HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984-03-08 Planner Memorandum Re St. Croix Mall Sign Plan •
NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS INC.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Oak Park Heights Mayor and City Council
FROM: Alan Brixius
DATE: 8 March 1984
RE: St. Croix Mall Sign Plan
FILE NO: 798.02 - 83.09
At the City's directive, we have reviewed the newly submitted signage
plan for the St. Croix Mall to determine if this plan is consistent with
the signage plan submitted in September 1983.
The newly submitted signage plan contained only the building elevations for
the upper and lower malls indicating the locations and sizes of the permitted
signs. These plans have not changed from what was submitted in September
1983.
The written signage agreement (see Exhibit A of the attached report) was
not submitted for review. This written agreement establishes the sign
review process for mall signs and criteria for signage review. The
original written agreement was found to be acceptable. The applicant
should provide a copy of this agreement to the City Council prior to
finalization of the signage plan to ensure there has been no changes in
its text.
Our intial review made recommendations for bringing the existing mall sign
into conformance with the mall signage plan. We have attached a copy of
this report for review and detailed background on the St. Croix Mall signage
plan.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on our review of the newly submitted St. Croix Mall signage plan, we
recommend approval, contingent on the applicant providing the City Council
with a copy of the tenants sign agreement governing mall signs and the
written provisions are consistent with the previously submitted tenant
sign agreement.
cc: LaVonne Wilson
Lyle Eckberg
Frank Leier
Don Bauman
4820 minnetonka boulevard, suite 420 minneapolis, mn 55416 612/925 -9420
w
NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS INC.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Oak Park Heights Mayor and City Council
FROM: James Vick
DATE: 1 September 1983
RE: St. Croix Mall - Sign Plan
FILE NO: 798.02 - 83.09
BACKGROUND
As part of the PUD Agreement, the St. Croix Mall is required to present a
sign plan. Oak Park Development Co., landlords for the upper and lower
mall, have submitted a plan which will effect all tenants of these build-
ings. The attached exhibits present written and graphic materials for the
sign plan proposed by Oak Park Development Co.
ISSUES AND ANALYSIS
The conditions of the proposed plan include:
1. No signage will be allowed until approval has been granted from both
Oak Park Development Co. and the City of Oak Park Heights.
2. Only tenants with an exclusive exterior entrance will be allowed
signage on the exterior of the building. The number of signs is
limited to one per entrance. The location of signs is limited to
the wall(s) directly related to the use being identified.
3. The signs shall consist of individual raised letters with a maximum
of 4 feet in height. Sign area will be determined by the length
of the tenants name spelled in 4 foot letters.
The first paragraph of Exhibit A specifically states that signage of any
sort must first be approved. The paragraphs that follow outline the signage
that is acceptable and potential for approval. With a review process by
the City and Oak Park Development Co., the standards outlined can be ensured.
The proposed plan presents a uniform appearance for signage around the mall.
While some tenants, because of the length of their name, will be allowed sign
area in excess of that allowed by the Zoning Ordinance, this situation is
advantageous in that it will maintain a consistent style.
4820 minnetonka boulevard, suite 420 minneapolis, mn 55416 612/925-9420
Oak Park Heights Mayor and City Council
1 September 1983 Page Two
One addition recommended for the proposed plan would be to allow a separate
sign for Ward's Automotive Center. This operation is somewhat independent
of the principal store, including a separate entrance. The additional sign
area can be justified on this premise.
The most difficult part of this sign plan will be its implementation. Since
the St. Croix Mall PUD was approved several years ago, most tenants allowed
signs in the proposed plan already have them in place. The mall is presently
cluttered with nonconforming signs and signs which are not permitted. This
excessive signing has a blighting influence on the entire mall.
RECOMMENDATION
The plan proposed by Oak Park Development Co., with the addition of one sign
allowed for Ward's Automotive Center, is recommended for approval. While
the City Council would then have the option of its strict enforcement,
immediate enforcement may not be the best alternative. Shop owners with non-
conforming signs will fight to keep their signs under a grandfather clause.
It would be advantageous to use this sign plan to dress up the area, however.
Perhaps the most equitable way to accomplish these goals will be to distinguish
a level of conformance for each sign.
Signs can be categorized as permitted /conforming, permitted /nonconforming, or
prohibited. Any sign that is permitted by the attached sign plan should be
allowed. If the existing sign is nonconforming because of area or dimension
requirements, it may remain, however, any change in sign content will be
required to bring the sign into conformance.
Any sign not permitted by the sign plan should be removed. These signs are
the main source of blight on the mall. Following is an inventory of these
prohibited signs which presently exist:
Upper Mall
North Elevation:
Hardware Hank - 2 temporary banners on building
facade.
- 8 temporary window signs for
advertising.
MGM Liquor Warehouse - 2 changeable wall signs for
advertising.
Snyder Bros. Drug - 2 permanent window signs.
Memory Banque - 2 windows used for advertising.
Ronald Jewlers - 1 60 square foot wall sign. This
tenant does not have an exclusive
exterior entrance.
Oak Park Heights Mayor and City Council
1 September 1983 Page Three
Mall Theaters - 1 45 square foot wall sign. This
tenant's business is located on the
southeast corner of the mall. This
sign should be relocated to a wall
adjacent to the business.
South Elevation:
St. Croix Shoe Service - 5 window signs.
Ward's Automotive Center - Ward's Auto Center has a partial
south elevation with a 30 square
foot wall sign. This sign is in
addition to what is allowed and
should be removed.
Lower Mall
North Elevation:
Golden Crown - 1 portable advertising sign on
boulevard.
- 1 window advertising sign.
Guns - 2 windows used for signage.
Video Merchants - Windows used for advertising.
All of the above mentioned signs are prohibited by the Oak Park Heights Zoning
Ordinance and the St. Croix Mall Sign Plan. When viewed on an individual basis,
these signs seem fairly insignificant. However, as demonstrated here, there
is an abundance of these "extra" signs producing a cluttered effect. The
prompt removal of these signs will reflect an improved character for the
entire mall.
In addition to the sign plan for the upper and lower mall, the PUD Agreement
requires a sign plan for all occupants of the entire St. Croix Mall PUD. It
is the Developer's (Oak Park Development Co.) responsibility to provide this
information. While the Developer is not expected to design a sign plan for
all of these occupants, they should present an inventory in written and graphic
form of the signs that are existing or proposed by these establishments. With
this information, the City Council can determine the acceptability of these
signs and require alterations as needed.
Due to the number of prohibited signs throughout the PUD, it is urged that
this part of the sign plan is strictly enforced.
cc: LaVonne Wilson
Lyle Eckberg
Frank Leier
Oak P�� 3 � 1963
K Park Demlopntent Co, Ins th
DEVELOPERS
5898 Omaha Avenue North • Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 • Telephone (b 12) 439 -7810
• M W'
RE: Sign Plan for St. Croix Mall '
A condition of your lease (Article 28 - Rules and Regulation)
is that:
Tenant covenants and agrees with Landlord that:
a) No sign, advertisement, display, notice, or other lettering
shall be exhibited, inscribed, painted or affixed on any part of
the outside of the premises or inside, if visible from the outside,
or the building of which they form a part, and no symbol, design,
mark, or insignia adopted by Landlord for St. Croix Mall or the
tenants therein shall be used in connection with the conduct of
Tenant's business in the premises or elsewhere without, in each
instance, the prior written consent of Landlord. All such signs,
displays, advertisements, and notices of Tenant so approved by
Landlord shall be maintained by Tenant in good and attractive
condition at Tenant's expense and risk.
The purpose of the following sign plan is to clarify the manner in
which Oak Park Development Co., Inc. (landlord) will approve or disapprove
a tenant's proposed sign plan.
First and above all else the sign must meet all zoning requirements
and be approved by the City of Oak Park Heights. Specifics may "be
obtained by calling the City Clerk of Oak Park Heights at 439 -4439.
Individual tenants shall not display seperate identification signs
on the exterior of the Mall unless the tenant's business has an exclusive
exterior entrance. The number of signs shall be limited to one per
entrance. Said signs shall be located only on exterior walls which are
directly related to the use being identified.
All exterior signs should consist of individual raised letters no
larger than 4' in height in a style consistent with the signs already
in existence. No product signs will be allowed. Exceptions will be
made in the case of trademarks, or if a hardship is identified.
All signs must have written concept approval before submittion to
the City. Final approval will be given in writing after approval of sign
has been given by the City. Under no circumstances should construction
begin until final written approval has been received from Oak Park Development.
Each store will be identified within the directory signs at each
public entrance. The size of each store's identification shall be in
relation to the space they occupy.
EXHIBIT A
WRITTEN SIGN AGREEMENT
r f t
— aana maama HNVN 2avm4zw/ - -,�- '_. .._.__: :N011VA313 N11,ON: 73rAORWOM yonbil WLJW
-- i Jr It
F'l
troNUp tiiow�w
• �qp� r, � _ - . -. No1.11Ma3a. NlyoN ObY
- M NN WOS1ryob1 Hmr X a.
— _ W
I -
'
:: - _.km o " NYML sawiHl II +1 'I'IYW - `� � _ . ,'- N01{YAVID MAnO9':' AUr•tT xea7 1T aw.,n aaxa rraa'u a+»++irM S sior7 ;iw+q
l �1
4' ', - ' Nn IlYAtI'16- ,X11109' "WIN) JIMA q14
.
u�e'a
o1pMl LIIr1h1U. II +I - nYW
iced
N
Ny d
I � � �_� OJreaAtalo NITI4YJNVM MW 1Nr/ta1 71n1,
ar�w'aai+a T 7WYN Lu+vN1.
• i •ASnee Awp a•Ja M w'; 3 �� \�I \yam,. VA �1 t, J ,r" N1 14 ftW Ya•YVf
vat.•t•r eT w tTaV• evra.atanv.pt .i1aaM w.. as •,n .0 'ranrn.
MI T
\ \Y' ! L�(\\\ \ \ \ \ \`\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\`� en TriL91 aa•wY �Yne�A�eM .o
mm� vaw a. nM• � tV Ala UMN PTi1iUTt aV nH wa. 4a4 i , Nv hVlh ` V t�l . '�
14NH•D aanonf SN91T 7loitfallO Ti)�,
..»,r• ,rvm enann Sr•q �. � _ . ...._.... — _._ - *xa AtlW n I
>UWptwa aaM Nye m+i T•xi
tnUn Ufaw UUnan,tnm OnW. reura I
•wtl,awt •1 dtvro at ae 'wt.ewn ; i � I • � rin+iln I - .
a• .r.e wa nt a•�a a nw wna.va wmt• a ntn amsr aaroe>a w . .. H3Md � .
'.•unn» ut AputU xen aVa v+tn aa.unum nAa• • K avant' m �t uwTa it I . :; i ,,," ' i, � .
a.est au •MiR pxna taNfattel >e aataaaa Tlnen nCn aetagts m -
7evn��c
•o• mwt aura .rn .ta w - ,
Pa•Pa AT1•• •n W"n KiM ,enww w A T•+�et w SPea n!n' 3etlloed
nw aswaw na w wo•txatt w nxar •q. >a , roan wa w,ne �,awumanY 1
-17K .a mT•ie w rr4 rr.Jtaa .�. rar .�.� ttrn ref a sst+•ee ,
wa w n�n wnetatrwtn .r.nd+�tT rw t7•n •rwwa ta4tatwt
i
vneo �I ITI 7CS - DWiI)
I i ._ ..�...,.. —.. .,„. I Y ..,� I _ _-- �.r:._�,,, \_./ \ / ` ` \ i r �, � r •
; j� /�'Iy E[ElR7;on/ �itZU ✓r,Ncfr Ntz�/'.36
W 4 ''- - 0 8' td' I
g�}Np wirN /J wtFmN TEA)"Ts St6,Js MAY 4[ Pu1aa0
puF 'To ,goACE Lf m ETA nDA3S - $r)� � "ID PCAeE.4nGV7'
Cl, 816US To 6£ mop- 0
A) IUD f-wo"ox S 7z c& - �+sPcr4yEP
6� PLAatvAuJ To tip Adeo�tG,fr1C, To BPR� Ozsa�
r m
o x
m
r n
r
N
0
z
v
r
n
z
Sy c .
elr
I N WA W AN K 365
iii
't = BEER 4 - Q i, DAYS t ,d
A YEAR
.wrn.► _ � f $n
_
t
9 Q A
�aA� If
o f
�� � - - --
V� •q ��n n o � d' �� s
�d N::
0 )4t
TREE � O _ RS r
{
-o m
o =
IT u
N
r-+
Z
N