HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002-09-24 CC Resolution 02-09-50A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING FINDINGS OF FACT AND
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL THAT THE
REQUEST BY DDD LLC FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT TO ALLOW
FOR BUILDING AND SITE PLAN CHANGES FOR
CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDING TWO AT
MEMORIAL AVENUE NORTH AND 55 STREET NORTH
BE APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS
WHEREAS, the City of Oak Park Heights has received a request from DDD
LLC for a conditional use permit /planned unit development amendment to allow for building and
site plan changes for construction of Building Two at Memorial Avenue North and 55 Street
North; and after having conducted a public hearing relative thereto, the Planning Commission of
Oak Park Heights recommended that the application be approved with conditions. The City
Council of the City of Oak Park Heights makes the following findings of fact:
1. The real property affected by said application is legally described as
SEE ATTACHMENT A
2. The applicant has submitted an application and supporting
documentation to the Community Development Department consisting of the following items:
follows, to wit:
and
and
RESOLUTION NO. QV -Oct -
OF THE
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA
SEE ATTACHMENT B
3. The subject site is zoned B -3, Highway Business and Warehousing
District in which business warehousing activities are a permitted use; and
4. The proposed site plan changes include incorporating the trash handing
area within a 572 square foot addition to proposed Building Two and removing the eight parking
stalls on the easterly side of the center parking island; and
5. City staff prepared a planning report dated September 5, 2002 reviewing
the request; and
6. The Planning Commission held a public hearing at their September 12,
2002 meeting, took comments from the applicants and public, closed the public hearing, and
made the following recommendation:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL FOR
THE CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS THAT THE CITY COUNCIL RECOMMENDS
THE FOLLOWING:
A. The application submitted by DDD LLC for a conditional use permit/planned unit
development amendment to allow for building and site plan changes for construction of Building
Two at Memorial Avenue North and 55 Street North and affecting the real ro ert as follows:
p p Y
SEE ATTACHMENT A
Be and the same as hereby approved by the City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights subject
to the following conditions:
1. The site plan has been revised to allow for a 572 square foot addition to Building 2 to
allow for trash storage.
2. The parking lot site plan has been revised to eliminate eight parking stalls within the
center parking island.
3. The grading, drainage and utility plans are subject to review and approval of the City
Engineer.
4. The lighting plans should be revised to comply with the lighting standards of the Zoning
Ordinance or the fixtures are removed from the northeast side of Building Two.
5. The landscape plan is subject to review and approval of the City Arborist.
Approved by the City Council of th
September 2002.
ATTEST:
Kimberly K - per, Ac ' ng City Administrator
2
David Beaudet, Mayor
Park Heig j s 24th day of
Attachment A
Lot 2 Block 1 Kern Center 2nd Addition
Planned Unit Development: Concept Plan /Amended PUD
For:
Application Materials
• Application Form
• Fees
• Plan Sets (3 Large Scale Sets /20 11X17 Sets)
• Written avid Graphic Materials Fully Explaining Proposal /Consistency with City's
Comprehensive Plan
• Mailing List from Washington County (3501150)
• Proof of Ownership or Authorization to Proceed (All Owners)
• Property Tax Statement
Conference With City Staff Upon Application Submittal o
Required Approvals:
Planning Commission 4/5
City Council 4/5
Limitation on General Concept Plan Approval
Unless a General Plan of Development covering the area designated in the General
Concept Plan as the first stage of the PUD has been filed within twelve (12) months
from the date Council grants General Concept Plan approval, or in any case where the
applicant fails to file General Plan of Development State and Final Plans and to proceed
with development in accordance with the provisions of this Ordinance and of an
approved General Concept Plan, the approval may be revoked by Council action.
A RECOMMENDING RESOLUTION
OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA
A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING FINDINGS OF FACT AND
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT THE
REQUEST BY DDD LLC FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT TO ALLOW
FOR BUILDING AND SITE PLAN CHANGES FOR
CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDING TWO AT
MEMORIAL AVENUE NORTH AND 55 STREET NORTH
SHOULD BE APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS
WHEREAS, the City of Oak Park Heights has received a request from DDD
LLC for a conditional use permit /planned unit development amendment to allow for building and
site p lan changes for construction of Building Two at Memorial Avenue North and 5 5 Street
North; and after having conducted a public hearing relative thereto, the Planning Commission of
Oak Park Heights makes the following findings of fact:
1. The real property affected by said application is legally described as
follows, to wit:
SEE ATTACHMENT A
and
2. The applicant has submitted an application and supporting
documentation to the Community Development Department consisting of the following items:
and
SEE ATTACHMENT B
3. The subject site is zoned B -3, Highway Business and Warehousing
District in which business warehousing activities are a permitted use; and
4. The proposed site plan changes include incorporating the trash handing
area within a 572 square foot addition to proposed Building Two and removing the eight parking
stalls on the easterly side of the center parking island; and
5. City staff prepared a planning report dated September 5, 2002 reviewing
the request; and
6. The Planning Commission held a public hearing at their September 12,
2002 meeting, took comments from the applicants and public, closed the public hearing, and
made the following recommendation:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING
COMMISSION FOR THE CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS THAT THE PLANNING
COMMISSION RECOMMENDS THE FOLLOWING:
A. The application submitted by DDD LLC for a conditional use permit /planned unit
development amendment to allow for building and site plan changes for construction of Building
Two at Memorial Avenue North and 55 Street North and affecting the real property as follows:
ATTEST:
SEE ATTACHMENT A
Be and the same as hereby recommended to the City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights for
approval subject to the following conditions:
1. The site plan has been revised to allow for a 572 square foot addition to Building 2 to
allow for trash storage.
2. The parking lot site plan has been revised to eliminate eight parking stalls within the
center parking island.
3. The grading, drainage and utility plans are subject to review and approval of the City
Engineer.
4. The lighting plans should be revised to comply with the lighting standards of the Zoning
Ordinance or the fixtures are removed from the northeast side of Building Two.
5. The landscape plan is subject to review and approval of the City Arborist.
Recommended by the Planning Commission of the City of Oak Park Heights this 12th
day of September 2002.
Kimberly Kam, Acting`ity Administrator
/6 6 /er
George Vogt, hair
2
Attachment A
Lot 2 Block 1 Kern Center 2 Addition
Planned Unit Development: Concept Plan/Amended PUD
For: £D L L-( 1
Application Materials
• Application Form
• Fees
• Plan Sets (3 Large Scale Sets /20 11x17 Sets)
• Written ar Graphic Materials Fully Explaining Proposal /Consistency with City's
Comprehensive Plan
• Mailing List from Washington County (350/150)
• Proof of Ownership or Authorization to Proceed (All Owners)
a Property Tax Statement
Conference With City Staff Upon Application Submittal / ‚ / ‚
Required Approvals:
Planning Commission 415
City Council 415
Limitation on General Concept Plan Approval
Unless a General Plan of Development covering the area designated in the General
Concept Plan as the first stage of the PUD has been filed within twelve (12) months
from the date Council grants General Concept Plan approval, or in any case where the
applicant fails to file General Plan of Development State and Final Plans and to proceed
with development in accordance with the provisions of this Ordinance and of an
approved General Concept Plan, the approval may be revoked by Council action.
NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CCttdSULTAt+1TS, INC.
5775 Wayzata Boulevard{ Suite 555, St.. Louis Park, MN 55416
Telephone: 952.595.96 36 Facsimile: 952.596.9837 pinnner @nacp1aflr i ng .c om
ENCLOSURE 2
PLANNING REPORT
TO: Kimberly Camper
FROM: Scott Richards
DATE: September 5, 2002
RE:
FILE NO: 798.02 - 02.23
BACKGROUND
Attached for reference:
Exhibit 1:
Exhibit 2:
Exhibit 3:
Exhibit 4:
Exhibit 5:
Exhibit 6:
Exhibit 7:
Exhibit 8:
Site Plan
Approved Site Plan
Grading, Drainage, and Utility Plan
Building 2 Floor Plan
Building Elevations
Landscape Plan
Lighting Plan
Project Narrative
Oak Park Heights -- DDD LLC Office/Warehouse Building
Conditional Use Permit/Planned Unit Development Amendment
And Site Plan Review
DDD LLC is p roposing an amendment to their conditional use permit/planned unit
development to allow for building site plan changes to allow construction of Building 2 of
the ro'ect. The project, as approved in 2001, allowed the development to be
p J
constructed in two phases, The applicants have proposed minor site and building
changes to include a slightly larger building to allow for trash storage. The parking lot
g
would be redesigned to better accommodate access to the loading doors of the second
building.
The applicants are interested in moving forward with construction of Building 2 this Fall.
The first building is in place and is currently fully leased.
ISSUES ANALYSIS
Project Request. The applicants have determined that it is not feasible to add onto
the existing trash enclosure located on the north side of the parking lot or construct a
new enclosure on the property. The proposed site plan indicates incorporation of the
trash handling area in Building 2. The trash area has been added onto Building 2 at the
inner corner facing west. That addition will add approximately 572 square feet to the
building footprint.
The trash enclosure for Building 2 had been planned on the south side of the building
near the driveway entrance of 55th Street North. The applicants have indicated that
location does not work from a practical or aesthetic point of view.
The second aspect of this review is that the applicants are requesting to remove the
eight parking stalls on the easterly side of the center parking island. This has been
requested to allow for better access into the doors of Building 2.
Parking. Building 1 requires 32 parking spaces. Building 2, with the larger footprint,
would require 29 parking spaces for a total of 61 for the site. The site plan indicates a
total of 76 parking spaces. If the eight stalls were removed as requested, the site would
have a seven stall surplus for parking.
Building Design. Elevations of the second building have been submitted
incorporating the building addition. The building will be identical in appearance to
Building 1 in terms of design and materials.
Grading, Drainage, and Utility Plans. The proposed building addition does not
increase the overall hard cover of the site. The submitted grading, drainage and utility
plans are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer.
Lighting. Lighting plans have been submitted. The fixtures will be identical to those
installed on Building 1 and are compliant with the Zoning Ordinance. The lighting plan
should be revised to assure that the maximum light at the property line is .4 foot
candles. The light fixtures installed on the northeast building side may not be necessary
and the applicant should consider whether they could be removed.
Landscaping. The submitted landscape plan is subject to review and approval of the
City Arborist.
RECOMMENDATION f CONCLUSION
Based upon the preceding review, it is recommended that the conditional use
permit/planned unit development and site plan review for Building 2 of the DDD LLC
project in the Kern Center should be approved with the following conditions:
2
1 , The site plan has been revised to allow for a 572 square foot addition to Building
v�
2 to allow for trash storage. .
2. The parking lot site plan has been revised to eliminate eight parking stalls within
the center parking island,
.. plans are subject , The grading, drainage and utility plan to review and approval of the �
City Engineer.
be revised to comply with the lighting standards of the
�. The lighting plans should � y
Zoning Ordinance or the e fixtures are removed from the northeast side of Building
�
2.
5, The landscape plan is subject to review and approval of the City Arborist.
�
pc: Kris Danielson
3
, �
C
40
z
co
u
' •
d d EJ
HO I 4 PI
,s,,
p i!
'11_111A 1
1 ?°'52 gl';
1. 1II! Mil .1114iiiiisql6 4111F,
11 *— /Ein g 411
1 11 111 1 ISLIRIJA p,
1
j c
--------
Zoti74n 1
(
elosautillW i s14 3 1 0 1-1 1.
Z# SuRna •01'1
JoJ 2uffne psodoJd
. 1
•
4ID
f
ta
re
0.
u.<
La a.
• g. 1 •• I
9L-J L_J L J L_.1
0 j
cq
wind
024
z
0
. .
6
I ,
I I
6
6
'A;
im
7.1 •
1111 . •4,1'
7j,1 • Js )1.
I Fai
11111 •
.3 vi r •
aarrn3 ^P.
0
•en
. -ct
-J
a.
411Z4
111
3
1
1
I' "'I"
a- ox < CO
x
v0
w
X
1
6
I
0
4D
A
A
6
1
R A
CV
CD
0
~ w �
rz ai 42
r
O J
F
E `'
rq
3
ELI
Pg
.16
Z
0
0
z.
lA..
z
w
Q
or:
!'7
q7
Qt
N,
IxJ
N
i•
!'r1
fr3
L
L
5 11
1119 *e
VC
gl
g rIg
Pqd
L J
--- f ' Y z" 47.-27.'7:: Y
___ - _- 4.._ +_ 4-- 1__1:__4.4;
1 •
1 1' 1 1 i i
1
I
I 1 ; I
f c� 4 1,1
■
1 1 1 1 1 aZ 1= 1
L L ...J
I
❑❑ -- 1 7 q I x t RzCg i w CC U - M G A S p i a .y C i ,,5 g X
❑ i1 P ti C tli N � L1 L S
i p.
PP 9 il .0,-, i 'i 2 ; ,i6 'C ' , ,,,x e, in ----
t''''° I tl ; i 1 1 0 1.3-- 15 '. g -c r7$ E i
E _ t3 i ,, >4
S , a
si - ° v y g o � �� til
iiillig i I' : i h I � i .' i I E§ gym gi
J 1 1i% .�J at, �d r s !
I tie-
illh I Ii - %; E. i a ; „ .i
•.- v' t ^r^ r--- s �� n x i i
15
1'
L.. L J
fl'` "' r r -r -r r i r 77-r
1 1
; , L _ 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 k1 1:
i j I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 !1 • 1 I
, - !r
wy
_ I vQ..5Atilutt
xs !
0
a c °
a 6 .
$
IX 5
is 0 Z '6
N µ F le
Ix 0
-15W*6
ri M M f t!
EA
1
c
a
r
y ■
E
Xg
Ehig
• e
•
old
5- 6
I tiq v
3 4§
L otk.L4
4
by
e.
E G
i g b
1 1 , 411P
a� 4 w w 4$ 4 a a
1 S
IDA
mi ' t iri : V. a
1 0
�
tux
:Flon tx. DOD-11C12V100-L.LC-2-AP-OM
)
. . •
• •
14; !,•
1 ,
jO
t
C •
z
2
2
•
52
4
.e0
4
4
90
0
Aft
emesmear
wwwwwn 177 111
Jr.
glean 1MM.M. 11.16.111,11.1Mli
1/4
1/4
4
4
WM.
111
IN
g
1:1
•
a
11111 gulp
3
wwwwi - 1101011.1101,,,MIki.L16,
0 0
0
®
•e-o• V-a 4 r-e• s•-tr. 4.-er -3;ir-e• 4 fr-2r 4
0
12
36 -V
• •
Oaic iHeight g Winnesota: •
- • • • ,
• .1 •
0
0
•
4
t,cek ikRa .�:••c:ay >J •
•
dB
` . a b . 5 i
; • 1 I h
•
ti
; 100u11yv - 'S1LJ !9H )P d )ep
• n F
Supppp e. pasodo id
5i
• • t
n •I•
I I
1•
!l:
ili
•
to
.
L
i
.LL._
-n
t � �
E jaw
2 Ca
.
w
Jj •;
j I
,JA6•W -•Z - a- l-- OdG%,,f0 1 - AGO :awavaRJ
1111111111P
�ive pr y ,YPwC p, • ri
prr. PkrA►s S��t
rx
:s ib.- ,•IJr.�L . . 7
MOM
•
-N � M 2:& f � �� �{',r�`" - ''+ '��� c .t � , y � � r �z� y� 'Cn ' '� �s r e i tl��a+4 4 ` a + yr r•ti r`iS+ Y;` fly' fir. i. �� �� f�_ ..s .� =r.•j� i�``°'�•
r�G -�"i ;` � e� s,�;`-'�%���• pit }�t� �r�r +' �i*�; •� +," i�? rl�•w ! � �;�
'C:: I L`>�� a: FE �t .r• t +:l �aT ,-C t;. .rti
,v: � }L��i��' f' �l• R.�~3 t .r. 5, -„A.W. �.{:'� �� �, [},,_ tit ✓ .y
j�l ��r" �l_ t..:. c'.' d.'.. i5bl �.. a- a,- a!}_' �iFti� 'YYil..i'i.:•�s•�r.`"�1tk... SCL!ri:�">'�M1�
:1 •F' •'
u;
f
-
Q). .
m
0
z
•
.
• . .
•
r
tte
" l � ' � r��`y :. +•3iYY1f• lr f• -u �,,,,,,��,f}}f''�• ;!' ..L
_' Y�s• ;'�• ^r iS ?.r.d. 1• .1��f • ���tiLA.. -s
•
It..�tc y
xi�C�7:ay.Lti r�rtL. .5. i q
• �
;k';i ? s��
' i i =a te, YP
ti
•
•
.r:
Wifr
S JA.W :r • V r
.i
i 1►s xYSf • 1G
•• f i r R
mii
i
� f s a� 'rc•� r. �
Li •j.Yy . -�rr'r
r l r. • �dh
'
•
9 11E11
•
� osauu1 ' s 42!aH, >rEa
Z# �r
2u!pI!na. ° aaa
jo J . Su!pI!fg pasodoad
•
• •
•
h
go
•
V y
z
0
z
oacro- z- TaT0bovia -n-640 :vwauva
August 23, 2002
City of Oak Park Heights
P.O, Box 2007
Oak Park Heights, MN 55082
RE: DDD, LLC Site Plan Revision
To Whom It May. Concern:
Sincerely,
DDD, LLC Officers:
Stephen A. Continenza
Charles A. Siedow
Robert L. White
Philip C. Ohs
•:�••�:
• is to why we need to relocate following ��s a list of reasons as � ate the trash enclosure at our
construction site located at Highway 5 and 55th Street.
• hauler to access the dumpster on the north end of
• �t will be difficult for the trash haule
the building. ` s not what we'd
in plain view upon
it would be 1n pia entering the parking lot, which �
like eo le to see upon entering the lot.
4. p p
It would be visible from Highway 5 and 5 5th Street. 0 .
ure will not work due to Xcel Energy utility
• 1�►.dd�. on to the existing trash enclosure Adding � i
these lines would be a major expense.
lines that run through. that area. Moving
• should be relocated to would not be seen from location we feel the trash enclosure ` eahle
• •th the building which would make it almost unnoticeable �a�r 5 and blends in well � g lows
� corner of the building and al
from �
5th Street. It also would clean up the northeast corn
ve rygood access for the trash hauler.
Your prompt review of this revision would be very much appreciated!
EXHIBIT 8
s
t!+`?'' Sq '��'urn`
i'
==,`
K.