HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993-10-25 BRAA Ltr to OPH Re Revised Plan Review OCT— —9Z MON 1" :0' BONE.�TR 'O € ASSOC I s'�TES F 0=
0 Otiti Cr ii3O,01 ±,:x Pti bt:rN•Irt1 A 3bnront P Oi M trq. a. P Milr - ;i , rr
g+�p p�/ Ml WI
A IL .i 'i id�1.J P ••trrA W r a ,. t' • xrn A ( n . P,S. ?Milo P PE i 1 r rid• Lie rvr, Pi
-- Ie � it)::. Ar1110 Fr RWCr! k Preterir. PE Yha. ^as W Pet • ..nr, PE X.str WSr�rn. Pr
4.
�v M Vn, ti.
1: I�bii 1 E �'taar W MRCP PE M.
. : ^:Fr1 C aye ti Sty
k y XrerlFrt• • t
i
R
&KM OS11 a avh:;n] f Nine. PS; p 1,0 :. , ! utkat$. RE le�np k btilant; PE i : Sin;! FVrs:rr PE Q Anderlik �u �ICr•rr k C ta . t F tenor ,; kti$Lek. A I r gory ^ ai. ;It V
' , t tr / i/ ®des P� C 1} C Pt W';C... E' nr, r Y�
S ?hon.' f Nt c. pF Jr .y A Mtiyrevt. PE koR J Avarrk. Pi 001 ! tsrrnr,, Pf
! E0Orn r, khVnuht ^E' Mask woman. PC . !tCnlett• ? Annerson. PE Shaw v O r .tr,ttsnn F,1 > As socia t es `41,1,7 n, t ^,. ;∎e∎ C PA ty rIN0 t Krwi/um, Pe 41wrk it, Pals PC
!M �. C:Tit1 M Pr
,., ' . C bnadrura ft X t <�tct P Mdn A Seep, Pw' Pa„' c., Nein PC
tnc , .n'i AnaC'sGn. A IA Giry i*/ .,!4t10r., t'r Jt,nr. ,. Girt::• r'
Engineers & Architects 0,,,-- ,_ tsuardt. Pt Oinlci J idgrrutn ?e Ch;ttr• A F nt+xu,
hr;r,Iris F■ ANNI. PE A. Rick knrntet. Pr 4MJ M 1•Awr!;Xy
iso. -4..1 MARI Y PE PNVP J. easwe PE it.r.I..t, AA iimoi.
ht. n..r: P frAU. ae Marko Wajr+ti Cr ib r I .,,,1..
October 25, 1993
Ms. Lavonne Wilson
City of Oak Park Heights
14168 North 57th Street
P.O. Box 2007
Stillwater, MN 55082
Re: East Oaks P.U.O.
File 55
Dear I.avonne:
We have reviewed the revised development plans for East Oaks as submitted by the Swager
Bros. and offer the following comments:
1. The grading and drainage plan for the project is acceptable with the storm water pond
being subject to the review and approval of the Watershed Management Organization.
2. The utility plans as submitted are acceptable. It would be desirable to have a looped
water main system to increase reliability but the single line should provide adequate fire
flows and pressures. The negative impact is that all 26 units would be out of service in
the event of a water main break.
3. The driveways for Lots 21 and 22 must be redesigned for ease of access which may also
require some special covenant for common use and maintenance
4. All fill sections in the grading areas must be properly compacted to support roads, drives,
and buildings.
5. The developer must obtain an entrance permit from the Minnesota (Department of
Tra nsportation.
It is hoped that the comments contained herein will assist you in reviewing this revised plan.
Yours very truly,
BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC.
?oseph C. Anderlik
, Isfr'
ICA:lk
cc: Stevens Engineers