The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2005-07-29 Applicant Legal Communication cc to OPHKenne C H A R T E R E D S. Bank Plaza mouth Sixth Sheet Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612) 337-9300 telephone (612) 337-9310 fax http://wvvw.kenned g raven.com A . ff STEPHEN J. BUBUL Attorne at Law Direct Dial (612) 337-9228 Email: sbubul@kenned Jul 29, 2005 John Gelder roan CSM Corporation 500 Washin Ave. S, Suite 3000 Minneapolis, MN 55415 Re: Oak Park Hei Pro Dear John: In connection with the proposed tax increment assistance for y our project in the Cit of Oak Park Hei the Cit and its financial advisor Northland Securities will need to review details about the proposal to detennine the amount of tax 'increment assistance that is reasonabl necessar to make the project financiall feasible. To help us with that anal please submit the followin items: I A parcel-b description of land ac for the prof ect, includin total ac costs and ownership status for each parcel. 2. A ten- pro forma for the pro showin costs, revenues, and expected rates of return, both with tax increment assistance and without. 3. A detailed description of improvements, b propert t and s foota and y our current proposed construction schedule. 4. Your estimated market values for all improvements at completion. 5. A description of y our current overall financin plan, includin e and bank financin ( identif y prospective lenders and g eneral ten - ns). 6. The amount of tax increment assistance currentl re Some of these items y ou have previousl assembled or submitted, but we would like updated versions. Please send this material as soon as possible to Eric Johnson at the Cit with a copies tome and to Nick Skarich at Northland Securities. Also, let me know who I should contact as y our le counsel for this project as it pro If y ou have q uestions, please contact me. Ver l y ours, I i4 Stephen J. Bubul cc: Eric Johnson Nick Skarich SfB-266208v1 AK 145-1 Information Summary for Comprehensive Plan Revisions and Plan Amendments This completed form should accompany each comprehensive plan revision or plan amendment submitted to the Metropolitan Council for review. The information submitted on this form is reviewed by Council staff within 10 working days to determine if the comprehensive plan or amendment is sufficiently complete for Council review purposes. This form is also available in alternative formats: Word Perfect 5.1 or 6.1, Microsoft Milord and ASCII, or a reasonable facsimile of this form can be produced on most word processing systems. Please send plan information to: Lynda Millashius, Referrals Coordinator Metropolitan Council Mears Park Centre 230 E. Fifth Street; St. Paul, MN 55101-1 634 SECTION 1: GENERAL INFORMATION A. Sponsoring Governmental Unit: City of Lake Elmo Name of Local Contact Person: Charles E. Dillerud Address: 3800 Laverne Avenue, Lake Elmo, MN 55042 Telephone Number: (651) 233.5402 Fax Number'. (651) 777-9615 I ntemet Address (if applicable): Lakeelmocd@aol.com aol.com Date of Preparation: August 2, 2005 S. Type of submittal Overall plan revision, or X Plan amendment Name of amendment/brief description: Public workslwater Tower Site. Amend the Comprehensive Plan to classify a portion of the 3M site in a manner that will permit the construction of a 35,000 square foot (at build -out) City Public Works/Park Maintenance Facility and a 500 - 750,000 gallon elevated City potable water storage facility. Land use change (describe): Amend RAD land use to PF land use. Size of affected area (in acres): MUSA Expansion? X No _Yes. Other (Please describe) C. Please attach seven (7) copies of the following: 1,Completed Information Summary for Comprehensive Plan Revisions and Plan Amendments (this form) 2.The proposed plan revision or plan amendment. 3.A city -wide map showing the location of the proposed change(s). 43he current plan map, indicating area(s) affected by the revision or amendment. 5.The proposed plan map, indicating the subject area(s) of the revision or amendment. 8.3 acres If yes, size of expansion (in acres) D. What is the official local status of the proposed plan revision or amendment? (Check all that apply.) If a report regarding this plan revision or amendment was prepared for the local Planning Commission or City Council please include one (1) copy of that report along with the submittal package. X Acted upon by planning commission (if applicable) on June 13, 200 X Approved by governing body, contingent upon Metropolitan Council review on June 21, 2005 Considered, but not approved by governing body on date. Other (please describe) E. List adjacent focal governmental units and other jurisdictions (school districts, watershed districts, etc.) to which copies of the plan revision or amendment have been sent, and the date the copies were sent to them. (Required by Minn. Stat. 473.858, Subd. 2). City of Oak Park Heights August 3, 2005 Baytown Township .. August 3, 2005 West Lakeland Township August 3, 2005 City of Afton August 3, 2005 City of Woodbury p August 3, 2005 City of Oakdale August 3, 2005 City of Pine Springs August 3, 2005 City of Grant August 3, 2005 City of Stillwater August 3, 2005 Washington County August 3, 2005 SECTION ll: CONFORMITY WITH METROPOLITAN SYSTEM PLANS A. Transportation I .Does this plan revision or amendment potentially increase existing trip generation (use Institute of Transportation Engineers trip - generation manual)? No .. if no, Skip to *5. X Yes .. if yes, &What is the estimated average daily traffic increase? 40 V'PD 6What is the estimated peak hour traffic increase? Inconsequential 2.Does the existing local and regional road network (including metropolitan interchanges) have the capacity to accommodate planned land use(s)? X Yes No , . if no, briefly describe the improvements to local or regional roads or interchanges that will be required to accommodate the planned use(s): Are these improvements included in a Capital Improvements Program? Yes .. briefly describe who will pay for improvements No. . Please explain 3.Does this plan amendment impact transit service or facilities either positively or negatively? X No Yes .. briefly describe 4.Can the potential traffic impacts of the land use be mitigated by implementing Traffic Demand Management (TDM) strategies or through land use and urban design measures that encourage alternatives to single occupancy vehicles (SOV)? X 'No Yes . , please describe (e.g., park & rides, flexible work hours, mixed land uses) 5.1s this proposed land use change located adjacent to a principal arterial or "A" minor arterial? X Yes .. please describe site access to the arterial, and whether location and spacing of the access is consistent with Access Spacing Guidelines: Site access to State Highway 5 has been prohibited by MnDOT. Site access will be via an easement parallel to cSAH 13, and at the existing median break several hundred feet north of the intersection with with State Highway S. S.Does the proposed plan revision or amendment positively or negatively affect pedestrian or bike systems? X No (No direct impact) Yes .. please describe the effects B. wastewater Treatment I .Total flog for community based on existing plan: year 2000: 0.03 million gallons /day (mgd) year 2010: 0.16 million gallonslday (mgd) 2.Total proposed flow for community, based on plan revision or amendment: year 2000: 0.03 million gallons /day (mgd) year 2010: 0.16 million gallons /day (mgd) 3,lf community discharges to more than one metropolitan interceptor, indicate which interceptor will be affected by the revision or amendment. 4.Will flows be diverted from one interceptor service area to another? X No _Yes .. if yes, describe the change and volumes (mgd) involved 5.1s any wastewater flow an intercommunity flow to an adjoining community's sanitary sewer system? X No Yes .. if yes, enclose a copy of the inter - community agreement. S,Has the community adopted a comprehensive program for the management of on -site septic systems? No X Yes Not Applicable .. please explain C. Aviation I.Has the community adopted (in local codes /ordinances) a "notification" element to protect regional airspace? X No Yes 2.Do the proposed changes in the plan revision or amendment involve areas within an airport influence area or airport search area? X No (If no, skip to D. Recreation open Space) Yes .. if yes, please answer "a" and "b a. Do the proposed changes affect the functioning of the airport(s) as defined in the approved airport Long -Term comprehensive Plan? Yes (If yes, please refer to the local plan content requirements as identified in the Aviation Policy Plan.) X No, (If no, go to 2.b.) b. Are the proposed changes in the plan revision or plan amendment consistent with guidelines for land use compatibility and aircraft noise guidelines in the Aviation Policy Plan? X Yes No (If no, please explain D. Recreation open Space I. Does the plan revision or proposed amendment affect existing or future federal, park reserves or trails? X No Yes .. please describe 2. Does the plan revision or amendment include a trail segment in, or a connection to a regional trail or park? X No Yes I1 1. IMPACT ON LAND USE A. overall Comprehensive Plan Update /Revision If you are submitting a plan revision and you are using your own community's land use data, please attach copies of Worksheets A and -Tab 9 in the Local Planning Handbook. D. Plan Amendment Questions 1, 2 and 3 below apply to plan amendments involving a land use change and/or MUSA expansion area. 1 .For the area in the amendment: a. Existing land uses in acres: 8.3 b. Proposed land uses in acres: 8.3 2. For residential use amendments: a. Number of residential dwelling units and types (single, multi- family) involved under existing plan 4 SFD under proposed revision /amendment 0 SFD b. Density under existing plan 4.40 DU /AC under proposed revision /amendment 0 DUTAC c. Anticipated change in the number of students in the school system under existing plan inconsequential under proposed revision lamendment inconsequential state or regional parks, 3. For commercial/industrial/institutional use amendments: a. Square footage of commercial structures under existing plan under proposed revisionla mend ment b. Square footage of industrial structures under existing plan under proposed revision/amendment c. Square footage of institutional structures under existing plan 0 under proposed revision/amendment 35,000 d. Number of employees under existing plan 0 under proposed revision/amendment 15 C. dousing 1 .Will the plan revision or amendment affect the availability of affordable or life -cycle housing in your community? X No (skip to D Environmental Resources) ,Yes .. please describe D. Environmental Resources 1 .Will an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) be prepared for the plan revision or amendment? X No Yes .. if yes, what is the schedule for completion of the EAW? 2. Does the plan revision or amendment affect a state or federal protected wetland? X No Yes . , if yes, please include a map showing the location of the wetland. Describe the type of wetland affected and tell how it will be protected or how impacts will be mitigated. 3.Will the plan revision or amendment potentially affect the quality of any surface water body? X No Yes .. if yes, identify water bodies affected and describe the impacts and planned efforts to protect the water body; 4.Does the plan revision or amendment affect any land in the Mississippi River Critical Area? X No Yes .. if yes, briefly describe relationship to the Mississippi National River and Recreation Area Comprehensive Management Plan 5. If the community has a municipal water supply system, does the local water supply plan meet the requirements of Chapter 186 of 1993 Session Laws? Not Applicable No X Yes .. if yes, will the proposed plan revision or plan amendment affect your water supply plan? No X Yes... If yes, how? The site will become the location of a new 500 - 750,000 gallon elevated storage tank as well as the city Central Garage. 6. Has the community adopted a local surface water management plan? X Yes No .. if no, has the community adopted the council's Interim Strategy to Reduce Nonpoint Source Pollution to all Metropolitan Water Bodies? X No Yes Yes , . if yes, will the proposed plan revision or plan amendment affect your local surface water management plan? X No Yes if yes, how? Ill. IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM A. Will the plan revision or amendment require changes in zoning, subdivision, on -site sewer ordinances or other official controls? No X Yes If yes, when? Upon Met council within 9 months of removal of the Metropolitan council contingency to local approval of the Plan. Describe proposed changes: changes to zoning Map for conformance with new Land Use Plan per State Statute. B, Has your community adopted a Capital Improvement Program (CIP) to implement the initial stages of the proposed plan or plan amendment? No X Yes If yes, what changes will be needed in your community's Capital Improvement Program to implement the plan revision or amendment? None, the central Garage and water Storage Tank are in the current 5 year CIP. F T r r -, Lt - dfa ef Vicinit Map 0 1200 Scale in Feet Tft drawi is t result Cr g wmpoaUon UA re Producfiart of Mad rewrds as I a ppe a r In va rim Wa s h kigion County Dfrfcas The drav ShDU.V be used for referenc ". washlr4an cou to not t=O=Dr an lmmurmUes, & urcs: WA sUrOOft Cou M Su rve of Phone (W) 4304576 Parcel dale basal on AS400 infbrmaUo i I RZIW R20W R19W T32N T3 2N T3 IN T3 I T3 ON nON YOU ARE HERE T29N 729N T28N T28N Tn27N T27N R2 2W R21 w R2j)W Vicinit Map 0 1200 Scale in Feet Tft drawi is t result Cr g wmpoaUon UA re Producfiart of Mad rewrds as I a ppe a r In va rim Wa s h kigion County Dfrfcas The drav ShDU.V be used for referenc ". washlr4an cou to not t=O=Dr an lmmurmUes, & urcs: WA sUrOOft Cou M Su rve of Phone (W) 4304576 Parcel dale basal on AS400 infbrmaUo i I R21 R20W R19W 732N n2N '13 1N 'DIN \NN 73ON YOU ARE ME T30N j T? 9N T29N T28N T29N T27N T27N �' � R22W R21W R20W rye Rn AG Vicinit Map CIO 0 RAD ro \ RAID (Parent Parcel) 0 800 Scale in Feet State Hi 5 f i . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . This drawin Is O)a result of B compitafian and reproduction of land records as [he appear In vailou; VWshIn County offices. The drawing "uM be used for rafarence purposes onl Washl CouN Is not resNrm an Im COL" CJ C & Source: Washin Count Surveyors off". Location Map PhOrte ( 651) 430-687S Parcel data based on AS400 information . ........ . ........ uollowolu! ODVSV un paseq ump ivied � f ayl11D saoRanJnS +Llu sn��ui145eM 3Vwnog deA uogeoo� •salaerrraoeu Aue odsal f �1 �qt� lam sr AwnOO Uvl6u O M ',duo MKOW td l + ' aouaialal 2ol pasn aq pinoi{c Bulmwp aql -saowo 4junoz) uo}5iqt}seM anoper, ul jeadde A941 se spiwoi pvq }o ualznpoidaj pue 1 1 4 uonv3{dwoo a Jo gnsar o4l sl F"Mmp sNJ ■ 1 r i r r r i r I i I N �y jaa ut aleos I ca T 7 7 r sae a L 09 OJ -ed IuWed) 1 '...�. s U J �] CL I le �r C I cn w E)V Ue d Pla U MO2'd M [ rd MZZ'd �N 4� t � 1 x6Z N6ZL r 1 { ROU NOU fJlr i f x l L.i.. H [ EL 1 5 � r ��y�y��}p rr** XZ L.L lZ LL. M6 1'd trtaM MlU �f � � r t ! f I 1