Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-05-25 RESOLUTION NO. 06 -05 -25 • CITY COUNCIL CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL THAT THE REQUEST BY TIM NOLDE REPRESENTING ANCHOBAYPRO INC. AND VALLEY SENIOR SERVICES ALLIANCE FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD), GENERAL PLAN, PRELIMINARY /FINAL PLAT AND A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A TOTAL OF 67 RESIDENTIAL TOWNHOME UNITS AS PART OF THE FIRST PHASE OF THE OAKGREEN VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT IN THE B -4, LIMITED BUSINESS DISTRICT AND IN THAT AREA WEST OF OAKGREEN AVENUE AND NORTH OF 58 STREET NORTH BE APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS WHEREAS, the City of Oak Park Heights has received a request from Tim Nolde representing Anchobaypro Inc. and Valley Senior Services Alliance for PUD, general • plan, preliminary /final plat and a conditional use permit to allow a total of 67 residential townhome units as part of the first phase of the Oakgreen Village development in the B -4, Limited Business District and in that area west of Oakgreen Avenue and north of 58'" Street North; and after having conducted a public hearing relative thereto, the Planning Commission of Oak Park Heights recommended that the request be approved with conditions. The City Council makes the following findings of fact and resolution: 1. The real property affected by said application is legally described as follows, to wit: SEE ATTACHMENT A and 2. The applicant has submitted an application and supporting documentation to the Community Development Department consisting of the following items: SEE ATTACHMENT B and 3. The subject property is zoned B -4, Limited Business District which allows for residential development as a conditional use. The Oakgreen Village development is proposed as a planned unit development; and i 4. The City Council, at their April 11, 2006 meeting, approved the concept • plan with conditions for the first phase of the Oakgreen Village development; and 5. City staff prepared a planning report dated May 4, 2006 reviewing the request for the general plan of development; and 6. The May 4, 2006 planning report recommended approval of the general plan of development subject to the fulfillment of conditions; and 7. The Planning Commission held a public hearing at their May 11, 2006 meeting, took comments from the applicants and public, closed the public hearing, and recommended that the application be approved with conditions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVES THE FOLLOWING: A. The application submitted by Tim Nolde representing Anchobaypro Inc. and Valley Senior Services Alliance for PUD, general plan, preliminary /final plat and a conditional use permit to allow a total of 67 residential townhome units as part of the first phase of the Oakgreen Village development in the B -4, Limited Business District and in that area west of Oakgreen Avenue and north of 58 Street North and affecting the real property as follows: • SEE ATTACHMENT A Be and the same as hereby approved by the City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights subject to the following conditions: 1. The preliminary /final plat is subject to review and approval by the City Engineer and City Attorney. 2. The Park Commission recommends a cash park dedication for Oakgreen Village. Park dedication must be paid at the time of recording of the final plat. The specific terms of the dedication will be addressed in the development agreement. 3. All easements, as required by the City Engineer and City Attorney, shall be dedicated to the City as part of the subdivision approvals. 4. The applicant shall dedicate the right -of -way area for Nova Scotia Court North and Oakgreen Avenue as part of the final plat. 5. The City Council is favorable to the berming and screening provided for Nova Scotia Avenue North as part of the grading and landscape plans. • 2 6. Sidewalks /trails and timing for construction are subject to review and approval by the • Parks Commission, City Council, and City Engineer. 7. The applicant's traffic study for the Oakgreen Village development shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 8. The tree preservation and landscape plans are subject to review and approval of the City Arborist. Additional trees and landscaping shall be provided on the north edge of the development. The landscape plan shall be updated and approved by the City Arborist. The applicant shall remove the dead trees within the stormwater /wetland ponding area identified as Outlot D. 9. The plans for the private park shall be provided and reviewed as part of the Phase 2 concept and general plan of development review process. 10. Grading, drainage, erosion control, and utility plans are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. Stormwater issues are also subject to review and approval by the applicable watershed authority. 11. The applicant must comply with Xcel Energy's requirements for construction of a pond within the Xcel Energy easement. The applicant shall resubmit the development plans to Xcel Energy to assure compliance with all utility requirements. Written approval from Xcel Energy shall be provided to the City. • 12. Prior to the issuance of any grading p ermit , all existing wells an g p � g d septic systems must be identified and abandoned in conformance with Minnesota Rules. 13. The site plan does not include light fixtures on buildings. If lights are proposed on the buildings, they must be illustrated on the building plans, details submitted, and the photometric plan must be revised to include them subject to City staff review and approval. 14. Two monument signs shall be allowed for the development, subject to final review and approval of locations, and compliance with the City's Sign Ordinance. 15. The City Council is favorable to the final design and materials for the townhome structures. 16. The proposed vinyl lap siding must be changed to steel or Hardiboard siding subject to final review and approval of City staff. 17. The Fire Marshal and Police Chief should review the plans and determine the accessibility of emergency vehicles throughout the development. 18. The applicant shall supply the homeowners association documents as required by the City . Attorney for review and approval. 3 19. The applicant shall provide all association duties and maintenance until the completion of Phase 2. The homeowners association shall be organized with a funded reserve provided by the developer. The details of the reserve amount shall be outlined in the development agreement. Only one homeowners association for both Phase 1 and Phase 2 will be allowed. 20. The applicant shall be required to disclose the entire development plans to include Phase 2 for all Phase 1 buyers. Disclosure is also required for modification of all buyers within the development that the roadway and wetlands are to be private and will not be accepted as public in the future by the City. 21. The applicant shall dedicate the wetland area north of 58 Street (Outlot D) to the City. 22. The applicant is required to enter into a development agreement with the City in a form acceptable to the City, and subject to review and approval of the City Attorney. 23. A plan for postal box design and locations on the site shall be submitted to and approved by City staff and the Postmaster. 24. The City Engineer shall review and submit for approval to the Parks Commission and City Council a plan for crosswalks and 58 Street and Nova Scotia Avenue North. • 25. The applicant shall provide a snow removal plan subject to review and approval of City staff. 26. All conditions and recommendations as listed in the May 15, 2006 letter from the City Engineer shall be complied with. 27. A temporary play area/open space area shall be provided by the applicant and shall be provided with an appropriate play surface to be completed no later than occupancy of the first two story building of the development. Approved by the City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights this 23` y of May 2006. David Beaudet, W ayor ATT ric A. son City Administrator • 4 Attachment A Washington County GEO Code: 05.029.20- XX -XXX Legal Description: Lot 1 -4, Block 1, Oakgreen Village Lot 1 -4, Block 2, Oakgreen Village Lot 1 -8, Block 3, Oakgreen Village Lot 1 -3, Block 4, Oakgreen Village Lot 1 -8, Block 5, Oakgreen Village Lot 1 -4, Block 6, Oakgreen Village Lot 1 -4, Block 7, Oakgreen Village Lot 1 -4, Block 8, Oakgreen Village Lot 1 -4, Block 9, Oakgreen Village Lot 1 -4, Block 10, Oakgreen Village Lot 1 -4, Block 11, Oakgreen Village Lot 1 -4, Block 12, Oakgreen Village Lot 1 -4, Block 13, Oakgreen Village Lot 1 -4, Block 14, Oakgreen Village Lot 1 -4, Block 51, Oakgreen Village • All located within the NE1 /4 of Section 5, Township 29, Range 20, Washington County, MN Page 72 of 126 ATTACHMENT B yin Planned Unit Development (PUD): General Plan, Preliminary /Final Plat & Conditional Use Permit OAKGREEN VILLAGE — Phase I (67 Residential Townhouse Units) Application Materials • Application Form • Fees (applicable) • Plan Sets (3 Large Scale Sets /20 11X17 Sets) • Written Narrative and Graphic Materials Explaining Proposal • Mailing List from Washington County (500' from subject property) • Proof of Ownership or Authorization to Proceed • Property Tax Statements) /Legal Description(s) • Planning Commission Public Hearing & Recommendation: May 11, 2006 Required Approvals: Planning Commission Majority Vote City Council Majority Vote Conditional Use Permit - Lapse of Approval: Unless the City Council specifically approves a different time when action is officially taken on the request, the conditional use permit shall become null and void twelve (12) months after the date of approval, unless the property owner or applicant has substantially started the construction of any building, structure, addition or alteration, or use requested as part of the conditional use. An application to extend the approval of a conditional use permit shall be submitted to the Zoning Administrator not less than thirty (30) days before the expiration of said approval. (401.03.C.4.a and b) • Page 73 of 126 Bonestrao 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul. MN 55113 Rosene Office: 651 -636 -4600 • Fax: 651-636.1311 Anderfik& wwwbonestroocom Associates Engineers & Architects May 15, 2005 Mr.. Eric Johnson City Administrator City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Blvd.., P.O. Box 2007 Oak. Park Heights, MN 55082 -2007 Re: Oakgreen Village General Plan Review BRA File No- 55 -05 -000 Dear Eric: We have reviewed the general plans, dated April 26, 2006, for the Oakgreen Village development as submitted by Folz, Freeman, Erickson, Inc. Following are our comments and /or recommendations. Development Comments L The streets, sanitary sewer, water main and majority of the storm sewer will be • privately owned. The exception is all storm sewer that connects trunk storm water ponds will be owned by the City. I Sheet 2 1. The south cul -de -sac is shown with a 42' radius. A 45' radius is the minimum required for public cul -de -sacs in the City. It should be verified by the fire chief that this radius is acceptable for maneuvering emergency vehicles. Sheet 4 1. Spot elevations should be shown for the top and bottom of all retaining walls. Detailed design drawings and calculations for any retaining walls over 3.0 feet tall shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to construction. 2. The grading contours on the west side of the wetland go from 940 directly to 944.. It appears the 942 contour is missing, 31 Clearly define the wetland boundary and provide verification that proper' wetland setbacks and buffers are being met. 4. Verify that all slopes are 3:1 or less. It appears there are slopes greater than 3:1 in the southwest corner of the property and just southwest of the north pond- St Paul. St Cloud, Rochester. MN • Milwaukee. W1 M Chicago. IL Affirmative Action /Equal Opportunity Employer and Employee Owned I Page 74 of 126 5. Label the Emergency Overflow Routes 6. Identify some spot elevations and drainage arrows, especially in critical drainage locations such as south of units 52 -54.. At this location the overland drainage appears to be minimal. 7. The existing southwest NURP Pond is being significantly reduced. Show the proposed grading plan for this pond and provide information on its water' quality treatment. The existing drainage area to the pond is being maintained, however the size ofthe pond is being reduced: 8. The southeast NURP pond and the existing wetland are labeled with a NW L of 936.0 and the southwest NURP pond is labeled with a NWL of 937.7. However, the contours shown in this area are not corresponding with the blue area shown on the plans as the NW L of the ponds. Sheet 7 1. With the construction of'Nova Scotia Avenue North the City will install the following items that will be paid for by the nakgreen Village development: a. Three 8 "water main stubs extended to the right -of way. • b. Concrete curb and gutter radii at the two entrances to the development. c. The bituminous pathway in the east boulevard of Nova Scotia, 2. The plans currently show the connection ofthe water main in Nova Scotia Avenue. This should be revised to show the connection at the right of way. 3. The drainage area to the existing wetland is being decreased with the grading of the site. To maintain hydrology to the wetland the outlet for the south ponding system should be placed on the existing wetland, rather than on the east NURP pond as currently drawn. This will allow both the east and the West NURP Ponds to discharge into the wetland. To maximize the upland buffer surrounding the wetland it is recommend the outlet be placed at 935.50. 4. Inlet FES 103 in the proposed north pond is directly across from the outlet.. This configuration decreases the treatment capabilities of the pond. The inlet/outlet locations should be moved to maximize the hydraulic length between the two structures.. 5. Both the sanitary sewer and storm sewer pass between units 39 and 40 and between units 51 and 52. The pipes are approximately 15' deep relative to the finish floor elevations of the units. The plans show only 10' between the pipes and the buildings. At these depths there should be a minimum of 15' from the utilities to the buildings. Page 75 of 126 • 6. In the HydroCAD model a 15" and 8" submerged pipe are shown in the outlet for the south pond and north pond, respectively. The primary outlet for the south pond is 15" RCP and 12" RCP for the north pond. Submerged pipes easily fill with sediment and debris, therefore to maintain capacity to the primary outlets the minimize size for the submerged pipes shall be 24 ". Plat 1., The storm sewer from pond to pond and the storm sewer outlet from the proposed north pond to the existing system will part ofthe City's public infrastnrcture.. A 30' utility easement will be required for this system. General Comments 1. The additional items shall be submitted for review: a, Pipe profiles for public storm sewer. b. Details, including outlet structures. c, Typical Section for Roads_ d. Erosion Control Plan, including native seed mixture for upland area surrounding the wetland. e,. Copy of the Approval letter from the Middle St.. Croix Watershed. • The plans will require further review when items discussed in this letter' are submitted. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me at (65 1) 604 -4788 or Dennis Postler at (651) 604 -4815. Sincerely, BONE TROD, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC.. 0""o � "E"tt' aren S_ Erickson, P.E. cc: Tom Ozzelio, Public Works Director - Jim Butler, Building Official Scott Richards, City Planner Mark Vierling, City Attorney Todd Erickson -Folz, Freeman Erickson, Inc. DMP, BMK, File -- Bonestroo & Associates K:\ 55155privatc\ oakgreenvillagcfti )0b \johnson_KSI's ^Oakgrecn Village gencral plans 5 -15-06 Page 76 of 126