures are shielded fixtures, with fully recessed lamp sources. The lighting shall be arranged to deflect light away from adjoining property or public right - of -way, so the luminaire shall contain a cutoff, which directs and cuts off the light at an angle of 90 degrees or less, The maximum height above the ground grade permitted for light sources mounted on a pole is 25 feet. Lighting is also proposed on the exterior of the b m l i g in:::th ree locations. Recessed 9 � p ro p cans in the soffit, above the main entrance (fixtur t r 115e 'DI); recessed square cano py fixtures installed inside the drive• --thi : :. ?y structure (fixture type `D2'); and surface - mounted fixtures, above the err rgency exit door (fixture type 'L'). All exterior fixture types will utilize fully 1 ieldei.iarrp configurations. The fixtures located within soffits are also fully re.oessed:_ ::::: h it locations and shielded from view. Intensity. The submitted photoretric =:p1 meets the Ordinance requirements for lighting intensity. Location, The single shoo : € ht fixture proposed on the west property line does not meet the required setba:...from the side property line. The Lighting Plan indicates that this light fixture is Obposed to be located directly on the west property line adjacent to Lot 5. The Ordinance requires the light source of an outdoor Tight fixture to be setback a minimum of five feet from an interior side lot line. Therefore, the revised Lighting Plan shall indicate that this proposed light fixture meets the required setback from the side lot line. Hours, Outdoor lighting for parking Tots shall be turned off one hour after closing, except for approved security lighting. Landscape Design. The Landscape Plan shall be subject to approval by the City Arborist. Signs. The site plan indicates two "exit only signs proposed at the west driveway. The east driveway shall also be signed, indicating that it is an entrance only. The site plan also indicates an address sign on the east elevation of the building, facing Nova Scotia Avenue North. The elevation notes indicate that the numbers will not exceed three square feet, which meet the Ordinance requirement. In addition, the 4 Page 74 of 96 Bremer n'arnce Page 10 of 49 numbers shall be metal, glass, plastic or durable material, and the numbers shall not be less than 3.5 inches in height, In a contrasting color to the base or made of some reflective material, and so placed to be easily seen from the street. The submitted site plan also includes a proposed monument sign on the northwest corner of the site. The sign is approximately eight feet tall and 52 square feet. However, the subject site already contains an existing monument sign advertising the entire development on the northeast corner of the property. The Ordinance only allows a maximum of one freestanding development sign; therefore, a variance is required. The site plan also indicates three walls signs proposed on the bank. Each sign is on a separate building facade: one on the north, east, and west elevations of the building. Each sign appears to be approximately 31 square feet in area, The Ordinance only allows a maximum of two walls signs on any principal building; therefore, a variance is required. All illuminated on- premise and off - premise signs for advertising purposes shall be turned off between 11:00 PM and sunrise, excep,t said signs may be illuminated while the business facility on the premise is open fo'.vice. Building Type and Construction, Quality. The proposed building meets t :,.qu i�tnny standards of the Ordinance, which states that buildings in all zoning distr mall maintain a high standard of architectural and aesthetic cornpa'1 ▪ 'v't ffigtirrounding properties to ensure that they will not adversely impact ,: :b.e pr ; p,erty values of the abutting properties or adversely impact the public h with; . :fety nd general welfare, Photos of another recently cor. leted Bremer Bank have been included with the report. The photos illustrate ::bank's size, scale, composition colors, and exterior materials. Exterior Finishes. The exterior of the bank is proposed to be finished with the following materials: ashlar gray rock face concrete block; jumbo modular face brick; vertical windows with insulated glazing; synthetic stucco with a sandpebble texture. The roof structure is proposed to be composed of bare galvanized sheet metal roofing with insulated glazing windows that are exposed between the walls and the roof structure. All of the proposed exterior building finishes are consistent with the Ordinance standards for grade and quality. Trash Enclosure, The proposed trash enclosure meets the following Ordinance standards: a. The exterior wall treatment is similar to the principal building. h. The trash receptacle area is located in the rear /side yard. 5 Page 75 of 96 Bremer Ni an��ar�iance Page 11 of 49 c. The trash enclosure is in an accessible location for pick up hauling vehicles. It is located near the west entrance /exit to and from the parking lot. d. The trash receptacle is screened from view of the public rights -of ---way to the north and east and also the private road to the south of the property, However, the trash receptacle is not fully screened from view of the adjacent property to the west. Therefore, additional landscaping shall be added between the trash receptacle and the property line to the west. Mechanical Equipment. The roof plan indicates several items that are proposed to be located on the roof. if any of the mechanical equipment located on the roof is visible from the street level or from neighborhood properties, it shall be screened with a material designed to blend harmoniously with the building facade materials. Grading /Drainage. The Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan shall be subject to approval by the City Engineer. See additional engineering comments in Exhibit P. Variance. Variance criteria is provided in Section 401,04 of the Oak Park Heights Zoning ordinance. The Planning Commission and City Council should review the following criteria and conditions to determine if the • ViCripnce is ustified, Review Criteria, The Planning Commission and City Cot c 1 ' cull rake a fording of fact that the proposed action will not: a. ]repair an adequate supply of light and aft= p.ad j: property. b. Unreasonably increase the conge i, hr p tliblic street. c. Have the effect of allowing s.py di tri.ct use ; : ; ,prohibited therein, permit a lesser degree of flood protection than the flood otectioievation for the particular area or permit standards which are lower than thggirregyjd by law d. increase the danger of fire a.i`ndanger the public safety, 0. unreasonably diminish or impair established property values within the neighborhood, or in any way be contrary to the intent of this Ordinance. f. Violate the intent and purpose of the Comprehensive Pan. g. Violate any of the terms or conditions of Item 5, below. Conditions for Approval. A variance from the terms of this ordinance shall not be granted unless it can be demonstrated that: a. Undue hardship will result if the variance is denied due to the existence of special conditions and circumstances which are peculiar to the land, structure, or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures or buildings in the same district. 1) Special conditions may include exceptional topographic or water conditions or, in the case of an existing lot or parcel of record, narrowness, shallowness, insufficient area or shape of the property. 6 Page 76 of 96 BremerilL anE/ Page 12 of 49 2) Undue hardship caused by the special conditions and circumstances nay not be solely economic in nature, if a reasonable use of the property exists under the terms of this Title. 3) Special conditions and circumstances causing undue hardship shall not be a result of lot size or building location when the lot qualifies as a buildable parcel. b. Literal interpretation of the provisions of this Ordinance would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of this ordinance or deny the applicant the ability to put the property in question to a reasonable use. c. The special conditions and circumstances causing the undue hardship do not result from the actions of the applicant. d, Granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this Ordinance to other lands, structure or buildings in the same district under the same conditions. e, The request is not a result of non-conforming lands, structures or buildings in the same district. f The request is not a use variance. The variance requested is the minimum variance necgg0Fyiita accomplish the intended purpose of the applicant, h. The request does not create an inconve properties and uses, Comment regarding the second n: In response to the criteria and conditions listed above, granting the-:.. vat : .ce request to allow a second monument sign would be awarding the applicant that is denied by this Ordinance to other lands, structure, or bufldir in tf :one district under the same conditions. The site and building are highly visa ie Highway 36. A freestanding sign that exists on site could advertise the Bran i :,nk. Allowing the bank to construct an additional freestanding, advertising sign without a justified hardship would set a precedent for future requests. For these reasons, City planning staff recommends that the second monument sign variance be denied. Comment regarding the third wail sign: In response to the criteria and conditions listed above, the proposed wall signs are fairly small in size and granting the variance request to allow the third wall sign will not create an inconvenience to neighboring properties and uses. The City has granted a third wall sign to allow better visibility from Highway 36 for other businesses in this area. For these reasons, City planning staff recommends that the third wall sign variance be approved, 9• RECOMMENDATION AND CONCLUSION After reviewing the request and the criteria and conditions for variance approvals, staff recommends denial of the request for the additional freestanding, monument sign on the subject property. 7 Page 77 of 96 Bremer 4FfilPanEWIance Page 13 of 49 After reviewing the request and the criteria and conditions for variance approvals, staff recommends approval of the request for the third wall sign on the proposed building. After reviewing the request for the PUD, general plan review, and site plan review, staff recommends approval of the proposed Brener Bank. The recommendation is made with the following conditions: 1. The property owners shall finish the construction of the private road with curb and gutter along the property line of the subject property, 2, The outdoor lighting for the parking lot shall be turned off one hour after closing, except for approved security lighting. 3. The lighting shall be arranged to deflect light away from adjoining property or public right --of -way, so the lut inaire shall contain a cutoff, which directs and cuts off the light at an angle of 90 degrees or less. 4 The maximum height above the ground grade permitted for light sources mounted on a pole is 25 feet. 5, The trash receptacle shall be fully screened from view of the adjacent property to the west. Additional landscaping shall be ,.dded between the trash receptacle and the property line to the west. 6, The Landscape Plan shall be subject to approvee'� yt e City Arborist. 7. If any of the mechanical equipment loco roof is visible from the street level or from neighborhood properties,: :::hal be screened with a material designed to blend harmoniously with t:e buqkJing facade materials. 8. A revised parking plan shall be submitted t h Vindicates the following: a) : ti icat . ng that l The east driveway shall jgne `. id� at it is an entrance only; b) The concrete curb tb ack :::shall be subject to approval of the City Engineer; c) The site plan sh" beppcfatOd to indicate a sidewalk entrance into the parking lot for pedestrian access to the bank, preferably along the east side of the property . =:ar the handicap parking; and d) Due to the signifi : ` t amount of impervious surface, staff is recommending that the parking area on the south side of the property be shifted to the north approximately four feet to ensure the drive aisle width requirement of 22 feet is still met, This will add increased green space to the subject property. g The address sign numbers shall be metal, glass, plastic or durable material, The numbers shall not be less than 3.5 inches in height, in a contrasting color to the base or made of some reflective material, and so placed to be easily seen from the street. 10. The Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan shall be subject to approval by the City Engineer. 11. Any additional comments or conditions of the City Council, Planning Commission, or City Staff, 8 Page 78 of 96 BremerMnPP 4 Page 14 of 49 flith E-. 0 1•- 8 li 5 -4 hh ° W :1:•.°. Pth g - I'd 1 . 14<3 - 1<sicl<11<.<11<]•=1-- 31 44,41 H 3141. 40 1334 017' • 1.,Zg. LOS • • . . 180N snNnAv viioos Vi\ON 9'g 0 oE 0 fr" 1 0Z *LI 1 6Z • 'g '039 AO t/1 31.11. Z/1 N 41-11 1334 00T601- ISV3 3111 20 3t411 A1,13153.4 3,*1.,Z5,10S G 40I1_03S I z 1 g3 as or. • o 8 • I • A 8 ' r 300 J F, . 18 1- gl ..) , -' r' / \ 1 8 iii 1 ' z , \ A 1 --4 91191 \-\---- c? ;', . 0 1 1 ' / ' ,/ \\\\ ‘1 r`i': ' .,-, 1 \ r 1 `V 1 /' :; $t;, fl '',-) (2 0 ,e "6 ; ■g )i,_- ' i - ,7 : 14011100Y 7:15VV1-i AO Dila r4 '4 83d 11 , r 31 , , * 30VNIV,..10 4003 017v d I 1 L 4 ' 9 1.'LL i j 1.] V_. 4°i4° 1 ' L' - 6.'-,c,', 26.6 1,10iliraPe :Zrel1 .4.0.1.V1,1 au hi tiiiivniiifil ]..C.. 2 . 00 N ,Y,, — v-, C.,o r"" 1 13ni'1:3A V >riVii,E)N co l' 6 z emer BarikPUftPt t 1 rrl and Variance Page 15 of 49 ,6rlift s , s ' t ra I Pg o r U W ..J 00 {} ! 11 I1I1 i H]- QN 3ONGAV V11OOS1 TON 1 i T t i J I .'k" "'� / �J7'r"t�!i f f 5'! J 1*+. wy /// / J // / .. P r r /rir r / r/ 7 , Vii, �'r //////, � �fr %r // i / / / // f / it / rI� i f ,f `/ //,,, „, r f 2 / .. l ff/ /r .- ,��rJ /r� . {r r� ff � _ er VJ 1 O1 I L PJ ❑1<1(94r14V444441 111 1111 1 1111 • nd Variance Page 16 of 49 3i ci. ti ..3 1. . .r, ;. .}N .��- =:s c.mm. • ..�. � -.- .� - - -.. 41! p c a rfl ? iiq i; ,q01 451 t 00 1; IVY§ 11 Vi i ntt Hi 'El gg. 4leg :%1;b1 '41 04d! a o Y Q z 4 11449gx Tri ti L�• b r 1 o' n W 1 P I I � � ( a $11f �r I J S r I , & 4 h z 1 :11 d g LI,E7 M x 'FM s>r :. 0 111 1 $. lge 41 Wrd TbRY rdir " 1 Or L li t F jf 1 444•4444444444 • •� �rF1eJ. ,v■ ■ f r-] 0 a tr- z 1 11 z 140,F5 ,) p •ik ijlt 8 11 ell111111111EMIN Car.crna. CM ri , 1 ii 1414<k444 0 1 1'4 ...] . ---,„ 5 -; 1r- an >.< riP ' 1. " Al • d Variance Page 18 of 49 Pi N. dhb L ay - - 2 fi ?-2 4 ti 11 , 1 , 14.1<4 , 1<1.1.1 L qg d!i! 5 ; Pgi . tip,1.1! 11 5 xt, 2? i; i• ipii 6 • . III re d Variance Page 19 of 49 0") F I : 3 • 10,111.! \Alt.) .4.. • '1 - 1 4'; j.j ,., __•........1,..„4.:1 " • ,,,.• 1 (- i' WL- - .-•-•-•- -----=: -. ,---A- i i-' ) .-- 1:: , '' ---- 71-- , „ . - ,;::.:7, 1 ,,,: ' - - ••'-.-- - . ' . " 71.____1____-.,: )., ' ': ..1-,i,:•...,...,„,k-,---------' ...... , 1 Jr ill! if Ii! 4 f „d 1 1 - 111 i 14 t n p HI, 4<m‹<Ii.113<iii« L., fl i 0 1 ell gl Y 11 I ii i ii i a ll y,,111!1 111 WI Y: • 1 li 5 5 45 5 5 51 '1 5'5 5 2 gi 15 t'V f!il iqt 6 !go 5 0' L tlo§ pgtq 4/111!0 41/1L wipl whin u so d Variance Page 20 of 49 :6) 4-- ij v.. ( 6/38105 ( Aq k t ft kE.!. r A hk. 0 I t (111 0 4 <N111411'11 1 I 1 1 I 8 (.9 r z 4 0 Q -1 ------ 7177M - PD=ner an ermirTid Variance Page 21 of 49 Pi !..• 1, M Y 5111212.4 <11.111411 011 WW1 1111 5 • ri Bremer Bank PUD Permit' and Variance Page 23 of 49 '0 a u is U 6 x � b g N . 1, (To r! 11� , n 0 0- 0 - . ______. - 0- • <pi <111444444 fl11 II IIII ED z L 0 . Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance Page 24 of 49 .14.114 <11111.(14111 -+1- 0 3 1-- Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance Page 25 of 49 I. I 1E E A g <1.1.1 9 l• C\j F-- 1 2 c12 cr c6,? r,,21 -, • ; R, 1 1 5 :4 ) , q plOfligH,r i 711 4E WI 1M M 1 11 lq t k 1 t F iliii ri Eth 1 611 NI rvilP i 1 3 yll blii f i'.., !.. 1! . irl.i p il Ati nfl W . 3 PM li ig',4' '''o e oe oeso eoacioo 1., 6 6 0 Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance Page 26 of 49 .0 0) c„ o „z, nrcii ti & d .6 41.10111111....11.00.■100.• 1 • 1 • Path. 7 4 ____------' --',----- — 7 _____.0- ,,0 .6 .k1 , 0 : •:::::,.. :0 ,,; :0 ., :0 ,,;' ,.: .6 ' .0 . .....,,,0 ..: ; .0 , .0 .0 - - .6 .6 O VII0MNIMSEMINS. ."- 1 '.1.1.10.00001101.10141•01001111000. 011 H H o • ° • . 7.7.J . u u .0 .7 ;a e ,0 c 'o :to 0 .0 9 0 o I :' 71 i ') t----- r-i—{ i CO i P-4 _. .< > X.J1 i r) 0 o 6 0° -4 .0 Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance Page 27 of 49 0 0 1 utrawawmocom. g EXHBIT *Tsai, 70%W. - ,PWCeR fl Jt Bremer Bank PUD Per 0 () 111 LL Zjt 4t tc 0 cc d3 cc 0 0 LU E- nd 72 IL Aft- TRON. HIP L 2.: a g. i I g i .' • . .- 'i',1. • c;.. ( 1 ,4 k g .g. g i 3 r ? 5 VI o 6 :,"•,'-', 9 , 7. r.ii -•-- - • • • • • •- - - • . 0 3 z 0 T 4 M ;.= Hemet [3anki PUD Per Kg 1 st: 0 0 00 6: ZC I 0 IL z 0 >- < 3: cc 0 d) 0 0 LIJ ma/ [fi f ,'... T. . . - z : 3 - 1 ! ,.. 5 iwr - r :,-„1—,7102.;R'1612Z 2"2'L' 11 EXHIBri 1 1.1, ::::g:::::;:%:1 3 i0 1111, _,,-, p 5'..i:.'-'ft'2,.1 E -hi 4 - ,.,11, :i ip avii 1.-.;,,-turA15 6 z , -5 3 . 6. 2 i \ q,E-7:4114-14,ihfi-di gE ,-, . ''' 1 WTnntT. Lit '.' E -''' F.--c,<uac.a., uJ (Th 0 LL ict 0 1 (i) (i) CD 0 w C) d agerC w \ ( . n L (1) V. c! (S.) 0) Ili -J< , 0 ....) e C,1 ...._ .Z -4, LIJ i- D7, C:\ (...) '-, t-- < 111 .27 1-:-. -' ‘.- D f Ili --i : i'lf":22: III cf..). - ,I ; (..) :-;„) 2: 1-, O :'; 5 ,,.. :: v.- tti '"" Ill , La 3 0 0_ 0 , c'l --! -.....i ,-- .,.; it! .1Z L L.) Ili - , FRIWARA1 g §. g '..--WKA Y-111311 ZAARATOWei,EWMAZMARW247MAXMat w0. -J .woo - tl:F— try3tIqiaTrIV cV 9- 1F00:;13!;g*: , a 2 ar 30. 'EL--z.q1;A451,1:tti'Lt UD Perrin Page 32 of 49 PUD Per Page 34 of 49 :t. EXHIBIT "B" City Engineer Letter September 20, 2007 Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance Page 35 of 49 September 20, 2007 Mr, Eric Johnson City Administrator City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Blvd., P.O. Box 2007 Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 -2007 Re: Bremer Bank City of Oak Park Heights Bonestroo file No. 55 -07 -000 Dear Eric: We have reviewed the Site Development Plans, dated September 4, 2007, for Bremer Bank as submitted by We #man Sperides Architects, LLC. We have the following remaining comments and/or recommendations. Sheet A1,0 1 We recommend the p avement marking for the parking j be changed from 3" lines to 4" lines, 2, Show 4" white pavement hatch markingO vaccessible isle between the two handicapped spots. General Comments 1 As directed by City Council on.Au }. 28 = 007, submit an auto turn analysis showing that a fire y y :::. truck is capable of making Eft turn rn o the . parking lot from the east driveway entrance. 2. Provide the City with a cop of: 'e approval letter from the Browns Creek Watershed District, If you have any questions or require additid fl information, please contact me at (651) 604 -4788 or Dennis Pastier at (651) 604 -4815. Sincerely, BONESTROO Karen 5. Erickson, P.E. cc: Tom Ozzello, Public Works Director Jim Butler, Building Official Scott Richards, City Planner Mark Vierling, City Attorney Eric Reiners, Welman Sperides, Architects DMP, BMK, CW1.2, File -- Bonestroo 2335 Highway 36 W St. Paul, MN 55113 Tel 651- 636 -4600 Fax 6S1- 636.1311 www.bonestroo.com Bonestroo 5t. Paul St. Cloud Rochester Milwaukee Chicago Engineers Architects Plat 1rprs rage oo 01 £.4. June 28, 2007 Mr, Eric Johnson City Administrator City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Blvd., P.Q. Box 2007 Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 -2007 Re: Bremer Bank City of Oak Park Heights Bonestroo file No, 55-07-000 Dear Eric: We have reviewed the Site Development Plans for Bremer Banks : ubmit•by Welman Sperides Architects, SEC on June 20, 2007. Following are our comments arrd .r rbmmendations. Sheet C 1 1, The development is constructing the drive thru lar e hd storm sewer within the City's utility easement and over the existing trunk sanitarVt wer'And water main, If in the future the City ever needs to replace /repair /maintain thetp development will be responsible to repair all of their items in the easement inc.ludn:: ut not limit to pavement, curb and gutter, landscaping and storm sewer /catch basin. 2. At critical areas, such as :€ e d riveway aprons and grade breaks, add the percent of slope at the drainage arrows. 3. Spot elevations should be added td trash enclosure. 4, The elevation of the concrete drive thru is not clearly identified on the plans Spot elevations should be placed at each corner to show the grade of the concrete pad, 5. Identify grades on the west side of the property in the landscaped area. Sheet C2 1. Verify the structure size of CB2. it appears the top of the 18 inch pipe to the south will be in conflict with the bottom of the 15" pipe to the southwest. Engineers Architects r 2335 Highway 36 W 5t. Paul, MN 55113 Tel 651.636 -4600 Fax 651 -636 -1311 www.bonestroo.com Bonestroo 5t. Paul St. Cloud Rochester Milwaukee Chicago City of Oak Park Heights Bremer Bank 2. It is assumed that the canopy for the drive thru will have footings five feet deep. If in the future the water main requires repair in this area the footings for the canopy may be undermined. Research the possibility of placing the water main more than 5 feet from the canopy. 3. Contact Alliant Engineering to verify the water main stub from the south that is identified by keynote number 2. The construction plans at our office for this development does not identify a water main stub at this location, 4. Contact Alliant Engineering to verify the sanitary stub from the north that is identified by keynote number 1. The construction plans at our office for this development does not identify the sanitary sewer stub at this location. 5. insulation shall be placed at all storm sewer /water main crossings. Sheet C3 1. The detail sheet appears to have details that will not be used. For example there was no call out for a wet tap on the utility sheet. In addition, there are details that are missing such as a 2 x 3 box structure that is called out on sheet C2 for structure CB5, 2. A typical section for the concrete drive apron should be gadded to:etail 13. 3. eta a p . Detail 4 is a storm manhole with a 27" ening:.. ThltfCtre should be revised to accommodate the Neenah casting R3067 as called out.:9 t= n shee: 4. Add a detail showing the section fgr.. the drive thru. 5. A detail is required showing the d ve t Sheet C4 Page 2 June 28 2 007 1 Submit rational design clat:1ns for the storm sewer. Sheet A1,0 1. To minimize turning movements on the thru street for the overall development it is recommended that the east driveway is narrowed and restricted to in movements only, This entrance should be signed appropriately. 2, There is a large radius on the northwest side of the drive thru lane that creates a bituminous bump out. Is this additional bituminous really required? 3. The radius in the northeast corner appears small, Verify that all vehicles using the drive thru lane are able to make the radius. 4. There is only 3' between the northerly drive thru lane and the existing bike path. It is recommended that the site plan is revised to provide more distance between the bike path and the drive thru lane. Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance Page 38 of 49 City of Oak Park Heights Bremer Bonk 5. The existing bike path on the east side of the property should be shown on the drawings. The pathway is on the plans on sheet C1. 6. Reference the detail locations on the keynotes. 7. Identify the size and color for the pavement markings. General Comments 1. Provide the City with a copy of the approval letter from the Browns Creek Watershed District. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me at (651) 604 -4788 or Dennis Pastier at (651) 604 -4815. Sincerely, BONETROO • Karen 5. Erickson, P.E. cc: Tom Ozzello, Public Works Director Jim Butler, Building Official Scott Richards, City Planner Mark Vierling, City Attorney Eric Reiners, Welman 5peride Archi is • DMP, BMK, CvL2, File -- Page 3 June 28, 2007 Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance Page 39 of 49 Final Site Plans approved by the City Council Subject to Verification and Compliance with City Ordinances and Approved Deviations as stated in Permit Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance Page 40 of 49 ; 1r, g - 1.] <I <<71 <KV] <I <I <1 I <1 4 Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance Page 41 of 49 ILI ,- 2 ....._. „„, .... 7' 4 , 1 - Xrd, KEZI q . . .....,...,..,,-,,,,,,•,- , 1- 1. -tr- ... . t-- T 4 kit W ; 2 l'i 51 , gli ! CM i q MEM T. - 1 1 § u !i ly j .,,ii -.), - i.f.F , ' ,6 0 ' 4, ,,,W. g - LR„, t— " ,8ili- E V „ , 111 x. zD c,c, . '_; ' 0 01 — • - 4 .,,-, = • c ; 1r, g - 1.] <I <<71 <KV] <I <I <1 I <1 4 Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance Page 41 of 49 1 - --; H.Ohl Miat•Y V11.0. VAC. w uj 1.. 1 cc Ii. 1— to 1 I I_ (0 ______,.....4.____z — ------ ... -.'""....-1.:•:;.:".„,,,, '7 , ifi ..:', '''...4 __,...",]::::,,,...... 7... qt ...: . ,..-.77.- '' - — IJE 1 . tc, 1P.'• I i , .:.;.'", ,•:::-::::,"Zgii.i;.*:*:::::::::---- 1:1 !, , :-.. I-1 4-- --, - 7 • ,, — ' : 1,1 .s; ,:, ..,' 1 I lq ------- -.• H.LHON gilNaAV VII 'VA N 1 _ ‘170.. .......... 1 , 34 1 --,,,,-,-.---, ___.._ .._ 1, . -.—.-----,::::::::- - -:' "c .- - -1- - - --,...-....---.... :.,,5 ---. Ci}Vgr.,.W 1 ... S • ,_. - " - ' 4 :....., ...::::, i i . i --- ''' — ,1 ..: Z . ,,P„ 1 I F, P (-,,, 1 , tl ..!. „, 1° - -r: • );• • k • •i• , 7 , ..ffatz _ 4.5 z 2 co w Z w < < !72 Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance Page 42 of 49 U 6,1E i iF g a VI 0 4 y y " 0' ttrd •-• y 4 !. Iti E:t4 " g 6 P"i" i 1 ;i tel ! .:8 i6Y gi X - V. qg s ! i411 „ ito ttgn Al ht iti hqg gq. b44 M,Y , 11 00. 1,1 16k.! Q 04 V r!li N 14r I V • qii 1 1 S, Tr a S !S Vq! e4 t Z. Pile r g A$V 1P-N;q: Z 1 ,4 r e i f g W i YigqPil 1 1 5 6 i1 K i! Ird' 10 pi I r - Pi I 1 .., i l l ;1 r c l 1 i liil BR o ... ,A 4 -Pilr E' II' 1111 iiir! 11 : 1 .1 CM 1‹.3•1<1.1111<101 I 1 1 0 o u um remer an erm and Variance Page 43 of 49 CID c, 1 _ glE „ - 7 -„--• , •.:.-- .•T-7.-..:77-•-77'. .....: .; [—T. ------ .,,,, ,.......___,. _____.„ , • - . _ 1 ' .:,-- : , • , . `__ ,. ,::::., - :•,.•.! ,?-, 1 - , 7-! , `f.:.: - -,.........------ ,s ! ir'qq!! kiMH tgb ; ; oo: ,4h ;I g 140•0 g :d `i i ij ! i tg."6 ji ; y T r ,' ifs; A' a it Y, l 110 ri q ; I 1,1 pi! " t 1 6 9 EfiNifliO4 Pyi g 11 111, 11 dhlfigi fl i!gH ;Li 0) 0)00) 0)00)M(3130€1®®0)0)0) 0)190)E$0) 41111 .1111 1111 I 0 ti f1: 2 • N 1 [ 0) L) 2 remer an ermit and Variance Page 44 of 49 't p R L 1n 4 ❑ W § � v'• � #:�i O®�®®®®®®®®©®® U oco ® qs1 C•C:K P, E '�f g ; 3 .a•.11 .a•t V . a -a ILL YON rlf Nait Y VI.L O3S VA ON �1 44444444 h 2 e i r Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance Page 45 of 49 • a as c k i tl 11! 44444417444,14444 N D Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance Page 46 of 49 )-- C 1 Fhth 1 gm 1 AI 1 1 () ( ) ( To? r rI . .. ..... ' r 1 i 11 s Ci y I I <1.14.144•11<341 5 (21.) (L9 -- "''"‘"11 - 9 ., . b ', , i2 ..ifi ! • 6 4 411 o 1.. :1 rl v v-' 1 i r. 1 ' ;., ?, ?P' ''': 0 g i 1, - . .), h: i ti ,, ' il iiii . 4 '''' i '• 1 h V a i f) 11 ; g 1 4 vIZ 6 . re_ q 1 f ° 1 , k it• L: 1 75 q 5j- gq, h 6 fil- 1 i i 0 I v r.4i' dP i c' y f4 1 • V l . a It4:1 51 4 Lg L - 0 0,0,30 ._........„..,„..._________________ Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance Page 47 of 49 - QP 0) 1 IJ fa z .., x 1:: i_;!! I l l ' c 4,1 4,1 1 I gl Pii 4 '' WI ill - LT z 0 g 0 0 x IV›t '-'- to 6 111 id 6 9 0 �4 0990 €44'4 0044® Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance Page 48 of 49 D F,} o} 3 � vn3 1 Gi O S ❑1111 , 1 , 1aa 1 I 1 {' a -.T K 1 X a° V § C ��d i Bremer Bank PUD Permit and Variance Page 49 of 49