Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001-04-24 CC Meeting Packet EnclosureOak Park Hei Re q uest for Council Action Meetin Date: A Item Title: Estimated Time Re A Placement: Ori g inatin g Department/Re Re q uester's Si Action Re Back cation: Please refer to enclosed Planner's Report Financial Implications Bud g et: Bud g eted: Administrative Recommendation: Approve Denial Comments: April 24, 2001 DDD, LLC-: PUD, CUP and Site Plan Review 5 Minutes New Business Communit Development Approval with Plannin Commission Recommendations No Recommendation SAS HAREDTormACOUNCIL ACTION REQUEST.doc NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS-, INC* 5775 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 555, St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Telephone: 952.596,9636 Facsimile: 952.595.9837 planners nacplannln -co - T - t AJXJ TO: Tom Melena FROM: Scott Richards DATE: April 18, 2001 RE: oak Park Heights — DDD -W- Office/Warehouse Building; CU P1PU D and Site Plan Review FILE NO: 798.02 — 01.02 Please be advised that the Planning Commission, at their April 12, 2001 meeting, voted unanimously to recommend approval of the Conditional Use Permit/Planned Unit Development and site plan for two office /warehouse buildings at the intersection of Memorial Avenue and 55 Street North. The Planning Commission also recommended unanimously that the City Council grant flexibility as part of the PUDICUP to consider the front of the lot to be that side abutting Memorial Avenue North. The structures proposed would consist of a 14,500 square foot building to be constructed as Phase 1 on the westerly portion of the lot. The eastern portion of the site is proposed to contain a building that is 12,500 square feet in size and will be constructed in Phase 2. Other than the applicants, no members of the audience spoke at the public hearing. The Planning commission questioned if the applicants had addressed the stormwater drainage issues with the applicable watershed district. Representatives of the Valley Branch and Browns Creek Watershed Districts had indicated that if the site is developed below 55% hardcover, no additional parking would be required. The site plans have been designed at just under 55% with an optional ponding site. The Planning Commission recommended the C U PIP U D and site plan review with the conditions listed in the Planning Report. Additional clarification on the landscape plan condition was also added. In addition, a motion was made and approved to recommend the City Council grant flexibility as part of the PUDICUP to consider the front of the lot to be the side abutting Memorial Avenue North. The conditions are as follows: �. The city council grants flexibility to consider the front of the lot to be the side abutting Memorial Avenue North. 2. Building elevations are revised to note the proposed colors of the painted concrete block and trim. The primary color must be a soft, warm, earth tone. Color samples must be submitted for City review and approval. 0. Building #2 is revised to include at least one stepped back break in the fagade that is similar to Building #1. 4. The landscape plan for the entire property including all phases is subject to review and approval of the city Arborist. Further review and approval of the landscape plan by the city Arborist will be required for that area identified for ponding if the watershed District determines that the stormwater pond is not required. Landscaping must include screening of trash enclosures and loading areas. 5. Details of the proposed wall lights are submitted and are compliant with Section 401 .15.7 of the Zoning Ordinance. 5. wall signage must not exceed 64 square feet for each business. If a monument sign is proposed, plans must be submitted showing that the sign does not exceed 50 square feet. the plans are subject to City review and approval. 7. All grading, drainage and utility plans shall be subject to review and approval of the city Engineer. 8. Watershed District approval is required. 9. A phasing plan is required and is subject to City review and approval. 10. If Phase 2 does not begin within three years of PUD approval or if the plans substantially change, approval of Phase 2 will be cancelled and the project must go through the review process again. 11. A development agreement will be required between the City and developer subject to review and approval of the city Attorney. 12. Comments of the Planning Commission, city Council and other City staff. Motion: The Planning commission recommended that the city Council grant flexibility as part of the PUDICUP to consider the front of the lot to be the side abutting Memorial Avenue North. pc: Kris Danielson 7w i lelosauuI 'SI49laH JJ'Rd )LO m k < CL .7 I ❑G (I G LU < x < u -j jo Suipp pasodM ki 6 6 W -C > it jV x t! w C , Lz-- z to x m = k --w j [7 Y Al .V :: Cc mamm SL E & ko 0 4T t c -, rn �o 0 0 0 0 �0 0 CD ci cr A F5 n I' :5 ' Cl �7, L A k A v I' tl w fr) CL 4 t � g, i—1 t.j us Lo ` er g C2 jq I Cl Lj 0 0 U © Uj k, 0 T LU ca lk 11 uj CL . ... ........ Hi -U."> En U) J, LA 01 LJ '- m '. -c WON ,A . . . . ....... 04 T 1I t I k u c tA cr Q MOO f 0 =lln W 0 a- m N, 7 fi r] prl Cc, 43 LA p A 1101 V9 e, 6f 110.10N ZZ 0 kv & . - L � Vi I A En U) J, LA 01 LJ '- m '. -c ,A m I k u c k A S En U) J, LA 01 LJ '- m '. -c I YYA CLI L IrR ----------- m I YYA CLI L IrR -----------