Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1997-11-20 NAC File Memorandum • . t MEMORANDUM TO: File FROM: Bob Kirmis DATE: 20 November 1997 RE: Oak Park Heights - Annexation FILE NO: 798.04 - 97.19 This memorandum is intended to document a conversation I had on this date with Mr. Mark Wespetal of the MPCA Division of Water Quality. had specifically contacted the MPCA to obtain any applicable information regarding the Agency's "position" on communal sewage treatment systems. In my conversation with Mr. Wespetal, the following points were made: • The PCA has no "official" position regarding communal versus individual drainfields. • System type preference depends on hydro - geology of the area. Findings of study should dictate preference • If determination is made that a single, high concentration of effluent will not negatively impact the ground water supply, a communal system is generally preferred. Placement of the drainfield is a key issue. • If a high concentration of effluent is a problem (typically associated with communal systems), a dispersement of drainfields is generally preferred (i.e., individual systems). • If urbanization is planned in the near future, a communal system is generally preferred (assuming no adverse environmental impacts). • • In this regard, a communal system offers advantages of in- ground pipes and the likely avoidance of individual property disputes. Attached to this memorandum is supplemental information pertaining to this matter which has been supplied by Mr. Westpetal. pc: Scott Richards 2 PCR WATER QUALITY NSC Fax :612-282-6247 Nov 20 '97 13:14 P.01 To v b, ken, s From wes Agency • November 20, 1997 Co./Dept.. Co. /voc, G Pno�te # Phone # r� p G 3 � ; Fax# S p c 8-3 7 Fax# o� DRAFT Collection Systems and Large Drainfields chance increases as system density There has been a interest in the past few years to increases. develop new subdivisions with central collection of the sewage with treatment provided by one 3. A large drainfield, which is permitted by the large septic tank/drainfield system. This method agency, would require the system to be is in lieu of the standard practice of developing operated and maintained by a qualified lots with tb ability to treat the waste with sewage operator. This would result in proper treatment systems Located on each lot. This fact maintenance and proper disposal of the sheet will highlight the advantages and septage. disadvantages of collecting the sewage with treatment by one large drainfield. 4. A large system alleviates the aggravation caused by failures of the individual systems Advantages: in the future. This aggravation is two fold. The first aggravation is the nuisance the 1. If hookup to a municipal treatment plant is failures cause and the enforcement effort anticipated in the future, a central collection required to bring the individual systems into system appears to be advantageous. This compliance. In some situations suitable soils advantage is that all the homes are plumbed or land area may not be available to upgrade for central collection, with their building the system on a lot. This condition causes sewers heading in the proper direction at the the second aggravation. In this case, a push appropriate elevation. Collection with a for a collection system is desired by those large drainfield also avoids the tearing up of individuals with failed systems. A the street or other areas in order to place the collection system is very expensive and sewer pipe sometime in the future. those in the subdivision with non - failing systems (especially those with newly 2. All drainfields, regardless of size, produce constructed systems) do not want the contaminant plumes in the groundwater. additional, and unneeded expenses of Individual systems produce small abandoning their compiling system and contaminant plumes and large drainfield hooking -up to the collection system. This produce bigger plumes. It is possible that a situations can be quite contentious and could large system can lessen the impacts to be avoided if collection is used from the drinking water wells if the system is placed start. in a groundwater discharge area. 5. The user fee collected for system for 3. For individual systems, wells and operation and maintenance could include drainfields are in closed proximity to each REPLACEMENT costs. In effect, this other. Therefore there is the possibility that could be a forced savings plan to replace the the groundwater plume from the drainfield system when needed.. may be within a well capture zone. This Thls fact sheet can be made available in other formats, such as Braille, Large type or audio tape upon request. Printed on recycled paper with at least 10% fibers from paper recycled by consumers. PCR WATER QUALITY NSC Faxi612- 282 -6247 Nov 20 '97 13:15 P.02 Minnesota PoHulk Control Agency • 6. As part of a state permit, the operator must identify and eliminate discharges of non- MN Rule Chapter 7080 (Individual Sewage domestic wastes. There is no check or little Treatment Standards) and Collection Systems education of owners of individual system to eliminate these discharges. MN Rule Chapter 7080 (7080) standards which are applicable to collector systems Disadvantages: are: 1. Large systems which are designed to treat I. Chapter 7080 classifies a Collection System greater than 10,000 gallons per day as an Alternative System. According to (roughly equivalent to 20 homes) must be 7080, an Alternative System can only be permitted by the agency There are used if a standard system camlot be installed additional costs with the design, permitting, or is not the most suitable treatment monitoring and operation of an agency , (7080.0910 subp. 3). permitted system. 2. The Collection system section of the rule 2. The agency permit requires groundwater (7080.0910 subp. 3. L) states that collection monitoring to ensure that the system is systems may be employed where site and operating as designed and that the system is soil conditions do not allow for final meeting groundwater standards at the treatment and disposal on an individual lot. property boundary. Meeting drinking water standards at the property boundary may 3. Chapter 7080.0300 subp. 2. states that all require a pre - treatment device, the purchase lots created after January 1, 1996 must of land downgradient of the system (for provide one additional soil treatment site per dilution of contaminants) or siting of the lot. system in a groundwater discharge area which includes the groundwater discharge 4. 7080.0030 subp. 2. requires justification of point. the need for a large drainfield. 3. No ground water monitoring would be An attempt will be made to interpret the above required for a large system if it is designed requirements when dealing with new to treat less than 10,000 gallons per day. developments. This could be problematic if the drainfield is located in a groundwater recharge area and The provisions in items 1 and 2 were /or the residents have shallow wells. This contained in the original sewage treatment condition could be avoided if the local rule, WPC -40. The Statement of Need and permitting authority would follow and Reasonableness (SONAR) prepared for WPC - enforce the agency's requirements for 40 does not mention the applicability of the permitted systems. alternative standards for new developments. The SONAR seems to be addressing situations 4. Septage produced under a permitted system of existing lots with siting or soil problems, is regulated the same municipal bio- solids and does not imply that individual systems are from a ?OTW. preferred over collector systems. The SONAR (pages 136 and 137) mentions that 5. The residents would have organize for these provisions were added to provide system operation and maintenance. flexibility for local units of government in PCA WATER QUALITY NSC Fax:612- 282 -6247 Nov 20 '97 13:15 41.4 Minnesota Pofun Control Agency • adopting and using other systems for treatment and disposal. Item 3 - the provision to require two ISTS sites per lot - was only meant to include those lots which were developed without collection services. For example, the agency had no intention of requiring two sewage treatment sites on a city lot which is to be connected to central collection. Item 4 - the justification for a large system - is due to the treatment concerns with large drainfields for nitrogen, chlorides and possibly some organic chemicals. This justification consists of a study of the hydogeologic conditions and whether the system can meet drinking water standards. If this justification proves that the system can meet standards, then it can be issued a permit by the agency. Conclusion: The decision on the use of individual systems verses a collection system should be based on protection of the groundwater. The agency feels that adequate groundwater protection can occur by following MN rule chapter 7080 for individual systems, or meeting agency permit requirements for a large drainfield. The decision on which to used should be based on local factors such as the proposed density of individual systems, individual well placement and depths (or use of central water), soil types, topography, and hydrogeologic conditions. More information If you have questions, please contact the MPCA's ISTS Unit at (800) 657 - 3864. fp/ section .np /ists /factshts /collec. doc