Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2008-02-20 CA Ltr to OPH Re Pylon SignECKBERG,onh, LAMMERS,� ATTORNEYS AT LAW Writer's Direct Dial: ( 651) 351-2118 Writer's E-mail: mvierlin 1 �l P� 1809 Northwestern Avenue, Suite 110 Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 (651) 43942878 Fax (651) 439-2923 www.eckber Februar 20, 2008 Eric Johnson Cit Administrator Cit of Oak Park Hei 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North Oak Park Hei MN 55082 Re: Best Bu and Menards P Si Dear Mr. Johnson: � Thank y ou for forwardin m aterials to our office indicatin that the Best Bu application has now been w ithdrawn b the app , licant, Mr. Bracke via his a 9 ent, Mr. McGovern. The withdrawal of the application does not, however, resolve the issue of compliance with the ori Menards permit issued back in 1995 b the Cit Council, which allowed a p si to be located at the comer of the fronta road and what is now Krue Drive on the condition that the land that the si was to be located on would be owned b Menards. Notwithstandin the representation made within the record of Ma 22, 1995, a cop of which I annex, as the same was made b the owner's representative at that time.. Mr. McGovern, the propert was never conve to Menards under which the p si is now owned. The owner, Mr. Bracke did conve to 1 'itc y 's ordi nance as w ell 7 ' cl a Menards an easement but the plan clearl re ownership under both t1ne X k_1 s the re of the Council at that time. There are onl two avenues that T can foresee under which the problem could be remediated or corrected. The are as follows: I - I . Menards can remove the si or move the si back to land that is owned b them. I understand that this is not fav b the Menards g roup. Mr. Bracke can create a fla lot alon Krue Drive and then conve it to Menards, who can then join it with their existin parcel, which would presumabl either re a form of replattin of their parcel to include the -fla lot or address the issue of the fla lot not bein 'separated from the Menards parcel b wa of bindin development a recorded a both parcels' descriptions. ECKBERG, LAMMERS, BRIGGS, WOLFF C6 VIERLING, PLLP Famil Law / Divorce • Business and Commercial Law • Criminal Law Personal Injur 1 Wron Death Estate Plannin Probate • Real Estate • Land Use Law • Mediation Municipal Law Civil Litigation Eric Johnson February 20, 2008 Page 2 of 2 In any event, the withdrawal of the Best Buy application does not absolve the remediation of this problem. The owner should address the issue as long as he now has the time in which to do so, creating either the flag lot or negotiating with Menards to remove the sign to an appropriate location approved by the City. I would suggest the City remind the owner of this obligation and provide a reasonable time table in which to accomplish a solution. Yqu:rs very truly; t_ . ...s- .....- "'..warn Mark J. Vierling MJVlsdb Enclosure