Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1998-05-07 NAC Planning ReportPLANNING REPORT TO: Tom Melena FROM: Scott Richards DATE: 7 May 1998 RE: Oak Park Heights - Menard's Sign Variances FILE NO: 798.02 - 96.10 BACKGROUND Menard's Inc. has applied for a variance from the Zoning Ordinance requirements to allow for signage over and above what was allowed by the approvals granted by the City Council on 27 March 1995. It was at that meeting the City Council granted a conditional use permit and variances for parking, fence height, and signage for the Menard's project. Menard's is located at 58th Street and Krueger Lane on property described as Lot 1, Block 1 of Brackey Addition. The City Council granted variances to allow for a 200 square foot pylon sign (150 square feet allowed by Ordinance), the 312 square foot Menard's sign and 60 square foot welcome sign (150 square foot wall sign allowed by Ordinance), and six of eight wall mounted signs indicating products (paint, lumber, carpet, etc.). When the Menard's was constructed, all eight of the product signs were installed on the front facade. Additionally, at the yard entrance, Menard's installed lit "in" and "out" signs, a lit "lumber yard entrance" sign, and another wood four foot by eight foot "lumber yard entrance" sign with additional directions for customers. Staff has determined that the "in" and "out" signs are directional and allowed on the site by Ordinance. The two "lumber yard entrance" signs are over the four square foot requirement and also require a variance for approval. Attached for reference: Exhibit A - Building Elevations NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS COMMUNITY PLANNING - DESIGN - MARKET RESEARCH 5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 555 ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 554 1 6 PHONE 61 2-595-9636 FAX 612-595-9837 E-MAIL NAC WINTERNET.COM ISSUES ANALYSIS Section 401.04.A.4 and 401.04.A.5 of the Oak Park Heights Zoning Ordinance Lists criteria for review and conditions of approval for variances. In considering all requests for a variance or appeal, the City Council shall make a finding of fact that the proposed action will not: a. Impair an adequate supply of Tight and air to adjacent property. b. Unreasonably increase the congestion in the public street. c. Have the effect of allowing any district uses prohibited therein, permit a lesser degree of flood protection than the flood protection elevation for the particular area, or permit standards which are lower than those required by State law. d. Increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety. e. Unreasonably diminish or impair established property values within the neighborhood, or in any way be contrary to the intent of this Ordinance. f. Violate the intent and purpose of the Comprehensive Plan. g . Violate any of the terms or conditions of Item 5, below. Additionally, a variance from the terms of this Ordinance shall not be granted unless and be demonstrated that: a. Undue hardship will result if the variance is denied due to the existence of special conditions and circumstances which are peculiar to the land, structure, or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures or buildings in the same district. 1) Special conditions may include exceptional topographic or water conditions or, in the case of an existing lot or parcel of record, narrowness, shallowness, insufficient area or shape of the property. 2 3 ) ) Undue hardship caused by the special conditions and circumstances may not be solely economic in nature, if a reasonable use of the property exists under the terms of this Title. Special conditions and circumstances causing undue hardship shall not be a result of lot size or building location when the lot qualifies as a buildable parcel. Page 2 b Literal interpretation of the provisions of this Ordinance would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of this Ordinance or deny the applicant the ability to put the property in question to a reasonable use. c. The special conditions and circumstances causing the undue hardship do not result from the actions of the applicant. d. Granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this Ordinance to other lands, structures or buildings in the same district under the same conditions. e. The request is not a result of non- conforming lands, structures or buildings in the same district. f The request is not a use variance. g . The variance requested is the minimum variance necessary to accomplish the intended purpose of the applicant. h. The request does not create an inconvenience to neighboring properties and uses. It is staff's position that a variance is not warranted for the two product signs reading "Hardware" and "Lumber" on the main front facade in that adequate signage was granted for the Menard's signs through the previous variance. As you may recall, staff had recommended that none of the eight product signs be allowed in that they are unjustified, there is no hardship, and there are no unusual or unique circumstances related to the property to allow for a variance under the criteria listed above. Staff does recommend allowing the one lit ` =lumber yard entrance" sign in that it does provide direction on site and that its size is necessary considering the overall size of the facade. The other wood "lumber yard entrance" sign should not be allowed in that it is redundant and again there is no hardship or unique circumstances related to the property. Menard's Inc. did not provide any written justification or explanation of hardship for the sign variance application submittal. Page 3 CONCLUSION Based upon the preceding review, our office recommends approval of the variance for the one lit "lumber yard entrance" sign. The request for the two additional product signs and the second "lumber yard entrance" sign should be denied in that they are not consistent with the criteria for granting a variance found in Sections 401.05.A.4 and 401.04.A.5 of the Zoning Ordinance. pc: Mayor and City Council Mark Vierl i ng Joe Anderl i k Gary Colby Page 4 - ` = / � � K Can ( 0 co ' « • " • ( • ' - • - . cc co ' ` ` ' ` ^ . / . • " " " 1 [ EXHIBIT A