HomeMy WebLinkAbout1978-08-28 Planner Ltr to Howard Turrentine Avaust 2e 197E
,M;r- H Yrcwtl R. Ttwrentlne
:they at 'Low:
14733 60* Stroot Nwth
;ok Fork Heights - it. Csol ;
Dear Bob I
,4 tftched plems Ond our corwmrft rolative to your *a* co f*t the ,t.
Croix Mail - Ken Houer, Lyt* CvkboV and ',*ft $onemm at" ho"V rocoolvwJ
tool es of y draft and my have mom to adj.
"'-*aot luntwe to contact me SFOU14 you havo quw'l*m.
Very "Vly your's,
4 7 , 1 HN 1 USE
PLAN NC P'kN,l R EARCH, IN
Ouvid R. Llahf Mir`
re s: e, ent
CC9 Lyle :ckberg
Ken h4mw
ttr
wow
(798.02)
lanningi
OEJ urban planning • design • market research
416 east hennepin avenue minneapolis
minnesota 55414 (612)379 -4600
MEMORANDUM
TO: File
FROM: David R. Licht
DATE: 28 August 1978
RE: Oak Park Heights - St. Croix Mall - PUD Covenants
(Review of Draft received 24 and 28 August 1978)
1 . Is Kentucky Fried Chicken included?
2. Section 1 .a. - Suggest adding the wording ....By the parties hereto as identified
on the attached site (plat) plan.
3. Section 5 - Seems weak - more detail and control needed.
4. In parking /accessAuiI ding section - maintenance is not covered for protection
of other owners. Some standards should be imposed.
5. Section 7 - A means of changing membership and votes on the Management
Committee would appear to be necessary. The formula utilized for votes and
participation should probably be outlined.
6. Landscaping plans, materials, and maintenance should be included. The Olene
Avenue situation is a prime example.
7. Sign control or limitations subject to City ordinances should be included.
8. Lighting standards and similar utility structures should be covered.
9. Permitted uses should be addressed.
10. Some attention to drainage and water runoff should possibly be added. This does
not appear to be covered adequately by Section 3. The various. owners may also
wish to consider costs of installation, maintenance and repair.
11. The covenants should also be tied in some fashion or another to the City's
conditions for PUD approval.
28 August 1978 Page Two
12. City approval of change in the covenants should be noted. It would appear
advisable to include such a stipulation in the convenants to ensure that such
a requirement is adequately publicized.
13. Public easement access for emergency vehicles, postal service, etc. should be
considered. Possibly such can be noted on the final plat.
(798.02)