Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002-05-14 CC Meeting Packet Enclosure Oak Park Hei Re for Council Action + ��_s :� � � p -1 4 Meetin Date Ma - 14, Z A Item Title McKean S East/Re for Shared Services Time Re 10 Min. A Placement Old Business FILE Copy Ori Department/ Re Administratio Kimber_l Kam per Re Si Action Re Receive Information and Take Appropriate Action Back Justification (Please indicate an previous action, financial implications includin bud information and recommendations) . S: \ SHARED \Forms \ COUNCIL ACTION REQUEST. doc Cit of Oak Park Hei Report on the Valle Senior Services Alliance (VSS.A) Re for Consideration for a Joint Powers or Shared Services A for McKean S East Submitted to the Oak Park Hei Cit Council Ma 14, 2002 Authors/Contributors: Kimberl Damper, Actin Cit Administrator Mark Vierlin Cit Attorne Scott Richards, Cit Planner Denru's Postler, Cit En Kris Darn" elson, Commumt Development Director Ja Johnson, Public Works Director Background and Request At the March 12, 2002 City Council meeting Valley Senior Services Alliance requested that the City Council consider a joint powers or shared services agreement for services as part of it's application for McKean. Square East. The City Council made a motion to direct City staff, attorney, planner and engineer to prepare a report providing pros and cons and the City's options on such a request. (Attachment 1) The proposed McKean Square East project is located in Baytown Township. The development is proposed as a continuation of the Boutwells Landing project located in the City of Oak Park Heights. McKean Square East is 21.5 acres and is proposed to include a 110 unit independent living facility and nine one -plea units. On April 9, 2002 the City received a fax from Valley Senior Services outlining specific elements that they would like to have included in a joint powers or shared services agreement for McKean Square East (Attachment 2). The correspondence explained further details related to McKean Square East, including the installation of public streets. ' In order to maintain consistency between the two proposed developments in Oak Park Heights and Baytown Township, VSSA has recognized that variances may be requested for setbacks, etc. Park dedication fees would be paid to Baytown Township and the parkland would be open to the public with Baytown Township and the owner providing the maintenance of the parkland.. Telephone, Internet and related services would be provided through Boutwells Landing's current system. The following is a listing of elements that VS SA would like to pursue as part of a joint powers or shared service agreement: 1. Request that water and sewer be provided through Oak Park Heights per the Joint Powers Agreement. 2. Police service may be requested through Oak Park Heights police department with agreed upon compensation or the Washington. County Sheriff. 3. Fire protection provided by the City of Bayport as is currently contracted by the City of Oak Park Heights and Baytown Township. 4. 911 and emergency response to be determined by police service, either being Oak Park Heights police department or Washington County Sheriff. 5. Building permit and the inspection process would tape place through Oak park Heights. Given the request for various services from the developer the City of Oak Parr Heights will need to consider if it is in the best interest of the city to eater into several contracts for service, including water and sewer, building inspection and police. Minnesota State Law A. City may enter into a joint powers agreement or enter into various contracts for services. Pursuant to Minnesota State law, the City of oak Park Heights may not regulate the utilization or enforcement of fees on its municipal services that are extended beyond it boundaries. Therefore, any form of regulation or enforcement would have to be by way of a joint powers or shared agreement with the jurisdiction into which those services would be extended. In general, a joint powers agreement must be between two governments that share the power in common (M.S. 471.705). other contracts for service may be entered into between governmental units or between the city and an individual, a business or a non -- profit organization. PIisto The concept of annexation is often explored when development needs require the decision of whether or not to provide services. In 1999, the City of oak Park Heights adopted an Annexation Policy. The policy states "The City of oak Park Heights will not independently petition or initiate for annexation of property outside of the City limits. All property for annexation must be requested by the property owner of the area in question. All costs of said petition and annexation request must be borne by the petitioner." Given this policy the City would not annex the parcel of land unless the property owner requests or unless the policy is modified. Once a municipality has agreed to extend its services, such as utilities, outside its boundaries there is little incentive for a property owner or a Township to discuss or agree to annexation. In Minnesota communities may negotiate for an orderly annexation agreement or annexing a property by ordinance. As the parcel of land is less than 60 acres for the proposed McKean Square East development, oak Park Heights could not declare the land ann exed by ordinance unless the property owner petitions for annexation. It is staff's understanding that the current property owner is not willing to petition for annexation or sell the land to VSSA if they intend to annex. The statute on annexation by ordinance outlines the formula for sharing of property taxes between the Township and the City. For orderly annexation, the Township and City can negotiate a sharing of tax revenues over the annexation period. The Annexation Policy also addresses many of these same issues. Oak Park Heights provides limited water and sewer service to areas outside of its boundaries. However, these services are being provided by default not by design. The City provides water and sewer services to the Washington County Government Center and its surrounding area as well as some sharing of services in the Sunnyside area. over the years, providing water and sewer services to areas in the City of Stillwater has proven to be a chore for City staff. Constant monitoring of flow and usage is required to ensure that the City is properly billing the users. Many times residents are confused when they receive a bill from oak Park Heights when they reside in the City of Stillwater and vice versa. a. City -s -- ptions The City of Oak Park Heights has the option to do the following given the request for a joint powers or shared service agreement; 1. Enter into a Joint Powers .Agreement or'Contract for Service Agreements for all City Services. 2. Enter into a Joint Powers Agreement or Contract for Service Agreements for Selected City Services. 3. Igo not enter into Joint Powers Agreement or Contract for Service Agreements. There are several factors, both positive and negative, that the City Council will need to consider before entering into a joint powers or shared services agreement to provide services outside of the oak Park Heights municipal boundaries: The City has a unique opportunity i n assisting V.S. S .A. with the completion of its Boutwells Landing development. From a land use perspective that ignores jurisdictional boundaries, the proposed site plan is favorable. The setting proposed for the independent living facility provides a natural setting with good proximity to the Autu Hills Park and the plain campus of the B outwells Landing development. The trail systems, existing wetlands and garden plaza will add to the amenities of the entire project while providing a buffer for Township residents to the east. The City has limited potential of generating additional funds by providing and charging for their various requested services. The City has the opportunity to work jointly with a governmental jurisdiction (Baytown Township). 0 Expansion of the City Police and Building Inspection services may require additional staff for the City of Oak Park Heights in order to meet the additional service demands. The Township would be required to adopt several regulatory ordinances as a result of entering into any form of a j pint powers or shared services agreement. The regulatory ordinances would address water and sewer facilities, building inspections, fire suppression systems, and related development matters by the jurisdiction in which the facilities would be proposed to be built. However, should that jurisdiction. decline to enforce the terms of the joint powers agreement, or modify or change their ordinances patterned after the City of Oak Park Heights so as to disable them from collecting revenues, water rates, sewer rates, etc. the City would have no effective enforcement mechanism other than to enter into litigation against the jurisdiction for breach or non- performance of the joint powers or shared service agreement. In effect, this would place the City at considerable risk in the advent of non - performance of the neighboring jurisdiction and also, places the community at risk in the advent that the neighboring or adjoining political subdivision, which is a township, should ever be incorporated or annexed to another governmental unit whose governing body may not share the same philosophies or wish to be bound by or enforce the terms and provisions of the joint powers agreement. There would be a potential loss of revenue consisting of park dedication fees, sewer, water and storm sewer connection fees, and the lack 'of tax revenue generated from the property over which the development was made possible by the City of oak Park Heights to the extent that it was located beyond the city borders. All of the access for McKean Square East would be from roadways within oak Park Heights. Most, if not all of the services, shopping, parks and recreation for McKean Square East residents would be provided within or by the City of oak Park Heights. The City should not agree to a joint powers or shared services agreement whereby all of the tax benefits would go to the Township and all of the expense of servicing the property and its residents would be borne by the City. With regard to the request for fire protection service, if in the future years the City of Oak Park Heights and the proposed neighboring jurisdiction would ever cease using common services for fire protection, the subject area could be the victim of some degree of confusion between fire service providers in the event of an emergency or service call. 0 Police functions and prosecutorial enforcement would differ between the oak Park Heights Police Department and the Washington County Sheriff's Department, which now provides criirinal enforcement for the unincorporated areas of Washington County inclusive of Baytown Township. This could cause confusion for the residents. There would also be confusion of service changes as well as confusion could occur at the time of elections for persons residing in the VSSA development in Baytown Township as they would have to be directed to Baytown electoral services as opposed to Oak Park Heights services when the balance of the development would be served by and provided with election services from the City of oak Park Heights. In addition to the initial development and the future development of the site, once water and sewer facilities were extended, they would be subject to Washington County or the Baytown Township Building Department, who would not be familiar with or accustomed to oak Park Heights development issues as it affects water and sewer capacities, fire suppression systems, etc. as the same may be impacted by future modifications, additions or other building changes that would occur over the years. Conclusion It appears to staff that there is no regional planning, local land use planning, engineering, public safety, or economic reason of benefit to the taxpayers of the City of oak Park Heights that would support or justify the request that this city extend its municipal services beyond its border. The individual desires of a current landowner to have his land remain in a particular political jurisdiction are certainly an expression of his desires but the same has no bearing in an analysis of a long term policy decision that would have the significant negative impact to the taxpayers of this community for generations to come. This city's short and long --term interest is primarily in providing municipal services efficiently and directly to the citizens and taxpayers who have built and maintain its infrastructures and to whom the city staff and council are directly responsible. Additionally there appears a significant opportunity for differences and confusion in the provision of any services beyond city boundaries that would compromise existing administrative processes within the city and further impair or limit the time and resources necessary to serve existing residents of Oak Park Heights. • r �' S • '• s - •t� 1 . V e ; - '. i i fi �} n �} o rye+ . • .■ , • J + *; � 3��V, � �7L+Y V�irL�I ;VF �i��r�.��Vi! � 4 • � y F • � • , ' .. � . � • ; � q , � , . S + . ,,,, �.. �;'�' w2�'znnesota S..I 4 • �. • , ° . • ' . , • f , , , . 14) 631'6156. y ■ r • y r 1) 631-6108' •. a r , L • a' + 1 i •• q AN � a IF ■ 1 ` ; r • r • A a rc h, .• ` !•• , . 1 • , . , •1 w . . ' ` .' r r ' T " • I 7, -2002' • ' . ' • .% , • ' : " • • • Honorabld Mayor David Beaudet -gild • ; . • :.. ...; ' .. .. •' ' ' • Council Membe' of,The City of Oak R�rt.H6ights �•' • .. , -• t , '• ' • , : - . r, • f 8 Qak:Park 'forth { , -. ,oak Park Helghts, 'Ml 55082 -2007 , '.. ' • .• ".. . M. • ti . • • • ♦ �. • , • A �• , • , :� • _ Dear Mayor arid. CounQil Nle' mbers: •� �; 4 : ' ' Ip .. . 1 • •' ' ' e'' se ` for 8eivices Affiance SSA is re ' uest`in • ponsi de'r tide o a� va l 1. Y _ rr f . f . • . t • • : _' �• Joint. Powers.&- Shared services Agreement fdr'service5 as 'part of it? • . , p . • a l�icatipn afar ,l�lckean Square fast .• . 4 . r • r ' • : •' ' ��' . .. ply . As -you kn��nr,. vss1 'is'part•of five sep agate- applicalions designed to d ress � �i�d fi• if it same of 11.e ob Gtiv s 'a�utlined �by t 'C ity 'of oak lark • . ` • 1 • ' ; 1 • f • 4 He :ants on I'and located to the north .and' ea`' f•'of 'l3dutwells Landing. • These ■ ' • r ' �•: . app �•ictions are . shed�led••te' work them; ay �throuh, the city processes �•' ; :• . �� over th next several weeks■ one of the key eleme•nfs,of this deverlopment.a v ■ a #•' • . o is� clean Sq uare.,Ea`st:� • • ' •' • 'u A, • �McKban sq uare •Ea'�t is a 20 --acre .site tocated in ',Baytown T�wrtishlp but , . • ' • imrnediately;cont toes with •l�oUti�rells •Landing,borde`red on'thebe st,and - •' r' a • p ` ' ` south sidl s . It n d Q0rrently iih- l36utWells•.Land ■� some of tl e e le rnerif� Q •• `° i clw6d injlhis�deve'loprpentare indeip-en'dent living, *n' •homes, an • a ` • large park'are', which would by desi pied' as a •learning % center' , ' w '~This center wOuld.Jnclude, plantings indi en�us -to, this area norr to ' • � � : • • s: •� • p. g g p •. " p 'deve•lo meat in ludin' thin s,like' raide rass tre rou, in ` etc, along ., . g p ! r s with .ex0Ia' n ins' and •walking ,trails that Oak park Heights ,residents Can • •, 1 , ; .. '' enjoy.- of t e of+" eve oping Mclean Spare as't`ir �, , . p'additional arkland•cennecte -1 bytrails'to'the currehf Park Heights ` s stem any eventual) " leadin • �.in o the high •s.checI e Vironmental learn' �. . r •■ Y g. gl g center VSSA has sin.oplion to acquire this acid but one of the conditions is • ' s that ' it remain•in Bay town `frown 'sh "• , ,• ■ '• ' i + o ' t'w eceive indication of rdur pe'rsp ective son a. Joint �s �r�p �tant tha . r y . T P owers or Shred SeMces� A reement as it si nificantl influences - the bat% nce. Qf the d�velo n�ent•that has be,en�.subn�itte"d for our cansideratjona • p Y. . We understand that there are other similar situations in e'ffitct oak Park 00 ! Ik 4 , a non - profit collaborative eF�'ort'o akevietiv Hospital, Qroixdate Residence &. Apartments, and Presb Homes � Services L T Y r{ y 4 1 gre�� 1 =e� otr t F,owe0s A ` • . • ° `� t , • • T _- • ! r , i / , Pa 2 6f Hei •.hts whiBro services• are shared between -different munici ali ibs • � • . p t we ' ". :. Woul .like your ,ccnsideration-t� hams a.sin��i r kind • a' � r�Orner t t {''� locatlC3n ,.. • , a r ,BaAown Tow' n "h" 'rs' a so�in1�& rocess'of%considerin this deve�� rnent. .. _ �. • • s;a the idea nas •been introduced to them arid applications have also •hden ... . • submitted f6r'th&Ir consideration.! We are - ho eful that ��re uest *es A 'for a ;point ' p q . . .. ' ' . r , • • Powers; or Shared Se Ac rr ent. i�1 . ais c. rrte�from Ba • own - ' • r . ' . Township as part of their review ,process. We anticipate; that this revibw gill: , • ' • . he completed •in thei net'`feir ninths +•, • , :i • ' 'r • - .. . ■ ' . ■ . f ou • have ' u stions or vi ou id ke additio ' • ' r . y q • nalr �nfermation, phase .conte ct • • . "' . .. •' �• one at Q l 631 1 `• r : •. ` . , ..: ,', ; , �- ' . y , • e r . d • • • ' .. - Dan Undh • r , r 1 ' CEO /Rr'e` s ident• .- Y • • • , • • , r / • +, + J 44 4 r ' d , • r 1 r a 1 . ■ , • f rr � a • r , • . a r 1 W � + •� r r 1 1/ a S • � r • ,r . a • I 1 a , e , • r r C e . r i t r4r Ia AN 0�� • r n• V: ,. ` r w v v r v r V a ] • try .d ■ ..•■ ,q . �. �■ � aoa w .� ' 7 �r i { iiri� i� d � ��".�. #,13. i� g �t� D� �F � 0•� a d■ a o a MR T A • r DESCRIPTION p ' Z 1 r f ■ The North Quaxer of the Norv�west QU,mr Of the Southem Quluticr of Sect P 29 Nort, Rxn �4rV�st, �shiq�t ��Ota. A4o, the West 220,00 ft:et of the x of the cth� t Quarter ' Q uzrter of sidd r i�an 5, r r of th e Southey'; { Also, that p� of tb6 aokjthwe� �ur�er 4ofthe orthwest uar°ter of the said 1 . ��t ter of th r y aid W1016 l�r Orthe Plat OfB�i►'� - ZMV? ' FOODS 3RD IDI - r(O ��t� �� tom' �e , plot on file in the r��ev afthro corny Rel' waswpst cow NrIme Bn(i lying WeStOrl Of the f'0)luMn Y� COMMMCIAS at tea nort�wes# wMe of t 1, BlPgq Z Ofsaid )MYTOWN WOODS y d r, a Mi;1Utc6 3 s =nd3 csL �ng oriented to d plat, along the . oaerly h1le 0f $214 PW to tat, nartEwmt carv of Yq North dcdtc%t4t3 �n " 'd Ian �n� . �V�itt� the POInt Qf bc8'n)ia8 of the line to be desorib td; thence NQdh 06 $ 33 mutes 24 sewe fast 729.06 feel a � Oe eta N � #� ���rt� 3� nuunuttz 0 s�r.,onds Bast m.7a r 1 the IL rth fad uthwes Quarter of'the NorthwOt 'Or Of the SOV140t Quarto and mid line there t i The tom mee orthki ovc d ribed par s l5 19.68 t4rr art: or Im, Su* ct tjO a ternPOmry vul-do "Ur, citsement FQr reed u o 4 1; �� " � r 840490. On bite � � "� � � � �����t ��� d of to said ofGo of the County "Order, a 4 p 9 P • • a t 4 � r�7/ V'lrl � ►4wV N0 ifY7 � s.I M A N m _� rn MY td tp � til!'tN�l'� �l�1lD .gyp ryfia Syr Z LA o,�� J 8 �, +a m aws . al -4 " , 14 C cm z e5 -0 LA 4A.-i 4 HI M r n a rn cR "' I N 0 g .. tn bow . .� m c7 q 0Z 0 00 C-) > �t �� tmo . 0 L m ,..,. 0 ril � < ' rTl , �cn c t OHM . Zrn rn c 0 r A SO • -� W �i U� 4r N n • � m� n n� y z� � m cn 3 '° o rn rq a e k x 4 � a K a r SHEET I of r [[ Prime f . ❑ ❑Cll ❑❑ ❑ ❑©❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ D ❑ 0 a ° 4 Q i ' o a C � y 4 �fIQ Lti Q o Q ❑ ©gyp ,� ... c , a n ❑ o b a , a rn a sn t o ro 0 . N r•.1 � 0• 3 r � ' C � • rr BOUTWELLS LANDING MCKEAN SQUARE EAST ^� VICINITY INFORMATION PLAN � 3 Sw D-W 02/22/2002 lsat W- M SNYDER & ASSOCIATES � � 2mn "s ? " w "a 102 -812 m l 1'�R� /Rlfiigi ►c..1+1Yt7iAiw.rti � . f � r' r n � x 7S I 1 � C o 9 14, C 9 BQUTWELLS LANDING - McKEAN SQUARE EAST MAU a ►, w EMSTiNG CDND PLAN ►°,. v +�d�w1+Lw dL.F n+tK GZ/Z�R00� xcri sk r SNIDE ASSO an�� I �sm L�.,�.�,�� M no 716 ,M 0- nCtt 3 Of I a • s v f r.•ua•.acvsnc•i�wr w titr S 1� L...I ❑ LUjLLJJ u u ! � • ED] ❑ fj El 0 El El El ED K :ZD f F L� s s V 17 9 .� '� •' C 4 d4 1 El l•.•..,,. • t SS 111 ...!!!❑ . r ❑ El r � w As r o �.�• 4r r~ J CIO Cil l^'f'.a• r.w.r�ti.r� ra. ��^ �} F ,}.rte Y ..•s. s ar r �w.►►rus� r...Y + `mow ■� "`• �r a • • i r wwr� . • 1 i £ q [ i / --.+� ww ry.�� w� • war i ■ h....el ` i AWNW rn p rn * ' La 4b +' . D 0 r z 49 tA x BOUTWELLS LANDING McKEAN SQUARE EAST Ito Ln M CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN :.�.�., c�.■s,a �, � s..s.� � • it 8 i7 7■w1J.1w JLP 02/22/MAZ llrS� 71i. MF SNYDER & ASSOCIATES of Atuart ,llrsxxA � . ,a2 -0124 � A.W , aztw�wc � vc. � rr. ,r+ � Sr sr n sx. r , , #c.� ti •• ■ ■ , r � 4 i + 1 r maw V in rri �100 0 c=;) r ri lz I z 9 m 'G pg r �,� m S� rn M 1 ► rn Zi s BOMWELLS LANDING McKEAN SQUARE EAST < < LAND USE AND STAGING PLAN '�� �� q ..K r.L.+s.1 s s•�.i,. v ' F i r, "..m JLP INA .02n2IY0{� rfa� sr. r* SNYDER & ASSOCIATES � ann iw � � 6� i 16, 102 - Df Z� Ra-�i M TJ7- itaiCi ?ri �r� -i�ri W4 I'm t '�V S 1 � r � � �a • i r RKFr.R�F 16 -I rw ro fA t r Frf /• w• � �+ Op f J . Ile Mir I tr J r �+�! ,• • J + . f Kr•. »• - J J r•rr 40 41P er ZN �"'� ...► , '._ .-.... y •• _ `�` J� f !fi �f �'; •1���/ )� j+ i � fi � � r �� � y � �. • r .. � � w• r ■r r- jJ i ' J I 1 �` �� ♦ , • ti� S � �. r .• �, .` - rte 'i 7 1 `• U f f ! `�"f I i � � 1 ;N• ��t~ r .��• � y` . f . r �,,,,,.� i r • ■ '^� a.��r'sti/ �i'�'T �.- i1o 7M1Mf� y 1 � r� r e BOUTWELLS LANDING - McKEAN SQUARE EAST CONCEMAL GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN • . pZ""'cm Q JLp a,.K 02n2nOW rrr�e w SNYDER & ASSOCIATES ow �W, �. . sw D- �y r � �a r r � r ti WBO OF L71 ■wrIR ► � a te.. _ .7 . M '. - � it �� • � � -- � 1 t r� �• f �n OVA 'ter► ..,,,� � � ,. � :. w�l[SON ywlwOWs.�Al ,rr ���►711Nf�11��Af � ������w�1C'li rs r fr t A �' � ► ,•..rte.. i ? ai } a� i 4 + i i M� a �� l f y s nimill 3p e td ol Z � e r c ' c Y zn rn -BOUTEWELLS LANDING � M3 .� SENIOR LIVrNGMM�JNITY j ! a Ln AK PARK HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA 0 z ,. , • • 1 ' • • • , , , ;.' � • • • • • etiy • f •M • NMSi M+a.Mw rM warms. •f N a +•+n .• l a .. . •rl••+'•*{�/s �t►►+..�r..lrlrrl•wr.l r. w • .L w .. . f , � ... � ".w .J •+K w fiw.p • � ' ry rl. r:•2 S + I •� '. + . . ..., • 1 LL 522 CD R7' j f i l ! •� JA 1 1 r ..►o.or.r � L . . 1 � 1 � 1 . I d ' 1 w � f • • , �• (= 1 � • �• �" r 1 ?� .rT• • ` � • IS • r ♦ •�• r •• • /T•1p1f •• •• �M. • 1 1 � • s ■ �. i s �= ' CS > RIP FEB U 1E= FM,l lr-= I = CD l L..,..,..1 R .... 3 •• � • A f • • • ' ' . 14 •� Cl) ■ • a 1 ' r +��. � 1 � r • ' w . li .: . .; • t v st , Pt • , • • it • • 1 ► • r •• • y Y f� • •• ,f• w • • ' - • , •. •+:� • Jib • ' t si„•t J�':• � • � • . • r • • ►i +(, . . !■ 5 ] � r Seni 4 .� S ENIO R .4 0 P 1 • � • f f ■ + • 1 • . �itP 1 ' ■ 2845 N om H� ' • 1 Fosevale, MN 5511 • • •■ Ph one (651) 635.6300 Fax (651)' 631 - :AjMl ■ • ■ r. 1 f 1 / 1 ■ f ■. �, Danielson + 1 FROM. K en Hoo ge . VA x 651439 -0574 PAGES: 7 • 1 . X)AT-. 4/9/2002 ■ 1 } 3pg W;::' 65 �1 439 -4 ■ , �a Joint Powers Agree�'en c. • • • 1 , 1 a a ■ 1 • • • a a 1 r � 1 ■ 1 ■ . • • ■ 1 • a � � f ■ a -- rarrf - �� . 1 • • • S . 1 • 1 • 1 • 1 . 1 • . / s I ; _ ;� x ,, * • t l`'� Ms, Kini Kjamper, Acting City A�im'nistr•ato1' 41 }� ''• ` ' f ` ` (1tv oi' Ouk )Nrk l [c•i,h €s M 14 I (18 N 01 ll 1 *7"' S t rc el ()ak TIark Heights. MN 550170007 ,vi s. K ri s Du tliel:►cyt� ( nmun Dc.vtflopt3 ellk ( its' ol'Ou Park Hei,ht 141 ' '111 57"' Street • ,. , . �c.c�trc�st Fo r C �, onsidcrati on ] a Joint Pow Agrec cent Dt2 Ki m amt Kris: .,� . . �a ,v c� l'o� =� is r the Joint Powers Agre�'mclit has beery grantees• by the t r p I • F �N 11 Township. '1'he r1Iutter` 11"ts t Well stIbIlli"Cd to wa sl ttir�gton �' �sunty for • / �; car j � c� tt icy t c� C011 fejjejjsr%,•e pItk1j. III jc)llov..up to our prc v4 us � � •' ic�er1ition of the 10llc�wing elemmits to be included in diS L15 � �� rc�• �.c�st c;o� s tiic: Joint Po \vers Agreement for McKean SgULIM East. R , , �' •ccom nictidin public str but Wady � . ���t�c.�� �st1 tei � ►� �.Ul������ 1�1p� t, we are 1 r � ue5 ct ��anaiiee on scat backs and di ; Iatice b�tweett u nits, to maintain cotlsisic(Icv with p ossible Uariamc rcuuests for McKean Squa > west. ?, Re ues—t that water aild sewer be pro�•ic��� through yak dark � t�� hts per 111c Joint Povcrs Agreemem. 1 1 scrviC Y ma lie requested 011 - L1811 Oak Park Heigh P0. C cj(.'l )art(jjc:ljt \With a 8reed it 1 jc)jj c.0,11pell or the Washingto i County Sl1eri f'i: '��tL .:tit 7 'oti t:t ti c: 'I t y o l% Bayport as I5 currently � lo ntraeted 4. l i p Y by t1le ( "tt ` o f`Oak Park I leights and k3aytow" �'0 \vt1ship,. t� 1 l and eE1 1c;j` c:1)ev t'Us ottse to bQ c�ett niiiiied by poli se rve.: .., either a � � • 1 t k #'at�k Hoi gilts o lice de artmem or Washi Co tnty b��ti� C�a �, l p Shorik. Park • ., Ge wo (lrl t)c: jaitl to Baytown 'I`ow.iship. A :cess to (lie 0. 1 ark tic.clic.ation f s l y ak�arS�:i Heights a� Baytown "row tship lark will bc, prov ideI l to U � 3a Towns ll .,lick the owner would mainta the park$ r esici e � �► t, . 1. y owr� 7 'l'c,�fc: 11olic::;C1 ice, Im vnict afld related WOUld be pro Vtded thr:ugh s ;� ( ; ��� :'t ,� �_, i.��tr, �,rt��. Lr�t�'rr � l ilkw \I . N •.'+ l 1 ' a lad [!�! �i1 :�•�{ . f� i �� 1 ��� i r / ' Joint Po, J A ment Ap 9 2002 Pa 2 of 2 8. • r Bin" Iding pennit old the im ecti€ n pXocess would take plaoe ffiMUgh 1 f ■ Oak 'Fark Heights. • • " a p relim in su to a�cilitate �er dism. sxon • We are intending this a x li p • 'loome an �p orturuty to dis this in moxe ct d �v�u�d ail , 1 ; �� • 1f ��u �.a�� �u �st�c� ox mead additional information, please contact roc at 65 1 . • 63.1 - 61330 r Sincerer r , + e r r Dan Linda ' . CEO/'iesidcait r , e • r r r' e e / • 1 , 1 r • • 1 r + r / ■ e , i 1 � / r / ■ i . 1 . f i s , f i / � f ■ v 1 • • r / e a • • ' r / / { e / / r r � e r r f f i r ■ / i ■ ' 1 . a r 1 ■ / 1 • + r 1 1 , 1 1 ■ f f ■ f r • 1 • ■ • f i • ■ 1 r CHECKLIST FOR OAK PARK HEIGHTS TO PROVID5 ■ MUNI-PIPAL SEWER AND WATER SERVICE 'HIGH RISE HOUSING DEV T ' 0 100+ UNIT ELOPMENT IC SYSTEM AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO A WELL & SEPT ■ • • 1 Q oncept approval frcirn Oak Park Hei ■ • 2. Amend Comp plans .of Ba Township and Washington Count 3 M 9tro Council approval of *bxtehsion of Metropolitan Urban Services Line ( MUSA ) "to serve ► area of town with orb an services. Can be done simultaneously with Comp plan • arnendm6nto 0410 • Al-nend z ordinanceof -Ba Township and W2shin Count to allow urban 0 " d a S o a pUD • 591 obtain PUD concept approval from Ba and Washin Count ■ 9 6, Obtain D'ensit Washington Count Land owner and Townshipe peeparabon of EAW if required ( note — mandatory for 100 unattached or 160 attached units in-sewered unincorpor6ted area. Minn. Rules 4410.4300)0 Conservatjoh Easement with Minnesota Land "rust restricting use of open N wgot'6te, Spam, b permitti owner to farm, g row trees, pasture, and raise livestock with appropriate bulldin 1 9 -Fl. palize Joint Powers A with Oak Park Hei 10.- D-Ovelopment A for Developer to build Municipal Sorv"ces frO I 9 1 connection polnt-'In'-Oak Park t the Development site build out of private `rnprovbrnents With sepurity to insure performanceq • Issue final PUD p6rrn't. ■ ■ ■ • ■ ■ 0 4 • ► • ■ • t. jOINT PbWERS-AGREEMENT . `his Ag reement made and entered into this ,.. • day of _ -� 2002, by and between the CITY OF OAK PARK 1 81 G HTS , Washington ton county, Minnesota, (hereinafter referred to as oak Park a ) and the TOWN OF BAYTOWN, Washington county Knnesota, (hereinafter . referred to as " Baytown " • RECITALS • i , • yak ?ark has ag reed reed to. extend municipal water and surer service mains and laterals to ' ("M unicipal seNces ►� to a development owned by Presbyterian o ert: located w�th�n Baytown � • P, p • r Hom ( the "Development' �on� ■ ` ' ir6 to enter into a cooperative agreement to provide for the construction .rhe parties de p • ' ' of the Municipal S ' ' ' e and p rovide for reasonable compensation to oak Park in corpliance ru and r� k, with the ulatiohs of Oak Pat g arties atso desire to implement a procedure whereby the communities can p �� to connections to the Municipal services and spread and collect Charges respe�veiy coordinate , • i it in a manner which reserves that their respe(.tive for Municipal Services and sy�tern reps p .. interests ' .Now, THEREFOREr the parties agree as follows° r� r uctton, The * Munici al servi for the Development will be financed. and 1. Co - p I ment, yak Perk rnustreview and approve the design con ;trUcted y the ,offer of ve op • of this s s ystem an the p lans - and p s ecif cations therefore before construction begins° �. ��d�catlon. Affer the sys tarn is constructed and as to each phase accepted by . ' ° Bayto will become the p roperty of Baytown and .remain Baytown the Muniapal services with Bayto p . yt the prc'perty of Baytown, • ' Into c , Th6 •connection between the oak Park Systems and the Baytown ` 'to ,the approved plans and specifications. systems will be • Ma de according pp ' an residential or other property looted in' the .4, core t9t. j0M Prior .to connecting ' r p t in Sa wn, �aytow or its designee must notify the Public Works Director of Oak � eve l aF rnen o .p � , . Oak Park alt Y clerk of the pending connection provit ing a Park an *the billing. offices of the , • • requested. Additionally, the Public Works D epartment relevant data and ipf9rmabon as may be re q • supervise and 'Inspect the connection `d any o f Oak Park must be provided the opportunity to supery p . • a e M unicip al Servi or sewer services, all prop�rtic� must p roperty. Prior to c�nn�ctlon t th l� p . • f • Park. The � oor�necf�on fee �f � �� ��}� �' p ayments must be made directly ict the p Y p ay . offices of the oak Park city Clerk. i .T .5. �e xr Mallnt r�anr, an fed the municipal S e including mains an iatera ls= w Baytown, w ill I e repaired or maintained by oak Park, charges for repaii., maintenance and upkeep P g will be spread ag ainst Baytown users on the. same basis and as • applied., with regard to oak Park users and billed according to Section 7. • � Com Uncewl #h h Water Ord inance 0� air dark igj hts am ha • e 1 � �on� �f � �i�c w or D epartme n t of Pg k ., Park Het hts, All properties serve Y e ` ` Service .located In the Develop gust canforrri to the rules and Oak mark i�un�crpai �er�rce . , regulations ado pted ted for use by oak park for citizens of Oak Park. will bill each p roperty owner quarterly for sewer and wate r`usage ,71 � tlln oak Par p charges and other charges. The amounts of all billings will be made pursuant to existing � to i r all Oak 'ark residents and may be adjusted from' time to . regul!40ns as established for f E e rates otherwise charged oak Park residents, plu:, in a comply with all a djustments on wat er events, an additional 10 % service char In the event of any delinquency occurring in F e I � payment of a bill, f rom any pr p o ernes served by the Municipal Services in the Developimenta i . Oak Park will b or before September I5' Baytown, up on notice of receipt of delinquency from y of each year, certify for collectio n to Washington county with the county takes, for the following statute, on remission of any payments to Baytown,: by' year in the runner provided by statu p , on co the same must then be promptly paid toe Park i�1lash���gt }�� . 8, lm ravenents, Improvements will be conducted by the parties pursuant to, Minn. . I� p¢+�[�[i �qq ` own will bald irnprovn7en S lat. § t hearings, assessment hearings . '."'���3 W4 W�qY �� r����l � y� • • nt again benefited rovidod property within �a'ytown asi p and sp;read the cost as an assessrne g :. d b Bayt for obligations issued -by 08 Park for e Y b law if assessments are collected y . is the funds must then be promptly paid to Oak Park. tests of the improvemen , -a g. end en s and ificaon This Agreement can only be o r dif e,d b writing signed by the parties. ' mo Y • ` 4 ra ion. yak dark and Baytown will cooperate in the enforcement an • 10, o 4 • _ he extent that an additional agreements, •notl0es, . implent- -iont of this agreement. To Y required to be issued b either com munity to tha, state of esolu�lIons or other romp nrtments are req ' , . , r i R ' ` n over reg ulator y agency, both communities will Mnna:oota, the county of ilashrngton or any g rY i ate and issue documents in a prompt manner, cooper any . 2 ' / • eer�nt i made �y tha parties and neither may delegate �f �n�]� e , n. `This Agr a o nq � p , � " In der this � reoment without the written consent of the other any ���;� ►IIr respo �rl��i,lg t�� � . � M M `11ty , 1f N WITNESS WHERE �, #h e ales have sat forth their hands and seals this d6y �rst w(Itten above, 1 TOWN OF BAYTOW N oAK PARK HEIGHTS 1 , M ayor halftan, Board of Supervisors 1 "own Clerk 1 City clork i ' 1 1 i f ■ 1 . . t 4 f 1 4 f � f 4 t • 1 t ■ t � / / / / T • , t , / • ■ / 1 ■