HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002-09-24 CC Meeting Packet EnclosureOak Park Heights
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date SepLetnber 24, 2002
Agenda Item Title DDD, LLC: Amendment to PUD
Time Required 5 Minutes
Agenda Placement New Business
Originating Department /Requestor Planning Commission/Community Development
Requester's signature Kry D
Action Requested Approval with Planning Commission Recommendations
Back ground /justification:
Please be advised that the Planning Commission voted 4 -0 at its meeting of September 12, 2002 to
recommend that the Cit Council vote to approve this project with conditions listed in the enclosed
resolution. Please refer to the enclosed Planner's memo and contact me with an questions y ou may
have at 439 -4439.
S AS HARED \Fonns \COUNCIL ACTION R.EQUE ST.c1oc
RESOLUTION NO. -6
OF THE
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA
A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING FINDINGS OF FACT AND
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL THAT THE
REQUEST BY DDD LLC FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT TO ALLOW
FOR BUILDING AND SITE PLAN CHANGES FOR
CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDING TWO AT
MEMORIAL AVENUE NORTH AND 55 STREET NORTH
BE APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS
WHEREAS, the City of Oak Park Heights has received a request from DDD
LLC for a conditional use permit/planned unit development amendment to allow for building and
site plan changes for construction of Building Two at Memorial Avenue North and 55 Street
North; and after having conducted a public hearing relative thereto, the Planning Commission of
Oak Park Heights recommended that the application be approved with conditions. The City
Council of the City of oak Park Heights makes the following findings of fact:
1. The real property affected by said application is legally described as
SEE ATTACHMENT A
2. The applicant has submitted an application and supporting
documentation to the Community Development Department consisting of the following items:
follows, to wit:
and
and
SEE ATTACHMENT B
3. The subject site is zoned B -3, Highway Business and Warehousing
District in which business warehousing activities are a permitted use; and
4. The proposed site plan changes include incorporating the trash handing
area within a 572 square foot addition to proposed Building Two and removing the eight parking
stalls on the easterly side of the center parking island; and
5. City staff prepared a planning report dated September 5, 2002 reviewing
the request; and
6. The Planning Commission held a public hearing at their September 12,
2002 meeting, took comments from the applicants and public, closed the public hearing, and
made the following recommendation:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL FOR
THE CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS THAT THE CITY COUNCIL RECOMMENDS
THE FOLLOWING:
A. The application submitted by DDD LLC for a conditional use permit /planned unit
development amendment to allow for building and site plan changes for construction of Building
Two at Memorial Avenue North and 55 Street North and affecting the real property as follows:
Be and the same as hereby approved by the City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights subject
to the following conditions:
1. The site plan has been revised to allow for a 572 square foot addition to Building 2 to
allow for trash storage.
2. The parking lot site plan has been revised to eliminate eight parking stalls within the
center parking island.
3. The grading, drainage and utility plans are subject to review and approval of the City
Engineer.
4. The lighting plans should be revised to comply with the lighting standards of the Zoning
Ordinance or the fixtures are removed from the northeast side of Building Two.
5. The landscape plan is subject to review and approval of the City Arborist.
Approved by the City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights this 24th day of
September 2002.
ATTEST:
SEE ATTACHMENT A
Kimberly Kamper, Acting City Administrator
David Beaudet, Mayor
2
Attachment A
Lot 2 Block 'I Kern Center 2nd Addition
Planned Unit Development: Concept Plan /Amended PUD
For: DcD i L L- 1
Application Materials
O Application Form
O Fees
O Plan Sets (3 Large Scale Sets /20 11X17 Sets)
O Written acid Graphic Materials Fully Explaining Proposal /Consistency with City's
Comprehensive Plan
O Mailing List from Washington County (350/150)
O Proof of Ownership or Authorization to Proceed (All Owners)
O Property Tax Statement
Conference With City Staff Upon Application Submittal O 2--,
Required Approvals:
Planning Commission 4/5
City Council 4/5
Limitation on General Concept Plan Approval
Unless a General Plan of Development covering the area designated in the General
Concept Plan as the first stage of the PUD has been filed within twelve (12) months
from the date Council grants General Concept Plan approval, or in any case where the
applicant fails to file General Plan of Development State and Final Plans and to proceed
with development in accordance with the provisions of this Ordinance and of an
approved General Concept Plan, the approval may be revoked by Council action.
and
and
A RECOMMENDING RESOLUTION
OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA
A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING FINDINGS OF FACT AND
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT THE
REQUEST BY DDD LLC FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT TO ALLOW
FOR BUILDING AND SITE PLAN CHANGES FOR
CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDING TWO AT
MEMORIAL AVENUE NORTH AND 55TH STREET NORTH
SHOULD BE APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS
WHEREAS, the City of Oak Park Heights has received a request from DDD
LLC for a conditional use permit /planned unit development amendment to allow for building and
site plan changes for construction of Building Two at Memorial Avenue North and 55 Street
North; and after having conducted a public hearing relative thereto, the Planning Commission of
Oak Park Heights makes the following findings of fact:
follows, to wit:
1. The real property affected by said application is legally described as
SEE ATTACHMENT A
2. The applicant has submitted an application and supporting
documentation to the Community Development Department consisting of the following items:
SEE ATTACHMENT B
3. The subject site is zoned B -3, Highway Business and Warehousing
District in which business warehousing activities are a permitted use; and
4. The proposed site plan changes include incorporating the trash handing
area within a 572 square foot addition to proposed Building Two and removing the eight parking
stalls on the easterly side of the center parking island; and
5. City staff prepared a planning report dated September 5, 2002 reviewing
the request; and
6. The Planning Commission held a public hearing at their September 12,
2002 meeting, took comments from the applicants and public, closed the public hearing, and
made the following recommendation:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING
COMMISSION FOR THE CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS THAT THE PLANNING
COMMISSION RECOMMENDS THE FOLLOWING:
A. The application submitted by DDD LLC for a conditional use permit /planned unit
development amendment to allow for building and site plan changes for construction of Building
Two at Memorial Avenue North and 55 Street North and affecting the real property as follows:
Be and the same as hereby recommended to the City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights for
approval subject to the following conditions:
1. The site plan has been revised to allow for a 572 square foot addition to Building 2 to
allow for trash storage.
2. The parking lot site plan has been revised to eliminate eight parking stalls within the
center parking island.
3. The grading, drainage and utility plans are subject to review and approval of the City
Engineer.
4. The lighting plans should be revised to comply with the lighting standards of the Zoning
Ordinance or the fixtures are removed from the northeast side of Building Two.
5. The landscape plan is subject to review and approval of the City Arborist.
Recommended by the Planning Commission of the City of Oak Park Heights this 12th
day of September 2002.
ATTEST:
SEE ATTACHMENT A
Kimberly Kamper, Acting City Administrator
George Vogt, Chair
2
ii ,
Lo Bk):01( 1 Kerr Centeq 3 itA„.(1._ tion
Attachment A
Planned Unit Development: Concept Plan /Amended PUD
For: Dap'
Application Materials
• Application Form
• Fees
• Plan Sets (3 Large Scale Sets /20 11X17 Sets)
• Written arid Graphic Materials Fully Explaining Proposal /Consistency with City's
Comprehensive Plan
• Mailing List from Washington County (350/150)
• Proof of Ownership or Authorization to Proceed (All Owners)
• Property Tax Statement
Conference With City Staff Upon Application Submittal
Required Approvals:
Planning Commission 4/5
City Council 4/5
Limitation on General Concept Plan Approval
Unless a General Plan of Development covering the area designated in the General
Concept Plan as the first stage of the PUD has been filed within twelve (12) months
from the date Council grants General Concept Plan approval, or in any case where the
applicant fails to file General Plan of Development State and Final Plans and to proceed
with development in accordance with the provisions of this Ordinance and of an
approved General Concept Plan, the approval may be revoked by Council action.
RE:
BACKGROUND
Attached for reference:
Exhibit 1:
Exhibit 2:
Exhibit 3:
Exhibit 4:
Exhibit 5:
Exhibit 6:
Exhibit 7:
Exhibit 8:
NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC.
5775 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 555, St, Louis Park, MN 55416
Telephone: 952.595.9636 Facsimile: 952 595.9837 plarinersranacplantilng.com
PLANNING REPORT
TO: Kimberly Kamper
FROM: Scott Richards
DATE: September 5, 2002
FILE NO: 798.02 -- 02.23
ENCLOSURE 2
Oak Park Heights - DDD LLC Office/Warehouse Building
Conditional Use Permit/Planned Unit Development Amendment
And Site Plan Review
ODD LLC is proposing an amendment to their conditional use permit/planned unit
development to allow for building site plan changes to allow construction of Building 2 of
the project. The project, as approved in 2001, allowed the development to be
constructed in two phases. The applicants have proposed minor site and building
changes to include a slightly larger building to allow for trash storage. The parking lot
would be redesigned to better accommodate access to the loading doors of the second
building.
The applicants are interested in moving forward with construction of Building 2 this Fall.
The first building is in place and is currently fully leased.
Site Plan
Approved Site Plan
Grading, Drainage, and Utility Plan
Building 2 Floor Plan
Building Elevations
Landscape Plan
Lighting Plan
Project Narrative
ISSUES ANALYSIS
Project Request. The applicants have determined that it is not feasible to add onto
the existing trash enclosure located on the north side of the parking lot or construct a
new enclosure on the property. The proposed site plan indicates incorporation of the
trash handling area in Building 2. The trash area has been added onto Building 2 at the
inner corner facing west. That addition will add approximately 572 square feet to the
building footprint.
The trash enclosure for Building 2 had been planned on the south side of the building
near the driveway entrance of 55 Street North. The applicants have indicated that
location does not work from a practical or aesthetic point of view.
The second aspect of this review is that the applicants are requesting to remove the
eight parking stalls on the easterly side of the center parking island. This has been
requested to allow for better access into the doors of Building 2.
Parking. Building I requires 32 parking spaces. Building 2, with the larger footprint,
would require 29 parking spaces for a total of 61 for the site. The site plan indicates a
total of 76 parking spaces. if the eight stalls were removed as requested, the site would
have a seven stall surplus for parking.
Building Design. Elevations of the second building have been submitted
incorporating the building addition. The building will be identical in appearance to
Building I in terms of design and materials.
Grading, Drainage, and Utility Plans. The proposed building addition does not
increase the overall hard cover of the site. The submitted grading, drainage and utility
plans are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer.
Lighting. Lighting plans have been submitted. The fixtures will be identical to those
installed on Building I and are compliant with the Zoning Ordinance. The lighting plan
should be revised to assure that the maximum light at the property line is .4 foot
candles. The light fixtures installed on the northeast building side may not be necessary
and the applicant should consider whether they could be removed.
Landscaping. The submitted landscape plan is subject to review and approval of the
City Arborist.
RECOMMENDATION 1 CONCLUSION
Based upon the preceding review, it is recommended that the conditional use
permit/planned unit development and site plan review for Building 2 of the DDD LLC
project in the Kern Center should be approved with the following conditions:
2
I . The site plan has been revised to allow for a 572 square foot addition to Building
2 to allow for trash storage.
2. The parking lot site plan has been revised to eliminate eight parking stalls within
the center parking island.
3. The grading, drainage and utility plans are subject to review and approval of the
City Engineer.
4. The lighting plans should be revised to comply with the lighting standards of the
Zoning Ordinance or the fixtures are removed from the northeast side of Building
2.
5, The landscape plan is subject to review and approval of the City Arborist.
pc: Kris Danielson
3
1 I3
•r y�
w •• -
131
1 1 .q
f W i1 V i
• C /�
cn - cn
`--
/
1 '
r� L W
r
L1.1
C34 Eli
c: LJ
rNLJJL1J
CI- -, L
L7 L1J Cla CI_
r--k r flc LLf CO CI4
tit
% •
- • 'K--
- ill
jig! e.
k
• j
•
f
1
r 1
r q o W,
tig ' 1
A
_ �i�rr■irkrr.�...� �.- `-- --- �-- --„-- .111..
EXHIBIT 2
,. •
10111.101=1.11.14.1.,
z
UMW
OMNI
ea
a
li
1Z :
1
F. • - - ., I . ti; • • m . 1 j:
1
HI 1
Ii limilmil : ,1 IN
.-i - .;1 P '
I'di i .
,.4.
i ,.
, .:,,.:,..:,:i.,::: j ,,..1
- .1 ' • l' 1
-
,12x x ..
. 4 Fi AA
.
1 ii • Wh 1 .1 - ( IX Ili • II 01111 111 I • • 1. 41 -. '' '... -2.: P.
til if P • it I 11 , 4 iqffigl::ri ,. , n .
§ •
.A
fig:ti i
5 1 1 R- ril Wig 1 filIz 1 I . 1 • .-• t-
in g A, / j . fik- i 5 g7 11 " 2 ---- "I: 7 . ai- • 411- . ' 1 i i, . i .4. . :_u_
_. . ... it ACAS :.. .
1 • • lilt Irk •
1 § gailkdig4 - 1* till i 1 Of 1 11,1 hill ,, AO 110 • -loll'
r ' 1 I ll: • . V §. Ai IL i g I tri '1V-1 I 1 - 7
11 1 2 g)i- .filietA 9t .
1 I 11 11 Ig LI 1th ! i rilill!!!!!! li . ni , j. 1 / : !1 .., t .. 11 . !:4 , 11 . 1 1 11ftily:21A 1 .a iliAllii) ,4 1 1 ! . :: : . ' g i ri lli . :gl . .,
LE1 - _ i i ' i I •
• d d - -4
•
Sulinne 'D711
- .10j 21-11plirlil p9S0clata
40
!, •
L L
. :414
• , - ge`
/
•
4D
. • vlosauultAl lvO
3 •
L _ 1 LJ 13 L
,
;14.: •
1.1111111-1141L
__1.
Lt.
1
5
1
5
Marne ..0-,DE
Stigerfd .0-.D
1.
• in
5
4D
J
b
•
uj
6
ACrlY-,311-000
A
5
1
5
z
0
F
a
z
W
r,
ry
n
•r
C]
N,
1 1 1 I 1
1 1• 11 1 [a
H
1 4G� yO� .0 f �� . a7 i 77 ::PR l c
t2.01 5E- I1 i 1 A i sii U R 5 . i"j ` I: 6i* 3 1 1
a ihk5" w '1 6 r; * :1,1 XM d511 111
e .r a a
III' 2* sn
in2le,j11, 1: n! 5,i'.71)- iNa6
ea' 1M
,111111! 1 .1 1 gav Ptr
O't gir .14 g,11
^ � � w � �� ii: tCK
1;
4,__ ___
? r7 r1-rm-r-r, r -7-r
L 1 t....L_. — 1__L__L_1__ L_.,I..1
I
1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1' 1 I1 ` - 1
111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 .1 I
d Tr.
skim
S x N
8 go
4,42i
N
A 60
84.054
5 g6i Rs
4
AF
gg � U
3
a
8
1
J4 i
g
§ s 411
f gt5 wx4t k
W151 t,11111Tiiil@‘
rise: >r 1:
0� X11/1 ,11i
RI !Ig J r R n +,nn��o a
L%i?
6.gs
Ilgg 2
. !VA:
a
:IX1§
g
G
P •
a
\�
[ 1
l I
1
i
,
i
X
'
- f3lmn! DOO- 11-CJ4\DOD- E1C- 2 -A7.1
•
r . .
•
• 4 •
9D
0
4 i'-3' 4`- t7' ! -r i'
a 0
Q
M
4
n
Mil
iikr�
I .
mili d i•
ii1W,
MIN i
i.l
tit
N
4-5 4'-0'
r- o' 4i ---0'• e' -r 4 i - O '
Ft
i
Go
o
—4 I -4'
0
i ;•
• g4
'4 •
r
JJ
l'4
L.
•
•
- •iis 'i1ft �EI��tfl�!!I[t m��
r
;LA 1
• 2i:e 2 4ri' AtiD`
a
J
' llOr -fl'
17f'ICJ[!
4
;� ' x )t. -: r Buildin
•'. i ?!': 3DD• ;1. C• !1U1.DING #2
ri .: = f . , a#c P iHei Minnesota:
■
• • •[ r•' �� !- Y•- .b�.';iL•' iG7''' :9 {S.�7e��v f S.. -r .. ,'•"
•
- 4• 1-
NV —If
x.- u'•-or
61Z fi
'11
V440
I
. ••
I 1
i;'4L
i
0
q
O .1
Q �
►t`+iti• — :„ci � .:ti.. n: ir? P:+. u4itty:�NSi,F:�rr,v.�.s r+��r; rS[� +'Li- .S ,': r' • .f, �.±lC.r.: ,ii � ,:atc +,��ti+:�.,. � v�•� .r,s•; .' • •a. i r•5,63'•rJ'ti 7..:ti -,i k�k�...i �}.•
•
•
4
,t
t - • 056tIul A�- •'s1y�1aH )fed )PO C a .
.. # .DNICillile *D*11 acmf.-.:j ,1 1
.. , . .,. . „
...-.. 13unpig. pasodoid .•.:.:,• . 1 1 1 !.:
,•
L••
!E:
1
1.
•
•
•
It
dB
x
0
•
f, ri
A
Ui
dB
j
MINIMPOPHE
somman
•
•
•
�e aseuu!W 'sxc 2!aH, Ixed CEO
Z# 2u!pI!n fl• 'YTl• ciao
iO: • SUIPI!nEI posodoii
•
0
H
� pq z '‹ 4.4 r:Q 4-4 1
s
J
x Ask
Q �.
• 1-
n
te
Az
•
GK 4.11- i- '17FTG4o\ -n-im i ryroua[d*
-
August 23, 2002
City of Oak Park Heights
P.O. Box 2007
Oak Park Heights, M' 55082
RE: DDD, LLC Site Plan Revision
Sincerely,
DDD, LLC Officers:
Stephen . ►.. Continenza
Charles ., Siedow
Robert L. White
Philip C. Ohs
S, �ti•,
To Whom It May. Coker:
The following • is why we need to relocate the trash enclosure at our
� �s a list of reasons as to y
construction site located at Highway 5 and 55th Street.
4¢ it will be difficult for the trash hauler ler to access the dumpster on the north end of
the buildingo ti w not what we'd
4� plain view upon entering the parking lot, which is
�� It �
like eople to see upon entering the lot.
p
�# It would be visible from Highway 5 and 55th Street. . .
` enclosure will not work due to Xcel Energy utility
4. Adding on to the existing trash enc
at area. Moving these lines would be a major expense.
lines that run. through th g'
° enclosure should be relocated to would not be seen from
The location we feel the trash enclosur
Highway 5 and blends in well with the building 11d�n which would make it almost unnoticeable
�
� building Pram 5 5th Street. It also would clean up the northeast corner of the b g and allows
very g ood access for the trash hauler.
Your prompt review of 's revision would be very much appreciated!
this
8