HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001-04-12 BRAA Comments Kris Danielson
From: Pootler Denniam1 .con]
Sent: Thursday Apr 12.2OD13:31 PM
To: Scott Richards (E-mail); Kris Danielson (E-mail)
Cc: Jay Johnson (E-maiH; Jim Butler (E-me|; Kathar O.Widin Kimberly Kemper(E-
rneU J Vieri (E-ma|); Thomas PW.Maleno(E-ma|U
Subject: Rainbow Foods Fuel Station, OOOLLC.and S PCS Tower
Scott/Kris:
I've had echance to review these plans, and offer the following comments:
Rainbow Foods Fuel Station
|n relation to Item Numbers 5,8. and 11. under Analysis - Conditional Use
Permit of Scott's 4/5/O1 Planning Report Item Numbers 1.,
7. and 2., respectively, under Cono|uo1on/Recomn mend otion):
5. Drainage -| spoke with Leon [>patzofRLK Kuum1sto. and heindicated FIL�� Cap y -~
that they will be installing their own storm water catch basin with e
hazardous material trap prior totying into the existing storm sewer. They
will be reshaping the site to drain to this new catch basin. We do
recommend modifying the existing outlet structure for the Pond south of this
site adjacent to 58th Stnoet, to prevent direct access of potential fuel
spillages into the City's storm sewer system. RLKoan design their own type
of skimmer structure for our meviovv or we can provide them with several
alternatives.
8. Fuel Pumps -VVe will review these details when they are made
available.
11. Vehicle Access ' The vehicle access/modifications are acceptable as
proposed. Traffic flow to/from the parking lot aisle directly east of the
proposed station will obviously be altered, but the effect should be fairly
insignificant. VVedo recommend installing yellow marking lines along the
north and south edges of where the existing bituminous will be joined (i.e.,
lines go in east-west direction along the center of the parking lot aisles),
to delineate the fuel station area and driving lanes.
OOOL.LC.
In relation to Item Number 7. under Conclusion and Recommendation of Scott's
4/5/01 Planning Report regarding Grading, Drainage and Utility Plane: /
�
The grading plan is acceptable as submitted.
°
The drainage area map and storm vvater/ponding calculations are
acceptable emsubmitted.
�
The sanitary sewer and water services proposed are acceptable as
submitted. VVe recommend the hydrant |ocation(e)be verified with the Fire
Department to verify adequate coverage.
�
The internal storm sewer that serves the "triangu(ar' parking area
is acceptable assubmitted. We recommend that on Emergency Overflow (EC)F)
hz the north ba maintained at an elevation no higher than 941.5O.
CurnenL|y, if storm water were to back up in this onae. the lowest overflow
elevation isQ42.83+ho the north (the easterly building finished floor
elevation ioQ42.5O).
8phntpC8
No specific engineering comments. \Ne assume the specific location was
chosen tobeaa inconspicuous os possible (tucked into trees aa far aa
possible). Wf this ie not the case, it may make more sense to locate the
tower slightly farther south or southeast on more level ground to keep it
out of the oiope/swa|e.
Dennis M. Poat|er
�